e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ______to ______
Commission File Number
000-50056
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
05-0527861 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
4200 Stone Road
Kilgore, Texas 75662
(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (903) 983-6200
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of the registrants Common Units outstanding at August 5, 2008 was 12,837,480. The
number of the registrants subordinated units outstanding at August 5, 2008 was 1,701,346
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Audited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
11,273 |
|
|
$ |
4,113 |
|
Accounts and other receivables, less
allowance for doubtful accounts of $350
and $211, respectively |
|
|
110,998 |
|
|
|
88,039 |
|
Product exchange receivables |
|
|
42,148 |
|
|
|
10,912 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
101,832 |
|
|
|
51,798 |
|
Due from affiliates |
|
|
8,336 |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
Fair value of derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
7,093 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
281,680 |
|
|
|
158,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
497,323 |
|
|
|
441,117 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(110,332 |
) |
|
|
(98,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
386,991 |
|
|
|
343,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
37,405 |
|
|
|
37,405 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated entities |
|
|
77,276 |
|
|
|
75,690 |
|
Fair value of derivatives |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
8,493 |
|
|
|
9,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
791,887 |
|
|
$ |
623,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Partners Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current installments of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
Trade and other accounts payable |
|
|
169,144 |
|
|
|
104,598 |
|
Product exchange payables |
|
|
70,856 |
|
|
|
24,554 |
|
Due to affiliates |
|
|
10,138 |
|
|
|
7,543 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
Fair value of derivatives |
|
|
13,083 |
|
|
|
4,502 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
4,717 |
|
|
|
4,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
268,609 |
|
|
|
146,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8,660 |
|
|
|
8,815 |
|
Fair value of derivatives |
|
|
11,535 |
|
|
|
5,576 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
575,390 |
|
|
|
387,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital |
|
|
232,798 |
|
|
|
242,610 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(16,301 |
) |
|
|
(6,762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital |
|
|
216,497 |
|
|
|
235,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
$ |
791,887 |
|
|
$ |
623,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and condensed financial statements.
1
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
9,900 |
|
|
$ |
7,037 |
|
|
$ |
17,820 |
|
|
$ |
13,988 |
|
Marine transportation |
|
|
19,309 |
|
|
|
15,154 |
|
|
|
35,712 |
|
|
|
29,038 |
|
Product sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
182,025 |
|
|
|
105,321 |
|
|
|
389,117 |
|
|
|
207,109 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
86,027 |
|
|
|
30,353 |
|
|
|
156,252 |
|
|
|
59,733 |
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
|
10,882 |
|
|
|
4,449 |
|
|
|
22,258 |
|
|
|
8,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,934 |
|
|
|
140,123 |
|
|
|
567,627 |
|
|
|
275,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
308,143 |
|
|
|
162,314 |
|
|
|
621,159 |
|
|
|
318,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
180,324 |
|
|
|
100,939 |
|
|
|
383,174 |
|
|
|
197,711 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
75,964 |
|
|
|
22,416 |
|
|
|
132,304 |
|
|
|
44,217 |
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
3,917 |
|
|
|
20,191 |
|
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,558 |
|
|
|
127,272 |
|
|
|
535,669 |
|
|
|
248,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
26,195 |
|
|
|
20,663 |
|
|
|
50,412 |
|
|
|
39,656 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
2,744 |
|
|
|
6,946 |
|
|
|
5,465 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,614 |
|
|
|
5,468 |
|
|
|
14,954 |
|
|
|
10,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
303,834 |
|
|
|
156,147 |
|
|
|
607,981 |
|
|
|
304,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
6,167 |
|
|
|
13,304 |
|
|
|
13,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities |
|
|
4,372 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
|
|
7,882 |
|
|
|
4,468 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,895 |
) |
|
|
(2,739 |
) |
|
|
(8,638 |
) |
|
|
(6,316 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
(1,697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before taxes |
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
5,918 |
|
|
|
12,795 |
|
|
|
12,070 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,317 |
|
|
$ |
5,927 |
|
|
$ |
12,334 |
|
|
$ |
11,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
$ |
354 |
|
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
$ |
629 |
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
3,652 |
|
|
$ |
5,573 |
|
|
$ |
11,018 |
|
|
$ |
11,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per limited partner unit basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average limited partner units basic |
|
|
14,532,826 |
|
|
|
13,638,101 |
|
|
|
14,532,826 |
|
|
|
13,478,271 |
|
Weighted average limited partner units diluted |
|
|
14,535,779 |
|
|
|
13,642,950 |
|
|
|
14,535,564 |
|
|
|
13,483,246 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and condensed financial statements.
2
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Balances January 1, 2007 |
|
|
10,603,808 |
|
|
$ |
201,387 |
|
|
|
2,552,018 |
|
|
$ |
(6,237 |
) |
|
$ |
3,253 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
198,525 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,730 |
|
|
Follow-on public offering |
|
|
1,380,000 |
|
|
|
55,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,934 |
|
|
General partner contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
Unit-based compensation |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
Cash distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,216 |
) |
|
|
(697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,274 |
) |
|
Adjustment in fair value of
derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances June 30, 2007 |
|
|
11,986,808 |
|
|
$ |
253,240 |
|
|
|
2,552,018 |
|
|
$ |
(7,606 |
) |
|
$ |
4,377 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
250,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances January 1, 2008 |
|
|
12,837,480 |
|
|
$ |
244,520 |
|
|
|
1,701,346 |
|
|
$ |
(6,022 |
) |
|
$ |
4,112 |
|
|
$ |
(6,762 |
) |
|
$ |
235,848 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,334 |
|
|
Cash distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,180 |
) |
|
Unit-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Adjustment in fair value of
derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,539 |
) |
|
|
(9,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances June 30, 2008 |
|
|
12,837,480 |
|
|
$ |
236,283 |
|
|
|
1,701,346 |
|
|
$ |
(7,378 |
) |
|
$ |
3,893 |
|
|
$ |
(16,301 |
) |
|
$ |
216,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and condensed financial statements.
3
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,317 |
|
|
$ |
5,927 |
|
|
$ |
12,334 |
|
|
$ |
11,730 |
|
Changes in
fair values of commodity cash flow hedges |
|
|
(8,700 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(8,487 |
) |
|
|
(357 |
) |
Cash flow hedging gains (losses) reclassified to
earnings |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
Changes in fair value of interest rate cash flow hedges |
|
|
4,112 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
(230 |
) |
|
$ |
7,231 |
|
|
$ |
2,795 |
|
|
$ |
11,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and condensed financial statements.
4
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,334 |
|
|
$ |
11,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,954 |
|
|
|
10,362 |
|
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(7,882 |
) |
|
|
(4,468 |
) |
Distributions from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
Distributions in-kind from equity investments |
|
|
5,621 |
|
|
|
4,541 |
|
Non-cash mark-to-market on derivatives |
|
|
5,195 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
Other |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Change in current assets and liabilities, excluding effects of
acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and other receivables |
|
|
(22,959 |
) |
|
|
6,769 |
|
Product exchange receivables |
|
|
(31,236 |
) |
|
|
4,170 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(50,034 |
) |
|
|
702 |
|
Due from affiliates |
|
|
(6,011 |
) |
|
|
(1,145 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
(6,509 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
Trade and other accounts payable |
|
|
64,546 |
|
|
|
6,059 |
|
Product exchange payables |
|
|
46,302 |
|
|
|
(7,401 |
) |
Due to affiliates |
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
(4,694 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(892 |
) |
Change in other non-current assets and liabilities |
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
27,039 |
|
|
|
27,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(52,756 |
) |
|
|
(36,772 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(5,983 |
) |
|
|
(37,344 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
|
|
Return of investments from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
2,970 |
|
Distributions from (contributions to) unconsolidated entities for operations |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(5,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(57,660 |
) |
|
|
(76,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(100,791 |
) |
|
|
(97,287 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
160,770 |
|
|
|
103,250 |
|
Net proceeds from follow on public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,934 |
|
General partner contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
Payments of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions paid |
|
|
(22,180 |
) |
|
|
(17,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
37,781 |
|
|
|
45,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
7,160 |
|
|
|
(3,351 |
) |
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
4,113 |
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
11,273 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated and condensed financial statements.
5
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(1) General
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (the Partnership) is a publicly traded limited partnership
with a diverse set of operations focused primarily in the United States Gulf Coast region. Its four
primary business lines include: terminalling and storage services for petroleum products and
by-products, natural gas services, marine transportation services for petroleum products and
by-products, and sulfur and sulfur based products processing, manufacturing, marketing and
distribution.
The Partnerships unaudited consolidated and condensed financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, these financial statements have been condensed and
do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting
principles for annual audited financial statements of the type contained in the Partnerships
annual reports on Form 10-K. In the opinion of the management of the Partnerships general partner,
all adjustments and elimination of significant intercompany balances necessary for a fair
presentation of the Partnerships results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the
periods shown have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Results for
such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Partnerships audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnerships annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) on March 5, 2008.
(a) Use of Estimates
Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets
and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these
consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(b) Unit Grants
The Partnership issued 1,000 restricted common units to each of its three independent,
non-employee directors under its long-term incentive plan in May 2008. These units vest in 25%
increments beginning in January 2009 and will be fully vested in January 2012.
The Partnership issued 1,000 restricted common units to each of its three independent,
non-employee directors under its long-term incentive plan in May 2007. These units vest in 25%
increments beginning in January 2008 and will be fully vested in January 2011.
The Partnership issued 1,000 restricted common units to each of its three independent,
non-employee directors under its long-term incentive plan in January 2006. These units vest in
25% increments on the anniversary of the grant date each year and will be fully vested in January
2010.
The Partnership accounts for the transactions under Emerging Issues Task Force 96-18
Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to other than Employees For Acquiring, or in
Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. The cost resulting from the share-based payment
transactions was $17 and $15 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
$34 and $26 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Partnerships
general partner contributed cash of $2 in January 2006 and $3 in May 2007 to the Partnership in
conjunction with the issuance of these restricted units in order to maintain its 2% general partner
interest in the Partnership. The Partnerships general partner did not make a contribution
attributable to the restricted units issued to its three independent, non-employee directors in May
2008, as such units were purchased in the open market by the Partnership.
6
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(c) Incentive Distribution Rights
The Partnerships general partner, Martin Midstream GP LLC, holds a 2% general partner
interest and certain incentive distribution rights in the Partnership. Incentive distribution
rights represent the right to receive an increasing percentage of cash distributions after the
minimum quarterly distribution, any cumulative arrearages on common units, and certain target
distribution levels have been achieved. The Partnership is required to distribute all of its
available cash from operating surplus, as defined in the partnership agreement. The target
distribution levels entitle the general partner to receive 15% of quarterly cash distributions in
excess of $0.55 per unit until all unitholders have received $0.625 per unit, 25% of quarterly cash
distributions in excess of $0.625 per unit until all unitholders have received $0.75 per unit, and
50% of quarterly cash distributions in excess of $0.75 per unit. For the three months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007 the general partner received $590 and $240, respectively, in incentive
distributions. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the general partner received and
$1,091 and $402, respectively, in incentive distributions.
(d) Net Income per Unit
Except as discussed in the following paragraph, basic and diluted net income per limited
partner unit is determined by dividing net income after deducting the amount allocated to the
general partner interest (including its incentive distribution in excess of its 2% interest) by the
weighted average number of outstanding limited partner units during the period. Subject to
applicability of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-06 (EITF 03-06), Participating
Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, as discussed below, Partnership
income is first allocated to the general partner based on the amount of incentive distributions.
The remainder is then allocated between the limited partners and general partner based on
percentage ownership in the Partnership.
EITF 03-06 addresses the computation of earnings per share by entities that have issued
securities other than common stock that contractually entitle the holder to participate in
dividends and earnings of the entity when, and if, it declares dividends on its common stock.
Essentially, EITF 03-06 provides that in any accounting period where the Partnerships aggregate
net income exceeds the Partnerships aggregate distribution for such period, the Partnership is
required to present earnings per unit as if all of the earnings for the periods were distributed,
regardless of the pro forma nature of this allocation and whether those earnings would actually be
distributed during a particular period from an economic or practical perspective. EITF 03-06 does
not impact the Partnerships overall net income or other financial results; however, for periods in
which aggregate net income exceeds the Partnerships aggregate distributions for such period, it
will have the impact of reducing the earnings per limited partner unit. This result occurs as a
larger portion of the Partnerships aggregate earnings is allocated to the incentive distribution
rights held by the Partnerships general partner, as if distributed, even though the Partnership
makes cash distributions on the basis of cash available for distributions, not earnings, in any
given accounting period. In accounting periods where aggregate net income does not exceed the
Partnerships aggregate distributions for such period, EITF 03-06 does not have any impact on the
Partnerships earnings per unit calculation.
The weighted average units outstanding for basic net income per unit were 14,532,826 and
13,638,101 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and 14,532,826 and
13,478,271 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For diluted net income
per unit, the weighted average units outstanding were increased by 2,953 and 4,849 for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and 2,738 and 4,975 for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, due to the dilutive effect of restricted units granted under
the Partnerships long-term incentive plan.
(e) Income taxes
With respect to our taxable subsidiary (Woodlawn Pipeline Co., Inc.), income taxes are
accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted
7
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date.
(f) Reclassification
The Partnership made a reclassification to the consolidated balance sheet for the year ended
December 31, 2007 to properly classify current and long-term derivative liabilities. This
reclassification had no impact on the total liabilities reported in consolidated balance sheet for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
(2) New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and was effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FAS 157-2, which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statement on a recurring basis, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. On
January 1, 2008, the Partnership adopted the portion of SFAS No. 157 that was not delayed, and
since the Partnerships existing fair value measurements are consistent with the guidance of SFAS
No. 157, the partial adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Partnerships
consolidated financial statements. The adoption of the deferred portion of SFAS No. 157 on
January 1, 2009 is not expected to have a material impact on the Partnerships consolidated
financial statements. See Note 3 for expanded disclosures about fair value measurements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). SFAS
No. 159 permits the Partnership to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items
at fair value (the fair value option). The Partnership would report unrealized gains and losses
on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting
period. This accounting standard is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that
begins after November 15, 2007 but is not required to be applied. The Partnership currently has no
plans to apply SFAS No. 159.
In December 2007, the FASB revised SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141), to
establish revised principles and requirements for how entities will recognize and measure assets
and liabilities acquired in a business combination. SFAS No. 141 is effective for business
combinations completed on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on
or after December 15, 2008. The Partnership will apply the guidance of SFAS No. 141 to business
combinations completed on or after January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Partnership is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced
disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
fiscal years and
8
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Partnership is evaluating
the additional disclosures required by SFAS No. 161 beginning January 1, 2009.
(3) Fair Value Measurements
During the first quarter of 2008, the Partnership adopted FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157). FAS 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded
disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption of FAS 157 had no impact on the
Partnerships financial position or results of operations.
FAS 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair
value basis. This statement enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs
used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and
reliability of the information used to determine fair values. The statement requires that each
asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market
data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
The Partnerships derivative instruments which consist of commodity and interest rate swaps
are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of the
Partnerships derivative instruments are determined based on inputs that are readily available in
public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. Refer to
Notes 7 and 8 for further information on the Partnerships derivative instruments and hedging
activities.
As prescribed by the FAS 157 levels listed above, the Partnership considers the Partnerships
derivative assets and liabilities as Level 2. The net fair value of the Partnerships assets and
liabilities measured on a recurring basis was a liability of $24,576 and $ 9,843 at June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively.
(4) Acquisitions
(a) Stanolind Assets
In January 2008, The Partnership acquired 7.8 acres of land, a deep water dock and two
sulfuric acid tanks at its Stanolind terminal in Beaumont, Texas from Martin Resource Management
Corporation (Martin Resource Management) for $5,983 which was allocated to property, plant and
equipment. The Partnership entered into a lease agreement with Martin Resource Management for
use of the sulfuric acid tanks.
(b) Asphalt Terminal
In October 2007, the Partnership acquired the asphalt assets of Monarch Oil, Inc. and related
companies (Monarch Oil) for $3,927 which was allocated to property, plant and equipment. The
results of Monarch Oils operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements
beginning October 2, 2007. The assets are located in Omaha, Nebraska. The Partnership entered
into an agreement with Martin Resource Management, whereby Martin Resource Management will operate
the facilities through a terminalling service agreement based upon throughput rates and will bear
all additional expenses to operate the facility.
(c) Lubricants Terminal
In June 2007, the Partnership acquired all of the operating assets of Mega Lubricants Inc.
(Mega Lubricants) located in Channelview, Texas. The results of Mega Lubricants operations have
been included in the consolidated financial statements beginning June 13, 2007. The excess of the
fair value over
9
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
the carrying value of the assets was allocated to all identifiable assets. After
recording all identifiable assets at their fair values, the remaining $1,020 was recorded as
goodwill. The goodwill was a result of Mega Lubricants strategically located assets combined with
the Partnerships access to capital and existing infrastructure. This will enhance the
Partnerships ability to offer additional lubricant blending and truck loading and unloading
services to customers. In accordance with FAS 142, the goodwill will not be amortized but tested
for impairment. The terminal is located on 5.6 acres of land, and consists of 38 tanks with a
storage capacity of approximately 15,000 Bbls, pump and piping infrastructure for lubricant
blending and truck loading and unloading operations, 34,000 square feet of warehouse space and an
administrative office.
The purchase price of $4,738, including two three-year non-competition agreements totaling
$530 and goodwill of $1,020, was allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
446 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
3,042 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,020 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
530 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition, the Partnership borrowed approximately $4,600 under its
credit facility.
(d) Woodlawn Pipeline Co., Inc.
On May 2, 2007, the Partnership, through its subsidiary Prism Gas Systems I, L.P. (Prism
Gas), acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Woodlawn Pipeline Co., Inc (Woodlawn). The
results of Woodlawns operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements
beginning May 2, 2007. The excess of the fair value over the carrying value of the assets was
allocated to all identifiable assets. After recording all identifiable assets at their fair values,
the remaining $8,785 was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill was a result of Woodlawns
strategically located assets combined with the Partnerships access to capital and existing
infrastructure. This will enhance the Partnerships ability to offer additional gathering services
to customers through internal growth projects including natural gas processing, fractionation and
pipeline expansions as well as new pipeline construction. In accordance with FAS 142, the goodwill
will not be amortized but tested for impairment.
Woodlawn is a natural gas gathering and processing company which owns integrated gathering and
processing assets in East Texas. Woodlawns system consists of approximately 135 miles of natural
gas gathering pipe, approximately 36 miles of condensate transport pipe and a 30 Mcf/day processing
plant. Prism Gas also acquired a nine-mile pipeline, from a Woodlawn related party, that delivers
residue gas from Woodlawn to the Texas Eastern Transmission pipeline system.
The selling parties in this transaction were Lantern Resources, L.P., David P. Deison, and
Peak Gas Gathering L.P. The final purchase price, after final adjustments for working capital, was
$32,606 and was funded by borrowings under the Partnerships credit facility.
The purchase price of $32,606, including four two-year non-competition agreements and other
intangibles reflected as other assets, was allocated as follows:
10
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
4,297 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
29,101 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
8,785 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,339 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(3,889 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(8,964 |
) |
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
32,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
The identifiable intangible assets of $3,339 are subject to amortization over a
weighted-average useful life of approximately ten years. The intangible assets include four
non-competition agreements totaling $40, customer contracts associated with the gathering and
processing assets of $3,002, and a transportation contract associated with the residue gas pipeline
of $297.
In connection with the acquisition, the Partnership borrowed approximately $33,000 under its
credit facility.
(5) Inventories
Components of inventories at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
$ |
26,715 |
|
|
$ |
31,283 |
|
Sulfur |
|
|
50,977 |
|
|
|
7,490 |
|
Sulfur Based Products |
|
|
14,303 |
|
|
|
6,626 |
|
Lubricants |
|
|
7,402 |
|
|
|
5,345 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,832 |
|
|
$ |
51,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) Investment in Unconsolidated Partnerships and Joint Ventures
The Partnership, through its Prism Gas subsidiary, owns 50% of the ownership interests in
Waskom Gas Processing Company (Waskom), Matagorda Offshore Gathering System (Matagorda),
Panther Interstate Pipeline Energy LLC (PIPE) and a 20% ownership interest in a partnership which
owns the lease rights to Bosque County Pipeline (BCP). Each of these interests is accounted for
under the equity method of accounting.
In accounting for the acquisition of the interests in Waskom, Matagorda and PIPE, the carrying
amount of these investments exceeded the underlying net assets by approximately $46,176. The
difference was attributable to property and equipment of $11,872 and equity method goodwill of
$34,304. The excess investment relating to property and equipment is being amortized over an
average life of 20 years, which approximates the useful life of the underlying assets. Such
amortization amounted to $148 and $297 for the three and six months June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and has been recorded as a reduction of equity in earnings of unconsolidated equity
method investees. The remaining unamortized excess investment relating to property and equipment
was $10,388 and $10,685 at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The equity-method
goodwill is not amortized in accordance with SFAS 142; however, it is analyzed for impairment
annually. No impairment was recognized in the first six months of 2008 or the year ended December
31, 2007.
11
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
As a partner in Waskom, the Partnership receives distributions in kind of natural gas liquids
(NGLs) that are retained according to Waskoms contracts with certain producers. The NGLs are
valued at prevailing market prices. In addition, cash distributions are received and cash
contributions are made to fund operating and capital requirements of Waskom.
Activity related to these investment accounts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waskom |
|
|
PIPE |
|
|
Matagorda |
|
|
BCP |
|
|
Total |
|
Investment in unconsolidated entities, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
70,237 |
|
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
|
$ |
3,693 |
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
75,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions in kind from equity investments |
|
|
(5,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,621 |
) |
Return on investments from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions to (distributions from) unconsolidated
entities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash contributions |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
Distributions from (contributions to) unconsolidated
entities for operations |
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(655 |
) |
Return of investments from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
Equity in earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from operations |
|
|
7,875 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
8,179 |
|
Amortization of excess investment |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated entities, June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
71,761 |
|
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
|
$ |
3,786 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
77,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waskom |
|
|
PIPE |
|
|
Matagorda |
|
|
BCP |
|
|
Total |
|
Investment in unconsolidated entities, December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
64,937 |
|
|
$ |
1,718 |
|
|
$ |
3,786 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
70,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions in kind from equity investments |
|
|
(4,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,541 |
) |
Return on investments from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
Contributions to (distributions from) unconsolidated
entities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions from (contributions to) unconsolidated
entities for operations |
|
|
5,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
5,777 |
|
Return of investments from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(2,625 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,970 |
) |
Equity in earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from operations |
|
|
4,301 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
4,765 |
|
Amortization of excess investment |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated entities, June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
67,467 |
|
|
$ |
1,659 |
|
|
$ |
3,807 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
73,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Select financial information for significant unconsolidated equity method investees is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Income |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waskom |
|
$ |
75,929 |
|
|
$ |
60,745 |
|
|
$ |
35,807 |
|
|
$ |
8,468 |
|
|
$ |
62,540 |
|
|
$ |
15,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waskom |
|
$ |
66,772 |
|
|
$ |
57,149 |
|
|
$ |
18,374 |
|
|
$ |
4,873 |
|
|
$ |
33,173 |
|
|
$ |
8,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(7) Commodity Cash Flow Hedges
The Partnership is exposed to market risks associated with commodity prices, counterparty
credit and interest rates. The Partnership has established a hedging policy and monitors and
manages the commodity market risk associated with its commodity risk exposure. In addition, the
Partnership is focusing on utilizing counterparties for these transactions whose financial
condition is appropriate for the credit risk involved in each specific transaction.
The Partnership uses derivatives to manage the risk of commodity price fluctuations.
Additionally, the Partnership manages interest rate exposure by targeting a ratio of fixed and
floating interest rates it deems prudent and using hedges to attain that ratio.
In accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 133), all derivatives and hedging instruments are included on the balance
sheet as an asset or a liability measured at fair value and changes in fair value are recognized
currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If a derivative qualifies
for hedge accounting, changes in the fair value can be offset against the change in the fair value
of the hedged item through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until such time as
the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The Partnership has adopted a hedging policy that
allows it to use hedge accounting for financial transactions that are designated as hedges.
Derivative instruments not designated as hedges are being marked to market with all market
value adjustments being recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30,
2008, the Partnership has designated a portion of its derivative instruments as qualifying cash
flow hedges. Fair value changes for these hedges have been recorded in other comprehensive income
as a component of equity.
The components of gain (loss) on derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting and those that do
not qualify for hedge accounting are included in the revenue of the hedged item in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge
accounting and settlements of maturing hedges |
|
$ |
(5,964 |
) |
|
$ |
(509 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,146 |
) |
|
$ |
(793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations |
|
$ |
(6,049 |
) |
|
$ |
(544 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,109 |
) |
|
$ |
(704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Fair value of derivative assets current |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
Fair value of derivative assets long term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities current |
|
|
(9,799 |
) |
|
|
(3,261 |
) |
Fair value of derivative liabilities long term |
|
|
(9,591 |
) |
|
|
(2,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value of derivatives |
|
$ |
(19,390 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set forth below is the summarized notional amount and terms of all instruments held for price
risk
13
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
management purposes at June 30, 2008 (all gas quantities are expressed in British Thermal
Units, crude oil
and NGLs are expressed in barrels). As of June 30, 2008, the remaining term of the contracts
extend no later than December 2011, with no single contract longer than one year. The Partnerships
counterparties to the derivative contracts include Shell Energy North America (US) L.P., Morgan
Stanley Capital Group Inc., Wachovia Bank and Wells Fargo Bank. For the period ended June 30, 2008,
changes in the fair value of the Partnerships derivative contracts were recorded in both earnings
and in other comprehensive income as a component of equity since the Partnership has designated a
portion of its derivative instruments as hedges as of June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
|
Remaining Terms |
|
|
Transaction Type |
|
Per Month |
|
Pricing Terms |
|
of Contracts |
|
Fair Value |
|
Mark-to-Market Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas swap
|
|
30,000 MMBTU
|
|
Fixed price of
$8.12 settled
against Houston
Ship Channel first
of the month
|
|
July 2008 to
December 2008
|
|
$ |
(904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap
|
|
3,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$70.75 settled
against WTI NYMEX
average monthly
closings
|
|
July 2008 to
December 2008
|
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap
|
|
3,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$69.08 settled
against WTI NYMEX
average monthly
closings
|
|
January 2009 to
December 2009
|
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap
|
|
3,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$70.90 settled
against WTI NYMEX
average monthly
closings
|
|
January 2009 to
December 2009
|
|
|
(2,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total swaps not designated as cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6,919 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap
|
|
5,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$66.20 settled
against WTI NYMEX
average monthly
closings
|
|
July 2008 to
December 2008
|
|
$ |
(2,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethane Swap
|
|
5,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$27.30 settled
against Mt. Belvieu
Purity Ethane
average monthly
postings
|
|
July 2008 to
December 2008
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gasoline
Swap
|
|
3,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$86.52 settled
against Mt. Belvieu
Non-TET natural
gasoline average
monthly postings.
|
|
July 2008 to
September 2008
|
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gasoline
Swap
|
|
3,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$85.79 settled
against Mt. Belvieu
Non-TET natural
gasoline average
monthly postings.
|
|
October 2008 to
December 2008
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas swap
|
|
30,000 MMBTU
|
|
Fixed price of
$9.025 settled
against Inside Ferc
Columbia Gulf daily
average
|
|
January 2009 to
December 2009
|
|
|
(1,144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap
|
|
1,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$70.45 settled
against WTI NYMEX
average monthly
closings
|
|
January 2009 to
December 2009
|
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gasoline
Swap
|
|
2,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$86.42 settled
against Mt. Belvieu
Non-TET natural
gasoline average
monthly postings.
|
|
January 2009 to
December 2009
|
|
|
(929 |
) |
14
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
|
Remaining Terms |
|
|
Transaction Type |
|
Per Month |
|
Pricing Terms |
|
of Contracts |
|
Fair Value |
|
Crude Oil Swap
|
|
2,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$69.15 settled
against WTI NYMEX
average monthly
closings
|
|
January 2010 to
December 2010
|
|
|
(1,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap
|
|
3,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$72.25 settled
against WTI NYMEX
average monthly
closings
|
|
January 2010 to
December 2010
|
|
|
(2,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap
|
|
1,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$104.80 settled
against WTI NYMEX
average monthly
closings
|
|
January 2010 to
December 2010
|
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gasoline
Swap
|
|
1,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$94.14 settled
against Mt. Belvieu
Non-TET natural
gasoline average
monthly postings
|
|
January 2010 to
December 2010
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap
|
|
2,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$99.15 settled
against WTI NYMEX
average monthly
closings
|
|
January 2011 to
December 2011
|
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil Swap
|
|
1,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$103.80 settled
against WTI NYMEX
average monthly
closings
|
|
January 2011 to
December 2011
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gasoline
Swap
|
|
2,000 BBL
|
|
Fixed price of
$93.18 settled
against Mt. Belvieu
Non-TET natural
gasoline average
monthly postings
|
|
January 2011 to
December 2011
|
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total swaps designated as cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net fair value of derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
(19,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On all transactions where the Partnership is exposed to counterparty risk, the Partnership
analyzes the counterpartys financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, has
established a maximum credit limit threshold pursuant to its hedging policy, and monitors the
appropriateness of these limits on an ongoing basis. The Partnership has incurred no losses
associated with the counterparty non-performance on derivative contracts.
As a result of the Prism Gas acquisition, the Partnership is exposed to the impact of market
fluctuations in the prices of natural gas, NGLs and condensate as a result of gathering, processing
and sales activities. Prism Gas gathering and processing revenues are earned under various
contractual arrangements with gas producers. Gathering revenues are generated through a combination
of fixed-fee and index-related arrangements. Processing revenues are generated primarily through
contracts which provide for processing on percent-of-liquids (POL) and percent-of-proceeds (POP)
basis. Prism Gas has entered into hedging transactions through 2011 to protect a portion of its
commodity exposure from these contracts. These hedging arrangements are in the form of swaps for
crude oil, natural gas, ethane, and natural gasoline.
Based on estimated volumes, as of June 30, 2008, Prism Gas had hedged approximately 67%, 47%,
22% and 16% of its commodity risk by volume for 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively. The
Partnership anticipates entering into additional commodity derivatives on an ongoing basis to
manage its risks associated with these market fluctuations, and will consider using various
commodity derivatives, including forward contracts, swaps, collars, futures and options, although
there is no assurance that the Partnership will be able to do so or that the terms thereof will be
similar to the Partnerships existing hedging arrangements.
Hedging Arrangements in Place
As of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commodity Hedged |
|
Volume |
|
Type of Derivative |
|
Basis Reference |
2008
|
|
Condensate & Natural Gasoline
|
|
5,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($66.20)
|
|
NYMEX |
2008
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
30,000 MMBTU/Month
|
|
Natural Gas Swap ($8.12)
|
|
Houston Ship Channel |
2008
|
|
Ethane
|
|
5,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Ethane Swap ($27.30)
|
|
Mt. Belvieu |
2008
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($70.75)
|
|
NYMEX |
15
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commodity Hedged |
|
Volume |
|
Type of Derivative |
|
Basis Reference |
2008
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Natural Gasoline Swap ($86.52)
|
|
Mt. Belvieu
(Non-TET) |
2008
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Natural Gasoline Swap ($85.79)
|
|
Mt. Belvieu
(Non-TET) |
2009
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
30,000 MMBTU/Month
|
|
Natural Gas Swap (9.025)
|
|
Columbia Gulf |
2009
|
|
Condensate & Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($69.08)
|
|
NYMEX |
2009
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($70.90)
|
|
NYMEX |
2009
|
|
Condensate
|
|
1,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($70.45)
|
|
NYMEX |
2009
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
2,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Natural Gasoline Swap ($86.42)
|
|
Mt. Belvieu
(Non-TET) |
2010
|
|
Condensate
|
|
2,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($69.15)
|
|
NYMEX |
2010
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($72.25)
|
|
NYMEX |
2010
|
|
Condensate
|
|
1,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($104.80)
|
|
NYMEX |
2010
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
1,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Natural Gasoline Swap ($94.14)
|
|
Mt. Belvieu
(Non-TET) |
2011
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
2,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($99.15)
|
|
NYMEX |
2011
|
|
Condensate
|
|
1,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($103.80)
|
|
NYMEX |
2011
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
2,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Natural Gasoline Swap ($93.18)
|
|
NYMEX |
The Partnerships principal customers with respect to Prism Gas natural gas gathering and
processing are large, natural gas marketing servicers, oil and gas producers and industrial
end-users. In addition, substantially all of the Partnerships natural gas and NGL sales are made
at market-based prices. The Partnerships standard gas and NGL sales contracts contain adequate
assurance provisions which allows for the suspension of deliveries, cancellation of agreements or
discontinuance of deliveries to the buyer unless the buyer provides security for payment in a form
satisfactory to the Partnership.
Impact of Cash Flow Hedges
Crude Oil
For the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, net gains and losses on swap hedge
contracts decreased crude revenue by $4,946 and $494, respectively. For the six month periods
ending June 30, 2008 and 2007 net gains and losses on swap hedge contracts decreased crude revenue
by $6,037 and $351, respectively. As of June 30, 2008 an unrealized derivative fair value loss of
$7,332, related to cash flow hedges of crude oil price risk, was recorded in other comprehensive
income (loss). This fair value loss is expected to be reclassified into earnings in 2008, 2009,
2010 and 2011. The actual reclassification to earnings will be based on mark-to-market prices at
the contract settlement date, along with the realization of the gain or loss on the related
physical volume, which amount is not reflected above.
Natural Gas
For the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, net gains and losses on swap hedge
contracts decreased gas revenue by $626 and increased gas revenue $130, respectively. For the six
month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, net losses and gains on swap hedge contracts decreased
gas revenue by $1,326 and $243, respectively. As of June 30, 2008 an unrealized derivative fair
value loss of $1,144, related to cash flow hedges of natural gas price risk, was recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss). This fair value loss is expected to be reclassified into earnings in
2009. The actual reclassification to earnings will be based on mark-to-market prices at the
contract settlement date, along with the realization of the gain or loss on the related physical
volume, which amount is not reflected above.
Natural Gas Liquids
For the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, net gains and losses on swap hedge
contracts decreased liquids revenue by $477 and $180, respectively. For the six month periods
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, net gains and losses on swap hedge contracts decreased liquids
revenue by $746 and $110, respectively. As of June 30, 2008 an unrealized derivative fair value
loss of $3,355, related to cash flow hedges of NGLs price risk, was recorded in other comprehensive
income (loss). This fair value loss is expected to be reclassified into earnings in 2008. The
actual reclassification to earnings will be based on mark-to-market prices at the contract
settlement date, along with the realization of the gain or loss on the
related physical volume, which amount is not reflected above.
16
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(8) Interest Rate Cash Flow Hedge
The Partnership has entered into several cash flow hedge agreements with an aggregate notional
amount of $195,000 to hedge its exposure to increases in the benchmark interest rate underlying its
variable rate revolving and term loan credit facilities. The Partnership designated these swap
agreements as cash flow hedges. Under these swap agreements, the Partnership pays a fixed rate of
interest and receives a floating rate based on a three-month U.S. Dollar LIBOR rate. Because these
swaps are designated as a cash flow hedge, the changes in fair value, to the extent the swap is
effective, are recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged interest costs are
recognized in earnings. At the inception of these hedges, these swaps were identical to the
hypothetical swap as of the trade date, and will continue to be identical as long as the accrual
periods and rate resetting dates for the debt and these swaps remain equal. This condition results
in a 100% effective swap for the following hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Hedge |
|
Notional Amount |
|
Fixed Rate |
|
Maturity Date |
January 2008 |
|
|
$25,000 |
|
|
|
3.400 |
% |
|
January 2010 |
September 2007 |
|
|
$25,000 |
|
|
|
4.605 |
% |
|
September 2010 |
November 2006 |
|
|
$40,000 |
|
|
|
4.820 |
% |
|
December 2009 |
March 2006 |
|
|
$75,000 |
|
|
|
5.250 |
% |
|
November 2010 |
In November 2006, the Partnership entered into an interest rate swap that swaps $30,000 of
floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 4.765% plus the Partnerships applicable LIBOR
borrowing spread. This interest rate swap matures in March 2010. The underlying debt related to
this swap was paid prior to December 31, 2006; therefore, hedge accounting was not utilized. The
swap has been recorded at fair value at June 30, 2008 with an offset to current operations.
The Partnership recognized increases in interest expense of $193 and $966 for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, related to the difference between the fixed rate and
the floating rate of interest on the interest rate swap and net cash settlement of interest rate
hedges.
The Partnership recognized decreases in interest expense of $403 and $431 for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, related to the difference between the fixed rate and
the floating rate of interest on the interest rate swap and net cash settlement of interest rate
hedges.
The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Fair value of derivative assets long-term |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities current |
|
|
(3,190 |
) |
|
|
(1,241 |
) |
Fair value of derivative liabilities long term |
|
|
(2,038 |
) |
|
|
(3,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value of derivatives |
|
$ |
(5,186 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) Related Party Transactions
Included in the consolidated and condensed financial statements are various related party
transactions and balances primarily with Martin Resource Management and affiliates. Related party
transactions include sales and purchases of products and services between the Partnership and these
related entities as well as payroll and associated costs and allocation of overhead.
The impact of these related party transactions is reflected in the consolidated and condensed
financial statements as follows:
17
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
4,454 |
|
|
$ |
2,683 |
|
|
$ |
8,232 |
|
|
$ |
5,268 |
|
Marine transportation |
|
|
6,219 |
|
|
|
6,133 |
|
|
|
12,443 |
|
|
|
12,687 |
|
Product sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
4,410 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
8,921 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,285 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
11,013 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,958 |
|
|
$ |
9,555 |
|
|
$ |
31,688 |
|
|
$ |
18,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas services |
|
$ |
28,578 |
|
|
$ |
13,646 |
|
|
$ |
48,982 |
|
|
$ |
25,856 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
|
3,311 |
|
|
|
6,716 |
|
|
|
7,289 |
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,995 |
|
|
$ |
16,957 |
|
|
$ |
55,995 |
|
|
$ |
33,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine transportation |
|
$ |
5,732 |
|
|
$ |
5,123 |
|
|
$ |
12,956 |
|
|
$ |
9,285 |
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
4,568 |
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,984 |
|
|
$ |
6,968 |
|
|
$ |
19,411 |
|
|
$ |
12,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas services |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Indirect overhead
allocation, net of
reimbursement |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
|
$ |
911 |
|
|
$ |
2,640 |
|
|
$ |
1,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) Business Segments
The Partnership has four reportable segments: terminalling and storage, natural gas services,
marine transportation and sulfur services. The Partnerships reportable segments are strategic
business units that offer different products and services. The operating income of these segments
is reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to assess performance and make business
decisions.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in Note 2 in
the Partnerships annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the
SEC on March 5, 2008. The Partnership evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based
on operating income. There is no allocation of administrative expenses or interest expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
after |
|
|
and |
|
|
after |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
eliminations |
|
|
Expenditures |
|
Three months ended June
30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
21,795 |
|
|
$ |
(1,013 |
) |
|
$ |
20,782 |
|
|
$ |
2,301 |
|
|
$ |
2,156 |
|
|
$ |
5,375 |
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
182,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,025 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
(2,667 |
) |
|
|
2,590 |
|
Marine transportation |
|
|
20,308 |
|
|
|
(999 |
) |
|
|
19,309 |
|
|
|
2,948 |
|
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
10,417 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
86,445 |
|
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
86,027 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
4,128 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
Indirect selling,
general and
administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
310,573 |
|
|
$ |
(2,430 |
) |
|
$ |
308,143 |
|
|
$ |
7,614 |
|
|
$ |
4,295 |
|
|
$ |
19,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June
30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
11,622 |
|
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
11,485 |
|
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
|
$ |
6,278 |
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
105,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,321 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
Marine transportation |
|
|
15,897 |
|
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
15,155 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
10,541 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
30,373 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
30,353 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
Indirect selling,
general and
administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
163,213 |
|
|
$ |
(899 |
) |
|
$ |
162,314 |
|
|
$ |
5,468 |
|
|
$ |
6,167 |
|
|
$ |
21,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
after |
|
|
and |
|
|
after |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
eliminations |
|
|
Expenditures |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
42,157 |
|
|
|
(2,079 |
) |
|
$ |
40,078 |
|
|
$ |
4,442 |
|
|
$ |
3,332 |
|
|
$ |
9,826 |
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
389,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,117 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
(2,625 |
) |
|
|
3,759 |
|
Marine transportation |
|
|
37,289 |
|
|
|
(1,577 |
) |
|
|
35,712 |
|
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
36,543 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
156,686 |
|
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
156,252 |
|
|
|
2,832 |
|
|
|
12,454 |
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
Indirect selling, general
and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
625,249 |
|
|
$ |
(4,090 |
) |
|
$ |
621,159 |
|
|
$ |
14,954 |
|
|
$ |
13,304 |
|
|
$ |
52,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
22,463 |
|
|
$ |
(234 |
) |
|
$ |
22,229 |
|
|
$ |
2,806 |
|
|
$ |
5,540 |
|
|
$ |
11,283 |
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
207,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,109 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
Marine transportation |
|
|
30,773 |
|
|
|
(1,734 |
) |
|
|
29,039 |
|
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
|
15,643 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
59,903 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
59,733 |
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
5,022 |
|
|
|
8,252 |
|
Indirect selling, general
and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
320,248 |
|
|
$ |
(2,138 |
) |
|
$ |
318,110 |
|
|
$ |
10,362 |
|
|
$ |
13,767 |
|
|
$ |
36,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles operating income to net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
4,295 |
|
|
$ |
6,167 |
|
|
$ |
13,304 |
|
|
$ |
13,767 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities |
|
|
4,372 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
|
|
7,882 |
|
|
|
4,468 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,895 |
) |
|
|
(2,739 |
) |
|
|
(8,638 |
) |
|
|
(6,316 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,317 |
|
|
$ |
5,927 |
|
|
$ |
12,334 |
|
|
$ |
11,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Total assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
146,563 |
|
|
$ |
126,575 |
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
310,100 |
|
|
|
268,230 |
|
Marine transportation |
|
|
141,148 |
|
|
|
107,081 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
194,076 |
|
|
|
121,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
791,887 |
|
|
$ |
623,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(11) Public Equity Offerings
In May 2007, the Partnership completed a public offering of 1,380,000 common units at a price
of $42.25 per common unit, before the payment of underwriters discounts, commissions and offering
expenses (per unit value is in dollars, not thousands). Total proceeds from the sale of the
1,380,000 common units, net of underwriters discounts, commissions and offering expenses were
$55,933. The Partnerships general partner contributed $1,190 in cash to the Partnership in
conjunction with the issuance in order to maintain its 2% general partner interest in the
Partnership. The net proceeds were used to pay down revolving debt under the Partnerships credit
facility and to provide working capital.
A summary of the proceeds received from these transactions and the use of the proceeds
received therefrom is as follows (all amounts are in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received: |
|
|
|
|
Sale of common units |
|
$ |
58,305 |
|
General partner contribution |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total proceeds received |
|
$ |
59,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of Proceeds: |
|
|
|
|
Underwriters fees |
|
$ |
2,107 |
|
Professional fees and other costs |
|
|
265 |
|
Repayment of debt under revolving credit facility |
|
|
55,850 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total use of proceeds |
|
$ |
59,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
(12) Long-term Debt
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
**$195,000 Revolving loan facility at variable
interest rate (5.97%* weighted average at June
30, 2008), due November 2010 secured by
substantially all of our assets, including,
without limitation, inventory, accounts
receivable, vessels, equipment, fixed assets and
the interests in our operating subsidiaries and
equity method investees |
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
95,000 |
|
***$130,000 Term loan facility at variable
interest rate (6.99%* at June 30, 2008), due
November 2010, secured by substantially all of
our assets, including, without limitation,
inventory, accounts receivable, vessels,
equipment, fixed assets and the interests in our
operating subsidiaries |
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
Other secured debt maturing in 2008, 7.25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
|
225,021 |
|
Less current installments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current installments |
|
$ |
285,000 |
|
|
$ |
225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Interest rate fluctuates based on the LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin set on the date of each
advance. The margin above LIBOR is set every three months. Indebtedness under the credit facility
bears interest at either LIBOR plus an applicable margin or the base prime rate plus an applicable
margin. The applicable margin for revolving loans that are LIBOR loans ranges from 1.50% to 3.00%
and the applicable margin for revolving loans that are base prime rate loans ranges from 0.50% to
2.00%. The applicable margin for term
loans that are LIBOR loans ranges from 2.00% to 3.00% and the applicable margin for term loans that
are |
20
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
base prime rate loans ranges from 1.00% to 2.00%. The applicable margin for existing
borrowings is 2.00%. Effective July 1, 2008, the applicable margin for existing borrowings will
remain 2.00%. As a result of our leverage ratio test as of June 30, 2008, effective October 1,
2008, the applicable margin for existing borrowings will increase to 2.50%. The Partnership incurs
a commitment fee on the unused portions of the credit facility. |
|
** |
|
Effective January, 2008, the Partnership entered into a cash flow hedge that swaps $25,000 of
floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 3.400% plus the Partnerships applicable
LIBOR borrowing spread. The cash flow hedge matures in January, 2010. |
|
** |
|
Effective September, 2007, the Partnership entered into a cash flow hedge that swaps $25,000 of
floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 4.605% plus the Partnerships applicable
LIBOR borrowing spread. The cash flow hedge matures in September, 2010. |
|
** |
|
Effective November, 2006, the Partnership entered into a cash flow hedge that swaps $40,000 of
floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 4.82% plus the Partnerships applicable LIBOR
borrowing spread. The cash flow hedge matures in December, 2009. |
|
*** |
|
The $130,000 term loan has $105,000 hedged. Effective March, 2006, the Partnership entered into
a cash flow hedge that swaps $75,000 of floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 5.25%
plus the Partnerships applicable LIBOR borrowing spread. The cash flow hedge matures in November,
2010. Effective November 2006, the Partnership entered into an additional interest rate swap that
swaps $30,000 of floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 4.765% plus the Partnerships
applicable LIBOR borrowing spread. This cash flow hedge matures in March, 2010. |
On November 10, 2005, the Partnership entered into a new $225,000 multi-bank credit facility
comprised of a $130,000 term loan facility and a $95,000 revolving credit facility, which includes
a $20,000 letter of credit sub-limit. This credit facility also includes procedures for additional
financial institutions to become revolving lenders, or for any existing revolving lender to
increase its revolving commitment, subject to a maximum of $100,000 for all such increases in
revolving commitments of new or existing revolving lenders. Effective June 30, 2006, the
Partnership increased its revolving credit facility $25,000 resulting in a committed $120,000
revolving credit facility. Effective December 28, 2007, the Partnership increased its revolving
credit facility $75,000 resulting in a committed $195,000 revolving credit facility. The revolving
credit facility is used for ongoing working capital needs and general partnership purposes, and to
finance permitted investments, acquisitions and capital expenditures. Under the amended and
restated credit facility, as of June 30, 2008, the Partnership had $155,000 outstanding under the
revolving credit facility and $130,000 outstanding under the term loan facility. As of June 30,
2008, the Partnership had $39,880 available under its revolving credit facility.
On July 14, 2005, the Partnership issued a $120 irrevocable letter of credit to the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality to provide financial assurance for its used oil handling
program.
The Partnerships obligations under the credit facility are secured by substantially all of
the Partnerships assets, including, without limitation, inventory, accounts receivable, vessels,
equipment, fixed assets and the interests in its operating subsidiaries and equity method
investees. The Partnership may prepay all amounts outstanding under this facility at any time
without penalty.
In addition, the credit facility contains various covenants, which, among other things, limit
the Partnerships ability to: (i) incur indebtedness; (ii) grant certain liens; (iii) merge or
consolidate unless it is the survivor; (iv) sell all or substantially all of its assets; (v) make
certain acquisitions; (vi) make certain investments; (vii) make certain capital expenditures;
(viii) make distributions other than from available cash; (ix) create obligations for some lease
payments; (x) engage in transactions with affiliates; (xi) engage in other types of business; and
(xii) its joint ventures to incur indebtedness or grant certain liens.
The credit facility also contains covenants, which, among other things, require the
Partnership to
21
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
maintain specified ratios of: (i) minimum net worth (as defined in the credit
facility) of $75,000 plus 50% of net proceeds from equity issuances after November 10, 2005; (ii)
EBITDA (as defined in the credit facility) to interest expense of not less than 3.0 to 1.0 at the
end of each fiscal quarter; (iii) total funded debt to EBITDA of not more 4.75 to 1.00 for each
fiscal quarter; and (iv) total secured funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.00 to 1.00 for each
fiscal quarter. The Partnership was in compliance with the debt covenants contained in credit
facility for the year ended December 31, 2007 and as of June 30, 2008.
On November 10 of each year, commencing with November 10, 2006, the Partnership must prepay
the term loans under the credit facility with 75% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the credit
facility), unless its ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA is less than 3.00 to 1.00. There were
no prepayments made or required under the term loan through June 30, 2008. If the Partnership
receives greater than $15,000 from the incurrence of indebtedness other than under the credit
facility, it must prepay indebtedness under the credit facility with all such proceeds in excess of
$15,000. Any such prepayments are first applied to the term loans under the credit facility. The
Partnership must prepay revolving loans under the credit facility with the net cash proceeds from
any issuance of its equity. The Partnership must also prepay indebtedness under the credit facility
with the proceeds of certain asset dispositions. Other than these mandatory prepayments, the credit
facility requires interest only payments on a quarterly basis until maturity. All outstanding
principal and unpaid interest must be paid by November 10, 2010. The credit facility contains
customary events of default, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to
other material indebtedness, bankruptcy-related defaults, change of control defaults and
litigation-related defaults.
Draws made under the Partnerships credit facility are normally made to fund acquisitions and
for working capital requirements. During the current fiscal year, draws on the Partnerships credit
facility have ranged from a low of $225,000 to a high of $296,400. As of June 30, 2008, the
Partnership had $39,880 available for working capital, internal expansion and acquisition
activities under the Partnerships credit facility.
In connection with the Partnerships Stanolind asset acquisition on January 22, 2008, the
Partnership borrowed approximately $6,000 under its revolving credit facility.
In connection with the Partnerships Monarch acquisition on October 2, 2007, the Partnership
borrowed approximately $3,900 under its revolving credit facility.
In connection with the Partnerships Mega Lubricants acquisition on June 13, 2007, the
Partnership borrowed approximately $4,600 under its revolving credit facility.
In connection with the Partnerships Woodlawn acquisition on May 2, 2007, the Partnership
borrowed approximately $33,000 under its revolving credit facility.
The Partnership paid cash interest in the amount of $4,107 and $2,342 for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $7,927 and $5,945 for the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Capitalized interest was $361 and $806 for the three months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively and $813 and $1,345 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
(13) Income Taxes
The operations of a partnership are generally not subject to income taxes, except as discussed
below, because its income is taxed directly to its partners. Effective January 1, 2007, the
Partnership is subject to the Texas margin tax as described below. Our subsidiary, Woodlawn, is
subject to income taxes due to its corporate structure. A current federal income tax expense of
$411 and $247 and state income tax expense of $13 and $19 related to the operation of the
subsidiary was recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. In
connection with the Woodlawn acquisition, the Partnership also
established deferred income taxes of $8,964 associated with book and tax basis differences of
the acquired assets and liabilities. The basis differences are primarily related to property,
plant and equipment.
22
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
A deferred tax benefit related to these basis differences of $75 and $68 was recorded for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $155 and $68 was recorded for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. A deferred tax liability of $8,660 and $8,815
related to the basis differences existing at June 30, 2008 and at December 31, 2007, respectively.
The final liquidation of the Prism Gas corporate entity was completed on November 15, 2006.
Additional federal and state income taxes of $173 resulting from the liquidation were recorded in
income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
On May 18, 2006, the Texas Governor signed into law a Texas margin tax (H.B. No. 3) which
restructures the state business tax by replacing the taxable capital and earned surplus components
of the current franchise tax with a new taxable margin component. Since the tax base on the Texas
margin tax is derived from an income-based measure, the margin tax is construed as an income tax
and, therefore, the provisions of SFAS 109 regarding the recognition of deferred taxes apply to the
new margin tax. The impact on deferred taxes as a result of this provision is immaterial. State
income taxes attributable to the Texas margin tax of $186 and $369 were recorded in current income
tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and $135 and $269 for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes. FIN 48 is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for recognizing, measuring, presenting and
disclosing in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken. The
Partnership adopted FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007. There was no impact to the Partnerships
financial statements as a result of adopting FIN 48, nor is there any impact in the current
financial statements.
The components of income tax expense (benefit) from operations recorded for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
State |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14) Consolidated Financial Statements
In connection with the Partnerships filing of a shelf registration statement on Form S-3
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Registration Statement), Martin Operating
Partnership L.P. (the Operating Partnership), the Partnerships wholly-owned subsidiary, may
issue unconditional guarantees of senior or subordinated debt securities of the Partnership in the
event that the Partnership issues such securities from time to time under the registration
statement. If issued, the guarantees will be full, irrevocable and unconditional. In addition, the
Operating Partnership may also issue senior or subordinated debt securities under the Registration
Statement which, if issued, will be fully, irrevocably and unconditionally guaranteed by the
Partnership. The Partnership does not provide separate financial statements of the Operating
Partnership because the Partnership has no independent assets or operations, the guarantees are
full and unconditional and the other subsidiary of the Partnership is minor. There are no
significant restrictions on the ability of the Partnership or the Operating Partnership to obtain
funds from any of their respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
23
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except where otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(15) Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, the Partnership is subject to various claims and legal actions arising in
the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership.
In addition to the foregoing, as a result of a routine inspection by the U.S. Coast Guard of
the Partnerships tug Martin Explorer at the Freeport Sulfur Dock Terminal in Tampa, Florida, the
Partnership has been informed that an investigation has been commenced concerning a possible
violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships, 33 USC 1901, et. seq., and the MARPOL
Protocol 73/78. In connection with this matter, two employees of
Martin Resource Management who provide services to the Partnership were served
with grand jury subpoenas during the fourth quarter of 2007. The Partnership is cooperating with
the investigation and, as of the date of this report, no formal charges, fines and/or penalties
have been asserted against the Partnership.
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
References in this quarterly report to Martin Resource Management refers to Martin Resource
Management Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. You should
read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction
with the consolidated and condensed financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere
in this quarterly report.
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. Statements included in this quarterly report that are not historical
facts (including any statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations
or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto), including, without
limitation, the information set forth in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology including forecast, may, believe,
will, expect, anticipate, estimate, continue or other similar words. These statements
discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition
or state other forward-looking information. We and our representatives may from time to time
make other oral or written statements that are also forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are made based upon managements current plans, expectations,
estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and therefore involve a
number of risks and uncertainties. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees
and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the
forward-looking statements.
Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, actual results could
differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements for a number
of important reasons, including those discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on
March 5, 2008.
Overview
We are a publicly traded limited partnership with a diverse set of operations focused
primarily in the United States Gulf Coast region. Our four primary business lines include:
|
|
Terminalling and storage services for petroleum and by-products; |
|
|
|
Natural gas services; |
|
|
|
Marine transportation services for petroleum products and by-products; and |
|
|
|
Sulfur and sulfur-based products gathering, processing, marketing, manufacturing and
distribution. |
The petroleum products and by-products we collect, transport, store and market are produced
primarily by major and independent oil and gas companies who often turn to third parties, such as
us, for the transportation and disposition of these products. In addition to these major and
independent oil and gas companies, our primary customers include independent refiners, large
chemical companies, fertilizer manufacturers and other wholesale purchasers of these products. We
operate primarily in the Gulf Coast region of the United States. This region is a major hub for
petroleum refining, natural gas gathering and processing and support services for the exploration
and production industry.
We were formed in 2002 by Martin Resource Management, a privately-held company whose initial
predecessor was incorporated in 1951 as a supplier of products and services to drilling rig
contractors. Since then, Martin Resource Management has expanded its operations through
acquisitions and internal expansion initiatives as its management identified and capitalized on the
needs of producers and purchasers of hydrocarbon products and by-products and other bulk liquids.
Martin Resource Management owns an approximate 34.9% limited partnership interest in us.
Furthermore, it owns and controls our general partner, which owns a 2.0% general partner interest
and incentive distribution rights in us.
Martin Resource Management has operated our business for several years. Martin Resource
Management began operating our natural gas services business in the 1950s and our sulfur business
in the 1960s. It began our marine transportation business in the late 1980s. It entered into our
fertilizer and
terminalling and storage businesses in the early 1990s. In recent years, Martin Resource
Management has increased the size of our asset base through expansions and strategic acquisitions.
25
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on
the historical consolidated and condensed financial statements included elsewhere herein. We
prepared these financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The preparation of these financial statements required us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We based our estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Our results may differ from these estimates. Currently, we believe that our
accounting policies do not require us to make estimates using assumptions about matters that are
highly uncertain. However, we have described below the critical accounting policies that we
believe could impact our consolidated and condensed financial statements most significantly.
You should also read Note 1, General in Notes to Consolidated and Condensed Financial
Statements contained in this quarterly report and the Significant Accounting Policies note in the
consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on March 5, 2008 in conjunction with this Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Some of the more
significant estimates in these financial statements include the amount of the allowance for
doubtful accounts receivable and the determination of the fair value of our reporting units under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142).
Derivatives
In accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 133), all derivatives and hedging instruments are included on the balance
sheet as an asset or liability measured at fair value and changes in fair value are recognized
currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If a derivative qualifies
for hedge accounting, changes in the fair value can be offset against the change in the fair value
of the hedged item through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until such time as
the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Our hedging policy allows us to use hedge accounting for
financial transactions that are designated as hedges. Derivative instruments not designated as
hedges or hedges that become ineffective are being marked to market with all market value
adjustments being recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2008, we
have designated a portion of our derivative instruments as qualifying cash flow hedges. Fair value
changes for these hedges have been recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of equity.
Product Exchanges
We enter into product exchange agreements with third parties whereby we agree to exchange
natural gas liquids (NGLs) and sulfur with third parties. We record the balance of exchange
products due to other companies under these agreements at quoted market product prices and the
balance of exchange products due from other companies at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue for our four operating segments is recognized as follows:
Terminalling and storage Revenue is recognized for storage contracts based on the contracted
monthly tank fixed fee. For throughput contracts, revenue is recognized based on the volume moved
through our terminals at the contracted rate. When lubricants and drilling fluids are sold by
truck, revenue is recognized upon delivering product to the customers as title to the product
transfers when the customer physically receives the product.
Natural gas services Natural gas gathering and processing revenues are recognized when title
passes or service is performed. NGL distribution revenue is recognized when product is delivered
by truck to our
NGL customers, which occurs when the customer physically receives the product. When product is sold
in
26
storage, or by pipeline, we recognize NGL distribution revenue when the customer receives the
product from either the storage facility or pipeline.
Marine transportation Revenue is recognized for contracted trips upon completion of the
particular trip. For time charters, revenue is recognized based on a per day rate.
Sulfur services Revenues are recognized when the products are delivered, which occurs when
the customer has taken title and has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership based on specific
contract terms at either the shipping or delivery point.
Equity Method Investments
We use the equity method of accounting for investments in unconsolidated entities where the
ability to exercise significant influence over such entities exists. Investments in unconsolidated
entities consist of capital contributions and advances plus our share of accumulated earnings as of
the entities latest fiscal year-ends, less capital withdrawals and distributions. Investments in
excess of the underlying net assets of equity method investees, specifically identifiable to
property, plant and equipment, are amortized over the useful life of the related assets. Excess
investment representing equity method goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment,
annually. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, this goodwill is not subject to amortization and
is accounted for as a component of the investment. Equity method investments are subject to
impairment under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 18, The Equity
Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock. No portion of the net income from these
entities is included in our operating income.
We own an unconsolidated 50% of the ownership interests in Waskom Gas Processing Company
(Waskom), Matagorda Offshore Gathering System (Matagorda), Panther Interstate Pipeline Energy
LLC (PIPE) and a 20% ownership interest in a partnership which owns the lease rights to Bosque
County Pipeline (BCP). Each of these interests is accounted for under the equity method of
accounting.
Goodwill
Goodwill is subject to a fair-value based impairment test on an annual basis. We are required
to identify our reporting units and determine the carrying value of each reporting unit by
assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets. We
are required to determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the carrying
amount of the reporting unit. To the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the
fair value of the reporting unit, we would be required to perform the second step of the impairment
test, as this is an indication that the reporting unit goodwill may be impaired.
All four of our reporting units, terminalling, marine transportation, natural gas services,
sulfur services, contain goodwill.
We determined fair value in each reporting unit based on a multiple of current annual cash
flows. This multiple was derived from our experience with actual acquisitions and dispositions and
our valuation of recent potential acquisitions and dispositions.
Environmental Liabilities
We have historically not experienced circumstances requiring us to account for environmental
remediation obligations. If such circumstances arise, we would estimate remediation obligations
utilizing a remediation feasibility study and any other related environmental studies that we may
elect to perform. We would record changes to our estimated environmental liability as circumstances
change or events occur, such as the issuance of revised orders by governmental bodies or court or
other judicial orders and our evaluation of the likelihood and amount of the related eventual
liability.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
In evaluating the collectability of our accounts receivable, we assess a number of factors,
including a specific customers ability to meet its financial obligations to us, the length of time
the receivable has been past due and historical collection experience. Based on these assessments,
we record specific and general reserves for bad debts to reduce the related receivables to the
amount we ultimately expect to collect from customers.
27
Asset Retirement Obligation
We recognize and measure our asset and conditional asset retirement obligations and the
associated asset retirement cost upon acquisition of the related asset and based upon the estimate
of the cost to settle the obligation at its anticipated future date. The obligation is accreted to
its estimated future value and the asset retirement cost is depreciated over the estimated life of
the asset.
Our Relationship with Martin Resource Management
Martin Resource Management is engaged in the following principal business activities:
|
|
|
providing land transportation of various liquids using a fleet of trucks and
road vehicles and road trailers; |
|
|
|
|
distributing fuel oil, asphalt, sulfuric acid, marine fuel and other liquids; |
|
|
|
|
providing marine bunkering and other shore-based marine services in Alabama,
Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas; |
|
|
|
|
operating a small crude oil gathering business in Stephens, Arkansas; |
|
|
|
|
operating a lube oil processing facility in Smackover, Arkansas; |
|
|
|
|
operating an underground NGL storage facility in Arcadia, Louisiana; |
|
|
|
|
developing an underground natural gas storage facility in Arcadia, Louisiana; |
|
|
|
|
supplying employees and services for the operation of our business; |
|
|
|
|
operating, for its account and our account, the docks, roads, loading and
unloading facilities and other common use facilities or access routes at our
Stanolind terminal; |
|
|
|
|
operating, solely for our account, an NGL truck loading and unloading and
pipeline distribution terminal in Mont Belvieu, Texas; and |
|
|
|
|
operating, solely for our account, the asphalt facilities in Omaha, Nebraska. |
We are and will continue to be closely affiliated with Martin Resource Management as a result
of the following relationships.
Ownership
Martin Resource Management owns an approximate 34.9% limited partnership interest and a 2%
general partnership interest in us and all of our incentive distribution rights.
Management
Martin Resource Management directs our business operations through its ownership and control
of our general partner. We benefit from our relationship with Martin Resource Management through
access to a significant pool of management expertise and established relationships throughout the
energy industry. We do not have employees. Martin Resource Management employees are responsible
for conducting our business and operating our assets on our behalf.
Related Party Agreements
We are a party to an omnibus agreement with Martin Resource Management. The omnibus agreement
requires us to reimburse Martin Resource Management for all direct expenses it incurs or payments
it makes on our behalf or in connection with the operation of our business. We reimbursed Martin
Resource Management for $16.3 million of direct costs and expenses for the three months ended June
30, 2008 compared to $12.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. We reimbursed Martin
Resource Management for $33.9 million of direct costs and expenses for the six months ended June
30, 2008 compared to $25.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. There is no monetary
limitation on the amount we are required to reimburse Martin Resource Management for direct
expenses.
In addition to the direct expenses, under the omnibus agreement, the reimbursement amount that
we are required to pay to Martin Resource Management with respect to indirect general and
administrative and
28
corporate overhead expenses was capped at $2.0 million. This cap expired on November 1, 2007.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Conflicts Committee of our general partner approved a reimbursement
amount for indirect expenses of $2.7 million for the year ending December 31, 2008. We reimbursed
Martin Resource Management for $0.7 and $0.3 million of indirect expenses for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We reimbursed Martin Resource Management for $1.3 and
$0.7 million of indirect expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
These indirect expenses covered a portion of the centralized corporate functions Martin Resource
Management provides for us, such as accounting, treasury, clerical billing, information technology,
administration of insurance, general office expenses and employee benefit plans and other general
corporate overhead functions we share with Martin Resource Management retained businesses. The
omnibus agreement also contains significant non-compete provisions and indemnity obligations.
Martin Resource Management also licenses certain of its trademarks and trade names to us under the
omnibus agreement.
In addition to the omnibus agreement, we and Martin Resource Management have entered into
various other agreements that are not the result of arms-length negotiations and consequently may
not be as favorable to us as they might have been if we had negotiated them with unaffiliated third
parties. The agreements include, but are not limited to, a motor carrier agreement, a terminal
services agreement, a marine transportation agreement, a product storage agreement, a product
supply agreement, a throughput agreement, and a Purchaser Use Easement, Ingress-Egress Easement and
Utility Facilities Easement. Pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement, we are prohibited
from entering into certain material agreements with Martin Resource Management without the approval
of the conflicts committee of our general partners board of directors.
For a more comprehensive discussion concerning the omnibus agreement and the other agreements
that we have entered into with Martin Resource Management, please refer to Item 13. Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions Agreements set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on March 5, 2008.
Commercial
We have been and anticipate that we will continue to be both a significant customer and
supplier of products and services offered by Martin Resource Management. Our motor carrier
agreement with Martin Resource Management provides us with access to Martin Resource Managements
fleet of road vehicles and road trailers to provide land transportation in the areas served by
Martin Resource Management. Our ability to utilize Martin Resource Managements land transportation
operations is currently a key component of our integrated distribution network.
We also use the underground storage facilities owned by Martin Resource Management in our
natural gas services operations. We lease an underground storage facility from Martin Resource
Management in Arcadia, Louisiana with a storage capacity of 2.0 million barrels. Our use of this
storage facility gives us greater flexibility in our operations by allowing us to store a
sufficient supply of product during times of decreased demand for use when demand increases.
In the aggregate, our purchases of land transportation services, NGL storage services,
sulfuric acid and lube oil product purchases and sulfur services payroll reimbursements from Martin
Resource Management accounted for approximately 12% and 13% of our total cost of products sold
during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively; and approximately 10% and 13%
of our total cost of products sold during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. We also purchase marine fuel from Martin Resource Management, which we account for
as an operating expense.
Correspondingly, Martin Resource Management is one of our significant customers. It primarily
uses our terminalling, marine transportation and NGL distribution services for its operations. We
provide terminalling and storage services under a terminal services agreement. We provide marine
transportation services to Martin Resource Management under a charter agreement on a spot-contract
basis at applicable market rates. Our sales to Martin Resource Management accounted for
approximately 5% and 6% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Our sales to Martin Resource Management accounted for approximately 5% and 6% of our
total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We provide
terminalling and storage and marine transportation services to Midstream Fuel and Midstream Fuel
provides terminal services to us by handling lubricants, greases and drilling fluids.
29
For a more comprehensive discussion concerning the agreements that we have entered into with
Martin Resource Management, please refer to Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Agreements set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007 filed with the SEC on March 5, 2008.
Approval and Review of Related Party Transactions
If we contemplate entering into a transaction, other than a routine or in the ordinary course
of business transaction, in which a related person will have a direct or indirect material
interest, the proposed transaction is submitted for consideration to the board of directors of our
general partner or to our management, as appropriate. If the board of directors is involved in the
approval process, it determines whether to refer the matter to the Conflicts Committee of our
general partners board of directors, as constituted under our limited partnership agreement. If a
matter is referred to the Conflicts Committee, it obtains information regarding the proposed
transaction from management and determines whether to engage independent legal counsel or an
independent financial advisor to advise the members of the committee regarding the transaction. If
the Conflicts Committee retains such counsel or financial advisor, it considers such advice and, in
the case of a financial advisor, such advisors opinion as to whether the transaction is fair and
reasonable to us and to our unitholders.
Results of Operations
The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 have been
derived from our consolidated and condensed financial statements.
We evaluate segment performance on the basis of operating income, which is derived by
subtracting cost of products sold, operating expenses, selling, general and administrative
expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense from revenues. The following table sets forth
our operating revenues and operating income by segment for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007. The results of operations for the first six months of the year are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations which might be expected for the entire year.
Effective October 1, 2007, we made changes to the way we report our segments. During the
fourth quarter of 2007, we effected a significant internal reorganization of the sulfur and
fertilizer businesses and implemented a new financial reporting system which grouped and reported
financial results differently to management for sulfur and sulfur-based fertilizer products
formerly reported in separate segments in our financial statements. Based on the changes in our
financial reporting structure, the previously reported financial information for the sulfur and
fertilizer segments have been combined into one segment known as the Sulfur Services segment. The
prior-period segment data previously reported in the sulfur and fertilizer segments have been
combined and restated in the new reporting segment to conform to the current periods presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
after |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
after |
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Income (loss) |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
21,795 |
|
|
$ |
(1,013 |
) |
|
$ |
20,782 |
|
|
$ |
3,025 |
|
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
|
$ |
2,156 |
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
182,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,025 |
|
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
(2,667 |
) |
Marine transportation |
|
|
20,308 |
|
|
|
(999 |
) |
|
|
19,309 |
|
|
|
2,552 |
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
1,993 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
86,445 |
|
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
86,027 |
|
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
4,128 |
|
Indirect selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
310,573 |
|
|
$ |
(2,430 |
) |
|
$ |
308,143 |
|
|
$ |
4,295 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
11,622 |
|
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
11,485 |
|
|
$ |
2,611 |
|
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
105,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,321 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464 |
|
Marine transportation |
|
|
15,897 |
|
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
15,155 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
1,385 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
30,374 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
30,353 |
|
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
Indirect selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
163,214 |
|
|
$ |
(899 |
) |
|
$ |
162,314 |
|
|
$ |
6,167 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income (loss) |
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
after |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
after |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Income (loss) |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Six months ended June, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
42,157 |
|
|
$ |
(2,079 |
) |
|
$ |
40,078 |
|
|
$ |
5,134 |
|
|
$ |
(1,802 |
) |
|
$ |
3,332 |
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
389,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,117 |
|
|
|
(3,089 |
) |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
(2,625 |
) |
Marine transportation |
|
|
37,289 |
|
|
|
(1,577 |
) |
|
|
35,712 |
|
|
|
3,852 |
|
|
|
(1,067 |
) |
|
|
2,785 |
|
Sulfur services |
|
|
156,686 |
|
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
156,252 |
|
|
|
10,049 |
|
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
12,454 |
|
Indirect selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
625,249 |
|
|
$ |
(4,090 |
) |
|
$ |
621,159 |
|
|
$ |
13,304 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminalling and storage |
|
$ |
22,463 |
|
|
$ |
(234 |
) |
|
$ |
22,229 |
|
|
$ |
5,498 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
5,540 |
|
Natural gas services |
|
|
207,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,109 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
Marine transportation |
|
|
30,773 |
|
|
|
(1,734 |
) |
|
|
29,039 |
|
|
|
4,084 |
|
|
|
(1,681 |
) |
|
|
2,403 |
|
Sulfur Services |
|
|
59,903 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
59,733 |
|
|
|
3,383 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
5,022 |
|
Indirect selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
320,248 |
|
|
$ |
(2,138 |
) |
|
$ |
318,110 |
|
|
$ |
13,767 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our results of operations are discussed on a comparative basis below. There are certain items
of income and expense which we do not allocate on a segment basis. These items, including equity
in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities, interest expense, and indirect selling, general and
administrative expenses, are discussed after the comparative discussion of our results within each
segment.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Our total revenues before eliminations were $310.6 million for the three months ended June 30,
2008 compared to $163.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $147.4
million, or 90%. Our operating income before eliminations was $4.3 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $6.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, a decrease
of $1.9 million, or 31%.
The results of operations are described in greater detail on a segment basis below.
Terminalling and Storage Segment
The following table summarizes our results of operations in our terminalling and storage
segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
9,900 |
|
|
$ |
7,037 |
|
Products |
|
|
11,895 |
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
21,795 |
|
|
|
11,622 |
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
10,269 |
|
|
|
3,938 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
6,173 |
|
|
|
3,576 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,301 |
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
3,025 |
|
|
$ |
2,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues. Our terminalling and storage revenues increased $10.2 million, or 88%, for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. Service revenue
accounted for $2.9 million of this increase. The service revenue increase was primarily a result
of recent acquisitions and capital projects being placed into service during the end of 2007 and
the beginning of 2008, and increased business activity at our shore based terminals. Product
revenue increased $7.3 million primarily due to our acquisition of the operating assets of Mega
Lubricants Inc. (Mega Lubricants) in June 2007.
31
Cost of products sold. Our cost of products sold increased $6.3 million, or 161%, for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. This was
primarily a result of the Mega Lubricants acquisition.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $2.6 million, or 73%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was result of
our recent acquisitions and capital projects being placed into service during the end of 2007 and
beginning of 2008. The increase was also a result of increased salaries and related burden,
repairs and maintenance and product hauling costs related to increased activity at our existing
terminals.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
were consistent for both three month periods.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $0.8 million,
or 57%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
This increase was primarily a result of our recent acquisitions and capital expenditures.
In summary, our terminalling operating income increased $0.4 million, or 16%, for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Natural Gas Services Segment
The following table summarizes our results of operations in our natural gas services segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGLs |
|
$ |
167,181 |
|
|
$ |
94,786 |
|
Natural gas |
|
|
19,808 |
|
|
|
10,342 |
|
Non-cash mark-to-market adjustment of commodity derivatives |
|
|
(3,995 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
) |
Gain (loss) on cash settlements of commodity derivatives |
|
|
(2,053 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
Other operating fees |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
182,025 |
|
|
|
105,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGLs |
|
|
161,355 |
|
|
|
91,092 |
|
Natural gas |
|
|
19,210 |
|
|
|
9,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of products sold |
|
|
180,565 |
|
|
|
100,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss) |
|
$ |
(2,907 |
) |
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGLs Volumes (Bbls) |
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Volumes (Mmbtu) |
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information above does not include activities relating to
Waskom, PIPE, Matagorda and BCP investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
$ |
4,372 |
|
|
$ |
2,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waskom: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant Inlet Volumes (Mmcf/d) |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frac Volumes (Bbls/d) |
|
|
10,943 |
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Revenues. Our natural gas services revenues increased $76.7 million, or 73% for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007 due to higher commodity
prices and increased natural gas volumes.
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, NGL revenues increased $72.4 million, or 76% and
natural gas revenues increased $9.5 million, or 92%. NGL sales volumes for the three months of
2008 remained relatively flat and natural gas volumes increased 35% compared to the same period of
2007. The increase in NGL revenues is primarily due from escalating commodity prices as our NGL
average sales price per barrel increased $39.46 or 73% and our natural gas average sales price per
Mmbtu increased $3.09, or 42% compared to the same period of 2007. The increase in natural gas
volumes is primarily due to the Woodlawn acquisition contributing for the entire second quarter of
2008 as compared to only a portion of 2007.
Our natural gas services segment utilizes derivative instruments to manage the risk of
fluctuations in market prices for its anticipated sales of natural gas, condensate and NGLs. This
activity is referred to as price risk management. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, 55% of
our total natural gas volumes and 72% of our total NGL volumes were hedged as compared to 46% and
53%, respectively in 2007. The impact of price risk management and marketing activities decreased
total natural gas and NGL revenues $6.1 million for the second quarter of 2008 compared to a
decrease of $0.6 million in the same period of 2007. Of the $6.1 million decrease, $4.0 was
attributable to a non-cash mark-to-market adjustments made to our derivative contracts and $2.1
million is related to losses recognized on cash settlements of our derivative contracts.
Costs of product sold. Our cost of products sold increased $79.6 million, or 79%, for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period of 2007. Of the increase, $70.3
million relates to NGLs and $9.4 million relates to natural gas. The increase in NGL cost of
products sold is less than our increase in NGL revenues as we were able to expand our NGL margins
by $1.15 per barrel, or 54%. The percentage increase relating to natural gas cost of products sold
is slightly higher than the percentage increase in natural gas revenues which caused our Mmbtu
margins to decrease by 10%. This is primarily a result of the terms of Woodlawns producer
contracts compared to the terms of our historical producer contracts.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $0.4 million, or 22%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period of 2007. This increase was primarily a result of
Woodlawn being in operation for the entire second quarter of 2008 as compared to 2007.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
remained relatively consistent for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $0.1 million, or 11%,
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period of 2007. This increase was
primarily a result of Woodlawn being in operation for the entire second quarter of 2008 as compared
to 2007.
In summary, our natural gas services operating income decreased $3.4 million, or 727%, for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period of 2007.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities. Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
was $4.4 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
an increase of 81%. This increase is primarily a result of completing the expansions to the Waskom
plant and the Waskom fractionator during the second quarter of 2007. As a result, our inlet
volumes and fractionation volumes increased 51% during the second quarter of 2008 as compared to
2007.
Marine Transportation Segment
The following table summarizes our results of operations in our marine transportation segment.
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
20,308 |
|
|
$ |
15,897 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
14,542 |
|
|
|
11,836 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,948 |
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
2,552 |
|
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues. Our marine transportation revenues increased $4.4 million, or 28%, for the three
months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. Our inland marine
operations generated an additional $5.5 million in revenue from expansion of our fleet and
increased contract rates. Our offshore revenues decreased $1.1 million due to downtime associated
with capital expenditures on offshore vessels.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $2.7 million, or 23%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. This was primarily a result
of increases in operating costs from fuel expense, and wage and burden costs due to expansion of
our fleet and increased fuel costs.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2007. This was primarily a result of increases in selling, general and administrative
costs to support our fleet expansion.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $1.0 million, or 50%,
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. This
increase was primarily a result of capital expenditures made in the last twelve months.
In summary, our marine transportation operating income increased $0.5 million, or 23%, for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Sulfur Services Segment
The following table summarizes our results of operations in our sulfur segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
86,445 |
|
|
$ |
30,374 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
76,690 |
|
|
|
22,790 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
4,727 |
|
|
|
3,943 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
2,940 |
|
|
$ |
1,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Volumes (long tons) |
|
|
289.8 |
|
|
|
355.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues. Our sulfur services revenues increased $56.1 million, or 185%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was primarily a
result of a 249% increase in our average sales price. The sales price increase was due primarily to
increased market prices for our sulfur products, primarily driven by higher costs of sulfur and raw
materials for sulfur-based products.
Cost of products sold. Our cost of products sold increased $53.9 million, or 237%, for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. Our margin per
ton increased 58% which was driven by a strong international demand in the prilled sulfur markets
and our ability to spread our margin to our sulfur-based product customers.
Operating expenses. Our operating expenses increased $0.8 million, or 20%, for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was a
result of increased marine transportation expenses.
34
Selling, general, and administrative expenses. Our selling, general, and administrative
expenses increased $0.1 million, or 12%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2007.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.2 million,
or 20%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
This is a result of our sulfuric acid plant becoming operational in late September 2007.
In summary, our sulfur operating income increased $1.9 million, or 36%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Our total revenues before eliminations were $625.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2008 compared to $320.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $305.1
million, or 95%. Our operating income before eliminations was $13.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $13.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, a decrease of
$0.5 million, or 4%.
The results of operations are described in greater detail on a segment basis below.
Terminalling and Storage Segment
The following table summarizes our results of operations in our terminalling and storage
segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
$ |
18,832 |
|
|
$ |
13,988 |
|
Products |
|
|
23,325 |
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
42,157 |
|
|
|
22,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
20,191 |
|
|
|
7,103 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
12,342 |
|
|
|
6,996 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,442 |
|
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
5,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
5,134 |
|
|
$ |
5,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues. Our terminalling and storage revenues increased $19.7 million, or 88%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. Service revenue
accounted for $4.8 million of this increase. The service revenue increase was primarily a result
of recent acquisitions and capital projects being placed into service during the last twelve
months, and increased business activity at our shore based terminals. Product revenue increased
$14.9 million primarily due the Mega Lubricants acquisition and an additional 9% increase in
historical sales volumes and a 1% increase in product cost that was able to be passed along to our
customers.
Cost of products sold. Our cost of products increased $13.1 million, or 184%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This was primarily a
result of the Mega Lubricants acquisition and an additional 9% increase in historical sales volumes
and a 1% increase in product cost that was able to be passed along to our customers.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $5.3 million, or 76%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was result of
our recent acquisitions and capital projects placed into service during the last twelve months.
The increase was also a
35
result of increased salaries and related burden, repairs and maintenance, and product hauling costs
related to increased activity at our existing terminals.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
were consistent for both six month periods.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $1.6 million, or 58%
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This
increase was primarily a result of our recent acquisitions and capital expenditures.
In summary, terminalling and storage operating income decreased $0.4 million, or 6%, for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Natural Gas Services Segment
The following table summarizes our results of operations in our natural gas services segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGLs |
|
$ |
361,790 |
|
|
$ |
193,018 |
|
Natural gas |
|
|
33,620 |
|
|
|
13,487 |
|
Non-cash mark-to-market adjustment of commodity derivatives |
|
|
(5,112 |
) |
|
|
(1,076 |
) |
Gain (loss) on cash settlements of commodity derivatives |
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
|
|
372 |
|
Other operating fees |
|
|
1,816 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
389,117 |
|
|
|
207,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGLs |
|
|
350,501 |
|
|
|
184,979 |
|
Natural gas |
|
|
33,137 |
|
|
|
12,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of products sold |
|
|
383,638 |
|
|
|
197,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
3,135 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,090 |
) |
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,089 |
) |
|
$ |
2,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGLs Volumes (Bbls) |
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Volumes (Mmbtu) |
|
|
3,699 |
|
|
|
1,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information above does not include
activities relating to Waskom, PIPE,
Matagorda and BCP investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Entities |
|
$ |
7,882 |
|
|
$ |
4,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waskom: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant Inlet Volumes (Mmcf/d) |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frac Volumes (Bbls/d) |
|
|
10,494 |
|
|
|
7,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues. Our natural gas services revenues increased $182.0 million, or 88% for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007 due to higher commodity
prices and increased natural gas and NGL volumes.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, NGL revenues increased $168.8 million, or 87% and
natural gas revenues increased $20.1 million, or 149%. NGL sales volumes for the six months of
2008 increased by
36
18% and natural gas volumes increased 95% compared to the same period of 2007. The increase in NGL
revenues is primarily due from escalating commodity prices as our NGL average sales price per
barrel increased $29.18 or 59% and our natural gas average sales price per Mmbtu increased $1.97,
or 28% compared to the same period of 2007. The increase in natural gas volumes is primarily due to
receiving a full six months benefit of the Woodlawn acquisition in 2008 and increased volumes from
the Waskom expansion.
Our natural gas services segment utilizes derivative instruments to manage the risk of
fluctuations in market prices for its anticipated sales of natural gas, condensate and NGLs. This
activity is referred to as price risk management. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, 55% of
our total natural gas volumes and 72% of our total NGL volumes were hedged as compared to 46% and
53%, respectively in 2007. The impact of price risk management and marketing activities decreased
total natural gas and NGL revenues $8.1 million for 2008 compared to a decrease of $0.7 million in
the same period of 2007. Of the $8.1 million decrease, $5.1 was attributable to a non-cash
mark-to-market adjustments made to our derivative contracts and $3.0 million is related to losses
recognized on cash settlements of our derivative contracts.
Costs of product sold. Our cost of products sold increased $185.9 million, or 94%, for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period of 2007. Of the increase, $165.5
million relates to NGLs and $20.4 million relates to natural gas. The increase in NGL cost of
products sold is less than our increase in NGL revenues as we were able to expand our NGL margins
by $0.39 per barrel, or 19%. The percentage increase relating to natural gas cost of products sold
was higher than the percentage increase in natural gas revenues which caused our Mmbtu margins to
decrease by 67%. This is primarily a result of the terms of Woodlawns producer contracts compared
to the terms of our historical producer contracts.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $1.1 million, or 35%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period of 2007. This increase was primarily a result of
Woodlawn being in operation for the entire six months of 2008 as compared to 2007.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
remained consistent for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $0.6 million, or 49%,
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period of 2007. This increase was
primarily a result of Woodlawn being in operation for the first six months of 2008 as compared to
2007.
In summary, our natural gas services operating income decreased $5.5 million, or 228%, for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period of 2007.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities. Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
was $7.9 million and $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, an
increase of 76%. This increase is primarily a result of receiving full benefit of the expansion to
the Waskom plant and the Waskom fractionator for the six months of 2008 as the plant was shut down
for a portion of the first half of 2007. As a result, our inlet volumes and fractionation volumes
increased 28% during the six months ending June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007.
Marine Transportation Segment
The following table summarizes our results of operations in our marine transportation segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
37,289 |
|
|
$ |
30,773 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
27,317 |
|
|
|
22,703 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
|
3,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,713 |
|
|
|
4,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
3,852 |
|
|
$ |
4,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Revenues. Our marine transportation revenues increased $6.5 million, or 21%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. Our inland marine
operations generated an additional $7.2 million in revenue from expansion of our fleet and
increased contract rates. Our offshore revenues decreased $0.8 million primarily from downtime
associated with capital expenditures on offshore vessels.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $4.6 million, or 20%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This was primarily a result of
increases in operating costs from fuel expense, wages and burden costs, and repairs and maintenance
due to expansion of our fleet and increased fuel costs.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June
30, 2007. This was primarily a result of increases in selling, general and administrative costs to
support our fleet expansion.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $1.8 million, or 47%,
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This
increase was primarily a result of capital expenditures made in the last twelve months.
In summary, our marine transportation operating income decreased $0.2 million, or 6%, for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Sulfur Services Segment
The following table summarizes our results of operations in our sulfur segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
156,686 |
|
|
$ |
59,903 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
133,907 |
|
|
|
44,803 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
8,559 |
|
|
|
8,203 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
10,049 |
|
|
$ |
3,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulfur Volumes (long tons) |
|
|
467.2 |
|
|
|
720.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues. Our sulfur services revenues increased $96.8 million, or 162%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was primarily a
result of a 304% increase in our average sales price. The sales price increase was due primarily to
increased market prices for our sulfur products, primarily driven by higher costs of sulfur and raw
materials for sulfur-based products.
Cost of products sold. Our cost of products sold increased $89.1 million, or 199%, for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. Our margin per ton
increased 54% which was driven by a strong international demand in the prilled sulfur markets and
being able to spread our margin to our sulfur-based product customers.
Operating expenses. Our operating expenses increased $0.4 million, or 4%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was a result of
increased marine transportation expenses.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses. Our selling, general, and administrative
expenses increased $0.2 million, or 15%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2007.
38
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.5 million,
or 20%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
This is a result of our sulfuric acid plant becoming operational in late September 2007.
In summary, our sulfur operating income increased $6.3 million, or 185%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Statement of Operations Items as a Percentage of Revenues
Our cost of products sold, operating expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses,
and depreciation and amortization as a percentage of revenues for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Revenues |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Cost of products sold |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Entities
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 equity in earnings of unconsolidated
entities relates to our unconsolidated interests in Waskom, Matagorda, PIPE and BCP.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities was $4.4 million for the three months ended June
30, 2008 compared to $2.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $2.0
million. This increase is related to earnings received from Waskom, Matagorda, PIPE and BCP.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities was $7.9 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008 compared to $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $3.4
million. This increase is related to earnings received from Waskom, Matagorda, PIPE and BCP.
Interest Expense
Our interest expense for all operations was $3.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2008, compared to the $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $1.2
million, or 44%. This increase was primarily due to recognized increases in interest expense of
$0.6 million, related to the difference between the fixed rate and the floating rate of interest on
the mark-to-market interest rate swap and an increase in average debt outstanding.
Our interest expense for all operations was $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to the $6.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $2.3
million, or 37%. This increase was primarily due to recognized increases in interest expense of
$1.4 million, related to the difference between the fixed rate and the floating rate of interest on
the interest rate swap and an increase in average debt outstanding.
Indirect Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Indirect selling, general and administrative expenses were $1.3 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, an increase
of $0.5 million, or 55%.
Indirect selling, general and administrative expenses were $2.6 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of
$1.0 million, or 65%.
39
Martin Resource Management allocated to us a portion of its indirect selling, general and
administrative expenses for services such as accounting, treasury, clerical billing, information
technology, administration of insurance, engineering, general office expense and employee benefit
plans and other general corporate overhead functions we share with Martin Resource Management
retained businesses. This allocation is based on the percentage of time spent by Martin Resource
Management personnel that provide such centralized services. Generally accepted accounting
principles also permit other methods for allocation these expenses, such as basing the allocation
on the percentage of revenues contributed by a segment. The allocation of these expenses between
Martin Resource Management and us is subject to a number of judgments and estimates, regardless of
the method used. We can provide no assurances that our method of allocation, in the past or in the
future, is or will be the most accurate or appropriate method of allocation these expenses. Other
methods could result in a higher allocation of selling, general and administrative expense to us,
which would reduce our net income. Under the omnibus agreement, the reimbursement amount with
respect to indirect general and administrative and corporate overhead expenses was capped at $2.0
million. This cap expired on November 1, 2007. Effective January 1, 2008, the Conflicts Committee
of our general partner approved a reimbursement amount for indirect expenses of $2.7 million for
the year ending December 31, 2008. Martin Resource Management allocated indirect selling, general
and administrative expenses of $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively, and $1.3 million and $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows and Capital Expenditures
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 cash increased $7.2 million as a result of $27.0
million provided by operating activities, $57.7 million used in investing activities and $37.8
million provided by financing activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, cash decreased
$3.4 million as a result of $28.0 million provided by operating activities, $76.9 million used in
investing activities and $45.8 million provided by financing activities.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 our investing activities of $57.7 million consisted of
capital expenditures, acquisitions, proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment, return of
investments from unconsolidated entities and investments in and distributions from unconsolidated
entities. For the six months ended June 30, 2007 our investing activities of $76.9 million
consisted of capital expenditures, acquisitions, return of investments from unconsolidated
entities, and investments in and distributions from unconsolidated partnerships.
Generally, our capital expenditure requirements have consisted, and we expect that our capital
requirements will continue to consist, of:
|
|
|
maintenance capital expenditures, which are capital expenditures made to replace
assets to maintain our existing operations and to extend the useful lives of our
assets; and |
|
|
|
|
expansion capital expenditures, which are capital expenditures made to grow our
business, to expand and upgrade our existing terminalling, marine transportation,
storage and manufacturing facilities, and to construct new terminalling facilities,
plants, storage facilities and new marine transportation assets. |
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, our capital expenditures for property and
equipment were $58.7 million and $68.9 million, respectively.
As to each period:
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we spent $53.7 million for expansion and
$5.0 million for maintenance. Our expansion capital expenditures were made in
connection with assets acquired in the Stanolind acquisition, marine vessel purchases
and conversions and construction projects associated with our terminalling business.
Our maintenance capital expenditures were primarily made in our marine transportation
segment for routine dry dockings of our vessels pursuant to the United States Coast
Guard requirements. |
40
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we spent $64.9 million for expansion and
$4.0 million for maintenance. Our expansion capital expenditures were made in
connection with assets acquired in the Woodlawn and Mega Lubricants acquisitions,
marine vessel purchases and conversions, construction projects associated with our
terminalling business, and the sulfuric acid plant construction project at our
facility in Plainview, Texas. Our maintenance capital expenditures were primarily
made in our marine transportation segment for routine dry dockings of our vessels
pursuant to the United States Coast Guard requirements and include $0.1 million spent
in connection with restoration of assets destroyed in Hurricanes Rita and Katrina. |
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, our financing activities consisted of cash
distributions paid to common and subordinated unitholders of $22.2 million, payments of long term
debt to financial lenders of $100.8 million and borrowings of long-term debt under our credit
facility of $160.8 million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007, our financing activities consisted of cash
distributions paid to common and subordinated unitholders of $17.3 million, net proceeds from a
follow on equity offering of $55.9 million, payments of long term debt to financial lenders of
$97.3 million, borrowings of long-term debt under our credit facility of $103.3 million and
contributions of $1.2 million from our general partner.
We made net investments in (received distributions from) unconsolidated entities of $(0.1)
million and $5.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The net
investment in unconsolidated entities includes $1.9 million and $6.1 million of expansion capital
expenditures in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Capital Resources
Historically, we have generally satisfied our working capital requirements and funded our
capital expenditures with cash generated from operations and borrowings. We expect our primary
sources of funds for short-term liquidity needs will be cash flows from operations and borrowings
under our credit facility.
As of June 30, 2008, we had $285.0 million of outstanding indebtedness, consisting of
outstanding borrowings of $155.0 million under our revolving credit facility and $130.0 million
under our term loan facility.
On January 22, 2008, we financed the Stanolind asset acquisition through approximately $6.0
million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
On October 2, 2007, we financed the Monarch acquisition through approximately $3.9 million in
borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
On June 13, 2007, we financed the Mega Lubricants acquisition through approximately $4.6
million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
On May 2, 2007, we financed the Woodlawn acquisition through approximately $33.0 million in
borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
In May 2007, we completed a follow-on public offering of 1,380,000 common units, resulting in
proceeds of $56.0 million, after payment of underwriters discounts, commissions, and offering
expenses. Our general partner contributed $1.2 million in cash to us in conjunction with the
offering in order to maintain its 2% general partner interest in us. The net proceeds were used to
pay down revolving debt under our credit facility and to provide working capital.
We believe that cash generated from operations, and our borrowing capacity under our credit
facility, will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements, anticipated capital
expenditures and scheduled debt payments in 2008. However, our ability to satisfy our working
capital requirements, to fund planned capital expenditures and to satisfy our debt service
obligations will depend upon our future operating performance, which is subject to certain risks.
Please read Item 1A. Risk Factors Risks Related to Our Business in our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on March 5, 2008 for a discussion of such risks.
41
Total Contractual Cash Obligations. A summary of our total contractual cash obligations as of
June 30, 2008 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
Due |
|
Type of Obligation |
|
Obligation |
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Term loan facility |
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-competition agreements |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
27,031 |
|
|
|
3,813 |
|
|
|
9,610 |
|
|
|
4,998 |
|
|
|
8,610 |
|
Interest expense (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
|
|
21,927 |
|
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
|
12,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan facility |
|
|
21,519 |
|
|
|
9,082 |
|
|
|
12,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
356,077 |
|
|
$ |
22,399 |
|
|
$ |
319,920 |
|
|
$ |
5,098 |
|
|
$ |
8,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest commitments are estimated using our current interest rates for the respective credit
agreements over their remaining terms. |
Letter of Credit At June 30, 2008, we had an outstanding irrevocable letter of credit in the
amount of $0.1 million which was issued under our revolving credit facility. This letter of credit
was issued to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to provide financial assurance for our
used oil handling program.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements. We do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.
Description of Our Credit Facility
On November 10, 2005, we entered into a new $225.0 million multi-bank credit facility
comprised of a $130.0 million term loan facility and a $95.0 million revolving credit facility,
which includes a $20.0 million letter of credit sub-limit. Our credit facility also includes
procedures for additional financial institutions to become revolving lenders, or for any existing
revolving lender to increase its revolving commitment, subject to a maximum of $100.0 million for
all such increases in revolving commitments of new or existing revolving lenders. Effective June
30, 2006, we increased our revolving credit facility $25.0 million resulting in a committed $120.0
million revolving credit facility. Effective December 28, 2007, we increased our revolving credit
facility $75.0 million resulting in a committed $195.0 million revolving credit facility. The
revolving credit facility is used for ongoing working capital needs and general partnership
purposes, and to finance permitted investments, acquisitions and capital expenditures. Under the
amended and restated credit facility, as of June 30, 2008, we had $155.0 million outstanding under
the revolving credit facility and $130.0 million outstanding under the term loan facility. As of
June 30, 2008, we had $39.9 million available under our revolving credit facility.
On July 14, 2005, we issued a $0.1 million irrevocable letter of credit to the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality to provide financial assurance for its used oil handling
program.
Draws made under our credit facility are normally made to fund acquisitions and for working
capital requirements. During the current fiscal year, draws on our credit facilities have ranged
from a low of $225.0 million to a high of $296.4 million. As of June 30, 2008, we had $39.9
million available for working capital, internal expansion and acquisition activities under our
credit facility.
Our obligations under the credit facility are secured by substantially all of our assets,
including, without limitation, inventory, accounts receivable, marine vessels, equipment, fixed
assets and the interests in our operating subsidiaries and equity method investees. We may prepay
all amounts outstanding under this facility at any time without penalty.
Indebtedness under the credit facility bears interest at either LIBOR plus an applicable
margin or the base prime rate plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for revolving loans
that are LIBOR loans
42
ranges from 1.50% to 3.00% and the applicable margin for revolving loans that are base prime
rate loans ranges from 0.50% to 2.00%. The applicable margin for term loans that are LIBOR loans
ranges from 2.00% to 3.00% and the applicable margin for term loans that are base prime rate loans
ranges from 1.00% to 2.00%. The applicable margin for existing borrowings is 2.00%. Effective July
1, 2008, the applicable margin for existing borrowings will remain 2.00%. As a result of our
leverage ratio test, effective October 1, 2008, the applicable margin for existing borrowings will
increase to 2.50%. We incur a commitment fee on the unused portions of the credit facility.
Effective January 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap that swaps $25.0 million of
floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 3.400% plus our applicable LIBOR borrowing
spread. This interest rate swap which matures in January, 2010 is accounted for using hedge
accounting.
Effective September 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap that swaps $25.0 million of
floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 4.605% plus our applicable LIBOR borrowing
spread. This interest rate swap which matures in September, 2010 is accounted for using hedge
accounting.
Effective November 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap that swaps $40.0 million of
floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 4.82% plus our applicable LIBOR borrowing
spread. This interest rate swap which matures in December, 2009 is accounted for using hedge
accounting.
Effective November 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap that swaps $30.0 million of
floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 4.765% plus our applicable LIBOR borrowing
spread. This interest rate swap, which matures in March, 2010, is not accounted for using hedge
accounting.
Effective March 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap that swaps $75.0 million of
floating rate to fixed rate. The fixed rate cost is 5.25% plus our applicable LIBOR borrowing
spread. This interest rate swap which matures in November, 2010 is accounted for using hedge
accounting.
In addition, the credit facility contains various covenants, which, among other things, limit
our ability to: (i) incur indebtedness; (ii) grant certain liens; (iii) merge or consolidate unless
we are the survivor; (iv) sell all or substantially all of our assets; (v) make certain
acquisitions; (vi) make certain investments; (vii) make certain capital expenditures; (viii) make
distributions other than from available cash; (ix) create obligations for some lease payments; (x)
engage in transactions with affiliates; (xi) engage in other types of business; and (xii) our joint
ventures to incur indebtedness or grant certain liens.
The credit facility also contains covenants, which, among other things, require us to maintain
specified ratios of: (i) minimum net worth (as defined in the credit facility) of $75.0 million
plus 50% of net proceeds from equity issuances after November 10, 2005; (ii) EBITDA (as defined in
the credit facility) to interest expense of not less than 3.0 to 1.0 at the end of each fiscal
quarter; (iii) total funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.75 to 1.00 for each fiscal quarter;
and (iv) total secured funded debt to EBITDA of not more than 4.00 to 1.00 for each fiscal quarter
there. We are in compliance with the debt covenants contained in the credit facility.
On November 10 of each year, commencing with November 10, 2006, we must prepay the term loans
under the credit facility with 75% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the credit facility), unless
its ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA is less than 3.00 to 1.00. No prepayments under the term
loan were required to be made through June 30, 2008. If we receive greater than $15.0 million from
the incurrence of indebtedness other than under the credit facility, we must prepay indebtedness
under the credit facility with all such proceeds in excess of $15.0 million. Any such prepayments
are first applied to the term loans under the credit facility. We must prepay revolving loans under
the credit facility with the net cash proceeds from any issuance of its equity. We must also prepay
indebtedness under the credit facility with the proceeds of certain asset dispositions. Other than
these mandatory prepayments, the credit facility requires interest only payments on a quarterly
basis until maturity. All outstanding principal and unpaid interest must be paid by November 10,
2010. The credit facility contains customary events of default, including, without limitation,
payment defaults, cross-defaults to other material indebtedness, bankruptcy-related defaults,
change of control defaults and litigation-related defaults.
As of August 4, 2008, our outstanding indebtedness includes $297.6 million under our credit
facility.
43
Seasonality
A substantial portion of our revenues are dependent on sales prices of products, particularly
NGLs and fertilizers, which fluctuate in part based on winter and spring weather conditions. The
demand for NGLs is strongest during the winter heating season. The demand for fertilizers is
strongest during the early spring planting season. However, our terminalling and storage and
marine transportation businesses and the molten sulfur business are typically not impacted by
seasonal fluctuations. We expect to derive a majority of our net income from our terminalling and
storage, marine transportation and sulfur businesses. Therefore, we do not expect that our overall
net income will be impacted by seasonality factors. However, extraordinary weather events, such as
hurricanes, have in the past, and could in the future, impact our terminalling and storage and
marine transportation businesses. For example, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in the third quarter of
2005 adversely impacted operating expenses and the four hurricanes that impacted the Gulf of Mexico
and Florida in the third quarter of 2004 adversely impacted our terminalling and storage and marine
transportation businesss revenues.
Impact of Inflation
Inflation in the United States has been relatively low in recent years and did not have a
material impact on our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
However, inflation remains a factor in the United States economy and could increase our cost to
acquire or replace property, plant and equipment as well as our labor and supply costs. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to pass along increased costs to our customers.
Increasing energy prices could adversely affect our results of operations. Diesel
fuel, natural gas, chemicals and other supplies are recorded in operating expenses. An increase in
price of these products would increase our operating expenses which could adversely affect net
income. We cannot assure you that we will be able to pass along increased operating expenses to
our customers.
Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations adopted by various
governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which these operations are conducted. We incurred
no material environmental costs, liabilities or expenditures to mitigate or eliminate environmental
contamination during the six months ended June 30, 2008 or 2007.
44
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Commodity Price Risk. Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market
rates and prices. We are exposed to market risks associated with commodity prices, counterparty
credit and interest rates. Historically, we have not engaged in commodity contract trading or
hedging activities. Under our hedging policy, we monitor and manage the commodity market risk
associated with the commodity risk exposure of Prism Gas. In addition, we are focusing on
utilizing counterparties for these transactions whose financial condition is appropriate for the
credit risk involved in each specific transaction. For the period ended June 30, 2008, changes in
the fair value of our derivative contracts were recorded both in earnings and comprehensive income
since we have designated a portion of our derivative instruments as hedges as of June 30, 2008.
We use derivatives to manage the risk of commodity price fluctuations. Our counterparties to
the commodity derivative contracts include Coral Energy Holding LP, Morgan Stanley Capital Group
Inc., Wachovia Bank and Wells Fargo Bank.
On all transactions where we are exposed to counterparty risk, we analyze the counterpartys
financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, and have established a maximum credit
limit threshold pursuant to our hedging policy and monitor the appropriateness of these limits on
an ongoing basis.
As a result of the Prism Gas acquisition, we are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations
in the prices of natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs) and condensate as a result of gathering,
processing and sales activities. Prism Gas gathering and processing revenues are earned under
various contractual arrangements with gas producers. Gathering revenues are generated through a
combination of fixed-fee and index-related arrangements. Processing revenues are generated
primarily through contracts which provide for processing on percent-of-liquids (POL) and
percent-of-proceeds (POP) basis. Prism Gas has entered into hedging transactions through 2011 to
protect a portion of its commodity exposure from these contracts. These hedging arrangements are in
the form of swaps for crude oil, natural gas, ethane, and natural gasoline.
Based on estimated volumes, as of June 30, 2008, Prism Gas had hedged approximately 67%, 47%,
22% and 16% of its commodity risk by volume for 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. We
anticipate entering into additional commodity derivatives on an ongoing basis to manage our risks
associated with these market fluctuations, and will consider using various commodity derivatives,
including forward contracts, swaps, collars, futures and options, although there is no assurance
that we will be able to do so or that the terms thereof will be similar to the our existing hedging
arrangements. In addition, we will consider derivative arrangements that include the specific NGL
products as well as natural gas and crude oil.
Hedging Arrangements in Place
As of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commodity Hedged |
|
Volume |
|
Type of Derivative |
|
Basis Reference |
2008
|
|
Condensate & Natural Gasoline
|
|
5,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($66.20)
|
|
NYMEX |
2008
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
30,000 MMBTU/Month
|
|
Natural Gas Swap ($8.12)
|
|
Houston Ship Channel |
2008
|
|
Ethane
|
|
5,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Ethane Swap ($27.30)
|
|
Mt. Belvieu |
2008
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($70.75)
|
|
NYMEX |
2008
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Natural Gasoline Swap ($86.52)
|
|
Mt. Belvieu
(Non-TET) |
2008
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Natural Gasoline Swap ($85.79)
|
|
Mt. Belvieu
(Non-TET) |
2009
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
30,000 MMBTU/Month
|
|
Natural Gas Swap (9.025)
|
|
Columbia Gulf |
2009
|
|
Condensate & Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($69.08)
|
|
NYMEX |
2009
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($70.90)
|
|
NYMEX |
2009
|
|
Condensate
|
|
1,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($70.45)
|
|
NYMEX |
2009
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
2,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Natural Gasoline Swap ($86.42)
|
|
Mt. Belvieu
(Non-TET) |
2010
|
|
Condensate
|
|
2,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($69.15)
|
|
NYMEX |
2010
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
3,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($72.25)
|
|
NYMEX |
2010
|
|
Condensate
|
|
1,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($104.80)
|
|
NYMEX |
2010
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
1,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Natural Gasoline Swap ($94.14)
|
|
Mt. Belvieu
(Non-TET) |
2011
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
2,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($99.15)
|
|
NYMEX |
2011
|
|
Condensate
|
|
1,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Crude Oil Swap ($103.80)
|
|
NYMEX |
2011
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
2,000 BBL/Month
|
|
Natural Gasoline Swap ($93.18)
|
|
NYMEX |
45
Our principal customers with respect to Prism Gas natural gas gathering and processing are
large, natural gas marketing services, oil and gas producers and industrial end-users. In addition,
substantially all of our natural gas and NGL sales are made at market-based prices. Our standard
gas and NGL sales contracts contain adequate assurance provisions which allows for the suspension
of deliveries, cancellation of agreements or discontinuance of deliveries to the buyer unless the
buyer provides security for payment in a form satisfactory to us.
Interest Rate Risk. We are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of our credit
facility, which had a weighted-average interest rate of 6.44% as of June 30, 2008. We had a total
of $285.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under our credit facility as of the date hereof of
which $90.0 million was unhedged floating rate debt. Based on the amount of unhedged floating rate
debt owed by us on June 30, 2008, the impact of a 1% increase in interest rates on this amount of
debt would result in an increase in interest expense and a corresponding decrease in net income of
approximately $0.9 million annually.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. In accordance with Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), we, under the supervision
and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our
general partner, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of our general partner concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
the end of the period covered by this report, to provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms.
In response to the material weakness disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on March 5, 2008, we have implemented new internal
control procedures to improve the effectiveness of our review of identified reconciling items on
product exchange reconciliations. These remedial actions include additional review by our internal
accounting staff and enhanced documentation related to such review.
Changes in internal controls. Except as described above, there were no other changes in our
internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
46
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are subject to certain legal proceedings claims and disputes that arise
in the ordinary course of our business. Although we cannot predict the outcomes of these legal
proceedings, we do not believe these actions, in the aggregate, will have a material adverse impact
on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
In addition to the foregoing, as a result of an inspection by the U.S. Coast Guard of our tug
Martin Explorer at the Freeport Sulfur Dock Terminal in Tampa, Florida, we have been informed that
an investigation has been commenced concerning a possible violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution
from Ships, 33 USC 1901, et. seq., and the MARPOL Protocol 73/78. In connection with this matter,
two employees of Martin Resource Management who provide services to us were served with grand jury
subpoenas during the fourth quarter of 2007. We are cooperating with the investigation and, as of
the date of this report, no formal charges, fines and/or penalties have been asserted against us.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Item 1A. Risk
Factors of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on March 5, 2008.
Please see Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with
the SEC on March 5, 2008.
Item 5. Other Information.
On May 2, 2008, we received a copy of a petition filed in the District Court of Gregg County,
Texas by Scott D. Martin (the Plaintiff) against Ruben S. Martin, III (the Defendant) with
respect to certain matters relating to Martin Resource Management Corporation (Martin Resource
Management), the parent company of Martin Midstream GP, LLC (Martin Midstream GP), our general
partner. The Plaintiff and the Defendant are directors and executive officers of both Martin
Resource Management and Martin Midstream GP. The lawsuit alleges that the Defendant breached a
settlement agreement with the Plaintiff concerning certain Martin Resource Management matters and
that the Defendant breached fiduciary duties allegedly owed to the Plaintiff in connection with
their respective ownership and other positions with Martin Resource Management. We are not a party
to the lawsuit and the lawsuit does not assert any claims (i) against us, (ii) concerning the our
governance or operations or (iii) against the Defendant with respect to his service as an officer
or director of Martin Midstream GP. The lawsuit is not expected to affect the financial condition
or operation of us or Martin Midstream GP.
Item 6. Exhibits
The information required by this Item 6 is set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying
this quarterly report and is incorporated herein by reference.
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
Martin Midstream GP LLC
Its General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 5, 2008
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Ruben S. Martin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruben S. Martin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
48
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Name |
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (the Partnership), dated June
21, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Partnerships Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No.
333-91706), filed July 1, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership, dated November 6,
2002 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Partnerships Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 19, 2002,
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership,
dated November 1, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Partnerships Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
November 2, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership,
dated effective January 1, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Partnerships Current Report on Form
8-K, filed April 7, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Martin Operating Partnership L.P. (the Operating
Partnership), dated June 21, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Partnerships Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-91706), filed July 1, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, dated November 6,
2002 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Partnerships Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 19, 2002,
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Martin Midstream GP LLC (the General Partner), dated June 21, 2002
(filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Partnerships Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-91706),
filed July 1, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of the General Partner, dated June 21, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 3.6
to the Partnerships Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 33-91706), filed July 1, 2002, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Martin Operating GP LLC (the Operating General Partner), dated June 21,
2002 (filed as Exhibit 3.7 to the Partnerships Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No.
333-91706), filed July 1, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Operating General Partner, dated June 21, 2002 (filed as
Exhibit 3.8 to the Partnerships Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-91706), filed July
1, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Unit Certificate for Common Units (contained in Exhibit 3.2). |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Specimen Unit Certificate for Subordinated Units (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 4 to the
Partnerships Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-91706), filed October 25, 2002, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
99.1*
|
|
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31, 2007 (audited) of the General Partner. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith |
49