e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-23550
Fentura Financial, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-2806518 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employee Identification No.) |
175 N Leroy, P.O. Box 725, Fenton, Michigan 48430
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(810) 629-2263
(Registrants telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer
and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: July 22, 2010
|
|
|
Class Common Stock
|
|
Shares Outstanding 2,276,441 |
Fentura Financial Inc.
Index to Form 10-Q
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(000s omitted except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
15,535 |
|
|
$ |
18,459 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
28,050 |
|
|
|
23,650 |
|
|
|
|
Total cash & cash equivalents |
|
|
43,585 |
|
|
|
42,109 |
|
Securities-available for sale |
|
|
45,604 |
|
|
|
43,608 |
|
Securities-held to maturity, (fair value of $4,744
at June 30, 2010 and $5,493 at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
5,456 |
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
|
50,301 |
|
|
|
49,064 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
244,672 |
|
|
|
252,764 |
|
Real estate loans construction |
|
|
17,578 |
|
|
|
26,295 |
|
Real estate loans mortgage |
|
|
24,465 |
|
|
|
28,058 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
43,567 |
|
|
|
48,313 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
330,282 |
|
|
|
355,430 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(14,227 |
) |
|
|
(10,726 |
) |
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
316,055 |
|
|
|
344,704 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
7,318 |
|
|
|
7,221 |
|
Bank premises and equipment |
|
|
15,471 |
|
|
|
15,914 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
7,967 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
37,919 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,710 |
|
|
|
12,637 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
455,290 |
|
|
$ |
522,079 |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
69,955 |
|
|
$ |
64,530 |
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
341,429 |
|
|
|
376,245 |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
411,384 |
|
|
|
440,775 |
|
Short term borrowings |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
7,954 |
|
|
|
7,981 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
35,217 |
|
Accrued taxes, interest and other liabilities |
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
437,395 |
|
|
|
501,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value
2,276,441 shares issued (2,248,553 at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
42,974 |
|
|
|
42,913 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(24,920 |
) |
|
|
(21,657 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
17,895 |
|
|
|
20,532 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
455,290 |
|
|
$ |
522,079 |
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
3
FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(000s omitted except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
5,200 |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,506 |
|
|
$ |
12,463 |
|
Interest and dividends on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
Interest on federal funds sold |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
5,611 |
|
|
|
6,528 |
|
|
|
11,338 |
|
|
|
13,555 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
5,226 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
1,792 |
|
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
5,828 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
3,819 |
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
7,727 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,619 |
|
|
|
7,711 |
|
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
|
9,366 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(4,087 |
) |
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
(1,639 |
) |
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Trust and investment services income |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Loss on equity investment |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
Other income and fees |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
2,063 |
|
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
|
|
4,623 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
Loan and collection |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
Advertising and promotional |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Loss on security impairment |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
4,370 |
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
8,937 |
|
|
|
10,447 |
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
(2,612 |
) |
|
|
(8,573 |
) |
|
|
(3,909 |
) |
|
|
(10,121 |
) |
Federal income tax/(benefit) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
5,952 |
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
5,360 |
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2,665 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,525 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,635 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,481 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net
of tax |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(839 |
) |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
(1,542 |
) |
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,780 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,364 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(1.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.61 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.61 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) per share from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(0.71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(1.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.99 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends declared |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Fentura Financial, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
42,913 |
|
|
$ |
42,778 |
|
Issuance of shares under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director stock purchase plan & Dividend reinvestment program (27,888 and 23,418 shares) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
42,974 |
|
|
|
42,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(21,657 |
) |
|
|
(4,677 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
(17,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(24,920 |
) |
|
|
(21,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(1,977 |
) |
Change in unrealized loss on securities, net of tax |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
$ |
17,895 |
|
|
$ |
19,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Fentura Financial, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,023 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
Establishment of deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,617 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
|
9,366 |
|
Loans originated for sale |
|
|
(13,821 |
) |
|
|
(42,302 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of loans |
|
|
13,621 |
|
|
|
42,368 |
|
Gain on sales of loans |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
Loss on sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Loss on security impairment |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Loss on equity investment |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Earnings from bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in interest receivable & other assets |
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in interest payable & other liabilities |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
(4,079 |
) |
Net change in discontinued operations operating activities |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
3,120 |
|
|
|
|
Total Adjustments |
|
|
9,261 |
|
|
|
21,727 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities |
|
|
5,998 |
|
|
|
4,704 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities HTM |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities AFS |
|
|
5,577 |
|
|
|
4,726 |
|
Proceeds from calls of securities HTM |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Proceeds from calls of securities AFS |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Proceeds from sales of securities AFS |
|
|
7,105 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Proceeds from sales of equity securities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Purchases of securities AFS |
|
|
(17,156 |
) |
|
|
(10,646 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of bank subsidiary |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Net decrease in loans |
|
|
20,907 |
|
|
|
23,466 |
|
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Sales of other real estate owned |
|
|
2,315 |
|
|
|
865 |
|
Acquisition of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Net change in discontinued operations investing activities |
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
24,445 |
|
|
|
22,049 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
(29,391 |
) |
|
|
9,711 |
|
Net (decrease) in short term borrowings |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
Purchase of advances from FHLB |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
55,495 |
|
Repayments of advances from FHLB |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(58,221 |
) |
Net proceeds from stock issuance and purchase |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Net change in discontinued operations financing activities |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
(2,518 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(28,967 |
) |
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
$ |
30,019 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents Beginning |
|
|
42,109 |
|
|
|
13,626 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents Ending |
|
$ |
43,585 |
|
|
$ |
43,645 |
|
Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations |
|
$ |
43,585 |
|
|
$ |
41,076 |
|
|
|
|
6
Fentura Financial, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
3,677 |
|
|
$ |
5,655 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,715 |
|
Non-cash Disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from loans to other real estate |
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
Fentura Financial, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,780 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,364 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,023 |
) |
Other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising
during period |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Tax effect |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(2,377 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,679 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,698 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,986 |
) |
|
|
|
Fentura Financial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2009, June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010 include
Fentura Financial, Inc. (the Corporation) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, The State Bank in
Fenton, Michigan and West Michigan Community Bank in Hudsonville, Michigan (the Banks), as well
as West Michigan Mortgage Company, LLC, and the other subsidiaries of the Banks. Intercompany
transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
On March 17, 2009, The Corporation entered into an agreement to sell all of the stock of one of its
bank subsidiaries, Davison State Bank, to a private, non-affiliated, investor group. The
Corporation recorded an estimated loss on the sale of Davison State Bank of $700,000 in the first
quarter of 2009. As a result of the amended sales agreement, the estimated loss of $700,000 was
reversed in the first quarter of 2010. On April 30, 2010, the sale of Davison State Bank closed and
the assets and liabilities were transferred to the investor group. As a result of the timing of
the sale, held for sale operations reflect one month of income on the income statement for the
current quarter.
Financial statements are presented with discontinued operations sequestered on the balance sheet
and income statement. The presentations have been updated for June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009 to reflect the discontinued operations results.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they
do not include all
7
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. For further information,
refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Corporations
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Reclassifications
Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current
presentation. For the six month period ending June 30, 2009, a $700,000 impairment charge on
discontinued operations was reclassified in the prior year presentation from non-interest expense
of continuing operations to discontinued operations. This reclassification reduced the loss from
continuing operations by $700,000, net of tax, and had no impact on net income.
Securities: Securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost
when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Securities are
classified as available for sale when they might be sold before maturity. Securities available for
sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other
comprehensive income, net of tax.
Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on
securities are amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for
mortgage-backed securities, where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are based
on the amortized cost of the security sold. Securities are written down to fair value when a
decline in fair value is not temporary.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis,
and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
In determining OTTI management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions,
and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be
required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an
other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is
based on the information available to management at a point in time.
When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity
intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss. If an entity
intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss, the OTTI shall be
recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments amortized cost basis
and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and
it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into
the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of
the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows
expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to
other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous
amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of
the investment.
8
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses,
increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs less recoveries. Management
estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of
the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values,
economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific
loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in managements judgment, should be
charged-off. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the
uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.
A loan is impaired when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Impairment is evaluated
in total for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as residential mortgage, consumer, and on
an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is
allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows
using the loans existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely
from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and
residential real estate loans are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are
not separately identified for impairment disclosures. Loans for which the terms have been modified
and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt
restructurings and are classified as impaired. Troubled debt restructurings are measured at the
present value of estimated future cash flows using the loans effective rate at inception.
Other Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Assets: Assets acquired through or instead of loan
foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired,
establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through
expense. Costs after acquisition are expensed.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in
deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future
tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and
liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets
to the amount expected to be realized.
The Corporation recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax
expense.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009, and the Corporation
does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next
twelve months.
Dividend Restriction
Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by
the Banks to the Corporation or by the Corporation to shareholders. West Michigan Community Bank
and The State Bank have been restricted from dividend payments due to the signing of Consent Orders
with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
Stock Option Plans
The Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan provides for granting options to nonemployee directors
to purchase the Corporations common stock. The purchase price of the shares is the fair market
value at the date of the grant, and there is a three-year vesting period before options may be
exercised. Options to acquire no more than 8,131 shares of stock may be granted under the Plan in
any calendar year and options to acquire not more than 73,967 shares in the aggregate may be
outstanding at any one time. No options have been granted in 2010 or 2009.
9
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
The Employee Stock Option Plan grants options to eligible employees to purchase the Corporations
common stock at or above, the fair market value of the stock at the date of the grant. Awards
granted under this plan are limited to an aggregate of 86,936 shares. The administrator of the
plan is a committee of directors. The administrator has the power to determine the number of
options to be granted, the exercise price of the options and other terms of the options, subject to
consistency with the terms of the Plan.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option
valuation (Black-Scholes) model. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the
Corporations common stock. The Corporation uses historical data to estimate option exercise and
post-vesting termination behavior. The expected term of options granted is based on historical
data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which
takes into account that the options are not transferable. The risk-free interest rate for the
expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the
grant. Shares that are issued upon option exercise come from authorized but unissued shares.
The following table summarizes stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average Price |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
20,297 |
|
|
$ |
29.55 |
|
Options granted 2010 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
Options forfeited 2010 |
|
|
(3,542 |
) |
|
$ |
25.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
16,755 |
|
|
$ |
30.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Going Concern
As a result of the Corporations net losses and non-compliance with the higher capital requirements
of the Consent Orders, our auditors added an explanatory paragraph to their opinion on the
Corporations December 31, 2009 consolidated financial statements, expressing substantial doubt
about the Corporations ability to continue as a going concern. In 2010, the Banks have come in to
compliance with substantially all areas of the Consent Orders, except for capital requirements.
Managements strategies to improve profitability and to meet the capital requirements of the
Consent Orders, discussed in Note 10, include shrinking assets, reducing costs, and sales of
subsidiary banks. The capital positions of the Banks have improved as of June 30, 2010. The sale
of Davison State Bank, which closed on April, 30, 2010, generated $2.8 million, of which a portion
was reinvested in The State Bank. On April 27, 2010, an agreement was signed for the sale of West
Michigan Community Bank which is expected to generate additional capital to strengthen The State
Bank. See Note 11 for details regarding the definitive agreement to sell West Michigan Community
Bank.
These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the
Corporation is unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 2 ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
New Accounting Pronouncements:
In June 2009, the FASB amended previous guidance relating to transfers of financial assets and
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. This guidance must be applied as of
the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November
15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual
reporting periods thereafter. This guidance must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the
effective date. Additionally, on and
10
NOTE 2 ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (continued)
after the effective date, the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity is no longer relevant
for accounting purposes. Therefore, formerly qualifying special-purpose entities should be
evaluated for consolidation by reporting entities on and after the effective date in accordance
with the applicable consolidation guidance. The disclosure provisions were also amended and apply
to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date of this guidance. The effect
of adopting this new guidance was not material to the Corporation.
In June 2009, the FASB amended guidance for consolidation of variable interest entity guidance by
replacing the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if
any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on
identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity
that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. Additional disclosures
about an enterprises involvement in variable interest entities are also required. This guidance is
effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins
after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Early adoption is prohibited. The effect of
adopting this new guidance was not material to the Corporation.
NOTE 3 SECURITIES
Securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government & federal agency |
|
$ |
8,715 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
8,759 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
12,947 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,253 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
21,324 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
21,167 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,843 |
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
(1,013 |
) |
|
$ |
45,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government & federal agency |
|
$ |
6,543 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
6,514 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
7,034 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
7,095 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
13,482 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,780 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
15,369 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
14,690 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,399 |
|
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
$ |
(1,449 |
) |
|
$ |
43,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
NOTE 3 SECURITIES (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal |
|
$ |
4,697 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
4,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal |
|
$ |
5,455 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
5,492 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,456 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
5,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and fair value of the securities portfolio are shown by expected maturity.
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Contractual maturities of
securities at June 30, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
9,616 |
|
|
$ |
9,672 |
|
Due from one to five years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Due from five to ten years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
12,947 |
|
|
|
13,253 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
21,324 |
|
|
|
21,167 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,843 |
|
|
$ |
45,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
2,616 |
|
|
$ |
2,624 |
|
Due from one to five years |
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
Due from five to ten years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,697 |
|
|
$ |
4,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, there were 2 private label CMO securities, with holdings totaling $4,175,000,
which exceeded 10% of shareholders equity. At June 30, 2009, there were no holdings of securities
of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10%
of shareholders equity.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Corporation sold 19 securities with a net gain of
$75,000. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 the Corporation did not sell securities and
therefore had no gain or loss on securities.
Securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, aggregated by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position are as follows:
12
NOTE 3 SECURITIES (continued)
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4,854 |
|
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
4,854 |
|
|
|
(524 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
5,571 |
|
|
$ |
(1,013 |
) |
|
$ |
5,571 |
|
|
$ |
(1,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
US Government & federal agency |
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
State & municipal |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4,872 |
|
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
4,872 |
|
|
|
(878 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired |
|
$ |
3,972 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
6,540 |
|
|
$ |
(1,382 |
) |
|
$ |
10,512 |
|
|
$ |
(1,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
In evaluating OTTI, management considers the factors presented in Note 1.
As of June 30, 2010, the Corporations security portfolio consisted of 109 securities, 13 of which
were in an unrealized loss position. All unrealized losses are related to the Corporations
collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and equity securities, as discussed below.
Credit losses recognized in earnings on debt securities totaled $288,000 at December 31, 2009 and
there were no additional OTTI losses recognized through earnings during the period ending June 30,
2010.
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs)
Gross unrealized losses relating to collateralized mortgage obligation securities were $524,000 at
June 30, 2010. The decline in fair value is primarily attributable to temporary illiquidity and the
financial crisis affecting these markets and not necessarily the expected cash flows of the
individual securities. These investments consist of three private label securities with an
amortized cost of $5.3 million. The ratings held on the private label securities are AA, A- and
CCC. The Corporation has been closely monitoring the performance of the CMO portfolio. In 2009,
there were several CMOs that were downgraded in the market. The underlying collateral of these CMOs
is comprised largely of 1-4 family residences. In each of these securities, the Corporation lies
in the senior tranche and receives payments before other tranches. For private label securities,
management completes an analysis to review the recent performance of the mortgage pools underlying
the instruments. On a quarterly basis, management reviews historical and projected payment
streams, delinquency ratios, geographic distribution, ratings, projected future cash flows and
general market conditions. Management uses multiple assumptions to project the expected future cash
flows of the private label CMOs, which include prepayment speeds, projected default rates and loss
severity rates. The cash flows are then discounted using the effective rate on the securities
determined at acquisition. Recent historical experience is the base for determining the cash flow
assumptions and are adjusted when appropriate after considering characteristics of the underlying
loans collateralizing the private label CMO security. As a result of its review, in the fourth
quarter of 2009, the
13
NOTE 3 SECURITIES (continued)
Corporation recognized a $79,000 other-than-temporary impairment as a result of incurred credit
losses which was reflected in the income statement. The security with the credit loss is the
Corporations sole CCC rated security and has a remaining amortized cost of $691,000 at June 30,
2010. The remaining unrealized loss of $207,000 on this security has been reflected in accumulated
other comprehensive loss. Following the June 30, 2010 analysis, managements review did not
indicate any additional OTTI on these securities.
Equity securities
The Corporation also holds investments in equity securities which had gross unrealized losses of
$489,000 at June 30, 2010. The majority of the equity securities are investments into bank holding
companies within Michigan. On a quarterly basis, management reviews the Corporations investment
in these equity securities. Management reviews current market prices on publicly traded equity
securities and compares the current price to the book price. Any difference is adjusted as a
temporary valuation difference, unless other resources provide other information. Equity
securities that are not publicly traded receive a multi-faceted review utilizing call report data.
Management reviews such performance indicators as earnings, ROE, ROA, non-performing assets,
brokered deposits and capital ratios. Management draws conclusions from this information, as well
as any published information or trading activity received from the individual institutions, to
assist in determining if a temporary valuation adjustment is warranted. The equity securities
portfolio has an amortized cost of $1,956,000. Currently, the equity securities have a net
unrecognized loss of $444,000, for a fair value of $1,512,000. The performance of the bank holding
companies remained relatively stable thus far in 2010. As a result, no OTTI was recognized during
the quarter as management anticipates improved performance of these institutions as economic
conditions stabilize.
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Major categories of loans at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
83,004 |
|
|
$ |
81,425 |
|
Real estate commercial |
|
|
161,668 |
|
|
|
171,339 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
17,578 |
|
|
|
26,295 |
|
Real estate mortgage |
|
|
24,465 |
|
|
|
28,058 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
43,567 |
|
|
|
48,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,282 |
|
|
|
355,430 |
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
14,227 |
|
|
|
10,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
316,055 |
|
|
$ |
344,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation has originated primarily residential and commercial real estate loans, commercial,
and installment loans. Construction lending has curtailed given the present economy. The
Corporation estimates that the majority of their loan portfolio is based in Genesee, Oakland and
Livingston counties within southeast Michigan; in Kent and Ottawa counties in west Michigan, with
the remainder of the portfolio distributed throughout Michigan. The ability of the Corporations
debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate and general economic conditions
in these areas.
14
NOTE 4 LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)
Activity in the allowance for loan losses, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and June
30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Balance, January 1, |
|
$ |
10,726 |
|
|
$ |
10,455 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
|
9,366 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(2,646 |
) |
|
|
(5,958 |
) |
Loan recoveries |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
14,227 |
|
|
$ |
13,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses, for the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and June
30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Balance, January 1, |
|
$ |
12,338 |
|
|
$ |
11,405 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,619 |
|
|
|
7,711 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(1,863 |
) |
|
|
(5,194 |
) |
Loan recoveries |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
14,227 |
|
|
$ |
13,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan impairment is measured by valuing the underlying collateral or by estimating the expected
future cash flows and discounting them at the respective effective interest rate.
The recorded investment in these loans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Period end loans not requiring allocation |
|
$ |
14,329 |
|
|
$ |
15,874 |
|
Period end loans requiring allocation |
|
|
25,278 |
|
|
|
23,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,607 |
|
|
$ |
38,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated |
|
$ |
8,105 |
|
|
$ |
5,683 |
|
Non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual |
|
$ |
1,673 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
Renegotiated loans |
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
|
16,661 |
|
|
|
16,507 |
|
Non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance
homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified
impaired loans.
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels
of inputs that may be used to measure fair values.
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets
that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
15
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. Securities
classified as available for sale are generally reported at fair value utilizing Level 2
inputs where the Corporation obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing
service which uses matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the
industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the
specific securities but rather by relying on the securities relationship to other benchmark
quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). The fair value measurements consider observable data
that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows and the bonds terms and
conditions, among other things. The fair value of the Corporations equity securities,
which primarily consists of the common stock in other Michigan bank holding companies, is
based on the prices of recent stock trades and is considered Level 2 because these stocks
are not actively traded in public markets (Level 2 inputs).
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entitys own assumptions
about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing and asset or liability.
The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on
nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a
mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying
exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). The remaining fair values of
securities (Level 3 inputs) are based on the reporting entitys own assumptions and basic knowledge
of market conditions and individual investment performance.
Impaired Loans: The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance
for loan losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize
a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the
income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to
adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments
are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for
determining fair value.
Other Real Estate Owned: Non-recurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential
real estate properties classified as other real estate owned are measured at the lower of carrying
amount or fair value, less costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party
appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.
16
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Total |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government and federal agency |
|
$ |
8,759 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
8,759 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
13,253 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,253 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
21,167 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
21,167 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,604 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
45,597 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Total |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government and federal agency |
|
$ |
6,514 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
6,514 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
7,095 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,095 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mortgage-backed residential |
|
|
13,780 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,780 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
14,690 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,690 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,608 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
43,590 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses
for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Corporation did not hold any Level 3 assets
during 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant |
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Total |
|
Beginning balance, Jan. 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
Total gains or losses (realized / unrealized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on security impairment |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and / or out of Level 3 |
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
Assets Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Inputs |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
At June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
17,355 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
17,355 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
17,376 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
17,376 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
The following represent impairment charges recognized during the period:
At June 30, 2010, impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the
collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a principal amount of $25,278,000 with a valuation
allowance of $8,105,000 resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $2,580,000 for the
three month period, and $3,010,000 for the six month period, ending June 30, 2010. This is compared
to December 31, 2009 when the principal amount of impaired loans was $23,059,000 with a valuation
allowance of $5,683,000.
Other real estate owned which is measured at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs
to sell, had a net carrying amount of $7,948,000, of which $540,000 was at fair value at June 30,
2010, resulting from write-downs totaling $72,000 for the three month period and $151,000 for the
six month period. At December 31, 2009, other real estate owned had a net carrying amount of
$7,967,000, of which $1,274,000 was at fair value.
Carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments, not previously presented were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
43,585 |
|
|
$ |
43,585 |
|
|
$ |
42,109 |
|
|
$ |
42,109 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
5,456 |
|
|
|
5,493 |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
Loans (including impaired loans) |
|
|
316,055 |
|
|
|
306,413 |
|
|
|
344,704 |
|
|
|
326,422 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
411,384 |
|
|
$ |
409,814 |
|
|
$ |
440,775 |
|
|
$ |
441,827 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
7,954 |
|
|
|
8,376 |
|
|
|
7,981 |
|
|
|
8,488 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
12,613 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
12,656 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
18
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value
disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate
their fair values.
Securities
Fair values for securities held to maturity are based on similar information previously presented
for securities available for sale.
FHLB Stock
It was not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its
transferability.
Loans held for sale
The fair values of these loans are determined in the aggregate on the basis of existing forward
commitments or fair values attributable to similar loans.
Loans
For variable rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant change in credit risk,
fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value for other loans is estimated using
discounted cash flow analysis. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its
fair value.
Off-balance-sheet instruments
The fair value of off-balance sheet items is not considered material.
Deposit liabilities
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition equal to the amount payable on
demand at the reporting date. The carrying amounts for variable rate, fixed term money market
accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair
values for fixed certificates of deposit are estimated using discounted cash flow calculation that
applies interest rates currently being offered on similar certificates. The carrying amount of
accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
Short-term borrowings
The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings approximate their
fair values.
FHLB advances
Rates currently available for FHLB debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to
estimate the fair value of the existing debt.
Subordinated Debentures
The estimated fair value of the existing subordinated debentures is calculated by comparing a
current market rate for the instrument compared to the book rate. The difference between these
rates computes the fair value.
19
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE (continued)
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and
information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount
that could result from offering for sale at one time the Corporations entire holdings of a
particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the
Corporations financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on managements judgments
regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics and
other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions
could significantly affect the estimates.
NOTE 6 INCOME TAXES
A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely
than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. Management
has reviewed the deferred tax position for the Corporation at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The Corporations evaluation of taxable events, losses in recent years and the continuing
deterioration of the Michigan economy led management to conclude that it was more likely than not
that all or part of the benefit would not be realized. During the second quarter of 2009, the
Corporation established a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. The valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets may be reversed to income in future periods to the extent
that the related deferred income tax assets are realized or the valuation allowance is otherwise no
longer required. Management will continue to monitor our deferred tax assets quarterly for changes
affecting their realizability.
Normally, the calculation for the income tax expense (benefit) does not consider the tax effects of
changes in other categories of income such as other comprehensive income (OCI), which is a
component of shareholders equity on the balance sheet. However, an exception is warranted when
there is a pre-tax loss in continuing operations. When this is the case, pre-tax income from other
categories, such as changes in OCI and discontinued operations, are included in the calculation of
the tax expense or benefit for the current year. For the first six months of 2010, this resulted
in an income tax benefit recorded to continuing operations.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009, and the Corporation
does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next
twelve months.
NOTE 7 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The factors in the earnings per share computation follow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(000s omitted except share and per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,780 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,364 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
2,268,791 |
|
|
|
2,196,743 |
|
|
|
2,259,406 |
|
|
|
2,191,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share |
|
$ |
(1.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.99 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,780 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,364 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,023 |
) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding for
basic earnings per common share |
|
|
2,268,791 |
|
|
|
2,196,743 |
|
|
|
2,259,406 |
|
|
|
2,191,940 |
|
Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
2,268,791 |
|
|
|
2,196,743 |
|
|
|
2,259,406 |
|
|
|
2,191,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share |
|
$ |
(1.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.99 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
NOTE 7 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (continued)
There were no stock options for the three or six month periods ended June 30, 2010 or 2009 that
were dilutive, as a result of the net loss for both periods.
NOTE 8 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
There are various contingent liabilities that are not reflected in the financial statements
including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not
expected to have a material effect on the Corporations consolidated financial condition or results
of operations.
NOTE 9 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On March 17, 2009, The Corporation entered into an agreement to sell all of the stock of one of its
bank subsidiaries, Davison State Bank, to a private, non-affiliated, investor group. The
Corporation recorded an estimated loss on the sale of Davison State Bank of $700,000 in the first
quarter of 2009. As a result of the amended sales agreement, the estimated loss of $700,000 was
reversed in the first quarter of 2010. This transaction will have minimal impact to 2010 core
earnings due to the proportionate size of Davison State Bank. On April 30, 2010, the sale of
Davison State Bank closed and the assets and liabilities were transferred to the investor group.
A condensed balance sheet of held for sale operations is presented below for the period ended and
December 31, 2009. As of April 30, 2010, Davison State Bank was sold to an independent financial
group. As a result, there is no balance sheet for presentation at June 30, 2010.
DAVISON STATE BANK
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,537 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
7,082 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
405 |
|
Loans, net of allowance ($679-2009) |
|
|
24,396 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
37,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
9,012 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
26,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
35,277 |
|
Accrued taxes, interest and other liabilities |
|
|
(60 |
) |
Shareholders equity |
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
37,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
A condensed statement of income of held for sale operations are presented for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009. At April 30, 2010, Davison State Bank was sold
to an independent investor group. As a result, the three month period ended June 30, 2010, is
representative of one month of income, while the six month period is representative of four months
of income. These are compared to the 2009 periods which are full three and six month period
representations, respectively.
21
NOTE 9 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (continued)
DAVISON STATE BANK
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(000s omitted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
1,062 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before federal income tax |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
|
Federal income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(115 |
) |
|
$ |
(839 |
) |
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
(1,542 |
) |
|
|
|
NOTE 10-REGULATORY MATTERS
The Corporation (on a consolidated basis) and its Bank subsidiaries are subject to various
regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet
minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary
actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Banks
financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Corporation and the Banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items are calculated
under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classifications are also subject to
qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Banks to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as
defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as
defined) to average assets (as defined). As of December 31, 2009 the most recent notification from
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Banks as adequately capitalized under the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
As of December 31, 2009, The State Bank was required by regulatory authorities to maintain certain
minimum capital ratios. The State Banks required capital ratios were those required in the
Consent Order that was effective January 10, 2010 which is discussed later in this note.
In March 2009, West Michigan Community Bank entered into a Consent Order with federal and state
banking regulators that contain provisions to foster improvement in West Michigan Community Banks
earnings, lower non performing loan levels, and increase capital. Under regulatory guidelines,
when a bank is issued a Consent Order the capital status of the bank is automatically reduced to
adequately capitalized. The Consent Order requires West Michigan Community Bank to retain a Tier 1
capital to average assets ratio of a minimum of 8.0%. As of June 30, 2010, West Michigan Community
Bank has a Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio of 6.4%, as compared to Tier 1 capital to average
assets ratio of 6.9%
22
NOTE 10-REGULATORY MATTERS (continued)
at December 31, 2009. At both June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, West Michigan Community Bank was
not in compliance with the Consent Order capital requirements.
Effective January 10, 2010, The State Bank entered into a Consent Order with federal and state
banking regulators that contain provisions to foster improvement in The State Banks earnings,
lower nonperforming loan levels, increase capital, and require revisions to various policies. The
Consent Order requires The State Bank to maintain a Tier 1 capital to average asset ratio of a
minimum of 8.0%. It also requires The State Bank to maintain a total capital to risk weighted
asset ratio of 12.0%. At June 30, 2010, The State Bank had a Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio
of 6.8% and a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 9.8%. This is compared to ratios at
December 31, 2009, of a Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio of 6.2% and a total capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio of 8.9%. At June 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, The State Bank was
not in compliance with the Consent Order capital requirements. However, The State Bank is making
progress as illustrated by the increase in capital ratios.
The Consent Orders restrict the Banks from issuing or renewing brokered deposits. The Consent
Orders also restrict dividend payments from The State Bank and West Michigan Community Bank to the
Corporation. The Consent Orders do not place any restrictions on the Corporation. The Corporation,
the Board of Directors and management continue to work on plans to come into compliance with the
Consent Orders. From the sale of Davison State Bank, a portion of the $2.8 million of proceeds was
distributed to The State Bank during the second quarter of 2010. While below the compliance level
required by the Orders, both Banks maintain capital levels considered adequate by regulatory
standards. Non-compliance with Consent Order requirements may cause the Banks to be subject to
further enforcement actions by the FDIC.
As illustrated in the table below, at June 30, 2010, the Consolidated Corporations total capital
to risk weighted assets ratio indicates that it is slightly under capitalized. The Corporation is
at a ratio of 7.8%, while adequately capitalized has a minimum requirement of 8.0%. At December
31, 2009, the Consolidated Corporations total capital to risk weighted assets ratio indicates that
it is under capitalized. The Corporation is at a ratio of 7.8%, while adequately capitalized has a
minimum requirement of 8.0%. With the current capital levels, the Corporation is required to obtain
written approval prior to payments of any dividends or for any increase or decrease to outstanding
debt.
The Corporations principal source of funds for dividend payments is dividends received from the
Banks. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval
of regulatory agencies. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any
calendar year is limited to the current years net profits, combined with the retained net profits
of the preceding two years, subject to the limitations described above.
23
NOTE 10-REGULATORY MATTERS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
|
Regulatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy |
|
|
Agreement |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Purposes |
|
|
Requirements |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
28,691 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
$ |
29,586 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
NA |
| |
NA |
|
The State Bank |
|
|
24,863 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
20,269 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
30,403 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
%(1) |
West Michigan Community Bank |
|
|
10,668 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
9,152 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
Tier 1 Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
23,967 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA |
|
The State Bank |
|
|
21,595 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
10,134 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA | |
West Michigan Community Bank |
|
|
9,231 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
(to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
23,967 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
18,957 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA | |
The State Bank |
|
|
21,595 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
12,640 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
25,280 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
West Michigan Community Bank |
|
|
9,231 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5,770 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
11,540 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
|
Regulatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy |
|
|
Agreement |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Purposes |
|
|
Requirements |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
33,661 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
$ |
34,636 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
NA |
| |
NA |
|
The State Bank |
|
|
24,334 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
21,961 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
32,810 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
%(1) |
Davison State Bank |
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA |
|
West Michigan Community Bank |
|
|
11,841 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
10,063 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA |
|
Tier 1 Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
28,164 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
17,318 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA |
|
The State Bank |
|
|
20,830 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
10,981 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA | |
Davison State Bank |
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA | |
West Michigan Community Bank |
|
|
10,262 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
28,164 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
22,491 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
NA |
| |
NA | |
The State Bank |
|
|
20,830 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
13,535 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
27,069 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Davison State Bank |
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
West Michigan Community Bank |
|
|
10,262 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
5,923 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
11,845 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Effective April 10, 2010 |
24
NOTE 11-DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
On April 28, 2010, at the Annual Shareholder Meeting, a formal announcement was made regarding the
signing of a definitive agreement to sell West Michigan Community Bank. The intended purchasers
are affiliated with Northstar Financial Group, Inc. headquartered in Bad Axe, Michigan. The
Corporation anticipates the receipt of $10.4 million from the sale of West Michigan Community Bank
(an approximate 10% premium to book). As a condition of the sale, the Corporation will acquire all
the non-performing assets of West Michigan Community Bank. The assets will be housed in a newly
formed holding company subsidiary of the Corporation. The transaction is expected to close in the
fourth quarter of 2010; however regulatory approval is required for the sale and for the
Corporation to acquire the non-performing assets. Regulatory approval has not yet been obtained. It
is expected that the Corporation will utilize a portion of the proceeds from the sale of West
Michigan Community Bank to improve the capital position of The State Bank. At June 30, 2010, West
Michigan Community Bank is not considered to have the status of discontinued operations due to
uncertainties with the final transaction.
25
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations
As indicated in the income statement, the loss for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was
$2,780,000 compared to a loss of $15,364,000 for the same period in 2009. Net interest income in
the second quarter of 2010, was $195,000 below net interest income for the same quarter in 2009.
The second quarter 2010 provision for loan losses was down $4,092,000 compared to the first quarter
of 2009. Management feels the allowance for loan losses is adequate and has increased $257,000 when
comparing the period ended June 30, 2010 to the period ended June 30, 2009.
On March 17, 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement to sell all of the stock of one of its
bank subsidiaries, Davison State Bank, to a private, non-affiliated, investor group. The
Corporation recorded an estimated loss on the sale of Davison State Bank of $700,000 in the first
quarter of 2009. As a result of the amended sales agreement, the estimated loss of $700,000 was
reversed in the first quarter of 2010. On April 30, 2010, the sale of Davison State Bank closed
and the assets and liabilities were transferred to the investor group.
The banking industry uses standard performance indicators to help evaluate a banking institutions
performance. Return on average assets is one of these indicators. For the three months ended June
30, 2010, the Corporations return on average assets (annualized) was (2.33%) compared to (10.63%)
for the same period in 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Corporations return on
average assets (annualized) was (1.37%) compared to (5.89%) for the same period in 2009. Net loss
per share, basic and diluted, was ($1.23) in the second quarter of 2010 compared to ($6.99) net
loss per share basic and diluted for the same period in 2009. Net loss per share, basic and
diluted, was ($1.44) in the six month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to ($7.77) net loss per
share basic and diluted for the same period in 2009.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income and average balances and yields on major categories of interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are summarized in
Table 2. Net interest income and average balances and yields on major categories of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 are summarized in Table 3. The effects of changes in average interest rates and average
balances are detailed in Table 1 below.
As indicated in Table 1, during the six months ended June 30, 2010, net interest income decreased
compared to the same period in 2009. Interest rates and volume on loans continued to decrease over
the past year. As an offset, deposit interest expense was also decreased. The deposit interest
rate reduction was achieved by reduction of offering rates on time deposits, which assisted in
encouraging high rate instruments from renewing, with some funds exiting, thus reducing interest
bearing liability costs.
26
Table 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
JUNE 30 |
|
|
|
2010 COMPARED TO 2009 |
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) |
|
|
|
DUE TO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
VOL |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
Taxable securities |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
(130 |
) |
|
$ |
(198 |
) |
Tax-exempt securities |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
Other securities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
(2,263 |
) |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(1,934 |
) |
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
(2,427 |
) |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
(2,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
Savings deposits |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
Time CDs $100,000 and over |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(809 |
) |
Other time deposits |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
(605 |
) |
Other borrowings |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
(2,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
$ |
(1,581 |
) |
|
$ |
1,353 |
|
|
$ |
(228 |
) |
|
|
|
As indicated in Table 2, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Corporations net
interest margin (with consideration of full tax equivalency) was 3.66% compared with 3.35% for the
same period in 2009. This increase is a result of managements ability to make continuing downward
repricing steps on interest bearing liabilities. Additionally non-interest bearing deposits
decreased less than 0.5% when comparing the period ended June 30, 2010 to the period ended June 30,
2009.
Average earning assets decreased 11.0% or $52,098,000 comparing the six months of 2010 to the same
time period in 2009. Management continues to strategically work to shrink both sides of the balance
sheet. Loans, the highest yielding component of earning assets, represented 81.6% of earning assets
in 2010 compared to 88.5% in 2009. Average interest bearing liabilities decreased 11.7% or
$50,593,000 comparing the first six months of 2010 to the same time period in 2009. Non-interest
bearing deposits amounted to 15.7% of average earning assets in the first six months of 2010
compared with 14.1% in the same time period of 2009.
Net interest income (displayed with consideration of full tax equivalency), average balance sheet
amounts, and the corresponding yields for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are shown
in Table 3. Net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $3,885,000, an
increase of $175,000, or 4.7%, from the same period in 2009. Net interest margin increased as a
result of increases in loan portfolio yields, which were assisted by a large decrease in the
interest bearing liability yield.
Management reviews economic forecasts and strategy on a monthly basis. Accordingly, the Corporation
will continue to strategically manage the balance sheet structure in an effort to create stability
in net interest income. The Corporation expects to continue to seek out new loan opportunities
while continuing to maintain sound credit quality.
Management continually monitors the Corporations balance sheet in an effort to insulate net
interest income from significant swings caused by interest rate volatility. If market rates change
in 2010, corresponding changes in funding costs will be considered to avoid the potential
negative impact on net interest income. The Corporations policies in this regard are further
discussed in the section titled Interest Rate Sensitivity Management.
27
Table 2 Average Balance and Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
(000s omitted)(Annualized) |
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies |
|
$ |
33,285 |
|
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
$ |
36,818 |
|
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
% |
State and Political (1) |
|
|
11,428 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
% |
|
|
14,143 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
6.11 |
% |
Other |
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
3,526 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
|
48,136 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
54,487 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
% |
Fed Funds Sold |
|
|
29,552 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
269,922 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
% |
|
|
328,220 |
|
|
|
9,777 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
Tax Free (1) |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
% |
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
% |
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
26,694 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
% |
|
|
36,339 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
6.20 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
45,871 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
51,693 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
344,812 |
|
|
|
10,510 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
% |
|
|
418,976 |
|
|
|
12,444 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
% |
Allowance for Loan Losses |
|
|
(11,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
333,068 |
|
|
|
10,510 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
% |
|
|
408,204 |
|
|
|
12,444 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
% |
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
$ |
423,344 |
|
|
|
11,480 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
% |
|
$ |
475,442 |
|
|
|
13,730 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Due from Banks |
|
|
16,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
24,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Assets |
|
|
43,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
495,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
578,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing DDA |
|
$ |
82,842 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
% |
|
$ |
87,954 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
% |
Savings Deposits |
|
|
71,260 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
73,027 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
Time CDs $100,000 and Over |
|
|
102,648 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
|
130,946 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
% |
Other Time CDs |
|
|
103,576 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
114,204 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
360,326 |
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
406,131 |
|
|
|
5,226 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
% |
Other Borrowings |
|
|
22,305 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
% |
|
|
27,093 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES |
|
$ |
382,631 |
|
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
$ |
433,224 |
|
|
|
5,828 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest bearing DDA |
|
|
66,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
24,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Liabilities |
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
18,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
495,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
578,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Rate Spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income /Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,674 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,902 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 34%. |
28
Table 3 Average Balance and Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
INCOME/ |
|
|
YIELD/ |
|
(000s omitted)(Annualized) |
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
BALANCE |
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
RATE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies |
|
$ |
33,408 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
$ |
37,664 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
% |
State and Political (1) |
|
|
10,319 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
6.14 |
% |
|
|
13,889 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
|
46,634 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
54,458 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
% |
Fed Funds Sold |
|
|
33,429 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
265,246 |
|
|
|
4,104 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
% |
|
|
323,183 |
|
|
|
4,693 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
% |
Tax Free (1) |
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
% |
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
% |
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
25,796 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
6.45 |
% |
|
|
36,957 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
44,533 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
49,295 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
337,840 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
|
412,132 |
|
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
% |
Allowance for Loan Losses |
|
|
(12,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans |
|
|
325,510 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
401,031 |
|
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
% |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
4.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
$ |
418,878 |
|
|
$ |
5,677 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
$ |
468,460 |
|
|
$ |
6,614 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Due from Banks |
|
|
16,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
12,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Assets |
|
|
41,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
477,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
580,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing DDA |
|
$ |
82,733 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
$ |
85,972 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
% |
Savings Deposits |
|
|
72,847 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
76,644 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
Time CDs $100,000 and Over |
|
|
95,852 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
129,979 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
% |
Other Time CDs |
|
|
100,838 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
118,665 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
352,270 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
411,260 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
% |
Other Borrowings |
|
|
22,279 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
% |
|
|
24,406 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES |
|
$ |
374,549 |
|
|
$ |
1,792 |
|
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
$ |
435,666 |
|
|
$ |
2,904 |
|
|
|
2.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Interest bearing DDA |
|
|
68,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
12,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Liabilities |
|
|
3,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
18,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
477,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
580,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Rate Spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income /Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,885 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,710 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Allowance and Provision For Loan Losses
The Corporation maintains formal policies and procedures to control and monitor credit risk.
Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide for probable incurred
losses in the loan portfolio. While the Corporations loan portfolio has no significant
concentrations in any one industry or any exposure in foreign loans, the loan portfolio had a
concentration connected with construction and land development loans. Specific strategies have
been deployed to reduce the concentration level and limit exposure to this type of lending in the
future. The Michigan economy, employment levels and other economic conditions in the Corporations
local markets may have a significant impact on the level of credit losses. Management continues to
identify and devote attention to credits that are not performing as agreed. Of course,
deterioration of economic conditions could have an impact on the Corporations credit quality,
which could impact the need for greater provision for loan losses and the level of the allowance
for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans. Non-performing loans are discussed further in the
section titled Non-Performing Assets.
The allowance for loan losses reflects managements judgment as to the level considered appropriate
to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. The Corporations methodology in determining the
adequacy of the allowance is based on ongoing quarterly assessments and relies on several key
elements, which include specific allowances for identified problem loans and a formula-based
risk-allocated allowance for the remainder of the portfolio. This includes a review of individual
loans, size, and composition of the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, current economic
conditions, financial condition of borrowers, the level and composition of non-performing loans,
portfolio trends, estimated net charge-offs and other pertinent factors. While we consider the
allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future
adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, delinquencies,
or loss rates. Although portions of the allowance have been allocated to various portfolio
segments, the allowance is general in nature and is available for the portfolio in its entirety.
At June 30, 2010, the allowance was $14,227,000, or 4.31% of total loans compared to $10,726,000,
or 3.01%, at December 31, 2009, increasing the allowance $3,501,000 during the first six months of
2010. Non performing loan levels, discussed later, increased $10,000 during the period and net
charge-offs have decreased to $1,908,000 during the first six months of 2010 compared to $5,851,000
during the first six months of 2009. The provision for loan losses remains high as a result of
continued weaknesses in the local economy, elevated amounts of non-performing loans and elevated
charge-off levels over the past three years. Rolling twelve quarter periods of historical charge
off experience is considered when calculating the current required level of the allowance for loan
losses and as prior periods with less loan losses are replaced with periods with higher loan losses
the required level of allowance increases. Additionally the amount of the allowance for loan
losses specifically allocated to impaired loans increased by $2,422,000 during the quarter as a
result of updated collateral evaluations and a migration to the impaired status.
Table 4 below summarizes loan losses and recoveries for the first six months of 2010 and 2009.
During the first six months of 2010, the Corporation experienced net charge-offs of $1,908,000 or .58% of gross loans compared with net charge-offs of $5,851,000 or 1.46% of gross loans in the
first six months of 2009. The provision for loan loss was $5,409,000 in the first six months of
2010 and $9,366,000 for the same time period in 2009. The application of historical loss rates to
the current portfolio has the potential to be a lagging indicator and management evaluates whether
these allocations should be adjusted. While there are indicators that asset quality is improving,
such as a decrease on non-performing loans, management still feels there is enough uncertainty
given the current economic conditions to use these high historical loss rates in estimating the
required level of allowance for loan losses.
30
Table 4 Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
$ |
10,726 |
|
|
$ |
10,455 |
|
|
|
|
Charge-Offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture |
|
|
(2,081 |
) |
|
|
(5,063 |
) |
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(476 |
) |
Installment Loans to Individuals |
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Charge-Offs |
|
|
(2,646 |
) |
|
|
(5,957 |
) |
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Real Estate-Mortgage |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Installment Loans to Individuals |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
Total Recoveries |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-Offs |
|
|
(1,908 |
) |
|
|
(5,851 |
) |
Provision |
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
|
9,366 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
$ |
14,227 |
|
|
$ |
13,970 |
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Net Charge-Offs to Gross Loans |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income increased during the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same
period in 2009. Overall non-interest income, of continuing operations, was $1,558,000 for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $826,000 for the same period in 2009. This represents an
increase of 88.6%. The largest component of increase was in 2009, the Corporation recorded a loss
on equity investment of $874,000, which did not occur in 2010. On a year to date basis,
non-interest income at June 30, 2010 was $2,905,000 compared with $1,965,000 at June 30, 2009; an
increase of 47.8%.
The most significant category of non-interest income is service charges on deposit accounts. These
fees from continuing operations were $403,000 in the second quarter of 2010, compared to $480,000
for the same period of 2009. This represents a decrease of 16.0% from year to year. The decrease is
a result of an 18.5% decrease in NSF charges collected. On a year to date basis, service charges
on deposit accounts, decreased 4.4% to $877,000 at June 30, 2010.
Gain on the sale of mortgage loans originated by the Banks and sold into the secondary market
decreased to $135,000 in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $277,000 in the same period in
2009. As anticipated in 2009, this was a short term rise in mortgage refinance. Management
believes for the remainder of 2010, for this income to remain relatively flat as many governmental
incentives have expired and property values continue to decrease. On a year to date basis, the
gain on the sale of mortgage loans has decreased 55.5% from the first six months of 2009.
Trust, investment and financial planning services income decreased $125,000 or 27.0% in the second
quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease is attributable to
unfavorable changes in market value, which resulted in lower fee income. On a year to date basis,
trust and wealth management income has decreased 12.1% compared to 2009.
Other operating income increased by $127,000 or 26.5% to $607,000 in the second quarter of 2010
compared to $480,000 in the same time period in 2009. On a year to date basis, other operating
income decreased $71,000 or 6.6%. A reduction of other operating income was the 2009 benefit
received by one of the Banks for proceeds from a bank owned life insurance policy totaling
$203,000. This benefit was not received in 2010.
31
Non-Interest Expense
Total non-interest expense from continued operations, decreased 17.7% to $4,370,000 in the three
months ended June 30, 2010, compared with $5,312,000 in the same period of 2009. Decreases in all
categories, which include: salaries and benefits, furniture and equipment depreciation, advertising
expenses, loan and collection expenses related to other real estate owned. For the six month period
ended June 30, 2010, total non-interest expense from continued operations decreased. This decrease
was also in all categories, with the largest decreases in loan and collection expenses, charges
related to other-than-temporary-impairment on a single security and the impairment of held for sale
operations.
Salary and benefit costs, the Corporations largest non-interest expense category, were $2,063,000
in the second quarter of 2010, compared with $2,071,000, or a decrease of 0.4%, for the same time
period in 2009. Staff reductions late in the second quarter of 2010 are reflected in this decrease.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, salary and benefit costs were $4,178,000, compared with
$4,623,000 for the same time period in 2009. This reduction of 9.6% or $445,000 was related to the
elimination of the 401(k) match for retirement benefits.
Occupancy expenses, at $431,000, decreased in the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009 by $16,000 or 3.6%. The decrease in occupancy expenses is related to reductions
in building repairs and maintenance; these decreases were partially offset by increases in property
insurance costs. For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, occupancy expenses were $880,000,
compared to $950,000 for the same time period in 2009. This represents a decrease of 7.4%. For
the six month period ended June 30, 2010, the decrease in occupancy expenses is related to
reductions in building repairs and maintenance, primarily due to lower snow removal costs in 2010.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, furniture and equipment expenses were $386,000
compared to $403,000 for the same period in 2009, a decrease of 4.2%. For the six month period
ended June 30, 2010, furniture and equipment expenses were $757,000 compared to $827,000 for the
same period in 2009. This represents a decrease of 8.5% for the six month period comparison.
Loan and collection expenses, from continuing operations, at $433,000, were down $500,000 or 53.6%
during the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same time period in 2009. The decrease
was related to other loan expense on other real estate owned, in the form of property taxes and
property maintenance decreased loan and collection expenses. For the six month period ended June
30, 2010, loan and collection expenses totaled $990,000 compared to $1,318,000 for the same period
in 2009. This represents a decrease of 24.9%. The decrease during the six month period was also
related to decreases in other real estate owned expenses.
Advertising expenses remained stable for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same
period in 2009. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, advertising expenses were $45,000
compared to $47,000 for the same period in 2009. This is a decrease of 4.3%. The Corporation
continues review the sponsorships and donations shared with the local communities and events. As a
result, we have reduced our advertising in local markets and reduced the level of sponsorships in
community events, while still remaining a participating sponsor. For the six month period ended
June 30, 2010, advertising expenses totaled $73,000, compared to $88,000 for the same time in 2009.
This is a decrease of 17.0%.
Other operating expenses, from continued operations, were $1,012,000 in the three months ended June
30, 2010 compared to $1,211,000 in the same time period in 2009, a decrease of $199,000 or 16.4%.
Increases year over year include increases in our general insurance of $60,000 from second quarter
2009 totals. Partially offsetting these increases were reductions in FDIC assessment, supplies
expense, director fees, ATM/Debit card expenses, business development expenses, and conferences and
education. In the six months ended June 30, 2010, other operating expenses, from continued
operations, were $2,059,000 compared to $2,441,000 in the same time period in 2009, a decrease of
$382,000 or 15.6%. The largest components of this decrease was the 2009 recognition of
other-than-temporary impairment of $200,000 on a single investment.
32
Financial Condition
Proper management of the volume and composition of the Corporations earning assets and funding
sources is essential for ensuring strong and consistent earnings performance, maintaining adequate
liquidity and limiting exposure to risks caused by changing market conditions. The Corporations
securities portfolio is structured to provide a source of liquidity through maturities and to
generate an income stream with relatively low levels of principal risk. The Corporation does not
engage in securities trading. Loans comprise the largest component of earning assets and are the
Corporations highest yielding assets. Customer deposits are the primary source of funding for
earning assets while short-term debt and other sources of funds could be further utilized if market
conditions and liquidity needs change.
The Corporations total assets were $455 million at June 30, 2010 compared to total assets of $522
million at December 31, 2009. This includes assets from discontinued operations of $38 million at
December 31, 2009. Loans comprised 72.5% of total assets at June 30, 2010 compared to 68.1% at
December 31, 2009. Loans shrank $25.1 million during the first six months of 2010. On the liability
side of the balance sheet, the ratio of non-interest bearing deposits to total deposits was 17.0%
at June 30, 2010 and 14.6% at December 31, 2009. Interest bearing deposit liabilities totaled
$341.4 million at June 30, 2010 compared to $376.2 million at December 31, 2009. Total deposits
decreased $29.4 million with non-interest bearing demand deposits increasing $5.4 million and
interest bearing deposits decreasing $34.8 million. Short-term borrowings decreased $154,000 due to
the decrease in treasury tax and loan payments outstanding at the end of the two periods. FHLB
advances decreased $27,000 at June 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009. This was due to the
annual payment on a long-term advance held at one of the Banks.
Non-Performing Assets
Non-performing assets include loans on which interest accruals have ceased, loans past due 90 days
or more and still accruing, loans that have been renegotiated, and real estate acquired through
foreclosure. Table 5 reflects the levels of these assets at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Non-performing assets decreased from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010. The decrease of $2,189,000
was primarily due to decreases in renegotiated loans and REO in redemption. Loans past due 90 days
or more and still accruing increased $1,354,000 from year end and non-accrual loans increased
$154,000. REO in redemption balance is comprised of ten commercial properties and three residential
properties for a total of $2,792,000 at June 30, 2010. Marketability of these properties is
dependent on the real estate market. Renegotiated loans decreased $1,498,000 from December 31, 2009
to a total of $2,324,000 at June 30, 2010.
33
Table 5 Non-Performing Assets and Past Due Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
| |
Non-Performing Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Past Due 90 Days or More & Still Accruing |
|
$ |
1,673 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
Non-Accrual Loans |
|
|
16,661 |
|
|
|
16,507 |
|
Renegotiated Loans |
|
|
2,324 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
| |
Total Non-Performing Loans |
|
|
20,658 |
|
|
|
20,648 |
|
|
|
| |
Other Non-Performing Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Real Estate |
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
7,967 |
|
REO in Redemption |
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
| |
Total Other Non-Performing Assets |
|
|
10,740 |
|
|
|
12,939 |
|
|
|
| |
Total Non-Performing Assets |
|
$ |
31,398 |
|
|
$ |
33,587 |
|
|
|
| |
Non-Performing Loans as a % of Total Loans |
|
|
6.23 |
% |
|
|
5.80 |
% |
Non-Performing Loans as a % of Total Loans and Other Real Estate |
|
|
6.09 |
% |
|
|
5.67 |
% |
Allowance for Loan Losses as a % of Non-Performing Loans |
|
|
68.87 |
% |
|
|
51.95 |
% |
Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More to Total Loans |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
Non-performing Assets as a % of Total Assets |
|
|
6.90 |
% |
|
|
6.43 |
% |
The level and composition of non-performing assets are affected by economic conditions in the
Corporations local markets. Non-performing assets, charge-offs, and provisions for loan losses
tend to decline in a strong economy and increase in a weak economy, potentially impacting the
Corporations operating results. In addition to non-performing loans, management carefully monitors
other credits that are current in terms of principal and interest payments but, in managements
opinion, may deteriorate in quality if economic conditions change.
Certain portions of the Corporations non-performing loans included in Table 5 are considered
impaired. The Corporation measures impairment on all large balance non-accrual commercial loans.
Certain large balance accruing loans rated watch or lower are also measured for impairment.
Impairment losses are believed to be adequately covered by the allowance for loan losses.
The Corporation maintains policies and procedures to identify and monitor non-accrual loans. A
loan is placed on non-accrual status when there is doubt regarding collection of principal or
interest, or when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more. Interest accrued but not
collected is reversed against income for the current quarter when the loan is placed on non-accrual
status.
Liquidity and Interest Rate Risk Management
Asset/Liability management is designed to assure liquidity and reduce interest rate risks. The goal
in managing interest rate risk is to maintain a strong and relatively stable net interest margin.
It is the responsibility of the Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO) to set policy
guidelines and to establish short-term and long-term strategies with respect to interest rate
exposure and liquidity. The ALCO, which is comprised of key members of management, meets regularly
to review financial performance and soundness, including interest rate risk and liquidity exposure
in relation to present and prospective markets, business conditions, and product lines.
Accordingly, the committee adopts funding and balance sheet management strategies that are intended
to maintain earnings, liquidity, and growth rates consistent with policy and prudent business
standards.
34
Liquidity maintenance together with a solid capital base and strong earnings performance are key
objectives of the Corporation. The Corporations liquidity is derived from a strong deposit base
comprised of individual and business deposits. Deposit accounts of customers in the mature market
represent a substantial portion of deposits of individuals. The Banks deposit base plus other
funding sources (short-term borrowings, FHLB advances, other liabilities and shareholders equity)
provided primarily all funding needs in the first six months of 2010. While these sources of funds
are expected to continue to be available to provide funds in the future, the mix and availability
of funds will depend upon future economic conditions.
Primary liquidity is provided through short-term investments or borrowings (including federal funds
sold and purchased) while the securities portfolio provides secondary liquidity. The securities
portfolio has increased $1.2 million since December 31, 2009 due to restructure of the investment
portfolio. Multiple available for sale securities with elevated credit risk were sold and the
proceeds used to purchase mortgage backed instruments with lower credit risk. The Corporation has
re-invested some of the funds, from the call of these securities, back into the securities
portfolio to increase yield and manage the asset ratios on the balance sheet. The Corporation
regularly monitors liquidity to ensure adequate cash flows to cover unanticipated reductions in the
availability of funding sources.
Interest rate risk is managed by controlling and limiting the level of earnings volatility arising
from rate movements. The Corporation regularly performs reviews and analysis of those factors
impacting interest rate risk. Factors include maturity and re-pricing frequency of balance sheet
components, impact of rate changes on interest margin and prepayment speeds, market value impacts
of rate changes, and other issues. Both actual and projected performance are reviewed, analyzed,
and compared to policy and objectives to assure present and future financial viability.
The Corporation used cash in financing activities resulting primarily from the decrease of
deposits. In the first six months of 2010 deposits decreased $29,391,000. Cash provided by
investing activities was $24,445,000 in first six months of 2010 compared to cash provided of
$22,049,000 in first six months of 2009. The change in investing activities was due maturities of
available for sale securities totaling $5,577,000, calls on available for sale securities totaling
$3,500,000 and sales of available for sale securities totaling $7,105,000. Those proceeds were
utilized in the purchase of $17,156,000 of available for sale securities. These transactions
reduced credit risk within the investment portfolio, while slightly improving yield. In addition,
payments of loans totaled $20,907,000 of the cash provided by investing activities.
Capital Resources
Management closely monitors capital levels to provide for current and future business needs and to
comply with regulatory requirements. Regulations prescribed under the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 have defined adequately capitalized institutions as those
having total risk-based ratios, tier 1 risk-based capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratios of at
least 8%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. At June 30, 2010, the Corporation and subsidiary Banks were in
excess of the minimum capital and leverage requirements as defined by federal law; however The
State Bank and West Michigan Community Bank were not in compliance with the capital requirements
prescribed by their respective Consent Orders.
Total shareholders equity decreased 12.8% to $17,895,000 at June 30, 2010 compared with
$20,532,000 at December 31, 2009. The decline was due to a net loss in the first six months of
2010, partially offset by improvements to other comprehensive income as noted below. The
Corporations equity to asset ratio was 3.9% at June 30, 2010 and 3.9% at December 31, 2009.
As indicated on the balance sheet at December 31, 2009, the Corporation had an accumulated other
comprehensive loss of $724,000 compared to accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30, 2010 of
$159,000. The decrease in the loss position is attributable to a combination of the fluctuation of
the
35
market price of securities held in the available for sale portfolio as well as restructuring of the
investment portfolio composition.
Regulatory Orders
In December 2009, The State Bank entered into a formal enforcement action with federal and state
banking regulators that contain provisions to foster improvement in The State Banks earnings,
lower nonperforming loan levels, increase capital, and require revisions to various policies.
The stipulation and consent to the issuance of a consent order (the Stipulation and Consent)
among The State Bank, the FDIC and the Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation
(OFIR) contains several provisions which pertain to The State Banks asset quality.
Specifically, The State Bank is required to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses and to
adopt a plan to reduce The State Banks risk position in each asset in excess of $500,000 which was
then classified as substandard or doubtful. In addition, while the Stipulation and Consent is in
effect, The State Bank may not extend additional credit to any borrower who is already obligated on
any extension of credit that has been charged-off so long as the credit remains uncollected.
Likewise, The State Bank may not extend any additional credit to any borrower whose loan has been
classified as substandard or doubtful and is uncollected, unless The State Banks board of
directors has adopted a plan giving the reasons why such extension of credit is in its best
interest.
The Stipulation and Consent also requires The State Bank to implement or improve certain plans.
Specifically, The State Bank must implement a plan and budget for 2010 and 2011 to improve The
State Banks overall earnings. The State Bank must also adopt a written contingency funding plan
identifying sources of liquid assets to meet contingency funding needs over the near term.
With respect to capital and management generally, The State Bank is required to have and maintain
its level of Tier 1 capital as a percentage of its total assets at a minimum of 8%, its total
capital to total risk-adjusted assets as a minimum of 12%, and not pay or declare any dividends
without the prior consent of the FDIC and the OFIR. The State Bank must also retain qualified
management and obtain approval of the FDIC and the OFIR of any changes in The State Banks
directors or senior executive officers. The capital position of The State Bank improved from its
December 31, 2009 position due to the injection of $1,900,000 from the sale of Davison State Bank
at April 30, 2010. Other improvements to capital ratios at The State Bank are a result of the
ongoing strategy to reduce the size of the institution.
A substantially similar formal enforcement action was entered into among West Michigan Community
Bank and its regulators in February 2009. The banks have begun addressing substantially all of the
requirements of the respective enforcement actions. As of June 30, 2010, the Banks have made
progress in addressing several of the Consent Order stipulations. Non-performing assets have
decreased $2,189,000. The change in non-performing assets consists of a decrease of $2,199,000 in
other non-performing assets and an increase of $10,000 in non-performing loans since December 31,
2009. Concentrations of construction and land development loans have decreased $8,700,000 or 33.2%
since December 31, 2009. As a result, these favorable changes have lead to a stabilization of the
net interest margin. Net interest margin has improved .24% from December 31, 2001 to 3.66% at June
30, 2010.
The Corporations primary source of cash to service its subordinated debt is dividends from the
subsidiary banks. As the subsidiary banks are working to preserve capital and not upstream
dividends to the Holding Company, the Corporation has elected to defer interest payments for five
years on $14,000,000 of subordinated debentures. The reason for the interest deferral is to
maintain liquidity at the Holding Company. The Corporation is not in default under either of the
indentures. During this five year period, the Corporation is precluded from paying dividends on
its outstanding common stock. The Corporation subsequently may give notice that it elects to
shorten the deferral period, pay accrued interest and return to the normal course of dividend
payments.
36
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Managements Discussion and Analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based
on the Corporations consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible
to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan
losses, income taxes, other real estate owned, and investment securities valuation. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level we believe is adequate to absorb probable
losses identified and inherent in the loan portfolio. Our evaluation of the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses is an estimate based on reviews of individual loans, assessments of the
impact of current and anticipated economic conditions on the portfolio, and historical loss
experience. The allowance for loan losses represents managements best estimate, but significant
downturns in circumstances relating to loan quality or economic conditions could result in a
requirement for an increased allowance for loan losses in the near future. Likewise, an upturn in
loan quality or improved economic conditions may result in a decline in the required allowance for
loan losses. In either instance unanticipated changes could have a significant impact on operating
earnings.
The allowance for loan losses is increased through a provision charged to operating expense.
Uncollectible loans are charged-off through the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries of loans
previously charged-off are added to the allowance for loan losses. A loan is considered impaired
when it is probable that contractual interest and principal payments will not be collected either
for the amounts or by the dates as scheduled in the loan agreement.
Our accounting for income taxes involves the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities
primarily associated with differences in the timing of the recognition of revenues and expenses for
financial reporting and tax purposes. A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is
required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such
assets will not be realized. Management has reviewed the deferred tax position for the Corporation
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation
recognized a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets may be
reversed to income in future periods to the extent that the related deferred income tax assets are
realized or the valuation allowance is otherwise no longer required. Management will continue to
monitor our deferred tax assets quarterly for changes affecting their realizability.
Other Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Assets are acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure.
They are initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired, establishing
a new cost basis. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense.
Costs after acquisition are expensed.
The Corporation evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. In
determining other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) management considers many factors, including:
(1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the
financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was
affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt
security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated
recovery. The assessment of whether other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of
subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in
time.
37
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Some financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, letters of credit, and
overdraft protection, are issued to meet customer financing needs. These are agreements to provide
credit or to support the credit of others, as long as conditions established in the contract are
met, and usually have expiration dates. Commitments may expire without being used.
Off-balance-sheet risk to credit loss exists up to the face amount of these instruments, although
material losses are not anticipated. The same credit policies are used to make such commitments as
are used for loans, including obtaining collateral at exercise of the commitment.
The contractual amount of financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk was as follows at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Commitments to make loans (at market rates) |
|
$ |
5,812 |
|
|
$ |
2,939 |
|
Unused lines of credit and letters of credit |
|
|
44,659 |
|
|
|
53,941 |
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information concerning quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk contained on
page 61 in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, is
incorporated herein by reference.
Fentura Financial, Inc. faces market risk to the extent that both earnings and the fair value of
its financial instruments are affected by changes in interest rates. The Corporation manages this
risk with static GAP analysis and simulation modeling. For the first six months of 2010, the
results of these measurement techniques were within the Corporations policy guidelines. The
Corporation does not believe that there has been a material change in the nature of the
Corporations primary market risk exposures, including the categories of market risk to which the
Corporation is exposed and the particular markets that present the primary risk of loss to the
Corporation, or in how those exposures have been managed in 2010 compared to 2009.
The Corporations market risk exposure is mainly comprised of its vulnerability to interest rate
risk. Prevailing interest rates and interest rate relationships in the future will be primarily
determined by market factors, which are outside of the Corporations control. All information
provided in this section consists of forward-looking statements. Reference is made to the section
captioned Forward Looking Statements in this quarterly report for a discussion of the limitations
on the Corporations responsibility for such statements.
Interest Rate Sensitivity Management
Interest rate sensitivity management seeks to maximize net interest income as a result of changing
interest rates, within prudent ranges of risk. The Corporation attempts to accomplish this
objective by structuring the balance sheet so that re-pricing opportunities exist for both assets
and liabilities in roughly equivalent amounts at approximately the same time intervals. Imbalances
in these re-pricing opportunities at any point in time constitute a banks interest rate
sensitivity. The Corporation currently does not utilize derivatives in managing interest rate risk.
An indicator of the interest rate sensitivity structure of a financial institutions balance sheet
is the difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities, and is referred to
as GAP. Table 5 sets forth the distribution of re-pricing of the Corporations earning assets and
interest bearing liabilities as of June 30, 2010, the interest rate sensitivity GAP, as defined
above, the cumulative interest rate sensitivity GAP, the interest rate sensitivity GAP ratio (i.e.
interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate sensitive liabilities) and the cumulative
sensitivity GAP ratio. The table also sets forth the time
38
periods in which earning assets and liabilities will mature or may re-price in accordance with
their contractual terms.
Table 6 GAP Analysis June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
Three |
|
|
One to |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Months to |
|
|
Five |
|
|
Five |
|
|
|
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Months |
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Total |
|
Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds Sold |
|
$ |
28,050 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
28,050 |
|
Securities |
|
|
5,815 |
|
|
|
13,314 |
|
|
|
11,961 |
|
|
|
19,211 |
|
|
|
50,301 |
|
Loans |
|
|
76,065 |
|
|
|
59,985 |
|
|
|
152,187 |
|
|
|
42,045 |
|
|
|
330,282 |
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
FHLB Stock |
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
Total Earning Assets |
|
$ |
113,089 |
|
|
$ |
73,299 |
|
|
$ |
164,148 |
|
|
$ |
61,256 |
|
|
$ |
411,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Demand Deposits |
|
$ |
80,878 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
80,878 |
|
Savings Deposits |
|
|
74,869 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
74,869 |
|
Time Deposits Less than $100,000 |
|
|
19,831 |
|
|
|
42,325 |
|
|
|
34,726 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
96,980 |
|
Time Deposits Greater than $100,000 |
|
|
6,766 |
|
|
|
42,385 |
|
|
|
39,551 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
88,702 |
|
Short term borrowings |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other Borrowings |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
5,030 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
7,954 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities |
|
$ |
198,354 |
|
|
$ |
89,740 |
|
|
$ |
74,425 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
363,393 |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity GAP |
|
$ |
(85,265 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,441 |
) |
|
$ |
89,723 |
|
|
$ |
60,382 |
|
|
$ |
48,399 |
|
Cumulative Interest Rate
Sensitivity GAP |
|
$ |
(85,265 |
) |
|
$ |
(101,706 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,983 |
) |
|
$ |
48,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity GAP |
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
|
|
|
70.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Interest Rate
Sensitivity GAP Ratio |
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
As indicated in Table 6, the short-term (one year and less) cumulative interest rate
sensitivity gap is negative. Accordingly, if market interest rates increase, this negative gap
position could have a short-term negative impact on interest margin. Conversely, if market rates
decline this should theoretically have a short-term positive impact. However, gap analysis is
limited and may not provide an accurate indication of the impact of general interest rate movements
on the net interest margin since the re-pricing of various categories of assets and liabilities is
subject to the Corporations needs, competitive pressures, and the needs of the Corporations
customers. In addition, various assets and liabilities indicated as re-pricing within the same
period may in fact re-price at different times within such period and at different rate indices.
The Prime Rate has remained steady over the past twelve months. This steadiness allowed management
to close the gap related to interest rate sensitivity. Management was able to reduce liquid
interest bearing liability rates to extremely low rates, while maintaining relatively similar
volumes. The Banks were also able to re-price maturing time deposits, usually in a downward fashion
as longer term certificates at higher rates matured during the year. On the asset side of the
balance sheet, rates on the investment portfolios remained relatively steady, however the yields on
loans decreased slightly. Management worked to re-price loans favorably as they renewed and were
priced accordingly for risk, however overall loan yields decreased. This was due to increases in
non-performing loans. The Corporation expects to continue to make strides in managing interest rate
sensitivity.
Forward Looking Statements
This report includes forward-looking statements as that term is used in the securities laws. All
statements regarding our expected financial position, business and strategies are forward-looking
statements. In addition, the words anticipates, believes, estimates, seeks, expects,
plans, intends, and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are intended
to identify
39
forward-looking statements. The presentation and discussion of the provision and allowance for loan
losses and statements concerning future profitability or future growth or increases, are examples
of inherently forward looking statements in that they involve judgments and statements of belief as
to the outcome of future events. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future
plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on
our operations and our future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in: interest
rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of
the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the
quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit
flows, competition, demand for financial services in our market area and accounting principles,
policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating
forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further
information concerning us and our business, including additional factors that could materially
affect our financial results, is included in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ITEM 4T: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Corporations Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Corporations
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, have concluded that
the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure
that material information relating to the Corporation would be made known to them by others
within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this Form 10-Q was being
prepared. |
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Controls. During the period covered by this report, there have
been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting that have
materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting. |
40
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. - None
Item 1A. Risk Factors This item is not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. None
Item 4. [Reserved]
Item 5. Other Information. None
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits
|
10.1 |
|
Stock purchase agreement for sale of West Michigan Community
Bank dated April 27, 2010 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on May
3, 2010). |
|
31.1 |
|
Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura
Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Fentura
Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura
Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
41
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fentura Financial, Inc.
|
|
Dated: August 13, 2010 |
/s/Donald L. Grill
|
|
|
Donald L. Grill |
|
|
President & CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 13, 2010 |
/s/Douglas J. Kelley
|
|
|
Douglas J. Kelley |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
42
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
Stock purchase agreement for sale of West Michigan Community Bank dated April 27, 2010
(incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2010). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant
to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
43