e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarter ended March 31, 2011
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-892
GOODRICH CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
34-0252680 |
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
Four Coliseum Centre
|
|
28217 |
2730 West Tyvola Road
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Charlotte, North Carolina |
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (704) 423-7000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o
No þ
At March 31, 2011, there were 124,870,523 shares of common stock outstanding (excluding 14,000,000
shares held by wholly owned subsidiary). There is only one class of common stock.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Goodrich Corporation as of March 31,
2011, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Goodrich Corporation as of
December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and
cash flows for the year then ended, not presented herein; and in our report dated February 15,
2011, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2010, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated
balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
April 21, 2011
2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per |
|
|
|
share amounts) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,895.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,695.2 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
1,310.5 |
|
|
|
1,204.3 |
|
Selling and administrative costs |
|
|
285.1 |
|
|
|
269.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,595.6 |
|
|
|
1,474.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
300.3 |
|
|
|
221.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
|
|
(33.5 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other income (expense) net |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
260.2 |
|
|
|
181.2 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(63.6 |
) |
|
|
(68.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations |
|
|
196.6 |
|
|
|
112.6 |
|
Income from discontinued operations net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Net Income |
|
|
196.6 |
|
|
|
113.8 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Goodrich |
|
$ |
194.8 |
|
|
$ |
111.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Goodrich: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
194.8 |
|
|
$ |
110.0 |
|
Income from discontinued operations net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Goodrich |
|
$ |
194.8 |
|
|
$ |
111.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share attributable to Goodrich: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Goodrich |
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Attributable to Goodrich |
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Declared Per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, |
|
|
|
except share amounts) |
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
811.1 |
|
|
$ |
798.9 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, less allowances for doubtful receivables
($16 at March 31, 2011 and $16.8 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
1,267.7 |
|
|
|
1,102.7 |
|
Inventories net |
|
|
2,564.5 |
|
|
|
2,449.4 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
162.5 |
|
|
|
158.3 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
85.4 |
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
4,898.7 |
|
|
|
4,671.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation
($1,902.7 at March 31, 2011 and $1,843.9 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
1,477.5 |
|
|
|
1,521.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,773.5 |
|
|
|
1,762.2 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets net |
|
|
672.5 |
|
|
|
675.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
758.4 |
|
|
|
624.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
9,597.4 |
|
|
$ |
9,271.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
647.8 |
|
|
|
514.0 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
980.4 |
|
|
|
1,041.8 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
1,693.6 |
|
|
|
1,592.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
2,352.7 |
|
|
|
2,352.8 |
|
Pension obligations |
|
|
525.7 |
|
|
|
556.7 |
|
Postretirement benefits other than pensions |
|
|
295.1 |
|
|
|
296.9 |
|
Long-term income taxes payable |
|
|
136.0 |
|
|
|
150.7 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
460.3 |
|
|
|
431.2 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
514.1 |
|
|
|
503.1 |
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $5 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 200,000,000 shares; issued 149,233,822 shares at
March 31, 2011 and 148,213,331 shares at December 31, 2010
(excluding 14,000,000 shares held by a wholly owned subsidiary) |
|
|
746.2 |
|
|
|
741.1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,798.4 |
|
|
|
1,751.2 |
|
Income retained in the business |
|
|
2,685.1 |
|
|
|
2,527.2 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(558.7 |
) |
|
|
(676.1 |
) |
Common stock held in treasury, at cost (24,363,299 shares at
March 31, 2011 and 23,259,865 shares at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
(1,093.1 |
) |
|
|
(996.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
3,577.9 |
|
|
|
3,346.9 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
3,619.9 |
|
|
|
3,387.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities And Equity |
|
$ |
9,597.4 |
|
|
$ |
9,271.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income |
|
$ |
196.6 |
|
|
$ |
113.8 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Pension and postretirement benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
Contributions and benefit payments |
|
|
(75.4 |
) |
|
|
(112.7 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
67.1 |
|
Excess tax benefits related to share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(157.3 |
) |
|
|
(100.5 |
) |
Inventories, net of pre-production and excess-over-average |
|
|
(41.0 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
Pre-production and excess-over-average inventories |
|
|
(55.8 |
) |
|
|
(50.3 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
90.5 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(68.3 |
) |
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
Income taxes payable/receivable |
|
|
105.8 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities |
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Payments received (made) in connection with acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and advances to equity investees |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities |
|
|
(27.7 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in short-term debt, net |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Proceeds (repayments) of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(96.6 |
) |
|
|
(42.8 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(34.1 |
) |
Excess tax benefits related to share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities |
|
|
(61.8 |
) |
|
|
(33.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
(32.6 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
798.9 |
|
|
|
811.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
811.1 |
|
|
$ |
778.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
5
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1. Basis of Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Goodrich Corporation and
its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not
include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States for complete financial statements. Unless indicated otherwise or the context
requires, the terms we, our, us, Goodrich or Company refer to Goodrich Corporation and
its subsidiaries. The Company believes that all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain amounts in prior
year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be achieved for the twelve months ending December 31, 2011. Unless otherwise
noted, disclosures pertain to the Companys continuing operations. For further information, refer
to the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect amounts recognized. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed and updated
regularly as new information becomes available. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, the Company changed its estimates of revenues and costs on certain long-term contracts
primarily in its aerostructures and aircraft wheels and brakes businesses. The changes in estimates
increased income from continuing operations before income taxes during the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010 by $20.7 million and $16 million ($13.1 million and $10 million after tax, or
$0.10 and $0.08 per diluted share, respectively). These changes were primarily related to favorable
cost and operational performance, changes in volume expectations and sales pricing improvements and
finalization of contract terms on current and/or follow-on contracts.
Accrued Expenses. Accrued expenses consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
$ |
327.1 |
|
|
$ |
274.9 |
|
Wages, vacations, pensions and other employment costs |
|
|
223.5 |
|
|
|
313.2 |
|
Warranties |
|
|
95.3 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
Postretirement benefits other than pensions |
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
Accrued taxes |
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Foreign currency hedges |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
253.5 |
|
|
|
280.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
980.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,041.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Note 2. New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
As of March 31, 2011, there were no new standards applicable to the Company that have not yet been
adopted.
Note 3. Business Segment Information
The Companys business segments are as follows:
|
|
|
The Actuation and Landing Systems segment provides systems, components and related
services pertaining to aircraft taxi, take-off, flight control, landing and stopping, and
engine components, including fuel delivery systems and rotating assemblies. |
|
|
|
|
The Nacelles and Interior Systems segment produces products and provides maintenance,
repair and overhaul services associated with aircraft engines, including thrust reversers,
cowlings, nozzles and their components, and aircraft interior products, including slides,
seats, cargo and lighting systems. |
|
|
|
|
The Electronic Systems segment produces a wide array of systems and components that
provide flight performance measurements, flight management, fuel controls, electrical
systems, control and safety data, reconnaissance and surveillance systems and precision
guidance systems. |
7
The Company measures each reporting segments profit based upon operating income. Accordingly, the
Company does not allocate net interest expense, other income (expense) net and income taxes to
its reporting segments. The company-wide Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) costs that are not
directly associated with a specific business were not allocated to the segments. The accounting
policies of the reportable segments are the same as those for the Companys condensed consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuation and Landing Systems |
|
$ |
684.3 |
|
|
$ |
613.1 |
|
Nacelles and Interior Systems |
|
|
656.4 |
|
|
|
555.8 |
|
Electronic Systems |
|
|
555.2 |
|
|
|
526.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,895.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,695.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuation and Landing Systems |
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
Nacelles and Interior Systems |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Electronic Systems |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23.5 |
|
|
$ |
15.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuation and Landing Systems |
|
$ |
86.5 |
|
|
$ |
69.4 |
|
Nacelles and Interior Systems |
|
|
157.3 |
|
|
|
118.8 |
|
Electronic Systems |
|
|
91.0 |
|
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334.8 |
|
|
|
259.0 |
|
Corporate general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(30.9 |
) |
|
|
(33.9 |
) |
ERP costs |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
300.3 |
|
|
$ |
221.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Other Income (Expense) Net
Other Income (Expense) Net consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Retiree health care expenses related to previously owned businesses |
|
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
Expenses related to previously owned businesses |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Equity in affiliated companies |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) net |
|
$ |
(5.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Note 5. Share-Based Compensation
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company expensed share-based
compensation awards under the Goodrich Equity Compensation Plan and the Goodrich Corporation 2008
Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan for employees and under the Outside Director Deferral and
Outside Director Phantom Share plans for non-employee directors. A detailed description of the
awards under these plans is included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
The compensation cost recorded for share-based compensation plans during the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $17.9 million and $18.2 million, respectively.
Grants
A summary of the Companys grants during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and the
weighted-average fair value per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
Performance Units |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
Shares |
|
Fair Value Per Share |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value Per Share |
|
Units |
|
Fair Value Per Unit |
733,400 |
|
$ |
28.35 |
|
|
|
497,950 |
|
|
$ |
88.64 |
|
|
|
140,600 |
|
|
$ |
102.67 |
|
The grant date fair value for the stock options with the three-year service condition was
estimated under the Black-Scholes-Merton formula using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Risk-free interest rate (%) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Expected dividend yield (%) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Historical volatility factor (%) |
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
Weighted-average expected life of the options (years) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued
There were 236,855 and 406,778 shares of common stock issued during the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Employee contributions of $13.2 million and $12.3 million during
the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were used to purchase the Companys stock
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
9
Note 6. Earnings Per Share
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) for income from continuing operations
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except per |
|
|
|
share amounts) |
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted EPS income from continuing operations attributable to Goodrich |
|
$ |
194.8 |
|
|
$ |
110.0 |
|
Percentage allocated to common shareholders (1) |
|
|
98.6 |
% |
|
|
98.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted EPS |
|
$ |
192.1 |
|
|
$ |
108.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic EPS weighted-average shares |
|
|
125.3 |
|
|
|
125.0 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options, employee stock purchase plan and other deferred compensation shares |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted EPS adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversion |
|
|
126.4 |
|
|
|
126.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
125.3 |
|
|
|
125.0 |
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding and unvested restricted share units
expected to vest |
|
|
127.0 |
|
|
|
126.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage allocated to common shareholders |
|
|
98.6 |
% |
|
|
98.6 |
% |
The Companys unvested restricted share units contain rights to receive nonforfeitable
dividend equivalents, and thus, are participating securities requiring the two-class method of
computing EPS. The calculation of EPS for common stock shown above excludes the income attributable
to the unvested restricted share units from the numerator and excludes the dilutive impact of those
units from the denominator.
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had 3.6 million and 4.7 million, respectively, of
outstanding stock options. Stock options are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation
using the treasury stock method, unless the effect of including the stock options would be
anti-dilutive. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, 0.7 million and 1.6 million
anti-dilutive stock options, respectively, were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company issued 1 million and 1.5
million, respectively, of shares of common stock pursuant to stock option exercises and other
share-based compensation plans.
The Companys share repurchase program was approved by the Board of Directors for $1.1 billion in
total. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company repurchased 0.9 million
and 0.5 million shares, respectively. From inception of the program through March 31, 2011, the
Company has repurchased 9.8 million shares for approximately $618 million under its share
repurchase program.
10
Note 7. Fair Value Measurements
The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer
a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability
in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The following three
levels of inputs are used to measure fair value:
|
Level 1 |
|
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and
liabilities. |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data available, which
require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. |
The Companys financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis were,
in millions, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2010 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
Cash Equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
207.6 |
|
|
$ |
207.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
596.2 |
|
|
$ |
596.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges |
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Forward Contracts |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Rabbi Trust Assets (3) |
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (4) |
|
|
(2,559.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,559.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,531.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,531.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Because of their short maturities, the carrying value of these
assets approximates fair value. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 17, Derivatives and Hedging Activities. Estimates of
the fair value of the derivative financial instruments represent
the Companys best estimates based on its valuation models, which
incorporate industry data and trends and relevant market rates
and transactions. |
|
(3) |
|
Rabbi trust assets include mutual funds and cash equivalents for
payment of certain non-qualified benefits for retired, terminated
and active employees. The fair value of these assets was based on
quoted market prices. |
|
(4) |
|
The carrying amount of the Companys long-term debt was $2,339.7
million and $2,339.6 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. The fair value of long-term debt is based on
quoted market prices or on rates available to the Company for
debt with similar terms and maturities. |
11
Note 8. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Average or actual cost (which approximates current costs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished products |
|
$ |
223.8 |
|
|
$ |
224.4 |
|
In-process |
|
|
1,977.1 |
|
|
|
1,866.1 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
|
710.2 |
|
|
|
692.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,911.1 |
|
|
|
2,783.3 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve to reduce certain inventories to LIFO basis |
|
|
(53.2 |
) |
|
|
(52.7 |
) |
Progress payments and advances |
|
|
(293.4 |
) |
|
|
(281.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,564.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,449.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process inventory included $1,224 million and $1,154.2 million at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, for the following: (1) pre-production and excess-over-average
inventory accounted for under long-term contract accounting; and (2) engineering costs recoverable
under long-term contractual arrangements. The March 31, 2011 balance of $1,224 million included
$604.2 million related to the Boeing 787, $252.7 million related to the Airbus A350 XWB and $186.9
million related to the Pratt and Whitney PurePower® PW 1000G engine contracts.
The Company uses the last-in, first-out (LIFO) cost method of valuing inventory for certain of the
Companys legacy aerospace manufacturing businesses, primarily the aircraft wheels and brakes
business in the Actuation and Landing Systems segment. An actual valuation of inventory under the
LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at
that time.
Progress payments and advances represent (1) non-refundable payments for work-in-process and (2)
cash received from government customers where the government has legal title to the
work-in-process.
Note 9. Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Business |
|
|
Translation/ |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Combinations |
|
|
Other |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Actuation and Landing Systems |
|
$ |
327.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
333.9 |
|
Nacelles and Interior Systems(1) |
|
|
591.6 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
593.7 |
|
Electronic Systems |
|
|
842.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
845.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,762.2 |
|
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,773.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On September 22, 2010, the Company acquired the cabin management
assets of DeCrane Holdings Co. In the three months ended March
31, 2011, the Company finalized the purchase price which resulted
in a decrease in goodwill. |
12
Note 10. Financing Arrangements
The Company has a $500 million committed global syndicated revolving credit facility, which expires
in May 2012. Interest rates under this facility vary depending upon:
|
|
|
The amount borrowed; |
|
|
|
|
The Companys public debt rating by Standard & Poors, Moodys and Fitch; and |
|
|
|
|
At the Companys option, rates tied to the agent banks prime rate or, for U.S. Dollar
and Great Britain Pounds Sterling borrowings, the London Interbank Offered Rate and for
Euro Dollar borrowings, the Euro Interbank Offered Rate. |
At March 31, 2011, there were no borrowings and $62.7 million in letters of credit outstanding
under the facility. At December 31, 2010, there were no borrowings and $62.5 million in letters of
credit outstanding under the facility. The level of unused borrowing capacity varies from time to
time depending, in part, upon the Companys compliance with financial and other covenants set forth
in the related agreement, including the consolidated net worth requirement and maximum leverage
ratio. The Company is currently in compliance with all such covenants. Under the most restrictive
of these covenants, $2,090 million of income retained in the business and additional paid-in
capital was free from such limitations at March 31, 2011. At March 31, 2011, the Company had
borrowing capacity under this facility of $437.3 million, after reductions for letters of credit
outstanding under the facility.
At March 31, 2011, the Company also maintained $75 million of uncommitted U.S. working capital
facilities and $156.8 million of uncommitted and committed foreign working capital facilities with
various banks to meet short-term borrowing requirements. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
there were $5.1 million and $4.1 million, respectively, in borrowings and $23 million in letters of
credit and bank guarantees outstanding under these facilities. These credit facilities are provided
by a small number of commercial banks that also provide the Company with committed credit through
the syndicated revolving credit facility described above and with various cash management, trust
and other services.
At March 31, 2011, the Company had letters of credit and bank guarantees of $123 million, inclusive
of letters of credit outstanding under the Companys syndicated revolving credit facility,
uncommitted U.S. working capital facilities and uncommitted and committed foreign working capital
facilities, as discussed above.
13
Long-term Debt
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, excluding current maturities, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Medium-term notes payable (interest rates from 6.8% to 8.7%) |
|
$ |
398.9 |
|
|
$ |
398.9 |
|
6.29% senior notes, maturing in 2016 |
|
|
294.8 |
|
|
|
295.0 |
|
6.125% senior notes, maturing in 2019 |
|
|
298.2 |
|
|
|
298.1 |
|
4.875% senior notes, maturing in 2020 |
|
|
299.4 |
|
|
|
299.4 |
|
3.6% senior notes, maturing in 2021 |
|
|
598.8 |
|
|
|
598.8 |
|
6.80% senior notes, maturing in 2036 |
|
|
233.9 |
|
|
|
233.7 |
|
7.0% senior notes, maturing in 2038 |
|
|
199.2 |
|
|
|
199.2 |
|
Other debt, maturing through 2020 (interest rates from 0.3% to 4.5%) |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,339.7 |
|
|
|
2,339.6 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,352.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,352.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Commitments
The Company leases certain of its office and manufacturing facilities, machinery and equipment and
corporate aircraft under various committed lease arrangements provided by financial institutions.
Future minimum lease payments under operating leases were $214.5 million at March 31, 2011.
Note 11. Pensions and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
Pensions
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost and the weighted-average
assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost. The net periodic benefit cost for
divested or discontinued operations retained by the Company is included in the amounts below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
|
U.K. Plans |
|
|
Other Plans |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(52.6 |
) |
|
|
(45.9 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost (income) |
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination benefit charge |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
The following table provides the weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net
periodic benefit cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
U.K. Plans |
|
Other Plans |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Discount rate |
|
|
5.67 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.81 |
% |
|
|
5.88 |
% |
|
|
5.19 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
Expected long-term rate of
return on assets |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
8.08 |
% |
|
|
8.32 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
|
3.38 |
% |
We generally amortize the actuarial gains and losses for our pension plans over the average
future service period of the active participants. However, in 2011, we are amortizing the
actuarial losses in our U.S. salaried plan over the remaining life of the inactive plan
participants since almost all of the plan participants are now inactive. This results in a
reduction in the amortization of actuarial losses from 2010 in the
U.S. salaried plan.
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost other
than pensions. Other postretirement benefits related to the divested and discontinued operations
retained by the Company are included in the amounts below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the assumptions used to determine the net periodic postretirement
benefit cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Discount rate |
|
|
5.29 |
% |
|
|
5.55 |
% |
Healthcare trend rate |
|
7.5% in 2011 to 5% in 2017 |
|
7.3% in 2010 to 5% in 2015 |
Note 12. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Net income attributable to Goodrich |
|
$ |
194.8 |
|
|
$ |
111.2 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during the period |
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
(53.3 |
) |
Pension/OPEB liability adjustments during the period, net of tax for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 of ($5.7) and ($13.1), respectively |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010 of ($22.7) and $18, respectively |
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
Less: Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
312.2 |
|
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Cumulative unrealized foreign currency translation gains, net of deferred
taxes of $1.7 and $1.7, respectively |
|
$ |
200.2 |
|
|
$ |
139.6 |
|
Pension/OPEB liability adjustments, net of deferred taxes of $489.4 and $495.1,
respectively |
|
|
(822.7 |
) |
|
|
(831.5 |
) |
Accumulated gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of deferred taxes of $27.3
and $4.6, respectively |
|
|
63.8 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
(558.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(676.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13. Noncontrolling Interests
The changes in the Companys noncontrolling interests were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
|
$ |
46.6 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
42.0 |
|
|
$ |
48.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14. Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was 24.4%. Significant
items that impacted the Companys effective tax rate as compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate
of 35% included a tax settlement with the IRS for the remaining unresolved issue for tax years
prior to 2000 which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 8 percentage points, earnings
in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates different from the statutory U.S. federal rate which
reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 2 percentage points, foreign and domestic tax
credits and benefits related to domestic manufacturing which reduced the effective tax rate by
approximately 4 percentage points, state income taxes (net of related federal tax benefit) which
increased the effective tax rate by approximately 1 percentage point and adjustments to reserves
for tax contingencies, including interest thereon (net of related tax benefit), which increased the
effective tax rate by approximately 1 percentage point.
16
The Companys effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was 37.9%. A significant
item impacting the Companys effective tax rate as compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of
35% was a charge of approximately $10 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 due to the
passage of health care reform legislation, which increased the effective tax rate by approximately
6 percentage points. Other items that impacted the effective tax rate included foreign and domestic
tax credits and benefits related to domestic manufacturing which reduced the effective tax rate by
approximately 4 percentage points, earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates different from
the statutory U.S. federal rate which reduced the effective tax rate by approximately 3 percentage
points, deemed repatriation of non-U.S. earnings which increased the effective tax rate by
approximately 2 percentage points, adjustments to reserves for tax contingencies, including
interest thereon (net of related tax benefit), which increased the effective tax rate by
approximately 1 percentage point and state income taxes (net of related tax benefit) which
increased the effective tax rate by approximately 2 percentage points.
At
March 31, 2011, the Company had $150.3 million of
unrecognized tax benefits; however, the total amount
of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would have affected the effective tax rate was $193.9
million. The difference relates to the impact of indirect effects including the federal benefit of
state taxes and interest and penalties net of any related federal benefit as well as temporary
differences which do not affect the effective tax rate. The Company reported interest and penalties
related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
At
December 31, 2010, the Company had $147.1 million of
unrecognized tax benefits; however, the total
amount of unrecognized benefits that, if recognized, would have affected the effective tax rate was
$203.9 million. The difference relates to the impact of indirect effects including the federal
benefit of state taxes and interest and penalties net of any related federal benefit as well as
temporary differences which do not affect the effective tax rate.
Note 15. Contingencies
General
There are various pending or threatened claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings against the
Company or its subsidiaries, arising from the ordinary course of business which seek remedies or
damages. Although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of these matters,
the Company believes that any liability that may finally be determined with respect to commercial
and non-asbestos product liability claims should not have a material effect on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Legal costs are expensed as incurred.
17
Environmental
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations which may require that the Company
investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites associated
with past and present operations. At certain sites, the Company has been identified as a
potentially responsible party under the federal Superfund laws and comparable state laws. The
Company is currently involved in the investigation and remediation of a number of sites under
applicable laws.
Estimates of the Companys environmental liabilities are based on current facts, laws, regulations
and technology. These estimates take into consideration the Companys prior experience and
professional judgment of the Companys environmental specialists. Estimates of the Companys
environmental liabilities are further subject to uncertainties regarding the nature and extent of
site contamination, the range of remediation alternatives available, evolving remediation
standards, imprecise engineering evaluations and cost estimates, the extent of corrective actions
that may be required and the number and financial condition of other potentially responsible
parties, as well as the extent of their responsibility for the remediation.
Accordingly, as investigation and remediation proceed, it is likely that adjustments in the
Companys accruals will be necessary to reflect new information. The amounts of any such
adjustments could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations or cash
flows in a given period. Based on currently available information, however, the Company does not
believe that future environmental costs in excess of those accrued with respect to sites for which
the Company has been identified as a potentially responsible party are likely to have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition.
Environmental liabilities are recorded when the liability is probable and the costs are reasonably
estimable, which generally is not later than at completion of a feasibility study or when the
Company has recommended a remedy or has committed to an appropriate plan of action. The liabilities
are reviewed periodically and, as investigation and remediation proceed, adjustments are made as
necessary. Liabilities for losses from environmental remediation obligations do not consider the
effects of inflation and anticipated expenditures are not discounted to their present value. The
liabilities are not reduced by possible recoveries from insurance carriers or other third parties,
but do reflect anticipated allocations among potentially responsible parties at federal Superfund
sites or similar state-managed sites, third party indemnity obligations or contractual obligations,
and an assessment of the likelihood that such parties will fulfill their obligations at such sites.
18
The Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet included an accrued liability for environmental
remediation obligations of $69.3 million and $67.7 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $18.1 million and $14.6 million,
respectively, of the accrued liability for environmental remediation were included in current
liabilities as accrued expenses. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $30.2 million and $27.3
million, respectively, was associated with ongoing operations and $39.1 million and $40.4 million,
respectively, was associated with previously owned businesses.
The Company expects that it will expend present accruals over many years, and will generally
complete remediation in less than 30 years at sites for which it has been identified as a
potentially responsible party. This period includes operation and monitoring costs that are
generally incurred over 15 to 25 years.
Certain states in the U.S. and countries globally are promulgating or proposing new or more
demanding regulations or legislation impacting the use of various chemical substances by all
companies. The Company continues to evaluate the potential impact, if any, of complying with such
regulations and legislation.
Asbestos
The Company and some of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various actions by
plaintiffs alleging damages as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers in products or at formerly
owned facilities. The Company believes that pending and reasonably anticipated future actions are
not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows. There can be no assurance, however, that future legislative or other
developments will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and
cash flows in a given period.
Insurance Coverage
The Company maintains a comprehensive portfolio of insurance policies, including aviation products
liability insurance which covers most of its products. The aviation products liability insurance
typically provides first dollar coverage for defense and indemnity of third party claims.
19
A portion of the Companys primary and excess layers of pre-1986 insurance coverage for third party
claims, primarily related to certain long-tail toxic tort and environmental claims, was provided by
certain insurance carriers who are either insolvent, undergoing solvent schemes of arrangement or
in run-off. The Company has entered into settlement agreements with a number of these insurers
pursuant to which the Company agreed to give up its rights with respect to certain insurance
policies in exchange for negotiated payments. These settlements represent negotiated payments for
the Companys loss of insurance coverage, as it no longer has this insurance available for claims
that may have qualified for coverage. The portion of these payments which related to recovery of
past costs (recognized as expense in prior periods) or for which there are currently no anticipated
future claims is recognized in income when the payments are received. The portion related to
potential future claims is recorded as deferred settlement credits on the balance sheet.
The deferred settlement credits partially offset future costs related to insurable claims utilizing
a systematic and consistent approach. The recognition of the deferred settlement credits is
calculated utilizing the estimated percent of costs incurred in the current period that insurance
companies would have reimbursed to the Company if insurance coverage were still in place. This
approach utilizes historical claims and insurance information of the Company and is reviewed and
updated at least annually.
A summary of the deferred settlement credits activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011, in
millions, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
48.6 |
|
Proceeds from insurance settlements |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Amounts recorded as reduction of costs |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
47.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
At
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $6 million and
$5.7 million, respectively, of the deferred settlement credits was reported in
accrued expenses and $41.5 million and $42.9 million, respectively, was reported in other
non-current liabilities. It is not practical to estimate when the remaining deferred settlement
credits are expected to be recognized. The proceeds from such insurance settlements were reported
as a component of net cash provided by operating activities in the period payments were received.
Liabilities of Divested Businesses
In connection with the divestiture of the Companys tire, vinyl and other businesses, the Company
has received contractual rights of indemnification from third parties for environmental and other
claims arising out of the divested businesses. Failure of these third parties to honor their
indemnification obligations could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
20
Aerostructures Long-term Contracts
The Companys aerostructures business in the Nacelles and Interior Systems segment has several
long-term contracts in the pre-production phase including the Airbus A350 XWB, the A320neo and the
Pratt and Whitney PurePower®
PW 1000G engine contracts, and in the early production phase,
including the Boeing 787. These contracts are accounted for in accordance with long-term
construction contract accounting.
The pre-production phase includes design of the product to meet customer specifications as well as
design of the processes to manufacture the product. Also involved in this phase is securing the
supply of material and subcomponents produced by third party suppliers, generally accomplished
through long-term supply agreements.
Contracts in the early production phase include excess-over-average inventories, which represent
the excess of current manufactured cost over the estimated average manufactured cost during the
life of the contract.
Cost estimates over the lives of contracts are affected by estimates of future cost reductions
including learning curve efficiencies. Because these contracts cover manufacturing periods of up to
20 years or more, there is risk associated with the estimates of future costs made during the
pre-production and early production phases. These estimates may be different from actual costs due
to various risk factors, including the following:
|
|
|
Ability to recover costs incurred for change orders and claims; |
|
|
|
|
Costs, including material and labor costs and related escalation; |
|
|
|
|
Labor improvements due to the learning curve experience; |
|
|
|
|
Anticipated cost and/or productivity improvements, including overhead absorption,
related to new, or changes to, manufacturing methods and processes; |
|
|
|
|
Supplier pricing, including escalation where applicable, potential supplier claims, the
suppliers financial viability and the suppliers ability to perform; |
|
|
|
|
The cost impact of product design changes that frequently occur during the flight test
and certification phases of a program; and |
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange fluctuations. |
21
Additionally, total contract revenue is based on estimates of future units to be delivered to the
customer, the ability to recover costs incurred for change orders and claims and sales price
escalation, where applicable. There is a risk that there could be differences between the actual
units delivered and the estimated total units to be delivered under the contract and differences in
actual revenues compared to estimates. Changes in estimates could have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations and cash flows.
Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are recorded in the period such losses are
determined to the extent total estimated costs exceed total estimated contract revenues.
Aerostructures 787 Contract with Boeing
During 2004, the Companys Aerostructures business entered into a long-term contract with Boeing on
the 787 program. The Companys latest outlook estimates original equipment sales in excess of $5
billion for this contract. Aftermarket sales associated with this program are not accounted for
using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting.
This program is in the pre-production phase, with entry into service expected in the second half of
2011 followed by rapidly increasing production rates shortly thereafter. For this contract to
remain profitable, it will be important that assumptions are realized as currently estimated in the
Companys outlook, such as:
|
|
|
Supplier pricing consistent with projected costs must be negotiated for portions of the
product. These prices could be impacted by design changes, changes in material costs and
availability of reliable suppliers in competitive cost countries; |
|
|
|
|
New automated equipment is being utilized to manufacture the 787 composite nacelle,
which is expected to reduce costs significantly during the contract period; |
|
|
|
|
Nacelle product design changes continue to occur to improve product performance, reduce
weight and lower cost. The Company expects that some of the costs for these changes will be
recoverable from Boeing and also expects to have success on its various cost reduction
initiatives; and |
|
|
|
|
Material and overhead cost escalation and inflation
assumptions could be different than estimated. |
While the Company continues to believe the contract will be profitable, it is important to note
that changes to any of the current cost and/or revenue assumptions will have a significant impact
on the overall profitability of the contract and could have a material impact on the Companys
results of operations in the period identified. From a sensitivity
perspective, a 1% change in the Companys estimate of recurring costs would change its estimate of total
costs over the contract by approximately $50 million.
22
All of the risk factors listed in Aerostructures Long-term Contracts above could also affect the
Companys outlook of profitability on this contract.
JSTARS Program
In 2002, Seven Q Seven, Ltd. (7Q7) was selected by Northrop Grumman Corporation to provide
propulsion pods for the re-engine program for the JT3D engines used by the U.S. Air Force. The
Company was selected by 7Q7 as a supplier for the inlet, thrust reverser, exhaust, EBU, strut
systems and wing interface systems. As of March 31, 2011, the Company has $20.1 million (net of
advances of $11.1 million) of pre-production costs and inventory related to this program.
Future program funding remains uncertain and there can be no assurance of such funding. If the
program were to be cancelled, the Company would recognize an impairment.
Tax
The Company is continuously undergoing examination by the IRS as well as various state and foreign
jurisdictions. The IRS and other taxing authorities routinely challenge certain deductions and
credits reported by the Company on its income tax returns. See Note 14, Income Taxes, for
additional detail.
Tax Years 2007 and 2008
In January 2011, the IRS issued a Revenue Agents Report (RAR) for the tax years 2007 and 2008. In
February 2011, the Company submitted a protest to the Appeals Division of the IRS with respect to
certain unresolved issues which involve the proper timing of deductions. Although it is reasonably
possible that these matters could be resolved during the next 12 months, the timing or ultimate
outcome is uncertain.
Tax Years 2005 and 2006
During 2009, the IRS issued a RAR for the tax years 2005 and 2006. In July 2009, the Company
submitted a protest to the Appeals Division of the IRS with respect to certain unresolved issues
which involve the proper timing of deductions. Although it is reasonably possible that these
matters could be resolved during the next 12 months, the timing or ultimate outcome is uncertain.
23
Tax Years 2000 to 2004
During 2007, the IRS and the Company reached agreement on substantially all of the issues raised
with respect to the examination of taxable years 2000 to 2004. The Company submitted a protest to
the Appeals Division of the IRS with respect to the remaining unresolved issues which involve the
proper timing of certain deductions. The Company and the IRS were unable to reach agreement on the
remaining issues. In December 2009, the Company filed a petition in the U.S. Tax Court and in March
2010 the Company also filed a complaint in the Federal District Court. The Company believes the
amount of the estimated tax liability if the IRS were to prevail is fully reserved. The Company
cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of a final resolution of the remaining unresolved
issues.
Tax Years Prior to 2000
The previous examination cycle included the consolidated income tax groups for the audit periods
identified below:
|
|
|
Coltec Industries Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
December, 1997 July, 1999 (through date of acquisition) |
Goodrich Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
1998 1999 (including Rohr, Inc. (Rohr) and Coltec) |
The IRS and the Company previously reached final settlement on all but one of the issues
raised in this examination cycle. The Company received statutory notices of deficiency dated June
14, 2007 related to the remaining unresolved issue which involves the proper timing of certain
deductions. The Company filed a petition with the U.S. Tax Court in September 2007 to contest the
notices of deficiency.
In December 2010, the Company reached a tentative agreement with the IRS to settle the remaining
unresolved issue but due to the size of the potential refund, the agreement required approval by
the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT). In January 2011, the JCT approved the terms of the
settlement agreement. In March 2011, the U.S. Tax Court accepted the terms of the settlement
agreement and agreed to the litigants request to dismiss the matter. The Company recognized a tax
benefit of approximately $21 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Rohr was examined by the State of California for the tax years ended July 31, 1985, 1986 and 1987.
The State of California disallowed certain expenses incurred by one of Rohrs subsidiaries in
connection with the lease of certain tangible property. Californias Franchise Tax Board held that
the deductions associated with the leased equipment were non-business deductions. In addition,
California audited our amended tax returns filed to reflect the changes resulting from the
settlement of the U.S. Tax Court for Rohrs tax years 1986 to
1997. California issued an assessment
based on numerous issues including proper timing of deductions and allowance of tax credits. In
October 2010, a comprehensive settlement was reached with the California Tax Board addressing all
issues for tax years 1985 through 2001. The Company recognized a tax benefit of approximately $23
million in the three months ended December 31, 2010.
24
Note 16. Guarantees
The Company extends financial and product performance guarantees to third parties. At March 31,
2011, the following environmental remediation and indemnification and financial guarantees were
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
Carrying |
|
|
Potential |
|
Amount of |
|
|
Payment |
|
Liability |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
Environmental remediation and other indemnifications (Note 15, Contingencies) |
|
No Limit |
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
Guarantees of residual value on leases |
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Guarantees of JV debt and other financial instruments |
|
$ |
41.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The Company has guarantees of residual values on certain lease obligations in which the
Company is obligated to either purchase or remarket the assets at the end of the lease term.
The Company is guarantor on a revolving credit agreement totaling £35 million between Rolls-Royce
Goodrich Engine Control Systems Limited (JV) and a financial institution. In addition, the Company
guarantees the JVs foreign exchange credit line with a notional amount of $154.9 million and a
fair value asset of $5 million at March 31, 2011. The Company is indemnified by Rolls-Royce for 50%
of the gains/losses resulting from the foreign exchange hedges.
Service and Product Warranties
The Company provides service and warranty policies on certain of its products. The Company accrues
liabilities under service and warranty policies based upon specific claims and a review of
historical warranty and service claim experience. Adjustments are made to accruals as claim data
and historical experience change. In addition, the Company incurs discretionary costs to service
its products in connection with product performance issues.
The changes in the carrying amount of service and product warranties for the three months ended
March 31, 2011, in millions, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
148.5 |
|
Net provisions for warranties issued during the period |
|
|
15.2 |
|
Net change to warranties existing at the beginning of the year |
|
|
0.7 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
Foreign currency translation and other |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
155.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
25
The current and long-term portions of service and product warranties were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
$ |
95.2 |
|
|
$ |
90.0 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
59.9 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
155.1 |
|
|
$ |
148.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 17. Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company has subsidiaries that conduct a substantial portion of their business in Great Britain
Pounds Sterling, Euros, Canadian Dollars, Indian Rupees and Polish Zlotys but have significant
sales contracts that are denominated primarily in U.S. Dollars. Periodically, the Company enters
into forward contracts to exchange U.S. Dollars for these currencies to hedge a portion of the
Companys exposure from U.S. Dollar sales.
The forward contracts described above are used to mitigate the potential volatility to earnings and
cash flow arising from changes in currency exchange rates that impact the Companys U.S. Dollar
sales for certain foreign operations. The forward contracts are accounted for as cash flow hedges
and are recorded in the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheet at fair value, with the
offset reflected in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI), net of deferred taxes. The gain
or loss on the forward contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss)
(OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged
transactions affect earnings. The notional value of the forward contracts at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 was $2,213.7 million and $2,286.5 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the total fair value before taxes of the Companys forward contracts and the
accounts in the condensed consolidated balance sheet in which the fair value amounts are included
are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
$ |
39.5 |
|
|
$ |
20.3 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
The amounts recognized in OCI and reclassified from AOCI into earnings are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
Amount of gain/(loss) recognized in OCI, net of tax of ($22.7) and $18, respectively |
|
$ |
48.0 |
|
|
$ |
(30.6 |
) |
Amount of gain/(loss) reclassified from AOCI into sales |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
(5.1 |
) |
26
The total
fair value of the Companys forward contracts of a
$99.9 million net asset (after
deferred taxes of $28.1 million) at March 31, 2011, combined with $2.8 million of losses on
previously matured hedges of intercompany sales and gains from forward contracts terminated prior
to the original maturity dates, is recorded in AOCI and will be reflected in income as earnings are
affected by the hedged items. As of March 31, 2011, the portion of the net $99.9 million asset that
would be reclassified into earnings to offset the effect of the hedged item in the next 12 months
is a gain of $27.6 million. These forward contracts mature on a monthly basis with maturity dates
that range from April 2011 to December 2015. There was a de minimis amount of both ineffectiveness
and hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness during the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Fair Value Hedges
The Company enters into interest rate swaps to increase the Companys exposure to variable interest
rates. The settlement and maturity dates on each swap are the same as those on the referenced
notes. The interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair value hedges and the carrying value of the
notes is adjusted to reflect the fair values of the interest rate swaps. At March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding interest rate swaps. For the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, before tax gains of $0.4 million and $0.8 million ($0.3 million and $0.5
million after tax), respectively, were recorded as a reduction to interest expense. These amounts
represent previously terminated swaps which are amortized over the life of the underlying debt.
Other Forward Contracts
As a supplement to the foreign exchange cash flow hedging program, the Company enters into forward
contracts to manage its foreign currency risk related to the translation of monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in currencies other than the relevant functional currency. These forward
contracts generally mature monthly and the notional amounts are adjusted periodically to reflect
changes in net monetary asset balances. Since these contracts are not designated as hedges, the
gains or losses on these forward contracts are recorded in selling and administrative costs or cost
of sales, as appropriate. These contracts are utilized to mitigate the earnings impact of the
translation of net monetary assets and liabilities.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a transaction loss on its
monetary assets of $13.5 million, which was offset by gains on the other forward contracts
described above of $10.2 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company
recorded a transaction gain on its monetary assets of $11.6 million, which was offset by losses on
the other forward contracts described above of $12.5 million.
27
Note 18. Subsequent Event
On March 31, 2011, the Company signed an agreement to acquire Microtecnica S.r.l., a leading
provider of flight control actuation systems for helicopter, regional and business aircraft,
missile actuation, and aircraft thermal and environmental control systems. The purchase price is
expected to be approximately 330 million Euros. The transaction is expected to close during the
three months ended June 30, 2011, subject to customary government approvals.
28
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
YOU SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 1 OF THIS DOCUMENT.
THIS MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CONTAINS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. SEE FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO RISK AND UNCERTAINTY
FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN OF THE UNCERTAINTIES, RISKS AND ASSUMPTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE
STATEMENTS.
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREIN, DISCLOSURES PERTAIN ONLY TO OUR CONTINUING OPERATIONS.
OVERVIEW
We are one of the largest worldwide suppliers of aerospace components, systems and services to the
commercial and general aviation airplane markets. We are also a leading supplier of systems and
products to the global defense and space markets. Our business is conducted globally with
manufacturing, service and sales undertaken in various locations throughout the world. Our products
and services are principally sold to customers in North America, Europe and Asia.
Key Market Channels for Products and Services, Growth Drivers and Industry and our Highlights
We participate in three key market channels: commercial, regional, business and general aviation
airplane original equipment (OE); commercial, regional, business and general aviation airplane
aftermarket; and defense and space.
29
Commercial, Regional, Business and General Aviation Airplane OE
Commercial, regional, business and general aviation airplane OE includes sales of products and
services for new airplanes produced by Airbus and Boeing, and regional, business and small airplane
manufacturers.
The key growth drivers in this market channel include the number of orders for the manufacturers
airplanes, which will be delivered to their customers over a period of several years, OE
manufacturer production and delivery rates for in-service airplanes such as the Airbus A320 and
Boeing 737NG, and introductions of new airplane models such as the Boeing 787 and 747-8 and the
Airbus A350 XWB and A320neo, and engine types such as the Pratt and Whitney PurePower®
PW1000G.
We have significant sales content on most of the airplanes manufactured in this market channel.
Over the last few years, we have benefited from the historically high production rates and
deliveries of Airbus and Boeing airplanes and from our substantial content on many of the regional
and general aviation airplanes. Airbus and Boeing have announced production rate increases for 2011
and beyond. However, production rates are always subject to change, and may be impacted by economic
conditions which may influence customers willingness and/or ability to purchase new aircraft.
Commercial, Regional, Business and General Aviation Airplane Aftermarket
The commercial, regional, business and general aviation airplane aftermarket channel includes sales
of products and services for existing commercial and general aviation airplanes, primarily to
airlines and package carriers around the world.
We have significant product content on most of the airplane models that are currently in service
and we enjoy the benefit of having excellent positions on the newer, more fuel-efficient airplanes
currently in service. The key growth drivers in this channel include worldwide passenger capacity
growth measured by Available Seat Miles (ASM) and the size, type and utilization levels of the
worldwide airplane fleet. Other important factors affecting growth in this market channel are the
age and types of the airplanes in the fleet, fuel prices, airline maintenance practices, Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) trends in countries and regions around the world and domestic and
international air freight activity.
Capacity in the global airline system, as measured by ASM, is expected to grow in 2011 as compared
to 2010 due in large part to the expected global economic recovery. ASM expectations could be
adversely affected if airlines choose to fly their in-service airplanes less frequently, or
temporarily ground airplanes due to decreased demand, high fuel prices and other factors including
weaker than expected global economic recovery.
30
Defense and Space
Worldwide defense and space sales include sales to prime contractors such as Boeing, Northrop
Grumman, Lockheed Martin, the U.S. Government and foreign companies and governments.
The key growth drivers in this channel include the level of defense spending by the U.S. and
foreign governments, the number of new platform starts, the level of military flight operations,
the level of upgrade, overhaul and maintenance activities associated with existing platforms and
demand for optical surveillance and reconnaissance systems.
The market for our defense and space products is global, and is not dependent on any single
program, platform or customer. We anticipate fewer new fighter and transport aircraft platform
starts over the next several years. We also anticipate that the introduction of the F-35 Lightning
II and new helicopter platforms, along with upgrades on existing defense and space platforms, will
provide long-term growth opportunities in this market channel. Additionally, we are participating
in, and developing new products for, the expanding intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
sector (ISR), which should further strengthen our position in this market channel.
Long-term Sustainable Growth
We believe that we are well positioned to grow our sales, organically and through acquisitions,
over the long-term due to:
|
|
|
Awards for key products on important new and expected programs, including the Airbus
A350 XWB and A320neo, the Boeing 787 and 747-8, the Pratt & Whitney PurePower®
PW1000G engine and the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II; |
|
|
|
|
The large installed base on commercial airplanes and our strong positions on newer,
more fuel-efficient airplanes, which should fuel sustained long-term aftermarket strength; |
|
|
|
|
Balance in the commercial airplane market, with strong sales to Airbus, Boeing and the
regional and business jet airplane manufacturers; |
|
|
|
|
Aging of the existing large commercial and regional airplane fleets, which should
result in increased aftermarket support; |
|
|
|
|
Increased number of long-term agreements for product and service sales on new and
existing commercial airplanes; |
|
|
|
|
Increased opportunities for aftermarket growth due to airline outsourcing; |
31
|
|
|
Growth in global maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) opportunities for our systems
and components, particularly in Europe, Asia and the Middle East, where we have expanded
our capacity; and |
|
|
|
|
Expansion of our product offerings in support of high growth areas in the defense and
space market channel, such as helicopter products and systems, ISR products and precision
guidance systems for munitions. |
First Quarter 2011 Sales Content by Market Channel
During the first quarter 2011, approximately 95% of our sales were from our three key market
channels described above. Following is a summary of the percentage of sales by market channel:
|
|
|
|
|
Airbus Commercial OE |
|
|
18 |
% |
Boeing Commercial OE |
|
|
9 |
% |
Regional, Business and General Aviation Airplane OE |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total Large Commercial, Regional, Business and General Aviation Airplane OE |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Large Commercial Airplane Aftermarket |
|
|
24 |
% |
Regional, Business and General Aviation Airplane Aftermarket |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total Large Commercial, Regional, Business and General Aviation Airplane Aftermarket |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total Defense and Space |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations First Quarter 2011 as Compared to First Quarter 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except diluted EPS) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,895.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,695.2 |
|
|
$ |
200.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income (1) |
|
$ |
334.8 |
|
|
$ |
259.0 |
|
|
$ |
75.8 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
Corporate general and administrative costs |
|
|
(34.5 |
) |
|
|
(38.0 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
300.3 |
|
|
|
221.0 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
Net interest expense |
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
(33.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Other income (expense) net |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
260.2 |
|
|
|
181.2 |
|
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(63.6 |
) |
|
|
(68.6 |
) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
196.6 |
|
|
|
112.6 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
74.6 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income |
|
|
196.6 |
|
|
|
113.8 |
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
72.8 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Goodrich |
|
$ |
194.8 |
|
|
$ |
111.2 |
|
|
$ |
83.6 |
|
|
|
75.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
76.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Goodrich |
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We measure each reporting segments profit based upon operating income. Accordingly, we do
not allocate net interest expense, other income (expense) net and income taxes to our
reporting segments. The company-wide Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) costs that were not
directly associated with a specific business were not allocated to the segments. For a
reconciliation of total segment operating income to total operating income, see Note 3,
Business Segment Information to our condensed consolidated financial statements. |
32
Sales
The sales increase in the first quarter 2011 as compared to the first quarter 2010 was driven by
changes in each of our major market channels as follows:
|
|
|
Defense and space sales of both original equipment and aftermarket products and
services increased by approximately $54 million, or 10%; |
|
|
|
|
Regional, business and general aviation airplane original equipment sales increased by
approximately $51 million, or 55%, including sales associated with the recent acquisition
of DeCranes cabin management assets; |
|
|
|
|
Large commercial, regional, business and general aviation airplane aftermarket sales
increased by approximately $62 million, or 12%; and |
|
|
|
|
Large commercial airplane original equipment sales increased by approximately $27
million, or 6%. |
Segment operating income
See discussion in the Business Segment Performance section.
Corporate general and administrative costs
Corporate general and administrative costs decreased primarily due to lower share-based
compensation and lease-related expenses.
Net interest expense
Net interest expense increased primarily as a result of higher debt levels in the first quarter
2011 as compared to the first quarter 2010.
Other income (expense) net
Other income (expense) net remained unchanged for the first quarter 2011 as compared to the
first quarter 2010.
33
Income from continuing operations
In addition to the items described above, income from continuing operations during the first
quarter 2011 as compared to the first quarter 2010 was impacted by the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
After |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except diluted EPS) |
|
Lower pension and postretirement benefits expense |
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower effective tax rate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower pension and postretirement benefits expense
The decrease in pension and postretirement benefits expense was primarily the result of actuarial
changes, including the change in the amortization period for gains and losses for our U.S. salaried
plan, the benefit of $300 million in incremental contributions that were made in 2010 and favorable
returns on our plan assets.
Lower effective tax rate
For the first quarter of 2011 we reported an effective tax rate of 24.4% as compared to 37.9% in
the first quarter 2010. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to a tax
settlement with the IRS for the remaining unresolved issues for tax years prior to 2000 which
reduced the effective tax rate in the first quarter of 2011 by approximately 8 percentage points,
and a charge of approximately $10 million in the first quarter 2010 to adjust deferred income taxes
due to the passage of U.S. health care reform legislation, which increased our effective tax rate
in the first quarter of 2010 by approximately 6 percentage points.
Our effective tax rate for the first quarter 2010 was not reduced for the benefit of the U.S.
Research and Development Credit (R&D Credit) because the federal statute authorizing the R&D Credit
had not been extended until the fourth quarter of 2010. We estimate that the effective tax rate at
March 31, 2010 would have been approximately 1 percentage point lower had we been able to consider
the tax benefits associated with the R&D Credit.
34
2011 OUTLOOK
We expect the following approximate results for the year ending December 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Outlook |
|
2010 Actual |
Sales
|
|
$7.8 billion
|
|
$7 billion |
Diluted EPS Net Income Attributable to Goodrich
|
|
$5.40 to $5.55 per share
|
|
$4.51 per share |
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$300 million to $350 million
|
|
$222.3 million |
Operating Cash Flow minus Capital Expenditures
|
|
Exceed 85% of net income
attributable to Goodrich
|
|
50% of net income
attributable to Goodrich
|
Our 2011 sales outlook does not include the impact of the Microtechnica S.r.l. (Microtechnica)
acquisition, or any other potential acquisitions or divestitures. Potential restructuring
activities that have not yet been approved are not included in the current outlook. Our 2011
outlook includes, among other factors:
|
|
|
Lower worldwide pre-tax pension expense of approximately $74 million, $46 million
after-tax or $0.37 per diluted share. For 2011, we expect total worldwide pre-tax pension
expense of approximately $88 million, compared to $162 million in 2010; and |
|
|
|
|
A full-year effective tax rate of approximately 30 percent for 2011, which is unchanged
from our previous outlook. We expect an effective tax rate of approximately 32 percent for
the remaining quarters of 2011. |
On March 14, 2011, our landing gear business, which is reported in the Actuation and Landing
Systems segment, began discussions with one of its local employee unions regarding a new contract.
The current contract expires in May 2011. The discussions include the fact that we are considering
the potential closure of our landing gear facility located on Marble Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio,
where approximately 400 employees are located. Negotiations with the union are ongoing. Should we
decide to close the facility, we would likely need to recognize personnel-related and facility
closure costs at that time.
Sales
Our current market assumptions for each of our major market channels for the full year 2011 outlook
compared to 2010 include the following:
|
|
|
Large commercial airplane original equipment sales are expected to increase
approximately 15%. This outlook assumes all announced production rate increases are
implemented and Boeing 787 and 747-8 deliveries are consistent with the latest schedule
announced by Boeing; |
|
|
|
|
Regional, business and general aviation airplane original equipment sales are expected
to grow approximately 30% to 35%, including incremental sales associated with the DeCrane
acquisition; |
35
|
|
|
Large commercial, regional, business and general aviation airplane aftermarket sales
are expected to increase approximately 7% to 9%; and |
|
|
|
|
Defense and space sales of both original equipment and aftermarket products and
services are expected to increase approximately 8% to 10%. |
Cash Flow
We expect net cash provided by operating activities, minus capital expenditures, to exceed 85% of
net income. This outlook reflects ongoing investments to support the current schedule for the
Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 XWB airplane programs, fixed assets and working capital to support
announced production rate increases associated with the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 airplanes, and
competitive cost country manufacturing and productivity initiatives that are expected to enhance
margins over the near and long term. We expect capital expenditures in 2011 to be approximately
$300 million to $350 million. Worldwide pension plan contributions are expected to be approximately
$100 million.
BUSINESS SEGMENT PERFORMANCE
Our three business segments are as follows:
|
|
|
The Actuation and Landing Systems segment provides systems, components and related
services pertaining to aircraft taxi, take-off, flight control, landing and stopping, and
engine components, including fuel delivery systems and rotating assemblies. |
|
|
|
|
The Nacelles and Interior Systems segment produces products and provides maintenance,
repair and overhaul services associated with aircraft engines, including thrust reversers,
cowlings, nozzles and their components, and aircraft interior products, including slides,
seats, cargo and lighting systems. |
|
|
|
|
The Electronic Systems segment produces a wide array of systems and components that
provide flight performance measurements, flight management, fuel controls, electrical
systems, control and safety data, reconnaissance and surveillance systems and precision
guidance systems. |
36
We measure each reporting segments profit based upon operating income. Accordingly, we do not
allocate net interest expense, other income (expense) net and income taxes to the reporting
segments. The company-wide ERP costs that were not directly associated with a specific business
were not allocated to the segments. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same
as those for our condensed consolidated financial statements. For a reconciliation of total segment
operating income to total operating income, see Note 3, Business Segment Information to our
condensed consolidated financial statements.
First Quarter 2011 Compared with First Quarter 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable/ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CUSTOMER SALES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuation and Landing Systems |
|
$ |
684.3 |
|
|
$ |
613.1 |
|
|
$ |
71.2 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nacelles and Interior Systems |
|
|
656.4 |
|
|
|
555.8 |
|
|
|
100.6 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic Systems |
|
|
555.2 |
|
|
|
526.3 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,895.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,695.2 |
|
|
$ |
200.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEGMENT OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuation and Landing Systems |
|
$ |
86.5 |
|
|
$ |
69.4 |
|
|
$ |
17.1 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Nacelles and Interior Systems |
|
|
157.3 |
|
|
|
118.8 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
Electronic Systems |
|
|
91.0 |
|
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
334.8 |
|
|
$ |
259.0 |
|
|
$ |
75.8 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuation and Landing Systems: Actuation and Landing Systems segment sales for the first
quarter 2011 increased from the first quarter 2010 primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
Higher defense and space OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $30 million,
primarily in our aircraft wheels and brakes, landing gear and engine components businesses; |
|
|
|
|
Higher large commercial airplane OE sales of approximately $15 million, primarily in
our landing gear and actuation systems businesses; |
|
|
|
|
Higher large commercial, regional, business and general aviation airplane aftermarket
sales of approximately $11 million, primarily in our aircraft wheels and brakes business; |
|
|
|
|
Higher regional, business and general aviation airplane OE sales of approximately $10
million, primarily in our landing gear, actuation systems and engine components businesses;
and |
|
|
|
|
Higher non-aerospace sales of approximately $7 million, primarily in our actuation
systems and engine components businesses. |
37
Actuation and Landing Systems segment operating income for the first quarter 2011 increased from
the first quarter 2010 primarily as a result of the following:
|
|
|
Higher sales volume and favorable product mix across most businesses resulting in
higher income of approximately $23 million; partially offset by |
|
|
|
|
Higher operating costs across most businesses partially offset by favorable pricing,
which resulted in lower income of approximately $4 million; and |
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable foreign exchange of approximately $2 million. |
Nacelles and Interior Systems: Nacelles and Interior Systems segment sales for the first quarter
2011 increased from the first quarter 2010 primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
Higher regional, business and general aviation airplane OE sales of approximately $43
million, primarily in our aerostructures and interiors businesses, including sales
associated with the acquisition of DeCranes cabin management assets; |
|
|
|
|
Higher large commercial, regional, business, and general aviation airplane aftermarket
sales of approximately $34 million, primarily in our aerostructures and interiors
businesses; |
|
|
|
|
Higher defense and space OE and aftermarket sales of approximately $13 million,
primarily in our aerostructures business; and |
|
|
|
|
Higher large commercial airplane OE sales of approximately $9 million, primarily in our
aerostructures business. |
Nacelles and Interior Systems segment operating income for the first quarter 2011 increased from
the first quarter 2010 primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
Higher sales volume and favorable product mix which resulted in higher income of
approximately $39 million, primarily in our aerostructures business; and |
|
|
|
|
Favorable pricing partially offset by higher operating costs, primarily in our
aerostructures business, which resulted in higher income of approximately $2 million. |
Electronic Systems: Electronic Systems segment sales for the first quarter 2011 increased from the
first quarter 2010 primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
Higher large commercial, regional, business and general aviation airplane aftermarket
sales primarily in our sensors and integrated systems and engine controls and electrical
power businesses of approximately $17 million; |
|
|
|
|
Higher defense and space OE and aftermarket sales across most businesses of
approximately $11 million; and |
38
|
|
|
Higher large commercial airplane OE sales of approximately $4 million, primarily in our
sensors and integrated systems and engine controls and electrical power businesses;
partially offset by |
|
|
|
|
Lower regional, business, and general aviation airplane OE sales of approximately $2
million, primarily in our engine controls and electrical power business. |
Electronic Systems segment operating income for the first quarter 2011 increased from the first
quarter 2010 primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
Higher sales volume and favorable product mix across all businesses, which resulted in
higher income of approximately $13 million; |
|
|
|
|
Higher income of approximately $6 million related to changes in estimates for certain
long-term contracts in our ISR business, consisting of favorable changes in estimates of
approximately $2 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to a charge of approximately
$4 million in the first quarter of 2010; and |
|
|
|
|
Favorable foreign exchange of approximately $3 million. |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We currently expect to fund expenditures for capital requirements and other liquidity needs from a
combination of cash, internally generated funds and financing arrangements. We believe that our
internal liquidity, together with access to external capital resources, will be sufficient to
satisfy existing plans and commitments, including our stock repurchase program, and also provide
adequate financial flexibility due to our strong balance sheet, lack of any large near-term funding
requirements and a committed credit facility with a strong banking group.
The following events have or will affect our liquidity and capital resources during 2011:
|
|
|
We repurchased 0.9 million shares for $81 million under our share repurchase program
during the first quarter 2011; |
|
|
|
|
We contributed approximately $75 million to our worldwide qualified and non-qualified
pension and postretirement benefit plans through March 31, 2011; |
|
|
|
|
We paid a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share on April 1; and |
39
|
|
|
On March 31, 2011, we signed an agreement to acquire Microtecnica, a leading provider
of flight control actuation systems for helicopter, regional and business aircraft, missile
actuation, and aircraft thermal and environmental control systems. The purchase price for
the acquisition is approximately 330 million Euros. The transaction is expected to close
during the three months ended June 30, 2011, subject to customary government approvals. |
Cash
At March 31, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $811.1 million, as compared to $798.9
million at December 31, 2010.
Credit Facilities
We have the following amounts available under our credit facilities:
|
|
|
$500 million committed global revolving credit facility that expires in May 2012, of
which $437.3 million was available at March 31, 2011; and |
|
|
|
|
$75 million of uncommitted domestic working capital facilities of which $52.2 million
was available at March 31, 2011 and $156.8 million of uncommitted and committed foreign
working capital facilities with various banks to meet short-term borrowing and documentary
credit requirements, of which $151.5 million was available at March 31, 2011. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Lease Commitments
We lease certain of our office and manufacturing facilities, machinery and equipment and corporate
aircraft under various committed lease arrangements provided by financial institutions. Future
minimum lease payments under operating leases were $214.5 million at March 31, 2011.
40
Derivatives
We utilize certain derivative financial instruments to enhance our ability to manage risk,
including foreign currency and interest rate exposures that exist as part of ongoing business
operations as follows:
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Contracts Designated as Cash Flow Hedges: At March 31, 2011, our
contracts had a notional amount of $2,213.7 million, fair value of a $99.9 million net
asset and maturity dates ranging from April 2011 to December 2015. The amount of
accumulated other comprehensive income that would be reclassified into earnings in the next
12 months is a gain of $27.6 million. During the first quarter 2011 and 2010, we realized a
net gain of $1.2 million and a net loss of $5.1 million, respectively, related to contracts
that settled. |
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Contracts not Designated as Hedges: At March 31, 2011, our contracts
had a notional amount of $11.8 million and a fair value net liability of $1 million. During
the first quarter 2011 and 2010, we realized a net gain of
$10.2 million and a net loss of $12.5 million,
respectively, for contracts entered into and settled during those periods. |
Estimates of the fair value of our derivative financial instruments represent our best estimates
based on our valuation models, which incorporate industry data and trends and relevant market rates
and transactions. Counterparties to these financial instruments expose us to credit loss in the
event of nonperformance; however, we do not expect any of the counterparties to fail to meet their
obligations. Counterparties, in most cases, are large commercial banks that also provide us with
our committed credit facilities. To manage this credit risk, we select counterparties based on
credit ratings, limit our exposure to any single counterparty and monitor our market position with
each counterparty.
Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
As of March 31, 2011, purchase obligations were approximately $848 million, compared to
approximately $811 million at December 31, 2010. In addition, we entered into a contract in the
first quarter 2011 whereby we are obligated to make $60 million of participation payments, which
will be paid through 2018. There have been no other material changes to the table presented in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The table excludes our liability
for unrecognized tax benefits, which was $150.3 million at March 31, 2011, since we cannot predict
with reasonable reliability the timing of cash settlements to the respective taxing authorities.
41
CASH FLOW
The following table summarizes our cash flow activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
Operating activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
96.4 |
|
|
$ |
29.5 |
|
|
$ |
66.9 |
|
Investing activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(27.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(21.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.4 |
) |
Financing activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(61.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(33.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(28.6 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Operating Activities of Continuing Operations
The increase in net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011
from the three months ended March 31, 2010 primarily consisted of lower pension contributions and
tax refunds received in the first quarter of 2011, partially offset by increased working capital.
Pension and postretirement benefit contributions and benefit payments were $75.4 million and $112.7
million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Investing Activities of Continuing Operations
Net cash used by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 included
capital expenditures of $35.6 million and $20.9 million, respectively.
Financing Activities of Continuing Operations
The increase in net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011
from the three months ended March 31, 2010 consisted primarily of higher purchases of our common
stock in connection with our share repurchase program, partially offset by lower dividend payments
as the fourth quarter dividend declared was accelerated and paid on December 30, 2010.
CONTINGENCIES
General
There are various pending or threatened claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings against us
or our subsidiaries, arising in the ordinary course of business, which seek remedies or damages.
Although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of these matters, we
believe that any liability that may finally be determined with respect to commercial and
non-asbestos product liability claims should not have a material effect on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Legal costs are expensed when incurred.
42
Environmental
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations which may require that we investigate and
remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and
present operations. At certain sites we have been identified as a potentially responsible party
under the federal Superfund laws and comparable state laws. We are currently involved in the
investigation and remediation of a number of sites under applicable laws.
Estimates of our environmental liabilities are based on current facts, laws, regulations and
technology. These estimates take into consideration our prior experience and professional judgment
of our environmental specialists. Estimates of our environmental liabilities are further subject to
uncertainties regarding the nature and extent of site contamination, the range of remediation
alternatives available, evolving remediation standards, imprecise engineering evaluations and cost
estimates, the extent of corrective actions that may be required and the number and financial
condition of other potentially responsible parties, as well as the extent of their responsibility
for the remediation.
Accordingly, as investigation and remediation proceed, it is likely that adjustments in our
accruals will be necessary to reflect new information. The amounts of any such adjustments could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in a given period. Based
on currently available information, however, we do not believe that future environmental costs in
excess of those accrued with respect to sites for which we have been identified as a potentially
responsible party are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Environmental liabilities are recorded when the liability is probable and the costs are reasonably
estimable, which generally is not later than at completion of a feasibility study or when we have
recommended a remedy or have committed to an appropriate plan of action. The liabilities are
reviewed periodically and, as investigation and remediation proceed, adjustments are made as
necessary. Liabilities for losses from environmental remediation obligations do not consider the
effects of inflation and anticipated expenditures are not discounted to their present value. The
liabilities are not reduced by possible recoveries from insurance carriers or other third parties,
but do reflect anticipated allocations among potentially responsible parties at federal Superfund
sites or similar state-managed sites, third party indemnity obligations or contractual obligations,
and an assessment of the likelihood that such parties will fulfill their obligations at such sites.
43
Our condensed consolidated balance sheet included an accrued liability for environmental
remediation obligations of $69.3 million and $67.7 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $18.1 million and $14.6 million,
respectively, of the accrued liability for environmental remediation were included in current
liabilities. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $30.2 million and $27.3 million,
respectively, was associated with ongoing operations and $39.1 million and $40.4 million,
respectively, was associated with previously owned businesses.
We expect that we will expend present accruals over many years, and will generally complete
remediation in less than 30 years at sites for which we have been identified as a potentially
responsible party. This period includes operation and monitoring costs that are generally incurred
over 15 to 25 years.
Certain states in the U.S. and countries globally are promulgating or proposing new or more
demanding regulations or legislation impacting the use of various chemical substances by all
companies. We continue to evaluate the potential impact, if any, of new regulations and
legislation.
Asbestos
We and some of our subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various actions by plaintiffs
alleging damages as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers in products or at formerly owned
facilities. We believe that pending and reasonably anticipated future actions are not likely to
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
There can be no assurance, however, that future legislative or other developments will not have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in a given period.
Insurance Coverage
We maintain a comprehensive portfolio of insurance policies, including aviation products liability
insurance which covers most of our products. The aviation products liability insurance typically
provides first dollar coverage for defense and indemnity of third party claims.
A portion of our primary and excess layers of pre-1986 insurance coverage for third party claims,
primarily related to certain long-tail toxic tort and environmental claims, was provided by certain
insurance carriers who are either insolvent, undergoing solvent schemes of arrangement or in
run-off. We have entered into settlement agreements with a number of these insurers pursuant to
which we agreed to give up our rights with respect to certain insurance policies in exchange for
negotiated payments. These settlements represent negotiated payments for our loss of insurance
coverage, as we no longer have this insurance available for claims that may have qualified for
coverage. The portion of these payments which related to recovery of past costs (recognized as
expense in prior periods) or for which there are currently no anticipated future claims is
44
recognized in income when the payments are received. The portion related to potential future claims
is recorded as deferred settlement credits on the balance sheet.
The deferred settlement credits partially offset future costs related to insurable claims utilizing
a systematic and consistent approach. The recognition of the deferred settlement credits is
calculated utilizing the estimated percent of costs incurred in the current period that insurance
companies would have reimbursed to us if insurance coverage were still in place. This approach
utilizes our historical claims and insurance information and is reviewed and updated at least
annually.
A summary of the deferred settlement credits activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011, in
millions, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
48.6 |
|
Proceeds from insurance settlements |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Amounts recorded as reduction of costs |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
47.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $6 million and $5.7 million, respectively, of the
deferred settlement credits was reported in accrued expenses and $41.5 million and $42.9 million,
respectively, was reported in other non-current liabilities. It is not practical to estimate when
the remaining deferred settlement credits are expected to be recognized. The proceeds from such
insurance settlements were reported as a component of net cash provided by operating activities in
the period payments were received.
Liabilities of Divested Businesses
In connection with the divestitures of our tire, vinyl, engineered industrial products and other
businesses, we have received contractual rights of indemnification from third parties for
environmental, asbestos and other claims arising out of the divested businesses. Failure of these
third parties to honor their indemnification obligations could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations and cash flows.
Guarantees
At March 31, 2011, we had letters of credit and bank guarantees of $123 million and residual value
guarantees of lease obligations of $28.1 million. See Note 10, Financing Arrangements to our
condensed consolidated financial statements. At March 31, 2011, we were a guarantor on a revolving
credit agreement totaling £35 million between Rolls-Royce Goodrich Engine Control Systems Limited
(JV) and a financial institution. In addition, we guarantee the JVs foreign exchange credit line
with a notional amount of $154.9 million at March 31, 2011. We are indemnified by Rolls-Royce for
50% of the gains/losses resulting from the foreign exchange hedges.
45
Aerostructures Long-term Contracts
Our aerostructures business in the Nacelles and Interior Systems segment has several long-term
contracts in the pre-production phase including the Airbus A350 XWB, the A320neo and the Pratt and
Whitney PurePower® PW 1000G engine contracts, and in the early production phase,
including the Boeing 787. These contracts are accounted for in accordance with long-term
construction contract accounting.
The pre-production phase includes design of the product to meet customer specifications as well as
design of the processes to manufacture the product. Also involved in this phase is securing the
supply of material and subcomponents produced by third party suppliers, generally accomplished
through long-term supply agreements.
Contracts in the early production phase include excess-over-average inventories, which represent
the excess of current manufactured cost over the estimated average manufactured cost during the
life of the contract.
Cost estimates over the lives of contracts are affected by estimates of future cost reductions
including learning curve efficiencies. Because these contracts cover manufacturing periods of up to
20 years or more, there is risk associated with the estimates of future costs made during the
pre-production and early production phases. These estimates may be different from actual costs due
to various risk factors, including the following:
|
|
|
Ability to recover costs incurred for change orders and claims; |
|
|
|
|
Costs, including material and labor costs and related escalation; |
|
|
|
|
Labor improvements due to the learning curve experience; |
|
|
|
|
Anticipated cost and/or productivity improvements, including overhead absorption,
related to new, or changes to, manufacturing methods and processes; |
|
|
|
|
Supplier pricing, including escalation where applicable, potential supplier claims, the
suppliers financial viability and the suppliers ability to perform; |
|
|
|
|
The cost impact of product design changes that frequently occur during the flight test
and certification phases of a program; and |
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange fluctuations. |
Additionally, total contract revenue is based on estimates of future units to be delivered to the
customer, the ability to recover costs incurred for change orders and claims and sales price
escalation, where applicable. There is a risk that there could be differences between the actual
units delivered and the estimated total units to be delivered under the contract and differences in
actual revenues compared to estimates. Changes in estimates could have a material impact on our
results of operations and cash flows.
46
Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are recorded in the period such losses are
determined to the extent total estimated costs exceed total estimated contract revenues.
Aerostructures 787 Contract with Boeing
During 2004, our Aerostructures business entered into a long-term contract with Boeing on the 787
program. Our latest outlook estimates original equipment sales in excess of $5 billion for this
contract. Aftermarket sales associated with this program are not accounted for using the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting.
This program is in the pre-production phase, with entry into service expected in the second half of
2011 followed by rapidly increasing production rates shortly thereafter. For this contract to
remain profitable, it will be important that assumptions are realized as currently estimated in our
outlook, such as:
|
|
|
Supplier pricing consistent with projected costs must be negotiated for portions of the
product. These prices could be impacted by design changes, changes in material costs and
availability of reliable suppliers in competitive cost countries; |
|
|
|
|
New automated equipment is being utilized to manufacture the 787 composite nacelle,
which is expected to reduce costs significantly during the contract period; |
|
|
|
|
Nacelle product design changes continue to occur to improve product performance, reduce
weight and lower cost. We expect that some of the costs for these changes will be
recoverable from Boeing and also expect to have success on our various cost reduction
initiatives; and |
|
|
|
|
Material and overhead cost escalation and inflation assumptions could be different than
estimated. |
While we continue to believe the contract will be profitable, it is important to note that changes
to any of the current cost and/or revenue assumptions will have a significant impact on the overall
profitability of the contract and could have a material impact on our results of operations in
the period identified. From a sensitivity perspective, a 1% change in our estimate of recurring
costs would change our estimate of total costs over the contract by approximately $50 million. All
of the risk factors listed in Aerostructures Long-term Contracts above could also affect our
outlook of profitability on this contract.
47
JSTARS Program
In 2002, Seven Q Seven, Ltd. (7Q7) was selected by Northrop Grumman Corporation to provide
propulsion pods for the re-engine program for the JT3D engines used by the U.S. Air Force. We were
selected by 7Q7 as a supplier for the inlet, thrust reverser, exhaust, EBU, strut systems and wing
interface systems. As of March 31, 2011, we have $20.1 million (net of advances of $11.1 million)
of pre-production costs and inventory related to this program.
Future program funding remains uncertain and there can be no assurance of such funding. If the
program were to be cancelled, we would recognize an impairment.
Tax
We are continuously undergoing examination by the IRS as well as various state and foreign
jurisdictions. The IRS and other taxing authorities routinely challenge certain deductions and
credits reported by us on our income tax returns. See Note 14, Income Taxes, for additional
detail.
Tax Years 2007 and 2008
In January 2011, the IRS issued a Revenue Agents Report (RAR) for the tax years 2007 and 2008. In
February 2011, we submitted a protest to the Appeals Division of the IRS with respect to certain
unresolved issues which involve the proper timing of deductions. Although it is reasonably possible
that these matters could be resolved during the next 12 months, the timing or ultimate outcome is
uncertain.
Tax Years 2005 and 2006
During 2009, the IRS issued a RAR for the tax years 2005 and 2006. In July 2009, we submitted a
protest to the Appeals Division of the IRS with respect to certain unresolved issues which involve
the proper timing of deductions. Although it is reasonably possible that these matters could be
resolved during the next 12 months, the timing or ultimate outcome is uncertain.
Tax Years 2000 to 2004
During 2007, we reached agreement with the IRS on substantially all of the issues raised with
respect to the examination of taxable years 2000 to 2004. We submitted a protest to the Appeals
Division of the IRS with respect to the remaining unresolved issues which involve the proper timing
of certain deductions. We were unable to reach agreement with the IRS on the remaining issues. In
December 2009, we filed a petition in the U.S. Tax Court and in March 2010 we also filed a
complaint in the Federal District Court. If the IRS were to prevail, we believe the amount of the
estimated tax liability is fully reserved. We cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of a
final resolution of the remaining unresolved issues.
48
Tax Years Prior to 2000
The previous examination cycle included the consolidated income tax groups for the audit periods
identified below:
|
|
|
Coltec Industries Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
December, 1997 July, 1999 (through date of acquisition) |
Goodrich Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
1998 1999 (including Rohr, Inc. (Rohr) and Coltec) |
We previously reached final settlement with the IRS on all but one of the issues raised in
this examination cycle. We received statutory notices of deficiency dated June 14, 2007 related to
the remaining unresolved issue which involves the proper timing of certain deductions. We filed a
petition with the U.S. Tax Court in September 2007 to contest the notices of deficiency.
In December 2010, we reached a tentative agreement with the IRS to settle the remaining
unresolved issue but due to the size of the potential refund, the agreement required approval by
the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT). In January 2011, the JCT approved the terms of the
settlement agreement. In March 2011, the U.S. Tax Court accepted the terms of the settlement
agreement and agreed to the litigants request to dismiss the matter. We recognized a tax benefit
of approximately $21 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Rohr was examined by the State of California for the tax years ended July 31, 1985, 1986 and 1987.
The State of California disallowed certain expenses incurred by one of Rohrs subsidiaries in
connection with the lease of certain tangible property. Californias Franchise Tax Board held that
the deductions associated with the leased equipment were non-business deductions. In addition,
California audited our amended tax returns filed to reflect the changes resulting from the
settlement of the U.S. Tax Court for Rohrs tax years 1986 to
1997. California issued an assessment
based on numerous issues including proper timing of deductions and allowance of tax credits. In
October 2010, a comprehensive settlement was reached with the California Tax Board addressing all
issues for tax years 1985 through 2001. We recognized a tax benefit of approximately $23 million in
the three months ended December 31, 2010.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our
condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us
to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, including those related to customer programs and incentives, product
returns, bad debts, inventories, investments, goodwill and intangible assets, income taxes,
financing obligations, warranty obligations, excess component order cancellation costs,
restructuring, long-term service contracts, share-based compensation, pensions and
49
other postretirement benefits, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Contract Accounting Percentage of Completion
We have sales under long-term contracts, many of which contain escalation clauses, requiring
delivery of products over several years and frequently providing the buyer with option pricing on
follow-on orders. Sales and profits on each contract are recognized in accordance with the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting, primarily using the units-of-delivery method. We use
the cumulative catch-up method in accounting for changes in estimates. Under the cumulative
catch-up method, the impact of changes in estimates related to units shipped to date is recognized
immediately when changes in estimated contract profitability are known. Amounts representing
contract claims or change orders are considered in estimating revenues, costs and profits when they
can be reliably estimated and realization is considered probable.
Estimates of revenue and cost for our contracts span a period of many years from the inception of
the contracts to the date of actual shipments and are based on a substantial number of underlying
assumptions. We believe that the underlying factors are sufficiently reliable to provide a
reasonable estimate of the profit to be generated. However, due to the significant length of time
over which revenue streams will be generated, the variability of the assumptions of the revenue and
cost streams can be significant if the factors change. The risk factors include but are not limited
to estimates of the following:
|
|
|
Escalation of future sales prices under the contracts; |
|
|
|
|
Ability to recover costs incurred for change orders and claims; |
|
|
|
|
Costs, including material and labor costs and related escalation; |
|
|
|
|
Labor improvements due to the learning curve experience; |
|
|
|
|
Anticipated cost productivity improvements, including overhead absorption, related to
new, or changes to, manufacturing methods and processes; |
|
|
|
|
Supplier pricing, including escalation where applicable, potential supplier claims, the
suppliers financial viability and the suppliers ability to perform; |
50
|
|
|
The cost impact of product design changes that frequently occur during the flight test
and certification phases of a program; and |
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange fluctuations. |
Inventory
Inventoried costs on long-term contracts include certain pre-production costs, consisting primarily
of tooling and design costs and production costs, including applicable overhead. The costs
attributed to units delivered under long-term commercial contracts are based on the estimated
average cost of all units expected to be produced and are determined under the learning curve
concept, which anticipates a predictable decrease in unit costs as tasks and production techniques
become more efficient through repetition. During the early years of a contract, manufacturing costs
per unit delivered are typically greater than the estimated average unit cost for the total
contract. This excess manufacturing cost for units shipped results in an increase in inventory
(referred to as excess-over-average) during the early years of a contract. See Note 8,
Inventories, to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
If in-process inventory plus estimated costs to complete a specific contract exceed the anticipated
remaining sales value of such contract, such excess is charged to cost of sales in the period
identified, thus reducing inventory to its estimated realizable value. Progress payments and
advances are classified as a reduction of inventory when they represent non-refundable payments for
work-in-process and cash received from government customers where the government has legal title to
the work-in-process.
Unbilled Receivables
Our aerostructures business is party to a long-term supply arrangement whereby we receive cash
payments for our performance over a period that extends beyond our performance period of the
contract. The contract is accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method of contract
accounting. Unbilled receivables include revenue recognized that will be realized from cash
payments to be received beyond the period of performance. In estimating our revenues to be received
under the contract, cash receipts that are expected to be received beyond the performance period
are included at their present value as of the end of the performance period.
Product Maintenance Arrangements
We have entered into long-term product maintenance arrangements to provide specific products and
services to customers for a specified amount per flight hour, brake landing and/or aircraft
landings. Revenue is recognized as the service is performed and the costs are incurred. We have
sufficient historical evidence that indicates that the costs of performing the service under the
contract are incurred on other than a straight line basis.
51
Income Taxes
As of each reporting period, we estimate an effective income tax rate that is expected to be
applicable for the full fiscal year. In addition, we establish reserves for uncertain tax positions
and record interest (net of any applicable tax benefit) on potential tax contingencies as a
component of our tax expense. The estimate of our effective income tax rate involves significant
judgments regarding the application of complex tax regulations across many jurisdictions and
estimates as to the amount and jurisdictional source of income expected to be earned during the
full fiscal year. Further influencing this estimate are evolving interpretations of new and
existing tax laws, rulings by taxing authorities and court decisions. Due to the subjective and
complex nature of these underlying issues, our actual effective tax rate and related tax
liabilities may differ from our initial estimates. Differences between our estimated and actual
effective income tax rates and related liabilities are recorded in the period they become known.
The resulting adjustment to our income tax expense could have a material effect on our results of
operations in the period the adjustment is recorded.
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets
Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually, or when an event occurs or
circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that an impairment may exist. Our annual
testing date is November 30. We test goodwill for impairment by first comparing the book value of
net assets to the fair value of the related reporting units. If the fair value is determined to be
less than book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In this
process, a fair value for goodwill is estimated, based in part on the fair value of the operations,
and is compared to its carrying value. The amount of the fair value below carrying value represents
the amount of goodwill impairment.
We estimate the fair values of the reporting units using discounted cash flows. Forecasts of future
cash flows are based on our best estimate of future sales and operating costs, based primarily on
existing firm orders, expected future orders, contracts with suppliers, labor agreements and
general market conditions. Changes in these forecasts could significantly change the amount of
impairment recorded, if any impairment exists. The cash flow forecasts are adjusted by a long-term
growth rate and a discount rate derived from our weighted-average cost of capital at the date of
evaluation.
52
Impairments of identifiable intangible assets are recognized when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset or related groups of assets may not be
recoverable, and our estimate of undiscounted cash flows over the assets remaining useful lives is
less than the carrying value of the assets. The determination of undiscounted cash flow is based on
our segments plans. The revenue growth is based upon aircraft build projections from aircraft
manufacturers and widely available external publications. The profit margin assumption is based
upon the current cost structure and anticipated cost reductions. Changes to these assumptions could
result in the recognition of impairment.
Other Assets
As with any investment, there are risks inherent in recovering the value of participation payments,
sales incentives and flight certification costs. Such risks are consistent with the risks
associated with acquiring a revenue-producing asset in which market conditions may change or the
risks that arise when a manufacturer of a product on which a royalty is based has business
difficulties and cannot produce the product. Such risks include but are not limited to the
following:
|
|
|
Changes in market conditions that may affect product sales under the program, including
market acceptance and competition from others; |
|
|
|
|
Performance of subcontract suppliers and other production risks; |
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy or other less significant financial difficulties of other program
participants, including the aircraft manufacturer, the OEM and other program suppliers or
the aircraft customer; and |
|
|
|
|
Availability of specialized raw materials in the marketplace. |
Participation Payments
Certain of our businesses make cash payments under long-term contractual arrangements to OEM or
system contractors in return for a secured position on an aircraft program. Participation payments
are capitalized, when a contractual liability has been incurred, as other assets and amortized as a
reduction to sales, as appropriate. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of
participation payments was $176.6 million and $116.7 million, respectively. The carrying amount of
participation payments is evaluated for recovery at least annually or when other indicators of
impairment exist, such as a change in the estimated number of units or a revision in the economics
of the program. If such estimates change, amortization expense is adjusted and/or an impairment
charge is recorded, as appropriate, for the effect of the revised estimates. No such impairment
charges were recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010.
53
Sales Incentives
We offer sales incentives such as up-front cash payments, merchandise credits and/or free products
to certain airline customers in connection with sales contracts. The cost of these incentives is
recognized in the period incurred unless recovery of these costs is specifically guaranteed by the
customer in the contract. If the contract contains such a guarantee, then the cost of the sales
incentive is capitalized as other assets and amortized to cost of sales, or as a reduction to
sales, as appropriate. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of sales
incentives was $54.4 million and $55.6 million, respectively. The carrying amount of sales
incentives is evaluated for recovery when indicators of potential impairment exist. The carrying
value of the sales incentives is also compared annually to the amount recoverable under the terms
of the guarantee in the customer contract. If the amount of the carrying value of the sales
incentives exceeds the amount recoverable in the contract, the carrying value is reduced. No such
impairment charges were recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010.
Flight Certification Costs
When a supply arrangement is secured, certain of our businesses may agree to supply hardware to an
OEM to be used in flight certification testing and/or make cash payments to reimburse an OEM for
costs incurred in testing the hardware. The flight certification testing is necessary to certify
aircraft systems/components for the aircrafts airworthiness and allows the aircraft to be flown
and thus sold in the country certifying the aircraft. Flight certification costs are capitalized in
other assets and are amortized to cost of sales, or as a reduction to sales, as appropriate. At
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of sales flight certification costs was
$46.6 million and $42.8 million, respectively. The carrying amount of flight certification costs is
evaluated for recovery when indicators of impairment exist or when the estimated number of units to
be manufactured changes. No such impairment charges were recorded in the three months ended March
31, 2011 or 2010.
Service and Product Warranties
We provide service and warranty policies on certain of our products. We accrue liabilities under
service and warranty policies based upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty and
service claim experience. Adjustments are made to accruals as claim data and historical experience
change. In addition, we incur discretionary costs to service our products in connection with
product performance issues. Our service and product warranty reserves are based upon a variety of
factors. Any significant change in these factors could have a material impact on our results of
operations. Such factors include but are not limited to the following:
|
|
|
The historical performance of our products and changes in performance of newer
products; |
54
|
|
|
The mix and volumes of products being sold; and |
|
|
|
|
The impact of product changes. |
Share-Based Compensation
We utilize the fair value method of accounting to account for share-based compensation awards. See
Note 5, Share-Based Compensation.
Assumptions
Stock Options
We use the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the expected value that our employees will
receive from the options based on a number of assumptions, such as interest rates, employee
exercises, our stock price and expected dividend yield. Our weighted-average assumptions included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Risk-free interest rate % |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Expected dividend yield % |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Historical volatility factor % |
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
Weighted-average expected life of the options (years) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
The expected life is a significant assumption as it determines the period for which the
risk-free interest rate, historical volatility and expected dividend yield must be applied. The
expected life is the period over which our employees are expected to hold their options. It is
based on our historical experience with similar grants. The risk-free interest rate is based on the
expected U.S. Treasury rate over the expected life. Historical volatility reflects movements in our
stock price over the most recent historical period equivalent to the expected life. Expected
dividend yield is based on the stated dividend rate as of the date of grant.
Restricted Stock Units
The fair value of the restricted stock units is determined based upon the average of the high and
low grant date fair value. The weighted-average grant date fair value during the first three months
of 2011 and 2010 was $88.64 and $65.31 per unit, respectively.
55
Performance Units
The value of each award is determined based upon the average of the high and low price of our stock
on the last day of each reporting period, as adjusted for a performance condition and a market
condition. The performance condition is applied to 50% of the awards and is based upon our actual
return on invested capital (ROIC) as compared to a target ROIC. The market condition is applied to
50% of the awards and is based on our relative total shareholder return (RTSR) as compared to the
RTSR of a peer group of companies. Since the awards will be paid in cash, they are recorded as a
liability award and are marked to market each reporting period. As such, assumptions are evaluated
for each award on an ongoing basis.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
We consult with an outside actuary as to the appropriateness for many of the assumptions used in
determining the benefit obligations and the annual expense for our worldwide pension and
postretirement benefits other than pensions. All significant assumptions are evaluated at least
annually. Assumptions such as the rate of compensation increase, health care cost projections, the
mortality rate assumption, and the long-term rate of return on plan assets are based upon our
historical and benchmark data, as well as our outlook for the future. The U.S. and the U.K.
discount rates are determined using a bond settlement approach based on a hypothetical portfolio of
high quality corporate bonds whose coupon payments and maturity values are designed to match the
projected benefit payment cash flows of the underlying pension and OPEB obligations. Only high
quality AA-graded or better, non-callable corporate bonds are included in this bond portfolio. The
discount rate for Canada resulted from benchmark plans with similar durations as the Canadian
plans, plotted against the respective Canadian yield curves of AA-graded corporate bonds. The
appropriate benchmarks by applicable country are used for pension plans other than those in the
U.S., U.K. and Canada.
We generally amortize the actuarial gains and losses for our pension plans over the average future
service period of the active participants. However, in 2011, we will amortize the actuarial gains
and losses over the remaining life of the inactive plan participants in our U.S. salaried plan
since almost all of the plan participants in that plan are now inactive. Additionally, as of
January 1, 2011 we reduced the expected long-term rate of return assumption for the U.S. and U.K.
plan assets to 8.25%.
56
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO RISK AND UNCERTAINTY
Certain statements made in this document are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding our future plans, objectives and
expected performance. Specifically, statements that are not historical facts, including statements
accompanied by words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, should, estimate, or
plan, are intended to identify forward-looking statements and convey the uncertainty of future
events or outcomes. We caution readers that any such forward-looking statements are based on
assumptions that we believe are reasonable, but are subject to a wide range of risks, and actual
results may differ materially.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected performance include, but
are not limited to:
|
|
|
demand for and market acceptance of new and existing products, such as the Airbus A350
XWB, A320neo and A380, the Boeing 787, the EMBRAER 190, the Mitsubishi Regional Jet (MRJ),
the Bombardier CSeries, the Dassault Falcon 7X and the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
and the Northrop Grumman Joint STARS re-engining program; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain profitability on the aerostructures 787 OE contract with
Boeing; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to extend our commercial OE contracts beyond the initial contract periods; |
|
|
|
|
cancellation or delays of orders or contracts by customers or with suppliers, including
delays or cancellations associated with the Boeing 787, the Airbus A380 and A350 XWB
aircraft programs, and major military programs, including the Northrop Grumman Joint STARS
re-engining program and the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain price adjustments pursuant to certain of our long-term contracts; |
|
|
|
|
the financial viability of key suppliers and the ability of our suppliers to perform
under existing contracts; |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which we are successful in integrating and achieving expected operating
synergies for recent and future acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
successful development of products and advanced technologies; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of bankruptcies and/or consolidations in the airline industry; |
57
|
|
|
the health of the commercial aerospace industry, including the large commercial,
regional, business and general aviation aircraft manufacturers; |
|
|
|
|
global demand for aircraft spare parts and aftermarket services; |
|
|
|
|
changing priorities or reductions in the defense budgets in the U.S. and other
countries, U.S. foreign policy and the level of activity in military flight operations; |
|
|
|
|
the possibility of restructuring and consolidation actions; |
|
|
|
|
threats and events associated with and efforts to combat terrorism; |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which changes in regulations and/or assumptions result in changes to
expenses relating to employee and retiree medical and pension benefits; |
|
|
|
|
competitive product and pricing pressures; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to recover under contractual rights of indemnification for environmental,
asbestos and other claims arising out of the divestiture of our tire, vinyl, engineered
industrial products and other businesses; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of changes in accounting policies or legislation, including tax legislation; |
|
|
|
|
cumulative catch-up adjustments or loss contract reserves on long-term contracts
accounted for under the percentage of completion method of accounting; |
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign government spending, budgetary and trade policies; |
|
|
|
|
economic and political changes in international markets where we compete, such as
changes in currency exchange rates, interest rates, inflation, fuel prices, deflation,
recession and other external factors over which we have no control; |
|
|
|
|
the outcome of contingencies including completion of acquisitions, joint ventures,
divestitures, tax audits, litigation and environmental remediation efforts; and |
|
|
|
|
the impact of labor difficulties or work stoppages at our, a customers or a suppliers
facilities. |
We caution you not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this
document, which speak only as of the date on which such statements are made. We undertake no
obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events
or circumstances after the date on which such statements were made or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
58
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations, including risks
from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, which could impact our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We manage our exposure to these and
other market risks through regular operating and financing activities and through the use of
derivative financial instruments. We use such derivative financial instruments as risk management
tools and not for speculative investment purposes.
We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of our outstanding variable rate debt obligations.
At March 31, 2011, a hypothetical 100 basis point unfavorable change in interest rates would
increase annual interest expense by $0.2 million. At March 31, 2011, a hypothetical 10 percent
strengthening of the U.S. dollar against other foreign currencies would decrease the value of our
forward contracts by $238.9 million. The fair value of these foreign currency forward contracts was
an asset of $99.9 million at March 31, 2011. Because we hedge only a portion of our exposure, a
strengthening of the U.S. Dollar as described above would have a more than offsetting benefit to
our financial results in future periods.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such
controls and procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding
managements disclosure control objectives.
We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report (the
Evaluation Date). Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date to provide reasonable assurance regarding
managements disclosure control objectives.
59
Changes in Internal Control
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our
most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We and certain of our subsidiaries are defendants in various claims, lawsuits and administrative
proceedings. In addition, we have been notified that we are among potentially responsible parties
under federal environmental laws, or similar state laws, relative to the cost of investigating and
in some cases remediating contamination by hazardous materials. See the disclosure under the
captions General, Environmental, Asbestos, Liabilities of Divested Businesses and Tax in
Note 15, Contingencies to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part 1,
Item 1, of this Form 10-Q, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the
factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
results of operations. The risks described in our Annual Report of Form 10-K are not the only risks
facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
results of operations.
60
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(c) The following table summarizes Goodrich Corporations purchases of its common stock for the
three months ended March 31, 2011:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value) of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
|
that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
(a) Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Under |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
(b) Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
|
Paid Per Share |
|
|
Programs (2) |
|
|
Programs (3) |
|
January 2011 |
|
|
159,188 |
|
|
$ |
88.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2011 |
|
|
601,145 |
|
|
|
89.00 |
|
|
|
595,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
March 2011 |
|
|
343,101 |
|
|
|
84.52 |
|
|
|
332,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,103,434 |
|
|
|
87.55 |
|
|
|
927,305 |
|
|
$482 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The category includes 176,129 shares delivered to us by employees to pay withholding taxes
due upon vesting of a restricted unit award and to pay the exercise price of employee stock
options. |
|
(2) |
|
This balance represents the number of shares that were repurchased under the Companys
repurchase program (the Program). The Program was approved by the Board of Directors for $1.1
billion in total. Unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Companys Board of Directors,
the Program will expire when the Company has purchased all shares authorized for repurchase.
The Program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any particular amount of common stock,
and may be suspended or discontinued at any time without notice. |
|
(3) |
|
This balance represents the value of shares that can be repurchased under the Program. |
61
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits have been filed with this report:
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Goodrich
Corporation, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Goodrich
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 1-892), is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.2
|
|
By-Laws of Goodrich Corporation, as amended, filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to Goodrich Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K dated February 16, 2011, is incorporated herein
by reference. In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A)
of Regulation S-K, Goodrich Corporation hereby undertakes
to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request, a copy of all instruments defining the rights of
holders of long-term debt. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1
|
|
Amendment Number One to the Goodrich Corporation Senior
Executive Management Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 15
|
|
Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 101
|
|
The following financial information from Goodrich
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on April
21, 2011, formatted in XBRL includes: (i) Condensed
Consolidated Income Statements for the fiscal periods
ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, (ii) Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Cash Flow
Statements for the fiscal periods ended March 31, 2011
and March 31, 2010, and (iv) the Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
62
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
April 21, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOODRICH CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ SCOTT E. KUECHLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott E. Kuechle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ SCOTT A. COTTRILL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott A. Cottrill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
63
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Goodrich
Corporation, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Goodrich Corporations
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2003 (File No. 1-892), is incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.2
|
|
By-Laws of Goodrich Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit
3.1 to Goodrich Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K
dated February 16, 2011, is incorporated herein by reference.
In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K,
Goodrich Corporation hereby undertakes to furnish to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request, a copy of
all instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term
debt. |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1
|
|
Amendment Number One to the Goodrich Corporation Senior
Executive Management Incentive Plan.* |
|
|
|
Exhibit 15
|
|
Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information.* |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.* |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.* |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications.* |
|
|
|
Exhibit 101
|
|
The following financial information from Goodrich
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on April 21, 2011,
formatted in XBRL includes: (i) Condensed Consolidated Income
Statements for the fiscal periods ended March 31, 2011 and
March 31, 2010, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (iii) Condensed
Consolidated Cash Flow Statements for the fiscal periods
ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, and (iv) the Notes
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Submitted electronically herewith. |
64