sv1
As filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 8, 2010
Registration
No. 333-
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
GREEN DOT
CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
6199
|
|
95-4766827
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary standard industrial
classification code number)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
605 East Huntington Drive, Suite 205
Monrovia, CA 91016
(626) 739-3942
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of Registrants
principal executive offices)
John C. Ricci
General Counsel
Green Dot Corporation
605 East Huntington Drive, Suite 205
Monrovia, CA 91016
(626) 739-3942
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Laird H. Simons III, Esq.
William L. Hughes, Esq.
James D. Evans, Esq.
Fenwick & West LLP
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
(650) 988-8500
|
|
William V. Fogg, Esq.
Daniel A. OShea, Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10019
(212) 474-1000
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of
this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of
1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box and list the Securities Act registration statement
number of the earlier effective registration statement for the
same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box and list the Securities Act registration statement
number of the earlier effective registration statement for the
same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
þ
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
CALCULATION OF
REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Registration
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Offering Price(1)
|
|
|
Fee
|
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
|
|
|
$100,000,000
|
|
|
$7,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the amount of the registration fee pursuant to
Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933.
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment that
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. The selling stockholders may not sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities,
and neither we nor the selling stockholders are soliciting an
offer to buy these securities, in any state where the offer or
sale is not permitted.
|
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS
Subject
to completion, dated November 8, 2010
Shares
Class
A Common Stock
The selling
stockholders identified in this prospectus are selling all of
the shares
of our Class A common stock offered hereby and will receive
all of the proceeds from this offering. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares of our Class A common
stock in this offering.
We have two
classes of authorized common stock Class A
common stock and Class B common stock. The rights of the
holders of our Class A common stock and our Class B
common stock are virtually identical, except with respect to
voting and conversion. Each share of our Class A common
stock is entitled to one vote per share. Each share of our
Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share and
is convertible at any time into one share of our Class A
common stock.
Our
Class A common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol
GDOT. On November 8, 2010, the last reported
sale price of our Class A common stock on the NYSE was
$53.96 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
Total
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Proceeds to the selling stockholders, before expenses
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
The selling
stockholders have granted the underwriters an option, for a
period of 30 days from the date of this prospectus, to
purchase from them up
to
additional shares of our Class A common stock to cover
over-allotments, if any.
Investing
in our Class A common stock involves a high degree of risk.
See Risk Factors beginning on page 10 of this
prospectus.
Neither the
Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
passed on the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Delivery of
the shares of our Class A common stock will be made on or
about ,
2010.
|
|
J.P.
Morgan |
Morgan Stanley |
, 2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
F-1
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus or in any free writing prospectus prepared by or on
behalf of us and delivered or made available to you. Neither we
nor the selling stockholders have authorized anyone to provide
you with information different from that contained in this
prospectus. The selling stockholders are offering to sell, and
seeking offers to buy, shares of our Class A common stock
only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The
information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of
the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery
of this prospectus or of any sale of our Class A common
stock. Our business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects may have changed since that date.
No action is being taken in any jurisdiction outside the United
States to permit a public offering of our Class A common
stock or possession or distribution of this prospectus in that
jurisdiction. Persons who come into possession of this
prospectus in jurisdictions outside the United States are
required to inform themselves about and to observe any
restrictions as to this offering and the distribution of this
prospectus applicable to that jurisdiction.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information contained
elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all
the information you should consider before investing in our
Class A common stock. You should read the entire prospectus
carefully, including the section entitled Risk
Factors and our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, before
making an investment in our Class A common stock.
Green Dot
Corporation
Green Dot is a leading prepaid financial services company
providing simple, low-cost and convenient money management
solutions to a broad base of U.S. consumers. We believe
that we are the leading provider of general purpose reloadable
prepaid debit cards in the United States and that our Green Dot
Network is the leading prepaid reload network in the United
States. We sell our cards and offer our reload services
nationwide at approximately 50,000 retail store locations, which
provide consumers convenient access to our products and
services. Our technology platform, Green PlaNET, provides
essential functionality, including
point-of-sale
connectivity and interoperability with Visa, MasterCard and
other payment or funds transfer networks, and compliance and
other capabilities to our Green Dot Network, enabling real-time
transactions in a secure environment. The combination of our
innovative products, broad retail distribution and proprietary
technology creates powerful network effects, which we believe
enhance the value we deliver to our customers, retail
distributors and other participants in our network.
We were an early pioneer in the development of general purpose
reloadable prepaid debit cards, or GPR cards, and associated
reload services, which collectively we refer to as prepaid
financial services. GPR cards are designed for general spending
purposes and can be used anywhere the cards applicable
payment network, such as Visa or MasterCard, is accepted, but,
unlike gift cards, can be reloaded with additional funds for
ongoing, long-term use. Our GPR cards are issued as Visa- or
MasterCard-branded cards and are accepted worldwide by merchants
and other businesses belonging to the applicable payment
network, including for bill payments, online shopping, everyday
store purchases and ATM withdrawals. We believe that we are the
leading provider of GPR cards in the United States based on the
3.3 million active cards in our portfolio as of
September 30, 2010, which we define as cards that have had
a purchase, reload or ATM withdrawal transaction during the
previous
90-day
period.
We have built strong distribution and marketing relationships
with many significant retail chains, including Walmart,
Walgreens, CVS, Rite Aid, 7-Eleven, Kroger, K-Mart, Meijer and
Radio Shack. These retail chains provide consumers with
convenient locations to purchase and reload our cards. In
addition, any holder of a GPR card issued by a member of our
reload network may reload that card at any one of those
locations. Currently, there are over 100 third-party prepaid
card programs that use our nationwide reload network to
facilitate reloading by their cardholders. In 2009, we entered
into an agreement with PayPal whereby its customers can add
funds to any new or existing PayPal account through our reload
network at all retail locations where we sell our products and
services, but to date we have not generated significant
operating revenues from our relationship with PayPal. In fiscal
2009, the gross dollar volume loaded to our GPR card and reload
products was $4.7 billion, an increase of 67% over fiscal
2008.
We have developed a business model with powerful network
effects. Growth in the number of our product and service
offerings or our network participants, which include consumers,
retail distributors and businesses that accept reloads or
payments through the Green Dot Network, enhances the value we
deliver to all network participants. Our technology platform,
Green PlaNET, enables network participants to communicate and
complete transactions rapidly and securely through our reload
network or third-party payment or funds transfer networks, and
is a central component of our network-based business model.
1
For the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, the five
months ended December 31, 2009 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, our total operating revenues were
$83.6 million, $168.1 million, $234.8 million,
$112.8 million and $272.0 million, respectively. In
the same periods, we generated operating income of
$1.2 million, $29.2 million, $63.7 million,
$23.3 million and $56.7 million, respectively.
Industry
Overview
Prepaid cards have emerged as an attractive product within the
electronic payments industry. They are easy for consumers to
understand and use because they work in a manner similar to
traditional debit cards, allowing the cardholder to use a
conventional plastic card linked to an account established at a
financial institution. According to Mercator Advisory
Groups Prepaid Market Forecasts 2010 to 2013
research report, $28.6 billion was loaded onto GPR cards in
the United States in 2009 and $201.9 billion is expected to
be loaded onto GPR cards in the United States in 2013,
reflecting a 63% compound annual growth rate during that
four-year period. We believe that this growth in the use of GPR
cards will contribute to a substantial increase in the demand
for prepaid financial services.
The prepaid financial services industry is fragmented and its
products are relatively early in their life cycles. Vendors
generally do not have a broad set of product and service
offerings or capabilities, and no single vendor currently
provides all of the elements that are necessary to establish and
operate a GPR card program. We believe this creates a
significant opportunity for a vertically-integrated provider
with a broad suite of innovative products and services.
Our Competitive
Strengths
Our combination of innovative products and marketing expertise,
a known brand name, a nationwide retail distribution presence
and proprietary technology supports our network-based business
model and has enabled us to become a leading provider of prepaid
financial services in the United States. Our strengths include:
|
|
|
|
|
Innovative Product and Marketing Expertise. We
are an innovator in the development, merchandising and marketing
of prepaid financial services. We believe we were the first
company to combine the products, technology platform and
distribution channel required to make retailer-distributed GPR
cards a viable product offering. Our consumer focus has led us
to enhance our product packaging and product displays in retail
locations to educate consumers and promote our products and
services more effectively. We believe that we have the strongest
brand in the prepaid financial services industry, and we
continue to build brand awareness using national television
advertising.
|
|
|
|
Leading Retail Distribution. We have
established a nationwide retail distribution network, consisting
of approximately 50,000 retail store locations, which gives us
access to the vast majority of the U.S. population.
According to a Scarborough Research survey, which was conducted
between February 2009 and March 2010, 94% of U.S. adult
respondents had shopped at one or more of the stores of our
current retail distributors within the prior twelve months.
|
|
|
|
Leading Reload Network in the United
States. We believe our Green Dot Network is the
leading reload network for prepaid cards in the United States.
We also believe that it can be expanded and adapted to many new
and evolving applications in the electronic payments industry.
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Technology. Green PlaNET, our
centralized processing platform, includes a variety of
proprietary software applications that, together with
third-party applications, run our front-end, back-end,
anti-fraud, regulatory compliance and customer service
processing systems. It enables us to develop, distribute and
support a variety of products and services effectively.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
This platform also enables our cards and Green Dot Network
to interoperate with Visa, MasterCard and other payment or funds
transfer networks, allowing our cardholders to make purchases
and complete other transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Model with Powerful Network
Effects. The combination of our broad group of
products and services, large portfolio of active cards,
nationwide footprint of retail distributors and proprietary
technology creates powerful network effects. Growth in the
number of our product and service offerings or network
participants enhances the value we deliver to all network
participants. For example, we are able to attract retail
distributors because of the large number of consumers who
actively use our reload network. We believe the breadth and
depth of our network would be difficult to replicate and
represents a significant competitive advantage, as well as a
barrier to entry for potential competitors.
|
|
|
|
Vertical Integration. We believe that we are
more vertically integrated than our competitors, based on our
distribution capabilities, processing platform, program
management skills and proprietary reload network. Whereas we
have built our offerings primarily around our own
internally-developed capabilities, none of our competitors has
been able to offer products and services similar to ours without
collaborating with third parties to provide one or more of the
essential features of prepaid financial service offerings, such
as program management or the reload network. Our vertical
integration has allowed us to reduce costs across our operations
and, we expect, will continue to provide us with opportunities
to reduce operational costs in the future. It also enables us to
scale our business quickly in response to rising demand and to
ensure high-quality service for our customers.
|
|
|
|
Strong Regulatory and Compliance
Infrastructure. We employ a proactive approach to
licensing, regulatory and compliance matters, which we believe
provides us with an important competitive advantage. We believe
that this has helped us develop strong relationships with
leading retailers and financial institutions and has prepared us
well for changes in the regulatory environment.
|
Our
Strategy
The key components of our strategy include:
|
|
|
|
|
Increasing the Number of Network
Participants. We intend to enhance the network
effects in our business model in the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
|
attracting new users by introducing new products, improving
current products and promoting our products;
|
|
|
|
expanding and strengthening our distribution by establishing
relationships with additional high-quality retail chains and
accelerating our entry into new distribution channels; and
|
|
|
|
adding businesses that accept reloads or payments through, and
applications for, the Green Dot Network by continuing to enroll
additional third-party prepaid card program providers in our
reload network and to identify additional uses for our reload
networks cash transfer technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increasing Revenue per Customer. We intend to
pursue greater revenue per customer by improving cardholder
retention, increasing card usage and increasing adoption of
optional revenue-generating services.
|
|
|
|
Improving Operating Efficiencies. We intend to
leverage our growing scale and vertical integration to generate
incremental operating efficiencies, which will provide us with
the flexibility to engage in new marketing programs, reduce
pricing and make other investments in our business to maintain
our leadership position.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Broadening Brand and Product Awareness. We
intend to broaden awareness of the Green Dot brand and our
products and services through national television advertising,
online advertising and ongoing enhancements to our packaging and
merchandising.
|
|
|
|
Acquiring a Bank and Complementary
Businesses. We intend to pursue acquisitions that
will help us achieve our strategic objectives, particularly
those designed to improve operating revenue growth and operating
efficiencies. In February 2010, we entered into a definitive
agreement to acquire Utah-based Bonneville Bancorp, a bank
holding company, and its subsidiary commercial bank, Bonneville
Bank, for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately
$15.7 million, and filed applications with the appropriate
federal and state regulators seeking approvals for this
transaction. While there can be no assurance that we will obtain
these approvals or our bank acquisition will close, we currently
expect to complete this acquisition during the fourth quarter of
calendar 2010. We believe this acquisition will increase the
efficiency with which we introduce and manage potential new
products and services, reduce the risk that we would be
negatively impacted by changes in the business practices of the
banks that issue our cards, reduce the sponsorship and service
fees and other expenses that we pay to third parties, and allow
us to serve our customers better and more efficiently through a
more vertically integrated platform.
|
Risks Affecting
Us
Our business is subject to numerous risks, which are highlighted
in the section entitled Risk Factors immediately
following this prospectus summary. These risks represent
challenges to the successful implementation of our strategy and
to the growth and future profitability of our business. These
risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
our growth rates may decline in the future;
|
|
|
|
operating revenues derived from sales at Walmart and from our
three other largest retail distributors, as a group, represented
63%, and 20%, respectively, of our total operating revenues and
64% and 19%, respectively, of our total operating revenues,
excluding stock-based retailer incentive compensation, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, and the loss of
operating revenues from any of these retail distributors would
adversely affect our business;
|
|
|
|
our future success depends upon our retail distributors
active and effective promotion of our products and services, but
their interests and operational decisions might not always align
with our interests;
|
|
|
|
the industry in which we compete is highly competitive and has a
number of major participants, which could adversely affect our
operating revenue growth; and
|
|
|
|
we operate in a highly regulated environment; failure to comply
with applicable laws or regulations, or changes in those laws or
regulations that adversely affect our operating methods or
economics (e.g., reducing interchange rates), could negatively
impact our business.
|
Corporate History
and Information
We were incorporated in Delaware in October 1999 as Next Estate
Communications, Inc. and changed our name to Green Dot
Corporation in October 2005. Our principal executive offices are
located at 605 East Huntington Drive, Suite 205, Monrovia,
California 91016, and our telephone number is
(626) 739-3942.
Our website address is www.greendot.com. The information on, or
that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by
reference into this prospectus and should not be considered to
be a part of this prospectus.
Unless otherwise indicated, the terms Green Dot,
we, us and our refer to
Green Dot Corporation, a Delaware corporation, together with its
consolidated subsidiaries, the term prepaid
4
cards refers to prepaid debit cards and the term our
cards refers to our Green Dot-branded and co-branded GPR
cards. In addition, prepaid financial services
refers to GPR cards and associated reload services, a segment of
the prepaid card industry.
In September 2009, we changed our fiscal year-end from July 31
to December 31. Throughout this prospectus, references to
fiscal 2007, fiscal 2008 and
fiscal 2009 are to the fiscal years ended
July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Green Dot and MoneyPak are our registered trademarks in the
United States, and the Green Dot logo is our trademark. Other
trademarks appearing in this prospectus are the property of
their respective holders.
5
The
Offering
|
|
|
Class A common stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
shares |
|
Class A common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
shares |
|
Class B common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
shares(1) |
|
Total Class A and Class B common stock to be
outstanding after this offering |
|
shares |
|
Voting rights |
|
We have two classes of authorized common stock
Class A common stock and Class B common stock. The
rights of the holders of our Class A and Class B
common stock are virtually identical, except with respect to
voting and conversion. The holders of our Class B common
stock are entitled to ten votes per share, and the holders of
our Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per
share. The holders of our Class A common stock and
Class B common stock will vote together as a single class
on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, unless
otherwise required by law. Each share of our Class B common
stock is convertible into one share of our Class A common
stock at any time and will convert automatically upon certain
transfers or the date that the total number of shares of
Class B common stock outstanding represents less than 10%
of the total number of shares of Class A and Class B
common stock outstanding. See Description of Capital
Stock. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
The selling stockholders are selling all of the shares in this
offering. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of
shares by the selling stockholders. See Use of
Proceeds. |
|
Dividends |
|
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock, and we do not currently intend to pay any cash dividends
on our Class A common stock for the foreseeable future. |
|
NYSE symbol |
|
GDOT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The shares of our Class B common stock outstanding after
this offering will represent
approximately % of the total number
of shares of our Class A and Class B common stock
outstanding after this offering
and % of the combined voting power
of our Class A and Class B common stock outstanding
after this offering. |
The number of shares of our Class A and Class B common
stock to be outstanding after this offering represents the
shares outstanding as of September 30, 2010, after giving
effect to the issuance
of shares
of Class B common stock to be acquired by certain selling
stockholders
6
through option exercises at the closing of this offering in
order to sell the underlying shares of Class A common stock
in this offering, and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
shares of our
Class B common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock
options outstanding as of September 30, 2010 with a
weighted average exercise price of
$ per share (other
than shares
that we expect to be sold in this offering by certain selling
stockholders upon the exercise of vested stock options and the
conversion of the shares received into shares of our
Class A common stock);
|
|
|
|
4,283,456 shares of our Class B common stock issuable
upon the exercise of a warrant outstanding as of
September 30, 2010, with an exercise price of $23.70 per
share, that is exercisable only upon the achievement of
performance goals specified in our arrangement with PayPal, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
50,000 shares of our Class A common stock issuable
upon the exercise of stock options granted after
September 30, 2010 with an exercise price of $46.15 per
share; and
|
|
|
|
2,200,000 shares of our Class A common stock reserved
for issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and our 2010
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (including 79,500 shares of
our Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of
stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2010 with an
exercise price of $36.00 per share, and the shares described in
the immediately preceding bullet), each of which contains
provisions that will automatically increase its share reserve
each year, as more fully described in Executive
Compensation Employee Benefit Plans.
|
Except as otherwise indicated, all information in this
prospectus assumes:
|
|
|
|
|
the conversion by the selling stockholders
of shares
of our Class B common stock into a like number of shares of
our Class A common stock immediately prior to the
completion of this offering; and
|
|
|
|
no exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase up
to an
additional
shares of our Class A common stock from the selling
stockholders in this offering.
|
7
Summary
Consolidated Financial and Other Data
The following tables present summary historical financial data
for our business. You should read this information together with
Selected Consolidated Financial Data,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements and related notes, each included elsewhere
in this prospectus.
We derived the statement of operations data for the years ended
July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the five months ended
December 31, 2009 from our audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the
statement of operations data for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010 and the balance sheet data as
of September 30, 2010 from our unaudited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus,
which have been prepared on a consistent basis with our audited
consolidated financial statements. We derived the statement of
operations data for the years ended July 31, 2005 and 2006
from our unaudited consolidated financial statements not
included in this prospectus. In the opinion of our management,
our unaudited financial data reflect all adjustments, consisting
of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
statement of our results for those periods. Our historical
results are not necessarily indicative of our results to be
expected in any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
$
|
21,771
|
|
|
$
|
36,359
|
|
|
$
|
45,717
|
|
|
$
|
91,233
|
|
|
$
|
119,356
|
|
|
$
|
50,895
|
|
|
$
|
93,011
|
|
|
$
|
124,978
|
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
12,064
|
|
|
|
20,616
|
|
|
|
25,419
|
|
|
|
45,310
|
|
|
|
62,396
|
|
|
|
30,509
|
|
|
|
49,383
|
|
|
|
73,630
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
9,975
|
|
|
|
12,488
|
|
|
|
31,583
|
|
|
|
53,064
|
|
|
|
31,353
|
|
|
|
46,554
|
|
|
|
81,106
|
|
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
39,540
|
|
|
|
66,951
|
|
|
|
83,624
|
|
|
|
168,126
|
|
|
|
234,816
|
|
|
|
112,757
|
|
|
|
188,948
|
|
|
|
272,041
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
19,148
|
|
|
|
28,660
|
|
|
|
38,838
|
|
|
|
69,577
|
|
|
|
75,786
|
|
|
|
31,333
|
|
|
|
52,430
|
|
|
|
87,777
|
|
Compensation and benefits expenses(2)
|
|
|
11,584
|
|
|
|
18,499
|
|
|
|
20,610
|
|
|
|
28,303
|
|
|
|
40,096
|
|
|
|
26,610
|
|
|
|
32,827
|
|
|
|
50,474
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
6,990
|
|
|
|
8,547
|
|
|
|
9,809
|
|
|
|
21,944
|
|
|
|
32,320
|
|
|
|
17,480
|
|
|
|
27,092
|
|
|
|
43,131
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,521
|
|
|
|
10,077
|
|
|
|
13,212
|
|
|
|
19,124
|
|
|
|
22,944
|
|
|
|
14,020
|
|
|
|
18,721
|
|
|
|
33,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
44,243
|
|
|
|
65,783
|
|
|
|
82,469
|
|
|
|
138,948
|
|
|
|
171,146
|
|
|
|
89,443
|
|
|
|
131,070
|
|
|
|
215,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(4,703
|
)
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
29,178
|
|
|
|
63,670
|
|
|
|
23,314
|
|
|
|
57,878
|
|
|
|
56,662
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
29,596
|
|
|
|
64,065
|
|
|
|
23,427
|
|
|
|
58,054
|
|
|
|
56,883
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
|
12,261
|
|
|
|
26,902
|
|
|
|
9,764
|
|
|
|
24,344
|
|
|
|
22,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
17,335
|
|
|
|
37,163
|
|
|
|
13,663
|
|
|
|
33,710
|
|
|
|
34,294
|
|
Dividends, accretion and allocated earnings of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(5,157
|
)
|
|
|
(13,650
|
)
|
|
|
(29,000
|
)
|
|
|
(9,170
|
)
|
|
|
(22,886
|
)
|
|
|
(16,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
(510
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,685
|
|
|
$
|
8,163
|
|
|
$
|
4,493
|
|
|
$
|
10,824
|
|
|
$
|
18,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
|
|
10,873
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
10,757
|
|
|
|
12,036
|
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
|
|
12,046
|
|
|
|
18,232
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Diluted weighted-average diluted common shares issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,884
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
14,154
|
|
|
|
15,712
|
|
|
|
15,425
|
|
|
|
15,545
|
|
|
|
21,441
|
|
8
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the recorded fair value of the shares for which our
right to repurchase has lapsed pursuant to the terms of the
agreement under which we issued approximately 2.2 million
shares of our Class A common stock to Walmart. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Overview May 2010 Changes to Our Relationship with
Walmart for more information. Prior to the three months
ended June 30, 2010, we did not incur any stock-based
retailer incentive compensation expense. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense of $0, $0, $156,000,
$1.2 million and $2.5 million for the years ended
July 31, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively,
$6.8 million for the five months ended December 31,
2009 and $2.0 million and $5.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statistical Data (Unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of GPR cards activated
|
|
|
428,737
|
|
|
|
721,561
|
|
|
|
894,295
|
|
|
|
2,167,004
|
|
|
|
3,106,923
|
|
|
|
2,105,908
|
|
|
|
4,735,792
|
|
Number of cash transfers
|
|
|
2,262,854
|
|
|
|
4,055,775
|
|
|
|
4,992,956
|
|
|
|
9,153,119
|
|
|
|
14,084,458
|
|
|
|
8,188,264
|
|
|
|
19,227,426
|
|
Number of active cards as of period end(1)
|
|
|
289,086
|
|
|
|
428,300
|
|
|
|
625,165
|
|
|
|
1,270,072
|
|
|
|
2,056,828
|
|
|
|
2,685,975
|
|
|
|
3,279,232
|
|
Gross dollar volume(2)
|
|
$
|
414,910
|
|
|
$
|
801,956
|
|
|
$
|
1,134,175
|
|
|
$
|
2,831,278
|
|
|
$
|
4,702,914
|
|
|
$
|
2,734,087
|
|
|
$
|
7,736,236
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the total number of GPR cards in our portfolio that
have had a purchase, reload or ATM withdrawal transaction during
the previous
90-day
period. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the total dollar volume of funds loaded to our GPR
card and reload products in the specified period. |
The following table presents consolidated balance sheet data as
of September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(1)
|
|
$
|
140,744
|
|
Settlement assets(2)
|
|
|
11,784
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
213,379
|
|
Settlement obligations(2)
|
|
|
11,784
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
92,914
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
120,465
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $5.2 million of restricted cash. We maintain
restricted deposits in bank accounts to support our line of
credit. |
|
(2) |
|
Our retail distributors collect customer funds for purchases of
new cards and reloads and then remit these funds directly to
bank accounts established on behalf of those customers by the
banks that issue our cards. Our retail distributors
remittance of these funds takes an average of three business
days. Settlement assets represent the amounts due from our
retail distributors for customer funds collected at the point of
sale that have not yet been remitted to the card issuing banks.
Settlement obligations represent the amounts that are due from
us to the card issuing banks for funds collected but not yet
remitted by our retail distributors and not funded by our line
of credit. We have no control over or access to customer funds
remitted by our retail distributors to the card issuing banks.
Customer funds therefore are not our assets, and we do not
recognize them in our consolidated financial statements. |
9
RISK
FACTORS
This offering and an investment in our Class A common
stock involve a high degree of risk. You should carefully
consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together
with all of the other information in this prospectus, including
our consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus, before deciding to invest in our
Class A common stock. If any of the following risks
actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of
operations and future prospects could be materially and
adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our
Class A common stock could decline and you could lose part
or all of your investment.
Risks Related to
Our Business
Our growth rates may decline in the future.
In recent quarters, our operating income and net income have
fluctuated and the rate of growth of our operating revenues
generally has declined on a sequential basis and in the three
months ended September 30, 2010, the rate of growth was
negative relative to the second quarter of 2010. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue our
historical growth rates in future periods, and we would expect
seasonal or other influences and fluctuations in stock-based
retailer incentive compensation caused by variations in our
stock price to cause sequential quarterly fluctuations and
periodic declines in our operating revenues, operating income
and net income. In particular, our results for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 were favorably affected by large
numbers of taxpayers electing to receive their refunds via
direct deposit on our cards, and our results for the subsequent
two quarters were adversely affected by stock-based retailer
incentive compensation that reduced our total operating
revenues. The incremental seasonal operating revenues in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 may not be replicated in
the remaining quarter of 2010 and the on-going stock-based
retailer incentive compensation will continue to reduce our
total operating revenues. Thus, our quarterly total operating
revenues for the fourth quarter of 2010 may be below those
in the three months ended March 31, 2010.
In the near term, our continued growth depends in significant
part on our ability, among other things, to attract new users of
our products, to expand our reload network and to increase our
operating revenues per customer. Since the value we provide to
our network participants relates in large part to the number of
users of, businesses that accept reloads or payments through,
and applications enabled by, the Green Dot Network, our
operating revenues could suffer if we were unable to increase
the number of purchasers of our GPR cards and to expand and
adapt our reload network to meet consumers evolving needs.
We may fail to expand our reload network for a number of
reasons, including our inability to produce products and
services that appeal to consumers and lead to increased new card
sales, our loss of one or more key retail distributors or our
loss of key, or failure to add, businesses that accept reloads
or payments through the Green Dot Network, which we refer to as
our network acceptance members.
We may not be able to increase card usage and cardholder
retention, which have been two important contributors to our
growth. Currently, many of our cardholders use their cards
infrequently or do not reload their cards. We may be unable to
generate increases in card usage or cardholder retention for a
number of reasons, including our inability to maintain our
existing distribution channels, the failure of our cardholder
retention and usage incentives to influence cardholder behavior,
our inability to predict accurately consumer preferences or
industry changes and to modify our products and services on a
timely basis in response thereto, and our inability to produce
new features and services that appeal to cardholders.
As the prepaid financial services industry continues to develop,
our competitors may be able to offer products and services that
are, or that are perceived to be, substantially similar to or
better than ours. This may force us to compete on the basis of
price and to expend significant advertising, marketing and other
resources in order to remain competitive. Even if we are
successful at increasing
10
our operating revenues through our various initiatives and
strategies, we will experience an inevitable decline in growth
rates as our operating revenues increase to higher levels and we
may also experience a decline in margins. If our operating
revenue growth rates slow materially or decline, our business,
operating results and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
Operating revenues derived from sales at Walmart and from
our three other largest retail distributors, as a group,
represented 63% and 20%, respectively, of our total operating
revenues and 64% and 19%, respectively, of our total operating
revenues, excluding stock-based retailer incentive compensation,
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, and the
loss of operating revenues from any of these retail distributors
would adversely affect our business.
Most of our operating revenues are derived from prepaid
financial services sold at our four largest retail distributors.
As a percentage of total operating revenues, operating revenues
derived from products and services sold at the store locations
of Walmart and from products and services sold at the store
locations our three other largest retail distributors, as a
group, were approximately 63% and 20%, respectively, in the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. We do not expect calendar
2010 operating revenues derived from products and services sold
at Walmart stores to change significantly as a percentage of our
total operating revenues from the percentage in the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, and expect that Walmart and our
other three largest retail distributors will continue to have a
significant impact on our operating revenues in future years. It
would be difficult to replace any of our large retail
distributors, particularly Walmart, and the operating revenues
derived from sales of our products and services at their stores.
Accordingly, the loss of Walmart or any of our other three
largest retail distributors would have a material adverse effect
on our business, and might have a positive impact on the
business of one of our competitors if it were able to replace
us. In addition, any publicity associated with the loss of any
of our large retail distributors could harm our reputation,
making it more difficult to attract and retain consumers and
other retail distributors, and could lessen our negotiating
power with our remaining and prospective retail distributors.
Our contracts with these retail distributors have terms that
expire at various dates between 2011 and 2015, but they can in
limited circumstances, such as our material breach or
insolvency, or in the case of Walmart, our failure to meet
agreed-upon
service levels, certain changes in control of GE Money Bank or
us, or our inability or unwillingness to agree to requested
pricing changes, be terminated by these retail distributors on
relatively short notice. See Business Our
Business Model Our Distribution Our
Relationship with Walmart for more information regarding
the termination rights under our contract with Walmart. There
can be no assurance that we will be able to continue our
relationships with our largest retail distributors on the same
or more favorable terms in future periods or that our
relationships will continue beyond the terms of our existing
contracts with them. Our operating revenues and operating
results could suffer if, among other things, any of our retail
distributors renegotiates, terminates or fails to renew, or to
renew on similar or favorable terms, its agreement with us or
otherwise chooses to modify the level of support it provides for
our products.
Our future success depends upon our retail
distributors active and effective promotion of our
products and services, but their interests and operational
decisions might not always align with our interests.
Most of our operating revenues are derived from our products and
services sold at the stores of our retail distributors. Revenues
from our retail distributors depend on a number of factors
outside our control and may vary from period to period. Because
we compete with many other providers of consumer products for
placement and promotion of products in the stores of our retail
distributors, our success depends on our retail distributors and
their willingness to promote our products and services
successfully. In general, our contracts with these third parties
allow them to exercise significant discretion over the placement
and promotion of our products in their stores, and they could
give higher priority to the products and services of other
companies. Accordingly, losing the support of our retail
11
distributors might limit or reduce the sales of our cards and
MoneyPak reload product. Our operating revenues may also be
negatively affected by our retail distributors operational
decisions. For example, if a retail distributor fails to train
its cashiers to sell our products and services or implements
changes in its systems that disrupt the integration between its
systems and ours, we could experience a decline in our product
sales. Even if our retail distributors actively and effectively
promote our products and services, there can be no assurance
that their efforts will result in growth of our operating
revenues.
Our operating results may fluctuate in the future, which
could cause our stock price to decline.
Our quarterly and annual results of operations may fluctuate in
the future as a result of a variety of factors, many of which
are outside of our control. If our results of operations fall
below the expectations of investors or any securities analysts
who follow our Class A common stock, the trading price of
our Class A common stock could decline substantially.
Fluctuations in our quarterly or annual results of operations
may be due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
the timing and volume of purchases, use and reloads of our
prepaid cards and related products and services;
|
|
|
|
the timing and success of new product or service introductions
by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
seasonality in the purchase or use of our products and services;
|
|
|
|
reductions in the level of interchange rates that can be charged;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in customer retention rates;
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix of products and services that we sell;
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix of retail distributors through which we sell
our products and services;
|
|
|
|
the timing of commencement, renegotiation or termination of
relationships with significant retail distributors and network
acceptance members;
|
|
|
|
changes in our or our competitors pricing policies or
sales terms;
|
|
|
|
the timing of commencement and termination of major advertising
campaigns;
|
|
|
|
the timing of costs related to the development or acquisition of
complementary businesses;
|
|
|
|
the timing of costs of any major litigation to which we are a
party;
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of operating costs related to the
maintenance and expansion of our business, operations and
infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
our ability to control costs, including third-party service
provider costs;
|
|
|
|
volatility in the trading price of our Class A common
stock, which may lead to higher stock-based compensation
expenses or fluctuations in the valuations of vesting equity
that cause variations in our stock-based retailer incentive
compensation; and
|
|
|
|
changes in the regulatory environment affecting the banking or
electronic payments industries generally or prepaid financial
services specifically.
|
12
The industry in which we compete is highly competitive,
which could adversely affect our operating revenue
growth.
The prepaid financial services industry is highly competitive
and includes a variety of financial and non-financial services
vendors. Our current and potential competitors include:
|
|
|
|
|
prepaid card program managers, such as First Data Corporation
(or First Data), NetSpend Holdings, Inc. (or Netspend),
AccountNow, Inc. (or AccountNow), PreCash Inc. (or PreCash) and
UniRush, LLC (or Rush Card);
|
|
|
|
reload network providers, such as Visa, Inc. (or Visa),
MasterCard International Incorporated (or MasterCard), The
Western Union Company (or Western Union) and MoneyGram
International, Inc. (or MoneyGram); and
|
|
|
|
prepaid card distributors, such as InComm and Blackhawk Network,
Inc. (or Blackhawk).
|
Some of these vendors compete with us in more than one of the
vendor categories described above, while others are primarily
focused in a single category. In addition, competitors in one
category have worked or are working with competitors in other
categories to compete with us. A portion of our cash transfer
revenues is derived from reloads to cards managed by companies
that compete with us as program managers. We also face potential
competition from retail distributors or from other companies,
such as Visa, that may in the future decide to compete, or
compete more aggressively, in the prepaid financial services
industry.
We also compete with businesses outside of the prepaid financial
services industry, including traditional providers of financial
services, such as banks that offer demand deposit accounts and
card issuers that offer credit cards, private label retail cards
and gift cards.
Many existing and potential competitors have longer operating
histories and greater name recognition than we do. In addition,
many of our existing and potential competitors are substantially
larger than we are, may already have or could develop
substantially greater financial and other resources than we
have, may offer, develop or introduce a wider range of programs
and services than we offer or may use more effective advertising
and marketing strategies than we do to achieve broader brand
recognition, customer awareness and retail penetration. We may
also face price competition that results in decreases in the
purchase and use of our products and services. To stay
competitive, we may have to increase the incentives that we
offer to our retail distributors and decrease the prices of our
products and services, which could adversely affect our
operating results.
Our continued growth depends on our ability to compete
effectively against existing and potential competitors that seek
to provide prepaid cards or other electronic payment products
and services. If we fail to compete effectively against any of
the foregoing threats, our revenues, operating results,
prospects for future growth and overall business could be
materially and adversely affected.
We operate in a highly regulated environment, and failure
by us, the banks that issue our cards or the businesses that
participate in our reload network to comply with applicable laws
and regulations could have an adverse effect on our business,
financial position and results of operations.
We operate in a highly regulated environment, and failure by us,
the banks that issue our cards or the businesses that
participate in our reload network to comply with the laws and
regulations to which we are subject could negatively impact our
business. We are subject to state money transmission licensing
requirements and a wide range of federal and other state laws
and regulations, which are described under
Business Regulation below. In
particular, our products and services are subject to an
increasingly strict set of legal and regulatory requirements
intended to protect consumers and to help detect and prevent
money laundering, terrorist financing and other illicit
activities.
Many of these laws and regulations are evolving, unclear and
inconsistent across various jurisdictions, and ensuring
compliance with them is difficult and costly. For example, with
increasing
13
frequency, federal and state regulators are holding businesses
like ours to higher standards of training, monitoring and
compliance, including monitoring for possible violations of laws
by the businesses that participate in our reload network.
Failure by us or those businesses to comply with the laws and
regulations to which we are subject could result in fines,
penalties or limitations on our ability to conduct our business,
or federal or state actions, any of which could significantly
harm our reputation with consumers and other network
participants, banks that issue our cards and regulators, and
could materially and adversely affect our business, operating
results and financial condition.
Changes in laws and regulations to which we are subject,
or to which we may become subject, may increase our costs of
operation, decrease our operating revenues and disrupt our
business.
Changes in laws and regulations may occur that could increase
our compliance and other costs of doing business, require
significant systems redevelopment, or render our products or
services less profitable or obsolete, any of which could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations. We could face more
stringent anti-money laundering rules and regulations, as well
as more stringent licensing rules and regulations, compliance
with which could be expensive and time consuming.
Changes in laws and regulations governing the way our products
and services are sold could adversely affect our ability to
distribute our products and services and the cost of providing
those products and services. If onerous regulatory requirements
were imposed on the sale of our products and services, the
requirements could lead to a loss of retail distributors, which,
in turn, could materially and adversely impact our operations.
For example, in June 2010, the Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network of the U.S. Department of Treasury published for
comment proposed new rules regarding, among other things, the
applicability of the Bank Secrecy Acts anti-money
laundering provisions to prepaid products such as ours. If
adopted as proposed, these new rules would establish a more
comprehensive regulatory framework for access to prepaid
financial services. As currently drafted, the proposed rules
would significantly change the way customer data, including
identification information, is collected for certain prepaid
products (including our cards) by shifting the point of
collection from us to our retail distributors. We believe that,
if the rules are adopted as currently proposed, we and our
retail distributors would need to modify operational elements of
our product offering to comply with the proposed rules. If we or
any of our retail distributors were unwilling or unable to make
any required operational changes to comply with the proposed
rules as adopted, we would no longer be able to sell our cards
through that noncompliant retail distributor, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial position and
results of operations. However, as the proposed rules are
subject to further comment and revision, it is difficult to
determine with any certainty what obligations the final rules
might impose or what impact they might have on our business or
that of our retail distributors.
State and federal legislators and regulatory authorities have
become increasingly focused on the banking and consumer
financial services industries, and continue to propose and adopt
new legislation that could result in significant adverse changes
in the regulatory landscape for financial institutions
(including card issuing banks) and other financial services
companies (including us). For example, changes in the way we or
the banks that issue our cards are regulated, such as the
changes under the recently-enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, related to
the consolidation of the primary federal regulator for savings
banks with the primary federal regulator for national banks and
the establishment of a federal Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection, or the Bureau, with oversight over us and our
products and services, could expose us and the banks that issue
our cards to increased regulatory oversight, more burdensome
regulation of our business, and increased litigation risk, each
of which could increase our costs and decrease our operating
revenues. Additionally, changes to the limitations placed on
fees, the interchange rates that can be charged or the
disclosures that must be provided with respect to our products
and services could increase our costs and decrease our operating
revenues.
14
Our actual operating results may differ significantly from
our guidance.
From time to time, we may release guidance in our quarterly
earnings releases, quarterly earnings conference calls, or
otherwise, regarding our future performance that represents our
managements estimates as of the date of release. This
guidance, which includes forward-looking statements, is based on
projections prepared by our management. These projections are
not prepared with a view toward compliance with published
guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, and neither our independent registered public
accounting firm nor any other independent expert or outside
party compiles or examines the projections. Accordingly, no such
person expresses any opinion or any other form of assurance with
respect to those projections.
Projections are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates
that, while presented with numerical specificity, are inherently
subject to significant business, economic and competitive
uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our
control and are based upon specific assumptions with respect to
future business decisions, some of which will change. We intend
to state possible outcomes as high and low ranges that are
intended to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are
changed but we can provide no assurances that actual results
will not fall outside of the suggested ranges. The principal
reason that we release guidance is to provide a basis for our
management to discuss our business outlook with analysts and
investors. We do not accept any responsibility for any
projections or reports published by any of these persons.
Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be
expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the
guidance furnished by us will prove to be incorrect or will vary
significantly from actual results. Accordingly, our guidance is
only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of
the date of release. Actual results will vary from our guidance
and the variations may be material. In light of the foregoing,
investors are urged not to rely upon our guidance in making an
investment decision with respect to our Class A common
stock.
Any failure to implement our operating strategy successfully or
the occurrence of any of the events or circumstances set forth
in this Risk Factors section could result in the
actual operating results being different from our guidance, and
such differences may be adverse and material.
Our pending bank acquisition will, if successful, subject
our business to significant new, and potentially changing,
regulatory requirements, which may adversely affect our
business, financial position and results of operations.
If we complete our pending bank acquisition, we will become a
bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956, or BHC Act. As a bank holding company, we will be
required to file periodic reports with, and will be subject to
comprehensive supervision and examination by, the Federal
Reserve Board. Among other things, we and the subsidiary bank we
acquire will be subject to risk-based and leverage capital
requirements, which could adversely affect our results of
operations and restrict our ability to grow. These capital
requirements, as well as other federal laws applicable to banks
and bank holding companies, could also limit our ability to pay
dividends. We also would likely incur additional costs
associated with legal and regulatory compliance as a bank
holding company, which could adversely affect our results of
operations. In addition, as a bank holding company, we would
generally be prohibited from engaging, directly or indirectly,
in any activities other than those permissible for bank holding
companies. This restriction might limit our ability to pursue
future business opportunities we might otherwise consider but
which might fall outside the activities permissible for a bank
holding company. See Business
Regulation Bank Regulations.
Moreover, substantial changes to banking laws and regulations
are possible in the near future. The Dodd-Frank Act made
numerous changes to the regulatory framework governing banking
organizations, and many of the provisions must be implemented by
regulation. These regulations could likewise substantially
affect our business and operations. There are proposals in the
U.S. Congress that could make additional changes to the
regulatory framework affecting our
15
operations. These changes, if they are made, could have an
adverse effect on our business, financial position and results
of operations.
We rely on relationships with card issuing banks to
conduct our business, and our results of operations and
financial position could be materially and adversely affected if
we fail to maintain these relationships or we maintain them
under new terms that are less favorable to us.
Substantially all of our cards are issued by GE Money Bank or
Columbus Bank and Trust Company, a division of Synovus
Bank. Our relationships with these banks are currently, and will
be for the foreseeable future, a critical component of our
ability to conduct our business and to maintain our revenue and
expense structure, because we are currently unable to issue our
own cards, and, even if we consummate our pending bank
acquisition, will be unable to do so for the foreseeable future
at the volume necessary to conduct our business, if at all. If
we lose or do not maintain existing banking relationships, we
would incur significant switching and other costs and expenses
and we and users of our products and services could be
significantly affected, creating contingent liabilities for us.
As a result, the failure to maintain adequate banking
relationships could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. Our
agreements with the banks that issue our cards provide for
revenue-sharing arrangements and cost and expense allocations
between the parties. Changes in the revenue-sharing arrangements
or the costs and expenses that we have to bear under these
relationships could have a material impact on our operating
expenses. In addition, we may be unable to maintain adequate
banking relationships or, following their expiration in 2012 and
2015, renew our agreements with the banks that currently issue
substantially all of our cards under terms at least as favorable
to us as those existing before renewal.
We receive important services from third-party vendors,
including card processing from Total System Services, Inc.
Replacing them would be difficult and disruptive to our
business.
Some services relating to our business, including fraud
management and other customer verification services, transaction
processing and settlement, card production and customer service,
are outsourced to third-party vendors, such as Total System
Services, Inc. for card processing and Genpact International,
Inc. for call center services. It would be difficult to replace
some of our third-party vendors, particularly Total System
Services, in a timely manner if they were unwilling or unable to
provide us with these services in the future, and our business
and operations could be adversely affected.
Changes in credit card association or other network rules
or standards set by Visa and MasterCard, or changes in card
association and debit network fees or products or interchange
rates, could adversely affect our business, financial position
and results of operations.
We and the banks that issue our cards are subject to Visa and
MasterCard association rules that could subject us to a variety
of fines or penalties that may be levied by the card
associations or networks for acts or omissions by us or
businesses that work with us, including card processors, such as
Total Systems Services, Inc. The termination of the card
association registrations held by us or any of the banks that
issue our cards or any changes in card association or other
debit network rules or standards, including interpretation and
implementation of existing rules or standards, that increase the
cost of doing business or limit our ability to provide our
products and services could have an adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition. In
addition, from time to time, card associations increase the
organization
and/or
processing fees that they charge, which could increase our
operating expenses, reduce our profit margin and adversely
affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Furthermore, a substantial portion of our operating revenues is
derived from interchange fees. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, interchange revenues represented 29.8%
of our total operating revenues, and we expect interchange
revenues to continue to represent a significant
16
percentage of our total operating revenues in the near term. The
amount of interchange revenues that we earn is highly dependent
on the interchange rates that Visa and MasterCard set and adjust
from time to time. There is a substantial likelihood that
interchange rates for certain products and certain issuing banks
will decline significantly in the future as a result of the
implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires the Federal
Reserve Board to implement regulations that will likely
substantially limit interchange fees for many issuers. While the
interchange rates that may be earned by us and the bank we
propose to acquire will be unaffected by this new law, there can
be no assurance that future legislation or regulation will not
impact our interchange revenues substantially. If interchange
rates decline, whether due to actions by Visa or MasterCard or
future legislation or regulation, we would likely need to change
our fee structure to compensate for lost interchange revenues.
To the extent we increase the pricing of our products and
services, we might find it more difficult to acquire consumers
and to maintain or grow card usage and customer retention. We
also might have to discontinue certain products or services. As
a result, our operating revenues, operating results, prospects
for future growth and overall business could be materially and
adversely affected.
Our business could suffer if there is a decline in the use
of prepaid cards as a payment mechanism or there are adverse
developments with respect to the prepaid financial services
industry in general.
As the prepaid financial services industry evolves, consumers
may find prepaid financial services to be less attractive than
traditional or other financial services. Consumers might not use
prepaid financial services for any number of reasons, including
the general perception of our industry. For example, negative
publicity surrounding other prepaid financial service providers
could impact our business and prospects for growth to the extent
it adversely impacts the perception of prepaid financial
services among consumers. If consumers do not continue or
increase their usage of prepaid cards, our operating revenues
may remain at current levels or decline. Predictions by industry
analysts and others concerning the growth of prepaid financial
services as an electronic payment mechanism, including those
included in this prospectus, may overstate the growth of an
industry, segment or category, and you should not rely upon
them. The projected growth may not occur or may occur more
slowly than estimated. If consumer acceptance of prepaid
financial services does not continue to develop or develops more
slowly than expected or if there is a shift in the mix of
payment forms, such as cash, credit cards, traditional debit
cards and prepaid cards, away from our products and services, it
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position
and results of operations.
Fraudulent and other illegal activity involving our
products and services could lead to reputational damage to us
and reduce the use and acceptance of our cards and reload
network.
Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to engage
in illegal activities involving our cards or cardholder
information, such as counterfeiting, fraudulent payment or
refund schemes and identity theft. We rely upon third parties
for some transaction processing services, which subjects us and
our cardholders to risks related to the vulnerabilities of those
third parties. A single significant incident of fraud, or
increases in the overall level of fraud, involving our cards and
other products and services, could result in reputational damage
to us, which could reduce the use and acceptance of our cards
and other products and services, cause retail distributors or
network acceptance members to cease doing business with us or
lead to greater regulation that would increase our compliance
costs.
A data security breach could expose us to liability and
protracted and costly litigation, and could adversely affect our
reputation and operating revenues.
We, the banks that issue our cards and our retail distributors,
network acceptance members and third-party processors receive,
transmit and store confidential customer and other information
in connection with the sale and use of our prepaid financial
services. Our encryption software and the other technologies we
use to provide security for storage, processing and transmission
of confidential
17
customer and other information may not be effective to protect
against data security breaches by third parties. The risk of
unauthorized circumvention of our security measures has been
heightened by advances in computer capabilities and the
increasing sophistication of hackers. The banks that issue our
cards and our retail distributors, network acceptance members
and third-party processors also may experience similar security
breaches involving the receipt, transmission and storage of our
confidential customer and other information. Improper access to
our or these third parties systems or databases could
result in the theft, publication, deletion or modification of
confidential customer and other information.
A data security breach of the systems on which sensitive
cardholder data and account information are stored could lead to
fraudulent activity involving our products and services,
reputational damage and claims or regulatory actions against us.
If we are sued in connection with any data security breach, we
could be involved in protracted and costly litigation. If
unsuccessful in defending that litigation, we might be forced to
pay damages
and/or
change our business practices or pricing structure, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on our operating revenues
and profitability. We would also likely have to pay (or
indemnify the banks that issue our cards for) fines, penalties
and/or other
assessments imposed by Visa or MasterCard as a result of any
data security breach. Further, a significant data security
breach could lead to additional regulation, which could impose
new and costly compliance obligations. In addition, a data
security breach at one of the banks that issue our cards or at
our retail distributors, network acceptance members or
third-party processors could result in significant reputational
harm to us and cause the use and acceptance of our cards to
decline, either of which could have a significant adverse impact
on our operating revenues and future growth prospects.
Litigation or investigations could result in significant
settlements, fines or penalties.
We have been the subject of general litigation and regulatory
oversight in the past, and could be the subject of litigation,
including class actions, and regulatory or judicial proceedings
or investigations in the future. The outcome of litigation and
regulatory or judicial proceedings or investigations is
difficult to predict. Plaintiffs or regulatory agencies in these
matters may seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts
or seek to have aspects of our business suspended or modified.
The monetary and other impact of these actions may remain
unknown for substantial periods of time. The cost to defend,
settle or otherwise resolve these matters may be significant.
If regulatory or judicial proceedings or investigations were to
be initiated against us by private or governmental entities, our
business, results of operations and financial condition could be
adversely affected. Adverse publicity that may be associated
with regulatory or judicial proceedings or investigations could
negatively impact our relationships with retail distributors,
network acceptance members and card processors and decrease
acceptance and use of, and loyalty to, our products and related
services.
We must adequately protect our brand and the intellectual
property rights related to our products and services and avoid
infringing on the proprietary rights of others.
The Green Dot brand is important to our business, and we utilize
trademark registrations and other means to protect it. Our
business would be harmed if we were unable to protect our brand
against infringement and its value was to decrease as a result.
We rely on a combination of trademark and copyright laws, trade
secret protection and confidentiality and license agreements to
protect the intellectual property rights related to our products
and services. We may unknowingly violate the intellectual
property or other proprietary rights of others and, thus, may be
subject to claims by third parties. If so, we may be required to
devote significant time and resources to defending against these
claims or to protecting and enforcing our own rights. Some of
our intellectual property rights may not be protected by
intellectual property laws, particularly in foreign
jurisdictions. The loss of our intellectual property or the
inability to secure or enforce our
18
intellectual property rights or to defend successfully against
an infringement action could harm our business, results of
operations, financial condition and prospects.
We are exposed to losses from cardholder account
overdrafts.
Our cardholders can incur charges in excess of the funds
available in their accounts, and we may become liable for these
overdrafts. While we decline authorization attempts for amounts
that exceed the available balance in a cardholders
account, the application of card association rules, the timing
of the settlement of transactions and the assessment of the
cards monthly maintenance fee, among other things, can
result in overdrawn accounts.
Maintenance fee assessment overdrafts accounted for
approximately 94% of aggregate overdrawn account balances in the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. Maintenance fee
assessment overdrafts occur as a result of our charging a
cardholder, pursuant to the cards terms and conditions,
the monthly maintenance fee at a time when he or she does not
have sufficient funds in his or her account. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates Reserve for
Uncollectible Overdrawn Accounts.
Our remaining overdraft exposure arises primarily from
late-posting. A late-post occurs when a merchant posts a
transaction within a card association-permitted timeframe but
subsequent to our release of the authorization for that
transaction, as permitted by card association rules. Under card
association rules, we may be liable for the amount of the
transaction even if the cardholder has made additional purchases
in the intervening period and funds are no longer available on
the card at the time the transaction is posted.
Overdrawn account balances are funded on our behalf by the bank
that issued the overdrawn card. We are responsible to this card
issuing bank for any losses associated with these overdrafts.
Overdrawn account balances are therefore deemed to be our
receivables due from cardholders. We maintain reserves to cover
the risk that we may not recover these receivables due from our
cardholders, but our exposure may increase above these reserves
for a variety of reasons, including our failure to predict the
actual recovery rate accurately. To the extent we incur losses
from overdrafts above our reserves or we determine that it is
necessary to increase our reserves substantially, our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be
materially and adversely affected.
We face settlement risks from our retail distributors,
which may increase during an economic downturn.
The vast majority of our business is conducted through retail
distributors that sell our products and services to consumers at
their store locations. Our retail distributors collect funds
from the consumers who purchase our products and services and
then must remit these funds directly to accounts established on
behalf of these consumers at the banks that issue our cards. The
remittance of these funds by the retail distributor takes on
average three business days. If a retail distributor becomes
insolvent, files for bankruptcy, commits fraud or otherwise
fails to remit proceeds to the card issuing bank from the sales
of our products and services, we are liable for any amounts owed
to the card issuing bank. As of September 30, 2010, we had
assets subject to settlement risk of $11.8 million. Given
the unprecedented volatility in global financial markets and the
frequent occurrence of negative economic events, the approaches
we use to assess and monitor the creditworthiness of our retail
distributors may be inadequate, and we may be unable to detect
and take steps to mitigate an increased credit risk in a timely
manner.
A further economic downturn could result in settlement losses,
whether or not directly related to our business. We are not
insured against these risks. Significant settlement losses could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
19
Future acquisitions or investments could disrupt our
business and harm our financial condition.
We are in the process of acquiring a bank holding company and
its subsidiary commercial bank, although we cannot guarantee
when, if ever, this acquisition will be completed. In addition,
we may pursue other acquisitions or investments that we believe
will help us to achieve our strategic objectives. The process of
integrating an acquired business, product or technology can
create unforeseen operating difficulties, expenditures and other
challenges such as:
|
|
|
|
|
increased regulatory and compliance requirements, including, if
we complete our pending bank acquisition, capital requirements
applicable to us and our acquired subsidiary bank;
|
|
|
|
implementation or remediation of controls, procedures and
policies at the acquired company;
|
|
|
|
diversion of management time and focus from operation of our
then-existing business to acquisition integration challenges;
|
|
|
|
coordination of product, sales, marketing and program and
systems management functions;
|
|
|
|
transition of the acquired companys users and customers
onto our systems;
|
|
|
|
retention of employees from the acquired company;
|
|
|
|
integrating employees from the acquired company into our
organization;
|
|
|
|
integration of the acquired companys accounting,
information management, human resource and other administrative
systems and operations generally with ours;
|
|
|
|
liability for activities of the acquired company prior to the
acquisition, including violations of law, commercial disputes,
and tax and other known and unknown liabilities; and
|
|
|
|
litigation or other claims in connection with the acquired
company, including claims brought by terminated employees,
customers, former stockholders or other third parties.
|
If we are unable to address these difficulties and challenges or
other problems encountered in connection with our bank
acquisition or any future acquisition or investment, we might
not realize the anticipated benefits of that acquisition or
investment, we might incur unanticipated liabilities or we might
otherwise suffer harm to our business generally.
To the extent we pay the consideration for any future
acquisitions or investments in cash, it would reduce the amount
of cash available to us for other purposes. Future acquisitions
or investments could also result in dilutive issuances of our
equity securities or the incurrence of debt, contingent
liabilities, amortization expenses, or impairment charges
against goodwill on our balance sheet, any of which could harm
our financial condition and negatively impact our stockholders.
Economic, political and other conditions may adversely
affect trends in consumer spending.
The electronic payments industry, including the prepaid
financial services segment within that industry, depends heavily
upon the overall level of consumer spending. Sustained
deterioration in general economic conditions in the United
States might reduce the number of our cards that are purchased
or reloaded, the number of transactions involving our cards and
the use of our reload network and related services. If general
economic conditions result in a sustained reduction in the use
of our products and related services, either as a result of a
general reduction in consumer spending or as a result of a
disproportionate reduction in the use of card-based payment
systems, our business, results of operations and financial
condition would be materially harmed.
20
Our business is dependent on the efficient and
uninterrupted operation of computer network systems and data
centers.
Our ability to provide reliable service to cardholders and other
network participants depends on the efficient and uninterrupted
operation of our computer network systems and data centers as
well as those of our retail distributors, network acceptance
members and third-party processors. Our business involves
movement of large sums of money, processing of large numbers of
transactions and management of the data necessary to do both.
Our success depends upon the efficient and error-free handling
of the money that is collected by our retail distributors and
remitted to network acceptance members or the banks that issue
our cards. We rely on the ability of our employees, systems and
processes and those of the banks that issue our cards, our
retail distributors, our network acceptance members and
third-party processors to process and facilitate these
transactions in an efficient, uninterrupted and error-free
manner.
In the event of a breakdown, a catastrophic event (such as fire,
natural disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure or
physical break-in), a security breach or malicious attack, an
improper operation or any other event impacting our systems or
processes, or those of our vendors, or an improper action by our
employees, agents or third-party vendors, we could suffer
financial loss, loss of customers, regulatory sanctions and
damage to our reputation. The measures we have taken, including
the implementation of disaster recovery plans and redundant
computer systems, may not be successful, and we may experience
other problems unrelated to system failures. We may also
experience software defects, development delays and installation
difficulties, any of which could harm our business and
reputation and expose us to potential liability and increased
operating expenses. Some of our contracts with retail
distributors, including our contract with Walmart, contain
service level standards pertaining to the operation of our
systems, and provide the retail distributor with the right to
collect damages and potentially to terminate its contract with
us for system downtime exceeding stated limits. If we face
system interruptions or failures, our business interruption
insurance may not be adequate to cover the losses or damages
that we incur.
We must be able to operate and scale our technology
effectively to match our business growth.
Our ability to continue to provide our products and services to
a growing number of network participants, as well as to enhance
our existing products and services and offer new products and
services, is dependent on our information technology systems. If
we are unable to manage the technology associated with our
business effectively, we could experience increased costs,
reductions in system availability and losses of our network
participants. Any failure of our systems in scalability and
functionality would adversely impact our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to keep pace with the rapid technological
developments in our industry and the larger electronic payments
industry necessary to continue providing our network acceptance
members and cardholders with new and innovative products and
services, the use of our cards and other products and services
could decline.
The electronic payments industry is subject to rapid and
significant technological changes, including continuing
advancements in the areas of radio frequency and proximity
payment devices (such as contactless cards),
e-commerce
and mobile commerce, among others. We cannot predict the effect
of technological changes on our business. We rely in part on
third parties, including some of our competitors and potential
competitors, for the development of, and access to, new
technologies. We expect that new services and technologies
applicable to our industry will continue to emerge, and these
new services and technologies may be superior to, or render
obsolete, the technologies we currently utilize in our products
and services. Additionally, we may make future investments in,
or enter into strategic alliances to develop, new technologies
and services or to implement infrastructure change to further
our strategic objectives, strengthen our existing businesses and
remain competitive. However, our ability to transition to new
services and technologies that we develop may be inhibited
21
by a lack of industry-wide standards, by resistance from our
retail distributors, network acceptance members, third-party
processors or consumers to these changes, or by the intellectual
property rights of third parties. Our future success will
depend, in part, on our ability to develop new technologies and
adapt to technological changes and evolving industry standards.
These initiatives are inherently risky, and they may not be
successful or may have an adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
As a newly public company, we are subject to financial and
other reporting and corporate governance requirements that may
be difficult for us to satisfy, and which have raised and may
continue to raise our costs and which have diverted and may
continue to divert resources and management attention from
operating our business.
We have historically operated as a private company. On
July 27, 2010, we completed an initial public offering. As
a result, we are required to file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or SEC, annual and quarterly information
and other reports that are specified in the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and SEC
regulations. Thus, we must be certain that we have the ability
to prepare on a timely basis financial statements that comply
with SEC reporting requirements. We are also subject to other
reporting and corporate governance requirements, including the
listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE,
and the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the regulations promulgated thereunder,
which impose significant new compliance obligations upon us. As
a public company, we are required, among other things, to:
|
|
|
|
|
prepare and distribute periodic reports and other stockholder
communications in compliance with our obligations under the
federal securities laws and the NYSE rules;
|
|
|
|
define and expand the roles and the duties of our board of
directors and its committees;
|
|
|
|
institute more comprehensive compliance, investor relations and
internal audit functions;
|
|
|
|
evaluate and maintain our system of internal control over
financial reporting, and report on managements assessment
thereof, in compliance with the requirements of Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules and regulations of
the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board; and
|
|
|
|
involve and retain outside legal counsel and accountants in
connection with the activities listed above.
|
The adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting
must be assessed by management for each year commencing with the
year ending December 31, 2011. We do not currently have
comprehensive documentation of our internal control over
financial reporting, nor do we document our compliance with
these controls on a periodic basis in accordance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act. Furthermore, we
have not tested our internal control over financial reporting in
accordance with Section 404 and, due to our lack of
documentation, this testing would not be possible at this time.
If we were unable to implement the controls and procedures
required by Section 404 in a timely manner or otherwise to
comply with Section 404, management might not be able to
certify, and our independent registered public accounting firm
might not be able to report on, the adequacy of our internal
control over financial reporting. If we are unable to maintain
adequate internal control over financial reporting, we might be
unable to report our financial information on a timely basis and
might suffer adverse regulatory consequences or violate NYSE
listing standards. There could also be a negative reaction in
the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us
and the reliability of our financial statements.
The changes necessitated by becoming a public company require a
significant commitment of resources and management oversight
that has increased and may continue to increase our costs and
might place a strain on our systems and resources. As a result,
our managements attention might be diverted from other
business concerns. In addition, we might not be successful in
implementing and
22
maintaining controls and procedures that comply with these
requirements. For example, in connection with the audit of our
consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ended
July 31, 2009, we identified a significant deficiency in
our internal control over financial reporting relating to our
financial statement closing process and the need to enhance our
financial reporting resources and infrastructure. If we fail to
maintain an effective internal control environment or to comply
with the numerous legal and regulatory requirements imposed on
public companies, we could make material errors in, and be
required to restate, our financial statements. Any such
restatement could result in a loss of public confidence in the
reliability of our financial statements and sanctions imposed on
us by the SEC.
Our future success depends on our ability to attract,
integrate, retain and incentivize key personnel.
Our future success will depend, to a significant extent, on our
ability to attract, integrate, retain and incentivize key
personnel, namely our management team and experienced sales,
marketing and program and systems management personnel. We must
retain and motivate existing personnel, and we must also
attract, assimilate and motivate additional highly-qualified
employees. We may experience difficulty assimilating our
newly-hired personnel, which may adversely affect our business.
Competition for qualified management, sales, marketing and
program and systems management personnel can be intense.
Competitors have in the past and may in the future attempt to
recruit our top management and employees. If we fail to attract,
integrate, retain and incentivize key personnel, our ability to
manage and grow our business could be harmed.
We might require additional capital to support our
business in the future, and this capital might not be available
on acceptable terms, or at all.
If our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents balances and any
cash generated from operations are not sufficient to meet our
future cash requirements, we will need to access additional
capital to fund our operations. We may also need to raise
additional capital to take advantage of new business or
acquisition opportunities. We may seek to raise capital by,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
issuing additional shares of our Class A common stock or
other equity securities;
|
|
|
|
issuing debt securities; and
|
|
|
|
borrowing funds under a credit facility.
|
We may not be able to raise needed cash in a timely basis on
terms acceptable to us or at all. Financings, if available, may
be on terms that are dilutive or potentially dilutive to our
stockholders. The holders of new securities may also receive
rights, preferences or privileges that are senior to those of
existing holders of our Class A common stock. In addition,
if we were to raise cash through a debt financing, the terms of
the financing might impose additional conditions or restrictions
on our operations that could adversely affect our business. If
we require new sources of financing but they are insufficient or
unavailable, we would be required to modify our operating plans
to take into account the limitations of available funding, which
would harm our ability to maintain or grow our business.
The occurrence of catastrophic events could damage our
facilities or the facilities of third parties on which we
depend, which could force us to curtail our operations.
We and some of the third-party service providers on which we
depend for various support functions, such as customer service
and card processing, are vulnerable to damage from catastrophic
events, such as power loss, natural disasters, terrorism and
similar unforeseen events beyond our control. Our principal
offices, for example, are situated in the foothills of southern
California near known earthquake fault zones and areas of
elevated wild fire danger. If any catastrophic event were to
occur, our ability to operate our business could be seriously
impaired, as we do not maintain redundant systems for critical
business functions, such as finance and accounting. In addition,
we
23
might not have adequate insurance to cover our losses resulting
from catastrophic events or other significant business
interruptions. Any significant losses that are not recoverable
under our insurance policies, as well as the damage to, or
interruption of, our infrastructure and processes, could
seriously impair our business and financial condition.
Risks Related to
Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock and This
Offering
The price of our Class A common stock may be
volatile, and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
In the recent past, stocks generally, and financial services
company stocks in particular, have experienced high levels of
volatility. The trading price of our Class A common stock
may fluctuate substantially. The trading price of our
Class A common stock depends on a number of factors,
including those described in this Risk Factors
section, many of which are beyond our control and may not be
related to our operating performance. These fluctuations could
cause you to lose all or part of your investment in our
Class A common stock as you may be unable to sell your
shares at or above the price you paid in this offering. Factors
that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our
Class A common stock include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from
time to time;
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market prices and trading volumes
of financial services company stocks;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in our results of operations or
fluctuations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in the expectations of investors
or the recommendations of any securities analysts who follow our
Class A common stock;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated developments in our business or our
competitors businesses or the competitive landscape
generally;
|
|
|
|
the publics reaction to our press releases, other public
announcements and filings with the SEC;
|
|
|
|
litigation involving us, our industry or both or investigations
by regulators into our operations or those of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws
or regulations applicable to our business;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidelines,
interpretations or principles;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions; and
|
|
|
|
sales of shares of our Class A common stock by us or our
stockholders.
|
In the past, many companies that have experienced volatility in
the market price of their stock have become subject to
securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this
type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against
us could result in substantial costs and divert our
managements attention from other business concerns, which
could seriously harm our business.
Concentration of ownership among our existing directors,
executive officers and principal stockholders may prevent new
investors from influencing significant corporate
decisions.
Our Class B common stock has ten votes per share and our
Class A common stock, which is the stock being sold in this
offering, has one vote per share. Assuming the
underwriters option to purchase additional shares is not
exercised, based upon beneficial ownership as of
September 30, 2010, after giving effect to the issuance
of shares
of Class B common stock to be acquired by certain selling
stockholders through option exercises at the closing of this
offering in order to sell
24
the underlying shares of Class A common stock in this
offering, following this offering, our current directors,
executive officers, holders of more than 5% of our total shares
of common stock outstanding and their respective affiliates
will, in the aggregate, beneficially own
approximately % of our outstanding
Class A and Class B common stock, representing
approximately % of the voting power
of our outstanding capital stock. As a result, these
stockholders are able to exercise a controlling influence over
matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election
of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions,
and have significant influence over our management and policies
for the foreseeable future. Some of these persons or entities
may have interests that are different from yours. For example,
these stockholders may support proposals and actions with which
you may disagree or which are not in your interests. The
concentration of ownership could delay or prevent a change in
control of our company or otherwise discourage a potential
acquirer from attempting to obtain control of our company, which
in turn could reduce the price of our Class A common stock.
In addition, these stockholders, some of which have
representatives sitting on our board of directors, could use
their voting control to maintain our existing management and
directors in office, delay or prevent changes of control of our
company, or support or reject other management and board of
director proposals that are subject to stockholder approval,
such as amendments to our employee stock plans and approvals of
significant financing transactions. See Description of
Capital Stock Anti-Takeover Provisions.
Our stock price could decline due to the large number of
outstanding shares of our common stock becoming eligible for
sale in the near future.
Sales of substantial amounts of our Class A common stock in
the public market, or even the perception that these sales could
occur, could cause the trading price of our Class A common
stock to decline. These sales could also make it more difficult
for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future
at a time and price that we deem appropriate.
Our Class A common stock began trading on the NYSE on
July 22, 2010; however, to date there have been a limited
number of shares trading in the public market. Upon completion
of this offering, we will have
outstanding shares
of our Class A common stock, assuming no exercise of
outstanding options or warrants after September 30, 2010
(other than as described below) and based on the number of
shares outstanding as of September 30, 2010 after giving
effect to the issuance
of shares
of our Class B common stock to be acquired by certain
selling stockholders through option exercises at the closing of
this offering in order to sell the underlying shares of
Class A common stock in this offering. The shares sold in
this offering will be immediately tradable without restriction.
Of the remaining shares:
|
|
|
|
|
No restricted shares will be eligible for sale in the public
market immediately upon completion of this offering;
|
|
|
|
shares
will be eligible for sale in the public market beginning on
January 18, 2011, when
lock-up
and/or
market standoff agreements entered into prior to our initial
public offering are scheduled to expire, subject in some cases
to the volume and other restrictions of Rule 144 and
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Act;
|
|
|
|
shares
will become eligible for sale in the public market from time to
time beginning on January 18, 2011 upon the lapse of our
right of repurchase with respect to any unvested shares, of
which
are held by a stockholder who has entered into
lock-up
agreements for this offering, as described below; and
|
|
|
|
shares
will be eligible for sale in the public market upon the
expiration of
lock-up
agreements for this offering, as described below.
|
The lock-up
and market standoff agreements entered into prior to our initial
public offering generally expire on January 18, 2011,
except that with respect to the
lock-up
agreements the expiration date may be extended for up to 34
additional days under specified circumstances where we
25
announce or pre-announce earnings or a material event occurs
within 17 days prior to, or 16 days after, the
termination of the
180-day
period. The
lock-up
agreements for this offering expire 90 days after the date
of this prospectus, except the
90-day
period may be extended for up to 34 additional days under
specified circumstances where we announce or pre-announce
earnings or a material event occurs within 17 days prior
to, or 16 days after, the termination of the
90-day
period. The representatives of the underwriters may, in their
sole discretion and at any time without notice, release all or
any portion of the securities subject to
lock-up
agreements.
Pursuant to the terms of our ninth amended and restated
registration rights agreement, immediately following this
offering, the holders of
approximately shares
of our Class A and Class B common stock and warrants
to purchase our Class B common stock will be entitled to
rights with respect to the registration of these shares under
the Securities Act. See Description of Capital
Stock Registration Rights. If we register the
resale of their shares following the expiration of the
lock-up
agreement, these stockholders could sell those shares in the
public market without being subject to the volume and other
restrictions of Rules 144 and 701.
In addition, we have registered 7,473,464 shares of our
Class A and Class B common stock subject to options
outstanding or reserved for future issuance under our stock
incentive plans. Of these shares, approximately
3,600,000 shares will be eligible for sale upon the
exercise of vested options immediately after the expiration of
the lock-up
and market standoff agreements entered into prior to our initial
public offering. In addition, the shares subject to an unvested
warrant to purchase up to 4,283,456 shares of our
Class B common stock will be eligible for sale after the
expiration of
lock-up
and/or
market standoff agreements entered into prior to our initial
public offering.
Our charter documents and Delaware law could discourage,
delay or prevent a takeover that stockholders consider favorable
and could also reduce the market price of our stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions
that could delay or prevent a change in control of our company.
These provisions could also make it more difficult for
stockholders to nominate directors for election to our board of
directors and take other corporate actions. These provisions,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
provide our Class B common stock with disproportionate
voting rights (see Concentration of ownership
among our existing directors, executive officers and principal
stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing
significant corporate decisions above);
|
|
|
|
provide for non-cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
provide for a classified board of directors;
|
|
|
|
authorize our board of directors, without stockholder approval,
to issue preferred stock with terms determined by our board of
directors and to issue additional shares of our Class A and
Class B common stock;
|
|
|
|
limit the voting power of a holder, or group of affiliated
holders, of more than 24.9% of our common stock to 14.9%, if we
become a bank holding company;
|
|
|
|
provide that only our board of directors may set the number of
directors constituting our board of directors or fill vacant
directorships;
|
|
|
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent and limit who may
call a special meeting of stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
require advance notification of stockholder nominations for
election to our board of directors and of stockholder proposals.
|
These and other provisions in our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws, as well as provisions under Delaware law, could
discourage potential takeover attempts, reduce the price that
investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of
our Class A common stock and result in the trading price of
26
our Class A common stock being lower than it otherwise
would be. See Description of Capital Stock,
including Preferred Stock and
Anti-Takeover Provisions.
If securities analysts do not continue to publish research
or reports about our business or if they publish negative
evaluations of our Class A common stock, the trading price
of our Class A common stock could decline.
We expect that the trading price for our Class A common
stock will be affected by any research or reports that
securities analysts publish about us or our business. If one or
more of the analysts who currently cover us or our business
downgrade their evaluations of our Class A common stock,
the price of our Class A common stock would likely decline.
If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company,
we could lose visibility in the market for our Class A
common stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to
decline.
We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable
future.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings and do
not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
Should we complete our proposed acquisition of a bank holding
company and its subsidiary commercial bank, as a bank holding
company, our ability to pay future dividends could be limited by
the capital requirements imposed under the BHC Act, as well as
other federal laws applicable to banks and bank holding
companies. As a result, you will likely receive a return on your
investment in our Class A common stock only if the market
price of our Class A common stock increases.
27
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In addition to historical information, this prospectus contains
forward-looking statements. We may, in some cases, use words,
such as project, believe,
anticipate, plan, expect,
estimate, intend, continue,
should, would, could,
potentially, will or may, or
other similar words and expressions that convey uncertainty
about future events or outcomes to identify these
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this
prospectus include, among other things, statements about:
|
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding our operating revenues, expenses,
effective tax rates and other results of operations;
|
|
|
|
our anticipated capital expenditures and our estimates regarding
our capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
our liquidity and working capital requirements;
|
|
|
|
our need to obtain additional funding and our ability to obtain
future funding on acceptable terms;
|
|
|
|
the impact of seasonality on our business;
|
|
|
|
the growth rates of the markets in which we compete;
|
|
|
|
our anticipated strategies for growth and sources of new
operating revenues;
|
|
|
|
maintaining and expanding our customer base and our
relationships with retail distributors and network acceptance
members;
|
|
|
|
our ability to anticipate market needs and develop new and
enhanced products and services to meet those needs;
|
|
|
|
our current and future products, services, applications and
functionality and plans to promote them;
|
|
|
|
anticipated trends and challenges in our business and in the
markets in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
the evolution of technology affecting our products, services and
markets;
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain and hire necessary employees and to staff
our operations appropriately;
|
|
|
|
management compensation and the methodology for its
determination;
|
|
|
|
our ability to find future acquisition opportunities on
favorable terms or at all and to manage any acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to complete our pending bank acquisition and our
expectations regarding the benefits of doing so;
|
|
|
|
our efforts to make our business more vertically integrated;
|
|
|
|
our ability to compete in our industry and innovation by our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
our ability to stay abreast of new or modified laws and
regulations that currently apply or become applicable to our
business;
|
|
|
|
estimates and estimate methodologies used in preparing our
consolidated financial statements and determining option
exercise prices; and
|
|
|
|
the future trading prices of our Class A common stock and
the impact of any securities analysts reports on these
prices.
|
The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking
statements is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the results anticipated by these forward-looking
statements. These risks, uncertainties and factors include those
we discuss in this prospectus under the caption Risk
Factors. You should read these
28
risk factors and the other cautionary statements made in this
prospectus as being applicable to all related forward-looking
statements wherever they appear in this prospectus.
The forward-looking statements made in this prospectus relate
only to events as of the date on which the statements are made.
We undertake no obligation to update publicly any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as required by
law.
INDUSTRY AND
MARKET DATA
This prospectus also contains estimates and other statistical
data, including those relating to market size, transaction
volumes, demographic groups and growth rates of the markets in
which we participate, that we have obtained from industry
publications and reports. These industry publications and
reports generally indicate that they have obtained their
information from sources believed to be reliable, but do not
guarantee the accuracy and completeness of their information.
This information involves a number of assumptions and
limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to
these estimates, as there is no assurance that any of them will
be reached. Although we have not independently verified the
accuracy or completeness of the data contained in these industry
publications and reports, based on our industry experience we
believe that the publications and reports are reliable and that
the conclusions contained in the publications and reports are
reasonable.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
The selling stockholders are selling all of the shares in this
offering. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of
shares of our Class A common stock by the selling
stockholders.
MARKET PRICE OF
CLASS A COMMON STOCK
Our Class A common stock has been listed on the NYSE under
the symbol GDOT since July 22, 2010. Prior to
that date, there was no public trading market for our
Class A common stock. Our initial public offering was
priced at $36.00 per share on July 21, 2010. The following
table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low
sales prices per share of our Class A common stock as
reported on the NYSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter (beginning July 22, 2010)
|
|
$
|
41.13
|
|
|
$
|
54.24
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through November 8, 2010)
|
|
$
|
44.50
|
|
|
$
|
55.50
|
|
On November 8, 2010, the last reported sale price of our
Class A common stock on the NYSE was $53.96 per share.
As of September 30, 2010, we had three holders of record of
our Class A common stock and 194 holders of record of
our Class B common stock. The actual number of stockholders
is greater than this number of record holders, and includes
stockholders who are beneficial owners, but whose shares are
held in street name by brokers and other nominees. This number
of holders of record also does not include stockholders whose
shares may be held in trust by other entities.
29
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock, and we do not currently intend to pay any cash dividends
on our Class A common stock for the foreseeable future.
Should we complete our proposed acquisition of a bank holding
company and its subsidiary commercial bank, as a bank holding
company, the Federal Reserve Boards risk-based and
leverage capital requirements, as well as other federal laws
applicable to banks and bank holding companies, could limit our
ability to pay dividends. See Business
Regulation Bank Regulations below. We expect
to retain future earnings, if any, to fund the development and
growth of our business. Any future determination to pay
dividends on our Class A common stock, if permissible, will
be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend
upon, among other factors, our financial condition, operating
results, current and anticipated cash needs, plans for expansion
and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
30
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables present selected historical financial data
for our business. You should read this information together with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements, related notes and other financial
information, each included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
selected consolidated financial data in this section are not
intended to replace the financial statements and are qualified
in their entirety by the consolidated financial statements and
related notes.
We derived the statement of operations data for the years ended
July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the five months ended
December 31, 2009, and the balance sheet data as of
July 31, 2008 and 2009 and December 31, 2009, from our
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. We derived the balance sheet data as of
July 31, 2007 from our audited consolidated financial
statements not included in this prospectus. We derived the
statement of operations data for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010 and the balance sheet data as
of September 30, 2010 from our unaudited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We
derived the statement of operations data for the years ended
July 31, 2005 and 2006 and the balance sheet data as of
July 31, 2005 and 2006 from our unaudited consolidated
financial statements not included in this prospectus. In the
opinion of our management, our unaudited financial data reflect
all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair statement of our results for those periods.
Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our
results to be expected in any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
$
|
21,771
|
|
|
$
|
36,359
|
|
|
$
|
45,717
|
|
|
$
|
91,233
|
|
|
$
|
119,356
|
|
|
$
|
50,895
|
|
|
$
|
93,011
|
|
|
$
|
124,978
|
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
12,064
|
|
|
|
20,616
|
|
|
|
25,419
|
|
|
|
45,310
|
|
|
|
62,396
|
|
|
|
30,509
|
|
|
|
49,383
|
|
|
|
73,630
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
9,975
|
|
|
|
12,488
|
|
|
|
31,583
|
|
|
|
53,064
|
|
|
|
31,353
|
|
|
|
46,554
|
|
|
|
81,106
|
|
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
39,540
|
|
|
|
66,951
|
|
|
|
83,624
|
|
|
|
168,126
|
|
|
|
234,816
|
|
|
|
112,757
|
|
|
|
188,948
|
|
|
|
272,041
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
19,148
|
|
|
|
28,660
|
|
|
|
38,838
|
|
|
|
69,577
|
|
|
|
75,786
|
|
|
|
31,333
|
|
|
|
52,430
|
|
|
|
87,777
|
|
Compensation and benefits expenses(1)
|
|
|
11,584
|
|
|
|
18,499
|
|
|
|
20,610
|
|
|
|
28,303
|
|
|
|
40,096
|
|
|
|
26,610
|
|
|
|
32,827
|
|
|
|
50,474
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
6,990
|
|
|
|
8,547
|
|
|
|
9,809
|
|
|
|
21,944
|
|
|
|
32,320
|
|
|
|
17,480
|
|
|
|
27,092
|
|
|
|
43,131
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,521
|
|
|
|
10,077
|
|
|
|
13,212
|
|
|
|
19,124
|
|
|
|
22,944
|
|
|
|
14,020
|
|
|
|
18,721
|
|
|
|
33,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
44,243
|
|
|
|
65,783
|
|
|
|
82,469
|
|
|
|
138,948
|
|
|
|
171,146
|
|
|
|
89,443
|
|
|
|
131,070
|
|
|
|
215,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(4,703
|
)
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
29,178
|
|
|
|
63,670
|
|
|
|
23,314
|
|
|
|
57,878
|
|
|
|
56,662
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
29,596
|
|
|
|
64,065
|
|
|
|
23,427
|
|
|
|
58,054
|
|
|
|
56,883
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
|
12,261
|
|
|
|
26,902
|
|
|
|
9,764
|
|
|
|
24,344
|
|
|
|
22,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
17,335
|
|
|
|
37,163
|
|
|
|
13,663
|
|
|
|
33,710
|
|
|
|
34,294
|
|
Dividends, accretion and allocated earnings of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
(5,157
|
)
|
|
|
(13,650
|
)
|
|
|
(29,000
|
)
|
|
|
(9,170
|
)
|
|
|
(22,886
|
)
|
|
|
(16,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
(510
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,685
|
|
|
$
|
8,163
|
|
|
$
|
4,493
|
|
|
$
|
10,824
|
|
|
$
|
18,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
Weighted-average common shares issued and outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
|
|
10,873
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
10,757
|
|
|
|
12,036
|
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
|
|
12,046
|
|
|
|
18,232
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Weighted-average diluted common shares issued and outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,884
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
14,154
|
|
|
|
15,712
|
|
|
|
15,425
|
|
|
|
15,545
|
|
|
|
21,441
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP total operating revenues(2)(4)
|
|
$
|
39,540
|
|
|
$
|
66,951
|
|
|
$
|
83,624
|
|
|
$
|
168,126
|
|
|
$
|
234,816
|
|
|
$
|
112,757
|
|
|
$
|
188,948
|
|
|
$
|
279,714
|
|
Non-GAAP net income(3)(4)
|
|
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
5,204
|
|
|
|
18,062
|
|
|
|
38,594
|
|
|
|
17,617
|
|
|
|
34,860
|
|
|
|
42,083
|
|
Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share(3)(4)
|
|
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(4)(5)
|
|
|
(3,492
|
)
|
|
|
3,214
|
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
34,825
|
|
|
|
70,731
|
|
|
|
32,350
|
|
|
|
63,413
|
|
|
|
74,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
As of July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(6)
|
|
$
|
15,619
|
|
|
$
|
16,670
|
|
|
$
|
14,991
|
|
|
$
|
41,613
|
|
|
$
|
41,931
|
|
|
$
|
71,684
|
|
|
$
|
140,744
|
|
Settlement assets(7)
|
|
|
8,590
|
|
|
|
12,868
|
|
|
|
15,412
|
|
|
|
17,445
|
|
|
|
35,570
|
|
|
|
42,569
|
|
|
|
11,784
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
30,436
|
|
|
|
42,626
|
|
|
|
56,441
|
|
|
|
97,246
|
|
|
|
123,269
|
|
|
|
183,108
|
|
|
|
213,379
|
|
Settlement obligations(7)
|
|
|
7,355
|
|
|
|
8,933
|
|
|
|
12,916
|
|
|
|
17,445
|
|
|
|
35,570
|
|
|
|
42,569
|
|
|
|
11,784
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
6,769
|
|
|
|
5,030
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
25,271
|
|
|
|
37,004
|
|
|
|
45,237
|
|
|
|
65,962
|
|
|
|
81,031
|
|
|
|
111,744
|
|
|
|
92,914
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,336
|
|
|
|
26,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
5,165
|
|
|
|
5,623
|
|
|
|
(11,130
|
)
|
|
|
4,468
|
|
|
|
42,238
|
|
|
|
71,364
|
|
|
|
120,465
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense of $0, $0, $156,000,
$1.2 million and $2.5 million for the years ended
July 31, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively,
$6.8 million for the five months ended December 31,
2009 and $2.0 million and $5.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
We define Non-GAAP total operating revenues as the total
operating revenues shown in our GAAP financial statements plus
stock-based retailer incentive compensation expense. |
|
(3) |
|
We define Non-GAAP net income as the net income shown on our
GAAP financial statements plus the after-tax amount of each of
stock-based retailer incentive compensation expense and
stock-based compensation expense. We then use Non-GAAP net
income as the basis for calculating Non-GAAP diluted earnings
per share, as shown in the reconciliation of this financial
measure to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure
below. |
|
(4) |
|
This financial measure is not calculated in accordance with
GAAP. A table at the end of this footnote provides a
reconciliation of this financial measure to the most directly
comparable financial measure calculated and presented in
accordance with GAAP. This financial measure should not be
considered as an alternative to or substitute for operating
revenues, operating income, net income or any other measure of
financial performance calculated and presented in accordance
with GAAP. This financial measure may not be comparable to
similarly-titled measures of other organizations because other
organizations may not calculate their measures in the same
manner as we do. We prepare this financial measure to eliminate
the impact of items that we do not consider indicative of our
core operating performance. You are encouraged to evaluate these
adjustments and the reasons we consider them appropriate. |
|
|
|
We believe that the non-GAAP financial measures we present are
useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance for
the following reasons: |
|
|
|
stock-based retailer incentive compensation is a
non-cash GAAP accounting charge that acts as an offset to our
actual revenues from operations as we historically calculated
them. This charge results from the monthly lapsing of our right
to repurchase a portion of the 2,208,552 shares we issued
to our largest retail distributor, Walmart, in May 2010. By
adding back this charge to our future total operating revenues,
investors can make direct comparisons of our revenues from
operations prior to and after May 2010 and thus more easily
perceive trends in our core operations. Further, because the
monthly charge is based on the then-current market value of the
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
shares as to which our repurchase right lapses, adding back this
charge eliminates fluctuations in our operating revenues caused
by variations in our month-end stock prices and thus provides
insight on the operating revenues directly associated with those
core operations; |
|
|
|
we adopted a new accounting standard for stock-based
compensation effective August 1, 2006 and recorded
stock-based compensation expense of approximately $156,000,
$1.2 million and $2.5 million for the years ended
July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively,
$6.8 million for the five months ended December 31,
2009 and $2.0 million and $5.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Prior to August 1, 2006, we accounted for stock-based
compensation using the intrinsic value method under previously
issued guidance, which resulted in zero stock-based compensation
expense. By comparing our adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP net income
and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share in different historical
periods, our investors can evaluate our operating results
without the additional variations caused by stock-based
compensation expense, which is not comparable from period to
period due to changes in accounting treatment, changes in the
fair market value of our common stock (which is influenced by
external factors like the volatility of public markets and the
financial performance of our peers), and is not a key measure of
our operations;
|
|
|
|
adjusted EBITDA is widely used by investors to
measure a companys operating performance without regard to
items, such as interest expense, income tax expense,
depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense,
and stock-based retailer incentive compensation expense, that
can vary substantially from company to company depending upon
their respective financing structures and accounting policies,
the book values of their assets, their capital structures and
the methods by which their assets were acquired; and
|
|
|
|
securities analysts use adjusted EBITDA as a
supplemental measure to evaluate the overall operating
performance of companies.
|
|
|
|
Our management uses the non-GAAP financial measures: |
|
|
|
as measures of operating performance, because they
exclude the impact of items not directly resulting from our core
operations;
|
|
|
|
for planning purposes, including the preparation of
our annual operating budget;
|
|
|
|
to allocate resources to enhance the financial
performance of our business;
|
|
|
|
to evaluate the effectiveness of our business
strategies; and
|
|
|
|
in communications with our board of directors
concerning our financial performance.
|
|
|
|
We understand that, although adjusted EBITDA and other non-GAAP
financial measures are frequently used by investors and
securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, these
measures have limitations as an analytical tool, and you should
not consider them in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of
our results of operations as reported under GAAP. Some of these
limitations are: |
|
|
|
that these measures do not reflect our capital
expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or
other contractual commitments;
|
|
|
|
that these measures do not reflect changes in, or
cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
that these measures do not reflect interest expense
or interest income;
|
|
|
|
that these measures do not reflect cash requirements
for income taxes;
|
|
|
|
that, although depreciation and amortization are
non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated or amortized will
often have to be replaced in the future, and these measures do
not reflect any cash requirements for these
replacements; and
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
that other companies in our industry may calculate
these measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness
as comparative measures.
|
|
|
|
The following tables present unaudited reconciliations of each
of our non-GAAP financial measures to their respective most
comparable GAAP financial measures, for each of the periods
indicated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of total operating revenues to non-GAAP total
operating revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
39,540
|
|
|
$
|
66,951
|
|
|
$
|
83,624
|
|
|
$
|
168,126
|
|
|
$
|
234,816
|
|
|
$
|
112,757
|
|
|
$
|
188,948
|
|
|
$
|
272,041
|
|
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
39,540
|
|
|
$
|
66,951
|
|
|
$
|
83,624
|
|
|
$
|
168,126
|
|
|
$
|
234,816
|
|
|
$
|
112,757
|
|
|
$
|
188,948
|
|
|
$
|
279,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net (loss) income to non-GAAP net (loss)
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
$
|
4,647
|
|
|
$
|
17,335
|
|
|
$
|
37,163
|
|
|
$
|
13,663
|
|
|
$
|
33,710
|
|
|
$
|
34,294
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
3,954
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
3,163
|
|
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
$
|
5,204
|
|
|
$
|
18,062
|
|
|
$
|
38,594
|
|
|
$
|
17,617
|
|
|
$
|
34,860
|
|
|
$
|
42,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Non-GAAP
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares issued and outstanding**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
14,154
|
|
|
|
15,712
|
|
|
|
15,425
|
|
|
|
15,545
|
|
|
|
22,884
|
|
Non-GAAP
|
|
|
34,316
|
|
|
|
37,282
|
|
|
|
36,807
|
|
|
|
40,917
|
|
|
|
41,386
|
|
|
|
40,367
|
|
|
|
40,529
|
|
|
|
42,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP diluted
weighted-average shares issued and outstanding are provided in
the next table.
|
|
|
|
** Diluted weighted-average Class A shares issued and
outstanding and diluted weighted-average Class B shares
issued and outstanding are the most directly comparable GAAP
measure for periods ending 2010 and any period ending prior to
2010, respectively.
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP diluted weighted-average
shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares issued and outstanding*
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
14,154
|
|
|
|
15,712
|
|
|
|
15,425
|
|
|
|
15,545
|
|
|
|
22,884
|
|
Assumed conversion of weighted-average shares of preferred stock
|
|
|
24,088
|
|
|
|
24,088
|
|
|
|
25,707
|
|
|
|
26,763
|
|
|
|
25,674
|
|
|
|
24,942
|
|
|
|
24,984
|
|
|
|
18,455
|
|
Weighted-average shares subject to repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP diluted weighted-average shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
34,316
|
|
|
|
37,282
|
|
|
|
36,807
|
|
|
|
40,917
|
|
|
|
41,386
|
|
|
|
40,367
|
|
|
|
40,529
|
|
|
|
42,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Refers to shares of Class A common stock for periods
ending in 2010 and shares of Class B common stock for
periods ending prior to 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net (loss) income to adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
$
|
4,647
|
|
|
$
|
17,335
|
|
|
$
|
37,163
|
|
|
$
|
13,663
|
|
|
$
|
33,710
|
|
|
$
|
34,294
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
|
12,261
|
|
|
|
26,902
|
|
|
|
9,764
|
|
|
|
24,344
|
|
|
|
22,589
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
3,524
|
|
|
|
4,407
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
3,552
|
|
|
|
5,405
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
6,782
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
5,246
|
|
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(3,492
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,214
|
|
|
$
|
4,835
|
|
|
$
|
34,825
|
|
|
$
|
70,731
|
|
|
$
|
32,350
|
|
|
$
|
63,413
|
|
|
$
|
74,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
We define adjusted EBITDA as the net income shown on our GAAP
financial statements plus net interest expense (income), income
tax expense (benefit), depreciation and amortization,
stock-based compensation expense and stock-based retailer
incentive compensation expense. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes $6,025, $2,025, $2,285, $2,328, $15,367, $15,381 and
$5,163 of restricted cash as of July 31, 2005, 2006, 2007,
2008 and 2009, December 31, 2009 and September 30,
2010, respectively. |
35
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Our retail distributors collect customer funds for purchases of
new cards and reloads and then remit these funds directly to
bank accounts established on behalf of those customers by the
banks that issue our cards. Our retail distributors
remittance of these funds takes an average of three business
days. Settlement assets represent the amounts due from our
retail distributors for customer funds collected at the point of
sale that have not yet been remitted to the card issuing banks.
Settlement obligations represent the amounts that are due from
us to the card issuing banks for funds collected but not yet
remitted by our retail distributors and not funded by our line
of credit. We have no control over or access to customer funds
remitted by our retail distributors to the card issuing banks.
Customer funds therefore are not our assets, and we do not
recognize them in our consolidated financial statements. |
36
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. This
discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may
differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors,
including those set forth under Risk Factors and
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
Green Dot is a leading prepaid financial services company
providing simple, low-cost and convenient money management
solutions to a broad base of U.S. consumers. We believe
that we are the leading provider of general purpose reloadable
prepaid debit cards in the United States and that our Green Dot
Network is the leading reload network for prepaid cards in the
United States. We sell our cards and offer our reload services
nationwide at approximately 50,000 retail store locations, which
provide consumers convenient access to our products and services.
We were founded in October 1999 to distribute and service GPR
cards. In 2001, we sold our first such card at a Rite Aid store
in Virginia. Between 2001 and 2004, we concentrated on
increasing our distribution capacity and established
distribution agreements with CVS, The Pantry Stores (Kangaroo
Express) and Radio Shack, among others. In 2004, we launched the
Green Dot Network, which allowed our cardholders to reload funds
onto their cards at any of our retail distributors
locations regardless of where their cards were initially
purchased. For example, this allowed our cards purchased at Rite
Aid stores to be reloaded at CVS stores. We also began to market
the Green Dot Network to providers of third-party prepaid card
programs, which enabled their cardholders to reload funds onto
their cards through our Green Dot Network. In 2005, we continued
to expand our distribution capacity by establishing a
distribution relationship with Walgreens. In May 2007, we began
marketing and distributing Green Dot-branded cards through our
website.
In October 2006, we entered into agreements with Walmart and GE
Money Bank to manage a co-branded GPR card program for Walmart
and to provide reload network services at Walmart stores through
our Green Dot Network. After an extensive product design and
pilot period, we launched the Walmart MoneyCard program in
approximately 2,500, or 70%, of Walmarts U.S. stores
in July 2007. In October 2007, we launched a Visa-branded
non-reloadable gift card program at most of these stores. By
March 31, 2010, we offered the Walmart MoneyCard in more
than 3,600, or 97%, of Walmarts U.S. stores. Since
its inception, the Walmart MoneyCard program has been highly
successful, contributing significantly to the increase in our
total operating revenues. To enhance the value proposition to
cardholders, in February 2009, significant pricing changes were
made to the Walmart MoneyCard program. The new card fee, monthly
maintenance fee and
point-of-sale,
or POS, swipe reload fee for Walmart MoneyCards at Walmart
stores were each lowered to $3.00 from $8.94, $4.94 and $4.64,
respectively. In addition, the sales commission percentage that
we paid to Walmart was significantly reduced in order to offset
our lost revenue resulting from these substantial fee
reductions. Our revenues from Walmart have increased
significantly in response to these pricing changes, as
substantial increases in volumes more than offset the revenue
impact of the lower fees. See also May 2010
Changes to Our Relationship with Walmart below.
In July 2009, we re-launched our core Green Dot-branded GPR card
with new packaging, features and pricing. Our innovative new
package contains a temporary prepaid card, for the first time
visible to the consumer through the packaging, that can be used
immediately upon activation. New card features include free
online bill payment services and a fee-free ATM network with
approximately 17,000 participating ATMs. We reduced the new card
fee from $9.95 to $4.95. We raised the monthly maintenance fee
from $4.95 to $5.95, and at the same time instituted maintenance
fee waivers for months in which cardholders either load $1,000
or more onto their cards or make at least 30 purchase
transactions in order to encourage increased card usage and
cardholder retention. The re-launch of
37
the Green Dot-branded GPR card generated significant increases
in volume that more than offset the revenue impact of the lower
new card fee.
In September 2009, we further expanded our distribution capacity
by entering into a distribution agreement with 7-Eleven. Also,
in September 2009, PayPal became a new acceptance member in the
Green Dot Network, allowing PayPal customers to add funds to a
new or existing PayPal account using our MoneyPak product. These
funds can be used immediately by account holders unlike funds
loaded to PayPal accounts from a bank account, which may not be
available for several days. We believe PayPals customers
have begun recognizing the value of our offerings, but to date
we have not generated significant operating revenues from our
relationship with PayPal. In October 2009, we further expanded
our distribution capacity by entering into a joint marketing and
referral agreement with Intuit Inc. In January 2010, Intuit
integrated into its TurboTax software an option that allows its
customers to receive their tax refunds via direct deposit to a
Green Dot co-branded GPR card, called a TurboTax Refund Card.
Under this program, which we will manage for Intuit through the
2011 tax season, we generated operating revenues that
represented approximately 7%, 4% and 2% of our total operating
revenues, excluding stock-based retailer incentive compensation,
in the quarters ended March 31, June 30 and
September 30, 2010, respectively. The initial term of our
agreement with Intuit expires in October 2011, and we do not
currently expect that this agreement will be renewed.
In May 2010, the terms of our commercial agreement with Walmart
were amended as described in the next paragraph, and, in July
2010, we further expanded our distribution capacity by entering
into a distribution agreement with Circle K.
May 2010
Changes to Our Relationship with Walmart
In May 2010, we entered into an amended prepaid card program
agreement with Walmart and GE Money Bank. This agreement
extended the term of our commercial relationship with Walmart
and GE Money Bank to May 2015 and significantly increased the
sales commission percentages that we pay to Walmart for the
Walmart MoneyCard program, which currently accounts for
approximately 85% of the total operating revenues that we derive
from products sold at Walmart, to an estimated 22%, or a level
approximately equal to what they had been during the three
months ended December 31, 2008. Additionally, the amended
agreement provides volume-based incentives that allow Walmart to
earn higher sales commission percentages as sales volumes of our
products in its stores grow. The agreement also provides for
enhanced coordination of Walmarts and our promotional
efforts with respect to the Walmart MoneyCard program, including
annual contributions by Walmart and us to a joint marketing
fund. Historically, and under our amended agreement with
Walmart, the sales commission percentages we pay to Walmart for
the Walmart MoneyCard program are derived from a formula and
vary based on dynamic program factors, such as new card sales
rates, consumer pricing, average cardholder usage and retention.
As an incentive to amend our prepaid card program agreement, we
issued Walmart 2,208,552 shares of our Class A common
stock. These shares are subject to our right to repurchase them
at $0.01 per share upon termination of our agreement with
Walmart other than a termination arising out of our knowing,
intentional and material breach of the agreement. Our right to
repurchase the shares lapses with respect to 36,810 shares
per month over the
60-month
term of the agreement. The repurchase right will expire as to
all shares of Class A common stock that remain subject to
the repurchase right if we experience a prohibited change
of control, as defined in the agreement, if we experience
a change of control, as defined in the stock
issuance agreement, or under certain other limited
circumstances, which we currently believe are remote. We
recognize the fair value of 36,810 shares each month over
the 60-month
term of the amended prepaid card program agreement with Walmart
and GE Money Bank, recording the fair value recognized as
stock-based retailer incentive compensation, a contra-revenue
component of our total operating revenues. See
Comparison of Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010 Operating
Revenues Future Contra-Revenue for more
information regarding the financial impact of our equity
issuance to Walmart.
38
As a result of entering into our amended agreement with Walmart,
we changed the manner in which customer funds for certain
products sold at Walmart are settled, eliminating the need to
record settlement assets and liabilities related to these
products. This change resulted in a significant reduction in our
settlement assets and settlement obligations associated with
Walmart and GE Money Bank, respectively.
Key Business
Metrics
We designed our business model to provide low-cost, easy-to-use
financial products and services to a large number of customers
through retail store and online distribution. We review a number
of metrics to help us monitor the performance of, and identify
trends affecting, our business. We believe the following
measures are the primary indicators of our quarterly and annual
performance.
Number of GPR Cards Activated represents the
total number of GPR cards sold through our retail and online
distribution channels that are activated (and, in the case of
our online channel, also funded) by cardholders in a specified
period. We activated 894,000, 2.2 million and
3.1 million GPR cards in fiscal 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, 976,000 and 2.1 million GPR cards in the five
months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and
2.9 million and 4.7 million GPR cards in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Number of Cash Transfers represents the total
number of MoneyPak and POS swipe reload transactions that we
sell through our retail distributors in a specified period. We
sold 5.0 million, 9.2 million and 14.1 million
MoneyPak and POS swipe reload transactions in fiscal 2007, 2008
and 2009, respectively, 5.0 million and 8.2 million
MoneyPak and POS swipe reload transactions in the five months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and
12.1 million and 19.2 million MoneyPak and POS swipe
reload transactions in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2010, respectively.
Number of Active Cards represents the total
number of GPR cards in our portfolio that have had a purchase,
reload or ATM withdrawal transaction during the previous
90-day
period. We had 625,000, 1.3 million and 2.1 million
active cards outstanding as of July 31, 2007, 2008 and
2009, respectively, 1.4 million and 2.7 million active
cards outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, and 2.2 million and 3.3 million active
cards outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and 2010,
respectively.
Gross Dollar Volume represents the total
dollar volume of funds loaded to our GPR card and reload
products. Our gross dollar volume was $1.1 billion,
$2.8 billion and $4.7 billion in fiscal 2007, 2008 and
2009, respectively, $1.6 billion and $2.7 billion in
the five months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, and $4.0 billion and $7.7 billion in the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Key components of
our results of operations
Operating
Revenues
We classify our operating revenues into the following four
categories:
Card Revenues Card revenues consist of new
card fees, monthly maintenance fees, ATM fees and other
revenues. We charge new card fees when a consumer purchases a
GPR or gift card in a retail store. We charge maintenance fees
on GPR cards to cardholders on a monthly basis pursuant to the
terms and conditions in our cardholder agreements. We charge ATM
fees to cardholders when they withdraw money or conduct other
transactions at certain ATMs in accordance with the terms and
conditions in our cardholder agreements. Other revenues consist
primarily of fees associated with optional products or services,
which we generally offer to consumers during the card activation
process. Optional products and services that generate other
revenues include providing a second card for an account,
expediting delivery of the personalized GPR card that replaces
the temporary card obtained at the retail store and upgrading a
cardholder account to one of our premium programs
39
the VIP program or Premier Card program which
provide benefits for our more active cardholders. Historically,
our card revenues have also included customer service fees that
we charged in accordance with the terms and conditions in our
cardholder agreements.
Our aggregate new card fee revenues vary based upon the number
of GPR cards activated and the average new card fee. The average
new card fee depends primarily upon the mix of products that we
sell since there are variations in new card fees among Green
Dot-branded and co-branded products and between GPR cards and
general purpose gift cards. Our aggregate monthly maintenance
fee revenues vary primarily based upon the number of active
cards in our portfolio and the average fee assessed per account.
Our average monthly maintenance fee per active account depends
upon the mix of Green Dot-branded and co-branded cards in our
portfolio and upon the extent to which fees are waived based on
significant usage. Our aggregate ATM fee revenues vary based
upon the number of cardholder ATM transactions and the average
fee per ATM transaction. The average fee per ATM transaction
depends upon the mix of Green Dot-branded and co-branded active
cards in our portfolio and the extent to which cardholders
enroll in our VIP program, which has no ATM fees, or effect ATM
transactions on our fee-free ATM network.
Cash Transfer Revenues We earn cash transfer
revenues when consumers purchase and use a MoneyPak or fund
their cards through a POS swipe reload transaction in a retail
store. Our aggregate cash transfer revenues vary based upon the
total number of MoneyPak and POS swipe reload transactions and
the average price per MoneyPak or POS swipe reload transaction.
The average price per MoneyPak or POS swipe reload transaction
depends upon the relative numbers of cash transfer sales at our
different retail distributors and on the mix of MoneyPak and POS
swipe reload transactions at certain retailers that have
different fees for the two types of reload transactions.
Interchange Revenues We earn interchange
revenues from fees remitted by the merchants bank, which
are based on rates established by Visa and MasterCard, when
cardholders make purchase transactions using our cards. Our
aggregate interchange revenues vary based primarily on the
number of active cards in our portfolio, the average
transactional volume of the active cards in our portfolio and
the mix of cardholder purchases between those using signature
identification technologies and those using personal
identification numbers.
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
We recognize each month the fair value of the 36,810 shares
issued to Walmart for which our right to repurchase has lapsed
during that month using the then-current fair market value of
our Class A common stock (and we would be required to
recognize the fair value of all shares still subject to
repurchase if there were an early expiration of our right to
repurchase). We record the fair value recognized as stock-based
retailer incentive compensation, a contra-revenue component of
our total operating revenues. In addition, it is possible that,
in the future, a warrant to purchase Class B common stock
issued to PayPal will vest and become exercisable upon the
achievement of certain performance goals by PayPal. If this
warrant vests, we will need to determine its fair value on the
vesting date using the Black-Scholes model and will record that
value as additional contra-revenue.
Operating
Expenses
We classify our operating expenses into the following four
categories:
Sales and Marketing Expenses Sales and
marketing expenses consist primarily of the sales commissions we
pay to our retail distributors and brokers for sales of our GPR
and gift cards and reload services in their stores, advertising
and marketing expenses, and the costs of manufacturing and
distributing card packages, placards and promotional materials
to our retail distributors and personalized GPR cards to
consumers who have activated their cards. We generally establish
sales commission percentages in long-term distribution
agreements with our retail distributors, and aggregate sales
commissions are determined by the number of prepaid cards and
cash transfers sold at their respective retail stores. We incur
advertising and marketing expenses for television and online
advertisements of our products and through retailer-based print
promotions and in-store displays.
40
Advertising and marketing expenses are recognized as incurred
and typically deliver a benefit over an extended period of time.
For this reason, these expenses do not always track changes in
revenues. Our manufacturing and distribution costs vary
primarily based on the number of GPR cards activated.
Compensation and Benefits Expenses
Compensation and benefits expenses represent the compensation
and benefits that we provide to our employees and the payments
we make to third-party contractors. While we have an in-house
customer service organization, we employ third-party contractors
to conduct all call center operations, handle routine customer
service inquiries and provide temporary support in the area of
IT operations and elsewhere. Compensation and benefits expenses
associated with our customer service and loss management
functions generally vary in line with the size of our active
card portfolio, while the expenses associated with other
functions do not.
Processing Expenses Processing expenses
consist primarily of the fees charged to us by the banks that
issue our prepaid cards, the third-party card processor that
maintains the records of our customers accounts and
processes transaction authorizations and postings for us, and
Visa and MasterCard, which process transactions for us through
their respective payment networks. These costs generally vary
based on the total number of active cards in our portfolio and
the gross dollar volume.
Other General and Administrative Expenses
Other general and administrative expenses consist primarily of
professional service fees, telephone and communication costs,
depreciation and amortization of our property and equipment,
transactional losses (losses from customer disputed
transactions, unrecovered customer purchase transaction
overdrafts and fraud), rent and utilities, and insurance. We
incur telephone and communication costs primarily from customers
contacting us through our toll-free telephone numbers. These
costs vary with the total number of active cards in our
portfolio as do losses from unrecovered customer purchase
transaction overdrafts and fraud. Costs associated with
professional services, depreciation and amortization of our
property and equipment, and rent and utilities vary based upon
our investment in infrastructure, risk management and internal
controls and are generally not correlated with our operating
revenues or other transaction metrics.
Income Tax
Expense
Our income tax expense consists of the federal and state
corporate income taxes accrued on income resulting from the sale
of our products and services. Since the majority of our
operations are based in California, most of our state taxes are
paid to that state.
Comparison of
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2010
Operating
Revenues
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating
revenues among card, cash transfer and interchange revenues as
well as contra-revenue items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
$
|
93,011
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
124,978
|
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
49,383
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
73,630
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
46,554
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
81,106
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,673
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
188,948
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
272,041
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
Card Revenues Card revenues totaled
$125.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, an increase of $32.0 million, or 34%, from the
comparable period in 2009. The increase was primarily the result
of
period-over-period
growth of 62% in the number of GPR cards activated and 50% in
the number of active cards in our portfolio. This growth was
driven by a variety of factors including growth in the number of
our cards sold through our established distribution channels and
expansion through our online distribution channel and the launch
of new retailers like 7-Eleven. Additionally, the fee reductions
and new product features that we launched in July 2009 helped us
attract significant numbers of new users of our Green Dot
branded products. These fee reductions also contributed to the
decline in card revenues as a percentage of total operating
revenues. We expect our card revenues will continue to increase
in absolute dollars from year to year as the number of our cards
grows, but we expect them to decline slightly as a percentage of
our total operating revenues, excluding stock-based retailer
incentive compensation, from the percentage for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010.
Cash Transfer Revenues Cash transfer revenues
totaled $73.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, an increase of $24.2 million, or
49%, from the comparable period in 2009. The increase was
primarily the result of
period-over-period
growth of 59% in the number of cash transfers sold, partially
offset by a shift in our mix of retail distributors toward
Walmart. The increase in cash transfer volume was driven both by
growth in our active card base and growth in cash transfer
volume from third party programs participating in our network.
We expect our cash transfer revenues will continue to increase
in absolute dollars from year to year because of increases in
the number of GPR cards activated and the addition of PayPal as
a network acceptance member, and we expect them to increase
slightly as a percentage of our total operating revenues,
excluding stock-based retailer incentive compensation, from the
percentage for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Interchange Revenues Interchange revenues
totaled $81.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, an increase of $34.5 million, or
74%, from the comparable period in 2009. The increase was
primarily the result of
period-over-period
growth of 50% in the number of active cards in our portfolio and
92% in gross dollar volume, driven by the factors discussed
above under Card Revenues, and an increase in the
average transactional volume of the active cards in our
portfolio. We expect our interchange revenues will continue to
increase in absolute dollars from year to year. However, we do
not expect these revenues to shift significantly as a percentage
of our total operating revenues, excluding stock-based retailer
incentive compensation, from the percentage for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010.
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
Our right to repurchase lapsed as to 184,050 shares issued
to Walmart during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
We recognized the fair value of the shares using the
then-current fair market value of our Class A common stock,
resulting in $7.7 million being recorded as stock-based
retailer incentive compensation.
42
Operating
Expenses
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating
expenses among sales and marketing, compensation and benefits,
processing, and other general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
$
|
52,430
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
87,777
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
%
|
Compensation and benefits expenses
|
|
|
32,827
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
50,474
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
27,092
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
43,131
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
18,721
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
33,997
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
131,070
|
|
|
|
69.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
215,379
|
|
|
|
79.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Marketing Expenses Sales and
marketing expenses totaled $87.8 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of
$35.4 million, or 68%, from the comparable period in 2009.
The increase was primarily the result of a $25.7 million
increase in sales commissions and manufacturing and distribution
costs due to increased sales commissions paid to Walmart as a
result of entering into our amended prepaid card agreement and
the increased numbers of GPR cards and MoneyPaks sold compared
with the corresponding period. The increase in sales and
marketing expenses was also due to a $9.7 million increase
in advertising and marketing expenses, as we significantly
increased our television and online advertising and deployed
more in-store displays than in the 2009 comparison period. We
expect our sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of our
total operating revenues, excluding stock-based retailer
incentive compensation, to increase significantly in future
periods from the percentage in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 because of the increased contractual
sales commission percentages that we are obligated to pay to
Walmart as a result of the May 2010 amendment to our agreement
with Walmart.
Compensation and Benefits Expenses
Compensation and benefits expenses totaled
$50.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, an increase of $17.7 million, or 54%, from the
comparable period in 2009. The increase was primarily the result
of a $10.8 million increase in employee compensation and
benefits, which included a $3.3 million increase in
employee stock-based compensation. The
period-over-period
growth in employee compensation and benefits was due to
additional employee headcount as we continued to expand our
operations and assumed the reporting requirements and compliance
obligations of a public company. The increase in compensation
and benefits expenses was also due to a $6.9 million
increase in third-party call center contractor expenses as the
number of active cards in our portfolio and associated call
volumes increased from the nine months ended September 30,
2009 to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. We expect
our compensation and benefits expenses to increase as we
continue to add personnel and incur additional third-party
contractor expenses to support expanding operations but, except
for any major fluctuations in stock-based compensation, we
expect them to decline as a percentage of our total operating
revenues, excluding stock-based retailer incentive compensation,
from the percentage for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 as we benefit from the hiring of key personnel in recent
prior periods.
Processing Expenses Processing expenses
totaled $43.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, an increase of $16.0 million, or
59%, from the comparable period in 2009. The increase was
primarily the result of
period-over-period
growth of 50% in the number of active cards in our portfolio and
92% in gross dollar volume. We expect our processing expenses to
increase in absolute dollars as our total operating revenues
increase but to remain relatively consistent with the
43
percentage of our total operating revenues, excluding
stock-based retailer incentive compensation, that they
represented in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Other General and Administrative Expenses
Other general and administrative expenses totaled
$34.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, an increase of $15.3 million, or 82%, from the
comparable period in 2009. The increase was partly the result of
an increase of $6.9 million relating to professional
services expenses, $5.1 million of which resulted from
expenses related to our initial public offering as we did not
receive any proceeds from the sale of our Class A common
stock, all of which were sold by existing stockholders, and
$1.8 million of which represented an increase in
professional services fees primarily incurred in connection with
our proposed bank acquisition and other corporate development
initiatives. The increase in other general and administrative
expenses was also the result of a $3.0 million increase in
telephone and communications expenses resulting from increased
use of our call center and our interactive voice response
system, or IVR, as the number of active cards in our portfolio
increased. Additionally, depreciation and amortization of
property and equipment increased by $1.9 million due to
expansion of our infrastructure to support our growth and we
experienced a $1.5 million increases in transaction losses,
primarily associated with customer disputed transactions. We
expect other general and administrative expenses to increase in
absolute dollars as we incur additional costs related to the
growth of our business. However, we expect these expenses to
decline as a percentage of our total operating revenues,
excluding stock-based retailer incentive compensation, from the
percentage in the nine months ended September 30, 2010
because of a significant decrease in professional fees following
the completion of our initial public offering in July 2010 and
as we benefit from past significant investments that we have
made.
Income Tax
Expense
Our income tax expense decreased by $1.7 million to
$22.6 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2010 from the comparable period in 2009, and our effective tax
rate decreased 2.3% from 42.0% to 39.7% primarily as a result of
a tax benefit that we recognized during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. The tax benefit was due to a change in
the apportionment method we use in California. Under the
alternative apportionment method, approved by the California
Franchise Tax Board in May 2010, we apportion less income to
California, resulting in a lower effective state tax rate. The
decrease in the effective tax rate was partially offset by
non-deductible expenses related to our initial public offering
recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Excluding the impact of these discrete items, our effective tax
rate would have been 40.3%. The petition expires on
July 31, 2011, however, we expect to continue to benefit
from the lower effective state tax rate in subsequent years as
certain enacted tax law changes, which conform to the petition,
become effective January 1, 2011.
44
Comparison of
Five Months Ended December 31, 2008 and 2009
Operating
Revenues
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating
revenues among card, cash transfer and interchange revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
$
|
46,460
|
|
|
|
52.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
50,895
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
%
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
24,391
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
30,509
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
18,212
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
31,353
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
89,063
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
112,757
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card Revenues. Our card revenues totaled
$50.9 million in the five months ended December 31,
2009, an increase of $4.4 million, or 10%, from the
comparable period in 2008. This increase was primarily due to
period-over-period
growth of 116% in the number of GPR cards activated and 92% in
the number of active cards in our portfolio, largely offset by
the February 2009 reduction in new card and monthly maintenance
fees for the Walmart MoneyCard and the July 2009 reduction in
the new card fee for Green Dot-branded cards. These fee
reductions also contributed to the decline in card revenues as a
percentage of total operating revenues.
Cash Transfer Revenues. Our cash transfer
revenues totaled $30.5 million in the five months ended
December 31, 2009, an increase of $6.1 million, or
25%, from the comparable period in 2008. This increase was
primarily due to
period-over-period
growth of 64% in the number of cash transfers sold, partially
offset by a shift in our retail distributor mix toward Walmart,
which generally has lower fees than our other retail
distributors and significantly reduced the POS swipe reload fee
in February 2009.
Interchange Revenues. Our interchange revenues
totaled $31.4 million in the five months ended
December 31, 2009, an increase of $13.1 million, or
72%, from the comparable period in 2008. This increase was
primarily due to
period-over-period
growth of 92% in the number of active cards in our portfolio.
45
Operating
Expenses
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating
expenses among sales and marketing, compensation and benefits,
processing, and other general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
$
|
35,001
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
31,333
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
Compensation and benefits expenses
|
|
|
15,409
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
26,610
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
11,765
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
17,480
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9,463
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
14,020
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
71,638
|
|
|
|
80.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
89,443
|
|
|
|
79.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Our sales and
marketing expenses were $31.3 million in the five months
ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $3.7 million,
or 10%, from the comparable period in 2008. This decrease was
primarily the result of a $4.3 million decline in
advertising and marketing expenses. During the 2009 comparison
period, we did no television advertising and deployed fewer new
in-store displays. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses
was also the result of a $2.7 million, or 12%, decline in
the sales commissions we paid to our retail distributors and
brokers because of reductions in the commission percentages we
paid to our retail distributors, most significantly Walmart.
These declines were partially offset by a $3.3 million
increase in our manufacturing and distribution costs due to
increased numbers of GPR cards and MoneyPaks sold.
Compensation and Benefits Expenses. Our
compensation and benefits expenses were $26.6 million in
the five months ended December 31, 2009, an increase of
$11.2 million, or 73%, from the comparable period in 2008.
This increase was primarily the result of a $7.1 million
increase in employee compensation and benefits, which included a
$5.8 million increase in stock-based compensation. In
December 2009, our board of directors awarded
257,984 shares of common stock to our Chief Executive
Officer to compensate him for past services rendered to our
company. The number of shares awarded was equal to the number of
shares subject to fully vested options that unintentionally
expired unexercised in June 2009. The aggregate grant date fair
value of this award was approximately $5.2 million, based
on an estimated fair value of our common stock of $20.01, as
determined by our board of directors on the date of the award.
We recorded the aggregate grant date fair value as stock-based
compensation on the date of the award. The increase in
compensation and benefits expenses was also the result of a
$4.1 million increase in third-party contractor expenses as
the number of active cards in our portfolio and associated call
volumes grew from the five months ended December 31, 2008
to the five months ended December 31, 2009.
Processing Expenses. Our processing expenses
were $17.5 million in the five months ended
December 31, 2009, an increase of $5.7 million, or
49%, from the comparable period in 2008. This increase was
primarily the result of
period-over-period
growth of 92% in the number of active cards in our portfolio,
partially offset by lower fees charged to us under agreements
with one of the banks that issue our cards and our third-party
card processor that became effective in November 2008 and by
more efficient use of our card processor through the purging of
inactive accounts and more effective use of analysis and
reporting tools.
Other General and Administrative Expenses. Our
other general and administrative expenses were
$14.0 million in the five months ended December 31,
2009, an increase of $4.6 million, or 48%, from the
comparable period in 2008. This increase was primarily the
result of a $2.6 million increase in professional service
fees due to our potential bank acquisition and other corporate
development
46
initiatives and a $1.2 million increase in telephone and
communication expenses due to increased use of our call center
and our IVR as the number of active cards in our portfolio
increased.
Income Tax
Expense
The following table presents a breakdown of our effective tax
rate among federal, state and other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
U.S. federal income tax
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
42.0
|
%
|
|
|
41.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our income tax expense increased by $2.3 million to
$9.8 million in the five months ended December 31,
2009 from the comparable period in 2008, and there was a slight
decline in the effective tax rate.
Comparison of
Fiscal 2008 and 2009
Operating
Revenues
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating
revenues among card, cash transfer and interchange revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
$
|
91,233
|
|
|
|
54.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
119,356
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
%
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
45,310
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
62,396
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
31,583
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
53,064
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
168,126
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
234,816
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card Revenues. Our card revenues totaled
$119.4 million in fiscal 2009, an increase of
$28.1 million, or 31%, from fiscal 2008. This increase was
primarily due to
year-over-year
growth of 43% in the number of GPR cards activated and 62% in
the number of active cards in our portfolio, partially offset by
the February 2009 reduction in new card and monthly maintenance
fees for the Walmart MoneyCard. This reduction in fees also
contributed to the decline in card revenues as a percentage of
total operating revenues.
Cash Transfer Revenues. Our cash transfer
revenues totaled $62.4 million in fiscal 2009, an increase
of $17.1 million, or 38%, from fiscal 2008. This increase
was primarily due to
year-over-year
growth of 54% in the number of cash transfers, partially offset
by a shift in our retail distributor mix toward Walmart, which
generally has lower fees than our other retail distributors and
significantly reduced the POS swipe reload fee in February 2009.
Interchange Revenues. Our interchange revenues
totaled $53.1 million in fiscal 2009, an increase of
$21.5 million, or 68%, from fiscal 2008. This increase was
primarily due to
year-over-year
growth of 62% in the number of active cards in our portfolio.
47
Operating
Expenses
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating
expenses among sales and marketing, compensation and benefits,
processing, and other general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
$
|
69,577
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
75,786
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
%
|
Compensation and benefits expenses
|
|
|
28,303
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
40,096
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
21,944
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
32,320
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
19,124
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
22,944
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
138,948
|
|
|
|
82.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
171,146
|
|
|
|
72.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Our sales and
marketing expenses were $75.8 million in fiscal 2009, an
increase of $6.2 million, or 9%, from fiscal 2008. This
increase was primarily the result of a $10.1 million, or
25%, increase in the sales commissions we paid to our retail
distributors and brokers. Aggregate commissions increased
because of increased sales, but the impact of these increased
sales was offset in part by a reduction in pricing and
commission rates at Walmart. The increase in sales and marketing
expenses was also the result of a $2.7 million increase in
our manufacturing and distribution costs due to the re-launch of
our Green Dot-branded products and increased numbers of GPR
cards and MoneyPaks sold. These sales and marketing expense
increases were partially offset by a $6.6 million decline
in advertising and marketing expenses, principally as a result
of our decision not to use television advertising during fiscal
2009.
Compensation and Benefits Expenses. Our
compensation and benefits expenses were $40.1 million in
fiscal 2009, an increase of $11.8 million, or 42%, from
fiscal 2008. This increase was primarily the result of a
$9.0 million increase in employee compensation and
benefits, including a $1.2 million increase in stock-based
compensation, as our headcount grew from 209 at the end of
fiscal 2008 to 248 at the end of fiscal 2009 and we hired
several new members of management. Third-party contractor
expenses also increased by $2.8 million as the number of
active cards in our portfolio and associated call volumes grew
from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.
Processing Expenses. Our processing expenses
were $32.3 million in fiscal 2009, an increase of
$10.4 million, or 47%, from fiscal 2008. This increase was
primarily the result of
year-over-year
growth of 62% in the number of active cards in our portfolio.
This growth was partially offset by lower fees charged to us
under agreements with one of the banks that issue our cards and
with our third-party card processor that became effective in
November 2008 and by more efficient use of that card processor.
Other General and Administrative Expenses. Our
other general and administrative expenses were
$22.9 million in fiscal 2009, an increase of
$3.8 million, or 20%, from fiscal 2008. This increase was
primarily the result of a $1.6 million increase in
telephone and communication expenses due to increased call
volumes as the number of active cards in our portfolio increased
and a $1.4 million increase in professional service fees
primarily associated with corporate development initiatives. We
also had increases of $0.4 million in rent due to
additional office space that we leased to support our increased
headcount and $0.4 million related to the write-off of
abandoned internal-use software. These increases were partially
offset by the reversal of a $0.5 million reserve that was
accrued in fiscal 2008 for a potential litigation settlement.
48
Income Tax
Expense
The following table presents a breakdown of our effective tax
rate among federal, state and other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
U.S. federal income tax
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
42.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our income tax expense increased by $14.6 million from
fiscal 2008 to $26.9 million in fiscal 2009, an effective
tax rate increase of 0.6 percentage points from 41.4% to
42.0%. This increase was primarily due to the utilization in
fiscal 2008 of our remaining net operating loss carryforwards to
reduce taxable income.
Comparison of
Fiscal 2007 and 2008
Operating
Revenues
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating
revenues among card, cash transfer and interchange revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
$
|
45,717
|
|
|
|
54.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
91,233
|
|
|
|
54.3
|
%
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
25,419
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
45,310
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
12,488
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
31,583
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
83,624
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
168,126
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card Revenues. Our card revenues totaled
$91.2 million in fiscal 2008, an increase of
$45.5 million, or 100%, from fiscal 2007. This increase was
primarily due to
year-over-year
growth of 142% in the number of GPR cards activated and 103% in
the number of active cards in our portfolio.
Cash Transfer Revenues. Our cash transfer
revenues totaled $45.3 million in fiscal 2008, an increase
of $19.9 million, or 78%, from fiscal 2007. This increase
was primarily due to
year-over-year
growth of 83% in the number of cash transfers.
Interchange Revenues. Our interchange revenues
totaled $31.6 million in fiscal 2008, an increase of
$19.1 million, or 153%, from fiscal 2007. This increase was
primarily due to
year-over-year
growth of 103% in the number of active cards in our portfolio.
49
Operating
Expenses
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating
expenses among sales and marketing, compensation and benefits,
processing, and other general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
$
|
38,838
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
69,577
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
Compensation and benefits expenses
|
|
|
20,610
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
28,303
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
9,809
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
21,944
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13,212
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
19,124
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
82,469
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
138,948
|
|
|
|
82.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Marketing Expenses. Our sales and
marketing expenses were $69.6 million in fiscal 2008, an
increase of $30.7 million, or 79%, from fiscal 2007. This
increase was primarily the result of a $14.5 million, or
55%, increase in the sales commissions we paid to our retail
distributors and brokers and a $9.8 million increase in our
manufacturing and distribution costs. Sales commissions and
manufacturing and distribution costs increased principally due
to increased sales of GPR cards and cash loading services.
Advertising and marketing expenses also increased by
$6.4 million from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 as a result of
significant television advertising in fiscal 2008.
Compensation and Benefits Expenses. Our
compensation and benefits expenses were $28.3 million in
fiscal 2008, an increase of $7.7 million, or 37%, from
fiscal 2007. This increase was primarily the result of a
$4.3 million increase in employee compensation and
benefits, including a $1.1 million increase in stock-based
compensation, as our headcount increased from 167 at the end of
fiscal 2007 to 209 at the end of fiscal 2008. Third-party
contractor expenses also increased by $3.3 million from
fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 as the number of active cards in our
portfolio and associated call volumes grew from fiscal 2007 to
fiscal 2008.
Processing Expenses. Our processing expenses
were $21.9 million in fiscal 2008, an increase of
$12.1 million, or 124%, from fiscal 2007. This increase was
primarily the result of
year-over-year
growth of 103% in the number of active cards in our portfolio.
Other General and Administrative Expenses. Our
other general and administrative expenses were
$19.1 million in fiscal 2008, an increase of
$5.9 million, or 45%, from fiscal 2007. This increase was
primarily the result of a $1.6 million increase in
professional services fees related, among other things, to an
uncompleted financing transaction, a $1.1 million increase
in telephone and communications expenses primarily related to
growth in call center volumes and a $1.1 million increase
in losses from fraud and purchase transaction overdrafts. Call
center volumes and losses from fraud and purchase transaction
overdrafts increased as the number of active cards in our
portfolio increased. Additionally, depreciation and amortization
of property and equipment increased by $0.9 million due to
expansion of our infrastructure to support our growth. We also
accrued $0.5 million for a potential litigation settlement,
and we had a $0.3 million increase in repair and
maintenance expenses.
50
Income Tax
(Benefit) Expense
The following table presents a breakdown of our effective tax
rate among federal, state and other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
U.S. federal income tax
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(288.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(257.2
|
)%
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our income tax expense increased by $15.6 million from a
$3.3 million income tax benefit in fiscal 2007 to a
$12.3 million income tax expense in fiscal 2008, and there
was a 298.6 percentage point increase in the effective
rate. These increases were primarily due a reduction of
$3.8 million in the valuation allowance associated with our
deferred tax asset, which we recognized in fiscal 2007.
51
Quarterly Results
of Operations
The following tables set forth unaudited consolidated statement
of operations data for the final quarter of calendar year 2008,
the four quarters of calendar year 2009 and the first three
quarters of calendar year 2010, as well as the percentage of our
total operating revenues that each line item represented. We
have prepared our consolidated statements of operations for each
of these quarters on the same basis as the audited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus,
except for certain consolidated statements of operations items
related to income allocated to common stockholders and earnings
per common share and, in the opinion of our management, each
statement of operations includes all adjustments, consisting
solely of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair
statement of the results of operations for these periods. This
information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus. These quarterly operating results are not
necessarily indicative of our operating results for any future
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sep. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sep. 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
$
|
28,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,185
|
|
|
$
|
30,977
|
|
|
$
|
30,849
|
|
|
$
|
30,779
|
|
|
$
|
42,158
|
|
|
$
|
42,228
|
|
|
$
|
40,592
|
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
14,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,744
|
|
|
|
16,383
|
|
|
|
17,256
|
|
|
|
19,132
|
|
|
|
22,782
|
|
|
|
24,364
|
|
|
|
26,484
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
11,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,811
|
|
|
|
15,530
|
|
|
|
17,213
|
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
27,879
|
|
|
|
26,183
|
|
|
|
27,044
|
|
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,457
|
)
|
|
|
(5,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
54,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,740
|
|
|
|
62,890
|
|
|
|
65,318
|
|
|
|
69,562
|
|
|
|
92,819
|
|
|
|
90,318
|
|
|
|
88,904
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
20,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,016
|
|
|
|
15,232
|
|
|
|
17,182
|
|
|
|
19,689
|
|
|
|
26,039
|
|
|
|
31,433
|
|
|
|
30,305
|
|
Compensation and benefits expenses
|
|
|
9,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
10,751
|
|
|
|
12,666
|
|
|
|
18,470
|
|
|
|
16,260
|
|
|
|
16,593
|
|
|
|
17,621
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
|
|
9,441
|
|
|
|
9,951
|
|
|
|
10,943
|
|
|
|
14,680
|
|
|
|
13,872
|
|
|
|
14,579
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
7,587
|
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
|
|
11,755
|
|
|
|
11,266
|
|
|
|
10,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
42,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,332
|
|
|
|
41,352
|
|
|
|
47,386
|
|
|
|
57,881
|
|
|
|
68,734
|
|
|
|
73,164
|
|
|
|
73,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
12,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,408
|
|
|
|
21,538
|
|
|
|
17,932
|
|
|
|
11,681
|
|
|
|
24,085
|
|
|
|
17,154
|
|
|
|
15,423
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
12,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,455
|
|
|
|
21,606
|
|
|
|
17,993
|
|
|
|
11,758
|
|
|
|
24,134
|
|
|
|
17,238
|
|
|
|
15,511
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,749
|
|
|
|
9,073
|
|
|
|
7,522
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
11,319
|
|
|
|
4,730
|
|
|
|
6,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,706
|
|
|
$
|
12,533
|
|
|
$
|
10,471
|
|
|
$
|
6,855
|
|
|
$
|
12,815
|
|
|
$
|
12,508
|
|
|
$
|
8,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percentage of Total Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sep. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Sep. 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
|
51.9
|
%
|
|
|
51.4
|
%
|
|
|
49.2
|
%
|
|
|
47.2
|
%
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
45.4
|
%
|
|
|
46.8
|
%
|
|
|
45.7
|
%
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
37.4
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
Compensation and benefits expenses
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
77.7
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
|
|
|
72.5
|
|
|
|
83.2
|
|
|
|
74.1
|
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total operating revenues increased sequentially in each
quarter presented through the quarter ended March 31, 2010
due primarily to a combination of increased numbers of cash
transfers sold and growth in our portfolio of active cards. Our
numbers of sales and active cards increased as we sold our
products in a growing number of retail locations and increased
same-store sales. Cash transfer revenues and interchange
revenues also increased sequentially in these quarters because
of steady growth in the number of cash transfers, network
acceptance members and active cards in our portfolio. However,
because of the unusually strong seasonal revenue growth in the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, card revenues and interchange
revenues in the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2010 were lower than card revenues and
interchange revenues in the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
This pattern may continue in the fourth quarter of 2010. In
addition, as a result of an equity issuance to Walmart in May
2010, we began to record stock-based retailer incentive
compensation expense. We recognize the fair value of
36,810 shares each month as our right to repurchase those
shares lapses, recording the fair value of the then-current fair
value market of our Class A common stock. This
contra-revenue component further reduced the overall level of
our total operating revenues in the quarters ended June 30
and September 30, 2010 and will continue to do so through
May 2015.
Over the periods presented, we have experienced significant
fluctuations in the growth rate of our card revenues, from a
9.6% increase between the quarters ended December 31, 2008
and March 31, 2009 to slight declines in each of the
quarters ended June 30, September 30 and December 31,
2009, a 37.0% increase between the quarters ended
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010 and a 3.9%
decrease between the quarters ended June 30 and
September 30, 2010. The increases in our card revenues in
the March quarters were due primarily to growth in the number of
GPR cards activated and in the more recent March quarter also
due to higher maintenance fees and ATM fees, as large numbers of
taxpayers elected to receive their refunds via direct deposit on
our cards and as we resumed substantial television advertising.
The declines in our card revenues in the final three
53
2009 quarters were due primarily to the mid-February 2009
reduction in the new card fee and monthly maintenance fees for
the Walmart MoneyCard and the July 2009 reduction in the new
card fee for our Green Dot-branded GPR cards, substantially
offset by the growth in sales of those cards, and the payment to
certain retail distributors in the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 of sales incentives that were recorded as
an offset to the related card revenues. Monthly maintenance fees
and ATM fees, currently the other large components of card
revenues besides new card fees, have generally increased
sequentially in each of the quarters presented, while the
remaining component of card revenues other
revenues has generally declined. The slight decline
in card revenues between the quarters ended June 30 and
September 30, 2010 resulted primarily from the completion
prior to June 30, 2010 of the six-month amortization periods for
all new card fees from gift cards sold during the 2009 holiday
season.
Our total operating expenses have generally increased
sequentially in our seven most recent quarters. The decline in
total operating expenses and sales and marketing expenses
between the quarter ended December 31, 2008 and the
quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2009 was due primarily
to lower sales commission percentages coinciding with the
mid-February 2009 reduction in the new card fee and monthly
maintenance fees for the Walmart MoneyCard. We continued to
benefit from these lower commission percentages in the quarter
ended September 30, 2009 and the next several quarters, but
sales and marketing expenses increased after the June 2009
quarter as a result of new revenue-sharing arrangements with two
of our other largest retail distributors, increased packaging
costs associated with the relaunch of our Green Dot-branded card
and an increase in advertising and marketing expenses in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 as we resumed television
advertising after more than one year. Sales and marketing
expenses significantly increased again in May 2010 when the
contractual sales commission percentages that we are obligated
to pay Walmart increased substantially as a result of the May
2010 amendment to our agreement with them and now are higher
than they were before the mid-February 2009 reduction. Sales and
marketing expenses declined between the quarters ended June 30
and September 30, 2010 because of a reduction in the level
of our television advertising. We expect to increase our level
of television advertising in the first quarter of 2011.
Compensation and benefits expenses have generally increased
sequentially in each of the quarters presented due to increases
in employee compensation and benefits and third-party contractor
expenses. We added personnel and incurred additional third-party
contractor expenses to support expanding operations and to meet
the reporting requirements and compliance obligations of a
public company. Compensation and benefits expenses increased
45.8% between the quarters ended September 30 and
December 31, 2009 and declined the following quarter
primarily because our board of directors awarded
257,984 shares of common stock to our Chief Executive
Officer in December 2009 to compensate him for past services
rendered to our company. The aggregate grant date fair value of
this award was approximately $5.2 million, based on an
estimated fair value of our common stock of $20.01, as
determined by our board of directors on the date of the award,
which we recorded as stock-based compensation on the date of the
award.
The trend in processing expenses generally correlates closely
with the trend in our interchange revenues. Processing expenses
have increased sequentially in each of the quarters presented,
except for a slight decline in the quarter ended June 30,
2010 that resulted from a decrease in both the number of active
cards in our portfolio and the gross dollar volume loaded onto
our GPR cards following the conclusion of the tax season. The
large increase in processing expenses between the quarters ended
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010 was due primarily
to many taxpayers electing in the quarter ending March 31,
2010 to receive their refunds via direct deposit on our cards,
which significantly increased the gross dollar volume loaded
onto our GPR cards during that quarter.
Other general and administrative expenses increased sequentially
the last three quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010,
primarily because of an increase in professional services fees
related to our potential bank acquisition and other corporate
development initiatives and an increase in telephone and
communication expenses due to increased use of our call center
and IVR as the
54
number of active cards in our portfolio increased. The large
increase in other general and administrative expenses in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 was also due to a
$2.7 million write-off of deferred offering expenses as we
did not expect to receive sufficient proceeds from the sale of
our Class A common stock in our initial public offering to
offset those expenses. Other general and administrative expenses
declined from the quarter ended December 31, 2008 to the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 because we reversed a $500,000
legal reserve in the latter quarter as a result of a favorable
judgment during that period. Other general and administrative
expenses declined in the quarters ended June 30 and
September 30, 2010 because of a significant decline in
professional service fees related to our initial public
offering, which was completed in July 2010, and to our on-going
bank acquisition.
Our effective tax rate in 2010 declined several percentage
points from its level of approximately 42.0% in 2009 as a result
of the approval by the California Franchise Tax Board in May
2010 of our petition to use an alternative apportionment method.
Under this alternative apportionment method, we apportion less
income before income taxes to the State of California, resulting
in a lower effective state tax rate. Although our petition
expires on July 31, 2011, we expect to continue to benefit
from the lower effective state tax rate in subsequent years as
certain enacted tax law changes, which conform to our petition,
become effective January 1, 2011. In addition, since our
petition is retroactive to August 1, 2008, we experienced
an additional tax benefit that further reduced our effective tax
rate in the three months ended June 30, 2010. These
benefits were partially offset in the quarters ended
March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 by the non-deductible
expenses related to our initial public offering.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
The following table sets forth the major sources and uses of
cash for our last three fiscal years ended July 31, the
five months ended December 31, 2009 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
2,461
|
|
|
$
|
35,006
|
|
|
$
|
35,297
|
|
|
$
|
26,121
|
|
|
$
|
77,493
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(4,558
|
)
|
|
|
(5,163
|
)
|
|
|
(19,400
|
)
|
|
|
(5,063
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(3,264
|
)
|
|
|
(28,618
|
)
|
|
|
8,681
|
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(1,939
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,579
|
|
|
$
|
(12,721
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,739
|
|
|
$
|
79,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2007, 2008 and 2009, the five months ended
December 31, 2009 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, we financed our operations primarily
through our cash flows from operations. At September 30,
2010, our primary source of liquidity was unrestricted cash and
cash equivalents totaling $135.6 million.
We use trend and variance analyses to project future cash needs,
making adjustments to the projections when needed. We believe
that our current unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and cash
flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our working
capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the
next twelve months. Thereafter, we may need to raise additional
funds through public or private financings or borrowings. Any
additional financing we require may not be available on terms
that are favorable to us, or at all. If we raise additional
funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt
securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant
dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have
rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of
55
holders of our Class A and Class B common stock. No
assurance can be given that additional financing will be
available or that, if available, such financing can be obtained
on terms favorable to our stockholders and us.
In February 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement for our
proposed bank acquisition. Under the terms of the agreement, we
have agreed to acquire all of the outstanding common shares and
voting interest of Bonneville Bancorp for an aggregate purchase
price of approximately $15.7 million in cash. We plan to
pay for the acquisition with existing cash balances. We
currently expect to complete this acquisition in the fourth
quarter of calendar 2010. However, the acquisition is subject to
regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions and,
therefore, there can be no assurance that our proposed bank
acquisition will be completed within this timeframe, or at all.
Cash Flows
From Operating Activities
Our $77.5 million of net cash provided by operating
activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2010
principally resulted from $34.3 million of net income, the
adjustment for non-cash operating expenses of $53.6 million
(including $34.9 million for the provision for
uncollectible overdrawn accounts, $7.7 million for
stock-based retail incentive compensation, $5.4 million for
depreciation and amortization and $5.2 million of employee
stock-based compensation), a $9.8 million increase in
amounts due to card issuing banks for overdrawn accounts and an
$8.4 million increase in income taxes payable. These
increases were partially offset by a $31.8 million increase
in accounts receivable and a $3.9 million decrease in
deferred revenue.
Our $26.1 million of net cash provided by operating
activities in the five months ended December 31, 2009
resulted from $13.7 million of net income, the adjustment
for non-cash operating expenses of $22.1 million (including
$11.2 million for the provision for uncollectible overdrawn
accounts, $6.8 million of stock-based compensation,
$3.5 million of deferred income tax expense and
$2.3 million for depreciation and amortization, offset by
$1.9 million of excess tax benefits from the exercise of
stock options), an increase of $8.1 million in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, an increase of
$7.6 million in deferred revenue and an increase of
$5.2 million in amounts due to card issuing banks for
overdrawn accounts. These increases were partially offset by a
$20.2 million increase in accounts receivable, a
$5.5 million increase in deferred expenses and a
$3.8 million decrease in income taxes payable. The increase
in our accounts receivable balance was primarily related to the
increase in the number of our GPR cards outstanding that are not
active cards but on which we charge a monthly maintenance fee.
This increase was partially offset by a $11.2 million
provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts that increased
the reserve held against the accounts receivable balance.
Our $35.3 million of net cash provided by operating
activities in fiscal 2009 resulted from $37.2 million of
net income, the adjustment for non-cash operating expenses of
$28.3 million (including $22.5 million for the
provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts,
$4.6 million for depreciation and amortization and
$2.5 million for stock-based compensation, partially offset
by a $1.7 million deferred income tax expense), a
$3.2 million increase in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, a $2.3 million decrease in deferred expenses
and a $1.4 million increase in income taxes payable. These
were offset by a $29.9 million increase in accounts
receivable and a $5.3 million decrease in the amounts due
to card issuing banks for overdrawn accounts. Although increases
in accounts receivable are generally partially offset by
increases in amounts due to issuing banks for overdrawn
accounts, during fiscal 2009, we amended our agreement with one
of the banks that issue our cards, expediting the settlement
timing of amounts due to them for overdrawn card accounts.
Our $35.0 million of net cash provided by operating
activities in fiscal 2008 resulted from $17.3 million of
net income, the adjustment for non-cash operating expenses of
$21.3 million (including $16.1 million for the
provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts,
$4.4 million for depreciation and amortization and
$1.2 million for stock-based compensation, offset by
$0.5 million of excess tax benefits from the exercise of
stock options), a $10.8 million increase in the amounts due
to
56
card issuing banks for overdrawn accounts, a $4.7 million
increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, a
$4.4 million increase in deferred revenue and a
$3.7 million decrease in income taxes receivable. These
were partially offset by a $24.7 million increase in
accounts receivable, a $2.8 million increase in deferred
expenses and a $2.3 million increase in prepaid expenses
and other assets.
Our $2.5 million of net cash provided by operating
activities in fiscal 2007 resulted from $4.6 million of net
income, the adjustment for non-cash operating expenses of
$8.8 million (including $7.9 million for the provision
for uncollectible overdrawn accounts and $3.5 million for
depreciation and amortization, partially offset by a
$2.6 million deferred income tax benefit), a
$3.9 million increase in the amounts due to card issuing
banks for overdrawn accounts and a $2.6 million increase in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities. These were partially
offset by an $11.0 million increase in accounts receivable,
a $4.5 million decrease in income taxes payable, a
$2.0 million decrease in deferred revenue.
Cash Flows
From Investing Activities
Our $0.1 million of net cash used in investing activities
in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 consisted of
the purchase of $10.3 million of property and equipment
almost entirely offset by a $10.2 million decrease in
restricted cash. Our net cash used in investing activities in
the five months ended December 31, 2009 consisted almost
entirely of the purchase of property and equipment of
$5.1 million. Our net cash used in investing activities in
fiscal 2009 consisted of a $13.0 million increase in
restricted cash and the purchase of $6.4 million of
property and equipment related to expanding our operations,
including the development of internal-use software, which we
capitalized. In fiscal 2009, we renewed our line of credit,
which is used to fund timing differences between funds remitted
by our retail distributors to the banks that issue our cards and
funds utilized by our cardholders, and elected to increase our
restricted deposits to $15.0 million at the lending
institution as collateral in order to reduce the commitment fees
we would incur on this line of credit. Our net cash used in
investing activities in fiscal 2007 and 2008 consisted primarily
of $4.3 million and $5.1 million, respectively, for
the purchase of computer hardware and software and the
development of internal-use software.
Cash Flows
From Financing Activities
Our $1.9 million of net cash provided by financing
activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
the result of proceeds from the exercise of stock options and
warrants. Our $8.7 million of net cash provided by
financing activities for the five months ended December 31,
2009 was the result of the repayment to us of $5.9 million
of related party notes receivable and excess tax benefits and
proceeds from the exercise of stock options for an aggregate of
$2.8 million. Our $28.6 million of net cash used in
financing activities in fiscal 2009 was primarily associated
with the redemption in full of our Series D redeemable
preferred stock. We entered into an agreement in December 2008
with the sole holder of these securities to pay
$39.2 million for an early redemption of all outstanding
shares of our Series D redeemable preferred stock and the
purchase of a call option on a common stock warrant held by this
stockholder. In June 2009, we exercised the call option on the
warrant for $2.0 million. We also received proceeds of
$13.0 million related to the issuance of our
Series C-2
preferred stock in fiscal 2009. Our $3.3 million of net
cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2008 resulted from
net repayments on our line of credit of $2.5 million and
principal payments on our short-term debt of $2.4 million,
offset by excess tax benefits and proceeds from the exercise of
stock options for an aggregate of $1.7 million. Our
$158,000 of net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal
2007 was primarily associated with net borrowings on our line of
credit of $2.5 million and proceeds of $355,000 from the
exercise of options and warrants, offset by principal payments
on short-term debt of $2.6 million. In fiscal 2007, we also
issued Series D redeemable preferred stock and a
freestanding warrant for total consideration of
$20.0 million and used the proceeds to repurchase
$20.0 million of common and preferred stock from our
existing stockholders.
57
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
Our contractual commitments will have an impact on our future
liquidity. The following table summarizes our contractual
obligations, including both on-and off-balance sheet
transactions that represent material expected or contractually
committed future obligations, at December 31, 2009. We
believe that we will be able to fund these obligations through
cash generated from operations and from our existing cash
balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less Than 1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
More Than 5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations(1)
|
|
|
4,507
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations(2)
|
|
|
41,546
|
|
|
|
21,287
|
|
|
|
20,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,053
|
|
|
$
|
23,067
|
|
|
$
|
22,950
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In January and October 2010, we leased approximately
27,000 square feet of office space near our existing
headquarters facility under sub-lease agreements that expire in
December 2011. We are obligated to pay an aggregate of
approximately $40,000 in monthly base rent payments for the
expanded space. |
|
(2) |
|
Primarily future minimum payments under agreements with vendors
and our retail distributors. See note 14 of the notes to
our audited consolidated financial statements. |
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
During fiscal 2007, 2008 and 2009, the five months ended
December 31, 2009 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, we did not have any relationships with
unconsolidated organizations or financial partnerships, such as
structured finance or special purpose entities that would have
been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance
sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited
purposes.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with GAAP. The preparation of our consolidated financial
statements requires our management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related
disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience,
current circumstances and various other assumptions that our
management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. In
many instances, we could reasonably use different accounting
estimates, and in some instances changes in the accounting
estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period.
Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from the
estimates made by our management. To the extent that there are
differences between our estimates and actual results, our future
financial statement presentation, financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows will be affected. We believe that
the accounting policies discussed below are critical to
understanding our historical and future performance, as these
policies relate to the more significant areas involving
managements judgments and estimates.
58
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue when the price is fixed or determinable,
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product is
sold or the service is performed, and collectibility of the
resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
We defer and recognize new card fee revenues on a straight-line
basis over the period commensurate with our service obligation
to our customers. We consider the service obligation period to
be the average card lifetime. We determine the average card
lifetime for each pool of homogeneous products (e.g., products
that exhibit the same characteristics such as nature of service
and terms and conditions) based on company-specific historical
data. Currently, we determine the average card lifetime
separately for our GPR cards and gift cards. For our GPR cards,
we measure the card lifetime as the period of time, inclusive of
reload activity, between sale (or activation) of a card and the
date of the last positive balance on that card. We analyze GPR
cards activated between six and forty-two months prior to each
balance sheet date. We use this historical look-back period as a
basis for determining our average card lifetime because it
provides sufficient time for meaningful behavioral trends to
develop. Currently, our GPR cards have an average card lifetime
of nine months. The usage of gift cards is limited to the
initial funds loaded to the card. Therefore, we measure these
gift cards lifetime as the redemption period over which
cardholders perform the substantial majority of their
transactions. Currently, gift cards have an average lifetime of
six months. We reassess average card lifetime quarterly. Average
card lifetimes may vary in the future as cardholder behavior
changes relative to historical experience because customers are
influenced by changes in the pricing of our services, the
availability of substitute products, and other factors.
We also defer and expense commissions paid to retail
distributors related to new card sales ratably over the average
card lifetime, which is currently nine months for our GPR cards
and six months for gift cards.
We report our different types of revenues on a gross or net
basis based on our assessment of whether we act as a principal
or an agent in the transaction. To the extent we act as a
principal in the transaction, we report revenues on a gross
basis. In concluding whether or not we act as a principal or an
agent, we evaluate whether we have the substantial risks and
rewards under the terms of the revenue-generating arrangements,
whether we are the party responsible for fulfillment of the
services purchased by the cardholders, and other factors. For
all of our significant revenue-generating arrangements,
including GPR and gift cards, we recognize revenues on a gross
basis.
Generally, customers have limited rights to a refund of the new
card fee or a cash transfer fee. We have elected to recognize
revenues prior to the expiration of the refund period, but
reduce revenues by the amount of expected refunds, which we
estimate based on actual historical refunds.
On occasion, we enter into incentive agreements with our retail
distributors designed to increase product acceptance and sales
volume. We record incentive payments, including the issuance of
equity instruments, as a reduction of revenues and recognize
them over the period the related revenues are recognized or as
services are rendered, as applicable.
Reserve for
Uncollectible Overdrawn Accounts
Cardholder account overdrafts may arise from maintenance fee
assessments on our GPR cards or from purchase transactions that
we honor on GPR or gift cards, in each case in excess of the
funds in the cardholders account. We are responsible to
the banks that issue our cards for any losses associated with
these overdrafts. Overdrawn account balances are therefore
deemed to be our receivables due from cardholders, and we
include them as a component of accounts receivable, net, on our
consolidated balance sheets. The banks that issue our cards fund
the overdrawn account balances on our behalf. We include our
obligations to them on our consolidated balance sheets as
amounts due to card issuing banks for overdrawn accounts, a
current liability, and we settle our obligations to them based
on the terms specified in their agreements with us. These
settlement terms
59
generally require us to settle on a monthly basis or when the
cardholder account is closed, depending on the card issuing bank.
We generally recover overdrawn account balances from those GPR
cardholders that perform a reload transaction. In addition, we
recover some purchase transaction overdrafts through enforcement
of payment network rules, which allow us to recover the amounts
from the merchant where the purchase transaction was conducted.
However, we are exposed to losses from unrecovered GPR
cardholder account overdrafts. The probability of recovering
these amounts is primarily related to the number of days that
have elapsed since an account had activity, such as a purchase,
ATM transaction or fee assessment. Generally, we recover
60-70% of
overdrawn account balances in accounts that have had activity in
the last 30 days,
10-20% in
accounts that have had activity in the last 30 to 60 days,
and less than 10% when more than 60 days have elapsed.
We establish a reserve for uncollectible overdrawn accounts for
maintenance fees we assess and purchase transactions we honor,
in each case in excess of a cardholders account balance.
We classify overdrawn accounts into age groups based on the
number of days since the account last had activity. We then
calculate a reserve factor for each age group based on the
average recovery rate for the most recent six months. These
factors are applied to these age groups to estimate our overall
reserve. We rely on these historical rates because they have
remained relatively consistent for several years. When more than
90 days have passed without any activity in an account, we
consider recovery to be remote and charge off the full amount of
the overdrawn account balance against the reserve for
uncollectible overdrawn accounts.
Overdrafts due to maintenance fee assessments comprised
approximately 94% of our total overdrawn account balances due
from cardholders for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. We charge our GPR cardholder accounts maintenance fees on
a monthly basis pursuant to the terms and conditions in the
applicable cardholder agreements. Although cardholder accounts
become inactive or overdrawn, we continue to provide cardholders
the ongoing functionality of our GPR cards, which allows them to
reload and use their cards at any time. As a result, we continue
to assess a maintenance fee until a cardholder account becomes
overdrawn by an amount equal to two maintenance fees, currently
$6.00 for the Walmart MoneyCard and $11.90 for our Green
Dot-branded GPR cards. We recognize the fees ratably over the
month for which they are assessed, net of the related reserve
for uncollectible overdrawn accounts, as a component of card
revenues in our consolidated statements of operations.
We include our reserve for uncollectible overdrawn accounts
related to purchase transactions in other general and
administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of
operations. As the recovery rate for gift card overdrafts is
based solely upon relatively unpredictable factors, such as
negotiations with merchants where purchase transactions are
conducted, we generally reserve these amounts in full as they
occur and recognize recoveries on a cash basis.
Our recovery rates may change in the future in response to
factors such as the pricing of reloads and new cards and the
availability of substitute products.
Employee
Stock-Based Compensation
Effective August 1, 2006, we adopted a new accounting
standard related to stock-based compensation. We adopted the new
standard using the prospective transition method, which required
compensation expense to be recognized on a prospective basis,
and therefore prior period financial statements do not include
the impact of our adoption of this standard. Compensation
expense recognized relates to stock options granted, modified,
repurchased, or cancelled on or after August 1, 2006 and
stock purchases under our employee stock purchase plan, or ESPP.
We record compensation expense using the fair value method of
accounting. For stock options and stock purchases under the
ESPP, we base compensation expense on fair values estimated at
the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For
stock awards, we base compensation expense on the estimated fair
value of our common stock at the grant date. We recognize
compensation expense for awards with
60
only service conditions that have graded vesting schedules on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period of the award.
Vesting is based upon continued service to our company.
Pre-IPO Valuation
of Common Stock
We continue to account for stock options granted to employees
prior to August 1, 2006, using the intrinsic value method.
Under the intrinsic value method, compensation associated with
stock awards to employees was determined as the difference, if
any, between the fair value of the underlying common stock on
the grant date, and the price an employee must pay to exercise
the award.
Determining the fair value of stock options requires the use of
highly subjective assumptions, including the expected term of
the option award and our expected stock price volatility. Our
weighted-average assumptions with respect to grants since
January 1, 2009, shown by grant date in the table below,
represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve
inherent uncertainties and the application of judgment. If
factors change and, as a result, we use different assumptions,
our stock-based compensation could be materially different in
the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-Free
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
Expected Stock
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
Price Volatility
|
|
|
March 19, 2009
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.0
|
%
|
June 9, 2009
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
August 3, 2009
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.0
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.0
|
|
February 4, 2010
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.3
|
|
May 6, 2010
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
The following table summarizes information by grant date for the
stock options that we have granted between January 1, 2009
and September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Per Share Estimated
|
|
|
|
Shares Subject
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
to Options
|
|
|
Price of
|
|
|
Our Common
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
March 19, 2009
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
|
$
|
5.83
|
|
June 9, 2009
|
|
|
85,800
|
|
|
|
15.65
|
|
|
|
15.65
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
August 3, 2009
|
|
|
127,500
|
|
|
|
17.19
|
|
|
|
17.19
|
|
|
|
9.50
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
|
1,261,750
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
9.47
|
|
February 4, 2010
|
|
|
130,500
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
12.79
|
|
May 6, 2010
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
|
|
32.23
|
|
|
|
32.23
|
|
|
|
15.40
|
|
Additionally, in December 2009 and February 2010, we granted
257,984 share and 1,600 share common stock awards. The
grant date fair values of our common stock at the dates of these
awards were $20.01 and $25.00 per share, respectively.
On each of the above dates, we granted our employees stock
options or awarded to our officers and directors common stock at
exercise prices or prices, respectively, equal to the estimated
fair value of the underlying common stock, as determined on a
contemporaneous basis by our board of directors with input from
management and an independent valuation firm. Because there was
no public market for our common stock, our board of directors
determined the fair value of our common stock on each grant or
award date by considering a number of objective and subjective
factors including:
|
|
|
|
|
the per share value of any recent preferred stock financing and
the amount of convertible preferred stock liquidation
preferences;
|
|
|
|
any third-party trading activity in our common stock or
preferred stock;
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
the illiquid nature of our common stock and the opportunity for
any future liquidity events;
|
|
|
|
our current and historical operating performance and current
financial condition;
|
|
|
|
our operating and financial projections;
|
|
|
|
our achievement of company milestones;
|
|
|
|
the stock price performance of a peer group comprised of
selected publicly-traded companies identified as being
comparable to us; and
|
|
|
|
economic conditions and trends in the broad market for stocks.
|
We have also used these fair market valuations in calculating
our stock-based compensation expense.
We determined the fair value of our common stock as of each
valuation date by allocating our enterprise value among each of
our equity securities. We utilized an income approach and two
market approaches to estimate our enterprise value. These
approaches are consistent with the methods outlined in the AICPA
Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity
Securities Issued as Compensation.
The income approach utilized was the discounted cash flow
method, which required us to determine the present value of our
estimated future cash flows by applying an appropriate discount
rate, such as our weighted average cost of capital. The cash
flows estimates that we used were consistent with our company
financial plan. As there is inherent uncertainty in making these
estimates, we assessed the risks associated with achieving the
forecasts in selecting the appropriate discount rates, which
ranged from 14.0% to 20.0%. If different discount rates had been
used, the valuations would have been different.
The market approaches we utilized were the guideline public
company method and the guideline transaction method. We derived
our enterprise value under the guideline public company method
by applying valuation multiples of comparable publicly held
companies to certain of our historical and forecasted financial
metrics. The comparable publicly held companies generally
consisted of Visa, American Express Co., Discover Financial
Services, MasterCard, Western Union, Dollar Financial Corp.,
Euronet Worldwide Inc., and Encore Capital Group Inc. We derived
our enterprise value under the guideline transaction method
based on recent cash transactions with independent third parties
involving our equity securities.
We assessed the results of the various approaches and
methodologies by considering the relative applicability of the
methods given the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the nature of our industry and current market conditions;
|
|
|
|
the quality, reliability and verifiability of the data used in
each methodology;
|
|
|
|
the comparability of publicly held companies or
transactions; and
|
|
|
|
any additional considerations unique to our company as of each
valuation date.
|
We placed the most weight on the guideline transaction method
when a recent cash transaction occurred with independent third
parties involving our equity securities and the transaction was
between willing parties. In the absence of a recent cash
transaction with independent third parties, we utilized the
discounted cash flow method and the guideline public company
method, weighted 75% and 25%, respectively, to estimate our
enterprise value. We placed more weight on the discounted cash
flow method because, as of the valuation dates, our company was
growing faster than the peer group companies used in the
guideline public company method, reducing the comparability of
their valuation multiples to our valuation multiples.
We allocated our enterprise value to each of our equity
securities using the option-pricing method, or OPM, the
probability-weighted expected return method, or PWERM, and the
current-value method,
62
as applicable. These equity allocation methods account for the
preferential rights of holders of our preferred stock, such as
liquidation preferences and conversion rights. Under these
equity allocation methods, we treated preferred stock as
equivalent to common stock when our enterprise value exceeded
the liquidation preferences of our preferred stock.
Under the OPM, we treated common stock, preferred stock and
other equity instruments as call options on our enterprise
value, as this equity allocation model relies on the principle
that any group of stakeholders in our company has the option to
acquire our company by paying the remaining stakeholders a fair
price for their securities. The options were valued using the
Black-Scholes formula, which required us to estimate the
volatility of the price of our equity securities. Estimating the
volatility of our stock price is complex because there is no
readily available market price for our stock. Therefore, we
based the volatility of our stock on the volatility of the
stocks of comparable publicly held companies. The volatility of
the stocks of the comparable publicly held companies varied
between 46% and 56% over this period. Had we used different
estimates of volatility, the allocations between preferred and
common stock would have been different.
Under the PWERM, we estimated the present value of our common
stock based upon the anticipated timing of potential liquidity
events, such as an IPO, merger or sale, or dissolution and
liquidation, or our continued operation as a viable private
enterprise. The anticipated timing and likelihood of each
liquidity event were based on the plans of our board of
directors and management as of the respective valuation dates.
We estimated the future value of our enterprise under each
liquidity event using both an income approach and market
approaches. We discounted the future values to present value and
then weighted the liquidity events based on the probability of
their occurring. However, due to the uncertainty surrounding
liquidity events and the capital markets at each grant date, our
board of directors relied more heavily on the OPM.
Under the current-value method, we allocated our enterprise
value to our common stock, preferred stock and other equity
instruments based on their liquidation preferences or conversion
rights, whichever would be greater. The fundamental assumption
of this allocation method is that the manner in which each class
of preferred stockholders will exercise its rights and achieve
its return is determined based on the enterprise value as of the
valuation date and not at some future date. Because this method
focuses on the present and is not forward-looking, its
usefulness is limited primarily to situations where a liquidity
event such as an IPO is imminent and thus expectations about the
future of the enterprise as a going concern are largely
irrelevant.
We reduced the fair value per share of our common stock, as
determined by the equity allocation methods, by a lack of
marketability discount that ranged from 15% to 30%. This
discount served to account for the fact that there was no public
market for our common stock as of the various grant dates. We
determined the appropriate level of discount by comparing
attributes of our company and our equity securities to
benchmarks in empirical studies of nonmarketable securities and
calculating the hypothetical cost to hedge our common stock with
put options over the period in which our common stock was
expected to remain illiquid and not marketable.
Our valuations for each grant date since January 1, 2009
are described in detail below.
Stock Option Grants on March 19, 2009. On
December 19, 2008, we sold 1,181,818 shares of
Series C-2
Preferred Stock at a price of $11.00 per share and we redeemed
2,926,458 shares of Series D Preferred Stock at a
price of $13.38 per share.
We completed a valuation analysis using the OPM and PWERM to
derive values for our preferred stock, our common stock and the
overall enterprise.
The value of each security and the enterprise was determined in
the OPM relative to the sale price of our
Series C-2
Preferred Stock. In the OPM, the value of each security was
determined using the Black-Scholes formula, assuming a time to
liquidity of 2.8 years, an asset volatility of 50% and a
risk-free interest rate commensurate with the estimated time to
liquidity of 1.2%. Because the Series D Preferred Stock
contained unique and complex redemption features that increased
the difficulty and
63
subjectivity in determining its value, we considered its
redemption value to be less reliable as an input into the OPM in
deriving an overall enterprise value.
We also utilized a PWERM that contemplated two
scenarios a remain-private scenario and a future
liquidity event scenario. We derived our value under the
remain-private scenario by discounting projected future cash
flows to their present value as of the grant date using a 20.0%
discount rate. This rate was determined based on an estimated
weighted-average cost of capital derived from our estimated cost
of equity, our after-tax cost of debt, and the
debt-to-equity
ratio implied by the valuation. Our cost of capital was based on
publicly available information for companies in lines of
business that were the same as or similar to ours.
We estimated high and low future enterprise values under the
PWERM future liquidity event scenario using high- and low-case
financial projections and market-based valuation multiples
derived from publicly traded peer group companies, transactions
involving businesses that were similar to our company, and
valuation multiples implied by the sale of our
Series C-2
Preferred Stock. We allocated the future enterprise values to
options, warrants and various series of preferred stock based on
their future liquidation preferences or conversion values,
whichever would be greater, and allocated the remainder to our
common stock. The allocated value was discounted to present
value at the grant date.
In the final analysis, we weighted the remain-private and future
liquidity event scenarios equally as the likelihood of either
scenario was difficult to forecast with reliability. We weighted
the value indications determined under the low- and high-case
cash flow projections by 75.0% and 25.0%, respectively. We
weighted the indications of the fair value of our common stock
under the two equity allocation methods OPM and
PWERM 75.0% and 25.0%, respectively, because of the
level of subjectivity inherent in the PWERM as a result of the
continued turmoil in the public and private markets and the
uncertainty at the time as to when a potential liquidity event
could occur for our company.
Based on this analysis, our board of directors determined that
the estimated fair value of our common stock at March 19,
2009 was $10.84 per share on a minority, nonmarketable basis.
Stock Option Grants on June 9, 2009. For
the June 9, 2009 valuation, we determined that the
uncertainty surrounding the timing of a liquidity event had
increased the level of subjectivity in the PWERM to the point
where that methodology was no longer considered appropriate.
Therefore, we utilized only the OPM equity allocation method.
We calculated values for our securities in the OPM using the
Black-Scholes formula, assuming a time to liquidity of
2.6 years, an asset volatility of 55.0%, and a risk-free
interest rate commensurate with the estimated time to liquidity
of 1.3%. We continued to estimate the enterprise value by
discounting high- and low-case cash flow projections to present
value as of the grant dates using a 20.0% discount rate and
through the application of valuation multiples derived from
publicly traded companies engaged in lines of business that were
the same as or similar to ours. Although we continued to weigh
the low- and high-case cash flow projections by 75.0% and 25.0%,
respectively, as of June 9, 2009, the enterprise value
increased as progress toward attaining the high-case cash flow
projections was made. Additionally, the value implied by the
guideline public company methodology increased due to
improvement in valuation multiples from increasing stock prices
for our peer group public companies.
Based on this analysis, our board of directors determined that
the estimated fair value of our common stock at June 9,
2009 was $15.65 per share on a minority, nonmarketable basis.
Stock Option Grants on August 3,
2009. For the August 3, 2009 valuation, we
continued to use only the OPM with the Black-Scholes formula to
calculate the value of our securities, assuming a time to
liquidity of 2.4 years, an asset volatility of 56.0%, and a
risk-free interest rate commensurate with the estimated time to
liquidity of 1.2%.
64
Continued progress toward the high-case cash flow scenario and
continued improvements in our peer group public company market
factors were reflected in the underlying enterprise value,
resulting in an increase in the estimated fair value of our
common stock value relative to the prior grant date.
Based on this analysis, our board of directors determined that
the estimated fair value of our common stock at August 3,
2009 was $17.19 per share on a minority, nonmarketable basis.
Stock Option Grants on November 12,
2009. In October 2009, certain existing and
third-party investors entered into a tentative agreement,
whereby the investors extended an offer to purchase
3,250,000 shares of our common stock, at a price of $20.05
less applicable selling fees, directly from our existing
stockholders. On November 9, 2009, the offering closed and
existing stockholders sold 3,033,661 shares of our common
stock at a price of $20.01 per share.
Our board of directors considered the offering price to be the
most reliable estimate of the fair value of our common stock
given that the transaction was an orderly purchase and sale
among parties that had reasonable knowledge of relevant facts
and that were not under any compulsion to buy or sell the
securities.
Based on these facts, our board of directors determined that the
estimated fair value of our common stock at November 12,
2009 was $20.01 per share on a minority, nonmarketable basis.
Stock Option Grants on February 4,
2010. In December 2009, an existing stockholder
sold 400,000 shares of Series C and C-1 Preferred
Stock for $25.00 per share to another existing stockholder. Our
board of directors considered this transaction to be a reliable
estimate of the fair value of our common stock given that the
transaction was an orderly purchase and sale among parties that
had reasonable knowledge of relevant facts and that were not
under any compulsion to buy or sell the securities.
Additionally, the liquidation preference of the Series C
and C-1 Preferred Stock sold was equal to $1.07 per share.
Relative to the purchase price of $25.00, the preferred stock
conversion option value was deeply
in-the-money
and implied no premium over common stock.
Based on these facts, our board of directors determined that the
estimated fair value of our common stock at February 4,
2010 was $25.00 per share on a minority, nonmarketable basis.
Stock Option Grants on May 6, 2010. For
the May 6, 2010 valuation, we estimated our enterprise
value taking into consideration a proposed amendment to our
agreement with Walmart. We utilized cash flow projections for
two alternative scenarios the proposed amendment was
completed and the proposed amendment was not completed. We
discounted these cash flow projections as of the grant date
using discount rates of 14.0% and 16.0% and applied valuation
multiples derived from publicly traded companies engaged in
lines of business that were the same as or similar to ours. Our
enterprise value increased from our valuation at
February 4, 2010 because we made progress toward achieving
our cash flow projections, we lowered the discount rate by 2.5%
from the previous valuation as a result of lower
company-specific risk premium and the value implied by the
guideline public company methodology increased due to
improvement in valuation multiples from increasing stock prices
for our peer group companies. We expanded our guideline company
set to include Amazon.com, Salesforce.com, Google and Tencent,
Inc. as we considered these companies relevant to the value of
our company.
We calculated values for our securities using the current-value
method. Due to the value of our common stock relative to the
liquidation preferences of our preferred stock, the selection of
the allocation method was insignificant. We weighted the fair
value of our common stock determined under the two scenarios
described above by the probability of each scenario
occurring 75% and 25%, respectively.
Based on this analysis, our board of directors determined that
the estimated fair value of our common stock at May 6, 2010
was $32.23 per share on a minority, nonmarketable basis. Our
proposed amendment with Walmart was completed after the grant
date, as discussed in this prospectus.
65
Post-IPO
Valuation of Common Stock
Stock Option Grants on July 21, 2010. Our
board of directors determined that the estimated fair value of
our common stock at July 21, 2010 was $36.00 per share,
consistent with our initial public offering price.
For all grants of stock options made following the completion
our initial public offering in July 2010, we have determined,
and will determine in the future, fair value based on the
closing price of our Class A common stock on the NYSE on
the date of grant.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update,
or ASU,
2010-09,
Subsequent Events Amendments to Certain
Recognition and Disclosure Requirements, which amends the
disclosure requirements related to subsequent events. Effective
immediately, the ASU retracts the requirement to disclose the
date through which subsequent events have been evaluated for a
SEC filer. We adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2010.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
approved the Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, as the
single source of authoritative accounting and reporting
standards for all nongovernmental entities, with the exception
of guidance issued by the SEC and its staff. The FASB ASC is
effective for interim or annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. All existing accounting standards have
been superseded, and all accounting literature not included in
the FASB ASC is considered non-authoritative. Our adoption of
FASB ASC did not have an impact on our consolidated financial
statements because it only amends the referencing to existing
accounting standards.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard for
disclosing events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before the financial statements are issued or are available to
be issued. Additionally, the standard requires companies to
disclose subsequent events as defined in the standard and to
disclose the date through which we have evaluated subsequent
events. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods
ending after June 15, 2009. Our adoption of the standard
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements. See note 16 of the notes to our audited
consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
requires us to include fair value disclosures of financial
instruments for each interim and annual period for which
financial statements are prepared. Our adoption of the standard
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements. See note 8 of the notes to our audited
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on
determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment
transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and
therefore need to be included in the earnings allocation in
calculating earnings per share under the two-class method.
Unvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable
rights to dividend or dividend equivalents are treated as a
separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share.
The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008; earlier application was not permitted.
Our adoption of the standard did not have a material effect on
our results of operations or earnings per share.
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance that modifies the
accounting for business combinations and requires, with limited
exceptions, the acquirer in a business combination to recognize
100% of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquired company at fair value on
the date of acquisition. In addition, the guidance requires that
the acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs be
charged to expense as incurred, and requires that certain
contingent assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as
contingent consideration, be recognized at fair value. This
guidance also modifies the accounting for certain acquired
income tax assets and liabilities. Further, the guidance
requires that assets acquired and
66
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from
contingencies be recognized at fair value on the acquisition
date if fair value can be determined during the measurement
period. If fair value cannot be determined, companies should
typically account for the acquired contingencies under existing
accounting guidance. This new guidance is effective for
acquisitions consummated on or after January 1, 2009. We
will apply this guidance to our pending acquisition of a bank
holding company and its subsidiary commercial bank. See
note 16 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial
statements.
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the potential for economic losses from changes in
market factors such as foreign currency exchange rates, credit,
interest rates and equity prices. We believe that we have
limited exposure to risks associated with changes in foreign
currency exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices. We
have no foreign operations, and we do not transact business in
foreign currencies. We do not hold or enter into derivatives or
other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
We do not consider our cash and cash equivalents to be subject
to interest rate risk due to their short periods of time to
maturity.
We do have exposure to credit risk associated with the financial
institutions that hold our cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash and our settlement assets due from our retail distributors
that collect funds and fees from our customers. We manage the
credit risk associated with our cash and cash equivalents by
maintaining an investment policy that limits investments to
highly liquid funds with certain highly rated financial
institutions. Our policy also limits the investment
concentration that we may have with a single financial
institution. We monitor compliance with our investment policy on
an ongoing basis, including quarterly communication with our
audit committee.
We also have exposure to credit risk associated with our retail
distributors, but that exposure is limited due to the short time
period, currently an average of three days, that the retailer
settlement asset is outstanding. We perform an initial credit
review of each new retail distributor prior to signing a
distribution agreement with it, and then monitor its financial
performance on a periodic basis. We monitor each retail
distributors settlement asset exposure and its compliance
with its specified contractual settlement terms on a daily basis.
67
BUSINESS
Overview
Green Dot is a leading prepaid financial services company
providing simple, low-cost and convenient money management
solutions to a broad base of U.S. consumers. We believe
that we are the leading provider of general purpose reloadable
prepaid debit cards in the United States and that our Green Dot
Network is the leading reload network for prepaid cards in the
United States. We sell our cards and offer our reload services
nationwide at approximately 50,000 retail store locations, which
provide consumers convenient access to our products and
services. Our technology platform, Green PlaNET, provides
essential functionality, including
point-of-sale
connectivity and interoperability with Visa, MasterCard and
other payment or funds transfer networks, and compliance and
other capabilities to our Green Dot Network, enabling real-time
transactions in a secure environment. The combination of our
innovative products, broad retail distribution and proprietary
technology creates powerful network effects, which we believe
enhance the value we deliver to our customers, our retail
distributors and other participants in our network.
We have designed our products and services to appeal primarily
to consumers living in households that earn less than $75,000
annually across the following four segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Never-banked households in which no one has ever had
a bank account;
|
|
|
|
Previously-banked households in which at least one
member has previously had a bank account, but no one has one
currently;
|
|
|
|
Underbanked households in which at least one member
currently has a bank account, but that also use non-bank
financial service providers to conduct routine transactions like
check cashing or bill payment; and
|
|
|
|
Fully-banked households that primarily rely on
traditional financial services.
|
We were an early pioneer in the development of prepaid financial
services in the United States. In May 2001, we sold our first
basic prepaid card with simple loading and spending
functionality targeted at low income and never-banked consumers.
As we have grown and our technological capabilities have
increased, we have broadened our offerings and their
functionality to provide consumers access to products and
services with a more comprehensive set of features. These
products and services now also appeal to more affluent
underbanked and fully-banked consumers who do not feel well
served by and cannot justify the cost and complexity of
traditional banking products and payment cards, have limited
access to credit, or find traditional bank policies and fee
schedules ill-suited to their needs.
We believe that we are the leading provider of GPR cards in the
United States. GPR cards are designed for general spending
purposes and can be used anywhere their applicable payment
network, such as Visa or MasterCard, is accepted. Unlike gift
cards, GPR cards are reloadable for ongoing, long-term use and
require the completion of various identification, verification
and other USA PATRIOT Act-compliant processes before a
cardholder relationship can be established. Our GPR cards are
issued as Visa- or MasterCard-branded cards and are accepted
worldwide by merchants and other businesses belonging to the
applicable payment network, including for bill payments, online
shopping, everyday store purchases and ATM withdrawals. As of
September 30, 2010, we had approximately 3.3 million
active cards, that is, cards that had had at least one purchase
transaction, reload transaction or ATM withdrawal during the
previous
90-day
period. In fiscal 2009, the gross dollar volume loaded to our
cards and reload products was $4.7 billion, an increase of
67% over fiscal 2008. During the five months ended
December 31, 2009, the gross dollar volume loaded to our
cards and reload products was $2.7 billion, an increase of
69% over the five months ended December 31, 2008. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the gross dollar
volume loaded to our cards and reload products was
$7.7 billion, an increase of 92% over the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
68
We distribute our products and services at the retail locations
of large national and regional chains throughout the United
States and through the Internet. We have built strong
distribution and marketing relationships with many significant
retail chains, including Walmart, Walgreens, CVS, Rite Aid,
7-Eleven, Kroger, Kmart, Meijer and Radio Shack. We market our
products under our Green Dot brand and through a number of
co-branded GPR card programs that we operate for retailers and
other business entities.
We believe our Green Dot Network is the leading reload network
for prepaid cards in the United States. Consumers can purchase
our MoneyPak product at any of our retail distributor locations
to reload cash onto our cards or cards issued under more than
100 third-party prepaid card programs. Furthermore, in 2009,
PayPal became a Green Dot Network acceptance member, enabling
PayPal customers to use a MoneyPak to fund a new or existing
PayPal account, but to date we have not generated significant
operating revenues from our relationship with PayPal.
Our centralized technology platform, Green PlaNET, connects all
network participants, which include consumers, retail
distributors and businesses that accept reloads or payments
through the Green Dot Network, enabling real-time transactions
across the Green Dot Network through a single and secure point
of integration and connectivity. This platform also enables our
cards and reload network to interoperate with Visa, MasterCard
and other payment or funds transfer networks, allowing our
cardholders to make purchases and complete other transactions.
These attributes of Green PlaNET enable us to develop,
distribute and support a variety of products and services
effectively. Green PlaNET includes a variety of proprietary
software applications that, together with third-party
applications, run our front-end, back-end, anti-fraud,
regulatory compliance and customer service processing systems.
For the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, the five
months ended December 31, 2009 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, our total operating revenues were
$83.6 million, $168.1 million, $234.8 million,
$112.8 million and $272.0 million, respectively. In
the same periods, we generated operating income of
$1.2 million, $29.2 million, $63.7 million,
$23.3 million and $56.7 million, respectively.
Industry
Background
New
technologies and product innovations have expanded the way
financial services are sold and used.
Over the past 40 years, technological advances in
telecommunications, software and data processing have spurred
innovations both in the types of financial products and services
that are available and in the ways that they are distributed in
the marketplace and used by consumers. Innovations such as ATMs
and the Internet have enhanced consumers access to their
demand deposit accounts, while innovations such as credit, ATM
and debit cards and electronic checks have permitted new methods
of payment each providing consumers with
alternatives to cash and traditional financial products and
services that offer greater convenience and ease of
use. These innovations contributed to an increase of
approximately 78% in the number of electronic payment
transactions in the United States from 2000 to 2005 and, we
believe, are a major reason that electronic payment transactions
have represented the majority of all payment transactions
annually since 2005. Over the past few years, a new series of
innovative products and technologies have increasingly been
adopted. Certain products, such as prepaid cards, prepaid
electronic wallets and prepaid mobile payments, are enabling the
distribution of fast, safe and low-cost alternative financial
services in non-bank locations.
Prepaid cards
represent a large and rapidly growing segment within the
electronic payments industry.
Prepaid cards have emerged as an attractive product within the
electronic payments industry. They are easy for consumers to
understand and use because they work in a manner similar to
69
traditional debit cards, allowing the cardholder to use a
conventional plastic card linked to an account established at a
financial institution. The consumer determines the cards
spending limit by adding money directly to the account, and can
reload the card with additional funds as needed. The consumer
can access the funds on the card at ATMs
and/or the
point of sale in retail locations using signature identification
technologies or a personal identification number. Prepaid cards
and related services offer consumers tremendous flexibility,
convenience and spending control. The Mercator Advisory Group
estimates that the total load volume in the United States for
prepaid cards, excluding single merchant, or closed
loop, cards, will grow at a 36% compound annual growth
rate from 2009 to 2013 and exceed $421.1 billion in 2013.
We believe this rapid growth results from improving underlying
technology, increasing adoption by a broader group of consumers,
increasing convenience, declining costs and increasing product
choices and capabilities that prepaid cards offer. Visa Inc.
estimates that the U.S. prepaid opportunity, defined as the
total dollars spent by the total estimated prepaid card target
audience, was $2.03 trillion in 2009, and that 56% of this
amount could potentially have been loaded on U.S. prepaid
cards in 2009.
Prepaid cards
and related services are currently offered by a wide array of
specialized and partially integrated vendors.
Although many large and well-established vendors provide
elements of prepaid cards and related services, the prepaid card
industry is fragmented. Vendors generally do not have a broad
set of product and service offerings or capabilities, and no
single vendor currently provides all of the elements that are
necessary to establish and operate a GPR card program. Existing
vendors include:
|
|
|
|
|
Card Issuing Banks banks that are authorized
by payment networks to issue cards and that provide accounts to
hold deposits. Many card issuing banks also manage settlement
and provide risk management services. A banks
participation in a prepaid card program can range from actively
managing and marketing the card program to providing passive
sponsorship into payment networks.
|
|
|
|
Payment Networks companies, such as Visa and
MasterCard, that facilitate
point-of-sale
card acceptance, provide purchase and withdrawal transaction
routing and processing between merchant acquirers and card
issuing banks, perform certain clearing and settlement functions
and provide marketing and support services to card issuing
banks. Payment networks also establish network rules and
establish processing and security standards and customer
protections to which all participating members must adhere.
|
|
|
|
Processors technology vendors that provide
connectivity to payment networks, maintain account balances, and
authorize purchase and withdrawal transactions. Many processors
provide additional services, including card activation and
customer service, and develop
and/or
integrate value-added cardholder applications such as online
bill payment, microlending and mobile payment services.
|
|
|
|
Program Managers specialized vendors that
design, manage, market and operate prepaid card programs.
Prepaid card program managers may provide a range of services or
delegate that provision to other specialized vendors, such as
card issuing banks, processors and distributors, and collaborate
with them as these programs are implemented. Prepaid card
program managers may also negotiate the allocation of fees and
risk management with all vendors involved in a particular
prepaid card program.
|
|
|
|
Distributors organizations, such as
retailers, remittance vendors, tax preparers, check cashers,
payday lenders, card resellers and employers, that distribute
cards through various sales channels and may also manage
inventory fulfillment and provide
point-of-sale
integration and technology.
|
|
|
|
Reload Networks vendors that provide products
and services, connectivity, technology and integration which
enable
point-of-sale
locations to accept cash payments and associate those
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
payments with a specific account. These vendors also provide
transaction routing and processing between the point of sale and
the destination of the fund transfer. A small number of reload
networks have proprietary brands, acceptance locations and
technology, while most take advantage of the brands, technology
and
point-of-sale
relationships of other third-party vendors.
|
Prepaid
financial services is a large and rapidly growing segment within
the prepaid card industry.
Prepaid financial services, which includes GPR cards and
associated reload services, is currently among the largest and
fastest-growing segments in the prepaid card industry. The GPR
card category has benefited from the expanding breadth of
applications for GPR cards and the ease with which they can be
acquired. According to Mercator Advisory Groups
Prepaid Market Forecasts 2010 to 2013 research
report, $28.6 billion was loaded onto GPR cards in the
United States in 2009 and $201.9 billion is expected to be
loaded onto GPR cards in the United States in 2013, reflecting a
63% compound annual growth rate during that four-year period. We
believe that this growth in the use of GPR cards will contribute
to a substantial increase in the demand for related services,
including reload services.
Prepaid
financial services are evolving as providers develop new ways of
offering financial services.
The products offered by prepaid financial service providers are
relatively early in their lifecycles. We believe that the
flexibility, accessibility and low cost of prepaid financial
services will lead to many new, attractive payment applications
outside of traditional banking channels. By virtue of their
broad acceptance and the flexibility they provide, GPR cards
offer safe, reliable, low-cost financial services to a broad
spectrum of U.S. consumers who do not feel well served by
and cannot justify the cost of traditional banking products.
Our Competitive
Strengths
Our combination of innovative products and marketing expertise,
a known brand name, a nationwide retail distribution presence
and proprietary technology supports our network-based business
model and has enabled us to become a leading provider of prepaid
financial services in the United States. Our strengths include:
Innovative
Product and Marketing Expertise
We are an innovator in the development, merchandising and
marketing of prepaid financial services. Our consumer focus has
helped us to develop solutions for people who, prior to the
existence of our products, either had to settle for an
ill-suited banking relationship or, more often, simply opted out
of the financial mainstream and resorted to using check cashers,
payday lenders and cash. We believe we were the first company to
combine the products, technology platform and distribution
channel required to make retailer-distributed GPR cards a viable
product offering. We subsequently built our reload network, and
have recently expanded it to facilitate cash loading of online
accounts like PayPal. We also have successfully incorporated
traditional bank account style online bill pay on
our GPR cards and launched a large-scale instant
issue program, whereby the Visa or MasterCard-branded GPR
card is enclosed in the package on the in-store display. Our
consumer focus has also led us to enhance our product packaging
and product displays in retail locations to educate consumers
and promote our products and services more effectively. In
addition, we believe that we have the strongest brand in the
prepaid financial services industry, and we continue to build
brand awareness using national television advertising.
71
Leading Retail
Distribution
We have established a nationwide retail distribution network,
consisting of approximately 50,000 retail store locations, which
gives us access to the vast majority of the
U.S. population. According to a Scarborough Research
survey, which was conducted between February 2009 and March
2010, 94% of U.S. adult respondents had shopped at one or
more of the stores of our current retail distributors within the
prior twelve months. We have built distribution relationships
with Walmart, CVS and Kroger, three of the five largest
retailers in the United States, and major chains like Walgreens,
Rite Aid,
7-Eleven,
Kmart, Meijer and Radio Shack. In general, our contracts with
retail distributors provide us with exclusivity relating to one
or more of the following: reloading GPR cards, selling GPR cards
in their stores and providing specific co-branded card programs.
Establishing distribution relationships requires significant
investments by, complex integrations between and large support
infrastructures from providers and distributors. As a result, we
believe our broad and established retail distribution network
constitutes one of our key competitive advantages and a
significant barrier to entry for potential competitors.
Leading Reload
Network in the United States
We believe our Green Dot Network is the leading reload network
for prepaid cards in the United States. By purchasing our
MoneyPak reload product at any of our distributors retail
locations, consumers can access the Green Dot Network and use it
for a wide variety of transactions, including cash loading onto
prepaid cards and PayPal accounts. Although a substantial
majority of the transactions on our reload network are
associated with our cards, the transaction volume from
third-party card portfolios has grown significantly as over 100
third-party prepaid card programs now use the Green Dot Network
for card reloading services. Recent innovations, like our
relationships with PayPal and Intuit, have also expanded our
transaction volume and consumers familiarity with the
Green Dot brand. While our reload network today is used
primarily for cash loading of prepaid cards and cash loading of
PayPal accounts, we believe that it can be expanded and adapted
to many new and evolving applications in the electronic payments
industry.
Proprietary
Technology
Green PlaNET, our centralized technology platform, enables our
network participants to engage in real-time transactions across
the Green Dot Network and enables the effective development,
distribution and support of a variety of products and services.
This platform also enables our cards and reload network to
interoperate with Visa, MasterCard and other payment or funds
transfer networks, allowing our cardholders to make purchases
and complete other transactions. Green PlaNET includes a variety
of proprietary software applications that, together with
third-party applications, run our front-end, back-end,
anti-fraud, regulatory compliance and customer service
processing systems. Green PlaNET gives us the ability to
centrally develop, distribute and support product applications,
manage customer accounts, authorize, process and settle
transactions, enable security and regulatory compliance, and
provide customer services through the Internet, IVR, call
centers, mobile applications and email. In addition, Green
PlaNET enables network participants to communicate and complete
card purchases, reloads, bill payments and other transactions
rapidly and securely through our reload network, using a variety
of services,
point-of-sale
technologies or third-party payment or funds transfer networks,
and is a central component of our network-based business model.
Business Model
with Powerful Network Effects
The combination of our broad group of products and services,
large portfolio of active cards, nationwide footprint of retail
distributors and proprietary technology creates powerful network
effects. Growth in the number of products and services that we
offer or in the number of network participants enhances the
value we deliver to all network participants. For example, we
are able to attract retail
72
distributors because of the large number of consumers who
actively use our reload network. This network effect helps us
continue to grow our cardholder base and expand our business. We
believe the breadth and depth of our network would be difficult
to replicate and represents a significant competitive advantage,
as well as a barrier to entry for potential competitors.
Vertical
Integration
We believe that we are more vertically integrated than our
competitors, based on our distribution capabilities, processing
platform, program management skills and proprietary reload
network. Whereas we have built our offerings primarily around
our own internally-developed capabilities, none of our
competitors has been able to offer products and services similar
to ours without collaborating with third parties to provide one
or more of the essential features of prepaid financial service
offerings, such as program management or a reload network. This
integration has allowed us to reduce costs across our operations
and, we expect, will continue to provide us with opportunities
to reduce operational costs in the future. It also enables us to
scale our business quickly in response to rising demand and to
ensure high-quality service for our customers.
Strong
Regulatory and Compliance Infrastructure
We employ a proactive approach to licensing, regulatory and
compliance matters, which we believe provides us with an
important competitive advantage. We maintain an ongoing dialogue
with the various governmental authorities that oversee the
prepaid financial services industry. We believe that our
pro-consumer orientation and regulatory focus have enabled us to
develop strong relationships with leading retailers and
financial institutions and have also prepared us well for
changes in the regulatory environment.
Our Strategy for
Growth
The key components of our strategy include:
Increasing the
Number of Network Participants
We intend to enhance the network effects in our business model
in the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
Attracting new users by introducing new products, improving
current products to address consumers current and evolving
needs, and building demand for our products through promotions;
|
|
|
|
Expanding and strengthening our distribution by establishing
relationships with additional high-quality retail chains,
increasing online distribution of our products and accelerating
our entry into new distribution channels, including
collaborating with third-party service providers, such as
electronic tax preparation providers; and
|
|
|
|
Adding network acceptance members to and applications for the
Green Dot Network by continuing to enroll additional third-party
prepaid card program providers that want to offer their
cardholders access to our reload network and to identify
additional uses for our reload networks cash transfer
technology.
|
Increasing
Revenue per Customer
We intend to pursue greater revenue per customer by improving
cardholder retention, increasing card usage and cross-selling
complementary products and services. Our historical card usage
patterns suggest that consumers who reload additional funds onto
their cards within three months of activation tend to have
significantly higher levels of transaction activity and generate
more cash transfer and interchange revenues for us than those
who do not. Therefore, we intend to target improved cardholder
retention by offering incentives, such as fee waivers for
specified reload amounts or activities, to encourage cardholders
to reload additional funds onto their cards and extend their
73
relationships with us. We also intend to add new services, such
as additional reload options and new mobile applications that
enable convenient use of our products and services, to make our
products more valuable to consumers.
Improving
Operating Efficiencies
We intend to leverage our growing scale and vertical integration
to generate incremental operating efficiencies. As we continue
to expand our business operations, we plan to reduce our
marginal operating costs by continuing to implement rigorous
cost-containment programs, purchase vendor services from
low-cost providers and reduce the use of outsourced services
that can be provided internally at lower cost. For example, we
intend to improve our self-service offerings so that customers
can obtain automated customer service through our website, IVR
or mobile applications. Additionally, some of our current vendor
agreements include pricing structures that call for reduced
pricing as our customer usage volumes grow. These cost savings
will provide us with the flexibility to engage in new marketing
programs, reduce pricing and make other investments in our
business to maintain our leadership position.
Broadening
Brand and Product Awareness
We intend to broaden awareness of the Green Dot brand, which we
believe is the leading national brand in prepaid financial
services, and of our products and services through national
television advertising, online advertising and ongoing
enhancements to our packaging and merchandising. We plan to
reinforce and strengthen perceptions of the key attributes of
the Green Dot brand, which we believe are trust, security,
convenience and simplicity. We also intend to continue educating
consumers, retail distributors and network acceptance members on
the functionality, convenience and cost advantages of our
products and services. Our advertising spending fluctuates and
tends to be greater when we believe we can earn the highest
return for the amount spent. We typically increase spending
during product launches, special promotions, periods of
seasonally increased card purchase and reload activity, and
periods when advertising media prices are unusually low.
Acquiring
Complementary Businesses
We intend to pursue acquisitions that will help us achieve our
strategic objectives. We intend to acquire companies that have
the potential to enhance the distribution of our products and
services through either existing or new channels. We also intend
to pursue acquisitions that have the potential to augment the
features and functionality of our existing products and services
or to provide complementary products and services that can be
sold through our existing distribution channels. There are many
prepaid financial services providers and the market remains
fragmented, which we believe will provide us with acquisition
opportunities over time.
Our Bank
Acquisition Strategy
In February 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement to
acquire Utah-based Bonneville Bancorp, a bank holding company,
and its subsidiary commercial bank, Bonneville Bank, for an
aggregate cash purchase price of approximately
$15.7 million, and filed applications with the appropriate
federal and state regulators seeking approvals for this
transaction. The bank had total assets of $34.1 million,
including net loans outstanding of approximately
$15.4 million, as of December 31, 2009, and earned a
nominal amount of income for the year ended December 31,
2009. This acquisition is subject to standard closing
conditions, including regulatory approval.
Upon consummation of the acquisition, we will become a bank
holding company regulated by the Federal Reserve Board. While
there can be no assurance that we will obtain these approvals or
our bank acquisition will close, we currently expect to complete
this acquisition in the fourth quarter of calendar 2010.
74
We believe that acquiring a bank charter will enable us to
(i) offer consumers FDIC-insured transactional accounts,
(ii) issue prepaid card and debit card products linked to
those transactional accounts, (iii) offer other types of
deposit products, such as savings accounts, and
(iv) provide settlement services for our reload network.
We believe that this acquisition will provide the following
strategic benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
increase our efficiency in introducing and managing potential
new products and services, which are more difficult to
accomplish with multiple unaffiliated card issuing banks;
|
|
|
|
reduce the risk that we would be negatively impacted by one of
the banks that issue our cards changing its business practices
as a result of, among other things, a change of strategic
direction, financial hardship or regulatory developments;
|
|
|
|
reduce the sponsorship and service fees and other expenses that
we incur each year to the third-party banks that issue our
cards, and correspondingly increase funds available to us to
spend on other aspects of our business, including the ability to
invest in further reducing consumer pricing; and
|
|
|
|
further increase the degree to which our operations are
integrated and provide increased control over our operations.
|
Our Business
Model
Our business model focuses on four major
elements: our consumers; our distribution; our
products and services; and our proprietary technology, which
provides functionality for and connectivity to the Green Dot
Network and supports the platform that brings the other three
elements together.
Our
Consumers
We have designed our products and services to appeal primarily
to consumers living in households that earn less than $75,000
annually across the following four segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Never-banked households in which no one has ever had
a bank account;
|
|
|
|
Previously-banked households in which at least one
member has previously had a bank account, but no one has one
currently;
|
|
|
|
Underbanked households in which at least one member
currently has a bank account, but that also use non-bank
financial service providers to conduct routine transactions like
check cashing or bill payment; and
|
|
|
|
Fully-banked households that primarily rely on
traditional financial services.
|
Based on data from the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Bank, the
U.S. Census and the Center for Financial Services
Innovation and our proprietary data, we believe these four
segments collectively represent an addressable market of
approximately 160 million people in the United States. We
believe that we currently have a significant number of customers
in each of these segments.
Customers in different segments tend to purchase and use our
products for different reasons and in different ways. For
example, we believe never-banked consumers use our products as a
safe, controlled way to spend cash and as a means to access
channels of trade, such as online purchases, where cash cannot
be used. We believe previously-banked consumers use our products
as a convenient and affordable substitute for a traditional
checking account by depositing payroll checks (via direct or
in-store deposit) into a Green Dot GPR card account and using
our products to pay bills, shop online, monitor spending and
withdraw cash from ATM machines.
We believe underbanked consumers use our products in ways
similar to those of the never- and previously-banked segments,
but additionally view our products as a credit card substitute.
For example, underbanked consumers use our products to make
purchases at physical and online
75
merchants, make travel arrangements and guarantee reservations.
We believe fully-banked consumers use our products as companion
products to their bank checking account, segregating funds into
separate accounts for a variety of uses. For example,
fully-banked consumers often use our cards to shop on the
Internet without providing their bank debit card account
information online. These consumers also use our products to
control spending, designate funds for specific uses, prevent
overdrafts in their checking accounts, or load funds into
specific accounts, such as a PayPal account.
Our
Distribution
We achieve broad distribution of our products and services
through our retail distributors, the Internet and relationships
with other businesses. In addition, our network acceptance
members encourage their customers to use our prepaid financial
services.
Retail Distributors. Our prepaid financial
services are sold in approximately 50,000 retail store
locations, including those of major national mass merchandisers,
national and regional drug store and convenience store chains,
and national and regional supermarket chains. Our retail
distributors include:
|
|
|
Type of Distributor
|
|
Representative Distributors
|
|
Mass merchandise retailers
|
|
Walmart, Kmart, Meijer
|
Drug store retailers
|
|
Walgreens, CVS, Rite-Aid, Duane Reade
|
Convenience store retailers
|
|
7-Eleven, The Pantry (Kangaroo Express)
|
Supermarket retailers
|
|
Kroger
|
Other
|
|
RadioShack
|
Most of these retailers have been our distributors for several
years and all have contracts with us, subject to termination
rights, that expire at various dates from 2011 to 2015. In
general, our agreements with our retail distributors give us the
right to provide Green Dot-branded
and/or
co-branded GPR cards and reload services in their retail
locations and require us to share with them by way of
commissions the revenues generated by sales of these cards and
reload services. We and the retail distributor generally also
agree to certain marketing arrangements, such as promotions and
advertising. Our operating revenues derived from products and
services sold at the store locations of our four largest retail
distributors (Walmart, Walgreens, CVS and Rite Aid) represented
the following percentages of our total operating revenues:
approximately 3%, 22%, 19% and 17%, respectively, for the year
ended July 31, 2007, 39%, 17%, 13% and 11%, respectively,
for the year ended July 31, 2008, 56%, 11%, 9% and 7%,
respectively, for the year ended July 31, 2009, 66%, 9%, 8%
and 6%, respectively, for the five months ended
December 31, 2009 and 63%, 8%, 7% and 5%, respectively, for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Our Relationship with Walmart. Walmart is our
largest retail distributor. We have been the exclusive provider
of GPR cards sold at Walmart since Walmart initiated its Walmart
MoneyCard program in 2007. In October 2006, we entered into
agreements with Walmart and GE Money Bank (the card issuing
bank), which set forth the terms and conditions of our
relationship with Walmart. Pursuant to the terms of these
agreements, Green Dot designs and delivers the Walmart MoneyCard
product and provides all ongoing program support, including
network IT, regulatory and legal compliance, website
functionality, customer service and loss management. Walmart
displays and sells the cards and GE Money Bank serves as the
issuer of the cards and holds the associated FDIC-insured
deposits. All Walmart MoneyCard products are reloadable
exclusively on the Green Dot Network.
In May 2010, the term of the agreement among Green Dot, Walmart
and GE Money Bank was extended through May 2015. The parties
also agreed to various other changes to the terms of the
agreement. In particular, the sales commission percentages that
we pay to Walmart for the Walmart MoneyCard program increased
significantly to an estimated 22%, or a level approximately
equal to what they had been during the three months ended
December 31, 2008, from the level in place during the
fifteen months ended April 30, 2010, which ranged from 5.0%
to 7.9% in the calendar quarters
76
fully within that period. We believe that the new sales
commission structure provides a long-term financial incentive
for Walmart to continue to grow the volume of our products sold
in its stores, but expect that this change will negatively
affect our sales and marketing expenses, net income and net
income per share through at least 2011. In future periods, we
believe that, if the volume of our products sold in Walmart
stores grows as we expect it will under the new arrangement, the
increased sales volumes will more than offset the margin impact
of the sales commission percentage increases. However, there can
be no assurance that the volume of our products sold in Walmart
stores will grow as we expect it will under the new arrangement.
Walmart has the right to terminate this agreement prior to its
expiration or renewal, but subject to notice periods of varying
lengths, for a number of specified reasons, including;
|
|
|
|
|
a change by GE Money Bank in its card operating procedures that
Walmart reasonably believes will have a material adverse effect
on Walmarts operations;
|
|
|
|
our or GE Money Banks inability or unwillingness to agree
to program-related pricing changes proposed by Walmart;
|
|
|
|
our inability or unwillingness to make Walmart MoneyCards
reloadable outside of our reload network in the event that our
reload network does not meet particular size requirements in the
future;
|
|
|
|
in the event Walmart reasonably believes that it is reasonably
possible, after the parties have explored and been unable to
agree on any alternatives, that the Federal Reserve Board may
determine that Walmart exercises a controlling influence over
our management or policies;
|
|
|
|
in the event of specified changes in control of GE Money Bank or
us that are not otherwise permitted by the agreement; or
|
|
|
|
our failure to meet
agreed-upon
service levels.
|
In connection with our entry into this commercial agreement, we
issued to Walmart 2,208,552 shares of our Class A
common stock, or approximately 29.1% of our outstanding
Class A common stock and 5.4% of our total outstanding
Class A and Class B common stock as of
September 30, 2010. These shares represented less than 1%
of the combined voting power of our outstanding Class A and
Class B common stock as of September 30, 2010, and, in
connection with the share issuance, Walmart entered into an
agreement to vote its shares in proportion to the way the rest
of our stockholders vote their shares. The Walmart shares also
are subject to our right to repurchase them at $0.01 per share
upon termination of our commercial agreement with Walmart and GE
Money Bank, other than a termination arising out of our knowing,
intentional and material breach of the agreement. Our right to
repurchase lapses with respect to 36,810 shares per month
over the
60-month
term of the agreement. The repurchase right will expire as to
all shares of Class A common stock that remain subject to
the repurchase right if we experience a prohibited change
of control, as defined in the commercial agreement, if we
experience a change of control, as defined in the
stock issuance agreement, or under certain other limited
circumstances, such as a termination of our commercial agreement
with Walmart and GE Money Bank for the reason described in the
fourth bullet of the preceding paragraph. However, should it
become reasonably possible that such termination right could be
exercised, we would take all steps within our power to address
the concerns of the Federal Reserve Board or its staff to avoid
a termination under our commercial agreement with Walmart and GE
Money Bank. Prior to the earliest to occur of
(i) December 24, 2012, (ii) the termination of
our commercial agreement under certain limited circumstances and
(iii) an event that would cause our repurchase right to
lapse in full prior to May 2015, Walmart is required to pay us
$25.00 per share for each share it sells in excess of
309,839 shares in any consecutive six-month period
following January 18, 2011. We have also granted Walmart
registration rights for all of its shares of our Class A
common stock that are no longer subject to our repurchase right.
See Description of Capital Stock.
77
Network Acceptance Members. A large number of
institutions accept funds through our reload network, using our
MoneyPak product. We provide reload services to over 100
third-party prepaid card programs, including programs offered by
H&R Block, AccountNow and Jackson Hewitt. MasterCards
RePower Reload Network also uses the Green Dot Network to
facilitate cash reloads for its own member programs.
Furthermore, in February 2009, we entered into a five-year
agreement with PayPal that enables PayPal customers to use a
MoneyPak to fund a new or existing PayPal account. To date, we
have not generated significant operating revenues from our
relationship with PayPal. As a result of this agreement,
consumers without a bank account or credit card are able to
fund PayPal accounts.
Other Channels. An increasing portion of our
card sales is generated from our online distribution channel and
other non-retail channels. We offer Green Dot-branded cards
through our website, www.greendot.com. We promote this
distribution channel through television and online advertising.
Customers who activate their cards through this channel
typically receive an unfunded card in the mail and then can
reload the card either through a cash reload or a payroll direct
deposit transaction. In October 2009, we entered into a joint
marketing and referral agreement with Intuit. Under this
agreement, Intuit customers can elect to receive their tax
refunds via a co-branded card program. We will manage this
program for Intuit through the 2011 tax season. The initial term
of our agreement with Intuit expires in October 2011 and we do
not currently expect that this agreement will be renewed.
Our Products
and Services
Our principal products and services consist of Green Dot-branded
and co-branded GPR cards and MoneyPak and POS swipe reload
transactions facilitated by the Green Dot Network. We also
service general purpose gift cards, which have historically
represented only a small percentage of our operating revenues.
The GPR cards we offer are issued primarily by Columbus Bank and
Trust Company and, in the case of certain of our co-branded
cards discussed below, GE Money Bank. Card balances are
FDIC-insured and have either Visa or MasterCard zero liability
card protection.
Card
Products
Green Dot-Branded GPR Cards. Our Green
Dot-branded GPR cards provide consumers with an affordable and
convenient way to manage their money and make payments without
undergoing a credit check or possessing a pre-existing bank
account. In addition to standard prepaid Visa or
MasterCard-branded GPR cards, we also offer GPR cards marketed
for a specific use or market, such as our Online Shopping card,
our Prepaid Student card and our Prepaid NASCAR card.
We offer these GPR cards to consumers in approximately 50,000
retail store locations in 49 states, including those of
Walgreens, CVS, Rite Aid, 7-Eleven and Kroger. We also offer our
GPR cards online through our web site, www.greendot.com. To
purchase a GPR card, consumers typically select the GPR card
from an in-store display and pay the cashier a one-time purchase
fee plus the initial amount they would like to reload onto their
card. Consumers then go online or call a toll-free number to
register their personal information with us so that we can
activate their temporary prepaid card and mail them a
personalized GPR card. As explained below, consumers can then
reload their personalized GPR cards using a MoneyPak or, at
enabled retailers, via a
point-of-sale
process, which we refer to as a POS swipe reload transaction.
Funds can also be loaded on the card via direct deposit of a
customers government or payroll check.
Our GPR cards are issued as Visa- or MasterCard-branded cards
and are accepted worldwide by merchants and other businesses
belonging to the applicable payment network, including for bill
payments, online shopping, everyday store purchases and ATM
withdrawals. As of December 31, 2009, Visa and MasterCard
each were accepted at approximately 29 million acceptance
locations worldwide. As of December 31, 2009, our
cardholders could complete ATM transactions at approximately
1.4 million Visa PLUS or 1.0 million MasterCard Cirrus
ATMs worldwide, including over 17,000 MoneyPass fee-free ATMs in
all 50 states and Puerto Rico.
78
We have instituted a simple fee structure that includes a new
card fee (if the card is purchased from one of our retail
distributors), a monthly maintenance fee (which may be waived
based on usage), a cash reload fee and an ATM withdrawal fee for
non-MoneyPass ATMs. Most of the features and functions of our
cards are provided without surcharges. Our free services include
account management and balance inquiry services via the
Internet, telephone and mobile applications. In addition, via an
online tool, we allow cardholders to manage household and other
bills and to make payments to companies or individuals.
For regulatory compliance, risk management, operational and
other reasons, our GPR cards and reload products have certain
limitations and restrictions, including but not limited to
maximum dollar reload amounts, maximum numbers of reloads in a
given time period (e.g., per day), and limitations of uses of
our temporary cards versus our permanent personalized cards.
Co-Branded GPR Cards. We provide co-branded
GPR cards on behalf of certain retail distributors and other
business entities. Co-branded cards generally bear the
trademarks or logos of the retail distributor or business
entity, and our trademark on the packaging and back of the card.
These cards have the same features and characteristics as our
Green Dot-branded GPR cards, and are accepted at the same
locations. We typically are responsible for managing all aspects
of these programs, including strategy, product design,
marketing, customer service and operations/compliance.
Representative co-branded cards include the Walmart MoneyCard,
the TurboTax Refund Card, the Kmart Prepaid Visa and MasterCard
cards and the Meijer Prepaid MasterCard.
Reload
Services
We generate cash transfer revenues when consumers purchase our
reload services. We offer consumers affordable and convenient
ways to reload any of our GPR cards and to conduct other cash
loading transactions through our reload network, using our
MoneyPak product or through retailers specially enabled
POS devices. MoneyPak is offered in all of the retail locations
where our GPR cards are sold. MoneyPak is a cash reload product
that we market on a display like our Green Dot-branded GPR
cards. Cash reloads using a MoneyPak involve a two-step process:
consumers pay the cashier the desired amount to be reloaded,
plus a service fee, and then go online or call a toll-free
number to submit the MoneyPak number and add the funds to a GPR
card or other account, such as a PayPal account. Alternatively,
at many retail locations, consumers can add funds directly to
their Green Dot-branded and co-branded cards at the point of
sale through a POS swipe reload transaction. Unlike a MoneyPak,
these POS swipe reload transactions involve a single-step
process: consumers pay the cashier the desired amount to be
reloaded, plus a service fee, and funds are reloaded onto the
GPR card at the point of sale without further action required on
the part of the consumer.
Our Technology
Platform Green PlaNET
Green PlaNET is our technology platform that enables our network
participants to communicate with us in a real-time, secure
environment. Green PlaNET is a centralized, client-server based
processing system that gives us the ability to centrally develop
and distribute product applications, manage customer accounts,
authorize, process and settle transactions, ensure security and
regulatory compliance, and provide customer services across a
variety of points of contact and technologies.
Green PlaNET enables Green Dot cardholders to activate and use
their card accounts for a variety of transactions, such as cash
loads and online bill payments. Green PlaNET also provides a
single and secure point of integration for all our network
participants, enabling them to communicate with us and our
customers and facilitating the initiation, authorization and
settlement of transactions.
Green PlaNET has the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
The Green PlaNET front-end processing system communicates with
the host systems of retail distributors and network acceptance
members through a proprietary application programming interface,
or API, and runs a variety of proprietary and third-party
software applications that
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
facilitate the purchase of a card at a retail location as well
as the loading of cash onto a card or MoneyPak. It enables our
reload network to interoperate with funds transfer networks and
engages in real-time transaction verification so that cards do
not exceed applicable limits, thus ensuring compliance with our
anti-money laundering program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Green PlaNET back-end processing system runs a variety of
proprietary and third-party software applications that enable
the activation, daily use and maintenance of our cardholder
accounts. It executes a variety of transaction-enabling
processes and initiates several customer verification modules,
such as internally developed anti-money laundering, Know
Your Customer and Office of Foreign Assets Control
requirements, and external data requests from outsourced
vendors, such as Experian and LexisNexis, that together ensure
compliance with all federal requirements for the opening of a
new account. It interfaces with our database to generate account
statements and initiate account notification communications,
such as emails and text messages. It also enables our cards to
interoperate with Visa, MasterCard and other payment or funds
transfer networks, interacts with the systems of other
processors and executes back-end batch processes, such as
transaction fee calculations, charge-back transactions, retailer
invoicing and account write-offs, that facilitate the daily
accounting, reconciliation and settlement of transactions and
account activity. In addition, the Green PlaNET back-end
processing system houses a variety of security applications that
provide customer and card data encryption, fraud monitoring,
information security administration and firewalls that protect
the Green PlaNET infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
The Green PlaNET customer-facing systems include a service
processing system and various communication systems. The Green
PlaNET service processing system includes several customer
relationship management software applications that operate a
variety of support services, providing real-time account history
access and pending transaction data, contact information,
personal identification number request and issuance services and
balance inquiry applications. It also enables consumers to
direct cash transfers using our MoneyPak product. In addition,
Green PlaNET provides our consumers, retail distributors and
network acceptance members with the ability to communicate with
us and access accounts using a variety of technologies. These
technologies integrate with our customer care applications and
allow us, among other things, to address customer inquiries and
automatically prompt customer support agents to sell upgrades
and make cross-sales. We have also integrated Green PlaNET with
our website, www.greentdot.com, to provide a full range of
interactive services, including online card sales, full
activation and personalization services, electronic funds
transfers, and access to account histories and management
services.
|
Sales and
Marketing
The primary objective of our sales and marketing efforts is to
educate consumers on the utility of our products and services in
order to generate demand, and to instruct consumers on where
they may purchase our products and services. We also seek to
educate existing customers on the use of our products and
services to encourage use and retention of our products. We
accomplish these objectives through various types of
consumer-oriented marketing and advertising and by expanding our
group of retail distributors to gain access to additional
customers.
Marketing to
Consumers
We believe that our marketing efforts to consumers are
fundamental to the success of our business. We market our
products to a broad group of consumers, ranging from
never-banked to fully-banked consumers. We are focusing our
current sales and marketing efforts on customer acquisition,
enhancing our brand and image, building market awareness of our
products, improving cardholder retention and increasing card
usage. To achieve these objectives, we highlight to consumers
the core benefits of our products, which we believe are
affordability, access to funds, utility, convenience,
transparency and security.
80
Our marketing campaigns involve creating a compelling in-store
presence and conducting television advertising, retailer
promotions such as newspaper inserts and circulars, online
advertisements, and co-op advertising with select retail
distributors. We focus on raising brand awareness while
educating our customers.
We also design, and provide to our retail distributors for use
in their stores, innovative packaging and in-store displays that
we believe generate consumer interest and differentiate our
products from other card products on their racks. Our packaging
and displays help ensure that our products are promoted in a
consistent, visual manner that is designed to invite consumers
to browse and learn about our products, and thus to increase our
sales opportunities. This packaging is designed to establish a
connection with consumers, which we believe increases the
likelihood that they will buy our products.
We employ a number of strategies to improve cardholder retention
and increase card usage. These strategies are based on research
we conduct on an ongoing basis to understand consumer behavior
and improve consumer loyalty and satisfaction. For example, we
use our points of contact with customers (e.g., our website,
email, IVR and mobile applications) to educate our customers and
promote new card features. We also provide incentives for
behaviors, such as cash reloading, establishing payroll direct
deposit and making frequent purchases with our cards, that we
believe increase cardholder retention.
Marketing to
Retail Distributors
When marketing to potential new retail distributors, we
highlight the key benefits of our products, including our
national brand, our in-store presence and merchandising
expertise, our cash reload network, the profitability to them of
our products and our commitment to national television and other
advertising. In addition, we communicate the peripheral benefits
of our products, such as their ability to generate additional
foot traffic and sales in their stores.
Marketing to
Our Network Acceptance Members
We market our reload network to a broad range of banks,
third-party processors, program managers and others that have
uses for our reload networks cash transfer technology.
When marketing to potential network acceptance members, we
highlight the key benefits of our cash loading network,
including the breadth of our distribution capabilities, our
leadership position in the industry, the profitability to them
of our products, consumer satisfaction and our commitment to
national television and other advertising and marketing support.
Customer
Service
We provide customer service for all GPR card and gift card
programs that we manage and for MoneyPak on a
24-hour per
day, 365-day
per year basis, primarily through third-party service providers
in Guatemala and the Philippines, and also through our staff in
the United States. All card activations, reloads, support and
lost/stolen inquiries are handled online and through various
toll-free numbers at these locations. We also operate our own
call center at our headquarters for handling customer and
corporate escalations. Customer service is provided in both
English and Spanish.
Competition
We operate in highly competitive and still developing markets,
which we expect to become increasingly competitive in the
future. In addition to the direct competitors described below,
we compete for access to retail distribution channels and for
the attention of consumers at the retail level.
81
Prepaid Card
Issuance and Program Management
We compete against the full spectrum of providers of GPR cards.
We compete with traditional providers of financial services,
such as banks that offer demand deposit accounts and card
issuers that offer credit cards, private label retail cards and
gift cards. Many of these institutions are substantially larger
and have greater resources, larger and more diversified customer
bases and greater brand recognition than we do. Many of these
companies can also leverage their extensive customer bases and
adopt aggressive pricing policies to gain market share. Our
primary competitors in the prepaid card issuance and program
management market are traditional credit, debit and prepaid card
account issuers and prepaid card program managers like First
Data, Netspend, AccountNow, PreCash, Rush Card, Western Union
and MoneyGram. Our Green-Dot branded cards also compete with our
co-branded GPR cards, such as the Walmart MoneyCard.
We believe that the principal competitive factors for the
prepaid card issuance and program management market include:
|
|
|
|
|
breadth of distribution;
|
|
|
|
brand recognition;
|
|
|
|
the ability to reload funds;
|
|
|
|
compliance and regulatory capabilities;
|
|
|
|
enterprise-class and scalable IT;
|
|
|
|
customer support capabilities; and
|
|
|
|
pricing.
|
We believe our products compete favorably on each of these
factors.
Reload
Networks
While we believe our Green Dot Network is the leading reload
network for prepaid cards in the United States, a growing number
of companies are attempting to establish and grow their own
reload networks. In this market, new companies, or alliances
among existing companies, may be formed that rapidly achieve a
significant market position. Many of these companies are
substantially larger than we are and have greater resources,
larger and more diversified customer bases and greater name
recognition than we do. Our primary competitors in the reload
services market are: Visa, MasterCard, Western Union, MoneyGram,
Blackhawk and Netspend. Visa and MasterCard each have broad
brand recognition and a large base of merchant acquiring and
card issuing banks. Western Union, MoneyGram, Blackhawk and
Netspend each have a national network of retail
and/or agent
locations. In addition, we compete for consumers and billers
with financial institutions that provide their retail customers
with billing, payment and funds transfer services. Many of these
institutions are substantially larger and have greater
resources, larger and more diversified customer bases and
greater brand recognition than we do.
We believe that the principal competitive factors for reload
network services include:
|
|
|
|
|
the number and quality of retail locations;
|
|
|
|
brand recognition;
|
|
|
|
product and service functionality;
|
|
|
|
number of cardholders and customers using the service;
|
|
|
|
reliability of the service;
|
|
|
|
retail price;
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
enterprise-class and scalable IT;
|
|
|
|
ability to integrate quickly with multiple payment platforms and
distributors;
|
|
|
|
customer support capabilities; and
|
|
|
|
compliance and regulatory capabilities.
|
We believe the Green Dot Network competes favorably on each of
these factors.
Prepaid Card
Distribution
We compete against the full spectrum of prepaid card
distributors and third-party processors that sell competing
prepaid card programs through retail and online channels. Many
of these institutions are substantially larger and have greater
resources, larger and more diversified customer bases and
greater brand recognition than we do. Many of these companies
can also leverage their extensive customer bases and adopt
aggressive pricing policies to gain market share. As new payment
methods are developed, we also expect to experience competition
from new entrants. Our primary competitors in the prepaid card
distribution market are: InComm, Blackhawk, First Data, Netspend
and AccountNow. In addition, we face potential competition from
Western Union, MoneyGram and a number of retail banks if they
enter this market.
We believe that the principal competitive factors for the
prepaid card distribution market include:
|
|
|
|
|
brand recognition with consumers and retailers;
|
|
|
|
the ability to reload funds;
|
|
|
|
ability to develop and maintain strong relationship with retail
distributors;
|
|
|
|
compliance and regulatory capabilities;
|
|
|
|
pricing; and
|
|
|
|
large customer base.
|
We believe our products compete favorably on each of these
factors.
Intellectual
Property
We rely on a combination of trademark and copyright laws and
trade secret protection in the United States, as well as
confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to
protect the intellectual property rights related to our products
and services.
We own several trademarks, including Green Dot, MoneyPak and the
Green Dot logo. These assets are essential to our business.
Through agreements with our network acceptance members, retail
distributors and customers, we authorize and monitor the use of
our trademarks in connection with their activities with us.
We have one patent application under consideration in the United
States related to the retail packaging of our cards.
Regulation
Compliance with legal and regulatory requirements is a highly
complex and integral part of our
day-to-day
operations. Our products and services are generally subject to
federal, state and local laws and regulations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
anti-money laundering laws;
|
|
|
|
money transfer and payment instrument licensing regulations;
|
|
|
|
escheatment laws;
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
privacy and information safeguard laws;
|
|
|
|
bank regulations; and
|
|
|
|
consumer protection laws.
|
These laws are often evolving and sometimes ambiguous or
inconsistent, and the extent to which they apply to us or the
banks that issue our cards, our retail distributors, our network
acceptance members or our third-party processors is at times
unclear. Any failure to comply with applicable law
either by us or by the card issuing banks, retail distributors,
network acceptance members or third-party processors, over which
we have limited legal and practical control could
result in restrictions on our ability to provide our products
and services, as well as the imposition of civil fines and
criminal penalties and the suspension or revocation of a license
or registration required to sell our products and services. See
Risk Factors for additional discussion regarding the
potential impacts of changes in laws and regulations to which we
are subject and failure to comply with existing or future laws
and regulations.
We continually monitor and enhance our compliance program to
stay current with the most recent legal and regulatory changes.
We also continue to implement policies and programs and to adapt
our business practices and strategies to help us comply with
current legal standards, as well as with new and changing legal
requirements affecting particular services or the conduct of our
business generally. These programs include dedicated compliance
personnel and training and monitoring programs, as well as
support and guidance to our retail distributors and network
acceptance members on compliance programs.
Anti-Money
Laundering Laws
Our products and services are generally subject to federal
anti-money laundering laws, including the Bank Secrecy Act, as
amended by the USA PATRIOT Act, and similar state laws. On an
ongoing basis, these laws require us, among other things, to:
|
|
|
|
|
report large cash transactions and suspicious activity;
|
|
|
|
screen transactions against the U.S. governments
watch-lists, such as the watch-list maintained by the Office of
Foreign Assets Control;
|
|
|
|
prevent the processing of transactions to or from certain
countries, individuals, nationals and entities;
|
|
|
|
identify the dollar amounts loaded or transferred at any one
time or over specified periods of time, which requires the
aggregation of information over multiple transactions;
|
|
|
|
gather and, in certain circumstances, report customer
information;
|
|
|
|
comply with consumer disclosure requirements; and
|
|
|
|
register or obtain licenses with state and federal agencies in
the United States and seek registration of our retail
distributors and network acceptance members when necessary.
|
Anti-money laundering regulations are constantly evolving. We
continuously monitor our compliance with anti-money laundering
regulations and implement policies and procedures to make our
business practices flexible, so we can comply with the most
current legal requirements. We cannot predict how these future
regulations might affect us. Complying with future regulation
could be expensive or require us to change the way we operate
our business. For example, in June 2010, the Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, of the U.S. Department of
Treasury published for comment proposed new rules regarding,
among other things, the applicability of the Bank Secrecy
Acts anti-money laundering provisions to prepaid products
such as ours. If adopted as proposed, the rules would establish
a more comprehensive regulatory framework for access to prepaid
financial services. As currently drafted, the proposed rules
would significantly change the way customer data,
84
including identification information, is collected for certain
prepaid products (including our cards) by shifting the point of
collection from us to our retail distributors. We believe that,
if the rules are adopted as currently proposed, we and our
retail distributors would need to modify operational elements of
our product offering to comply with the proposed rules. If we or
any of our retail distributors were unwilling or unable to make
any required operational changes to comply with the proposed
rules as adopted, we would no longer be able to sell our cards
through that noncompliant retail distributor, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial position and
results of operations. However, as the proposed rules are
subject to further comment and revision, it is difficult to
determine with any certainty what obligations the final rules
might impose or what impact they might have on our business or
that of our retail distributors.
We are voluntarily registered with FinCEN as a money services
business. As a result of being so registered, we are required to
establish anti-money laundering compliance programs that
include: (i) internal policies and controls;
(ii) designation of a compliance officer;
(iii) ongoing employee training and (iv) an
independent review function. We have developed and deployed
compliance programs comprised of policies, procedures, systems
and internal controls to monitor and address various aspects of
legal requirements and developments. To assist in managing and
monitoring money laundering risks, we continue to enhance our
anti-money laundering compliance program. We offer our services
largely through our retail distributor and network acceptance
member relationships. We have developed an anti-money laundering
training manual and a program to assist in educating our retail
distributors on applicable anti-money laundering laws and
regulations.
Money Transfer
and Payment Instrument Licensing Regulations
We are subject to money transfer and payment instrument
licensing regulations. We have obtained licenses to operate as a
money transmitter in 39 U.S. jurisdictions. The remaining
U.S. jurisdictions either do not currently regulate money
transmitters or have rendered a regulatory determination or a
legal interpretation that the money services laws of that
jurisdiction do not require us to obtain a license in connection
with the conduct of our business. As a licensee, we are subject
to certain restrictions and requirements, including reporting,
net worth and surety bonding requirements and requirements for
regulatory approval of controlling stockholders, agent locations
and consumer forms and disclosures. We are also subject to
inspection by the regulators in the jurisdictions in which we
are licensed, many of which conduct regular examinations.
In addition, we must at all times maintain permissible
investments in an amount equivalent to all
outstanding payment obligations. While, technically,
the outstanding payment obligations represented by the balances
on our card products are liabilities of the issuing bank and not
us, it is possible that some states will require us to maintain
permissible investments in an amount equal to the outstanding
payment obligations of the bank that issues our cards. The types
of securities that are considered permissible
investments vary from state to state, but generally
include cash and cash equivalents, U.S. government
securities and other highly rated debt instruments.
Escheatment
Laws
Unclaimed property laws of every U.S. jurisdiction require
that we track certain information on our card products and
services and that, if customer funds are unclaimed at the end of
an applicable statutory abandonment period, the proceeds of the
unclaimed property be remitted to the appropriate jurisdiction.
We have agreed with the banks that issue our cards to manage
escheatment law compliance with respect to our card products and
services and have an ongoing program to comply with those laws.
Statutory abandonment periods applicable to our card products
and services typically range from three to seven years.
85
Privacy and
Information Safeguard Laws
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect certain types
of data, which subjects us to certain privacy and information
security laws in the United States, including, for example, the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, or the GLB Act, and other laws
or rules designed to regulate consumer information and mitigate
identity theft. We are also subject to privacy laws of various
states. These state and federal laws impose obligations with
respect to the collection, processing, storage, disposal, use
and disclosure of personal information, and require that
financial institutions have in place policies regarding
information privacy and security. In addition, under federal and
certain state financial privacy laws, we must provide notice to
consumers of our policies and practices for sharing nonpublic
information with third parties, provide advance notice of any
changes to our policies and, with limited exceptions, give
consumers the right to prevent use of their nonpublic personal
information and disclosure of it to unaffiliated third parties.
Certain state laws may, in some circumstances, require us to
notify affected individuals of security breaches of computer
databases that contain their personal information. These laws
may also require us to notify state law enforcement, regulators
or consumer reporting agencies in the event of a data breach, as
well as businesses and governmental agencies that own data. In
order to comply with the privacy and information safeguard laws,
we have confidentiality/information security standards and
procedures in place for our business activities and with network
acceptance members and our third-party vendors and service
providers. Privacy and information security laws evolve
regularly, requiring us to adjust our compliance program on an
ongoing basis and presenting compliance challenges.
Bank
Regulations
All of the GPR cards that we provide and the Walmart gift cards
we service are issued by either a federally- or state-chartered
bank. Thus, we are subject to the oversight of the regulators
for, and certain laws applicable to, these card issuing banks.
These banking laws require us, as a servicer to the banks that
issue our cards, among other things, to undertake compliance
actions similar to those described under
Anti-Money Laundering Laws above and to
comply with the privacy regulations promulgated under the GLB
Act as discussed under Privacy and Information
Safeguard Laws above.
In addition, in February 2010, we entered into a definitive
agreement to acquire a bank holding company and its subsidiary
commercial bank, and filed applications with the appropriate
federal and state regulators seeking approval for this
transaction. Should we complete our pending bank acquisition, we
will become a bank holding company as provided in the BHC Act.
Bank holding companies and banks are subject to supervision by
the Federal Reserve Board and are extensively regulated under
federal and state laws. In general, this supervision and
regulation will increase our compliance costs and other
expenses, as we and our proposed subsidiary bank will be
required to undergo regular
on-site
examinations and to comply with additional reporting
requirements. In addition, bank holding companies are subject to
certain restrictions on their business and activities, although
we do not believe our current or currently proposed business
will be restricted materially, if at all, by these restrictions.
Activities. Federal laws restrict the types of
activities in which bank holding companies may engage, and
subject them to a range of supervisory requirements, including
regulatory enforcement actions for violations of laws and
policies. Bank holding companies may engage in the business of
banking and managing and controlling banks, as well as closely
related activities. The business activities that we currently
conduct are permissible activities for bank holding companies
under U.S. law, and we do not expect the limitations
described above will adversely affect our current operations or
materially prohibit us from engaging in activities that are
currently contemplated by our business strategies. It is
possible, however, that these restrictions might limit our
ability to enter other businesses in which we may wish to engage
at some time in the future. It is also possible that in the
future these laws may be amended in ways, or new laws or
regulations may be adopted, that adversely affect our ability to
engage in our current or additional businesses.
86
Even if our activities are permissible for a bank holding
company, as discussed under Capital Adequacy
and Prompt Corrective Action below, the Federal Reserve
Board has the authority to order a bank holding company or its
subsidiaries to terminate any activity or to require divestiture
of ownership or control of a subsidiary in the event that it has
reasonable cause to believe that the activity or continued
ownership or control poses a serious risk to the financial
safety, soundness or stability of the bank holding company or
any of its bank subsidiaries.
Dividend Restrictions. Bank holding companies
are subject to various restrictions that may affect their
ability to pay dividends. Federal and state banking regulations
applicable to bank holding companies and banks generally require
that dividends be paid from earnings and, as described under
Capital Adequacy and Prompt Corrective
Action below, require minimum levels of capital, which
limits the funds available for payment of dividends. Other
restrictions include the Federal Reserve Boards general
policy that bank holding companies should pay cash dividends on
common stock only out of net income available to stockholders
for the preceding year or four quarters and only if the
prospective rate of earnings retention is consistent with the
organizations expected future needs and financial
condition, including the needs of each of its bank subsidiaries.
In the current financial and economic environment, the Federal
Reserve Board has indicated that bank holding companies should
carefully review their dividend policies and has discouraged
dividend pay-out ratios that are at the 100% level unless both
their asset quality and capital are very strong. A bank holding
company also should not maintain a dividend level that places
undue pressure on the capital of its bank subsidiaries, or that
may undermine the bank holding companys ability to serve
as a source of strength for its bank subsidiaries. See
Source of Strength below.
In addition, various federal and state statutory provisions and
regulations limit the amount of dividends that banks may pay. We
expect that our new state-chartered bank subsidiary will become
a member of the Federal Reserve System following completion of
our pending bank acquisition. State-chartered banks that are
members of the Federal Reserve System may not pay dividends in
an amount that exceeds the lesser of the amounts calculated
under a recent earnings test and an undivided
profits test. Under the recent earnings test, a bank may
not pay a dividend if the total of all dividends it declares in
any calendar year is in excess of the current years net
income combined with the retained net income of the two
preceding years, unless the bank obtains the approval of its
chartering authority. Under the undivided profits test, a bank
may not pay a dividend in excess of its undivided
profits.
Capital Adequacy and Prompt Corrective
Action. Bank holding companies and banks are
subject to various federal requirements relating to capital
adequacy. These include meeting minimum leverage ratio
requirements. As a bank holding company, we will be required to
be well-capitalized, meaning we will need to
maintain a ratio of Tier 1 capital to assets of at least
5%, a ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at
least 6% and a ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of
at least 10%. Tier 1 capital, or core capital,
generally consists of common stockholders equity,
perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock and, up to certain
limits, other capital elements. Tier 2 capital consists of
supplemental capital items such as the allowance for loan and
lease losses, certain types of preferred stock, hybrid capital
securities and certain types of debt, all subject to certain
limits. Total capital is the sum of Tier 1 capital plus
Tier 2 capital. When measuring compliance with certain of
these capital requirements, bank regulators adjust the asset
values in accordance with their perceived risk. We believe that
we and our new bank subsidiary will be well
capitalized under these standards and we will be able to
maintain these ratios in future periods. It is possible,
however, that regulators may require us or our new bank
subsidiary to maintain higher levels of capital in the future,
and there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain
the required ratios in future periods.
Under the regulatory framework that Congress has established and
bank regulators have implemented, banks are either
well-capitalized, adequately
capitalized, undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized or critically
undercapitalized. Banks are generally subject to greater
restrictions and supervision than bank holding companies, and
these restrictions increase as the financial condition of the
bank worsens. For instance, a bank that is not well-capitalized
may not accept, renew
87
or roll over brokered deposits without the consent of the FDIC.
If our proposed subsidiary bank were to become less than
adequately capitalized, the bank would need to submit to bank
regulators a capital restoration plan that was guaranteed by us,
as its bank holding company. The bank would also likely become
subject to broad restrictions on activities, including
establishing new branches, entering into new lines of business
or conducting activities that have the effect of limiting asset
growth or preventing acquisitions. A bank that is
undercapitalized would also be prohibited from making capital
distributions, including dividends, and from paying management
fees to its bank holding company if the institution would be
undercapitalized after any such distribution or payment. A
significantly undercapitalized institution would be subject to
mandatory capital raising activities, restrictions on interest
rates paid and transactions with affiliates, removal of
management and other restrictions. The FDIC has only very
limited discretion in dealing with a critically undercapitalized
institution and is virtually required to appoint a receiver or
conservator.
Source of Strength. Under Federal Reserve
Board policy, bank holding companies are expected to act as a
source of strength to their bank subsidiaries and to commit
capital and financial resources to support them. This support
may theoretically be required by the Federal Reserve Board at
times when the bank holding company might otherwise determine
not to provide it. As noted above, if a bank becomes less than
adequately capitalized, it would need to submit an acceptable
capital restoration plan that, in order to be acceptable, would
need to be guaranteed by the parent holding company. In the
event of a bank holding companys bankruptcy, any
commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank
regulator to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank would be
assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of
payment.
Acquisitions of Bank Holding Companies. Under
the BHC Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, and their
implementing regulations, Federal Reserve Board approval is
necessary prior to any person or company acquiring control of a
bank or bank holding company, subject to certain exceptions.
Control is conclusively presumed to exist if an individual or
company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities,
and may be presumed to exist if a person acquires 10% or more of
any class of voting securities. These restrictions could affect
the willingness or ability of a third party to acquire control
of us following completion of our pending bank acquisition and
for so long as we are a bank holding company.
Deposit Insurance and Deposit Insurance
Assessments. Deposits accepted by banks, such as
our prospective bank subsidiary, have the benefit of FDIC
insurance up to the applicable limits. The FDICs Deposit
Insurance Fund is funded by assessments on insured depository
institutions, the level of which depends on the risk category of
an institution and the amount of insured deposits that it holds.
These rates currently range from 7 to 77.5 basis points on
deposits. The FDIC may increase or decrease the assessment rate
schedule semi-annually, and has in the past required and may in
the future require banks to prepay their estimated assessments
for future periods. The Dodd-Frank Act changes the method of
calculating deposit assessments, requiring the FDIC to assess
premiums on the basis of assets less tangible stockholders
equity. The FDIC has indicated that this change will likely
result in a lower assessment rate because of the larger
assessment base. Because of the current stress on the
FDICs Deposit Insurance Fund resulting from the banking
crisis, those fees have increased and are likely to stay at a
relatively high level.
Community Reinvestment Act. The Community
Reinvestment Act of 1977, or CRA, and the regulations
promulgated by the FDIC to implement the CRA are intended to
ensure that banks meet the credit needs of their respective
service areas, including low and moderate income communities and
individuals, consistent with safe and sound banking practices.
The CRA regulations also require the banking regulatory
authorities to evaluate a banks record in meeting the
needs of its service area when considering applications to
establish new offices or consummate any merger or acquisition
transaction. The federal banking agencies are required to rate
each insured institutions performance under the CRA and to
make that information publicly available. Our proposed
subsidiary bank intends to comply with the CRA through
investments and other activities that it believes will benefit
the needs of low and moderate income communities. If banking
regulatory authorities do not approve the banks
88
compliance plan, the bank could be required to engage in lending
and other community outreach activities in the community in
which it is located.
Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates and
Insiders. Transactions between a bank and its
nonbanking affiliates are regulated by the Federal Reserve
Board. These regulations limit the types and amount of these
transactions, require certain levels of collateral for loans to
affiliated parties and generally require those transactions to
be on an arms-length basis. As a bank holding company, our
transactions with our proposed subsidiary bank could be limited
by these regulations, although we do not anticipate that these
restrictions will adversely affect our ability to conduct our
current operations or materially prohibit us from engaging in
activities that are currently contemplated by our business
strategies.
Other. The policies of regulatory authorities,
including the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve Board, have
a significant effect on the operating results of bank holding
companies and their subsidiaries. Moreover, additional changes
to banking laws and regulations are possible in the near future.
The Dodd-Frank Act made numerous changes to the regulatory
framework governing banking organizations, and many of the
provisions must be implemented by regulation. These regulations
could likewise substantially affect our business and operations.
In addition, the U.S. Congress is considering various
proposals relating to the activities and supervision of banks
and bank holding companies, some of which could materially
affect our operations and those of the bank we are seeking to
acquire. Although there can be no assurance regarding the
ultimate impact that adoption of these proposals will have on
us, if the proposals are enacted, we expect that the benefits we
seek to realize from our pending bank acquisition will be
reduced.
Consumer
Protection Laws
We are subject to state and federal consumer protection laws,
including laws prohibiting unfair and deceptive practices,
regulating electronic fund transfers and protecting consumer
nonpublic information. We believe that we have appropriate
procedures in place for compliance with these consumer
protection laws, but many issues regarding our service have not
yet been addressed by the federal and state agencies charged
with interpreting the applicable laws.
Although not expressly required to do so under the Electronic
Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E of the Federal
Reserve Board, we disclose, consistent with banking industry
practice, the terms of our electronic fund transfer services to
consumers prior to their use of the service, provide
21 days advance notice of material changes, establish
specific error resolution procedures and timetables, and limit
customer liability for transactions that are not authorized by
the consumer.
Card
Associations
In order to provide our products and services, we, as well as
the banks that issue our cards, must register with Visa and
MasterCard and, as a result, are subject to card association
rules that could subject us to a variety of fines or penalties
that may be levied by the card association or network for
certain acts or omissions. The banks that issue our cards are
specifically registered as members of the Visa
and/or
MasterCard card associations. Visa and MasterCard set the
standards with which we and the card issuing banks must comply.
Employees
As of September 30, 2010, we had 327 employees,
including 287 in general and administrative, 33 in sales and
marketing and 7 in research and product development. None of our
employees is represented by a labor union or is covered by a
collective bargaining agreement. We have never experienced any
employment-related work stoppages and consider relations with
our employees to be good. As of September 30, 2010, we also
had arrangements with third-party call center providers in
Guatemala and the Philippines that provided us with
approximately 800 contractors for customer service and similar
functions.
89
Facilities
We lease approximately 80,000 square feet in Monrovia,
California for our corporate headquarters, pursuant to a
noncancelable lease agreement for approximately
53,000 square feet that expires, as to approximately 4,000
square feet, in December 2011 and, as to the remainder, in
September 2012 and
sub-lease
agreements for a total of approximately 27,000 square feet
that expire in December 2011. We believe our space is adequate
for our current needs and that suitable additional or substitute
space will be available to accommodate the foreseeable expansion
of our operations.
Legal
Proceedings
From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and
claims in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently
a party to any material legal proceedings, and to our knowledge
none is threatened.
90
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers and Directors
The following table provides information regarding our executive
officers and directors as of September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Steven W. Streit
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Mark T. Troughton
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
President, Cards and Network
|
John L. Keatley
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
John C. Ricci
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
General Counsel and Secretary
|
William D. Sowell
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
Kenneth C. Aldrich*
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
Director
|
Timothy R. Greenleaf(1)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Director
|
Virginia L. Hanna(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Director
|
Michael J. Moritz(2)(3)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Director
|
William H. Ott, Jr.(1)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
W. Thomas Smith, Jr.(2)(3)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Lead independent director. |
|
(1) |
|
Member of our audit committee. |
|
(2) |
|
Member of our compensation committee. |
|
(3) |
|
Member of our nominating and governance committee. |
Steven W. Streit is our founder, and has served as our
President and a director since October 1999, our Chief Executive
Officer since January 2001 and our Chairman since February 2010.
He also served as our Secretary from October 1999 to April 2000
and as our Treasurer from October 1999 to April 2004. From 1983
to 1999, Mr. Streit worked in the radio broadcasting
industry, including serving as a Vice President of Programming
at AMFM, a publicly-traded radio broadcast group. We believe
Mr. Streit should serve as our Chairman based on the
perspective and experience he brings to our board of directors
as our President and Chief Executive Officer and our founder,
which adds historical knowledge, operational expertise and
continuity to our board of directors.
Mark T. Troughton has served as our President, Cards and
Network, since February 2007. From June 2003 to July 2004, he
served as our Executive Vice President, Business Development,
and from July 2004 to February 2007, he served as our Chief
Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Corporate
Strategy. Prior to joining Green Dot, Mr. Troughton was
Vice President, Marketplace Services for Quadrem.com, an
Internet procurement company. Mr. Troughtons prior
experience also includes a four-year tenure at
McKinsey & Company, a management consulting firm,
where he served in various capacities, including most recently
as Engagement Manager. Mr. Troughton started his career as
a Chartered Accountant and entrepreneur in South Africa. He
holds a BCom, a BCom (Hons) and an MCom, each in finance,
accounting or related subjects, from the University of Cape Town
(South Africa).
John L. Keatley has served as our Chief Financial Officer
since October 2006. From May 2005 to October 2006, he served as
our Vice President, Finance, and from August 2004 to May 2005,
he served as our Director, Financial Planning &
Analysis. Prior to joining Green Dot, Mr. Keatley served in
various positions at McKinsey & Company, a management
consulting firm, from October 2001 to July 2004, most recently
as Engagement Manager. Mr. Keatley holds an A.B. in physics
from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business
School.
John C. Ricci has served as our General Counsel since
June 2004 and our Secretary since April 2003. From April 2003 to
June 2004, he served as our Director of Legal Affairs. Prior to
joining Green
91
Dot, Mr. Ricci was an associate at the law firm of
Strategic Law Partners, LLP from November 1999 to June 2002.
Mr. Ricci began his career as an attorney in the
Enforcement Division of the SEC. Mr. Ricci holds a B.A. in
economics and political science from the University of
California at San Diego and a J.D. from Loyola Law School.
William D. Sowell has served as our Chief Operating
Officer since March 2009. Prior to joining Green Dot,
Mr. Sowell served in a number of positions at GE Money, a
financial services company, from March 1998 to January 2006,
most recently as Vice President, Prepaid Products. From May 1998
to March 2000, Mr. Sowell also served as a Master Black
Belt (Vice President, Quality) at GE Mortgage Services, a
mortgage servicing company. Mr. Sowell holds a B.S. in
electronic engineering technology from East Tennessee State
University and an M.B.A. from Southern Methodist University.
Kenneth C. Aldrich has served on our board of directors
since January 2001. Mr. Aldrich is currently Chairman of
the Board of International Stem Cell Corporation, a
biotechnology company focused on developing therapeutic and
research products through a proprietary stem cell technology. He
has served in that position since January 2008 and previously
from January 2001 through June 2006. Mr. Aldrich has also
served as President of The Aldrich Company, a real estate
investment firm, since June 1975, and on the board of directors
of WaveTec Vision Systems, Inc. since January 1999.
Mr. Aldrich previously served on the boards of directors of
Encode Bio, Inc. and International Stem Cell Corporation.
Mr. Aldrich holds an A.B. in history and literature from
Harvard University and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. We
believe Mr. Aldrich should serve as a member of our board
of directors based on his extensive corporate management
experience, including serving as the chief executive officer of
a publicly-held company and the chief financial officer of
another publicly-held company, and his experience with the
organizational challenges involved with becoming a publicly-held
company.
Timothy R. Greenleaf has served on our board of directors
since January 2001. Mr. Greenleaf has been the Managing
Director of Fairmont Capital, Inc., a private equity firm with a
focus on investments in middle-market consumer-related
businesses, since January 1999. Previously, Mr. Greenleaf
was a partner at the law firm of Fulbright & Jaworski
L.L.P., specializing in mergers and acquisitions, and tax and
corporate structuring. Mr. Greenleaf has served on a number
of other boards of directors, including Fairmont Capital, Garden
Fresh Restaurant Corp. (Souplantation) and Sharis
Management Corp. Mr. Greenleaf holds a dual B.A. in
administrative studies and political science from the University
of California at Riverside, a J.D. from Loyola Law School and an
L.L.M. in taxation from New York University Law School. We
believe Mr. Greenleaf should serve as a member of our board
of directors based on his experience as a private equity
investor, tax attorney and financial advisor, the leadership
qualities he brings to our audit committee and the perspective
he adds to our board of directors from his service on the boards
of directors of other companies.
Virginia L. Hanna has served on our board of directors
since April 2002. Ms. Hanna has served as the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Hanna Capital Management, Inc., a
business management firm, since March 1998, as a Managing Member
of Hanna Ventures, LLC, a venture capital firm, since April
1999, and as CEO, President and Managing Member of Hanna Energy,
LLC, an energy consulting firm, since December 2009. From 1996
to April 1997, Ms. Hanna was Treasurer and Director of
Investor Relations at Intuit Inc., a consumer and small business
financial software company. Ms. Hanna served as the Vice
President and Treasurer of The Vons Companies, Inc., a
supermarket retailer, from 1985 to 1995. Ms. Hanna holds a
B.A. in liberal arts from the University of Illinois and an
M.B.A. in finance from DePaul University. We believe
Ms. Hanna should serve as a member of our board of
directors based on her experience as a financial executive at
two consumer-focused, publicly-held companies during the period
from 1985 to 1997, which provides our board of directors with
insights into the areas of corporate finance, cash management
and investor relations, and the perspective she brings from her
involvement with retailer deployment of card-based payment
systems and the design and implementation of electronic point of
sale transaction systems in retail environments.
92
Michael J. Moritz has served on our board of directors
since February 2003. Mr. Moritz has been a Managing Member
of Sequoia Capital since 1986. He has previously served as a
director of a variety of companies, including Flextronics Ltd.,
Google Inc., PayPal, Inc., Red Envelope, Inc., Saba Software,
Inc., Yahoo! Inc. and Zappos.com, Inc. Mr. Moritz holds an
M.A. in modern history from Christ Church, Oxford. We believe
Mr. Moritz should serve as a member of our board of
directors based on the important perspective he brings to our
board of directors from his over 25 years of experience in
the venture capital industry, providing guidance and counsel to
a wide variety of companies, and service on the boards of
directors of a range of consumer- or retail-oriented, private
and publicly-held companies.
William H. Ott, Jr. has served on our board of
directors since January 2010. Since 2003, Mr. Ott has
served as the President of PEAC Ventures, Inc., a corporate
advisory and consulting firm. From 2002 to 2003, Mr. Ott
served as the Chief Operating Officer of Visa U.S.A. Inc. From
1998 to 2002, Mr. Ott served as Group Executive in charge
of retail, small business, card services, mortgage and consumer
banking, as well as marketing, advertising and operations, for
St. George Bank, a commercial bank based in Sydney, Australia.
He serves as an advisor to the Ethics and Compliance Officer
Association. Mr. Ott previously served as Chairman of
E*TRADE Bank and as a director of CashCard Australia.
Mr. Ott holds a B.A. in English from San Jose State
University and an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University. We
believe Mr. Ott should serve as a member of our board of
directors based on his experience in senior management roles at
large publicly-held domestic, global and international banking
companies and at card and retail payments companies, including
serving in the positions described above, and the perspective he
brings to our board of directors from his experiences as a
business consultant and his service on the boards of directors
of other companies.
W. Thomas Smith, Jr. has served on our board of
directors since April 2001. Mr. Smith founded Total
Technology Ventures, LLC, a venture capital firm, and has been
its Managing Director since April 2000. Mr. Smith retired
from IBM in 2000 after 30 years of service. Mr. Smith
also serves on the boards of directors of numerous private
companies, including ALI Solutions,
E-Duction,
Inc. and Silverpop. Mr. Smith holds a B.S. in industrial
management from The Georgia Institute of Technology and
completed the executive program at Dartmouth Colleges Amos
Tuck School of Business. We believe Mr. Smith should serve
as a member of our board of directors based on his extensive
management experience, including serving in senior executive
positions responsible for sales, service and relationship
management, and the perspective he brings to our board of
directors from his exposure to the financial services industry
during his tenure at IBM.
Our executive officers are elected by, and serve at the
discretion of, our board of directors. There are no familial
relationships among our directors and officers.
Board of
Directors Composition
Under our restated bylaws, our board of directors may set the
authorized number of directors. Our board of directors currently
consists of seven members. Our board of directors has determined
that the following six members of our board of directors are
currently independent as determined under the rules of the
NYSE Messrs. Aldrich, Greenleaf, Moritz, Ott
and Smith and Ms. Hanna.
Our board of directors is divided into three classes of
directors, who serve staggered three-year terms, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Class I directors are Messrs. Ott and Smith (current
terms expiring in 2011);
|
|
|
|
Class II directors are Mr. Aldrich and Ms. Hanna
(current terms expiring in 2012); and
|
|
|
|
Class III directors are Messrs. Greenleaf, Moritz and
Streit (current terms expiring in 2013).
|
At each annual meeting of our stockholders, successors to the
directors whose terms expire at that meeting will be elected to
serve until the third annual meeting after their election or
until their
93
successors have been elected. As a result, only one class of
directors will be elected at each annual meeting of our
stockholders, with the other classes serving for the remainder
of their respective terms.
Committees of Our
Board of Directors
Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a
compensation committee and a nominating and governance
committee. The composition and responsibilities of each
committee are described below. Copies of the charters for each
committee are available, without charge, upon request in writing
to Green Dot Corporation, 605 East Huntington Drive,
Suite 205, Monrovia, California 91016, Attn: General
Counsel or by clicking on Corporate Governance in
the investor relations section of our website,
http://ir.greendot.com/.
Members serve on these committees until their resignations or
until otherwise determined by our board of directors.
Audit
Committee
Our audit committee is comprised of Mr. Greenleaf, who is
the chair of the audit committee, and Ms. Hanna and
Mr. Ott. The composition of our audit committee meets the
requirements for independence under the current NYSE and SEC
rules and regulations. Each member of our audit committee is
financially literate as required by current NYSE listing
standards. In addition, our board of directors has determined
that Mr. Greenleaf is an audit committee financial expert
within the meaning of Item 407(d) of
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act based on his experience in the areas of
venture capital and private equity investment (including
strategic financial analysis), finance and business generally.
Our audit committee recommended, and our board of directors
adopted, an amended and restated charter for our audit
committee, which is posted on the investor relations section of
our website,
http://ir.greendot.com/.
Our audit committee, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
appoints our independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
approves the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our
independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
assesses the qualifications, performance and independence of our
independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
monitors the integrity of our financial statements and our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate
to financial statements or accounting matters;
|
|
|
|
reviews the integrity, adequacy and effectiveness of our
accounting and financial reporting processes and the adequacy
and effectiveness of our systems of internal control;
|
|
|
|
discusses the results of the audit with the independent auditors
and reviews with management and the independent auditors our
interim and year-end operating results; and
|
|
|
|
prepares the audit committee report that the SEC requires in our
annual proxy statement.
|
Compensation
Committee
Our compensation committee is comprised of Mr. Smith, who
is the chair of the compensation committee, and Ms. Hanna
and Mr. Moritz. The composition of our compensation
committee meets the requirements for independence under the
current NYSE and SEC rules and regulations. Our compensation
committee recommended, and our board of directors adopted, a
charter for our compensation committee, which is posted on the
investor relations section of our website,
http://ir.greendot.com/.
Our compensation committee, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviews, approves and makes recommendations to our board of
directors regarding the compensation of our executive officers;
|
|
|
|
administers and interprets our stock and equity incentive plans;
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
reviews, approves and makes recommendations to our board of
directors (as our compensation committee deems appropriate) with
respect to equity and non-equity incentive compensation plans;
and
|
|
|
|
establishes and reviews general strategies relating to
compensation and benefits of our employees.
|
Nominating and
Governance Committee
Our nominating and governance committee is comprised of
Ms. Hanna, who is the chair of the nominating and
governance committee, and Messrs. Moritz and Smith. The
composition of our nominating and governance committee meets the
requirements for independence under the current NYSE and SEC
rules and regulations. Our nominating and governance committee
recommended, and our board of directors adopted, a charter for
our nominating and governance committee, which is posted on the
investor relations section of our website,
http://ir.greendot.com/.
Our nominating and governance committee, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
identifies, evaluates and recommends nominees to our board of
directors and its committees;
|
|
|
|
oversees the evaluation of the performance of our board of
directors and its committees and of individual directors;
|
|
|
|
considers and makes recommendations to our board of directors
regarding the composition of our board of directors and its
committees;
|
|
|
|
reviews our legal compliance policies; and
|
|
|
|
makes recommendations to our board of directors concerning our
corporate governance guidelines and other corporate governance
matters.
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Since August 1, 2008, the following directors and former
directors have at one time been members of our compensation
committee: Messrs. Moritz and Smith, Ms. Hanna and a
former director, Donald B. Wiener. None of them has at any time
been one of our officers or employees. None of our executive
officers serves or in the past has served as a member of the
board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that
has one or more of its executive officers serving on our board
of directors or our compensation committee.
Preferred
Stock Financings
In December 2008, entities associated with Sequoia Capital
purchased 1,181,818 shares of
Series C-2
Preferred Stock. Mr. Moritz was then and is currently a
Managing Member of Sequoia Capital.
Warrant
Exercises
In March 2007, David W. Hanna, Trustee, David William Hanna
Trust dated October 30, 1989 exercised warrants to purchase
145,348 shares of our common stock. Mr. Hanna is the
spouse of Ms. Hanna.
Director
Compensation
The following table provides information for our fiscal year
ended July 31, 2009 and the five months ended
December 31, 2009 regarding all plan and non-plan
compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each non-employee
who served as a director for some portion or all of those
periods. In fiscal 2009 and the five months ended
December 31, 2009, none of our directors received
compensation for his or her services as a director except the
chair of our audit committee, who received an
95
equity award, with a grant date fair value of $39,990, for
serving in that role during fiscal 2009. Other than
reimbursement of reasonable travel and related expenses incurred
by non-employee directors in connection with their attendance at
meetings of our board of directors and its committees and the
payment to Mr. Ott of $3,000 for attending a meeting of our
board of directors prior to his appointment as a non-employee
director, we did not pay any fees, make any equity or non-equity
awards or pay any other compensation to our non-employee
directors in fiscal 2009 or in the five months ended
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Kenneth C. Aldrich
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy R. Greenleaf
|
|
$
|
39,990
|
(1)
|
Virginia L. Hanna
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Moritz
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Ott, Jr.(2)
|
|
|
|
|
W. Thomas Smith, Jr
|
|
|
|
|
Michael S. Fisher*
|
|
|
|
|
Donald B. Wiener*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Former director. |
|
(1) |
|
Represents the grant date fair value of 3,720 fully-vested
shares of our common stock that were issued to
Mr. Greenleaf as compensation for his services as chair of
our audit committee on December 11, 2008 under our 2001
Stock Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Ott was appointed to our board of directors after the
completion of fiscal 2009 and did not receive any compensation
for fiscal 2009. |
Our non-employee directors, other than those who are prohibited
from receiving director compensation pursuant to the policies of
their affiliated funds, are compensated with a combination of
cash and equity awards. Effective January 1, 2010, the
annual retainer fee for service on our board of directors is
$20,000 and the additional annual retainer fee for service:
|
|
|
|
|
on our audit committee is $10,000 for the chair of that
committee and $5,000 for each of its other members;
|
|
|
|
on our compensation committee is $5,000 for the chair of that
committee and $3,000 for each of its other members;
|
|
|
|
on our nominating and corporate governance committee is $5,000
for the chair of that committee and $3,000 for each of its other
members; and
|
|
|
|
as the Lead Independent Director is $5,000.
|
In addition to cash retainer fees, non-employee directors
receive meeting fees of $3,000 for each meeting of our board of
directors attended, $1,750 for each meeting of our audit
committee attended and $500 for each meeting of our compensation
committee or nominating and corporate governance committee
attended.
In addition, following the completion of our pending bank
acquisition, we intend to compensate any non-employee director
who serves on the board of directors or audit committee of our
proposed subsidiary bank. The annual retainer fee for service on
the board of directors of our proposed subsidiary bank will be
$10,000, and the additional annual retainer fee for service on
the audit committee of our proposed subsidiary bank will be
$5,000 for the chair of the audit committee and $3,000 for each
of its other members.
Our board of directors has adopted a non-employee director
equity compensation policy for 2010 that provides for the
granting of an option to purchase 8,500 shares of
Class A common stock under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
to any non-employee director who first becomes a member of our
96
board of directors in 2010. In addition, non-employee directors
are eligible to receive discretionary awards. The awards granted
in connection with commencement of service as a member of our
board of directors are fully vested and immediately exercisable
as of the grant date.
In addition, non-employee directors who serve on the board of
directors or any committee of our proposed subsidiary bank will
receive meeting fees and stock option awards. The per-meeting
fee for service on the board of directors of our proposed
subsidiary bank will be $3,000 and for service on the audit
committee of our proposed subsidiary bank will be $750.
Non-employee directors will also receive an option to purchase
8,500 shares of Class A common stock pursuant to the
terms described above.
Non-employee directors are also eligible for and may elect to
receive medical, dental and vision benefits. These benefits are
available to our employees, officers and directors generally and
in operation provide for the same method of allocation of
benefits between management and non-management participants.
Non-employee directors receive no other form of remuneration,
perquisites or benefits, but are reimbursed for their expenses
in attending meetings, including travel, meal and other expenses
incurred to attend meetings solely among the non-employee
directors.
In February 2010, in connection with his appointment to our
board of directors, we awarded Mr. Ott an option to
purchase 17,000 shares of our Class B common stock,
with an exercise price of $25.00 per share. This award had a
grant date fair value of $208,080. Also in February 2010, we
issued 1,600 fully-vested shares of our Class B common
stock to Mr. Greenleaf under our 2001 Stock Plan as
compensation for his services as chair of our audit committee.
This award had a grant date fair value of $40,000.
97
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The following discussion describes and analyzes our compensation
program for the five executive officers who are identified in
the Summary Compensation Table below (our
named executive officers). For fiscal 2009 and the
five months ended December 31, 2009, our named executive
officers were:
|
|
|
|
|
Steven W. Streit, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, or CEO;
|
|
|
|
Mark T. Troughton, President, Cards and Network;
|
|
|
|
John L. Keatley, Chief Financial Officer;
|
|
|
|
John C. Ricci, General Counsel and Secretary; and
|
|
|
|
William D. Sowell, Chief Operating Officer.
|
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation program is designed to:
|
|
|
|
|
attract and retain talented and experienced executives;
|
|
|
|
motivate and reward executives whose knowledge, skills and
performance are critical to our success;
|
|
|
|
link compensation to company performance and individual
achievement;
|
|
|
|
link specific cash-based elements of compensation to our
near-term financial performance; and
|
|
|
|
align the interests of our executive officers and those of our
stockholders by providing our executive officers with long-term
incentives to increase stockholder value.
|
We have endeavored to create an executive compensation program
that provides a mix of short-term and long-term payments and
awards, cash payments and equity awards, and fixed and variable
payments and awards that we believe appropriately motivates our
executive officers and discourages them from taking excessive or
unnecessary risks. We view these components of compensation as
related but distinct. Although our compensation committee
considers the value of total compensation of our executive
officers, neither our board of directors nor our compensation
committee believes that significant compensation derived from
one component of compensation should negate or reduce
compensation derived from other components. Except as described
below, neither our compensation committee nor our board of
directors has adopted any formal or informal policies or
guidelines for allocating total target compensation between
short-term and long-term compensation, between cash payments and
equity awards or between fixed and variable payments and awards.
However, in general, our compensation committee and our board of
directors believe a significant portion of the value of total
target compensation for each of our named executive officers
should be in the form of performance-based compensation. In
addition, our compensation committee and our board of directors
strive to keep cash compensation at a competitive level while
providing executive officers with the opportunity to be well
rewarded through equity awards if our company performs well over
time.
From time to time, special business conditions may warrant
additional compensation to attract, retain or motivate executive
officers. Examples of these conditions include the need to
recruit or retain individuals with specific or unique talents,
and to recognize exceptional contributions. In these situations,
we consider our business needs and the potential costs and
benefits of special rewards. For instance, in fiscal 2009, we
awarded Mr. Sowell a housing and travel allowance under his
offer letter.
98
Historical
Compensation Decision Process
Our compensation committee oversees the compensation of our
named executive officers and our executive compensation programs
and initiatives. Our compensation committee typically reviews
executive officer compensation, both base salary levels and the
target levels for variable cash incentive awards, following the
end of each fiscal year. In connection with this review, our
compensation committee considers any input it may receive from
our CEO (with respect to executive officers other than himself)
in evaluating the performance of each executive officer and sets
each executive officers total target cash compensation for
the current year based on this review and the other factors
described below. We pay cash incentive awards under our
management cash incentive compensation plans, which are designed
to compensate our named executive officers for their
contribution to achieving semi-annual financial goals contained
in our company financial plan, as explained in further detail
below. This plan informally resets each year when our board of
directors approves our company financial plan for the next
fiscal year unless and until our compensation committee or our
board of directors determines otherwise. In connection with its
annual review and any reviews that occur during the fiscal year,
our compensation committee also recommends to our board of
directors any equity compensation to be awarded to our named
executive officers. Authority to make equity award grants to our
named executive officers currently rests with our board of
directors.
We have based most, if not all, of our prior compensation
determinations, including those made for fiscal 2009 and the
five months ended December 31, 2009, on a variety of
factors, including our performance, our financial condition and
available resources, individual performance, our need for a
particular position to be filled and the recommendations of our
CEO (other than with respect to his own compensation). In
addition, we have based our prior compensation determinations on
our compensation committees
and/or our
board of directors evaluation of the competitive market
based on their respective members experience with other
companies and the competitive market, compensation survey data
available from outside sources and, to a lesser degree, the
compensation levels of our other executive officers, each as of
the time of the applicable compensation decision. Although our
compensation committee members refer to compensation survey
data, they do not formally benchmark executive compensation
against a particular set of comparable companies or use a
formula to set the compensation for our executives in relation
to survey data. Substantially all of our compensation
committees discussions and decisions about executive
compensation occur outside of formal meetings through
e-mails and
other informal communications. In establishing compensation for
executive officers other than our CEO, our compensation
committee gives weight to the recommendations of our CEO, which
are communicated to the chair of our compensation committee, but
final decisions about the compensation of our named executive
officers are typically made solely by our compensation committee.
We expect that the specific direction, emphasis and components
of our executive compensation program will continue to evolve
and our compensation committees processes and procedures
will become more formalized as we gain experience operating as a
public company. Although we have no current plans to effect any
material changes to our executive compensation program, the
compensation paid to our named executive officers for fiscal
2009 and the five months ended December 31, 2009 is not
necessarily indicative of how we will compensate our named
executive officers in future periods. For example, our
compensation committee recently engaged an independent
compensation consultant and will consider any recommendations
the consultant may make.
Elements of
Compensation
Our current executive compensation program consists of the
following primary components:
|
|
|
|
|
base salary;
|
|
|
|
variable and other cash incentive awards linked to corporate
and/or
individual objectives; and
|
|
|
|
periodic grants of long-term equity-based awards.
|
99
Base Salary. We seek to provide each member of
our senior management with a base salary that is appropriate for
his roles and responsibilities, and that provides him with a
level of income stability. Our compensation committee reviews
the base salaries of our executive officers annually, with
significant input from our CEO, to determine whether any
adjustment is warranted. In considering a base salary
adjustment, our compensation committee considers our
companys overall performance and the executive
officers performance, individual contribution, changes in
responsibilities and prior experience. Our compensation
committee may also take into account the executive
officers current salary and equity ownership and the
amounts paid to other executive officers of our company. Our
compensation committee relies upon its members experience
with the compensation practices of other companies, compensation
survey data available from outside sources and its members
familiarity with the competitive market.
For fiscal 2009, we determined the base salaries of each of our
named executive officers by evaluating our companys
overall performance and his performance, contributions and prior
experience. Our compensation committee made its compensation
decisions for fiscal 2009 based on its subjective judgment
taking into account the available information, including our
CEOs recommendations and the experience of the members of
our compensation committee with the compensation practices of
other companies, compensation survey data available from outside
sources and their familiarity with the competitive market. After
careful consideration, in October 2008, our compensation
committee increased the annual base salaries of
Messrs. Troughton, Keatley and Ricci by $50,000 (to
$350,000), $50,000 (to $300,000) and $25,000 (to $275,000),
respectively. Our compensation committee made these adjustments
to make these base salaries more competitive with those of other
companies and to compensate these named executive officers for
increased responsibilities associated with our companys
growth. Consistent with his request, Mr. Streit did not
receive a base salary increase. Our compensation committee
believed Mr. Streits then-current salary level was
competitive, and his salary, together with his equity ownership
in our company and vested stock option awards, would serve as an
effective means of retaining and incentivizing him.
In connection with the hiring of Mr. Sowell as our Chief
Operating Officer in March 2009, we negotiated an employment
arrangement with him that provided for an annual base salary of
$235,000. In negotiating and setting Mr. Sowells base
salary, we offered him the amount of compensation we believed
was necessary to attract a qualified candidate, taking into
account the other cash compensation and personal benefits
offered, including Mr. Sowells $4,000 per month
housing and travel allowance. See Other
Executive Benefits and Perquisites below for a description
of this benefit. In July 2009, we increased
Mr. Sowells base salary by $50,000 (to $285,000) in
recognition of the fact that Mr. Sowells
responsibilities within our company were greater than originally
anticipated and to achieve internal equity among our named
executive officer team.
During the five months ended December 31, 2009, the
compensation committee evaluated the base salary of each of our
named executive officers and made compensation decisions for the
year ending December 31, 2010 based on its subjective
judgment taking into account the available information,
including among other things the CEOs recommendations.
Effective in January 2010, the compensation committee increased
the annual base salaries of Messrs. Streit, Troughton,
Keatley and Ricci to $525,000, $475,000, $425,000 and $350,000,
respectively.
The actual base salaries paid to our named executive officers in
fiscal 2009 and the five months ended December 31, 2009 are
set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below.
Cash Incentive Awards. We utilize cash bonuses
to incentivize our executive officers to achieve company
and/or
individual performance goals on a semi-annual basis, and to
reward extraordinary accomplishments. We establish bonus targets
for variable cash incentive awards annually, following the end
of the fiscal year, and we pay bonuses following the applicable
performance period (i.e., the first and second halves of each
fiscal year). Each executive officers on-target bonus
amount is a pre-determined amount that is intended to provide a
competitive level of compensation if the executive officer
achieves his performance targets. Performance targets consist of
one or more company
100
performance objectives
and/or
individual objectives established by our CEO for the particular
executive officer. In general, we use performance targets to
ensure that our executive compensation program aligns the
interests of each of our named executive officers with those of
our stockholders and that we provide our named executive
officers with incentives to maximize their efforts throughout
the year. Our annual variable cash incentive awards are intended
to compensate our named executive officers for their
contribution to achieving semi-annual financial goals contained
in our company financial plan and for success in meeting any
individual performance objectives. We determine the actual bonus
award for each of our named executive officers according to his
level of achievement of his performance objectives. For more
information about our variable cash incentive awards, see
FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation
Plan and FY2010 Management Cash
Incentive Compensation Plan below.
Our compensation committee may grant non-plan cash incentive
awards at any time during the fiscal year to reward an executive
officer who accomplishes pre-established extraordinary or
nonrecurring business objectives on behalf of our company. To
date, the compensation committee has granted these awards
infrequently. In October 2008, our compensation committee
approved a $50,000 award to Mr. Troughton, conditioned upon
his success at securing a key commercial agreement on acceptable
terms. We paid Mr. Troughton this amount in full in January
2009 pursuant to the terms of the award.
The actual cash incentive awards paid to our named executive
officers in fiscal 2009 and the five months ended
December 31, 2009, as determined in accordance with the
management cash incentive compensation plan for the applicable
period (described below) or otherwise, are set forth in the
Summary Compensation Table below under the column
captioned Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.
FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation
Plan. We calculated all variable cash incentive
awards under our FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation
Plan by multiplying the individuals on-target bonus amount
by the percentage of achievement of corporate objectives and, if
applicable, by the percentage of achievement of individual
objectives. In keeping with past practice, in early fiscal 2009
we established no individual objectives for our named executive
officers for any of the periods under the plan. In March 2009,
we tied our new Chief Operating Officers cash incentive
award to both corporate objectives and individual objectives, as
explained below.
For fiscal 2009, our compensation committee set the annual
on-target bonus amount for each executive officer at a value
that it believed would provide a competitive level of
compensation if the executive officer achieved his performance
targets, based on its subjective judgment taking into account
the available information, including our CEOs
recommendations and its members experience with the
compensation practices of other companies, compensation survey
data available from outside sources and its members
familiarity with the competitive market. For fiscal 2009, the
individual on-target bonus amounts for our named executive
officers ranged from 17% to 36% of their respective base annual
salaries. The on-target bonus amounts for our named executive
officers for fiscal 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-Target
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Steven W. Streit
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
Mark T. Troughton
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
John L. Keatley
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
John C. Ricci
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
William D. Sowell
|
|
|
28,471
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Sowells annual on-target bonus amount was
$70,500, prorated based on his date of hire of March 2,
2009. In connection with the hiring of Mr. Sowell as our
Chief Operating Officer in March |
101
|
|
|
|
|
2009, we negotiated an employment arrangement with him that
provided for an on-target bonus amount equal to 30% of his base
annual salary, which we believed was the level of variable cash
incentive compensation required to attract qualified candidates
and provide the candidate selected with appropriate incentives
during his first year of service. |
The actual on-target bonus amounts in each of the applicable
semi-annual periods were 50% of the amounts stated above. As
explained below, the actual amount of any variable cash
incentive award paid to a named executive officer could be less
than 100% of the applicable on-target bonus amount, depending on
the percentage of achievement of corporate and individual
objectives. Our FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation
Plan provides that the amount of the actual bonus payment cannot
exceed the on-target bonus amount.
Our board of directors approves a financial plan for our company
for each fiscal year and, in practice, that action resets our
management cash incentive compensation plan for that year,
establishing the corporate objective under the plan. For fiscal
2009, the bonuses were earned and paid semi-annually based upon
attainment of the semi-annual goals contained in our company
financial plan for profit before tax, or PBT, which is
calculated by adding the amount of stock-based compensation to
the amount of income before income taxes reflected in our
consolidated statements of operations. PBT was originally chosen
as the corporate objective under the plan because we believed it
to be the best indicator of financial success and stockholder
value creation for our company. We also believe that the focus
on PBT as the corporate objective discourages inappropriate risk
taking by our executives as it encourages them to take a
balanced approach that focuses on corporate profitability. The
PBT targets were set at levels that were intended to reward our
named executive officers for achieving results that met our
expectations. We believe that, to provide for an appropriate
incentive effect, the goals should be such that to achieve 100%
of the objective, the performance for the applicable period must
be aligned with our company financial plan, and that our named
executive officers should not be rewarded for company
performance that did not approximate our company financial plan.
Accordingly, as discussed below, we would have paid our named
executive officers nothing if the PBT achieved in a particular
semi-annual period was less than 90% of the PBT target for that
period.
For the first and last six months of fiscal 2009, the PBT
targets under the plan were $24.3 million (268%
year-over-year
growth) and $36.4 million (50%
year-over-year
growth), respectively, and actual results were
$24.2 million (267%
year-over-year
growth) and $42.4 million (75%
year-over-year
growth), respectively. We determined that the company objective
percentage was 100% for both periods, which under the above
formula resulted in 100% of the on-target bonus amounts being
payable to the executive officer participants, subject to the
impact of any individual objective(s) established for the
participants.
We may also set individual objectives under our management cash
incentive compensation plan to promote achievement of
non-financial operational goals. According to the plan, these
objectives should be:
|
|
|
|
|
directly or indirectly linked to our companys achievement
of its objectives;
|
|
|
|
aspirational i.e., their achievement should
represent a bonus-worthy accomplishment; and
|
|
|
|
linked to the executive officers job description and
direct responsibilities.
|
For purposes of the formula contained in the FY2009 Management
Cash Incentive Compensation Plan, we based the percentage of
achievement of individual objectives on the degree to which each
of the objectives is achieved, as determined by the assessments
and recommendations of our CEO. Any particular individual
objective that is achieved at less than 90% of the target for
that objective would be counted as zero, causing the amount that
has been allocated to that objective to be zero and, as a
result, reducing the total amount paid.
102
For fiscal 2009, our compensation committee determined not to
establish individual objectives for our named executive officers
other than our new Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Sowell,
because it believed that, in general, their cash incentive
compensation should be based solely on our financial
performance. In October 2008, our compensation committee, to
ensure internal equity among executive officers under the plan,
approved a $50,000 non-plan incentive award to
Mr. Troughton that was conditioned upon his success at
securing a key commercial agreement on acceptable terms and that
was paid in full in January 2009.
As a managerial decision, in connection with the commencement of
the employment of our new Chief Operating Officer,
Mr. Sowell, our CEO established individual objectives for
Mr. Sowell for the second half of fiscal 2009 under our
FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan. The fiscal
2009 individual objectives of Mr. Sowell focused on
operational activities within his area of responsibility,
including the re-launch of our Green Dot-branded GPR card,
integration of PayPal as a network acceptance member and
developing enterprise processes for coordinating new product
development and assessing organizational risk. For the last six
months of fiscal 2009, our CEO determined that Mr. Sowell
achieved at least 90% of each of the individual objectives
contained in his cash incentive award and, on a combined basis,
achieved 91.5% of his individual objectives. Under the formula
contained in the plan, which provides for the on-target bonus
amount to be multiplied by the percentage achievement of
corporate objectives (i.e., 100%) and the percentage achievement
of individual objectives (i.e., 91.5%), we paid Mr. Sowell
91.5% of his on-target bonus amount.
FY2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation
Plan. Prior to the change in our fiscal year-end
to December 31, our compensation committee established the
FY2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan as the
primary means of providing cash incentive compensation to our
named executive officers for the year ending July 31, 2010.
The FY2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan was
identical to the FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation
Plan, except the payments to our named executive officers
thereunder depended solely on the achievement of corporate
objectives, which were set in the same manner and for the same
reasons that the corporate objectives were set for the FY2009
Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan. For the first six
months of the year ending July 31, 2010, the PBT target
under the plan was $33.6 million (39%
year-over-year
growth). As a result of the change in our fiscal year-end to
December 31, the end of this performance period was
shortened by one month to coincide with our new fiscal year-end
and the plan was replaced in January 2010 with a new 2010
Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan that contains two
six-month performance periods. Consequently, the PBT target for
the first and only performance period under the FY2010
Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan was changed to
$27.3 million (47%
year-over-year
growth), reflecting the financial plan for our company for the
five months ended December 31, 2009. Actual results were
$30.2 million (62%
year-over-year
growth). Accordingly, we determined that the company objective
percentage was 100% for this new five-month payment period,
which resulted in 100% of the awards being payable to the
executive officer participants. For the adjusted threshold,
target and maximum bonus amounts for each of our named executive
officers, see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table
below.
Long-Term Equity-Based Awards. We utilize
equity awards, principally stock options, to ensure that our
named executive officers have a continuing stake in our
long-term success. Because we award our executive officers stock
options with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant, the
determination of which is discussed below, these options will
have value to our named executive officers only if the market
price of our common stock increases after the date of grant.
Typically, our stock options vest and become exercisable as to
25% of the shares underlying the option on the first anniversary
of the vesting commencement date, with the remainder of the
shares vesting monthly in equal installments over the next three
years. Our board of directors believes that these features of
the awards align the interests of our named executive officers
with those of the stockholders because they create the incentive
to build stockholder value over the long-term. In addition,
equity awards improve our ability to attract and retain our
executives by providing compensation that is competitive with
market levels.
103
We typically grant stock options to executive officers upon
hiring or promotion, in connection with a significant change in
responsibilities, to recognize extraordinary performance, or to
achieve internal equity. At least annually, our compensation
committee
and/or our
board of directors review the equity ownership of our executive
officers and consider whether to make additional awards.
Typically, our board of directors determines to make equity
awards upon the recommendation of our compensation committee. In
making its recommendation or determination, our compensation
committee or our board of directors (as applicable) takes into
account, on a subjective basis, various factors. These factors
include the responsibilities, past performance and anticipated
future contributions of the executive officer, and the
competitiveness of the executive officers overall
compensation package, as well as the executive officers
existing equity holdings, the extent to which these holdings are
vested, the potential reward to the executive officer if the
market value of our common stock appreciates, and the
recommendations of our CEO. Frequently, the amount of each award
is determined with reference to a specified percentage of equity
ownership in our company that is deemed appropriate for the
individual, based on the foregoing factors.
We grant stock options with an exercise price equal to or
greater than the fair value of our stock on the applicable date
of grant. During fiscal 2009, our board of directors determined
the value of our common stock based on the methodologies and
other relevant factors discussed under Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Stock-Based Compensation. For all
grants of stock options made following the completion our
initial public offering in July 2010, we have determined, and
will determine in the future, fair value based on the closing
price of our Class A common stock on the NYSE on the date
of grant.
During fiscal 2009, our compensation committee reviewed equity
compensation for our named executive officers and, with input
from our CEO, determined that it was appropriate to provide
additional incentive for Messrs. Keatley and Ricci to help
us achieve our long-term growth objectives. Accordingly, in
December 2008, upon the recommendation of our compensation
committee, our board of directors approved grants of options to
purchase 225,000 and 100,000 shares of our common stock to
Messrs. Keatley and Ricci, respectively, each with an
exercise price of $10.75 per share. The determination of the
number of shares of our common stock underlying each stock
option grant was made with reference to a specified percentage
of equity ownership in our company based on our compensation
committees recommendation in light of those
individuals respective performances, equity ownership and
level of vesting and the equity positions of our other named
executive officers. Based on our compensation committees
determination that the February 2008 stock option grants to
Messrs. Streit and Troughton were providing them with
sufficient incentive to help us achieve our long-term growth
objectives, our compensation committee did not recommend and our
board of directors did not grant awards of stock options to
Messrs. Streit or Troughton in fiscal 2009. However, based
on our CEOs recommendation, our compensation committee
converted the vesting terms of an option to purchase
450,000 shares of our common stock granted to
Mr. Troughton in February 2008 from vesting conditioned
upon our achievement of annual revenue goals to time-based
vesting because, in view of our revenue growth during the first
eight months of his vesting period and other factors, our board
of directors determined that the performance goals were no
longer necessary.
In connection with the hiring of Mr. Sowell in March 2009,
we negotiated an employment arrangement with him that provided
for an option to purchase 40,000 shares of our common
stock, which our compensation committee believed was the level
of compensation required to attract a qualified candidate and
retain and provide him with incentives to perform as required
over the duration of vesting of that award. In March 2009, our
board of directors approved the grant to Mr. Sowell of
options to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock with
an exercise price of $10.84 per share, pursuant to
Mr. Sowells employment arrangement. In July 2009, our
compensation committee recommended that our board of directors
grant Mr. Sowell an additional option to purchase
100,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price
of $17.19. Our compensation committee made this recommendation
based on our CEOs recommendation and in recognition of the
fact that
104
Mr. Sowells responsibilities within our company were
greater than originally anticipated and to achieve internal
equity among our named executive officer team. This award was
granted in August 2009.
During the five months ended December 31, 2009, our
compensation committee reviewed equity compensation for our
named executive officers and, with input from our CEO (other
than with respect to his own compensation), determined that it
was appropriate to provide additional incentives for
Messrs. Streit, Troughton, Keatley and Ricci to help us
achieve our long-term growth and operational objectives,
particularly those we expect to have as a public company.
Accordingly, in November 2009, upon the recommendation of our
compensation committee, our board of directors approved grants
of options to purchase 400,000, 200,000, 150,000 and
100,000 shares of our common stock to Messrs. Streit,
Troughton, Keatley and Ricci, respectively, each with an
exercise price of $20.01 per share. The determination of the
number of shares of our common stock underlying each stock
option grant was made with reference to a specified percentage
of equity ownership in our company based on our compensation
committees recommendation in light of those
individuals respective performances, equity ownership and
level of vesting and the equity positions of our other named
executive officers. Based on our compensation committees
determination that the March and August 2009 stock option grants
to Mr. Sowell were providing him with sufficient incentive
to help us achieve our long-term growth objectives, our
compensation committee did not recommend and our board of
directors did not grant stock options to Mr. Sowell. In
December 2009, our board of directors awarded
257,984 shares of common stock to Mr. Streit to
compensate him for past services rendered to our company and
further align his interests with those of our stockholders to
increase the future value of our company. The number of shares
awarded was equal to the number of shares underlying the
fully-vested stock option that he had unintentionally allowed to
expire unexercised in June 2009. This award restored
Mr. Streits equity ownership to the level that our
compensation committee and board of directors had sought to
establish in November 2009 when Mr. Streit was awarded
options to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock. As
noted above, our board of directors and compensation committee
determined the size of the November 2009 award with reference to
a percentage of equity ownership that it believed was
appropriate in light of his performance, equity ownership and
level of vesting and the equity positions of our other named
executive officers. Following their determinations, our board of
directors and our compensation committee became aware of the
expiration of Mr. Streits fully-vested stock option
and determined to reestablish Mr. Streits equity
ownership at the level they had determined was appropriate in
November 2009 for purposes of aligning his interests with those
of our stockholders in light of his current equity position.
In the case of each of the stock option grants described above,
the exercise price of the stock option equaled 100% of the fair
value on the date of grant in accordance with the terms of our
2001 Stock Plan. Each stock option vests and becomes exercisable
as to 25% of the shares underlying the option on the first
anniversary of the vesting commencement date, with the remainder
of the shares vesting monthly in equal installments over the
next three years. Each of these stock options has a ten-year
term.
In general, our stock option grants to date have been made under
our 2001 Stock Plan. In June 2010, our board of directors
adopted, and in July 2010 our stockholders approved, a new
equity incentive plan and a new employee stock purchase plan.
The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan replaces our 2001 Stock Plan and
affords greater flexibility in making a wide variety of equity
awards, including stock options, shares of restricted stock and
stock appreciation rights, to executive officers and our other
employees. The 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan enables
eligible employees to periodically purchase shares of our
Class A common stock at a discount. Participation in the
2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is available to all executive
officers following this offering on the same basis as our other
employees. See Employee Benefit Plans
below for descriptions of our 2001 Stock Plan, 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan and 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
105
Severance and
Change of Control Agreements
As the result of arms-length negotiations in connection
with our offer letter to Mr. Sowell, we have agreed to
provide Mr. Sowell severance benefits if his employment is
terminated by our company without cause. In such an event,
Mr. Sowell would be entitled to continued payment of his
base salary for twelve months. During 2010, we entered into
severance arrangements with our other four named executive
officers. These arrangements included severance pay and
accelerated vesting of equity awards. These arrangements were
designed to improve retention of our senior executive team or,
in the case of Mr. Troughton only, replace an existing
employment agreement that contained a similar cash severance
arrangement. Details of each of our named executive
officers severance arrangements, including estimates of
amounts payable in specified circumstances, are disclosed under
Severance and Change of Control
Agreements below. The value of our severance arrangements
for our named executive officers was not a material factor in
our compensation committees or our board of
directors determination of the level of any other element
of their compensation.
We have routinely granted and will continue to grant our named
executive officers stock options under our equity incentive
plans. As further described in Severance and
Change of Control Agreements below, some of the option
agreements for our executive officers provide for acceleration
of vesting of the awards for up to 100% of the unvested shares
in the event of a change of control.
Other
Executive Benefits and Perquisites
We provide the following benefits to our executive officers on
the same basis as our other eligible employees:
|
|
|
|
|
health insurance;
|
|
|
|
vacation, personal holidays and sick days;
|
|
|
|
life insurance and supplemental life insurance;
|
|
|
|
short-term and long-term disability insurance; and
|
|
|
|
a 401(k) retirement plan with matching contributions.
|
We believe these benefits are generally consistent with those
offered by other companies and specifically with those companies
with which we compete for employees.
In addition to the foregoing, we reimburse
Mr. Streits cost of insurance premiums under our
healthcare plans, continuing the benefit we provided him under
our employment agreement with him that expired in January 2004.
Under the terms of his offer letter, we provide Mr. Sowell
with a housing and travel allowance of up to $4,000 per month.
We believed that this personal benefit was necessary to attract
and retain Mr. Sowell, who resides in Texas and was not
willing to relocate to Southern California on a full-time basis.
In the event that Mr. Sowell terminates his employment with
us before March 2, 2011, he is required to reimburse us for
all amounts advanced to him under this allowance.
Other
Compensation Practices and Policies
Stock Ownership Guidelines. We do not
currently have equity securities ownership guidelines.
Tax Considerations. Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code,
disallows a tax deduction by any publicly-held corporation for
individual compensation exceeding $1.0 million in any
taxable year for its chief executive officer and each of our
other named executive officers (other than its chief financial
officer), unless compensation is performance-based. Prior to the
time we became a publicly-held company, our board of directors
had not taken the deductibility limit imposed by
Section 162(m) into consideration in setting compensation.
We expect, however, that our compensation committee will adopt a
policy that, where reasonably practicable, we
106
will seek to qualify the variable compensation paid to our
executive officers for an exemption from the deductibility
limitations of Section 162(m). Thus, in approving the
amount and form of compensation for our executive officers in
the future, our compensation committee will consider all
elements of the cost to our company of providing this
compensation, including the potential impact of
Section 162(m). However, our compensation committee may, in
its judgment, authorize compensation payments that do not comply
with the exemptions in Section 162(m) when it believes
these payments are appropriate to attract and retain executive
talent.
Policy Regarding the Timing of Equity
Awards. We have no program, plan or practice
pertaining to the timing of stock option grants to executive
officers relative to the timing of the release of material
nonpublic information. We do not, as of yet, have any plans to
implement such a program, plan or practice. However, we intend
to implement policies to ensure that equity awards are granted
at fair market value on the date that the grant occurs.
Policy Regarding Restatements. We do not have
a formal policy regarding adjustment or recovery of awards or
payments if the relevant performance measures upon which they
are based are restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that
would reduce the size of the award or payment. Under those
circumstances, our board of directors or our compensation
committee would evaluate whether adjustments or recoveries of
awards were appropriate based upon the facts and circumstances
surrounding the restatement or adjustment.
Executive
Compensation Tables
The following table provides information regarding all plan and
non-plan compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our
principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and
our three other most highly compensated executive officers
serving as such at December 31, 2009 for all services
rendered in all capacities to us during fiscal 2009 and the five
months ended December 31, 2009. We refer to these five
executive officers as our named executive officers.
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary(1)
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Awards(3)
|
|
Compensation(4)
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total(5)
|
|
Steven W. Streit
|
|
8/09-12/09*
|
|
$
|
190,385
|
|
|
$
|
5,162,260
|
|
|
$
|
3,788,518
|
|
|
$
|
31,250
|
|
|
$
|
1,281
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
9,173,694
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2009
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
(6)
|
|
|
528,209
|
|
Mark T. Troughton
|
|
8/09-12/09*
|
|
|
148,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,894,259
|
|
|
|
41,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,084,003
|
|
President, Cards and Network
|
|
2009
|
|
|
339,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489,231
|
|
John L. Keatley
|
|
8/09-12/09*
|
|
|
126,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,420,694
|
|
|
|
41,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,589,284
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2009
|
|
|
289,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,262,215
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,651,446
|
|
John C. Ricci
|
|
8/09-12/09*
|
|
|
116,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
947,130
|
|
|
|
41,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,105,143
|
|
General Counsel
|
|
2009
|
|
|
269,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560,985
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930,600
|
|
William D. Sowell
|
|
8/09-12/09*
|
|
|
120,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
949,938
|
|
|
|
48,231
|
|
|
|
52,147
|
(9)
|
|
|
1,170,892
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
2009(8)
|
|
|
94,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233,055
|
|
|
|
26,051
|
|
|
|
24,176
|
(9)
|
|
|
378,186
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Effective September 2009, we changed our fiscal year-end from
July 31 to December 31. Amounts in this row are for the
five months ended December 31, 2009. |
|
(1) |
|
Effective in October 2008, the following named executive
officers received an increase in annual base salary to the
amounts set forth after their names:
Mr. Troughton $350,000;
Mr. Keatley $300,000 and
Mr. Ricci $275,000. Effective in July 2009,
Mr. Sowell received an increase in annual base salary to
$285,000. Effective in January 2010, the following named
executive officers received an increase in annual base salary to
the amounts set forth after their names:
Mr. Streit $525,000;
Mr. Troughton $475,000;
Mr. Keatley $425,000; and
Mr. Ricci $350,000. |
107
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The amount in this column represents the grant date fair value
of the stock award granted to Mr. Streit, as discussed in
note 11 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial
statements. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair values
of stock option awards granted to our named executive officers
in the applicable period, as discussed in note 11 of the
notes to our audited consolidated financial statements. See the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below for
information on stock option grants made during fiscal 2009 and
the five months ended December 31, 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts in this column generally (see footnote
7) represent total performance-based bonuses under our
FY2010 and FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plans
earned for services rendered in the applicable period. See the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below for
information on awards made under these plans. |
|
(5) |
|
The amounts in this column represent the sum of the compensation
amounts reflected in the other columns of this table. |
|
(6) |
|
Represents a health insurance premium paid by us in the
applicable period on behalf of Mr. Streit. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes a $50,000 incentive bonus awarded in January 2009 for
Mr. Troughtons success at securing a key commercial
agreement on acceptable terms. This bonus was not awarded under
our FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr. Sowell joined our company in March 2009 and his
compensation set forth in this row represents the amount earned
from the commencement of his employment through July 31,
2009. |
|
(9) |
|
Represents perquisites and personal benefits received in the
applicable period pursuant to Mr. Sowells housing and
travel allowance. |
In December 2008, we amended an option to purchase
450,000 shares of our common stock that was granted to
Mr. Troughton in February 2008 to change the terms of
vesting from performance-based to time-based vesting. See
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Elements of Compensation
Long-Term Equity-Based Awards above for further discussion
of this award.
On August 16, 2010, our compensation committee approved
incentive payments for the first half of 2010 under our 2010
Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan to our named
executive officers in the following amounts: Steven W. Streit,
$62,500; Mark T. Troughton, $50,000; John L. Keatley, $50,000;
John C. Ricci, $50,000; and William D. Sowell, $57,000.
108
The following table provides information with regard to
potential cash bonuses paid or payable for fiscal 2009 and the
five months ended December 31, 2009 under our
performance-based, non-equity incentive plan, and with regard to
each stock option or stock award granted to a named executive
officer during fiscal 2009 and the five months ended
December 31, 2009. There were no equity incentive
plan awards made in either period.
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under
|
|
Number of
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Price of
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Stock
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Awards(3)
|
|
Steven W. Streit
|
|
FY09(4)
|
|
$
|
37,500
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY10(4)
|
|
|
15,625
|
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/12/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
20.01
|
|
|
$
|
3,788,518
|
|
|
|
12/30/09(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,162,260
|
|
Mark T. Troughton
|
|
FY09(4)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY10(4)
|
|
|
20,833
|
|
|
|
41,667
|
|
|
|
41,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/12/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
1,894,259
|
|
John L. Keatley
|
|
FY09(4)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY10(4)
|
|
|
20,833
|
|
|
|
41,667
|
|
|
|
41,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
|
|
1,262,215
|
|
|
|
11/12/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
1,420,694
|
|
John C. Ricci
|
|
FY09(4)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY10(4)
|
|
|
20,833
|
|
|
|
41,667
|
|
|
|
41,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
|
|
560,985
|
|
|
|
11/12/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
947,130
|
|
William D. Sowell
|
|
FY09(4)(7)
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
32,708
|
|
|
|
32,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY10(4)
|
|
|
24,115
|
|
|
|
48,231
|
|
|
|
48,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03/19/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
10.84
|
|
|
|
233,055
|
|
|
|
08/03/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
17.19
|
|
|
|
949,938
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These option awards vest as to 25% of the shares of common stock
underlying the option on the first anniversary of the vesting
commencement date, with the remainder of the shares vesting
monthly in equal installments over the next three years. All
options were granted under our 2001 Stock Plan, which is
described below under Employee Benefit
Plans, and contain provisions that call for accelerated
vesting upon a change of control as discussed above in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis and
below in Severance and Change of Control
Agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the fair market value of a share of our common stock,
as determined by our board of directors, on the options
grant date. Please see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Stock-Based Compensation above for a
discussion of how we have valued our common stock. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair values
for equity awards granted to our named executive officers as
discussed in note 11 of the notes to our audited
consolidated financial statements. |
|
(4) |
|
These rows represent possible cash incentive awards under our
FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan (FY09) or
FY2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan (FY10), as
the case may be, upon our achievement of applicable corporate
profit goals. Actual awards are only payable if the corporate
objectives (i.e., PBT targets) are achieved at a level of at
least 90%. Actual awards cannot exceed 100% of the target amount
and are adjusted downward in the event corporate objectives are
achieved at a level between 90% and 100% by subtracting the
actual percentage achievement from 100%, multiplying that
percentage by 5 and subtracting the resulting percentage from
100%, which is then multiplied against the target bonus amount.
Bonuses were paid on a semi-annual basis. See
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
above for further discussion of these awards. |
109
|
|
|
(5) |
|
In December 2009, our board of directors awarded
257,984 shares of common stock to Mr. Streit to
compensate him for past services rendered to our company. The
number of shares awarded was equal to the number of shares
underlying fully-vested stock options that he unintentionally
allowed to expire unexercised in June 2009. |
|
(6) |
|
Represents a cash incentive award conditioned upon
Mr. Troughtons success at securing a key commercial
agreement on acceptable terms. See
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
above for additional information regarding this award. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Sowells award under our FY2009 Management Cash
Incentive Compensation Plan was also based on individual
objectives intended to promote achievement of non-financial
operational goals within his area of responsibility, as further
discussed in Compensation Discussion and
Analysis above, including the re-launch of our Green
Dot-branded GPR card, integration of PayPal as a network
acceptance member and developing enterprise processes for
coordinating new product development and assessing
organizational risk. |
110
The following table provides information regarding each
unexercised stock option held by our named executive officers as
of December 31, 2009.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Options(1)
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Price(2)
|
|
Date
|
|
Steven W. Streit
|
|
|
536,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
6/07/14
|
|
|
|
|
116,666
|
|
|
|
83,334
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
|
2/15/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
11/12/19
|
|
Mark T. Troughton
|
|
|
145,833
|
|
|
|
7,292
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
1/19/16
|
|
|
|
|
262,500
|
|
|
|
187,500
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
|
2/15/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
11/12/19
|
|
John L. Keatley
|
|
|
4,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
9/17/14
|
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
8/24/15
|
|
|
|
|
22,917
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
1/19/16
|
|
|
|
|
24,374
|
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
4/27/16
|
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
|
2/15/18
|
|
|
|
|
56,250
|
|
|
|
168,750
|
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
|
|
12/11/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
11/12/19
|
|
John C. Ricci
|
|
|
65,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
4/28/13
|
|
|
|
|
192,029
|
|
|
|
5,209
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
1/19/16
|
|
|
|
|
71,154
|
|
|
|
52,084
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
|
2/15/18
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
|
|
12/11/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
11/12/19
|
|
William D. Sowell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
10.84
|
|
|
|
3/19/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
17.19
|
|
|
|
08/03/19
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All options vest as to 25% of the shares of common stock
underlying the option on the first anniversary of the vesting
commencement date, with the remainder of the shares vesting
monthly in equal installments over the next three years. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the fair market value of a share of our common stock,
as determined by our board of directors, on the options
grant date. Please see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Stock-Based Compensation for a
discussion of how we have valued our common stock. |
111
Option Exercises
and Stock Vested
The following table provides information concerning each
exercise of stock options by, and each vesting of stock awards
for, each of our named executive officers during the five months
ended December 31, 2009. No shares were acquired pursuant
to the exercise of stock options by, and no stock awards vested
for, any of our named executive officers in fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
on
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
Steven W. Streit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
257,984
|
|
|
$
|
5,162,260
|
|
Mark T. Troughton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John L. Keatley
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
153,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Ricci
|
|
|
58,924
|
|
|
|
1,008,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William D. Sowell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
Agreements, Offer Letters and Arrangements
Steven W. Streit. Mr. Streits
current annual base salary is $525,000, and his maximum bonus
under our 2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan is
$125,000. Mr. Streits employment is at will and may
be terminated at any time, with or without formal cause. As
discussed in Severance and Change of Control
Agreements below, if we terminate Mr. Streit without
cause (as defined in his severance agreement), we have agreed to
pay him six months of his then-current annual base salary.
Mark T. Troughton. Mr. Troughtons
current annual base salary is $475,000, and his maximum bonus
under our 2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan is
$100,000. Mr. Troughtons employment is at will and
may be terminated at any time, with or without formal cause. As
discussed in Severance and Change of Control
Agreements below, if we terminate Mr. Troughton
without cause (as defined in his agreement), we have agreed to
pay him six months of his then-current annual base salary.
John L. Keatley. Mr. Keatleys
current annual base salary is $425,000, and his maximum bonus
under our 2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan is
$100,000. Mr. Keatleys employment is at will and may
be terminated at any time, with or without formal cause. As
discussed in Severance and Change of Control
Agreements below, if we terminate Mr. Keatley without
cause (as defined in his severance agreement), we have agreed to
pay him six months of his then-current annual base salary.
John C. Ricci. Mr. Riccis current
annual base salary is $350,000, and his maximum bonus under our
2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan is $100,000.
Mr. Riccis employment is at will and may be
terminated at any time, with or without formal cause. As
discussed in Severance and Change of Control
Agreements below, if we terminate Mr. Ricci without
cause (as defined in his severance agreement), we have agreed to
pay him six months of his then-current annual base salary.
William D. Sowell. Our offer letter to
Mr. Sowell, dated January 28, 2009, provides for an
initial annual base salary and eligibility for our standard
benefits and bonus programs. Pursuant to the offer letter,
Mr. Sowell also received an option to purchase
40,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date
of grant. Mr. Sowells current annual base salary is
$285,000, and his maximum bonus under our 2010 Management Cash
Incentive Compensation Plan is 40% of his base salary. In
addition, we have agreed to provide Mr. Sowell with a
housing and travel allowance of up to $4,000 per month for
housing and travel expenses. In the event that Mr. Sowell
terminates his employment with us before March 2, 2011, he
112
would be required to reimburse us for the cumulative amounts
advanced to him in connection with this allowance.
Mr. Sowells employment is at will and may be
terminated at any time, with or without formal cause. As
discussed in Severance and Change of Control
Agreements below, if we terminate Mr. Sowells
employment without cause (as defined in his offer letter), we
have agreed to pay him twelve months of his then-current salary.
Severance and
Change of Control Agreements
Severance Arrangements. Under our severance
agreements with each of our named executive officers, except
William D. Sowell, we have agreed, if we terminate his
employment without cause (as defined in his employment or
severance agreement), to pay him six months of his then-current
salary and to accelerate fully the vesting of all unvested
shares underlying his then-outstanding equity awards. The
following table summarizes the cash severance amount and the
value of the acceleration payout each named executive officer
would have been entitled to receive assuming a qualifying
termination as of December 31, 2009. Acceleration values
are based upon the per share market price of the shares of our
common stock underlying options as of December 31, 2009,
which is assumed to be the initial public offering price of a
share of our Class A common stock on July 21, 2010, or
$36.00 per share, minus the exercise price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Name
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Steven W. Streit
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,009,354
|
|
Mark T. Troughton
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
9,330,234
|
|
John L. Keatley
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
10,759,619
|
|
John C. Ricci
|
|
|
137,500
|
|
|
|
5,306,286
|
|
William D. Sowells Severance
Arrangement. Under our offer letter with
Mr. Sowell discussed above, we have agreed to pay him
twelve months of his then-current salary if we terminate him
without cause (as defined in his agreement). Assuming a
qualifying termination as of December 31, 2009,
Mr. Sowell would have been entitled to receive $285,000
pursuant to his offer letter.
Change in Control Arrangements. Certain option
agreements for the executive officers listed in the table below
provide for full vesting of the unvested shares underlying the
options in the event of a change in control. The following table
summarizes the value of the payouts to these executive officers
pursuant to these awards, assuming a qualifying change of
control as of December 31, 2009. Values are based upon the
per share market price of the shares of our common stock
underlying options as of December 31, 2009, which is
assumed to be the initial public offering price of a share of
our Class A common stock on July 21, 2010, or $36.00
per share, minus the exercise price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Name
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Steven W. Streit
|
|
$
|
9,009,354
|
|
Mark T. Troughton
|
|
|
9,330,234
|
|
John L. Keatley
|
|
|
10,759,619
|
|
John C. Ricci
|
|
|
5,306,286
|
|
William D. Sowell
|
|
|
2,887,400
|
|
Employee Benefit
Plans
2001 Stock
Plan
Our board of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved,
our 2001 Stock Plan in January 2001. The 2001 Stock Plan was
amended and restated in February 2008. The 2001 Stock Plan
provided for the grant of both incentive stock options, which
qualify for favorable tax treatment to their recipients under
Section 422 of the Code, and nonstatutory stock options, as
well as for the issuance
113
of shares of restricted stock. We were permitted to grant
incentive stock options only to our employees. We were permitted
to grant nonstatutory stock options to our employees, directors,
consultants, independent contractors and advisors. The exercise
price of each stock option had to be at least equal to the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The
exercise price of incentive stock options granted to 10%
stockholders had to be at least equal to 110% of the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant. The maximum
permitted term of options granted under our 2001 Stock Plan was
ten years. In the event of a change in control, as
defined in the 2001 Stock Plan, the 2001 Stock Plan provides
that, unless the applicable option agreement provides otherwise,
options held by current employees, directors and consultants
will vest in full if they are not assumed or substituted or if
the employee, director or consultant is involuntarily terminated
within six months following the change in control. We ceased
granting equity awards under the 2001 Stock Plan on
July 21, 2010, the date of our initial public offering.
As of September 30, 2010, options to purchase
5,571,452 shares had been exercised under the 2001 Stock
Plan and options to purchase 5,227,764 shares remained
outstanding under the 2001 Stock Plan. In addition, we had
granted restricted stock awards and other stock awards for
48,585 shares and 257,984 shares, respectively, of
Class B common stock. The options outstanding as of
September 30, 2010 had a weighted average exercise price of
$9.27 per share. The 2001 Stock Plan terminated on July 21,
2010, the date of our initial public offering. However, any
outstanding options granted under the 2001 Stock Plan prior to
its termination remain outstanding, subject to the terms of our
2001 Stock Plan and stock option agreements, until they are
exercised or until they terminate or expire by their terms.
Options granted under the 2001 Stock Plan have terms similar to
those described below with respect to options granted under our
2010 Equity Incentive Plan, except that the options granted
under the 2001 Stock Plan will become fully exercisable if the
option holder is employed as of the closing of a change in
control and either the option is not assumed or
substituted by the successor company or the option holder is
subject to an involuntary termination, as defined in
the 2001 Stock Plan, within six months following that change in
control.
2010 Equity
Incentive Plan
In June 2010, our board of directors adopted, and in July 2010
our stockholders approved, our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, which
became effective on July 21, 2010, the date of our initial
public offering, and serves as the successor to our 2001 Stock
Plan. We have reserved 2,000,000 shares of our Class A
common stock for issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
As of September 30, 2010, options to purchase 79,500 of
these shares had been granted and were outstanding under the
2010 Equity Incentive Plan. These options had an exercise price
of $36.00 per share. The number of shares reserved for issuance
under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will increase automatically
on the first day of January of each of 2011 through 2014 by a
number of shares equal to 3% of the total outstanding shares our
Class A and Class B common stock as of the immediately
preceding December 31st. However, our board of directors or
compensation committee may reduce the amount of the increase in
any particular year. In addition, the following shares will
again be available for grant or issuance under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
shares subject to options granted under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan that cease to be subject to the option for any
reason other than exercise of the option;
|
|
|
|
shares subject to awards granted under our 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan that are subsequently forfeited or repurchased by us at the
original issue price; and
|
|
|
|
shares subject to awards granted under our 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan that otherwise terminate without shares being issued.
|
Our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will terminate in June 2020,
unless it is terminated earlier by our board of directors. Our
2010 Equity Incentive Plan authorizes the award of stock
options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock units, performance shares and stock bonuses. No
person will be eligible to receive more than
2,000,000 shares in any calendar year under our 2010
114
Equity Incentive Plan other than a new employee of ours, who
will be eligible to receive no more than 4,000,000 shares
under the plan in the calendar year in which the employee
commences employment.
Our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan is administered by our
compensation committee, all of the members of which are
non-employee directors under applicable federal securities laws
and outside directors as defined under applicable federal tax
laws. The compensation committee has the authority to construe
and interpret our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, grant awards and
make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the
administration of the plan.
Our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of
incentive stock options that qualify under Section 422 of
the Code only to our employees. All awards other than incentive
stock options may be granted to our employees, directors,
consultants, independent contractors and advisors, provided the
consultants, independent contractors and advisors render
services not in connection with the offer and sale of securities
in a capital-raising transaction. The exercise price of each
stock option must be at least equal to the fair market value of
our Class A common stock on the date of grant. The exercise
price of incentive stock options granted to 10% stockholders
must be at least equal to 110% of that value.
Our compensation committee may provide for options to be
exercised only as they vest or to be immediately exercisable
with any shares issued on exercise being subject to our right of
repurchase that lapses as the shares vest. In general, options
will vest over a four-year period. The maximum term of options
granted under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan is ten years.
A restricted stock award is an offer by us to sell shares of our
Class A common stock subject to restrictions. The price (if
any) of a restricted stock award will be determined by the
compensation committee. Unless otherwise determined by the
compensation committee at the time of award, vesting will cease
on the date the participant no longer provides services to us
and unvested shares will be forfeited to or repurchased by us.
Stock appreciation rights provide for a payment, or payments, in
cash or shares of our Class A common stock, to the holder
based upon the difference between the fair market value of our
Class A common stock on the date of exercise and the stated
exercise price up to a maximum amount of cash or number of
shares. Stock appreciation rights may vest based on time or
achievement of performance conditions.
A restricted stock unit is an award that covers a number of
shares of our Class A common stock that may be settled upon
vesting in cash, by the issuance of the underlying shares or a
combination of both. These awards are subject to forfeiture
prior to settlement because of termination of employment or
failure to achieve certain performance conditions.
A performance share is an award that covers a number of shares
of our Class A common stock that may be settled upon
achievement of the pre-established performance conditions in
cash or by issuance of the underlying shares. These awards are
subject to forfeiture prior to settlement because of termination
of employment or failure to achieve the performance conditions.
Stock bonuses may be granted as additional compensation for
services
and/or
performance, and therefore, not be issued in exchange for cash.
Awards granted under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan may not be
transferred in any manner other than by will or by the laws of
descent and distribution or as determined by our compensation
committee. Unless otherwise restricted by our compensation
committee, awards that are nonstatutory stock options may be
exercised during the lifetime of the optionee only by the
optionee, the optionees guardian or legal representative,
or a family member of the optionee who has acquired the option
by a permitted transfer. Awards that are incentive stock options
may be exercised during the lifetime of the optionee only by the
optionee or the optionees guardian or legal
representative. Options granted under our 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan generally may be exercised for a period of three months
after
115
the termination of the optionees service to us, except in
the case of death or permanent disability, in which case the
options may be exercised for up to 12 months following
termination of the optionees service to us.
If we experience a change in control transaction, outstanding
awards, including any vesting provisions, may be assumed or
substituted by the successor company. Outstanding awards that
are not assumed or substituted will expire upon the closing of a
change in control transaction. In the discretion of our
compensation committee, the vesting of these awards may be
accelerated upon the occurrence of these types of transactions.
2010 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
In June 2010, our board of directors adopted, and in July 2010
our stockholders approved, our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, which is a plan designed to enable eligible employees to
periodically purchase shares of our common stock at a discount.
Purchases will be accomplished through participation in discrete
offering periods. Our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is
intended to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan under
Section 423 of the Code. We have reserved
200,000 shares of our Class A common stock for
issuance under our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The number
of shares reserved for issuance under our 2010 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan will increase automatically on the first day of
January of each of 2011 through 2018 by the number of shares
equal to 1% of the total outstanding shares of our Class A
and Class B common stock as of the immediately preceding
December 31st. However, our board of directors or
compensation committee may reduce the amount of the increase in
any particular year. No more than 50,000,000 shares of our
Class A common stock may be issued under our 2010 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, and no other shares may be added to this
plan without the approval of our stockholders.
Our compensation committee will administer our 2010 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan. Our employees generally are eligible to
participate in our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan if they are
employed by us for at least 20 hours per week and more than
five months in a calendar year. Employees who are 5%
stockholders, or would become 5% stockholders as a result of
their participation in our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
are ineligible to participate in our 2010 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. We may impose additional restrictions on
eligibility. Under our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
eligible employees are able to acquire shares of our
Class A common stock by accumulating funds through payroll
deductions. Our eligible employees are able to select a rate of
payroll deduction between 1% and 15% of their cash compensation.
We also have the right to amend or terminate our 2010 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, except that, subject to certain exceptions,
no such action may adversely affect any outstanding rights to
purchase stock under the plan. Our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the last day of
the first offering period, unless it is terminated earlier by
our board of directors.
When an offering period commences, our employees who meet the
eligibility requirements for participation in that offering
period are automatically granted a nontransferable option to
purchase shares in that offering period. Each offering period
will run for no more than twenty-four months and consist of no
more than five purchase periods. An employees
participation automatically ends upon termination of employment
for any reason.
Except for the first offering period, each offering period will
be for six months (commencing each May 15 and November 15 on and
after May 15, 2011) and will consist of one six-month
purchase period (May 15 to November 14 or November 15 to May
14). The first offering period and purchase period commenced on
July 21, 2010 and will end on May 14, 2011.
No participant will have the right to purchase our shares in an
amount, when aggregated with purchase rights under all our
employee stock purchase plans that are also in effect in the
same calendar year(s), that has a fair market value of more than
$25,000, determined as of the first day of the applicable
offering period, for each calendar year in which that right is
outstanding. The purchase price for shares of our Class A
common stock purchased under our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase
116
Plan will be 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of our
Class A common stock on (i) the first trading day of
the applicable offering period and (ii) the last trading
day of each purchase period in the applicable offering period.
If we experience a change in control transaction, our 2010
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and any offering periods that
commenced prior to the closing of the proposed transaction may
terminate on the closing of the proposed transaction and the
final purchase of shares will occur on that date, but our
compensation committee may instead terminate any such offering
period at a different date.
401(k)
Plan
We sponsor a retirement plan intended to qualify for favorable
tax treatment under Section 401(k) of the Code. Employees
who have attained at least 21 years of age are generally
eligible to participate in the plan on the first day of the
calendar month following the month in which they commence
service with us. Participants may make pre-tax contributions to
the plan from their eligible earnings up to the statutorily
prescribed annual limit on pre-tax contributions under the Code.
Participants who are 50 years of age or older may
contribute additional amounts based on the statutory limits for
catch-up
contributions. We also make a matching contribution equal to 50%
of the first 6% of the eligible earnings that a participant
contributes to the plan. Pre-tax contributions by participants
and any employer contributions that we make to the plan and the
income earned on those contributions are generally not taxable
to participants until withdrawn. Employer contributions that we
make to the plan are generally deductible when made. Participant
contributions are held in trust as required by law. No minimum
benefit is provided under the plan. An employees interest
in his or her pre-tax deferrals is 100% vested when contributed.
We are permitted to contribute to the plan on a discretionary
basis and did contribute $73,000, $8,000 and $58,000 for the
years ended July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and
$0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. We did not make any discretionary contributions for the
five months ended December 31, 2009.
Limitation of
Liability and Indemnification of Directors and
Officers
Our restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions
that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages
to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently,
our directors will not be personally liable to us or our
stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary
duties as directors, except for liability:
|
|
|
|
|
for any breach of their duty of loyalty to our company or our
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
for any act or omission not in good faith or that involves
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
for unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases
or redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law; or
|
|
|
|
for any transaction from which they derived an improper personal
benefit.
|
Our restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify, to the
fullest extent permitted by law, any person who is or was a
party or is threatened to be made a party to any action, suit or
proceeding by reason of the fact that he or she is or was one of
our directors or officers or is or was serving at our request as
a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise. Our restated bylaws provide
that we may indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by law any
person who is or was a party or is threatened to be made a party
to any action, suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that he
or she is or was one of our employees or agents or is or was
serving at our request as an employee or agent of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise. Our restated bylaws also provide that we must
advance expenses incurred by or on behalf of a director or
officer in advance of the final disposition of any action or
proceeding, subject to very limited exceptions.
117
We have obtained insurance policies under which, subject to the
limitations of the policies, coverage is provided to our
directors and officers against loss arising from claims made by
reason of breach of fiduciary duty or other wrongful acts as a
director or officer, including claims relating to public
securities matters, and to us with respect to payments that may
be made by us to these officers and directors pursuant to our
indemnification obligations or otherwise as a matter of law.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our
directors and executive officers that are broader than the
specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware
General Corporation Law. These indemnification agreements
require us, among other things, to indemnify our directors and
executive officers against liabilities that may arise by reason
of their status or service. These indemnification agreements
also require us to advance all expenses incurred by the
directors and executive officers in investigating or defending
any such action, suit or proceeding. We believe that these
agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified
individuals to serve as directors and executive officers.
At present, we are not aware of any pending litigation or
proceeding involving any person who is or was one of our
directors, officers, employees or other agents or is or was
serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent
of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or
other enterprise, for which indemnification is sought, and we
are not aware of any threatened litigation that may result in
claims for indemnification.
The underwriting agreement provides for indemnification by the
underwriters of us and our officers, directors and employees for
certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act or
otherwise.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or
persons controlling our company pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the
SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
118
TRANSACTIONS WITH
RELATED PARTIES, FOUNDERS AND CONTROL PERSONS
In addition to the compensation arrangements, including
employment, termination of employment and
change-in-control
arrangements and indemnification arrangements, discussed, when
required, above under Management and Executive
Compensation, and the registration rights described below
under Description of Capital Stock
Registration Rights, the following is a description of
each transaction since January 1, 2007 and each currently
proposed transaction in which:
|
|
|
|
|
we have been or are to be a participant;
|
|
|
|
the amount involved exceeded or exceeds $120,000; and
|
|
|
|
any of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than
5% of our capital stock, or any immediate family member of or
person sharing the household with any of these individuals, had
or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
|
Repurchase of
Common and Preferred Stock
In January 2007, we repurchased 2,926,458 shares of our
capital stock for $6.8342 per share, or an aggregate of
$20.0 million. As part of this transaction, we repurchased
shares of our common stock from certain of our directors,
executive officers and holders of more than 5% of our capital
stock, as follows: Steven W. Streit
1,359,892 shares; TTP Fund, L.P.
199,711 shares; Mark T. Troughton
48,483 shares; and John C. Ricci
5,294 shares. In addition, Kenneth C. Aldrich donated to a
charitable organization 36,115 shares of our common stock,
which were repurchased by us in connection with the January 2007
repurchase transaction.
Series C-2
Preferred Stock Financing
In December 2008, we issued and sold 1,181,818 shares of
Series C-2
Preferred Stock for $11.00 per share, or an aggregate of
$13.0 million. All shares in the financing were sold to
entities affiliated with Sequoia Capital, a holder of more than
5% of our capital stock, as follows: Sequoia Capital Franchise
Fund 775,774 shares, Sequoia Capital IX.1
Holdings LLC 288,247 shares, Sequoia Capital
Franchise Partners 105,787 shares and Sequoia
Capital Entrepreneurs Annex Fund
12,010 shares. Each of the shares of
Series C-2
Preferred Stock automatically converted into one share of our
Class B common stock immediately prior to the closing of
our initial public offering. The proceeds from the
Series C-2
Preferred Stock Financing were used to repurchase a portion of
our then-outstanding Series D Preferred Stock.
Series D
Preferred Stock Repurchase
In December 2008, we repurchased all of our 2,926,458
outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock from GE
Capital Equity Investments, Inc., then a holder of more than 5%
of our capital stock and an affiliate of Michael S. Fisher, a
former member of our board of directors, for $13.38 per share,
or approximately $39.2 million. As part of this
transaction, we also purchased a call option that gave us the
right to repurchase from GE Capital Equity Investments, Inc. an
outstanding warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of our
common stock. This call option was exercisable at any time
between March 1, 2009 and September 1, 2009. In June
2009, we exercised the call option and repurchased the warrant
for $2.0 million.
Warrant
Exercises
In March 2007, David W. Hanna, Trustee, David William Hanna
Trust dated October 30, 1989, exercised warrants to
purchase 145,348 shares of our common stock. Mr. Hanna
is the spouse of Virginia L. Hanna, a member of our board of
directors.
119
Loans to
Executive Officers
In March 2004 and February 2006, we loaned $3.0 million and
$800,000, respectively, to Steven W. Streit, our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer. These loans bore interest
at rates of 3.5% and 4.5%, respectively, compounded
semi-annually, and would have matured in March 2011. The notes
were secured by 2,500,000 shares of our common stock owned
by Mr. Streit. In November 2009, Mr. Streit repaid in
full the principal and all accrued interest under these notes.
In May 2006, we loaned $622,000 to Mark T. Troughton, our
President, Cards and Network, and monthly from June 2006 through
October 2006, we loaned him $17,800. In May 2008, we loaned him
an additional $364,000. These loans, aggregating
$1.1 million, bore interest at rates of 2.72% to 5.14%,
compounded semi-annually, and would have matured in May 2013.
They were secured by 898,000 shares of our common stock
owned by Mr. Troughton. In November 2009,
Mr. Troughton repaid in full the principal and all accrued
interest under this note.
In February 2008, we loaned $120,000 to John L. Keatley, our
Chief Financial Officer. This loan bore interest at the rate of
3.48%, compounded semi-annually, and would have matured in
February 2015. It was secured by 85,000 shares of our
common stock owned by Mr. Keatley. In November 2009,
Mr. Keatley repaid in full the principal and all accrued
interest under this note.
Review, Approval
or Ratification of Transactions with Related Parties
We have adopted a written related-party transactions policy
which sets forth our policies and procedures regarding the
identification, review, consideration and approval or
ratification of related person transactions. Our
audit committee reviews transactions that may be related
person transactions, which are transactions between us and
any related persons in which the aggregate amount involved
exceeds or may be expected to exceed $120,000, and in which the
related person has or will have a direct or indirect material
interest. For purposes of the policy, a related person is any
executive officer, director, nominee for director, or
stockholder of ours holding more than 5% of any class of our
voting securities, in each case since the beginning of the
previous fiscal year, and their immediate family members.
Under the policy, absent any facts or circumstances indicating
special or unusual benefits to the related person, the following
transactions, arrangements or relationships need not be approved
by our audit committee pursuant to the policy:
|
|
|
|
|
employment by us of an executive officer if
|
|
|
|
|
|
the related compensation is required to be reported in our proxy
statement, or
|
|
|
|
the executive officer is not an immediate family member of
another of our executive officers or directors, the related
compensation would be reported in our proxy statement if the
executive officer were a named executive officer,
and our compensation committee approved or recommended that our
board of directors approve the compensation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any compensation paid to a director if the compensation is
required to be reported in our proxy statement;
|
|
|
|
any transaction where the related persons interest arises
solely from the ownership of our common stock and all holders of
our common stock received the same benefit on a pro rata basis;
|
|
|
|
any transaction where the rates or charges involved are
determined by competitive bids;
|
|
|
|
any transaction involving the rendering of services as a common
or contract carrier, or public utility, at rates or charges
fixed in conformity with law or government authority;
|
|
|
|
any transaction involving services as a bank depository of
funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust
indenture or similar services;
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by us to a
charitable organization, foundation or university at which a
related persons only relationship is as an employee (other
than as an executive officer);
|
|
|
|
any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by us to a
charitable organization, foundation or university at which a
related person is a trustee, director or executive officer, if
the aggregate amount involved in any fiscal year does not exceed
$120,000;
|
|
|
|
any non-discretionary matching contribution, grant or endowment
made pursuant to a matching gift program;
|
|
|
|
ordinary course business travel expenses, advances and
reimbursements; and
|
|
|
|
any indemnification payments made pursuant to our insurance
policies, certificate of incorporation or bylaws or as otherwise
approved by our board of directors.
|
Under the policy, members of our legal department review
transactions involving related persons that do not fall into one
of the above categories. If they determine that a related person
could have a significant interest in a transaction, the
transaction is referred to our audit committee. In addition,
transactions may be identified through our code of business
conduct and ethics or our other policies and procedures, and
reported to the audit committee. The audit committee determines
whether the related person has a material interest in a
transaction and may approve, ratify, reject, rescind or take
other action with respect to the transaction.
121
PRINCIPAL AND
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table presents information as to the beneficial
ownership of our common stock as of September 30, 2010, as
adjusted to reflect the sale by the selling stockholders of
Class A common stock (including shares acquired through the
exercise of options at the closing of this offering) in this
offering assuming no exercise of the underwriters option
to purchase additional shares, by:
|
|
|
|
|
each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more
than 5% of either class of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
each of our directors;
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group; and
|
|
|
|
the selling stockholders.
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the
individuals and entities named in the table below under
Directors, Named Executive Officers and 5%
Stockholders is
c/o Green
Dot Corporation, 605 East Huntington Drive, Suite 205,
Monrovia, California 91016.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC and thus represents sole or shared voting or
investment power with respect to our securities. Unless
otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and
entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment
power with respect to all shares that they beneficially own,
subject to community property laws where applicable. Shares of
our Class B common stock are convertible into shares of our
Class A common stock at the discretion of the holder on a
one-for-one
basis.
Shares of our Class B common stock subject to options or
warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within
60 days of September 30, 2010 are deemed to be
outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding
the option or warrant for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of that person but are not treated as
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of any other person.
Percentage ownership of our Class A common stock and
Class B common stock prior to this offering is based on
7,588,887 shares of our Class A common stock and
33,269,421 shares of our Class B common stock
outstanding on September 30, 2010 (and does not assume the
conversion of any outstanding shares of Class B common
stock). Percentage ownership of our Class A and
Class B common stock after the offering also assumes the
issuance
of shares
to be sold in this offering by certain selling stockholders upon
the exercise of vested stock options and the automatic
conversion
of shares
of Class B common stock into a like number of shares of our
Class A common stock in connection with and immediately
prior to the sale of those shares by the selling stockholders in
this offering.
Percentage of total voting power represents voting power with
respect to all shares of our Class A and Class B
common stock, as a single class. Holders of Class A common
stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of
Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share.
Holders of common stock vote together as a single class on all
matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, subject to certain
exceptions or unless otherwise required by law. For the purpose
of computing the percentage of total voting power, each share of
Class B common stock is deemed not to have been converted
into a share of Class A common stock, and thus to have ten
votes per share.
122
Unless otherwise described below, to our knowledge, none of the
selling stockholders or their affiliates has held any position
or office with, been employed by or otherwise had any material
relationship with us or our affiliates during the three years
prior to the date of this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Prior to this Offering
|
|
Shares of
|
|
After this Offering
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
Class B
|
|
% of
|
|
Class A
|
|
Class A
|
|
Class B
|
|
% of
|
Name and Address of
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Total Voting
|
|
Common Stock Being
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Total Voting
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares
|
|
%
|
|
Shares
|
|
%
|
|
Power
|
|
Offered
|
|
Shares
|
|
%
|
|
Shares
|
|
%
|
|
Power
|
|
Directors, Named Executive Officers and 5% Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequoia Capital(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,099,373
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
35.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Moritz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven W. Streit(2) §
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,553,408
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTP Fund, L.P.(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,431,783
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Thomas Smith, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.(4)
|
|
|
2,208,552
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mark T. Troughton(5) §
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
1,206,991
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia L. Hanna(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,176,790
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy R. Greenleaf(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522,792
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YKA Partners Ltd.(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,916
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kenneth C. Aldrich
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Ricci(9) §
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,588
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John L. Keatley(10) §
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,762
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
William H. Ott, Jr.(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
William D. Sowell(12) §
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,999
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
TCV(13)
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
1,829,373
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
(11 persons)(14)
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
23,580,610
|
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
|
|
67.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain Other Selling Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Selling Stockholders(15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of our
outstanding shares of common stock. |
|
§ |
|
Identifies a person who is one of our current employees or was
an employee of ours within the past three years. |
|
(1) |
|
Represents 7,778,099 shares owned by Sequoia Capital
Franchise Fund, 1,850,387 shares owned by Sequoia Capital
IX, 1,195,073 shares owned by Sequoia Capital US Growth
Fund IV, L.P., 1,060,650 shares owned by Sequoia
Capital Franchise Partners, 163,292 shares owned by Sequoia
Capital Entrepreneurs Annex Fund and 51,872 shares
owned by Sequoia Capital USGF Principals Fund IV, L.P. SCFF
Management, LLC is the sole general partner of Sequoia Capital
Franchise Fund and Sequoia Capital Franchise Partners. SC IX.I
Management, LLC is the sole general partner of Sequoia Capital
IX and Sequoia Capital Entrepreneurs Annex Fund. SCGF IV
Management, LP is the mid-tier general partner and SCGF GenPar,
Ltd. is the top tier general partner of Sequoia Capital US
Growth Fund IV, LP and Sequoia Capital USGF Principals
Fund IV, L.P. Michael J. Moritz, one of our directors, is a
Managing Director of SCGF GenPar, Ltd., and he is a Managing
Member of SCFF Management, LLC, SC IX.I Management, LLC, SCGF IV
Management, LP and a Class A Limited Partner of SCGF IV
Management, LP. Mr. Moritz may be deemed to have shared
voting and investment power over the shares held by Sequoia
Capital Franchise Fund, Sequoia Capital IX, Sequoia Capital US
Growth Fund IV, L.P., Sequoia Capital Franchise Partners,
Sequoia Capital Entrepreneurs Annex Fund and Sequoia
Capital USGF Principals Fund IV, L.P., as applicable.
Mr. Moritz disclaims beneficial ownership of those shares, |
123
|
|
|
|
|
except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The
address for Mr. Moritz and each of these entities is 3000
Sand Hill Road, Building 4, Suite 250, Menlo Park,
California 94025. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents 3,091,039 shares owned by the Steven W. Streit
Family Trust, 400,000 shares owned by the Streit 2009 GRAT
A, 210,247 shares held by Mr. Streit,
20,000 shares owned by the Streit 2009 GRAT B, for each of
which Mr. Streit is the trustee, 33,020 shares owned
by his children and 799,102 shares subject to options held
by Mr. Streit that are exercisable within 60 days of
September 30, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
W. Thomas Smith, Jr., one of our directors, is a managing
partner of Total Technology Partners, LLC, the general partner
of TTP Fund, L.P. The other managing partner is Gardiner W.
Garrard III. The address for Mr. Smith and each of these
entities is 1230 Peachtree Street, Promenade II,
Suite 1150, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. |
|
(4) |
|
Our right to repurchase these shares has lapsed as to 184,050 of
these shares as of September 30, 2010 and lapses with
respect to an additional 36,810 shares per month through
May 2015. The principal business address of Wal-Mart Stores,
Inc. is 702 Southwest 8th Street, Bentonville, Arkansas
72716-0215. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents 498,241 shares held by Mr. Troughton,
125,000 shares held by the Mark Troughton GRAT dtd
6/22/10 for
which Mr. Troughton is the trustee, 125,000 shares
held by the Tara McWhirter GRAT dtd
6/22/2010
for which Tara Elizabeth McWhirter is the trustee,
1,250 shares held by Mr. Troughtons wife and
458,750 shares subject to options held by
Mr. Troughton that are exercisable within 60 days of
September 30, 2010. |
|
(6) |
|
Represents 1,071,438 shares held by the David William Hanna
Trust dated October 30, 1989, 37,152 Shares held by
Tim J. Morgan, Trustee of the David W. Hanna Childrens
Trust dated
6/5/2008 and
68,200 shares held by the Virginia L. Hanna Trust dated
August 16, 2001. Ms. Hanna, one of our directors,
disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by the David
William Hanna Trust dated October 30, 1989 and the shares
held by Tim J. Morgan, Trustee of the David W. Hanna
Childrens Trust dated
6/5/2008
except to the extent of her pecuniary interest therein. The
address of these trusts is
c/o Hanna
Capital Management, 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1170,
Irvine, California 92618. |
|
(7) |
|
Represents 517,472 shares held by the Greenleaf Family
Trust, of which Timothy R. Greenleaf, one of our directors, is
the trustee, and 5,320 shares held by Mr. Greenleaf. |
|
(8) |
|
Represents shares held by YKA Partners Ltd., of which Kenneth C.
Aldrich, one of our directors, is the agent of the general
partner. |
|
(9) |
|
Represents 4,400 shares held by John C. Ricci,
4,460 shares held by his minor children and
376,728 shares subject to options held by Mr. Ricci
that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30,
2010. |
|
(10) |
|
Represents 81,400 shares held by John L. Keatley,
6,600 shares held by his minor daughters and
303,762 shares subject to options held by Mr. Keatley
that are exercisable within 60 days of September 30,
2010. This amount does not include 10,000 shares held by
the Keatley Family Trust, of which he is neither a trustee nor a
beneficiary. |
|
(11) |
|
Represents shares subject to options held by Mr. Ott that
are exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2010. |
|
(12) |
|
Represents shares subject to options held by Mr. Sowell
that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2010. |
|
(13) |
|
Based solely on information set forth in a Schedule 13D
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 6, 2010 by filed by (1) TCV VII, L.P., a Cayman
Islands exempted limited partnership (TCV VII),
(2) TCV VII (A), L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited
partnership (TCV VII(A)), (3) TCV Member Fund,
L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership
(Member Fund and, together with TCV VII and TCV
VII(A), the TCV Funds), (4) Technology
Crossover Management VII, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted
limited partnership (TCM VII), (5) Technology
Crossover Management VII, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted
company |
124
|
|
|
|
|
(Management VII), (6) Jay C. Hoag
(Mr. Hoag), (7) Richard H. Kimball
(Mr. Kimball), (8) John L. Drew
(Mr. Drew), (9) Jon Q. Reynolds, Jr.
(Mr. Reynolds), (10) William J.G.
Griffith IV (Mr. Griffith),
(11) Robert W. Trudeau (Mr. Trudeau),
(12) Christopher P. Marshall
(Mr. Marshall), (13) Timothy P. McAdam
(Mr. McAdam) and (14) John C. Rosenberg
(Mr. Rosenberg). Mr. Hoag,
Mr. Kimball, Mr. Drew, Mr. Reynolds,
Mr. Griffith, Mr. Trudeau, Mr. Marshall,
Mr. McAdam and Mr. Rosenberg (collectively, the
Class A Directors) are the Class A
Directors of Management VII. TCV VII holds 49,300 shares of
Class A common stock and 1,196,702 shares of
Class B common stock, TCV VII(A) holds 25,603 shares
of Class A common stock and 621,476 shares of
Class B common stock and Member Fund holds 97 shares
of Class A common stock and 11,195 shares of
Class B common stock. Each of the TCV Funds has the sole
power to dispose or direct the disposition of the shares which
it holds directly, and has the sole power to vote or direct the
vote of such shares. Management VII, as the ultimate general
partner of TCV VII and TCV VII(A) and a general partner of the
Member Fund, and TCM VII, as the direct general partner of TCV
VII and TCV VII(A), may also be deemed to have the sole power to
dispose or direct the disposition of the shares held by TCV VII
and TCV VII(A) and, with respect to Management VII, certain of
the shares held by Member Fund and have the sole power to direct
the vote of such shares. Each of Management VII and TCM VII
disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities except to the
extent of their respective pecuniary interest therein. Under the
memorandum and articles of association of Management VII, the
Class A Directors have the shared power to dispose or
direct the disposition of the shares held by TCV VII and TCV
VII(A) and certain of the shares held by Member Fund and the
shared power to direct the vote of such shares. Each of the
Class A Directors disclaims beneficial ownership of the
securities owned by Management VII, TCM VII, TCV VII, TCV VII(A)
and Member Fund except to the extent of their respective
pecuniary interest therein. The address of the principal
business and office of each of TCV VII, TCV VII(A), Member Fund,
TCM VII, Management VII and the Class A Directors is 528
Ramona Street, Palo Alto, California 94301. |
|
(14) |
|
Includes 2,005,341 shares subject to options that are
exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2010. |
|
(15) |
|
Represents shares held
by
selling stockholders not listed above who, as a group, owned
less than 1% of the outstanding Class B common stock prior
to this offering. Of these selling stockholders, are current or
former (within the past three years) employees of Green Dot
Corporation. |
The following table presents information as to the beneficial
ownership of our Class A and Class B common stock as
of September 30, 2010, as adjusted to reflect the sale of
the selling stockholders of Class A common stock (including
shares acquired through the exercise of options at the closing
of this offering) in this offering assuming exercise in full of
the underwriters option to purchase additional shares, by:
|
|
|
|
|
each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more
than 5% of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
each of our directors;
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group; and
|
|
|
|
the selling stockholders.
|
125
Beneficial ownership is determined on the same basis as
described in the introductory paragraphs for and the footnotes
to the previous table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
after Offering if the
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Underwriters Option is
|
|
|
to be Sold if the
|
|
Exercised in Full
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Class A
|
|
Class B
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
Option is
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Voting
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Exercised in Full
|
|
Shares
|
|
%
|
|
Shares
|
|
%
|
|
Power
|
|
Named Executive Officers, Directors and 5% Holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequoia Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Moritz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven W. Streit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTP Fund, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Thomas Smith, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark T. Troughton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia L. Hanna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy R. Greenleaf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YKA Partners Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth C. Aldrich
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Ricci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John L. Keatley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William H. Ott, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William D. Sowell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain Other Selling Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Selling Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
DESCRIPTION OF
CAPITAL STOCK
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares
of Class A common stock, $0.001 par value per share,
100,000,000 shares of Class B common stock,
$0.001 par value per share, and 5,000,000 shares of
undesignated preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.
The following description summarizes the most important terms of
our capital stock. Because it is only a summary, it does not
contain all the information that may be important to you. For a
complete description, you should refer to our restated
certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws, which are
included as exhibits to the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part, and to the provisions of applicable
Delaware law.
Common
Stock
As of September 30, 2010, there were 7,588,887 shares
of our Class A common stock outstanding, held by three
stockholders of record, 33,269,421 shares of our
Class B common stock outstanding, held by 194 stockholders
of record, and no shares of our preferred stock outstanding.
After this offering, there will
be shares
of our Class A common stock and shares of our Class B
common stock outstanding,
including shares
of Class A common stock sold by selling stockholders who
acquired the related shares of Class B common stock through
option exercises at the closing of this offering. Our board of
directors is authorized, without stockholder approval, to issue
additional shares of Class A and Class B common stock.
Dividend Rights. Subject to preferences that
may apply to any shares of preferred stock outstanding at the
time, the holders of outstanding shares of our Class A and
Class B common stock are entitled to receive dividends out
of funds legally available at the times and in the amounts that
our board of directors may determine. In the event a dividend is
paid in the form of shares of common stock or rights to acquire
shares of common stock, the holders of Class A common stock
will receive Class A common stock, or rights to acquire
Class A common stock, as the case may be, and the holders
of Class B common stock will receive Class B common
stock, or rights to acquire Class B common stock, as the
case may be. However, in general and subject to certain limited
exceptions, without approval of each class of our common stock,
we may not pay any dividends or make other distributions with
respect to any class of common stock unless at the same time we
make a ratable dividend or distribution with respect to each
outstanding share of common stock, regardless of class.
Voting Rights. Holders of our Class A
common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of
our Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per
share. In general, holders of our Class A common stock and
Class B common stock will vote together as a single class
on all matters (including the election of directors) submitted
to a vote of stockholders, unless otherwise required by law.
Delaware law could require either our Class A common stock
or our Class B common stock to vote separately as a single
class in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
If we were to seek to amend our certificate of incorporation to
increase the authorized number of shares of a class of stock, or
to increase or decrease the par value of a class of stock, then
that class would be required to vote separately to approve the
proposed amendment; and
|
|
|
|
If we were to seek to amend our certificate of incorporation in
a manner that altered or changed the powers, preferences or
special rights of a class of stock in a manner that affected its
holders adversely, then that class would be required to vote
separately to approve the proposed amendment.
|
Our certificate of incorporation requires the separate vote and
majority approval of each class of our common stock prior to
distributions, reclassifications and mergers or consolidations
that would result in one class of common stock being treated in
a manner different from the other, subject to limited
exceptions, and for amendments of our certificate of
incorporation that would affect our dual class stock structure.
127
We have not provided for cumulative voting for the election of
directors in our restated certificate of incorporation. In
addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that, in the
event we become a bank holding company, a holder, or group of
affiliated holders, of more than 24.9% of our common stock may
not vote shares representing more than 14.9% of the voting power
represented by the outstanding shares of our Class A and
Class B common stock.
No Preemptive or Similar Rights. Neither our
Class A nor our Class B common stock is entitled to
preemptive rights, and neither is subject to redemption.
Conversion. Our Class A common stock is
not convertible into any other shares of our capital stock. Each
share of our Class B common stock is convertible at any
time at the option of the holder into one share of our
Class A common stock. In addition, each share of our
Class B common stock will convert automatically into one
share of our Class A common stock upon any transfer,
whether or not for value, except for estate planning,
intercompany and other similar transfers or upon the date that
the total number of shares of our Class B common stock
outstanding represents less than 10% of the total number of
shares of our Class A and Class B common stock
outstanding. Once transferred and converted into Class A
common stock, the Class B common stock may not be reissued.
No class of our common stock may be subdivided or combined
unless the other class of our common stock concurrently is
subdivided or combined in the same proportion and in the same
manner.
Right to Receive Liquidation
Distributions. Upon our liquidation, dissolution
or
winding-up,
the assets legally available for distribution to our
stockholders would be distributable ratably among the holders of
our Class A and Class B common stock and any
participating preferred stock outstanding at that time after
payment of liquidation preferences, if any, on any outstanding
shares of preferred stock and payment of other claims of
creditors.
Fully Paid and Non-Assessable. All of the
outstanding shares of our Class B common stock are, and the
shares of our Class A common stock to be issued pursuant to
this offering will be, fully paid and non-assessable.
Preferred
Stock
Our board of directors is authorized, subject to limitations
prescribed by Delaware law, to issue preferred stock in one or
more series, to establish from time to time the number of shares
to be included in each series, and to fix the designation,
powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each series and
any of its qualifications, limitations or restrictions, in each
case without further action by our stockholders. Our board of
directors can also increase or decrease the number of shares of
any series of preferred stock, but not below the number of
shares of that series then outstanding, unless approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our capital
stock entitled to vote, or such other vote as may be required by
the certificate of designation establishing the series. Our
board of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock
with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the
voting power or other rights of the holders of our Class A
and Class B common stock. The issuance of preferred stock,
while providing flexibility in connection with possible
acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other
things, have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a
change in our control and might adversely affect the market
price of our Class A common stock and the voting and other
rights of the holders of our Class A and Class B
common stock. We have no current plan to issue any shares of
preferred stock.
Warrants
As of September 30, 2010, we had outstanding the following
warrant to purchase shares of our capital stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Subject
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Type of Capital Stock
|
|
to Warrants
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Class B common stock*
|
|
|
4,283,456
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
23.70
|
|
|
|
March 3, 2017
|
(2)
|
128
|
|
|
* |
|
This warrant is redeemable for cash if we fail to perform under
our commercial agreement with the holder (PayPal). In addition,
we have the right to repurchase any shares previously issued
upon the exercise of the warrant if the holder fails to perform
under the same agreement. |
|
(1) |
|
Of these shares, 3,426,765 shares will vest and become
exercisable only upon the achievement of certain performance
goals prior to the earlier of March 3, 2014 or the
termination of our commercial agreement with the holder
(PayPal), and the remaining shares will vest and become
exercisable only if certain other performance goals also take
place prior to the same deadline. |
|
(2) |
|
The warrant may expire earlier than this date. The warrant
provides that it expires on the earlier of March 3, 2014 or
the termination of our commercial agreement with the holder
(PayPal) if none of the shares subject to the warrant have
vested prior to the earlier event. Should any of the shares
subject to the warrant vest, the warrant expires on the earliest
of the date on which our commercial agreement with the holder is
terminated, the date of a change in control of our company or
March 3, 2017. |
Registration
Rights
Pursuant to the terms of our ninth amended and restated
registration rights agreement, immediately following this
offering, certain holders of our Class A and Class B
common stock and warrants to purchase our Class B common
stock are entitled to rights with respect to the registration of
shares
under the Securities Act, as described below.
Demand Registration Rights. At any time after
January 27, 2011, the holders of at least 50% of the
then-outstanding shares having registration rights can request
that we file a registration statement covering registrable
securities with an anticipated aggregate offering price of at
least $5.0 million. We are only required to file two
registration statements upon exercise of these demand
registration rights. We may postpone the filing of a
registration statement for up to 90 days once in a
12-month
period if we determine that the filing would be detrimental to
us and that it would be in our best interests to defer the
filing of the registration statement.
Piggyback Registration Rights. If we register
any of our Class A common stock for public sale, holders of
shares having registration rights will have the right to include
their shares in the registration statement. However, this right
does not apply to a registration relating to any of our employee
benefit plans, a registration relating to a corporate
reorganization or acquisition or a registration in which the
only Class A common stock being registered is Class A
common stock issuable upon conversion of debt securities that
are also being registered. The managing underwriter of any
underwritten offering will have the right, in its sole
discretion, to limit, because of market conditions, the number
of shares registered by these holders, in which case the number
of shares to be registered will be apportioned pro rata among
these holders, according to the total amount of securities
entitled to be included by each holder, or in a manner mutually
agreed upon by the holders. However, the number of shares to be
registered by these holders cannot be reduced below 25% of the
total value of the shares covered by the registration statement.
Form S-3
Registration Rights. The holders of at least 20%
of the then-outstanding shares having registration rights can
request that we register all or part of their shares on
Form S-3
if we are eligible to file a registration statement on
Form S-3
and if the aggregate price to the public of the shares offered
is at least $1.0 million. The stockholders may only require
us to file two registration statements on
Form S-3
in a
12-month
period. We may postpone the filing of a registration statement
on
Form S-3
for up to 90 days once in a
12-month
period if we determine that the filing would be seriously
detrimental to us and our stockholders.
Expenses of Registration Rights. We will pay
all expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions
and the fees and disbursements of more than one counsel for the
selling stockholders, incurred in connection with the
registrations described above.
129
Expiration of Registration Rights. The
registration rights described above will expire, with respect to
any particular holder of these rights, on the earlier of
July 27, 2015 or when that holder can sell all of its
registrable securities in any three-month period under
Rule 144 of the Securities Act.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions
The provisions of Delaware law, our dual class structure, and
the provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and
our restated bylaws may have the effect of delaying, deferring
or preventing a change in our control.
Delaware Law. We are governed by the
provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law. In general, Section 203 prohibits a public
Delaware corporation from engaging in a business
combination with an interested stockholder for
a period of three years after the date of the transaction in
which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the
business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. A
business combination includes mergers, asset sales
or other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the
stockholder. An interested stockholder is a person
who, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within
the prior three years did own, 15% or more of the
corporations outstanding voting stock. These provisions
may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a
change in our control.
Dual Class Stock Structure. As discussed
above, our Class B common stock has ten votes per share,
while our Class A common stock, which is the class of stock
the selling stockholders are selling in this offering and which
will be the only class of stock which is publicly traded, has
one vote per share. After the offering, our current directors,
executive officers, holders of more than 5% of our common stock
and their respective affiliates will, in the aggregate,
beneficially own approximately % of
our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock,
representing approximately % of the
total voting power of our outstanding capital stock
(approximately % and
approximately %, respectively, if
the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full).
Because of our dual class structure, the holders of our
Class B common stock will continue to be able to control
all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval even if
they own significantly less than 50% of the shares of our
outstanding Class A and Class B common stock. This
concentrated control could discourage others from initiating any
potential merger, takeover or other change of control
transaction that other stockholders might view as beneficial.
Our board of directors is authorized, without stockholder
approval, to issue additional shares of Class A and
Class B common stock.
Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Restated Bylaw
Provisions. Our restated certificate of
incorporation and our restated bylaws not only provide for a
dual class structure, but also include a number of other
provisions that could deter hostile takeovers or delay or
prevent a change in our control, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Board of Directors Vacancies. Our restated
certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws authorize only
our board of directors to fill vacant directorships. In
addition, the number of directors constituting our board of
directors is permitted to be set only by a resolution adopted by
a majority vote of our entire board of directors. These
provisions would prevent a stockholder from increasing the size
of our board of directors and then gaining control of our board
of directors by filling the resulting vacancies with its own
nominees.
|
|
|
|
Classified Board. Our restated certificate of
incorporation and restated bylaws provide that our board is
classified into three classes of directors. This could delay a
successful tender offeror from obtaining majority control of our
board of directors, and the prospect of that delay might deter a
potential offeror. In addition, stockholders are not permitted
to cumulate their votes for the election of directors.
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Action; Special Meeting of
Stockholders. Our restated certificate of
incorporation provides that our stockholders may not take action
by written consent, but may only take action at annual or
special meetings of our stockholders. Our restated bylaws
further provide that
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by a
majority of our board of directors, the chairman of our board of
directors, our chief executive officer or our president.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Notice Requirements for Stockholder Proposals and
Director Nominations. Our restated bylaws provide
advance notice procedures for stockholders seeking to bring
business before our annual meeting of stockholders, or to
nominate candidates for election as directors at our annual
meeting of stockholders. Our restated bylaws also specify
certain requirements regarding the form and content of a
stockholders notice. These provisions might preclude our
stockholders from bringing matters before our annual meeting of
stockholders or from making nominations for directors at our
annual meeting of stockholders.
|
|
|
|
Limits on Voting Power. Our restated
certificate of incorporation provides that a holder, or group of
affiliated holders, of more than 24.9% of our common stock may
not vote shares representing more than 14.9% of the voting power
represented by the outstanding shares of our Class A and
Class B common stock. These provisions might make it more
difficult for, or discourage an attempt by, such a stockholder
to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer,
proxy contest or other means.
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Undesignated Preferred Stock. Our
board of directors has the authority, without further action by
the stockholders, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of
undesignated preferred stock with rights and preferences,
including voting rights, designated from time to time by our
board of directors. The existence of authorized but unissued
shares of preferred stock would enable our board of directors to
render more difficult, or to discourage an attempt to obtain
control of us by means of, a merger, tender offer, proxy contest
or similar transaction.
|
Listing
Our Class A common stock is listed on the NYSE under the
symbol GDOT.
Transfer Agent
and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our Class A and
Class B common stock is Computershare Trust Company,
N.A.
131
SHARES ELIGIBLE
FOR FUTURE SALE
We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales of
shares of our Class A common stock or the availability of
shares of our Class A common stock for sale will have on
the market prices of our Class A common stock prevailing
from time to time. Nevertheless, sales of substantial amounts of
our Class A common stock, including shares of Class A
common stock issued upon conversion of Class B common stock
issued upon exercise of outstanding options or warrants, or the
perception that those sales could occur, in the public market
after this offering could adversely affect market prices
prevailing from time to time and could impair our ability to
raise capital through the sale of our equity securities.
Upon the completion of this offering, based on the number of
shares outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and giving
effect to the issuance
of shares
of Class B common stock to be acquired by certain selling
stockholders through option exercises at the closing of this
offering in order to sell the underlying shares of Class A
common stock in this offering, we will have a total
of shares
of our Class A and Class B common stock outstanding.
Of these outstanding shares, shares of Class A common
stock, consisting of the shares of Class A common stock
being sold in this offering, and the 5,241,758 shares of
Class A common stock sold in our initial public offering,
will be freely tradable, except that any shares purchased in the
directed share program offered in connection with our initial
public offering or held by our affiliates, as that term is
defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act, will only be
able to be sold in compliance with the limitations described
below.
The remainder of the outstanding shares of our Class B
common stock as of September 30, 2010 and the underlying
Class A common stock issuable upon conversion thereof will
be deemed restricted securities as defined in Rule 144.
Restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if
they are registered or if they qualify for an exemption from
registration under Rule 144 or Rule 701 promulgated
under the Securities Act, which rules are summarized below. In
addition, these shares are subject to market standoff agreements
between us and our stockholders and the
lock-up
agreements described below. Subject to the volume and other
restrictions of Rule 144 or Rule 701 these shares will
be available for sale in the public market as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
No restricted shares will be eligible for sale in the public
market immediately upon completion of this offering;
|
|
|
|
shares
will be eligible for sale in the public market upon the
expiration of the
lock-up
and/or
market standoff agreements entered into prior to our initial
public offering, beginning on January 18, 2011;
|
|
|
|
shares
of the shares will be eligible for sale in the public market
from time to time beginning on January 18, 2011 upon the
lapse of our right of repurchase with respect to any unvested
shares, of
which
are held by a stockholder who has entered into
lock-up
agreements for this offering, as described below; and
|
|
|
|
shares
will be eligible for sale in the public market upon the
expiration of
lock-up
agreements for this offering, as described below.
|
Lock-Up
Agreements
In connection with our initial public offering, holders of
securities representing more than 95% of our fully diluted
shares, including all of our directors, officers and the selling
stockholders, entered into and are subject to
lock-up
agreements that, subject to exceptions described in the
Underwriting section below, prohibit them from
offering for sale, selling, contracting to sell, granting any
option for the sale of, transferring or otherwise disposing of
any shares of our common stock, options or warrants to acquire
shares of our common stock or any security or instrument related
to this common stock, option or warrant until January 18,
2011 without the prior written consent of J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated.
In addition, all of our security holders are
132
subject to market standoff provisions that contain restrictions
similar to those contained in the
lock-up
agreements.
In addition, in connection with this offering, holders of
securities representing more than %
of our fully diluted shares, including all of our directors,
officers and the selling stockholders, have entered into, or
will enter into,
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters of this offering, which
agreements, subject to certain exceptions, prohibit them from
offering for sale, selling, contracting to sell, granting any
option for the sale of, transferring or otherwise disposing of
any shares of our common stock, options or warrants to acquire
shares of our common stock or any security or instrument related
to this common stock, option or warrant sale, transfer or
disposal of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common
stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or
exchangeable for shares of our common stock without the prior
written consent of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated for a period of
90 days after the date of this prospectus. These new
lock-up
agreements are described below under Underwriting.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person
who is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates for
purposes of the Securities Act at any time during the
90 days preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the
shares proposed to be sold for at least six months, including
the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates,
is entitled to sell those shares without complying with the
manner of sale, volume limitation or notice provisions of
Rule 144, subject to compliance with the public information
requirements of Rule 144. If such person has beneficially
owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least one year,
including the holding period of any prior owner other than our
affiliates, then that person would be entitled to sell those
shares immediately without complying with any of the
requirements of Rule 144.
In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, our
affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates
are entitled to sell upon expiration of the
lock-up and
market standoff agreements described above, within any
three-month period, a number of shares that does not exceed the
greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of our Class A and Class B
common stock then outstanding, which will equal
approximately shares
immediately after this offering; or
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our Class A common
stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a
notice on Form 144 with respect to that sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates or persons selling
shares on behalf of our affiliates are also subject to certain
manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us.
Rule 701
Rule 701 generally allows a stockholder who purchased
shares of our Class A or Class B common stock pursuant
to a written compensatory plan or contract and who is not deemed
to have been an affiliate of our company during the immediately
preceding 90 days to sell those shares in reliance upon
Rule 144, but without being required to comply with the
public information, holding period, volume limitation or notice
provisions of Rule 144. Rule 701 also permits
affiliates of our company to sell their
Rule 701 shares under Rule 144 without complying
with the holding period requirements of Rule 144.
Stock Options and
Awards
We have filed a registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act covering all of the shares of our
Class B common stock subject to options outstanding and the
shares of our Class A common stock reserved for issuance
under our stock plans. Accordingly, shares of our common stock
133
issued under these plans will be eligible for sale in the public
market, subject to vesting restrictions and the
lock-up
restrictions and market stand-off agreements described above.
However, the shares registered on
Form S-8
may be subject to the volume limitations and the manner of sale,
notice and public information requirements of Rule 144 and
will not be eligible for resale until expiration of the
lock-up and
market standoff agreements to which they are subject.
Warrants
As of September 30, 2010, we had an outstanding unvested
warrant to purchase 4,283,456 shares of Class B common
stock. This warrant vests and becomes exercisable only upon
achievement of certain performance goals. See Description
of Capital Stock Warrants. In addition, this
warrant contains a net exercise provision. This
provision allows the holder to exercise the warrant for a lesser
number of shares of Class B common stock in lieu of paying
cash. The number of shares that would be issued in this case
would be based upon the market price of the Class B common
stock at the time of the net exercise. Because this warrant has
been held for at least one year, any shares of Class B
common stock issued upon net exercise of this warrant could be
publicly sold under Rule 144 following expiration of the
lock-up and
market standoff agreements described above.
Registration
Rights
We have granted demand, piggyback and
Form S-3
registration rights to certain of our security holders to sell
our Class A common stock. For a further description of
these rights, see Description of Capital Stock
Registration Rights.
134
UNDERWRITING
The selling stockholders are offering the shares of Class A
common stock described in this prospectus through a number of
underwriters. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated are acting as joint
book-running managers of the offering and as representatives of
the underwriters. We and the selling stockholders have entered
into an underwriting agreement with the underwriters. Subject to
the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, the
selling stockholders have agreed to sell to the underwriters,
and each underwriter has severally agreed to purchase, at the
public offering price less the underwriting discounts and
commissions set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, the
number of shares of our Class A common stock listed next to
its name in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Name
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters are committed to purchase all the shares of our
Class A common stock offered by the selling stockholders if
they purchase any shares. The underwriting agreement also
provides that, if an underwriter defaults, the purchase
commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be increased or
the offering may be terminated.
The underwriters propose to offer the Class A common stock
directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on
the cover page of this prospectus and to certain dealers at that
price less a concession not in excess of
$ per share. Any such dealers may
resell shares to certain other brokers or dealers at a discount
of up to $ per share from the
public offering price set forth on the cover of this prospectus.
After the initial public offering of the shares, the offering
price and other selling terms may be changed by the
underwriters. Sales of shares made outside the United States may
be made by affiliates of the underwriters.
The underwriters have an option to buy up
to
additional shares of our Class A common stock from the
selling stockholders to cover over-allotments, if any. The
underwriters have 30 days from the date of this prospectus
to exercise this over-allotment option. If any shares are
purchased with this over-allotment option, the underwriters will
purchase shares in approximately the same proportion as shown in
the table above. If any additional shares of our Class A
common stock are purchased, the underwriters will offer the
additional shares on the same terms as those on which the shares
are being offered.
The underwriting discounts and commissions are equal to the
public offering price per share of our Class A common stock
less the amount paid by the underwriters to the selling
stockholders per share of our Class A common stock. The
discounts and commissions are $
per share. The following table shows the per share and total
underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid to the
underwriters assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid by Selling Stockholders
|
|
|
No Exercise
|
|
Full Exercise
|
|
Per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We estimate that the total expenses of this offering, including
registration, filing and listing fees, printing fees and legal
and accounting expenses, but excluding the underwriting
discounts and commissions, will be approximately
$ .
The selling stockholders will reimburse us for the expenses we
incur in connection with this offering.
135
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
web sites maintained by one or more underwriters, or selling
group members, if any, participating in the offering. The
underwriters may agree to allocate a number of shares to
underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online
brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be
allocated by the representatives to underwriters and selling
group members that may make Internet distributions on the same
basis as other allocations.
We have agreed that we will not (i) offer, pledge, announce
the intention to sell, sell, contract to sell, sell any option
or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to
sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase or
otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, or
file with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities
Act relating to, any shares of our Class A common stock or
securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
any shares of our Class A common stock, or publicly
disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge,
disposition or filing, or (ii) enter into any swap or other
agreement that transfers all or a portion of the economic
consequences associated with the ownership of any shares of our
Class A common stock or any such other securities
(regardless of whether any of these transactions are to be
settled by the delivery of shares of our Class A common
stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise), in each
case without the prior written consent of J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus,
other than (A) grants, exercises and settlements of awards
under our stock plans that are described in this prospectus,
(B) the filing of a registration statement in connection
with an employee stock compensation plan and (C) the
issuance of securities in connection with certain acquisitions,
joint ventures or other strategic transactions, provided that
the aggregate number of shares issued in all such transactions
under this clause (C) may not exceed 10% of our outstanding
stock following this offering and any recipient of any such
shares agrees to be subject to the restrictions set forth in the
following paragraph. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if
(1) during the last 17 days of the
90-day
restricted period, we issue an earnings release or material news
or a material event relating to our company occurs; or
(2) prior to the expiration of the
90-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
90-day
period, the restrictions described above will continue to apply
until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
occurrence of the material news or material event.
Holders of securities representing more
than % of our fully diluted shares,
including all of our directors, officers and the selling
stockholders, have entered into
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters pursuant to which each of these
persons or entities, with limited exceptions, for a period of
90 days after the date of this prospectus, may not, without
the prior written consent of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated , (1) offer,
pledge, announce the intention to sell, sell, contract to sell,
sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or
contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to
purchase, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our Class A common stock or any
securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
our Class A common stock (including, without limitation,
Class A common stock or such other securities which may be
deemed to be beneficially owned by these directors, executive
officers, managers and members in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the SEC and securities that may be issued upon
exercise of a stock option or warrant) or (2) enter into
any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in part,
any of the economic consequences of ownership of our
Class A common stock or such other securities, whether any
such transaction described in clause (1) or (2) above
is to be settled by delivery of our Class A common stock or
such other securities, in cash or otherwise, or (3) make
any demand for or exercise any right with respect to the
registration of any shares of our Class A common stock or
any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
our Class A common stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if
(1) during the last 17 days of the
90-day
restricted period, we issue an earnings release or material news
or a material event relating to our company occurs; or
(2) prior to the expiration of the
90-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
90-day
period, the restrictions described above will continue to apply
until the expiration of the
136
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
occurrence of the material news or material event.
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act.
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, which involves making bids for,
purchasing and selling shares of our Class A common stock
in the open market for the purpose of preventing or retarding a
decline in the market price of our Class A common stock
while this offering is in progress. These stabilizing
transactions may include making short sales of our Class A
common stock, which involves the sale by the underwriters of a
greater number of shares of our Class A common stock than
they are required to purchase in this offering, and purchasing
shares of our Class A common stock in the open market to
cover positions created by short sales. Short sales may be
covered shorts, which are short positions in an
amount not greater than the underwriters over-allotment
option referred to above, or may be naked shorts,
which are short positions in excess of that amount. The
underwriters may close out any covered short position either by
exercising their over-allotment option, in whole or in part, or
by purchasing shares in the open market. In making this
determination, the underwriters will consider, among other
things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open
market compared to the price at which the underwriters may
purchase shares through the over-allotment option. A naked short
position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are
concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of
our Class A common stock in the open market that could
adversely affect investors who purchase shares in this offering.
To the extent that the underwriters create a naked short
position, they will purchase shares in the open market to cover
the position.
The underwriters have advised us that, pursuant to
Regulation M of the Securities Act, they may also engage in
other activities that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect
the price of our Class A common stock, including the
imposition of penalty bids. This means that, if the
representatives of the underwriters purchase our Class A
common stock in the open market in stabilizing transactions or
to cover short sales, the representatives can require the
underwriters that sold those shares as part of this offering to
repay the underwriting discount received by them.
These activities may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our Class A common stock or preventing
or retarding a decline in the market price of our Class A
common stock, and, as a result, the price of our Class A
common stock may be higher than the price that otherwise might
exist in the open market. If the underwriters commence these
activities, they may discontinue them at any time. The
underwriters may carry out these transactions on the NYSE, in
the
over-the-counter
market or otherwise.
Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us
or the underwriters that would permit a public offering of the
securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction where
action for that purpose is required. The securities offered by
this prospectus may not be offered or sold, directly or
indirectly, nor may this prospectus or any other offering
material or advertisements in connection with the offer and sale
of any such securities be distributed or published in any
jurisdiction, except under circumstances that will result in
compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of that
jurisdiction. Persons into whose possession this prospectus
comes are advised to inform themselves about and to observe any
restrictions relating to this offering and the distribution of
this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to
sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities offered
by this prospectus in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or
a solicitation is unlawful.
This document is only being distributed to and is only directed
at (i) persons who are outside the United Kingdom or
(ii) investment professionals falling within
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the Order) or
(iii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom it
may lawfully be communicated, falling with Article 49(2)(a)
to (d) of the Order (all such persons together being
referred to as relevant persons). The securities are
only available to, and any invitation, offer or agreement to
subscribe, purchase or otherwise acquire such
137
securities will be engaged in only with, relevant persons. Any
person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on
this document or any of its contents.
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
that has implemented the European Union Prospectus Directive
(the EU Prospectus Directive) (each, a
Relevant Member State), from and including the date
on which the EU Prospectus Directive is implemented in that
Relevant Member State (the Relevant Implementation
Date), an offer of securities described in this prospectus
may not be made to the public in that Relevant Member State
prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the
shares that has been approved by the competent authority in that
Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in another
Relevant Member State and notified to the competent authority in
that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with the EU
Prospectus Directive, except that it may, with effect from and
including the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of
shares to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time:
|
|
|
|
|
to legal entities that are authorized or regulated to operate in
the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated,
whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
|
|
|
|
to any legal entity that has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year;
(2) a total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than 50,000,000,
as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts;
|
|
|
|
to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified
investors as defined in the EU Prospectus Directive) subject to
obtaining the prior consent of the book-running managers for any
such offer; or
|
|
|
|
in any other circumstances that do not require the publication
by the issuer of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the
EU Prospectus Directive.
|
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of securities to the public in relation to any
securities in any Relevant Member State means the communication
in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the
terms of the offer and the securities to be offered so as to
enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe for the
securities, as the same may be varied in that Member State by
any measure implementing the EU Prospectus Directive in that
Relevant Member State and the expression EU Prospectus Directive
means Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant
implementing measure in each Relevant Member State.
Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates have provided
in the past to us and our affiliates and may provide from time
to time in the future certain commercial banking, financial
advisory, investment banking and other services to us and those
affiliates in the ordinary course of their business, for which
they have received and may continue to receive customary fees
and commissions. In addition, from time to time, certain of the
underwriters and their affiliates may effect transactions for
their own account or the accounts of customers, and hold on
behalf of themselves or their customers, long or short positions
in our debt or equity securities or loans.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, California, will
pass upon the validity of the issuance of the shares of our
Class A common stock offered by this prospectus. Cravath,
Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, New York, will act as
counsel to the underwriters.
EXPERTS
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, has audited our consolidated financial
statements at July 31, 2008 and 2009 and December 31,
2009, for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended
July 31, 2009 and for the five months ended December 31
2009, as set forth in their report. We have included our audited
consolidated financial statements in this prospectus
138
and elsewhere in the registration statement in reliance on
Ernst & Young LLPs report, given on their
authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN
FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act with respect to our Class A common
stock. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the
registration statement, does not contain all of the information
set forth in the registration statement, some items of which are
contained in exhibits to the registration statement as permitted
by the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information
with respect to us and our Class A common stock, we refer
you to the registration statement, including the exhibits and
the consolidated financial statements and related notes filed as
a part of the registration statement. Statements contained in
this prospectus concerning the contents of any contract or any
other document are not necessarily complete. If a contract or
document has been filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement, please see the copy of the contract or document that
has been filed. Each statement in this prospectus relating to a
contract or document filed as an exhibit is qualified in all
respects by the filed exhibit. The exhibits to the registration
statement should be reviewed for the complete contents of these
contracts and documents. A copy of the registration statement,
including the exhibits and the consolidated financial statements
and related notes filed as a part of the registration statement,
may be inspected without charge at the SECs Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies of all or any part of
the registration statement may be obtained from the SEC upon the
payment of fees prescribed by it. You may call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for more information on the operation of the public reference
facilities. The SEC maintains a website at
http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements and
other information regarding companies that file electronically
with it.
We are also subject to the information and reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act and, in accordance with this
law, will file periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. These periodic reports, proxy
statements and other information will be available for
inspection and copying at the SECs public reference
facilities and the website of the SEC referred to above.
139
Green Dot
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except par value)
|
|
|
Assets
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
56,303
|
|
|
$
|
135,581
|
|
Settlement assets
|
|
|
42,569
|
|
|
|
11,784
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
29,157
|
|
|
|
23,985
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
7,262
|
|
|
|
6,776
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,634
|
|
|
|
4,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
145,377
|
|
|
|
182,461
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
15,381
|
|
|
|
5,163
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
3,175
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
11,973
|
|
|
|
16,045
|
|
Deferred expenses
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
|
|
5,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
183,108
|
|
|
$
|
213,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
9,777
|
|
|
$
|
11,331
|
|
Settlement obligations
|
|
|
42,569
|
|
|
|
11,784
|
|
Amounts due to card issuing banks for overdrawn accounts
|
|
|
23,422
|
|
|
|
33,181
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
13,916
|
|
|
|
14,071
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
15,048
|
|
|
|
11,227
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
104,732
|
|
|
|
84,580
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
4,398
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
4,154
|
|
|
|
3,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
111,744
|
|
|
|
92,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value:
25,554 shares authorized as of December 31, 2009,
5,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2010;
24,942 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2009, no shares issued and outstanding as of
September 30, 2010; liquidation preference of $31,322 and
$0 as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010,
respectively
|
|
|
31,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value; no shares
authorized as of December 31, 2009, 100,000 shares
authorized as of September 30, 2010; no shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2009, 7,589 shares
issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Class B convertible common stock, $0.001 par value,
50,000 shares authorized as of December 31, 2009,
100,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2010;
12,860 and 33,269 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010, respectively
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
12,603
|
|
|
|
58,706
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
27,426
|
|
|
|
61,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
71,364
|
|
|
|
120,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
183,108
|
|
|
$
|
213,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
F-2
Green Dot
Corporation
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
$
|
30,849
|
|
|
$
|
40,592
|
|
|
$
|
93,011
|
|
|
$
|
124,978
|
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
17,256
|
|
|
|
26,484
|
|
|
|
49,383
|
|
|
|
73,630
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
17,213
|
|
|
|
27,044
|
|
|
|
46,554
|
|
|
|
81,106
|
|
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
65,318
|
|
|
|
88,904
|
|
|
|
188,948
|
|
|
|
272,041
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
17,182
|
|
|
|
30,305
|
|
|
|
52,430
|
|
|
|
87,777
|
|
Compensation and benefits expenses
|
|
|
12,666
|
|
|
|
17,621
|
|
|
|
32,827
|
|
|
|
50,474
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
9,951
|
|
|
|
14,579
|
|
|
|
27,092
|
|
|
|
43,131
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
7,587
|
|
|
|
10,976
|
|
|
|
18,721
|
|
|
|
33,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
47,386
|
|
|
|
73,481
|
|
|
|
131,070
|
|
|
|
215,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
17,932
|
|
|
|
15,423
|
|
|
|
57,878
|
|
|
|
56,662
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
17,993
|
|
|
|
15,511
|
|
|
|
58,054
|
|
|
|
56,883
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
7,522
|
|
|
|
6,540
|
|
|
|
24,344
|
|
|
|
22,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
10,471
|
|
|
|
8,971
|
|
|
|
33,710
|
|
|
|
34,294
|
|
Dividends, accretion, and allocated earnings of preferred stock
|
|
|
(7,060
|
)
|
|
|
(1,255
|
)
|
|
|
(22,886
|
)
|
|
|
(16,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocated to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
3,411
|
|
|
$
|
7,716
|
|
|
$
|
10,824
|
|
|
$
|
18,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
|
12,051
|
|
|
|
28,627
|
|
|
|
12,046
|
|
|
|
18,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
|
15,262
|
|
|
|
31,862
|
|
|
|
15,545
|
|
|
|
21,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
F-3
Green Dot
Corporation
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
33,710
|
|
|
$
|
34,294
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,552
|
|
|
|
5,405
|
|
Provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts
|
|
|
18,089
|
|
|
|
34,912
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
5,246
|
|
Stock-based retailer incentive compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,673
|
|
Provision (benefit) for uncollectible trade receivables
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Impairment of capitalized software
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(1,731
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement assets
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
30,785
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(19,668
|
)
|
|
|
(31,761
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(3,105
|
)
|
|
|
817
|
|
Deferred expenses
|
|
|
3,568
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,544
|
|
|
|
3,877
|
|
Settlement obligations
|
|
|
(3,289
|
)
|
|
|
(30,785
|
)
|
Amounts due to card issuing banks for overdrawn accounts
|
|
|
4,996
|
|
|
|
9,759
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(4,988
|
)
|
|
|
(3,868
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
8,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
41,614
|
|
|
|
77,493
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
(13,028
|
)
|
|
|
10,218
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment, including internal-use
software
|
|
|
(5,547
|
)
|
|
|
(10,321
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(18,575
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on line of credit
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on line of credit
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of warrants and options
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
Exercise of call option on warrant
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of preferred and common shares
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(2,413
|
)
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
Net increase in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
20,626
|
|
|
|
79,278
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
16,692
|
|
|
|
56,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
37,318
|
|
|
$
|
135,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
24,009
|
|
|
$
|
14,215
|
|
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
F-4
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Green Dot Corporation (we, us and
our refer to Green Dot Corporation and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Next Estate Communications, Inc. and
Green Dot Acquisition Corp.) is one of the leading providers of
general purpose reloadable prepaid debit cards and cash loading
and transfer services in the United States. Our products include
Green Dot MasterCard and Visa-branded prepaid debit cards and
several co-branded reloadable prepaid card programs,
collectively referred to as our GPR cards; Visa-branded gift
cards; and our MoneyPak and swipe reload proprietary products,
collectively referred to as our cash transfer products, which
enable cash loading and transfer services through our Green Dot
Network. The Green Dot Network enables consumers to use cash to
reload our prepaid debit cards or to transfer cash to any of our
Green Dot Network acceptance members, including competing
prepaid card programs and other online accounts.
We market our cards and financial services to banked,
underbanked and unbanked consumers in the United States using
distribution channels other than traditional bank branches, such
as third-party retailer locations nationwide and the Internet.
Our prepaid debit cards are issued by third-party issuing banks,
and we have relationships with several card issuers, including
GE Money Bank and Columbus Bank and Trust Company, a
division of Synovus Bank. We also have distribution arrangements
with many large and medium-sized retailers, such as Walmart,
Walgreens, CVS, Rite Aid, 7-Eleven, Kroger, Kmart, Meijer and
Radio Shack, and with various industry resellers, such as Incomm
and PaySpot. We refer to participating retailers collectively as
our retail distributors.
Initial Public
Offering
On July 27, 2010, we completed an initial public offering
of 5,241,758 shares of our Class A common stock at an
initial public offering price of $36.00 per share, all of which
were sold by existing stockholders. We did not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares of our Class A common
stock in the offering. Concurrent with the completion of the
initial public offering, certain selling stockholders exercised
a warrant to purchase 283,786 shares of
Series C-1
preferred stock at an exercise price of $1.41 per share and
vested options to purchase 377,840 shares of Class B
common stock with a weighted-average exercise price of $2.63 in
order to sell the underlying shares of Class A common stock
in the offering. We received aggregate proceeds of
$1.4 million from these exercises. Additionally, all of our
outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock were
automatically converted to 24,941,421 shares of our
Class B common stock, and all shares of our Class B
common stock sold in the offering were automatically converted
into a like number of Class A common stock.
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of
Presentation
We have prepared the accompanying consolidated financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, or GAAP. We have eliminated all
significant intercompany balances and transactions in
consolidation.
We consider an operating segment to be any component of our
business whose operating results are regularly reviewed by our
chief operating decision-maker to make decisions about resources
to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance based
on discrete financial information. Our Chief Executive Officer,
our chief operating decision-maker, reviews our operating
results on an aggregate basis and manages our operations and the
allocation of resources as a single operating
segment prepaid cards and related services.
F-5
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
We have evaluated subsequent events through the date that the
financial statements were issued, based on the accounting
guidance for subsequent events. Based on our evaluation, we did
not identify any recognized or nonrecognized subsequent events
that would have required adjustment to or disclosure in the
consolidated financial statements.
Unaudited Interim
Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited September 30, 2010 consolidated
balance sheet, the consolidated statements of operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related interim
information contained within the notes to the consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP
and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and the
notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our
opinion, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring
adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of our
financial position at September 30, 2010, the results of
our operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, and our cash flows for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Our results
of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 are not necessarily indicative
of future results.
Accounts
Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable is comprised principally of receivables due
from card issuing banks, overdrawn account balances due from
cardholders, trade accounts receivable and other receivables. We
record accounts receivable net of reserves for estimated
uncollectible accounts. Receivables due from card issuing banks
primarily represent revenue-related funds collected by the card
issuing banks from our retail distributors, merchant banks and
cardholders that have yet to be remitted to us. These
receivables are generally collected within a short period of
time based on the remittance terms in our agreements with the
card issuing banks.
Overdrawn Account
Balances Due from Cardholders and Reserve for Uncollectible
Overdrawn Accounts
Cardholder account overdrafts may arise from maintenance fee
assessments on our GPR cards or from purchase transactions that
we honor on GPR or gift cards, in each case in excess of the
funds in a cardholders account. We are exposed to losses
from unrecovered cardholder account overdrafts. We establish a
reserve for uncollectible overdrawn accounts. We classify
overdrawn accounts into age groups based on the number of days
that have elapsed since an account has had activity, such as a
purchase, ATM transaction or maintenance fee assessment. We
calculate a reserve factor for each age group based on the
average recovery rate for the most recent six months. These
factors are applied to these age groups to estimate our overall
reserve. When more than 90 days have passed without
activity in an account, we consider recovery to be remote and
write off the full amount of the overdrawn account balance. We
include our provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts
related to maintenance fees as an offset to card revenues in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. We include
our provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts related to
purchase transactions in other general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
F-6
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
Revenue
Recognition
Our operating revenues consist of card revenues, cash transfer
revenues and interchange revenues. We recognize revenue when the
price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, the product is sold or the service is
performed, and collectibility of the resulting receivable is
reasonably assured.
Card revenues consist of new card fees, monthly maintenance
fees, ATM fees, and other revenues. We charge new card fees when
a consumer purchases a new card in a retail store. We defer and
recognize new card fee revenues on a straight-line basis over
our average card lifetime, which is currently nine months for
our GPR cards and six months for our gift cards. We determine
the average card lifetime based on our recent historical data
for comparable products. We measure card lifetime for our GPR
cards as the period of time, inclusive of reload activity,
between sale (or activation) of the card and the date of the
last positive balance. We measure the card lifetime for our gift
cards as the redemption period during which cardholders perform
the substantial majority of their transactions. We reassess
average card lifetime quarterly. We report the unearned portion
of new card fees as a component of deferred revenue in our
consolidated balance sheets. We charge maintenance fees on a
monthly basis pursuant to the terms and conditions in the
applicable cardholder agreements. We recognize monthly
maintenance fees ratably over the month for which they are
assessed. We charge ATM fees to cardholders when they withdraw
money or conduct other transactions at certain ATMs in
accordance with the terms and conditions in the applicable
cardholder agreements. We recognize ATM fees when the withdrawal
is made by the cardholder, which is the same time our service is
completed and the fees are assessed. Other revenues consist of
customer service fees, and fees associated with optional
products or services, which we generally offer to consumers
during the card activation process. We charge customer service
fees pursuant to the terms and conditions in the applicable
cardholder agreements and recognize them when the underlying
services are completed. Optional products and services that
generate other revenues include providing a second card for an
account, expediting delivery of the personalized debit card that
replaces the temporary card obtained at the retail store, and
upgrading a cardholder account to one of our upgrade programs.
We generally recognize revenue related to optional products and
services when the underlying services are completed, but we
treat revenues related to our upgrade programs in a manner
similar to new card fees and monthly maintenance fees.
We generate cash transfer revenues when consumers purchase our
cash transfer products (reload services) in a retail store. We
recognize these revenues when the cash transfer transactions are
completed, generally within three business days from the time of
sale of these products.
We earn interchange revenues from fees remitted by the
merchants bank, which are based on rates established by
Visa and MasterCard, when cardholders make purchase transactions
using our cards. We recognize interchange revenues as these
transactions occur.
We report our different types of revenues on a gross or net
basis based on our assessment of whether we act as a principal
or an agent in the transaction. To the extent we act as a
principal in the transaction, we report revenues on a gross
basis. In concluding whether or not we act as a principal or an
agent, we evaluate whether we have the substantial risks and
rewards under the terms of the revenue-generating arrangements,
whether we are the party responsible for fulfillment of the
services purchased by the cardholders, and other factors. For
all of our significant revenue-generating arrangements,
including GPR and gift cards, we record revenues on a gross
basis.
F-7
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
Generally, customers have limited rights to a refund of a new
card fee or a cash transfer fee. We have elected to recognize
revenues prior to the expiration of the refund period, but
reduce revenues by the amount of expected refunds, which we
estimate based on actual historical refunds.
On occasion, we enter into incentive agreements with our retail
distributors designed to increase product acceptance and sales
volume. We record incentive payments, including the issuance of
equity instruments, as a reduction of revenues and recognize
them over the period the related revenues are recognized or as
services are rendered, as applicable.
Employee
Stock-Based Compensation
Effective August 1, 2006, we adopted a new accounting
standard using the prospective transition method, which required
compensation expense to be recognized on a prospective basis,
and therefore prior period financial statements do not include
the impact of our adoption of this standard. Compensation
expense recognized relates to stock options granted, modified,
repurchased, or cancelled on or after August 1, 2006 and
stock purchases under our employee stock purchase plan, or ESPP.
We record compensation expense using the fair value method of
accounting. For stock options and stock purchases under our
ESPP, we base compensation expense on fair values estimated at
the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For
stock awards, we base compensation expense on the estimated fair
value of our common stock at the grant date. We recognize
compensation expense for awards with only service conditions
that have graded vesting schedules on a straight-line basis over
the vesting period of the award. Vesting is based upon continued
service to our company.
We continue to account for stock options granted to employees
prior to August 1, 2006, using the intrinsic value method.
Under the intrinsic value method, compensation associated with
stock awards to employees was determined as the difference, if
any, between the fair value of the underlying common stock on
the grant date, and the price an employee must pay to exercise
the award. We measure the fair value of equity instruments
issued to non-employees as of the earlier of the date a
performance commitment has been reached by the counterparty or
the date performance is completed by the counterparty. We
determine the fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model or the fair value of our common stock, as applicable, and
recognize related expense in the same periods that the goods or
services are received.
Income
Taxes
Our income tax expense is comprised of current and deferred
income tax expense. Current income tax expense approximates
taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period. Deferred
income tax expense results from the changes in deferred tax
assets and liabilities during the periods. These gross deferred
tax assets and liabilities represent decreases or increases in
taxes expected to be paid in the future because of future
reversals of temporary differences between the bases of assets
and liabilities as measured by tax laws and their bases as
reported in our consolidated financial statements. We also
recognize deferred tax assets for tax attributes such as net
operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. We
record valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amounts we conclude are more
likely-than-not
to be realized in the foreseeable future.
We recognize and measure income tax benefits based upon a
two-step model: 1) a tax position must be more
likely-than-not
to be sustained based solely on its technical merits in order to
be recognized, and 2) the benefit is measured as the
largest dollar amount of that position that is more
likely-than-not
to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between the
benefit recognized for a
F-8
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
position and the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred
to as an unrecognized tax benefit. We accrue income tax related
interest and penalties, if applicable, within income tax expense.
Earnings Per
Common Share
We have multiple classes of common stock and our preferred
stockholders, during the periods their shares were outstanding,
were entitled to participate with common stockholders in the
distributions of earnings through dividends. Therefore, we apply
the two-class method in calculating earnings per common share,
or EPS. The two-class method requires net income, after
deduction of any preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends on
preferred stock redemptions, and accretions in the carrying
value on preferred stock, to be allocated between each class or
series of common and preferred stockholders based on their
respective rights to receive dividends, whether or not declared.
Basic EPS is then calculated by dividing net income allocated to
each class of common stockholders by the respective
weighted-average common shares issued and outstanding.
In addition, for diluted EPS, the conversion of Class B
common stock can affect net income allocated to Class A
common stockholders. Where the effect of this conversion is
dilutive, we adjust net income allocated to Class A common
stockholders by the associated allocated earnings of the
convertible securities. We divide adjusted net income for each
class of common stock by the respective weighted-average number
of the common shares issued and outstanding for each period plus
amounts representing the dilutive effect of outstanding stock
options and outstanding warrants, shares to be purchased under
our employee stock purchase plan and the dilution resulting from
the conversion of convertible securities, if applicable. We
exclude the effects of convertible securities and outstanding
warrants and stock options from the computation of diluted EPS
in periods in which the effect would be antidilutive. We
calculate dilutive potential common shares using the treasury
stock method, if-converted method and the two-class method, as
applicable.
Fair Values of
Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments, including unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents, restricted cash, settlement assets and obligations,
accounts receivable, certain other assets, accounts payable, and
other accrued liabilities, are short-term, and, accordingly, we
believe their carrying amounts approximate their respective fair
values.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU,
2010-09,
Subsequent Events Amendments to Certain
Recognition and Disclosure Requirements, which amends the
disclosure requirements related to subsequent events. Effective
immediately, the ASU retracts the requirement to disclose the
date through which subsequent events have been evaluated for a
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, filer. We adopted
this ASU in the first quarter of 2010.
Use of Estimates
and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements,
including the accompanying notes. We base our estimates and
assumptions on historical factors, current circumstances, and
the experience and judgment of management. We evaluate our
estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
F-9
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
Accounts receivable consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Overdrawn account balances due from cardholders
|
|
$
|
12,072
|
|
|
$
|
19,190
|
|
Reserve for uncollectible overdrawn accounts
|
|
|
(7,460
|
)
|
|
|
(13,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net overdrawn account balances due from cardholders
|
|
|
4,612
|
|
|
|
5,645
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
Reserve for uncollectible trade receivables
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trade receivables
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
Receivables due from card issuing banks
|
|
|
22,123
|
|
|
|
20,347
|
|
Payroll taxes due from related parties
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
30,287
|
|
|
$
|
27,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, we had receivables of
$2.3 million due from our Chief Executive Officer and
$0.1 million due from our Chief Financial Officer. These
receivables were related to federal and state payroll taxes
arising from stock awards granted and stock options exercised
that we were required to remit to the various taxing
authorities. We collected these receivables in cash in January
2010.
Activity in the reserve for uncollectible overdrawn accounts
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
30,467
|
|
|
$
|
13,651
|
|
|
$
|
26,485
|
|
|
$
|
7,460
|
|
Provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
5,746
|
|
|
|
11,632
|
|
|
|
16,431
|
|
|
|
32,982
|
|
Purchase transactions
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(28,964
|
)
|
|
|
(12,379
|
)
|
|
|
(36,788
|
)
|
|
|
(28,828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
7,786
|
|
|
$
|
13,545
|
|
|
$
|
7,786
|
|
|
$
|
13,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2010 varied from the amount computed by applying the
federal statutory income tax rate to income before income taxes.
A reconciliation between the expected federal income tax expense
using the federal statutory tax rate of
F-10
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Income Taxes
(Continued)
|
35% and our actual income tax expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal income tax
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Non-deductible offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Change in state tax apportionment method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
%
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense was $24.3 million and $22.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010,
respectively, with an effective tax rate of 42.0% and 39.7%,
respectively. The effective tax rates for these periods differ
from the expected federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily
due to state income taxes, net of the federal tax benefit. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our effective tax
rate was also impacted by several discrete items. In May 2010,
the California Franchise Tax Board, or FTB, approved our
petition to use an alternative apportionment method provided for
in Revenue and Tax Code Section 25137. The alternative
method, known as the market-source approach, allows us to
apportion income to California based on a customers
address, rather than apportion income based on cost of
performance, which is the standard method under existing law.
Under the market-source approach, we apportion less income to
California, resulting in a lower effective state tax rate. The
petition is retroactive to our 2009 tax year, prior to the
change in our fiscal year from July 31 to December 31. We
recognized the effect of the change in apportionment method,
including the retroactive tax benefit, in our consolidated
financial statements for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. The benefit from the change in
apportionment method was partially offset by non-deductible
offering costs recognized during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Excluding the impact of these discrete
items, our effective tax rate would have been 40.3%.
In accounting for income taxes, we follow the guidance related
to uncertainty in income taxes. The guidance prescribes a
comprehensive framework for the financial statement recognition,
measurement, presentation, and disclosure of uncertain income
tax positions that we have taken or anticipate taking in a tax
return, and includes guidance on de-recognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and
transition rules. We have concluded that we have no significant
unrecognized tax benefits. We are subject to examination by the
Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and various state tax
authorities. Our consolidated federal income tax returns for the
years ended July 31, 2005 and 2008 have been examined by
the IRS, and there have been no material changes in our tax
liabilities for those years. We generally remain subject to
examination of our federal income tax returns for the year ended
July 31, 2006 and later years. We generally remain subject
to examination of our various state income tax returns for
periods ranging from four to five years from the respective
dates the returns were filed.
On July 27, 2010, we filed a restated certificate of
incorporation that increased the number of authorized
Class A and Class B common stock from
75,000,000 shares each to 100,000,000 shares each and
reduced the number of authorized shares of preferred stock from
25,553,267 to 5,000,000.
F-11
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Stockholders
Equity (Continued)
|
Shares Subject
to Repurchase
In May 2010, we amended our commercial agreement with Walmart,
our largest retail distributor, and GE Money Bank. The amendment
modifies the terms of our agreement related to our co-branded
GPR MoneyCard, which significantly increased the sales
commission rates we pay to Walmart for our products sold in
their stores. The new agreement has a five-year term commencing
May 1, 2010. As an incentive to amend our prepaid card
program agreement, we issued Walmart 2,208,552 shares of
our Class A common stock. These shares are subject to our
right to repurchase them at $0.01 per share upon termination of
our agreement with Walmart other than a termination arising out
of our knowing, intentional and material breach of the
agreement. Our right to repurchase the shares lapses with
respect to 36,810 shares per month over the
60-month
term of the agreement. The repurchase right will expire as to
all shares of Class A common stock that remain subject to
the repurchase right if we experience a prohibited change
of control, as defined in the agreement, if we experience
a change of control, as defined in the stock
issuance agreement, or under certain other limited
circumstances, which we currently believe are remote. We have
also granted Walmart registration rights for all of its shares
of our Class A common stock that are no longer subject to
our repurchase right. In connection with the share issuance,
Walmart entered into an agreement to vote its shares in
proportion to the way the rest of our stockholders vote their
shares. As of September 30, 2010, 184,050 shares of
Class A common stock issued to Walmart were no longer
subject to the repurchase right.
|
|
6.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
Employee
Stock-Based Compensation
In June 2010, our board of directors adopted, and in July 2010
our stockholders approved, a new equity incentive plan and an
employee stock purchase plan. The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
replaced our 2001 Stock Plan. We reserved 2,000,000 shares
of our Class A common stock for issuance under our 2010
Equity Incentive Plan. The number of shares reserved for
issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will increase
automatically on the first day of January of each of 2011
through 2014 by up to a number of shares equal to 3% of the
total outstanding shares our Class A and Class B
common stock as of the immediately preceding December 31st.
The 2010 Equity Incentive Plan authorizes the award of stock
options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock units, performance shares and stock bonuses.
The 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan enables eligible employees
to purchase shares of our Class A common stock periodically
at a discount. Our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is intended
to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan under
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. We reserved
200,000 shares of our Class A common stock for
issuance under our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The number
of shares reserved for issuance under our 2010 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan will automatically increase on the first day of
January of each of 2011 through 2018 by up to the number of
shares equal to 1% of the total outstanding shares of our
Class A and Class B common stock as of the immediately
preceding December 31st. Our board of directors or its
compensation committee may reduce the amount of the annual
increase under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan or 2010 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan in any particular year.
We granted options to purchase 127,500 shares of our
Class B common stock under our 2001 Stock Plan, the
predecessor to our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, to our officers,
employees, and outside directors during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 with a weighted-average exercise price
of $17.19 per share and a weighted-average grant-date fair value
of $9.50 per share. We granted options to purchase
79,500 shares of our Class A common stock under our
2010 Equity Incentive
F-12
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation (Continued)
|
Plan to our officers, employees, and outside directors during
the three months ended September 30, 2010 with an exercise
price of $36.00 per share and a grant-date fair value of $17.23
per share.
We granted options to purchase 263,300 shares of
Class B common stock under our 2001 Stock Plan to our
officers, employees, and outside directors during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. The stock options had a
weighted-average exercise price of $15.48 per share and a
weighted-average grant-date fair value of $8.58 per share. We
granted options to purchase 299,000 shares of our common
stock to our officers, employees, and outside directors during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, of which 79,500
were options to purchase Class A common stock granted under
our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan and 219,500 were options to
purchase Class B common stock granted under our 2001 Stock
Plan. The stock options had a weighted-average exercise price of
$30.08 per share and a weighted-average grant-date fair value of
$14.68 per share.
We estimated the fair value of each stock option grant on the
date of grant using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.88
|
%
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
2.75
|
%
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
Expected term (life) of options (in years)
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
5.90
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
56.00
|
%
|
|
|
48.00
|
%
|
|
|
56.33
|
%
|
|
|
49.62
|
%
|
We recognized stock-based compensation expense of
$0.8 million and $1.7 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively, and
$2.0 million and $5.2 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Stock-Based
Retailer Incentive Compensation
As discussed in Note 5
Stockholders Equity, we issued
Walmart 2,208,552 shares of our Class A common stock.
We recognize the fair value of 36,810 shares each month
over the
60-month
term of the commercial agreement. An early expiration of our
right to repurchase as described above would, however, result in
the recognition of the fair value of all the shares still
subject to repurchase on the date of the expiration. We
currently assess an early expiration of our repurchase right to
be remote. We record the fair value recognized as stock-based
retailer incentive compensation, a contra-revenue component of
our total operating revenues. We recognize monthly the fair
value of the shares for which our right to repurchase has lapsed
using the then-current fair market value of our Class A
common stock. We recognized $5.2 million and
$7.7 million of stock-based retailer incentive compensation
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
respectively.
|
|
7.
|
Earnings per
Common Share
|
We calculate EPS using the two-class method. Refer to
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies for a discussion of the calculation of EPS.
F-13
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Earnings per
Common Share (Continued)
|
The calculation of basic EPS and diluted EPS for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was as
follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Class A common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,971
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,294
|
|
Allocated earnings to preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,094
|
)
|
Allocated earnings to other classes of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocated to Class A common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
Weighted-average Class A shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Class A common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per Class A common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocated to Class A common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
Allocated earnings to participating securities, net of
re-allocated earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,288
|
|
Re-allocated earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income allocated to Class A common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,452
|
|
Weighted-average Class A shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,441
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average Class A shares issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per Class A common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Earnings per
Common Share (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Class B common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
10,471
|
|
|
$
|
8,971
|
|
|
$
|
33,710
|
|
|
$
|
34,294
|
|
Allocated earnings and deemed dividends to preferred stock
|
|
|
(7,060
|
)
|
|
|
(1,255
|
)
|
|
|
(22,886
|
)
|
|
|
(16,094
|
)
|
Allocated earnings to other classes of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocated to Class B common stockholders
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
10,824
|
|
|
|
15,901
|
|
Weighted-average Class B shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
12,051
|
|
|
|
28,627
|
|
|
|
12,046
|
|
|
|
18,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Class B common share
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per Class B common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocated to Class B common stockholders
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
10,824
|
|
|
|
15,901
|
|
Re-allocated earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income allocated to Class B common stockholders
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
6,509
|
|
|
|
10,824
|
|
|
|
17,288
|
|
Weighted-average Class B shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
12,051
|
|
|
|
28,627
|
|
|
|
12,046
|
|
|
|
18,232
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
2,950
|
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
3,011
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average Class B shares issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
15,262
|
|
|
|
31,862
|
|
|
|
15,545
|
|
|
|
21,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per Class B common share
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, 2,024,502 shares of
Class A common stock issued to Walmart were subject to our
right to repurchase. Basic and diluted EPS for these shares were
the same as basic and diluted EPS for our Class A common
stock for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010.
We excluded from the computation of basic EPS for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 all shares issuable
under an unvested warrant to purchase 4,283,456 shares of
our Class B common stock, as the related performance
conditions had not been satisfied.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2010, we excluded all shares of convertible preferred stock and
certain stock options outstanding, which could potentially
dilute basic EPS in the future, from the computation of diluted
EPS as their effect was anti-dilutive. The following
F-15
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Earnings per
Common Share (Continued)
|
table shows the weighted-average number of anti-dilutive shares
excluded from the diluted EPS calculation for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase Class A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase Class B common stock
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Conversion of convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
24,941
|
|
|
|
5,693
|
|
|
|
24,984
|
|
|
|
18,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options and convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
24,994
|
|
|
|
5,698
|
|
|
|
25,076
|
|
|
|
18,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Significant
Customer Concentrations
|
A credit concentration may exist if customers are involved in
similar industries, economic sectors, and geographic regions.
Our retail distributors operate in similar economic sectors but
diverse domestic geographic regions. The loss of a significant
retail distributor could have a material adverse effect upon our
card sales, profitability, and revenue growth.
Revenues derived from our products sold at Walmart and our three
other largest retail distributors, as a group, represented
approximately 63% and 20%, respectively, of our total operating
revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
63% and 20%, respectively, for the three months ended
September 30, 2010. Revenues derived from our products sold
at Walmart and our three other largest distributors, as a group,
represented approximately 60% and 22%, respectively, of our
total operating revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 63% and 20%, respectively, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. Revenues derived from
our products sold at Walmart and our three other largest retail
distributors, as a group, represented approximately 65% and 20%,
respectively, of our total operating revenues, excluding
stock-based retailer incentive compensation, for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 and 64% and 19%,
respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
In determining the customer concentration, we attributed new
card fees and cash transfer revenues to the retail distributor
where the sale of the new cards and cash transfer products
occurred.
The concentration of GPR cards activated (in units) for Walmart
and our three other largest retail distributors, in the
aggregate, was 97% and 88% for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The
concentration of sales of cash transfer products (in units) for
these retail distributors, in the aggregate, was 94% and 92% for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010,
respectively. The concentration of GPR cards activated (in
units) for these retail distributors, in the aggregate, was 97%
and 83% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2010, respectively. The concentration of sales of cash transfer
products (in units) for these retail distributors, in the
aggregate, was 94% and 93% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Settlement assets attributable to Walmart and our three other
largest retail distributors, as a group, comprised 81% and 15%,
respectively, as of December 31, 2009, and 27% and 48%,
respectively, of the settlement assets recorded on our
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010. As a
result of entering into our amended agreement with Walmart, we
changed the manner in which customer funds for certain products
sold at Walmart are settled, eliminating the need to record
F-16
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Significant
Customer Concentrations (Continued)
|
settlement assets and liabilities related to these products.
This change resulted in a significant reduction in our
settlement assets and settlement obligations associated with
Walmart and GE Money Bank, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2010,
the majority of the customer funds underlying our products were
held in bank accounts at two card issuing banks. These funds are
held in trust for the benefit of the customers, and we have no
legal rights to the customer funds or deposits at the card
issuing banks. Additionally, we have receivables due from these
card issuing banks included in accounts receivable, net, on our
consolidated balance sheets. The failure of either of these card
issuing banks could result in significant business disruption, a
potential material adverse affect on our ability to service our
customers, potential contingent obligations by us to customers
and material write-offs of uncollectible receivables due from
these card issuing banks.
On February 4, 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement
to acquire 100% of the outstanding common shares and voting
interest of Bonneville Bancorp for approximately
$15.7 million in cash, subject to approval by various
regulatory bodies. Bonneville Bancorp, a Utah bank holding
company, offers a range of business and consumer banking
products in the Provo, Utah area through its bank subsidiary,
Bonneville Bank, or the Bank. The Bank also originates
commercial, industrial, residential, real estate and personal
loans. We expect to focus the Bank on issuing our Green
Dot-branded debit cards linked to an FDIC-insured transactional
account.
As of September 30, 2010, regulatory approval of our
proposed bank acquisition was still pending.
F-17
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Green Dot Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Green Dot Corporation (the Company) as of July 31, 2008,
July 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in redeemable
convertible preferred stock and in stockholders equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended July 31, 2009 and for the five months ended
December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Green Dot Corporation at July 31,
2008, July 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2009
and for the five months ended December 31, 2009 in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
April 26, 2010
F-18
Green Dot
Corporation
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Assets
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
39,285
|
|
|
$
|
26,564
|
|
|
$
|
56,303
|
|
Settlement assets
|
|
|
17,445
|
|
|
|
35,570
|
|
|
|
42,569
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
14,080
|
|
|
|
19,967
|
|
|
|
29,157
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
6,317
|
|
|
|
7,262
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,446
|
|
|
|
5,681
|
|
|
|
4,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
82,044
|
|
|
|
94,099
|
|
|
|
145,377
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
15,367
|
|
|
|
15,381
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
7,096
|
|
|
|
8,679
|
|
|
|
11,973
|
|
Deferred expenses
|
|
|
4,949
|
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
97,246
|
|
|
$
|
123,269
|
|
|
$
|
183,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and
Stockholders Equity
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,464
|
|
|
$
|
8,359
|
|
|
$
|
9,777
|
|
Settlement obligations
|
|
|
17,445
|
|
|
|
35,570
|
|
|
|
42,569
|
|
Amounts due to card issuing banks for overdrawn accounts
|
|
|
23,578
|
|
|
|
18,269
|
|
|
|
23,422
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
9,360
|
|
|
|
6,865
|
|
|
|
13,916
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
7,404
|
|
|
|
15,048
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
63,198
|
|
|
|
76,804
|
|
|
|
104,732
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
2,561
|
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
4,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
65,962
|
|
|
|
81,031
|
|
|
|
111,744
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock,
$0.001 par value:
2,926 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at
July 31, 2008, reported at redemption value; no shares
issued and outstanding at July 31, 2009 or
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
26,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value:
24,372 shares authorized, 23,837 shares issued and
outstanding as of July 31, 2008; 25,554 shares
authorized, 24,942 shares issued and outstanding as of
July 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009; liquidation
preference of $18,345 as of July 31, 2008 and $31,322 as of
July 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009
|
|
|
18,345
|
|
|
|
31,322
|
|
|
|
31,322
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 50,000 shares
authorized as of July 31, 2008 and 2009 and
December 31, 2009; 11,753, 12,040 and 12,860 shares
issued and outstanding as of July 31, 2008 and 2009 and
December 31, 2009, respectively
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,593
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
12,603
|
|
Related party notes receivable
|
|
|
(5,235
|
)
|
|
|
(5,814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(12,247
|
)
|
|
|
13,763
|
|
|
|
27,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
4,468
|
|
|
|
42,238
|
|
|
|
71,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
97,246
|
|
|
$
|
123,269
|
|
|
$
|
183,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-19
Green Dot
Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
$
|
45,717
|
|
|
$
|
91,233
|
|
|
$
|
119,356
|
|
|
$
|
50,895
|
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
25,419
|
|
|
|
45,310
|
|
|
|
62,396
|
|
|
|
30,509
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
12,488
|
|
|
|
31,583
|
|
|
|
53,064
|
|
|
|
31,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
83,624
|
|
|
|
168,126
|
|
|
|
234,816
|
|
|
|
112,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
38,838
|
|
|
|
69,577
|
|
|
|
75,786
|
|
|
|
31,333
|
|
Compensation and benefits expenses
|
|
|
20,610
|
|
|
|
28,303
|
|
|
|
40,096
|
|
|
|
26,610
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
9,809
|
|
|
|
21,944
|
|
|
|
32,320
|
|
|
|
17,480
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13,212
|
|
|
|
19,124
|
|
|
|
22,944
|
|
|
|
14,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
82,469
|
|
|
|
138,948
|
|
|
|
171,146
|
|
|
|
89,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
29,178
|
|
|
|
63,670
|
|
|
|
23,314
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
29,596
|
|
|
|
64,065
|
|
|
|
23,427
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
|
12,261
|
|
|
|
26,902
|
|
|
|
9,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
17,335
|
|
|
|
37,163
|
|
|
|
13,663
|
|
Dividends, accretion, and allocated earnings of preferred stock
|
|
|
(5,157
|
)
|
|
|
(13,650
|
)
|
|
|
(29,000
|
)
|
|
|
(9,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(510
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,685
|
|
|
$
|
8,163
|
|
|
$
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Weighted-average common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
10,757
|
|
|
|
12,036
|
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
Weighted-average diluted common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
14,154
|
|
|
|
15,712
|
|
|
|
15,425
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-20
Green Dot
Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock
and in Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
Redeemable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Party
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,088
|
|
|
$
|
18,540
|
|
|
|
11,508
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
1,318
|
|
|
$
|
(4,020
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,695
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,155
|
|
Exercise of warrants and options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
Issuance of related party notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
Interest on related party notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Issuance of new shares and repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of existing shares, net
|
|
|
2,926
|
|
|
|
18,701
|
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
(2,675
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,419
|
)
|
|
|
(18,808
|
)
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,635
|
)
|
|
|
(3,635
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,926
|
|
|
|
22,336
|
|
|
|
|
23,837
|
|
|
|
18,345
|
|
|
|
10,194
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
(4,922
|
)
|
|
|
(25,102
|
)
|
|
|
(11,130
|
)
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
Issuance of related party notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
Interest on related party notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,480
|
)
|
|
|
(4,480
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,335
|
|
|
|
17,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,926
|
|
|
|
26,816
|
|
|
|
|
23,837
|
|
|
|
18,345
|
|
|
|
11,753
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
3,593
|
|
|
|
(5,235
|
)
|
|
|
(12,247
|
)
|
|
|
4,468
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
Issuance of related party notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
Interest on related party notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,956
|
)
|
|
|
(1,956
|
)
|
Issuance of new shares and repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of existing shares, net
|
|
|
(2,926
|
)
|
|
|
(28,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
12,977
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,778
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,197
|
)
|
|
|
2,002
|
|
Exercise of call option on warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,163
|
|
|
|
37,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,942
|
|
|
|
31,322
|
|
|
|
12,040
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
(5,814
|
)
|
|
|
13,763
|
|
|
|
42,238
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,812
|
|
Interest on related party notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of related party notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,869
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,782
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,663
|
|
|
|
13,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,942
|
|
|
$
|
31,322
|
|
|
|
12,860
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
12,603
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,426
|
|
|
$
|
71,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-21
Green Dot
Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,647
|
|
|
$
|
17,335
|
|
|
$
|
37,163
|
|
|
$
|
13,663
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,524
|
|
|
|
4,407
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
Provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts
|
|
|
7,909
|
|
|
|
16,135
|
|
|
|
22,548
|
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
6,782
|
|
Provision (benefit) for uncollectible trade receivables
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Impairment of capitalized software
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(2,635
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(1,731
|
)
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,866
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement assets
|
|
|
(2,544
|
)
|
|
|
(2,033
|
)
|
|
|
(18,125
|
)
|
|
|
(6,999
|
)
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(11,001
|
)
|
|
|
(24,717
|
)
|
|
|
(29,853
|
)
|
|
|
(20,241
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(551
|
)
|
|
|
(2,263
|
)
|
|
|
(903
|
)
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
Deferred expenses
|
|
|
(862
|
)
|
|
|
(2,750
|
)
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
(5,548
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,607
|
|
|
|
4,665
|
|
|
|
3,170
|
|
|
|
8,135
|
|
Settlement obligations
|
|
|
3,983
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
18,125
|
|
|
|
6,999
|
|
Amounts due to card issuing banks for overdrawn accounts
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
|
10,785
|
|
|
|
(5,309
|
)
|
|
|
5,153
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
4,394
|
|
|
|
(978
|
)
|
|
|
7,603
|
|
Income taxes payable (receivable)
|
|
|
(4,527
|
)
|
|
|
3,713
|
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
(3,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
2,461
|
|
|
|
35,006
|
|
|
|
35,297
|
|
|
|
26,121
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(13,039
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(4,298
|
)
|
|
|
(5,120
|
)
|
|
|
(6,361
|
)
|
|
|
(5,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(4,558
|
)
|
|
|
(5,163
|
)
|
|
|
(19,400
|
)
|
|
|
5,063
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on short-term debt
|
|
|
(2,584
|
)
|
|
|
(2,446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on line of credit
|
|
|
(148,560
|
)
|
|
|
(76,961
|
)
|
|
|
(12,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings from line of credit
|
|
|
151,056
|
|
|
|
74,465
|
|
|
|
12,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of warrants and options
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
Excess tax benefits from exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
Exercise of call option on warrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred shares and freestanding warrant
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of preferred and common shares
|
|
|
(20,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,770
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the repayment of related party notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(3,264
|
)
|
|
|
(28,618
|
)
|
|
|
8,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,939
|
)
|
|
|
26,579
|
|
|
|
(12,721
|
)
|
|
|
29,739
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
14,645
|
|
|
|
12,706
|
|
|
|
39,285
|
|
|
|
26,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
12,706
|
|
|
$
|
39,285
|
|
|
$
|
26,564
|
|
|
$
|
56,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
3,805
|
|
|
$
|
8,104
|
|
|
$
|
27,403
|
|
|
$
|
10,032
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-22
Green Dot
Corporation
Green Dot Corporation (we, us and
our refer to Green Dot Corporation and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Next Estate Communications, Inc.) is
one of the leading providers of general purpose reloadable
prepaid debit cards and cash loading and transfer services in
the United States. Our products include Green Dot
MasterCard®
and
Visa®-branded
prepaid debit cards and several co-branded reloadable prepaid
card programs, collectively referred to as our GPR cards;
Visa-branded gift cards; and our
MoneyPak®
and swipe reload proprietary products, collectively referred to
as our cash transfer products, which enable cash loading and
transfer services through our Green Dot Network. The Green Dot
Network enables consumers to use cash to reload our prepaid
debit cards or to transfer cash to any of our Green Dot Network
acceptance members, including competing prepaid card programs
and other online accounts.
We market our cards and financial services to banked,
underbanked, and unbanked consumers in the United States using
distribution channels other than traditional bank branches, such
as retailer locations nationwide and the Internet. Our prepaid
debit cards are issued by third-party issuing banks, and we have
relationships with several large card issuers including GE Money
Bank, Columbus Bank and Trust Company, and National Bank of
South Carolina. We also have distribution arrangements with many
large and medium-sized retailers, such as Walmart, Walgreens,
CVS, Rite Aid, 7-Eleven, Kroger, Kmart, Meijer and Radio Shack,
and with various industry resellers, such as Incomm, PaySpot,
and Coinstar. We refer to participating retailers collectively
as our retail distributors.
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of
Presentation
We have prepared the accompanying consolidated financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, or GAAP. We have eliminated all
significant intercompany balances and transactions in
consolidation.
We consider an operating segment to be any component of our
business whose operating results are regularly reviewed by our
chief operating decision-maker to make decisions about resources
to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance based
on discrete financial information. Our Chief Executive Officer,
our chief operating decision-maker, reviews our operating
results on an aggregate basis and manages our operations and the
allocation of resources as a single operating
segment prepaid cards and related services.
Change in Fiscal
Year
On September 29, 2009, our board of directors approved a
change to our fiscal year-end from July 31 to December 31.
Included in this report is the transition period for the five
months ended December 31, 2009. Accordingly, these
financial statements present our financial position as of
July 31, 2008 and 2009 and December 31, 2009, and the
results of our operations, cash flows and changes in redeemable
convertible preferred stock and in stockholders equity
(deficit) for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009
and the five months ended December 31, 2009.
Unaudited
Comparative Financial Information
As a result of our change in fiscal year-end, we have presented
below, for comparative purposes, our unaudited consolidated
statement of operations and condensed consolidated statement of
cash flows for the five months ended December 31, 2008. In
our opinion, the unaudited consolidated financial information
reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring
adjustments,
F-23
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
necessary for the fair presentation of the results of our
operations and our cash flows for the five months ended
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
Card revenues
|
|
$
|
46,460
|
|
Cash transfer revenues
|
|
|
24,391
|
|
Interchange revenues
|
|
|
18,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
89,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expenses
|
|
|
35,001
|
|
Compensation and benefits expenses
|
|
|
15,409
|
|
Processing expenses
|
|
|
11,765
|
|
Other general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
71,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
17,425
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
255
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
17,679
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
7,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
10,255
|
|
Dividends, accretion, and allocated earnings of preferred stock
|
|
|
(11,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocated to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Weighted-average common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
12,028
|
|
Weighted-average diluted common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
12,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
5,999
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,452
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(26,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(22,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
approved the Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, as the
single source of authoritative accounting and reporting
standards for all nongovernmental entities, with the exception
of guidance issued by the SEC and its staff. The FASB ASC is
effective for interim or annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. All existing accounting standards have
been superseded, and all accounting literature not included in
the FASB ASC is considered nonauthoritative. Our adoption of
FASB ASC did not have an impact on our consolidated financial
statements because it only amends the referencing to existing
accounting standards.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a new standard for disclosing
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.
Additionally, the standard requires companies to disclose
subsequent events as defined in the standard and to disclose the
date through which we have evaluated subsequent events. The
standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. Our adoption of the standard did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
See Note 16 Subsequent Events for
additional details.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that
requires us to include fair value disclosures of financial
instruments for each interim and annual period for which
financial statements are prepared. Our adoption of the standard
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements. See Note 8 Fair Values of
Financial Instruments for additional details.
In June 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on
determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment
transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and
therefore need to be included in the earnings allocation in
calculating earnings per share under the two-class method.
Unvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable
rights to dividend or dividend equivalents are treated as a
separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share.
The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008; earlier application was not permitted.
Our adoption of the standard did not have a material effect on
our results of operations or earnings per share.
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance that modifies the
accounting for business combinations and requires, with limited
exceptions, the acquirer in a business combination to recognize
100% of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquired company at fair value on
the date of acquisition. In addition, the guidance requires that
the acquisition-related transaction and restructuring costs be
charged to expense as incurred, and requires that certain
contingent assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as
contingent consideration, be recognized at fair value. This
guidance also modifies the accounting for certain acquired
income tax assets and liabilities. Further, the guidance
requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized
at fair value on the acquisition date if fair value can be
determined during the measurement period. If fair value cannot
be determined, companies should typically account for the
acquired contingencies under existing accounting guidance. This
new guidance is effective for acquisitions consummated on or
after January 1, 2009. This guidance will be applicable to
our pending acquisition of a bank holding company and its
subsidiary commercial bank. See Note 16
Subsequent Events for additional details.
F-25
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
Use of Estimates
and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements,
including the accompanying notes. We base our estimates and
assumptions on historical factors, current circumstances, and
the experience and judgment of management. We evaluate our
estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Unrestricted Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We consider all unrestricted highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less to be unrestricted
cash and cash equivalents.
Restricted
Cash
We maintain restricted deposits in bank accounts to
collateralize our line of credit.
Settlement Assets
and Obligations
Our retail distributors collect customer funds for purchases of
new cards and cash transfer products and then remit these funds
directly to bank accounts established on behalf of those
customers by the third-party card issuing banks. The remittance
of these funds by our retail distributors takes an average of
three business days.
Settlement assets represent the amounts due from our retail
distributors for customer funds collected at the point of sale
that have not yet been remitted to the card issuing banks.
Settlement obligations represent the amounts due from us to the
card issuing banks for funds collected but not yet remitted by
our retail distributors and not funded by our line of credit.
We have no control over or access to customer funds remitted by
our retail distributors to the bank accounts. Customer funds
therefore are not our assets, and we do not recognize them in
our consolidated financial statements. As of July 31, 2008
and 2009 and December 31, 2009, total funds held in the
bank accounts on behalf of our customers totaled
$86.7 million, $127.5 million and $194.1 million,
respectively, of which $7.6 million, $13.0 million and
$19.8 million, respectively, related to funds for prepaid
debit cards and cash transfer products that had not yet been
activated by the customers.
Accounts
Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable is comprised principally of receivables due
from card issuing banks, over-drawn account balances due from
cardholders, trade accounts receivable, and other receivables.
We record accounts receivable net of reserves for estimated
uncollectible accounts.
Overdrawn Account Balances Due from Cardholders and Reserve
for Uncollectible Overdrawn Accounts
Cardholder account overdrafts arise from fee assessments or from
purchase transactions that we honor, in each case in excess of
the funds in a cardholders account. We are exposed to
losses from unrecovered cardholder account overdrafts. We
establish a reserve for uncollectible overdrawn accounts for
both fees assessed and purchase transactions in excess of a
cardholders account balance. The reserve for uncollectible
overdrawn accounts represents our estimate of the portion of
F-26
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
these receivables that will not be recovered. We base our
estimate of the reserve upon historical overdraft recovery rates
and our judgment regarding overall adequacy of the reserve. When
a cardholder account has more than 90 days of inactivity,
we consider the probability of recovery to be remote and we
charge off the full amount of the overdrawn account balance. We
include our provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts
related to fees as an offset to card revenues in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. We include
our provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts related to
purchase transactions as other general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Property and
Equipment
We carry our property and equipment at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. We generally compute depreciation
on property and equipment using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets, except for
internal-use software in development, which is not depreciated.
We generally compute amortization on tenant improvements using
the straight-line method over the shorter of the related lease
term or estimated useful lives of the improvements. We expense
expenditures for maintenance and repairs as incurred.
The estimated useful lives of the respective classes of assets
are as follows:
|
|
|
Computer equipment, furniture and office equipment
|
|
3 4 years
|
Computer software purchased
|
|
3 years
|
Capitalized internal-use software
|
|
2 years
|
Tenant improvements
|
|
Shorter of the useful life or the lease term
|
We capitalize certain internal and external costs incurred to
develop internal-use software during the application development
stage. We also capitalize the cost of specified upgrades and
enhancements to internal-use software that result in additional
functionality. Once a development project is substantially
complete and the software is ready for its intended use, we
begin depreciating these costs on a straight-line basis over the
internal-use softwares estimated useful life.
Impairment of
Long Lived Assets
We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of expected
undiscounted future cash flows from an asset is less than the
carrying amount of the asset, we recognize an impairment loss.
We measure the loss as the amount by which the carrying amount
exceeds its fair value calculated using the present value of
estimated net future cash flows. Included in other general and
administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of
operations for the year ended July 31, 2009 and the five
months ended December 31, 2009 were $405,000 and $77,000,
respectively, of recognized impairment losses on internal-use
software. We identified no indicators of impairment during the
years ended July 31, 2007 and 2008.
Amounts Due to
Card Issuing Banks for Overdrawn Accounts
Our card issuing banks fund overdrawn cardholder account
balances on our behalf. Amounts funded are due from us to the
card issuing banks based on terms specified in the agreements
with the card issuing banks. Generally, we expect to settle
these obligations within 12 months.
F-27
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
Amounts Due Under
Line of Credit
After a consumer purchases a new card or cash transfer product
at a retail location, we make the funds immediately available
once the consumer goes online or calls a toll-free number to
activate the new card or add funds from a cash transfer product.
Since our retail distributors do not remit funds to our card
issuing banks, on average, for three business days, we maintain
a line of credit with certain card issuing banks that is
available to fund any cash requirements related to the timing
difference between funds remitted by our retail distributors to
the card issuing banks and funds utilized by consumers. We repay
any draws on this line of credit when our retail distributors
remit the funds to the card issuing banks bank accounts.
Revenue
Recognition
Our operating revenues consist of card revenues, cash transfer
revenues, and interchange revenues. We recognize revenue when
the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, the product is sold or the service is
performed, and collectibility of the resulting receivable is
reasonably assured.
Card revenues consist of new card fees, monthly maintenance
fees, ATM fees, and other revenues. We charge new card fees when
a consumer purchases a new card in a retail store. We defer and
recognize new card fee revenues on a straight-line basis over
our average card lifetime, which is currently nine months for
our GPR cards and six months for our gift cards. We determine
the average card lifetime based on our recent historical data
for comparable products. We measure card lifetime for our GPR
cards as the period of time, inclusive of reload activity,
between sale (or activation) of the card and the date of the
last positive balance. We measure the card lifetime for our gift
cards as the redemption period during which cardholders perform
the substantial majority of their transactions. We report the
unearned portion of new card fees as a component of deferred
revenue in our consolidated balance sheets. We charge
maintenance fees on a monthly basis pursuant to the terms and
conditions in the applicable cardholder agreements. We recognize
monthly maintenance fees ratably over the month for which they
are assessed. We charge ATM fees to cardholders when they
withdraw money or conduct other transactions at certain ATMs in
accordance with the terms and conditions in the applicable
cardholder agreements. We recognize ATM fees when the withdrawal
is made by the cardholder, which is the same time our service is
completed and the fees are assessed. Other revenues consist of
customer service fees, and fees associated with optional
products or services, which we generally offer to consumers
during the card activation process. We charge customer service
fees pursuant to the terms and conditions in the applicable
cardholder agreements and recognize them when the underlying
services are completed. Optional products and services that
generate other revenues include providing a second card for an
account, expediting delivery of the personalized debit card that
replaces the temporary card obtained at the retail store, and
upgrading a cardholder account to one of our upgrade programs.
We generally recognize revenue related to optional products and
services when the underlying services are completed, but we
treat revenues related to our upgrade programs in a manner
similar to new card fees and monthly maintenance fees.
We generate cash transfer revenues when consumers purchase our
cash transfer products (reload services) in a retail store. We
recognize these revenues when the cash transfer transactions are
completed, generally within three business days from the time of
sale of these products.
We earn interchange revenues from fees remitted by the
merchants bank, which are based on rates established by
Visa and MasterCard, when cardholders make purchase transactions
using our cards. We recognize interchange revenues as these
transactions occur.
F-28
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
We report our different types of revenues on a gross or net
basis based on our assessment of whether we act as a principal
or an agent in the transaction. To the extent we act as a
principal in the transaction, we report revenues on a gross
basis. In concluding whether or not we act as a principal or an
agent, we evaluate whether we have the substantial risks and
rewards under the terms of the revenue-generating arrangements,
whether we are the party responsible for fulfillment of the
services purchased by the cardholders, and other factors. For
all of our significant revenue-generating arrangements,
including GPR and gift cards, we record revenues on a gross
basis.
Generally, customers have limited rights to a refund of a new
card fee or a cash transfer fee. We have elected to recognize
revenues prior to the expiration of the refund period, but
reduce revenues by the amount of expected refunds, which we
estimate based on actual historical refunds.
On occasion, we enter into incentive agreements with our retail
distributors designed to increase product acceptance and sales
volume. We capitalize incentive payments that we make in
instances where we receive a preferred product placement for a
negotiated period of time. We amortize capitalized amounts as a
reduction of revenues over that period.
Sales and
Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses primarily consist of sales
commissions, advertising and marketing expenses, and the costs
of manufacturing and distributing card packages, placards, and
promotional materials to our retail distributors locations
and personalized GPR cards to consumers who have activated their
cards.
We pay our retail distributors and brokers commissions based on
sales of our prepaid debit cards and cash transfer products in
their stores. We defer and expense commissions related to new
cards sales ratably over the average card lifetime, which is
currently nine months for our GPR cards and six months for our
gift cards. We expense commissions related to cash transfer
products when the cash transfer transactions are completed.
Sales commissions were $26.2 million, $40.7 million,
and $50.8 million for the years ended July 31, 2007,
2008, and 2009, respectively, and $19.0 million for the
five months ended December 31, 2009.
We expense costs for the production of advertising as incurred.
The cost of media advertising is expensed when the advertising
first takes place. Advertising and marketing expenses were
$7.2 million, $13.6 million, and $7.0 million for
the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009,
respectively, and $1.5 million for the five months ended
December 31, 2009.
We record the costs associated with card packages and placards
as prepaid expenses, and we record the costs associated with
personalized GPR cards as deferred expenses. We recognize the
prepaid cost of card packages and placards over the related
sales period, and we amortize the deferred cost of personalized
GPR cards, when activated, over the average card lifetime,
currently nine months. Our manufacturing and distributing costs
were $5.5 million, $15.3 million, and
$18.0 million for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008,
and 2009, respectively, and $10.8 million for the five
months ended December 31, 2009. Included in our
manufacturing and distributing costs were shipping and handling
costs of $0.5 million, $1.3 million, and
$2.3 million for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008,
and 2009, respectively, and $1.2 million for the five
months ended December 31, 2009. Also included in our
manufacturing and distributing costs was a liability that we
incurred for use tax to various states related to purchases of
materials since no sales tax is charged to customers when new
cards or cash transfer transactions are purchased.
F-29
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective August 1, 2006, we adopted a new accounting
standard related to stock-based compensation. We adopted the new
standard using the prospective transition method, which required
compensation expense to be recognized on a prospective basis,
and therefore prior period financial statements do not include
the impact of our adoption of this standard. Compensation
expense recognized relates to stock options granted, modified,
repurchased, or cancelled on or after August 1, 2006. We
record compensation expense using the fair value method of
accounting. For stock options, we base compensation expense on
option fair values estimated at the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For stock awards, we base
compensation expense on the estimated fair value of our common
stock at the grant date. We recognize compensation expense for
awards with only service conditions that have graded vesting
schedules on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of
the award. Vesting is based upon continued service to our
company.
We continued to account for stock options granted to employees
prior to August 1, 2006, using the intrinsic value method.
Under the intrinsic value method, compensation associated with
stock awards to employees was determined as the difference, if
any, between the fair value of the underlying common stock on
the grant date, and the price an employee must pay to exercise
the award. For additional information, refer to
Note 11 Stock-Based Compensation.
We also measure the fair value of equity instruments issued to
non-employees using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and
recognize related expense in the same periods that the goods or
services are received. For additional information, refer to
Note 10 Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock and Stockholders Equity (Deficit).
Income
Taxes
Our income tax expense is comprised of current and deferred
income tax expense. Current income tax expense approximates
taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period. Deferred
income tax expense results from the changes in deferred tax
assets and liabilities during the periods. These gross deferred
tax assets and liabilities represent decreases or increases in
taxes expected to be paid in the future because of future
reversals of temporary differences between the bases of assets
and liabilities as measured by tax laws and their bases as
reported in our consolidated financial statements. We also
recognize deferred tax assets for tax attributes such as net
operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. We
record valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amounts we conclude are more
likely-than-not
to be realized in the foreseeable future.
We recognize and measure income tax benefits based upon a
two-step model: 1) a tax position must be more
likely-than-not
to be sustained based solely on its technical merits in order to
be recognized, and 2) the benefit is measured as the
largest dollar amount of that position that is more
likely-than-not
to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between the
benefit recognized for a position and the tax benefit claimed on
a tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit. We
accrue income tax related interest and penalties, if applicable,
within income tax expense.
For additional information, refer to Note 6
Income Taxes.
Earnings (Loss)
Per Common Share
The holders of our preferred stock are entitled to participate
in dividends and earnings of our company. Therefore, we apply
the two-class method in calculating earnings per common share.
The two-class method requires net income, after deduction of any
preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends on preferred stock
redemptions, and accretions in the carrying value on preferred
stock, to
F-30
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
|
be allocated between the common and preferred stockholders based
on their respective rights to receive dividends, whether or not
declared. Basic earnings (loss) per common share is then
calculated by dividing net income (loss) allocated to common
stockholders, after the reduction for earnings allocated to
preferred stock, by the weighted-average common shares issued
and outstanding.
In addition, for diluted earnings per common share, the
conversion of convertible preferred stock can affect net income
(loss) allocated to common stockholders. Where the effect of
this conversion is dilutive, we adjust net income (loss)
allocated to common stockholders by the associated preferred
dividends. We divide adjusted net income by the weighted-average
number of common shares issued and outstanding for each period
plus amounts representing the dilutive effect of outstanding
stock options and outstanding warrants, and the dilution
resulting from the conversion of convertible preferred stock, if
applicable. We exclude the effects of convertible preferred
stock and outstanding warrants and stock options from the
computation of diluted earnings (loss) per common share in
periods in which the effect would be antidilutive. We calculate
dilutive potential common shares using the treasury stock
method, if-converted method and the two-class method, as
applicable.
For additional information, refer to Note 12
Earnings Per Common Share.
Accounts receivable consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Overdrawn account balances due from cardholders
|
|
$
|
9,231
|
|
|
$
|
10,165
|
|
|
$
|
12,072
|
|
Reserve for uncollectible overdrawn accounts
|
|
|
(5,277
|
)
|
|
|
(6,448
|
)
|
|
|
(7,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net overdrawn account balances due from cardholders
|
|
|
3,954
|
|
|
|
3,717
|
|
|
|
4,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
Reserve for uncollectible trade receivables
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trade receivables
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables due from card issuing banks
|
|
|
8,989
|
|
|
|
14,870
|
|
|
|
22,123
|
|
Payroll taxes due from related parties (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
14,080
|
|
|
$
|
21,324
|
|
|
$
|
30,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables due from card issuing banks primarily represents
revenue-related funds collected by the card issuing banks from
our retail distributors, merchant banks and cardholders that
have yet to be remitted to us. These receivables are generally
collected within a short period of time based on the remittance
terms in our agreements with the card issuing banks.
F-31
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Accounts
Receivable (Continued)
|
Activity in the reserve for uncollectible overdrawn accounts
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
2,104
|
|
|
$
|
2,718
|
|
|
$
|
5,277
|
|
|
$
|
6,448
|
|
Provision for uncollectible overdrawn accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
6,519
|
|
|
|
13,652
|
|
|
|
20,187
|
|
|
|
10,255
|
|
Purchase transactions
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
2,483
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(7,295
|
)
|
|
|
(13,576
|
)
|
|
|
(21,377
|
)
|
|
|
(10,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
2,718
|
|
|
$
|
5,277
|
|
|
$
|
6,448
|
|
|
$
|
7,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Property and
Equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Computer equipment, furniture, and office equipment
|
|
$
|
6,296
|
|
|
$
|
7,812
|
|
|
$
|
10,180
|
|
Computer software purchased
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
Capitalized internal-use software
|
|
|
9,470
|
|
|
|
13,078
|
|
|
|
15,114
|
|
Tenant improvements
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,710
|
|
|
|
24,866
|
|
|
|
30,373
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(11,614
|
)
|
|
|
(16,187
|
)
|
|
|
(18,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
7,096
|
|
|
$
|
8,679
|
|
|
$
|
11,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense was $3.5 million,
$4.4 million, and $4.6 million for the years ended
July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, and
$2.3 million for the five months ended December 31,
2009. Included in those amounts are depreciation expense related
to internal-use software of $1.7 million,
$2.4 million, and $2.5 million for the years ended
July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, and
$1.3 million for the five months ended December 31,
2009. The net carrying value of capitalized internal-use
software was $3.0 million, $3.6 million,
$4.7 million and $5.5 million at July 31, 2007,
2008, and 2009 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
|
|
5.
|
Related Party
Transactions
|
We loaned $3.0 million in March 2004 and $0.8 million
in February 2006 to our current Chief Executive Officer bearing
interest at rates of 3.5% and 4.5%, respectively, compounded
semiannually. All principal and unpaid interest outstanding
under the loans is due in March 2011. The loans are
collateralized by 2,500,000 shares of our common stock
owned by the officer and pledged under a stock pledge agreement.
We classified the outstanding balance of these loans, including
capitalized interest of $575,000, $735,000 and $776,000 at
July 31, 2008 and 2009 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, as a reduction in stockholders equity. We
recorded interest on these loans of $150,000, $155,000, and
$160,000 for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009,
respectively, and $41,000 for the five months ended
December 31, 2009 as additional
paid-in-capital.
F-32
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Related Party
Transactions (Continued)
|
During the three-year period ended July 31, 2009, we loaned
an aggregate amount of $1.1 million to an executive to
purchase common stock. The $1.1 million was loaned in seven
installments, each installment ranging from $18,000 to $622,000.
The interest rate on the loan is specified for each installment
and ranges from 2.72% to 5.14%, compounded semiannually. All
principal and unpaid interest outstanding under the loan is due
in May 2013. The loan is collateralized by 898,000 shares
of our common stock owned by the officer and a full recourse
promissory note. We classified the outstanding balance of the
loan, including capitalized interest of $77,000, $127,000 and
$140,000 at July 31, 2008 and 2009 and December 31,
2009, respectively, as a reduction in stockholders equity.
We recorded interest on these loans of $41,000, $36,000, and
$50,000 for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009,
respectively, and $13,000 for the five months ended
December 31, 2009 as additional
paid-in-capital.
We loaned $120,000 in February 2008 to our current Chief
Financial Officer to purchase common stock. The loan bears an
interest rate of 3.48%, compounded semiannually. All principal
and unpaid interest outstanding under the loan is due in
February 2015. The loan is collateralized by 85,000 shares
of our common stock owned by the officer and a full recourse
promissory note. We classified the outstanding balance of the
loan, including capitalized interest of $2,000, $7,000 and
$8,000 at July 31, 2008 and 2009 and December 31,
2009, respectively, as a reduction in stockholders equity.
We recorded interest on the loan of $2,000 and $5,000 for the
years ended July 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and
$1,000 for the five months ended December 31, 2009 as
additional
paid-in-capital.
All of these related party notes receivable were repaid in full,
including accrued interest of $936,000, in November 2009.
At December 31, 2009, we had receivables of
$2.3 million due from our Chief Executive Officer and
$0.1 million due from our Chief Financial Officer. These
receivables were related to federal and state payroll taxes
arising from stock awards granted and stock options exercised
that we are required to remit to the various taxing authorities.
We recorded these receivables as a component of accounts
receivable, net, on our consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2009. We collected these receivables in cash
in January 2010.
The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years
ended July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 and the five months
ended December 31, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(629
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,611
|
|
|
$
|
22,645
|
|
|
$
|
4,389
|
|
State
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
2,610
|
|
|
|
5,988
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
12,221
|
|
|
|
28,633
|
|
|
|
6,234
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(2,121
|
)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(1,662
|
)
|
|
|
3,114
|
|
State
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,635
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(1,731
|
)
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,261
|
|
|
$
|
26,902
|
|
|
$
|
9,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Income Taxes
(Continued)
|
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended July 31,
2007, 2008 and 2009 and the five months ended December 31,
2009 varied from the amount computed by applying the federal
statutory income tax rate to income before income taxes. A
reconciliation between the expected federal income tax expense
using the federal statutory tax rate of 35% and our actual
income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended July 31,
2007, 2008 and 2009 and the five months ended December 31,
2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
U.S. federal income tax
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(288.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(257.2
|
)%
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
42.0
|
%
|
|
|
41.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of our deferred tax assets and liabilities
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for overdrawn accounts
|
|
$
|
3,102
|
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
|
$
|
3,280
|
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
Other
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
5,046
|
|
|
|
6,683
|
|
|
|
6,087
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal-use software costs
|
|
|
(975
|
)
|
|
|
(2,019
|
)
|
|
|
(2,423
|
)
|
Deferred expenses
|
|
|
(1,572
|
)
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
|
|
(2,697
|
)
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(2,624
|
)
|
|
|
(2,530
|
)
|
|
|
(5,607
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
2,422
|
|
|
$
|
4,153
|
|
|
$
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in
our consolidated balance sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
4,446
|
|
|
$
|
5,681
|
|
|
$
|
4,634
|
|
Noncurrent net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
|
(1,528
|
)
|
|
|
(4,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
2,422
|
|
|
$
|
4,153
|
|
|
$
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In assessing whether a valuation allowance is needed for our
deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more
likely-than-not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
F-34
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Income Taxes
(Continued)
|
realized. The ultimate realization of our deferred tax assets is
dependent upon our generation of sufficient taxable income of
the appropriate character during the periods in which those
temporary differences become deductible. We consider the
scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and projected
future taxable income in making this assessment. Based upon the
level of our historical taxable income and projections of our
future taxable income over the periods in which the temporary
differences resulting in the deferred tax assets are deductible,
we believe it is more likely than not that we will realize the
benefits of our deferred tax assets. Accordingly, we recorded no
valuation allowance as of July 31, 2008 and 2009 and
December 31, 2009.
During the year ended July 31, 2008, we utilized
approximately $2.8 million of federal and approximately
$2.7 million of state net operating loss carryforwards. As
of July 31, 2009 and December 31, 2009, we had no
unutilized net operating loss carryforwards.
In accounting for income taxes, we followed the guidance related
to uncertainty in income taxes. The guidance prescribes a
comprehensive framework for the financial statement recognition,
measurement, presentation, and disclosure of uncertain income
tax positions that we have taken or anticipate taking in a tax
return, and includes guidance on de-recognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and
transition rules. We have concluded that we have no significant
unrecognized tax benefits. We are subject to examination by the
Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and various state tax
authorities. Our consolidated federal income tax returns for the
years ended July 31, 2005 and 2008 have been examined by
the IRS, and there have been no material changes in our tax
liabilities for those years. We generally remain subject to
examination of our federal income tax returns for the year ended
July 31, 2006 and later years. We generally remain subject
to examination of our various state income tax returns for a
period of four to five years from the respective dates the
returns were filed.
In March 2009, we increased the balance available on our line of
credit from $12.0 million to $15.0 million. This line
of credit matures on March 24, 2010, and bears interest at
LIBOR (as published in The Wall Street Journal) plus
1.50%. The line of credit is collateralized by substantially all
of our assets, including a restricted cash deposit at the
lending institution of $15.0 million. There was no
outstanding borrowing on this line of credit at July 31,
2008 and 2009 or December 31, 2009.
|
|
8.
|
Fair Values of
Financial Instruments
|
Our financial instruments, including unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents, restricted cash, settlement assets and obligations,
accounts receivable, certain other assets, accounts payable, and
other accrued liabilities, are short-term, and, accordingly, we
believe their carrying amounts approximate their respective fair
values.
|
|
9.
|
Concentrations of
Credit Risk
|
Financial instruments that subject us to concentration of credit
risk consist primarily of unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, and
settlement assets. We deposit our unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents and our restricted cash with regional and national
banking institutions, including certain of our card issuing
banks, that we periodically monitor and evaluate for
creditworthiness. Credit risk for our accounts receivable is
concentrated with card issuing banks and our customers, and this
risk is mitigated by the relatively short collection period and
our large customer base. We do not require or maintain
collateral for accounts receivable. We maintain
F-35
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Concentrations of
Credit Risk (Continued)
|
reserves for uncollectible overdrawn accounts and uncollectible
trade receivables. Credit risk for our settlement assets is
concentrated with our retail distributors, which we periodically
monitor.
|
|
10.
|
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders Equity
(Deficit)
|
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock
In October 2006, we entered into an agreement with a card
issuing bank to provide a co-branded GPR card program with a
major retail distributor. We also entered into equity financing
transactions with the bank and an affiliated investment entity,
under which we issued a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares
of our common stock in October 2006 and 2,926,458 shares of
Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock, or
Series D, in December 2006. We received cash consideration
of $20.0 million from the equity financing transactions.
The holder of Series D was entitled to receive
noncumulative dividends at a per annum rate of $0.547 per share
and to participate in dividends on common stock on an
as-converted basis, subject to the declaration by our board of
directors out of funds legally available. Series D was
redeemable for cash at the option of the holder on the seventh
anniversary of its issuance. Series D was also convertible
into our common stock any time prior to redemption, at the
option of the holder, based on a conversion ratio. In the event
of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company,
the holder of Series D was entitled to receive an amount
equal to $6.834 per share plus 20% per annum from the date of
issuance.
The freestanding warrant we issued entitled the holder to
purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at a per share
price of $6.834 any time prior to the earliest of: a) the
date of our initial public offering; b) the date of a
change in control of our company; or c) October 27,
2013. The warrant was not redeemable.
We allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the Series D
and the freestanding warrant to these instruments on a relative
fair value basis. The initial allocated value of the warrant
calculated using an option-pricing model was $1.3 million.
As the warrant allowed settlement only in the underlying common
stock, it was recorded at its initial allocated value as a
component of additional paid-in capital.
Due to the nature of the redemption feature and other
provisions, we classified Series D as temporary equity at
its initial allocated value of $18.7 million. We determined
that Series D did not contain any beneficial conversion
features. We accreted the carrying value of the stock to its
redemption value at each reporting period with a charge to
retained earnings.
On December 19, 2008, we entered into an agreement with the
sole holder of Series D for an early redemption of the
2,926,458 outstanding shares. The agreed redemption value was
$39.2 million, or $13.38 per share, which we paid in cash
on December 19, 2008. Upon redemption, the Series D
preferred shares were canceled.
In addition, on December 19, 2008, we purchased a call
option, which entitled us to purchase the freestanding warrant
on 500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
approximately $2.0 million. The call option was exercisable
any time during the period March 1, 2009 to
September 1, 2009. In June 2009, we exercised the call
option and repurchased the warrant.
F-36
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders Equity
(Deficit) (Continued)
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock
Our convertible preferred stock at July 31, 2008 and 2009
and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
July 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds Net of
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
Issuance
|
|
Series
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
6,481
|
|
|
$
|
1,953
|
|
|
$
|
1,899
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
3,197
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
10,114
|
|
|
|
9,939
|
|
|
|
8,230
|
|
|
|
8,136
|
|
Series C-1
|
|
|
4,541
|
|
|
|
4,240
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,372
|
|
|
|
23,837
|
|
|
$
|
18,345
|
|
|
$
|
18,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds Net of
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
Issuance
|
|
Series
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
6,404
|
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
1,877
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
3,197
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
10,114
|
|
|
|
9,939
|
|
|
|
8,230
|
|
|
|
8,136
|
|
Series C-1
|
|
|
4,541
|
|
|
|
4,240
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
Series C-2
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
12,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,554
|
|
|
|
24,942
|
|
|
$
|
31,322
|
|
|
$
|
30,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds Net of
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
Issuance
|
|
Series
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
6,404
|
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
1,877
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
3,197
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
10,114
|
|
|
|
9,939
|
|
|
|
8,230
|
|
|
|
8,136
|
|
Series C-1
|
|
|
4,541
|
|
|
|
4,240
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
Series C-2
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
12,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,554
|
|
|
|
24,942
|
|
|
$
|
31,322
|
|
|
$
|
30,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Certificate of Incorporation specifies the following rights,
preferences, and privileges for our preferred stockholders.
Voting
Each share of Series A, B, C, C-1, and C-2 convertible
preferred stock has voting rights equal to the number of shares
of common stock into which it is convertible and votes together
as one class
F-37
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders Equity
(Deficit) (Continued)
|
with the common stock. Our preferred stockholders are entitled
to elect four directors. Additionally, the holders of our
Series C, C-1 and C-2 shares, voting together, are
entitled to elect one director. The approval of at least 67% of
the then-outstanding number of shares of convertible preferred
stock and a majority of the then-outstanding Series C, C-1
and C-2 convertible preferred stock, voting together as a
separate class, is required to, among other things: change the
rights and preferences of our preferred stock; change our
authorized share capital; redeem shares of our capital stock;
increase the number of shares available for issuance under our
stock plan; declare or pay any dividend; take any action that
results in a merger, sale of control, or any other transaction
in which all or substantially all of our assets or more than 50%
of the voting power of our company is disposed of; and the
dissolution or winding up of our company.
Dividends
Our Series A, B, C, C-1, and C-2 convertible preferred
stockholders are entitled to receive noncumulative dividends at
the per annum rates of $0.024, $0.055, $0.066, $0.113, and
$0.88, respectively, when and if declared by our board of
directors. The holders of Series A, B, C, C-1, and C-2
convertible preferred stock will also be entitled to participate
in dividends on our common stock, when and if declared by our
board of directors, on an as-converted basis. Our board of
directors did not declare any dividends on our convertible
preferred stock or common stock during the three-year period
ended July 31, 2009 or the five months ended
December 31, 2009.
Liquidation
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of
our company, the available funds and assets that may be legally
distributed to our stockholders will be distributed, without
preference, to the holders of our Series A, B, C, C-1, and
C-2 convertible preferred stock at amounts equal to $0.30,
$0.69, $0.83, $1.41, and $11.00 per share, respectively. Upon
completion of the distributions to each series of convertible
preferred stock, all remaining funds and assets available for
distribution are required to be distributed on a pro rata basis
among holders of our common stock. If upon any liquidation,
dissolution, or winding up of our company, the available funds
and assets are insufficient to permit the payment to holders of
each series of convertible preferred stock of the full
preferential amounts, then the entire remaining funds and assets
will be distributed on a pro rata basis among holders of each
series of convertible preferred stock in proportion to their
preferential amounts.
A liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of our company
includes the acquisition of our company by another entity by
merger, consolidation, sale of voting control, or any other
transaction or series of transactions in which all our
stockholders immediately prior to such transaction hold less
than 50% of the voting power of the surviving entity. Upon such
an event, all of the holders of each class of stock are eligible
to participate in all available remaining funds and assets.
Conversion
Each share of Series A, B, C, C-1, and C-2 convertible
preferred stock is convertible into our common stock, at the
option of the holder, according to a conversion ratio, subject
to adjustment for dilution. Each share of Series A, B, C,
C-1, and C-2 convertible preferred stock automatically converts
into the number of shares of common stock into which such shares
are convertible at the then-effective conversion ratio upon:
(1) the closing of a public offering of common stock at a
per share price of at least $2.48 per share with gross proceeds
of at least $25 million, or (2) the consent of the
holders of the majority of our convertible preferred stock,
provided, however, that no shares of Series C, C-1, or C-2
convertible preferred stock will automatically be converted
pursuant to such
F-38
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders Equity
(Deficit) (Continued)
|
consent unless a majority of the then-outstanding Series C,
C-1, and C-2 convertible preferred stockholders, voting together
as separate class, also consent to such conversion.
Registration
Rights Agreement
We are a party to a registration rights agreement with certain
of our investors, pursuant to which we have granted those
persons or entities the right to register shares of common stock
held by them under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Act. Holders of these rights are entitled to
demand that we register their shares of common stock under the
Securities Act so long as certain conditions are satisfied and
require us to include their shares of common stock in future
registration statements that may be filed, either for our own
account or for the account of other security holders exercising
registration rights. In addition, after an initial public
offering, these holders have the right to request that their
shares of common stock be registered on a
Form S-3
registration statement so long as certain conditions are
satisfied and the anticipated aggregate sales price of the
registered shares as of the date of filing of the
Form S-3
registration statement is at least $1 million. The
foregoing registration rights are subject to various conditions
and limitations, including the right of underwriters of an
offering to limit the number of registrable securities that may
be included in an offering. The registration rights terminate as
to any particular shares on the date on which the holder sells
such shares to the public in a registered offering or pursuant
to Rule 144 under the Securities Act. We are generally
required to bear all of the expenses of these registrations,
except underwriting commissions, selling discounts and transfer
taxes.
We are not obligated under the registration rights agreement to
transfer consideration, whether in cash, equity instruments, or
adjustments to the terms of the financial instruments that are
subject to the registration payment arrangement, to the
investors, if the registration statement is not declared
effective within the specified time or if effectiveness of the
registration statement is not maintained.
Stock Repurchase
Agreement
On January 22, 2007, we entered into a Stock Repurchase
Agreement with Related Stock Cancellation Provisions with
certain stockholders to repurchase 2,926,458 common and
preferred shares. In addition, we purchased a call option from
these stockholders that gave us the right to obtain and cancel
an additional 2,926,458 shares from these stockholders. We
paid an aggregate consideration of $20.0 million related to
these transactions. Upon redemption of all Series D
preferred stock, the call option was canceled on
December 19, 2008.
Non-Employee
Stock-Based Payments
At July 31, 2008 and 2009 and December 31, 2009, a
warrant to purchase 283,786 shares of
Series C-1
preferred stock at an exercise price of $1.41 per share was
outstanding. This warrant was issued in 2005, and is exercisable
any time prior to its expiration date of February 11, 2012.
We recognized stock-based compensation of $319,000 for this
warrant during 2005, 2006, and 2007 and included it as a
component of additional paid-in capital.
On March 3, 2009, we entered into a sales and marketing
agreement with a third party that contained a contingent warrant
feature. The warrant provides the third party with an option to
purchase 3,426,765 shares of our common stock at a per
share price of $23.70 if certain sales volume or revenue targets
are achieved. A further 856,691 shares become eligible for
purchase under the warrant should either of these targets be
achieved and additional specified marketing and promotional
activities take place.
F-39
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders Equity
(Deficit) (Continued)
|
The shares become eligible for purchase under the warrant at any
time the targets are achieved prior to the earlier of
March 3, 2014 or the termination of the sales and marketing
agreement. Once eligible for purchase, the purchase option
expires on the earliest of: (1) the date at which the sales
and marketing agreement with the third-party is terminated;
(2) the date of a change of control transaction of our
company; or (3) March 3, 2017.
The warrant is redeemable for cash by the holder if we fail to
perform in accordance with the customary contractual terms of
the sales and marketing agreement. Should the third party fail
to perform in accordance with the terms of the sales and
marketing agreement, we obtain an option to repurchase any
shares previously issued under the warrant.
As the option to purchase shares under the warrant is contingent
upon the achievement of certain sales volume or revenue targets,
there is a possibility that no shares will become eligible for
purchase. Based on different possible outcomes, we developed a
range of fair values for the warrant, and we measured the
warrant at its current lowest aggregate fair value within that
range. As none of the performance conditions have been met, the
lowest aggregate fair value is zero. Accordingly, we have not
assigned any value to the warrant in our consolidated financial
statements as of July 31, 2009 or December 31, 2009.
|
|
11.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
Stock
Plan
In January 2001, we adopted the 2001 Stock Plan, or the Plan.
The Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options,
nonqualified stock options and other stock awards. Our officers,
employees, outside directors, and consultants are eligible to
receive stock-based awards under the Plan; however, incentive
stock options may only be granted to our officers and employees.
During the year ended July 31, 2009, we increased the
number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the
Plan from 9,643,134 shares to 9,943,134 shares and, in
November 2009, we further increased the number of shares of
common stock reserved for issuance to 11,208,384. Options
granted under the Plan generally vest over four years and expire
five or ten years from the date of grant.
The total stock-based compensation expense recognized was
$0.2 million, $1.2 million, and $2.5 million for
the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009,
respectively, and $6.8 million for the five months ended
December 31, 2009. The total income tax benefit recognized
as a component of income tax expense for stock-based
compensation arrangements was $0, $0.3 million, and
$0.4 million for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008,
and 2009, respectively, and $2.6 million for the five
months ended December 31, 2009.
We estimated the fair value of each employee option grant on the
date of grant using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.52
|
%
|
|
|
2.98
|
%
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
|
|
2.56
|
%
|
Expected term (life) of options (in years)
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
54.3
|
%
|
|
|
54.3
|
%
|
|
|
53.2
|
%
|
|
|
46.9
|
%
|
F-40
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation (Continued)
|
Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at their
respective grant dates requires considerable judgment, including
estimating expected volatility and expected term (life). We
based our expected volatility on the historical volatility of
comparable public companies over the options expected
term. We calculated our expected term based on the simplified
method, which is the mid-point between the weighted-average
graded-vesting term of 2.16 years and the contractual term
of 10 years, resulting in 6.08 years. The simplified
method was chosen as a means to determine expected term as there
is limited historical option exercise experience due to our
company being privately held. We derived the risk-free rate from
the average yield for the five-and seven-year zero-coupon
U.S. Treasury Strips. We estimate forfeitures at the grant
date based on our historical forfeiture rate since the
Plans inception and revise the estimate, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates.
The weighted-average fair value of options granted was $2.17,
$2.49, and $6.98 per share for the years ended July 31,
2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, and $9.47 per share for the
five months ended December 31, 2009.
The following table summarizes information by grant date for the
stock options that we granted during the preceding
12 months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Fair
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Shares Subject
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Value of Our
|
|
|
Average Fair
|
|
|
|
to Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
March 19, 2009
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
|
$
|
10.84
|
|
|
$
|
5.83
|
|
June 9, 2009
|
|
|
85,800
|
|
|
|
15.65
|
|
|
|
15.65
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
August 3, 2009
|
|
|
127,500
|
|
|
|
17.19
|
|
|
|
17.19
|
|
|
|
9.50
|
|
November 2, 2009
|
|
|
1,261,750
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
9.47
|
|
On each of the above dates, we granted our employees stock
options at exercise prices equal to the estimated fair value of
the underlying common stock, as determined on a contemporaneous
basis by our board of directors with input from management and
an independent valuation firm.
Stock
Awards
In December 2009, our board of directors awarded
257,984 shares of common stock to our Chief Executive
Officer to compensate him for past services rendered to our
company. The number of shares awarded was equal to the number of
shares subject to fully vested options that unintentionally
expired unexercised in June 2009. The aggregate grant date fair
value of the December 2009 award was approximately
$5.2 million, based on an estimated fair value of our
common stock of $20.01, as determined by our board of directors
on the date of the award. We recorded the aggregate grant date
fair value as compensation and benefits expense on the date of
the award.
Stock Option
Modification
On December 11, 2008, our board of directors approved the
modification of options to purchase 155,500 shares of
common stock previously granted on August 12, 2008, to
decrease the exercise price from $17.90 to $10.75. The stock
option modification resulted in incremental stock-based
compensation expense of $214,000, of which $38,000 was
recognized for the year ended July 31, 2009, $16,000 was
recognized for the five months ended December 31, 2009 and
$160,000 will be recognized over the remaining vesting period.
F-41
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation (Continued)
|
Option activity for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008 and
2009 and the five months ended December 31, 2009 was as
follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2006
|
|
|
5,164
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2007
|
|
|
4,866
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
2.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(1,822
|
)
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2008
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
11.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2009
|
|
|
4,908
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
1,389
|
|
|
|
19.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
5,687
|
|
|
$
|
7.98
|
|
|
$
|
68,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
5,552
|
|
|
$
|
7.79
|
|
|
$
|
67,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
$
|
2.96
|
|
|
$
|
51,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years
ended July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the five months
ended December 31, 2009 was $0.8 million,
$7.3 million, $0.3 million and $10.0 million,
respectively. The total shares available for grant under the
Plan were 200,145 as of December 31, 2009.
F-42
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation (Continued)
|
The following table summarizes information with respect to stock
options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Currently Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
Number
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Currently
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Exercise
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Life (in Years)
|
|
Price
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Life (in Years)
|
|
Price
|
|
$0.35-$0.83
|
|
|
462,163
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
$ 0.56
|
|
|
|
462,163
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
$1.41-$4.00
|
|
|
1,436,762
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
1,383,780
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
$4.64-$10.75
|
|
|
2,315,146
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
|
1,170,484
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
|
$10.84-$17.19
|
|
|
211,500
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
15.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$20.01
|
|
|
1,261,750
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
20.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,687,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,016,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits realized from the exercise of stock options were
$0, $0.6 million and $0 for the years ended July 31,
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and $1.9 million for the
five months ended December 31, 2009. Cash proceeds from the
exercise of stock options were $0.3 million,
$1.2 million, and $0.1 million for the years ended
July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, and
$0.9 million for the five months ended December 31,
2009. There were 3,016,427 vested and
2,670,894 unvested outstanding options at December 31,
2009. The aggregate unrecognized compensation cost for unvested
stock options issued subsequent to August 1, 2006, expected
to be recognized in compensation expense in future periods was
$16.9 million at December 31, 2009, and the related
weighted-average period over which it is expected to be
recognized was estimated at 3.4 years. No stock-based
compensation expense was reflected in our consolidated
statements of operations for those stock option grants issued
prior to August 1, 2006. At December 31, 2009,
1,746,750 vested and 23,148 unvested outstanding options were
granted prior to August 1, 2006.
|
|
12.
|
Earnings per
Common Share
|
Our preferred stockholders are entitled to participate with
common stockholders in the distributions of earnings through
dividends. We calculated earnings per common share using the
two-class method. Refer to Note 2 Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies for a discussion of the
calculation of earnings (loss) per common share.
F-43
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
Earnings per
Common Share (Continued)
|
The calculation of basic earnings (loss) per common share and
diluted earnings (loss) per common share, or EPS, for the years
ended July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the five months
ended December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,647
|
|
|
$
|
17,335
|
|
|
$
|
37,163
|
|
|
$
|
13,663
|
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(3,635
|
)
|
|
|
(4,480
|
)
|
|
|
(1,956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deemed dividend on preferred stock redemptions
|
|
|
(1,522
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,634
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated earnings to preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,170
|
)
|
|
|
(17,410
|
)
|
|
|
(9,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
|
3,685
|
|
|
|
8,163
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
Weighted-average common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
10,757
|
|
|
|
12,036
|
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(510
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,685
|
|
|
$
|
8,163
|
|
|
$
|
4,493
|
|
Weighted-average common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
10,757
|
|
|
|
12,036
|
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,747
|
|
|
|
2,978
|
|
|
|
2,941
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average common shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
14,154
|
|
|
|
15,712
|
|
|
|
15,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We excluded from the computation of basic EPS for the year ended
July 31, 2009 shares issuable under the contingent
warrant referred to in Note 10 Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders Equity
(Deficit) as the related performance conditions have not
been satisfied.
F-44
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
Earnings per
Common Share (Continued)
|
For the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for
the five months ended December 31, 2009, we excluded
convertible preferred stock and certain stock options
outstanding, which could potentially dilute basic EPS in the
future, from the computation of diluted EPS as their effect was
anti-dilutive. The following table shows the weighted-average
number of anti-dilutive shares excluded from the diluted EPS
calculation for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008 and
2009 and the five months ended December 31, 2009 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31,
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
3,307
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Conversion of convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
25,707
|
|
|
|
26,763
|
|
|
|
25,674
|
|
|
|
24,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options and conversion of convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
29,014
|
|
|
|
27,155
|
|
|
|
25,771
|
|
|
|
25,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 1, 2004, we established a defined contribution
savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code. Employees who have attained at least 21 years of age are
generally eligible to participate in the plan on the first day
of the calendar month following the month in which employees
commence service with us. Participants may make pre-tax
contributions to the plan from their eligible earnings up to the
statutorily prescribed annual limit on pre-tax contributions
under the code. We may contribute to the plan at the discretion
of our board of directors. We made contributions to the plan of
$73,000, $8,000, and $58,000 for the years ended July 31,
2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, and $0 for the five months
ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
14.
|
Commitments and
Contingencies
|
We lease approximately 56,000 square feet of office space
at our headquarters in Monrovia, California, pursuant to a
noncancelable lease agreement for approximately
49,000 square feet that expires in September 2012 and a
sub-lease agreement for approximately 7,000 square feet that
expires in December 2011. We also lease a data center in Los
Angeles, California under a noncancelable lease expiring in
November 2010. Our total rental expense for these leases
amounted to $1.0 million, $1.2 million, and
$1.4 million for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008,
and 2009, respectively, and $0.6 million for the five
months ended December 31, 2009.
At December 31, 2009, the minimum aggregate rental
commitment under all non-cancelable operating leases was (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,780
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
2013
|
|
|
36
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, we had a $4.0 million letter of
credit outstanding, issued on our behalf, to collateralize
surety bonds issued in connection with our state money
transmitter licenses.
F-45
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Commitments and
Contingencies (Continued)
|
We have various agreements with vendors and retail distributors
that include future minimum annual payments. At
December 31, 2009, the minimum aggregate commitment under
these agreements was (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
20,353
|
|
2011
|
|
|
17,499
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the event we terminate our processing services agreement for
convenience, we are required to pay a single lump sum equal to
any minimum payments remaining on the date of termination.
We have retained outside regulatory counsel to survey and
monitor the laws of all 50 states to identify state laws or
regulations that apply to prepaid debit cards and other stored
value products. Many state laws do not specifically address
stored value products and what, if any, legal or regulatory
requirements (including licensing) apply to the sale of these
products. We have obtained money transmitter licenses (or
similar such licenses) where applicable, based on advice of
counsel or when we have been requested to do so. If we were
found to be in violation of any laws and regulations governing
banking, money transmitters, electronic fund transfers, or money
laundering in the United States or abroad, we could be subject
to penalties or could be forced to change our business practices.
In the ordinary course of business, we are a party to various
legal proceedings. We review these actions on an ongoing basis
to determine whether it is probable that a loss has occurred and
use that information when making accrual and disclosure
decisions. We have not established reserves or possible ranges
of losses related to these proceedings because, at this time in
the proceedings, the matters do not relate to a probable loss
and/or the
amounts are not reasonably estimable.
From time to time we enter into contracts containing provisions
that contingently require us to indemnify various parties
against claims from third parties. These contracts primarily
relate to (i) contracts with our card issuing banks, under
which we are responsible to them for any unrecovered overdrafts
on cardholders accounts; (ii) certain real estate
leases, under which we may be required to indemnify property
owners for environmental and other liabilities, and other claims
arising from our use of the premises, (iii) certain
agreements with our officers, directors, and employees, under
which we may be required to indemnify these persons for
liabilities arising out of their relationship with us,
(iv) contracts under which we may be required to indemnify
our retail distributors, suppliers, vendors and other parties
with whom we have contracts against third-party claims that our
products infringe a patent, copyright, or other intellectual
property right claims arising from our acts, omissions, or
violation of law.
Generally, a maximum obligation under these contracts is not
explicitly stated. Because the obligated amounts associated with
these types of agreements are not explicitly stated, the overall
maximum amount of the obligation cannot be reasonably estimated.
With the exception of overdrafts on cardholders accounts,
historically, we have not been required to make payments under
these and similar contingent obligations, and no liabilities
have been recorded for these obligations in our
F-46
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Commitments and
Contingencies (Continued)
|
consolidated balance sheets. For additional information
regarding overdrafts on cardholders accounts, refer to
Note 3 Accounts Receivable.
|
|
15.
|
Significant
Customer Concentrations
|
A credit concentration may exist if customers are involved in
similar industries, economic sectors, and geographic regions.
Our retail distributors operate in similar economic sectors but
diverse domestic geographic regions. The loss of a significant
retail distributor could have a material adverse effect upon our
card sales, profitability, and revenue growth.
Revenues derived from our products sold at our four largest
retail distributors, Walmart, Walgreens, CVS, and Rite Aid,
represented approximately 3%, 22%, 19%, and 17%, respectively,
of our operating revenues for the year ended July 31, 2007,
39%, 17%, 13%, and 11%, respectively, for the year ended
July 31, 2008, 56%, 11%, 9%, and 7%, respectively, for the
year ended July 31, 2009.
Revenues derived from our products sold at our four largest
retail distributors, Walmart, Walgreens, CVS, and Rite Aid,
represented approximately 66%, 9%, 8%, and 6%, respectively, of
our operating revenues for the five months ended
December 31, 2009.
In determining the customer concentration, we attributed new
card fees and cash transfer revenues to the retail distributor
where the sale of the new cards and cash transfer products
occurred.
The concentration of sales of new GPR cards (in units) for these
retail distributors, in the aggregate, was 84%, 94%, and 95% for
the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009,
respectively, and 94% for the five months ended
December 31, 2009. The concentration of sales of cash
transfer products (in units) for these retail distributors, in
the aggregate, was 78%, 89%, and 92% for the years ended
July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, and 93% for
the five months ended December 31, 2009.
Our four largest retail distributors also comprised 51%, 15%,
17%, and 10%, respectively, of the settlement assets recorded on
our consolidated balance sheet as of July 31, 2008, 83%,
10%, 0%, and 5%, respectively, as of July 31, 2009 and 81%,
9%, 0%, and 6%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009.
During the years ended July 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 and
during the five months ended December 31, 2009, the
majority of the customer funds underlying our products were held
in bank accounts at two card issuing banks. These funds are held
in trust for the benefit of the customers, and we have no legal
rights to the customer funds or deposits at the card issuing
banks. Additionally, we have receivables due from these card
issuing banks included in accounts receivable, net, on our
consolidated balance sheets. The failure of either of these card
issuing banks could result in significant business disruption, a
potential material adverse affect on our ability to service our
customers, potential contingent obligations by us to customers
and material write-offs of uncollectible receivables due from
these card issuing banks.
We evaluate subsequent events that have occurred after our most
recent balance sheet date but before the financial statements
are issued or are available to be issued. There are two types of
subsequent events: (1) recognized, or those that provide
additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of
the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the
process of preparing financial statements, and
(2) nonrecognized, or those that provide evidence about
conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet
but arose after that date. We evaluated subsequent events
through April 26, 2010, the issuance date of our financial
statements.
F-47
Green Dot
Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
16.
|
Subsequent Events
(Continued)
|
Based on the evaluation, we did not identify any recognized
subsequent events that would have required adjustment to the
consolidated financial statements. The following were
nonrecognized subsequent events we identified:
On February 4, 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement
to acquire 100% of the outstanding common shares and voting
interest of Bonneville Bancorp for approximately
$15.7 million in cash, subject to approval by the Federal
Reserve Bank and state regulators. Bonneville Bancorp, a Utah
bank holding company, offers a range of business and consumer
banking products in the Provo, Utah area through its bank
subsidiary, Bonneville Bank, or the Bank. The Bank also
originates commercial, industrial, residential, real estate and
personal loans. We expect to focus the Bank on issuing our Green
Dot-branded debit cards linked to an FDIC-insured transactional
account and, initially, on a pilot basis, savings accounts to
our core customer base.
In February 2010, we terminated our letter of credit because the
beneficiary no longer required us to collateralize surety bonds
issued in connection with our state money transmitter licenses.
In March 2010, our board of directors amended our Certificate of
Incorporation to adopt a dual class structure for our common
stock. The two classes of common stock are Class A common
stock and Class B common stock. The rights of the holders
of Class A and Class B common stock are virtually
identical, except with respect to voting and conversion. The
holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to ten
votes per share, and the holders of our Class A common
stock are entitled to one vote per share. The holders of our
Class A common stock and Class B common stock will
vote together as a single class on all matters submitted to a
vote of our stockholders, unless otherwise required by law. Each
share of our Class B common stock is convertible into one
share of our Class A common stock at any time and will
convert automatically upon certain transfers or on the date that
the total number of shares of Class B common stock
outstanding represents less than 10% of the total number of
shares of Class A and Class B common stock
outstanding. The amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation
does not amend any of the rights, preferences or privileges of
our preferred stockholders, except that each share of
Series A, B, C, C-1 and C-2 convertible preferred stock
converts into our Class B common stock upon the events
specified in Note 10 Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock and Stockholders Equity (Deficit).
As there are currently no shares of Class A common stock
outstanding, net income allocated to common stockholders is
attributed solely to Class B common stock under the
two-class method.
In March 2010, we renewed our line of credit, reducing the
balance available from $15.0 million to $10.0 million.
We also reduced the cash collateral requirements from
$15.0 million to $5.0 million. We present our cash
collateral requirements on our consolidated balance sheets as
restricted cash.
F-48
Shares
Class A
Common Stock
Prospectus
|
|
J.P.
Morgan |
Morgan Stanley |
,
2010
PART II
INFORMATION NOT
REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
Other Expenses
of Issuance and Distribution.
|
The following table sets forth the fees and expenses in
connection with the sale of the shares of Class A common
stock being registered hereby, all of which are expected to be
paid by the selling stockholders. All amounts are estimates
except for the SEC registration fee and the FINRA filing fee.
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$ 7,130
|
FINRA filing fee
|
|
10,500
|
Printing and engraving
|
|
*
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
*
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
*
|
Road show expenses
|
|
*
|
Transfer agent and registrar fees and expenses
|
|
*
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be provided by amendment. |
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
authorizes a court to award, or a corporations board of
directors to grant, indemnity to directors and officers under
certain circumstances and subject to certain limitations. The
terms of Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law are sufficiently broad to permit indemnification under
certain circumstances for liabilities, including reimbursement
of expenses incurred, arising under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the Securities Act).
As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, the
Registrants restated certificate of incorporation contains
provisions that eliminate the personal liability of its
directors for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary
duties as a director, except for liability:
|
|
|
|
|
for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to the
Registrant or its stockholders;
|
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
(regarding unlawful dividends and stock purchases); or
|
|
|
|
for any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, the
Registrants restated bylaws provide that:
|
|
|
|
|
the Registrant is required to indemnify its directors and
officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law, subject to very limited exceptions;
|
|
|
|
the Registrant may indemnify its other employees and agents as
set forth in the Delaware General Corporation Law;
|
|
|
|
the Registrant is required to advance expenses, as incurred, to
its directors and officers in connection with a legal proceeding
to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law, subject to very limited exceptions; and
|
|
|
|
the rights conferred in the bylaws are not exclusive.
|
II-1
The Registrant has entered into indemnification agreements with
each of its current directors and executive officers to provide
these directors and executive officers additional contractual
assurances regarding the scope of the indemnification set forth
in the Registrants restated certificate of incorporation
and restated bylaws and to provide additional procedural
protections. At present, there is no pending litigation or
proceeding involving a director, executive officer or employee
of the Registrant regarding which indemnification is sought.
Reference is also made to Section 9 of the Underwriting
Agreement, which provides for the indemnification of executive
officers, directors and controlling persons of the Registrant
against certain liabilities. The indemnification provisions in
the Registrants restated certificate of incorporation and
restated bylaws and the indemnification agreements entered into
or to be entered into between the Registrant and each of its
directors and executive officers may be sufficiently broad to
permit indemnification of the Registrants directors and
executive officers for liabilities arising under the Securities
Act.
The Registrant has directors and officers liability
insurance for securities matters.
In addition, Michael J. Moritz, one of our directors, is
indemnified by his employer with regard to his serving on the
Registrants board of directors.
Reference is made to the following documents filed as exhibits
to this Registration Statement regarding relevant
indemnification provisions described above and elsewhere herein:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Document
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
Tenth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant
|
|
|
3.01
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
Ninth Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement by and
among the Registrant and certain investors of the Registrant
|
|
|
4.01
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement
|
|
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
Recent Sales
of Unregistered Securities.
|
Since January 1, 2007, the Registrant has issued and sold
the following securities:
1. In February and March 2007, the Registrant issued
197,672 shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of
warrants with a per share exercise price of $0.3014 for an
aggregate purchase price of $59,578. All sales were made in
reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
and/or
Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act and were made
without general solicitation or advertising.
2. In December 2008, the Registrant sold
1,181,818 shares of
Series C-2
preferred stock to four entities affiliated with Sequoia
Capital, a venture capital firm, for an aggregate purchase price
of $13.0 million. These shares are convertible into
1,181,818 shares of our Class B common stock. All
sales were made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act
and/or
Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act and were made
without general solicitation or advertising.
3. In March 2009, the Registrant issued a warrant to
purchase up to 4,283,456 shares of common stock to PayPal,
Inc. in connection with a commercial transaction. This issuance
was made in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
and/or
Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act and was made
without general solicitation or advertising.
4. In December 2009, the Registrant issued
257,984 shares of common stock with an aggregate grant date
fair value of approximately $5.2 million to Steven W.
Streit, its Chief Executive Officer, to compensate him for past
services rendered to the Registrant. This issuance was made in
reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and was made
without general solicitation or advertising.
II-2
5. In May 2010, the Registrant issued 2,208,552 shares
of Class A Common Stock to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in
connection with a commercial transaction. The issuance was made
in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
and/or
Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act and was made
without general solicitation or advertising. Wal-Mart Stores,
Inc. has represented to the Registrant that it is a
qualified institutional buyer as defined in
Rule 144A under the Securities Act.
6. Since January 1, 2007, the Registrant has issued an
aggregate of 13,941 shares of common stock under its 2001
Stock Plan to Timothy R. Greenleaf, one of its directors, to
compensate him for past services rendered to the Registrant as
chair of its audit committee. Such issuances had an aggregate
grant date fair value of approximately $119,991.
7. Since January 1, 2007, the Registrant has issued
options to employees, consultants and directors to purchase an
aggregate of 4,457,307 shares of common stock under its
2001 Stock Plan.
8. Since January 1, 2007, the Registrant has issued
3,206,752 shares of common stock to its employees,
directors, consultants and other service providers upon exercise
of options granted by it under its 2001 Stock Plan, with prices
ranging from $0.16 to $10.75 per share, for an aggregate
purchase price of $3,936,482.
The recipients of the securities in each of the transactions
described in paragraphs (1)-(5) above represented their
intentions to acquire the securities for investment only and not
with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution
thereof, and appropriate legends were placed upon the share
certificates issued in these transactions. All recipients had
adequate access, through their relationships with us, to
information about the Registrant. The issuance of the securities
described in paragraphs (6)-(8) above were deemed to be exempt
from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon
Rule 701 promulgated under Section 3(b) of the
Securities Act as transactions pursuant to benefit plans and
contracts relating to compensation as provided under
Rule 701 or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
and/or
Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act.
|
|
ITEM 16.
|
Exhibits and
Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
File
|
|
File
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
Number
|
|
Date
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
1
|
.01*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.01
|
|
Tenth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
S-1(A2)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
April 26, 2010
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
3
|
.02
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
4
|
.01
|
|
Ninth Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement by and
among the Registrant, certain stockholders and certain warrant
holders of the Registrant.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
4.01
|
|
|
|
4
|
.02
|
|
First Amendment to Ninth Amended and Restated Registration
Rights Agreement by and among the Registrant, certain
stockholders and certain warrant holders of the Registrant.
|
|
S-1(A7)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 19, 2010
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
5
|
.01*
|
|
Opinion of Fenwick & West LLP regarding the legality
of the securities being registered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
File
|
|
File
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
Number
|
|
Date
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.01
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
10
|
.02
|
|
Second Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Plan and forms of notice
of stock option grant, stock option agreement and stock option
exercise letter.
|
|
S-1(A3)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 2, 2010
|
|
10.02
|
|
|
|
10
|
.03
|
|
2010 Equity Incentive Plan and forms of notice of stock option
grant, stock option award agreement, notice of restricted stock
award, restricted stock agreement, notice of stock bonus award,
stock bonus award agreement, notice of stock appreciation right
award, stock appreciation right award agreement, notice of
restricted stock unit award, restricted stock unit award
agreement, notice of performance shares award and performance
shares agreement.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
10.03
|
|
|
|
10
|
.04
|
|
Lease Agreement between Registrant and Foothill Technology
Center, dated July 8, 2005, as amended on August 21,
2008 and July 30, 2009.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-165081
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
10
|
.05
|
|
Amended and Restated Prepaid Card Program Agreement, dated as of
May 27, 2010, by and among the Registrant, Wal-Mart Stores,
Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.P., Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC,
Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, L.P. and GE Money
Bank.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.05
|
|
|
|
10
|
.06
|
|
Card Program Services Agreement, dated as of October 27,
2006, by and between the Registrant and GE Money Bank, as
amended.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
10
|
.07
|
|
Program Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2009, by and
between the Registrant and Columbus Bank and Trust Company.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.07
|
|
|
|
10
|
.08
|
|
Agreement for Services, dated as of September 1, 2009, by
and between the Registrant and Total System Services, Inc.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.08
|
|
|
|
10
|
.09
|
|
Master Services Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2009, by and
between the Registrant and Genpact International, Inc.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.09
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Sixth Amended and Restated Loan and Line of Credit Agreement
between Columbus Bank and Trust Company and Registrant,
dated March 24, 2010.
|
|
S-1(A2)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
April 26, 2010
|
|
10.10
|
|
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
File
|
|
File
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
Number
|
|
Date
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Offer letter to William D. Sowell from the Registrant, dated
January 28, 2009.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-165081
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
10.11
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Form of Executive Severance Agreement.
|
|
S-1(A2)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
April 26, 2010
|
|
10.12
|
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-165081
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
10.13
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Description of FY2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation
Plan.
|
|
S-1(A3)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 2, 2010
|
|
10.14
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Warrant to purchase shares of common stock of the Registrant.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Class A Common Stock Issuance Agreement, dated as of
May 27, 2010, between the Registrant and Wal-Mart Stores,
Inc.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Voting Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2010, between the
Registrant and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
10.18
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Standard Sublease, dated January 12, 2010, between the
Registrant and Telscape Communications, Inc., as amended.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-34819
|
|
November 3, 2010
|
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
23
|
.01*
|
|
Consent of Fenwick & West LLP (included in
Exhibit 5.01).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
.02
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
24
|
.01
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on
page II-7).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
|
Registrant has omitted portions of the referenced exhibit and
filed such exhibit separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to a grant of confidential treatment under
Rule 406 promulgated under the Securities Act. |
(b) Financial Statement Schedules.
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are
not applicable or the information is included in the
Registrants consolidated financial statements or related
notes.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to provisions
described in Item 14 above, or otherwise, the Registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
II-5
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) for purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
(2) for the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-6
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Monrovia, State of California, on
November 8, 2010.
GREEN DOT CORPORATION
Steven W. Streit
President and Chief Executive Officer
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that each individual whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Steven W.
Streit, John C. Ricci and John L. Keatley, and each of them, his
or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full
power of substitution, for him or her and in his or her name,
place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this
Registration Statement, and to sign any registration statement
for the same offering covered by the Registration Statement that
is to be effective upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b)
promulgated under the Securities Act, and all post-effective
amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or his, her or
their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be
done or by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this
Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Executive Officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven
W. Streit
Steven
W. Streit
|
|
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
November 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
L. Keatley
John
L. Keatley
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
November 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Simon
M. Heyrick
Simon
M. Heyrick
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
November 8, 2010
|
II-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kenneth
C. Aldrich
Kenneth
C. Aldrich
|
|
Director
|
|
November 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Timothy
R. Greenleaf
Timothy
R. Greenleaf
|
|
Director
|
|
November 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Virginia
L. Hanna
Virginia
L. Hanna
|
|
Director
|
|
November 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
J. Moritz
Michael
J. Moritz
|
|
Director
|
|
November 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
H. Ott, Jr.
William
H. Ott, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
November 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ W.
Thomas Smith, Jr.
W.
Thomas Smith, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
November 8, 2010
|
II-8
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
File
|
|
File
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
Number
|
|
Date
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
1
|
.01*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.01
|
|
Tenth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
S-1(A2)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
April 26, 2010
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
3
|
.02
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
4
|
.01
|
|
Ninth Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement by and
among the Registrant, certain stockholders and certain warrant
holders of the Registrant.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
4.01
|
|
|
|
4
|
.02
|
|
First Amendment to Ninth Amended and Restated Registration
Rights Agreement by and among the Registrant, certain
stockholders and certain warrant holders of the Registrant.
|
|
S-1(A7)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 19, 2010
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
5
|
.01*
|
|
Opinion of Fenwick & West LLP regarding the legality
of the securities being registered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.01
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
10
|
.02
|
|
Second Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Plan and forms of notice
of stock option grant, stock option agreement and stock option
exercise letter.
|
|
S-1(A3)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 2, 2010
|
|
10.02
|
|
|
|
10
|
.03
|
|
2010 Equity Incentive Plan and forms of notice of stock option
grant, stock option award agreement, notice of restricted stock
award, restricted stock agreement, notice of stock bonus award,
stock bonus award agreement, notice of stock appreciation right
award, stock appreciation right award agreement, notice of
restricted stock unit award, restricted stock unit award
agreement, notice of performance shares award and performance
shares agreement.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
10.03
|
|
|
|
10
|
.04
|
|
Lease Agreement between Registrant and Foothill Technology
Center, dated July 8, 2005, as amended on August 21,
2008 and July 30, 2009.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-165081
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
10
|
.05
|
|
Amended and Restated Prepaid Card Program Agreement, dated as of
May 27, 2010, by and among the Registrant, Wal-Mart Stores,
Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.P., Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC,
Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, L.P. and GE Money
Bank.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.05
|
|
|
|
10
|
.06
|
|
Card Program Services Agreement, dated as of October 27,
2006, by and between the Registrant and GE Money Bank, as
amended.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
10
|
.07
|
|
Program Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2009, by and
between the Registrant and Columbus Bank and Trust Company.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.07
|
|
|
|
10
|
.08
|
|
Agreement for Services, dated as of September 1, 2009, by
and between the Registrant and Total System Services, Inc.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.08
|
|
|
|
10
|
.09
|
|
Master Services Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2009, by and
between the Registrant and Genpact International, Inc.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
File
|
|
File
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
Number
|
|
Date
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Sixth Amended and Restated Loan and Line of Credit Agreement
between Columbus Bank and Trust Company and Registrant,
dated March 24, 2010.
|
|
S-1(A2)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
April 26, 2010
|
|
10.10
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Offer letter to William D. Sowell from the Registrant, dated
January 28, 2009.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-165081
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
10.11
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Form of Executive Severance Agreement.
|
|
S-1(A2)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
April 26, 2010
|
|
10.12
|
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
FY2009 Management Cash Incentive Compensation Plan.
|
|
S-1
|
|
333-165081
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
10.13
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Description of FY2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation
Plan.
|
|
S-1(A3)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 2, 2010
|
|
10.14
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Warrant to purchase shares of common stock of the Registrant.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Class A Common Stock Issuance Agreement, dated as of
May 27, 2010, between the Registrant and Wal-Mart Stores,
Inc.
|
|
S-1(A6)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
July 13, 2010
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Voting Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2010, between the
Registrant and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
10.18
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
S-1(A4)
|
|
333-165081
|
|
June 29, 2010
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Standard Sublease, dated January 12, 2010, between the
Registrant and Telscape Communications, Inc., as amended.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-34819
|
|
November 3, 2010
|
|
10.01
|
|
|
|
23
|
.01*
|
|
Consent of Fenwick & West LLP (included in
Exhibit 5.01).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
.02
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
24
|
.01
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on
page II-7).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
|
Registrant has omitted portions of the referenced exhibit and
filed such exhibit separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to a grant of confidential treatment under
Rule 406 promulgated under the Securities Act. |