sv1za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 8, 2010
Registration No. 333-169399
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 5
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
FIRST BANCORP.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
6022
|
|
66-0561882
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
1519 Ponce de León Avenue,
Stop 23
Santurce, Puerto Rico
00908
(787) 729-8200
(Address, including zip code and
telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
Lawrence Odell
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
First BanCorp.
1519 Ponce de León Avenue,
Stop 23
Santurce, Puerto Rico
00908
(787) 729-8109
(Name, address, including zip
code and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Linda L. Griggs
Andrew T. Budreika
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
|
|
Richard A. Drucker, Esq.
Arthur S. Long, Esq.
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of
this registration statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer
or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering Price(1)
|
|
|
Registration Fee(2)
|
Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share
|
|
|
$402,500,000.00
|
|
|
$28,698.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the amount of the registration fee in accordance
with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and includes shares of common stock that the
underwriters have an option to purchase to cover over
allotments, if any.
|
|
(2)
|
|
A registration fee of $40,997.50
has been paid previously in connection with this Registration
Statement.
|
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration
statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
EXPLANATORY
NOTE
This Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Registration
No. 333-169399)
of First BanCorp. (the Registrant) is being filed
primarily to incorporate by reference into the preliminary
prospectus constituting Part I of the Registration
Statement the Registrants Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
which were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 6, 2010 and December 8, 2010, respectively.
No other changes or additions are being made hereby to the
preliminary prospectus constituting Part I of the
Registration Statement or to Items 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17 of
Part II of the Registration Statement.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an
offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer
to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or
sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION: DATED
DECEMBER 8, 2010
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS
Shares
Common Stock
First BanCorp. is the holding company for FirstBank Puerto Rico,
a Puerto Rico-chartered commercial bank headquartered in
San Juan, Puerto Rico.
We are
offering post-reverse
stock split (as defined below) shares of our common stock
representing an aggregate offering price of $350 million.
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol FBP. On December 1, 2010, the last
reported sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange was $0.25 per pre-reverse stock split share.
Before the registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part is declared effective, we will effect a reverse stock split
(the reverse stock split) in the range of between
one new share of common stock for 10 old shares of common stock
and one new share of common stock for 20 old shares of common
stock, which is the range that our stockholders approved at our
Special Meeting of Stockholders on August 24, 2010. The
number of authorized shares of common stock will remain the same
after the reverse stock split. Once the ratio for the reverse
stock split is determined, except where we state otherwise, all
of the numbers and prices of shares presented in this prospectus
will be restated on a post-reverse stock split basis.
The public offering price for each share of our post-reverse
stock split shares of common stock will be determined by a
negotiation between us and the underwriters based upon market
conditions, an estimate of the change in the market price of our
common stock as a result of the reverse stock split and other
factors on the day we price the shares. In the usual case, as a
result of a reverse stock split (all other things being equal),
the market price of common stock may not rise proportionally to
the decrease in outstanding shares resulting from the reverse
stock split. While it is not possible to predict the impact of
the reverse stock split in our case, consideration of the impact
of the reverse stock split will be necessary in determining the
number of post-reverse stock split shares to include in this
offering.
We previously offered to issue shares of common stock for gross
proceeds of $500 million. In connection with our decision
to lower the size of the offering of shares of common stock for
gross proceeds of $350 million, the United States
Department of the Treasury (the U.S. Treasury)
agreed to amendments to the terms of the Fixed Rate Cumulative
Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G, $1,000
liquidation preference per share (Series G Preferred
Stock), which revise the terms under which we can compel
the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into shares
of common stock. The revised terms require that we sell shares
of common stock for gross proceeds of $350 million, rather
than $500 million, and provide for the issuance of
approximately 438.7 million shares of common stock upon the
mandatory conversion based on an initial conversion rate of
1034.1975 shares of common stock for each share of
Series G Preferred Stock (calculated by dividing $750, or a
discount of 25% from the $1,000 liquidation preference per share
of Series G Preferred Stock, by the initial conversion
price of $0.7252 per share, which is subject to adjustment).
Previously, the discount was 35% from the $1,000 liquidation
value.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 24 to read about factors
you should consider before you make your investment decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per post-reverse stock split share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Price to public
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to First BanCorp.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up
to
additional post-reverse stock split shares of common stock
(equal to 15% of the total number of shares we are offering)
solely to cover over-allotments, if any.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any
securities commission of any state or other jurisdiction has
approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the
accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offense.
These securities are not savings accounts, deposits, or other
obligations of any bank and are not insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental
agency.
The underwriters expect to deliver the common stock to
purchasers on or
about ,
2010, subject to customary closing conditions.
Sole Book-Running Manager
Lead Manager
UBS
Investment Bank
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
We have not authorized anyone to provide any information
other than that contained or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus or in any free writing prospectus prepared by or on
behalf of us or to which we have referred you. We take no
responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the
reliability of, any other information that others may give
you.
This prospectus and any applicable prospectus supplement are
not offers to sell nor are they seeking an offer to buy these
securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted. The information contained in this prospectus and any
applicable prospectus supplement is complete and correct only as
of the date on the front cover of such documents, regardless of
the time of the delivery of such documents or any sale of these
securities. In this prospectus, First BanCorp,
we, us, and our refer to the
consolidated operations of First BanCorp., and references to a
company name refer solely to such company.
For investors outside the United States: Neither we nor any of
the underwriters have taken any action to permit a public
offering of the shares of our common stock or the possession or
distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action
for that purpose is required, other than the United States. You
are required to inform yourselves about and to observe any
restrictions relating to this offering and the distribution of
this prospectus.
This prospectus includes statistical and other industry and
market data that we obtained from industry publications and
research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties.
Industry publications and third party research, surveys and
studies generally indicate that their information has been
obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although they do
not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
While we believe these industry publications and third party
research, surveys and studies are reliable, we have not
independently verified such data.
About
This Prospectus
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we
filed with Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC). When required, we will file prospectus
supplements to update or change information contained in this
prospectus. You should read both this prospectus and any
prospectus supplement together with additional information
described under the headings Additional Information
and Incorporation By Reference.
Additional
Information
As permitted by SEC rules, this prospectus omits certain
information that is included in the registration statement and
its exhibits. Since the prospectus may not contain all of the
information that you may find important, you should review the
full text of these documents. If we have filed a contract,
agreement or other document as an exhibit to the registration
statement, you should read the exhibit for a more complete
understanding of the document or matter involved. Each statement
in this prospectus, including statements incorporated by
reference as discussed below, regarding a contract, agreement or
other document is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
actual document.
We file annual, quarterly and special reports and other
information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we
file with the SEC at the SECs public reference room
located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference room. Our
filings are also available to the public from the SECs web
site at
http://www.sec.gov.
i
Incorporation
by Reference
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference the
information we file with the SEC, which means we can disclose
important information to you by referring to these documents.
The information included in the following documents is
incorporated by reference and is considered a part of this
prospectus. The most recent information that we file with the
SEC automatically updates and supersedes previously filed
information.
We hereby incorporate by reference into this prospectus the
following documents that we have filed with the SEC:
|
|
|
|
|
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on
March 2, 2010;
|
|
|
|
Our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010
and September 30, 2010 filed with the SEC on May 10,
2010, August 9, 2010 and November 9, 2010,
respectively;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 3, 2010 (excluding Item 2.02
and Exhibit 99.2 of Item 9.01), April 29, 2010
(excluding Items 2.02 and 9.01, as amended by
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on May 3, 2010), June 4, 2010,
July 2, 2010, July 7, 2010, July 15, 2010,
July 16, 2010, July 20, 2010, August 17, 2010,
August 18, 2010, August 23, 2010, August 24,
2010, August 26, 2010, October 26, 2010 (excluding the
three paragraphs immediately following the bullets under the
section heading Third Quarter Highlights beginning
on the first page of Exhibit 99.1), November 24, 2010,
December 2, 2010, December 6, 2010 and
December 8, 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held
on April 27, 2010 filed with the SEC on April 6,
2010; and
|
|
|
|
Our Proxy Statement for the August 24, 2010 Special Meeting
of Stockholders filed with the SEC on August 2, 2010.
|
You may request a copy of these filings, other than an exhibit
to a filing (unless that exhibit is specifically incorporated by
reference into that filing), at no cost, by writing to us at the
following address: First BanCorp., Attention: Lawrence Odell,
Secretary, P.O. Box 9146, San Juan, Puerto Rico,
00908-0146.
Telephone requests may be directed to:
(787) 729-8109.
E-mail
requests may be directed to lawrence.odell@firstbankpr.com. You
may also access this information at our website at
www.firstbankpr.com by viewing the SEC
Filings subsection of the Investor Relations
menu. No additional information on our website is deemed to be
part of or incorporated by reference into this prospectus. We
have included our website address in this prospectus solely as
an inactive textual reference.
ii
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary does not contain all of the information you
should consider before investing in our common stock. This
prospectus includes or incorporates by reference information
about the shares we are offering as well as information
regarding our business and detailed financial data. Before you
decide to invest in our common stock, you should read the entire
prospectus carefully, including the Risk Factors
section and any information incorporated by reference herein.
First
BanCorp
OUR
COMPANY
Founded in 1948, First BanCorp is the second-largest publicly
owned financial holding company in Puerto Rico as measured by
total assets as of September 30, 2010. We are subject to
regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York (the Federal Reserve) and the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. First BanCorp was
incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
to serve as the bank holding company for FirstBank Puerto Rico
(FirstBank). We are a full-service provider of
financial services and products with operations in Puerto Rico,
the mainland United States (the U.S.), the United
States Virgin Islands (the USVI) and the British
Virgin Islands (the BVI and together with the USVI,
the Virgin Islands). As of September 30, 2010,
we had total assets of $16.7 billion, total deposits of
$12.5 billion and total stockholders equity of
$1.3 billion.
We provide a wide range of financial services for retail,
commercial and institutional clients. We control two wholly
owned subsidiaries: FirstBank, a Puerto Rico-chartered
commercial bank, and FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc., a Puerto
Rico-chartered insurance agency (FirstBank Insurance
Agency).
FirstBank is subject to the supervision, examination and
regulation of both the Office of the Commissioner of Financial
Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the
OCIF) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(the FDIC). Deposits are insured through the FDIC
Deposit Insurance Fund. In addition, within FirstBank, the
operations in the USVI are subject to regulation and examination
by the United States Virgin Islands Banking Board and, in the
BVI, operations are subject to regulation by the British Virgin
Islands Financial Services Commission. FirstBank Insurance
Agency is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation
of the Office of the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico and operates six offices in Puerto Rico.
FirstBank conducts its business through its main office located
in San Juan, Puerto Rico, forty-eight full service banking
branches in Puerto Rico, fourteen branches in the USVI and the
BVI and ten branches in the State of Florida.
In addition to the banking operations of FirstBank, we provide,
through directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries, small loan
origination services in Puerto Rico and the USVI, residential
mortgage loan origination services, local municipal bond
underwriting services and insurance services in Puerto Rico and
the USVI.
BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
We have six operating segments: Commercial and Corporate
Banking, Mortgage Banking, Consumer (Retail) Banking and
Treasury and Investments in Puerto Rico; United States
Operations; and Virgin Islands Operations. Each of our six
operating segments is described below:
Commercial
and Corporate Banking
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of our
lending and other services across a broad spectrum of industries
ranging from small businesses to large corporate clients.
FirstBank has developed expertise in industries including
healthcare, tourism, financial institutions, food and beverage,
income-producing real estate
1
and the public sector. The Commercial and Corporate Banking
segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real
estate (CRE) and construction loans, and other
products such as cash management and business management
services. A substantial portion of this portfolio is secured by
the underlying value of the real estate collateral and personal
guarantees of the borrowers.
Mortgage
Banking
The Mortgage Banking segment conducts its operations mainly
through FirstBank and its mortgage origination subsidiary,
FirstMortgage, Inc (FirstMortgage). These operations
consist of the origination, sale and servicing of a variety of
residential mortgage loans products. Originations are sourced
through different channels such as FirstBank branches, mortgage
bankers and in association with new project developers.
FirstMortgage focuses on originating residential real estate
loans, some of which conform to Federal Housing Administration
(FHA), Veterans Administration (VA) and
Rural Development (RD) standards. Loans originated
that meet FHA standards qualify for FHAs insurance program
whereas loans that meet VA and RD standards are guaranteed by
their respective federal agencies.
The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages
in the secondary markets. More than 90% of FirstBanks
residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed-rate,
fully amortizing, full documentation loans. FirstBank is not
actively engaged in offering negative amortization loans or
option adjustable rate mortgage loans.
Consumer
(Retail) Banking
The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of our consumer
lending and deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through
FirstBanks branch network and loan centers in Puerto Rico.
Loans to consumers include auto, boat and personal loans and
lines of credit. Deposit products include interest bearing and
non-interest bearing checking and savings accounts, individual
retirement accounts and retail certificates of deposit
(CDs). Retail deposits gathered through each branch
of FirstBanks retail network serve as one of the funding
sources for its lending and investment activities. Credit card
accounts are issued under FirstBanks name through an
alliance with a nationally recognized financial institution,
which bears the credit risk.
Treasury
and Investments
The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for our
treasury and investment management functions. In the treasury
function, which includes funding and liquidity management, the
Treasury and Investments segment sells funds to the Commercial
and Corporate Banking segment, the Mortgage Banking segment and
the Consumer (Retail) Banking segment to finance their
respective lending activities and purchases funds gathered by
those segments.
United
States Operations
The United States Operations segment consists of all banking
activities conducted by FirstBank in the U.S. mainland.
FirstBank provides a wide range of banking services to
individual and corporate customers primarily in southern Florida
through its ten branches and two specialized lending centers.
Our success in attracting core deposits in Florida has enabled
us to become less dependent on brokered deposits. The United
States Operations segment offers an array of both retail and
commercial banking products and services. Consumer banking
products include checking, savings and money market accounts,
retail CDs, internet banking services, residential mortgages,
home equity loans and lines of credit, automobile loans and
credit cards through an alliance with a nationally recognized
financial institution, which bears the credit risk.
The commercial banking services include checking, savings and
money market accounts, CDs, internet banking services, cash
management services, remote data capture and automated clearing
house, or ACH, transactions. Loan products include the
traditional commercial and industrial (C&I) and
CRE products, such as lines of credit, term loans and
construction loans.
2
Virgin
Islands Operations
The Virgin Islands Operations segment consists of all banking
activities conducted by FirstBank in the USVI and BVI, including
retail and commercial banking services, with a total of fourteen
branches serving St. Thomas, St. Croix, St. John, Tortola
and Virgin Gorda. The Virgin Islands Operations segment is
driven by its consumer, commercial lending and deposit-taking
activities. Since 2005, FirstBank has been the largest bank in
the USVI as measured by total assets.
CURRENT
SITUATION
Like many financial institutions across the U.S., our operations
have been adversely affected by sustained adverse economic
conditions that have affected Puerto Rico and the U.S. The
economy in Puerto Rico continues to be challenging, although the
year-over-year
economic activity and recent employment increases in the
services, financial activities and tourism industries suggest
some improvement. The Government Development Bank for Puerto
Rico Economic Activity Index (GDB-EAI), which is a
coincident index consisting of four major monthly economic
indicators, namely total payroll employment, total electric
power consumption, cement sales and gas consumption, monitors
the actual trend of Puerto Ricos economy. The GDB-EAI
reflected a decrease in the rate of contraction of Puerto
Ricos economy in the ten-month period ended
October 31, 2010 as compared to the ten-month period ended
October 31, 2009, suggesting that economic activity has
been stabilizing. In October 2010, it reflected the largest
month-over-month
improvement since October 2006 and the largest
year-over-year
improvement since April 2008. In addition, on November 29,
2010, Standard & Poors revised its outlook from
stable to positive on the general
obligation rating of BBB- for the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico.
The adverse economic conditions have negatively affected our
capital position and reduced our profitability, particularly as
a result of the dramatic reductions in the underlying collateral
values of real estate for our secured loans. Since the beginning
of 2009, we have taken a number of steps to enable us to emerge
from the current adverse economic conditions as a stronger
organization:
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios. As of September 30, 2010,
FirstBanks capital ratios exceeded the minimum established
capital ratios required for a well-capitalized
depository institution, with approximately $336 million and
$659 million of capital in excess of that required to
satisfy the minimum ratios for total capital to risk-weighted
assets and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets,
respectively. We recently completed an offer to exchange newly
issued shares of our common stock for any and all of the issued
and outstanding shares of Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
Preferred Stock, Series A through E, and an exchange of
shares of our Series F Preferred Stock (as defined below)
that we previously had sold to the U.S. Treasury, plus dividends
accrued thereon, for shares of Series G Preferred Stock.
See Our StrategyStrengthen our Capital
Position. The exchange offer improved the quality of our
capital position by substantially increasing tangible common
equity and enhanced our ability to meet any new capital
requirements. As of September 30, 2010, our Tier 1
common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio increased from 2.86%
as of June 30, 2010 to 6.62% and our tangible common equity
to tangible assets ratio increased from 2.57% as of
June 30, 2010 to 5.21%. See Regulatory and Other
Capital Ratios and Non-GAAP Data.
Further, we believe the completion of the exchange offer
improves our ability to operate in the current economic
environment, access the capital markets to fund strategic
initiatives or other business needs and absorb any future credit
losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Agreements. On June 4, 2010,
we announced that FirstBank had agreed to a Consent Order (the
Order) issued by the FDIC and OCIF, dated as of
June 2, 2010, and we had entered into a Written Agreement
with the Federal Reserve, dated as of June 3, 2010 (the
Written Agreement and collectively with the Order,
the Agreements). The Agreements require us and
FirstBank to take certain actions to, among other things,
develop and adopt plans to attain certain capital levels and
reduce non-performing and classified assets that have impacted
FirstBanks financial condition and performance. We have
submitted our capital plan setting forth how we plan to improve
our capital positions to comply with the above mentioned
Agreements over time. Specifically, the capital plan
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
details how we will achieve a total capital to risk-weighted
assets ratio of at least 12%, a Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 10% and a leverage ratio
of at least 8%. In addition to the capital plan, we have
submitted to our regulators a liquidity and brokered deposit
plan, including a contingency funding plan, a non-performing
asset reduction plan, a budget and profit plan, a strategic plan
and a plan for the reduction of classified and special mention
assets. Further, we have reviewed and enhanced our loan review
program, various credit policies, our treasury and investments
policy, our asset classification and allowance for loan and
lease losses and non-accrual policies, our charge-off policy and
our appraisal program. The Agreements also require the
submission to the regulators of quarterly progress reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deleverage. We have deleveraged our balance
sheet in order to preserve capital, principally by selling
investments and reducing the size of the loan portfolio.
Significant decreases in assets have been achieved mainly
through the non-renewal of matured commercial loans, such as
temporary loan facilities to the Puerto Rico government, and
through the charge-off of portions of loans deemed
uncollectible. In addition, a reduced volume of loan
originations has contributed to this deleveraging strategy.
|
During the first nine months of 2010, we reduced our investment
portfolio by approximately $1.3 billion, while our loan
portfolio decreased by $1.8 billion. The net reduction in
securities and loans has reduced our total assets to
$16.7 billion as of September 30, 2010, a decrease of
$2.9 billion from December 31, 2009. This decrease in
securities and loans allowed a reduction of $3.6 billion in
wholesale funding as of September 30, 2010, including
repurchase agreements, advances, and brokered CDs.
During the third quarter of 2010, we achieved a reduction of
$1.0 billion in investment securities mostly as a result of
a balance sheet repositioning strategy that resulted in the sale
during August of $1.2 billion in investment securities
combined with the early termination of repurchase agreements,
which, given the yield and cost combination of the instruments,
eliminated assets that were providing no positive marginal
contribution to earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality. We have strengthened our
processes to enhance asset quality through the implementation of
stricter loan approval processes. In addition, the
responsibilities of our Special Assets Group, which reports
directly to our chief executive officer, have been expanded to
include management of all activities related to our classified
credits and non-performing assets for the commercial business
with the purpose of improving their quality or disposing of the
assets. See Our StrategyImprove our
Profitability. Our Special Assets Group focuses on
strategies for the accelerated reduction of non-performing
assets through note sales, troubled debt restructurings, loss
mitigation programs, sales of real estate owned and sales of
loans through special purpose vehicles. In addition to the
management of the resolution process for problem loans, the
Special Assets Group oversees collection efforts for all loans
to prevent migration to the non-performing and or classified
status. Therefore, the Special Assets Group not only implements
a remediation strategy, but also provides preventive oversight
at a corporate level to reduce non-performing migration trends
within the commercial loan portfolio.
|
As a result of these strategies, FirstBank has reduced
delinquencies within the 30 to 89 days past due range and
the level of non-performing loans as of September 30, 2010,
when compared to the first quarter of 2010. Total non-performing
loans decreased by $133.3 million to $1.51 billion
when compared to $1.64 billion as of March 31, 2010.
This decrease was mainly a function of charge-off activity and
the sale of
non-performing
loans. During the first nine months of 2010, we sold
non-performing assets totaling approximately
$198.9 million, which includes $157.4 million of
non-performing loans, and $41.5 million of real estate
owned properties.
Our entire construction portfolio has been transferred to the
Special Assets Group and is in the workout phase.
Strategies are being implemented to expedite the resolution of
problem loans through restructurings, note sales and short
sales, among others. The portfolio is increasingly moving into
the project completion phase. During the third
quarter of 2010, $109.1 million of construction
4
loans were converted to CRE loans, of which $78 million
have Puerto Rico government guarantees. We expect additional
conversions of construction loans to commercial loans or CRE
loans in the amounts of $9.8 million in the fourth quarter
of 2010 and $133.1 million in 2011. Absorption rates on
residential construction projects in Puerto Rico, that is, the
rates at which newly constructed units are sold, have increased
for the third consecutive quarter from 6% in the third quarter
of 2009 to 11% in the fourth quarter of 2009 to 17% in the first
quarter of 2010 and to 18% in the second quarter of 2010. As a
key initiative to increase the absorption rate in residential
construction projects, we have engaged in discussions with
developers to review the sales strategies and to reduce the sale
price per unit. In addition, we believe that absorption rate may
increase as a result of recent legislation enacted in Puerto
Rico. In September, the Puerto Rico government enacted a housing
stimulus package that provides various incentives to buyers of
residences in Puerto Rico. See Recent
Developments. With respect to non-performing residential
construction loans, we are providing mortgage financing
incentives for buyers of the units.
The United States Operations segment has also had success in
substantially reducing its construction loan portfolio and the
level of non-performing assets. The construction portfolio in
Florida has been reduced to $107 million as of
September 30, 2010 from $981 million as of
June 30, 2006 when construction lending in this segment was
halted. Non-performing assets in Florida decreased by
$189 million, or 49%, from $384 million as of
December 31, 2009 to $195 million as of
September 30, 2010.
With respect to the residential mortgage portfolio,
delinquencies appear to be stabilizing as reflected by a
$19.1 million, or 4%, reduction in residential
non-performing loans over the last two quarters. As part of its
asset quality initiatives for the residential mortgage
portfolio, FirstBank developed a loss mitigation program in 2007
focused on providing homeownership preservation assistance. In
2010, FirstBank expanded the loss mitigation program, dedicated
additional personnel and engaged a third party to further expand
our resources in this area.
With respect to the consumer loan portfolio, performance of the
portfolio has been stable since 2008. We continue to believe
that this portfolio will remain stable.
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Governance. We reorganized our
management structure to better implement and execute our
business strategies. In addition, since September of 2009 we
have an independent chairman who is separate from the chief
executive officer. Two new committees at the board level, a
Strategic Planning Committee and a Compliance Committee, were
established to provide ongoing monitoring of business
strategies, financial targets and corporate objectives as well
as compliance with regulatory Agreements.
|
We believe that these steps, together with our established,
integrated and geographically diverse network, position us to
emerge from the current adverse economic conditions as a
stronger organization.
QUALITY
OF LOAN PORTFOLIO
Loan
Reviews
We regularly perform internal assessments of all loan
portfolios. Our internal loan review unit (Loan
Review) assesses a variety of factors, including the
soundness of the loan structure, the value of the underlying
collateral, the ability of the primary borrower to repay the
debt as contracted, the accuracy of the risk ratings and the
adherence to FirstBanks policies. Loan Review is an
independent function and, as such, reports to the audit
committee of our board of directors. Loan Review applies a
risk-based approach in selecting commercial loans for review
purposes. The scope of our annual plan to internally review
loans, which is designed to include a representative mix of our
commercial loan portfolio, encompasses nearly 65% of our total
commercial loan portfolio as measured in dollars. The annual
plan contemplates the quarterly review of those loans classified
as special mention or worse
and/or in
non-accrual status and an annual review. The review of the
retail credit portfolio (consumer, auto and mortgage loan
portfolios) is accomplished through assessments performed by the
Quality Assurance units (Quality Assurance) over a
sample of loans.
5
Quality Assurance assesses compliance with FirstBanks
retail credit policies and procedures, including documentation,
and applicable laws and regulations. We believe that our loan
review process is consistent with the requirement in the Order
that FirstBank operate under an adequate and effective program
of independent loan review.
In addition to our ongoing internal assessment of our loan
portfolio, since October 2007 we have engaged an external loan
review firm to review our Florida loan portfolio on a
semi-annual basis. This firm typically reviews approximately 60%
to 75% of our commercial loan portfolio in Florida, which
includes construction, C&I and CRE loans and was
$585 million in size at September 30, 2010. These loan
reviews are designed to verify the accuracy of our internal
risk-grading process and compliance with our loan policy and
regulatory and accounting guidelines.
Stress
Testing Analysis
For the last four years, FirstBanks operations have been
adversely affected by sustained adverse economic conditions as a
result of the recessionary environment in Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands and the mainland U.S. During this period,
FirstBanks loan portfolios have deteriorated as reflected
in the significant reductions in collateral values and the
higher delinquencies resulting from the reduced income
generation capacity of its borrowers. We have conducted a
detailed portfolio level credit stress test that assumes an
economic outlook that is more adverse than the current
environment, adjusted for the particular characteristics of our
loan portfolio and markets in which we operate. Our analysis was
generally consistent with the guidelines utilized for the
Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP)
analysis, which was intended to measure the financial strength
of the nations 19 largest financial institutions on a
going forward basis. The 19 financial institutions were asked to
project potential losses over a two-year period, however, our
analysis projected losses over longer periods, as described
below.
With respect to the residential mortgage portfolio, the analysis
was performed by a third party consulting firm based on market
information from such firms database and FirstBanks
portfolio specific information provided by management. With our
concurrence, the consultants used risk characteristics of the
portfolio such as historical loss migration by region, vintage,
rank and credit scores to analyze the performance of the
portfolio at the individual loan level. These factors were
analyzed under the assumption of a continued recessionary
environment where there is a prolonged decline in the House
Price Index (HPI) and foreclosures are approximately
5% compared to the current 3.1% level. HPI was stressed by
applying an additional reduction from current price levels of
20% in year one, 10% in year two and 5% in year three, leveling
off in year four and with a 3% recovery in year five. The model
also provided for risk adjusted prepayment curves, default
curves and loss severity curves. Management believes that the
cumulative effect of the additional reduction in HPI in addition
to the reductions that have already been experienced in our
markets applied a significant level of stress to the portfolio.
With respect to the construction, CRE and C&I portfolios,
we performed a stress test with the assistance of a consultant
by applying stress factors, as described below, to a
representative sample of loans from FirstBanks respective
loan portfolios in Puerto Rico. The statistical sample selection
achieved a 95% confidence level with a 5% margin of error. The
resulting coverage of the sample, measured in dollars, was 34%
of the construction portfolio, 43% of the CRE portfolio and 15%
of the C&I portfolio. The results obtained on the tested
samples were then applied by FirstBanks credit risk group
to the overall loan portfolios.
For the construction portfolio, severity was measured by
reducing absorption rates by 50% and property selling prices by
40% from those reflected on recent appraisals. For land loans,
recent appraised collateral values were reduced by 35%. In the
case of CRE loans secured by income producing properties,
vacancy rates were increased to 25% coupled with the loss of the
anchor tenant, and, for owner occupied properties, net operating
income was reduced by 25%. For C&I loans, the severity
factor was applied by reducing borrowers current net
operating income by 25% and applying haircuts to existing
collateral values between 10% and 50%, depending on the type of
collateral. In the event the collateral on the loans included
real estate
6
properties, we applied a haircut of 20% to the appraised value
with respect to appraisals older than two years at the time
of the analysis. Loss factors were computed based on the
deficiency reflected on all sampled loans where debt service
coverage fell below 1.15x under the above stressed conditions.
For the loan portfolios described herein, the appraisal, net
operating income and vacancy rates information used for the
stress analysis consisted of the most recent information
available as of the third quarter of 2009 when the detailed
testing of the sample was performed.
With respect to the consumer portfolio, which consists mostly of
personal and auto loans, the stress analysis was performed
internally by increasing the current loss rates by the worst
percentage loss rate change experienced by FirstBank on each
product type between 2005 through 2009 and generally an
additional 20% related to bankruptcy increases. FirstBank does
not have any credit card receivables and home equity loans
amounted to only $29 million, or less than 2% of the
consumer loan portfolio, as of September 30, 2010.
Presented below is a comparison of FirstBanks stress test
loss factors on the more adverse loss scenario described above
as compared to the average of the highest and lowest SCAP
factors of the institutions tested:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FirstBanks
|
|
|
Average of SCAP
|
|
|
|
more adverse
|
|
|
loss factor range on
|
|
|
|
loss factor
|
|
|
the more
adverse(1)
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage
|
|
|
9.74
|
%
|
|
|
11.51
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
48.84
|
%
|
|
|
16.50
|
%
|
CRE
|
|
|
18.75
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
C&I
|
|
|
7.35
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
10.20
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average of high/low cumulative two-year loss factors |
The application of FirstBanks more adverse loss factors to
the gross outstanding loan portfolios as of September 30,
2010 would represent additional losses of approximately
$1.4 billion over the next two to five years in excess of
the charge-offs we have already taken. Losses on the residential
mortgage portfolio were estimated over five years while consumer
losses were based on the average life of the portfolio, which
approximates two and a half years. Construction, CRE and
C&I losses are mostly expected to occur over two years.
These losses are not considered forecasts of expected losses but
a calculation of the loss impact on the loan portfolio based on
a hypothetical exercise which assumes that market financial
conditions deteriorate to the levels considered in the more
adverse stress factors.
As of September 30, 2010, we had a total capital ratio of
13.26%, a Tier I capital ratio of 11.96% and a leverage
ratio of 8.34%. We believe that the likelihood of the level of
loan losses projected in the more adverse economic scenario is
remote. Notwithstanding this view, we used stress testing to
gauge the amount of regulatory capital that would be required in
the event that the more adverse conditions were to prevail. In
performing this analysis, we considered the current level of
pre-tax, pre-provision earnings, the portion of the
$608 million in allowance for loan losses as of
September 30, 2010 available to absorb losses after
allocating a normalized reserve level to the remaining loan
portfolio, the time it would take for the losses to occur and
the current level of capital. If we adjust our as adjusted and
pro forma capital ratios as of September 30, 2010 disclosed
in the section Regulatory and Other Capital Ratios,
which give effect to the additional $350 million in capital
from this offering, to reflect three years of the annualized
2010 level of pre-tax, pre-provision earnings, the assumed
additional $1.4 billion of losses and the allocation of a
portion of our allowance, our as adjusted and pro forma capital
ratios would exceed currently established regulatory
well-capitalized capital ratio requirements.
7
OUR
STRATEGY
We developed and have been implementing a strategy to strengthen
our capital position and improve our profitability, which have
been adversely affected over the past few years as a result of
the sustained adverse economic conditions that have affected
Puerto Rico and the U.S. To implement this strategy, we
have modified our business model to respond to economic
conditions and to maintain our business on a sound course. We
have undergone an extensive strategic exercise that has enabled
us to identify opportunities to stabilize portfolios and
increase revenues. The challenges ahead and current economic
conditions mandate this new focus.
Since late 2009, we have developed and pursued a strategic plan
that includes the following key features:
|
|
|
|
|
capital preservation and optimization through the implementation
of capital restructuring initiatives;
|
|
|
|
enhanced and proactive management action plans on all loan
portfolios across the entire credit cycle to improve asset
quality, with the expectation of increased spreads and reduced
portfolio risk;
|
|
|
|
heightened efforts to grow core deposits and reduce dependency
on brokered deposits, including increasing deposit growth
through network optimization and core deposit penetration in
commercial loan and government customers and in Florida and the
Virgin Islands, which provide an additional source of funds to
increase core deposits;
|
|
|
|
initiatives to increase non-interest income through insurance
fees and transaction banking services, among other things;
|
|
|
|
initiatives to increase margins and loan yields through pricing
rationalization; and
|
|
|
|
continued operating efficiency improvements and expense
reduction by expanding the specific initiatives and enhancing
our technological infrastructure through targeted investments.
|
We believe that the recent consolidation of the Puerto Rico
banking market provides a significant opportunity for us to grow
organically and to capture market share as a wide gap currently
exists between the market share leader and other banks in Puerto
Rico. Given our franchise strengths and proven track record of
growing organically, we are confident that we will capitalize on
these opportunities and solidify our position in Puerto Rico.
Our competitive strengths, which we believe will enable us to
successfully implement our strategic plan and to accomplish
these goals, and further details about our strategy are set
forth below.
Our competitive strengths have enabled us to deliver positive
pre-tax, pre-provision earnings during the past five years
although we have had GAAP losses since 2009. See
Non-GAAP Data. These strengths include:
|
|
|
|
|
our position as the second largest financial holding company in
Puerto Rico and as the largest bank in the USVI as measured by
total assets as of September 30, 2010;
|
|
|
|
FirstBanks recognized brand in Puerto Rico and the Virgin
Islands, with consistent execution of a banking strategy focused
on customer satisfaction and personalized service in both retail
and commercial operations;
|
|
|
|
a well-diversified operation with a wide range of financial
services, including a diversified portfolio of products and
services and over 630,000 retail and commercial customers who
enable FirstBank to continue to grow and who provide FirstBank
with opportunities to cross-sell its products;
|
|
|
|
an ability to attract new customers and to cross-sell products
due to its strong market share in retail deposits, commercial
lending, automobile lending, finance leasing, personal loans and
small loans;
|
|
|
|
a high-quality technology and operating infrastructure that
supports our customer focus while maintaining non-interest
expenses at an efficient level;
|
|
|
|
an experienced management team; and
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
FirstBanks established, integrated and geographically
diverse network of branches, offices and service centers that
are located in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Florida.
|
Our specific strengths as of September 30, 2010 by
geographic area are described below in further detail:
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
|
|
a strong diversified franchise with 48 bank branches located
throughout much of the island of Puerto Rico;
|
|
|
|
an attractive business mix with substantial market share,
ranking second in total loans and third in total deposits net of
brokered CDs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a proven track record of organic growth and a core deposit
growth strategy that has driven a $981.7 million, or 42%,
increase in core deposits since December 31, 2007; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets of $13.9 billion representing 83% of our total
assets.
|
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
|
|
a strong market position with market share in excess of 40% and
limited competition;
|
|
|
|
14 branches serving St. Thomas, St. Croix, St. John,
Tortola and Virgin Gorda;
|
|
|
|
an attractive customer and business segment mix, skewed more
towards mass affluent retail customers and retail-oriented
businesses; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets of $963.7 million representing 6% of our total
assets.
|
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
a limited market presence in highly attractive counties;
|
|
|
|
10 branches serving primarily the south Florida region and a
loan production office;
|
|
|
|
83% increase in core deposits since December 2009 to
$1.5 billion as of September 30, 2010;
|
|
|
|
a local market that provides expansion opportunities under
improved market conditions; and
|
|
|
|
assets of $1.8 billion, representing 11% of our total
assets.
|
We have a two-pronged strategy, which is consistent with the
plans we have submitted to our regulators in accordance with the
Agreements into which we entered in early June 2010 and contains
elements intended to strengthen our capital position and
elements intended to improve our profitability. These elements
are described below:
Strengthen
our Capital Position
|
|
|
|
|
Completion of Exchange of Series F Preferred Stock into
Convertible Preferred Stock. On July 20,
2010, we exchanged our Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference per share
(Series F Preferred Stock), that we previously
had sold to the U.S. Treasury, plus accrued dividends on
the Series F Preferred Stock, for 424,174 shares of
Series G Preferred Stock, that has similar terms (including
the same liquidation preference), but which we can convert,
under the conditions described herein, as recently amended, into
shares of common stock. This conversion of the Series G
Preferred Stock would help to increase our tangible common
equity, which has already been substantially improved by our
completion of our offer to exchange shares of common stock for
shares of preferred stock discussed below. See
Recent Developments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion of Exchange of Series A through E Preferred
Stock into Common Stock. On August 30, 2010,
we completed our offer to exchange shares of common stock for
our outstanding shares of Series A through E Preferred
Stock. See Recent Developments. Our issuance
of 227,015,210 shares of common stock in the exchange offer
increased our common equity to provide
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
additional protection from the need to recognize future loan
loss reserves against our loan portfolio and credit losses
associated with the disposition of non-performing assets due to
the current adverse economic situation and improves our
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio and
tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio. Our ratio of
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets, which was
2.86% as of June 30, 2010, increased to 6.62% as of
September 30, 2010, and our ratio of tangible common equity
to tangible assets, which was 2.57% as of June 30, 2010,
increased to 5.21% as of September 30, 2010. See
Non-GAAP Data for reconciliations of
Tier 1 common equity and tangible common equity to
stockholders equity, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure, and tangible assets to total assets, the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measure, as of
September 30, 2010. During the third quarter of 2010, we
completed the exchange offer and the exchange of Series F
Preferred Stock for Series G Preferred Stock. In addition,
the issuance of shares of common stock in the exchange offer
satisfies a substantive condition to our ability to mandatorily
convert the Series G Preferred Stock into common stock and
improves our ability to meet any new capital requirements. See
Recent Developments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obtain Stockholder Approval of Charter
Amendments. Our stockholders approved amendments
to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number
of authorized shares of our common stock and decrease the par
value of our common stock. Such approval was obtained on
August 24, 2010. See Recent Developments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunistic Deleveraging Strategies and Sales of
Non-Performing Assets. We intend to continue with
the targeted deleveraging of our balance sheet through reduction
of our construction portfolio, sales of investment securities on
an opportunistic basis and the reduction of non-performing
assets, including through opportunistic sales of non-performing
loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion of this Common Stock Offering. The
completion of this common stock offering is the final element of
our capital strategy. See Recent Developments.
|
Improve
our Profitability
|
|
|
|
|
Improve Asset Quality. We intend to improve
asset quality and reduce our level of delinquencies,
non-performing assets and classified loans by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
aggressively monitoring asset quality through our Special Assets
Group, which was created in 2009 to address challenges faced by
our operations in Florida and was recently tasked with managing
all activities related to our classified credits and
non-performing assets for the commercial business at a
centralized level and overseeing collection efforts for
performing loans that are not classified to prevent excess
migration to the non-performing
and/or
classified status;
|
|
|
|
accelerating the disposition and sale of certain non-performing
assets and by engaging in other loss mitigation measures, such
as the restructuring of certain credits;
|
|
|
|
continuing to not originate construction loans until the adverse
economic conditions in the markets in which we operate improve
and reducing outstanding construction loan commitments through
the sale of such loans and implementing other work-out
initiatives, which also reduce the carrying costs associated
with such loans;
|
|
|
|
expanding FirstBanks loss mitigation programs and its home
ownership preservation assistance;
|
|
|
|
taking advantage of the recently enacted Puerto Rico housing
stimulus package, which we believe may increase our residential
construction loan portfolios absorption rate;
|
|
|
|
controlling the early delinquency stages with strengthened
collection activities in all loan portfolios, including the use
of external service providers for collection and loss mitigation
programs; and
|
|
|
|
accelerating the disposition of other real estate owned
(OREO) properties by increasing sale channels and
OREO unit resources.
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Growth of Core Deposits. We intend to continue
to grow our core deposits and reduce our dependence on brokered
certificates of deposit by expanding and optimizing our network
of retail branches, continuing local initiatives to increase our
retail deposits, seeking to attract customers looking to
diversify their banking relationships resulting from the recent
consolidation in Puerto Ricos banking industry and
realigning our sales force to increase our presence in the
commercial and governmental deposit and transaction banking
market. The implementation of our core deposit growth strategy
has resulted in an increase of $747.4 million, or 15%, in
non-brokered deposits during the first nine months of 2010.
|
|
|
|
Increase Non-Interest Income. We intend to
increase our non-interest income by expanding our fee-based
businesses, such as cash management, merchant banking,
interchange income and retail and commercial insurance programs
through increased product offerings and incorporation of new
technologies. Non-interest income represented approximately 11%
and 12.7% of net interest income for the 2009 fiscal year and
for the first nine months of 2010, respectively. To grow our
cash management and merchant services, we intend to further
leverage our branch network as a selling channel in order to
increase the cross-selling to current customers through training
and new procedures to be implemented in branches and cash
management operations. To grow our insurance business, we will
continue to focus on targeted cross-selling of our various
insurance offerings to FirstBanks customer base.
Currently, we have insurance relationships with approximately
18% of FirstBanks retail clients and approximately 1% of
FirstBanks commercial clients.
|
|
|
|
Improve Net Interest Margins. We have been
enhancing our risk based loan pricing by applying minimum
acceptable pricing thresholds which include interest rate
floors. Also, we have been changing the terms of our funding mix
to incorporate other balance sheet strategies we have been
implementing, such as originating a higher proportion of the
residential mortgage loans production in conforming paper that
can be sold in the market, thus eliminating the longer term
asset from the balance sheet, and the maintenance of higher
liquidity levels in short term instruments to properly position
us under the current economic scenario. The execution of our
capital strategy, including the completion of this common stock
offering, will allow us to reposition our liquidity needs which
we expect that, coupled with a stabilization of economic
conditions, will also enable us to improve our net interest
margin.
|
|
|
|
Operational Efficiencies. We intend to
continue to improve our operating efficiency by further reducing
controllable expenses, consolidating our infrastructure in a new
service center building, rationalizing our business operations
and enhancing our technological infrastructure through targeted
investments. We have reduced the number of our employees from
approximately 3,000 full time equivalents (FTEs) as
of December 31, 2008 to 2,523 FTEs as of September 30,
2010.
|
In addition, our management strives for prudent financial
management, employs a conservative investment philosophy, and
seeks to maintain strong capitalization and ample liquidity.
We believe that our effective implementation of the various
elements of our strategy will afford us the following
opportunities for increased profitability:
|
|
|
|
|
the investment of excess liquidity in higher yielding
instruments;
|
|
|
|
the further reduction in operating expenses;
|
|
|
|
the increase in non-interest income;
|
|
|
|
the reduction in nonrecurring operating expenses including, but
not limited to, professional service fees;
|
|
|
|
the reduction in expenses incurred with respect to real estate
owned as such real estate is divested;
|
|
|
|
improvement in net interest margin and the reduction in expenses
incurred with respect to non-performing assets as our loan
portfolio is strengthened;
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
as our risk profile improves, the reduction in FDIC deposit
insurance premiums, subject to increases mandated by the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the
Dodd-Frank Act); and
|
|
|
|
the realization of the benefit of the reversal of the
$290.5 million valuation allowance on the deferred tax
asset as FirstBank returns to profitability.
|
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
Financial
Results For Quarterly Period Ended September 30,
2010
On October 21, 2010, we released our financial results for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010. The press
release setting forth our results is an exhibit to our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 26, 2010. We reported a net
loss of $75.2 million for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2010 compared to a net loss of
$165.2 million for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009.
12
The following table provides a reconciliation of earnings (loss)
per common share for the quarterly periods ended
September 30, 2010, June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009 and for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(75,233
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,218
|
)
|
|
$
|
(272,872
|
)
|
|
$
|
(221,985
|
)
|
Non-cumulative preferred stock dividends (Series A through
E)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,494
|
)
|
Cumulative non-convertible preferred stock dividends
(Series F)
|
|
|
(1,618
|
)
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
(11,618
|
)
|
|
|
(14,167
|
)
|
Cumulative convertible preferred stock dividend (Series G)
|
|
|
(4,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock discount accretion (Series F and G)
|
|
|
(1,688
|
)
|
|
|
(1,170
|
)
|
|
|
(1,115
|
)
|
|
|
(4,010
|
)
|
|
|
(3,095
|
)
|
Favorable impact from issuing common stock in exchange for
Series A through E preferred stock, net of issuance
costs(1)
|
|
|
385,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable impact from issuing Series G mandatorily
convertible preferred stock in exchange for Series F
preferred
stock(2)
|
|
|
55,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholdersbasic
|
|
$
|
357,787
|
|
|
$
|
(96,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
(174,689
|
)
|
|
$
|
147,826
|
|
|
$
|
(262,741
|
)
|
Convertible preferred stock dividends and accretion
|
|
|
5,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholdersdiluted
|
|
$
|
363,413
|
|
|
$
|
(96,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
(174,689
|
)
|
|
$
|
153,452
|
|
|
$
|
(262,741
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
171,483
|
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
119,131
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
Average potential common shares
|
|
|
1,126,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstandingassuming dilution
|
|
|
1,298,275
|
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
498,856
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
$
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
(2.84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
(2.84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excess of carrying amount of
Series A through E Preferred Stock exchanged over the fair
value of new common shares issued.
|
|
(2) |
|
Excess of carrying amount of
Series F Preferred Stock exchanged and original warrant
over the fair value of new Series G Preferred Stock issued
and amended warrant.
|
13
The following table provides certain consolidated financial data
for the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2010,
June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009
and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(75,233
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,218
|
)
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholdersbasic
|
|
$
|
357,787
|
|
|
$
|
(96,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
(174,689
|
)
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholdersdiluted
|
|
$
|
363,413
|
|
|
$
|
(96,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
(174,689
|
)
|
Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision
income(1)
|
|
$
|
43,410
|
|
|
$
|
35,739
|
|
|
$
|
40,063
|
|
|
$
|
62,909
|
|
|
$
|
62,280
|
|
Common share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share basic
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
$
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
Financial ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
(1.73
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.94
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.25
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.08
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.27
|
)%
|
Return on average common equity
|
|
|
(50.80
|
)%
|
|
|
(70.31
|
)%
|
|
|
(68.06
|
)%
|
|
|
(30.54
|
)%
|
|
|
(74.62
|
)%
|
Tier 1 capital
|
|
|
11.96
|
%
|
|
|
12.05
|
%
|
|
|
11.98
|
%
|
|
|
12.16
|
%
|
|
|
12.52
|
%
|
Total capital
|
|
|
13.26
|
%
|
|
|
13.35
|
%
|
|
|
13.26
|
%
|
|
|
13.44
|
%
|
|
|
13.79
|
%
|
Leverage
|
|
|
8.34
|
%
|
|
|
8.14
|
%
|
|
|
8.37
|
%
|
|
|
8.91
|
%
|
|
|
8.97
|
%
|
Tangible common
equity(2)
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weight
assets(2)
|
|
|
6.62
|
%
|
|
|
2.86
|
%
|
|
|
3.36
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
Net interest
margin(3)
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
3.03
|
%
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
Efficiency
|
|
|
66.69
|
%
|
|
|
62.18
|
%
|
|
|
56.33
|
%
|
|
|
50.43
|
%
|
|
|
46.21
|
%
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
319,557,932
|
|
|
|
92,542,722
|
|
|
|
92,542,722
|
|
|
|
92,542,722
|
|
|
|
92,542,722
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
171,483,057
|
|
|
|
92,521,245
|
|
|
|
92,521,245
|
|
|
|
92,514,124
|
|
|
|
92,510,506
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,298,275,316
|
|
|
|
92,521,245
|
|
|
|
92,521,245
|
|
|
|
92,514,124
|
|
|
|
92,510,506
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For a reconciliation of adjusted
pre-tax, pre-provision income, a non-GAAP financial measure, to
(loss) before income taxes, its comparable GAAP equivalent, for
the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2010, June 30, 2010,
March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, refer
to the table set forth immediately below under
Non-GAAP MeasuresEarnings Data.
|
|
(2) |
|
For reconciliations of these ratios
to GAAP for the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2010,
June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009
and September 30, 2009, refer to the tables set forth
immediately below under Non-GAAP
MeasuresFinancial Ratios.
|
|
(3) |
|
On a tax-equivalent basis and
excluding valuations. For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP
financial measure to the comparable GAAP measure for the
quarterly periods ended September 30, 2010, June 30,
2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009, refer to the table set forth
immediately below under Non-GAAP MeasuresNet
Interest Margin.
|
14
Non-GAAP
Measures
Earnings
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Adjusted Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(Loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(76,196
|
)
|
|
$
|
(86,817
|
)
|
|
$
|
(100,138
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,891
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51,745
|
)
|
Add: Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
120,482
|
|
|
|
146,793
|
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
137,187
|
|
|
|
148,090
|
|
Less: Net (gain) on sale and OTTI of investment securities
|
|
|
(48,281
|
)
|
|
|
(24,237
|
)
|
|
|
(30,764
|
)
|
|
|
(24,387
|
)
|
|
|
(34,065
|
)
|
Add: Loss on early extinguishment of repurchase agreements
|
|
|
47,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision income
|
|
$
|
43,410
|
|
|
$
|
35,739
|
|
|
$
|
40,063
|
|
|
$
|
62,909
|
|
|
$
|
62,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Tangible Common Equity
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data and ratio results)
|
|
|
Tangible Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equityGAAP
|
|
$
|
1,321,979
|
|
|
$
|
1,438,289
|
|
|
$
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
$
|
1,698,843
|
|
Preferred equity
|
|
|
(411,876
|
)
|
|
|
(930,830
|
)
|
|
|
(929,660
|
)
|
|
|
(928,508
|
)
|
|
|
(927,374
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(14,673
|
)
|
|
|
(15,303
|
)
|
|
|
(15,934
|
)
|
|
|
(16,600
|
)
|
|
|
(17,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity
|
|
$
|
867,332
|
|
|
$
|
464,058
|
|
|
$
|
514,851
|
|
|
$
|
625,857
|
|
|
$
|
726,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assetsGAAP
|
|
$
|
16,678,879
|
|
|
$
|
18,116,023
|
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
19,628,448
|
|
|
$
|
20,081,185
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(14,673
|
)
|
|
|
(15,303
|
)
|
|
|
(15,934
|
)
|
|
|
(16,600
|
)
|
|
|
(17,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
16,636,108
|
|
|
$
|
18,072,622
|
|
|
$
|
18,806,932
|
|
|
$
|
19,583,750
|
|
|
$
|
20,035,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
319,558
|
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity ratio
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
Tangible book value per common share
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
$
|
5.01
|
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
|
$
|
7.85
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
Tier 1 Common Equity to
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Risk-Weighted Assets
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Tier 1 Common Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equityGAAP
|
|
$
|
1,321,979
|
|
|
$
|
1,438,289
|
|
|
$
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
$
|
1,698,843
|
|
Qualifying preferred stock
|
|
|
(411,876
|
)
|
|
|
(930,830
|
)
|
|
|
(929,660
|
)
|
|
|
(928,508
|
)
|
|
|
(927,374
|
)
|
Unrealized (gain) on
available-for-sale
securities(1)
|
|
|
(30,295
|
)
|
|
|
(63,311
|
)
|
|
|
(22,948
|
)
|
|
|
(26,617
|
)
|
|
|
(73,095
|
)
|
Disallowed deferred tax
asset(2)
|
|
|
(43,552
|
)
|
|
|
(38,078
|
)
|
|
|
(40,522
|
)
|
|
|
(11,827
|
)
|
|
|
(1,721
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(14,673
|
)
|
|
|
(15,303
|
)
|
|
|
(15,934
|
)
|
|
|
(16,600
|
)
|
|
|
(17,297
|
)
|
Cumulative change gain in fair value of liabilities accounted
for under a fair value option
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
|
(3,170
|
)
|
|
|
(951
|
)
|
|
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
|
(1,647
|
)
|
Other disallowed assets
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity
|
|
$
|
790,195
|
|
|
$
|
359,433
|
|
|
$
|
450,406
|
|
|
$
|
585,854
|
|
|
$
|
649,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
11,930,854
|
|
|
$
|
12,570,330
|
|
|
$
|
13,402,979
|
|
|
$
|
14,303,496
|
|
|
$
|
14,394,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio
|
|
|
6.62
|
%
|
|
|
2.86
|
%
|
|
|
3.36
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tier 1 capital excludes net
unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
debt securities and net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in
accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines. In
arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to
deduct net unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of
tax.
|
|
(2) |
|
Approximately $64 million of
our deferred tax assets at September 30, 2010
(June 30, 2010$71 million; March 31,
2010$69 million December 31,
2009$102 million; September 30,
2009$112 million) were included without limitation in
regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based capital
guidelines, while approximately $44 million of such assets
at September 30, 2010 (June 30,
2010$38 million; March 31,
2010$41 million; December 31,
2009$12 million; September 30,
2009$2 million) exceeded the limitation imposed by
these guidelines and, as disallowed deferred tax
assets, were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital.
According to regulatory capital guidelines, the deferred tax
assets that are dependent upon future taxable income are limited
for inclusion in Tier 1 capital to the lesser of:
(i) the amount of such deferred tax asset that the entity
expects to realize within one year of the calendar quarter
end-date, based on its projected future taxable income for that
year, or (ii) 10% of the amount of the entitys
Tier 1 capital. Approximately $7 million of our other
net deferred tax liability at September 30, 2010
(June 30, 2010$12 million; March 31,
2010$5 million; December 31,
2009$5 million; September 30,
2009$6 million) represented primarily the deferred
tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale
debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to
deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to
limitation under the guidelines.
|
16
Net
Interest Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Net Interest Income (in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest IncomeGAAP
|
|
$
|
204,028
|
|
|
$
|
214,864
|
|
|
$
|
220,988
|
|
|
$
|
243,449
|
|
|
$
|
242,022
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
(2,764
|
)
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income excluding valuations
|
|
|
204,966
|
|
|
|
215,351
|
|
|
|
221,732
|
|
|
|
240,685
|
|
|
|
243,507
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment
|
|
|
6,778
|
|
|
|
7,222
|
|
|
|
9,912
|
|
|
|
12,311
|
|
|
|
12,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding valuations
|
|
|
211,744
|
|
|
|
222,573
|
|
|
|
231,644
|
|
|
|
252,996
|
|
|
|
256,432
|
|
Interest ExpenseGAAP
|
|
|
90,326
|
|
|
|
95,802
|
|
|
|
104,125
|
|
|
|
106,152
|
|
|
|
112,889
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments and liabilities
measured at fair value
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
(989
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(1,589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense excluding valuations
|
|
|
89,800
|
|
|
|
99,698
|
|
|
|
103,136
|
|
|
|
105,905
|
|
|
|
111,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest incomeGAAP
|
|
$
|
113,702
|
|
|
$
|
119,062
|
|
|
$
|
116,863
|
|
|
$
|
137,297
|
|
|
$
|
129,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income excluding valuations
|
|
$
|
115,166
|
|
|
$
|
115,653
|
|
|
$
|
118,596
|
|
|
$
|
134,780
|
|
|
$
|
132,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding
valuations
|
|
$
|
121,944
|
|
|
$
|
122,875
|
|
|
$
|
128,508
|
|
|
$
|
147,091
|
|
|
$
|
145,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balances (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases
|
|
$
|
12,443,055
|
|
|
$
|
13,025,808
|
|
|
$
|
13,569,467
|
|
|
$
|
13,777,928
|
|
|
$
|
13,321,100
|
|
Total securities and other short-term investments
|
|
|
4,640,055
|
|
|
|
5,485,934
|
|
|
|
5,526,589
|
|
|
|
5,505,527
|
|
|
|
6,220,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
$
|
17,083,110
|
|
|
$
|
18,511,742
|
|
|
$
|
19,096,056
|
|
|
$
|
19,283,455
|
|
|
$
|
19,541,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
$
|
15,002,168
|
|
|
$
|
16,378,022
|
|
|
$
|
16,910,781
|
|
|
$
|
17,112,556
|
|
|
$
|
17,308,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Average Yield/Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield on interest-earning assetsGAAP
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilitiesGAAP
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spreadGAAP
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
|
2.31
|
%
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
2.55
|
%
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest marginGAAP
|
|
|
2.64
|
%
|
|
|
2.58
|
%
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
2.82
|
%
|
|
|
2.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield on interest-earning assets excluding valuations
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
4.95
|
%
|
|
|
4.94
|
%
|
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.37
|
%
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
2.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.67
|
%
|
|
|
2.51
|
%
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
|
2.68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield on interest-earning assets on a tax-equivalent
basis and excluding valuations
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
4.82
|
%
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.37
|
%
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
2.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding
valuations
|
|
|
2.55
|
%
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
|
|
2.75
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding
valuations
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
3.03
|
%
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Developments
On August 24, 2010, our stockholders approved the following
proposals at a special meeting of stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance of up to 256,401,610 pre-reverse stock split
shares of common stock in exchange (the Exchange
Offer) for shares of our (i) 7.125% Noncumulative
Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A
(Series A Preferred Stock), (ii) 8.35%
Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series B (Series B Preferred Stock),
(iii) 7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
Preferred Stock, Series C (Series C Preferred
Stock), (iv) 7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly
Income Preferred Stock, Series D (Series D
Preferred Stock) and (v) 7.00% Noncumulative
Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series E
(Series E Preferred Stock and together with the
Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock,
Series C Preferred Stock and Series D Preferred Stock,
the Preferred Stock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance of shares of common stock to a director and to The
Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) if BNS exercises its
anti-dilution rights under the Stockholder Agreement, dated as
of August 24, 2007 (the Stockholder Agreement),
that we entered into with BNS at the time it acquired
approximately 10% of our outstanding shares of common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an amendment to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to
decrease the par value of our common stock from $1.00 to $0.10
per share;
|
|
|
|
an amendment to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to
increase the total number of authorized shares of common stock
from 750 million to 2 billion; and
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
an amendment to our Restated Articles of Incorporation
empowering our board of directors to effect a reverse stock
split, thereby enabling us to comply with New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) listing requirements, and pursuant
to which the total number of authorized shares would remain at
2 billion.
|
On August 30, 2010, we issued 227,015,210 pre-reverse
stock split shares of common stock to participants in our offer
to issue shares of common stock in the Exchange Offer to holders
of validly tendered shares of Preferred Stock. Approval of our
stockholders to the issuance of shares in the Exchange Offer,
which was required by NYSE listing requirements, and to the
decrease in the par value of our common stock were conditions to
the completion of the Exchange Offer. The Exchange Offer, which
commenced on July 16, 2010 and expired at 9:30 a.m.,
New York City time, on August 25, 2010, resulted in the
tender of $487.1 million, or 88.54%, of the aggregate
liquidation preference of the Preferred Stock.
The tender of over $385 million of the liquidation
preference of the Preferred Stock and our stockholders
approval of the amendments to our Restated Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
common stock and decrease the par value of our common stock
satisfy all but one of the substantive conditions to our ability
to compel the conversion of the 424,174 shares of a new
series of Series G Preferred Stock, that we issued to the
U.S. Treasury on July 20, 2010 in exchange for the
$400 million liquidation value of our Series F
Preferred Stock, plus accrued and unpaid dividends pursuant to
the Exchange Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2010, by and
between us and the U.S. Treasury (the Exchange
Agreement). The other substantive condition to our ability
to compel the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock,
which was amended by the First Amendment to Exchange Agreement,
dated as of December 1, 2010, by and between us and the
U.S. Treasury (the First Amendment), is our
issuance of a minimum aggregate amount of $350 million of
additional capital, subject to terms, other than the price per
share, reasonably acceptable to the U.S. Treasury in its
sole discretion. In addition, neither we nor any of our
subsidiaries must have dissolved or became subject to insolvency
or similar proceedings, or become subject to other materially
adverse regulatory or other actions. The First Amendment also
reduced the discount applicable to the mandatory conversion of
the Series G Preferred Stock into common stock. As noted on
the cover page of this prospectus, the First Amendment provides
for the issuance of approximately 438.7 million shares of
common stock upon the mandatory conversion based on an initial
conversion rate of 1034.1975 shares of common stock for
each share of Series G Preferred Stock (calculated by
dividing $750, or a discount of 25% from the $1,000 liquidation
preference per share of Series G Preferred Stock, by the
initial conversion price of $0.7252 per share, which is subject
to adjustment). The reduction in the discount also will apply to
conversions at the option of a holder of the Series G
Preferred Stock.
In September 2010, the Puerto Rico government passed Act 132 of
2010, known as the Puerto Rico Housing Stimulus Package (the
Stimulus Package), creating an incentive program to
facilitate and promote the purchase of homes and other real
estate properties in the Puerto Rico market. The Puerto Rico
government has estimated that there is an unsold inventory of
new residences totaling roughly 20,000 in Puerto Rico. This
backlog contributes to depressed housing prices and continuing
stagnation and unemployment in the construction sector. As part
of the Stimulus Package, the following stimulus measures are
effective from September 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
owners of new residences would be exempt from capital gain taxes
to the extent the residences are bought on or after
September 1, 2010 but prior to June 30, 2011;
|
|
|
|
owners of existing residences would be exempt from capital gain
taxes to the extent the residences are sold on or after
September 1, 2010 but prior to June 30, 2011;
|
|
|
|
buyers of existing residences and non-residential properties
purchased on or after September 1, 2010 but prior to
June 30, 2011 will be entitled to a 50% exemption on
capital gain taxes provided that, with respect to
non-residential properties, the purchase price does not exceed
$3.0 million;
|
|
|
|
owners of non-residential properties sold on or after
September 1, 2010 but prior to June 30, 2011 will be
exempt from capital gain taxes to the extent the sale price does
not exceed $3.0 million;
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
buyers of new residences bought on or after September 1,
2010 but prior to June 30, 2011 will be exempt from
property taxes for five years;
|
|
|
|
owners of new and existing residences will be exempt from income
taxes on rental income derived from these properties for
10 years;
|
|
|
|
new residences sold on or after September 1, 2010 but prior
to June 30, 2011 will be fully exempt from recording
costs; and
|
|
|
|
existing residences and non-residential properties sold on or
after September 1, 2010 but prior to June 30, 2011
will be entitled to a 50% exemption from recording costs.
|
As of September 30, 2010, FirstBanks borrowers have
963 units completed and ready for immediate sale under the
Stimulus Package. We believe the Stimulus Package may increase
sales of current inventory and the disposition of OREO
properties.
OUR
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Our principal executive offices are located at 1519 Ponce de
Leon Avenue, Stop 23, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00908 and our
telephone number is
(787) 729-8200.
Our website address is www.firstbankpr.com.
20
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Aggregate offering price of shares of common stock offered by us |
|
$350,000,000* |
|
|
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
post-reverse
stock split shares.* |
|
Over allotment option |
|
We have granted the underwriters an option for 30 days from
the date of this prospectus to purchase up
to
additional shares of common stock (equal to 15% of the total
number of shares we are offering) to cover over allotments. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We expect to use the net proceeds from the sale of our common
stock for general corporate purposes, including strengthening
FirstBanks capital position. See Use of
Proceeds. |
|
Dividend policy |
|
We suspended the payment of dividends on our common stock
effective in August 2009 and do not intend to pay cash dividends
on our common stock for the foreseeable future. In addition,
under the terms of the Written Agreement with the Federal
Reserve, we are required to obtain prior approval from the
Federal Reserve to declare or pay dividends and to receive
dividends from FirstBank. See Description of Capital
StockDividends and Distributions. |
|
Voting |
|
Holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to one vote
per share on all matters voted on by our stockholders. There are
no cumulative voting rights for the election of directors. |
|
New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
FBP |
|
Risk factors |
|
You should read the Risk Factors section of this
prospectus for a discussion of factors to consider carefully
before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock. |
|
|
|
*
|
|
The public offering price for each
share of our post-reverse stock split shares of common stock
will be determined by a negotiation between us and the
underwriters based upon market conditions, an estimate of the
change in the market price of our common stock as a result of
the reverse stock split and other factors on the day we price
the shares. In the usual case, as a result of a reverse stock
split (all other things being equal), the market price of common
stock may not rise proportionally to the decrease in outstanding
shares resulting from the reverse stock split. While it is not
possible to predict the impact of the reverse stock split in our
case, consideration of the impact of the reverse stock split
will be necessary in determining the number of post-reverse
stock split shares to include in this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although we want to receive gross
proceeds of at least $350 million, we may determine to
complete an offering for a number of shares of common stock that
results in a lower amount of gross proceeds. In that case, we
would not be able to fulfill the remaining substantive condition
required for us to compel the conversion of the Series G
Preferred Stock into common stock, which would mean that our
tangible common equity would not benefit from an increase in the
number of outstanding shares of common stock resulting from such
a conversion and that we will continue to have to accrue
dividends payable on the Series G Preferred Stock. In
addition, the lower level of proceeds may require us to
implement additional de-leveraging strategies to ensure our
compliance with the capital plans we submitted to our regulators.
|
21
SUMMARY
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following summary selected consolidated financial data
summarizes our consolidated financial information as of and for
each of the five years ended December 31, 2009 and the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. You should read
the following financial data in conjunction with the information
set forth under Selected Financial Data and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the financial
statements and the related notes thereto included in our Annual
Reports on
Form 10-K
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and
2005 and our reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
June 30, 2010 and 2009 and September 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively, from which this information is derived. For
more information, see Incorporation by Reference.
Our historical results for any prior period are not necessarily
indicative of results to be expected in any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Summary of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
639,880
|
|
|
$
|
753,125
|
|
|
$
|
996,574
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,897
|
|
|
$
|
1,189,247
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,813
|
|
|
$
|
1,067,590
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
290,253
|
|
|
|
371,380
|
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
599,016
|
|
|
|
738,231
|
|
|
|
845,119
|
|
|
|
635,271
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
349,627
|
|
|
|
381,745
|
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
|
|
527,881
|
|
|
|
451,016
|
|
|
|
443,694
|
|
|
|
432,319
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
438,240
|
|
|
|
442,671
|
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
190,948
|
|
|
|
120,610
|
|
|
|
74,991
|
|
|
|
50,644
|
|
Net interest (loss) income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(88,613
|
)
|
|
|
(60,926
|
)
|
|
|
(60,816
|
)
|
|
|
336,933
|
|
|
|
330,406
|
|
|
|
368,703
|
|
|
|
381,675
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
104,117
|
|
|
|
103,457
|
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
|
|
74,643
|
|
|
|
67,156
|
|
|
|
31,336
|
|
|
|
63,077
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
278,655
|
|
|
|
263,293
|
|
|
|
352,101
|
|
|
|
333,371
|
|
|
|
307,843
|
|
|
|
287,963
|
|
|
|
315,132
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(9,721
|
)
|
|
|
(1,223
|
)
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
31,732
|
|
|
|
(21,583
|
)
|
|
|
(27,442
|
)
|
|
|
(15,016
|
)
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(272,872
|
)
|
|
|
(221,985
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
109,937
|
|
|
|
68,136
|
|
|
|
84,634
|
|
|
|
114,604
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock, basic
|
|
|
147,286
|
|
|
|
(262,741
|
)
|
|
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
|
69,661
|
|
|
|
27,860
|
|
|
|
44,358
|
|
|
|
74,328
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock, diluted
|
|
|
153,452
|
|
|
|
(262,741
|
)
|
|
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
|
69,661
|
|
|
|
27,860
|
|
|
|
44,358
|
|
|
|
74,328
|
|
Net (loss) income per pre-reverse stock split common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
(2.84
|
)
|
|
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
(2.84
|
)
|
|
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
Net (loss) income per post-reverse stock split share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data at Period-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
16,678,879
|
|
|
|
20,081,185
|
|
|
|
19,628,448
|
|
|
|
19,491,268
|
|
|
|
17,186,931
|
|
|
|
17,390,256
|
|
|
|
19,917,651
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
12,189,222
|
|
|
|
13,756,168
|
|
|
|
13,949,226
|
|
|
|
13,088,292
|
|
|
|
11,799,746
|
|
|
|
11,263,980
|
|
|
|
12,685,929
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
12,543,567
|
|
|
|
12,298,790
|
|
|
|
12,669,047
|
|
|
|
13,057,430
|
|
|
|
11,034,521
|
|
|
|
11,004,287
|
|
|
|
12,463,752
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,321,979
|
|
|
|
1,698,843
|
|
|
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
|
1,548,117
|
|
|
|
1,421,646
|
|
|
|
1,229,553
|
|
|
|
1,197,841
|
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
(1.98
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.49
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.39
|
)%
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
|
0.44
|
%
|
|
|
0.64
|
%
|
Return on average common equity
|
|
|
(62.75
|
)
|
|
|
(34.94
|
)
|
|
|
(34.07
|
)
|
|
|
7.89
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
6.85
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Net interest
margin(1)
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
|
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital ratio (total capital to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
13.26
|
%
|
|
|
13.79
|
%
|
|
|
13.44
|
%
|
|
|
12.80
|
%
|
|
|
13.86
|
%
|
|
|
12.25
|
%
|
|
|
10.72
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets)
|
|
|
11.96
|
|
|
|
12.52
|
|
|
|
12.16
|
|
|
|
11.55
|
|
|
|
12.61
|
|
|
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
9.71
|
|
Leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average assets)
|
|
|
8.34
|
|
|
|
8.97
|
|
|
|
8.91
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
|
|
|
9.29
|
|
|
|
7.82
|
|
|
|
6.72
|
|
Credit Quality Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
10.01
|
%
|
|
|
8.39
|
%
|
|
|
8.71
|
%
|
|
|
3.27
|
%
|
|
|
2.56
|
%
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
Non-performing loans to total loans receivable
|
|
|
12.36
|
|
|
|
11.21
|
|
|
|
11.23
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
Net charge offs to average loans
held-in-portfolio
|
|
|
3.67
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
40.41
|
|
|
|
30.64
|
|
|
|
33.77
|
|
|
|
47.95
|
|
|
|
46.04
|
|
|
|
62.79
|
|
|
|
110.18
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to year end loans
held-in-portfolio
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
Other Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
|
$
|
8.34
|
|
|
$
|
7.25
|
|
|
$
|
10.78
|
|
|
$
|
9.42
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
$
|
8.01
|
|
Average total equity to average total assets
|
|
|
8.11
|
|
|
|
9.60
|
|
|
|
9.36
|
|
|
|
7.74
|
|
|
|
7.70
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
7.09
|
|
Pre-tax, pre-provision
earnings(2)
|
|
|
175,089
|
|
|
|
221,909
|
|
|
|
309,205
|
|
|
|
269,153
|
|
|
|
210,329
|
|
|
|
187,067
|
|
|
|
180,264
|
|
Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision
earnings(3)
|
|
|
71,807
|
|
|
|
161,150
|
|
|
|
224,059
|
|
|
|
247,960
|
|
|
|
213,055
|
|
|
|
195,261
|
|
|
|
167,925
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On a tax-equivalent basis and
excluding valuations. For information about managements
use of this non-GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of
this non-GAAP financial measure to its comparable GAAP
equivalent, see Non-GAAP Data.
|
|
(2) |
|
Pre-tax, pre-provision earnings is
net (loss) income without regard to the provision for loan
losses and income tax expense (benefit). See
Non-GAAP Data for information about
managements use of this financial measure and a
reconciliation of pre-tax, pre-provision earnings to net loss
(income).
|
|
(3) |
|
Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision
earnings is net (loss) income without regard to the provision
for loan losses, income tax expense (benefit), gain on sale of
securities and recognition of
other-than-temporary
impairment. See Non-GAAP Data for information
about managements use of this financial measure and a
reconciliation of this adjusted earnings measure to net (loss)
income.
|
23
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Before you decide to invest in our common stock, you should
consider carefully the risks described below, together with the
other information contained in or incorporated by reference into
this prospectus, including our financial statements and the
related notes thereto. We believe the risks described below are
the risks that are material to us as of the date of this
prospectus. If any of the following risks actually occur, our
business, financial condition, results of operations and future
growth prospects would likely be materially and adversely
affected. In these circumstances, the market price of our common
stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business
FirstBank
is operating under the Order with the FDIC and OCIF and we are
operating under the Written Agreement with the Federal
Reserve.
On June 4, 2010, we announced that FirstBank agreed to the
Order, dated as of June 2, 2010, issued by the FDIC and
OCIF, and we entered into the Written Agreement, dated as of
June 3, 2010, with the Federal Reserve. The Agreements stem
from the FDICs examination as of the period ended
June 30, 2009 conducted during the second half of 2009.
Although our regulatory capital ratios exceeded the required
established minimum capital ratios for a
well-capitalized institution as of
September 30, 2010, because of the Order, FirstBank cannot
be regarded as well-capitalized as of
September 30, 2010.
Under the Order, FirstBank has agreed to address specific areas
of concern to the FDIC and OCIF through the adoption and
implementation of procedures, plans and policies designed to
improve the safety and soundness of FirstBank. These actions
include, among others, (1) having and retaining qualified
management; (2) increased participation in the affairs of
FirstBank by its board of directors; (3) development and
implementation by FirstBank of a capital plan to attain a
leverage ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of at least 10% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at
least 12%; (4) adoption and implementation of strategic,
liquidity and fund management and profit and budget plans and
related projects within certain timetables set forth in the
Order and on an ongoing basis; (5) adoption and
implementation of plans for reducing FirstBanks positions
in certain classified assets and delinquent and non-accrual
loans within timeframes set forth in the Order;
(6) refraining from lending to delinquent or classified
borrowers already obligated to FirstBank on any extensions of
credit so long as such credit remains uncollected, except where
FirstBanks failure to extend further credit to a
particular borrower would be detrimental to the best interests
of FirstBank, and any such additional credit is approved by the
FirstBanks board of directors; (7) refraining from
accepting, increasing, renewing or rolling over brokered
deposits without the prior written approval of the FDIC;
(8) establishment of a comprehensive policy and methodology
for determining the allowance for loan and lease losses and the
review and revision of FirstBanks loan policies, including
the non-accrual policy; and (9) adoption and implementation
of adequate and effective programs of independent loan review,
appraisal compliance and an effective policy for managing
FirstBanks sensitivity to interest rate risk.
The Written Agreement, which is designed to enhance our ability
to act as a source of strength to FirstBank, requires that we
obtain prior Federal Reserve approval before declaring or paying
dividends, receiving dividends from FirstBank, making payments
on subordinated debt or trust preferred securities, incurring,
increasing or guaranteeing debt (whether such debt is incurred,
increased or guaranteed, directly or indirectly, by us or any of
our non-banking subsidiaries) or purchasing or redeeming any
capital stock. The Written Agreement also requires us to submit
to the Federal Reserve a capital plan and progress reports,
comply with certain notice provisions prior to appointing new
directors or senior executive officers and comply with certain
payment restrictions on severance payments and indemnification
restrictions.
We anticipate that we will need to continue to dedicate
significant resources to our efforts to comply with the
Agreements, which may increase operational costs or adversely
affect the amount of time our management has to conduct our
operations. If we need to continue to recognize significant
reserves, cannot raise additional
24
capital pursuant to this offering of common stock, or cannot
accomplish other contemplated alternative capital preservation
strategies, including among others, an accelerated deleverage
strategy and the divestiture of profitable businesses, we and
FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum capital
requirements included in the capital plans required by the
Agreements. These capital plans, which we have submitted to, but
are subject to the approval of, our regulators, set forth our
plan to attain the capital ratio requirements set forth in the
Order over time.
If, at the end of any quarter, we do not comply with any
specified minimum capital ratios, we must notify our regulators.
We must notify the Federal Reserve within 30 days of the
end of any quarter of our inability to comply with a capital
ratio requirement and submit an acceptable written plan that
details the steps we will take to comply with the requirement.
FirstBank must immediately notify the FDIC of its inability to
comply with a capital ratio requirement and, within
45 days, it must either increase its capital to comply with
the capital ratio requirements or submit a contingency plan to
the FDIC for its sale, merger or liquidation. In the event of a
liquidation of FirstBank, the holders of our outstanding
preferred stock would rank senior to the holders of our common
stock with respect to rights upon any liquidation of First
BanCorp. If we fail to comply with the Agreements, we may become
subject to additional regulatory enforcement action up to and
including the appointment of a conservator or receiver for
FirstBank. In many cases when a conservator or receiver is
appointed for a wholly owned bank, the bank holding company
files for bankruptcy protection.
We may
need additional capital resources in the future, and these
capital resources may not be available when needed or at
all.
Due to our financial results during 2009 and the first nine
months of 2010, we need to access the capital markets in order
to raise additional capital to absorb future credit losses due
to the distressed economic environment and potential further
deterioration in our loan portfolio, to maintain adequate
liquidity and capital resources, to finance future growth,
investments or strategic acquisitions and to implement the
capital plans required by the Agreements. We have been taking
steps, including this offering, to obtain additional capital.
Based on our stress test analysis, we believe that the proceeds
from this offering will be sufficient to withstand the
deterioration of current economic conditions to the levels
assumed in that analysis, particularly in the residential and
CRE markets where our business is primarily concentrated. We may
need to raise significant additional capital if such
deterioration exceeds the assumptions utilized for purposes of
the stress test. Ultimately, the factors affecting whether we
would need to raise additional capital include, among others,
the requirements of regulators, additional provisions for loan
losses and loan charge-offs and other risks discussed in this
Risk Factors section. If we are unable to obtain
additional necessary capital or otherwise improve our financial
condition in the near future, or are unable to accomplish other
alternate capital preservation strategies, which could allow us
to meet the minimum capital requirements included in the capital
plans required by the Agreements, we will be required to notify
our regulators and take the additional steps described above,
which may include submitting a contingency plan to the FDIC for
the sale, liquidation or merger of FirstBank.
Certain
funding sources may not be available to us and our funding
sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits and support
future growth.
FirstBank relies primarily on its issuance of brokered CDs, as
well as customer deposits and advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank, to pay its operating expenses and interest on its
debt, to maintain its lending activities and to replace certain
maturing liabilities. As of September 30, 2010, we had
$6.7 billion in brokered deposits outstanding, representing
approximately 53% of our total deposits, and a reduction from
$7.6 billion at year end 2009. The average term to maturity
of the retail brokered CDs outstanding as of September 30,
2010 was approximately 1.2 years. Approximately 3% of the
principal value of these certificates is callable at our option.
Although FirstBank has historically been able to replace
maturing deposits and advances as desired, we may not be able to
replace these funds in the future if our financial condition or
general market conditions were to change or the FDIC did not
approve our request to issue brokered CDs as required by the
Order. The
25
Order requires FirstBank to obtain FDIC approval prior to
issuing, increasing, renewing or rolling over brokered CDs and
to develop a plan to reduce its reliance on brokered CDs.
Although the FDIC has issued temporary approvals permitting
FirstBank to renew
and/or roll
over certain amounts of brokered CDs maturing through
December 31, 2010, the FDIC may not continue to issue such
approvals, and, even if issued, such approvals may not be for
amounts of brokered CDs sufficient for FirstBank to meet its
funding needs. The use of brokered CDs has been particularly
important for the funding of our operations. If we are unable to
issue brokered CDs, or are unable to maintain access to our
other funding sources, our results of operations and liquidity
would be adversely affected.
If we are required to rely more heavily on more expensive
funding sources, profitability would be adversely affected.
Although we consider currently available funding sources to be
adequate for our liquidity needs, we may seek additional debt
financing in the future to achieve our long-term business
objectives. Any additional debt financing requires the prior
approval from the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Reserve may
not approve such additional debt. Additional borrowings, if
sought, may not be available to us or on acceptable terms. The
availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of
factors such as market conditions, the general availability of
credit, our credit ratings and our credit capacity. If
additional financing sources are unavailable or are not
available on acceptable terms, our profitability and future
prospects could be adversely affected.
We
depend on cash dividends from FirstBank to meet our cash
obligations, but the Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve
prohibits the receipt of such dividends without prior Federal
Reserve approval, which may adversely affect our ability to
fulfill our obligations.
As a holding company, dividends from FirstBank have provided a
substantial portion of our cash flow used to service the
interest payments on our trust preferred securities and other
obligations. As outlined in the Written Agreement, we cannot
receive any cash dividends from FirstBank without prior written
approval of the Federal Reserve. Our inability to receive
approval from the Federal Reserve to receive dividends from
FirstBank could adversely affect our ability to fulfill our
obligations in the future.
We
cannot pay any dividends on common stock or preferred stock or
any interest, principal or other sums on subordinated debentures
or trust preferred securities without prior Federal Reserve
approval, which adversely affects our ability to make such
payments.
The Written Agreement provides that we cannot declare or pay any
dividends (including on the Series G Preferred Stock) or
make any distributions of interest, principal or other sums on
subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities without
prior written approval of the Federal Reserve. With respect to
our $231.9 million of outstanding subordinated debentures,
we have provided, within the time frame prescribed by the
indentures governing the subordinated debentures, a notice to
the trustees of the subordinated debentures of our election to
an extension period. Under the indentures, we have the right,
from time to time, and without causing an event of default, to
defer payments of interest on the subordinated debentures by
extending the interest payment period at any time and from time
to time during the term of the subordinated debentures for up to
twenty consecutive quarterly periods. We have elected to defer
the interest payments that were due in September and December
2010 because the Federal Reserve did not approve our request
submitted pursuant to the Written Agreement to pay interest on
the subordinated debentures. To the extent our capital is
insufficient, we may elect additional extension periods for
future quarterly interest payments.
Our inability to receive approval from the Federal Reserve to
make distributions of interest, principal or other sums on our
trust preferred securities and subordinated debentures could
result in a default under those obligations if we need to defer
such payments for longer than twenty consecutive quarterly
periods.
Banking
regulators could take additional adverse action against
us.
We are subject to supervision and regulation by the Federal
Reserve. We are a bank holding company and a financial holding
company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended
(the BHC Act). As
26
such, we are permitted to engage in a broader spectrum of
activities than those permitted to bank holding companies that
are not financial holding companies. At this time, under the BHC
Act, we may not be able to engage in new activities or acquire
shares or control of other companies. As of September 30,
2010, we and FirstBank continue to satisfy all applicable
established capital guidelines. However, we have agreed to
regulatory actions by our banking regulators that include, among
other things, the submission of a capital plan by FirstBank to
comply with more stringent capital requirements under an
established time period in the capital plan. Our regulators
could take additional action against us if we fail to comply
with the Agreements, including the requirements of the submitted
capital plans. Additional adverse action against us by our
primary regulators could adversely affect our business.
Credit
quality may result in future additional losses.
The quality of our credits has continued to be under pressure as
a result of continued recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico and
the State of Florida that have led to, among other things,
higher unemployment levels, much lower absorption rates for new
residential construction projects and further declines in
property values. Our business depends on the creditworthiness of
our customers and counterparties and the value of the assets
securing our loans or underlying our investments. When the
credit quality of the customer base materially decreases or the
risk profile of a market, industry or group of customers changes
materially, our business, financial condition, allowance levels,
asset impairments, liquidity, capital and results of operations
are adversely affected.
We have a significant construction loan portfolio, in the amount
of $1.11 billion as of September 30, 2010, mostly
secured by commercial and residential real estate properties.
Due to their nature, these loans entail a higher credit risk
than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since they are
larger in size, concentrate more risk in a single borrower and
are generally more sensitive to economic downturns. Although we
have ceased new originations of construction loans, decreasing
collateral values, difficult economic conditions and numerous
other factors continue to create volatility in the housing
markets and have increased the possibility that additional
losses may have to be recognized with respect to our current
nonperforming assets. Furthermore, given the current slowdown in
the real estate market, the properties securing these loans may
be difficult to dispose of if they are foreclosed.
Our
allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual
losses, and we may be required to materially increase our
allowance, which may adversely affect our capital, financial
condition and results of operations.
We are subject to the risk of loss from loan defaults and
foreclosures with respect to the loans we originate. We
establish a provision for loan losses, which leads to reductions
in our income from operations, in order to maintain our
allowance for inherent loan losses at a level which our
management deems to be appropriate based upon an assessment of
the quality of the loan portfolio. Although our management
strives to utilize its best judgment in providing for loan
losses, our management may fail to accurately estimate the level
of inherent loan losses or may have to increase our provision
for loan losses in the future as a result of new information
regarding existing loans, future increases in non-performing
loans, changes in economic and other conditions affecting
borrowers or for other reasons beyond our control. In addition,
bank regulatory agencies periodically review the adequacy of our
allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the
provision for loan losses or the recognition of additional
classified loans and loan charge-offs, based on judgments
different than those of our management.
While we have substantially increased our allowance for loan and
lease losses in 2009 and the first nine months of 2010, we may
have to recognize additional provisions in the fourth quarter of
2010 and in 2011 to cover future credit losses in the portfolio.
The level of the allowance reflects managements estimates
based upon various assumptions and judgments as to specific
credit risks, evaluation of industry concentrations, loan loss
experience, current loan portfolio quality, present economic,
political and regulatory conditions and unidentified losses
inherent in the current loan portfolio. The determination of the
appropriate level of the allowance for loan and lease losses
inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires
management
27
to make significant estimates and judgments regarding current
credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo
material changes. If our estimates prove to be incorrect, our
allowance for credit losses may not be sufficient to cover
losses in our loan portfolio and our expense relating to the
additional provision for credit losses could increase
substantially.
Any such increases in our provision for loan losses or any loan
losses in excess of our provision for loan losses would have an
adverse effect on our future financial condition and results of
operations. Given the difficulties facing some of our largest
borrowers, these borrowers may fail to continue to repay their
loans on a timely basis or we may not be able to assess
accurately any risk of loss from the loans to these borrowers.
Changes
in collateral values of properties located in stagnant or
distressed economies may require increased
reserves.
Substantially all of our loan portfolio is located within the
boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is
located in Puerto Rico, the USVI, the BVI or the
U.S. mainland, the performance of our loan portfolio and
the collateral value backing the transactions are dependent upon
the performance of and conditions within each specific real
estate market. Recent economic reports related to the real
estate market in Puerto Rico indicate that certain pockets of
the real estate market are subject to readjustments in value
driven not by demand but more by the purchasing power of the
consumers and general economic conditions. In southern Florida,
we have been seeing the negative impact associated with low
absorption rates and property value adjustments due to
overbuilding. We measure the impairment based on the fair value
of the collateral, if collateral dependent, which is generally
obtained from appraisals. Updated appraisals are obtained when
we determine that loans are impaired and are updated annually
thereafter. In addition, appraisals are also obtained for
certain residential mortgage loans on a spot basis based on
specific characteristics such as delinquency levels, age of the
appraisal and
loan-to-value
ratios. The appraised value of the collateral may decrease or we
may not be able to recover collateral at its appraised value. A
significant decline in collateral valuations for collateral
dependent loans may require increases in our specific provision
for loan losses and an increase in the general valuation
allowance. Any such increase would have an adverse effect on our
future financial condition and results of operations.
Worsening
in the financial condition of critical counterparties may result
in higher losses than expected.
The financial stability of several counterparties is critical
for their continued financial performance on covenants that
require the repurchase of loans, posting of collateral to reduce
our credit exposure or replacement of delinquent loans. Many of
these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of a
default by one of our counterparties. Any such losses could
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Interest
rate shifts may reduce net interest income.
Shifts in short-term interest rates may reduce net interest
income, which is the principal component of our earnings. Net
interest income is the difference between the amounts received
by us on our interest-earning assets and the interest paid by us
on our interest-bearing liabilities. When interest rates rise,
the rate of interest we pay on our liabilities rises more
quickly than the rate of interest that we receive on our
interest-bearing assets, which may cause our profits to
decrease. The impact on earnings is more adverse when the slope
of the yield curve flattens, that is, when short-term interest
rates increase more than long-term interest rates or when
long-term interest rates decrease more than short-term interest
rates.
Increases
in interest rates may reduce the value of holdings of
securities.
Fixed-rate securities acquired by us are generally subject to
decreases in market value when interest rates rise, which may
require recognition of a loss (e.g., the identification of
other-than-temporary
impairment on our available-for-sale or held-to-maturity
investments portfolio), thereby adversely affecting our results
of operations. Market-related reductions in value also influence
our ability to finance these securities.
28
Increases
in interest rates may reduce demand for mortgage and other
loans.
Higher interest rates increase the cost of mortgage and other
loans to consumers and businesses and may reduce demand for such
loans, which may negatively impact our profits by reducing the
amount of loan origination income.
Accelerated
prepayments may adversely affect net interest
income.
Net interest income of future periods will be affected by our
decision to deleverage our investment securities portfolio to
preserve our capital position. Also, net interest income could
be affected by prepayments of mortgage-backed securities.
Acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities
would lower yields on these securities, as the amortization of
premiums paid upon acquisition of these securities would
accelerate. Conversely, acceleration in the prepayments of
mortgage-backed securities would increase yields on securities
purchased at a discount, as the amortization of the discount
would accelerate. These risks are directly linked to future
period market interest rate fluctuations. Also, net interest
income in future periods might be affected by our investment in
callable securities.
Changes
in interest rates may reduce net interest income due to basis
risk.
Basis risk is the risk of adverse consequences resulting from
unequal changes in the difference, also referred to as the
spread, between two or more rates for different
instruments with the same maturity and occurs when market rates
for different financial instruments or the indices used to price
assets and liabilities change at different times or by different
amounts. The interest expense for liability instruments such as
brokered CDs at times does not change by the same amount as
interest income received from loans or investments. The
liquidity crisis that erupted in late 2008, and that slowly
began to subside during 2009 and 2010, caused a wider than
normal spread between brokered CD costs and London Interbank
Offered Rates (LIBOR) for similar terms. This, in
turn, has prevented us from capturing the full benefit of a
decrease in interest rates, as the floating rate loan portfolio
re-prices with changes in the LIBOR indices, while the brokered
CD rates decreased less than the LIBOR indices. To the extent
that such pressures fail to subside in the near future, the
margin between our LIBOR-based assets and the higher cost of the
brokered CDs may compress and adversely affect net interest
income.
If all
or a significant portion of the unrealized losses in our
investment securities portfolio on our consolidated balance
sheet were determined to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired, we would recognize a material charge to our earnings
and our capital ratios would be adversely
affected.
For the year ended December 31, 2009 and the first nine
months of 2010, we recognized a total of $1.7 million and
$0.6 million, respectively, in
other-than-temporary
impairments. To the extent that any portion of the unrealized
losses in our investment securities portfolio is determined to
be
other-than-temporary
and, in the case of debt securities, the loss is related to
credit factors, we would recognize a charge to earnings in the
quarter during which such determination is made and capital
ratios could be adversely affected. Even if we do not determine
that the unrealized losses associated with this portfolio
require an impairment charge, increases in these unrealized
losses adversely affect our tangible common equity ratio, which
may adversely affect credit rating agency and investor sentiment
towards us. This negative perception also may adversely affect
our ability to access the capital markets or might increase our
cost of capital. Valuation and
other-than-temporary
impairment determinations will continue to be affected by
external market factors including default rates, severity rates
and macro-economic factors.
Downgrades
in our credit ratings could further increase the cost of
borrowing funds.
Fitch Ratings Ltd.s (Fitch) long-term issuer
default rating of First BanCorp and FirstBank is CC,
or eight notches below investment grade. Standard and
Poors (S&P) long-term issuer credit
rating of First BanCorp and FirstBank is CCC+, or
seven notches below investment grade. Moodys Investor
Services (Moodys) issuer credit rating
of FirstBank is B3, or six notches below investment
grade, and S&Ps
29
issuer rating is CCC+, or seven notches below
investment grade. On June 4, 2010, Moodys placed
FirstBanks rating on Credit Watch Negative.
We do not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements
that would be affected by a credit downgrade. Our liquidity is
contingent upon our ability to obtain new external sources of
funding to finance our operations; however, our current credit
ratings and any future downgrades in credit ratings could hinder
our access to external funding
and/or cause
external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn
adversely affect our results of operations. Changes in credit
ratings may also affect the fair value of certain liabilities
and unsecured derivatives, measured at fair value in the
financial statements, for which our own credit risk is an
element considered in the fair value determination.
These debt and financial strength ratings are current opinions
of the rating agencies. As such, they may be changed, suspended
or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies as a result of
changes in, or unavailability of, information or based on other
circumstances.
Our
controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented, our risk
management policies and procedures may be inadequate and
operational risk could adversely affect our consolidated results
of operations.
We may fail to identify and manage risks related to a variety of
aspects of our business, including, but not limited to,
operational risk, interest-rate risk, trading risk, fiduciary
risk, legal and compliance risk, liquidity risk and credit risk.
We have adopted various controls, procedures, policies and
systems to monitor and manage risk. While we currently believe
that our risk management policies and procedures are effective,
the Order required us to review and revise our policies relating
to risk management, including the policies relating to the
assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease
losses and credit administration. Any improvements to our
controls, procedures, policies and systems may not be adequate
to identify and manage the risks in our various businesses. If
our risk framework is ineffective, either because it fails to
keep pace with changes in the financial markets or our
businesses or for other reasons, we could incur losses, suffer
reputational damage or find ourselves out of compliance with
applicable regulatory mandates or expectations.
We may also be subject to disruptions from external events that
are wholly or partially beyond our control, which could cause
delays or disruptions to operational functions, including
information processing and financial market settlement
functions. In addition, our customers, vendors and
counterparties could suffer from such events. Should these
events affect us, or the customers, vendors or counterparties
with which we conduct business, our consolidated results of
operations could be negatively affected. When we record balance
sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies related to
operational losses, we may be unable to accurately estimate our
potential exposure, and any reserves we establish to cover
operational losses may not be sufficient to cover our actual
financial exposure, which may have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial condition for
the periods in which we recognize the losses.
Competition
for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract
and retain the highly skilled people we need to support our
business.
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract
and to retain key people. Competition for the best people in
most activities in which we engage can be intense, and we may
not be able to hire people or retain them, particularly in light
of uncertainty concerning evolving compensation restrictions
applicable to banks but not applicable to other financial
services firms. The unexpected loss of services of one or more
of our key personnel could adversely affect our business because
of the loss of their skills, knowledge of our markets and years
of industry experience and, in some cases, because of the
difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
Similarly, the loss of key employees, either individually or as
a group, can adversely affect our customers perception of
our ability to continue to manage certain types of investment
management mandates.
30
Further
increases in the FDIC deposit insurance premium or required
reserves may have a significant financial impact on
us.
The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC-insured depository
institutions up to certain limits. The FDIC charges insured
depository institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit
Insurance Fund (the DIF). Current economic
conditions have resulted in higher bank failures and
expectations of future bank failures. In the event of a bank
failure, the FDIC takes control of a failed bank and ensures
payment of deposits up to insured limits (which have recently
been increased) using the resources of the DIF. The FDIC is
required by law to maintain adequate funding of the DIF, and the
FDIC may increase premium assessments to maintain such funding.
The Dodd-Frank Act signed into law on July 21, 2010
requires the FDIC to increase the DIFs reserves against
future losses, which will necessitate increased deposit
insurance premiums that are to be borne primarily by
institutions with assets of greater than $10 billion. On
October 19, 2010, the FDIC addressed plans to bolster the
DIF by increasing the required reserve ratio for the industry to
1.35 percent (ratio of reserves to insured deposits) by
September 30, 2020, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The
FDIC also proposed to raise its industry target ratio of
reserves to insured deposits to 2 percent, 65 basis
points above the statutory minimum, but the FDIC does not
project that goal to be met until 2027.
On November 9, 2010, the FDIC approved two proposed rules
that would amend its current deposit insurance assessment
regulations. The first proposed rule would implement a provision
in the Dodd-Frank Act that changes the assessment base for
deposit insurance premiums from one based on domestic deposits
to one based on average consolidated total assets minus average
Tier 1 capital. The proposed rule would also change the
assessment rate schedules for insured depository institutions so
that approximately the same amount of revenue would be collected
under the new assessment base as would be collected under the
current rate schedule and the schedules previously proposed by
the FDIC in October 2010. The second proposed rule would revise
the risk-based assessment system for all large insured
depository institutions (generally, institutions with at least
$10 billion in total assets). Under the proposed rule, the
FDIC would use a scorecard method to calculate assessment rates
for all such institutions.
Although the precise impact of the proposed rules on us is not
clear at this time, any future increases in assessments will
decrease our earnings and could have a material adverse effect
on the value of, or market for, our common stock.
We may
not be able to recover all assets pledged to Lehman Brothers
Special Financing, Inc.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was
the counterparty to First BanCorp on certain interest rate swap
agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to
pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to us, which
constituted an event of default under those interest rate swap
agreements. We terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman
and replaced them with other counterparties under similar terms
and conditions. In connection with the unpaid net cash
settlement due as of September 30, 2010 under the swap
agreements, we have an unsecured counterparty exposure with
Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008, of
approximately $1.4 million. This exposure was reserved in
the third quarter of 2008. We had pledged collateral of
$63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee our performance
under the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was
required. The book value of pledged securities with Lehman as of
September 30, 2010 amounted to approximately
$64.5 million.
We believe that the securities pledged as collateral should not
be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate given the facts that the
posted collateral constituted a performance guarantee under the
swap agreements and was not part of a financing agreement, and
that ownership of the securities was never transferred to
Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate swap agreements,
Lehmans obligation was to return the collateral to us.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, we discovered that Lehman
Brothers, Inc., acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the
securities in a custodial account at JP Morgan Chase, and that,
shortly before the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings,
it had provided instructions to have most of the securities
transferred to
31
Barclays Capital (Barclays) in New York. After
Barclayss refusal to turn over the securities, during
December 2009, we filed a lawsuit against Barclays in federal
court in New York demanding the return of the securities. During
February 2010, Barclays filed a motion with the court requesting
that our claim be dismissed on the grounds that the allegations
of the complaint are not sufficient to justify the granting of
the remedies therein sought. Shortly thereafter, we filed our
opposition motion. A hearing on the motions was held in court on
April 28, 2010. The court, on that date, after hearing the
arguments by both sides, concluded that our equitable-based
causes of action, upon which the return of the investment
securities is being demanded, contain allegations that
sufficiently plead facts warranting the denial of Barclays
motion to dismiss our claim. Accordingly, the judge ordered the
case to proceed to trial. Subsequent to the decision handed down
by the court, the district court judge transferred the case to
the Lehman bankruptcy court for trial. While we believe we have
valid reasons to support our claim for the return of the
securities, we may not succeed in our litigation against
Barclays to recover all or a substantial portion of the
securities.
Additionally, we continue to pursue our claim filed in January
2009 in the proceedings under the Securities Protection Act with
regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in Bankruptcy Court,
Southern District of New York. An estimated loss was not accrued
as we are unable to determine the timing of the claim resolution
or whether we will succeed in recovering all or a substantial
portion of the collateral or its equivalent value. If additional
relevant negative facts become available in future periods, a
need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this claim may
arise. Considering that the investment securities have not yet
been recovered by us, despite our efforts in this regard, we
decided to classify such investments as non-performing during
the second quarter of 2009.
Our
businesses may be adversely affected by
litigation.
From time to time, our customers, or the government on their
behalf, may make claims and take legal action relating to our
performance of fiduciary or contractual responsibilities. We may
also face employment lawsuits or other legal claims. In any such
claims or actions, demands for substantial monetary damages may
be asserted against us resulting in financial liability or an
adverse effect on our reputation among investors or on customer
demand for our products and services. We may be unable to
accurately estimate our exposure to litigation risk when we
record balance sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies.
As a result, any reserves we establish to cover any settlements
or judgments may not be sufficient to cover our actual financial
exposure, which may have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations or financial condition.
In the ordinary course of our business, we are also subject to
various regulatory, governmental and law enforcement inquiries,
investigations and subpoenas. These may be directed generally to
participants in the businesses in which we are involved or may
be specifically directed at us. In regulatory enforcement
matters, claims for disgorgement, the imposition of penalties
and the imposition of other remedial sanctions are possible.
The resolution of certain pending legal actions or regulatory
matters, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated results of operations for the quarter in which
such actions or matters are resolved or a reserve is established.
Our
businesses may be negatively affected by adverse publicity or
other reputational harm.
Our relationships with many of our customers are predicated upon
our reputation as a fiduciary and a service provider that
adheres to the highest standards of ethics, service quality and
regulatory compliance. Adverse publicity, regulatory actions,
like the Agreements, litigation, operational failures, the
failure to meet customer expectations and other issues with
respect to one or more of our businesses could materially and
adversely affect our reputation, ability to attract and retain
customers or obtain sources of funding for the same or other
businesses. Preserving and enhancing our reputation also depends
on maintaining systems and procedures that address known risks
and regulatory requirements, as well as our ability to identify
and mitigate additional risks that arise due to changes in our
businesses, the market places in which we operate,
32
the regulatory environment and customer expectations. If any of
these developments has a material adverse effect on our
reputation, our business will suffer.
Changes
in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board or other standard-setting bodies may adversely
affect our financial statements.
Our financial statements are subject to the application of
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP), which is periodically revised and expanded.
Accordingly, from time to time, we are required to adopt new or
revised accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board. Market conditions have prompted accounting
standard setters to promulgate new requirements that further
interpret or seek to revise accounting pronouncements related to
financial instruments, structures or transactions as well as to
issue new standards expanding disclosures. The impact of
accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet
implemented is disclosed in our annual reports on
Form 10-K
and quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
which are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. See
Incorporation by Reference. An assessment of
proposed standards is not provided as such proposals are subject
to change through the exposure process and, therefore, the
effects on our financial statements cannot be meaningfully
assessed. It is possible that future accounting standards that
we are required to adopt could change the current accounting
treatment that we apply to our consolidated financial statements
and that such changes could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
Losses
in future reporting periods may require us to adjust the
valuation allowance against our deferred tax
assets.
We evaluate the deferred tax assets for recoverability based on
all available evidence. This process involves significant
management judgment about assumptions that are subject to change
from period to period based on changes in tax laws or variances
between the future projected operating performance and the
actual results. We are required to establish a valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets if we determine, based on
available evidence at the time the determination is made, that
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. In evaluating the
more-likely-than-not criterion, we consider all positive and
negative evidence as of the end of each reporting period. Future
adjustments, either increases or decreases, to the deferred tax
asset valuation allowance will be determined based upon changes
in the expected realization of the net deferred tax assets. The
realization of the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the
existence of sufficient taxable income in either the carryback
or carryforward periods under the tax law. Due to significant
estimates utilized in establishing the valuation allowance and
the potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is
reasonably possible that we will be required to record
adjustments to the valuation allowance in future reporting
periods. Such a charge could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations, financial condition and capital
position.
If our
goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired, it
may adversely affect our operating results.
If our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become
impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to
earnings. Under GAAP, we review our amortizable intangible
assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is
tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be
considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the
carrying value of the goodwill or amortizable intangible assets
may not be recoverable, include reduced future cash flow
estimates and slower growth rates in the industry.
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires us to make
estimates and assumptions with regards to the fair value of our
reporting units. Actual values may differ significantly from
these estimates. Such differences could result in future
impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact
our results of operations and the reporting unit where the
goodwill is recorded.
We conducted our annual evaluation of goodwill during the fourth
quarter of 2009. This evaluation is a
33
two-step process. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill allocated to
the Florida reporting unit, which is one level below the United
States Operations segment, indicated potential impairment of
goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the unit was below the
carrying amount of its equity book value as of the
December 31, 2009 valuation date, requiring the completion
of Step 2. Step 2 required a valuation of all assets and
liabilities of the Florida unit, including any recognized and
unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of
net assets. To complete Step 2, we subtracted from the
units Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the
net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The
results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that the implied fair
value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of
$27 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. If we are
required to record a charge to earnings in our consolidated
financial statements because an impairment of the goodwill or
amortizable intangible assets is determined, our results of
operations could be adversely affected.
We
must respond to rapid technological changes, and these changes
may be more difficult or expensive than
anticipated.
If competitors introduce new products and services embodying new
technologies, or if new industry standards and practices emerge,
our existing product and service offerings, technology and
systems may become obsolete. Further, if we fail to adopt or
develop new technologies or to adapt our products and services
to emerging industry standards, we may lose current and future
customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. The
financial services industry is changing rapidly and in order to
remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the
functionality and features of our products, services and
technologies. These changes may be more difficult or expensive
than we anticipate.
Risks
Related to Business Environment and Our Industry
Difficult
market conditions have affected the financial industry and may
adversely affect us in the future.
Given that almost all of our business is in Puerto Rico and the
U.S. mainland and given the degree of interrelation between
Puerto Ricos economy and that of the U.S., we are exposed
to downturns in the U.S. economy. Dramatic declines in the
U.S. housing market over the past few years, with falling
home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and
under-employment, have negatively impacted the credit
performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant
write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including
government-sponsored entities as well as major commercial banks
and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of
mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit default swaps
and other derivative and cash securities, in turn, have caused
many financial institutions to seek additional capital from
private and government entities, to merge with larger and
stronger financial institutions and, in some cases, to fail.
Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets
in general and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and
institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding
to borrowers, including other financial institutions. This
market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased
level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, erosion of
consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread
reduction of business activity in general. The resulting
economic pressure on consumers and erosion of confidence in the
financial markets has already adversely affected our industry
and may continue to adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations. A worsening of these
conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these
difficult market conditions on us and other financial
institutions. In particular, we may face the following risks in
connection with these events:
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to assess the creditworthiness of our customers may
be impaired if the models and approaches we use to select,
manage and underwrite the loans become less predictive of future
behaviors.
|
|
|
|
The models used to estimate losses inherent in the credit
exposure require difficult, subjective, and complex judgments,
including forecasts of economic conditions and how these
economic predictions
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
might impair the ability of the borrowers to repay their loans,
which may no longer be capable of accurate estimation and which
may, in turn, impact the reliability of the models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to borrow from other financial institutions or to
engage in sales of mortgage loans to third parties (including
mortgage loan securitization transactions with
government-sponsored entities) on favorable terms, or at all,
could be adversely affected by further disruptions in the
capital markets or other events, including deteriorating
investor expectations.
|
|
|
|
Competitive dynamics in the industry could change as a result of
consolidation of financial services companies in connection with
current market conditions.
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to comply with the Agreements, which could
result in further regulatory enforcement actions.
|
|
|
|
We expect to face increased regulation of our industry.
Compliance with such regulation may increase our costs and limit
our ability to pursue business opportunities.
|
|
|
|
We may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums in
the future because market developments have significantly
depleted the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of
reserves to insured deposits.
|
|
|
|
There may be additional downward pressure on our stock price.
|
If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue
or worsen, our ability to access capital and our business,
financial condition and results of operations may be materially
and adversely affected.
A
prolonged economic slowdown or decline in the residential real
estate market in the U.S. mainland and in Puerto Rico and an
increase in continued unemployment in Puerto Rico could continue
to harm our results of operations.
The residential mortgage loan origination business has
historically been cyclical, enjoying periods of strong growth
and profitability followed by periods of shrinking volumes and
industry-wide losses. The market for residential mortgage loan
originations is currently in decline and this trend could also
reduce the level of mortgage loans we may produce in the future
and adversely affect our business. During periods of rising
interest rates, refinancing originations for many mortgage
products tend to decrease as the economic incentives for
borrowers to refinance their existing mortgage loans are
reduced. In addition, the residential mortgage loan origination
business is impacted by home values. Over the past two years,
residential real estate values in many areas of the
U.S. have decreased significantly, which has led to lower
volumes and higher losses across the industry, adversely
impacting our mortgage business.
The actual rates of delinquencies, foreclosures and losses on
loans have been higher during the recent economic slowdown.
Rising unemployment, higher interest rates or declines in
housing prices have had a greater negative effect on the ability
of borrowers to repay their mortgage loans. Any sustained period
of increased delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could
continue to harm our ability to sell loans, the prices we
receive for loans, the values of mortgage loans
held-for-sale
or residual interests in securitizations, which could continue
to harm our financial condition and results of operations. In
addition, any additional material decline in real estate values
would further weaken the collateral
loan-to-value
ratios and increase the possibility of loss if a borrower
defaults. In such event, we will be subject to the risk of loss
on such real asset arising from borrower defaults to the extent
not covered by third-party credit enhancement.
Our
business concentration in Puerto Rico imposes
risks.
We conduct our operations in a geographically concentrated area,
as our main market is Puerto Rico. This imposes risks from lack
of diversification in the geographical portfolio. Our financial
condition and results of operations are highly dependent on the
economic conditions of Puerto Rico, where adverse political or
economic developments, among other things, could affect the
volume of loan originations, increase the level of
35
non-performing assets, increase the rate of foreclosure losses
on loans and reduce the value of our loans and loan servicing
portfolio.
Our
credit quality may be adversely affected by Puerto Ricos
current economic condition.
Since March 2006, a number of key economic indicators have shown
that the economy of Puerto Rico has been in recession.
Construction has remained weak since 2009 as Puerto Ricos
fiscal situation and decreasing public investment in
construction projects affected the sector. For the ten-month
period ended October 31, 2010, cement sales, which is an
indicator of construction activity, were 22.7% lower than the
same period in 2009.
On March 12, 2010, the Puerto Rico Planning Board announced
the release of Puerto Ricos macroeconomic data for the
fiscal year ended on June 30, 2009 (Fiscal Year
2009) and projections for the fiscal year ending on
June 30, 2010 (Fiscal Year 2010) and for the
fiscal year ending on June 30, 2011 (Fiscal Year
2011). Fiscal Year 2009 showed a reduction in real GNP of
3.7%, while the projections suggested a reduction in real GNP of
3.6% for Fiscal Year 2010 and an increase in real GNP of 0.4%
for Fiscal Year 2011. The Government Development Bank for Puerto
Rico Economic Activity Index, which is a coincident index
consisting of four major monthly economic indicators, namely
total payroll employment, total electric power consumption,
cement sales and gas consumption, and which monitors the actual
trend of Puerto Ricos economy, reflected a decrease of
4.67% in the rate of contraction of Puerto Ricos economy
in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2011 as compared to a
decrease of 5.48% in the rate of contraction in the first
quarter of Fiscal Year 2010.
The above economic concerns and uncertainty in the private and
public sectors may continue to have an adverse effect on the
credit quality of our loan portfolios, as delinquency rates have
increased, until the economy stabilizes.
The
failure of other financial institutions could adversely affect
us.
Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be
adversely affected by future failures of financial institutions
and the actions and commercial soundness of other financial
institutions. Financial institutions are interrelated as a
result of trading, clearing, counterparty and other
relationships. We have exposure to different industries and
counterparties and routinely execute transactions with
counterparties in the financial services industry, including
brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks,
investment companies and other institutional clients. In certain
of these transactions, we are required to post collateral to
secure the obligations to the counterparties. In the event of a
bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving one of such
counterparties, we may experience delays in recovering the
assets posted as collateral or may incur a loss to the extent
that the counterparty was holding collateral in excess of the
obligation to such counterparty.
In addition, many of these transactions expose us to credit risk
in the event of a default by our counterparty or client. In
addition, the credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral
held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not
sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative
exposure due to us. Any losses resulting from our routine
funding transactions may materially and adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
Legislative
and regulatory actions taken now or in the future may increase
our costs and impact our business, governance structure,
financial condition or results of operations.
We and our subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation by
multiple regulatory bodies. These regulations may affect the
manner and terms of delivery of our services. If we do not
comply with governmental regulations, we may be subject to
fines, penalties, lawsuits or material restrictions on our
businesses in the jurisdiction where the violation occurred,
which may adversely affect our business operations. Changes in
these regulations can significantly affect the services that we
are asked to provide as
36
well as our costs of compliance with such regulations. In
addition, adverse publicity and damage to our reputation arising
from the failure or perceived failure to comply with legal,
regulatory or contractual requirements could affect our ability
to attract and retain customers.
Current economic conditions, particularly in the financial
markets, have resulted in government regulatory agencies and
political bodies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the
financial services industry. The U.S. government has
intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what has
been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, by
temporarily enhancing the liquidity support available to
financial institutions, establishing a commercial paper funding
facility, temporarily guaranteeing money market funds and
certain types of debt issuances and increasing insurance on bank
deposits.
These programs have subjected financial institutions,
particularly those participating in the
U.S. Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program (the
TARP), to additional restrictions, oversight and
costs. In addition, new proposals for legislation are
periodically introduced in the U.S. Congress that could
further substantially increase regulation of the financial
services industry, impose restrictions on the operations and
general ability of firms within the industry to conduct business
consistent with historical practices, including in the areas of
compensation, interest rates, financial product offerings and
disclosures, and have an effect on bankruptcy proceedings with
respect to consumer residential real estate mortgages, among
other things. Federal and state regulatory agencies also
frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the
manner in which existing regulations are applied.
In recent years, regulatory oversight and enforcement have
increased substantially, imposing additional costs and
increasing the potential risks associated with our operations.
If these regulatory trends continue, they could adversely affect
our business and, in turn, our consolidated results of
operations.
Financial
services legislative and regulatory reforms may, if enacted or
adopted, have a significant impact on our business and results
of operations and on our credit ratings.
We face increased regulation and regulatory scrutiny as a result
of our participation in the TARP. On July 20, 2010, we
issued Series G Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury
in exchange for the shares of Series F Preferred Stock plus
accrued and unpaid dividends pursuant to an Exchange Agreement
with the U.S. Treasury dated as of July 7, 2010, as
amended. We also issued to the U.S. Treasury an amended and
restated warrant to replace the original warrant that we issued
to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP. Pursuant to the terms
of this issuance, we are prohibited from increasing the dividend
rate on our common stock in an amount exceeding the last
quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly
announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14,
2008, which was $0.07 per share, without approval.
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) was
signed into law, which significantly changes the regulation of
financial institutions and the financial services industry. The
Dodd-Frank Act includes, and the regulations to be developed
thereunder will include, provisions affecting large and small
financial institutions alike, including several provisions that
will affect how community banks, thrifts, and small bank and
thrift holding companies will be regulated in the future.
The Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, imposes new capital
requirements on bank holding companies; changes the base for
FDIC insurance assessments to a banks average consolidated
total assets minus average tangible equity, rather than upon its
deposit base, and permanently raises the current standard
deposit insurance limit to $250,000; and expands the FDICs
authority to raise insurance premiums. The legislation also
calls for the FDIC to raise the ratio of reserves to deposits
from 1.15% to 1.35% for deposit insurance purposes by
September 30, 2020 and to offset the effect of
increased assessments on insured depository institutions with
assets of less than $10 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act also
limits interchange fees payable on debit card transactions,
establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as an
independent entity within the Federal Reserve, which will have
broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement authority over
consumer financial products and services, including deposit
products, residential mortgages, home-equity loans and credit
cards, and contains provisions on mortgage-related matters such
as steering incentives,
37
determinations as to a borrowers ability to repay and
prepayment penalties. The Dodd-Frank Act also includes
provisions that affect corporate governance and executive
compensation at all publicly-traded companies and allows
financial institutions to pay interest on business checking
accounts. The legislation also restricts proprietary trading,
places restrictions on the owning or sponsoring of hedge and
private equity funds, and regulates the derivatives activities
of banks and their affiliates.
The Collins Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act, among other things,
eliminates certain trust preferred securities from Tier 1
capital. TARP preferred securities are exempted from this
treatment. In the case of certain trust preferred securities
issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank holding companies with
total consolidated assets of $15 billion or more as of
December 31, 2009, these regulatory capital
deductions are to be phased in incrementally over a period
of three years beginning on January 1, 2013. This provision
also requires the federal banking agencies, to establish minimum
leverage and risk-based capital requirements that will apply to
both insured banks and their holding companies. Regulations
implementing the Collins Amendment must be issued within
18 months of July 21, 2010.
These provisions, or any other aspects of current or proposed
regulatory or legislative changes to laws applicable to the
financial industry, if enacted or adopted, may impact the
profitability of our business activities or change certain of
our business practices, including the ability to offer new
products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans, and
achieve satisfactory interest spreads, and could expose us to
additional costs, including increased compliance costs. These
changes also may require us to invest significant management
attention and resources to make any necessary changes to
operations in order to comply, and could therefore also
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, and results of operations. Our management is actively
reviewing the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, many of which
are to be phased in over the next several months and years, and
assessing its probable impact on our operations. However, the
ultimate effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on the financial services
industry in general, and us in particular, is uncertain at this
time.
A separate legislative proposal would impose a new fee or tax on
U.S. financial institutions as part of the 2010 budget
plans in an effort to reduce the anticipated budget deficit and
to recoup losses anticipated from the TARP. Such an assessment
is estimated to be 15-basis points, levied against bank assets
minus Tier 1 capital and domestic deposits. It appears that
this fee or tax would be assessed only against the 50 or so
largest financial institutions in the U.S., which are those with
more than $50 billion in assets, and therefore would not
directly affect us. However, the large banks that are affected
by the tax may choose to seek additional deposit funding in the
marketplace, driving up the cost of deposits for all banks. The
administration has also considered a transaction tax on trades
of stock in financial institutions and a tax on executive
bonuses.
The U.S. Congress has also recently adopted additional
consumer protection laws such as the Credit Card Accountability
Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, and the Federal
Reserve has adopted numerous new regulations addressing
banks credit card, overdraft and mortgage lending
practices. Additional consumer protection legislation and
regulatory activity is anticipated in the near future.
Internationally, both the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
and the Financial Stability Board (established in April 2009 by
the Group of Twenty (G-20) Finance Ministers and
Central Bank Governors to take action to strengthen regulation
and supervision of the financial system with greater
international consistency, cooperation and transparency) have
committed to raise capital standards and liquidity buffers
within the banking system (Basel III). On
September 12, 2010, the Group of Governors and Heads of
Supervision agreed to the calibration and phase-in of the
Basel III minimum capital requirements (raising the minimum
Tier 1 common equity ratio to 4.5% and minimum Tier 1
equity ratio to 6.0%, with full implementation by January 2015)
and introducing a capital conservation buffer of common equity
of an additional 2.5% with implementation by January 2019. The
U.S. federal banking agencies generally support
Basel III. The G-20 endorsed Basel III on
November 12, 2010.
Such proposals and legislation, if finally adopted, would change
banking laws and our operating
38
environment and that of our subsidiaries in substantial and
unpredictable ways. We cannot determine whether such proposals
and legislation will be adopted, or the ultimate effect that
such proposals and legislation, if enacted, or regulations
issued to implement the same, would have upon our financial
condition or results of operations.
Monetary
policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In addition to being affected by general economic conditions,
our earnings and growth are affected by the policies of the
Federal Reserve. An important function of the Federal Reserve is
to regulate the money supply and credit conditions. Among the
instruments used by the Federal Reserve to implement these
objectives are open market operations in U.S. government
securities, adjustments of the discount rate and changes in
reserve requirements against bank deposits. These instruments
are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic
growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments
and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on
loans or paid on deposits.
On January 6, 2010, the member agencies of the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination Council, which includes the
Federal Reserve, issued an interest rate risk advisory reminding
banks to maintain sound practices for managing interest rate
risk, particularly in the current environment of historically
low short-term interest rates.
The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve
have had a significant effect on the operating results of
commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do
so in the future. The effects of such policies upon our
business, financial condition and results of operations may be
adverse.
The
imposition of additional property tax payments in Puerto Rico
may further deteriorate our commercial, consumer and mortgage
loan portfolios.
On March 9, 2009, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into
law the Special Act Declaring a State of Fiscal Emergency and
Establishing an Integral Plan of Fiscal Stabilization to Save
Puerto Ricos Credit, Act No. 7 (the Credit
Act). The Credit Act imposes a series of temporary and
permanent measures, including the imposition of a 0.591% special
tax applicable to properties used for residential (excluding
those exempt as detailed in the Credit Act) and commercial
purposes, and payable to the Puerto Rico Treasury Department.
This temporary measure will be effective for tax years that
commenced after June 30, 2009 and before July 1, 2012.
The imposition of this special property tax could adversely
affect the disposable income of borrowers from the commercial,
consumer and mortgage loan portfolios and may cause an increase
in our delinquency and foreclosure rates.
Risks
Related to the Future Issuance of Common Stock
Issuances
of common stock to the U.S. Treasury and BNS would dilute
holders of our common stock, including purchasers of our common
stock in this offering.
The issuance of at least $350 million of common stock in
this offering would satisfy the remaining substantive condition
to our ability to compel the U.S. Treasury to convert the
Series G Preferred Stock into approximately
438.7 million pre-reverse stock split shares of common
stock. This condition was recently revised pursuant to the First
Amendment to Exchange Agreement between us and the U.S.
Treasury. The number of shares we issue upon conversion will
increase if we sell shares of common stock in this offering at a
price below 90% of the market price per share of common stock on
the trading day immediately preceding the pricing date of the
offering. In addition, the issuance of shares of common stock in
this offering and upon the conversion of the Series G
Preferred Stock will enable BNS, pursuant to its anti-dilution
rights in the Stockholder Agreement, to acquire additional
shares of common stock so that it can maintain the same
percentage of ownership in our common stock of approximately 10%
that it owned prior to the completion of the Exchange Offer. On
November 18, 2010, we received an executed amendment to the
Stockholder
39
Agreement from BNS that provides BNS the right to decide
whether to exercise its anti-dilution rights after we give
aggregate notice of our issuance of shares of common stock to
the participants in our Exchange Offer, and/or in this offering
and/or to the U.S. Treasury upon the conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock. Finally, the U.S. Treasury
has an amended and restated warrant to purchase
5,842,259 pre-reverse stock split shares of our common
stock at a pre-reverse stock split exercise price of $0.7252 per
share, which is subject to adjustment as discussed below. This
warrant, which replaced a warrant exercisable at a pre-reverse
stock split price of $10.27 per share that the
U.S. Treasury acquired when it acquired the Series F
Preferred Stock, was restated at the time we issued the
Series G Preferred stock in exchange for the Series F
Preferred Stock. Like the original warrant, the amended and
restated warrant has an anti-dilution right that requires an
adjustment to the exercise price for, and the number of shares
underlying, the warrant. This adjustment is necessary under
various circumstances, including as a result of the reverse
stock split and if we issue shares of common stock for
consideration per share that is lower than the initial
pre-reverse stock split conversion price of the Series G
Preferred Stock, or $0.7252, in this offering.
The issuance of shares of common stock to the U.S. Treasury
and to BNS will affect our current stockholders in a number of
ways, including by:
|
|
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common
stock; and
|
|
|
|
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the
outstanding shares of common stock.
|
Finally, the additional issuances of shares of common stock may
adversely impact the market price of our common stock.
Issuance
of additional equity securities in the public markets and other
capital management or business strategies that we may pursue
could depress the market price of our common stock and result in
the dilution of our common stockholders, including purchasers of
our common stock in this offering.
Generally, we are not restricted from issuing additional equity
securities, including our common stock. We may choose or be
required in the future to identify, consider and pursue
additional capital management strategies to bolster our capital
position. We may issue equity securities (including convertible
securities, preferred securities, and options and warrants on
our common or preferred stock) in the future for a number of
reasons, including to finance our operations and business
strategy, to adjust our leverage ratio, to address regulatory
capital concerns, to restructure currently outstanding debt or
equity securities or to satisfy our obligations upon the
exercise of outstanding options or warrants. Future issuances of
our equity securities, including common stock, in any
transaction that we may pursue may dilute the interests of our
existing common stockholders, including purchasers of our common
stock in this offering, and cause the market price of our common
stock to decline.
Risks
Related to the Market Price and Value of Our Common
Stock
This
offering will result in a substantial amount of our common stock
becoming available for sale in the market, which could adversely
affect the market price of our common stock.
As of December 2, 2010, we had 319,557,932 pre-reverse
stock split shares of our common stock outstanding. Following
completion of this offering at a public offering price per
post-reverse stock split share determined through negotiation
between us and the underwriters based upon market conditions, an
estimate of the change in the market price of our common stock
as a result of the reverse stock split and other factors on the
day we price the shares, and assuming we compel the conversion
of the Series G Preferred Stock at the initial conversion
price and issue the anti-dilution shares to BNS, we would
have post-reverse
stock split shares of common stock outstanding. The issuance of
such a large number of shares of our common stock in such a
short period of time will significantly reduce earnings per
share and could adversely affect the market price of our common
stock.
40
The
market price of our common stock may be subject to significant
fluctuations and volatility.
The stock markets have recently experienced high levels of
volatility. These market fluctuations have adversely affected,
and may continue to adversely affect, the trading price of our
common stock. In addition, the market price of our common stock
has been subject to significant fluctuations and volatility
because of factors specifically related to our businesses and
may continue to fluctuate or further decline. Factors that could
cause fluctuations, volatility or further decline in the market
price of our common stock, many of which could be beyond our
control, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to comply with the Agreements;
|
|
|
|
any additional regulatory actions against us;
|
|
|
|
our ability to complete this offering, the conversion into
common stock of the Series G Preferred Stock or any other
issuances of common stock;
|
|
|
|
changes or perceived changes in the condition, operations,
results or prospects of our businesses and market assessments of
these changes or perceived changes;
|
|
|
|
announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other
material events by us or our competitors, including any future
failures of banks in Puerto Rico;
|
|
|
|
our announcement of the sale of common stock at a particular
price per share;
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or proposals, or new
governmental regulations or proposals, affecting us, including
those relating to the current financial crisis and global
economic downturn and those that may be specifically directed to
us;
|
|
|
|
the continued decline, failure to stabilize or lack of
improvement in general market and economic conditions in our
principal markets;
|
|
|
|
the departure of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
changes in the credit, mortgage and real estate markets;
|
|
|
|
operating results that vary from the expectations of management,
securities analysts and investors;
|
|
|
|
operating and stock price performance of companies that
investors deem comparable to us;
|
|
|
|
market assessments as to whether and when this offering and the
acquisition of additional newly issued shares by BNS will be
consummated; and
|
|
|
|
the public perception of the banking industry and its safety and
soundness.
|
In addition, the stock market in general, and the NYSE and the
market for commercial banks and other financial services
companies in particular, has experienced significant price and
volume fluctuations that sometimes have been unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of those
companies. These broad market and industry factors may seriously
harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our
operating performance. In the past, following periods of
volatility in the market price of a companys securities,
securities class action litigation has often been instituted. A
securities class action suit against us could result in
substantial costs, potential liabilities and the diversion of
managements attention and resources. As a result of these
factors, among others, the value of your investment may decline,
and you may be unable to sell your shares of our common stock at
or above the offering price. You are urged to obtain current
market quotations for our common stock when you consider
participating in this offering. See The
implementation of the reverse stock split authorized by our
stockholders may adversely affect the market price of our common
stock and the trading liquidity of our common stock.
Our
suspension of dividends may have adversely affected and may
further adversely affect our stock price and result in the
expansion of our board of directors.
In March 2009, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
issued a supervisory guidance letter
41
intended to provide direction to bank holding companies
(BHCs) on the declaration and payment of dividends,
capital redemptions and capital repurchases by BHCs in the
context of their capital planning process. The letter reiterates
the long-standing Federal Reserve supervisory policies and
guidance to the effect that BHCs should only pay dividends from
current earnings. More specifically, the letter heightens
expectations that BHCs will inform and consult with the Federal
Reserve supervisory staff on the declaration and payment of
dividends that exceed earnings for the period for which a
dividend is being paid. In consideration of the financial
results reported for the second quarter ended June 30,
2009, we decided, as a matter of prudent fiscal management and
following the Federal Reserve guidance, to suspend payment of
common stock dividends and dividends on our Preferred Stock and
Series G Preferred Stock. Our Agreement with the Federal
Reserve precludes us from declaring any dividends without the
prior approval of the Federal Reserve. We cannot anticipate if
and when the payment of dividends might be reinstated.
This suspension may have adversely affected and may continue to
adversely affect our stock price. Further, in general, if
dividends on our preferred stock are not paid before
February 28, 2011 (18 monthly dividend periods after
we suspended dividend payments in August 2009), our preferred
stockholders will have the right to elect two additional members
of the our board of directors until all accrued and unpaid
dividends for all past dividend periods have been declared and
paid in full.
The
price of our common stock is depressed and may not
recover.
The price of our common stock has declined significantly during
2010 to a closing price of $0.25 on December 1, 2010, the
last trading day prior to the date of this prospectus. See
Market Price, Dividend and Distribution Information.
Our stock price may never recover to prior levels. Many factors
discussed under Risk Factors in this prospectus that
we cannot predict or control may cause sudden changes in the
price of our common stock or prevent the price of our common
stock from recovering.
The
implementation of the reverse stock split authorized by our
stockholders may adversely affect the market price of our common
stock and the trading liquidity of our common
stock.
Before the registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part is declared effective, we will effect a reverse stock split
in the range of between one new share of common stock for 10 old
shares of common stock and one new share of common stock for 20
old shares of common stock, which is the range that our
stockholders approved at our Special Meeting of Stockholders on
August 24, 2010. We believe that the reverse stock split
will return us to compliance with the NYSE listing requirements.
See Our common stock could be delisted if we fall
below applicable compliance standards. A reverse stock
split in a ratio within the approved range will provide enough
authorized shares of common stock for issuance (i) in this
offering, (ii) in the conversion of the Series G
Preferred Stock, (iii) pursuant to the amended and restated
warrant of the U.S. Treasury and (iv) pursuant to
outstanding options under our stock incentive plan. At this
time, our board of directors has not made a decision as to what
ratio to select.
Because some investors may view the reverse stock split
negatively, the reverse stock split may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock. In the usual case, as a result
of the reverse stock split (all other things being equal), the
market price of common stock may not rise proportionally to the
decrease in outstanding shares resulting from the reverse stock
split. In addition, the market price of our common stock may
decline by a greater percentage than would occur in the absence
of the reverse stock split. The post-reverse stock split stock
price may not attract institutional investors or investment
funds and may not satisfy the investing guidelines of such
investors and, consequently, the trading liquidity of our common
stock may not improve. Finally, the reverse stock split will
likely increase the number of stockholders who own odd lots
(less than 100 shares) and stockholders who hold odd lots
typically may experience an increase in the cost of selling
their shares, and may have greater difficulty effecting sales.
Our
common stock could be delisted if we fall below applicable
compliance standards.
Under the NYSE rules, a listed company will be considered below
compliance standards if the average
42
closing price of its common stock is less than $1.00 over a
consecutive 30
trading-day
period. One July 10, 2010, the NYSE notified us that the
average closing price of our common stock over the consecutive
30
trading-day
period ended July 6, 2010 was less than $1.00. Accordingly,
the price of our common stock was below the price criteria
compliance standard. The price of our common stock has remained
below $1.00 since then. Before the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part is declared effective, we will
effect a reverse stock split within the range approved by our
stockholders. We believe that the reverse stock split will
return us to compliance with the NYSEs price criteria
compliance standard and allow us to maintain the listing of our
common stock on the NYSE. If we are unable to effect a reverse
stock split, if we are unable to cure our failure to comply
within six months following notification from the NYSE, or if
the reverse stock split does not result in our ability to
maintain compliance with the applicable NYSE listing
requirements, our common stock may be suspended from trading on,
or delisted from, the NYSE, which will adversely impact the
market liquidity of our common stock.
If we
do not raise gross proceeds of at least $350 million in
this offering, we would not be able to fulfill the remaining
substantive condition required for us to compel the conversion
of the Series G Preferred Stock into common stock, which
may adversely affect investor interest in us and will require us
to continue to accrue dividends payable on the Series G
Preferred Stock.
If we are unable to sell a number of shares that results in
gross proceeds to us of at least $350 million, we would not
be able to fulfill the remaining substantive condition required
for us to compel the conversion of the shares of Series G
Preferred Stock that the U.S. Treasury now owns. That
inability would mean that our ratios of Tier 1 common
equity to risk-weighted assets and tangible common equity to
tangible assets, which are ratios that investors are likely to
consider in making investment decisions, would not benefit from
the increase in outstanding common equity resulting from the
conversion. In addition, our inability to convert the
Series G Preferred Stock would mean that we would continue
to need to accrue dividends on the Series G Preferred
Stock, which are 5% per year until January 16, 2014 (or
$21.2 million per year on an aggregate basis), and 9%
thereafter (or $38.2 million per year on an aggregate
basis) until it automatically converts into common stock on
July 7, 2017, if it is still outstanding at that time.
Risks
Related to the Rights of Holders of Our Common Stock Compared to
the Rights of Holders of Our Debt Obligations and Shares of
Preferred Stock
The
holders of our debt obligations, the shares of Preferred Stock
still outstanding and any remaining Series G Preferred Stock
after this offering will have priority over our common stock
with respect to payment in the event of liquidation, dissolution
or winding up and with respect to the payment of
dividends.
In any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of First BanCorp,
our common stock would rank below all debt claims against us and
claims of all of our outstanding shares of preferred stock,
including the shares of Preferred Stock that were not exchanged
for common stock in the Exchange Offer, which has a liquidation
preference of approximately $63 million, and the
Series G Preferred Stock, which has a liquidation
preference of approximately $424.2 million, if we cannot
compel the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into
common stock.
As a result, holders of our common stock will not be entitled to
receive any payment or other distribution of assets upon the
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of First BanCorp until
after all our obligations to our debt holders have been
satisfied and holders of senior equity securities and trust
preferred securities have received any payment or distribution
due to them.
In addition, we are required to pay dividends on our preferred
stock before we pay any dividends on our common stock. Holders
of our common stock will not be entitled to receive payment of
any dividends on their shares of our common stock unless and
until we obtain the Federal Reserves approval to resume
payments of dividends on any shares of outstanding preferred
stock.
43
Dividends
on our common stock have been suspended and you may not receive
funds in connection with your investment in our common stock
without selling your shares of our common stock.
The Written Agreement that we entered into with the Federal
Reserve prohibits us from paying any dividends or making any
distributions without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve.
Holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive
dividends as our board of directors may declare out of funds
legally available for payment of such dividends. We have
suspended dividend payments on our common stock since August
2009. Furthermore, so long as any shares of preferred stock
remain outstanding and until we obtain the Federal
Reserves approval, we cannot declare, set apart or pay any
dividends on shares of our common stock (i) unless any
accrued and unpaid dividends on our preferred stock for the
twelve monthly dividend periods ending on the immediately
preceding dividend payment date have been paid or are paid
contemporaneously and the full monthly dividend on our preferred
stock for the then current month has been or is
contemporaneously declared and paid or declared and set apart
for payment and, (ii) with respect to our Series G
Preferred Stock, unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all
past dividend periods, including the latest completed dividend
period, on all outstanding shares have been declared and paid in
full. Prior to January 16, 2012, unless we have redeemed or
converted all of the shares of Series G Preferred Stock or
the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the Series G
Preferred Stock to third parties, the consent of the
U.S. Treasury will be required for us to, among other
things, increase the dividend rate per pre-reverse stock split
share of common stock above $0.07 per pre-reverse stock split
share or repurchase or redeem equity securities, including our
common stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. This could
adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Also, we are a bank holding company and our ability to declare
and pay dividends is dependent also on certain federal
regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the
Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends.
Moreover, the Federal Reserve has issued a policy statement
stating that bank holding companies should generally pay
dividends only out of current operating earnings. In the current
financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve has
indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review
their dividend policy and has discouraged dividend pay-out
ratios that are at the 100% or higher level unless both asset
quality and capital are very strong.
In addition, the terms of our outstanding junior subordinated
debt securities held by trusts that issue trust preferred
securities prohibit us from declaring or paying any dividends or
distributions on our capital stock, including our common stock
and preferred stock, or purchasing, acquiring, or making a
liquidation payment on such stock, if we have given notice of
our election to defer interest payments but the related deferral
period has not yet commenced or a deferral period is continuing.
We elected to defer the interest payments that would have been
due in September and December 2010 and may make similar
elections with respect to future quarterly interest payments.
Accordingly, you may have to sell some or all of your shares of
our common stock in order to generate cash flow from your
investment. You may not realize a gain on your investment when
you sell your shares of common stock and may lose the entire
amount of your investment.
Offerings
of debt, which would be senior to our common stock upon
liquidation, or preferred equity securities, which may be senior
to our common stock for purposes of dividend distributions or
upon liquidation, may adversely affect the market price of our
common stock.
Subject to any required approval of our regulators, if our
capital ratios or those of our banking subsidiary fall below the
required minimums, we or our banking subsidiary could be forced
to raise additional capital by making additional offerings of
debt or preferred equity securities, including medium-term
notes, trust preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes
and preferred stock. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt
securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with
respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of our
available assets prior to the holders of our common stock.
Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of our
existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our common
stock, or both.
44
Our board of directors is authorized to issue one or more
classes or series of preferred stock from time to time without
any action on the part of the stockholders. Our board of
directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to
set the terms of any such classes or series of preferred stock
that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights and
preferences over our common stock with respect to dividends or
upon our dissolution, winding up and liquidation and other
terms. If we issue preferred shares in the future that have a
preference over our common stock with respect to the payment of
dividends or upon liquidation, or if we issue preferred shares
with voting rights that dilute the voting power of our common
stock, the rights of holders of our common stock or the market
price of our common stock could be adversely affected.
Risk
Related to this Offering
Management
will have discretion as to the use of the proceeds from this
offering, and we may not use the proceeds
effectively.
We have not designated the amount of net proceeds we will use
for any particular purpose. Accordingly, our management will
have discretion as to the application of the net proceeds and
could use them for purposes other than those contemplated at the
time of this offering. Our stockholders may not agree with the
manner in which our management chooses to allocate and invest
the net proceeds. Our use of the net proceeds may not increase
profitability or market value and we may not be able to invest
the net proceeds to yield a favorable return pending our use of
such net proceeds.
If we
determine to complete this offering for a lower amount of gross
proceeds than $350 million, we may be required to implement
additional de-leveraging strategies to ensure our compliance
with the capital plans we submitted to our
regulators.
Although we want to receive gross proceeds of at least
$350 million, we may determine to complete an offering for
a number of shares of common stock that results in a lower
amount of gross proceeds. In that case, we would not be able to
fulfill the remaining substantive condition required for us to
compel the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into
common stock. See Risks Related to the Market Price
and Value of Our Common StockIf we do not raise gross
proceeds of at least $350 million in this offering, we would not
be able to fulfill the remaining substantive condition required
for us to compel the conversion of the Series G Preferred
Stock into common stock, which may adversely affect investor
interest in us and will require us to continue to accrue
dividends payable on the Series G Preferred Stock. In
addition, the lower level of proceeds may require us to
implement additional de-leveraging strategies to ensure our
compliance with the capital plans we submitted to our regulators.
45
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain statements made or incorporated by reference in this
prospectus are forward-looking statements within the
meaning of, and subject to the protections of, Section 27A
of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.
These forward-looking statements may relate to our financial
condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future
performance and business, including, but not limited to,
statements with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for
loan and lease losses, market risk and the impact of interest
rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and
liquidity and the effect of new accounting guidance on our
financial condition and results of operations. All statements
contained herein or incorporated by reference in this prospectus
that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking,
and the words anticipate, believe,
continues, expect, estimate,
intend, project and similar expressions
and future or conditional verbs such as will,
would, should, could,
might, can, may, or similar
expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking
statements.
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, estimates
and assumptions by us that are difficult to predict. Various
factors, some of which are beyond our control, could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or
implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that might
cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the
risks described above in the Risk Factors section,
and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about whether we will be able to fully comply with
the Agreements that, among other things, require us to attain
certain capital levels and reduce our special mention,
classified, delinquent and non-accrual assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
uncertainty as to whether we will be able to issue
$350 million of equity so as to meet the remaining
substantive condition necessary to compel the U.S. Treasury
to convert into common stock the shares of our Series G
Preferred Stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury;
|
|
|
|
|
|
uncertainty as to whether we will be able to complete future
capital-raising efforts;
|
|
|
|
uncertainty as to the availability of certain funding sources,
such as retail brokered CDs;
|
|
|
|
the risk of not being able to fulfill our cash obligations or
pay dividends in the future to our stockholders due to our
inability to receive approval from the Federal Reserve to
receive dividends from our main banking subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
the risk of being subject to possible additional regulatory
action;
|
|
|
|
the strength or weakness of the real estate market and of the
consumer and commercial credit sector and their impact on the
credit quality of our loans and other assets, including our
construction and commercial real estate loan portfolios, which
have contributed and may continue to contribute to, among other
things, the increase in the levels of non-performing assets,
charge-offs and the provision expense and may subject us to
further rise from loan defaults and foreclosures;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in general economic conditions in the
U.S. and in Puerto Rico, including the interest rate
scenario, market liquidity, housing absorption rates, real
estate prices and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets,
which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and
affect demand for all of our products and services and the value
of our assets, including the value of derivative instruments
used for protection from interest rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
our reliance on brokered CDs and our ability to obtain, on a
periodic basis, approval to issue brokered certificates of
deposit to fund operations and provide liquidity in accordance
with the terms of the Order;
|
|
|
|
an adverse change in our ability to attract new clients and
retain existing ones;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in demand for our products and services and lower
revenues and earnings because of the continued recession in
Puerto Rico and the current fiscal problems and budget deficit
of the Puerto Rico government;
|
|
|
|
a need to recognize additional impairments of financial
instruments or goodwill relating to acquisitions;
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about regulatory and legislative changes for
financial services companies in Puerto Rico, the U.S., the USVI
and the BVI, which could affect our financial performance and
could cause our actual results for future periods to differ
materially from prior results and anticipated or projected
results;
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about the effectiveness of the various actions
undertaken to stimulate the U.S. economy and stabilize the
U.S. financial markets, and the impact such actions may
have on our business, financial condition and results of
operations;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of
the federal government, including those determined by the
Federal Reserve, the FDIC, government-sponsored housing agencies
and local regulators in Puerto Rico, the USVI and the BVI;
|
|
|
|
the risk of possible failure or circumvention of controls and
procedures and the risk that our risk management policies may
not be adequate;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the FDIC may further increase the deposit
insurance premium
and/or
require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund,
causing an additional increase in our non-interest expense;
|
|
|
|
risks of not being able to generate sufficient income to realize
the benefit of the deferred tax asset;
|
|
|
|
risks of not being able to recover the assets pledged to Lehman
Brothers Special Financing, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
risks relating to the impact of the reverse stock split on the
price of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
changes in our expenses associated with acquisitions and
dispositions;
|
|
|
|
the adverse effect of litigation;
|
|
|
|
developments in technology;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with further downgrades in the credit ratings
of our long-term senior debt;
|
|
|
|
general competitive factors and industry consolidation;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the depression of the price of our common
stock, including the possibility of our common stock being
delisted from the NYSE; and
|
|
|
|
the possible future dilution to holders of our common stock
resulting from additional issuances of common stock or
securities convertible into common stock.
|
Although the forward-looking statements are based on
our current beliefs and expectations, we do not undertake, and
specifically disclaim any obligation, to update any of the
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or
unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such
statements except as required by federal and state securities
laws.
We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or
expectations described in our forward-looking statements and you
should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking
statements. Actual results or events could differ materially
from the plans, intentions and expectations described in the
forward- looking statements we make. We have included important
factors in the cautionary statements included in this
prospectus, particularly in the Risk Factors
section, that we believe could cause actual results or events to
differ materially from those expressed or implied by our
forward-looking statements. Furthermore, if our forward-looking
statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be
material. In light of the significant uncertainties in these
forward-looking statements, you should not regard these
statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other
person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any
specified timeframe, or at all.
You should read this prospectus and the documents that we
reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part
completely and with the understanding that our actual future
results may be materially different from what we expect. The
information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of
the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery
of this prospectus or any sale of our common stock. We do not
assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
47
REGULATORY
AND OTHER CAPITAL RATIOS
The following table sets forth our regulatory capital ratios as
of September 30, 2010 on an as reported basis
and as adjusted and pro forma basis to give effect to the
issuance of aggregate net proceeds of $350 million of our
common stock in this offering and the mandatory conversion of
the Series G Preferred Stock into approximately
438.7 million pre-reverse stock split shares of common
stock at the initial pre-reverse stock split conversion price of
$0.7252 per share, which is subject to adjustment for the
reverse stock split and possibly this offering, and assuming the
proceeds of this offering (after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us) will be invested in cash and cash
equivalents.
This table should be read in conjunction with the information
set forth under Selected Financial Data and our
consolidated unaudited financial statements in our
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, which is
incorporated by reference into this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
Total capital ratio (total capital to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
13.26
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets)
|
|
|
11.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average assets)
|
|
|
8.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity ratio (tangible common equity to tangible
assets)
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common ratio (Tier 1 common equity to
risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
6.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Non-GAAP Data for reconciliations of
Tier 1 common equity and tangible common equity to
stockholders equity, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure, and tangible assets to total assets, the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measure, as of
September 30, 2010.
The following table sets forth the regulatory capital ratios of
FirstBank as of September 30, 2010 on an as
reported basis. Although all of FirstBanks
regulatory capital ratios exceeded the established ratios for a
well-capitalized institution at September 30,
2010, because of the Order, FirstBank cannot be treated as a
well-capitalized institution under regulatory
guidance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Established ratios for a well-
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
|
capitalized institution
|
|
|
Total capital ratio (total capital to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
12.81
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets)
|
|
|
11.52
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average assets)
|
|
|
8.03
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
48
NON-GAAP DATA
The ratios of Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets
and tangible common equity to tangible assets, the adjusted
earnings data and net interest margin (on a tax equivalent basis
and excluding valuations) mentioned above are not financial
measures recognized under generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP, and therefore are considered non-GAAP
financial measures.
Tier 1
Common Equity to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio
The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is
calculated by dividing (a) Tier 1 capital less
non-common elements, including qualifying perpetual preferred
stock and qualifying trust preferred securities, by
(b) risk-weighted assets, which is calculated in accordance
with applicable bank regulatory requirements. The Tier 1
common equity ratio is not required by GAAP or on a recurring
basis by applicable bank regulatory requirements. However, this
ratio was used by the Federal Reserve in connection with its
stress test administered to the 19 largest U.S. bank
holding companies under the Supervisory Capital Assessment
Program (SCAP), the results of which were announced
on May 7, 2009. Management is currently monitoring this
ratio, along with the applicable bank regulatory ratios, in
evaluating our capital levels and believes that, at this time,
the ratio may continue to be of interest to investors.
The following table reconciles stockholders equity (GAAP)
as of September 30, 2010 to Tier 1 common equity on
(1) an actual basis and (2) an as adjusted and pro forma
basis to reflect the sale of common stock in this offering and
the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into common
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As adjusted
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
and pro forma
|
|
|
Tier 1 Common Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equityGAAP
|
|
$
|
1,321,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifying preferred stock
|
|
|
(411,876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) on available-for-sale
securities(1)
|
|
|
(30,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Disallowed deferred tax
asset(2)
|
|
|
(43,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposits intangible
|
|
|
(14,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative change gain in fair value of liabilities accounted
for under a fair value option
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other disallowed assets
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity
|
|
$
|
790,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
11,930,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio
|
|
|
6.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tier 1 capital excludes net
unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
debt securities and net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in
accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines. In
arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to
deduct net unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of
tax.
|
|
(2) |
|
Approximately $64 million of
First BanCorps deferred tax assets at September 30,
2010 were included without limitation in regulatory capital
pursuant to the risk-based capital guidelines, while
approximately $44 million of such assets at
September 30, 2010 exceeded the limitation imposed by these
guidelines and, as disallowed deferred tax assets,
were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital. According to
regulatory capital guidelines, the deferred tax assets that are
dependent upon future taxable income are limited for inclusion
in Tier 1 capital to the lesser of: (i) the amount of
such deferred tax asset that the entity expects to realize
within one year of the calendar quarter end-date, based on its
projected future taxable income for that year or (ii) 10%
of the amount of the entitys Tier 1 capital.
Approximately $7 million of First BanCorps other net
deferred tax liability at September 30, 2010 represented
primarily the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and
losses on
available-for-sale
debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to
deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to
limitation under the guidelines.
|
49
Tangible
Common Equity Ratio
The tangible common equity ratio is a non-GAAP measure generally
used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate
capital adequacy. Tangible common equity is total equity less
preferred equity, goodwill and core deposit intangibles.
Tangible assets are total assets less goodwill and core deposit
intangibles. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible
common equity ratio in conjunction with more traditional bank
capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking
organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other
intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the
purchase accounting method of accounting for mergers and
acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets
or related measures should be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for stockholders equity, total assets or any
other measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the
manner in which we calculate tangible common equity, tangible
assets and any other related measures may differ from that of
other companies reporting measures with similar names.
The following table reconciles stockholders equity (GAAP)
as of September 30, 2010 to tangible common equity on
(1) an actual basis, and (2) an as adjusted and pro
forma basis to reflect the sale of common stock in this offering
and the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into
common stock and reconciles total assets (GAAP) as of
September 30, 2010 to tangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As adjusted
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
and pro forma
|
|
|
Tangible Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equityGAAP
|
|
$
|
1,321,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred equity
|
|
|
(411,876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(14,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity
|
|
$
|
867,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assetsGAAP
|
|
$
|
16,678,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(14,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
16,636,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity ratio
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
Earnings Data
Management uses the non-GAAP measures of pre-tax, pre-provision
earnings and adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision earnings to assess
the performance of our core business and the strength of our
capital position. We believe that these non-GAAP financial
measures provide meaningful additional information about us to
assist investors in evaluating our operating results and
financial strength. These non-GAAP financial measures should not
be considered as substitutes for operating results determined in
accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to other
similarly titled measures at other companies.
50
Presented below is a reconciliation of these financial measures
to net income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended September 30,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income (GAAP)
|
|
$
|
(272,872
|
)
|
|
$
|
(221,985
|
)
|
|
$
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
$
|
109,937
|
|
|
$
|
68,136
|
|
|
$
|
84,634
|
|
|
$
|
114,604
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
9,721
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
4,534
|
|
|
|
(31,732
|
)
|
|
|
21,583
|
|
|
|
27,442
|
|
|
|
15,016
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
438,240
|
|
|
|
442,671
|
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
190,948
|
|
|
|
120,610
|
|
|
|
74,991
|
|
|
|
50,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax, pre-provision earnings (non-GAAP)
|
|
$
|
175,089
|
|
|
$
|
221,909
|
|
|
$
|
309,205
|
|
|
$
|
269,153
|
|
|
$
|
210,329
|
|
|
$
|
187,067
|
|
|
$
|
180,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended September 30,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income (GAAP)
|
|
$
|
(272,872
|
)
|
|
$
|
(221,985
|
)
|
|
$
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
$
|
109,937
|
|
|
$
|
68,136
|
|
|
$
|
84,634
|
|
|
$
|
114,604
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
9,721
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
4,534
|
|
|
|
(31,732
|
)
|
|
|
21,583
|
|
|
|
27,442
|
|
|
|
15,016
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
438,240
|
|
|
|
442,671
|
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
190,948
|
|
|
|
120,610
|
|
|
|
74,991
|
|
|
|
50,644
|
|
Net (gain) loss on sale of securities or other-than-temporary
impairments
|
|
|
(103,282
|
)
|
|
|
(60,759
|
)
|
|
|
(85,146
|
)
|
|
|
(21,193
|
)
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
8,194
|
|
|
|
(12,339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision earnings (non-GAAP)
|
|
$
|
71,807
|
|
|
$
|
161,150
|
|
|
$
|
224,059
|
|
|
$
|
247,960
|
|
|
$
|
213,055
|
|
|
$
|
195,261
|
|
|
$
|
167,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
Net
Interest Margin
Net interest margin is reported on a tax-equivalent basis and
excluding changes in the fair value of derivative instruments
and financial liabilities elected to be measured at fair value
(valuations). The presentation of net interest
margin excluding valuations provides additional information
about our net interest margin and facilitates comparability and
analysis. The changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments and unrealized gains and losses on liabilities
measured at fair value have no effect on interest due or
interest earned on interest-bearing liabilities or
interest-earning assets, respectively. The tax-equivalent
adjustment to net interest margin recognizes the income tax
savings when comparing taxable and tax-exempt assets and assumes
a marginal income tax rate. Income from tax-exempt earning
assets is increased by an amount equivalent to the taxes that
would have been paid if this income had been taxable at
statutory rates. We believe that it is a standard practice in
the banking industry to present net interest margin (as well as
net interest income and interest rate spread) on a fully
tax-equivalent basis. This adjustment puts all earning assets,
most notably tax-exempt securities and certain loans, on a
common basis that facilitates comparison of our results to
results of our peers.
The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measures
net interest spread and margin on a tax-equivalent basis
and excluding fair value changes with net interest spread
and margin calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP for
the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009 and years ended December 31, 2009,
December 31, 2008, December 31, 2007,
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The table
also reconciles the non-GAAP financial measure net
interest income on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding fair
value changes with net interest income calculated and
presented in accordance with GAAP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended September 30,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net Interest Income (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest IncomeGAAP
|
|
$
|
639,880
|
|
|
$
|
753,125
|
|
|
$
|
996,574
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,897
|
|
|
$
|
1,189,247
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,813
|
|
|
$
|
1,067,590
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
(2,755
|
)
|
|
|
(5,519
|
)
|
|
|
8,037
|
|
|
|
6,638
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income excluding valuations
|
|
|
642,049
|
|
|
|
750,370
|
|
|
|
991,055
|
|
|
|
1,134,934
|
|
|
|
1,195,885
|
|
|
|
1,288,738
|
|
|
|
1,070,001
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment
|
|
|
23,912
|
|
|
|
41,306
|
|
|
|
53,617
|
|
|
|
56,408
|
|
|
|
15,293
|
|
|
|
27,987
|
|
|
|
61,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding valuations
|
|
|
665,961
|
|
|
|
791,676
|
|
|
|
1,044,672
|
|
|
|
1,191,342
|
|
|
|
1,211,178
|
|
|
|
1,316,725
|
|
|
|
1,131,167
|
|
Interest ExpenseGAAP
|
|
|
290,253
|
|
|
|
371,380
|
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
599,016
|
|
|
|
738,231
|
|
|
|
845,119
|
|
|
|
635,271
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments and liabilities
measured at fair value
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
13,214
|
|
|
|
(2,427
|
)
|
|
|
(58,269
|
)
|
|
|
(71,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense excluding valuations
|
|
|
292,634
|
|
|
|
371,582
|
|
|
|
477,487
|
|
|
|
612,230
|
|
|
|
735,804
|
|
|
|
786,850
|
|
|
|
564,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest incomeGAAP
|
|
$
|
349,627
|
|
|
$
|
381,745
|
|
|
$
|
519,042
|
|
|
$
|
527,881
|
|
|
$
|
451,016
|
|
|
$
|
443,694
|
|
|
$
|
432,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income excluding valuations
|
|
$
|
349,415
|
|
|
$
|
378,788
|
|
|
$
|
513,568
|
|
|
$
|
522,704
|
|
|
$
|
460,081
|
|
|
$
|
501,888
|
|
|
$
|
505,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding
valuations
|
|
$
|
373,327
|
|
|
$
|
420,094
|
|
|
$
|
567,185
|
|
|
$
|
579,112
|
|
|
$
|
475,374
|
|
|
$
|
529,875
|
|
|
$
|
566,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended September 30,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Average Balances (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases
|
|
$
|
13,008,559
|
|
|
$
|
13,353,628
|
|
|
$
|
13,460,562
|
|
|
$
|
12,393,589
|
|
|
$
|
11,288,745
|
|
|
$
|
11,767,736
|
|
|
$
|
11,509,477
|
|
Total securities and other short-term investments
|
|
|
5,214,304
|
|
|
|
5,960,069
|
|
|
|
5,865,662
|
|
|
|
5,689,217
|
|
|
|
5,486,601
|
|
|
|
6,874,539
|
|
|
|
6,038,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
$
|
18,222,863
|
|
|
$
|
19,313,697
|
|
|
$
|
19,326,224
|
|
|
$
|
18,082,806
|
|
|
$
|
16,775,346
|
|
|
$
|
18,642,275
|
|
|
$
|
17,548,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
$
|
16,074,153
|
|
|
$
|
17,093,195
|
|
|
$
|
17,099,692
|
|
|
$
|
16,278,116
|
|
|
$
|
14,928,807
|
|
|
$
|
16,690,265
|
|
|
$
|
15,747,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Yield/Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield on interest-earning assetsGAAP
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
|
|
5.16
|
%
|
|
|
6.23
|
%
|
|
|
7.09
|
%
|
|
|
6.91
|
%
|
|
|
6.08
|
%
|
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilitiesGAAP
|
|
|
2.41
|
%
|
|
|
2.90
|
%
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
|
3.68
|
%
|
|
|
4.95
|
%
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spreadGAAP
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
2.31
|
%
|
|
|
2.37
|
%
|
|
|
2.55
|
%
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest marginGAAP
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
2.64
|
%
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
|
|
2.92
|
%
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield on interest-earning assets excluding valuations
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
5.19
|
%
|
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
|
|
6.28
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
6.91
|
%
|
|
|
6.10
|
%
|
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
|
|
2.91
|
%
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
|
3.76
|
%
|
|
|
4.93
|
%
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
3.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.56
|
%
|
|
|
2.62
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
|
|
2.88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield on interest-earning assets on a tax-equivalent
basis and excluding valuations
|
|
|
4.89
|
%
|
|
|
5.48
|
%
|
|
|
5.41
|
%
|
|
|
6.59
|
%
|
|
|
7.22
|
%
|
|
|
7.06
|
%
|
|
|
6.45
|
%
|
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
|
|
2.91
|
%
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
|
3.76
|
%
|
|
|
4.93
|
%
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
3.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding
valuations
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
2.62
|
%
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding
valuations
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
2.91
|
%
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
|
3.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
OTHER
CAPITAL RAISING EFFORTS
Prior to filing the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part, we were engaged in preliminary discussions
with certain investors, all of whom we believe were accredited
investors, concerning a private placement of our common stock.
The proposed private placement sought to raise approximately
$500 million in gross proceeds. We terminated all offering
activity related to the proposed private placement on
August 24, 2010. We did not accept any offers to buy shares
of our common stock and none of our shares of common stock were
sold in the proposed private placement. This prospectus and any
accompanying prospectus supplement supersede any offering
materials used in the proposed private placement.
In connection with our proposed private placement, we intended
to offer the right to our holders of common stock to acquire
shares of common stock at the price at which the shares were
sold in the offering. In as much as we have determined to
conduct this offering, we have determined not to proceed with a
rights offering to our common stockholders.
54
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We expect to use the net proceeds from the sale of our common
stock for general corporate purposes, including strengthening
FirstBanks capital position.
55
MARKET
PRICE, DIVIDEND AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION
Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE under the
symbol FBP. As of December 1, 2010, we had
319,557,932 pre-reverse stock split shares of our common
stock outstanding, held by approximately 536 holders of record.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
high and low sales prices per pre-reverse stock split share of
the common stock and the cash dividends declared per pre-reverse
stock split share of the common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
Share prices
|
|
|
declared
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
per share
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through December 1, 2010)
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
*
|
Third Quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
*
|
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
3.69
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
*
|
First Quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
*
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
3.03
|
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
*
|
Third Quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
*
|
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
7.64
|
|
|
|
3.94
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
First Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
12.17
|
|
|
$
|
7.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Third Quarter ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
11.29
|
|
|
|
6.28
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
First Quarter ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
11.11
|
|
|
|
7.26
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Cash dividends on the common stock have been suspended since
August 2009. |
On December 1, 2010, the closing sales price of our common
stock on the NYSE was $0.25 per pre-reverse stock split share.
56
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
On an actual basis without regard to the reverse stock split
effected on , 2010; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
On an as adjusted and pro forma basis to give effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the reverse stock split effected
on , 2010 in which one new
share of our common stock was issued
for
old shares our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance of 438,679,675 pre-reverse stock split shares
to the U.S. Treasury upon the conversion of
424,174 shares of our Series G Preferred Stock
assuming that the number of shares and the initial conversion
price of $0.7252 per share are adjusted only to reflect the
reverse stock split; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance and sale
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at a public offering price
of $ per share, and assuming the
proceeds (after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us) will
be invested in cash and cash equivalents.
|
The table should be read in conjunction with and is qualified in
its entirety by our audited and unaudited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto incorporated by reference into this
prospectus. For more information, see Incorporation by
Reference.
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As adjusted
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
and pro forma
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Long term borrowings
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 50,000,000 shares
authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,600,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
outstanding, 450,195 as of July 20, 2010
|
|
|
11,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock
outstanding, 475,987 as of July 20, 2010
|
|
|
11,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,140,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock
outstanding, 460,611 as of July 20, 2010
|
|
|
11,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,680,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock
outstanding, 510,592 as of July 20, 2010
|
|
|
12,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,584,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock
outstanding, 624,487 as of July 20, 2010
|
|
|
15,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 shares of Series F Preferred Stock
outstanding, net of discount, 400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,174 shares of Series G Preferred Stock
outstanding, net of discount, 424,174
|
|
|
348,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 2,000,000,000 shares
authorized, 329,455,732 shares issued and
319,557,932 shares outstanding, actual; $0.10 par
value, 2,000,000,000 shares
authorized, shares
issued
and shares
outstanding, as adjusted and pro forma
|
|
|
32,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock (at par value)
|
|
|
(990
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
289,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal surplus
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
259,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income-unrealized gain on
securities available for sale net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,321,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capitalization
|
|
$
|
1,546,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above does not include:
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance of any shares to BNS pursuant to its anti-dilution
right under the Stockholder Agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072,200 pre-reverse stock split shares of common stock
issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding as of
October 28, 2010 at a weighted average exercise price of
$13.24 per share;
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,842,259 pre-reverse stock split shares of common stock
issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding as of
October 28, 2010 at an exercise price of $0.7252 per share,
subject to adjustment;
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,767,784 pre-reverse stock split additional shares of common
stock available for future issuance as of October 28, 2010
under the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
up
to
additional post-reverse stock split shares of common stock
(equal to 15% of the total number of shares we are offering)
that we may sell to the underwriter upon the exercise of its
over allotment option to purchase additional shares of common
stock.
|
58
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
Our Restated Articles of Incorporation (Articles of
Incorporation) authorize the issuance of up to
2,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.10 per
share, and up to 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $1.00 per share. The amount of authorized shares of common
stock will not change as a result of the reverse stock split.
The following summary outlines the rights of holders of the
shares of Preferred Stock, the holder of Series G Preferred
Stock and the holders of our common stock. This summary is
qualified in its entirety by reference to our Articles of
Incorporation, including the Certificates of Designation, and
our by-laws (the Bylaws), each of which is an
exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus
is a part. We urge you to read these documents for a more
complete understanding of stockholder rights. On July 20,
2010, we issued shares of a new series of Series G
Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the
Series F Preferred Stock that it owned and accrued and
unpaid dividends on such stock. The Series G Preferred
Stock has similar terms to the Series F Preferred Stock but
is convertible as described below under Conversion
Rights.
Governing
Documents
Preferred
Stock
Holders of shares of Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred
Stock have the rights set forth in our Articles of
Incorporation, including the applicable Certificate of
Designation, the Bylaws and Puerto Rico law.
Common
Stock
Holders of shares of our common stock have the rights set forth
in our Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws and Puerto Rico law.
Dividends
and Distributions
Preferred
Stock
The shares of Preferred Stock, as well as Series G
Preferred Stock, rank senior to the common stock and any other
stock that is expressly junior to Preferred Stock and
Series G Preferred Stock as to payment of dividends.
Dividends on shares of Preferred Stock are payable monthly and
are not mandatory or cumulative. Series G Preferred Stock
pay cumulative compounding dividends quarterly in arrears of 5%
per year until January 16, 2014, and 9% thereafter. Holders
of shares of preferred stock are entitled to receive dividends,
when, as, and if declared by our board of directors, out of
funds legally available for dividends. On July 30, 2009, we
announced the suspension of dividends on each series of our
Preferred Stock and our previously outstanding Series F
Preferred Stock (which was exchanged for the Series G
Preferred Stock) effective with the dividend for August 2009.
Furthermore, under the terms of the Written Agreement with the
Federal Reserve, we are required to obtain prior approval from
the Federal Reserve to declare or pay dividends on our capital
stock and to receive dividends from FirstBank.
Common
Stock
Subject to the preferential rights of any other class or series
of capital stock, including preferred stock, holders of our
common stock are entitled to receive, pro rata, dividends when
and as declared by our board of directors out of funds legally
available for the payment of dividends.
In general, so long as any shares of preferred stock remain
outstanding and until we meet various federal regulatory
considerations, we cannot declare, set apart or pay any
dividends on shares of our common stock unless all accrued and
unpaid dividends on our Preferred Stock for the twelve monthly
dividend periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend
payment date have been paid or are paid contemporaneously and
the full monthly dividend on our Preferred Stock for the then
current month has been or is contemporaneously declared and paid
or declared and set apart for payment.
59
In addition, in general, and subject to certain limitations in
the applicable certificate of designation, so long as any shares
of Series G Preferred Stock remain outstanding, we cannot
declare, set apart or pay any dividends on shares of our common
stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past
dividend periods, including the latest completed dividend
period, on all outstanding shares of Series G Preferred
Stock have been declared and paid in full. Furthermore, under
the terms of the Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve, we
are required to obtain prior approval from the Federal Reserve
to declare or pay dividends on our capital stock and to receive
dividends from FirstBank.
Ranking
Preferred
Stock
Each series of Preferred Stock, as well as Series G
Preferred Stock, currently ranks senior to the common stock with
respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation,
dissolution or
winding-up
of First BanCorp. Each series of Preferred Stock, as well as
Series G Preferred Stock, is equal in right of payment with
the other outstanding series of shares of Preferred Stock,
including Series G Preferred Stock. The liquidation
preference of the shares of Preferred Stock is $25 per share,
plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon for the current
monthly dividend period to the date of distribution. The
liquidation preference of shares of Series G Preferred
Stock is $1,000 per share, plus the amount of any accrued and
unpaid dividends, whether or not declared, to the date of
payment.
Common
Stock
The common stock ranks junior with respect to dividend rights
and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of First BanCorp to all other securities and indebtedness of
First BanCorp.
Conversion
Rights
None of the shares of Preferred Stock or common stock are
convertible into other securities. The Series G Preferred
Stock is convertible by us if within nine months from the date
of the Exchange Agreement, (a) at least $385 million
of the liquidation preference of our Preferred Stock are
tendered in the Exchange Offer (which we achieved upon
settlement of the Exchange Offer), (b) we raise
$350 million of additional capital, subject to terms, other
than the price per share, reasonably acceptable to the
U.S. Treasury in its sole discretion, (c) we obtain
the approval of the holders of our common stock of an amendment
to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number
of authorized shares of common stock from 750,000,000 to at
least 1,200,000,000 and to reduce the par value of a share of
common stock from $1.00 to $0.10 (which we obtained on
August 24, 2010 at a special meeting of stockholders),
(d) we have requested and received from the appropriate
banking regulators all requisite approvals of the conversion (no
approvals are required of the conversion), (e) we have made
any applicable anti-dilution adjustments and (f) neither we
nor any of our subsidiaries has dissolved or became subject to
insolvency or similar proceedings, or has become subject to
other materially adverse regulatory or other actions. The
U.S. Treasury, and any subsequent holder of the
Series G Preferred Stock, will have the right to convert
the Series G Preferred Stock at any time. Unless earlier
converted by the holder or us, the Series G Preferred Stock
will automatically convert into shares of common stock on
July 7, 2017 of the issuance of the Series G Preferred
Stock at the then current market price of the common stock. The
conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock would
significantly increase our tangible common equity ratio.
Voting
Rights
Preferred
Stock
Whenever dividends remain unpaid on the shares of preferred
stock or any other class or series of preferred stock that ranks
on parity with shares of preferred stock as to payment of
dividends and having equivalent voting rights (Parity
Stock) for at least 18 monthly dividend periods
(whether or not consecutive), the number of directors
constituting our board of directors will be increased by two
members and the holders
60
of the shares of preferred stock together with holders of
Parity Stock, voting separately as a single class, will have the
right to elect the two additional members of our board of
directors. As of December 2, 2010, we have not paid
dividends on the Preferred Stock for 17 months. When First
BanCorp has paid full dividends on any class or series of
non-cumulative Parity Stock for at least 12 consecutive monthly
dividend periods following such non-payment, and has paid
cumulative dividends in full on any class or series of
cumulative Parity Stock, the voting rights will cease and the
authorized number of directors will be reduced by two.
Holders of shares of Preferred Stock currently have the right to
vote as a separate class with all other series of Parity Stock
adversely affected by and entitled to vote thereon (except
Series G Preferred Stock, which votes as a separate class),
with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
any amendment, alteration or repeal of the provisions of the
Articles of Incorporation, including the relevant Certificates
of Designation, or Bylaws that would alter or change the voting
powers, preferences or special rights of such series of shares
of Preferred Stock so as to affect them adversely; or
|
|
|
|
any amendment or alteration of the Articles of Incorporation to
authorize or increase the authorized amount of any shares of, or
any securities convertible into shares of, any of First
BanCorp.s capital stock ranking senior to such series of
shares of Preferred Stock.
|
Approval of two-thirds of such shares is required.
So long as any shares of Series G Preferred Stock are
outstanding, in addition to the voting rights set forth above,
the vote or consent of the holders of at least of two-thirds of
the shares of Series G Preferred Stock at the time
outstanding, voting separately as a single class, shall be
necessary for effecting or validating any consummation of a
binding share exchange or reclassification involving
Series G Preferred Stock or of a merger or consolidation of
First BanCorp with another entity, unless the shares of
Series G Preferred Stock remain outstanding following any
such transaction or, if First BanCorp is not the surviving
entity, are converted into or exchanged for preference
securities and such remaining outstanding shares of
Series G Preferred Stock or preference securities have
rights, references, privileges and voting powers that are not
materially less favorable than the rights, preferences,
privileges or voting powers of Series G Preferred Stock,
taken as a whole.
Common
Stock
Holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to one vote
per share on all matters voted on by our stockholders. There are
no cumulative voting rights for the election of directors. The
U.S. Treasury has agreed to vote, or cause to be voted, any
shares of common stock that it acquires pursuant to the terms of
the Series G Preferred Stock or the amended and restated
warrant, except with respect to certain matters, in the same
proportion as the votes on all other outstanding shares of
common stock. The U.S. Treasury will retain discretionary
authority to vote on the election and removal of directors, the
approval of any business combination or sale of substantially
all of the assets or property of First BanCorp, the approval of
any dissolution of First BanCorp, the approval of any issuance
of any securities of First BanCorp on which holders of common
stock are entitled to vote and on any other matters reasonably
incidental to those matters, as determined by the
U.S. Treasury.
61
Redemption
Preferred
Stock
Optional
Redemption by First BanCorp
We may redeem all or a portion of each series of shares of
Preferred Stock, at our option at the redemption prices set
forth below, on any dividend payment date for which dividends
have been declared in full.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption price
|
|
CUSIP
|
|
|
Title of securities represented by shares of preferred
stock
|
|
per share
|
|
|
|
318672201
|
|
|
7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series A
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
318672300
|
|
|
8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series B
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
318672409
|
|
|
7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series C
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
318672508
|
|
|
7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series D
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
318672607
|
|
|
7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series E
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
Series G Preferred Stock may not be redeemed prior to
January 16, 2012 unless we have received aggregate gross
proceeds from one or more Qualified Equity Offerings (as defined
below) of at least $100 million. In such a case, we may
redeem Series G Preferred Stock, subject to the approval of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in whole
or in part, up to a maximum amount equal to the aggregate net
cash proceeds received by us from such qualified equity
offerings. A Qualified Equity Offering is a sale and
issuance for cash by us, to persons other than us or our
subsidiaries after January 16, 2009, of shares of perpetual
preferred stock, common stock or a combination thereof, that in
each case qualify as Tier 1 capital of First BanCorp at the
time of issuance under the applicable risk-based capital
guidelines. Qualified Equity Offerings do not include issuances
made in connection with agreements or arrangements entered into,
or pursuant to financing plans that were publicly announced, on
or prior to October 13, 2008. After January 16, 2012,
Series G Preferred Stock may be redeemed, in whole or in
part, at any time and from time to time, subject to the approval
of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. In any
redemption of Series G Preferred Stock, the redemption
price is an amount equal to the per-share liquidation amount
plus accrued and unpaid dividends to but excluding the date of
redemption.
Redemption
at Option of Holder
The shares of Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock
are not redeemable at the option of the holders.
Common
Stock
We have no obligation or right to redeem our common stock.
Listing
Preferred
Stock
Our shares of Series G Preferred Stock are not listed on a
national securities exchange and we expect to submit a request
to the NYSE to delist our shares of Preferred Stock.
Common
Stock
The common stock is listed for trading on the NYSE.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock will be
the Bank of New York Mellon.
62
SHARES ELIGIBLE
FOR FUTURE SALE
Upon the completion of this offering, we will have outstanding
an aggregate of shares of our
common stock ( shares if the
underwriters in this offering exercise their overallotment
option in full) that will be freely tradable without restriction
or further registration under the Securities Act, except that an
aggregate of shares held by
our directors and executive officers will be subject to
lock-up
agreements, as described under Underwriting, and our
affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act, generally may resell their shares in
the public market only in compliance with Rule 144, as
described below.
Future sales of shares of our common stock in the public market,
or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely
affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and could
impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of our
equity or equity-related securities in the future.
After completion of this offering, we expect to issue additional
shares of our common stock. We expect to issue shares of common
stock upon the conversion of the U.S. Treasurys
shares of Series G Preferred Stock into shares of our
common stock. In addition, to the extent that the
U.S. Treasury elects to exercise its warrant, we may issue
up to an additional 5,842,259 pre-reverse stock split shares of
common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.7252 per share.
We may also issue shares to BNS if it exercises its
anti-dilution rights under the Stockholder Agreement. As of
December 2, 2010, BNS owns an aggregate of 9,250,450
pre-reverse stock split shares of common stock. BNS
purchase of such shares in a private placement on
August 24, 2007 resulted in its ownership of approximately
10% of the then outstanding shares of common stock. Pursuant to
an amendment to the Stockholder Agreement that we finalized with
BNS recently, we must give an aggregate notice of our sales of
common stock by no later than April 1, 2011 and BNS has the
ability to decide whether to exercise its anti-dilution rights
so that it owns up to approximately 10% of our outstanding
common stock after we have given BNS such notice of our issuance
of common stock (i) in the recently completed exchange
offer under which we issued shares of common stock in exchange
for the then outstanding shares of the Corporations
Series A through E Preferred Stock,
and/or
(ii) in a sale of common stock for cash, in one or more
public or private offerings,
and/or
(iii) pursuant to the conversion into common stock of the
shares of Series G Preferred Stock that the Corporation
issued to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the
Series F Preferred Stock.
The U.S. Treasury and BNS have certain registration rights,
and will be able to sell shares pursuant to the provisions of
Rule 144, which are described below. In addition, BNS has
various other rights under the Stockholder Agreement under which
it acquired its shares, including the right to observe meetings
of our board of directors.
In addition to the beneficial ownership of more than 5% of our
outstanding common stock by the U.S. Treasury if the
U.S. Treasurys shares of Series G Preferred
Stock are converted into shares of common stock and BNS
right to acquire additional shares of our common stock so that
it beneficially owns approximately 10% of our outstanding common
stock, as of October 11, 2010, UBS AG, filing on behalf of
itself and three wholly owned subsidiaries, UBS Securities LLC,
UBS Financial Services Inc. and UBS Trust Company of Puerto
Rico (collectively, UBS), reported beneficial
ownership of 36,551,657 pre-reverse stock split shares of common
stock, or 11.4% of our outstanding pre-reverse stock split
shares of common stock. UBS reported sole voting and dispositive
power over 8,060,715 shares, shared voting power over
8,052,599 shares and shared dispositive power over
28,490,942 shares. UBS reported that
20,438,343 shares, with respect to which it disclaimed
beneficial ownership, were held by a trustee pursuant to a
voting trust agreement on behalf of five fixed-income,
closed-end Puerto Rico investment companies managed by UBS
Trust Company of Puerto Rico.
Rule 144
In general, any person who is not one of our
affiliates (as that term is defined in
Rule 144) at any time during the three months
preceding a sale, and who has owned the restricted shares
proposed to be sold for at least six months, is entitled to sell
an unlimited number of such shares of common stock provided
current
63
public information about us is available. Such non-affiliate,
after owning the restricted shares proposed to be sold for at
least one year, is entitled to sell an unlimited number of such
shares regardless of whether current public information about us
is available.
In general, under Rule 144, our affiliates are entitled to
sell within any three-month period a number of shares of our
common stock that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of common stock then
outstanding; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average weekly trading volume of the common stock on the
NYSE during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a
notice on Form 144 with respect to that sale.
|
In addition, sales of shares of our common stock under
Rule 144 by our affiliates must be in brokers
transactions and are also subject to notice requirements and to
the availability of current public information about us.
Resale
Registration Rights
Each of the U.S. Treasury and BNS has the right, subject to
certain exceptions and conditions, to require us to register
their securities under the Securities Act, and to participate in
certain registrations of securities by us. Pursuant to the terms
of the Exchange Agreement between us and the U.S. Treasury,
which references the registration rights set forth in the Letter
Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2009, between us and the
U.S. Treasury, which incorporates by reference that certain
Securities Purchase Agreement Standard Terms
(collectively, the Securities Purchase Agreement),
the U.S. Treasury has resale registration rights that cover
the shares of Series G Preferred Stock, the warrant and our
shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock and the U.S. Treasurys
exercise of its warrant. Pursuant to the terms of the
Stockholder Agreement between us and BNS, BNS has resale
registration rights that cover any shares of our common stock
that BNS has acquired, including pursuant to the exercise of its
anti-dilution rights. Registration of shares of our common stock
under the Securities Act would result in the shares becoming
freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act
immediately upon sale to non-affiliates pursuant to the
registration statement.
Demand
Resale Registration Rights
Subject to specified limitations, the U.S. Treasury may
demand that we register all or a portion of their registrable
securities under the Securities Act on a shelf resale
registration statement on
Form S-3.
The U.S. Treasury has acknowledged that we are not
currently eligible to file a shelf resale registration statement
on
Form S-3,
and we are not obligated to file a shelf resale registration
statement on an appropriate form unless and until requested to
do so by the U.S. Treasury.
Subject to specified limitations, BNS may demand that we
register all or a portion of their registrable shares under the
Securities Act. We are not obligated to file a resale
registration statement pursuant to this provision unless the
aggregate number of the registrable shares requested to be
registered constitutes at least 3% of our shares of common stock
issued and outstanding on the date such demand is made. In
addition, BNS may demand that we register on
Form S-3
all or any portion of the registrable shares it owns at any time
that we are eligible to file a registration statement relating
to an offering on
Form S-3.
We are not obligated to register BNSs shares at any time
that they are already included in an effective shelf resale
registration statement.
Piggyback
Resale Registration Rights
Similarly, subject to specified limitations, if during any
period when an effective shelf resale registration statement is
not available, we propose to register any of our equity
securities, the U.S. Treasury is entitled to include its
registrable securities upon written request to us; provided,
however, that if the registration is proposed to be
underwritten, the U.S. Treasurys right to
registration is conditioned upon the U.S. Treasurys
securities being of the same class of securities as the
securities to be offered in the underwritten offering.
64
Subject to specified limitations, BNS is entitled to include its
registrable shares of our common stock in any registration
statement that we are filing for other purposes. Pursuant to
this provision, we have already included the 9,250,450
pre-reverse stock split shares of common stock purchased by BNS
in 2007 on a shelf registration statement filed in 2009.
Limitations
and Expenses
In the event that any registration in which the
U.S. Treasury participates pursuant to the Securities
Purchase Agreement or BNS participates pursuant to the
Stockholder Agreement is an underwritten public offering, the
number of securities to be included for them may, in specified
circumstances, be limited due to market conditions or if the
managing underwriters advise us that in their reasonable opinion
the number of securities requested to be included in such
offering exceeds the number which can be sold without adversely
affecting the marketability of the offering (including an
adverse effect on the per share offering price). Pursuant to the
Securities Purchase Agreement and the Stockholder Agreement, we
are required to pay all registration expenses, including the
fees and expenses of certain counsel, other than any
underwriting discounts and commissions, in connection with any
such resale registration statements.
65
UNDERWRITING
We are offering the shares of our common stock described in this
prospectus in an underwritten offering in which Sandler
ONeill & Partners, L.P. is acting as sole
bookrunning manager and representative of the underwriters. We
will enter into an underwriting agreement with the underwriters
named below, with respect to the common stock being offered.
Subject to the terms and conditions contained in the
underwriting agreement, each underwriter has severally agreed to
purchase the respective number of shares of our common stock set
forth opposite its name below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of post-reverse
|
|
Name
|
|
stock split shares
|
|
|
Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters
obligation to purchase shares of our common stock depends on the
satisfaction of the conditions contained in the underwriting
agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties made by us are true and
agreements have been performed;
|
|
|
|
there is no material adverse change in the financial markets or
in our business; and
|
|
|
|
we deliver customary closing documents.
|
Subject to these conditions, the underwriters are committed to
purchase and pay for all shares of our common stock offered by
this prospectus, if any such shares are purchased. However, the
underwriters are not obligated to take or pay for the shares of
our common stock covered by the underwriters
over-allotment option described below, unless and until that
option is exercised.
Over-Allotment
Option
We have granted the underwriters an option, exercisable no later
than 30 days after the date of the underwriting agreement,
to purchase up to an aggregate
of
additional post-reverse stock split shares of common stock
(equal to 15% of the total number of shares we are offering) at
the public offering price, less the underwriting discount set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus. We will be obligated
to sell these shares of common stock to the underwriters to the
extent the over-allotment option is exercised. The underwriters
may exercise this option only to cover over-allotments, if any,
made in connection with the sale of our common stock offered by
this prospectus.
Commissions
and Expenses
The underwriters propose to offer our common stock directly to
the public at the offering price set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus and to dealers at the public offering price less
a concession not in excess of $
per post-reverse stock split share. The underwriters may allow,
and the dealers may re-allow, a concession not in excess of
$ per post-reverse stock split
share on sales to other brokers and dealers. After the public
offering of our common stock, the underwriters may change the
offering price, concessions and other selling terms.
66
The following table shows the per share and total underwriting
discount and commissions that we will pay to the underwriters
and the proceeds we will receive before expenses. These amounts
are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional post-reverse
stock split shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
post-
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
Total with
|
|
|
|
reverse
|
|
|
over-
|
|
|
over-
|
|
|
|
stock split
|
|
|
allotment
|
|
|
allotment
|
|
|
|
share
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds to us (before expenses)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
In addition to the underwriting discount, we will reimburse the
underwriters for their reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with their engagement as
underwriters, regardless of whether this offering is
consummated, including, without limitation, legal fees and
expenses, marketing, syndication and travel expenses. We
estimate that the total expenses of this offering, including
out-of-pocket expenses of the underwriters in an amount not to
exceed $150,000 but exclusive of the underwriting discounts and
commissions, will be approximately $1,200,000 and are payable by
us. Our reimbursement of the underwriters out-of-pocket
expenses is deemed to be underwriting compensation by FINRA.
Sales of shares made outside of the U.S. may be made by
affiliates of the underwriters.
Indemnity
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters, and persons who
control the underwriters, against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act, and to contribute to
payments that the underwriters may be required to make in
respect of these liabilities.
Lock-up
Agreements
We and each of our directors and executive officers, have
agreed, for a period of 90 days after the date of this
prospectus, not to sell, offer to sell, agree to sell, contract
to sell, hypothecate, pledge, grant any option to sell, make any
short sale or otherwise dispose of or hedge, directly or
indirectly, any common shares or securities convertible into,
exchangeable or exercisable for any common shares or warrants or
other rights to purchase our common shares or other similar
securities without, in each case, the prior written consent of
Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. except as
otherwise provided herein and subject to other customary
exceptions. The 90-day restricted period described above will be
automatically extended if (1) during the last 17 days
of the
90-day
restricted period, we issue an earnings release or material news
or a material event relating to us occurs or (2) before the
expiration of the
90-day
restricted period, we announce we will release earnings results
or become aware that material news or a material event will
occur during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
90-day
restricted period, in which case the restricted period will
continue to apply until the expiration of the
17-day
period beginning on the date on which the earnings release is
issued or the material news or material event related to us
occurs.
These restrictions are expressly agreed to preclude us and our
executive officers and directors from engaging in any hedging or
other transactions or arrangement that is designed to, or which
reasonably could be expected to, lead to or result in a sale,
disposition or transfer, in whole or in part, of any of the
economic consequences of ownership of our common shares, whether
the transaction would be settled by delivery of common shares or
other securities, in cash or otherwise.
In addition, the U.S. Treasury has agreed in principle to
enter into an agreement not to sell any shares of common stock
for a period of 45 days after the date of the conversion of
the Series G Preferred Stock into common stock.
67
Listing
on the New York Stock Exchange
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the trading symbol
FBP.
Stabilization
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate
covering transactions and penalty bids.
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase shares of
common stock so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum, and are engaged in for the purpose of
preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the
common stock while the offering is in progress.
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment transactions involve sales by the underwriters of
shares of common stock in excess of the number of shares the
underwriters are obligated to purchase. This creates a syndicate
short position that may be either a covered short position or a
naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of
shares of common stock over-allotted by the underwriters is not
greater than the number of shares that they may purchase in the
over-allotment option. In a naked short position, the number of
shares involved is greater than the number of shares in the
over-allotment option. The underwriters may close out any short
position by exercising their over-allotment option
and/or
purchasing shares in the open market.
|
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared with the price at which they may purchase shares
through exercise of the over-allotment option. If the
underwriters sell more shares than could be covered by exercise
of the over-allotment option and, therefore, have a naked short
position, the position can be closed out only by buying shares
in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be
created if the underwriters are concerned that after pricing
there could be downward pressure on the price of the shares in
the open market that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in the offering.
|
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by that syndicate member is purchased in
stabilizing or syndicate covering transactions to cover
syndicate short positions.
|
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a result,
the price of our common stock in the open market may be higher
than it would otherwise be in the absence of these transactions.
Neither we nor the underwriters make any representation or
prediction as to the effect that the transactions described
above may have on the price of our common stock. These
transactions may be effected on the New York Stock Exchange, in
the
over-the-counter
market or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at
any time.
Our
Relationship with the Underwriters
Certain of the underwriters or some of their respective
affiliates have performed and expect to continue to perform
financial advisory and investment banking services for us in the
ordinary course of their respective businesses, and may have
received, and may continue to receive, compensation for such
services.
UBS Securities LLC acted as dealer manager for the Exchange
Offer, which was completed on August 30, 2010. See
Recent Developments.
68
Notices
to Investors
Notice
to Prospective Investors in the European Economic
Area
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area,
or EEA, which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a
Relevant Member State), with effect from, and
including, the date on which the Prospectus Directive is
implemented in that Relevant Member State (the Relevant
Implementation Date), an offer to the public of our shares
of common stock which are the subject of the offering
contemplated by this prospectus may not be made in that Relevant
Member State, except that, with effect from, and including, the
Relevant Implementation Date, an offer to the public in that
Relevant Member State of our shares of common stock may be made
at any time under the following exemptions under the Prospectus
Directive, if they have been implemented in that Relevant Member
State:
(a) to legal entities which are authorized or
regulated to operate in the financial markets, or, if not so
authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to
invest in our shares of common stock;
(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of:
(1) an average of at least 250 employees during the
last (or, in Sweden, the last two) financial year(s); (2) a
total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than 50,000,000,
as shown in its last (or, in Sweden, the last two) annual or
consolidated accounts; or
(c) to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other
than qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive)
subject to obtaining the prior consent of the representative for
any such offer; or
(d) in any other circumstances falling within
Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive provided that no
such offer of our shares of common stock shall result in a
requirement for the publication by us or any underwriter or
agent of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the
Prospectus Directive.
As used above, the expression offered to the public
in relation to any of our shares of common stock in any Relevant
Member State means the communication in any form and by any
means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and
our shares of common stock to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase or subscribe for our shares of
common stock, as the same may be varied in that Member State by
any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member
State and the expression Prospectus Directive means
Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing
measure in each Relevant Member State.
The EEA selling restriction is in addition to any other selling
restrictions set out in this prospectus.
Notice
to Prospective Investors in the United Kingdom
This prospectus is only being distributed to and is only
directed at: (1) persons who are outside the United
Kingdom; (2) investment professionals falling within
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the Order);
or (3) high net worth companies, and other persons to whom
it may lawfully be communicated, falling within
Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons
falling within (1)-(3) together being referred to as
relevant persons). The shares are only available to,
and any invitation, offer or agreement to subscribe, purchase or
otherwise acquire such shares will be engaged in only with,
relevant persons. Any person who is not a relevant person should
not act or rely on this prospectus or any of its contents.
Notice
to Prospective Investors in Switzerland
The Prospectus does not constitute an issue prospectus pursuant
to Article 652a or Article 1156 of the Swiss Code of
Obligations (CO) and our shares of common stock will
not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange. Therefore, this
prospectus may not comply with the disclosure standards of the
CO and/or
the listing rules (including any prospectus schemes) of the SIX
Swiss Exchange. Accordingly, our shares of
69
common stock may not be offered to the public in or from
Switzerland, but only to a selected and limited circle of
investors, which do not subscribe to our shares of common stock
with a view to distribution.
Notice
to Prospective Investors in Australia
This prospectus is not a formal disclosure document and has not
been, nor will be, lodged with the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission. It does not purport to contain all
information that an investor or their professional advisers
would expect to find in a prospectus or other disclosure
document (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia))
for the purposes of Part 6D.2 of the Corporations Act 2001
(Australia) or in a product disclosure statement for the
purposes of Part 7.9 of the Corporations Act 2001
(Australia), in either case, in relation to our shares of common
stock.
Our shares of common stock are not being offered in Australia to
retail clients as defined in sections 761G and
761GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia). This offering is
being made in Australia solely to wholesale clients
for the purposes of section 761G of the Corporations Act
2001 (Australia) and, as such, no prospectus, product disclosure
statement or other disclosure document in relation to our shares
of common stock has been, or will be, prepared.
This prospectus does not constitute an offer in Australia other
than to wholesale clients. By submitting an application for our
shares of common stock, you represent and warrant to us that you
are a wholesale client for the purposes of section 761G of
the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia). If any recipient of this
prospectus is not a wholesale client, no offer of, or invitation
to apply for, our shares of common stock shall be deemed to be
made to such recipient and no applications for our shares of
common stock will be accepted from such recipient. Any offer to
a recipient in Australia, and any agreement arising from
acceptance of such offer, is personal and may only be accepted
by the recipient. In addition, by applying for our shares of
common stock you undertake to us that, for a period of
12 months from the date of issue of our shares of common
stock, you will not transfer any interest in our shares of
common stock to any person in Australia other than to a
wholesale client.
Notice
to Prospective Investors in Hong Kong
Our shares of common stock may not be offered or sold in Hong
Kong, by means of this prospectus or any document other than
(i) to professional investors within the
meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571, Laws
of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder, or (ii) in
circumstances which do not constitute an offer to the public
within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of
Hong Kong), or (iii) in other circumstances which do not
result in the document being a prospectus within the
meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong).
No advertisement, invitation or document relating to our shares
of common stock may be issued or may be in the possession of any
person for the purpose of issue (in each case whether in Hong
Kong or elsewhere) which is directed at, or the contents of
which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public in Hong
Kong (except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of
Hong Kong) other than with respect to our shares of common stock
which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons
outside Hong Kong or only to professional investors
within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.
571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder.
Notice
to Prospective Investors in Japan
Our shares of common stock have not been and will not be
registered under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of
Japan (the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law) and our
shares of common stock will not be offered or sold, directly or
indirectly, in Japan, or to, or for the benefit of, any resident
of Japan (which term as used herein means any person resident in
Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under
the laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale,
directly or indirectly, in Japan, or to a resident of Japan,
except pursuant to an exemption from the registration
requirements of, and otherwise in compliance
70
with, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law and any other
applicable laws, regulations and ministerial guidelines of Japan.
Notice
to Prospective Investors in the Singapore
This document has not been registered as a prospectus with the
Monetary Authority of Singapore and in Singapore, the offer and
sale of our shares of common stock is made pursuant to
exemptions provided in sections 274 and 275 of the
Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore
(SFA). Accordingly, this prospectus and any other
document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or
invitation for subscription or purchase, of our shares of common
stock may not be circulated or distributed, nor may our shares
of common stock be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an
invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or
indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an
institutional investor as defined in Section 4A of the SFA
pursuant to Section 274 of the SFA, (ii) to a relevant
person as defined in section 275(2) of the SFA pursuant to
Section 275(1) of the SFA, or any person pursuant to
Section 275(1A) of the SFA, and in accordance with the
conditions specified in Section 275 of the SFA or
(iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the
conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA, in
each case subject to compliance with the conditions (if any) set
forth in the SFA. Moreover, this document is not a prospectus as
defined in the SFA. Accordingly, statutory liability under the
SFA in relation to the content of prospectuses would not apply.
Prospective investors in Singapore should consider carefully
whether an investment in our securities is suitable for them.
Where our shares of common stock are subscribed or purchased
under Section 275 of the SFA by a relevant person which is:
(a) by a corporation (which is not an accredited
investor as defined in Section 4A of the SFA) the sole
business of which is to hold investments and the entire share
capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of
whom is an accredited investor; or
(b) for a trust (where the trustee is not an
accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments
and each beneficiary of the trust is an individual who is an
accredited investor,
shares of that corporation or the beneficiaries rights and
interest (howsoever described) in that trust shall not be
transferable for six months after that corporation or that trust
has acquired our shares of common stock under Section 275
of the SFA, except:
(1) to an institutional investor (for corporations
under Section 274 of the SFA) or to a relevant person
defined in Section 275(2) of the SFA, or any person
pursuant to an offer that is made on terms that such shares of
that corporation or such rights and interest in that trust are
acquired at a consideration of not less than S$200,000 (or its
equivalent in a foreign currency) for each transaction, whether
such amount is to be paid for in cash or by exchange of
securities or other assets, and further for corporations, in
accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of
the SFA;
(2) where no consideration is given for the transfer;
or
(3) where the transfer is by operation of law.
In addition, investors in Singapore should note that our shares
of common stock acquired by them are subject to resale and
transfer restrictions specified under Section 276 of the
SFA, and they, therefore, should seek their own legal advice
before effecting any resale or transfer of our shares of common
stock.
71
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock being offered by this
prospectus will be passed upon for us by Lawrence
Odell, Esq., Executive Vice President and General Counsel.
As of the date of this prospectus, Lawrence Odell, Esq.,
beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 225,000 shares
of our common stock, as determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
of the Exchange Act. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New
York, New York, is acting as counsel for the underwriters in
connection with this offering.
EXPERTS
The financial statements and managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
(which is included in Managements Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting) incorporated in this
prospectus by reference to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 have been so
incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on
the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
72
Shares
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
Sole Book-Running Manager
Lead Manager
UBS
Investment Bank
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2010
Until ,
2010, 25 days after the date of this prospectus, all
dealers that effect transactions in our common stock, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with
respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 13. Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
The following table sets forth all costs and expenses, other
than underwriting discounts and commissions, in connection with
the sale of the common stock being registered, all of which will
be paid by us. All amounts shown are estimates except for the
Securities Exchange Commission, or SEC, registration fee, the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA),
filing fee and the listing fee for the NYSE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount paid
|
|
|
|
or to be paid
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
40,997.50
|
|
FINRA filing fee
|
|
$
|
58,000.00
|
|
NYSE listing fees
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Printing expenses
|
|
$
|
75,000.00
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
775,000.00
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
70,000.00
|
|
Transfer agent and registrar fees and expenses
|
|
$
|
5,000.00
|
|
Federal and state taxes
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Miscellaneous expenses
|
|
$
|
176,002.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
$
|
1,200,000.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment |
Item 14. Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
(a) Article NINTH of First BanCorps
Articles of Incorporation provides for indemnification of
directors and officers and reads as follows:
(1) First BanCorp shall indemnify any person who was
or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other
than an action by or in the right of First BanCorp) by reason of
the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or
agent of First BanCorp, or is or was serving at the written
request of First BanCorp as a director, officer, employee or
agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust
or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys
fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually
and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action,
suit or proceeding if it is formally determined by the Board of
Directors, or other committee or entity empowered to make such
determination, that he acted in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of First BanCorp, and, with respect to any criminal
action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his
conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or
proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a
plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself,
create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith
and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of First BanCorp and, with respect
to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to
believe that his conduct was unlawful.
(2) First BanCorp shall indemnify any person who was
or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the
right of First BanCorp to procure a judgment in its favor by
reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer,
employee or agent of First BanCorp, or is or was serving at the
written request of First BanCorp as a director, officer,
employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including
attorneys fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection with the defense of settlement of such
II-1
action or suit if it is formally determined by the Board of
Directors, or other committee or entity empowered to make such
determination, that he acted in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of First BanCorp, except that no indemnification shall
be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which
such person shall have been adjudged to be liable for negligence
or misconduct in the performance of his duty to First BanCorp
unless and only to the extent that the court in which such
action was brought shall determine upon application that,
despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the
circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses which such court shall
deem proper.
(3) To the extent that a director, officer, employee
or agent of First BanCorp has been successful on the merits or
otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred
to in a paragraph 1 or 2 of this Article NINTH, or in
defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he shall be
indemnified against expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection therewith.
(4) Any indemnification under paragraph 1 or 2
of this Article NINTH (unless ordered by a court) shall be
made by First BanCorp only as authorized in the specific case
upon a determination that indemnification of the director,
officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances
because he has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth
therein. Such determination shall be made (a) by the Board
of Directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of
directors who were not parties to such action, suit or
proceeding, or (b) if such a quorum is not obtainable, or,
even if obtainable a quorum of disinterested directors so
directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or
(c) by the stockholders.
(5) Expenses incurred in defending a civil or
criminal action, suit or proceeding may be paid by First BanCorp
in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or
proceeding as authorized by the Board of Directors in the
specific case upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of
the director, officer, employee or agent to repay such amount
unless it shall ultimately be determined that he is entitled to
be indemnified by First BanCorp as authorized in this
Article NINTH.
(6) The indemnification provided by this
Article NINTH shall not be deemed exclusive of any other
rights to which those seeking indemnification may be entitled
under any statute, by-law, agreement, vote of stockholders or
disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in his
official capacity and as to action in another capacity while
holding such office, and shall continue as to a person who has
ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall
inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators
of such a person.
(7) By action of its Board of Directors,
notwithstanding any interest of the directors in the action,
First BanCorp may purchase and maintain insurance, in such
amounts as the Board of Directors deems appropriate, on behalf
of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or
agent of First BanCorp, or is or was serving at the written
request of First BanCorp as a director, officer, employee or
agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust
or other enterprise, against any liability asserted against him
and incurred by him in any such capacity, or arising out of his
status as such.
(8) Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the
contrary, no indemnification may be made by First BanCorp to any
person if it relates to the imposition of a fine for an
infraction or violation of any provision of the law.
(b) Article 1.02(b)(6) of the Puerto Rico
General Corporation Law of 1995, as amended (the
PR-GCL),
provides that a corporation may include in its certificate of
incorporation a provision eliminating or limiting the personal
liability of members of its board of directors or governing body
for breach of a directors fiduciary duty of care. However,
no such provision may eliminate or limit the liability of a
director for breaching his duty of loyalty, failing to act in
good faith, engaging in intentional misconduct or knowingly
violating a law, paying an unlawful dividend or approving an
unlawful stock repurchase or obtaining an improper personal
benefit.
II-2
(c) Article 4.08 of the
PR-GCL
authorizes a Puerto Rico corporation to indemnify its officers
and directors against liabilities arising out of pending or
threatened actions, suits or proceedings to which such officers
and directors are or may be made parties by reason of being
officers or directors. Such rights of indemnification are not
exclusive of any other rights to which such officers or
directors may be entitled under any by-law, agreement, vote of
stockholders or otherwise.
(d) Article 2.02(n) of the
PR-GCL
states that every corporation created under the provisions of
the PR-GCL
shall have the power to reimburse to all directors and officers
or former directors and officers the expenses which necessarily
or in fact were incurred with respect to the defense in any
action, suit or proceeding in which such persons, or any of
them, are included as a party or parties for having been
directors or officers of one or another corporation, pursuant to
the provisions of Article 4.08 of the
PR-GCL
described above.
(e) First BanCorp maintains directors and
officers liability insurance on behalf of its directors
and officers.
Item 15. Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities.
The following sets forth information regarding unregistered
securities that were sold by the Registrant within the past
three years:
On July 20, 2010, the Registrant exchanged its Fixed Rate
Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000
liquidation preference per share (Series F Preferred
Stock), which has a liquidation preference of
$400 million, and accrued and unpaid dividends on the
Series F Preferred Stock, for shares of a new series of
Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series G (the Series G Preferred Stock),
that has similar terms (including the same liquidation
preference), but, as amended on December 1, 2010, which we
could convert under certain conditions and the holder could
convert based on an initial conversion rate of
1034.1975 pre-reverse
stock split shares of common stock for each share of
Series G Preferred Stock (calculated by dividing $750, or a
discount of 25% from the $1,000 liquidation preference per share
of Series G Preferred Stock, by the initial conversion
price of $0.7252 per
pre-reverse
stock split share, which is subject to adjustment).
In addition, the Registrant issued an amended and restated
warrant (the Amended and Restated Warrant), having a
10-year term
and exercisable at an initial exercise price of $0.7252 per
share, at the same time as it issued the Series G Preferred
Stock in exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock to
replace the warrant issued to the U.S. Treasury on
January 16, 2009 (the Warrant) in connection
with the issuance of the Series F Preferred Stock to the
U.S. Treasury. Like the Warrant, the Amended and Restated
Warrant has an anti-dilution right that requires an adjustment
to the exercise price for, and the number of shares underlying,
the warrant. This adjustment will be necessary under various
circumstances, including for the reverse stock split and if we
issue shares of common stock for consideration per
pre-reverse
stock split share that is lower than the initial
pre-reverse
stock split conversion price of the Series G Preferred
Stock, or $0.7252.
On January 16, 2009, the Registrant entered into a Letter
Agreement with the U.S. Treasury pursuant to which the
U.S. Treasury invested $400,000,000 in Series F
Preferred Stock of the Registrant under the
U.S. Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital
Purchase Program. Under the Letter Agreement, which incorporates
the Securities Purchase AgreementStandard Terms, the
Registrant issued and sold to the U.S. Treasury
(1) 400,000 shares of Series F Preferred Stock,
and (2) the Warrant to purchase 5,842,259 pre-reverse
stock split shares of First BanCorps common stock at an
initial exercise price of $10.27 per pre-reverse stock split
share.
On August 24, 2007, the Registrant entered into a
Stockholder Agreement relating to its sale of
9,250,450 pre-reverse stock split shares of common stock to
The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) at a price of $10.25
per pre-reverse stock split share (aggregate value of
$94,817,112.50) pursuant to the terms of an Investment
Agreement, dated February 15, 2007.
II-3
Each of the Series G Preferred Stock, the Amended and
Restated Warrant, and the 9,250,450 pre-reverse stock split
shares of the Registrants common stock sold to BNS in 2007
were issued in a private placement exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public
offering. The recipients of securities in each such transaction
represented its intention to acquire the securities for
investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection
with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were
affixed to the share certificates and other instruments issued
in such transactions. Each transaction was made without general
solicitation or advertising. However, none of the shares of
Series G Preferred Stock or the Warrant and Amended and
Restated Warrant, or the shares underlying such warrant are
subject to any contractual restriction on transfer.
Item 16. Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) Exhibits.
The exhibits to the registration statement are listed in the
Exhibit Index attached hereto and incorporated by reference
herein.
(b) Financial Statements Schedules.
The financial statement schedules have been provided in the
consolidated financial statements or notes thereto, which are
incorporated herein by reference to the Registrants Annual
Report to Stockholders on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 2, 2010.
Item 17. Undertakings.
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to
provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the
underwriting agreement, certificates in such denominations and
registered in such names as required by the underwriter to
permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities
arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
(c) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under
the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)
(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be
deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time
it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-4
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the city of Santurce, Puerto Rico, on
December 8, 2010.
FIRST BANCORP.
Orlando Berges
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
II-5
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this Registration Statement has been signed below by
the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Aurelio
Alemán
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
December 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Orlando
Berges
Orlando
Berges
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
December 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Jorge
L. Díaz
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
José
L.
Ferrer-Canals
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Frank
Kolodziej
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
José
Menéndez-Cortada
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Héctor
M. Nevares
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
José
F. Rodríguez
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Fernando
Rodríguez-Amaro
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Pedro
Romero
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
December 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Sharee
Ann
Umpierre-Catinchi
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2010
|
* Lawrence Odell, by signing his name hereto, does
hereby sign this document on behalf of each of the above-named
directors and officers of the registrant pursuant to powers of
attorney duly executed by such persons.
Lawrence Odell
Attorney-in-fact
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 3.1 of the
Form S-1/A
filed by First BanCorp on August 24, 2010.
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-Laws, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 of the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed by First BanCorp
on March 2, 2009.
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the 7.125% Noncumulative
Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A,
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(B) to the
Form S-3
filed by First BanCorp on March 30, 1999.
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the 8.35% Noncumulative
Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B,
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(B) to
Form S-3
filed by First BanCorp on September 8, 2000.
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the 7.40% Noncumulative
Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series C, incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 4(B) to the
Form S-3
filed by First BanCorp on May 18, 2001.
|
|
3
|
.6
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the 7.25% Noncumulative
Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series D,
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(B) to the
Form S-3/A
filed by First BanCorp on January 16, 2002.
|
|
3
|
.7
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the 7.00% Noncumulative
Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series E,
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the
Form 8-K
filed by First BanCorp on September 5, 2003.
|
|
3
|
.8
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the fixed-rate cumulative
perpetual preferred stock, Series G, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the
Form 8-K
filed by First BanCorp on July 7, 2010.
|
|
3
|
.9
|
|
First Amendment to Certificate of Designation creating the
Fixed-Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series G, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1
to the Form 8-K filed by First BanCorp on December 2,
2010.
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 4 of the Registration Statement on
Form S-4/A
filed by First BanCorp on April 24, 1998.
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series A, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 4(A) to the
Form S-3
filed by First BanCorp on March 30, 1999.
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series B, incorporated by
reference form Exhibit 4(A) to the
Form S-3
filed by First BanCorp on September 8, 2000.
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for 7.40% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series C, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 4(A) to the
Form S-3
filed by First BanCorp on May 18, 2001.
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series D, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 4(A) to the
Form S-3/A
filed by First BanCorp on January 16, 2002.
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for 7.00% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series E, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by First BanCorp on September 5, 2003.
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series F, incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 4.6 to the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed by First BanCorp
on March 2, 2009.
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Amended and Restated Warrant, Annex A to the Exchange Agreement
by and between First BanCorp and the United States Treasury
dated as of July 7, 2010, incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.2 of the
Form 8-K
filed on July 7, 2010.
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Lawrence Odell, Esq., Executive Vice President
and General Counsel of First BanCorp, regarding the validity of
the Common Stock being registered.*
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
FirstBanks 1997 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by
reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 filed by First BanCorp
on March 26, 1999.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
First BanCorps 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 filed by First BanCorp
on May 12, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Investment Agreement between The Bank of Nova Scotia and
First BanCorp dated February 15, 2007, including the Form
of Stockholder Agreement, incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.01 to the
Form 8-K
filed by First BanCorp on February 22, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Employment AgreementAurelio Alemán, incorporated by
reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 filed by First BanCorp
on March 26, 1999.
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment AgreementAurelio
Alemán, incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed by First BanCorp
on May 11, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employment AgreementAurelio
Alemán, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6
of the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed by First BanCorp
on March 2, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Employment AgreementRandolfo Rivera, incorporated by
reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 filed by First BanCorp
on March 26, 1999.
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment AgreementRandolfo
Rivera, incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed by First BanCorp
on May 11, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employment AgreementRandolfo
Rivera, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.9 of the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed by First BanCorp
on March 2, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Employment AgreementLawrence Odell, incorporated by
reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed by First BanCorp
on February 9, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment AgreementLawrence
Odell, incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed by First BanCorp
on February 9, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employment AgreementLawrence
Odell, incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed by First BanCorp
on May 11, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Employment AgreementLawrence
Odell, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.13 of the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed by First BanCorp
on March 2, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Employment AgreementOrlando Berges, incorporated by
reference from the
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 filed by First BanCorp
on August 11, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Service Agreement Martinez Odell & Calabria, incorporated
by reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed by First BanCorp
on February 9, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Service Agreement Martinez Odell &
Calabria, incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed by First BanCorp
on February 9, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Service Agreement Martinez Odell &
Calabria, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.17 of
the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed by First BanCorp
on March 2, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Consent Order, dated June 2, 1010, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the
Form 8-K
filed on June 4, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Written Agreement, dated June 3, 2010, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the
Form 8-K
filed on June 4, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Exchange Agreement by and between First BanCorp and the United
States Treasury dated as of July 7, 2010, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the
Form 8-K
filed on July 7, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.23 to the
Form S-1/A
filed by First BanCorp on July 16, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Officers and Other Employees
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.24 to the
Form S-1/A
filed by First BanCorp on July 16, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2009, and
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 16,
2009, by and between First BanCorp and the United States
Department of the Treasury, incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.1 of the
Form 8-K
filed on January 20, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Stockholder Agreement, dated as of
October 13, 2010, by and between First BanCorp and The Bank
of Nova Scotia, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the
Form 8-K
filed on November 24, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
First Amendment to Exchange Agreement, dated as of
December 1, 2010, by and between First BanCorp and The
United States Department of the Treasury incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by First BanCorp on December 2, 2010.
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of First BanCorp.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm.
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Lawrence Odell, Esq. (included in
Exhibit 5.1 above).*
|
|
25
|
.1
|
|
Powers of Attorney (included on signature pages to the initial
filing).
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to this Registration Statement. |