fwp
Free Writing Prospectus
Filed Pursuant to Rule 433
Relating to Preliminary Prospectus Supplement Filed June 12, 2006
Registration Statement No. 333-132868
Zions Bancorporation
Free Writing Prospectus Dated June 13, 2006
The information in this free writing prospectus supplements the information contained in, and
should be read together with, the preliminary prospectus supplement of Zions Bancorporation filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission (the SEC) on June 12, 2006 (including the base prospectus
filed with the SEC on March 31, 2006, as well as the documents incorporated by reference therein).
On June 8, 2006, the Wall Street Journal published an article regarding Zions Bancorporation
(Zions), the full text of which is reproduced below. The information set forth in the article
was not prepared by Zions and, with the exception of the statements and acknowledgements attributed
directly to Mr. Evan Hill in the 11th and 12th paragraphs of the article,
constitutes the authors opinion, which is not necessarily endorsed or adopted by Zions. In
particular, Zions assumes no responsibility for the statements in the 10th,
13th and 15th paragraphs of the article, which were statements made by people
unrelated to Zions.
Wall Street Journal Article
Another Stab At Public Options
Zions to Register Securities With SEC That Will
Mimic Stock Awards of Employees
By Serena Ng and David Reilly
Less than a year after the Securities and Exchange Commission shot down attempts by several
companies, including computer-networking giant Cisco Systems Inc., to create market values for
employee stock options, a bank is preparing to launch a new method of valuing options that it hopes
will pass regulatory muster.
Zions Bancorp, of Salt Lake City, plans to register securities with the SEC as soon as today
that will mimic the stock options it grants to employees. The bank hopes to sell those securities
in a public auction this month, and the price fetched at that auction would become a market value
for the securities that the bank could use to determine the expense it must book for awarding
options to its employees.
Buyers of the securities receive payments from Zions when employees exercise their options.
If the options expire worthless or arent exercised by employees, holders of the securities receive
no payments and lose the entire value of their investment. Essentially, Zions is creating what
looks and feels like a so-called asset-backed security, with the underlying asset in this case
being the options. The bank expects high-net-worth individuals and sophisticated investors to buy
the securities. Among other things, these investors would be betting Zions stock will continue to
rise and thus push Zions employees options into the money.
The bank hopes the auction will produce a truerread: lowervalue for employee stock options
than would be derived from valuation methods such as Black-Scholes, the standard formula that has
been used for years. That would happen, Zions argues, because investors would take into account
factors unique to each companys employee options program that arent reflected in most pricing
models.
A lower value would of course mean a lower corresponding expense on the income statement, and
thus less of a hit to profit. The lower price would help to offset the companys cost of issuing
the options-linked securities.
The SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the rule-making body that decreed
companies starting this year must expense options, both have said companies can choose to use
formulas or market values to value options.
But there havent been any markets for trading employee stock options, which offer workers the
right, but not the obligation, to buy company stock at a preset price at a future date.
There is no guarantee the SEC will approve Zionss method, although the bank says it has
learned from earlier concerns raised by the SEC when companies tried to establish market values for
their stock options. The key: Zions will sell the securities at the highest, market-clearing
price it receives at the auction.
Previous attempts to create markets for options-based securities, such as the one considered
by Cisco, called for sales through private placements. It created a potential problem in that both
the company selling the securities and buyers had an interest in seeing the instruments priced as
low as possible.
Accounting observers say the idea of market pricing for options is good in theory but may not
work well in practice. The pitfall is that there just isnt enough of the [securities] out there
that are being traded, says Jack Ciesielski, editor of the Analysts Accounting Observer.
Zions is hoping there will be enough competition between bidders to ensure a real market
emerges. I think having it available to the public in an auction that is completely transparent
to the SECthats the only way we can go to them and say this worked, says Evan Hill, a vice
president with Zions who helped to develop the product.
Mr. Hill acknowledges that if the auction produces a price that is way below the value that
would be derived from Black-Scholes, the SEC is likely to view it skeptically. Conversely, if the
auctions result in prices that exceed Black-Scholes values, it is unlikely to be picked up and
copied by other companies.
A spokesman for Cisco says the San Jose, Calif., company continues to look for opportunities
to engage in a dialogue with the SEC on an approach that will lead to an objective, market-based
valuation to employee stock options. The company is keeping any eye on others approach, although
last year it began using a pricing formula to value employee options.
2
Ultimately, Cisco and other companies will need assurances the benefits of creating securities
to set a market value for their options is worth the extra hassle compared with the usual formulas.
Norman Strauss, an accounting professor at Baruch College in New York, says the success of the
Zionss approach and any others like it will relate to the passion with which a company feels that
option-pricing models are inherently overvaluing the price of their options.
Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this free writing prospectus contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding the timing and benefits of the
proposed transaction, expected synergies, and anticipated future financial operating performance
and results. Such statements encompass Zions beliefs, expectations, hopes or intentions regarding
future events. Words such as expects, intends, believes, anticipates, should, likely
and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements
included in this release are made as of the date hereof and are based on information available to
Zions as of such date. Zions assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement. Risk
factors, cautionary statements and other conditions which could cause actual results to differ from
managements current expectations are contained in Zions filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, including the section of Zions preliminary prospectus supplement dated June 12, 2006,
entitled Risk Factors.
Zions Bancorporation has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the SEC
(File no. 333-132868) for the offering to which this free writing prospectus relates. Before you
invest, you should read the prospectus in that registration statement and other documents the
issuer has filed with the SEC for more complete information about the issuer and this offering.
You may get these documents for free by visiting EDGAR on the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov.
Alternatively, Zions Bancorporation, any underwriter or any dealer participating in the offering
will arrange to send you the prospectus if you request it by calling toll-free 1 (800) 524-8875.
You may also get a copy at www.esoars.com.
3