e10vkza
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 000-1158172
COMSCORE, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
54-1955550 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
11950 Democracy Drive, Suite 600
Reston, Virginia 20190
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(703) 438-2000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class:
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on which Registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2009, the last business day of the registrants most
recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $283.9 million (based on the closing sales price of
the registrants common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Market on that date). Shares of the
registrants common stock held by each officer and director and each person who owns more than 10%
or more of the outstanding common stock of the registrant have been excluded in that such persons
may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a
conclusive determination for other purposes.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock,
as of the latest practicable date: As of April 26, 2010, there were 30,996,337 shares of the
registrants common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
Explanatory Note
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this Amendment) amends comScore, Incs Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC, on March 12, 2010 (the Original Filing). We are amending and refiling Part
III to include information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 because our definitive proxy
statement will not be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2009, the end of the fiscal year
covered by our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, reference to our proxy statement on the
cover page has been deleted.
In addition, pursuant to the rules of the SEC, we have also included as exhibits currently
dated certifications required under Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Because no
financial statements are contained within this Amendment, we are not including certifications
pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We are amending and refiling Part IV to
reflect the inclusion of those certifications.
Except as described above, no other changes have been made to the Original Filing. Except as
otherwise indicated herein, this Amendment continues to speak as of the date of the Original
Filing, and we have not updated the disclosures contained therein to reflect any events that
occurred subsequent to the date of the Original Filing. The filing of this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A is not a representation that any statements contained in items of our Annual Report on Form
10-K other than Part III, Items 10 through 14, and Part IV are true or complete as of any date
subsequent to the Original Filing.
COMSCORE, INC.
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K/A
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
PART III
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the names and ages of our executive officers and directors as
of April 28, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D.
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Gian M. Fulgoni
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Kenneth J. Tarpey
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Gregory T. Dale
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
Christiana L. Lin
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Chief Privacy Officer |
Jeffrey Ganek(1)
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Director |
Bruce Golden(2)
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Director |
William J. Henderson(1)(3)
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Director |
William Katz(2)(3)
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Director |
Ronald J. Korn(1)
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Director |
Jarl Mohn(2)(3)
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Member of audit committee |
|
(2) |
|
Member of nominating and governance committee |
|
(3) |
|
Member of compensation committee |
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D., one of our co-founders, has served as our President, Chief
Executive Officer and as a Director since September 1999. In 1995, Dr. Abraham founded Paragren
Technologies, Inc., which specialized in delivering large scale Customer Relationship Marketing
systems for strategic and target marketing, and served as its Chief Executive Officer from 1995 to
1999. Prior to founding Paragren, Dr. Abraham was employed by Information Resources, Inc. from 1985
until 1995, where he was President and Chief Operating Officer from 1993 to 1994 and later Vice
Chairman of the Board of Directors from 1994 until 1995. Since January 2008, Dr. Abraham has also
been a member of the board of directors of Milo.com, a startup company. He received a Ph.D. in
Operations Research and an M.B.A. from MIT. He also holds an Engineering degree from the École
Polytechnique in France.
Gian M. Fulgoni, one of our co-founders, has served as our Executive Chairman of the Board of
Directors since September 1999. Prior to co-founding comScore, Mr. Fulgoni was employed by
Information Resources, Inc., where he served as President from 1981 to 1989, Chief Executive
Officer from 1986 to 1998 and Chairman of the Board of Directors from 1991 until 1995. Mr. Fulgoni
has served on the board of directors of PetMed Express, Inc. since 2002 and previously served from
August 1999 through November 2000. Mr. Fulgoni has also served on the board of directors of Inxpo,
Inc., an Illinois-based provider of virtual events, since July 2005 and the Advertising Research
Foundation, an industry research organization, since 2008. He also served on the board of directors
of Platinum Technology, Inc. from 1990 to 1999, U.S. Robotics, Inc. from 1991 to 1994, and
Yesmail.com, Inc. from 1999 to 2000. Educated in the United Kingdom, Mr. Fulgoni holds an M.A. in
Marketing from the University of Lancaster and a B.Sc. in Physics from the University of
Manchester.
Kenneth J. Tarpey has served as our Chief Financial Officer since April 20, 2009. Prior to
joining comScore, Mr. Tarpey was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Operating Officer of Objectvideo, Inc., a Reston, Virginia-based provider of video surveillance
software, from 2003 until April 2009. From 2002 until 2003, Mr. Tarpey was Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Ai Metrix, Inc., a Herndon, Virginia-based provider of
network optimization software. From 1997 until 2001, Mr. Tarpey was Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Proxicom, a NASDAQ-listed Internet business consulting and development
company. Mr. Tarpey holds an M.B.A. from Babson College and a B.A. from College of the Holy Cross.
Gregory T. Dale has served as our Chief Operating Officer since August 2009. Prior to that, he
served as our Vice President, Product Management from September 1999 until October 2000 and as our
Chief Technology Officer from October 2000 until August 2009. Prior to joining us, he served as
Vice President of Client Service at Paragren
4
Technologies, Inc., a company that specialized in enterprise relationship marketing. He holds
a B.S. in Industrial Management from Purdue University.
Christiana L. Lin has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief
Privacy Officer since August 2009. Prior to that, she served as our Deputy General Counsel from
February 2001 until March 2003, as our Corporate Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer from March 2003
until January 2006 and as our General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer from January 2006 until
August 2009. Ms. Lin holds a J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center and a B.A. in Political
Science from Yale University.
Jeffrey Ganek has served as a director since May 2008. Since December 1999, Mr. Ganek has
also served as chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer of NeuStar, Inc.
From December 1995 to December 1999, Mr. Ganek was Senior Vice President and Managing Director of
Communications Industry Services at Lockheed Martin, an advanced technology company. The
Communications Industry Services group of Lockheed Martin was acquired from Lockheed Martin in 1999
to form NeuStar, which provides clearinghouse services to the telecommunications industry. From
1993 to 1995, he was Vice President Asia Operations for Global TeleSystems Group, a
communications service provider in Europe and Asia. From 1991 to 1993, Mr. Ganek was Vice
President of Marketing at GTE Spacenet, a satellite communications service provider. From 1985 to
1991, he was Director of Marketing and Corporate Development at MCI Communications Corporation, a
telecommunications company. From 1976 to 1985, he held management positions at AT&T, a
telecommunications company, in Corporate Development, Marketing and Finance. Mr. Ganek holds an
M.S. in Public Policy and Management and a B.S. in Economics from Carnegie-Mellon University.
Bruce Golden has served as a director since June 2002. He is a partner at Accel Partners,
which he joined in 1997. Mr. Golden has led a number of investments in enterprise software and
Internet-related companies while at Accel and currently serves as a member of the boards of
directors of several private companies. Mr. Golden holds an M.B.A. from Stanford University and a
B.A. from Columbia University..
William J. Henderson has served as a director since August 2001. Mr. Henderson was the 71st
Postmaster General of the United States. He served in that position from May 1998 until his
retirement in May 2001. Mr. Henderson also served as the Chief Operations Officer of Netflix, Inc.
from January 2006 until February 2007. Mr. Henderson also currently serves on the board of
directors of Acxiom Corporation, where he has been a director since June 2001. Mr. Henderson holds
a B.S. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and served in the U.S. Army.
William Katz has served as a director since June 2008. Since June 2004, Mr. Katz has also
served as the chairman of the board of directors of Visible World Inc., a privately-held multimedia
marketing services provider. From 1996 to 2004, Mr. Katz served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of BBDO New York, the flagship office of BBDO Worldwide, the worlds third largest global
agency network. Mr. Katz holds a B.A. in Business and Psychology from American University.
Ronald J. Korn has served as a director since November 2005. Since 1991, he has served as the
President of Ronald Korn Consulting, which provides business and marketing services. Mr. Korn
served as a director, chairman of the audit committee, and member of the loan committee of Equinox
Financial Corporation from 1999 until its acquisition in October 2005. Since 2002, he has served
as a director, chairman of the audit committee and a member of the compensation and nominating and
governance committees of PetMed Express, Inc., and since July 2003, he has served as a director,
chairman of the audit committee and a member of the compensation committee of Ocwen Financial
Corporation. Prior to that, Mr. Korn was a partner and employee of KPMG, LLP, from 1961 to 1991,
where he was the managing partner of KPMGs Miami office from 1985 until 1991. Mr. Korn holds a
B.S. from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania and a J.D. from New York
University Law School.
Jarl Mohn, also known as Lee Masters from his radio career, has served as a director
since June 2008. Mr. Mohn has also served on the board of directors of Scripps Network Interactive
since June 2008. From December 2003 until July 2008, Mr. Mohn served on the board of directors of
CNET Networks, Inc., where he also served as non-executive chairman from October 2006 to July 2008.
Mr. Mohn also previously served on the boards of directors of XM Satellite Radio, Inc. from May
2004 to July 2008 and the E.W. Scripps Company from 2002 until 2008. Mr. Mohn was the founding
President of Liberty Digital Inc., a publicly traded subsidiary of Liberty Media Group involved in
interactive television, cable television networks and Internet enterprises, and served as its Chief
Executive Officer from June 1999 to March 2002. Prior to founding Liberty Digital, he was
President and Chief Executive Officer of E!
5
Entertainment Television. From 1986 to 1989, Mr. Mohn was Executive Vice President and
General Manager of MTV and VH1. His professional career also includes twenty years in radio. Mr.
Mohn attended Temple University, where he studied Mathematics and Philosophy.
We believe that our board of directors represents a desirable mix of backgrounds, skills, and
experiences, and they all share the personal attributes of effective directors described above.
Below are some of the specific experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills in addition to the
biographical information provided above that led to the conclusion that each person should serve as
one of our directors in light of our business and structure:
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D., is one of our co-founders, president, chief executive officer and a
director. Dr. Abraham has over ten years of experience with our business in a variety of roles
including research and development, sales and marketing and corporate administration, since its
inception. In addition, Dr. Abraham brings his experience as a founder and senior executive of
previous successful market-research based companies. Dr. Abraham has a deep understanding of all
aspects of our business. He also has significant corporate governance experience through service on
other company boards and as an executive with other companies, and he has an extensive educational
background.
Gian M. Fulgoni, is one of our co-founders, executive chairman and a director. Mr. Fulgoni has
over ten years of experience with our business in a variety of roles including research and
development, sales and marketing and corporate administration, since its inception. In addition,
Mr. Fulgoni brings his experience as a founder and senior executive of previous successful
market-research based companies. Mr. Fulgoni has a deep understanding of all aspects of our
business. He also has significant corporate governance experience through service on other public
company boards and as an executive with other companies, and he has an extensive educational
background.
Jeffrey Ganek has served as an executive or a member of the board of directors of several
large technology and telecom companies. Mr. Ganek has substantial experience with research and
development, sales and marketing and corporate administration of technology companies. He also has
significant corporate governance experience through his service on other company boards and as an
executive with other companies, and he has an extensive educational background.
Bruce Golden has served as a member of the board of directors of several high technology and
internet companies through his role as a venture capitalist. Mr. Golden has substantial experience
with advising on the strategic development of technology companies. He also has significant
corporate governance experience through his service on other company boards, and he has an
extensive educational background.
William J. Henderson has served as an executive or a member of the board of directors of
several large technology, data aggregation and multimedia companies. Mr. Henderson has substantial
experience marketing and the corporate administration of large businesses. He also has significant
corporate governance experience through his service on other company boards, and he has an
extensive educational background.
William Katz has also served as an executive of or a member of the board of directors of
several marketing and advertising companies. Mr. Katz has extensive experience in those
industries, as well as with corporate governance through his service on other boards of directors.
Ronald J. Korn has served as an executive or a member of the board of directors of several
large public companies. Mr. Korn has substantial experience as a public accountant, and he has
sufficient background to qualify as our audit committee financial expert. He also has significant
corporate governance experience through his service on other company boards, and he has an
extensive educational background.
Jarl Mohn has also served as an executive of or a member of the board of directors of several
multimedia companies. Mr. Katz has extensive experience in that industry, as well as with
corporate governance through his service on other boards of directors.
6
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires that certain of our
executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our
equity securities, file reports of ownership and changes in ownership (Forms 3, 4 and 5) with the
SEC. Such executive officers, directors and greater than 10% holders are required to furnish us
with copies of all of these forms that they file. Certain employees of our company hold a power of
attorney to enable such individuals to file ownership and change in ownership forms on behalf of
certain of our executive officers and directors.
Based solely on our review of these reports or written representations from certain reporting
persons, we believe that during 2009, all filing requirements applicable to our officers,
directors, greater-than-10% beneficial owners and other persons subject to Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, were met, except that the following reports, although
filed, were not filed timely:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Filer |
|
Form |
|
Date Filed |
|
Description |
Magid M. Abraham |
|
4/A |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
Amendment to correct clerical error in filing on February 19, 2009 regarding calculation of the number of shares subject to repurchase by us. |
|
|
4/A |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
Amendment to correct clerical error in filing on March 27, 2009 regarding total beneficial ownership of shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Dale |
|
4/A |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
Amendment to correct clerical error in filing on February 19, 2009 regarding calculation of the number of shares subject to repurchase by us. |
|
|
4/A |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
Amendment to correct clerical error in filing on March 27, 2009 regarding beneficial ownership of shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gian M. Fulgoni |
|
4/A |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
Amendment to correct clerical error in filing on February 19, 2009 regarding calculation of the number of shares subject to repurchase by us. |
|
|
4/A |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
Amendment to correct clerical error in filing on March 27, 2009 regarding beneficial ownership of shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Ganek |
|
4 |
|
August 4, 2009 |
|
Late filing for grant of restricted stock on July 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Golden |
|
4 |
|
August 4, 2009 |
|
Late filing for grant of restricted stock on July 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Green |
|
4/A |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
Amendment to correct clerical error in filing on February 19, 2009 regarding calculation of the number of shares subject to repurchase by us. |
|
|
4/A |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
Amendment to correct clerical error in filing on March 27, 2009 regarding beneficial ownership of shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Henderson |
|
4 |
|
August 4, 2009 |
|
Late filing for grant of restricted stock on July 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Katz |
|
4 |
|
August 4, 2009 |
|
Late filing for grant of restricted stock on July 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald J. Korn |
|
4 |
|
August 4, 2009 |
|
Late filing for grant of restricted stock on July 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christiana L. Lin |
|
4/A |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
Amendment to correct clerical error in filing on February 19, 2009 regarding calculation of the number of shares subject to repurchase by us. |
|
|
4/A |
|
April 15, 2009 |
|
Amendment to correct clerical error in filing on March 27, 2009 regarding beneficial ownership of shares. |
|
|
4 |
|
May 6, 2009 |
|
Late filing for grant of restricted stock on May 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jarl Mohn |
|
4 |
|
August 4, 2009 |
|
Late filing for grant of restricted stock on July 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Tarpey |
|
4 |
|
May 6, 2009 |
|
Late filing for grant of restricted stock on May 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all directors and
employees of the company, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer
and principal accounting officer or controller. The full text of our Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics is posted under the Investor Relations section on our website at http://www.comscore.com.
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend
nominees to our board of directors since those procedures were described in our proxy statement for
our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
We have a separately-designated audit committee of our board of directors established in
accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
7
The audit committee of our board of directors recommends the appointment of our independent
registered public accountant, reviews our internal accounting procedures and financial statements,
and consults with and reviews the services provided by our independent registered public
accountant, including the results and scope of their audit. The audit committee met twelve times
(including telephonic meetings) during 2009.
The audit committee is currently comprised of Ronald J. Korn (chair), William J. Henderson and
Jeffrey Ganek, each of whom is independent within the meaning of the requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and applicable SEC and NASDAQ rules. Ronald J. Korn is chairman of our
audit committee as well as our audit committee financial expert, as currently defined under the SEC
rules implementing the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We believe that the composition and functioning
of our audit committee complies with all applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
The NASDAQ Global Market, and SEC rules and regulations.
The audit committee operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors, a copy
of which is available under the Investor Relations section of our website,
http://www.comscore.com.
|
|
|
ITEM 11. |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following discussion and analysis of our compensation arrangements with our named
executive officers should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set
forth elsewhere in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Our named executive
officers for the year ended December 31, 2009 are Magid M. Abraham, Kenneth J. Tarpey, John M.
Green, Gian M. Fulgoni, Gregory T. Dale and Christiana L. Lin. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans and expectations regarding future
compensation programs. Actual compensation programs that we adopt may differ materially from
currently planned programs as summarized in this discussion.
Our Philosophy
The objective of our compensation programs for employees is to attract and retain top talent.
Our compensation plans are designed to motivate and reward employees for achievement of positive
business results and also to promote and enforce accountability. In determining the compensation
arrangement of our named executive officers, we are guided by the following key principles:
|
|
|
Attract and Retain Top Talent. Our compensation arrangements should be sufficient
to allow us to attract, retain and motivate named executive officers with the necessary
skills and talent to successfully manage our business. In order to attract, motivate
and retain such executives, we seek to compensate our named executive officers at
levels of at least the 50th percentile of our identified peer group, with
opportunities to reward stronger performers at levels as much as the 75th
percentile of that peer group. |
|
|
|
|
Promote Business Performance Accountability. Compensation should be tied, in part,
to the performance of the portion of the business for which a named executive officer
is responsible and how that named executive officers business unit or area performs
and contributes to the overall financial performance of our business. |
|
|
|
|
Promote Individual Performance Accountability. Compensation should be tied, in
part, to the individual named executive officers performance to encourage and reflect
individual contributions to our performance. |
|
|
|
|
Align Stockholder Interests. Compensation should be tied, in part, to our financial
performance through equity awards, which help to align our named executive officers
interests with those of our stockholders. |
Application of our Philosophy
We believe that our executive compensation and benefit program balances short-term and
long-term components, cash and equity elements, and fixed and contingent payments. We apply our
compensation philosophy using both quantitative and qualitative standards to incentivize our named
executive officers and reward them for achieving the following goals:
8
|
|
|
develop a culture that embodies a passion for our business and a drive to achieve
and exceed established goals and objectives; |
|
|
|
|
provide leadership to the organization in such a way as to maximize the results of
our business operations; |
|
|
|
|
lead us by demonstrating forward thinking in the operation, development and
expansion of our business; and |
|
|
|
|
effectively manage organizational resources to derive the greatest value possible
from each dollar invested. |
Our executive compensation structure aims not only to compensate top talent at levels that we
believe are at the 50th percentile or greater of an identified peer group, but also to
be fair relative to compensation paid to other professionals within our organization, relative to
our short- and long-term performance results and relative to the value we deliver to our
stockholders. We seek to maintain a performance-oriented culture with a compensation approach that
rewards our executive officers when we achieve and exceed our goals and objectives, while putting
at risk an appropriate portion of their compensation against the possibility that our goals and
objectives may not be achieved. Our board of directors considers both qualitative and quantitative
factors as measures of individual performance and weights these factors as appropriate in assessing
a particular individuals performance. Overall, our approach is designed to relate the
compensation of our named executive officers to the following: the achievement of short- and
long-term goals and objectives; their willingness to challenge and improve existing policies and
structures; and their capability to take advantage of unique opportunities and overcome difficult
challenges within our business.
Role of Our Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee approves, administers and interprets our executive compensation and
benefit policies, including our 1999 Stock Plan, our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and our
compensation, incentives and benefits programs. Our compensation committee is appointed by our
board of directors, and consists entirely of directors who are outside directors for purposes of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, non-employee directors for purposes of Rule 16b-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and independent directors under the
listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Our compensation committee is comprised of Messrs.
Henderson, Katz and Mohn, and is chaired by Mr. Henderson.
Our compensation committee reviews and approves our executive compensation and benefit program
to ensure that it is consistent with our compensation philosophy and corporate governance
guidelines. Our compensation committee also is responsible for establishing the executive
compensation packages offered to our named executive officers.
Our compensation committee has taken the following steps to ensure that our executive
compensation and benefit program is consistent with both our compensation philosophy and our
corporate governance guidelines:
|
|
|
regularly reviewed the performance of and the total compensation earned by or
awarded to our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman independent of input from
them; |
|
|
|
|
examined on an annual basis the performance of our other named executive officers
and other key employees with assistance from our Chief Executive Officer and Executive
Chairman and approved compensation packages that are believed to be consistent with or
more attractive than those generally found in the executives marketplace; |
|
|
|
|
regularly held executive sessions of compensation committee meetings without
management present; and |
|
|
|
|
engaged outside compensation consultants to review our executive compensation
practices and provide comparison to other opportunities in the marketplaces for our
named executive officers in connection with setting compensation for our 2009 bonus
target levels and 2009 fiscal year base salaries and equity-award levels. |
9
Utilization of Outside Compensation Consultants
Prior to our initial public offering in 2007, our compensation committee had not previously
conducted formal surveys or analyses of compensation levels in various marketplaces or engaged
compensation consultants to do so on our behalf. However, beginning in mid-2007, in addition to
utilizing the collective experience and knowledge of our board of directors and executive
management, as well as informal reviews of compensation information gained through marketplace
contacts and service providers, our compensation committee selected and directly engaged the
services of an independent executive compensation consulting firm, Towers Perrin. No member of the
compensation committee or any named executive officer had any affiliation with Towers Perrin.
Towers Perrin had not performed any other work for us, and it has reported directly to the chairman
of the compensation committee.
In July 2009, our compensation committee selected and directly engaged the services of a new
independent executive compensation consulting firm, Compensia. The committee selected Compensia
because Compensias primary focus is on technology companies and because of its familiarity and
experience in advising the compensation committees for the boards of directors of technology
companies. No member of the compensation committee or any named executive officer has any
affiliation with Compensia. Compensia has not performed any other work for us, and it has reported
directly to the chairman of the compensation committee. Compensia is engaged to conduct an annual
compensation study for the compensation committee of our board of directors, including without
limitation, selection of a peer group, reporting on our compensation as compared to our peers, and
providing recommendations to the compensation committee on adjustments to our compensation plans
and approaches to support our compensation philosophy.
Fees of the Compensation Committee Consultants
The aggregate fees billed by Towers Perrin and Compensia for 2009 to provide advice or
recommendations on the amount or form of executive and director compensation did not exceed
$120,000 individually or in the aggregate. Neither Towers Perrin nor Compensia provided additional
services to us or our affiliates during 2009
Approval of Compensation Consultant Services
Our compensation committee directly approved Towers Perrin as its compensation consultant
until its subsequent engagement of Compensia in 2009. In 2007, our management screened and
recommended several firms, including Towers Perrin, to serve as the compensation consultant to our
compensation committee. Following this process, our compensation committee determined that it would
engage Towers Perrin. Our compensation committee also approved the fee schedule for executive
compensation consulting fees.
In 2009, our board of directors and our management sought to engage a compensation consultant
with strong experience with technology companies at similar stages of growth as our company. In
2009, our General Counsel screened and recommended several firms, including Compensia, to serve as
the compensation consultant to our compensation committee. The chairman of our compensation
committee interviewed representatives from three firms and our compensation committee determined
that it would engage Compensia. Our compensation committee directly approved Compensia as its
compensation consultant.
Review of Compensation for 2009 Fiscal Year
In 2008, as part of our ongoing commitment to link current compensation levels to our
compensation philosophy and business strategy, our compensation committee requested that Towers
Perrin review our direct compensation, including base salary, total cash compensation and total
direct compensation. We define total cash compensation as base salary plus actual annual
incentives, and we define total direct compensation as total cash compensation plus the annualized
expected value of long-term incentives.
Towers Perrin provided a report to the compensation committee in October 2008 with
observations and analyses regarding the direct compensation of our named executive officers. The
October 2008 study referenced both published compensation survey data of comparably-sized companies
and a valuation peer group determined based on inputs from investment banks as well as management
input as to companies with whom we compete for executive talent,
10
with median annual revenues of $100 million. All of the companies included in the peer group
are providers of digital marketing intelligence or related analytical products and services,
marketing services and solutions or survey services. Specifically, the peer group consisted of the
following companies:
|
|
|
|
|
Arbitron Inc.
|
|
Marchex, Inc.
|
|
Rainmaker Systems, Inc. |
Forrester Research, Inc.
|
|
MIVA, Inc.
|
|
Taylor Nelson Sofres plc |
Greenfield Online, Inc.
|
|
Morningstar, Inc.
|
|
Think Partnership Inc. |
Harris Interactive Inc.
|
|
National Research Corporation
|
|
ValueClick, Inc. |
Ipsos Group S.A.
|
|
Omniture, Inc.
|
|
Website Pros, Inc. |
Based on the inputs from Towers Perrin and our management as well as their own review,
our compensation committee determined that our named executive officers compensation package for
our 2008 fiscal year continued to fall within the 50th percentile range of the identified peer
group for executive compensation, and target annual incentives, total cash compensation and total
direct compensation were all in line with market medians, with the flexibility to exceed up to the
75th percentile range of the identified peer group. Our compensation committee further
determined that, with the exception of Dr. Abraham, our named executive officers base salaries for
our 2008 fiscal year continued to fall within the 50th percentile range of our
identified peer group for executive base salary. Although Dr. Abrahams base salary was found to
be below the 50th percentile range, our compensation committee determined that Dr.
Abrahams compensation package was heavily weighted in equity compensation. Such equity component
was found to have counterbalanced the shortfall in base salary such that Dr. Abrahams compensation
package remained consistent with our compensation philosophy. Moreover, the compensation committee
believed that the heavier weighting towards equity compensation would better align Dr. Abrahams
interests with the interests of the company and our stockholders. Accordingly, the compensation
committee determined in October 2008 to leave 2009 base salaries for our named executive officers
unchanged from 2008.
Our compensation committee chose the 50th percentile of this peer group as the
baseline for our compensation components with a view towards what our compensation committee
believed to be fair to our named executive officers and to the company as well as consistent with
industry practices in the technology sector. In making such determination, our compensation
committee considered such factors as the stage of our companys development, the size and
characteristics of our company, based on both headcount and operations and balance sheet
characteristics, as well as the expected future characteristics of our business relative to our
identified peer group.
In connection with their October 2008 review of base salaries, the compensation committee
requested that Towers Perrin further review our incentive programs, including annual performance
bonuses and long-term incentive awards. Since our initial public offering, our annual performance
bonuses have been paid in cash and, in recent years, restricted stock in lieu of a portion of the
cash bonus at the election of the officers. Our long-term incentive awards utilize restricted
stock, although we had used stock option awards in past years as well. Given the economic
conditions in late 2008, the compensation committee sought to explore the use of non-cash
incentives as an alternative to cash-based incentives in order to better control our cash usage.
At the same time, our management also suggested to the compensation committee that non-cash based
incentives may help enhance retention of existing named executive officers and align stockholder
interest with named executive officers interests.
Pursuant to the compensation committees request, Towers Perrin provided several reports to
the compensation committee during the first few months of 2009 with observations and analysis as
well as certain proposals regarding making salary adjustments and increasing the non-cash
components of our annual performance bonuses and long-term incentive awards to our named executive
officers.
Based on the inputs from Towers Perrin and our management as well as their own review, in
March 2009 our compensation committee established an incentive award policy for our 2009 fiscal
year to the effect that bonus target amounts would be combined with long-term incentive target
amounts, and would be paid entirely with awards of restricted stock or restricted stock units
according to certain target levels based on respective base salary levels for each of the executive
officers included in the policy. The stock associated with such awards would be distributed in
2010, and seventy-five percent of the total shares issued would remain subject to vesting
restrictions that would lapse ratably over the three years following the award date.
11
Based on additional inputs from Towers Perrin, the compensation committee determined, in April
2009, that our named executive officers should have a compensation package that was more heavily
weighted in equity than in cash. As a result, the compensation committee determined that the 2009
base salary of our named executive officers should be reduced by 7.5% and that additional
restricted stock should be awarded to our named executive officers. On May 1, 2009, our
compensation committee approved the following changes to the compensation packages of our named
executive officers based on this review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary |
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
through |
|
|
2009 after |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
of Stock |
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
May 1 |
|
|
May 1 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Issued |
|
|
Awards (1) |
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D. |
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
|
$ |
393,125 |
|
|
$ |
(31,875 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
$ |
31,878 |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Tarpey |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
14,995 |
(2) |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gian M. Fulgoni |
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
346,875 |
|
|
|
(28,125 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
2,412 |
|
|
|
28,124 |
|
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Dale |
|
|
275,600 |
|
|
|
254,930 |
|
|
|
(20,670 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
1,773 |
|
|
|
20,673 |
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christiana L. Lin |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
231,250 |
|
|
|
(18,750 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
18,749 |
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Chief Privacy Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Green |
|
|
302,400 |
|
|
|
222,000 |
(3) |
|
|
(80,400 |
) |
|
|
(30.7) |
%(1) |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
17,996 |
|
Former Chief Financial Officer and Former
Executive Vice President of Human Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts represent fair value of stock-based awards granted in the fiscal year as calculated
in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and as further described in Note 13 of the Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Tarpey began his employment with us on April 20, 2009. Accordingly, the salary reduction
and the compensating restricted stock award was prorated to reflect the portion of the year
during which he was employed by us. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Green served as our Chief Financial Officer until April 19, 2009, at which time Mr.
Tarpey was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Green transitioned positions to
become our Executive Vice President of Human Capital. Accordingly, the terms of his
employment arrangement were amended effective May 20, 2009 to align his compensation package
with compensation commensurate with his new role. Mr. Greens initial salary for his new role
of $240,000 was further adjusted to reflect the 7.5% cash salary reduction taken by our
management for 2009 consistent with the adjustment for all of our management in May 2009. |
Each award of restricted stock was made pursuant to our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, and
is subject to vesting in equal installments over a four year period with each installment vesting
annually on May 1. This compensation adjustment, which was also applied to a significant number of
our other employees, was expected to allow us to reduce our cash expenses, improve our long-term
retention of employees and retain additional liquid resources to fund and accelerate certain
investments in new product offerings and capabilities within our existing cost structure.
Review of Compensation for 2010 Fiscal Year
In 2009, as part of our ongoing commitment to link current compensation levels to our
compensation philosophy and business strategy, our compensation committee requested that Compensia
review our direct compensation, including base salary, total cash compensation and total direct
compensation. Also in 2009, our compensation committee requested that Compensia review our
identified peer group and recommend appropriate improvements.
Compensia provided a report to the compensation committee in October 2009 with observations
and analyses regarding the direct compensation of our named executive officers. The October 2009
study referenced both published compensation survey data of comparably-sized companies and a
valuation peer group determined based on inputs from investment banks as well as management input
as to companies with whom we compete for executive talent with annual revenues of
between half and two-and-one-half times our annual revenues.
The peer group was also identified using profitability and market capitalization
comparable companies in addition to revenues. comScore was below the median
revenues of the identified peer group but above the median for profitability and market capitalization.
All of the companies included in the peer group are providers of
digital marketing intelligence or related analytical products and services, marketing services and
solutions or survey services. Specifically, the peer group consisted of the following companies:
12
|
|
|
|
|
Arbitron Inc.
|
|
Internet Brands
|
|
TechTarget |
Bankrate
|
|
Kenexa
|
|
The Knot |
Corporate Executive
|
|
Liquidity Services 75%
|
|
Unica |
Board
|
|
LoopNet
|
|
ValueClick |
CoStar Group
|
|
Marchex, Inc.
|
|
Web.com |
Dice Holdings
|
|
Omniture, Inc.* |
|
|
Forrester Research, Inc.
|
|
SuccessFactors |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Omniture was acquired by Adobe Systems Incorporated in October 2009 |
Our identified peer group for 2009 changed somewhat from the group identified and used
for 2008. Upon consultation with the compensation committee and management, as well as upon
conducting independent research, Compensia recommended the group identified above. The changes in
composition from 2009 were due to several factors, including the determination by Compensia to
better align our recommended peer group with similarly-sized companies in the technology space with
similar growth characteristics as our own business. We also eliminated certain companies from our
2008 peer group due to the impact of the changing economy on identified firms as well as certain
firms existing the market altogether.
Based on the inputs from Compensia and our management as well as their own review, our
compensation committee determined that our named executive officers compensation package for our
2009 fiscal year continued to fall within the 50th percentile range of the identified peer group
for executive compensation, and target annual incentives, total cash compensation and total direct
compensation were all in line with market medians, with the flexibility to exceed up to the
75th percentile range of the identified peer group. Our compensation committee further
determined that, with the exception of Dr. Abraham, Mr. Dale and Ms. Lin, our named executive
officers base salaries for our 2009 fiscal year continued to fall within the 50th
percentile range of our identified peer group for executive base salary. Although Dr. Abrahams
base salary was found to be below the 50th percentile range, our compensation committee
determined that Dr. Abrahams compensation package was heavily weighted in equity compensation.
Such equity component was found to have counterbalanced the shortfall in base salary such that Dr.
Abrahams compensation package remained consistent with our compensation philosophy. Moreover, the
compensation committee believed that the heavier weighting towards equity compensation would better
align Dr. Abrahams interests with the interests of the company and our stockholders. As Chief
Technology Officer, Mr. Dales compensation fell within the 50th percentile range of our
identified peer groups for executive base salary. In August 2009, Mr. Dale was promoted without an
accompanying cash increase. Additionally, in July 2009, Ms. Lin was promoted to executive vice
president, and in December 2009, Ms. Lin assumed the additional responsibility of overseeing our
human capital department without an accompanying cash increase. Mr. Dale and Ms. Lin did not
receive increases in cash salary in connection with their increased responsibilities, but each was
awarded additional restricted stock in order to maintain a total compensation package that was
consistent with the 50th percentile for peers with their respective level of
responsibility. Moreover, in support of our cash-conservation efforts in 2009, our compensation
committee determined to accelerate the vesting of 2,500 shares of restricted stock previously
issued to Mr. Dale and Ms. Lin. On April 22, 2010, based on input received from Compensia, and in
consultation with management, our compensation committee determined to adjust Mr. Dales and Ms.
Lins compensation by providing each executive with a 9% increase to their base salary effective
May 1, 2010. Because there was no change in responsibilities for the other named executive
officers, the compensation committee determined to leave 2010 base salaries for those named
executive officers unchanged from 2009.
Our compensation committee chose the 50th percentile of this peer group as the
baseline for our compensation components with a view towards what our compensation committee
believed to be fair to our named executive officers and to the company as well as consistent with
industry practices in the technology sector. In making such determination, our compensation
committee considered such factors as the stage of our companys development, the size and
characteristics of our company, based on both headcount and operations and balance sheet
characteristics, as well as the expected future characteristics of our business relative to our
identified peer group.
13
Our compensation committee believes that our current compensation format and the target levels
are consistent with the 50th percentile range of our identified peer group. In reaching these
decisions, the compensation committee considered the importance of providing increased incentive
opportunities to our named executive officers in equity, which would help better align the
long-term incentives of those executives with the incentives of our stockholders.
Components of our Executive Compensation Program.
Our executive compensation program consists of three components: short-term compensation
(including base salary and annual performance bonuses), long-term incentives (including equity
awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock units and/or restricted stock awards) and
benefits.
Our compensation committee evaluates executive compensation and strives to apply the mix of
these components in a manner that implements our philosophy while meeting our objectives to attract
and retain top talent using compensation that is consistent with or more attractive than other
opportunities while also adjusting for individual relative performance and responsibilities as well
as our business goals. Our compensation committee has no formal policy for allocating compensation
among the compensation components described above, but it does strive to set each component at
levels that are consistent with the 50th percentile range of our identified peer group.
Short-term Compensation
We utilize short-term compensation, including base salary, annual adjustments to base salary
and annual performance bonuses, to motivate and reward our named executive officers in accordance
with our performance-based program. Each individuals short-term compensation components are tied
to an annual assessment of his or her progress against established objectives.
Base Salary
Base salary is used to recognize the experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities
required of each named executive officers, as well as to reflect market conditions as indicated by
reference to our peer group. As we initially considered our named executive officers compensation
for 2009, base salary determinations were guided primarily by our objective to provide compensation
at levels to attract and retain top talent. In establishing the 2009 base salaries of the named
executive officers, our compensation committee and management took into account a number of
factors, including the executives seniority, position and functional role, level of responsibility
and his or her accomplishments against personal and group objectives. In addition, we considered
the market for corresponding positions within comparable geographic areas and industries as well as
the state of our business and our cash flows. In initially setting 2009 base salaries, the
compensation committee and management also compared their assessments to input provided by
Compensia.
The base salary of our named executive officer group is reviewed on an annual basis and
adjustments are made following each fiscal year and at other times as appropriate to reflect
performance-based factors, marketplace conditions and the overall performance of our business.
Increases are considered within the context of our overall annual merit increase structure, as well
as individual and marketplace factors. We do not apply specific formulas to determine increases.
Beginning in 2008, due to increasing global economic uncertainty, our compensation committee
generally considered the impact of external marketplace conditions as a determinative factor in
setting our named executive officers salaries for 2008 and 2009. However, we have historically
also considered the following when evaluating named executive officers salaries:
|
|
|
their achievement of specific objectives established during the prior review; |
|
|
|
|
an assessment of their professional effectiveness, consisting of a portfolio of
competencies that include leadership, commitment, creativity and organizational
accomplishment; |
|
|
|
|
their knowledge, skills and attitude, focusing on capabilities, capacity and the
ability to drive results; and |
|
|
|
|
external factors such as the marketplace for the named executive officers, the state
of our business and the condition of the global economy. |
14
Magid M. Abraham, our Chief Executive Officer, periodically reviews the performance of
our named executive officers in the context of the factors noted above and recommends to the
compensation committee any base salary changes or bonuses deemed appropriate.
In late 2008, in connection with an October 2008 report prepared by Towers Perrin, our
compensation committee evaluated the base salaries of our named executive officers for our 2009
fiscal year. Although all of our named executive officers achieved various objectives and
demonstrated improvements in their personal capacities during 2008, the compensation committee
considered the external market factors and economic conditions particularly heavily in its October
2008 review. In light of our overall financial performance and the general uncertainty of the
global economic conditions at that time, as well as the competitive conditions within our peer
group and industry, our compensation committee determined at that time to set base salaries of our
named executive officers for our upcoming 2009 fiscal year at the same level as were set in 2008.
Our compensation committee believed that such levels remained consistent with our compensation
philosophy of providing executive base salaries at the 50th percentile range of our companys peer
group.
In April 2009, based on additional inputs from Towers Perrin, the compensation committee
determined that our named executive officers should have a compensation package that was more
heavily weighted in equity than in cash. As a result, the compensation committee determined, among
other things, that the 2009 base salary of our named executive officers should be reduced by 7.5%
from the 2008 base salary.
In August 2009, Mr. Dale was promoted to chief operating officer. Additionally, in July 2009,
Ms. Lin was promoted to executive vice president, and in December 2009, Ms. Lin assumed the
additional responsibility of overseeing our human capital department. Mr. Dale and Ms. Lin did not
receive increases in cash salary in connection with their increased responsibilities, but each was
awarded additional restricted stock in order to maintain a total compensation package that was
consistent with the 50th percentile for peers with their respective level of
responsibility.
In late 2009, in connection with input provided by Compensia, our compensation committee
evaluated the base salaries of our named executive officers for our 2010 fiscal year. Similar to
2009, although all of our named executive officers achieved various objectives and demonstrated
improvements in their personal capacities during 2009, the compensation committee continued to
heavily consider the external market factors and economic conditions in its review of our named
executive officers respective compensation arrangements. In light of our overall financial
performance and the continued general uncertainty of the global economic conditions at that time,
as well as the competitive conditions within our peer group and industry, our compensation
committee determined at that time to set base salaries of our named executive officers for our
upcoming 2010 fiscal year at the same level as were set in 2009. Our compensation committee
believed that such levels remained consistent with our compensation philosophy of providing
executive base salaries at the 50th percentile range of our peer group.
The annual base salaries for 2008, 2009 and 2010 for each named executive officer are set
forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary |
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
2008(1) |
|
|
2009(2) |
|
|
2010(3) |
|
|
2009 v. 2008 |
|
|
2010 v. 2009 |
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D. |
|
$ |
425,000 |
|
|
$ |
393,125 |
|
|
$ |
393,125 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Tarpey |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gian M. Fulgoni |
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
346,875 |
|
|
|
346,875 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Dale |
|
|
275,600 |
|
|
|
254,930 |
|
|
|
277,874 |
(4) |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christiana L. Lin |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
231,250 |
|
|
|
252,063 |
(5) |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Chief Privacy Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Green |
|
|
302,400 |
|
|
|
222,000 |
(6) |
|
|
222,000 |
(6) |
|
|
(30.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Former Chief Financial Officer and Former
Executive Vice President of Human Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Effective beginning March 1, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Effective beginning May 1, 2009. |
15
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Effective beginning May 1, 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
In August 2009, Mr. Dale was promoted to chief operating officer. The 2010 increase in Mr.
Dales salary reflects his increased responsibilities as compared to during 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
In July 2009, Ms. Lin was promoted to executive vice president, and in December 2009, Ms. Lin
assumed the additional responsibility of overseeing our human capital department. The 2010
increase in Ms. Lins salary reflects her increased responsibilities as compared to during
2009. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Green served as our Chief Financial Officer until April 19, 2009, at which time Mr.
Tarpey was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Green transitioned positions to
become our Executive Vice President of Human Capital. Accordingly, the terms of his
employment arrangement were amended effective May 20, 2009 to align his compensation package
with compensation commensurate with his new role. Mr. Greens initial salary of $240,000 for
his new role was further adjusted to reflect a 7.5% cash salary reduction taken by our
management for 2009 consistent with the adjustment for all of our management in April 2009.
For further details of Mr. Greens amended employment arrangement beginning May 20, 2009,
refer to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 22, 2009. On November 13, 2009, Mr.
Green further notified us of his intention to resign from all positions with us effective on
or before February 28, 2010. |
Performance Bonuses and Long-Term Compensation
Annual Bonus Policy
Based on the collective inputs from Towers Perrin, management, and the experience of the
members of our board of directors and compensation committee, in February 2009 our compensation
committee determined to consolidate our bonus policy with our long-term incentive compensation
policy beginning with our 2009 fiscal year so that named executive officers would be awarded
restricted stock according to certain target levels based on each named executive officers
respective base salary levels. Prior to 2009, we had paid a cash-based or cash- and equity-based
bonuses on an annual basis to our named executive officers.
In reaching this decision, the compensation committee considered the importance of providing
increased incentive opportunities to our named executive officers in equity, which would help
better align the long-term incentives of those executives with the incentives of our stockholders.
The compensation committee also considered the importance of reducing or delaying cash outlays from
the company in light of the global economic environment, the inherent cash budgeting uncertainties
in such an environment as well as managements planned investment activities. Finally, the
compensation committee considered the competitive landscape for compensation, observing that, most
U.S. technology companies had not necessarily reduced the value of bonus opportunities for
executives despite the recent economic downturn of the past few years but rather had adjusted the
threshold performance levels and discretionary components of their bonus programs in order to
reduce cash outlays while providing long-term incentives.
Additional awards under this policy for our named executive officers are tied to the
achievement of our annual company goals and objectives, functional area goals, and/or individual
performance objectives. Annual performance bonuses are primarily guided by our objectives of
accountability for individual and business performance. We set clearly defined goals for each
named executive officer, with an emphasis on quantifiable and achievable targets. A portion of
each named executive officers award is clearly tied to the achievement of specific targets
relative to the performance of the particular business segment or functional area for which they
are responsible, with the remainder tied to similar targets relative to our overall financial
performance. Individual awards under the program are based on a thorough review of the applicable
performance results of our company, business, function or individual as compared to the applicable
goals.
Target bonus levels are set at a percentage of actual full-year salary. Our compensation
committee approves these percentages for our named executive officers based on a determination of
the appropriate portion of total compensation that should be at risk for a particular executive.
Generally, target bonuses for our named executive officers are set at a higher percentage of salary
than for our other officers, so as to recognize their broader responsibility for company-wide
results and to place a greater portion of their total compensation at risk against the achievement
of overall goals and objectives.
Our compensation committee believes that this format of a bonus and long-term compensation
policy and the target levels are consistent with the 50th percentile range of our identified peer
group based on their experience in the marketplace as well as insight provided by Towers Perrins
report. The specifics terms of this combined
16
bonus and long-term compensation policy is summarized
in greater detail in the following section titled Long-Term Compensation.
Long-term Compensation
Long-term, equity-based incentives are primarily guided by our objective of aligning named
executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. Grants of stock options, restricted
stock units and restricted stock made to executive officers are designed to provide them with
incentive to execute their responsibilities in such a way as to generate long-term benefit to us
and our stockholders. Through possession of stock options, restricted stock units and shares of
restricted stock, our executives participate in the long-term results of their efforts, whether by
appreciation of our companys value or the impact of business setbacks, either company-specific or
industry based. Additionally, stock options, restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock
provide a means of ensuring the retention of named executive officers, in that they are in almost
all cases subject to vesting over an extended period of time, often multiple years.
Stock options, restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock are granted periodically,
and are typically subject to vesting based on the executives continued employment. Historically,
most of these grants were designed to vest evenly over four years, beginning on the date of the
grant.
Beginning in 2007, we began to use shares of restricted common stock as a form of long-term
compensation. Such grants have been made by our board of directors upon the recommendations of our
compensation committee. Our compensation committee has preferred the recent use of restricted
stock in favor of stock options now that our common stock is publicly traded because it results in
less dilution of our existing stockholders, it provides some immediate, tangible value to our
employees, and it also does not require cash outlay by our employees. At the same time, restricted
stock with vesting creates long-term growth incentives for our employees as well. We expect to
continue to predominantly use restricted stock awards in favor of stock options as a form of
long-term, stock-based compensation in the foreseeable future.
Historically, upon joining us, each executive was granted an initial option award that was
primarily based on competitive conditions applicable to the executives specific position. After
our initial public offering, upon joining us, each executive is granted an initial restricted stock
award that is primarily based on competitive conditions applicable to the executives specific
position. In addition, the compensation committee considers the number of shares subject to
options or shares of restricted stock owned by other executives in comparable positions within our
company when determining the number of shares to grant to each executive, as well as the number of
shares that remain unvested. Based upon input provided by Towers Perin and Compensia and reviewed
by our compensation committee, we believe this strategy is consistent with the approach of our peer
group and, in our compensation committees view, is appropriate for aligning the interests of our
executives with those of our stockholders over the long term.
Periodic awards to named executive officers are made based on an assessment of their sustained
performance over time, their ability to impact results that drive value to our stockholders and
their organization level. Magid M. Abraham, our Chief Executive Officer, periodically reviews the
performance of our other named executive officers on this basis and recommends to the compensation
committee any equity awards deemed appropriate. The compensation committee reviews any such
recommendations and presents them to our board of directors for approval, if appropriate.
2009 Executive Long-Term Compensation Policy
As discussed above, in February 2009 our compensation committee combined our bonus policy for
our 2009 fiscal year with our long-term compensation policy, so that named executive officers may
be awarded restricted stock according to certain target levels based on our named executive
officers respective base salary levels and their performance during the 2009 fiscal year. If
earned, these awards will be paid out following the end of our 2009 fiscal year, with a portion of
the shares issued vesting immediately upon the date of the award and the remaining shares vesting
over three years thereafter. Our compensation committee believes that this format and the target
levels are consistent with or more attractive than other opportunities in those named executive
officers
17
respective marketplaces based on their experience in the marketplace as well as insight
provided by Towers Perrins report.
The combined bonus and long-term compensation targets for each named executive officer for the
2009 fiscal year long-term compensation awards as well as the actual payouts were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Level as |
|
|
Actual Payout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Full- |
|
|
a % of 2009 |
|
|
as a % of 2009 |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
Full-Year |
|
|
Full-Year |
|
|
Payout |
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
Salary |
|
|
Salary(1) |
|
|
Salary |
|
|
(1) |
|
Magid M.
Abraham, Ph.D. |
|
$ |
393,125 |
|
|
|
200 |
% |
|
|
205 |
% |
|
$ |
807,469 |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Tarpey |
|
|
285,000 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
88 |
(2) |
|
|
250,426 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gian M. Fulgoni |
|
|
346,875 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
569,967 |
|
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Dale |
|
|
254,930 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
184,285 |
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christiana L. Lin |
|
|
231,250 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
180,462 |
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Green |
|
|
222,000 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
42 |
(3) |
|
|
94,206 |
(3) |
Former Chief Financial Officer and Former Executive Vice President
of Human Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The awards for the 2009 executive long-term compensation policy were paid in the form of
restricted stock based on the value of our common stock as reported at market close by the
NASDAQ Global Market on February 18, 2010, the date of payment, as adjusted for rounding for
fractional shares. Part of Mr. Greens payout was made in cash as further described in
footnote (3) below. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Tarpey began his employment with us on April 20, 2009. Accordingly, his 2009 executive
long-term compensation policy award was prorated to reflect the portion of the year during
which he was employed by us. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Green served as our Chief Financial Officer until April 19, 2009, at which time Mr. Green
transitioned positions to become our Executive Vice President of Human Capital. Accordingly,
the terms of his employment arrangement were amended effective May 20, 2009 to align his
compensation package with compensation commensurate with his new role. On November 13, 2009,
Mr. Green further notified us of his intention to resign from all positions with us effective
on or before February 28, 2010. In connection with Mr. Greens resignation, we awarded 50% of
his earned Executive Long-Term Compensation in restricted stock. |
The above-referenced restricted stock awards were issued on February 18, 2010 based on
each named executive officers actual performance during 2009 relative to the metrics described in
further detail below. One-quarter of the total number of shares of the restricted stock award to
each named executive officer vested immediately upon the grant date, and the remaining
three-quarters of the shares of the restricted stock award vest ratably over the three-year period
following the grant date.
Under this policy, the award levels established for the 2009 fiscal year for Dr. Abraham and
Messrs. Tarpey and Fulgoni were based on a mix of quantitative and qualitative factors, certain of
which were the satisfactory completion of specific projects or initiatives. The 2009 targets for
Dr. Abraham and Messrs. Tarpey and Fulgoni were calculated based on the following component
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight of |
|
Achievement of |
|
Target |
|
Milestones for 2009 earnings before interest taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA |
|
|
50 |
% |
Milestones for 2009 revenue |
|
|
30 |
% |
Individual qualitative factors such as client retention, personnel retention, strategic milestones |
|
|
20 |
% |
A minimum threshold must be exceeded for each component above before any award will be
made with respect to that component. In the event that the target metrics are surpassed, the
maximum possible awards under the plan for Dr. Abraham, and Messrs. Fulgoni and Tarpey was 320%,
240% and 175%, respectively, of base salary.
The annual performance targets established for the 2009 fiscal year for Messrs. Dale and Green
and Ms. Lin were based solely on the achievement of qualitative performance factors. Targets were
based on qualitative factors such as successful completion and integration of strategic
transactions, effective management of their respective organizations, the development and release
of new technology or product offerings, successful recruiting and development of our human capital
resources and the successful implementation of strategic initiatives. The
18
maximum possible awards under the plan for Messrs. Dale and Green and Ms. Lin were 150%
in each case of base salary.
Participants in this policy must remain employed through the date that awards are paid in
order to qualify for the awards. Our compensation committee, in its sole discretion, retains the
right to amend, supplement, supersede or cancel this policy for any reason, and reserves the right
to determine whether and when to pay out any awards, regardless of the achievement of the
performance targets.
2010 Executive Long-Term Compensation Policy
In February 2010, our compensation committee confirmed that the combined bonus and long-term
compensation policies and target levels that we used for our 2009 Executive Long-Term Compensation
Policy remained appropriate and therefore the same as 2009 for our 2010 Executive Long-Term
Compensation Policy. If earned, these awards will be paid out following the end of our 2010 fiscal
year, with one quarter of the incentive amount issued as cash immediately upon the date of the
incentive award and the remaining amounts issued as shares vesting annually over three years
thereafter. Our compensation committee believes that this format and the target levels are
consistent with or more attractive than other opportunities in those named executive officers
respective marketplaces based on their experience in the marketplace as well as insight provided by
Compensias report.
Under this policy, the award levels established for the 2010 fiscal year for Dr. Abraham and
Messrs. Tarpey and Fulgoni are based on a mix of quantitative and qualitative factors, certain of
which were the satisfactory completion of specific projects or initiatives. The quantitative
milestones varied somewhat from 2009 to reflect the expected financial performance of the company
in 2010 as compared to 2009. The 2010 targets for Dr. Abraham and Messrs. Tarpey and Fulgoni were
calculated based on the following component factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight of |
|
Achievement of |
|
Target |
|
Milestones for 2010 earnings before interest taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA |
|
|
50 |
% |
Milestones for 2010 revenue |
|
|
30 |
% |
Individual qualitative factors such as client retention, personnel retention, strategic milestones |
|
|
20 |
% |
A minimum threshold must be exceeded for each component above before any award will be
made with respect to that component. In the event that the target metrics are surpassed, the
maximum possible awards under the plan for Dr. Abraham, and Messrs. Fulgoni and Tarpey are 320%,
240% and 175%, respectively, of base salary.
The annual performance targets established for the 2010 fiscal year for Messrs. Dale and Ms.
Lin were based solely on the achievement of qualitative performance factors. Targets were based on
qualitative factors such as successful completion and integration of strategic transactions,
effective management of their respective organizations, the development and release of new
technology or product offerings, successful recruiting and development of our human capital
resources and the successful implementation of strategic initiatives. The maximum possible award
under the plan for Mr. Dale and Ms. Lin is 150% in each case of base salary.
Participants in this program must remain employed through the date that awards are paid in
order to qualify for the awards. Our compensation committee, in its sole discretion, retains the
right to amend, supplement, supersede or cancel this program for any reason, and reserves the right
to determine whether and when to pay out any awards, regardless of the achievement of the
performance targets.
Benefits and Perquisites
We provide the following benefits to our named executive officers on the same basis as the
benefits provided to all our employees:
|
|
|
health and dental insurance; |
|
|
|
|
|
life insurance; |
19
|
|
|
short-and long-term disability; and |
|
|
|
|
401(k) plan. |
These benefits are consistent with those offered by other companies and specifically with
those companies with which we compete for employees.
In general, we do not view perquisites as a significant component of our executive
compensation structure. However, the compensation committee has the authority to approve
perquisites, primarily for retention purposes or to accommodate specific, and usually temporary,
circumstances of executives who do not reside near their work locations.
Severance and Change of Control Arrangements
Of our named executive officers for 2009, Dr. Abraham and Messrs. Tarpey, Fulgoni and Green
were parties to agreements that provided certain benefits to these named executive officers in the
event of their termination or a change of control of the Company under certain circumstances or
both.
We believe the following arrangements are useful retention tools that are particularly
necessary in an industry, such as ours, where there is frequent market consolidation. We recognize
that it is possible that we may be subject to a change of control, and that this possibility could
result in a sudden departure or distraction of our key executives to the detriment of our business.
We believe that the following arrangements help to maintain the continued focus and dedication of
our executives to their assigned duties to maximize stockholder value without the distraction that
could result from the uncertainty of a change of control.
Magid M. Abraham and Gian M. Fulgoni
Certain shares of the restricted common stock held by Dr. Abraham and Mr. Fulgoni at
December 31, 2009 that remain unvested were subject to single trigger acceleration provisions,
which results in the repurchase rights fully lapsing upon the occurrence of a change of control
event. In general terms, the restricted stock agreements for Dr. Abraham and Mr. Fulgoni define a
change of control event as an acquisition of at least 50% of the voting control of the company, a
sale or merger of the company or the sale of substantially all the assets of the company. Assuming
a fair market value of our common stock of $17.55 per share, which represented the closing market
price of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on December 31, 2009, Dr. Abraham
and Mr. Fulgoni would have obtained an immediate increase in the value of their respective stock
holdings upon a change of control at December 31, 2009 as indicated in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Common Stock Shares |
|
|
Value Realized Upona |
|
Name |
|
Vesting Upon a Change of Control |
|
|
Change of Control |
|
Magid M.
Abraham, Ph.D.
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
877,500 |
|
|
Gian M.
Fulgoni
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
658,125 |
|
Kenneth J. Tarpey
In connection with his initial employment as our Chief Financial Officer on April 20, 2009,
Mr. Tarpey entered into a letter agreement with us dated April 1, 2010 providing for certain
benefits upon either a change of control or upon his termination without cause.
In general, Mr. Tarpeys employment offer letter defines a change of control event as an
acquisition of at least 50% of the voting control of the company, a sale or merger of the company
or the sale of substantially all the assets of the company. Mr. Tarpeys employment offer letter
defines cause for termination to include the commission of any act of dishonesty, embezzlement,
theft or fraud with respect to the company; an indictment, plea of nolo contendere or conviction,
of any felony or of any crime involving dishonesty; a material breach of Mr.
20
Tarpeys duties to the
Company, including repeated unsatisfactory performance of job duties; or a material breach by Mr.
Tarpey of the letter agreement or any written comScore policy.
Upon a change of control, the right of repurchase restrictions on all restricted stock awards
held by Mr. Tarpey shall lapse immediately. Assuming a fair market value of our common stock of
$17.55 per share, which represented the closing market price of our common stock as reported on the
NASDAQ Global Market on December 31, 2009, Mr. Tarpey would have obtained an immediate increase in
the value of his stock holdings of $1,491,750 upon a change of control at December 31, 2009 that
resulted in the lapsing of the repurchase rights on all 85,000 shares of his then-unvested
restricted stock.
Upon a termination without cause, Mr. Tarpey is entitled to lump-sum severance payment of six
(6) months base salary as then in effect. Furthermore, the right of repurchase with respect to
any restricted stock award granted to Mr. Tarpey under our executive long-term compensation policy
prior to the date of such termination shall be waived for 50% of the initial portion of each such
award made to Mr. Tarpey with a right of repurchase, subject to Mr. Tarpey signing a release of
claims.
Assuming a fair market value of our common stock of $17.55 per share, which represented the
closing market price of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on December 31,
2009, Mr. Tarpey would receive the following upon a termination without cause at December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Lump-sum severance payment of six months base salary |
|
$ |
142,500 |
|
Acceleration of Unvested Executive Long-Term Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Awards |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
142,500 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Tarpey did not hold any unvested Executive Long-Term Compensation
Plan Restricted Stock Awards as of December 31, 2009. |
John M. Green
Given Mr. Greens change in position on April 20, 2009 from Chief Financial Officer to
Executive Vice President of Human Capital, his employment arrangement was amended on May 20, 2009,
including severance and change of control provisions, to align his compensation package with one
more commensurate with his new role.
In connection with the modification of Mr. Greens prior employment arrangement and his new
May 20, 2009 employment offer letter, unvested options and shares of restricted stock held by Mr.
Green were cancelled as of May 18, 2009, except that Mr. Green retained 11,803 shares of restricted
stock and options for the purchase of 16,248 shares of the Companys common stock that were then
unvested and remained subject to vesting contingent upon Mr. Greens continued status as a service
provider. However, if Mr. Green is terminated without cause (as such term is defined in the award
agreements) prior to the date on which those options and shares fully vest, those options and
shares will fully vest upon his date of termination. As of the date of Mr. Greens new employment
agreement on May 20, 2009, our previous obligations with respect to Mr. Greens severance and
changes of control were superseded by the new agreement. On November 13, 2009, Mr. Green further
notified us of his intention to resign from all positions with us effective on or before February
28, 2010. Accordingly, as of November 13, 2009, any effects that might occur relating to the
change of control provisions of Mr. Greens employment arrangement were otherwise mitigated by his
resignation.
Total Compensation
We intend to continue our strategy of compensating our named executive officers at levels
consistent with or more attractive than other opportunities for each type of executive, with the
opportunity to impact their total annual compensation through performance-based incentive programs
that include both cash and equity elements. Our approach to total executive compensation is
designed to drive results that maximize our financial performance and deliver value to our
stockholders. In light of our compensation philosophy, we believe that the total compensation
package for our executives should continue to consist of base salary, annual cash performance bonus
and long-term equity-based incentives, reflecting our key compensation principles of compensation
to attract and retain top talent, accountability for individual and business performance, and
alignment with stockholder interests,
21
respectively. We do not consider benefits to be a key
element in attracting executive officers, and we typically offer largely the same benefits to our
executive officers as to our other employees. Historically, we have typically offered a
combination of short-term and long-term compensation to suit our executives preferences. Certain
of our executives who joined us earlier in our history preferred to accept more long-term
compensation in the form of stock options, as the potential return was higher at that stage and our
ability to fund short-term cash compensation was more limited. At the same time, certain of our
executives have preferred greater short-term compensation and reduced long-term compensation. As
we have become more profitable and our common stock has become publicly traded, our ability to
attract executives through short-term compensation has increased. Accordingly, we expect that our
decisions regarding the relationship among our elements of compensation will become less dependent
upon our stage as a growing company and more dependent upon our key compensation principles.
Evolution of our Compensation Approach
Our compensation approach is necessarily tied to our stage of development as a company.
Accordingly, the specific direction, emphasis and components of our executive compensation program
will continue to evolve as our company and its underlying business strategy continue to grow and
develop. For example, we have reduced our executive compensation programs emphasis on stock
options as a long-term incentive component in favor of other forms of equity compensation such as
restricted stock awards. Similarly, we continue to revise how we measure senior executive
performance to take into account the unique requirements of being a public company, including, but
not limited to, strict compliance with the standards of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. In addition, we
have engaged an outside compensation consultant since mid-2007 to assist our compensation committee
in continuing to evolve our executive compensation program, and we may look to programs implemented
by comparable public companies in refining our compensation approach.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A with company management. Based on the compensation
committees review of, and the discussions with management with respect to, the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, the compensation committee recommended to the board of directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
|
|
William J. Henderson, Chairman |
|
|
William Katz |
|
|
Jarl Mohn |
The foregoing compensation committee report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not
otherwise be deemed filed under these acts, except to the extent we specifically incorporate by
reference into such filings.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth summary information concerning compensation for the following
persons: (i) all persons serving as our chief executive officer during 2009, (ii) all persons
serving as our chief financial officer during 2009 and (iii) the three most highly compensated of
our other executive officers who received compensation during 2009 of at least $100,000 and who
were executive officers on December 31, 2009. We refer to these persons as our named executive
officers elsewhere in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. The following table
includes all compensation earned by the named executive officers for the respective periods,
regardless of whether such amounts were actually paid during the period.
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
Name and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
|
Salary($) |
|
|
Bonus($) |
|
|
($)(1) |
|
|
($)(1) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D. |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
403,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
653,849 |
(2) |
|
$ |
807,469 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61 |
(4) |
|
$ |
1,865,129 |
|
President, Chief Executive |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
408,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,000 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
183,751 |
(6) |
|
|
3,290 |
(7) |
|
|
1,445,374 |
|
Officer and Director |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
326,635 |
|
|
$ |
95,317 |
(8) |
|
|
1,125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,178 |
(7) |
|
|
1,550,130 |
|
Kenneth J. Tarpey |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
200,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,165,895 |
(2)(9) |
|
|
250,426 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
(4) |
|
|
1,616,766 |
|
Chief Financial Officer* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gian M. Fulgoni |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
356,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,686 |
(2) |
|
|
569,967 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
(4) |
|
|
1,378,964 |
|
Executive Chairman of the |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
362,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562,492 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,126 |
(6) |
|
|
4,162 |
(7) |
|
|
1,097,280 |
|
Board of Directors |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
303,000 |
|
|
|
88,931 |
(10) |
|
|
843,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,178 |
(7) |
|
|
1,239,859 |
|
Gregory T. Dale |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
261,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619,236 |
(2)(11) |
|
|
184,285 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
(4) |
|
|
1,065,402 |
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
272,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,008 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,401 |
(6) |
|
|
3,161 |
(7) |
|
|
527,569 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
258,538 |
|
|
|
59,879 |
(12) |
|
|
205,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,178 |
(7) |
|
|
527,095 |
|
Christiana L. Lin |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
237,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,608 |
(2)(13) |
|
|
180,462 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
(4) |
|
|
751,780 |
|
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
241,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,008 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,078 |
(6) |
|
|
3,161 |
(7) |
|
|
493,914 |
|
General Counsel and Chief |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
158,958 |
|
|
|
32,775 |
(14) |
|
|
213,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,482 |
(7) |
|
|
407,965 |
|
Privacy Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Green |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
251,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,865 |
(2)(15) |
|
|
94,206 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
(4) |
|
|
703,337 |
|
Former Chief Financial |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
297,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,795 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,031 |
(6) |
|
|
4,099 |
(7) |
|
|
990,925 |
|
Officer* and Former |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
271,500 |
|
|
|
62,819 |
(16) |
|
|
337,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,900 |
(7) |
|
|
675,969 |
|
Executive Vice President
of Human Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Mr. Green served as our Chief Financial Officer until April 19, 2009, at which time Mr.
Tarpey was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Green transitioned positions to
become our Executive Vice President of Human Capital. On November 13, 2009, Mr. Green further
notified us of his intention to resign from all positions with us effective on or before
February 28, 2010. |
|
(1) |
|
Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards or equity plan compensation
computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these
amounts are described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the award of (i) a one-time award of restricted stock issued to key senior
employees, including named executive officers, to promote retention given expected challenges
during 2009 and (ii) a one-time May 1, 2009 award of restricted stock in connection with our
April 2009 reduction in salaries, which is further described in the paragraph below this
table. |
|
(3) |
|
In February 2009, our compensation committee determined to consolidate our annual bonus
policy for our 2009 fiscal year with our long-term incentive compensation policy.
Accordingly, our named executive officers were awarded restricted stock according to certain
target levels based on each named executive officers respective base salary levels. There
was no cash component of these equity incentive awards paid to our named executive officers.
Awards under such policy relating to 2009 performance were paid in February 2010 following
approval by our compensation committee. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes payment of life insurance premiums paid on behalf of the named executive officer. |
|
(5) |
|
In December 2007 our compensation committee approved guidelines for restricted stock awards
to be granted in the first quarter of 2008 based on each executives respective 2008 base
salary as well as the number of shares held by each named executive officers that remain
unvested as part of our long-term compensation policy. On February 18, 2008, our compensation
committee approved specific restricted common stock awards for our executives using the
targets established in December 2007, as well as factors such as the number of unvested shares
remaining from option grants previously awarded to the executive and the amount of restricted
common stock awarded to an executive that remains subject to a right of repurchase. |
|
(6) |
|
Amounts represent compensation paid in a combination of cash and stock-based compensation to
our named executive officers pursuant to our executive compensation bonus policy for 2008.
Payments under such policy were paid in February 2009 following approval by our compensation
committee. Equity awards included in such amounts are included based on the aggregate grant
date fair value of equity compensation computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are described in Note 13 to the
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes discretionary matching contributions by us to the officers 401(k) plan account and
payment of life insurance premiums paid on behalf of the named executive officers. |
|
(8) |
|
Included an award of 1,996 shares of restricted stock granted in February 2008 with a grant
date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of approximately $45,130. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes an award of 85,000 shares of restricted stock with a grant date fair value computed
in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of approximately $1,150,900 granted on April 20, 2009,
the start date of Mr. Tarpeys employment as our Chief Financial Officer. |
|
(10) |
|
Included an award of 1,850 shares of restricted stock granted in February 2008 with a grant
date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of approximately $41,829. |
|
(11) |
|
Mr. Dale was promoted to Chief Operating Officer within the company on September 14, 2009.
In connection with such promotion, Mr. Dale was awarded an additional 30,000 shares of
restricted stock on November 15, 2009 with a grant date fair value computed in accordance with
FASB ASC Topic 718 of approximately $482,400, which amount is included in the referenced item. |
|
(12) |
|
Included an award of 1,230 shares of restricted stock granted in February 2008 with a grant
date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of approximately $27,810. |
|
(13) |
|
Ms. Lin was promoted to Executive Vice President within the company on September 14, 2009.
In connection with such promotion, Ms. Lin was awarded an additional 15,000 shares of
restricted stock on August 15, 2009 with a grant date fair value computed in accordance with
FASB ASC Topic 718 of approximately $210,150, which amount is included in the referenced item. |
|
(14) |
|
Included an award of 647 shares of restricted stock granted in February 2008 with a grant
date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of approximately $14,629. |
23
|
|
|
(15) |
|
Mr. Green served as our Chief Financial Officer until April 19, 2009, at which time Mr.
Tarpey was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Green transitioned positions to
become our Executive Vice President of Human Capital. In connection with his change of
position, Mr. Green was awarded an additional 10,000 shares of restricted stock on May 18,
2009 with a grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of
approximately $109,400, which amount is included in the referenced item. |
|
(16) |
|
Included an award of 1,290 shares of restricted stock granted in February 2008 with a grant
date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of approximately $29,167. |
In April 2009, our compensation committee determined to adjust the compensation packages
of our named executive officers to more heavily favor equity than cash than we had in recent years.
As a result, the compensation committee recommended the reduction of the base salary of our named
executive officers by 7.5% and the award of additional restricted stock. Such adjustment was
intended to allow us to reduce our cash expenses, increase our long-term retention of employees and
retain additional liquid resources to fund and accelerate certain investments in new product
offerings and capabilities within our existing cost structure. All of our named executive officers
and employees that were affected by the reduction received a corresponding award of restricted
stock on May 1, 2009.
In August 2009, Mr. Dale was promoted to chief operating officer. Additionally, in July 2009,
Ms. Lin was promoted to executive vice president, and in December 2009, Ms. Lin assumed the
additional responsibility of overseeing our human capital department. Mr. Dale and Ms. Lin did not
receive increases in cash salary in connection with their increased responsibilities, but each was
awarded additional restricted stock in order to maintain a total compensation package that was
consistent with the 50th percentile for peers with their respective level of responsibility.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth certain information concerning grants of plan-based awards to
named executive officers in 2009. No options were granted to our named executive officers during
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity |
|
|
Stock Awards: |
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Stock and |
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
Threshold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Stock |
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Name |
|
Date |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Target($) |
|
|
Maximum($) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
(2) |
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
786,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,258,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,247 |
(3) |
|
$ |
81,669 |
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,902 |
(4) |
|
|
47,039 |
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,137 |
(5)(6) |
|
|
574,932 |
|
|
|
|
5/1/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,734 |
(6)(7) |
|
|
31,878 |
|
Kenneth J. Tarpey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
720,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/20/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
(6)(8) |
|
|
1,150,900 |
|
|
|
|
5/1/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,286 |
(6)(7) |
|
|
14,995 |
|
Gian M. Fulgoni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,000 |
|
|
|
832,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,097 |
(3) |
|
|
72,503 |
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,240 |
(4) |
|
|
41,763 |
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,030 |
(5)(6) |
|
|
382,799 |
|
|
|
|
5/1/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,412 |
(6)(7) |
|
|
28,124 |
|
Gregory T. Dale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,944 |
|
|
|
382,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,997 |
(3) |
|
|
23,886 |
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,559 |
(4) |
|
|
12,425 |
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,016 |
(5)(6) |
|
|
103,738 |
|
|
|
|
5/1/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,773 |
(6)(7) |
|
|
20,673 |
|
|
|
|
11/15/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
(9) |
|
|
482,400 |
|
Christiana L. Lin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
346,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,653 |
(3) |
|
|
21,144 |
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,380 |
(4) |
|
|
10,999 |
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,887 |
(5)(6) |
|
|
102,709 |
|
|
|
|
5/1/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,608 |
(6)(7) |
|
|
18,749 |
|
|
|
|
8/15/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
(10) |
|
|
210,150 |
|
John M. Green |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,658 |
(3) |
|
|
37,124 |
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,683 |
(4) |
|
|
21,384 |
|
|
|
|
2/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,234 |
(5)(6) |
|
|
209,085 |
|
|
|
|
5/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,645 |
(6)(7) |
|
|
17,996 |
|
|
|
|
5/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
(6)(11) |
|
|
109,400 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The target incentive amounts shown in this column reflect the value of incentive compensation
available to our named executive officers pursuant to our 2009 executive long-term
compensation policy. The amounts representing the target awards were pre-established as a |
24
|
|
|
|
|
percentage of salary. The maximum is the greatest payout which can be made if the
pre-established maximum performance level is met or exceeded. The policy also provides that
the entire bonus amount shall be paid in shares of restricted stock valued at the time of
grant. Actual payouts under our 2009 executive long-term compensation policy were approved on
February 18, 2010 and are reflected in the Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the
Summary Compensation Table above for 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts represent fair value of stock-based awards granted in the fiscal year as calculated
in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and as further described in Note 13 of the Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
The referenced grant was issued as part of our 2008 bonus plan earned for the 2008 fiscal
year. Awards under our 2008 bonus plan are reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table above for 2008, as the 2008 bonus plan
included a combination of cash- and equity-based incentives. |
|
(4) |
|
The referenced grant was issued as a one-time discretionary award to promote retention given
the expected challenges during 2009. This award is subject to a right of repurchase that shall
lapse for all of the shares subject to the original grant on the one (1) anniversary date of
the grant, contingent upon the executives continued service as of such date. These awards
are reflected in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table above for 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
The referenced grant was issued as a one-time grant to promote long-term retention of
employees. These awards under our 2009 executive long-term compensation policy are reflected
in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table above for 2009. |
|
(6) |
|
This award is subject to a right of repurchase that shall lapse annually for twenty-five
percent (25%) of the total shares subject to the original grant each year on the anniversary
date of the grant until the full amount of the grant shall be vested as of the fourth
anniversary date of the original grant, contingent upon the executives continued service as
of each such dates. |
|
(7) |
|
In April 2009, our compensation committee determined to adjust the compensation packages of
our named executive officers to more heavily favor equity than cash than we had in recent
years. As a result, the compensation committee recommended the reduction of the base salary
of our named executive officers by 7.5% and the award of additional restricted stock to
compensate for the reduction. This award was granted in connection with such adjustment.
These awards are reflected in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table above
for 2009. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr. Tarpey became our Chief Financial Officer on April 20, 2009. In connection with his
hiring, he was awarded the referenced restricted stock. |
|
(9) |
|
Mr. Dale was promoted to Chief Operating Officer within the company on September 14, 2009.
This award was granted in connection with his increased responsibilities. This award is
subject to a right of repurchase that shall lapse annually for twenty-five percent (25%) of
the total shares subject to the original grant beginning on August 15, 2010 and on the
anniversary date thereafter until the full amount of the grant shall be vested as of August
15, 2014, contingent upon Mr. Dales continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(10) |
|
Ms. Lin was promoted to Executive Vice President within the company on August 15, 2009. This
award was granted in connection with his increased responsibilities. This award is subject to
a right of repurchase that shall lapsed immediately upon grant for twenty-five percent (25%)
of the total shares subject to the original grant and annually thereafter for twenty-five
percent (25%) of the total shares subject to the original grant on the anniversary date
thereafter until the full amount of the grant shall be vested as of August 15, 2013,
contingent upon Ms. Lins continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(11) |
|
Mr. Green transitioned roles from our Chief Financial Officer to our Executive Vice President
of Human Capital on April 20, 2009. In connection with the modification of Mr. Greens prior
employment arrangement, Mr. Green forfeited 42,896 shares of unvested restricted stock and
unvested options for the purchase of 18,960 shares of the Companys common stock held by Mr.
Green were cancelled as of May 18, 2009. The referenced grant was awarded to adjust the
aggregate vesting and total holdings of Mr. Greens restricted stock holdings consistent with
his new employment arrangement. |
25
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2009
The following table shows outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers as of
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of |
|
|
Shares of Stock |
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock That Have Not |
|
|
That Have Not |
|
|
|
Unexercised Options (#) |
|
|
Option Exercise |
|
|
Option Expiration |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
Vested |
|
Name |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
Price($) |
|
|
Date |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($)(1) |
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D. |
|
|
241,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
12/15/2013 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
877,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,196 |
(3) |
|
|
494,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,137 |
(4) |
|
|
1,266,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,902 |
(5) |
|
|
103,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,734 |
(6) |
|
|
47,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Tarpey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
(7) |
|
|
1,491,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,286 |
(8) |
|
|
22,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gian M. Fulgoni |
|
|
223,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
12/15/2013 |
|
|
|
37,500 |
(9) |
|
|
658,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,659 |
(10) |
|
|
327,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,030 |
(11) |
|
|
842,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,240 |
(12) |
|
|
91,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,412 |
(13) |
|
|
42,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Dale |
|
|
67,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
4/27/2014 |
2 |
|
|
9,000 |
(14) |
|
|
157,950 |
|
|
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
12/27/2015 |
|
|
|
6,635 |
(15) |
|
|
116,444 |
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,016 |
(16) |
|
|
228,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,559 |
(17) |
|
|
27,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,773 |
(18) |
|
|
31,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
(19) |
|
|
526,500 |
|
Christiana L. Lin |
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
4/27/2014 |
12 |
|
|
9,500 |
(20) |
|
|
166,725 |
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,635 |
(21) |
|
|
116,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,887 |
(22) |
|
|
226,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,380 |
(23) |
|
|
24,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,608 |
(24) |
|
|
28,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,250 |
(25) |
|
|
197,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Green |
|
|
51,874 |
(26) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
5/9/2016 |
|
|
|
11,083 |
|
|
|
194,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
175,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
28,870 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Market value of shares of stock that have not vested is computed based on $17.55 per share,
which was the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on
December 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 25,000 shares annually on March 25, contingent upon
Dr. Abrahams continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(3) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 9,398 shares annually on February 18, contingent
upon Dr. Abrahams continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(4) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 18,034 shares annually on February 18, contingent
upon Dr. Abrahams continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(5) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for all 5,902 shares on February 18, 2010, contingent
upon Dr. Abrahams continued service as of such date. |
|
(6) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 18,034 shares annually on May 1, contingent upon
Dr. Abrahams continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(7) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 21,250 shares annually on April 20, contingent upon
Mr. Tarpeys continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(8) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 322 shares annually on May 1, contingent upon Mr.
Tarpeys continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(9) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 18,750 shares annually on March 25, contingent upon
Mr. Fulgonis continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(10) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 6,220 shares annually on February 18, contingent
upon Mr. Fulgonis continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(11) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 12,007 shares annually on February 18, contingent
upon Mr. Fulgonis continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(12) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for all 5,240 shares on February 18, 2010, contingent
upon Mr. Fulgonis continued service as of such date. |
26
|
|
|
(13) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 603 shares annually on May 1, contingent upon Mr.
Fulgonis continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(14) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 4,500 shares annually on March 25, contingent upon
Mr. Dales continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(15) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 2,212 shares annually on February 18, contingent
upon Mr. Dales continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(16) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 3,254 shares annually on February 18, contingent
upon Mr. Dales continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(17) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for all 1,559 shares on February 18, 2010, contingent
upon Mr. Dales continued service as of such date. |
|
(18) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 443 shares annually on May 1, contingent upon Mr.
Dales continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(19) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 7,500 shares annually on August 15, contingent upon
Mr. Dales continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(20) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 4,750 shares annually on March 25, contingent upon
Ms. Lins continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(21) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 2,212 shares annually on February 18, contingent
upon Ms. Lins continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(22) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 3,222 shares annually on February 18, contingent
upon Ms. Lins continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(23) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for all 1,380 shares on February 18, 2010, contingent
upon Ms. Lins continued service as of such date. |
|
(24) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 402 shares annually on May 1, contingent upon Ms.
Lins continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(25) |
|
comScores right of repurchase lapses for 3,750 shares annually on August 15, contingent upon
Ms. Lins continued service as of each such dates. |
|
(26) |
|
In connection with the amendment of Mr. Greens employment arrangement in May 2009, 42,896
shares of then-unvested restricted stock were forfeited and then-unvested options for the
purchase of 18,960 shares of our common stock held by Mr. Green were cancelled as of May 18,
2009. For further details of Mr. Greens amended employment arrangement beginning May 20,
2009, refer to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 22, 2009. On November 13, 2009,
Mr. Green notified the Company of his intention to resign, effective on or before February 28,
2010, as announced in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 19, 2009. Pursuant to
the terms of his option grants, Mr. Green may exercise his vested options until May 28, 2010. |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
The following table shows the stock options exercised and value realized upon exercise, as
well as all stock awards vested and value realized upon vesting by our named executive officers
during the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired on |
|
|
Value Realized on |
|
|
Acquired on Vesting |
|
|
Value Realized on |
|
Name |
|
Exercise (#) |
|
|
Exercise ($)(1) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
Vesting ($) |
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D. |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,158,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
299,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,398 |
|
|
|
74,902 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
15,908 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,247 |
|
|
|
81,669 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Tarpey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gian M. Fulgoni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
224,250 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,219 |
|
|
|
49,565 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
14,745 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,097 |
|
|
|
72,503 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Dale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
53,820 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
17,622 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
9,803 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
23,886 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christiana L. Lin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
56,810 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
17,622 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
5,157 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,653 |
|
|
|
21,144 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
50,325 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Green |
|
|
26,666 |
|
|
$ |
266,660 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
89,700 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,687 |
|
|
|
53,295 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
10,281 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
37,124 |
(3) |
27
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value realized on exercise is calculated as the difference between the actual sales price
of the shares underlying the options exercised and the applicable exercise price of those
options. |
|
(2) |
|
The value realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares vesting and
by the market value of the underlying shares on the vesting date, which was $11.96 per share
at market close as listed by the NASDAQ Global Market on March 25, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
The value realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares vesting and
by the market value of the underlying shares on the vesting date, which was $7.97 per share at
market close as listed by the NASDAQ Global Market on February 18, 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
The value realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares vesting and
by the market value of the underlying shares on the vesting date, which was $13.42 per share
at market close as listed by the NASDAQ Global Market on August 15, 2009. |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Director Compensation Policies
Retainers and Meeting Fees: During 2009, our non-employee directors were eligible to receive
an annual cash retainer of $25,000 for service on our board of directors, and the chairs of certain
of the standing committees of our board of directors were eligible to receive annual cash retainers
as follows: $10,000 per year for the chair of our audit committee and $7,500 per year for the chair
of our compensation committee. In the case of new non-employee directors, these fees are prorated
based on when the non-employee director joined our board of directors during the year. Employee
directors are not compensated for board of director or committee service in addition to their
regular employee compensation.
Other Equity-Based Compensation: Outside directors are also eligible to receive stock awards
and option grants under our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. Since our initial public offering in 2007,
our non-employee directors have been and are entitled to an annual grant of restricted stock having
a value of $50,000 at the time of grant. The total amount of each annual grant of restricted stock
shall remain unvested until the earlier of (i) the date of the respective directors next
anniversary upon joining our board of directors, (ii) the date of the first annual stockholders
meeting following the date of grant or (iii) a change of control. The board of directors has
discretion to accelerate or modify such vesting schedule due to special circumstances.
Expenses: We reimburse our non-employee directors for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in the performance of their duties as directors. Such expense reimbursements are not
included in the table below under the subheading 2009 Director Compensation.
28
2009 Director Compensation
The following table sets forth certain information concerning cash and non-cash compensation
earned by the non-employee members of our board of directors in 2009. None of the non-employee
members of our board of directors received option awards or other compensation in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash |
|
|
($)(1) |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
Jeffrey Ganek |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
49,996 |
(2) |
|
$ |
74,996 |
|
Bruce Golden |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
(2) |
|
|
74,996 |
|
William J. Henderson |
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
(2) |
|
|
82,496 |
|
William Katz |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
(2) |
|
|
74,996 |
|
Ronald J. Korn |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
(2) |
|
|
84,996 |
|
Jarl Mohn |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
(2) |
|
|
74,996 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock
Compensation (FASB ASC Topic 718) of stock awards concerning 2009. Assumptions used in the
calculation of these award amounts are included in Note 13 to the consolidated financial
statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The number of shares and the grant date fair value of each stock award included in the awards
for which expense is shown in the table above is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
Name |
|
Award Type |
|
Grant Date |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
Jeffrey Ganek |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
July 29, 2009 |
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
$ |
49,996 |
|
Bruce Golden |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
July 29, 2009 |
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
William J. Henderson |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
July 29, 2009 |
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
William Katz |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
July 29, 2009 |
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
Ronald J. Korn |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
July 29, 2009 |
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
Jarl Mohn |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
July 29, 2009 |
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
All of our non-employee directors that continued to serve after our 2009 annual meeting of
stockholders received an annual award of restricted stock with a fair value calculated in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of approximately $50,000 (as adjusted for rounding of
fractional shares, which were excluded). The awards are restricted common stock subject to a
right of repurchase by comScore until the earlier of (i) the date that is one (1) day prior to
the date of the 2009 annual meeting of our stockholders or (ii) the one (1) year anniversary
of such directors service as a director since our initial public offering, subject to such
director continuing to serve on our board of directors at such date. |
NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE OF OUR COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES AS THEY RELATE TO OUR RISK
MANAGEMENT
We believe that risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees
are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
William J. Henderson, William Katz and Jarl Mohn served as our compensation committee during
2009. None of the members of our compensation committee in 2009 was a present or former officer or
employee of our company. In addition, during 2009, none of our officers had an interlock
relationship, as that term is defined by the SEC.
29
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTTERS |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to beneficial ownership of our
common stock, as of March 31, 2010, by:
|
|
|
each beneficial owner of 5% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
each of our directors; |
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers; and |
|
|
|
|
all of our executive officers and directors as a group. |
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except as
indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the
persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to
all shares of the common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property
laws. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage
ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options or warrants held by that person
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2010 are deemed
outstanding, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of
any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, these shares do not include any stock or options
awarded after March 31, 2010. A total of 30,988,326 shares of our common stock were outstanding as
of March 31, 2010.
Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each of the persons in this table is
c/o comScore, Inc., 11950 Democracy Drive, Suite 600, Reston, Virginia 20190.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
of Beneficial |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Ownership(1) |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
5% Stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accel Partners(2) |
|
|
5,902,859 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
% |
Blackrock, Inc.(3) |
|
|
3,272,832 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Named Executive Officers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D.(4) |
|
|
1,602,026 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Gian M. Fulgoni(5) |
|
|
1,077,010 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Kenneth J. Tarpey(6) |
|
|
101,210 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gregory T. Dale(7) |
|
|
83,430 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Christiana L. Lin(8) |
|
|
82,145 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John M. Green |
|
|
140,968 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jeffrey Ganek(9) |
|
|
5,735 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Bruce Golden(10) |
|
|
23,866 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William J. Henderson(11) |
|
|
27,666 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William Katz(9) |
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Ronald J. Korn(12) |
|
|
18,666 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jarl Mohn(9) |
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (eleven persons)(13) |
|
|
3,032,624 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock. |
|
(1) |
|
The information provided in this table is based on our records, information supplied to us by
our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders and information contained in
Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes shares held by Accel VII L.P., Accel Internet Fund III L.P. and Accel Investors 99
L.P. (together, the Accel Funds). Accel VII Associates L.L.C. is a general partner of Accel
VII L.P. and has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by Accel
VII L.P. Accel Internet Fund III Associates L.L.C. is a general partner of Accel Internet
Fund III L.P. and has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by
Accel Internet Fund III L.P. James W. Breyer, Arthur C. Patterson, Theresia Gouw Ranzetta,
James R. Swartz, and J. Peter Wagner are managing members of Accel VII Associates L.L.C. and
Accel Internet Fund III Associates L.L.C. and share voting and dispositive powers. They are
also the General Partners of Accel Investors 99 L.P. and share voting and dispositive power |
30
|
|
|
|
|
with respect to the shares held by Accel Investors 99 L.P. The general partners and managing
members disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares owned by the Accel Funds except to the
extent of their proportionate pecuniary interest therein. The address for Accel Partners is 428
University Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94301. |
|
(3) |
|
This information is derived solely from the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 8,
2010 and effective as of December 31, 2009. BlackRock, Inc. on behalf of its investment
advisory subsidiaries has shared voting and dispositive power as to 3,272,832 shares. Includes
shares reportedly held by the following subsidiaries of Blackrock, Inc. that are investment
advisors: BlackRock Advisors LLC, BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited, BlackRock Asset Management
Australia Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Japan Limited, BlackRock Capital Management,
Inc., BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Institutional
Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A.,
Blackrock International Ltd, BlackRock Investment Management UK Ltd, State Street Research &
Management Co. The address for Blackrock, Inc. and its subsidiaries is c/o Blackrock, Inc.,
40 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10022. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 241,099 shares subject to options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of March 31, 2010. Also includes 581,876 shares held by the Abraham Family
Trust, of which Dr. Abraham and his wife, Linda Abraham, are co-trustees and share voting and
investment control. Mr. and Mrs. Abraham disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares except
to the extent of their respective pecuniary interests. Also includes 140,556 shares held
directly by Dr. Abraham and 24,140 shares held by Mrs. Abraham subject to a right of
repurchase held by the Company pursuant to restricted stock sale agreements.
(5) Includes 223,345 shares subject to options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of March 31, 2010. Also includes 97,804 shares subject to a right of
repurchase held by the Company pursuant to a restricted stock sale agreement. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 98,667 shares subject to a right of repurchase held by the Company pursuant to a
restricted stock sale agreement. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 91,325 shares subject to options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of March 31, 2010. Also includes 56,570 shares subject to a right of
repurchase held by the Company pursuant to a restricted stock sale agreement. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 12,869 shares subject to options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of March 31, 2010. Also includes 35,870 shares subject to a right of
repurchase held by the Company pursuant to a restricted stock sale agreement. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 3,488 shares subject to a right of repurchase held by the Company pursuant to a
restricted stock sale agreement. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 3,488 shares subject to a right of repurchase held by the Company pursuant to a
restricted stock sale agreement. Mr. Golden is a partner of Accel Partners, and he disclaims
beneficial ownership of any of the Accel Funds shares except to the extent of his
proportionate pecuniary interest therein. See footnote (2) of this table for further details
of ownership by Accel Funds. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes 16,000 shares subject to options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of March 31, 2010. Additionally, includes 3,488 shares held directly by
Mr. Henderson that are subject to a right of repurchase held by the Company pursuant to
restricted stock sale agreements. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 7,000 shares subject to options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of March 31, 2010. Additionally, includes 3,488 shares held directly by
Mr. Korn that are subject to a right of repurchase held by the Company pursuant to restricted
stock sale agreements. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes 591,638 shares subject to options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of the March 31, 2010. Also includes 474,295 shares subject to a right of
repurchase held by the Company pursuant to restricted stock sale agreements. Excludes
holdings of John Green, who was a named executive officer for the year ended December 31, 2009
but was no longer an executive officer as of March 31, 2010. |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table summarizes our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Future Issuance |
|
|
|
Securities to be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Equity |
|
|
|
Issued Upon |
|
|
Weighted- Average |
|
|
Compensation Plans |
|
|
|
Exercise of |
|
|
Exercise Price of |
|
|
(Excluding |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
Options, Warrants |
|
|
Options, Warrants |
|
|
Reflected in Column |
|
|
|
and Rights |
|
|
and Rights |
|
|
(a)) |
|
Plan Category |
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
1,180,098 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
|
2,446,277 |
(1) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,180,098 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
|
2,446,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan provides for annual increases in the number of shares
available for issuance thereunder on the first day of each fiscal year, beginning with our
2008 fiscal year, equal to the least of: (i) 4% of the outstanding shares of our common stock
on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year; (ii) 1,800,000 shares; or (iii) such
other amount as our board of directors may determine. |
31
|
|
|
ITEM 13. |
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Policies and Procedures for Transactions with Related Persons
Related person transactions, which we define as all transactions involving an executive
officer, director, nominee for director or a holder of more than five percent of our common stock,
including any of their immediate family members and any entity owned or controlled by such persons,
are reviewed and approved by the audit committee of our board of directors or in some cases by a
majority of disinterested directors on our board of directors.
In any transaction involving a related person, our audit committee and our board of directors
consider all of the available material facts and circumstances of the transaction, including: the
direct and indirect interests of the related persons; in the event the related person is a director
or nominee for director (or immediate family member of a director or an entity with which a
director is affiliated), the impact that the transaction will have on a directors or nominee for
directors independence; the risks, costs and benefits of the transaction to us; and whether any
alternative transactions or sources for comparable services or products are available.
After considering all such facts and circumstances, our audit committee and our board of
directors determines whether approval or ratification of the related person transaction is in our
best interests. For example, if our audit committee determines that the proposed terms of a
related person transaction are reasonable and at least as favorable as could have been obtained
from unrelated third parties, it will recommend to our board of directors that such transaction be
approved or ratified. In addition, if a related person transaction will compromise the
independence of one of our directors or nominees for director, our audit committee may recommend
that our board of directors reject the transaction if it could affect our ability to comply with
securities laws and regulations or NASDAQ listing requirements.
Of the transactions described below, the employment arrangement with Ms. Abraham and several
of the indemnification agreements were entered into prior to the adoption of our audit committee
charter. Accordingly, each of those transactions were approved by disinterested members of our
board of directors after making a determination that the transaction was executed on terms no less
favorable than those we could have obtained from unrelated third parties. The transaction with
Glam Media was ratified by our audit committee after making a determination that the transaction
was executed on terms no less favorable than those we could have obtained from unrelated third
parties.
The policies and procedures described above for reviewing and approving related person
transactions are not in writing. However, the charter for our audit committee provides that one of
the committees responsibilities is to review and approve in advance any proposed related person
transactions.
Transactions and Relationships with Directors, Officers and Five Percent Stockholders
We believe that there has not been any other transaction or series of transactions during 2009
to which we were or are to be a participant in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in
which any director, nominee for director, executive officer or holder of more than five percent of
our common stock, or members of any such persons immediate family, had or will have a direct or
indirect material interest, other than compensation described in Executive Compensation or
Director Compensation elsewhere in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A and as
described below.
Linda Boland Abraham
Since our inception in 1999, Linda Boland Abraham, the spouse of our President and Chief
Executive Officer, Dr. Magid M. Abraham, has been employed in various management positions with us.
Most recently, Ms. Abraham has served as our Chief Marketing Officer and Executive Vice President
of International Business
32
Development beginning in 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2009, Ms. Abraham earned
approximately $199,500 in salary. Also during the year ended December 31, 2009, Ms. Abraham
received an award of shares of our restricted stock pursuant to our 2008 Bonus Plan with a fair
value at the time of grant of approximately $140,448 that was granted in February 2010.
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into an indemnification agreement with each of our directors and executive
officers. The indemnification agreements and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
and bylaws require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by
Delaware law.
Services Agreement with Glam Media
During 2009, we entered into various transactions for the purchases for our products and
services in the ordinary course of business with Glam Media, one of our customers. One of our
directors, Jarl Mohn, is also a member of Glam Medias board of directors. We recognized
approximately $216,000 of revenue pursuant to such agreement during the year ended December 31,
2009. In relation to this counterparty, there was $237,000 included in accounts receivable
balances as of December 31, 2009.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Our board of directors has determined that each of Messrs. Ganek, Golden, Henderson, Katz,
Korn and Mohn is independent under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market; therefore, every member of the audit committee,
compensation committee and nominating and governance committee is an independent director in
accordance with those standards. Other than our customer relationship with Glam Media described
under the heading Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, there were no related person
transactions considered in the last fiscal year in the determination of the independence of the
directors.
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
Audit and Related Fees for Fiscal Years 2008 and 2009
The following table sets forth a summary of the fees billed to us by Ernst & Young LLP for
professional services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively. All of
the services described in the following fee table were approved by the audit committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Audit Fees(1) |
|
$ |
1,459,325 |
|
|
$ |
1,232,500 |
|
Audit-Related Fees(2) |
|
|
73,800 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Tax Fees(3) |
|
|
205,355 |
|
|
|
109,501 |
|
All Other Fees(4) |
|
|
171,105 |
|
|
|
163,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees |
|
$ |
1,909,565 |
|
|
$ |
1,515,672 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit fees represent fees for professional services relating to the audit of our financial
statements included in our annual reports on Form 10-K and our registration statements on
Forms S-1 and S-8, the audit of internal control over financial reporting required by Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the review of the financial statements included in
our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-related fees represent fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably
related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements and not reported
under Audit Fees. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax fees principally represent fees for professional services for tax compliance and tax
advice. |
|
(4) |
|
Other fees consisted of miscellaneous other permissible services not included in the first
three categories and were immaterial for 2008 and 2009. |
The audit committee meets regularly with Ernst & Young LLP throughout the year and
reviews both audit and non-audit services performed by Ernst & Young LLP as well as fees charged
for such services. The audit committee has determined that the provision of the services described
above is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLPs independence in the conduct of its audit
functions.
33
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our audit committee has adopted and our board of directors has approved a policy that sets
forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the
independent auditor may be pre-approved. Pursuant to its audit, audit-related and non-audit
services pre-approval policy, our audit committee may delegate either type of pre-approval
authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must
report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its
next scheduled meeting. Our audit committee pre-approved all audit related, tax and other services
rendered by Ernst & Young LLP in 2008 and 2009, with the exception of 9.7% of the tax services
rendered by Ernst & Young LLP in 2008. Such services that were not pre-approved in 2008 were
promptly brought to the attention of, and were approved by, the audit committee.
PART IV
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
|
|
|
(a)(1) and (a)(2): No financial statements or schedules are filed with this Amendment No. 1
to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. |
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Document |
2.1(1)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 28, 2008, amount comScore, Inc., OpinionCounts,
Inc., M:Metrics, Inc. and Randolph L. Austin, Jr., as Stockholder Representative. (Exhibit
2.1)* |
|
3.1(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (Exhibit 3.3) |
|
3.2(2)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (Exhibit 3.4) |
|
4.1(2)
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (Exhibit 4.1) |
|
4.2(2)
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement by and among comScore Networks, Inc.
and certain holders of preferred stock, dated August 1, 2003 (Exhibit 4.2) |
|
4.3(2)
|
|
Amendment, Waiver and Termination Agreement by and among comScore, Inc. and certain
holders of preferred stock, dated June 8, 2007 (Exhibit 10.20) |
|
4.4(2)
|
|
Warrant to purchase 108,382 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, dated July 31,
2002 (Exhibit 4.10) |
|
10.1(2)
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive officers (Exhibit 10.1) |
|
10.2(3)
|
|
1999 Stock Plan (Exhibit 4.2) |
|
10.3(2)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement under 1999 Stock Plan (Exhibit 10.3) |
|
10.4(2)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Purchase Right under 1999 Stock Plan (Exhibit
10.4) |
|
10.5(2)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units under 1999 Stock Plan (Exhibit 10.5) |
|
10.6(4)
|
|
2007 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated July 29, 2009 (Exhibit 10.3) |
|
10.7(2)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Option under 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.7) |
|
10.8(2)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock under 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.8) |
|
10.9(2)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units under 2007 Equity Incentive Plan
(Exhibit 10.9) |
|
10.10(2)
|
|
Stock Option Agreement with Magid M. Abraham, dated December 16, 2003 (Exhibit 10.10) |
|
10.11(2)
|
|
Stock Option Agreement with Gian M. Fulgoni, dated December 16, 2003 (Exhibit 10.11) |
|
10.12(5)
|
|
Deed of Lease between South of Market LLC (as Landlord) and comScore, Inc. (as Tenant),
dated December 21, 2007 (Exhibit 10.1) |
|
10.13(6)
|
|
Summary of 2008 Executive Compensation Bonus Policy |
|
10.14(7)
|
|
Summary of 2009 Executive Compensation Bonus Policy (Exhibit 10.22) |
|
10.15(8)
|
|
Letter Agreement with Kenneth J. Tarpey, dated April 1, 2009 (Exhibit 10.1) |
|
10.16(4)
|
|
Letter Agreement with John M. Green, dated May 20, 2009 (Exhibit 10.2) |
|
21.1**
|
|
List of Subsidiaries |
|
23.1**
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young |
|
24.1**
|
|
Power of Attorney |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
34
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Document |
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2**
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
The Registrant has omitted certain schedules and exhibits identified therein in accordance
with Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The registrant will furnish the omitted schedules and
exhibits to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed with the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2010 |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed May 28, 2008 (File No. 000-1158172). The number given in parentheses indicates the
corresponding exhibit number in such Form 8-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-1, as amended, dated June 26, 2007 (No. 333-141740). The number given in parentheses
indicates the corresponding exhibit number in such Form S-1. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-8, as amended, dated July 2, 2007 (No. 333-144281). The number given in parentheses
indicates the corresponding exhibit number in such Form S-8. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
filed August 10, 2009 (File No. 000-1158172). The number given in parentheses indicates the
corresponding exhibit number in such Form 10-Q. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed February 5, 2008 (File No. 000-1158172). The number given in parentheses indicates the
corresponding exhibit number in such Form 8-K. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 27,
2007 (File No. 000-1158172). |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed March 16, 2009 (File No. 000-1158172). The number given in parentheses indicates the
corresponding exhibit number in such Form 10-K. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed April 20, 2009 (File No. 000-1158172). The number given in parentheses indicates the
corresponding exhibit number in such Form 8-K. |
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
comScore, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Magid M. Abraham
|
|
|
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D. |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
April 28, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
/s/ Magid M. Abraham
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D.
|
|
President, Chief Executive
Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) and
Director
|
|
April 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kenneth J. Tarpey
Kenneth J. Tarpey
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
|
April 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Chairman of the
Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ Magid M. Abraham
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D.,
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
April 28,
2010 |
36