Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-10767
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
20-0090238 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
4150 E. Fifth Avenue, Columbus, Ohio
|
|
43219 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(614) 238-4148
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). o Yes o No
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
The number of outstanding Common Shares, without par value, as of November 29, 2010 was 50,254,551.
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-1-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
113,927 |
|
|
$ |
141,773 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
206,065 |
|
|
|
164,265 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
11,592 |
|
|
|
6,509 |
|
Accounts receivable from related parties, net |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
332,446 |
|
|
|
262,284 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
30,218 |
|
|
|
22,478 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
34,571 |
|
|
|
29,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
728,858 |
|
|
|
627,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments, net |
|
|
11,767 |
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
208,804 |
|
|
|
208,813 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
25,899 |
|
|
|
25,899 |
|
Conversion feature of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,029 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
14,191 |
|
|
|
5,657 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
10,224 |
|
|
|
6,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
999,743 |
|
|
$ |
903,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-2-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
(in thousands, except share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
138,846 |
|
|
$ |
120,038 |
|
Accounts payable to related parties |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
Accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
23,264 |
|
|
|
27,056 |
|
Taxes |
|
|
19,138 |
|
|
|
29,682 |
|
Gift cards and merchandise credits |
|
|
16,293 |
|
|
|
17,774 |
|
Guarantees from discontinued operations |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
Other |
|
|
51,560 |
|
|
|
36,162 |
|
Current maturities of long-term obligations |
|
|
131,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant liability |
|
|
34,328 |
|
|
|
23,068 |
|
Conversion feature of short-term debt |
|
|
6,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
423,051 |
|
|
|
257,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,757 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
100,013 |
|
|
|
112,599 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
14,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, without par value; 160,000,000
authorized; issued and outstanding, including
7,551 treasury shares, 49,047,530 and
48,964,530, respectively |
|
|
313,864 |
|
|
|
313,147 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(79,272 |
) |
|
|
(100,277 |
) |
Treasury shares, at cost, 7,551 shares |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(6,942 |
) |
|
|
(6,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Retail Ventures shareholders equity |
|
|
227,591 |
|
|
|
205,869 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
234,931 |
|
|
|
197,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
462,522 |
|
|
|
403,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
999,743 |
|
|
$ |
903,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-3-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
489,269 |
|
|
$ |
444,621 |
|
|
$ |
1,353,926 |
|
|
$ |
1,199,957 |
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation included below in
selling, general and administrative expenses) |
|
|
(268,485 |
) |
|
|
(238,549 |
) |
|
|
(737,626 |
) |
|
|
(666,416 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(171,883 |
) |
|
|
(164,862 |
) |
|
|
(479,947 |
) |
|
|
(531,140 |
) |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
(31,681 |
) |
|
|
(30,701 |
) |
|
|
(45,843 |
) |
|
|
(40,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
17,220 |
|
|
|
10,509 |
|
|
|
90,510 |
|
|
|
(38,377 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,335 |
) |
|
|
(3,236 |
) |
|
|
(10,032 |
) |
|
|
(9,678 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(2,077 |
) |
|
|
(2,610 |
) |
|
|
(7,361 |
) |
|
|
(7,787 |
) |
Non-operating income (expense), net |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
16,643 |
|
|
|
7,145 |
|
|
|
84,649 |
|
|
|
(46,785 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(8,726 |
) |
|
|
(11,079 |
) |
|
|
(38,532 |
) |
|
|
(13,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
|
(3,934 |
) |
|
|
46,117 |
|
|
|
(60,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax Value City |
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax Filenes Basement |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
44,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
44,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
10,108 |
|
|
|
(4,229 |
) |
|
|
51,278 |
|
|
|
(15,628 |
) |
Less: net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(13,428 |
) |
|
|
(9,900 |
) |
|
|
(33,642 |
) |
|
|
(15,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Retail Ventures, Inc. |
|
$ |
(3,320 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,129 |
) |
|
$ |
17,636 |
|
|
$ |
(30,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations
attributable to Retail Ventures, Inc. common shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations
attributable to Retail Ventures, Inc. common shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
Basic earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
attributable to Retail Ventures, Inc. common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
attributable to Retail Ventures, Inc. common shareholders |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share attributable to Retail
Ventures, Inc. common shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
(0.63 |
) |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Retail
Ventures, Inc. common shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
(0.63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
49,037 |
|
|
|
48,938 |
|
|
|
49,028 |
|
|
|
48,855 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
49,037 |
|
|
|
48,938 |
|
|
|
49,315 |
|
|
|
48,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Retail Ventures, Inc. common shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(5,511 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,834 |
) |
|
$ |
12,475 |
|
|
$ |
(75,651 |
) |
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
44,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,320 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,129 |
) |
|
$ |
17,636 |
|
|
$ |
(30,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-4-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Retail Ventures, Inc. Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accum- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accum- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Shares in |
|
|
Common |
|
|
ulated |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehen- |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Deficit) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
sive Loss |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, January 31, 2009 |
|
|
48,691 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
306,868 |
|
|
$ |
(76,930 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
(7,389 |
) |
|
$ |
172,572 |
|
|
$ |
395,186 |
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,359 |
|
|
|
(60,292 |
) |
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,664 |
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(15,727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities to an other-than temporary impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
754 |
|
Capital transactions of subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
Stock based compensation expense, before related tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
949 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511 |
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting pronouncement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of warrants to liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2009 |
|
|
48,947 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
308,328 |
|
|
$ |
(105,930 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,619 |
) |
|
$ |
191,205 |
|
|
$ |
386,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 30, 2010 |
|
|
48,964 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
313,147 |
|
|
$ |
(100,277 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,942 |
) |
|
$ |
197,421 |
|
|
$ |
403,290 |
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,642 |
|
|
|
46,117 |
|
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital transactions of subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,868 |
|
|
|
7,237 |
|
Stock based compensation expense, before related tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
Net issuance of restricted shares |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 30, 2010 |
|
|
49,047 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
313,864 |
|
|
$ |
(79,272 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,942 |
) |
|
$ |
234,931 |
|
|
$ |
462,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-5-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
51,278 |
|
|
$ |
(15,628 |
) |
Less: income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(5,161 |
) |
|
|
(44,664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before discontinued operations |
|
|
46,117 |
|
|
|
(60,292 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount on debt |
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
Stock based compensation expense |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
Restricted shares granted |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital transactions of subsidiary |
|
|
3,369 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
34,823 |
|
|
|
34,782 |
|
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
45,843 |
|
|
|
40,778 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other non current liabilities |
|
|
(13,607 |
) |
|
|
(28,053 |
) |
Loss on disposal of long-lived assets |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
Impairment charges on long-lived assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
481 |
|
Impairment charges on receivables from Filenes Basement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,897 |
|
Non-operating expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
621 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,525 |
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
Change in working capital, assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(4,968 |
) |
|
|
2,403 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(70,162 |
) |
|
|
(45,387 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(11,809 |
) |
|
|
2,951 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
18,221 |
|
|
|
47,703 |
|
Proceeds from construction and tenant allowances |
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
6,680 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(5,098 |
) |
|
|
31,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations |
|
|
54,119 |
|
|
|
101,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for property and equipment |
|
|
(32,182 |
) |
|
|
(18,671 |
) |
Purchases of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(24,918 |
) |
|
|
(161,147 |
) |
Purchases of held-to-maturity investments |
|
|
(147,348 |
) |
|
|
(12,105 |
) |
Maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
68,145 |
|
|
|
101,106 |
|
Maturities and sales of held-to-maturity investments |
|
|
49,876 |
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
Return of capital from equity investment related party |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of tradename |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfer of cash from restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,261 |
|
Transfer of cash to restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations |
|
|
(86,453 |
) |
|
|
(86,881 |
) |
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-6-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Payment of current maturities on long-term obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities from continuing
operations |
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
|
261 |
|
|
Cash and equivalents from discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
20,563 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents from discontinued
operations |
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
(4,776 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(33,007 |
) |
|
$ |
14,415 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
141,773 |
|
|
|
99,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
113,927 |
|
|
$ |
108,723 |
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-7-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Retail Ventures, Inc. (Retail Ventures or RVI) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and
majority-owned subsidiary are herein referred to collectively as the Company. Retail Ventures
Common Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol RVI.
The Company operates two segments in the United States of America (United States) as of
October 30, 2010. DSW Inc. (DSW) is a specialty branded footwear retailer. The Corporate
segment consists of all corporate assets, liabilities and expenses that are not attributable to
the DSW segment. As of October 30, 2010, there were 313 DSW stores located throughout the United
States. DSW also supplies shoes, under supply arrangements, for 351 locations for other retailers in the United States.
DSW. On July 5, 2005, DSW completed an initial public offering (IPO) of 16,171,875 Class A
Common Shares sold at a price of $19.00 per share and raised net proceeds of $285.8 million, net
of the underwriters commission and before expenses of approximately $7.8 million. As of October
30, 2010, Retail Ventures owned Class B Common Shares of DSW representing approximately 62.2% of
DSWs outstanding Common Shares and approximately 92.9% of the combined voting power of such
shares. RVI accounted for the sale of DSW as a capital transaction. Associated with this
transaction, a deferred tax liability of $65.5 million was recorded. DSW is a controlled
subsidiary of Retail Ventures and its Class A Common Shares are listed on the NYSE under the
ticker symbol DSW.
DSW is a leading U.S. branded footwear specialty retailer operating 313 shoe stores in 39 states
as of October 30, 2010. DSW offers a wide assortment of better-branded dress, casual and
athletic footwear for women and men, as well as accessories through DSW stores and dsw.com. As
of October 30, 2010, DSW, pursuant to supply agreements, operated 261 leased shoe departments
for Stein Mart, Inc., 68 for Gordmans, Inc., 21 for Filenes Basement and one for Frugal
Fannies Fashion Warehouse. Supply agreements results are included within the DSW segment.
During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, DSW opened nine new DSW stores and three new
leased departments, ceased operations in two DSW stores and seven leased departments and
recategorized one combination DSW/Filenes Basement store as a DSW store.
Corporate. The Corporate segment represents the corporate assets, liabilities and expenses not
allocated to the DSW segment, debt related expenses and income on investments.
2. |
|
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended January 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) on October 12, 2010 (the 2009 Annual Report).
In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements
reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary to
present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows for the periods presented.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses and
records related allowances for doubtful accounts. Allowances are estimated based upon specific
accounts receivable balances, where a risk of default has been identified. As of October 30,
2010 and January 30, 2010, the Companys allowance for doubtful accounts were $2.6 million and
$5.3 million, respectively. The decrease in the allowance was primarily related to the reversal
of allowances recorded for receivables from liquidating Filenes Basement due to an initial
distribution from the debtors estates.
In addition, during the quarter ended May 2, 2009, there was an allowance recorded for $52.6
million to fully reserve for the notes receivable from liquidating Filenes Basement. Effective
November 3, 2009, RVIs claims against liquidating Filenes Basement in respect of these notes
receivable were released in connection with a Settlement Agreement approved by the bankruptcy
court.
Inventories Merchandise inventories are stated at net realizable value, determined using the
first-in, first-out basis, or market, using the retail inventory method. The retail method is
widely used in the retail industry due to its practicality.
Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross
profits are calculated by applying a cost to retail ratio to the retail value of inventories.
The cost of the inventory reflected on the balance sheet is decreased by charges to cost of
sales at the time the retail value of the inventory is lowered through the use of markdowns,
which are reductions in prices due to customers perception of value. Hence, earnings are
negatively impacted as the merchandise is marked down prior to sale.
-8-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Inherent in the calculation of inventories are certain significant management judgments and
estimates, including setting the original merchandise retail value, markdowns, and estimates of
losses between physical inventory counts, or shrinkage, which combined with the averaging
process within the retail method, can significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at
cost and the resulting gross profit.
A reduction to inventories is charged to cost of sales for shrinkage. Shrinkage is calculated as
a percentage of sales from the last physical inventory date. Estimates are based on both
historical experience as well as recent physical inventory results. Physical inventory counts
are taken on an annual basis and have supported the Companys shrinkage estimates.
Markdowns represent the excess of the carrying value over the amount the Company expects to
realize from the ultimate disposition of the inventory. Factors considered in the determination
of markdowns include customer preference and fashion trends. Changes in facts or circumstances
do not result in the reversal of previously recorded markdowns or an increase in that newly
established cost basis.
Tradenames and Other Intangible Assets, Net Tradenames and other intangible assets, net are
primarily comprised of values assigned to tradenames and leases. As of October 30, 2010 and
January 30, 2010, the gross balance of tradenames was $13.0 million and $12.8 million,
respectively. During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, DSW purchased a merchandise
tradename for the amount of $0.2 million, amortizable over five years and an indefinite lived
tradename for less than $0.1 million. As of both October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010, the
gross balance of other intangible assets was $0.1 million. Accumulated amortization for
tradenames was $10.6 million and $10.0 million as of October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010,
respectively. Accumulated amortization for other intangible assets was $0.1 million as of both
October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010. The average useful lives of tradenames and other
intangible assets, net are 14 and 15 years as of October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010,
respectively.
Amortization expense for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 was $0.7 million, and $0.2
million will be amortized during the remainder of fiscal 2010. Amortization expense associated
with the net carrying amount of intangible assets as of October 30, 2010 is $0.9 million for
both fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012, $0.3 million in fiscal 2013 and less than $0.1 million in
fiscal 2014.
Customer Loyalty Program DSW maintains a customer loyalty program for the DSW stores and
dsw.com in which program members earn reward certificates that result in discounts on future
purchases. Upon reaching the target-earned threshold, the members receive reward certificates
for these discounts which expire six months after being issued. DSW accrues the anticipated
redemptions of the discount earned at the time of the initial purchase. To estimate these costs,
DSW is required to make assumptions related to customer purchase levels and redemption rates
based on historical experience. The accrued liability as of October 30, 2010 and January 30,
2010 was $11.9 million and $9.0 million, respectively.
Deferred Rent Many of the Companys operating leases contain predetermined fixed increases of
the minimum rentals during the initial lease terms. For these leases, the Company recognizes the
related rental expense on a straight-line basis over the original terms of the lease. The
Company records the difference between the amounts charged to expense and the rent paid as
deferred rent and begins amortizing such deferred rent upon the delivery of the lease location
by the lessor. The deferred rent included in noncurrent liabilities was $34.3 million and $34.4
million as of October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010, respectively.
Construction and Tenant Allowances DSW receives cash allowances from landlords, which are
deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the original terms of the lease as a
reduction of rent expense. Construction and tenant allowances are included in noncurrent
liabilities and were $57.4 million and $59.7 million as of October 30, 2010 and January 30,
2010, respectively.
Noncontrolling Interests During both the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010 and
October 31, 2009, there was an immaterial impact to the net income (loss) attributable to Retail
Ventures, Inc. as a result of the additional DSW common shares outstanding from DSW director
stock unit grants of 432 and 765 made during each respective three month period and 31,130 and
45,895 made during each respective nine month period.
-9-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Sales and Revenue Recognition Revenues from merchandise sales are recognized upon customer
receipt of merchandise, are net of returns through period end and sales tax and are not
recognized until collectability is reasonably assured. For dsw.com, the Company estimates a time
lag for shipments to record revenue when the customer receives the goods and also includes
revenue from shipping and handling in net sales while the related costs are included in cost of
sales.
Revenue from gift cards is deferred and recognized upon redemption of the gift card. The
Companys policy is to recognize income from breakage of gift cards when the likelihood of
redemption of the gift card is remote. The Company recognized $0.2 million as other operating
income from gift card breakage during both of the three months ended October 30, 2010 and
October 31, 2009. The Company recognized $0.6 million as other operating income from gift card
breakage during both of the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009.
Cost of Sales Cost of sales includes the cost of merchandise, markdowns, and inventory
shrinkage. Cost of merchandise includes related inbound freight to our distribution centers,
duties, commissions and outbound freight from the distribution centers to our stores and
outbound freight of e-commerce sales. The classification of these expenses vary across the
retail industry, thus our gross margin rates may not be comparable to those of other retailers
that include warehousing and outbound distribution and transportation costs in cost of sales.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Selling, general and administrative expenses
include, and consist primarily of, store, warehousing, distribution and corporate payrolls and
benefit costs, occupancy costs which include retail stores, warehousing and corporate rent
costs, facility and leasehold improvement depreciation and utility costs, advertising, repair
and maintenance, insurance, equipment depreciation, professional fees and other miscellaneous
expenses.
Non-operating Income, Net Non-operating income, net includes other-than-temporary impairments
related to investments and realized gains on disposition of investments.
Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under this
method, deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets
and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. A valuation allowance is
established against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Sale of Subsidiary Stock Sales of stock by a subsidiary are accounted for by Retail Ventures
as capital transactions.
3. |
|
ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) 860 Transfers and Servicing related to accounting for transfers
of financial assets. This guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose and
removes the exception from applying ASC 810 to qualifying special-purpose entities. This
guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, and did not impact the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an update to ASC 810 Consolidation. The guidance requires ongoing
assessments using a primarily qualitative approach rather than the quantitative-based risks and
rewards calculation in determining which entity has a controlling interest in a variable
interest entity. In addition, an additional reconsideration assessment should be completed when
an event causes a change in facts or circumstances. Lastly, the guidance requires additional
disclosures about an entitys involvement in variable interest entities. This guidance is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, and did not impact the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued updates to existing guidance related to fair value
measurements. As a result of these updates, entities will be required to provide enhanced
disclosures about transfers into and out of level 1 and level 2 classifications, provide
separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to the tabular
reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of the level 3 classification and provide
greater disaggregation for each class of assets and liabilities that use fair value
measurements. Except for the detailed level 3 disclosures, the new standard was effective for
the Company for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The requirement related to level 3 fair value
measurements is effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after January 29, 2011. The adoption of the effective portions of this new standard did not have
a material impact to its consolidated financial
statements and the Company does not expect a material impact to its consolidated financial
statements related to the level 3 fair value disclosures.
-10-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
4. |
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
Value City
On January 23, 2008, Retail Ventures disposed of an 81% ownership interest in its Value City
operations to VCHI Acquisition Co., a newly formed entity owned by VCDS Acquisition Holdings,
LLC, Emerald Capital Management LLC and Crystal Value, LLC. Retail Ventures received no net cash
proceeds from the sale and paid a fee of $0.5 million to the purchaser. Retail Ventures
recognized an aggregate after-tax loss related to the Value City disposition of $65.1 million as
of October 30, 2010.
Filenes Basement
On April 21, 2009, Retail Ventures disposed of Filenes Basement, Inc. and certain related
entities to FB II Acquisition Corp., a newly formed entity owned by Buxbaum Holdings, Inc.
(Buxbaum). RVI did not realize any cash proceeds from this transaction and agreed to pay a fee
of $1.3 million to Buxbaum, which has been paid, and reimbursed $0.4 million of Buxbaums costs
associated with the transaction. RVI also agreed to indemnify Buxbaum, FB II Acquisition Corp.
and their owners against certain liabilities. As of October 30, 2010, RVI had recorded a
liability of $0.2 million under lease obligations related to leases not assumed by New Filenes
Basement. RVI has recognized an after-tax gain of $84.9 million on the transaction as of October
30, 2010. The $84.9 million gain on the disposition of Filenes Basement is comprised of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment in Filenes Basement as of April 21, 2009 |
|
$ |
(90,026 |
) |
Disposition Costs: |
|
|
|
|
Selling costs to dispose of Filenes Basement |
|
|
5,848 |
|
Outstanding guarantees |
|
|
400 |
|
Impairment of fixed assets not sold |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Disposition Costs |
|
|
7,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax gain on disposition of Filenes Basement |
|
|
(82,112 |
) |
Less tax effect |
|
|
(2,805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
After tax gain on disposition of Filenes Basement |
|
$ |
(84,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
In accordance with ASC 205-20, Discontinued Operations, changes in the carrying value of assets
with residual interest in the discontinued business should be classified within continuing
operations. The other accounts receivable from Filenes Basement existed prior to the
disposition of Filenes Basement and the notes receivable and related interest receivable from
Filenes Basement were not forgiven pursuant to the disposition transaction, but as a result of
the May 4, 2009, Filenes Basement filing for bankruptcy after the disposition transaction.
Therefore, the Company recorded bad debt expense in the amount of $57.3 million for the notes
receivable, related interest receivable and other accounts receivable from Filenes Basement in
selling, general and administrative expenses within continuing operations. DSW recorded bad debt
expense related to the impairment of certain accounts receivable from liquidating Filenes
Basement of $0.6 million. Therefore, included in the consolidated results of operations of RVI
for the nine months ended October 31, 2009 is bad debt expense of $57.9 million related to the
impairment of these items. On March 3, 2010, an initial distribution from the debtors estates
of $5.8 million to Retail Ventures and $0.2 million to DSW was made.
On May 4, 2009, Filenes Basement Inc. filed for bankruptcy protection. On June 18, 2009,
following bankruptcy court approval, SYL LLC, a subsidiary of Syms Corp (Syms), purchased
certain assets of Filenes Basement. All references to liquidating Filenes Basement refer to
the debtor, formerly known as Filenes Basement Inc., and its debtor subsidiaries remaining
after the asset purchase by a subsidiary of Syms. All references to New Filenes Basement
refer to the stores operated by Syms. On September 25, 2009, RVI and DSW entered into a
settlement agreement with liquidating Filenes Basement and its related debtors and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in the Chapter 11 case for the debtors. On November
3, 2009, the settlement agreement was approved by the Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware. As a result of the courts approval of the settlement agreement, RVIs claims in
respect of $52.6 million in notes receivable (comprised of two 13% Promissory Notes) from
liquidating Filenes Basement were released; RVI maintained the rights and obligations related
to (and agreed to indemnify liquidating Filenes Basement with regard to certain matters arising
out of) the liquidating Filenes Basement defined benefit pension plan (the Pension Plan); and
liquidating
Filenes Basement and the creditors committee agreed to allow certain general unsecured claims
for amounts owed to RVI and DSW. The parties also agreed to certain provisions affecting the
proper allocation of proceeds paid to RVI or liquidating Filenes Basement in connection with
specified third party litigation and to certain provisions related to the debtors recovery from
third parties that were the beneficiaries of letters of credit or hold collateral related to
workers compensation claims. The settlement agreement also provides for certain mutual releases
among the debtors, the creditors committee, RVI, DSW and other parties.
-11-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The following table presents the significant components of Filenes Basement operating results
included in discontinued operations in each of the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(31,195 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345 |
) |
Gain on sale |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
3,009 |
|
|
|
76,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from
discontinued
operations, net of tax
Filenes Basement |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
3,009 |
|
|
$ |
44,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION |
Retail Ventures Stock Compensation Plans
Retail Ventures has a 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the RVI Plan) that provides for the issuance
of stock options to purchase up to 13,000,000 common shares or the issuance of restricted stock
to management, key employees of Retail Ventures and affiliates, consultants (as defined in the
RVI Plan), and directors of Retail Ventures. Stock options generally vest 20% per year on a
cumulative basis. Stock options granted under the RVI Plan remain exercisable for a period of
ten years from the date of grant.
A stock option to purchase 2,500 common shares is automatically granted to each non-employee RVI
director on the first NYSE trading day in each calendar quarter. The exercise price for each
stock option is the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant. All stock
options become exercisable one year after the grant date and remain exercisable for a period of
ten years from the grant date, subject to continuation of the option holders service as
directors of Retail Ventures.
Retail Ventures had a 1991 Stock Option Plan. As of October 30, 2010, there were no outstanding
options under this plan.
The following table summarizes the activity of RVIs stock options, stock appreciation rights
(SARs) and restricted stock units (RSUs) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended October 30, 2010 |
|
Stock Options |
|
|
SARs |
|
|
RSUs |
|
Outstanding beginning of period |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Granted |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of period |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable end of period |
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
-12-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Stock Options
Retail Ventures expensed $0.2 million for both the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and
October 31, 2009, respectively, related to RVI stock options.
The following table illustrates the weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model for RVI stock options granted in each of the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Expected volatility of Retail Ventures common shares |
|
|
87.6 |
% |
|
|
84.6 |
% |
Expected option term |
|
4.9 years |
|
|
5.0 years |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
The weighted-average grant date fair value of RVI stock options granted in the nine months ended
October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009 was $6.78 per share and $1.94 per share, respectively. The
total aggregate intrinsic value of nonvested RVI stock options as of October 30, 2010 was $0.2
million. As of October 30, 2010, the total compensation cost related to nonvested RVI stock
options not yet recognized was approximately $0.1 million with a weighted-average expense
recognition period remaining of 0.6 years.
Stock Appreciation Rights
Retail Ventures expensed less than $0.1 million and $0.7 million in continuing operations for
the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and August 1, 2009, respectively, related to RVI SARs. As
of October 30, 2010, the total compensation cost related to nonvested RVI SARS not yet
recognized was less than $0.1 million with a weighted-average expense recognition period
remaining of 1.4 years.
Restricted Stock Units
Retail Ventures expensed less than $0.1 million in continuing operations for both the nine
months ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, related to RVI restricted stock units. The
restricted stock units are settled only in cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of
an equivalent number of RVIs common shares on the date of vesting. Retail Ventures paid $0.1
million to settle vested RVI restricted stock units during the nine months ended October 30,
2010. There were no RVI restricted stock units accrued as of October 30, 2010 and there were
less than $0.1 million RVI restricted stock units accrued at January 30, 2010.
Restricted Shares
Retail Ventures expensed $0.4 million in continuing operations for the nine months ended October
30, 2010 related to RVI restricted shares. There was no expense related to RVI restricted shares
during the nine months ended October 31, 2009. Retail Ventures issues restricted common shares
to certain key employees pursuant to individual employment agreements and certain other grants
from time to time, which are approved by the Board of Directors. The agreements condition the
vesting of the RVI restricted shares generally upon continued employment with Retail Ventures
with such restrictions generally expiring over one to three years. The market value of the RVI
restricted shares at the date of grant is charged to expense on a straight-line basis over the
period that the restrictions lapse. As of October 30, 2010, Retail Ventures had 70,000
restricted shares outstanding.
The total aggregate intrinsic value of nonvested RVI restricted shares at October 30, 2010 was
$1.0 million. As of October 30, 2010, the total compensation cost related to nonvested RVI
restricted shares not yet recognized was approximately $0.2 million with a weighted-average
expense recognition period remaining of 0.3 years. The weighted-average exercise price for all
RVI restricted shares is zero.
-13-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
DSW Stock Compensation Plan
DSW has a 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the DSW Plan) that provides for the issuance of equity
awards to purchase up to 7.6 million DSW common shares. The DSW Plan covers stock options,
restricted stock units and director stock units. Eligible recipients include key employees of
DSW and affiliates, as well as directors of DSW. Stock options generally vest 20% per year on a
cumulative basis. Stock options granted under the DSW Plan generally remain exercisable for a
period of ten years from the date of grant. Prior to fiscal 2005, DSW did not have a stock
option plan or any equity units outstanding.
The following tables summarize the activity of DSWs stock options and restricted stock units
(RSUs) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended October 30, 2010 |
|
Stock Options |
|
|
RSUs |
|
Outstanding beginning of period |
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
Granted |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of period |
|
|
2,843 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Exercisable end of period |
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
Included in the consolidated statements of operations is expense of $3.5 million and $3.2
million for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively, related
to DSW stock options.
The following table illustrates the weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model for DSW stock options granted in each of the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Expected volatility of DSW common shares |
|
|
56.9 |
% |
|
|
57.6 |
% |
Expected option term |
|
4.9 years |
|
|
4.9 years |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
The weighted-average grant date fair value of DSW stock options granted in the nine months ended
October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009 was $13.40 per share and $5.10 per share, respectively.
The total aggregate intrinsic value of nonvested DSW stock options as of October 30, 2010 was
$25.5 million. As of October 30, 2010, the total compensation cost related to nonvested DSW
stock options not yet recognized was approximately $9.0 million with a weighted average expense
recognition period remaining of 3.5 years.
Restricted Stock Units
Included in the consolidated statements of operations is expense of $0.7 million and $1.0
million for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively, related
to DSW restricted stock units. The total aggregate intrinsic value of nonvested DSW restricted
stock units as of October 30, 2010 was $9.2 million. As of October 30, 2010, the total
compensation cost related to nonvested DSW restricted stock units not yet recognized was
approximately $1.9 million with a weighted-average expense recognition period remaining of 2.6
years. The weighted-average exercise price for all DSW restricted stock units is zero.
-14-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Director Stock Units
Included in the consolidated statements of operations is expense of $0.8 million and $0.6
million for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively, related
to DSW director stock units. DSW issues stock units to directors who are not employees of DSW
or RVI. During the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, DSW granted 31,130
and 45,895 director stock units, respectively. As of October 30, 2010, 160,835 DSW director
stock units had been issued and no DSW director stock units had been settled.
DSW determines the balance sheet classification of its investments at the time of purchase
and evaluates the classification at each balance sheet date. If DSW has the intent and ability
to hold the investments to maturity, investments are classified as held-to-maturity.
Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost plus accrued interest. Otherwise,
investments are classified as available-for-sale. The majority of DSWs short-term
available-for-sale investments generally have renewal dates of every 7 days and longer stated
maturities. Despite the long-term nature of the stated contractual maturities of these
short-term investments, DSW has the ability to liquidate these securities shortly after the
renewal dates. In addition to short-term investments, DSW has invested in certain longer term
bonds to receive higher returns. These long-term investments have maturities greater than one
year but generally shorter than two years and are classified as held-to-maturity. DSW also
received a return of capital of $0.2 million related to its related party equity investment.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, DSW sold its fully impaired auction rate security for a
gain of $1.5 million.
The following table discloses the major categories of DSWs investments (in thousands) as of the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
Long-term investments, net |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax exempt, tax advantaged and taxable bonds |
|
$ |
99,822 |
|
|
$ |
124,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax exempt commercial paper |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
8,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale investments |
|
$ |
103,822 |
|
|
$ |
147,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes |
|
$ |
102,243 |
|
|
$ |
17,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investment related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
206,065 |
|
|
$ |
164,265 |
|
|
$ |
11,767 |
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-15-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
7. |
|
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS AND WARRANT LIABILITIES |
Long-term obligations as of the periods presented consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Credit facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Income Exchangeable Securities (PIES) |
|
$ |
133,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Discount on PIES |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term obligations |
|
$ |
131,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt net of current maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Income Exchangeable Securities (PIES) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
133,750 |
|
Discount on PIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
129,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Availability to DSW under the revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
87,107 |
|
|
$ |
132,560 |
|
DSW $100 Million Credit Facility
On June 30, 2010, DSW entered into a $100 million secured revolving credit facility (the DSW
Credit Facility) with a term of four years that will expire on June 30, 2014. Under this
facility, DSW and its subsidiary, DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc. (DSWSW), are co-borrowers, with all
other subsidiaries listed as guarantors. The DSW Credit Facility may be increased by up to $75
million upon DSWs request and approval by increasing lenders and subject to customary
conditions. The DSW Credit Facility provides for swing loans of up to $10 million and the
issuance of letters of credit up to $50 million. The DSW Credit Facility is secured by a lien on
substantially all of the personal property assets of DSW and its subsidiaries with certain
exclusions and will be used to provide funds for general corporate purposes, to refinance
existing letters of credit outstanding under DSWs previous credit arrangement, to provide for
the ongoing working capital requirements of DSW, and to make permitted acquisitions. Revolving
credit loans bear interest under the DSW Credit Facility at DSWs option under: (A) a base rate
option at a rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the Federal Funds Open Rate (as defined
in the DSW Credit Facility), plus 0.5%, (ii) the Agents prime rate, and (iii) the Daily LIBOR
Rate (as defined in the DSW Credit Facility) plus 1.0%, plus in each instance an applicable
margin based upon DSWs revolving credit availability; or (B) a LIBOR option at rates equal to
the one, two, three, or six month LIBOR rates, plus an applicable margin based upon DSWs
revolving credit availability. Swing loans bear interest under the base rate option. DSWs right
to obtain advances under the DSW Credit Facility is limited by a borrowing base. In addition,
the DSW Credit Facility contains usual and customary restrictive covenants relating to the
management and the operation of DSWs business. These covenants, among other things, limit or
restrict DSWs ability to grant liens on its assets, incur additional indebtedness, enter into
transactions with affiliates, merge or consolidate with another entity, redeem its stock and pay
cash dividends up to the aggregate amount of 50% of the previous years net income, for a
maximum of $50.0 million.
As of October 30, 2010, DSW had no outstanding borrowings, had availability under the facility
of $87.1 million and had outstanding letters of credit of $12.9 million. As of January 30, 2010
under its previous credit facility, DSW had no outstanding borrowings, had availability under
the facility of $132.6 million and had outstanding letters of credit of $17.4 million. DSW is in
compliance with the covenants under the DSW Credit Facility.
RVIs net restricted assets as of October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010 were $234.8 million and
$197.4 million, respectively.
-16-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Derivative Instruments
In accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, the Company recognizes all derivatives on
the balance sheet at fair value. For derivatives that are not designated as hedges under ASC
815, changes in the fair values are recognized in earnings in the period of change. There were
no derivatives designated as hedges outstanding as of October 30, 2010 or January 30, 2010. The
Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Retail
Ventures estimates the fair values of derivatives based on the Black-Scholes model using current
market information and records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.
$143,750,000 Premium Income Exchangeable SecuritiesSM (PIES)
On August 10, 2006, Retail Ventures announced the pricing of its 6.625% Mandatorily Exchangeable
Notes due September 15, 2011, or PIES, in the aggregate principal amount of $125,000,000. The
closing of the transaction took place on August 16, 2006. On September 15, 2006, Retail Ventures
closed on the exercise by the sole underwriter of its entire option to purchase an additional
aggregate principal amount of $18,750,000 of PIES. The $143,750,000 PIES bear a coupon at an
annual rate of 6.625% of the principal amount, payable quarterly in arrears on March 15,
June 15, September 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on December 15, 2006 and ending
on September 15, 2011. Except to the extent RVI exercises its cash settlement option, the PIES
are mandatorily exchangeable, on the maturity date, into Class A Common Shares of DSW, no par
value per share, which are issuable upon exchange of DSW Class B Common Shares, no par value per
share, beneficially owned by RVI. On the maturity date, each holder of the PIES will receive a
number of DSW Class A Common Shares per $50.00 principal amount of PIES equal to the exchange
ratio described in the RVI prospectus filed with the SEC on August 11, 2006, or if RVI elects,
the cash equivalent thereof or a combination of cash and DSW Class A Common Shares. The exchange
ratio is equal to the number of DSW Class A Common Shares determined as follows: (i) if the
applicable market value of DSW Class A Common Shares equals or exceeds $34.95, the exchange
ratio will be 1.4306 shares; (ii) if the applicable market value of DSW Class A Common Shares is
less than $34.95 but greater than $27.41, the exchange ratio will be between 1.4306 and 1.8242
shares; and (iii) if the applicable market value of DSW Class A Common Shares is less than or
equal to $27.41, the exchange ratio will be 1.8242 shares, subject to adjustment as provided in
the PIES. The maximum aggregate gross number of DSW Class A Common Shares deliverable upon
exchange of the PIES is 5,244,575 DSW Class A Common Shares, subject to adjustment as provided
in the PIES. As of October 30, 2010 the PIES have been reclassified to a current liability.
The embedded exchange feature of the PIES is accounted for as a derivative, which is recorded at
fair value with changes in fair value in the statement of operations. Accordingly, the
accounting for the embedded derivative addresses the variations in the fair value of the
obligation to settle the PIES when the market value exceeds or is less than the threshold
appreciation price. The fair value of the conversion feature at the date of issuance of $11.7
million was equal to the amount of the discount of the PIES and will be amortized into interest
expense over the term of the PIES.
As of October 30, 2010, the discount on the PIES has a remaining amortization period of 0.9
years. The amount of interest expense recognized and the effective interest rate for the PIES
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Contractual interest expense |
|
$ |
7,143 |
|
|
$ |
7,090 |
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
8,905 |
|
|
$ |
8,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective interest rate |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
On October 10, 2008, Retail Ventures repurchased 200,000 units of PIES for an aggregate purchase
price of $5.6 million, which resulted in a reduction of the long-term obligation of $10.0
million. Retail Ventures recorded a gain of $1.5 million on the repurchase which was included in
non-operating income on the statements of operations.
-17-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
During the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company recorded a non-cash charge
of $23.5 million and $34.6 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of the
conversion feature of the PIES. During the three and nine months ended October 31, 2009, the
Company recorded a non-cash charge of $21.6 million and $30.8 million, respectively, related to
the change in fair value of the conversion feature of the PIES. At October 30, 2010 the fair
value current liability recorded for the conversion feature was $6.6 million. At January 30,
2010, the fair value asset recorded for the conversion feature was $28.0 million.
The fair value of the conversion feature of the PIES was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following assumptions in each of the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 30, 2010 |
|
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Expected volatility of common shares |
|
|
48.1 |
% |
|
|
70.9 |
% |
Expected option term |
|
0.9 years |
|
|
1.6 years |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Warrants
The detached warrants with dual optionality issued in connection with previously paid credit
facilities qualified as derivatives under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The fair values of
the warrants have been recorded on the balance sheet within current liabilities. As of both
October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010, the Company had 3,683,959 outstanding warrants. The
warrants outstanding as of October 30, 2010 expire on June 11, 2012.
During the three months and nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company recorded a non-cash
charge of $8.2 million and $11.3 million, respectively, related to the change in the fair value
of the warrants, of which the portion held by related parties was a non-cash charge of $3.9
million and $5.3 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended October 31, 2009,
the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $9.1 million and $10.0 million, respectively, related
to the change in the fair value of the warrants, of which the portion held by related parties
was a non-cash charge of $4.3 million and $3.7 million, respectively. The fair value of the
warrants was $34.3 million and $23.1 million at October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010,
respectively. The fair value of the warrants held by related parties at October 30, 2010 and
January 30, 2010 was $16.1 million and $10.8 million, respectively.
Effective November 16, 2010, Retail Ventures, Inc issued 1,214,572 of its common shares, without
par value, to Cerberus Partners, L.P. (Cerberus) in connection with Cerberus exercise of its
outstanding term warrant that was originally issued by the Company on July 5, 2005. The warrant
was exercised on a cashless exercise basis as permitted by the warrant, resulting in the
issuance of 1,214,572 of the 1,731,460 shares for which the warrant could have been exercised
(at an exercise price of $4.50 per share). In connection with this issuance, no payment was
made to the Company, no underwriters were utilized and no commissions were paid.
The fair value of the warrants was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following assumptions in each of the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 30, 2010 |
|
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Expected volatility of common shares |
|
|
61.3 |
% |
|
|
123.0 |
% |
Expected option term |
|
1.6 years |
|
|
2.4 years |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
-18-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The fair values and balance sheet locations of the Companys derivative (liabilities) assets are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
January 30, |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Warrants |
|
Warrant liability |
|
$ |
(34,328 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,068 |
) |
Conversion feature of short-term debt |
|
Conversion feature of short-term debt |
|
|
(6,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Conversion feature of long-term debt |
|
Conversion feature of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(40,881 |
) |
|
$ |
4,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments on the Companys condensed consolidated statements of
operations is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Warrants |
|
$ |
(8,209 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,076 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,260 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,960 |
) |
Conversion feature of long-term debt |
|
|
(23,472 |
) |
|
|
(21,625 |
) |
|
|
(34,583 |
) |
|
|
(30,818 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense related to the
change in fair value of derivative
instruments |
|
$ |
(31,681 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,701 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,843 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Therefore, fair value is a market-based measurement based on assumptions of the market
participants. As a basis for these assumptions, the Company classifies its fair value
measurements under the following fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that are publicly accessible. Active markets have frequent transactions with
enough volume to provide ongoing pricing information. |
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs are other than level 1 inputs that are directly or indirectly observable.
These can include unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets, unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets
or other observable inputs. |
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs. |
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the periods
presented consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 30, 2010 |
|
|
As of January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
113,927 |
|
|
$ |
113,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
141,773 |
|
|
$ |
141,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
206,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
206,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
164,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments, net |
|
|
11,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,815 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
Conversion feature of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
331,759 |
|
|
$ |
113,927 |
|
|
$ |
216,880 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
335,218 |
|
|
$ |
141,773 |
|
|
$ |
192,294 |
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion feature of short-term debt |
|
$ |
6,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant liability |
|
|
34,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-19-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Cash and equivalents primarily represent cash deposits and investments in money market funds
held with financial institutions, as well as credit card receivables that generally settle
within three days. Equity investments are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment using
level 3 inputs such as the financial condition and future prospects of the entity. The Companys
available-for-sale and held-to maturity investments are valued using a market-based approach
using level 2 inputs such as prices of similar assets in active markets.
See Note 6 for fair value disclosures regarding investments and Note 7 for fair value disclosure
regarding long-term obligations and warrant liabilities.
The following table presents the activity related to level 3 fair value measurements for the
periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, 2010 |
|
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
investments |
|
|
investments, net |
|
|
investments |
|
|
investments, net |
|
Carrying value at the beginning of the period |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
1,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers between short-term and long-term
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,771 |
) |
|
$ |
1,771 |
|
Reclassification of unrealized losses on
available-for-sale securities to an
other-than-temporary impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment included in net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at the end of the period |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, 2010 |
|
|
October 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
investments |
|
|
investments, net |
|
|
investments |
|
|
investments, net |
|
Carrying value at the beginning of the period |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
$ |
1,845 |
|
|
$ |
1,266 |
|
Transfer out of level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,266 |
) |
Transfers between short-term and long-term
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
|
|
1,845 |
|
Return of capital from equity investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized losses on
available-for-sale securities to an
other-than-temporary impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment included in net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at the end of the period |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no non-financial assets measured on a nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended
October 30, 2010. As of October 31, 2009, long-lived assets to be held and used with a carrying
amount of $1.3 million were written down to their fair value of $0.8 million resulting in an
impairment charge of $0.5 million, which was included in earnings.
-20-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The Company periodically evaluates the carrying amount of its long-lived assets, primarily
property and equipment, and finite life intangible assets when events and circumstances warrant
such a review to ascertain if any assets have been impaired. The carrying amount of a long-lived
asset or asset group is considered impaired when the carrying value of the asset or asset group
exceeds the expected future cash flows from the asset or asset group. The Company reviews are
conducted at the lowest identifiable level, which include a store. The impairment loss
recognized is the excess of the carrying value of the asset or asset group over its fair value,
based on a discounted cash flow analysis using a discount rate determined by management. Should
an impairment loss be realized, it will generally be included in selling, general and
administrative expense.
The Company contributed $0.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 to meet minimum funding
requirements under the Pension Plan. The Company was not required to make any contributions
during the first three quarters of fiscal 2009 to meet minimum funding requirements under the
Pension Plan. The following table shows the components of net periodic cost of the Pension Plan
for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(567 |
) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
|
(LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE |
Basic (loss) earnings per share are based on the net (loss) income and a simple weighted average of
common shares outstanding. Diluted (loss) earnings per share reflects the potential dilution of
common shares, related to outstanding stock options, SARs and Warrants, calculated using the
treasury stock method. The following is a reconciliation of the components of net (loss) income and
number of shares used in the calculation of diluted (loss) earnings per share computations for the
three and nine months ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009 (in thousands except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net (loss) income
from continuing
operations
attributable to
Retail Ventures,
Inc. common
shareholders for
basic earnings per
share |
|
$ |
(5,511 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,834 |
) |
|
$ |
12,475 |
|
|
$ |
(75,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
attributable to
Retail Ventures,
Inc. common
shareholders for
basic earnings per
share |
|
$ |
(3,320 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,129 |
) |
|
$ |
17,636 |
|
|
$ |
(30,987 |
) |
For
all periods presented, the loss in fair value of Term Loan Warrants (warrants) was included in the
calculation of the net (loss) income.
-21-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
49,037 |
|
|
|
48,938 |
|
|
|
49,028 |
|
|
|
48,855 |
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive SARs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares for computations of
dilutive earnings per share |
|
|
49,037 |
|
|
|
48,938 |
|
|
|
49,315 |
|
|
|
48,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended October 30, 2010, the assumed exercise of 1,970,396 warrants was not
included in the calculation of shares since there was a loss in fair value of warrants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Dilutive (loss)
earnings per share
from continuing
operations
attributable to
Retail Ventures,
Inc. common
shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive (loss)
earnings per share
attributable to
Retail Ventures,
Inc. common
shareholders |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
(0.63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 2,390,370 and 530,566 securities outstanding for the quarter ended October 30, 2010 and
October 31, 2009, respectively, 2,087,432 and 441,553 of which were for the assumed exercise of warrants, that had an equity unit exercise price less than the average market
price of the common shares for the period, but were not included in the computation of dilutive
(loss) earnings per share since the effect would be anti-dilutive due to the quarter-to-date net
loss. There were 194,711 securities outstanding for the year-to-date period ended October 31, 2009, 147,184 of which were for the assumed exercise of warrants that had an equity unit exercise price less than the average market price of the common shares for
the period, but were not included in the computation of dilutive (loss) earnings per share since
the effect would be anti-dilutive due to the year-to-date net loss.
The amount of securities outstanding at October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009 that were not
included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share because the equity units exercise price
was greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period and, therefore, the
effect would be anti-dilutive, was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
SARs |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Stock Options |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total of all potentially dilutive instruments |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. |
|
TOTAL ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS |
The balance sheet caption Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss was $6.9 million at both
October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010 and related to the Pension Plan. For the nine months ended
October 30, 2010 the comprehensive income was $51.3 million. For the nine months ended October
31, 2009 the comprehensive loss was $15.7 million.
-22-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Effective February 4, 2007, in accordance with ASC 740 Income Taxes, the Company establishes
valuation allowances for deferred tax assets when the amount of expected future taxable income
is not likely to support the use of the deduction or credit. The Company has determined that
there is a probability that future taxable income may not be sufficient to fully utilize
deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance as of October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010 was
$89.5 million and $91.8 million, respectively. Based on available data, the Company believes it
is more likely than not that the remaining deferred tax assets will be realized.
The tax rate of 45.5% for the nine month period ended October 30, 2010 reflects the impact of
the change in fair value of warrants, included in book income but not
tax income, and changes due to the value of the derivative
instruments on federal and state deferred tax assets.
The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal or state and local income tax examinations by
tax authorities for the fiscal years prior to 2007. The Company is not currently under audit by
the IRS. There are several state audits and appeals ongoing for fiscal years from 2006 through
2009. The Company estimates the range of possible changes that may result from the examinations
to be insignificant at this time.
Consistent with its historical financial reporting, the Company has elected to classify interest
expense related to income tax liabilities, when applicable, as part of the interest expense in
its condensed consolidated statement of income rather than income tax expense. The Company will
continue to classify income tax penalties as part of operating expenses in its condensed
consolidated statements of income. As of October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010, $0.5 million and
$1.9 million, respectively, were accrued for the payment of interest and penalties.
13. |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
A supplemental schedule of cash flow information is presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
7,143 |
|
|
$ |
7,143 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
65,612 |
|
|
$ |
12,536 |
|
Noncash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of accounts payable and accrued
expenses due to property and equipment
purchases |
|
$ |
4,740 |
|
|
$ |
1,372 |
|
Capital contribution to subsidiary |
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of investment discounts and premiums |
|
$ |
1,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is operated in two segments: DSW and Corporate. All of the operations are located in
the United States. As a result of RVIs disposition of Filenes Basement during fiscal 2009, the
results of Filenes Basement operations are included in discontinued operations and Filenes
Basement is therefore no longer included as a reportable segment of the Company. As a result of
RVIs disposition of an 81% ownership interest in its Value City business during fiscal 2007,
the results of the Value City operations are also included in discontinued operations and Value
City is therefore no longer included as a reportable segment of the Company.
The Company has identified its segments based on the chief operating decision makers
responsibilities and measures segment profit (loss) as operating profit (loss), which is defined
as profit (loss) before interest expense, income taxes and noncontrolling interest. The goodwill
balance of $25.9 million outstanding at October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010, is recorded in
the DSW segment. The Corporate segment includes activities that are not allocated to the DSW
segment.
-23-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The tables below present segment information for the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010
and October 31, 2009 and as of October 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSW |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Three months ended October 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
489,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
489,269 |
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
55,072 |
|
|
$ |
(37,852 |
) |
|
|
17,220 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,328 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
11,437 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
3,335 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(22,104 |
) |
|
|
13,378 |
|
|
|
(8,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
16,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended October 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
444,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
444,621 |
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
44,721 |
|
|
$ |
(34,212 |
) |
|
|
10,509 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,691 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
11,801 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
3,236 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(17,781 |
) |
|
|
6,702 |
|
|
|
(11,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
3,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended October 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
1,353,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,353,926 |
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
142,312 |
|
|
$ |
(51,802 |
) |
|
|
90,510 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
34,495 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
34,823 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
9,333 |
|
|
|
10,032 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(56,628 |
) |
|
|
18,096 |
|
|
|
(38,532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
34,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended October 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
1,199,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,199,957 |
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
68,185 |
|
|
$ |
(106,562 |
) |
|
|
(38,377 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
34,415 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
34,782 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
9,131 |
|
|
|
9,678 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(27,498 |
) |
|
|
13,991 |
|
|
|
(13,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
16,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
965,396 |
|
|
$ |
34,347 |
|
|
$ |
999,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
850,756 |
|
|
$ |
52,709 |
|
|
$ |
903,465 |
|
-24-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
15. |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of its
business. The Company estimates the range of liability related to pending litigation, including
legal fees, where the amount of the range of loss can be estimated. The Company records its best
estimate of a loss when the loss is considered probable. Where a liability is probable and there
is a range of estimated loss, the Company records the most likely estimated liability related to
the claim. In the opinion of management, the amount of any potential liability with respect to
these proceedings will not be material to the Companys results of operations or financial
condition. As additional information becomes available, the Company will assess the potential
liability related to its pending litigation and revise the estimates as needed. Revisions in its
estimates and potential liability could materially impact the Companys results of operations and
financial condition.
The Company is exposed to a number of asserted and unasserted claims encountered in the course of
its business. The Company believes adequate provision has been made for all such asserted and
unasserted claims in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable with
assurance.
Guarantees and Liabilities related to Discontinued Operations
RVI may become subject to various risks related to guarantees and in certain circumstances may be
responsible for certain other liabilities related to discontinued operations. Changes in the
amount of guarantees and liabilities related to discontinued operations are included in the loss
from discontinued operations on the statements of operations. Additionally, if the underlying
obligations are paid down or otherwise liquidated by the primary obligor, subject to certain
statutory requirements, RVI will recognize a reduction of the associated liability. In certain
instances, RVI or Retail Ventures Services, Inc. (RVS) may have the ability to reduce the
estimated potential liability of $0.6 million. The amount of any reduction is not reasonably
estimable.
Value City
As discussed above, RVI completed the disposition of an 81% ownership interest in its Value City
business segment on January 23, 2008. Retail Ventures or its wholly-owned subsidiary, RVS, has
guaranteed and in certain circumstances may be responsible for certain liabilities of Value City.
If Value City does not pay creditors whose obligations RVI and RVS had guaranteed, RVI may become
subject to various risks associated with such refusal to pay creditors or any insolvency or
bankruptcy proceedings.
As of October 30, 2010, RVI had recorded an estimated potential liability of $0.4 million, of
which $0.3 million is classified as short-term, for the guarantees of Value City commitments
including, but not limited to: amounts of approximately $0.1 million for the guarantee of certain
workers compensation claims for events prior to the disposition date and other amounts totaling
$0.3 million. As of January 30, 2010, RVI had recorded an estimated liability of $2.9 million, of
which $2.4 million is classified as short-term, for the guarantees of Value City commitments of
$0.5 million for the guarantee of certain workers compensation claims for events prior to the
disposition date and other amounts totaling $2.4 million.
On October 25, 2010, Value City Holdings, Inc., Value City Department Stores LLC, Value City
Department Stores Services, Inc., Value City of Michigan, Inc., Gramex Retail Stores, Inc., GB
Retailers, Inc., J.S. Overland Delivery, Inc., Retail Ventures Jewelry, Inc., and VCHI
Acquisition Co. (collectively, Debtors) filed a complaint against RVI, Retail Ventures
Services, Inc., and DSW (the Defendants) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court). The complaint relates to Debtors pending
voluntary cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
In the complaint, Debtors have alleged claims for avoidable preferences, fraudulent transfer,
receipt of illegal dividends, recovery of assets, unjust enrichment and breach of contract. The
claims are related to transfers made by Debtors to the Defendants during the one year period
preceding Debtors filing of voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code on October 26, 2008. Debtors have sought damages that total approximately $373.4
million.
-25-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Defendants intend to contest the lawsuit vigorously and believe it is without merit and that
there are substantial factual and legal defenses to the claims at issue. The reasonable estimate
of the liability related to the Debtors litigation is approximately $4.0 million and as of
October 30, 2010 we have accrued $4.0 million in Accrued Expenses Other and expensed
approximately $4.0 million in SG&A expense from continuing operations related to the Debtors
litigation.
Filenes Basement
On April 21, 2009, RVI disposed of its Filenes Basement operations. RVI agreed to indemnify
Buxbaum, FB II Acquisition Corp. and their owners against certain liabilities. As of October 30,
2010 and January 30, 2010, RVI had recorded a current liability of $0.2 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, for the guarantees of Filenes Basement commitments related to leases not assumed
by New Filenes Basement.
Contractual Obligations
As of October 30, 2010, DSW has entered into various construction commitments, including capital
items to be purchased for projects that were under construction, or for which a lease has been
signed. DSWs obligations under these commitments aggregated to approximately $1.9 million as of
October 30, 2010. In addition, DSW has signed lease agreements for five new store locations
expected to be opened over the next eighteen months, with total annual rent of approximately $4.5
million. In connection with the new lease agreements, DSW will receive a total of $2.5 million of
construction and tenant allowance reimbursements for expenditures at these locations.
-26-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this Report or Form 10-Q) and except as the
context otherwise may require, RVI, Retail Ventures Company, we, us, and our refers to
Retail Ventures, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary DSW Inc. (DSW), a controlled subsidiary,
and DSWs wholly-owned subsidiaries, including but not limited to, DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc.
(DSWSW).
OVERVIEW
Retail Ventures is a holding company operating retail stores in one of its two segments and all our
operations are conducted through our subsidiaries. RVI has no net sales on a standalone basis, and
RVI also does not have any credit facilities under which it can borrow funds. DSW is a leading U.S.
branded footwear specialty retailer operating 313 shoe stores in 39 states as of October 30, 2010.
DSW offers a wide assortment of better-branded dress, casual and athletic footwear for women and
men, as well as accessories through DSW stores and dsw.com. In addition, DSW operates 351 leased
shoe departments for four other retailers as of October 30, 2010. DSWs typical customers are
brand, value, quality and style-conscious shoppers who have a passion for footwear and accessories.
The Corporate segment consists of all corporate assets, liabilities and expenses that are not
attributable to the DSW segment.
On July 5, 2005, DSW completed an initial public offering (IPO) of 16,171,875 Class A Common
Shares sold to the public. As of October 30, 2010, Retail Ventures owned Class B Common Shares of
DSW representing approximately 62.2% of DSWs outstanding Common Shares and approximately 92.9% of
the combined voting power of such shares. DSW is a controlled subsidiary of Retail Ventures and its
Class A Common Shares are listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DSW.
On January 23, 2008, Retail Ventures disposed of an 81% ownership interest in its Value City
Department Stores (Value City) business to VCHI Acquisition Co., a newly formed entity owned by
VCDS Acquisition Holdings, LLC, Emerald Capital Management LLC and Crystal Value, LLC. Retail
Ventures received no net cash proceeds from the sale, paid a fee of $0.5 million to the purchaser,
and recognized an aggregate after-tax loss of $65.1 million on the transaction as of October 30,
2010. To facilitate the change in ownership and operation of Value City Department Stores, Retail
Ventures agreed to provide or arrange for the provision of certain transition services principally
related to information technology, finance and human resources to Value City Department Stores for
a period of one year unless otherwise extended by both parties. On October 26, 2008, Value City
filed for bankruptcy protection and announced that it would close its remaining stores. The Company
negotiated an agreement with Value City to continue to provide services post bankruptcy filing,
including risk management, financial services, benefits administration, payroll and information
technology services, in exchange for a weekly payment.
On April 21, 2009, Retail Ventures disposed of Filenes Basement, Inc. and certain related entities
to FB II Acquisition Corp., a newly formed entity owned by Buxbaum Holdings, Inc. (Buxbaum).
Retail Ventures did not realize any cash proceeds from this transaction, agreed to pay a fee of
$1.3 million to Buxbaum, which has been paid, and has reimbursed $0.4 million of Buxbaums costs
associated with the transaction. Retail Ventures has also agreed to indemnify Buxbaum, FB II
Acquisition Corp. and their owners against certain liabilities. Retail Ventures has recognized an
aggregate after-tax gain of $84.9 million on the transaction as of October 30, 2010. On May 4,
2009, Filenes Basement filed for bankruptcy protection. On June 18, 2009, following bankruptcy
court approval, SYL LLC, a subsidiary of Syms Corp (Syms), purchased certain assets of Filenes
Basement. All references to liquidating Filenes Basement refer to the debtor, formerly known as
Filenes Basement Inc., and its debtor subsidiaries remaining after the asset purchase by a
subsidiary of Syms. All references to New Filenes Basement refer to the stores operated by Syms.
On September 25, 2009, RVI and DSW entered into a settlement agreement with liquidating Filenes
Basement and its related debtors and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in the
Chapter 11 case for the debtors. On November 3, 2009, the settlement agreement was approved by the
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. As a result of the courts approval of the
settlement agreement, RVIs claims in respect of $52.6 million in notes receivable from liquidating
Filenes Basement were released; RVI assumed the rights and obligations related to (and agreed to
indemnify liquidating Filenes Basement with regard to certain matters arising out of) the
liquidating Filenes Basement defined benefit pension plan; and liquidating Filenes Basement and
the creditors committee agreed to allow certain general unsecured claims for amounts owed to RVI
and DSW.
-27-
The parties also agreed to certain provisions affecting the proper allocation of proceeds paid to
RVI or liquidating Filenes Basement in connection with specified third party litigation and to
certain provisions related to the debtors recovery from third parties that are the beneficiaries
of letters of credit or hold collateral related to workers compensation claims. The settlement
agreement also provides for certain mutual releases among the debtors, the creditors committee,
RVI, DSW and other parties. Although the settlement agreement provides that RVI will have certain
allowed claims against the debtors, there can be no assurance as to whether RVI will ultimately
recover all of the amounts in connection with these claims. A plan of reorganization of the debtors
was confirmed by the court on January 26, 2010, and an initial distribution from the debtors
estates of $5.8 million to RVI and $0.2 million to DSW has been made. However, there can be no
assurance as to timing or the amount of any additional distribution in respect of its claims (or
whether RVI will recover any of the remainder of the amounts in connection with its claims). In
addition, as a result of the releases provided by the settlement agreement, RVI has relinquished
the right to pursue additional claims, which may include unknown or unmatured claims, against the
debtors.
As of October 30, 2010 we are not providing transition services to Value City or Syms.
We intend for this discussion to provide the reader with information that will assist in
understanding our financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial
statements from period to period, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well
as how certain accounting principles affect our financial statements. The discussion also provides
information about the financial results of the segments of our business to provide a better
understanding of how those segments and their results affect the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as a whole. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our
condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes as of October 30, 2010.
-28-
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information for Purposes of the Safe Harbor
Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements
which reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and financial
performance. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words
such as outlook, believes, expects, potential, continues, may, should, seeks,
approximately, predicts, intends, plans, estimates, anticipates or other comparable
words or the negative version of those words. Any forward-looking statements contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based upon our historical performance and on current plans,
estimates and expectations and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations,
financial condition, growth strategy and liquidity. The inclusion of this forward-looking
information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the future
plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by us will be achieved. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual
results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In addition to
the risks discussed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in each of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) on October 12, 2010 (the 2009 Annual Report), and other factors discussed from time
to time in our other filings with the SEC, some important factors that could cause actual results,
performance or achievements for the Company to differ materially from those discussed in
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
our ability to manage and enhance liquidity; |
|
|
|
|
DSWs success in opening and operating new stores on a timely and profitable basis; |
|
|
|
|
continuation of DSWs supply agreements and the financial condition of its leased
business partners; |
|
|
|
|
DSW maintaining good relationships with its vendors; |
|
|
|
|
DSWs ability to anticipate and respond to fashion trends; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuation of DSWs comparable store sales and quarterly financial performance; |
|
|
|
|
the realization of our bankruptcy claims related to liquidating Filenes Basement
and Value City; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of the disposition of Filenes Basement and of a majority interest in
Value City and the reliance on remaining subsidiaries to pay indebtedness and
intercompany service obligations; |
|
|
|
|
the risk of Value City and liquidating Filenes Basement not paying us or their
creditors, for which Retail Ventures may have some liability; |
|
|
|
|
the risk of New Filenes Basement not paying obligations related to the assets it
has assumed from liquidating Filenes Basement if such obligations are subject to
ongoing guarantee by us; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of Value City and Filenes Basement on our liquidity; |
|
|
|
|
disruption of DSWs distribution operations; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on DSW for key services; |
|
|
|
|
failure to retain our key executives or attract qualified new personnel; |
|
|
|
|
DSWs competitiveness with respect to style, price, brand availability and customer
service; |
|
|
|
|
uncertain general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
risks inherent to international trade with countries that are major manufacturers of
footwear; |
|
|
|
|
the success of dsw.com; |
|
|
|
|
lease of an office facility; |
|
|
|
|
risks related to our cash and investments; and |
|
|
|
|
various risks associated with the Value City bankruptcy proceedings. |
If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying
assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially
from what we may have projected. Furthermore, new factors emerge from time to time and it is not
possible for management to predict all such factors, nor can it assess the impact of any such
factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause
results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Any
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and, except
as required by law, RVI undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect
events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence
of unanticipated events.
-29-
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our critical accounting policies are described in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and in the notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements for the year ended January 30, 2010 contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on October 12, 2010 (the 2009 Annual
Report). We base these estimates and judgments on our historical experience and other factors we
believe to be relevant, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The process of
determining significant estimates is fact-specific and takes into account factors such as
historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, product mix, and in some cases,
actuarial and appraisal techniques. We constantly re-evaluate these significant factors and make
adjustments where facts and circumstances dictate. There have been no significant changes to our
critical accounting policies since the 2009 Annual Report.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage relationships to net
sales of the listed items included in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
(54.9 |
) |
|
|
(53.7 |
) |
|
|
(54.5 |
) |
|
|
(55.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(35.1 |
) |
|
|
(37.1 |
) |
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
|
|
(44.3 |
) |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Non-operating income (expense), net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Retail Ventures, Inc. |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
(6.3 |
)% |
-30-
THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 30, 2010 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 increased 10.0% from the third quarter
of fiscal 2009. The following table summarizes the increase in net sales for the three months ended
October 30, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
444.6 |
|
Increase in comparable sales |
|
|
43.6 |
|
Net increase from non-comparable and closed store sales |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the three months ended October 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
489.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, dsw.com is included in the change in comparable
sales. The increase in comparable sales was primarily a result of an increase in transactions
driven by more customers visiting our stores and dsw.com and a higher percentage of those customers
making a purchase. For the DSW stores and dsw.com, all merchandise categories had positive
comparable sales and increased in womens footwear by 12.8%, mens by 7.0%, athletic by 9.7% and
accessories by 21.0%.
Gross Profit. Gross profit is defined as net sales less cost of sales. Gross profit decreased, as
a percent of net sales, from 46.3% for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 to 45.1% for the third
quarter of fiscal 2010. The decrease as a percent of net sales is the result of an increase in
markdown activity. Markdown activity was higher as our inventory was more appropriately positioned
for the sales volume when compared to last year when sales significantly exceeded our expectations.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses increased $7.0 million from $164.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 to $171.9
million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. SG&A expense decreased, as a percentage of net sales,
from 37.1% for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 to 35.1% for the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
DSW segment SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were 33.9% and 36.3% for the third quarter
of fiscal 2010 and the third quarter of fiscal 2009, respectively. Operating expenses for the
quarter leveraged as a result of the sales increase compared to last year and a significant
reduction in bonus expense. Bonus expense for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 included an increase
in the year-to-date bonus accrual as a result of improvement in the expected 2009 annual results.
Overhead and store expenses leveraged due to the sales increase and were partially offset by an
increase in marketing and new store opening expenses.
Corporate segment SG&A expense increased $2.7 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 compared
to the third quarter of fiscal 2009, primarily due to the $4.0 million accrued for the complaint
filed by Value City Holdings, Inc., Value City Department Stores LLC, Value City Department Stores
Services, Inc., Value City of Michigan, Inc., Gramex Retail Stores, Inc., GB Retailers, Inc., J.S.
Overland Delivery, Inc., Retail Ventures Jewelry, Inc., and VCHI Acquisition Co. (collectively,
Debtors).
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instruments. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal
2009, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $8.2 million and $9.1 million, respectively,
relating to the changes in fair value of the warrants. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and
fiscal 2009, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $23.5 million and $21.6 million,
respectively, related to the change in the fair value of the conversion feature of the PIES. The
change in the fair value of the derivatives is primarily due to the changes in the RVI and DSW
stock prices.
Operating Profit (Loss). Operating profit for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 was $17.2 million
compared to operating profit of $10.5 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, an increase of
$6.7 million. Operating profit as a percentage of net sales was 3.5% and 2.3% for the third quarter
of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.
The operating profit for the DSW segment increased $10.4 million to $55.1 million for the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 from $44.7 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, which was primarily
the result of an increase in gross profit partially offset by an increase in operating expenses.
Operating profit for the DSW segment as a percentage of net sales was 11.3% and 10.1% for the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.
The operating loss for the Corporate segment increased $3.7 million to an operating loss of $37.9
million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 from an operating loss of $34.2 million for the third
quarter of fiscal 2009, primarily due to the change in fair value of derivative instruments.
-31-
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 increased $0.1 million
to $3.3 million compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2009.
Interest Income. Interest income increased $0.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010
compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2009, primarily as a result of the reversals of interest
reserves related to uncertain tax positions which were released during the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
Non-operating Income, (Expense), Net. Non-operating income, net of non-operating expense, for the
third quarter of fiscal 2010 resulted from a gain on the sale of a fully impaired auction rate
security which was sold during the third quarter. Non-operating expense for the third quarter of
fiscal 2009 resulted from an other-than-temporary impairment related to an auction rate security.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for third quarter of fiscal 2010 was 52.4% compared to a
155.1% effective tax rate for the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The effective tax rate reflects the
impact of the change in fair value of the warrants which are included for book income but not tax
income, and changes due to the value of the derivative instruments on
federal and state deferred tax assets.
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations. For the third quarter of fiscal 2010, income from
continuing operations was $7.9 million compared to loss from continuing operations of $3.9 million
during the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Income from continuing operations as a percentage of net
sales was 1.6% and loss from continuing operations as a percentage of net sales was 0.9% for the
third quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, respectively.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of tax Value City. During the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, the income from discontinued operations, net of tax Value City of
$2.2 million and the loss from discontinue operations, net of tax Value City of $0.5 million,
respectively, was primarily due to revaluation of guarantees due to the passage of time.
Income from Discontinued Operations, net of tax Filenes Basement. During the third quarter of
fiscal 2010, the income from discontinued operations, net of tax Filenes Basement of less than
$0.1 million was due to a change in the income tax.
During the quarter ended October 31, 2009, the gain from discontinued operations, net of tax
Filenes Basement of $0.2 million was primarily due to adjustments of the guarantees due to the
passage of time.
Noncontrolling Interests. For the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, net income
attributable to Retail Ventures was impacted by $13.4 million and $9.9 million, respectively, to
reflect that portion of the income attributable to DSW minority shareholders.
NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 30, 2010 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 increased 12.8% from the nine
months ended October 31, 2009. The following table summarizes the increase in net sales for the
nine months ended October 30, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the nine months ended October 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,200.0 |
|
Increase in comparable sales |
|
|
148.1 |
|
Net increase from non-comparable and closed store sales |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,353.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, dsw.com is included in the change in comparable
sales. The increase in comparable sales was primarily a result of an increase in transactions
driven by more customers visiting our stores and dsw.com and a higher percentage of those customers
making a purchase. For the DSW stores and dsw.com, all merchandise categories had positive
comparable sales, and increased in womens footwear by 14.7%, mens by 12.7%, athletic by 12.2% and
accessories by 14.1%.
Gross Profit. Gross profit is defined as net sales less cost of sales. Gross profit increased as a
percent of net sales to 45.5% from 44.5% for the comparable period last year due to a reduction in
markdown activity during the spring season as a result of sales exceeding our expectations.
-32-
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses decreased $51.2 million from $531.1 million in the nine months ended October 31, 2009 to
$479.9 million in the nine months ended October 30, 2010. SG&A expense decreased, as a percentage
of net sales, from 44.3% for the nine months ended October 31, 2009 to 35.4% for the nine months
ended October 30, 2010.
DSW segment SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales was 35.0% and 38.8% for the nine months
ended October 30, 2010 and the nine months ended October 31, 2009, respectively. Overhead, store,
and marketing expenses decreased as a percentage of net sales as a result of the sales increase and
expense management.
Corporate segment SG&A expense decreased $59.8 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010
compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2009. The decrease in SG&A expense was primarily due to a
reduction of bad debt expense of $2.7 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 due to an
initial distribution from the debtors estates, compared to an increase in bad debt expense of
$57.3 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 recorded against the notes and accounts
receivable from Filenes Basement due to the bankruptcy filing of Filenes Basement on May 4, 2009.
This was partially offset by the $4.0 million accrued for the complaint filed by the Debtors.
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instruments. During the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and
October 31, 2009, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $11.3 million and $10.0 million,
respectively, related to the change in fair value of the warrants. During the nine months ended
October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $34.6 million and
$30.8 million, respectively, related to the change in the fair value of the conversion feature of
the PIES. The change in the fair value of the derivatives is primarily due to the changes in the
RVI and DSW stock prices.
Operating Profit (Loss). Operating profit for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 was $90.5
million compared to operating loss of $38.4 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2009, an
increase of $128.9 million. Operating profit as a percentage of net sales was 6.7% and operating
loss as a percentage of net sales was 3.2% for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and October
31, 2009, respectively.
The operating profit for the DSW segment increased $74.1 million to $142.3 million for the nine
months ended October 30, 2010 from $68.2 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2009, which
was primarily the result of an increase in gross profit partially offset by an increase in
operating expenses. Operating profit for the DSW segment as a percentage of net sales was 10.5%
and 5.7% for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively.
The operating loss for the Corporate segment decreased $54.8 million to an operating loss of $51.8
million for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 from an operating loss of $106.6 million for the
nine months ended October 31, 2009 primarily due to the decrease in SG&A expense.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 increased $0.4
million to $10.0 million compared to the nine months ended October 31, 2009.
Interest Income. Interest income increased $0.8 million in the nine months ended October 30, 2010
compared to the nine months ended October 31, 2009. The increase in interest income is primarily a
result of the reversals of interest reserves related to uncertain tax
positions which were released during the nine
months ended October 30, 2010.
Non-operating Income (Expense), net. Non-operating income, net of non-operating expense for the
nine months ended October 30, 2010 resulted from a gain on the sale of a fully impaired auction
rate security which was sold during the third quarter. Non-operating expense for the nine months
ended October 31, 2009 resulted from other-than-temporary impairments related to auction rate
securities partially offset by realized gains related to the sale of preferred shares.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for nine months ended October 30, 2010 was 45.5% compared to
a negative 28.9% effective tax rate for the nine months ended October 31, 2009. The effective tax
rate reflects the impact of the change in fair value of the warrants which are included for book
income but not tax income, and changes due to the value of the
derivative instruments on federal and state deferred tax assets.
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations. For the nine months ended October 30, 2010, income
from continuing operations was $46.1 million compared to loss from continuing operations of $60.3
million during the nine months ended October 31, 2009. Income from continuing operations as a
percentage of net sales was 3.4% and loss from continuing operations as a percentage of net sales
was 5.0% for the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, respectively.
-33-
Income(Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of tax Value City. During the nine months ended
October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, the income from discontinued operations, net of tax Value
City of $2.2 million and $0.1 million respectively, was primarily due to revaluation of guarantees
due to the passage of time.
Income from Discontinued Operations, net of tax Filenes Basement. During the nine months ended
October 30, 2010, the $3.0 million gain from discontinued operations, net of tax Filenes
Basement is primarily due to an initial distribution from the debtors estates.
During the nine months ended October 31, 2009, the income from discontinued operations, net of tax
Filenes Basement was comprised of two components; the gain on the disposition of Filenes
Basement of $76.1 million partially offset by the loss from Filenes Basement operations of $31.5
million. The gain on the disposition of Filenes Basement was due to the write off of the
investment in Filenes Basement partially offset by the recording of guarantees, other expenses
relating to the disposition of Filenes Basement and income tax expense of $1.8 million in the
aggregate.
Noncontrolling Interests. For the nine months ended October 30, 2010 and October 31, 2009, net
income attributable to Retail Ventures was impacted by $33.6 million and $15.4 million,
respectively, to reflect that portion of the income attributable to DSW minority shareholders.
Seasonality
Our business is affected by the pattern of seasonality common to most retail businesses.
Historically, DSW net sales have typically been higher in the first and third quarters, when DSWs
customers interest in new seasonal styles increases.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Retail Ventures, Inc. relies on the cash flow of our subsidiaries and our cash on hand to meet our
obligations, including our obligations under the PIES and the guarantees of certain obligations of
Filenes Basement and Value City. The ability of our subsidiaries to provide cash to Retail
Ventures by way of dividends, distributions, interest or other payments (including intercompany
loans) is subject to various restrictions, including restrictions imposed by the existing credit
facility governing our subsidiaries indebtedness. Future indebtedness incurred by our subsidiaries
may also limit or prohibit such payments. In addition, the ability of our subsidiaries to make such
payments may be limited by relevant provisions of the laws of their respective jurisdictions of
organization.
To the extent cash on hand is not sufficient to meet our operating cash flow needs we may seek
other sources to provide the funds necessary for operations. Even though we could receive cash from
DSW in the form of dividends, loans or otherwise, DSW has indicated that it does not intend to pay
dividends in fiscal 2010, and RVI does not have a current arrangement for loans or other funding
with DSW. DSW is a separate and distinct legal entity and currently has no obligation, contingent
or otherwise, to distribute cash to us or to make funds available to service our coupon payments
under the PIES.
Retail Ventures is continuing to review its available options to the extent it may become necessary
to manage and enhance its liquidity position. Although RVIs plan to enhance liquidity could
include, among other things, the sale or collateralization of shares of common stock of DSW Inc. or
a sale of equity by RVI, no assurance can be given that any such transaction can be completed on
favorable terms or that such a transaction would satisfy all of RVIs liquidity requirements. On
January 15, 2010, Retail Ventures sold to DSW 320,000 Class B Common Shares, without par value, of
DSW for an aggregate amount of $8.0 million. Proceeds from the sale will be used for general
corporate purposes and continuing expenses; however, this transaction will not eliminate RVIs need
to continue to review available additional options to manage and enhance its liquidity.
We are exposed to a number of asserted and unasserted claims encountered in the course of our
business. We believe adequate provision has been made for all such asserted and unasserted claims
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Such matters are
subject to many uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable with assurance.
DSWs primary ongoing cash flow requirements are for seasonal and new store inventory purchases,
capital expenditures in connection with its store expansion, improving its information systems, the
remodeling of existing stores and infrastructure growth. DSWs working capital and inventory levels
typically build seasonally. DSW believes that it has sufficient financial resources and access to
financial resources at this time. DSW is committed to a cash management strategy that maintains
liquidity to adequately support the operation of the business, its growth strategy and to withstand
unanticipated business volatility. DSW believes that cash generated from its operations, together
with its current levels of cash and equivalents and short-term investments as well as availability
under its revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to maintain its ongoing operations, support
seasonal working capital requirements and fund capital expenditures related to projected business
growth.
-34-
Although DSWs plan of continued expansion could place increased demands on its financial,
managerial, operational and administrative resources and result in increased demands on management,
DSW does not believe that its anticipated growth plan will have an unfavorable impact on its
operations or liquidity. Uncertainty in the United States economy could result in reductions in
customer traffic and comparable sales in its existing stores with the resultant increase in
inventory levels and markdowns. Reduced sales may result in reduced operating cash flows if DSW is
not able to appropriately manage inventory levels or leverage expenses. These potential negative
economic conditions may also affect future profitability and may cause DSW to reduce the number of
future store openings, impair goodwill or impair long-lived assets.
Net working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities and was $305.8 million
and $369.2 million at October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010, respectively. The decrease in net
working capital is primarily due to the classification of the PIES as a current liability as of
October 30, 2010 and an increase in accounts payable, partially offset by a seasonal increase in
inventory. At October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010, the current ratio was 1.7 and 2.4,
respectively.
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $54.1 million for the nine
months ended October 30, 2010 as compared to $101.0 million provided by operating activities from
continuing operations for the nine months ended October 31, 2009. Net income increased as compared
to the prior period but the increase was offset by changes in working capital. The decrease in cash
provided by operations was primarily a result of a seasonal increase in inventory and changes in
accrued taxes.
Net cash used in investing activities was $86.5 million compared to $86.9 million for the nine
months ended October 31, 2009. During the nine months ended October 30, 2010, DSW incurred capital
expenditures of $35.0 million, of which $22.0 million related to stores, $9.6 million related to
information technology and infrastructure and $3.4 million related to supply chain projects and
warehouses. During the nine months ended October 30, 2010 DSW had net purchases of short-term
investments of $54.2 million.
DSW expects to spend approximately $50 million for capital expenditures in fiscal 2010. DSWs
future investments will depend primarily on the number of stores it opens and remodels,
infrastructure and information technology programs that it undertakes and the timing of these
expenditures. DSW opened nine stores in fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2009, the average investment
required to open a typical new DSW store was approximately $1.4 million, prior to construction and
tenant allowances. Of this amount, gross inventory typically accounted for $0.5 million, fixtures
and leasehold improvements typically accounted for $0.7 million and new store advertising and other
new store expenses typically accounted for $0.2 million.
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations was $0.6 million for the nine
months ended October 30, 2010 as compared to $0.3 million provided by financing activities from
continuing operations for the nine months ended October 31, 2009.
DSW has a $100 million credit facility under which DSW and its subsidiaries are co-borrowers (the
DSW Credit Facility). RVI has outstanding $133,750,000 of 6.625% Mandatorily Exchangeable Notes
due September 15, 2011, or PIES. Collectively, the DSW Credit Facility and the PIES are sometimes
referred to herein as the Credit Facilities.
The Company is not subject to any financial covenants; however, certain of the Credit Facilities
contain numerous non-financial covenants relating to the Companys management and operation. These
non-financial covenants include, among other restrictions, limitations on indebtedness, guarantees,
mergers, acquisitions, fundamental corporate changes, financial reporting requirements, budget
approval, disposition of assets, investments, loans and advances, liens, dividends, stock
purchases, transactions with affiliates, issuance of securities and the payment of and
modifications to debt instruments under these agreements.
-35-
The Credit Facilities are described more fully below:
DSW $100 Million Credit Facility
On June 30, 2010, DSW entered into a $100 million secured revolving credit facility (the DSW
Credit Facility) with a term of four years that will expire on June 30, 2014. Under this
facility, DSW and its subsidiary, DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc. (DSWSW), are co-borrowers, with all
other subsidiaries listed as guarantors. The DSW Credit Facility may be increased by up to $75
million upon DSWs request and approval by increasing lenders and subject to customary conditions.
The DSW Credit Facility provides for swing loans of up to $10 million and the issuance of letters
of credit up to $50 million. The DSW Credit Facility is secured by a lien on substantially all of
the personal property assets of DSW and its subsidiaries with certain
exclusions and will be used to provide funds for general corporate purposes, to refinance existing
letters of credit outstanding under DSWs previous credit arrangement, to provide for the ongoing
working capital requirements of DSW and to make permitted acquisitions. Revolving credit loans bear
interest under the DSW Credit Facility at DSWs option under: (A) a base rate option at a rate per
annum equal to the highest of (i) the Federal Funds Open Rate (as defined in the DSW Credit
Facility), plus 0.5%, (ii) the Agents prime rate, and (iii) the Daily LIBOR Rate (as defined in
the DSW Credit Facility) plus 1.0%, plus in each instance an applicable margin based upon DSWs
revolving credit availability; or (B) a LIBOR option at rates equal to the one, two, three, or six
month LIBOR rates, plus an applicable margin based upon DSWs revolving credit availability. Swing
loans bear interest under the base rate option. DSWs right to obtain advances under the DSW Credit
Facility is limited by a borrowing base. In addition, the DSW Credit Facility contains usual and
customary restrictive covenants relating to the management and the operation of DSWs business.
These covenants, among other things, limit or restrict DSWs ability to grant liens on its assets,
incur additional indebtedness, enter into transactions with affiliates, merge or consolidate with
another entity, redeem its stock and pay cash dividends up to the aggregate amount of 50% of the
previous years net income for a maximum of $50.0 million.
As of October 30, 2010, DSW had no outstanding borrowings, had availability under the facility of
$87.1 million and had outstanding letters of credit of $12.9 million. As of January 30, 2010 under
its previous credit facility, DSW had no outstanding borrowings, had availability under the
facility of $132.6 million and had outstanding letters of credit of $17.4 million.
RVIs net restricted assets as of October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010 were $234.8 million and
$197.4 million, respectively.
$143,750,000 Premium Income Exchangeable SecuritiesSM (PIES)
On August 10, 2006, Retail Ventures announced the pricing of its 6.625% Mandatorily Exchangeable
Notes due September 15, 2011, or PIES in the aggregate principal amount of $125,000,000. The
closing of the transaction took place on August 16, 2006. On September 15, 2006, Retail Ventures
closed on the exercise by the sole underwriter of its entire option to purchase an additional
aggregate principal amount of $18,750,000 of PIES. The $143,750,000 PIES bear a coupon at an annual
rate of 6.625% of the principal amount, payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15,
September 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on December 15, 2006 and ending on
September 15, 2011. Except to the extent RVI exercises its cash settlement option, the PIES are
mandatorily exchangeable, on the maturity date, into Class A Common Shares of DSW, no par value per
share, which are issuable upon exchange of DSW Class B Common Shares, no par value per share,
beneficially owned by RVI. On the maturity date, each holder of the PIES will receive a number of
DSW Class A Common Shares per $50.00 principal amount of PIES equal to the exchange ratio
described in the RVI prospectus filed with the SEC on August 11, 2006, or if RVI elects, the cash
equivalent thereof or a combination of cash and DSW Class A Common Shares. The exchange ratio is
equal to the number of DSW Class A Common Shares determined as follows: (i) if the applicable
market value of DSW Class A Common Shares equals or exceeds $34.95, the exchange ratio will be
1.4306 shares; (ii) if the applicable market value of DSW Class A Common Shares is less than $34.95
but greater than $27.41, the exchange ratio will be between 1.4306 and 1.8242 shares; and (iii) if
the applicable market value of DSW Class A Common Shares is less than or equal to $27.41, the
exchange ratio will be 1.8242 shares, subject to adjustment as provided in the PIES. The maximum
aggregate number of DSW Class A Common Shares deliverable upon exchange of the PIES is 5,244,575
DSW Class A Common Shares, subject to adjustment as provided in the PIES.
The embedded exchange feature of the PIES is accounted for as a derivative, which is recorded at
fair value with changes in fair value in the statement of operations. Accordingly, the accounting
for the embedded derivative addresses the variations in the fair value of the obligation to settle
the PIES when the market value exceeds or is less than the threshold appreciation price. The fair
value of the conversion feature at the date of issuance of $11.7 million was equal to the amount of
the discount of the PIES and will be amortized into interest expense over the term of the PIES.
On October 10, 2008, Retail Ventures repurchased 200,000 units of PIES for an aggregate purchase
price of $5.6 million, which resulted in a reduction of the long-term obligation of $10.0 million.
Retail Ventures recorded a gain of $1.5 million on the repurchase which was included in
non-operating income on the statements of operations.
During the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of
$23.5 million and $34.6 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of the
conversion feature of the PIES. During the three and nine months ended October 31, 2009, the
Company recorded a non-cash charge of $21.6 million and $30.8 million, respectively, related to the
change in fair value of the conversion feature of the PIES. As of October 30, 2010 the current fair
value liability recorded for the conversion feature of the PIES was $6.6 million. As of January 30,
2010, the fair value asset recorded for the conversion feature of the PIES was $28.0 million.
-36-
Warrants
The Company has outstanding warrants to purchase up to 3,683,959 RVI Common Shares (including
1,731,460 to Schottenstein RVI LLC, a related party) at an initial exercise price of $4.50 per
share or up to 699,819 (including 328,915 to Schottenstein RVI LLC, a related party) DSW Class A
Common Shares owned by Retail Ventures at an initial exercise price of $19.00 per share. The
warrants are subject to certain anti-dilution provisions and are exercisable at any time on or
prior to June 11, 2012. The Company has granted registration rights with respect to the shares
issuable upon exercise of the warrants. Retail Ventures is subject to contractual obligations with
its warrantholders to retain enough DSW Common Shares to be able to satisfy its obligations to
deliver such shares to its warrantholders if the warrantholders elect to exercise their warrants in
full for DSW Class A Common Shares.
During the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of
$8.2 million and $11.3 million, respectively, related to the change in the fair value of the
warrants, of which the portion held by related parties was a non-cash charge of $3.9 and $5.3
million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended October 31, 2009, the Company
recorded a non-cash charge of $9.1 million and $10.0 million, respectively, related to the change
in the fair value of the warrants, of which the portion held by related parties was a non-cash
charge of $4.3 million and $3.7 million, respectively. The fair value of the warrants was $34.3
million and $23.1 million at October 30, 2010 and January 30, 2010, respectively.
Effective November 16, 2010, Retail Ventures, Inc issued 1,214,572 of its common shares, without
par value, to Cerberus Partners, L.P. (Cerberus) in connection with Cerberus exercise of its
outstanding term warrant that was originally issued by the Company on July 5, 2005. The warrant
was exercised on a cashless exercise basis as permitted by the warrant, resulting in the issuance
of 1,214,572 of the 1,731,460 shares for which the warrant could have been exercised (at an
exercise price of $4.50 per share). In connection with this issuance, no payment was made to the
Company, no underwriters were utilized and no commissions were paid.
Liquidity and Capital Resources Considerations Relating to the Value City Disposition
RVI completed the disposition of an 81% ownership interest in its Value City business on January
23, 2008. Retail Ventures or its wholly-owned subsidiary, Retail Ventures Services, Inc. (RVS),
guaranteed or may, in certain circumstances, be responsible for certain liabilities of Value City
including, but not limited to: amounts owed under certain guarantees with various financing
institutions for Value City inventory purchases made prior to the disposition date; amounts owed
for guaranteed severance for certain Value City employees; amounts owed under lease obligations for
certain equipment leases; amounts owed under certain employee benefit plans if the plans are not
fully funded on a termination basis; amounts owed for certain workers compensation claims for
events prior to the disposition date; amounts owed under certain income tax liabilities and the
guarantee of other amounts.
On October 26, 2008, Value City filed for bankruptcy protection and announced that it would close
its remaining stores. RVI may become subject to risks associated with the bankruptcy filing by
Value City, if creditors whose obligations RVI has guaranteed are not paid. As of October 30, 2010
and January 30, 2010, the amount of RVIs guarantees of Value City commitments was $0.4 million and
$2.9 million, respectively. The reduction in the liability through October 30, 2010 is primarily
due to payments to the guaranteed party and revaluation of guarantees
due to the passage of time.
To facilitate the change in ownership and operation of Value City, Retail Ventures agreed to
provide or arrange for the provision of certain transition services to Value City for a period of
one year unless otherwise extended by both parties. We negotiated an agreement with Value City to
continue to provide services post bankruptcy filing until the liquidation is complete, including
risk management, financial services, benefits administration, payroll and information technology
services, in exchange for a weekly payment. We have submitted a proof of claim in the bankruptcy
proceeding seeking payment in full for all amounts owed to us. However, there is no assurance that
we will be able to collect all or any of the amounts owed to us.
On October 25, 2010, Value City Holdings, Inc., Value City Department Stores LLC, Value City
Department Stores Services, Inc., Value City of Michigan, Inc., Gramex Retail Stores, Inc., GB
Retailers, Inc., J.S. Overland Delivery, Inc., Retail Ventures Jewelry, Inc., and VCHI Acquisition
Co. (collectively, Debtors) filed a complaint against RVI, Retail Ventures Services, Inc., and
DSW (the Defendants) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
(the Bankruptcy Court). The complaint relates to Debtors pending voluntary cases under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
In the complaint, Debtors have alleged claims for avoidable preferences, fraudulent transfer,
receipt of illegal dividends, recovery of assets, unjust enrichment and breach of contract. The
claims are related to transfers made by Debtors to the Defendants during the one year period
preceding Debtors filing of voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code on October 26, 2008. Debtors have sought damages that total approximately $373.4
million.
-37-
Defendants intend to contest the lawsuit vigorously and believe it is without merit and that there
are substantial factual and legal defenses to the claims at issue. The reasonable estimate of the
liability related to the Debtors litigation is approximately $4.0 million and as of October 30,
2010 we have accrued $4.0 million in Accrued Expenses Other and expensed approximately $4.0
million in SG&A expense from continuing operations related to the Debtors litigation. An
unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on RVIs consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources Considerations Relating to the Filenes Basement Disposition
On April 21, 2009, we sold all of the outstanding capital stock of Filenes Basement and certain
related entities to FB II Acquisition Corp., a newly formed entity owned by Buxbaum Holdings, Inc.
Retail Ventures guaranteed or may, in certain circumstances, be responsible for certain liabilities
of Filenes Basement, including, but not limited to, amounts owed under lease obligations related
to leases not assumed by New Filenes Basement. As of October 30, 2010, RVI has recorded a
liability of $0.2 million for the guarantees of Filenes Basement commitments for lease
obligations. On May 4, 2009, liquidating Filenes Basement filed for bankruptcy protection. On June
18, 2009, following bankruptcy court approval, Syms purchased certain assets of Filenes Basement.
The Company negotiated with Syms to provide transition services in
exchange for payment. As of October 30, 2010 we are not
providing any services to Syms.
On September 25, 2009, RVI and DSW entered into a settlement agreement with liquidating Filenes
Basement and its related debtors and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in the
Chapter 11 case for the debtors. On November 3, 2009, the settlement agreement was approved by the
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Effective as of the courts approval, under the
settlement agreement, RVIs claims in respect of $52.6 million in notes receivable from liquidating
Filenes Basement were released; RVI assumed the rights and obligations related to (and agreed to
indemnify liquidating Filenes Basement with regard to certain matters arising out of) the
liquidating Filenes Basement defined benefit pension plan; and liquidating Filenes Basement and
the creditors committee agreed to allow certain general unsecured claims for amounts owed to RVI
and DSW. The parties also agreed to certain provisions affecting the proper allocation of proceeds
paid to RVI or liquidating Filenes Basement in connection with specified third party litigation
and to certain provisions related to the debtors recovery from third parties that are the
beneficiaries of letters of credit or hold collateral related to workers compensation claims. The
settlement agreement also provides for certain mutual releases among the debtors, the creditors
committee, RVI, DSW and other parties. (The foregoing description of the Settlement Agreement is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the terms of the settlement agreement.)
Although the settlement agreement provides that RVI will have certain allowed claims against the
debtors, there can be no assurance as to whether RVI will ultimately recover all of the amounts in
connection with these claims. A plan of reorganization of the debtors was confirmed by the court on
January 26, 2010, and an initial distribution from the debtors estates of $5.8 million to RVI and
$0.2 million to DSW has been made. However, there can be no assurance as to timing or the amount of
any additional distribution in respect of its claims (or whether RVI will recover any of the
remainder of the amounts in connection with its claims).
Certain Liquidity Issues of RVI
Retail Ventures is a holding company and all our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries.
RVI has no net sales on a standalone basis and RVI also does not have any credit facilities under
which it can borrow funds. Therefore, we rely on the cash flow of our subsidiaries and our cash on
hand to meet our obligations, including our obligations under the PIES and the guarantees of
certain obligations of Filenes Basement and Value City. The ability of our subsidiaries to provide
cash to Retail Ventures by way of dividends, distributions, interest or other payments (including
intercompany loans) is subject to various restrictions, including restrictions imposed by the
existing credit facility governing our subsidiaries indebtedness. Future indebtedness incurred by
our subsidiaries may also limit or prohibit such payments. In addition, the ability of our
subsidiaries to make such payments may be limited by relevant provisions of the laws of their
respective jurisdictions of organization.
To the extent cash on hand is not sufficient to meet our operating cash flow needs we may seek
other sources to provide the funds necessary for operations. Even though we could receive cash from
DSW in the form of dividends, loans or otherwise, DSW has indicated that it does not intend to pay
dividends in fiscal 2010, and RVI does not have a current arrangement for loans or other funding
with DSW. DSW is a separate and distinct legal entity and currently has no obligation, contingent
or otherwise, to distribute cash to us or to make funds available to service our coupon payments
under the PIES.
-38-
The Company is reviewing strategic alternatives to maximize value for its shareholders as well as
its available options, to the extent it may become necessary, to manage and enhance its liquidity
position pending the realization of such strategic alternatives. Although RVIs plan to enhance
liquidity could include, among other things, the sale or collateralization of shares
of common stock of DSW Inc. or a sale of equity by RVI, no assurance can be given that any such
transaction can be completed on favorable terms or that such a transaction would satisfy all of
RVIs liquidity requirements. On January 15, 2010, Retail Ventures sold to DSW 320,000 Class B
Common Shares, without par value, for an aggregate amount of $8.0 million. Proceeds from the sale
will be used for general corporate purposes and continuing expenses; however, this transaction will
not eliminate RVIs need to continue to review available additional options to manage and enhance
its liquidity.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
DSW had outstanding letters of credit that totaled approximately $12.9 million as of October 30,
2010 under its $100 million credit facility and as of January 30, 2010 $17.4 million of letters of
credit were outstanding under DSWs previous facility. If certain conditions are met under these
arrangements, DSW would be required to satisfy the obligations in cash. Due to the nature of these
arrangements and based on historical experience and future expectations, DSW does not expect to
make any significant payment outside of terms set forth in these arrangements.
As of October 30, 2010, DSW has entered into various construction commitments, including capital
items to be purchased for projects that were under construction, or for which a lease has been
signed. DSWs obligations under these commitments aggregated to approximately $1.9 million as of
October 30, 2010. In addition, DSW has signed lease agreements for five new store locations
expected to be opened over the next eighteen months, with total annual rent of approximately $4.5
million. In connection with the new lease agreements, DSW will receive a total of $2.5 million of
construction and tenant allowance reimbursements for expenditures at these locations
We operate all of our stores, warehouses and corporate office space from leased facilities. Lease
obligations are accounted for either as operating leases or as capital leases based on lease by
lease review at lease inception. The Company had no capital leases outstanding as of October 30,
2010 or January 30, 2010.
The Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of October 30, 2010 or January 30, 2010 as
that term is defined by the SEC.
-39-
PROPOSED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The FASB periodically issues statements and interpretations, some of which require implementation
by a date falling within or after the close of the fiscal year. See Note 3 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the new accounting standards issued or
implemented during the period ended October 30, 2010.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, which may adversely affect our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In seeking to minimize the risks from
interest rate fluctuations, we manage exposures through our regular operating and financing
activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We do
not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and are not party to any
leveraged financial instruments.
Our cash and equivalents have maturities of 90 days or fewer. At times, cash and equivalents may be
in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance limits. DSW also has
investments in various short-term and long-term investments. DSWs available-for-sale investments
generally renew every seven days, and they have held-to-maturity investments that have terms
greater than 365 days. These financial instruments may be subject to interest rate risk through
lost income should interest rates increase during their term to maturity and thus may limit DSWs
ability to invest in higher income investments.
Warrants
For derivatives that are not designated as hedges under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, changes
in the fair values are recognized in earnings in the period of change. Retail Ventures estimates
the fair value of derivatives based on pricing models using current market rates and records all
derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.
As of October 30, 2010, the Company had 3,683,959 warrants outstanding.
During the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of
$8.2 million and $11.3 million, respectively, related to the change in the fair value of the
warrants, of which the portion held by related parties was a non-cash charge of $3.9 million and
$5.3 million, respectively. The $34.3 million value ascribed to the warrants was estimated as of
October 30, 2010 using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model with the following assumptions: risk-free
interest rate of 0.4%; expected life of 1.6 years; expected volatility of 61.3%; and an expected
dividend yield of 0.0%. The Term Loan Warrants (warrants) expire on June 11, 2012. As the
warrants may be exercised for either RVI Common Shares or Class A Common Shares of DSW owned by
RVI, the settlement of these warrants will not result in a cash outlay by the Company.
Conversion Feature of PIES
During the three and nine months ended October 30, 2010, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of
$23.5 million and $34.6 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of the
conversion feature of the PIES. The $6.6 million value of the short-term liability ascribed to the
conversion feature of the PIES was estimated as of October 30, 2010 using the Black-Scholes Pricing
Model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 0.9%; expected life of 0.9 years;
expected volatility of 48.1%; and an expected dividend yield of 0.0%. The fair value of the
conversion feature at the date of issuance of $11.7 million is equal to the amount of the discount
of the PIES and is being amortized into interest expense over the term of the PIES.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its
principal executive and principal financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, performed an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, the Companys principal executive
and principal financial officers concluded, as of October 30, 2010, that such disclosure controls
and procedures were effective.
-40-
As noted in the Form 10-K/A filed by the Company on October 12, 2010, during the third quarter
management identified a material weakness related to the controls over the calculation of diluted
(loss) earning per share from continuing operations attributable to Retail Ventures, Inc. common
shareholders and diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Retail Ventures, Inc. common
shareholders disclosed in the consolidated financial statement for years ended January 31, 2009 and
February 2, 2008. Management determined that there were ineffective controls over these
calculations which resulted from the inappropriate preparation and review of the diluted earnings
per share calculation. The Company mitigated this control weakness by enhancing the review of the
calculation of diluted (loss) earning per share from continuing operations attributable to Retail
Ventures, Inc. common shareholders and diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Retail
Ventures, Inc. common shareholders. Other than this change, no change in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting occurred during the Companys fiscal quarter ended October 30,
2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
On October 25, 2010, Value City Holdings, Inc., Value City Department Stores LLC, Value City
Department Stores Services, Inc., Value City of Michigan, Inc., Gramex Retail Stores, Inc., GB
Retailers, Inc., J.S. Overland Delivery, Inc., Retail Ventures Jewelry, Inc., and VCHI Acquisition
Co. (collectively, Debtors) filed a complaint against RVI, Retail Ventures Services, Inc., and
DSW (the Defendants) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
(the Bankruptcy Court). The complaint relates to Debtors pending voluntary cases under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
In the complaint, Debtors have alleged claims for avoidable preferences, fraudulent transfer,
receipt of illegal dividends, recovery of assets, unjust enrichment and breach of contract. The
claims are related to transfers made by Debtors to the Defendants during the one year period
preceding Debtors filing of voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code on October 26, 2008. Debtors have sought damages that total approximately $373.4
million.
Defendants intend to contest the lawsuit vigorously and believe it is without merit and that there
are substantial factual and legal defenses to the claims at issue. The reasonable estimate of the
liability related to the Debtors litigation is approximately $4.0 million and as of October 30,
2010 we have accrued $4.0 million in Accrued Expenses Other and expensed approximately $4.0
million in SG&A expense from continuing operations related to the Debtors litigation. An
unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on RVIs consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations.
The Company is also involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of its
business. The Company estimates the range of liability related to pending litigation where the
amount of the range of loss can be estimated. The Company records its best estimate of a loss when
the loss is considered probable. Where a liability is probable and there is a range of estimated
loss, the Company records the most likely estimated liability related to the claim. In the opinion
of management, the amount of any potential liability with respect to current legal proceedings will
not be material to the Companys results of operations or financial condition. As additional
information becomes available, the Company will assess the potential liability related to its
pending litigation and revise the estimates as needed. Revisions in its estimates and potential
liability could materially impact the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
We caution that certain information in this Form 10-Q, particularly information regarding future
economic performance and finances, and plans, expectations and objectives of management, is
forward-looking (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995)
and is subject to change based on various important factors. The factors previously disclosed under
the caption Risk Factors in our 2009 Annual Report, and other factors discussed from time to time
in our filings with the SEC, could affect our actual results and cause such results to differ
materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements.
-41-
Risk Factors Relating to DSW
DSW opened nine stores in fiscal 2010 and plans to open ten to fifteen stores each year for the
next three to five years, which could strain its resources and have a material adverse effect on
its business and financial performance.
DSWs continued and future growth largely depends on its ability to successfully open and operate
new DSW stores on a profitable basis. During fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, DSW opened 9, 41 and 37
new DSW stores, respectively. DSW opened
nine stores in fiscal 2010 and plans to open ten to fifteen stores each year for fiscal 2011 and
beyond. As of October 30, 2010, DSW has signed leases for an additional five stores opening in
fiscal 2011. During fiscal 2009, the average investment required to open a typical new DSW store
was approximately $1.4 million. This continued expansion could place increased demands on DSWs
financial, managerial, operational and administrative resources. For example, DSWs planned
expansion will require it to increase investments in management information systems and
distribution facilities. These increased demands and operating complexities could cause DSW to
operate its business less efficiently, have a material adverse effect on its operations and
financial performance and slow its growth.
Restrictions in DSWs secured revolving credit facility could limit its operational
flexibility.
DSW has a $100 million secured revolving credit facility (the DSW Credit Facility) with a term
expiring June 2014. Under this facility, DSW and its subsidiary, DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc.
(DSWSW), are co-borrowers. This facility is subject to a borrowing base restriction and provides
for borrowings at variable interest rates as defined in the agreement. The DSW credit facility is
secured by a lien on substantially all of DSWs and its subsidiaries personal property assets with
certain exclusions and will be used to provide funds for general corporate purposes, to refinance
existing letters of credit outstanding under DSWs previous credit arrangement, to provide for
DSWs ongoing working capital requirements, and to make permitted acquisitions. The DSW credit
facility provides for a sub-limit to foreign borrowers that could subject us to foreign currency
rate risk. In addition, the DSW Credit Facility contains usual and customary restrictive covenants
relating to DSWs management and the operation of its business. These covenants, among other
things, limit or restrict DSWs ability to grant liens on its assets, incur additional
indebtedness, pay cash dividends and redeem its stock, enter into transactions with affiliates and
merge or consolidate with another entity. These covenants could restrict DSWs operational
flexibility, and any failure to comply with these covenants or its payment obligations would limit
DSWs ability to borrow under the DSW Credit Facility and, in certain circumstances, may allow the
lenders thereunder to require repayment.
Risk Factors Relating to RVI
Retail Ventures is subject to various risks associated with the Value City bankruptcy proceedings.
On January 23, 2008, Retail Ventures disposed of an 81% ownership interest in its Value City
Department Stores business to VCHI Acquisition Co., a newly formed entity owned by VCDS Acquisition
Holdings, LLC, Emerald Capital Management LLC and Crystal Value, LLC. On October 26, 2008 Value
City filed for bankruptcy and has discontinued operations. RVI may become subject to risks
associated with the bankruptcy filing by Value City, if creditors whose obligations RVI has
guaranteed are not paid. There are risks and uncertainties inherent in such events and RVI is
unable to predict what claims may be made or the precise effect of the Value City liquidation
process on RVIs operations and financial condition. RVI may also be required to record impairment
charges or writeoffs as a result of any bankruptcy proceeding and to incur expenses and liabilities
associated with any bankruptcy proceeding. Additionally, the Value City bankruptcy and the
publicity surrounding its filing could adversely affect RVIs and its subsidiaries businesses and
relationships with employees, customers and suppliers. All of the foregoing circumstances or
events could have a material adverse impact on RVIs financial condition and results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(a) |
|
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities. Not applicable |
|
(b) |
|
Use of Proceeds. Not applicable |
|
(c) |
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers. |
Retail Ventures made no purchases of its common shares during the third quarter of the 2010 fiscal
year.
We have paid no cash dividends in the two most recent fiscal years and we do not anticipate paying
cash dividends on our Common Shares during fiscal 2010. Presently we expect that all of DSWs
future earnings will be retained for development of its businesses while all of RVIs future
earnings will be used for general corporate purposes and continuing expenses. The payment of any
future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among
other things, future earnings, operations, capital requirements, our general financial condition
and general business conditions. The DSW Credit Facility restricts the payment of dividends by DSW
up to the aggregate amount of up to 50% of the previous yearss net income, for a maximum of $50.0
million, provided that DSW meets the minimum cash requirements set forth in the DSW Credit
Facility.
-42-
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. None
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).
Item 5. Other Information. None
Item 6. Exhibits. See Index to Exhibits
-43-
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: December 8, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ James A. McGrady
|
|
|
|
James A. McGrady, Chief Executive Officer, |
|
|
|
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer) |
|
-44-
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
* |
|
Lease dated August 26, 2010 by and between JLP Nashua NH LLC, an
affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc., re
Nashua, NH store |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
-45-