sv1za
As filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 8, 2009
Registration
No. 333-163277
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
CRIMSON EXPLORATION
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
1311
|
|
20-3037840
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
Incorporation)
|
|
(Primary Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
E. Joseph Grady
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
717 Texas Avenue,
Suite 2900
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 236-7400
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number,
including area code, of
registrants principal executive offices
and agent for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
J. Michael Chambers
Patrick J. Hurley
|
|
James M. Prince
Gillian A. Hobson
|
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
1111 Louisiana Street, Suite 4400
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 220-5800
(713) 236-0822
(fax)
|
|
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2500
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 758-2222
(713) 758-2346 (fax)
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practical after the effective
date of this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company þ
|
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Price(1)
(2)
|
|
|
Registration
Fee(3)
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par
value(2)
|
|
|
$165,600,000
|
|
|
$9,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of
the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes shares of common stock subject to the
underwriters option to purchase additional shares. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
$5,580 of which was previously paid. |
The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act or until this Registration Statement shall
become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange
Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an
offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities
in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
Subject to Completion, dated
December 8, 2009
PROSPECTUS
18,000,000 Shares
Common Stock
We are offering 18,000,000 shares of our common stock. We
have applied to list our common stock on The NASDAQ Global
Market under the symbol CXPO. We anticipate that the
initial public offering price per share of common stock will be
between $6.00 and $8.00. Our common stock is currently traded on
the
Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board under the symbol CXPO.OB.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 16.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Total
|
|
Price to the public
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds to us (before expenses)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to an additional 2,700,000 shares
from us on the same terms and conditions as set forth above if
the underwriters sell more than 18,000,000 shares of common
stock in this offering.
Affiliates of certain of the underwriters are lenders under our
existing revolving credit facility and therefore will receive a
portion of the net proceeds of this offering.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Barclays Capital, on behalf of the underwriters, expects to
deliver the shares on or
about ,
2009.
|
|
Barclays
Capital |
Credit Suisse |
Morgan Keegan & Company,
Inc.
RBS
Pritchard
Capital Partners, LLC
Johnson
Rice & Company L.L.C.
Rodman & Renshaw, LLC
Stifel Nicolaus
Prospectus
dated ,
2009
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
EX-23.1 |
EX-23.2 |
ABOUT THIS
PROSPECTUS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
Except as otherwise indicated herein or as the context otherwise
requires, references in this prospectus to Crimson
Exploration, Crimson, the Company,
our company, we, our, and
us refer collectively to Crimson Exploration Inc.,
its predecessor GulfWest Energy Inc. and our subsidiaries.
Our natural gas and crude oil reserve information as of
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 included in
this prospectus is based on reserve reports prepared by
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., our independent
reserve engineering firm. A summary of the December 31,
2008 report is attached as Appendix B.
Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained in this
prospectus assumes that the underwriters do not exercise their
option to purchase additional shares from us.
i
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information appearing elsewhere in
this prospectus. Because this is a summary, it may not contain
all of the information that you should consider before investing
in our common stock. You should carefully read the entire
prospectus, including the financial data and related notes and
the information presented under the caption Risk
Factors, before making an investment decision. Certain
terms used in this prospectus are defined in the Glossary
of Selected Terms beginning on
page A-1.
Our
Company
Crimson is an independent energy company engaged in the
acquisition, exploitation, exploration and development of
natural gas and crude oil properties. We have historically
focused our operations in the onshore U.S. Gulf Coast and
South Texas regions, which are generally characterized by high
rates of return in known, prolific producing trends. We have
recently expanded our strategic focus to include longer reserve
life resource plays that we believe provide significant
long-term growth potential in multiple formations.
In late 2008 and early 2009, we acquired approximately
12,000 net acres in East Texas where we completed our first
well, the Kardell #1H, in October 2009. This well targeted
the Haynesville Shale and initially produced 30.7 MMcfe/d,
which we believe to be the highest publicly announced initial
production rate to date in that formation. In addition to the
Haynesville Shale, we believe this acreage is equally
prospective in the Bossier Shale and James Lime formations where
industry participants have drilled successful wells on adjacent
acreage.
In 2007, we acquired approximately 2,800 net acres in South
Texas, which we believe is prospective in the Austin Chalk and
the Eagle Ford Shale. We drilled our first well on this acreage,
the Dubose #1, during the fourth quarter of 2009, and we
are preparing to complete the well in the Eagle Ford Shale.
We intend to grow reserves and production by developing our
existing producing property base, developing our East Texas and
South Texas resource potential, and pursuing opportunistic
acquisitions in areas where we have specific operating
expertise. We have developed a significant project inventory of
over 800 drilling locations associated with our existing
property base. Our technical team has a successful track record
of adding reserves through the drillbit. Since January 2008, we
have drilled 34 gross (15.2 net) wells with an overall
success rate of 91% (excluding one well which has not yet been
completed).
As of December 31, 2008, our estimated proved reserves, as
prepared by our independent reserve engineering firm,
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., were
131.9 Bcfe, consisting of 96.2 Bcf of natural gas and
6.0 MMBbl of crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids.
As of December 31, 2008, 73% of our proved reserves were
natural gas, 69% were proved developed and 81% were attributed
to wells and properties operated by us. From 2006 to 2008, we
grew our estimated proved reserves from 46.4 Bcfe to
131.9 Bcfe. In addition, we grew our average daily
production from 7.3 MMcfe/d for the year ended
December 31, 2006 to 43.0 MMcfe/d for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we generated $55.2 million of
Adjusted EBITDAX. Our definition of the non-GAAP financial
measure of Adjusted EBITDAX and a reconciliation of net income
(loss) to Adjusted EBITDAX are provided under
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and
Reconciliations. For the same period, our net income
(loss) was $(16.8) million.
After application of net proceeds of approximately
$117.6 million from this offering (estimated based upon the
midpoint of the range of the offering price on the cover of this
prospectus), we expect to have approximately $83.1 million
of available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit
facility to pursue our 2010 drilling program based upon
$129.5 million outstanding under our revolving credit
facility as of December 4, 2009. See Recent
DevelopmentsAmendments to Revolving Credit Facility.
Our 2010 capital budget is approximately $56 million,
exclusive of acquisitions, of which we
1
expect to spend approximately 76% of our budget on our East
Texas and South Texas resource plays and 24% on our existing
producing assets. We plan to drill 12 gross (6.0 net)
wells in 2010, including 7 gross (3.0 net) wells on
our East Texas resource play acreage, one gross (0.4 net)
well on our South Texas resource play acreage, and 4 gross
(2.6 net) wells in Liberty County. The actual number of
wells drilled and the amount of our 2010 capital expenditures
will depend on market conditions, commodity prices, availability
of capital and drilling and production results.
Our
Strategy
The key elements of our business strategy are:
|
|
|
|
|
Develop our East Texas resource play. We have
approximately 12,000 net acres in San Augustine and
Sabine Counties of East Texas, which we believe is prospective
in the Haynesville Shale, Bossier Shale and James Lime
formations. In November 2009, we announced the completion and
initial production of our first well on this acreage, the
Kardell #1H. The well tested at 30.7 MMcfe/d, which we
believe to be the highest publicly reported
24-hour
initial production rate for a Haynesville Shale well in Texas or
Louisiana to date and is currently flowing to sales. We believe
the Kardell #1H confirms the potential of our Bruin
Prospect, which is comprised of 3,000 net acres in San Augustine
County, resulting in over 100 potential drilling locations in
multiple formations. We are currently in the planning stages of
several wells in this area and intend to further evaluate and
exploit these multiple formations beginning in early 2010. We
have an additional 9,000 net acres outside this prospect
within Sabine and San Augustine Counties, and we expect to
drill our initial well on that acreage in early 2010. We intend
to allocate a substantial portion of our capital budget over the
next several years to develop the significant potential that we
believe exists on our East Texas acreage. Based on our current
capital budget, we expect to drill approximately 7 gross
(3.0 net) wells in 2010 that will target the Haynesville
and Bossier Shales, while retaining future development
opportunities in shallower formations.
|
|
|
|
Develop our South Texas resource play. We have
approximately 2,800 net acres in Bee County, Texas which we
believe is prospective in the Austin Chalk and Eagle Ford Shale.
In November 2009, we drilled our initial well on this acreage,
the Dubose #1. This well is in the process of being
completed with results expected prior to year end 2009. We
intend to allocate a portion of our capital budget in 2010 to
validate the potential we believe exists on our acreage.
|
|
|
|
Exploit our existing producing property base to generate cash
flows. We believe our multi-year drilling
inventory of high return exploitation opportunities on our
existing producing properties provides us with a solid platform
to continue growing our reserves and production for the next
several years. We believe these projects, if successful, will
allow us to fund a larger portion of our resource plays and
exploration activities from cash flows from operations. In 2010,
we intend to focus much of our exploitation drilling on our
Liberty County acreage, located in Southeast Texas. We will be
targeting the Yegua and Cook Mountain formations in which
industry players have recently experienced success on wells in
the area. We own 3D seismic data that covers substantially all
of our Liberty County acreage, giving us a higher degree of
confidence in the potential in this area. We have drilled
11 gross (6.8 net) wells in Liberty County since early
2008 and have successfully completed 82%. During 2010, we intend
to drill 4 gross (2.6 net) wells in this area.
|
|
|
|
Explore in defined producing trends. Our
exploration activities consist primarily of step-out drilling in
known, producing formations in our legacy areas of South and
Southeast Texas. In 2007, we began acquiring seismic data to use
in identifying new exploration prospects. Currently, we have a
library of over 4,200 square miles of 3D seismic data and
over 2,500 linear miles of 2D seismic data.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Make opportunistic acquisitions that meet our strategic and
financial objectives. We seek to acquire natural
gas and crude oil properties, including both undeveloped and
producing reserves in areas where we have specific operating
expertise.
|
|
|
|
Reduce commodity exposure through hedging. We
employ the use of swaps and costless collar derivative
instruments to limit our exposure to commodity prices. As of
September 30, 2009, we had 13.9 Bcfe of equivalent
production hedged, representing 1.8 Bcf, 6.1 Bcf and
3.2 Bcf of natural gas hedges in place and 86 MBbl,
250 MBbl and 124 MBbl of crude oil hedges in place for
the fourth quarter of 2009, the year 2010 and the year 2011,
respectively. The average price of our natural gas and crude oil
hedges in place is $8.19/MMBtu and $86.03/Bbl for the fourth
quarter of 2009, $7.71/MMBtu and $83.02/Bbl in the year 2010 and
$7.32/MMBtu and $66.50/Bbl in the year 2011.
|
Our Competitive
Strengths
Our competitive strengths include:
|
|
|
|
|
Geographically focused operations in basins with established
production profiles. The geographic concentration
of our current operations along the onshore Texas Gulf Coast and
in South Texas allows us to establish economies of scale with
respect to drilling, production, operating and administrative
costs, and enables us to leverage our base of technical
expertise in these geographic areas. In addition, we believe the
cash flows from our existing properties provide a stable
foundation to support our ongoing exploitation and development
efforts.
|
|
|
|
Significant operational control. As of
September 30, 2009, we operated a majority of our producing
wells. As a result, we exercise a significant level of control
over the amount and timing of expenses, capital allocation and
other aspects of development, exploitation and exploration.
While operatorship of future wells on our East Texas acreage
will be subject to negotiation as drilling units are formed, we
expect to operate a significant number of the wells we drill on
this acreage.
|
|
|
|
Proven track record of reserve and production
growth. Since 2005, we have significantly grown
proved reserves and production through a combination of
continued drilling success and the successful acquisition of
underdeveloped properties that have proven to be complementary
to our existing asset base and technical expertise. We plan to
continue this growth by focusing on a balanced combination of
drilling longer life, multi-pay natural gas targets within our
resource plays and exploitation of our producing properties and
undeveloped acreage.
|
|
|
|
Large inventory of identified projects. We
currently have an inventory of over 800 identified potential
drilling locations, including 375 associated with our existing
conventional properties, plus an estimated 422 locations on our
East Texas resource play acreage and an estimated 25 locations
on our South Texas resource play acreage. Since the beginning of
2008, we have drilled 16 gross (10.7 net) operated and
18 gross (4.5 net) non-operated wells and have experienced
a 91% success rate (excluding one well which has not yet been
completed). We expect to drill 12 gross (6.0 net)
wells in 2010.
|
|
|
|
Experienced management and technical
teams. Our senior management team averages over
25 years of experience in the energy industry and is led by
Allan D. Keel, President and Chief Executive Officer, who has
25 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry.
Mr. E. Joseph Grady, our Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, has over 30 years of financial
management experience in the energy industry. Other members of
our senior management include: Mr. Tracy Price, our Senior
Vice PresidentLand Business/Development; Mr. Thomas
H. Atkins, our Senior Vice PresidentExploration; and
Mr. Jay S. Mengle, our Senior Vice
PresidentEngineering, each of whom has more than
25 years of
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
experience in the oil and gas industry. Our experienced
management team has an established track record of successfully
exploiting and developing natural gas and crude oil properties.
|
Our
Operations
Our areas of primary focus include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
East Texas. Our East Texas properties include
approximately 17,000 gross (12,000 net) acres acquired in
2008 and early 2009 in the highly prospective and active
resource play in San Augustine and Sabine Counties, where
we will focus primarily on the pursuit of the Haynesville Shale,
Bossier Shale and James Lime formations. In October 2009, we
drilled and completed our first well in this area, the
Kardell #1H. While drilling this well, we identified
additional prospective formations, including the Pettet and
Knowles Lime.
|
|
|
|
Southeast Texas. Our Southeast Texas
properties primarily include the Felicia field area in Liberty
County. We own approximately 27,300 gross (15,100 net)
acres in Liberty, Madison and Grimes Counties. As of
September 30, 2009, we owned and operated 35 gross
(27.0 net) producing wells, representing approximately 38% of
our average daily production for the first nine months of 2009.
|
|
|
|
South Texas. Our South Texas properties
include approximately 2,800 gross (2,800 net) acres in Bee
County, which we believe to be prospective in the Austin Chalk
and Eagle Ford Shale. Our conventional operations include
approximately 87,600 gross (50,700 net) acres predominately
in Brooks, Lavaca, DeWitt, Zapata, Webb and Matagorda Counties.
|
We also own interests in the following areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado and Other. Our Colorado and other
properties include primarily producing assets and approximately
16,900 gross (11,900 net) acres in the Denver Julesburg
Basin in Colorado (mostly in Adams County) and a minor crude oil
property in Mississippi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southwest Louisiana. Our Southwest Louisiana
properties include approximately 8,200 gross (3,600 net)
acres, primarily in the Fenton field area of Calcasieu Parish
and our legacy Grand Lake and Lacassine fields in Cameron
Parish. In addition, we own a 15% working interest ownership in
2007 exploratory successes in Louisiana at Sabine Lake and West
Cameron 432. On November 24, 2009, we entered into a
purchase and sale agreement for the sale of substantially all of
our Southwest Louisiana properties. See Recent
DevelopmentsSouthwest Louisiana Disposition.
|
4
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our estimated proved reserves as of December 31, 2008,
as estimated by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.,
and production for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The following table also identifies potential drilling
locations and net acreage as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production For
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Gross
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Nine
|
|
|
Net Acreage
|
|
|
Drilling
|
|
|
|
Reserves as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
at
|
|
|
Locations at
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
% Natural
|
|
|
% Proved
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Region
|
|
2008 (MMcfe)
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
2009 (Mcfe/d)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
Southeast Texas
|
|
|
29,393
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
%
|
|
|
85.8
|
%
|
|
|
16,521
|
|
|
|
15,100
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
South Texas
|
|
|
60,602
|
|
|
|
78.0
|
%
|
|
|
59.8
|
%
|
|
|
11,963
|
|
|
|
53,500
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Colorado and Other
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
71.5
|
%
|
|
|
55.3
|
%
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
11,900
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
East
Texas(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
Southwest
Louisiana(3)
|
|
|
10,398
|
|
|
|
62.4
|
%
|
|
|
57.3
|
%
|
|
|
3,139
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Non-operated(3)(4)
|
|
|
24,879
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
|
|
79.8
|
%
|
|
|
10,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
131,947
|
|
|
|
72.9
|
%
|
|
|
68.9
|
%
|
|
|
42,979
|
|
|
|
96,100
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes multiple drilling locations on acreage with multiple
target formations. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
We recently completed our first well on our East Texas acreage,
the Kardell #1H, as a horizontal Haynesville Shale producer, in
which we own a 52% working interest. Drilling locations in this
region were identified assuming an allocated 100 acres per
potential horizontal East Texas well drilled to multiple target
formations. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
On November 24, 2009, we entered into a purchase and sale
agreement for the sale of substantially all of our operated and
certain non-operated Southwest Louisiana properties. See
Recent DevelopmentsSouthwest Louisiana
Disposition. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Our non-operated properties consist primarily of our 25% working
interest in the Samano field in Starr and Hidalgo Counties in
South Texas, our 28% working interest in certain fields in
Liberty County in Southeast Texas and our 15% and 15% respective
working interests resulting from exploratory successes in 2007
at Sabine Lake and West Cameron 432 in Southwest Louisiana. |
Recent
Developments
Amendments to Revolving Credit
Facility. Effective December 7, 2009, we
entered into a fourth amendment to our revolving credit
facility. This amendment provides, among other things, that,
subject to the closing of this offering, (i) the ratio of
our total debt to Adjusted EBITDAX for any four trailing fiscal
quarters may not be greater than 3.50x as of the end of any
fiscal quarter ending on or prior to December 31, 2010, and
3.25x as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending thereafter, and
(ii) the ratio of Adjusted EBITDAX to cash interest expense
for any four trailing fiscal quarters may not be less than 2.25x
as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending on or prior to
December 31, 2010, and 2.75x as of the end of any fiscal
quarter ending thereafter. In addition, this amendment also
provides that, subject to the closing of this offering, the
borrowing base under our revolving credit facility will be
redetermined to be $105.0 million at January 1, 2010
and that we may issue up to $200 million in senior
unsecured notes. Any such issuance of senior unsecured notes
will reduce our borrowing base by 25% of the net proceeds from
such issuance in excess of $150 million.
Southwest Louisiana Disposition. On
November 24, 2009, we entered into a definitive agreement
to sell operated and non-operated working interests in various
producing wells, related production equipment and associated
acreage primarily in Cameron, Calcasieu and Jefferson Davis
parishes in Southwest Louisiana for an aggregate contract price
of $10.2 million, subject to normal
5
purchase price adjustments for environmental defects and oil
and gas operations for the period between the effective date and
the final closing date, and the assumption of all related asset
retirement obligations, with an effective date of
October 1, 2009. The assets include substantially all of
our Southwest Louisiana properties, representing approximately
10.7 Bcfe of proved reserves at December 31, 2008,
with average daily production of approximately 3.8 MMcfe/d
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, or
approximately 9% of our total daily production for such period.
We expect to use the proceeds from this sale to repay
outstanding amounts under our revolving credit facility. We
anticipate closing the transaction prior to 2010, subject to the
prior satisfaction of customary closing conditions. We cannot
assure you that all of the conditions to closing will be timely
satisfied or satisfied at all. The disposition of our Southwest
Louisiana properties has been contemplated in the
redetermination of our borrowing base at January 1, 2010 in
connection with the amendments to our revolving credit facility.
Preferred Stock
Conversion
As of September 30, 2009, there were 80,500 shares of
our Series G convertible preferred stock, par value $0.01
per share (Series G Preferred Stock),
outstanding. OCM GW Holdings, LLC (Oaktree Holdings)
and OCM Crimson Holdings, LLC (OCM Crimson),
affiliates of Oaktree Capital Management, LP (Oaktree
Capital Management), currently hold 76,700 and
10 shares, respectively, of our Series G Preferred
Stock and Allan D. Keel, our President and CEO, currently holds
600 shares of our Series G Preferred Stock. With the
recommendation of an independent committee of our Board of
Directors and the consent of OCM Holdings and OCM Crimson,
holders in the aggregate of approximately 95% of our outstanding
Series G Preferred Stock, on December 8, 2009, we
amended the terms of such preferred stock to provide for the
conversion of all outstanding shares of Series G Preferred
Stock in connection with this offering. See Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions. We
anticipate issuing 8,418,206 shares of our common stock in
connection with the conversion of all of our Series G
Preferred Stock and the accrued but unpaid dividends on those
shares, assuming an offering price of $7.00 per share,
which is the midpoint in the range provided on the cover page of
this prospectus. Of those shares of common stock, we anticipate
issuing an aggregate of 8,021,870 shares to Oaktree
Holdings and OCM Crimson and 62,744 shares to Mr. Keel.
As of September 30, 2009, there were 2,100 shares of
our Series H convertible preferred stock, par value $0.01
per share (our Series H Preferred Stock),
outstanding, which shares were held of record by three
stockholders, including 2,000 shares held by Oaktree
Holdings. Each share of our Series H Preferred Stock is
convertible into the number of shares of our common stock that
is equal to $500 divided by $3.50. Pursuant to the Certificate
of Designations governing the terms of the Series H
Preferred Stock, if Oaktree Holdings or its affiliates convert
all of their shares of Series G Preferred Stock into common
stock, all shares of Series H Preferred Stock automatically
convert into shares of our common stock. We anticipate issuing
300,000 shares of our common stock in connection with the
conversion of all of our Series H Preferred Stock.
Upon the completion of this offering, Oaktree Holdings and OCM
Crimson will together own approximately 31% of our outstanding
common stock and Mr. Keel will hold approximately 4% of our
outstanding common stock, assuming the exercise of all vested
and unvested stock options held by him (in each case, estimated
based upon the midpoint of the range of the offering price on
the cover of this prospectus). Please see Summary
Consolidated Financial DataPro Forma Net Income (Loss) Per
Share Data for information with respect to the effect of
the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock and the Series H
Preferred Stock (the Preferred Stock Conversion) on
our net income (loss) per share.
Principal
Stockholder
Our principal stockholder is Oaktree Holdings, an affiliate of
Oaktree Capital Management. Oaktree Capital Management is a
premier global alternative and non-traditional investment
manager
6
with over $67 billion in assets under management as of
September 30, 2009. The firm emphasizes an opportunistic,
value-oriented and risk-controlled approach to investments in
distressed debt, high yield and convertible bonds, specialized
private equity (including power infrastructure), real estate,
emerging market and Japanese securities, and mezzanine finance.
Oaktree Capital Management was founded in 1995 by a group of
principals who have worked together since the mid-1980s.
Headquartered in Los Angeles, the firm today has over
580 employees in 14 offices worldwide.
Risk
Factors
Investing in our common stock involves substantial risk. For a
discussion of certain risks you should consider in making an
investment, see Risk Factors beginning on
page 16. In particular, the following considerations may
offset our business strengths or have a negative effect on our
business strategy as well as on activities on our properties,
which could cause a decrease in the price of our common stock
and result in a loss of all or a portion of your investment:
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids prices are
volatile, and a decline in prices can significantly affect our
financial results and impede our growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial production rates in shale plays, and particularly in the
Haynesville Shale, tend to decline steeply in the first twelve
months of production and are not necessarily indicative of
sustained production rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our development and exploration operations, including on our
East Texas resource play acreage, require substantial capital,
and we may be unable to obtain needed capital or financing on
satisfactory terms, which could lead to a loss of properties and
a decline in our natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
reserves.
|
|
|
|
Reserve estimates depend on many assumptions that may turn out
to be inaccurate. Any material inaccuracies in these reserve
estimates or underlying assumptions could materially reduce the
estimated quantities and present value of our reserves.
|
|
|
|
We have incurred net losses in the past and there can be no
assurance that we will be profitable in the future.
|
|
|
|
Unless we replace our natural gas and crude oil reserves, our
reserves and production will decline, which would adversely
affect our cash flows, our ability to raise capital and the
value of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which may
adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to operate our
business.
|
Corporate
Structure
Our company was founded in 1987 and is incorporated in Delaware.
In February 2005, the Company, previously incorporated in Texas
and named GulfWest Energy Inc., was recapitalized and in June
2005 was reincorporated as a Delaware corporation, and renamed
Crimson Exploration Inc. We are organized as a holding company
with most of our oil and gas assets held in our primary
operating subsidiary.
Our
Offices
Our principal office is located at 717 Texas Avenue,
Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002 and our telephone number
is
(713) 236-7400.
7
The
Offering
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
Crimson Exploration Inc. |
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
18,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
Underwriters option to purchase additional shares |
|
We have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to an additional 2,700,000 shares of
common stock. |
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding immediately following this offering |
|
33,134,607 shares of common stock (excluding 2,700,000
shares that will be sold to the underwriters if they exercise
their option to purchase additional shares), including
8,718,206 shares that will be issued pursuant to the
Preferred Stock Conversion, assuming an offering price of $7.00,
which is the midpoint of the range provided on the cover page of
this prospectus |
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that our net proceeds from this offering will be
approximately $117.6 million after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses,
assuming an offering price of $7.00, which is the midpoint of
the range provided on the cover page of this prospectus. |
|
|
|
|
|
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to repay
approximately $107.6 million in aggregate principal amount
of indebtedness outstanding under our revolving credit facility
and to repay our $10 million unsecured promissory note in
full. |
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates of certain of the underwriters are lenders under our
existing revolving credit facility and therefore will receive a
portion of the net proceeds of this offering. See
Underwriting. |
|
|
|
Dividend policy |
|
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock or preferred stock, and we do not currently anticipate
paying any cash dividends on our common stock or preferred stock
in the foreseeable future. For more information, see
Dividend Policy. |
|
|
|
Risk factors |
|
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. See Risk Factors and other information
included elsewhere in this prospectus for a discussion of
factors you should consider before investing in our common stock. |
Unless we specifically state otherwise, the information in this
prospectus (i) gives effect to the Preferred Stock
Conversion as if it will occur in December of 2009;
(ii) assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their
option to purchase 2,700,000 additional shares of common stock;
(iii) excludes an aggregate of 551,315 shares of
common stock reserved and available for future issuance under
our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and 1,960,310 shares issuable
upon exercise of outstanding options at a weighted average
exercise price of $8.82 per share as of December 4, 2009;
and (iv) is based on 6,416,401 shares outstanding
(including approximately 0.6 million shares of restricted
common stock to be issued to our employees, including to our
executive officers, pursuant to our
performance-based
long-term
incentive compensation plan) as of December 4, 2009.
8
Summary
Consolidated Financial Data
The following table presents summary historical consolidated
financial data of our business, as of the dates and for the
periods indicated. The summary historical consolidated financial
data as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 have
been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements
and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
summary historical consolidated financial data for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 have been derived
from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The September 30, 2008 and
2009 financial statements have been prepared on a basis
consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements
and reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary
for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of
operations for the periods presented.
The summary consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with Selected Historical Consolidated
Financial Data, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
Risk Factors and our consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales
|
|
$
|
10,570
|
|
|
$
|
67,868
|
|
|
$
|
116,415
|
|
|
$
|
92,075
|
|
|
$
|
55,135
|
|
Crude oil sales
|
|
|
10,908
|
|
|
|
27,021
|
|
|
|
41,860
|
|
|
|
34,150
|
|
|
|
21,519
|
|
Natural gas liquids sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,273
|
|
|
|
27,405
|
|
|
|
24,687
|
|
|
|
9,089
|
|
Operating overhead and other income
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
21,659
|
|
|
|
109,543
|
|
|
|
186,768
|
|
|
|
151,801
|
|
|
|
86,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
5,633
|
|
|
|
12,034
|
|
|
|
20,825
|
|
|
|
15,363
|
|
|
|
13,518
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
11,702
|
|
|
|
16,266
|
|
|
|
14,355
|
|
|
|
6,061
|
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
|
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
2,873
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
30,796
|
|
|
|
50,467
|
|
|
|
36,030
|
|
|
|
41,599
|
|
Impaired assets of oil and gas
properties(1)
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
25,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
8,730
|
|
|
|
14,542
|
|
|
|
22,406
|
|
|
|
17,819
|
|
|
|
13,381
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of
assets(2)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
(15,210
|
)
|
|
|
(15,272
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
24,118
|
|
|
|
75,927
|
|
|
|
140,673
|
|
|
|
95,971
|
|
|
|
77,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
operations(3)
|
|
|
(2,459
|
)
|
|
|
33,616
|
|
|
|
46,095
|
|
|
|
55,830
|
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(14,949
|
)
|
|
|
(21,109
|
)
|
|
|
(15,871
|
)
|
|
|
(16,349
|
)
|
Other financing costs
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
(1,322
|
)
|
|
|
(1,501
|
)
|
|
|
(1,174
|
)
|
|
|
(1,110
|
)
|
Loss from equity in investments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
6,082
|
|
|
|
(18,186
|
)
|
|
|
49,409
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
(17,238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
(34,457
|
)
|
|
|
26,799
|
|
|
|
(15,380
|
)
|
|
|
(34,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
(841
|
)
|
|
|
72,894
|
|
|
|
40,450
|
|
|
|
(25,897
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(1,425
|
)
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
(26,691
|
)
|
|
|
(15,105
|
)
|
|
|
9,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
46,203
|
|
|
|
25,345
|
|
|
|
(16,817
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(3,649
|
)
|
|
|
(4,453
|
)
|
|
|
(4,234
|
)
|
|
|
(3,164
|
)
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(1,790
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,884
|
)
|
|
$
|
41,969
|
|
|
$
|
22,181
|
|
|
$
|
(20,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
4,330
|
|
|
|
5,371
|
|
|
|
5,225
|
|
|
|
6,301
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.81
|
|
|
$
|
4.25
|
|
|
$
|
(3.20
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
4,330
|
|
|
|
10,360
|
|
|
|
10,289
|
|
|
|
6,301
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.46
|
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
|
$
|
(3.20
|
)
|
Other Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDAX(4)
|
|
$
|
9,219
|
|
|
$
|
76,003
|
|
|
$
|
132,707
|
|
|
$
|
108,715
|
|
|
$
|
55,160
|
|
Capital
expenditures(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
253,434
|
|
|
$
|
58,482
|
|
|
$
|
58,032
|
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
Other capital
expenditures(6)
|
|
|
21,777
|
|
|
|
59,049
|
|
|
|
141,795
|
|
|
|
82,577
|
|
|
|
16,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,777
|
|
|
$
|
312,483
|
|
|
$
|
200,277
|
|
|
$
|
140,609
|
|
|
$
|
16,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009(7)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
425,236
|
|
|
$
|
425,236
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
462,481
|
|
|
|
464,481
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
291,526
|
|
|
|
175,941
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
106,542
|
|
|
|
224,127
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
462,481
|
|
|
|
464,481
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008, includes (i) an
impairment expense of $10.2 million in December 2008 with
respect to our Grand Lake Field in Southwest Louisiana,
resulting from negative reserve revisions resulting from year
end low commodity prices, and (ii) $25.8 million in
asset impairments in the nine months ended September 30,
2008 resulting from our capital investment in the Rodessa
formation within the Madisonville Field. |
|
(2) |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, includes a gain of
$15.6 million resulting from the disposition of our
interest in the Barnett Shale Play in January 2008. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Non-cash equity-based compensation charges were
$5.4 million, $4.7 million and $3.8 million, in
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Non-cash equity-based
compensation charges were $1.9 million and
$4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Adjusted EBITDAX is a non-GAAP financial measure. Our definition
of Adjusted EBITDAX and a reconciliation of net income (loss) to
Adjusted EBITDAX is provided under Non-GAAP
Financial Measures and Reconciliations. |
|
(5) |
|
Capital expenditures are derived from our consolidated
statements of cash flows in our financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
(6) |
|
Other capital expenditures consists primarily of capital
drilling and lease acquisitions. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
On an adjusted pro forma basis to give effect to this offering
(estimated based upon the midpoint of the range of the offering
price on the cover of this prospectus), the application of the
estimated net proceeds of this offering, the Preferred Stock
Conversion, the issuance of $12 million in unsecured
promissory notes and the repayment of loans under our revolving
credit facility with proceeds of one of such promissory notes. |
10
Pro Forma Net
Income (Loss) Per Share Data
The pro forma data presented in the following table gives effect
to the Preferred Stock Conversion as of the beginning of the
period presented (estimated based upon the midpoint of the range
of the offering price on the cover of this prospectus).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma preferred stock dividends
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
|
46,203
|
|
|
|
(16,817
|
)
|
Pro forma basic net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
13,263
|
|
|
|
14,449
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
3.48
|
|
|
$
|
(1.16
|
)
|
Pro forma diluted net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
13,468
|
|
|
|
14,449
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
3.43
|
|
|
$
|
(1.16
|
)
|
11
Summary Reserve
and Historical Operating Data
The following tables present certain information with respect to
our estimated proved natural gas, crude oil and natural gas
liquids reserves at year end and operating data for the periods
presented. The table shows estimated net proved reserves and
related data, based on the reserve report at December 31,
2006, 2007 and 2008, substantially all of which were prepared by
our independent petroleum engineers. The table also shows proved
reserves and related data at September 30, 2009 based upon
a reserve report prepared by our independent petroleum
engineers. Our September 30, 2009 proved reserves and
related
PV-10 were
significantly affected by reduced commodity prices and reduced
capital expenditures for drilling during 2009. You should refer
to Risk Factors, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, BusinessProved Reserves and
BusinessProduction, Revenue and Price History
when evaluating the material presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
9,068
|
|
|
|
13,136
|
|
|
|
9,753
|
|
|
|
8,143
|
|
Crude oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Natural gas liquids (MBbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Total (MMcfe)
|
|
|
2,652
|
|
|
|
13,236
|
|
|
|
19,222
|
|
|
|
14,598
|
|
|
|
11,733
|
|
Average Sales Prices (Before Hedging):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
|
$
|
6.78
|
|
|
$
|
8.92
|
|
|
$
|
9.83
|
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
$
|
63.29
|
|
|
$
|
74.38
|
|
|
$
|
101.13
|
|
|
$
|
112.98
|
|
|
$
|
52.80
|
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.92
|
|
|
$
|
53.07
|
|
|
$
|
58.49
|
|
|
$
|
27.19
|
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
$
|
8.34
|
|
|
$
|
8.02
|
|
|
$
|
10.14
|
|
|
$
|
11.24
|
|
|
$
|
4.68
|
|
Average Sales Prices (After
Hedging)(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
$
|
6.85
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
8.86
|
|
|
$
|
9.44
|
|
|
$
|
6.77
|
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
$
|
59.00
|
|
|
$
|
66.09
|
|
|
$
|
84.03
|
|
|
$
|
88.60
|
|
|
$
|
81.46
|
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.92
|
|
|
$
|
53.07
|
|
|
$
|
58.49
|
|
|
$
|
27.19
|
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
$
|
8.10
|
|
|
$
|
8.25
|
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
|
$
|
10.34
|
|
|
$
|
7.31
|
|
Expenses: (Mcfe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
$
|
2.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
3.29
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
$
|
2.47
|
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
Proved Reserves (end of
period)(2)(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
31,388
|
|
|
|
91,239
|
|
|
|
96,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,768
|
|
Crude oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
Natural gas liquids (MBbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,590
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
Total proved reserves (MMcfe)
|
|
|
46,394
|
|
|
|
130,197
|
|
|
|
131,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,854
|
|
Percent proved developed reserves
|
|
|
88%
|
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
69%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68%
|
|
PV-10 (in
millions)(4)
|
|
$
|
102.4
|
|
|
$
|
531.4
|
|
|
$
|
291.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
190.8
|
|
Standardized measure (in
millions)(5)
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
|
399.5
|
|
|
|
260.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.A.
|
|
Prices utilized in
estimates(6):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (MMBtu)
|
|
$
|
6.03
|
|
|
$
|
6.80
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.30
|
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
$
|
61.06
|
|
|
$
|
92.50
|
|
|
$
|
41.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
67.00
|
|
12
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts shown are based on natural gas and crude oil sales, net
of realized commodity derivative gains (losses). |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Does not give effect to the disposition of substantially all of
our Southwest Louisiana properties, representing approximately
8.5 Bcfe of proved reserves at September 30, 2009,
approximately $19.9 million of
PV-10 as of
September 30, 2009, and with an average daily production of
approximately 3.8 MMcfe/d for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, or approximately 9% of our total daily
production for such period. See Recent
DevelopmentsSouthwest Louisiana Disposition. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Our independent petroleum engineers did not prepare a reserve
report for proved reserves and related data at
September 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
PV-10 is a
non-GAAP financial measure. A reconciliation of our Standardized
Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows to
PV-10 is
provided under Non-GAAP Financial Measures and
Reconciliations. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
The Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows represents
the present value of estimated future cash inflows from proved
natural gas and crude oil reserves, less future development and
production costs, and income tax expenses, discounted at 10% per
annum to reflect timing of future cash flows and using the same
pricing assumptions as were used to calculate
PV-10.
Standardized Measure differs from
PV-10
because Standardized Measure includes the effect of future
income taxes. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Natural gas prices are based on Henry Hub spot prices at year
end, except for 2006 which is based on NYMEX prices. Oil prices
are based upon year end West Texas Intermediate posted prices.
Under new SEC rules, prices used in determining our proved
reserves as of December 31, 2009 will be based upon an
unweighted
12-month
first day of the month average price of $3.87 per MMBtu (Henry
Hub spot) of natural gas and $57.65 per barrel of oil (West
Texas Intermediate posted). These are adjusted for quality,
energy content, transportation fees and regional price
differentials. |
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures and Reconciliations
Adjusted
EBITDAX
EBITDAX represents net income (loss) before net interest
expense, taxes, and depreciation, amortization and exploration
expenses. Adjusted EBITDAX represents EBITDAX as further
adjusted to reflect the items included in the table below, all
of which will be required in determining our compliance with
financial covenants under our revolving credit facility and
second lien term loan agreement.
We have included EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX in this prospectus
to provide investors with a supplemental measure of our
operating performance and information about the calculation of
some of the financial covenants that are contained in our credit
agreements. We believe EBITDAX is an important supplemental
measure of operating performance because it eliminates items
that have less bearing on our operating performance and so
highlights trends in our core business that may not otherwise be
apparent when relying solely on generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP, financial measures. We also believe that
securities analysts, investors and other interested parties
frequently use EBITDAX in the evaluation of issuers, many of
which present EBITDAX when reporting their results. Adjusted
EBITDAX is a material component of the covenants that are
imposed on us by our revolving credit facility and second lien
term loan agreement. We are subject to financial covenant ratios
that are or will be calculated by reference to Adjusted EBITDAX.
Non-compliance with the financial covenants contained in these
credit agreements could result in a default, an acceleration in
the repayment of amounts outstanding, and a termination of
lending commitments. For a description of required financial
covenant levels and actual ratio calculations based on Adjusted
EBITDAX, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of OperationsFinancial
ConditionLiquidity and Capital ResourcesCovenant
compliance. Our management and external
13
users of our financial statements, such as investors, commercial
banks, research analysts and others, also use EBITDAX and
Adjusted EBITDAX to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
the financial performance of our assets without regard to
financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay
interest costs and support our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
our operating performance and return on capital as compared to
those of other companies in our industry, without regard to
financing or capital structure; and
|
|
|
|
the feasibility of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities.
|
EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX are not presentations made in
accordance with GAAP. As discussed above, we believe that the
presentation of EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX in this prospectus
is appropriate. However, when evaluating our results, you should
not consider EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX in isolation of, or as
a substitute for, measures of our financial performance as
determined in accordance with GAAP, such as net income (loss).
EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX have material limitations as
performance measures because they exclude items that are
necessary elements of our costs and operations. Because other
companies may calculate EBITDAX and Adjusted EBITDAX differently
than we do, EBITDAX may not be, and Adjusted EBITDAX as
presented in this prospectus is not, comparable to
similarly-titled measures reported by other companies.
The following table reconciles net income (loss) to EBITDAX and
Adjusted EBITDAX for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,072
|
|
|
$
|
(3,543
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,859
|
|
|
$
|
(431
|
)
|
|
$
|
46,203
|
|
|
$
|
25,345
|
|
|
$
|
(16,817
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,154
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
14,949
|
|
|
|
21,109
|
|
|
|
15,871
|
|
|
|
16,349
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(3,204
|
)
|
|
|
(792
|
)
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
26,691
|
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
(9,080
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,257
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
30,796
|
|
|
|
50,467
|
|
|
|
36,030
|
|
|
|
41,599
|
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
|
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
2,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDAX
|
|
$
|
11,712
|
|
|
$
|
926
|
|
|
$
|
8,101
|
|
|
$
|
48,078
|
|
|
$
|
154,435
|
|
|
$
|
94,228
|
|
|
$
|
34,924
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
(6,082
|
)
|
|
|
18,186
|
|
|
|
(49,409
|
)
|
|
|
(1,665
|
)
|
|
|
17,238
|
|
Non-cash equity-based compensation charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
3,820
|
|
|
|
4,738
|
|
|
|
5,436
|
|
|
|
4,451
|
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
Impaired assets
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
3,689
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
25,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
financing(1)
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
Forgiveness of debt
|
|
|
(12,476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on the disposition of assets
|
|
|
2,034
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
(15,210
|
)
|
|
|
(15,272
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDAX
|
|
$
|
4,309
|
|
|
$
|
8,296
|
|
|
$
|
9,219
|
|
|
$
|
76,003
|
|
|
$
|
132,707
|
|
|
$
|
108,715
|
|
|
$
|
55,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes amortization of deferred finance costs and other fees
and expenses payable under our credit agreements. |
14
PV-10
PV-10 is a
non-GAAP financial measure and represents the year-end present
value of estimated future cash inflows from proved natural gas
and crude oil reserves, less future development and production
costs, discounted at 10% per annum to reflect timing of future
cash flows and using pricing assumptions in effect at the end of
the period.
PV-10
differs from Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash Flows
because it does not include the effects of income taxes or
non-property related expenses such as general and administrative
expenses and debt service or depreciation, depletion and
amortization on future net revenues. Neither
PV-10 nor
Standardized Measure represents an estimate of fair market value
of our natural gas and crude oil properties.
PV-10 is
used by the industry and by our management as an arbitrary
reserve asset value measure to compare against past reserve
bases and the reserve bases of other business entities that are
not dependent on the taxpaying status of the entity. GAAP does
not require calculation of Standardized Measure for interim
financial statements, and therefore there is no comparable GAAP
financial measure to
PV-10 for
September 30, 2009.
The following table provides a reconciliation of our
Standardized Measure to
PV-10:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted net cash flows
|
|
$
|
77.4
|
|
|
$
|
399.5
|
|
|
$
|
260.9
|
|
Present value of future income tax and other discounted at 10%
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
131.9
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PV-10
|
|
$
|
102.4
|
|
|
$
|
531.4
|
|
|
$
|
291.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the risk factors included below as
well as the other information contained in this prospectus
before investing in our common stock, or deciding whether you
will or will not participate in this offering. Any of the
following risks could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition or results of operations. In such
a case, you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to
Our Business
Natural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids prices are volatile, and a
decline in prices can significantly affect our financial results
and impede our growth.
Our revenue, cash flow from operations and future growth depend
upon the prices and demand for natural gas, crude oil and
natural gas liquids. The markets for these commodities are very
volatile. Even relatively modest drops in prices can
significantly affect our financial results and impede our
growth. Changes in natural gas, crude oil and natural gas
liquids prices have a significant impact on the value of our
reserves and on our cash flow. In addition, periods of sustained
lower prices may compel us to reduce our capital expenditures
and budget for drilling. Prices for natural gas, crude oil and
natural gas liquids may fluctuate widely in response to
relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for natural
gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids and a variety of
additional factors that are beyond our control, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the domestic and foreign supply of natural gas, crude oil and
natural gas liquids;
|
|
|
|
the price of foreign imports;
|
|
|
|
worldwide economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
political and economic conditions in oil producing countries,
including the Middle East and South America;
|
|
|
|
the ability of members of the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries to agree to and maintain oil price and
production controls;
|
|
|
|
the level of consumer product demand;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
technological advances affecting energy consumption;
|
|
|
|
availability of pipeline infrastructure, treating,
transportation and refining capacity;
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes; and
|
|
|
|
the price and availability of alternative fuels.
|
Lower natural gas and crude oil prices may not only decrease our
revenues on a per share basis, but also may reduce the amount of
natural gas and crude oil that we can produce economically. This
may result in our having to make substantial downward
adjustments to our estimated proved reserves.
Our East Texas
leases must be drilled before expiration, generally within three
years, in order to hold the leases by production. In the highly
competitive market for Haynesville Shale acreage, failure to
drill sufficient wells timely to hold this acreage will result
in a substantial renewal cost, or if renewal is not feasible,
loss of lease investment and prospective drilling opportunities
in the Haynesville Shale, Bossier Shale and James Lime
formations.
Our East Texas leases have three year terms which require that
an initial producing well be drilled prior to expiration date or
the lease will terminate. Most of our leases in this area were
signed in
16
late 2008. Generally, once an initial well is drilled and
completed as a producer, the lease is extended for the duration
of production subject to payment of royalties and additional
wells may be drilled on that lease. The leases in this area are
extremely fragmented and much of the leased acreage is not
contiguous. In many cases, contiguous leases owned by us are not
large enough to accommodate horizontal drilling to the
Haynesville Shale, which usually involves a horizontal lateral
of between 4,000 to 5,000 feet within lease lines. In other
cases, leases may be from fractional interest land owners and
may not comprise a sufficient aggregate percentage working
interest to make such a well economic. As a result, in order to
realize the drilling opportunities in the Haynesville Shale,
Bossier Shale and James Lime formations, we and other similarly
situated major lease owners and operators in East Texas will
need to cooperate and negotiate joint drilling operations in
order to drill initial wells prior to lease expirations. These
negotiations may include the right to act as operator for
jointly owned wells. If we do not reach agreements with other
major lease owners and operators to drill wells prior to lease
expirations, or if we are unable to drill timely sufficient
wells to hold our acreage, we will lose the drilling
opportunities and investment in the expiring leases unless we
can successfully negotiate to renew the leases. We may not be
able to renew the expired leases, or if renewed, the cost of
releasing could be substantial, particularly if development in
this area proves successful.
Part of our
strategy involves exploratory drilling, including drilling in
new or emerging plays. As a result, our drilling results in
these areas are uncertain.
The results of our exploratory drilling in new or emerging
plays, such as in our East Texas resource play, are more
uncertain than drilling results in areas that are developed and
have established production. Since new or emerging plays and new
formations have limited or no production history, we are less
able to use past drilling results in those areas to help predict
our future drilling results. Accordingly, our drilling results
are subject to greater risks in these areas and could be
unsuccessful. To the extent we are unable to execute our
expected drilling program in these areas, because of
disappointing drilling results, capital constraints, lease
expirations, access to adequate gathering systems or pipeline
take-away capacity, availability of drilling rigs and other
services, or otherwise,
and/or
natural gas and crude oil prices decline, we may not realize a
return on our investment in these areas or the return on
investment may not be as attractive as we anticipate and our
common stock price may decrease. We could incur material
write-downs of unevaluated properties, and the value of our
undeveloped acreage could decline in the future if our drilling
results are unsuccessful.
The results of
our planned exploratory drilling in our East Texas and South
Texas resource plays, which are newly emerging plays with
limited drilling and production history, are subject to more
uncertainties than our drilling program in our more established
areas of operation in the onshore South Texas and U.S. Gulf
Coast regions and may not meet our expectations for reserves or
production.
We have recently completed drilling our first well in the
Haynesville Shale in East Texas, for which we were not operator,
as well as a test well in Bee County, South Texas to the Eagle
Ford Shale. The exploration of the Haynesville Shale in the East
Texas area where we own leases has been limited. Part of our
drilling strategy to maximize recoveries from the Haynesville
Shale involves the drilling of horizontal wells using completion
techniques that have proven to be successful in other shale
formations. Our experience with horizontal drilling of these
shale plays is limited. The ultimate success of these drilling
and completion strategies and techniques in these formations
will be better evaluated over time as more wells are drilled and
production profiles are better established. Accordingly, the
results of our future drilling in the emerging shale plays are
more uncertain than drilling results in our more established
areas of operation with established reserves and production
history.
17
Initial
production rates in shale plays, and particularly in the
Haynesville Shale, tend to decline steeply in the first twelve
months of production and are not necessarily indicative of
sustained production rates.
The initial production rate for our first well in our
Haynesville acreage was 30.7 MMcfe/d, which we believe to be the
highest publicly reported
24-hour
initial production rate for a Haynesville Shale well in Texas or
Louisiana. However, initial production rates in shale plays, and
particularly in the Haynesville Shale, tend to decline steeply
in the first twelve months of production and are not necessarily
indicative of sustained production rates.
Our
development and exploration operations, including on our East
Texas resource play acreage, require substantial capital, and we
may be unable to obtain needed capital or financing on
satisfactory terms, which could lead to a loss of properties and
a decline in our natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
reserves.
The oil and gas industry is capital intensive. We make and
expect to continue to make substantial capital expenditures in
our business and operations for the exploration, development,
production and acquisition of natural gas, crude oil and natural
gas liquids reserves. We intend to finance our future capital
expenditures primarily with cash flow from operations and
borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our cash flow
from operations and access to capital is subject to a number of
variables, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our proved reserves;
|
|
|
|
the level of natural gas and crude oil we are able to produce
from existing wells;
|
|
|
|
the prices at which natural gas and crude oil are sold; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to acquire, locate and produce new reserves.
|
If our revenues decrease as a result of lower natural gas, crude
oil and natural gas liquids prices, operating difficulties,
declines in reserves or for any other reason, we may have
limited ability to obtain the capital necessary to sustain our
operations at current levels or to further develop and exploit
our current properties, or for exploratory activity. In order to
fund our capital expenditures, we may need to seek additional
financing. Our credit agreements contain covenants restricting
our ability to incur additional indebtedness without the consent
of the lenders. Our lenders may withhold this consent in their
sole discretion. In addition, if our borrowing base is
redetermined resulting in a lower borrowing base under our
revolving credit facility, we may be unable to obtain financing
otherwise available under our revolving credit facility. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital
ResourcesCapital resources.
Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain debt or equity
financing on terms favorable to us, or at all. In particular,
the cost of raising money in the debt and equity capital markets
has increased substantially while the availability of funds from
those markets generally has diminished significantly. Also, as a
result of concerns about the stability of financial markets
generally and the solvency of counterparties specifically, the
cost of obtaining money from the credit markets generally has
increased as many lenders and institutional investors have
increased interest rates, enacted tighter lending standards,
refused to refinance existing debt at maturity on terms that are
similar to existing debt, and reduced, or in some cases ceased,
to provide funding to borrowers. The failure to obtain
additional financing could result in a curtailment of our
operations relating to exploration and development of our
prospects, which in turn could lead to a possible loss of
properties and a decline in our natural gas, crude oil and
natural gas liquids reserves.
18
Recent changes
in the financial and credit markets may impact economic growth
and natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids prices may
continue to be adversely affected by general economic
conditions.
Based on a number of economic indicators, global economic
activity has slowed substantially. At the present time, the rate
at which the global economy will slow has become increasingly
uncertain. A continued slowing of global economic growth, and,
in particular, economic growth in the United States, will
likely continue to reduce demand for natural gas, crude oil and
natural gas liquids, which in turn could likely result in lower
prices for natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids.
Natural gas and crude oil prices dropped dramatically from
record levels of approximately $13 per MMbtu and $145 per
barrel, respectively, in July 2008 to below $3 per MMbtu in
September 2009 and below $34 per barrel in December 2008. A
reduction in demand for, and the resulting lower prices of,
natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids could adversely
affect our results of operations.
Recent market
events and conditions, including disruptions in the U.S. and
international credit markets and other financial systems and the
deterioration of the U.S. and global economic conditions, could,
among other things, impede access to capital or increase the
cost of capital, which would have an adverse effect on our
ability to fund our working capital and other capital
requirements.
Recent market events and conditions, including unprecedented
disruptions in the current credit and financial markets and the
deterioration of economic conditions in the U.S. and
internationally have had a significant material adverse impact
on a number of financial institutions and have limited access to
capital and credit for many companies. These disruptions could,
among other things, make it more difficult for us to obtain, or
increase our cost of obtaining, capital and financing for our
operations. Access to additional capital may not be available on
terms acceptable to us or at all. Difficulties in obtaining
capital and financing or increased costs for obtaining capital
and financing for our operations would have an adverse effect on
our ability to fund our working capital and other capital
requirements.
We have
incurred net losses in the past and there can be no assurance
that we will be profitable in the future.
We have incurred net losses in two of the last five fiscal
years. We cannot assure you that our current level of operating
results will continue or improve. Our activities could require
additional debt or equity financing. Our future operating
results may fluctuate significantly depending upon a number of
factors, including industry conditions, prices of natural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids, rates of production, timing
of capital expenditures and drilling success. Negative changes
in these variables could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and the
market value of our common stock.
Reserve
estimates depend on many assumptions that may turn out to be
inaccurate. Any material inaccuracies in these reserve estimates
or underlying assumptions could materially reduce the estimated
quantities and present value of our reserves.
The process of estimating natural gas and crude oil reserves is
complex. It requires interpretations of available technical data
and many estimates, including estimates based upon assumptions
relating to economic factors. Any significant inaccuracies in
these interpretations or estimates could materially reduce the
estimated quantities and present value of reserves shown in this
prospectus. See Business for information about our
crude oil and natural gas reserves.
In order to prepare our estimates, we must project production
rates and timing of development expenditures. We must also
analyze available geological, geophysical, production and
engineering data. The extent, quality and reliability of this
data can vary. The process also requires economic assumptions
about matters such as crude oil and natural gas prices, drilling
and operating expenses, the amount and timing of capital
expenditures, taxes and the availability of funds.
19
Actual future production, crude oil and natural gas prices,
revenues, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses
and quantities of recoverable natural gas and crude oil reserves
most likely will vary from our estimates. Any significant
variance could materially affect the estimated quantities and
present value of reserves shown in this prospectus. In addition,
we may adjust estimates of proved reserves to reflect production
history, results of exploration and development, prevailing
natural gas and crude oil prices and other factors, many of
which are beyond our control.
Approximately
31% of our total estimated proved reserves at December 31,
2008 were proved undeveloped reserves.
Recovery of proved undeveloped reserves requires significant
capital expenditures and successful drilling operations. The
reserve data included in the reserve engineer reports assumes
that substantial capital expenditures are required to develop
such reserves. Although cost and reserve estimates attributable
to our natural gas and crude oil reserves have been prepared in
accordance with industry standards, we cannot be sure that the
estimated costs are accurate, that development will occur as
scheduled or that the results of such development will be as
estimated.
The present
value of future net cash flows from our proved reserves will not
necessarily be the same as the current market value of our
estimated natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
reserves.
You should not assume that the present value of future net
revenues from our proved reserves referred to in this prospectus
is the current market value of our estimated natural gas, crude
oil and natural gas liquids reserves. In accordance with the
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), the estimated discounted future net cash
flows from our proved reserves are based on prices and costs on
the date of the estimate, held flat for the life of the
properties. Actual future prices and costs may differ materially
from those used in the present value estimate. The present value
of future net revenues from our proved reserves as of
December 31, 2008 was based on a Henry Hub spot market
price of $5.71 per MMbtu for natural gas and a West Texas
Intermediate posted price of $41.00 per barrel for crude oil on
December 31, 2008. If crude oil prices were $1.00 per Bbl
lower than the price used, our
PV-10 as of
December 31, 2008 would have decreased from
$290.95 million to $288.15 million. If natural gas
prices were $0.10 per Mcf lower than the price used, our
PV-10 as of
December 31, 2008, would have decreased from
$290.95 million to $285.47 million. Any adjustments to
the estimates of proved reserves or decreases in the price of
crude oil or natural gas may decrease the value of our common
stock.
Actual future net cash flows will also be affected by increases
or decreases in consumption by oil and gas purchasers and
changes in governmental regulations or taxation. The timing of
both the production and the incurrence of expenses in connection
with the development and production of oil and gas properties
affects the timing of actual future net cash flows from proved
reserves. In addition, the 10% discount factor, which is
required by the SEC to be used in calculating discounted future
net cash flows for reporting purposes, is not necessarily the
most appropriate discount factor. The effective interest rate at
various times and the risks associated with our business or the
oil and gas industry in general will affect the accuracy of the
10% discount factor.
Our estimates
of proved reserves and related
PV-10 and
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, which
are prepared and presented under existing SEC rules, may change
materially as a result of new SEC rules that will go into effect
for fiscal years ending on or after December 31,
2009.
This prospectus presents estimates of our proved reserves and
related
PV-10 and
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows as of
December 31, 2008 and as of September 30, 2009, which
estimates have been prepared and presented under existing SEC
rules. The SEC has adopted new rules that are effective for
fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009, which
will require SEC reporting companies to prepare their reserves
estimates using revised reserve definitions and
20
revised pricing based on
12-month
unweighted
first-day-of-the-month
average pricing. The pricing to be utilized for estimates of our
reserves as of December 31, 2009 will be based on an
unweighted average twelve month Henry Hub spot price of
$3.87 per MMBtu for natural gas and an average West Texas
Intermediate posted price of $57.65.
Another impact of the new SEC rules is a general requirement
that, subject to limited exceptions, proved undeveloped reserves
may only be booked if they relate to wells scheduled to be
drilled within five years of the date of booking. This new rule
may limit our potential to book additional proved undeveloped
reserves as we pursue our drilling program, particularly as we
develop our significant acreage in East Texas.
The SEC has released only limited interpretive guidance
regarding reporting of reserve estimates under the new rules and
may not issue further interpretive guidance on the new rules
prior to the end of 2009. We have not determined the impact the
new rules may have on our estimates of our proved reserves and
related
PV-10 and
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows as of
December 31, 2009 or as of September 30, 2009, but the
impact of the new rules on such estimates, and in particular the
estimates of proved undeveloped reserves, could be material.
Our use of 2D
and 3D seismic data is subject to interpretation and may not
accurately identify the presence of natural gas and crude oil.
In addition, the use of such technology requires greater
predrilling expenditures, which could adversely affect the
results of our drilling operations.
Our decisions to purchase, explore, develop and exploit
prospects or properties depend in part on data obtained through
geophysical and geological analyses, production data and
engineering studies, the results of which are uncertain. For
example, we have over 4,200 square miles of 3D data in the
South Texas and Gulf Coast regions and 1,130 square miles
of 3D data in the Lobo trend in South Texas that our
internal prospect generation team uses to develop drilling
opportunities in these areas. However, even when used and
properly interpreted, 3D seismic data and visualization
techniques only assist geoscientists and geologists in
identifying subsurface structures and hydrocarbon indicators.
They do not allow the interpreter to know if hydrocarbons are
present or producible economically. Other geologists and
petroleum professionals, when studying the same seismic data,
may have significantly different interpretations than our
professionals.
In addition, the use of 3D seismic and other advanced
technologies require greater predrilling expenditures than
traditional drilling strategies, and we could incur losses due
to such expenditures. As a result, our drilling activities may
not be geologically successful or economical, and our overall
drilling success rate or our drilling success rate for
activities in a particular area may not improve.
Drilling for
and producing natural gas and crude oil are high risk activities
with many uncertainties that could adversely affect our
business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Our drilling and operating activities are subject to many risks,
including the risk that we will not discover commercially
productive reservoirs. Drilling for natural gas and crude oil
can be unprofitable, not only from dry holes, but from
productive wells that do not produce sufficient revenues to
return a profit. In addition, our drilling and producing
operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of
other factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
unusual or unexpected geological formations and miscalculations;
|
|
|
|
pressures;
|
|
|
|
fires;
|
|
|
|
explosions and blowouts;
|
|
|
|
pipe or cement failures;
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
environmental hazards, such as natural gas leaks, pipeline
ruptures and discharges of toxic gases;
|
|
|
|
loss of drilling fluid circulation;
|
|
|
|
title problems;
|
|
|
|
facility or equipment malfunctions;
|
|
|
|
unexpected operational events;
|
|
|
|
shortages of skilled personnel;
|
|
|
|
shortages or delivery delays of equipment and services;
|
|
|
|
compliance with environmental and other regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
natural disasters; and
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions.
|
Any of these risks can cause substantial losses, including
personal injury or loss of life; severe damage to or destruction
of property, natural resources and equipment; pollution;
environmental contamination;
clean-up
responsibilities; loss of wells; repairs to resume operations;
and regulatory fines or penalties.
Insurance against all operational risks is not available to us.
Additionally, we may elect not to obtain insurance if we believe
that the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to
the perceived risks presented. We carry limited environmental
insurance, thus, losses could occur for uninsurable or uninsured
risks or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage.
The occurrence of an event that is not covered in full or in
part by insurance could have a material adverse impact on our
business activities, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our
acquisition strategy may subject us to greater
risks.
The successful acquisition of properties requires an assessment
of recoverable reserves, future natural gas and crude oil
prices, operating costs, potential environmental and other
liabilities, and other factors beyond our control. Such
assessments are necessarily inexact and their accuracy
uncertain. In connection with such an assessment, we perform a
review of the subject properties that we believe to be generally
consistent with industry practices. Such a review, however, will
not reveal all existing or potential problems, costs and
liabilities, nor will it permit us, as the buyer, to become
sufficiently familiar with the properties to fully assess their
capabilities or deficiencies. We may not inspect every well and,
even when an inspection is undertaken, structural and
environmental problems may not necessarily be observable.
We may be
unable to successfully integrate the properties and assets we
acquire with our existing operations.
Integration of the properties and assets we acquire may be a
complex, time consuming and costly process. Failure to timely
and successfully integrate these assets and properties with our
operations may have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and result of operations. The difficulties
of integrating these assets and properties present numerous
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions may prove unprofitable and fail to generate
anticipated cash flows;
|
|
|
|
we may need to (i) recruit additional personnel and, in
this competitive labor market, we cannot be certain that any of
our recruiting efforts will succeed, and (ii) expand
corporate infrastructure to facilitate the integration of our
operations with those associated with the acquired properties,
and failure to do so may lead to disruptions in our ongoing
businesses or distract our management; and
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
our managements attention may be diverted from other
business concerns.
|
We are also exposed to risks that are commonly associated with
acquisitions of this type, such as unanticipated liabilities and
costs, some of which may be material. As a result, the
anticipated benefits of acquiring assets and properties may not
be fully realized, if at all.
When we
acquire properties, in most cases, we are not entitled to
contractual indemnification for pre-closing liabilities,
including environmental liabilities.
We generally acquire interests in properties on an as
is basis with limited remedies for breaches of
representations and warranties, and in these situations we
cannot assure you that we will identify all areas of existing or
potential exposure. In those circumstances in which we have
contractual indemnification rights for pre-closing liabilities,
we cannot assure you that the seller will be able to fulfill its
contractual obligations. In addition, the competition to acquire
producing natural gas and crude oil properties is intense and
many of our larger competitors have financial and other
resources substantially greater than ours. We cannot assure you
that we will be able to acquire producing natural gas and crude
oil properties that have economically recoverable reserves for
acceptable prices.
We cannot
control activities on properties that we do not operate and are
unable to control their proper operation and
profitability.
We do not operate a significant portion of the properties in
which we own an interest. As a result, we have limited ability
to exercise influence over, and control the risks associated
with, the operations of these properties. The failure of an
operator of our wells to adequately perform operations, an
operators breach of the applicable agreements or an
operators failure to act in ways that are in our best
interests could reduce our production and revenues. The success
and timing of our drilling and development activities on
properties operated by others therefore depend upon a number of
factors outside of our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the nature and timing of drilling and operational activities;
|
|
|
|
the timing and amount of capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
the operators expertise and financial resources;
|
|
|
|
the approval of other participants in drilling wells; and
|
|
|
|
the operators selection of suitable technology.
|
If our access
to markets is restricted, it could negatively impact our
production, our income and ultimately our ability to retain our
leases.
Market conditions or the unavailability of satisfactory natural
gas and crude oil transportation arrangements may hinder our
access to natural gas and crude oil markets or delay our
production. The availability of a ready market for our crude oil
and natural gas production depends on a number of factors,
including the demand for and supply of natural gas and crude oil
and the proximity of reserves to pipelines and terminal
facilities. Our ability to market our production depends in
substantial part on the availability and capacity of gathering
systems, pipelines and processing facilities owned and operated
by third parties. Our failure to obtain such services on
acceptable terms could materially harm our business. Our
productive properties may be located in areas with limited or no
access to pipelines, thereby necessitating delivery by other
means, such as trucking, or requiring compression facilities.
Such restrictions on our ability to sell our natural gas and
crude oil may have several adverse effects, including higher
transportation costs, fewer potential purchasers (thereby
potentially resulting in a lower selling price) or, in the event
we were unable to market and sustain production from a
particular lease for an extended time, possible loss of a lease
due to lack of production.
23
Unless we
replace our natural gas and crude oil reserves, our reserves and
production will decline, which would adversely affect our cash
flows, our ability to raise capital and the value of our common
stock.
Unless we conduct successful development, exploitation and
exploration activities or acquire properties containing proved
reserves, our proved reserves will decline as those reserves are
produced. Producing natural gas and crude oil reservoirs
generally are characterized by declining production rates that
vary depending upon reservoir characteristics and other factors.
Our future natural gas and crude oil reserves and production,
and therefore our cash flow and results of operations, are
highly dependent on our success in efficiently developing and
exploiting our current reserves and economically finding or
acquiring additional recoverable reserves. The value of our
common stock and our ability to raise capital will be adversely
impacted if we are not able to replace our reserves that are
depleted by production. We may not be able to develop, exploit,
find or acquire sufficient additional reserves to replace our
current and future production.
The potential
lack of availability or high cost of drilling rigs, equipment,
supplies, personnel and crude oil field services could adversely
affect our ability to execute on a timely basis our exploration
and development plans within our budget.
When the prices of natural gas and crude oil increase, such as
during 2008, we encounter an increase in the cost of securing
drilling rigs, equipment and supplies. In addition, larger
producers may be more likely to secure access to such equipment
by offering more lucrative terms. If we are unable to acquire
access to such resources, or can obtain access only at higher
prices, our ability to convert our reserves into cash flow could
be delayed and the cost of producing those reserves could
increase significantly, which would adversely affect our results
of operation and financial condition.
Our hedging
activities could result in financial losses or reduce our
income.
To achieve a more predictable cash flow and to reduce our
exposure to adverse fluctuations in the prices of natural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids, as well as interest rates, we
currently, and may in the future, enter into derivative
arrangements for a significant portion of our natural gas, crude
oil and/or
natural gas liquids production and our debt that could result in
both realized and unrealized hedging losses. We utilize
financial commodity price hedge instruments to minimize exposure
to declining prices on our crude oil and natural gas liquids
production. As of September 30, 2009, we had 13.9 Bcfe
of equivalent production hedged representing 1.8 Bcf,
6.1 Bcf and 3.2 Bcf of natural gas hedges in place and
86 MBbl, 250 MBbl and 124 MBbl of crude oil
hedges in place for the fourth quarter of 2009, 2010 and 2011,
respectively. The average price of our natural gas and crude oil
hedges in place is $8.19/MMBtu and $86.03/Bbl for the fourth
quarter of 2009, $7.71/MMBtu and $83.02/Bbl in the year 2010 and
$7.32/MMBtu and $66.50/Bbl in the year 2011. As of
September 30, 2009, we had entered into interest rate swap
agreements with a total notional amount of $200.0 million
related to our indebtedness. Under our interest rate swap
agreements, we receive interest at a floating rate equal to
one-month LIBOR and pay interest at a fixed rate of 1.50% for
$50.0 million and pay interest at 2.90% for
$150.0 million.
Our actual future production may be significantly higher or
lower than we estimate at the time we enter into hedging
transactions for such period. If the actual amount is higher
than we estimate, we will have greater commodity price exposure
than we intended. If the actual amount is lower than the nominal
amount that is subject to our derivative financial instruments,
we might be forced to satisfy all or a portion of our derivative
transactions without the benefit of the cash flow from our sale
or purchase of the underlying physical commodity, resulting in a
substantial diminution of our liquidity. As a result of our
interest rate swap agreements, we may fail to benefit when rates
fall, to the extent we have agreed to pay interest at a fixed
rate, or face a greater degree of exposure when rates increase,
to the extent we have agreed to pay interest at a floating rate.
As a result of these factors, our hedging activities may not be
as effective as we intend in reducing the volatility of our cash
flows, and in certain circumstances may actually increase the
volatility of our cash flows.
24
Competition in
the oil and gas industry is intense, and many of our competitors
have resources that are greater than ours.
We operate in a highly competitive environment for acquiring
prospects and productive properties, marketing natural gas and
crude oil, and securing equipment and trained personnel. Many of
our competitors possess and employ financial, technical and
personnel resources substantially greater than ours. Those
companies may be able to develop and acquire more prospects and
productive properties than our financial our personnel resources
permit. Our ability to acquire additional prospects and discover
reserves in the future will depend on our ability to evaluate
and select suitable properties and consummate transactions in a
highly competitive environment. Also, there is substantial
competition for capital available for investment in the oil and
gas industry. Our larger competitors may be better able to
withstand sustained periods of unsuccessful drilling and absorb
the burden of changes in laws and regulations more easily than
we can, which would adversely affect our competitive position.
We may not be able to compete successfully in the future in
acquiring prospective reserves, developing reserves, marketing
hydrocarbons, attracting and retaining quality personnel and
raising additional capital.
We depend on
our senior management team and other key personnel. Accordingly,
the loss of any of these individuals could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and the results of operations and
future growth.
Our success is largely dependent on the skills, experience and
efforts of our people. The loss of the services of one or more
members of our senior management team or of our other employees
with critical skills needed to operate our business could have a
negative effect on our business, financial conditions and
results of operations and future growth. These persons include
the executive officers listed in ManagementExecutive
Officers and Directors. Our ability to manage our growth,
if any, will require us to continue to train, motivate and
manage our employees and to attract, motivate and retain
additional qualified personnel. Competition for these types of
personnel is intense and we may not be successful in attracting,
assimilating and retaining the personnel required to grow and
operate our business profitably.
We are subject
to complex federal, state, local and other law and regulations
that could adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of
conducting our operations.
Our operations are subject to complex and stringent laws and
regulations. In order to conduct our operations in compliance
with these laws and regulations, we must obtain and maintain
numerous permits, approvals and certificates from various
federal, state and local governmental authorities. We may incur
substantial costs in order to maintain compliance with these
existing laws and regulations. In addition, our costs of
compliance may increase if existing laws and regulations are
revised or reinterpreted, or if new laws and regulations become
applicable to our operations. For instance, we may be unable to
obtain all necessary permits, approvals and certificates for
proposed projects. Alternatively, we may have to incur
substantial expenditures to obtain, maintain or renew
authorizations to conduct existing projects. If a project is
unable to function as planned due to changing requirements or
public opposition, we may suffer expensive delays, extended
periods of non-operation or significant loss of value in a
project. All such costs may have a negative effect on our
business and results of operations.
Our business is subject to federal, state and local regulations
as interpreted and enforced by governmental agencies and other
bodies vested with much authority relating to the exploration
for, and the development, production, transportation and
marketing of, natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids.
Failure to comply with such laws and regulations, as interpreted
and enforced, could have a material adverse effect on us.
25
Federal and
state legislation and regulatory initiatives relating to
hydraulic fracturing could result in increased costs and
additional operating restrictions or delays.
Congress is currently considering legislation to amend the
federal Safe Drinking Water Act to require the disclosure of
chemicals used by the oil and natural gas industry in the
hydraulic fracturing process. Hydraulic fracturing is an
important and commonly used process in the completion of
unconventional natural gas wells in shale formations. This
process involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals
under pressure into rock formations to stimulate natural gas
production. Sponsors of these bills, which are currently pending
in the Energy and Commerce Committee and the Environmental and
Public Works Committee of the House of Representatives and
Senate, respectively, have asserted that chemicals used in the
fracturing process could adversely affect drinking water
supplies. The proposed legislation would require the reporting
and public disclosure of chemicals used in the fracturing
process, which could make it easier for third parties opposing
the hydraulic fracturing process to initiate legal proceedings
based on allegations that specific chemicals used in the
fracturing process could adversely affect groundwater. In
addition, these bills, if adopted, could establish an additional
level of regulation at the federal level that could lead to
operational delays or increased operating costs and could result
in additional regulatory burdens that could make it more
difficult to perform hydraulic fracturing and increase our costs
of compliance and doing business.
Our operations
expose us to potentially substantial costs and liabilities with
respect to environmental, health and safety
matters.
We may incur substantial costs and liabilities as a result of
environmental, health and safety requirements applicable to our
crude oil and natural gas operations and other activities. These
costs and liabilities could arise under a wide range of federal,
state and local environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations that cover, among other things, emissions into the
air and water, habitat and endangered species protection, the
containment and disposal of hazardous substances, oil field
waste and other waste materials, the use of underground
injection wells, and wetlands protection. These laws and
regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to
become increasingly stringent over time. Failure to comply with
environmental, health and safety laws or regulations may result
in assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties,
imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs and liens, the
suspension or revocation of necessary permits, licenses and
authorizations, the requirement that additional pollution
controls be installed and the issuance of orders enjoining or
limiting our current or future operations. Compliance with these
laws and regulations also increases the cost of our operations
and may prevent or delay the commencement or continuance of a
given operation.
Under certain environmental laws that impose strict, joint and
several liability, we may be required to remediate our
contaminated properties regardless of whether such contamination
resulted from the conduct of others or from consequences of our
own actions that were in compliance with all applicable laws at
the time those actions were taken. In addition, claims for
damages to persons, property or natural resources may result
from environmental and other impacts of our operations.
Moreover, new or modified environmental, health or safety laws,
regulations or enforcement policies could be more stringent and
impose unforeseen liabilities or significantly increase
compliance costs. Therefore, the costs to comply with
environmental, health, or safety laws or regulations or the
liabilities incurred in connection with them could significantly
and adversely affect our business, financial condition or
results of operations. In addition, many countries, as well as
more than one-third of the states have agreed to regulate
emissions of greenhouse gases, including methane, a
primary component of natural gas, and carbon dioxide, a
byproduct of burning natural gas and oil. National greenhouse
gas legislation and regulation is in early stages of development
in the U.S., and we are currently unable to determine the impact
of potential greenhouse gas emission control requirements.
Mandatory greenhouse gas emissions reductions may impose
increased costs on our business and could adversely impact some
of our operations. It is possible that broader national or
regional greenhouse gas reduction requirements may directly or
indirectly have an adverse impact on natural
26
gas or other fuel markets, including future demand for the
natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids that we produce.
See BusinessEnvironmental Regulations.
If we are
unable to successfully prevent or address material weaknesses in
our internal control over financial reporting, or any other
control deficiencies, our ability to report our financial
results on a timely and accurate basis and to comply with
disclosure and other reporting requirements may be adversely
affected.
While we have taken actions designed to address compliance with
the internal control, disclosure control and other requirements
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations
promulgated by the SEC implementing these requirements, there
are inherent limitations in our ability to control all
circumstances. Our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our
internal controls and disclosure controls will prevent all
errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. For example, for the quarter ended March 31, 2007,
our management concluded that our historical documentation of
related tax positions could have resulted in a material
misstatement to our annual or interim financial statements and,
accordingly, concluded that this deficiency was a material
weakness. Although this material weakness was subsequently
remedied, if we are unable to successfully prevent or address
these and other material weaknesses in our internal control
systems, our ability to report our financial results on a timely
and accurate basis and to comply with disclosure and other
reporting requirements may be adversely affected.
Derivatives
regulation could restrict our ability to execute commodity
derivative instruments as a hedge against fluctuating commodity
prices.
Various measures are being proposed by committees of Congress,
the U.S. Treasury Department, and other agencies to
restrict the use of
over-the-counter
(OTC) derivative instruments. These proposals
include, but are not limited to, requiring cash collateral on
all OTC derivatives and requiring all OTC derivatives to be
executed and settled through an exchange system.
Although we do not currently know the exact form any final
legislation or rule-making activity will take, any restriction
on the use of OTC instruments could have a significant impact on
our business. Limits on the use of OTC instruments could
significantly reduce our ability to execute strategic price
hedges against commodity price volatility. In addition, cash
collateral requirements could create significant liquidity
issues and exchange system trades may restrict our ability to
execute derivative instruments to fit our strategic needs.
Risks Related to
an Investment in Our Common Stock and this Offering
One
stockholder will, after the completion of this offering, hold a
significant number of our shares, which will limit your ability
to influence corporate activities and may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock, and that stockholders
interests may conflict with the interests of our other
stockholders.
After completion of the Preferred Stock Conversion and the
issuance of shares of common stock in this offering, we expect,
based on the midpoint of the range provided on the cover of this
prospectus, there will be approximately 33.1 million shares
of our common stock outstanding. Of that amount, we expect that
10.3 million shares of our common stock will be held by
Oaktree Holdings. As a result, Oaktree Holdings will own or
control outstanding common stock representing, in the aggregate,
an approximate 31% voting interest in us. As a result of this
stock ownership, Oaktree Holdings will possess significant
influence over matters requiring approval by our stockholders,
including the adoption of amendments to our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws and significant corporate transactions.
Such ownership and control may also have the effect of delaying
or preventing
27
a future change of control, impeding a merger, consolidation,
takeover or other business combination or discouraging a
potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise
attempting to obtain control of our company.
Oaktree Holdings and its affiliates engage, from time to time in
the ordinary course of their respective businesses, in the
trading securities of, and investing in, energy companies. As a
result, conflicts may arise between the interests of Oaktree
Holdings, on the one hand, and the interests of our other
stockholders, on the other hand. Oaktree Holdings may, from time
to time, compete directly or indirectly with us or prevent us
from taking advantage of corporate opportunities. Oaktree
Holdings may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be
complementary to our business, and as a result, those
acquisition opportunities may not be available to us.
The price of
our common stock may fluctuate significantly, and you could lose
all or part of your investment.
Volatility in the market price of our common stock price may
prevent you from being able to sell your common stock at or
above the price you paid for your common stock. The market price
for our common stock could fluctuate significantly for various
reasons, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our operating and financial performance and prospects;
|
|
|
|
our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in
our industry;
|
|
|
|
conditions that impact demand for natural gas, crude oil and
natural gas liquids;
|
|
|
|
future announcements concerning our business;
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities
analysts;
|
|
|
|
actions of competitors;
|
|
|
|
market and industry perception of our success, or lack thereof,
in pursuing our growth strategy;
|
|
|
|
strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions
or restructurings;
|
|
|
|
changes in government and environmental regulation;
|
|
|
|
general market, economic and political conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles;
|
|
|
|
sales of common stock by us or members of our management
team; and
|
|
|
|
natural disasters, terrorist attacks and acts of war.
|
See Risks Related to Our Business.
In addition, in recent years, the stock market has experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has
had a significant impact on the market price of securities
issued by many companies, including companies in our industry.
The changes frequently appear to occur without regard to the
operating performance of the affected companies. Hence, the
price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors
that have little or nothing to do with our company, and these
fluctuations could materially reduce our share price.
28
We have no
plans to pay regular dividends on our common stock, so you may
not receive funds without selling your common
stock.
Our board of directors presently intends to retain all of our
earnings for the expansion of our business; therefore, we have
no plans to pay regular dividends on our common stock. Any
payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our
board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our
earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, level of
indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applying to
the payment of dividends, and other considerations that our
board of directors deems relevant. Also, the provisions of our
revolving credit facility and second lien term loan agreement
restrict the payment of dividends. Accordingly, you may have to
sell some or all of your common stock in order to generate cash
flow from your investment.
Future sales
or the possibility of future sales of a substantial amount of
our common stock may depress the price of shares of our common
stock.
Future sales or the availability for sale of substantial amounts
of our common stock in the public market could adversely affect
the prevailing market price of our common stock and could impair
our ability to raise capital through future sales of equity
securities.
Upon consummation of this offering and the Preferred Stock
Conversion, based on the midpoint of the range provided on the
cover of this prospectus, there will be 33,134,607 shares
of our common stock outstanding. All shares of our common stock
sold in this offering will be freely transferable without
restriction or further registration under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.
We may issue shares of our common stock or other securities from
time to time as consideration for future acquisitions and
investments. If any such acquisition or investment is
significant, the number of shares of our common stock, or the
number or aggregate principal amount, as the case may be, of
other securities that we may issue may in turn be substantial.
We may also grant registration rights covering those shares of
our common stock or other securities in connection with any such
acquisitions and investments.
As of December 4, 2009, we had 2.0 million options to
purchase shares of our common stock outstanding,
1.2 million of which were vested.
We cannot predict the size of future issuances of our common
stock or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of
our common stock will have on the market price of our common
stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock
(including shares of our common stock issued in connection with
an acquisition), or the perception that such sales could occur,
may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common
stock.
Our
organizational documents may impede or discourage a takeover,
which could deprive our investors of the opportunity to receive
a premium for their shares.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may
make it more difficult for, or prevent a third party from,
acquiring control of us without the approval of our board of
directors. These provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
permit us to issue, without any further vote or action by the
stockholders, additional shares of preferred stock in one or
more series and, with respect to each such series, to fix the
number of shares constituting the series and the designation of
the series, the voting powers (if any) of the shares of the
series, and the preferences and relative, participating,
optional, and other special rights, if any, and any
qualification, limitations or restrictions of the shares of such
series;
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
require special meetings of the stockholders to be called by the
Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the
President, or by resolution of a majority of the board of
directors;
|
|
|
|
require business at special meetings to be limited to the stated
purpose or purposes of that meeting;
|
|
|
|
require that stockholder action be taken at a meeting rather
than by written consent, unless approved by our board of
directors;
|
|
|
|
require that stockholders follow certain procedures, including
advance notice procedures, to bring certain matters before an
annual meeting or to nominate a director for election; and
|
|
|
|
permit directors to fill vacancies in our board of directors.
|
The foregoing factors, as well as the significant common stock
ownership by Oaktree Holdings, could discourage potential
acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change of
control. See Description of Capital Stock.
After this
offering, we will be subject to the Delaware business
combination law.
After this offering, we will be subject to the provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In
general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly held Delaware
corporation from engaging in a business combination
with an interested stockholder for a period of three
years after the date of the transaction in which the person
became an interested stockholder, unless the business
combination is approved in a prescribed manner.
Section 203 defines a business combination as a
merger, asset sale or other transaction resulting in a financial
benefit to the interested stockholders. Section 203 defines
an interested stockholder as a person who, together
with affiliates and associates, owns, or, in some cases, within
three years prior, did own, 15% or more of the
corporations voting stock. Under Section 203, a
business combination between us and an interested stockholder is
prohibited unless:
|
|
|
|
|
our board of directors approved either the business combination
or the transaction that resulted in the stockholders becoming an
interested stockholder prior to the date the person attained the
status;
|
|
|
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding
at the time the transaction commenced, excluding, for purposes
of determining the number of shares outstanding, shares owned by
persons who are directors and also officers and issued employee
stock plans, under which employee participants do not have the
right to determine confidentially whether shares held under the
plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
|
|
the business combination is approved by our board of directors
on or subsequent to the date the person became an interested
stockholder and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
the stockholders by the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
This provision has an anti-takeover effect with respect to
transactions not approved in advance by our board of directors,
including discouraging takeover attempts that might result in a
premium over the market price for the shares of our common
stock. With approval of our stockholders, we could amend our
certificate of incorporation in the future to elect not to be
governed by the anti-takeover law. Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law will not apply to Oaktree
Holdings.
30
We have
blank check preferred stock.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the board of
directors to issue preferred stock without further stockholder
action in one or more series and to designate the dividend rate,
voting rights and other rights preferences and restrictions. The
issuance of preferred stock could have an adverse impact on
holders of common stock. Preferred stock is senior to common
stock. Additionally, preferred stock could be issued with
dividend rights senior to the rights of holders of common stock.
Finally, preferred stock could be issued as part of a
poison pill, which could have the effect of
deterring offers to acquire our company. See Description
of Capital StockAnti-Takeover Effects of Delaware Laws and
Our Charter and Bylaws Provisions.
The holders of
our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights,
preemptive rights or rights to convert their common stock to
other securities.
We are authorized to issue 200.0 million shares of common
stock, $0.001 par value per share. As of December 4,
2009, there were 6.4 million shares of common stock issued
and outstanding. After giving effect to this offering and the
Preferred Stock Conversion, based on the midpoint of the range
provided on the cover of this prospectus, there will be
33.1 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
Since the holders of our common stock do not have cumulative
voting rights, the holders of a majority of the shares of common
stock present, in person or by proxy, will be able to elect all
of the members of our board of directors. The holders of shares
of our common stock do not have preemptive rights or rights to
convert their common stock into other securities.
Prior to this
offering, our common stock has been thinly traded and there has
been no active trading market for our common stock and an active
trading market may not develop.
The trading volume of our common stock has historically been low
and reliable market quotations for our common stock have not
been available, partially due to the fact that we are not listed
on an exchange and our common stock is only traded
over-the-counter.
An active trading market for our common stock may not develop
or, if developed, may not continue, and a holder of any of our
securities may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain
accurate quotations as to the market value of such securities.
The impairment
of financial institutions could adversely affect
us.
We have exposure to different counterparties, and we have
entered into transactions with counterparties in the financial
services industry specifically, with members of our bank group.
These transactions could expose us to credit risk in the event
of default of our counterparty. We have exposure to these
financial institutions in the form of derivative transactions in
connection with our hedges. We also maintain insurance policies
with insurance companies to protect us against certain risks
inherent in our business. In addition, if any lender under our
credit facility is unable to fund its commitment, our liquidity
could be reduced by an amount up to the aggregate amount of such
lenders commitment under our credit facility.
We have a
substantial amount of indebtedness, which may adversely affect
our cash flow and our ability to operate our
business.
As of September 30, 2009, pro forma for the application of
net proceeds from this offering (estimated based upon the
midpoint of the range of the offering price on the cover of this
prospectus) we had outstanding debt of $175.9 million under
our credit agreements. Our substantial level of indebtedness
increases the possibility that we may be unable to pay, when
due, the principal of, interest on, or other amounts due in
respect of our indebtedness. Our substantial indebtedness,
31
combined with our other financial obligations and contractual
commitments, could have other important consequences, including
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
funds available for our operations and general corporate
purposes or for capital expenditures will be reduced as a result
of the dedication of a portion of our consolidated cash flow
from operations to the payment of the principal and interest on
our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
we may be more highly leveraged than certain of our competitors,
which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;
|
|
|
|
certain of the borrowings under our debt agreements have
floating rates of interest, which causes us to be vulnerable to
increases in interest rates;
|
|
|
|
our degree of leverage could make us more vulnerable to
downturns in general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to plan for, or react to, changes in our business
and the industry in which we operate may be limited; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing on satisfactory terms
to fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditures,
investments, debt service requirements and other general
corporate requirements may be reduced.
|
In addition, our revolving credit facility and second lien term
loan agreement contain a number of significant covenants that
place limitations on our activities and operations, including
those relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
creation of liens;
|
|
|
|
hedging;
|
|
|
|
mergers, acquisitions, asset sales or dispositions;
|
|
|
|
payments of dividends;
|
|
|
|
incurrence of additional indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
certain leases and investments outside of the ordinary course of
business.
|
Our credit agreements require us to maintain compliance with
specified financial ratios and satisfy certain financial
condition tests. Our ability to comply with these ratios and
financial condition tests may be affected by events beyond our
control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet these ratios
and financial condition tests. These financial ratio
restrictions and financial condition tests could limit our
ability to obtain future financings, make needed capital
expenditures, withstand a future downturn in our business or the
economy in general or otherwise conduct necessary or desirable
corporate activities.
A breach of any of these covenants or our inability to comply
with the required financial ratios or financial condition tests
could also result in a default under our credit agreements. A
default, if not cured or waived, could result in all of our
indebtedness becoming immediately due and payable. If that
should occur, we may not be able to pay all such debt or to
borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital
ResourcesCapital resources for further information
regarding future compliance with these covenants. Even if new
financing were then available, it may not be on terms that are
acceptable to us. See Recent market events and
conditions, including disruptions in the U.S. and
international credit markets and other financial systems and the
deterioration of the U.S. and global economic conditions,
could, among other things, impede access to capital or increase
the cost of capital, which would have an adverse effect on our
ability to fund our working capital and other capital
requirements and Our development and
exploration operations, including on our East Texas resource
play acreage, require substantial capital, and we may be unable
to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms,
which could lead to a loss of properties and a decline in our
natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids reserves.
32
Changes to
current laws may affect our ability to take certain
deductions.
Substantive changes to the existing federal income tax laws have
been proposed that, if adopted, would affect, among other
things, our ability to take certain deductions related to our
operations, including depletion deductions, deductions for
intangible drilling and development costs and deductions for
United States production activities. These changes, if enacted
into law, could negatively affect our financial condition and
results of operations.
Our ability to
use our net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to
limitation and may result in increased future tax liability
to us.
Generally, a change of more than 50% in the ownership of a
corporations stock, by value, over a three-year period
constitutes an ownership change for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. An ownership change may limit a companys ability
to use its net operating loss carryforwards attributable to the
period prior to such change. The number of shares of common
stock that we issue in connection with this offering may be
sufficient, taking into account prior or future shifts in our
ownership over a three-year period, to cause us to undergo an
ownership change. As a result, if we earn net taxable income,
our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss
carryforwards to offset U.S. federal taxable income may
become subject to limitations, which could potentially result in
increased future tax liability to us. In addition, the carrying
value of any tax asset related to our net operating loss
carryforwards could be significantly reduced.
33
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make forward-looking statements throughout this prospectus
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to, statements regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
estimates of proved reserve quantities and net present values of
those reserves;
|
|
|
|
|
|
business strategy;
|
|
|
|
estimates of future commodity prices;
|
|
|
|
amounts, timing and types of capital expenditures and operating
expenses;
|
|
|
|
expansion and growth of our business and operations;
|
|
|
|
expansion and development trends of the oil and gas industry;
|
|
|
|
acquisitions of natural gas and crude oil properties;
|
|
|
|
production of crude oil and natural gas reserves;
|
|
|
|
exploration prospects;
|
|
|
|
wells to be drilled and drilling results;
|
|
|
|
operating results and working capital; and
|
|
|
|
future methods and types of financing.
|
Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement of
historical fact (such as when we describe what we
believe, expect or
anticipate will occur, and other similar
statements), you must remember that our expectations may not be
correct, even though we believe they are reasonable. We caution
that a number of factors could cause future production, revenues
and expenses to differ materially from our expectations. We do
not guarantee that the transactions and events described in this
prospectus will happen as described (or that they will happen at
all). The forward-looking information contained in this
prospectus is generally located in the material provided under
the headings Business, Risk Factors, and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations but may be found in
other locations as well. These forward-looking statements
generally relate to our plans and objectives for future
operations and are based upon our managements reasonable
estimates of future results and trends. For a discussion of risk
factors affecting our business, see Risk Factors.
34
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale of shares of our
common stock in this offering, after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, will
be approximately $117.6 million, assuming an offering price
of $7.00 per share, which is the midpoint of the range
provided on the cover page of this prospectus.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to repay
approximately $107.6 million in aggregate principal amount
of loans outstanding under our revolving credit facility and
$10 million in aggregate principal amount of indebtedness
under our $10 million unsecured promissory note due to
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. At December 4, 2009
and after application of proceeds from our $10 million
unsecured promissory note, we had $129.5 million of
indebtedness outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
This indebtedness matures on May 8, 2011, and at
December 4, 2009 had a weighted average interest rate of
3.76% per annum. The indebtedness under our $10 million
unsecured promissory note bears interest at a rate per annum
equal to two-month LIBOR plus 2% and matures on January 15,
2010. For a description of our revolving credit facility and our
$10 million unsecured promissory note, please see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital
ResourcesCapital resources.
Affiliates of certain of the underwriters are lenders under our
existing revolving credit facility and therefore will receive a
portion of the net proceeds of this offering. See
Underwriting.
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of $7.00 per share would increase (decrease) the
net proceeds from this offering by approximately
$16.9 million, assuming no change in the number of shares
offered by us as included on the cover page of this prospectus
and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common
stock or our preferred stock. Each share of our Series G
Preferred Stock is entitled to a quarterly cash dividend, if, as
and when declared, that cumulates and compounds quarterly
whether or not dividends in a quarter are declared or paid,
equal to 8% per annum based on the then-current liquidation
preference. Dividends on our Series G Preferred Stock have
accumulated since 2005, but have not been declared or paid. As
of September 30, 2009, accumulated dividends on the
Series G Preferred Stock equaled approximately
$17.7 million. We expect to convert all shares of our
Series G Preferred Stock and the accumulated dividends on
such shares in connection with the closing of this offering. See
Prospectus SummaryPreferred Stock Conversion.
Although we have not, and are not required to, pay a cash
dividend on our Series H Preferred Stock, we have paid a
quarterly dividend of one share of our common stock (as adjusted
for our
1-for-10
reverse stock split in September 2006) on our outstanding
shares of Series H Preferred Stock, as required by its
Certificate of Designations, since 2005. The provisions of our
revolving credit facility, second lien term loan agreement and
preferred stock restrict the payment of dividends. We currently
intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for
use in the operation of our business and to fund future growth.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future.
35
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth cash and cash equivalents and
capitalization as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis to give effect to the Preferred Stock
Conversion (estimated based on the mid-point of the range of the
offering price on the cover of this prospectus), the issuance of
$12 million in unsecured promissory notes and the repayment
of loans under our revolving credit facility with proceeds of
one of such promissory notes; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis as further adjusted to give effect to this
offering and the application of the estimated net proceeds of
this offering (estimated based on the mid-point of the range of
the offering price on the cover of this prospectus).
|
This table should be read together with Use of
Proceeds, Selected Historical Consolidated Financial
Data, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the
consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements,
in each case, included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Further
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured promissory note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,526
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit
facility(2)
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
131,526
|
|
|
|
23,941
|
|
Second lien term loan agreement
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Subordinated unsecured promissory note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
290,000
|
|
|
$
|
283,526
|
|
|
$
|
175,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
291,526
|
|
|
$
|
293,526
|
|
|
$
|
175,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series G Preferred Stock
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Series H Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
97,566
|
|
|
|
97,558
|
|
|
|
215,125
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
9,353
|
|
|
|
9,353
|
|
|
|
9,353
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
106,543
|
|
|
$
|
106,542
|
|
|
$
|
224,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
398,069
|
|
|
$
|
400,068
|
|
|
$
|
400,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed $7.00 per share
initial public offering price would decrease (increase)
long-term debt, including current maturities, by
$16.9 million and increase (decrease) each of additional
paid-in capital and total stockholders equity by
$18.0 million, assuming the number of shares offered by us,
as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the
same. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As of December 4, 2009, and after application of proceeds
from our $10 million unsecured promissory note, we had
$129.5 million in aggregate indebtedness outstanding under
our revolving credit facility. After this offering, we expect
that we will have approximately $83.1 million in available
borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility. Also, if
we close the sale of substantially all of our Southwest
Louisiana properties, we expect to pay down our revolving credit
facility by an additional $10.2 million. Effective
December 7, 2009, we entered into an amendment to our
revolving credit facility that, among other things, amended
certain of our financial covenants and our debt incurrence
covenant and provided for redetermination of our borrowing base
at January 1, 2010. See Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital
resourcesRevolving Credit Facility. |
37
MARKET FOR OUR
COMMON STOCK
Our common stock is traded on the
Over-the-Counter
Bulletin Board (the OTCBB) under the symbol
CXPO.OB. We have applied to list our common stock on
the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol CXPO.
As of December 4, 2009, the last reported sales price of
our common stock on the OTCBB was $6.60 per share of common
stock and there were 6,416,401 shares of our common stock
outstanding held by approximately 275 holders of record.
The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid
quotation prices per share of our common stock as reported by
the OTCBB. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without
retail
mark-up,
mark-down or commissions, and may not represent actual
transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Reported
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High and Low Bid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quotations(1)
|
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Trading Volume
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
|
$
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
4,008
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
8.90
|
|
|
$
|
6.30
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
7.90
|
|
|
$
|
6.40
|
|
|
|
2,646
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
7.30
|
|
|
$
|
5.20
|
|
|
|
4,762
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
6.20
|
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
7.55
|
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
4,046
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
8.35
|
|
|
$
|
7.15
|
|
|
|
6,110
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.35
|
|
|
$
|
7.65
|
|
|
|
31,362
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
18.50
|
|
|
$
|
9.10
|
|
|
|
22,038
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
17.50
|
|
|
$
|
8.20
|
|
|
|
22,773
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
16.20
|
|
|
$
|
7.23
|
|
|
|
12,932
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
7.43
|
|
|
$
|
2.85
|
|
|
|
6,533
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
4.65
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
4.30
|
|
|
$
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
6,492
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through December 4, 2009)
|
|
$
|
8.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
15,331
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In September 2006, we effected a reverse stock split where each
ten shares of outstanding common stock were exchanged for one
new share of common stock. All periods presented have been
adjusted to reflect the effects of the reverse stock split. |
38
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth our selected historical
consolidated financial data as of the dates and for the periods
indicated. The selected historical consolidated financial data
as of December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and for
each of the five years in the period ended December 31,
2008 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The historical consolidated financial data for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 have been
derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements
and, in the opinion of our management, have been prepared on a
basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial
statements and reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial position and results of operations for the periods
presented. The consolidated results of operations for any period
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for
any future period. The selected historical consolidated
financial data provided below should be read in conjunction
with, and are qualified by reference to, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and the consolidated financial statements and
related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
11,208
|
|
|
$
|
17,683
|
|
|
$
|
21,659
|
|
|
$
|
109,543
|
|
|
$
|
186,768
|
|
|
$
|
151,801
|
|
|
$
|
86,251
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
5,334
|
|
|
|
5,633
|
|
|
|
12,034
|
|
|
|
20,825
|
|
|
|
15,363
|
|
|
|
13,518
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
11,702
|
|
|
|
16,266
|
|
|
|
14,355
|
|
|
|
6,061
|
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
|
|
9,965
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
2,873
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
2,257
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
30,796
|
|
|
|
50,467
|
|
|
|
36,030
|
|
|
|
41,599
|
|
Impaired assets of oil and gas
properties(1)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
3,689
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
35,954
|
|
|
|
25,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
|
|
3,773
|
|
|
|
8,730
|
|
|
|
14,542
|
|
|
|
22,406
|
|
|
|
17,819
|
|
|
|
13,381
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of
assets(2)
|
|
|
2,034
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
(15,210
|
)
|
|
|
(15,272
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
11,684
|
|
|
|
17,045
|
|
|
|
24,118
|
|
|
|
75,927
|
|
|
|
140,673
|
|
|
|
95,971
|
|
|
|
77,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
operations(3)
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
(2,459
|
)
|
|
|
33,616
|
|
|
|
46,095
|
|
|
|
55,830
|
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,154
|
)
|
|
|
(1,302
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(14,949
|
)
|
|
|
(21,109
|
)
|
|
|
(15,871
|
)
|
|
|
(16,349
|
)
|
Other financing costs
|
|
|
(1,472
|
)
|
|
|
(1,956
|
)
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
(1,322
|
)
|
|
|
(1,501
|
)
|
|
|
(1,174
|
)
|
|
|
(1,110
|
)
|
Loss from equity in investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(1,506
|
)
|
|
|
(1,642
|
)
|
|
|
6,082
|
|
|
|
(18,186
|
)
|
|
|
49,409
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
(17,238
|
)
|
Forgiveness of debt
|
|
|
12,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
|
(4,972
|
)
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
(34,457
|
)
|
|
|
26,799
|
|
|
|
(15,380
|
)
|
|
|
(34,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
4,868
|
|
|
|
(4,334
|
)
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
(841
|
)
|
|
|
72,894
|
|
|
|
40,450
|
|
|
|
(25,897
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
(1,425
|
)
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
(26,691
|
)
|
|
|
(15,105
|
)
|
|
|
9,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
8,072
|
|
|
|
(3,543
|
)
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
46,203
|
|
|
|
25,345
|
|
|
|
(16,817
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
(3,563
|
)
|
|
|
(3,649
|
)
|
|
|
(4,453
|
)
|
|
|
(4,234
|
)
|
|
|
(3,164
|
)
|
|
|
(3,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
7,617
|
|
|
$
|
(7,106
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,790
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,884
|
)
|
|
$
|
41,969
|
|
|
$
|
22,181
|
|
|
$
|
(20,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,854
|
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
4,330
|
|
|
|
5,371
|
|
|
|
5,225
|
|
|
|
6,301
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
4.11
|
|
|
$
|
(2.66
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.81
|
|
|
$
|
4.25
|
|
|
$
|
(3.20
|
)
|
Pro forma weighted average shares
outstanding(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,725
|
|
|
|
30,778
|
|
|
|
31,855
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) per
share(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
3,162
|
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
4,330
|
|
|
|
10,360
|
|
|
|
10,289
|
|
|
|
6,301
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
2.41
|
|
|
$
|
(2.66
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.46
|
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
|
$
|
(3.20
|
)
|
Pro forma weighted average shares
outstanding(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,930
|
|
|
|
31,051
|
|
|
|
31,855
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) per
share(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
3,809
|
|
|
$
|
5,825
|
|
|
$
|
4,232
|
|
|
$
|
36,481
|
|
|
$
|
46,348
|
|
|
$
|
42,195
|
|
|
$
|
29,529
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
50,123
|
|
|
|
54,223
|
|
|
|
76,547
|
|
|
|
356,489
|
|
|
|
449,156
|
|
|
|
417,977
|
|
|
|
425,236
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
3,944
|
|
|
|
3,067
|
|
|
|
3,924
|
|
|
|
5,965
|
|
|
|
16,042
|
|
|
|
7,536
|
|
|
|
7,716
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
57,876
|
|
|
|
63,115
|
|
|
|
84,703
|
|
|
|
398,935
|
|
|
|
511,546
|
|
|
|
467,708
|
|
|
|
462,481
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
37,249
|
|
|
|
6,856
|
|
|
|
10,932
|
|
|
|
48,879
|
|
|
|
83,990
|
|
|
|
67,441
|
|
|
|
41,394
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
|
|
12,445
|
|
|
|
280,403
|
|
|
|
305,933
|
|
|
|
300,361
|
|
|
|
314,545
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
18,677
|
|
|
|
52,805
|
|
|
|
61,326
|
|
|
|
69,653
|
|
|
|
121,623
|
|
|
|
99,906
|
|
|
|
106,542
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
57,876
|
|
|
$
|
63,115
|
|
|
$
|
84,703
|
|
|
$
|
398,935
|
|
|
$
|
511,546
|
|
|
$
|
467,708
|
|
|
$
|
462,481
|
|
Other Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDAX(5)
|
|
$
|
4,309
|
|
|
$
|
8,296
|
|
|
$
|
9,219
|
|
|
$
|
76,003
|
|
|
$
|
132,707
|
|
|
$
|
108,715
|
|
|
$
|
55,160
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
253,434
|
|
|
$
|
58,482
|
|
|
$
|
58,032
|
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
Other capital
expenditures(6)
|
|
|
6,142
|
|
|
|
10,798
|
|
|
|
21,777
|
|
|
|
59,049
|
|
|
|
141,795
|
|
|
|
82,577
|
|
|
|
16,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,142
|
|
|
$
|
10,798
|
|
|
$
|
21,777
|
|
|
$
|
312,483
|
|
|
$
|
200,277
|
|
|
$
|
140,609
|
|
|
$
|
16,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008, includes (i) an
impairment expense of $10.2 million in December 2008 with
respect to our Grand Lake Field in Southwest Louisiana,
resulting from negative reserve revisions resulting from year
end low commodity prices, and (ii) $25.8 million in
asset impairments in the nine months ended September 30,
2008 resulting from our capital investment in the Rodessa
formation within the Madisonville Field. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, includes a gain of
$15.6 million resulting from the disposition of our
interest in the Barnett Shale Play in January 2008. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Non-cash equity-based compensation charges were
$5.4 million, $4.7 million and $3.8 million, in
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Non-cash equity-based
compensation charges were $1.9 million and
$4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
On an adjusted pro forma basis to give effect to this offering
and the Preferred Stock Conversion assuming the conversion
occurred at the beginning of the period presented. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Adjusted EBITDAX is a non-GAAP financial measure. Our definition
of Adjusted EBITDAX and a reconciliation of net income (loss) to
Adjusted EBITDAX is provided under Prospectus
SummaryNon-GAAP Financial Measures and
Reconciliations. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Other capital expenditures consists primarily of capital
drilling and lease acquisitions. |
40
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our results of
operations and financial condition with the Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Data and the historical
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties,
including, but not limited to, those described in the Risk
Factors section of this prospectus. Actual results may
differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements.
Overview
Crimson is an independent energy company engaged in the
acquisition, exploitation, exploration and development of
natural gas and crude oil properties. We have historically
focused our operations in the onshore U.S. Gulf Coast and
South Texas regions, which are generally characterized by high
rates of return in known, prolific producing trends. We have
recently expanded our strategic focus to include longer reserve
life resource plays that we believe provide significant
long-term growth potential in multiple formations.
In late 2008 and early 2009, we acquired approximately
12,000 net acres in East Texas where we completed our first
well, the Kardell #1H, in October 2009. This well targeted
the Haynesville Shale and initially produced 30.7 MMcfe/d,
which we believe to be the highest publicly announced initial
production rate to date in that formation. In addition to the
Haynesville Shale, we believe this acreage is equally
prospective in the Bossier Shale and James Lime formations where
industry participants have drilled successful wells on adjacent
acreage.
In 2007, we acquired approximately 2,800 net acres in South
Texas, which we believe is prospective in the Austin Chalk and
the Eagle Ford Shale. We drilled our first well on this acreage,
the Dubose #1, during the fourth quarter of 2009, and we
are preparing to complete the well in the Eagle Ford Shale.
We intend to grow reserves and production by developing our
existing producing property base, developing our East Texas and
South Texas resource potential, and pursuing opportunistic
acquisitions in areas where we have specific operating
expertise. We have developed a significant project inventory of
over 800 drilling locations associated with our existing
property base. Our technical team has a successful track record
of adding reserves through the drillbit. Since January 2008, we
have drilled 34 gross (15.2 net) wells with an overall
success rate of 91% (excluding one well which has not yet been
completed).
As of December 31, 2008, our estimated proved reserves, as
prepared by our independent reserve engineering firm,
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., were
131.9 Bcfe, consisting of 96.2 Bcf of natural gas and
6.0 MMBbl of crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids.
As of December 31, 2008, 73% of our proved reserves were
natural gas, 69% were proved developed and 81% were attributed
to wells and properties operated by us. From 2006 to 2008, we
grew our estimated proved reserves from 46.4 Bcfe to
131.9 Bcfe. In addition, we grew our average daily
production from 7.3 MMcfe/d for the year ended
December 31, 2006 to 43.0 MMcfe/d for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we generated $55.2 million of
Adjusted EBITDAX. Our definition of the non-GAAP financial
measure of Adjusted EBITDAX and a reconciliation of net income
(loss) to Adjusted EBITDAX are provided under Prospectus
SummaryNon-GAAP Financial Measures and
Reconciliations. For the same period, our net income
(loss) was $(16.8) million.
Recent
Developments
East Texas
Acreage Acquisition
In the second half of 2008 and early 2009, we obtained natural
gas and crude oil leases from mineral interest owners covering
approximately 17,000 gross (12,000 net) acres in the
natural gas
41
resource play in East Texas specifically in San Augustine
and Sabine Counties. We commenced our first well (the
Kardell #1H), in which we owned a 52% working interest, in
this play in late June 2009 and completed that well in October
2009. The well had a measured depth of approximately
18,350 feet and was a successful test of the Haynesville
Shale formation. The initial
24-hour
production experienced from the Kardell #1H well in early
November 2009 was 30.7 MMcfe/d (12.0 MMcfe/d net to
our interest). We plan to continue to pursue an active drilling
program in this area for the next several years, targeting
primarily the Haynesville Shale, the Bossier Shale and the James
Lime formations. We financed the acquisition of this acreage
with cash flows from operations and from borrowings available
under our revolving credit facility.
Smith
Acquisition
In May 2008, we acquired four producing gas fields and
undeveloped acreage in South Texas from Smith Production Inc.
(Smith) for a purchase price of $65.0 million
with an economic effective date of January 1, 2008. After
adjustment for the estimated results of operations, and other
typical purchase price adjustments of approximately
$7.4 million for the period between the effective date and
the closing date, the cash consideration was approximately
$57.6 million. The assets acquired consist of a 25%
non-operated working interest in the Samano Field located in
Starr and Hidalgo Counties, a 100% operated working interest in
the North Bob West Field in Zapata County and 100% operated
working interests in the Brushy Creek and Hope Fields in DeWitt
County. We acquired an interest in over 16,000 gross acres
with these fields, most of which is held by production.
Production from the acquired assets was averaging approximately
7 MMcfe/d at closing, which resulted in a 13% increase in
our then current net daily production.
The adjusted price for this acreage, with adjustment of the
reserves for approximately one Bcfe of production for the
interim operations between the effective date and closing,
represents a purchase cost of $2.82 per Mcfe for
approximately 21 Bcfe of proved reserves and
$8,300 per Mcfe of current average daily production. We
financed this acquisition with cash flows from operations,
proceeds from the sale of assets and from borrowings available
under our revolving credit facility. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, seven months of revenues and expenses,
$11.7 million and $3.7 million, respectively, were
included in our financial results of operations.
Southwest
Louisiana Disposition
On November 24, 2009, we entered into a definitive
agreement to sell operated and non-operated working interests in
various producing wells, related production equipment and
associated acreage primarily in Cameron, Calcasieu and Jefferson
Davis parishes in Southwest Louisiana for an aggregate contract
price of $10.2 million, subject to normal purchase price
adjustments for environmental defects and oil and gas operations
for the period between the effective date and the final closing
date, and the assumption of all related asset retirement
obligations, with an effective date of October 1, 2009. The
assets include substantially all of our Southwest Louisiana
properties, representing approximately 8.5 Bcfe of proved
reserves at September 30, 2009, approximately
$19.9 million in
PV-10 as of
September 30, 2009 and with average daily production of
approximately 3.8 MMcfe/d for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, or approximately 9% of our total daily
production for such period. We expect to use the proceeds from
this sale to repay outstanding amounts under our revolving
credit facility. We anticipate closing the transaction prior to
2010, subject to the prior satisfaction of customary closing
conditions. We cannot assure you that all of the conditions to
closing will be timely satisfied or satisfied at all.
Barnett Shale
Disposition
In January 2008, we and our operator-partner entered into a
series of agreements to sell our interests in wells and
undeveloped acreage in the Fort Worth Barnett Shale Play in
Johnson and Tarrant Counties, Texas to another industry
participant active in that area. We owned a 12.5% non-operated
working interest in the assets being sold and had 1.5 Bcfe
in proved reserves at December 31, 2007.
42
The total consideration paid by the buyer was based on existing
wells and undeveloped acreage owned by us and our partner at the
time of the final closing. Our share of the consideration
received was approximately $34.4 million. Proceeds received
for our interest were primarily used to repay amounts
outstanding under our revolving credit facility and to help
finance our acquisition of the properties from Smith. Our net
book value of the assets sold was $18.8 million, which
resulted in a gain of $15.6 million.
Amendments to
Revolving Credit Facility
Effective December 7, 2009, we entered into an amendment to
our revolving credit facility that, among other things, amended
certain of our financial covenants and our debt incurrence
covenant and provided for redetermination of our borrowing base
at January 1, 2010. See Liquidity and Capital
ResourcesCapital resourcesRevolving Credit
Facility.
Promissory
Notes
On November 6, 2009, we issued an unsecured promissory note
in the aggregate principal amount of $10.0 million to Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association and an unsecured subordinated
promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of
$2.0 million to Oaktree Holdings, our majority stockholder.
See Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital
resourcesPromissory Notes.
Selected Factors
That Affect Our Operating Results
Our revenue, cash flow from operations and future growth depend
substantially upon the prices and demand for natural gas, crude
oil and natural gas liquids, the quantity of our natural gas,
oil and natural gas liquids production and changes in the fair
value of derivative instruments we use to reduce the volatility
of the prices we receive for our natural gas, oil and natural
gas liquids production. Crude oil and natural gas prices have
historically been volatile and may fluctuate widely in the
future. Even relatively modest drops in prices can significantly
affect our financial position and results of operations, the
value of our reserves, the quantities of crude oil and gas that
we can economically produce and our ability to access capital.
Commodity Prices. Commodity prices have been
volatile over the past several years. Significant factors that
will impact near-term commodity prices include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the domestic and foreign supply of and demand for crude oil and
natural gas;
|
|
|
|
the level of consumer product demand;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
political and economic conditions and events in foreign oil and
gas producing countries, including those in the Middle East,
South America and Russia;
|
|
|
|
actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and
state-controlled oil companies relating to oil price and
production controls;
|
|
|
|
technological advances affecting energy consumption and supply;
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxation;
|
|
|
|
the impact of energy conservation efforts;
|
|
|
|
the proximity, capacity, cost and availability of oil and gas
pipelines and other transportation facilities to our production,
and access to readily available alternatives in the event of
disruptions in such pipelines or facilities; and
|
|
|
|
the price and availability of alternative fuels.
|
43
Prior to mid-2008, the oil and gas industry saw significant
increases in activity resulting from high commodity prices for
natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids. However, since
mid-2008 commodity prices have declined significantly, which has
adversely affected our results of operations. Supply and
geopolitical uncertainties resulted in significant price
volatility during 2008 with oil prices rising during the first
half of the year to record levels before falling by
approximately 68% during the second half of the year. Commodity
prices, particularly gas prices, continued to decline during the
first quarter of 2009. Spot prices for West Texas Intermediate
West Texas Intermediate oil averaged
$99.92/Bbl
during 2008, with a low price of
$31.41/Bbl
in December 2008 and a high price of
$145.29/Bbl
in July 2008. During 2008, the gas market continued to be driven
by high storage inventories and mild weather conditions across
much of the country. Spot prices for Henry Hub gas averaged
$8.89/MMbtu
for the year, with a low price of
$5.38/MMbtu
in December 2008 and a high price of
$13.31/MMbtu
in July 2008. Spot prices for West Texas Intermediate oil
averaged
$68.14/Bbl
and Henry Hub gas averaged
$3.17/MMbtu
during the third quarter of 2009. The NYMEX futures prices for
oil and gas were
$44.60/Bbl
and
$5.62/MMbtu
at December 31, 2008 and
$77.00/Bbl
and
$5.05/MMbtu
at October 30, 2009. The current global recession has had a
significant impact on commodity prices and our operations. If
commodity prices remain depressed or decline further, this could
negatively affect our ability to execute our growth strategy and
generate cash flows. See Risk FactorsNatural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids prices are volatile, and a
decline in prices can significantly affect our financial results
and impede our growth and Recent changes in
the financial and credit markets may impact economic growth and
natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids prices may
continue to be adversely affected by general economic
conditions.
Reserves. As is typical for businesses engaged
in the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas,
we face the challenge of natural production declines. As initial
reservoir pressures are depleted, natural gas, crude oil and
natural gas liquids production from a given well decreases.
Thus, unless we conduct successful development, exploitation and
exploration activities or acquire properties containing proved
reserves, our proved reserves will decline as they are produced.
Our future natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
reserves and production, and therefore our cash flow and results
of operations, are highly dependent on our success in
efficiently developing and exploiting our current reserves and
economically finding or acquiring additional recoverable
reserves.
As of December 31, 2008, we had 131.9 Bcfe of
estimated net proved reserves with an associated
PV-10 of
$291.0 million, representing an increase in reserves of
1.7 Bcfe from December 31, 2007, and an increase in
reserves of 85.6 Bcfe from December 31, 2006,
resulting primarily from our May 2007 acquisition of properties
(STGC Properties) from EXCO Resources, Inc.
(EXCO). As of September 30, 2009, we had
104.9 Bcfe of estimated net proved reserves with an
associated
PV-10 of
$190.8 million, representing a decrease of 27.0 Bcfe
from December 31, 2008. For a discussion of
PV-10 and a
reconciliation to Standardized Measure of Discounted Net Cash
Flows, see Prospectus SummaryNon-GAAP Financial
Measures and Reconciliations. We believe that our proved
reserves as of September 30, 2009 compared to
December 31, 2008 have declined for a number of reasons,
many of which are beyond our control. During the first nine
months of 2009, declining commodity prices, reductions in
production enhancing capital expenditures, as well as capital
expenditures associated with our exploitation and development
activities contributed to a decline in our proved reserves from
December 31, 2008, as have normal production, operations,
and certain property sales made throughout 2009. In addition,
approximately 31% and 32% of our total estimated proved reserves
at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009,
respectively, were undeveloped. Estimates of net proved reserves
are inherently imprecise. In addition, by their nature,
estimates of undeveloped reserves are less certain than proved
developed reserves. Recovery of such reserves will require
significant capital expenditures and successful drilling
operations. See Risk FactorsReserve estimates depend
on many assumptions that may turn out to be inaccurate. Any
material inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying
assumptions could materially reduce the estimated quantities and
present value of our reserves. Our level of exploratory
capital expenditures for the majority of 2009 was limited due to
low commodity prices and limited access to the capital markets,
and we deferred major capital allocation for drilling
opportunities during the year.
44
The SEC has adopted new rules that are effective for fiscal
years ending on or after December 31, 2009, which will
impact how we estimate our proved reserves and related
PV-10 and
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows. See
Risk FactorsOur estimates of proved reserves and
related
PV-10 and
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, which
are prepared and presented under existing SEC rules, may change
materially as a result of new SEC rules that will go into effect
for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009.
Revenues and Production. Our revenues, net of
the realized effects of our hedging instruments, decreased to
$85.7 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 from $151.0 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, a decrease of 43.2%, due to an
approximate 20% decrease in production and an approximate 29%
decline in realized commodity prices. Revenues, net of the
realized effects of our hedging instruments, decreased to
$26.7 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009 from $53.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, due to an approximate 29% decrease in
production and an approximate 29% decline in realized commodity
prices. In the nine month period ended September 30, 2009
our production was 11.7 Bcfe as compared to 14.6 Bcfe
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, or a decrease
of 19.6%. This decrease was primarily due to natural field
decline and limited production enhancing capital expenditure
activity in the first nine months of 2009. On a daily basis, we
produced an average of 43.0 MMcfe/d in the first nine
months of 2009 compared to an average of 53.3 MMcfe/d in
the first nine months of 2008. In the three month period ended
September 30, 2009, our production decreased by
1.5 Bcfe, to 3.5 Bcfe from 5.0 Bcfe for the third
quarter of 2009, or 30%, primarily due to natural field decline
and limited production enhancing capital expenditure activity
during 2009. On a daily basis, we produced an average of
38.3 MMcfe/d for the third quarter of 2009 compared to an
average of 54.1 MMcfe/d for the third quarter of 2008.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, revenues, net of the
realized effects of our hedging instruments, increased to
$185.7 million from $109.2 million in 2007 and from
$21.5 million in 2006. The increase in 2008 compared to
2007 was primarily due to increases in net realized commodity
prices, the success experienced in our drilling program, the
full-year effect of our May 2007 acquisition of the STGC
Properties from EXCO and the seven-month effect of the May 2008
South Texas acquisition from Smith, offset by lost production
and natural gas liquids not processed, due to Hurricanes Gustav
and Ike. Production volumes increased to 19.2 Bcfe in 2008
from 13.2 Bcfe in 2007, representing a 6.0 Bcfe, or
45.2%, increase. Realized prices (net of hedges) were $9.66 per
Mcfe in 2008 as compared to $8.25 in 2007. The increase in
revenues in 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to our
acquisition of the STGC Properties from EXCO in May of 2007.
Production volumes increased approximately 399.2% during 2007 as
compared to 2006 with average daily volumes of 36,264 Mcfe
in 2007 compared to an average of 7,265 Mcfe in 2006.
Derivative Instruments. To achieve more
predictable cash flow and to reduce our exposure to adverse
fluctuations in commodity prices, we generally enter into
derivative arrangements for a significant portion of our natural
gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids production. See
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market RiskCommodity Price Risk and
Derivative Instruments. While these derivative
contracts will protect us when market prices are below our
contract prices, they also prevent us from realizing an increase
in cash flow when market prices are higher than our contract
prices. We will sustain realized and unrealized losses to the
extent our contract prices are lower than market prices and
conversely, we will sustain realized and unrealized gains to the
extent our contract prices are higher than market prices. Our
derivatives contracts are not designated as accounting hedges
and, as a result, gains or losses on derivatives contracts are
recorded as an other expense. Internally, our management views
the settlement of such derivatives contracts as adjustments to
the price received for natural gas, crude oil and natural gas
liquids production to determine realized prices.
Net of the realized effect of our hedging agreements, the price
received for natural gas for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2009 was $6.77 per Mcf, the price received
for crude oil was $81.46 per Bbl, and the price received for
natural gas liquids was $27.19 per Bbl, or $7.31 per Mcfe on a
45
combined equivalent basis. Before the realized effect of our
hedges, the price received for natural gas for the nine month
period ended September 30, 2009 was $3.92 per Mcf, the
price received for crude oil was $52.80 per Bbl, and the price
received for natural gas liquids was $27.19 per Bbl, or $4.68
per Mcfe on a combined equivalent basis.
We realized gains of $7.6 million on our crude oil hedges
and $23.2 million on our natural gas hedges in the first
nine months of 2009, compared to realized losses of
$9.4 million for crude oil hedges and $3.8 million for
natural gas hedges in the first nine months of 2008. During the
nine month period ended September 30, 2009, we reported a
$17.2 million non-cash unrealized loss on our derivatives
positions compared to $1.7 million non-cash unrealized gain
for the same period of 2008. We realized losses of
$8.5 million on our crude oil hedges and $0.8 million
on our natural gas hedges in 2008, compared to realized losses
of $3.4 million for crude oil hedges and realized gains of
$6.4 million for natural gas hedges in 2007, and a loss of
$0.8 million for crude oil hedges and a realized gain of
$0.2 million for natural gas hedges in 2006. During 2008,
we reported a non-cash unrealized gain of $49.4 million
compared with a non-cash unrealized loss of $18.2 million
for 2007, and a $6.1 million non-cash unrealized gain for
2006. Unrealized gains or losses on derivative contracts
represent the change in fair value of open derivative positions
during the period. The change in fair value is principally
measured based on period end prices as compared to the contract
price. Future volatility in natural gas, crude oil and natural
gas liquids prices could have an adverse effect on the operating
results of our results of operations.
Operating Expenses. In evaluating our
operations, we frequently monitor and assess our operating
expenses, in terms of absolute dollars and on a per Mcfe basis.
We believe that this measure allows us to better evaluate our
operating efficiency and is used by us in reviewing the economic
feasibility of a potential acquisition or development project.
Operating expenses are the costs incurred in the operation of
producing properties. Expenses for utilities, direct labor,
water injection and disposal, production taxes and materials and
supplies comprise the most significant portion of our operating
expenses. A majority of our operating cost components are
variable and increase or decrease as the level of production
increases or decreases. Certain items, however, such as direct
labor and materials and supplies, generally remain relatively
fixed and do not fluctuate with changes in production volumes,
but can fluctuate depending on activities performed during a
specific period.
Our decrease in revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was offset by a decrease in our
operating expenses, primarily due to the implementation of cost
reduction initiatives in 2009 in response to a lower commodity
price environment and lower production and realized prices in
2009. However, our exploration expense increased by
$1.0 million, or 52.6%, from $1.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to $2.9 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to
higher geological and geophysical costs, abandoned property,
lease rentals and settled asset retirement costs incurred in the
first nine months of 2009. Similarly, depreciation, depletion
and amortization (DD&A) increased from
$36.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 to $41.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, primarily due to a higher DD&A
rate resulting from the effect of negative price-related
revisions, partially offset by lower production in 2009.
The increase in our revenue for 2008 as compared to 2007 was
offset by an increase of $47.8 million, or 66.2%, in our
operating expenses, primarily due to increased costs and
expenses resulting from the acquisition of properties from EXCO
and Smith and higher production and realized prices Similarly,
the increase in our revenue for 2007 as compared to 2006 was
offset by an increase of $51.3 million, or 245.5%, in our
operating expenses, primarily due to increased costs and
expenses resulting from the acquisition of the STGC Properties
from EXCO.
After application of approximately $117.6 million in net
proceeds from this offering (estimated based upon the midpoint
of the range of the offering price on the cover of this
prospectus), we expect to have approximately $83.1 million
of available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit
facility to pursue our 2010 drilling program based upon
$129.5 million outstanding under our revolving credit
46
facility as of December 4, 2009. See Liquidity
and Capital ResourcesCapital resourcesRevolving
Credit Facility. Our 2010 capital budget is approximately
$56 million, exclusive of acquisitions, of which we expect
to spend approximately 76% of our budget on our East Texas and
South Texas resource plays and 24% on our existing producing
assets. We plan to drill 12 gross (6.0 net) wells in 2010,
including 7 gross (3.0 net) wells on our East Texas resource
play acreage, one gross (0.4 net) well on our South Texas
resource play acreage, and 4 gross (2.6 net) wells in Liberty
County. The actual number of wells drilled and the amount of our
2010 capital expenditures will depend on market conditions,
commodity prices, availability of capital and drilling and
production results. We cannot assure you that our exploration
and development activities will result in increases in our
proved reserves.
Results of
Operations
The following discussion is of our consolidated results of
operations, financial condition and capital resources. You
should read this discussion in conjunction with our Consolidated
Financial Statements and the Notes thereto contained elsewhere
in this prospectus. Comparative results of operations for the
periods indicated are discussed below.
Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2008
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales
|
|
$
|
55.1
|
|
|
$
|
92.1
|
|
|
$
|
(37.0
|
)
|
|
|
−40.2
|
%
|
Crude oil sales
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
|
|
−37.1
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids sales
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
|
|
−63.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues
|
|
$
|
85.7
|
|
|
$
|
151.0
|
|
|
$
|
(65.3
|
)
|
|
|
−43.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas, Crude Oil and Natural Gas Liquids
Sales. Revenues from the sale of natural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids, net of the realized effects
of our hedging instruments, were $85.7 million for the
first nine months of 2009 compared to $151.0 million for
the first nine months of 2008 due to an approximate 20% decrease
in production and an approximate 29% decline in realized
commodity prices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sales (production) volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
8,142,588
|
|
|
|
9,752,667
|
|
|
|
(1,610,079
|
)
|
|
|
−16.5
|
%
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
|
264,170
|
|
|
|
385,458
|
|
|
|
(121,288
|
)
|
|
|
−31.5
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
334,303
|
|
|
|
422,107
|
|
|
|
(87,804
|
)
|
|
|
−20.8
|
%
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
|
11,733,426
|
|
|
|
14,598,057
|
|
|
|
(2,864,631
|
)
|
|
|
−19.6
|
%
|
Production was approximately 11.7 Bcfe for the first nine
months of 2009 compared to approximately 14.6 Bcfe for the
first nine months of 2008. On a daily basis, we produced an
average of 43.0 MMcfe/d in the first nine months of 2009
compared to an average of 53.3 MMcfe/d in the first nine
months of 2008. Production volumes decreased primarily due to
natural field decline and limited production-enhancing capital
expenditure activity in the first nine months of 2009.
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Average sales prices (before hedging):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
$
|
9.83
|
|
|
$
|
(5.91
|
)
|
|
|
−60.1
|
%
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
|
52.80
|
|
|
|
112.98
|
|
|
|
(60.18
|
)
|
|
|
−53.3
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
27.19
|
|
|
|
58.49
|
|
|
|
(31.30
|
)
|
|
|
−53.5
|
%
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
|
4.68
|
|
|
|
11.24
|
|
|
|
(6.56
|
)
|
|
|
−58.4
|
%
|
Average sales prices (after hedging):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
$
|
6.77
|
|
|
$
|
9.44
|
|
|
$
|
(2.67
|
)
|
|
|
−28.3
|
%
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
|
81.46
|
|
|
|
88.60
|
|
|
|
(7.14
|
)
|
|
|
−8.1
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
27.19
|
|
|
|
58.49
|
|
|
|
(31.30
|
)
|
|
|
−53.5
|
%
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
|
7.31
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
|
|
(3.03
|
)
|
|
|
−29.3
|
%
|
Natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids prices are
reported net of the realized effect of our hedging agreements.
We realized gains of $7.6 million on our crude oil hedges
and $23.2 million on our natural gas hedges in the first
nine months of 2009, compared to realized losses of
$9.4 million for crude oil hedges and $3.8 million for
natural gas hedges in the first nine months of 2008.
Costs and
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Certain Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
$
|
13.5
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
−12.3
|
%
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
−57.6
|
%
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
%
|
General and
administrative(1)
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
−13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses (cash)
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
|
−24.4
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
Share-based
compensation(1)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
−57.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain operating
expenses(2)
|
|
$
|
77.5
|
|
|
$
|
85.5
|
|
|
$
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
−9.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total general and administrative costs include share-based
compensation on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
|
(2) |
|
Exclusive of impairments and sales. |
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Selected Costs ($ per Mcfe):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
9.5%
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
−46.9%
|
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
84.6%
|
|
General and
administrative(1)
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
7.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses (cash)
|
|
|
2.89
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
−5.9%
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
43.7%
|
|
Share-based
compensation(1)
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
−48.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected costs
|
|
$
|
6.60
|
|
|
$
|
5.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
12.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total general and administrative costs include share-based
compensation on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Lease Operating Expenses. Lease operating
expenses for the first nine months of 2009 were
$13.5 million, compared to $15.4 million in the first
nine months of 2008, a decrease primarily due to the
implementation of cost reduction initiatives in 2009 in response
to the lower commodity price environment, offset by the
incremental costs in 2009 related to producing properties
acquired from Smith at the end of May 2008.
Production and Ad Valorem Tax
Expenses. Production and ad valorem tax expenses
for the first nine months of 2009 were $6.1 million,
compared to $14.4 million for the first nine months of
2008, due to lower production and lower realized prices in 2009
and state tax credits net to us of $0.4 million as a result
of our focus on maximizing allowable deductions and
opportunities for tax relief for prior periods.
Exploration Expenses. Exploration expenses
were $2.9 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared
to $1.9 million for the first nine months of 2008. The
increase in exploration expenses was primarily due to higher
geological and geophysical costs, abandoned property, lease
rentals and settled asset retirement costs incurred in the first
nine months of 2009.
Depreciation, Depletion and
Amortization. DD&A expense for the first
nine months of 2009 was $41.6 million compared to
$36.0 million for the first nine months of 2008, primarily
due to a higher DD&A rate resulting from the effect of
negative price related reserve revisions, partially offset by
lower production in 2009.
Impairment of Oil and Gas
Properties. Impairment expense for the first nine
months of 2009 was zero compared to $25.8 million for the
first nine months of 2008. The 2008 impairment relates primarily
to our capital investment made in pursuing the Rodessa formation
within the Madisonville Field. Negative performance-related
reserve revisions, including the abandonment of the Rodessa
formation in the Johnston 2U well, triggered an evaluation of
the Madisonville Field for impairment purposes. Given the high
original cost of drilling and developing the field and the high
cost of producing and processing sour gas, combined with lower
commodity prices, our evaluation resulted in the recorded costs
of this field exceeding the estimated future undiscounted cash
flow of the reserves as of the end of the third quarter 2008.
General and Administrative (G&A)
Expenses. Total G&A expenses were
$13.4 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to
$17.8 million for the first nine months of 2008, which
includes non-cash stock expense of $1.9 million ($0.16 per
Mcfe) and $4.5 million ($0.31 per Mcfe) for the first nine
months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The reduction in G&A
expenses is primarily a result of implementing cost reduction
initiatives during 2009.
49
Gain on Sale of Assets. We sold minimal assets
during the first nine months of 2009, while the gain on the sale
of assets in the first nine months of 2008 was
$15.3 million primarily due to the disposition of our
interest in the Barnett Shale Play in January 2008.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was
$16.3 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared
to $15.9 million for the first nine months of 2008. Total
interest expense increased primarily due to higher debt balances
and higher interest rates on our second lien term loan
agreement. Total interest expense capitalized for the first nine
months of 2009 and 2008 was approximately $25,000 and
$0.8 million, respectively.
Other Financing Costs. Other financing costs
were $1.1 million for the first nine months of 2009
compared with $1.2 million for the first nine months of
2008. These expenses are comprised primarily of the amortization
of capitalized costs associated with our credit agreements and
to commitment fees related to the unused portion of the credit
agreements.
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative
Instruments. Unrealized gain or loss on
derivative instruments is the change in the
mark-to-market
exposure under our commodity price hedging contracts and our
interest rate swaps. This non-cash unrealized loss for the first
nine months of 2009 was $17.2 million compared with a
non-cash unrealized gain of $1.7 million for the first nine
months of 2008. Unrealized gain or loss will vary period to
period, and will be a function of hedges in place, the strike
prices of those hedges and the forward curve pricing for the
commodities and interest rates being hedged.
Income Taxes. Our net loss before taxes was
$25.9 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to
net income before taxes of $40.4 million in the first nine
months of 2008. After adjusting for permanent tax differences,
we recorded income tax benefit of $9.1 million for the
first nine months of 2009, compared to income tax expense of
$15.1 million for the first nine months of 2008.
Dividends on Preferred Stock. Dividends on
preferred stock were $3.4 million for the first nine months
of 2009 compared with $3.2 million in the first nine months
of 2008. Dividends in the first nine months of 2009 included
approximately $3.3 million on the Series G Preferred
Stock and $19,565 on the Series H Preferred Stock.
Dividends in the first nine months of 2008 included
$3.1 million on the Series G Preferred Stock, and
$78,000 on the Series H Preferred Stock. Until such time as
the board of directors declares and pays dividends on our
Series G Preferred Stock, dividends shall continue to
accumulate. Dividends on our Series H Preferred Stock are
declared quarterly by our Board of Directors, and as such, are
paid out in shares of our common stock during the following
period.
Year Ended
December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31,
2007
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales
|
|
$
|
116.4
|
|
|
$
|
67.9
|
|
|
$
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
%
|
Crude oil sales
|
|
|
41.9
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids sales
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
91.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues
|
|
$
|
185.7
|
|
|
$
|
109.2
|
|
|
$
|
76.5
|
|
|
|
70.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas, Crude Oil and Natural Gas Liquids
Sales. Revenues from the sale of natural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids, net of the realized effects
of our hedging instruments, increased by 70.1%, to
$185.7 million in 2008 compared to $109.2 million in
2007. The increase in net revenues was primarily due to
increases in net realized commodity prices, the success
experienced in our drilling program, the full-year effect of the
May 2007 acquisition of the STGC Properties and the seven-month
50
effect of the May 2008 South Texas acquisition from Smith,
offset by lost production, and natural gas liquids not
processed, due to Hurricanes Gustav and Ike.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sales (production) volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
13,135,509
|
|
|
|
9,067,777
|
|
|
|
4,067,732
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
|
498,143
|
|
|
|
408,864
|
|
|
|
89,279
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
516,352
|
|
|
|
285,907
|
|
|
|
230,445
|
|
|
|
80.6
|
%
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
|
19,222,479
|
|
|
|
13,236,403
|
|
|
|
5,986,076
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
%
|
For 2008, sales volumes increased approximately 45.2% compared
to production in 2007. We had approximately 425,000 Mcfe of
production deferred in the third and fourth quarters of 2008 due
to Hurricanes Gustav and Ike. On a daily basis we produced an
average of
52.5 MMcfe/d
in 2008 compared to an average of
36.3 MMcfe/d
in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Average sales prices (before hedging):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
$
|
8.92
|
|
|
$
|
6.78
|
|
|
$
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
|
101.13
|
|
|
|
74.38
|
|
|
|
26.75
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
53.07
|
|
|
|
49.92
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
|
|
8.02
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
Average sales prices (after hedging):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
$
|
8.86
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
|
84.03
|
|
|
|
66.09
|
|
|
|
17.94
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
53.07
|
|
|
|
49.92
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
|
9.66
|
|
|
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
Natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids prices are
reported net of the realized effect of our hedging agreements.
We realized losses of $8.5 million on our crude oil hedges
and $0.8 million on our natural gas hedges in 2008,
compared to realized losses of $3.4 million for crude oil
hedges and realized gains of $6.4 million for natural gas
hedges in 2007.
Operating Overhead and Other Income. Revenues
from working interest partners increased to $1.1 million in
2008 compared to $0.4 million in 2007 due to the increase
in administrative overhead fees charged to our partners on the
operated acquired properties and the one-time catch up in the
third quarter 2008 on overhead billings due to the increase in
COPAS rates.
51
Costs and
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
$
|
20.8
|
|
|
$
|
12.0
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
%
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
212.5
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
64.0
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
54.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
120.0
|
|
|
$
|
72.2
|
|
|
$
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Selected Costs ($ per Mcfe):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
−3.4
|
%
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
116.7
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Lease Operating Expenses. Lease operating
expenses for 2008 were $20.8 million, compared to
$12.0 million in 2007. The increase in lease operating
expenses was primarily due to the addition of the STGC
Properties and the South Texas properties from the Smith
acquisition, increased workovers and general increases in the
costs of goods and services in the industry.
Production and Ad Valorem Tax
Expenses. Production and ad valorem tax expenses
for 2008 were $16.3 million, compared to $11.7 million
in 2007. The increase in production and ad valorem tax expenses
was primarily due to higher production and realized prices in
2008.
Exploration Expenses. Total exploration
expenses were $10.0 million in 2008 compared to
$3.2 million in 2007. The significant increase in
exploration expenses was primarily due to the release and
abandonment of the undeveloped leasehold position that we
acquired from Core Natural Resources in Culberson County, Texas
in 2006 which resulted in leasehold abandonment cost of
$7.1 million in 2008.
Depreciation, Depletion and
Amortization. DD&A expense for 2008 was
$50.5 million compared to $30.8 million in 2007, as a
result of higher production volumes and a higher DD&A rate.
Impairment of Oil and Gas
Properties. Impairment expense for 2008 was
$36.0 million compared to $4.4 million in 2007. In
December 2008, we recorded a non-cash impairment expense of
$10.2 million, primarily related to our Grand Lake Field in
Southwest Louisiana, resulting from negative reserve revisions
related to low commodity prices at year end. In September 2008,
we recorded a non-cash impairment expense of $25.8 million
related to the abandonment of the Rodessa formation development
in our Madisonville Field in our Southeast Texas Region.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our
G&A expenses were $22.4 million for 2008 compared to
$14.5 million in 2007. Included in G&A expense is a
non-cash stock expense of $5.4 million ($0.28 per
Mcfe) and $4.7 million ($0.36 per Mcfe) for 2008 and
2007, respectively. G&A expenses increased primarily due to
higher personnel costs, higher professional fees and higher
office rent expense related to expanding our infrastructure.
52
Gain on Sale of Assets. Gain on the sale of
assets for 2008 was $15.2 million. The net gain on the sale
of assets was primarily due to the disposition of our interest
in the Barnett Shale Play in the first quarter 2008, which
resulted in a gain of $15.6 million. The gain on the sale
of assets in 2007 was $0.7 million.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was
$21.1 million for 2008, up from $14.9 million in 2007.
Total interest expense increased primarily as a result of higher
outstanding loan balances on our credit agreements related to
our acquisition and drilling activity. Total interest expense
capitalized for 2008 and 2007 was $0.9 million and
$1.3 million, respectively.
Other Financing Costs. Other financing costs
were $1.5 million for 2008 compared with $1.3 million
for 2007. These expenses are comprised primarily of the
amortization of capitalized costs associated with our current
and former credit agreements and to commitment fees related to
the unused portion of the credit agreements.
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative
Instruments. Unrealized gain or loss on
derivative instruments is the change in the
mark-to-market
exposure under our commodity price hedging instruments and our
interest rate swaps. This non-cash unrealized gain for 2008 was
$49.4 million compared with a non-cash unrealized loss of
$18.2 million for 2007. Unrealized gain or loss will vary period
to period, and will be a function of the hedges in place, the
strike prices of those hedges, and the forward curve pricing of
the commodities and interest rates being hedged.
Income Taxes. Our net income before taxes was
$72.9 million for 2008 compared to a net loss before taxes
of $0.8 million in 2007. After adjusting for permanent tax
differences, we recorded income tax expense of
$26.7 million for 2008, of which $0.6 million was
current tax expense and $26.1 million was deferred. The
income tax benefit of $0.4 million for 2007 was all
deferred.
Dividends on Preferred Stock. Dividends on
preferred stock were $4.2 million for 2008 compared with
$4.5 million in 2007. Dividends in 2008 included
$4.1 million on the Series G Preferred Stock and
$0.1 million on the Series H Preferred Stock.
Dividends in 2007 included $4.3 million on the
Series G Preferred Stock, $0.1 million on the
Series H Preferred Stock and $0.1 million on the
Series E Preferred Stock. All of the Series E
Preferred Stock was converted to shares of our common stock in
May 2007.
Year Ended
December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended December 31,
2006
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales
|
|
$
|
67.9
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
57.3
|
|
|
|
540.6
|
%
|
Crude oil sales
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
147.7
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids sales
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
109.2
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
$
|
87.7
|
|
|
|
407.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas, Crude Oil and Natural Gas Liquids
Sales. Revenues from the sale of natural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids, net of the realized effects
of our hedging instruments, increased by 407.9%, to
$109.2 million in 2007 compared to $21.5 million in
2006. The increase in net revenues was primarily due to the
effect of the STGC Properties acquisition in May 2007, which
significantly increased our production volumes.
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Sales (production) volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
9,067,777
|
|
|
|
1,542,423
|
|
|
|
7,525,354
|
|
|
|
487.9
|
%
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
|
408,864
|
|
|
|
184,881
|
|
|
|
223,983
|
|
|
|
121.1
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
285,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,907
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
|
13,236,403
|
|
|
|
2,651,709
|
|
|
|
10,584,694
|
|
|
|
399.2
|
%
|
For 2007, sales volumes increased approximately 400% compared to
production in 2006. On a daily basis we produced an average of
36.3 MMcfe/d in 2007 compared to an average of
7.3 MMcfe/d in 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Average sales prices (before hedging):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
$
|
6.78
|
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
|
74.38
|
|
|
|
63.29
|
|
|
|
11.09
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
49.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.92
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
|
8.02
|
|
|
|
8.34
|
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
−3.8
|
%
|
Average sales prices (after hedging):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
6.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
|
66.09
|
|
|
|
59.00
|
|
|
|
7.09
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
49.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.92
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe)
|
|
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids prices are
reported net of the realized effect of our hedging agreements.
No natural gas liquids were sold in 2006. We realized a loss of
$3.4 million on our crude oil hedges and a gain of
$6.4 million on our natural gas hedges in 2007 compared to
a realized loss of $0.8 million for crude oil hedges and a
realized gain of $0.2 million for natural gas hedges in
2006.
Operating Overhead and Other Income. Revenues
from working interest partners increased to $0.4 million in
2007 compared to $0.2 million in 2006 due to the increase
in administrative overhead fees charged to partners on the
operated acquired STGC Properties.
Costs and
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
$
|
12.0
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
114.3
|
%
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
515.8
|
%
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
357.1
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
670.0
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
72.2
|
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
$
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
245.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Selected Costs ($ per Mcfe):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
2.12
|
|
|
$
|
(1.21
|
)
|
|
|
−57.1
|
%
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
−4.0
|
%
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
3.29
|
|
|
$
|
(2.19
|
)
|
|
|
−66.6
|
%
|
Lease Operating Expenses. Lease operating
expenses for 2007 were $12.0 million, compared to
$5.6 million in 2006. The increase was primarily due to the
addition of the STGC Properties.
Production and Ad Valorem Tax
Expenses. Production and ad valorem tax expenses
for 2007 were $11.7 million, compared to $1.9 million
in 2006. The increase in production and ad valorem tax expenses
was primarily due to the significant increase in production
related to the acquisition of the STGC Properties.
Exploration Expenses. Total exploration
expenses were $3.2 million in 2007 compared to
$0.7 million in 2006. Exploration expenses increased
primarily as a result of the acquisition of the STGC Properties.
Depreciation, Depletion and
Amortization. DD&A expense for 2007 was
$30.8 million compared to $4.0 million in 2006, as a
result of our acquisition of the STGC Properties.
Impairment of Oil and Gas
Properties. Impairment expense was
$4.4 million in 2007, primarily related to impairments on
our Turkey Creek and Huff McFaddin properties, and
$3.1 million in 2006, primarily related to our Iola
property. Declining performance and lower gas prices at year end
were contributing factors in these property impairments.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our
G&A expenses were $14.5 million in 2007 compared to
$8.7 million in 2006. Included in G&A expense is
non-cash stock expense of $4.7 million ($0.36 per
Mcfe) and $3.8 million ($1.44 per Mcfe) for 2007 and
2006, respectively. The $5.8 million increase was primarily
due to higher personnel costs, information technology costs,
professional fees and office rent incurred in expanding our
infrastructure after the acquisition of the STGC Properties.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was
$14.9 million in 2007, up from $0.1 million in 2006.
Total interest increased to $16.2 million for 2007 because
of the higher outstanding balances on our credit agreements
related to the STGC Properties acquisition. However,
$1.3 million of that interest, which was related to our
Madisonville/Rodessa Prospect, was capitalized in 2007.
Other Financing Costs. Other financing costs
were $1.3 million in 2007 compared with $0.2 million
in 2006. These expenses are comprised primarily of the
amortization of capitalized costs associated with our current
and former credit agreements and to commitment fees related to
the unused portion of the credit agreements.
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative
Instruments. Unrealized gain or loss on
derivative instruments is the change in the
mark-to-market
exposure under our commodity price hedging instruments and our
interest rate swap. This non-cash unrealized loss for 2007 was
$18.2 million compared with a non-cash unrealized gain of
$6.1 million for 2006. This amount will vary period to
period and will be a function of the hedges in place, the strike
prices of those hedges and the forward curve pricing of the
commodities and interest rates being hedged.
Income Taxes. Our net loss before taxes was
$0.8 million in 2007 compared to net income before taxes of
$3.3 million in 2006. After adjusting for permanent tax
differences, we recorded an income tax benefit of
$0.4 million in 2007 and an income tax expense of
$1.4 million in 2006. The income tax benefit/expense was
all deferred for both years.
55
Dividends on Preferred Stock. Dividends on
preferred stock were $4.5 million in 2007 compared with
$3.6 million for 2006. Dividends in 2007 included
$4.3 million on the Series G Preferred Stock,
$0.1 million on the Series H Preferred Stock and
$0.1 million on the Series E Preferred Stock.
Dividends in 2006 included $3.2 million on the
Series G Preferred Stock, $0.1 million on the
Series H Preferred Stock and $0.3 million on the
Series E Preferred Stock. All of the Series E
Preferred Stock was converted to common stock in May 2007.
Prior to the third quarter of 2007, we accumulated undeclared
dividends on the Series G Preferred Stock, on a simple or
non-compounded basis. During the third quarter, we were notified
by the holder of a majority of our outstanding Series G
Preferred Stock, Oaktree Holdings, that it believed that the
provisions of the Certificate of Designations for the
Series G Preferred Stock required compounding dividends.
After reviewing its interpretation, and consulting with legal
counsel, we and the Oaktree Holdings settled the dispute and
agreed to calculate the accrued, undeclared and unpaid dividends
on a compounded basis. This new basis for calculating the
dividend accrual was documented in a clarification memo between
the parties. The change in the method of calculating the
accrued, undeclared dividend was a change in accounting estimate
necessitated by the new information that became
available with the written agreement between the parties in the
settlement of the dispute. The net effect of the change in the
accounting estimate was an increase of $0.7 million in
preferred stock dividends in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007, of which
approximately $0.4 million was related to prior years, and
$0.1 million and $0.2 million was related to the first
and second quarters of 2007, respectively.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of financial condition and results
of our operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of these financial statements requires us to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Certain accounting
policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent
that there is reasonable likelihood that materially different
amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or
if different assumptions had been used. We evaluate such
estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. We base our
estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from
these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of our
financial statements. Below, we have provided expanded
discussion of the more significant accounting policies,
estimates and judgments. We believe these accounting policies
reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in
preparation of our financial statements. Please read the notes
to our audited consolidated financial statements included in
this prospectus for a discussion of additional accounting
policies and estimates made by management.
Successful
Efforts Method
We use the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and
gas producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral interests in
oil and gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells
that find proved reserves, and to drill and equip development
wells are capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory wells that do
not find proved reserves, delay rentals and geological and
geophysical costs are expensed (except those costs used to
determine a drill site location).
Depletion and
Depreciation
We consider depletion and depreciation of oil and gas properties
and related support equipment to be critical accounting
estimates, based upon estimates of total recoverable natural
gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids reserves. The estimates
of natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids reserves
utilized in the calculation of depletion and depreciation are
estimated in accordance
56
with guidelines established by the Society of Petroleum
Engineers, the SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board,
which require that reserve estimates be prepared under existing
economic and operating conditions with no provision for price
and cost escalations over prices and costs existing at year end,
except by contractual arrangements. We emphasize that reserve
estimates are inherently imprecise. Accordingly, the estimates
are expected to change as more current information becomes
available. Our policy is to amortize capitalized natural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids costs on the unit of
production method, based upon these reserve estimates. It is
reasonably possible that the estimates of future cash inflows,
future gross revenues, the amount of natural gas, crude oil and
natural gas liquids reserves, the remaining estimated lives of
the oil and gas properties, or any combination of the above may
be increased or reduced in the near term. If reduced, the
carrying amount of capitalized oil and gas properties may be
reduced materially in the near term.
Impairments
We assess all of our properties for possible impairment on an
annual basis as a minimum, or as circumstances warrant, based on
geological trend analysis, changes in proved reserves or
relinquishment of acreage. When impairment occurs, the
adjustment is recorded to accumulated depletion. See the
discussion of impairment expenses in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
We recognize an estimated liability for the plugging and
abandonment of our natural gas, crude oil and natural gas
liquids wells and associated pipelines and equipment. The
liability and the associated increase in the related long-lived
asset are recorded in the period in which our asset retirement
obligation, or ARO, is incurred. The liability is accreted to
its present value each period and the capitalized cost is
depreciated over the useful life of the related asset.
The estimated liability is based on historical experience in
plugging and abandoning wells, estimated remaining lives of
those wells based on reserves estimates and federal and state
regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using an
assumed credit-adjusted risk-free rate.
Revisions to the liability could occur due to acquisitions,
changes in estimates of plugging and abandonment costs, changes
in the risk-free rate or remaining lives of the wells, or if
federal or state regulators enact new plugging and abandonment
requirements. At the time of abandonment, we recognize a gain or
loss on abandonment to the extent that actual costs do not equal
the estimated costs.
Derivative
Instruments
At the end of each reporting period we record on our balance
sheet the
mark-to-market
valuation of our derivative instruments. The estimated change in
fair value of the derivatives is reported in Other Income and
Expense as unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
SEC
33-8995/34-59192.
In December 2008, the SEC adopted Release
No. 33-8995/34-59192,
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting (SEC
33-8995).
This release amends the oil and gas reporting disclosures that
exist in their current form in
Regulation S-K
and
Regulation S-X
under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act to provide
investors with a more meaningful and comprehensive understanding
of oil and gas reserves. The new rules include changes for the
pricing used to estimate reserves; permitting disclosure of
possible and probable reserves; permitting the inclusion of
non-traditional resources in reserves and the use of new
technology for determining reserves. SEC
33-8995 is
effective for fiscal years ending on or after December 31,
2009. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently
evaluating the provisions of SEC
33-8995 and
assessing the affect its adoption will have on our financial
reporting disclosures.
57
Contractual
Obligations
The following table sets forth certain of our contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
ACS
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Retirements
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Topic
740(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
90,368
|
|
|
$
|
14,848,716
|
|
|
$
|
2,641,835
|
|
|
$
|
1,659,371
|
|
|
$
|
1,516,300
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
17,352
|
|
|
|
14,848,716
|
|
|
|
1,820,471
|
|
|
|
1,031,755
|
|
|
|
1,516,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
126,673,074
|
|
|
|
5,279,543
|
|
|
|
1,437,749
|
|
|
|
1,953,292
|
|
|
|
710,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
150,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,864,088
|
|
|
|
1,419,933
|
|
|
|
438,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,419,933
|
|
|
|
393,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,328
|
|
|
|
7,592,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
276,780,794
|
|
|
$
|
38,841,063
|
|
|
$
|
8,858,249
|
|
|
$
|
13,068,542
|
|
|
$
|
3,742,600
|
|
|
$
|
518,219
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
FASB ACS Topic 740 (previously reported as FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
An interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109). We
cannot predict at this time when this obligation may be required
to be paid, if at all. |
As of September 30, 2009, there had been no significant
changes to our contractual obligations from December 31,
2008.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Our primary cash requirements are for capital expenditures,
working capital, operating expenses, acquisitions and principal
and interest payments on indebtedness. Our primary sources of
liquidity are cash generated by operations, net of the realized
effect of our hedging agreements, and amounts available to be
drawn under our credit agreements. To the extent our cash
requirements exceed our sources of liquidity, we will be
required to fund our cash requirements through other means, such
as through debt and equity financing activities
and/or asset
monetizations,
and/or
curtail capital expenditures.
Liquidity and
cash flow
During the last year there has been volatility and disruption in
the equity and debt markets. The volatility and disruptions have
created conditions
and/or
business strategies that have adversely affected the financial
condition of some of our lenders, the counterparties to our
derivative instruments, our insurers and our crude oil and
natural gas purchasers. While in recent months market conditions
have stabilized, continued economic uncertainty may limit our
ability to access the equity and debt markets. In addition,
though a substantial portion of our production is hedged, we are
still subject to commodity price risk and our liquidity may be
adversely affected if commodity prices were to decline.
Our working capital deficit was $11.9 million as of
September 30, 2009, compared to a working capital deficit
of $37.6 million as of December 31, 2008. Current
assets decreased $16.8 million, primarily due to the
decrease in accounts receivable related to lower revenues and
the decrease in the mark to market value of our current net
derivatives. Current liabilities, primarily accounts payable and
accrued liabilities, decreased $42.6 million due to our
reduced capital expenditure activity for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
The table below summarizes certain measures of liquidity and
capital expenditures, as well as our sources of capital from
internal and external sources, for the past three years and the
periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30,
2008.
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Financial Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
143.8
|
|
|
$
|
69.6
|
|
|
$
|
14.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
96.9
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(165.4
|
)
|
|
|
(311.8
|
)
|
|
|
(21.8
|
)
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)
|
|
|
(105.7
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
247.0
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Capital expenditures, including acquisitions
|
|
|
200.3
|
|
|
|
312.5
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
140.6
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $2.8 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to
$96.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, a change resulting primarily from the reduction in
revenues, accounts payable and accrued liabilities as well as
the change in the mark to market value of our derivatives during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. During the first
nine months of 2009, the net cash provided by operating
activities, before changes in working capital, was
$36.4 million. Net cash provided by operating activities,
before changes in working capital, was $89.3 million for
the first nine months of 2008.
Net cash used in investing activities was $16.0 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
$105.7 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Net cash used for investing activities during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 were primarily capital
expenditures for the development or maintenance of our proved
reserves and the development of our Haynesville Shale natural
gas resource play in East Texas. Net cash used in investing
activities during the first nine months of 2008 was primarily
for the Smith acquisition and capital expenditures for the
development of our Southeast Texas properties, offset primarily
by proceeds from the sale of our interest in the Barnett Shale
Play.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $13.3 million
for the first nine months of 2009 compared to $14.3 million
for the first nine months of 2008. Net cash provided by
financing activities during the first nine months of 2009 was
primarily the result of net borrowings under our revolving
credit facility to satisfy the fourth quarter 2008 balance in
current liabilities related to our active drilling program in
2008. Net cash provided by financing activities for the first
nine months of 2008 was primarily the result of borrowings on
debt to fund the Smith acquisition and normal drilling
expenditures, offset by repayments of debt from proceeds from
the sale of our interest in the Barnett Shale Play and
internally generated cash flow from operations.
Net cash provided by operating activities was
$143.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to $69.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, a change resulting primarily from an
increase in revenues, accounts payable and accrued liabilities
and a decrease in accounts receivable trade. Net
cash provided by operating activities was $69.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to
$14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, a
change resulting primarily from an increase in revenues,
accounts payable and accrued liabilities offset by an increase
in accounts receivable trade.
Net cash used in investing activities was $165.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to
$311.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Net cash used for investing activities during the year ended
December 31, 2008 were primarily related to capital
expenditures for the development or maintenance of our proved
reserves, prospect acquisitions in Sabine and San Augustine
counties in Texas, and the acquisition of properties in South
Texas from Smith, offset in part by the sale of properties in
the Barnett Shale. Net cash used in investing activities during
the year ended December 31, 2007, related primarily to the
acquisition of the STGC Properties and capital expenditures for
the development or maintenance of our proved reserves.
59
Net cash provided by financing activities was $16.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to
$247.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Net cash provided by financing activities during the year ended
December 31, 2008 was the result of net borrowings under
our revolving credit facility primarily used for our capital
expenditures for the development of new reserves, for prospect
acquisitions and to satisfy the South Texas acquisition from
Smith, offset by cash proceeds received from the sale of
properties in the Barnett Shale. Net cash provided by financing
activities during the year ended December 31, 2007 was
primarily the result of net cash provided by our second lien
credit agreement to satisfy the acquisition of the STGC
Properties and net borrowings under our revolving credit
facility for our capital expenditures.
Capital
resources
Revolving Credit Facility. On May 8,
2007, we entered into a revolving credit facility with Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as agent, and the lenders
party thereto, which amended and restated our revolving credit
facility dated as of July 15, 2005, as amended. On
May 8, 2007, we borrowed $122.7 million pursuant to
this revolving credit facility to pay the consideration for the
acquisition of the STGC Properties and to refinance certain of
our existing indebtedness. On May 31, 2007, we amended and
restated this facility (as amended and restated, our
revolving credit facility). Our revolving credit
facility provides for aggregate borrowings of up to
$400.0 million for acquisitions of crude oil and gas
properties and for general corporate cash requirements.
Borrowings under our revolving credit facility are subject to a
borrowing base limitation based on our proved crude oil and
natural gas reserves. The borrowing base under this facility is
currently set at $140.0 million, but, subject to the
completion of this offering, will decrease to
$105.0 million at January 1, 2010. The next borrowing
base re-determination under our revolving credit facility after
January 1, 2010 is scheduled for May 1, 2010 and is
subject to semi-annual redeterminations, although our lenders
may elect to make one additional redetermination between
scheduled redetermination dates. As of November 6, 2009, we
had $129.5 million in aggregate indebtedness outstanding
under our revolving credit facility. Our revolving credit
facility has a term of four years, and all principal amounts,
together with all accrued and unpaid interest, will be due and
payable in full on May 8, 2011. Our revolving credit
facility also provides for the issuance of
letters-of-credit
up to a $5.0 million
sub-limit.
Advances under our revolving credit facility are in the form of
either base rate loans or LIBOR loans. The interest rate on the
base rate loans fluctuates based upon the higher of the
lenders prime rate and the Federal Funds rate
plus a margin of 0.50%. The interest rate on the LIBOR loans
fluctuates based upon the rate at which Eurodollar deposits in
the LIBOR are quoted for the maturity selected. Pursuant to an
amendment to our revolving credit facility, dated July 31,
2009, the applicable margin was increased from between 1.25% and
2.00% to between 2.75% and 3.50%, for LIBOR loans, and from zero
and 0.50% to between 1.50% and 2.00%, for base rate loans. The
specific interest margin applicable is determined by, in each
case, the percent of the borrowing base utilized at the time of
the credit extension. LIBOR loans of one, two, three and six
months may be selected. Pursuant to that same amendment, the
commitment fee payable on the unused portion of our borrowing
base was increased from 0.375% to 0.50%, which fee accrues and
is payable quarterly in arrears.
On November 6, 2009, we entered into a second and a third
amendment to our revolving credit facility. These amendments
provided, among other things, for (i) a change in the
voting percentages required for certain amendments or waivers
from 50.1% to 60%, and (ii) a waiver of the current ratio
and the leverage ratio for the quarter ended September 30,
2009.
Effective December 7, 2009, we entered into a fourth
amendment to our revolving credit facility. This amendment
provides, among other things, that, subject to the closing of
this offering, (i) the ratio of our total debt to Adjusted
EBITDAX for any four trailing fiscal quarters may not be greater
than 3.50x as of the end of any fiscal quarter ending on or
prior to December 31, 2010, and 3.25x as of the end of any
fiscal quarter ending thereafter, and (ii) the ratio of
Adjusted EBITDAX to
60
cash interest expense for any four trailing fiscal quarters may
not be less than 2.25x as of the end of any fiscal quarter
ending on or prior to December 31, 2010, and 2.75x as of
the end of any fiscal quarter ending thereafter. In addition,
this amendment also provides that, subject to the closing of
this offering, the borrowing base under our revolving credit
facility will be redetermined to be $105.0 million at
January 1, 2010 and that we may issue up to
$200 million in senior unsecured notes. Any such issuance
of senior unsecured notes will reduce our borrowing base by 25%
of the net proceeds from such issuance in excess of
$150 million.
Second Lien Term Loan Agreement. On
May 8, 2007, we entered into a five-year second lien term
loan agreement with Credit Suisse, as agent, and the lender
party thereto which provided for term loans, made to us in a
single draw, in an aggregate principal amount of
$150.0 million (our second lien term loan
agreement). On May 8, 2007, we borrowed
$150.0 million pursuant to this second lien term loan
agreement to pay the consideration for the acquisition of the
STGC Properties and to refinance certain existing indebtedness.
Our second lien term loan agreement replaced our then existing
$150.0 million subordinate credit facility, which was paid
off in full and terminated at closing. Our second lien term loan
agreement matures on May 8, 2012. Loans under the second
lien term loan agreement, as it has been amended, bear interest
at a per annum rate equal to LIBOR plus 5.75%, in the case of
LIBOR loans, or the base rate plus 4.75%, in the case of base
rate loans. Eurodollar loans of one, two, three and six months
may be selected.
On May 13, 2009, we entered into a second amendment to our
second lien term loan agreement (including with an affiliate of
Oaktree Holdings), which, among other things, (i) modified
the leverage ratio covenant to be no greater than the leverage
ratio under our revolving credit facility plus 0.25,
(ii) modified the
PV-10 ratio
covenant to not less than 1.2x beginning with the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2009, to not be less than 1.25x, beginning
with the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2009, and to
not be less than 1.5x beginning with the fiscal quarter ending
December 31, 2010 and thereafter, (iii) increased the
applicable margin to 8.0% for loans bearing interest at LIBOR
and 7.0% for loans bearing interest at the alternate base rate,
unless we meet certain leverage and
PV-10
ratios, in which case the applicable margin will be 7.0% and
6.0%, respectively, (iv) set a minimum LIBOR of 3.0%, and
(v) included certain fee acreage in calculations of our
borrowing base after we have granted a lien on such fee acreage.
On November 6, 2009, we entered into a third amendment and
waiver to our second lien term loan agreement with lenders
holding a majority of the then outstanding term loans under such
agreement, which included an affiliate of Oaktree Holdings. The
amendment and waiver provided, among other things, for a waiver
of the leverage ratio covenant under that agreement for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009.
At September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the
covenants under our revolving credit facility and second lien
term loan agreement, with the exception of the current ratio
under our revolving credit facility and the leverage ratio under
both of these credit agreements. We obtained waivers of such
noncompliance from our lenders under both of these credit
agreements for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, and
effective December 7, 2009 amended the covenants under our
revolving credit facility as discussed above under
Revolving Credit Facility.
Our revolving credit facility and our second lien term loan
agreement are secured by liens on substantially all of our
assets, including the capital stock of our subsidiaries. The
liens securing the obligations under our second lien term loan
agreement are junior to those under our revolving credit
facility. Unpaid interest is payable under our credit agreements
as borrowings mature and renew.
In connection with the credit agreements, we utilize financial
commodity price hedge instruments to minimize exposure to
declining prices on our crude oil and natural gas liquids
production. As of September 30, 2009, we had
13.9 MMcfe of equivalent production hedged representing
2.3 MMcfe, 7.6 MMcfe and 3.9 MMcfe of hedges in
place in 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. Of the hedges in
place through 2011, approximately 80% of the hedges are natural
gas hedges and 20% are crude oil hedges. We used a series of
swaps and costless collars to accomplish
61
the hedging requirements. We also constructively fixed the base
LIBOR on $200.0 million of our variable rate debt by
entering into interest rate swaps at a weighted average swap
price of 2.61%.
At September 30, 2009, we had $141.5 million
outstanding under our revolving credit facility and
$150.0 million outstanding under our second lien term loan
agreement.
Promissory Notes. On November 6, 2009, we
issued an unsecured promissory note in aggregate principal of
$10.0 million to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
the administrative agent and a lender under our revolving credit
facility. All of the proceeds of this promissory note were used
to repay indebtedness outstanding under our revolving credit
facility. The indebtedness under this promissory note bears
interest at a per annum rate equal to two-month LIBOR plus 2.0%
and matures on January 15, 2010; provided that upon an
event of default resulting from the failure to make any payment
of principal or interest under this promissory note, the
interest rate per annum will increase to an amount equal to the
lesser of the maximum rate of interest that may be charged under
applicable law and LIBOR plus 4.0% or, if the promissory note
has been assigned to any person other than any affiliate of
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, LIBOR plus 15.0%. The
indebtedness under this promissory note may be prepaid, from
time to time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty.
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as payee, may assign this
promissory note at any time provided that the assignee expressly
agrees to subordinate its right to payment under this promissory
note to all obligations under our revolving credit facility. In
addition to any other rights and remedies Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as payee, may have under this promissory
note, upon the occurrence and continuation of an event of
default, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association may cause this
promissory note to be assigned to Oaktree Holdings in full. As
support for this contingent obligation to purchase this
promissory note, Oaktree Holdings has deposited
$10.0 million in escrow for the benefit of Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association. Upon an event of default under this
promissory note, on January 15, 2010, Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association may, at its option, cause the note to be
assigned to Oaktree Holdings and can draw upon the funds held in
escrow as payment for such assignment.
As consideration for Oaktree Holdings agreement to deposit
$10.0 million in escrow as described above, we issued an
unsecured subordinated promissory note on November 6, 2009
in aggregate principal amount of $2.0 million to Oaktree
Holdings. The indebtedness under the promissory note bears
interest at a per annum rate equal to 8.0% and matures on the
later of (i) November 8, 2012 and (ii) the date
six months after payment in full in cash of all Obligations (as
such term is defined under our credit agreements), and the
termination of all commitments to extend credit under our credit
facilities. The promissory note is subordinated in right of
payment to the prior payment in full in cash of all obligations
under our credit agreements.
Covenant
compliance
Our existing credit agreements contain certain financial
covenants that require us to maintain a maximum level of total
debt to Adjusted EBITDAX and a minimum adjusted interest
coverage ratio, in each case, on a trailing four-quarter basis.
Our compliance with these covenants is tested each quarter. We
believe our credit agreements are material agreements and that
these financial covenants are material terms of those
agreements. Non-compliance with these covenants could result in
a default, and an acceleration in the repayment of amounts
outstanding, under our credit agreements. If an event of default
occurs and is continuing under either credit agreement, we would
be precluded from, among other things, paying dividends on our
common stock or making additional borrowings. As a result, we
believe the information presented below regarding these
financial covenants is material to investors understanding
of our results of operations and financial condition. See
Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital
resources for a more detailed description of terms and
provisions of our credit agreements.
At September 30, 2009, the financial covenants contained in
our credit agreements included (a) with respect to our
revolving credit facility, maintaining (i) a ratio of
current assets to current
62
liabilities of at least 1.0 to 1.0, (ii) an interest
coverage ratio of Adjusted EBITDAX (defined as
EBITDAX in such agreement) to cash interest expense
of not less than 3.0 to 1.0 and (iii) a ratio of total debt
to Adjusted EBITDAX of not greater than 2.75 to 1.00 and
(b) with respect to our second lien term loan agreement,
maintaining (i) a minimum leverage ratio of total debt to
Adjusted EBITDAX of not greater than the leverage ratio under
our revolving credit facility plus 0.25 and (ii) a ratio of
the PV-10 of
our oil and gas reserves to total net debt, or
PV-10 Ratio
(which ratio is calculated semi-annually based on the latest
reserve report), of at least 1.5x. Effective December 7, 2009,
we entered into an amendment to our revolving credit facility
that, among other things, amended certain of our financial
covenants and our debt incurrence covenant and provided for
redetermination of our borrowing base at January 1, 2010.
See Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital
resourcesRevolving Credit Facility.
As of September 30, 2009, our ratio of current assets to
current liabilities was 0.71. For the four quarters ended
September 30, 2009, our ratio of total debt to Adjusted
EBITDAX was 3.68; our ratio of interest expense to Adjusted
EBITDAX was 0.27; and our
PV-10 Ratio
was 3.68.
We believe the presentation of Adjusted EBITDAX is appropriate
to provide additional information to investors to demonstrate
our ability to comply with the financial covenants to which we
are and expect to be subject. For a reconciliation of net income
(loss) to Adjusted EBITDAX, see Prospectus
SummaryNon-GAAP Financial Measures and
Reconciliations. The calculation of Adjusted EBITDAX in
this prospectus is in accordance with the definitions contained
in our credit agreements.
Future capital
requirements
Our future natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
reserves and production, and therefore our cash flow and results
of operations, are highly dependent on our success in
efficiently developing and exploiting our current reserves and
economically finding or acquiring additional recoverable
reserves. We intend to grow our reserves and production by
further exploiting our existing property base, through drilling
opportunities identified in our new resource plays in East and
South Texas and in our conventional inventory. We expect to
focus much of our drilling activity over the next several years
on continued development of our East Texas and South Texas
resource plays while we continue the development and
exploitation of our core legacy properties in the South Texas
and Gulf Coast areas. We anticipate that acquisitions, including
of undeveloped leasehold interests, will continue to play a
significant role in our business strategy as those opportunities
periodically arise from time to time. While there are currently
no unannounced agreements for the acquisition of any material
businesses or assets, such transactions can be effected quickly
and could occur at any time.
We believe that the proceeds from this offering and our
internally generated cash flow combined with access to our
revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet the
liquidity requirements necessary to fund our daily operations,
planned capital development and execute on our growth strategy
and debt service requirements for the next 12 months. Our
ability to execute on our growth strategy will be determined, in
large part, by the availability of debt and equity capital at
that time, and we continuously evaluate our financing
opportunities. Any decision regarding a financing transaction,
and our ability to complete such a transaction, will depend on
prevailing market conditions and other factors. Our ability to
continue to meet our liquidity requirements and execute on our
growth strategy can be impacted by economic conditions outside
of our control, such as the recent disruption in the capital and
credit markets, as well as continued commodity price volatility,
which could, among other things, lead to a decline in the
borrowing base under our revolving credit facility in connection
with a borrowing base redetermination. In such case, we may be
required to seek other sources of capital earlier than
anticipated, although the restrictions in our credit agreements
may impair our ability to access other sources of capital, and
access to additional capital may not be available on terms
acceptable to us or at all. See Risk FactorsRecent
market events and conditions, including disruptions in the
U.S. and international credit markets and other financial
systems and the deterioration of the U.S. and global
economic conditions, could, among other things, impede access to
63
capital or increase the cost of capital, which would have an
adverse effect on our ability to fund our working capital and
other capital requirements, Risk FactorsOur
development and exploration operations, including on our East
Texas resource play acreage, require substantial capital, and we
may be unable to obtain needed capital or financing on
satisfactory terms, which could lead to a loss of properties and
a decline in our natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
reserves and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Due to low commodity prices and limited access to capital
markets during 2009, our capital expenditure strategy for 2009
was to keep expenditures within internally generated cash flow
and to reduce debt. For the nine months ended September 30,
2009, we made capital expenditures of $16.5 million,
primarily for our Liberty County and East Texas leasing and
drilling programs. We currently anticipate capital expenditures
to be no more than $20 million in 2009. Our 2010 capital budget
is approximately $56 million, exclusive of acquisitions, of
which we expect to spend approximately 76% of our budget on our
East Texas and South Texas resource plays and 24% on our
existing producing assets. We plan to drill 12 gross
(6.0 net) wells in 2010, including 7 gross
(3.0 net) wells on our East Texas resource play acreage,
one gross (0.4 net) wells on our South Texas resource play
acreage, and 4 gross (2.6 net) wells in Liberty
County. The actual number of wells drilled and the amount of our
2010 capital expenditures will depend on market conditions,
availability of capital and drilling and production results. The
following table sets forth our estimated capital budget for 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geological
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast
|
|
South
|
|
Southwest
|
|
Colorado
|
|
East
|
|
Non-
|
|
and
|
|
|
2010E Capital Budget
|
|
Texas
|
|
Texas
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
and Other
|
|
Texas
|
|
Operated
|
|
Geophysical
|
|
Total
|
|
Capital Expenditures (in millions)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
Gross Wells
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Net Wells
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
64
Inflation and
Changes in Prices
While the general level of inflation affects certain costs
associated with the petroleum industry, factors unique to the
industry result in independent price fluctuations. Such price
changes have had, and will continue to have a material effect on
our operations; however, we cannot predict these fluctuations.
The following table indicates the average quarterly crude oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids prices received over the
last three years. Average prices per Mcf equivalent, computed by
converting crude oil production to natural gas equivalents at
the rate of 6 Mcf per barrel, indicate the composite impact
of changes in crude oil and natural gas prices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Prices(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
|
Liquids(2)
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
(per Mcf)
|
|
|
(per Bbl)
|
|
|
(per Bbl)
|
|
|
Mcf
|
|
|
2009 year to date
|
|
$
|
6.77
|
|
|
$
|
81.46
|
|
|
$
|
27.19
|
|
|
$
|
7.31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
8.39
|
|
|
$
|
78.62
|
|
|
$
|
57.18
|
|
|
$
|
9.39
|
|
Second
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
|
|
95.52
|
|
|
|
55.73
|
|
|
|
10.94
|
|
Third
|
|
|
9.68
|
|
|
|
92.54
|
|
|
|
63.49
|
|
|
|
10.67
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
68.42
|
|
|
|
28.84
|
|
|
|
7.52
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
7.07
|
|
|
$
|
60.28
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.33
|
|
Second
|
|
|
7.64
|
|
|
|
62.66
|
|
|
|
43.29
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
|
Third
|
|
|
7.60
|
|
|
|
66.47
|
|
|
|
45.17
|
|
|
|
8.18
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
7.28
|
|
|
|
69.41
|
|
|
|
55.19
|
|
|
|
8.42
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
7.71
|
|
|
$
|
58.11
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.63
|
|
Second
|
|
|
6.61
|
|
|
|
60.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
|
Third
|
|
|
6.72
|
|
|
|
60.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.07
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
56.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.71
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average sales price are shown net of the settled amounts of our
natural gas and crude oil hedge contracts. |
|
(2) |
|
Natural gas liquids became a significant addition to our
reserves since the acquisition of the STGC Properties in May
2007. |
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The following market rate disclosures should be read in
conjunction with the quantitative disclosures about market risk
contained in this prospectus, as well as with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto. All of our derivative
financial instruments are for purposes other than trading. We
only enter into derivative financial instruments in conjunction
with our crude oil and natural gas price hedging activities.
Hypothetical changes in interest rates and prices chosen for the
following stimulated sensitivity effects are considered to be
reasonably possible near-term changes generally based on
consideration of past fluctuations for each risk category. It is
not possible to accurately predict future changes in interest
rates and product prices. Accordingly, these hypothetical
changes may not be an indicator of probable future fluctuations.
65
Interest Rate
Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk on debt with variable
interest rates. To manage this risk and reduce our sensitivity
to volatile interest rates, we have entered into interest rate
swap agreements with a total notional amount of
$200.0 million related to our indebtedness. However, these
interest rate swap agreements limit the benefit of decreases in
interest rates. Moreover, these swap agreements apply only to a
portion of our debt and provide only partial protection against
increases in interest rates. Under these agreements, we receive
interest at a floating rate equal to one-month LIBOR and pay
interest at a fixed rate of 1.50% for $50.0 million and pay
interest at 2.90% for $150.0 million, effectively setting
our base LIBOR rate at 2.6%. As of September 30, 2009, the
interest rate swaps had an estimated net fair value liability of
$5.2 million. Assuming our current level of borrowings and
considering the effect of the interest rate swap agreements, a
100 basis point increase in the interest rate we pay under
our revolving credit facility would not have had a material
impact on our interest expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Commodity
Price Risk
In the past we have entered into, and may in the future enter
into, certain derivative arrangements with respect to portions
of our natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids production
to reduce our sensitivity to volatile commodity prices. During
2009, 2008 and 2007, we entered into price swaps and put
agreements with financial institutions. We believe that these
derivative arrangements, although not free of risk, allow us to
achieve a more predictable cash flow and to reduce exposure to
price fluctuations. However, derivative arrangements limit the
benefit to us of increases in the prices of crude oil and
natural gas sales. Moreover, our derivative arrangements apply
only to a portion of our production and provide only partial
price protection against declines in price. Such arrangements
may expose us to risk of financial loss in certain
circumstances. We expect that the monthly volume of derivative
arrangements will vary from time to time. We continuously
reevaluate our price hedging program in light of increases in
production, market conditions, commodity price forecasts, and
capital spending and debt service requirements.
Counterparty
Risk
We have exposure to financial institutions in the form of
derivative transactions in connection with our hedges. These
transactions are with counterparties in the financial services
industry, specifically with members of our bank group. These
transactions could expose us to credit risk in the event of
default of our counterparties. We believe our counterparty risk
related to our derivatives is low because of the offsetting
relationships we have with each of our counterparties. In
addition, we also have exposure to financial institutions within
our credit agreements. If any lender under our revolving credit
agreement is unable to fund its commitment, our liquidity could
be reduced by an amount up to the aggregate amount of such
lenders commitment under the revolving credit agreement.
Derivative
Instruments
At the end of each reporting period we record on our balance
sheet the
mark-to-market
valuation of our derivative instruments. We recorded a net asset
for derivative instruments of $34.2 million and a net
liability of $15.3 million at December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. As a result of these agreements, we recorded
a non-cash unrealized gain, for unsettled contracts, of
$49.4 million, a non-cash unrealized loss of
$18.2 million and a non-cash unrealized gain of
$6.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. As of September 30, 2009,
these derivative instruments had an estimated net fair value
asset of $16.9 million. The estimated change in fair value
of the derivatives is reported in Other Income (Expense) as
unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments.
For natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids derivatives
settled during 2008, we realized losses, reflected in operating
revenues, of $9.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. For natural
66
gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids derivatives settled
during 2007, we realized gains of $3.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 and a non-cash unrealized gain of
$6.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31,
2006. For natural gas, crude oil natural gas liquids derivatives
settled during 2006, we realized losses, reflected in operating
revenues of $0.6 million for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006. For interest rate swaps, we realized
losses, included in interest expense, of $4.0 million for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2008. We realized
gains, included in interest expense, of $0.2 million from
interest rate swaps for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2007.
For natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids derivatives
settled during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, reflected in operating revenues, we realized gains of
$30.8 million and losses of $13.2 million,
respectively. We also recorded a non-cash unrealized loss,
reflected in other income (expense), of $17.7 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and a non-cash
unrealized gain of $0.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. For interest rate swaps, we realized a
loss, included in interest expense, of $3.2 million and
$2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. We also recorded for interest rate
swaps non-cash gains, reflected in other income (expense), of
$0.4 million and $0.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The following commodity derivatives contracts were in place at
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
|
|
Volume/Month
|
|
|
Price/Unit
|
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec 2009
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
5,200 Bbls
|
|
|
$
|
74.20
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec 2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
12,800 Bbls
|
|
|
$
|
66.55-$71.40
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec 2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
10,733 Bbls
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
115.00-$171.50
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec 2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
4,250 Bbls
|
|
|
$
|
72.32
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec 2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
9,000 Bbls
|
|
|
$
|
65.28-$70.60
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec 2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
7,604 Bbls
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
110.00-$181.25
|
|
Jan 2011-Dec 2011
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
3,300 Bbls
|
|
|
$
|
70.74
|
|
Jan 2011-Dec 2011
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
7,000 Bbls
|
|
|
$
|
64.50-$69.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec 2009
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
36,000 MMbtu
|
|
|
$
|
8.32
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec 2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
475,000 MMbtu
|
|
|
$
|
7.90-$9.45
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec 2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
101,200 MMbtu
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
9.50-$18.70
|
|
Jan 2010-Jun 2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
45,833 MMbtu
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
6.25
|
(2)
|
Jan 2010-Dec 2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
29,000 MMbtu
|
|
|
$
|
7.88
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec 2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
351,000 MMbtu
|
|
|
$
|
7.57-$9.05
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec 2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
85,167 MMbtu
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
9.00-$15.25
|
|
Jan 2011-Dec 2011
|
|
Collar
|
|
|
266,000 MMbtu
|
|
|
$
|
7.32-$8.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
Fixed LIBOR Rate
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec 2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
$ 50,000,000
|
|
|
|
1.50%
|
|
Oct 2009-May 2011
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
$150,000,000
|
|
|
|
2.90%
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average volume per month for the remaining contract term. |
|
(2) |
|
Average price for the contract term. |
The total net fair value asset for derivative instruments at
September 30, 2009 was approximately $16.9 million and
at December 31, 2008 was approximately $34.2 million,
which are shown as derivative instruments on the balance sheet.
67
BUSINESS
Company
Overview
Crimson is an independent energy company engaged in the
acquisition, exploitation, exploration and development of
natural gas and crude oil properties. We have historically
focused our operations in the onshore U.S. Gulf Coast and
South Texas regions, which are generally characterized by high
rates of return in known, prolific producing trends. We have
recently expanded our strategic focus to include longer reserve
life resource plays that we believe provide significant
long-term growth potential in multiple formations.
In late 2008 and early 2009, we acquired approximately
12,000 net acres in East Texas where we completed our first
well, the Kardell #1H, in October 2009. This well targeted
the Haynesville Shale and initially produced 30.7 MMcfe/d,
which we believe to be the highest publicly announced initial
production rate to date in that formation. In addition to the
Haynesville Shale, we believe this acreage is equally
prospective in the Bossier Shale and James Lime formations where
industry participants have drilled successful wells on adjacent
acreage.
In 2007, we acquired approximately 2,800 net acres in South
Texas, which we believe is prospective in the Austin Chalk and
the Eagle Ford Shale. We drilled our first well on this acreage,
the Dubose #1, during the fourth quarter of 2009, and we
are preparing to complete the well in the Eagle Ford Shale.
We intend to grow reserves and production by developing our
existing producing property base, developing our East Texas and
South Texas resource potential, and pursuing opportunistic
acquisitions in areas where we have specific operating
expertise. We have developed a significant project inventory of
over 800 drilling locations associated with our existing
property base. Our technical team has a successful track record
of adding reserves through the drillbit. Since January 2008, we
have drilled 34 gross (15.2 net) wells with an overall
success rate of 91% (excluding one well which has not yet been
completed).
As of December 31, 2008, our estimated proved reserves, as
prepared by our independent reserve engineering firm,
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., were
131.9 Bcfe, consisting of 96.2 Bcf of natural gas and
6.0 MMBbl of crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids.
As of December 31, 2008, 73% of our proved reserves were
natural gas, 69% were proved developed and 81% were attributed
to wells and properties operated by us. From 2006 to 2008, we
grew our estimated proved reserves from 46.4 Bcfe to
131.9 Bcfe. In addition, we grew our average daily
production from 7.3 MMcfe/d for the year ended
December 31, 2006 to 43.0 MMcfe/d for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we generated $55.2 million of
Adjusted EBITDAX. Our definition of the non-GAAP financial
measure of Adjusted EBITDAX and a reconciliation of net income
(loss) to Adjusted EBITDAX are provided under Prospectus
SummaryNon-GAAP Financial Measures and
Reconciliations. For the same period, our net income
(loss) was $(16.8) million.
Our areas of primary focus include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
East Texas. Our East Texas properties includes
approximately 17,000 gross (12,000 net) acres acquired in
2008 and early 2009 in the highly prospective and active
resource play in San Augustine and Sabine Counties, where
we will focus primarily on the pursuit of the Haynesville Shale,
Bossier Shale and James Lime formations. In October 2009, we
drilled and completed our first well in this area, the
Kardell #1H. While drilling this well, we identified
additional prospective formations, including the Pettet and
Knowles Lime.
|
|
|
|
Southeast Texas. Our Southeast Texas
properties primarily include the Felicia field area in Liberty
County. We own approximately 27,300 gross (15,100 net)
acres in Liberty, Madison and Grimes Counties. As of
September 30, 2009, we owned and operated 35 gross
(27.0 net)
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
producing wells, representing approximately 38% of our average
daily production for the first nine months of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Texas. Our South Texas properties
include approximately 2,800 gross (2,800 net) acres in Bee
County, which we believe to be prospective in the Austin Chalk
and Eagle Ford Shale. Our conventional operations include
approximately 87,600 gross (50,700 net) acres predominantly
in Brooks, Lavaca, DeWitt, Zapata, Webb and Matagorda Counties.
|
We also own interests in the following areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado and Other. Our Colorado and other
properties include primarily producing assets and approximately
16,900 gross (11,900 net) acres in the Denver Julesburg
Basin in Colorado (mostly in Adams County) and a minor crude oil
property in Mississippi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southwest Louisiana. Our Southwest Louisiana
properties include approximately 8,200 gross (3,600 net)
acres, primarily in the Fenton field area of Calcasieu Parish
and our legacy Grand Lake and Lacassine fields in Cameron
Parish. In addition, we own a 15% working interest ownership in
2007 exploratory successes in Louisiana at Sabine Lake and West
Cameron 432. On November 24, 2009, we entered into a
purchase and sale agreement for the sale of substantially all of
our Southwest Louisiana properties. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsRecent DevelopmentsSouthwest Louisiana
Disposition.
|
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our estimated proved reserves as of December 31, 2008,
as estimated by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.,
and production and net acreage for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The following table also identifies
potential drilling locations and net acreage as of
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Daily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified
|
|
|
|
Estimated Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Nine
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Gross
|
|
|
|
Reserves as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Net acreage at
|
|
|
Drilling Locations
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
% Natural
|
|
|
% Proved
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
at September 30,
|
|
Region
|
|
2008 (MMcfe)
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
2009 (Mcfe/d)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
Southeast Texas
|
|
|
29,393
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
%
|
|
|
85.8
|
%
|
|
|
16,521
|
|
|
|
15,100
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
South Texas
|
|
|
60,602
|
|
|
|
78.0
|
%
|
|
|
59.8
|
%
|
|
|
11,963
|
|
|
|
53,500
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Colorado and Other
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
71.5
|
%
|
|
|
55.3
|
%
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
11,900
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
East
Texas(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
Southwest
Louisiana(3)
|
|
|
10,398
|
|
|
|
62.4
|
%
|
|
|
57.3
|
%
|
|
|
3,139
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Non-operated(3)(4)
|
|
|
24,879
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
|
|
79.8
|
%
|
|
|
10,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
131,947
|
|
|
|
72.9
|
%
|
|
|
68.9
|
%
|
|
|
42,979
|
|
|
|
96,100
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes multiple drilling locations on acreage with multiple
target formations. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
We recently completed our first well on our East Texas acreage,
the Kardell #1H, as a horizontal Haynesville Shale producer, in
which we own a 52% working interest. Drilling locations in this
region were identified assuming an allocated 100 acres per
potential horizontal East Texas well drilled to multiple target
formations. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
On November 24, 2009, we entered into a purchase and sale
agreement for the sale of substantially all of our operated and
certain non-operated Southwest Louisiana properties. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsRecent
DevelopmentsSouthwest Louisiana Disposition. |
69
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Our non-operated properties consist primarily of our 25% working
interest in the Samano field in Starr and Hidalgo Counties in
South Texas, our 28% working interest in certain fields in
Liberty County in Southeast Texas and our 15% and 15% respective
working interests resulting from exploratory successes in 2007
at Sabine Lake and West Cameron 432, in Southwest Louisiana. |
We have significantly increased our proved reserves and
production through acquisitions and drilling since our
recapitalization in early 2005. In 2007, we tripled our reserve
size through the acquisition from EXCO of producing properties
in the South Texas, Southeast Texas and Southwest Louisiana
regions, adding an aggregate of approximately 95 Bcfe to
our net proved reserves at a cost of $2.50 per Mcfe of proved
reserves as of the effective date. We added 21 Bcfe to our
South Texas proved reserves through the Smith acquisition in
2008 at an average cost of $2.82 per Mcfe of proved reserves as
of the closing date. Our acquisitions are focused on areas in
which we can leverage our geographic and geological expertise to
exploit those drilling opportunities identified at the time of
the acquisition and develop an inventory of additional drilling
prospects that we believe will enable us to grow production and
add reserves. We intend to continue to pursue the acquisition of
assets in our core areas, to continue to selectively expand our
presence in our East Texas resource play and to continue to
develop exploratory opportunities through our internal prospect
generation team.
We have also been successful at adding reserves through the
drilling of non-proved targets through our exploitation program
on existing producing properties. Since January 2008, we have
drilled 34 gross wells (16 operated and 18 non-operated),
with an overall success rate of 91% (excluding one well which
has not yet been completed). We added approximately
18.4 Bcfe in proved reserves in 2008. We believe that we
have a current inventory of 822 identified drilling
opportunities on our producing asset base as noted in the table
above.
During the latter half of 2008 and early 2009, we acquired
approximately 12,000 net acres in San Augustine and
Sabine Counties in East Texas, which we believed to be
prospective in the Haynesville Shale, James Lime and Mid-Bossier
formations. We have identified over 422 drilling locations on
our acreage targeting these formations alone. Recent activity in
the area also indicates that the Pettet and Knowles Lime
formations also appear prospective. We have separated our
acreage into several joint development areas (JDAs)
of varying sizes and are working with other industry players
holding acreage positions in those areas to jointly develop our
positions. Our Bruin prospect, on which our first
well, the Kardell #1H was drilled, is one such JDA. We and
Devon Energy Corporation, the operator, each contributed
approximately 350 acres to the JDA in San Augustine
County and drilled the Kardell #1H well. Given the success
we have had on the Kardell #1H well, we will likely
allocate a large portion of our drilling capital budget to
develop this resource play further for the next several years.
Strategy
The key elements of our business strategy are:
|
|
|
|
|
Develop our East Texas resource play. We have
approximately 12,000 net acres in San Augustine and
Sabine Counties of East Texas, which we believe is prospective
in the Haynesville Shale, Bossier Shale and James Lime
formations. In November 2009, we announced the completion and
initial production of our first well on this acreage, the
Kardell #1H. The well tested at 30.7 MMcfe/d, which we
believe to be the highest publicly reported
24-hour
initial production rate for a Haynesville Shale well in Texas or
Louisiana and is currently flowing to sales. We believe the
Kardell #1H confirms the potential of our Bruin Prospect,
which is comprised of 3,000 net acres in San Augustine
County, resulting in over 100 potential drilling locations in
multiple formations. We are currently in the planning stages of
several wells in this area and intend to further evaluate and
exploit these multiple formations beginning in early 2010. We
have an additional 9,000 net acres outside this prospect within
Sabine and San Augustine Counties, and we expect to drill
our initial well on that acreage in early 2010. We intend to
allocate a substantial portion of our capital budget
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
over the next several years to develop the significant potential
that we believe exists on our East Texas acreage. Based on our
current capital budget, we expect to drill approximately
7 gross (3.0 net) wells in 2010 that will target the
Haynesville and Bossier Shales, while retaining future
development opportunities in shallower formations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Develop our South Texas resource play. We have
approximately 2,800 net acres in Bee County, Texas which we
believe is prospective in the Austin Chalk and Eagle Ford Shale.
In November 2009, we drilled our initial well on this acreage,
the Dubose #1. This well is in the process of being
completed with results expected prior to year end 2009. We
intend to allocate a portion of our capital budget in 2010 to
validate the potential we believe exists on our acreage.
|
|
|
|
Exploit our existing producing property base to generate cash
flows. We believe our multi-year drilling
inventory of high return exploitation opportunities on our
existing producing properties provides us with a solid platform
to continue growing our reserves and production for the next
several years. We believe these projects, if successful, will
allow us to fund a larger portion of our resource plays and
exploration activities from cash flows from operations. In 2010,
we intend to focus much of our exploitation drilling on our
Liberty County acreage, located in Southeast Texas. We will be
targeting the Yegua and Cook Mountain formations in which
industry players have recently experienced success on wells in
the area. We own 3D seismic data that covers substantially all
of our Liberty County acreage, giving us a higher degree of
confidence in the potential in this area. We have drilled
11 gross (6.8 net) wells in Liberty County since early 2008
and have successfully completed 82%. During 2010, we intend to
drill 4 gross (2.6 net) wells in this area.
|
|
|
|
Explore in defined producing trends. Our
exploration activities consist primarily of step-out drilling in
known, producing formations in our legacy areas of South and
Southeast Texas. In 2007, we began acquiring seismic data to use
in identifying new exploration prospects. Currently, we have a
library of over 4,200 square miles of 3D seismic data and
over 2,500 linear miles of 2D seismic data.
|
|
|
|
Make opportunistic acquisitions that meet our strategic and
financial objectives. We seek to acquire natural
gas and crude oil properties, including both undeveloped and
producing reserves in areas where we have specific operating
expertise.
|
|
|
|
Reduce commodity exposure through hedging. We
employ the use of swaps and costless collar derivative
instruments to limit our exposure to commodity prices. As of
September 30, 2009, we had 13.9 Bcfe of equivalent
production hedged, representing 1.8 Bcf, 6.1 Bcf and
3.2 Bcf of natural gas hedges in place and 86 MBbl,
250 MBbl and 124 MBbl of crude oil hedges in place for
the fourth quarter of 2009, the year 2010 and the year 2011,
respectively. The average price of our natural gas and crude oil
hedges in place is $8.19/MMBtu and $86.03/Bbl for the fourth
quarter of 2009, $7.71/MMBtu and $83.02/Bbl in the year 2010 and
$7.32/MMBtu and $66.50/Bbl in the year 2011.
|
Competitive
Strengths
Our competitive strengths include:
|
|
|
|
|
Geographically focused operations in basins with established
production profiles. The geographic concentration
of our current operations along the onshore Texas Gulf Coast and
in South Texas allows us to establish economies of scale with
respect to drilling, production, operating and administrative
costs, and enables us to leverage our base of technical
expertise in these geographic areas. In addition, we believe the
cash flows from our existing properties provide a stable
foundation to support our ongoing exploitation and development
efforts.
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
Significant operational control. As of
September 30, 2009, we operated a majority of our producing
wells. As a result, we exercise a significant level of control
over the amount and timing of expenses, capital allocation and
other aspects of development, exploitation and exploration.
While operatorship of future wells on our East Texas acreage
will be subject to negotiation as drilling units are formed, we
expect to operate a significant number of the wells we drill on
this acreage.
|
|
|
|
Proven track record of reserve and production
growth. Since 2005, we have significantly grown
proved reserves and production through a combination of
continued drilling success and the successful acquisition of
underdeveloped properties that have proven to be complementary
to our existing asset base and technical expertise. We plan to
continue this growth by focusing on a balanced combination of
drilling longer life, multi-pay natural gas targets within our
resource plays and exploitation of our producing properties and
undeveloped acreage.
|
|
|
|
Large inventory of identified projects. We
currently have an inventory of over 800 identified potential
drilling locations, including 375 associated with our existing
conventional properties, plus an estimated 422 locations on our
East Texas resource play acreage and an estimated 25 locations
on our South Texas resource play acreage. Since the beginning of
2008, we have drilled 16 gross (10.7 net) operated and
18 gross (4.5 net) non-operated wells and have experienced
a 91% success rate (excluding one well which has not yet been
completed). We expect to drill 12 gross (6.0 net) wells in 2010.
|
|
|
|
Experienced management and technical
teams. Our senior management team averages over
25 years of experience in the energy industry and is led by
Allan D. Keel, President and Chief Executive Officer, who has
25 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry.
Mr. E. Joseph Grady, our Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, has over 30 years of financial
management experience in the energy industry. Other members of
our senior management include: Mr. Tracy Price, our Senior
Vice PresidentLand Business/Development; Mr. Thomas
H. Atkins, our Senior Vice PresidentExploration; and
Mr. Jay S. Mengle, our Senior Vice
PresidentEngineering, each of whom has more than
25 years of experience in the oil and gas industry. Our
experienced management team has an established track record of
successfully exploiting and developing natural gas and crude oil
properties.
|
Properties
As of September 30, 2009, we operated a majority of our
producing wells and held an average 52% (75% operated and 25%
non-operated) working interest. Gross wells are the total wells
in which we own a working interest. Net wells are the sum of the
fractional working interests we own in gross wells. Our
estimated net proved reserves were approximately 2.6 MMBbls
of crude oil and condensate 96.2 Bcf of natural gas and
3.4 MMBbls of natural gas liquids at December 31,
2008. Substantially all of our properties are located onshore in
Texas and Louisiana. As of December 31, 2008, our
properties were located in the following regions: Southeast
Texas, South Texas, Southwest Louisiana and Colorado and Other,
although we separately classify our non-operated properties in
our regions as Non-Operated. Given our success in 2009 with the
first well on our East Texas acreage, the Kardell #1H, we
intend to allocate a substantial portion of our drilling capital
budget in the next several years to the development of the
significant potential that we believe exists in this area.
Our estimated net proved reserves as of December 31, 2008,
were approximately 72.9% natural gas, 15.4% natural gas liquids
and 11.7% crude oil and condensate. As of December 31,
2008, approximately 68.9% of total proved reserves were
classified as proved developed. The average remaining proved
developed producing reserves per net operated well at
December 31, 2008 was 356.4 MMcfe. Our estimated net
proved reserves at December 31, 2008 had estimated
PV-10 of
$291.0 million. Our estimated net proved reserves as of
September 30, 2009, were approximately
72
70.4% natural gas, 16.1% natural gas liquids and 13.5% crude
oil and condensate. As of September 30, 2009, approximately
68% of total proved reserves were classified as proved
developed. The average remaining proved developed producing
reserves per net well at September 30, 2009 was 288.3
MMcfe. Our estimated net proved reserves at September 30,
2009 had estimated
PV-10 of
$190.8 million.
Our average proved
reserves-to-production
ratio, or average reserve life, is approximately 8.4 years
based on our proved reserves as of December 31, 2008 and
production for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 on
an annualized basis. During 2008, 15 gross (10.3 net)
operated wells and 17 gross (4.0 net) non-operated wells
were drilled, 93% and 88% respectively of which were successes.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we drilled
one gross (0.4 net) operated well, which has not yet been
evaluated. We also drilled one gross (0.5 net) non-operated well
in our East Texas acreage, which was a success. In 2010, we
currently expect to drill 12 gross (6.0 net) wells. Also, as of
September 30, 2009, we had identified 66 proved undeveloped
drilling locations and 756 other drilling locations.
Operated
Properties
East
Texas
East Texas includes 17,000 gross (12,000 net) acres
acquired in the latter half of 2008 and early 2009 in the highly
prospective and active resource play in San Augustine and
Sabine Counties, in which we will focus primarily on the pursuit
of the Haynesville Shale, Bossier Shale and James Lime
formations. Other potential formations that were seen in our
Kardell #1H well (a non-operated well), and that are
believed to be prospective in the area, are the Pettet and
Knowles Lime. In the past year, the Haynesville Shale formation
has become one of the most active natural gas plays in the
United States, primarily in Northern Louisiana and East Texas.
The formation is as much as 300 feet thick and exists at
depths ranging from 10,500 to more than 13,500 feet. The
Haynesville Shale has proven productive across numerous parishes
in Northwest Louisiana and counties in East Texas, primarily
Harrison, Panola and Shelby. We have identified 422 drilling
locations in this area, based on
100-acre
spacing. We are actively pursuing joint venture opportunities
with third parties to develop our Haynesville Shale acreage in
Texas. While operatorship of future wells on our East Texas
acreage will be subject to negotiation as drilling units are
formed, we expect to operate a significant number of the wells
we drill on this acreage.
Southeast
Texas
Our Southeast Texas properties consist primarily of the Felicia
field area in Liberty County, Texas, which we acquired in the
EXCO acquisition. We believe that the Liberty County area will
continue to provide accelerated production and high rates of
return as we exploit our probable and possible opportunities
targeting the Yegua and Cook Mountain formations. We currently
plan to drill or sidetrack 4 gross (2.6 net) wells during
2010 in Liberty County. The Southeast Texas region also includes
the Madisonville/Iola area in Madison and Grimes Counties, which
has deeper Smackover potential to complement our current Yegua,
Frio, Cook Mountain and Rodessa production.
As of September 30, 2009, in Southeast Texas, we owned and
operated 35 gross (27.0 net) producing wells. Our operated
wells have an average working interest of 75% and an average net
revenue interest of 60%. These wells produce crude oil and
natural gas from various formations at depths from 2,000 to
16,300 feet. We principally produce from the Frio, Yegua,
Cook Mountain and Rodessa formations. We own 27,300 gross
(15,100 net) acres in Southeast Texas.
The average net production from our Southeast Texas properties
for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 20.6 MMcfe/d,
or approximately 39% of our 2008 total net equivalent
production. The average net production from our Southeast Texas
properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
16.5 MMcfe/d, or approximately 38% of our total net
equivalent production for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The average net production per net
well
73
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 was 0.8 MMcfe/d and
0.6 MMcfe/d, respectively.
Our estimated net proved reserves for our Southeast Texas
properties as of December 31, 2008, were 29,393 MMcfe,
of which approximately 80.3% were natural gas and natural gas
liquids and 85.8% were classified as proved developed. The
average remaining proved developed producing reserves per net
operated well at December 31, 2008 was 672.7 MMcfe. Our
estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2008 had
estimated
PV-10 of
$89.7 million.
Our average reserve life for this region is approximately
five years based on our proved reserves as of
December 31, 2008 and production for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 on an annualized basis. During 2008,
8 gross (5.6 net) wells were drilled on our Southeast Texas
properties, 88% of which were successes, and during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, no wells were drilled in
Southeast Texas. Also, as of September 30, 2009, we had
identified five proved undeveloped drilling locations and 21
other drilling locations on our Southeast Texas leasehold
acreage. Our drilling opportunities for Southeast Texas have an
average estimated well life of eight years.
South
Texas
Our South Texas properties consist primarily of: the Cage Ranch
field in Brooks County and Southwest Speaks field in Lavaca
County, both acquired in the EXCO acquisition; the North Bob
West field in Zapata County and the Brushy Creek field in DeWitt
County, both acquired in the Smith acquisition; and Lobo trend
production and acreage in Zapata and Webb Counties. We own
approximately 90,400 gross (53,500 net) acres in these
known prolific trends that we intend to continue to exploit.
We also own approximately 2,800 gross (2,800 net)
acres in the Edwards Trend, which we call our NW Pawnee
prospect, that we believe not only contains the Edwards/Sligo
formations, but also believe to be prospective in the Austin
Chalk and the Eagle Ford Shale. We recently drilled and are in
the process of completing, the Dubose #1 well, our
first well on this acreage. If this well is successful, we plan
to drill additional wells in this area during 2010.
As of September 30, 2009, in South Texas, we owned and
operated 94 gross (73.0 net) producing wells. Our operated
wells have an average net working interest of 73% and an average
net revenue interest of 58%. These wells produce crude oil and
natural gas from various formations at depths from 2,000 to
19,400 feet. We principally produce from the Wilcox,
Vicksburg and Lobo formations.
The average net production from our South Texas properties for
the year ended December 31, 2008 was 9.7 MMcfe/d, or
approximately 19% of our 2008 total net equivalent production.
The average net production from our South Texas properties for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
12.0 MMcfe/d, or approximately 28% of our total net
equivalent production for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The average net production per operated
net well for the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 0.1 MMcfe/d
and 0.2 MMcfe/d, respectively.
Our estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2008 for
our South Texas properties were 60,602 MMcfe, of which
approximately 94.6% were natural gas and natural gas liquids and
59.8% were classified as proved developed. The average remaining
proved developed producing reserves per net well at
December 31, 2008 was 277.0 MMcfe. Our estimated net
proved reserves at December 31, 2008 had an estimated
PV-10 of
$101.8 million.
Our average reserve life for this region is approximately
14 years based on our proved reserves as of
December 31, 2008 and production for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 on an annualized basis. During 2008,
7 gross (4.7 net) wells were drilled on our South Texas
properties, 100% of which were successes. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, one gross (0.4 net) well
74
was drilled in South Texas (the Dubose #1), which has not
been completed. In 2009, we currently expect to drill one gross
well (0.4 net) on our South Texas resource play acreage.
Also, as of September 30, 2009, we had identified 24
additional proved undeveloped drilling locations and over 100
other drilling locations on our South Texas leasehold acreage.
Our drilling opportunities for South Texas have an average
estimated well life of 15 years.
Colorado and
Other
We also own properties in Colorado, Mississippi and other areas
(Other Properties), none of which is a current area
of focus for drilling. However, our Other Properties do serve to
broaden our range and diversify our risk. These properties
currently consist primarily of our legacy production and
exploitation potential in the Denver Julesburg Basin in
Colorado, which is primarily in Adams County. We own
approximately 9,500 gross (6,700 net) undeveloped
acres in this area that are held by production, that appear to
be prospective in the basin and for which we will endeavor to
find a local partner to participate in developing that acreage.
We also own a minor crude oil property in Mississippi. Our Other
Properties represent 6,675 MMcfe of proved reserves or 5.1%
of our total proved reserves of December 31, 2008.
As of September 30, 2009, in our Colorado and Other
Properties, we owned and operated 30 gross (22.0 net)
producing wells. Our operated wells have an average working
interest of 74% and an average net revenue interest of 59%.
These wells produce crude oil and natural gas from various
formations at depths from 2,000 to 17,500 feet. We
principally produce from the Denver and Julesberg Sand
formations in Colorado. We also own 16,900 gross (11,900
net) acres in these areas, most of which is held by production.
The average net production from our Colorado and Other
Properties for the year ended December 31, 2008 was
0.9 MMcfe/d, or approximately 1.6% of our 2008 total net
equivalent production. The average net production from our
Colorado and Other Properties for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was 0.5 MMcfe/d, or approximately
1% of our total net equivalent production for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. The average net production per
net well for the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 0.05 MMcfe/d
and 0.01 MMcfe/d, respectively.
Our estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2008 for
our Colorado and Other Properties were 6,675 MMcfe, of
which approximately 71.5% were natural gas and natural gas
liquids and 55.3% were classified as proved developed. The
average remaining proved developed producing reserves per net
well at December 31, 2008 was 157.9 MMcfe. Our
estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2008 had an
estimated
PV-10 of
$7.0 million.
Our average reserve life in this region is approximately
34 years based on our proved reserves as of
December 31, 2008 and production for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 on an annualized basis. We did not drill
any wells on our Colorado and Other Properties in 2008 or during
the first nine months of 2009. Our drilling opportunities for
Colorado and Other Properties have an average estimated well
life of 18 years. We recently contracted with a geological
consulting group that specializes in the Denver Julesburg Basin,
and that group has identified 151 drilling locations on our
acreage as of September 30, 2009. Because of the upside
potential, we are currently pursuing a relationship with an
industry partner experienced in the Denver Julesburg Basin area
to test that additional potential.
Southwest
Louisiana
Our Southwest Louisiana properties consist primarily of the
Fenton field area in Calcasieu Parish, acquired in the EXCO
acquisition, and our legacy Grand Lake and Lacassine fields in
Cameron Parish. In total, we own approximately 8,200 gross
(3,600 net) acres in these large and prolific areas. On
November 24, 2009, we entered into a purchase and sale
agreement for the sale of substantially all of our Southwest
Louisiana properties. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial
75
Condition and Results of OperationsOverviewRecent
DevelopmentsSouthwest Louisiana Disposition.
As of September 30, 2009, in Southwest Louisiana, we owned
and operated 16 gross (9.0 net) producing wells. Our
operated wells have an average net working interest of 51% and
an average net revenue interest of 40%. We also owned
8,200 gross and 3,600 net acres in Southwest Louisiana.
The average net production from our Southwest Louisiana
properties for the year ended December 31, 2008 was
5.9 MMcfe/d, or approximately 11% of our 2008 total net
equivalent production. The average net production from our
Southwest Louisiana properties for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was 3.1 MMcfe/d, or approximately
7% of our total net equivalent production for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. The average net production per
operated net well for the year ended December 31, 2008 and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
0.5 MMcfe/d and 0.4 MMcfe/d, respectively.
Our estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2008 for
our Southwest Louisiana properties were 10,398 MMcfe, of
which approximately 75.5% were natural gas and natural gas
liquids and 57.3% were classified as proved developed. The
average remaining proved developed producing reserves per net
well at December 31, 2008 was 397.5 MMcfe. Our
estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2008 had an
estimated
PV-10 of
$27.2 million and at September 30, 2009 had an
estimated
PV-10 of
$19.9 million.
Non-Operated
Properties
Though not a geographic region, we segregate our non-operated
properties and treat them as a separate region, in order to
allow our technical and operational teams dedicated to our
operated regions to focus on those properties on which we have
the ability to exercise operational and development control. Our
non-operated properties consist primarily of our 25% working
interest in the Samano field in Starr and Hidalgo Counties in
South Texas, which we acquired in the Smith acquisition, our 28%
working interest in certain fields in Liberty County in
Southeast Texas and our 15% and 15% respective working interests
resulting from exploratory successes in 2007 at Sabine Lake and
West Cameron 432, in Southwest Louisiana. On November 24,
2009, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement for the sale
of substantially all our operated and certain non-operated
properties in Southwest Louisiana. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsRecent DevelopmentsSouthwest Louisiana
Disposition.
As of September 30, 2009, we owned various working
interests in 170 existing non-operated producing wells, with an
average working interest of 25% and an average net revenue
interest of approximately 19%. These wells produce crude oil and
natural gas from various formations at depths from 2,000 to
17,500 feet.
The average net production from our non-operated properties for
the year ended December 31, 2008 was 15.5 MMcfe/d, or
approximately 29% of our 2008 total net equivalent production.
The average net production from our non-operated properties for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
10.9 MMcfe/d, or approximately 25% of our total net
equivalent production for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The average net production per
non-operated net well for the year ended December 31, 2008
and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
0.4 MMcfe/d and 0.3 MMcfe/d, respectively.
Our estimated net proved reserves at December 31, 2008 for
our non-operated properties were 24,879 MMcfe, of which
approximately 92.5% were natural gas and natural gas liquids and
79.8% were classified as proved developed. The average remaining
proved developed producing reserves per net well at
December 31, 2008 was 385.5 MMcfe. Our estimated net
proved reserves at December 31, 2008 had estimated
PV-10 of
$65.3 million.
Our average reserve life in this region is approximately six
years based on our proved reserves as of December 31, 2008
and production for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
on an
76
annualized basis. During 2008, 17 gross (4.0 net)
wells were drilled on our Non-Operated properties, 88% of which
were successes, and during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 we did not participate in any wells.
Also, as of September 30, 2009, we had identified 22
additional proved undeveloped drilling locations and 60 other
drilling locations on our non-operated leasehold acreage. A
typical well in our non-operated properties has a predictable
production profile and a standard economic life of approximately
19 years.
Proved
Reserves
The following tables reflect our estimated proved reserves at
December 31 for each of the preceding three years and at
September 30, 2009. The following tables do not give effect
to the disposition of substantially all of our Southwest
Louisiana properties. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsRecent DevelopmentsSouthwest Louisiana
Disposition. All information provided herein relating to
our proved reserves is taken or derived from reports prepared by
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent
petroleum engineers. The estimates of these engineers were based
upon their review of production histories and other geological,
economic, ownership and engineering data provided by and
relating to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Crude Oil (MBbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
27,145
|
|
|
|
67,997
|
|
|
|
66,712
|
|
|
|
49,540
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
4,243
|
|
|
|
23,242
|
|
|
|
29,457
|
|
|
|
24,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
31,388
|
|
|
|
91,239
|
|
|
|
96,169
|
|
|
|
73,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Liquids (Bbls)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,590
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (MMcfe)
|
|
|
46,394
|
|
|
|
130,197
|
|
|
|
131,947
|
|
|
|
104,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves percentage
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
PV-10 (in
millions)(1)
|
|
$
|
102.4
|
|
|
$
|
531.4
|
|
|
$
|
291.0
|
|
|
$
|
190.8
|
|
Estimated reserve life (in years)
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Prices utilized in
estimates(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (MMBtu)
|
|
$
|
6.03
|
|
|
$
|
6.80
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
$
|
3.30
|
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
$
|
61.06
|
|
|
$
|
92.50
|
|
|
$
|
41.00
|
|
|
$
|
67.00
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
PV-10 is a
non-GAAP financial measure. A reconciliation of our standardized
measure to
PV-10 is
provided under Prospectus
SummaryNon-GAAP Financial Measures and
Reconciliations. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Natural gas prices are based on Henry Hub spot price at year
end, except for 2006 which is based on NYMEX prices. Oil prices
are based upon year end West Texas Intermediate posted prices.
Under new SEC rules, prices used in determining our proved
reserves as of December 31, 2009 will be based upon an
unweighted
12-month
first day of the month average price of $3.87 per MMBtu (Henry
Hub spot) of natural gas and $57.65 per barrel of oil (West
Texas Intermediate posted). These are adjusted for quality,
energy content, transportation fees and regional price
differentials. |
77
The following tables reflect our estimated proved reserves by
category as of December 31, 2008. Approximately 69% of our
total proved reserves was classified as proved developed at
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquids
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
|
Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
|
Total (MMcfe)
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
PV-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Proved developed producing
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
48,458
|
|
|
|
1,630
|
|
|
|
65,228
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
180.1
|
|
Proved developed non-producing
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
18,254
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
Proved undeveloped
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
29,457
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
41,001
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
96,169
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
131,947
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
291.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables reflect our estimated proved reserves by
category as of September 30, 2009. Approximately 68% of our
total proved reserves was classified as proved developed at
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquids
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
|
Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
|
Total (MMcfe)
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
PV-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Proved developed producing
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
34,990
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
50,164
|
|
|
|
47.8%
|
|
|
$
|
110.4
|
|
Proved developed non-producing
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
14,550
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
21,084
|
|
|
|
20.1%
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
Proved undeveloped
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
24,228
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
33,606
|
|
|
|
32.1%
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
73,768
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
104,854
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
190.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized
Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The following table sets forth as of December 31 for each of the
preceding three years, the estimated future net cash flow from
and standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows of
our proved reserves, which were prepared in accordance with the
rules and regulations of the SEC and the Financial Accounting
Standards Board. Future net cash flow represents future gross
cash flow from the production and sale of proved reserves, net
of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids production
costs (including production taxes, ad valorem taxes and
operating expenses) and future development costs. The
calculations used to produce the figures in this table are based
on current cost and price factors at December 31 for each year.
We cannot assure you that the proved reserves will all be
developed within the periods used in the calculations or those
prices and costs will remain constant. A standardized measure of
discounted future net cash flows is not required to be presented
for interim financial presentation dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
|
$
|
313,313
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,375
|
|
|
$
|
749,121
|
|
Future production and development costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
108,694
|
|
|
|
258,029
|
|
|
|
214,969
|
|
Development
|
|
|
26,229
|
|
|
|
65,779
|
|
|
|
86,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash flows before income taxes
|
|
|
178,390
|
|
|
|
801,567
|
|
|
|
448,084
|
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
(43,534
|
)
|
|
|
(198,921
|
)
|
|
|
(46,696
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows after income taxes
|
|
|
134,856
|
|
|
|
602,646
|
|
|
|
401,388
|
|
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows
|
|
|
(57,443
|
)
|
|
|
(203,123
|
)
|
|
|
(140,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
77,413
|
|
|
$
|
399,523
|
|
|
$
|
260,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
All information provided herein relating to our proved reserves,
estimated future net cash flows and present values is taken or
derived from reports prepared by Netherland, Sewell &
Associates, Inc., independent petroleum engineers. The estimates
of these engineers were based upon their review of production
histories and other geological, economic, ownership and
engineering data provided by and relating to us. No reports on
our reserves have been filed with any federal agency. In
accordance with the SECs guidelines, our estimates of
proved reserves and the future net revenues from which present
values are derived are made using year end crude oil and natural
gas sales prices held constant throughout the life of the
properties (except to the extent a contract specifically
provides otherwise). Operating costs, development costs and
certain production-related taxes were deducted in arriving at
estimated future net revenues, but such costs do not include
debt service, general and administrative expenses and income
taxes.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating crude
oil and natural gas reserves and their values, including many
factors beyond our control. The reserve data included in this
report are based upon estimates. Reservoir engineering is a
subjective process, which involves estimating the sizes of
underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas that
cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of any
reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data,
engineering and geological interpretation of that data and
judgment. As a result, estimates of different engineers,
including those used by us, may vary. In addition, estimates of
reserves are subject to revision based upon actual production,
results of future development, exploitation and exploration
activities, prevailing crude oil and natural gas prices,
operating costs and other factors. Such revisions may be
material. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different
from the quantities of crude oil and natural gas that are
ultimately recovered and are highly dependent upon the accuracy
of the assumptions upon which they are based. We cannot assure
you that the estimates contained in this report are accurate
predictions of our crude oil and natural gas reserves or their
values. Estimates with respect to proved reserves that may be
developed and produced in the future are often based upon
volumetric calculations and upon analogy to similar types of
reserves rather than upon actual production history. Estimates
based on these methods are generally less reliable than those
based on actual production history. Subsequent evaluation of the
same reserves based upon production history will result in
potentially substantial variations in the estimated reserves.
Significant
Properties
Summary information on our properties with proved reserves is
provided below as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive Wells
|
|
|
Proved Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
Crude
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regions
|
|
Wells
|
|
|
Wells
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Liquids
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PV-10(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
|
(MMcf)
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
|
(MMcfe)
|
|
|
($M)
|
|
|
South Texas
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
47,284
|
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
60,602
|
|
|
$
|
101,838
|
|
Southeast Texas
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
17,669
|
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
29,393
|
|
|
|
89,685
|
|
Colorado and Other
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
7,002
|
|
Southwest
Louisiana(3)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
6,490
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
10,398
|
|
|
|
27,162
|
|
Non-Operated(3)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
19,951
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
24,879
|
|
|
|
65,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
96,169
|
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
131,947
|
|
|
$
|
290,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The prices utilized in the estimation of our 2008 proved
reserves were based on the West Texas Intermediate posted prices
on December 31, 2008 of $41.00 per barrel for crude oil and
the Henry Hub spot market price of $5.71 per MMBtu for natural
gas. All prices were adjusted by lease for quality, energy
content, transportation fees and regional price differentials. |
|
(2) |
|
PV-10 is a
non-GAAP financial measure. A reconciliation of our standardized
measure to
PV-10 is
provided under Prospectus
SummaryNon-GAAP Financial Measures and
Reconciliations. |
79
|
|
|
(3) |
|
On November 24, 2009, we entered into a purchase and sale
agreement for the sale of substantially all of our operated and
certain non-operated Southwest Louisiana properties. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsRecent
DevelopmentsSouthwest Louisiana Disposition. |
Production,
Revenue and Price History
The following table sets forth information (associated with our
proved reserves) regarding production volumes of crude oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids, revenues and expenses
attributable to such production (all net to our interests) and
certain price and cost information as of December 31 for each of
the preceding three years and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
1,542,423
|
|
|
|
9,067,777
|
|
|
|
13,135,509
|
|
|
|
8,142,588
|
|
Crude oil (Bbl)
|
|
|
184,881
|
|
|
|
408,864
|
|
|
|
498,143
|
|
|
|
264,170
|
|
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,907
|
|
|
|
516,352
|
|
|
|
334,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (Mcfe)
|
|
|
2,651,709
|
|
|
|
13,236,403
|
|
|
|
19,222,479
|
|
|
|
11,733,426
|
|
Revenue (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales
|
|
$
|
10,570
|
|
|
$
|
67,868
|
|
|
$
|
116,415
|
|
|
$
|
55,135
|
|
Crude oil sales
|
|
|
10,908
|
|
|
|
27,021
|
|
|
|
41,860
|
|
|
|
21,519
|
|
Natural gas liquids sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,273
|
|
|
|
27,405
|
|
|
|
9,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,478
|
|
|
$
|
109,162
|
|
|
$
|
185,680
|
|
|
$
|
85,743
|
|
Production Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales price (before hedging)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Mcf of natural gas
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
|
$
|
6.78
|
|
|
$
|
8.92
|
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
Per barrel of crude oil
|
|
$
|
63.29
|
|
|
$
|
74.38
|
|
|
$
|
101.13
|
|
|
$
|
52.80
|
|
Per barrel of natural gas liquids
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.92
|
|
|
$
|
53.07
|
|
|
$
|
27.19
|
|
Per Mcfe
|
|
$
|
8.34
|
|
|
$
|
8.02
|
|
|
$
|
10.14
|
|
|
$
|
4.68
|
|
Average sales price (after
hedging)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Mcf of natural gas
|
|
$
|
6.85
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
$
|
8.86
|
|
|
$
|
6.77
|
|
Per barrel of crude oil
|
|
$
|
59.00
|
|
|
$
|
66.09
|
|
|
$
|
84.03
|
|
|
$
|
81.46
|
|
Per barrel of natural gas liquids
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.92
|
|
|
$
|
53.07
|
|
|
$
|
27.19
|
|
Per Mcfe
|
|
$
|
8.10
|
|
|
$
|
8.25
|
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
|
$
|
7.31
|
|
Average expenses per Mcfe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating
|
|
$
|
2.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
Exploration
expenses(2)
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
General and
administrative(3)
|
|
$
|
3.29
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average sales prices are shown net of the settled amounts of our
natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids hedge contracts. |
|
(2) |
|
In November 2008, we released undeveloped leasehold interests
that we acquired from Core Natural Resources in Culberson
County, Texas in 2006, and recorded a $7.1 million
exploration expense. |
80
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Non-cash stock compensation expense on January 1, 2006 was
$0.16, $0.26, $0.32 and $1.39 per Mcfe in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. |
Productive
Wells
The following table shows the number of producing wells we owned
by location at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Net
|
|
Gross
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
Wells
|
|
Wells
|
|
Wells
|
|
Wells
|
|
South Texas
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Southeast Texas
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Southwest Louisiana
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Colorado and Other
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Non-operated
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, as of September 30, 2009, we had 171 inactive
wells and 26 salt water disposal wells.
Developed and
Undeveloped Acreage
Developed acreage is acreage spaced or assigned to productive
wells. Undeveloped acreage is acreage on which wells have not
been drilled or completed to a point that would form the basis
to determine whether the property is capable of production of
commercial quantities of natural gas, crude oil and natural gas
liquids. Gross acres are the total acres in which we own a
working interest. Net acres are the sum of the fractional
working interests we own in gross acres. The following table
shows the approximate developed and undeveloped acreage that we
have an interest in, by location, at September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
|
Gross Acres
|
|
|
Net Acres
|
|
|
Gross Acres
|
|
|
Net Acres
|
|
|
South Texas
|
|
|
74,100
|
|
|
|
39,500
|
|
|
|
16,300
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
Southeast Texas
|
|
|
23,400
|
|
|
|
12,800
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
Southwest Louisiana
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Colorado & Other
|
|
|
7,400
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
East Texas
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
11,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
112,600
|
|
|
|
60,400
|
|
|
|
47,200
|
|
|
|
35,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
Drilling
Results
The following table shows the results of the wells drilled and
completed for operated and
non-operated
properties for each of the last three fiscal years ended
December 31, 2008 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. No crude oil wells were drilled during
this time period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Gross Wells
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Exploratory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Wells
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
|
|
10.74
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
Exploratory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
|
|
|
12.59
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, we had no exploratory and
4 gross (1.1 net) development wells in progress. At
September 30, 2009, we had two gross (0.9 net) exploratory
wells and no development wells.
Costs
Incurred
The following table shows the costs incurred in our crude oil
and gas producing activities for the past three years and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Property Acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
238,036
|
|
|
$
|
60,765
|
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
Unproved
|
|
|
8,745
|
|
|
|
30,408
|
|
|
|
57,203
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
Development Costs
|
|
|
6,466
|
|
|
|
30,815
|
|
|
|
86,685
|
|
|
|
10,859
|
|
Exploration Costs
|
|
|
10,784
|
|
|
|
13,405
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
7,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
25,995
|
|
|
$
|
312,664
|
|
|
$
|
207,173
|
|
|
$
|
19,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These costs include crude oil and gas property acquisition,
exploration and development activities regardless of whether the
costs were capitalized or charged to expense, including lease
rental expenses and geological and geophysical expenses.
82
Property
Dispositions
The following table shows crude oil and gas property
dispositions for the three years ended December 31, 2008
and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Crude oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,766
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Accumulated DD&A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil and gas properties, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,106
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The dispositions in 2008 resulted in a net gain of
$15.2 million.
Marketing
We sell a significant portion of our natural gas production to
purchasers pursuant to sales agreements which contain a primary
term of up to two years and crude oil production to purchasers
under sales agreements with primary terms of up to one year. The
sales prices for natural gas are tied to industry standard
published index prices, subject to negotiated price adjustments,
while the sale prices for crude oil are tied to industry
standard posted prices subject to negotiated price adjustments.
Competition
The oil and gas industry is highly competitive and we compete
with a substantial number of other companies that have greater
resources. Many of these companies explore for, produce and
market crude oil and natural gas, carry on refining operations
and market the resultant products on a worldwide basis. The
primary areas in which we encounter substantial competition are
in locating and acquiring desirable leasehold acreage for our
drilling and development operations, locating and acquiring
attractive producing oil and gas properties, and obtaining
purchasers and transporters of the crude oil and natural gas we
produce. There is also competition between producers of crude
oil and natural gas and other industries producing alternative
energy and fuel. Furthermore, competitive conditions may be
substantially affected by various forms of energy legislation
and/or
regulation considered from time to time by the government of the
United States; however, it is not possible to predict the nature
of any such legislation or regulation that may ultimately be
adopted or its effects upon our future operations. Such laws and
regulations may, however, substantially increase the costs of
exploring for, developing or producing gas and crude oil and may
prevent or delay the commencement or continuation of a given
operation. The effect of these risks cannot be accurately
predicted.
Title to
Properties
We believe we have satisfactory title to all of our producing
properties in accordance with standards generally accepted in
the oil and gas industry. Our properties are subject to
customary royalty interests, liens incident to operating
agreements, liens for current taxes and other burdens, which we
believe do not materially interfere with the use of or affect
the value of such properties. As is customary in the industry in
the case of undeveloped properties, little investigation of
record title is made at the time of acquisition (other than a
preliminary review of local records). Detailed investigations,
including a title opinion rendered by a licensed attorney, are
typically made before commencement of drilling operations.
We have granted mortgage liens on substantially all of our crude
oil and natural gas properties to secure our revolving credit
facility and second lien term loan agreement. These mortgages
and the credit facilities contain substantial restrictions and
operating covenants that are customarily found in loan
agreements of this type. See Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and
83
Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital
ResourcesCapital resources and Covenant
compliance.
Government
Regulation and Industry Matters
Federal and
State Regulatory Requirements
We are a public company subject to the rules and regulations of
the SEC. Recently enacted and proposed changes in the laws and
regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules adopted by the SEC,
have resulted in increased costs to us. The new rules could make
it more difficult for us to obtain certain types of insurance,
including director and officer liability insurance, and we may
be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur
substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar
coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more
difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to
serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as
executive officers.
Our operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations
governing the operation and maintenance of our facilities and
the release of materials into the environment or otherwise
relating to environmental protection. These laws and regulations
may require that we acquire permits before commencing drilling;
restrict the substances that can be released into the
environment in connection with drilling and production
activities; limit or prohibit drilling activities on protected
areas such as wetlands or wilderness areas; or require remedial
measures to mitigate pollution from current or former
operations. Under these laws and regulations, we could be liable
for personal injury and
clean-up
costs and other environmental and property damages, as well as
administrative, civil and criminal penalties. These laws and
regulations have been changed frequently in the past. In
general, these changes have imposed more stringent requirements
that increase operating costs or require capital expenditures in
order to remain in compliance. It is also possible that
unanticipated developments could cause us to make environmental
expenditures that are significantly different from those we
currently expect. Existing laws and regulations could be changed
or reinterpreted, and any such changes or interpretations could
have an adverse effect on our business.
Industry
Regulations
The availability of a ready market for natural gas, crude oil
and natural gas liquids production depends upon numerous factors
beyond our control. These factors include regulation of natural
gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids production, federal and
state regulations governing environmental quality and pollution
control, state limits on allowable rates of production by well
or proration unit, the amount of natural gas, crude oil and
natural gas liquids available for sale, the availability of
adequate pipeline and other transportation and processing
facilities and the marketing of competitive fuels. For example,
a productive natural gas well may be shut-in because
of an oversupply of natural gas or lack of an available natural
gas pipeline in the areas in which we may conduct operations.
State and federal regulations generally are intended to prevent
waste of natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids, protect
rights to produce natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
between owners in a common reservoir, control the amount of
natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids produced by
assigning allowable rates of production and control
contamination of the environment. Pipelines are subject to the
jurisdiction of various federal, state and local agencies. We
are also subject to changing and extensive tax laws, the effects
of which cannot be predicted. The following discussion
summarizes the regulation of the United States oil and gas
industry. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with
the various statutes, rules, regulations and governmental orders
to which our operations may be subject, although there can be no
assurance that this is or will remain the case. Moreover, such
statutes, rules, regulations and government orders may be
changed or reinterpreted from time to time in response to
economic or political conditions, and there can be no assurance
that such changes or reinterpretations will not materially
adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition. The following discussion is not intended to
constitute a complete discussion of the various statutes, rules,
regulations and governmental orders to which our operations may
be subject.
84
Regulation of
Natural Gas, Crude Oil and Natural Gas Liquids Exploration and
Production
Our operations are subject to various types of regulation at the
federal, state and local levels. Such regulation includes
requiring permits for the drilling of wells, maintaining bonding
requirements in order to drill or operate wells and regulating
the location of wells, the method of drilling and casing wells,
the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells
are drilled, the plugging and abandoning of wells and the
disposal of fluids used in connection with operations. Our
operations are also subject to various conservation laws and
regulations. These include the regulation of the size of
drilling and spacing units or proration units and the density of
wells that may be drilled in and the unitization or pooling of
crude oil and natural gas properties. In this regard, some
states allow the forced pooling or integration of tracts to
facilitate exploration while other states rely primarily or
exclusively on voluntary pooling of lands and leases. In areas
where pooling is voluntary, it may be more difficult to form
units, and therefore more difficult to develop a project, if the
operator owns less than 100% of the leasehold. In addition,
state conservation laws which establish maximum rates of
production from crude oil and natural gas wells, generally
prohibit the venting or flaring of natural gas and impose
certain requirements regarding the ratability of production. The
effect of these regulations may limit the amount of natural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids we can produce from our wells
and may limit the number of wells or the locations at which we
can drill. The regulatory burden on the oil and gas industry
increases our costs of doing business and, consequently, affects
our profitability. Inasmuch as such laws and regulations are
frequently expanded, amended and interpreted, we are unable to
predict the future cost or impact of complying with such
regulations.
Regulation of
Sales and Transportation of Natural Gas
Federal legislation and regulatory controls have historically
affected the price of natural gas produced by us, and the manner
in which such production is transported and marketed. Under the
Natural Gas Act, or NGA, of 1938, the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, or the FERC, regulates the interstate transportation
and the sale in interstate commerce for resale of natural gas.
Effective January 1, 1993, the Natural Gas Wellhead
Decontrol Act, or the Decontrol Act, deregulated natural gas
prices for all first sales of natural gas, including
all sales by us of our own production. As a result, all of our
domestically produced natural gas may now be sold at market
prices, subject to the terms of any private contracts that may
be in effect. However, the Decontrol Act did not affect the
FERCs jurisdiction over natural gas transportation.
Under the provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, or the
2005 Act, the NGA has been amended to prohibit market
manipulation by any person, including marketers, in connection
with the purchase or sale of natural gas, and the FERC has
issued regulations to implement this prohibition. The Commodity
Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC, also holds authority to
monitor certain segments of the physical and futures energy
commodities market including oil and natural gas. With regard to
physical purchases and sales of natural gas and other energy
commodities, and any related hedging activities that we
undertake, we are thus required to observe anti-market
manipulation laws and related regulations enforced by FERC
and/or the
CFTC. These agencies hold substantial enforcement authority,
including the ability to assess civil penalties of up to
$1 million per day per violation.
Under the 2005 Act, the FERC has also established regulations
that are intended to increase natural gas pricing transparency
through, among other things, new reporting requirements and
expanded dissemination of information about the availability and
prices of gas sold. To the extent that we enter into
transportation contracts with interstate pipelines that are
subject to FERC regulation, we are subject to FERC requirements
related to use of such interstate capacity. Any failure on our
part to comply with the FERCs regulations or an interstate
pipelines tariff could result in the imposition of civil
and criminal penalties.
Our natural gas sales are affected by intrastate and interstate
gas transportation regulation. Following the Congressional
passage of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, or the NGPA, the
FERC adopted a series of regulatory changes that have
significantly altered the transportation and marketing
85
of natural gas. Beginning with the adoption of Order
No. 436, issued in October 1985, the FERC has implemented a
series of major restructuring orders that have required
pipelines, among other things, to perform open
access transportation of gas for others,
unbundle their sales and transportation functions,
and allow shippers to release their unneeded capacity
temporarily and permanently to other shippers. As a result of
these changes, sellers and buyers of gas have gained direct
access to the particular pipeline services they need and are
better able to conduct business with a larger number of
counterparties. We believe these changes generally have improved
our access to markets while, at the same time, substantially
increasing competition in the natural gas marketplace. It
remains to be seen, however, what effect the FERCs other
activities will have on access to markets, the fostering of
competition and the cost of doing business. We cannot predict
what new or different regulations the FERC and other regulatory
agencies may adopt, or what effect subsequent regulations may
have on our activities. We do not believe that we will be
affected by any such new or different regulations materially
differently than any other seller of natural gas with which we
compete.
In the past, Congress has been very active in the area of gas
regulation. However, as discussed above, the more recent trend
has been in favor of deregulation, or lighter handed
regulation, and the promotion of competition in the gas
industry. There regularly are other legislative proposals
pending in the Federal and state legislatures that, if enacted,
would significantly affect the petroleum industry. At the
present time, it is impossible to predict what proposals, if
any, might actually be enacted by Congress or the various state
legislatures and what effect, if any, such proposals might have
on us. Similarly, and despite the trend toward federal
deregulation of the natural gas industry, we cannot predict
whether or to what extent that trend will continue, or what the
ultimate effect will be on our sales of gas. Again, we do not
believe that we will be affected by any such new legislative
proposals materially differently than any other seller of
natural gas with which we compete.
Oil Price
Controls and Transportation Rates
Sales prices of crude oil, condensate and gas liquids by us are
not currently regulated and are made at market prices. Our sales
of these commodities are, however, subject to laws and to
regulations issued by the Federal Trade Commission, or the FTC,
prohibiting manipulative or fraudulent conduct in the wholesale
petroleum market. The FTC holds substantial enforcement
authority under these regulations, including the ability to
assess civil penalties of up to $1 million per day per
violation. Our sales of these commodities, and any related
hedging activities, are also subject to CFTC oversight as
discussed above.
The price we receive from the sale of these products may be
affected by the cost of transporting the products to market.
Much of the transportation is through interstate common carrier
pipelines. Effective as of January 1, 1995, the FERC
implemented regulations generally grandfathering all previously
approved interstate transportation rates and establishing an
indexing system for those rates by which adjustments are made
annually based on the rate of inflation, subject to certain
conditions and limitations. The FERCs regulation of crude
oil transportation rates may tend to increase the cost of
transporting crude oil and natural gas liquids by interstate
pipelines, although the annual adjustments may result in
decreased rates in a given year. Every five years, the FERC must
examine the relationship between the annual change in the
applicable index and the actual cost changes experienced in the
oil pipeline industry. In March 2006, to implement the second of
the required five-yearly re-determinations, the FERC established
an upward adjustment in the index to track oil pipeline cost
changes. The FERC determined that the Producer Price Index for
Finished Goods plus 1.3 percent (PPI plus 1.3 percent)
should be the oil pricing index for the five-year period
beginning July 1, 2006. We are not able at this time to
predict the effects of these regulations or FERC proceedings, if
any, on the transportation costs associated with crude oil
production from our crude oil producing operations.
Environmental
Regulations
Various federal, state and local authorities regulate our
operations with regard to air and water quality, release of
substances and other environmental matters. These laws and
regulations may
86
require the acquisition of a permit before drilling commences,
restrict the types, quantities and concentration of various
substances that can be released into the environment in
connection with drilling and production activities, limit or
prohibit drilling activities on certain lands within wilderness,
wetlands and other protected areas, require remedial measures to
mitigate pollution from current or former operations, such as
pit closure and plugging abandoned wells, and impose substantial
liabilities for pollution resulting from production and drilling
operations. In addition, various laws and regulations require
that well, pipeline, and facility sites be abandoned and
reclaimed. Public interest in the protection of the environment
has increased dramatically in recent years. The trend of more
expansive and stringent environmental legislation and
regulations applied to the crude oil and natural gas industry
could continue, resulting in increased costs of doing business
and consequently affecting profitability. To the extent laws are
enacted or other governmental action is taken that restricts
drilling or imposes more stringent and costly operating, waste
handling, disposal and cleanup requirements, our business and
prospects could be adversely affected.
We generate wastes that may be subject to the federal Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended, or the RCRA, and
comparable state statutes. The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, or the EPA, and various state agencies have
limited the approved methods of disposal for certain hazardous
and nonhazardous wastes. Furthermore, certain wastes generated
by our crude oil and natural gas operations that are currently
exempt from treatment as hazardous wastes may in the
future be designated as hazardous wastes, and
therefore be subject to more rigorous and costly operating and
disposal requirements.
We currently own or lease numerous properties that for many
years have been used for the exploration and production of crude
oil and natural gas. Although we believe that we have used good
operating and waste disposal practices, prior owners and
operators of these properties may not have used similar
practices, and hydrocarbons or wastes may have been disposed of
or released on or under the properties owned or leased by us or
on or under locations where such wastes have been taken for
recycling or disposal. In addition, many of these properties
have been operated by third parties whose treatment and disposal
or release of hydrocarbons or wastes was not under our control.
These properties and the wastes disposed thereon may be subject
to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act, as amended, or the CERCLA, RCRA and analogous
state laws as well as state laws governing the management of
crude oil and natural gas wastes. Under such laws, which impose
strict, joint and several liability, we could be required to
remove or remediate previously disposed wastes (including wastes
disposed of or released by prior owners or operators) or
property contamination (including groundwater contamination) or
to perform remedial plugging operations to prevent future
contamination.
Our operations may be subject to the Clean Air Act, as amended,
or the CAA, and comparable state and local requirements.
Amendments to the CAA adopted in 1990 contain provisions that
have resulted in the gradual imposition of pollution control
requirements with respect to air emissions from our operations.
The EPA and states developed and continue to develop regulations
to implement these requirements. We may be required to incur
capital expenditures in the next several years for air pollution
control equipment in connection with maintaining or obtaining
operating permits and approvals addressing other air
emission-related issues. However, we do not believe our
operations will be materially adversely affected by any such
requirements.
In June 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the
American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, also known as
the Waxman-Markey Bill, which would establish an economy-wide
cap-and-trade
program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
including carbon dioxide and methane by 17 percent from
2005 levels by the year 2020 and 80 percent by the year
2050. The U.S. Senate is considering a number of comparable
measures. One such measure, the Clean Energy Jobs and American
Power Act, or the Boxer-Kerry Bill, has been reported out of the
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, but has not
yet been considered by the full Senate and also includes a
cap-and-trade
system for controlling greenhouse gas emissions in the United
States. Under such system, certain sources of greenhouse gas
emissions would be required to obtain greenhouse gas
87
emission allowances corresponding to their annual
emissions of greenhouse gases. The number of emission allowances
issued each year would decline as necessary to meet overall
emission reduction goals. As the number of greenhouse gas
emission allowances declines each year, the cost or value of
allowances is expected to escalate significantly. The ultimate
outcome of these bills remains uncertain, and such bills would
have to undergo reconciliation before being adopted as law. Any
laws or regulations that may be adopted to restrict or reduce
emissions of U.S. greenhouse gases could require us to
incur increased operating costs, and could have an adverse
affect on demand for the oil and natural gas we produce. In
addition, at least 20 states have already taken legal
measures to control emissions of greenhouse gases, primarily
through the planned development of greenhouse gas emission
inventories
and/or
regional greenhouse gas cap and trade programs. In California,
for example, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
requires the California Air Resources Board to adopt regulations
by 2012 that will achieve an overall reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions from all sources in California of 25% by 2020.
Depending on the particular program, we could be required to
purchase and surrender allowances, either for greenhouse gas
emissions resulting from our operations or from combustion of
crude oil or natural gas we produce. Although we would not be
impacted to a greater degree than other similarly situated
producers of natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids, a
stringent greenhouse gas control program could have an adverse
effect on our cost of doing business and could reduce demand for
the crude oil and natural gas we produce.
On April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court found
that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide, or
CO2,
emissions from automobiles as air pollutants under
the CAA. Although this decision did not address
CO2
emissions from electric generating plants, the EPA has similar
authority under the CAA to regulate air pollutants
from those and other facilities. On April 17, 2009, the EPA
released a Proposed Endangerment and Cause or Contribute
Findings for Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act. The
EPAs proposed finding concludes that the atmospheric
concentrations of several key greenhouse gases threaten the
health and welfare of future generations and that the combined
emissions of these gases by motor vehicles contribute to the
atmospheric concentrations of these key greenhouse gases and
hence to the threat of climate change. On September 15,
2009, EPA proposed a rule in anticipation of finalizing its
findings to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases from motor
vehicles, which rule is expected to be adopted in March 2010.
Additionally, while the EPAs proposed findings do not
specifically address stationary sources, those findings, if
finalized, would be expected to support the establishment of
future emission requirements by the EPA for stationary sources.
On September 23, 2009, the EPA finalized a greenhouse gas
reporting rule establishing a national greenhouse gas emissions
collection and reporting program. The EPA rules will require
covered entities to measure greenhouse gas emissions commencing
in 2010 and submit reports commencing in 2011. On
September 30, 2009, EPA proposed new thresholds for
greenhouse gas emissions that define when Clean Air Act permits
under the New Source Review, or NSR, and Title V operating
permits programs would be required. Under the Title V
operating permits program, EPA is proposing a major source
emissions applicability threshold of 25,000 tons per year (tpy)
of carbon dioxide
CO2e
(carbon dioxide equivalency) for existing industrial facilities.
Facilities with greenhouse gas emissions below this threshold
would not be required to obtain an operating permit. Under the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration, or PSD, portion of NSR,
EPA is proposing a major stationary source threshold of 25,000
tpy
CO2e.
This threshold level would be used to determine if a new
facility or a major modification at an existing facility would
trigger PSD permitting requirements. EPA is also proposing a
significance level between 10,000 and 25,000 tpy
CO2e.
Existing major sources making modifications that result in an
increase of emissions above the significance level would be
required to obtain a PSD permit. EPA is requesting comment on a
range of values in this proposal, with the intent of selecting a
single value for the greenhouse gas significance level. These
proposals, along with new federal or state restrictions on
emissions of carbon dioxide that may be imposed in areas of the
United States in which we conduct business could also adversely
affect our cost of doing business and demand for the crude oil
and natural gas we produce.
88
The U.S. Senate and House of Representatives are currently
considering bills entitled, the Fracturing Responsibility
and Awareness of Chemicals Act, or the FRAC Act, to amend
the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, or the SDWA, to repeal an
exemption from regulation for hydraulic fracturing. If enacted,
the FRAC Act would amend the definition of underground
injection in the SDWA to encompass hydraulic fracturing
activities. If enacted, such a provision could require hydraulic
fracturing operations to meet permitting and financial assurance
requirements, adhere to certain construction specifications,
fulfill monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping obligations,
and meet plugging and abandonment requirements. The FRAC Act
also proposes to require the reporting and public disclosure of
chemicals used in the fracturing process, which could make it
easier for third parties opposing the hydraulic fracturing
process to initiate legal proceedings based on allegations that
specific chemicals used in the fracturing process could
adversely affect groundwater. Although the legislation is still
being developed, we do not expect the FRAC Act to have a
material affect on our business because the Company contracts
out all of its hydraulic fracturing work due to the specialized
nature of the activity and the extensive capital investment
required.
Federal regulations require certain owners or operators of
facilities that store or otherwise handle crude oil to prepare
and implement spill prevention, control, and countermeasure, or
the SPCC, and response plans relating to the possible discharge
of crude oil into surface waters. SPCC plans at our producing
properties were developed and implemented in 1999. In December
2008, EPA amended the SPCC rule. On November 5, 2009, EPA
signed a notice amending certain requirements of the SPCC
regulations to address concerns from the regulatory community
raised since the release of the December 2008 amendments. The
new SPCC rule is expected to be effective January 14, 2010.
Although EPA has not yet issued a final notice containing the
new rules, it is clear that there will be changes impacting oil
production facilities. These changes should not have a material
adverse effect on us. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990, as amended,
or the OPA, contains numerous requirements relating to the
prevention of and response to oil spills into waters of the
United States. The OPA subjects owners of facilities to strict,
joint and several liability for all containment and cleanup
costs and certain other damages arising from a spill, including,
but not limited to, the costs of responding to a release of oil
to surface waters. Noncompliance with OPA may result in varying
civil and criminal penalties and liabilities. Our operations are
also subject to the federal Clean Water Act, as amended, or the
CWA, and analogous state laws. In accordance with the CWA, the
state of Louisiana has issued regulations prohibiting discharges
of produced water in state coastal waters effective July 1,
1997. Like OPA, the CWA and analogous state laws relating to the
control of water pollution provide varying civil and criminal
penalties and liabilities for releases of petroleum or its
derivatives into surface waters or into the ground.
CERCLA, also known as the Superfund law, and similar
state laws impose liability, without regard to fault or the
legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of
potentially responsible persons that are considered to have
contributed to the release of a hazardous substance
into the environment. These potentially responsible persons
include the owner or operator of the disposal site or sites
where the release occurred and companies that disposed or
arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances found at
the site. Persons who are or were responsible for releases of
hazardous substances under CERCLA may be subject to joint and
several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous
substances that have been released into the environment, for
damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health
studies, and it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and
other third parties to file claims for personal injury and
property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances
released into the environment.
We also are subject to a variety of federal, state and local
permitting and registration requirements relating to protection
of the environment. Our management believes that we are in
substantial compliance with current applicable environmental
laws and regulations and that continued compliance with existing
requirements would not have a material adverse effect on us.
89
Employees
At September 30, 2009, we had 73 full time employees, of
whom 23 were field personnel and seven were geoscientists. We
have been able to attract a talented team of industry
professionals from other industry peers that have been
successful in achieving significant growth and success in the
past. As such, we are well-positioned to adequately manage and
develop our existing assets, and also to increase our proved
reserves and production through acquisitions. None of our
employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We
believe our relationship with our employees is good.
Insurance
Matters
As is common in the oil and gas industry, we will not insure
fully against all risks associated with our business either
because such insurance is not available or because premium costs
are considered prohibitive. A loss not fully covered by
insurance could have a materially adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Legal
Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in litigation relating to
claims arising out of our operations or from disputes with
vendors in the normal course of business. During the second
quarter of 2009, holders of oil and gas leases in East Texas
(Haynesville Shale) filed two causes of action against us
alleging breach of contract for not paying lease bonuses on
certain oil and gas leases taken by our leasing agent. The
damages alleged are approximately $2.8 million and there
are approximately $300,000 in written demands from other holders
of leases in this area that we believe may contemplate legal
proceedings. We are vigorously defending these lawsuits, and
believe we have meritorious defenses. We do not believe that
these claims will have a material adverse affect on our
business, financial position, results of operations or cash
flows, although we cannot guarantee that a material adverse
effect will not occur.
Offices
We currently sublease, through January 31, 2014,
54,939 square feet of executive and corporate office space
located at 717 Texas Avenue in downtown Houston, Texas. Rent,
including parking, related to this office space for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 was approximately
$1.3 million.
90
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers and Directors
Our executive officers and directors as of the date of this
prospectus are as follows. Each is a citizen of the
U.S. unless otherwise indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Allan D. Keel
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
E. Joseph Grady
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Tracy Price
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Senior Vice PresidentLand/Business Development
|
Thomas H. Atkins
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Senior Vice PresidentExploration
|
Jay S. Mengle
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Senior Vice PresidentEngineering
|
B. James Ford
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Director
|
Adam C. Pierce
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Director
|
Lee B. Backsen
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Director
|
Lon McCain
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
Cassidy J. Traub
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Director
|
Allan D. Keel was appointed Chief Executive Officer and
President and joined the Companys Board of Directors, or
Board, on February 28, 2005. Before joining Crimson,
Mr. Keel was Vice President/General Manager of Westport
Resources, Houston office, during 2004. In this role he was
responsible for its Gulf of Mexico operations including
acquisitions, development and exploration. In 2003,
Mr. Keel served as a consultant to both domestic and
international companies in building their presence in the Gulf
of Mexico. From mid-2000 until mid-2001, Mr. Keel served as
a Vice President at Enron Energy Finance where he worked on
private equity transactions and volumetric production payments.
From mid-2001 through 2002, Mr. Keel served as President
and CEO of Mariner Energy Company (Mariner), a
majority owned affiliate of Enron. Subsequent to Enrons
bankruptcy and its decision to sell Mariner, Mr. Keel
partnered with Oaktree Capital Management in an effort to
acquire Mariner. From 1996 until mid-2000, Mr. Keel was
Vice President/General Manager for Westport Resources, where he
built the Gulf of Mexico division from the grassroots. From 1984
to 1996, Mr. Keel was with Energen Resources where he
directed the companys exploration, joint venture and
acquisition activities. Mr. Keel was appointed pursuant to
the terms of the Series G Preferred Stock. He received a
Bachelor of Science degree and a Master of Science degree in
Geology from the University of Alabama and a Masters of Business
Administration degree from the Owen School of Management at
Vanderbilt University.
E. Joseph Grady was appointed Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer on February 28, 2005.
Mr. Grady is managing director of Vision
Fund Advisors, Inc., a financial advisory firm he
co-founded in 2001, and serves as an advisor to the board for
the firms privately-held investment and advisory clients.
Mr. Grady has over 30 years of financial, operational
and administrative experience, including over 20 years in
the oil and gas industry. He was formerly Senior Vice
PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer of Texas
Petrochemicals Holdings, Inc. from April 2003 to July 2004, Vice
President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Forcenergy
Inc. from 1995 to 2001 and held various financial management
positions with Pelto Oil Company from 1980 to 1990, including
Vice President-Finance from 1988 to 1990. Mr. Grady
received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from
Louisiana State University.
Tracy Price was appointed Senior Vice
PresidentLand/Business Development on April 1, 2005.
Mr. Price joined the Company after serving as the Senior
Vice President- Land/Business Development for The Houston
Exploration Company from 2001 until joining the Company. Prior
to his tenure at The Houston Exploration Company, Mr. Price
served as Manager of Land and Business Development for Newfield
Exploration Company between 1990 and 2001. From 1986 to 1990
Mr. Price was Land Manager for Apache Corporation. Prior to
Apache, Mr. Price served in similar land
91
management capacities at Challenger Minerals Inc. and Phillips
Petroleum Company. Mr. Price received a Bachelor of
Business Administration degree in Petroleum Land Management from
the University of Texas.
Thomas H. Atkins was appointed Senior Vice
PresidentExploration on April 1, 2005.
Mr. Atkins joined the Company after serving as the General
ManagerGulf of Mexico for Newfield Exploration Company
where he was employed from 1998 until joining the Company. Prior
to his tenure at Newfield, Mr. Atkins served in various
exploration capacities with EOG Resources and its predecessor
companies from 1984 to 1998, including prospect generator,
development geologist and finally as Exploration Manager.
Mr. Atkins also worked at the Superior Oil Company from
1981 through 1984. Mr. Atkins received a Bachelor of
Science degree in Geology from the University of Oklahoma.
Jay S. Mengle was appointed Senior Vice
PresidentOperations and Engineering on April 1, 2005,
after serving as the Shelf Asset ManagerGulf of Mexico for
Kerr-McGee Corporation subsequent to its 2004 merger with
Westport Resources. Mr. Mengle was with Westport Resources
from 1998 to 2004, where he started Westports Gulf
Coast/Gulf of Mexico drilling and production operations. Prior
to joining Westport, Mr. Mengle also served in various
drilling, production and marketing management capacities at
Norcen Energy Resources, Kirby Exploration and Mobil Oil Corp.
Mr. Mengle received his Bachelor of Science degree in
Petroleum Engineering from the University of Texas.
B. James Ford became a member of the Companys
Board on February 28, 2005. Mr. Ford is a Co-Portfolio
Manager and Managing Director of Oaktree Capital Management, an
affiliate of Oaktree Holdings. Before joining Oaktree Capital
Management in June 1996, Mr. Ford was a consultant with
McKinsey & Co., and a financial analyst in the
Investment Banking Department of PaineWebber Incorporated. He
currently serves as a director of EXCO, Cequel Holdings,
Fu Sheng Industrial Co., Ltd., GAP Broadcasting Group, LLC
and Verge Media Companies, Inc. Mr. Ford also serves as an
active member of the Childrens Bureau Board of Directors
and as trustee of the Stanford Graduate School of Business
Trust. Mr. Ford was appointed pursuant to the terms of the
Series G Preferred Stock, the majority of which is held by
Oaktree Holdings. Mr. Ford earned a Bachelor of Arts degree
in Economics from the University of California at Los Angeles
and a Masters of Business Administration degree from the
Stanford University Graduate School of Business.
Adam C. Pierce was appointed to the Companys Board
on January 24, 2008. Mr. Pierce is a Vice President of
Oaktree Capital Management, an affiliate of Oaktree Holdings.
Prior to joining Oaktree Capital Management in 2003, he was an
investment banker with J.P. Morgan Chase &
Company. Prior to joining J.P. Morgan Chase &
Co., Mr. Pierce worked for Goldman Sachs. Mr. Pierce
serves on the board of directors for several privately-held
companies in which Oaktree Capital Management has invested.
Mr. Pierce was appointed pursuant to the terms of the
Series G Preferred Stock, the majority of which is held by
Oaktree Holdings. Mr. Pierce received a Bachelor of Arts
degree in Economics with a focus on Business Administration from
Vanderbilt University.
Lee B. Backsen became a member of the Companys
Board on June 1, 2005. Mr. Backsen is an oil and gas
exploration consultant with over 45 years experience in the
industry holding senior exploration management positions with
Burlington Resources Inc., UMC Petroleum Corporation, General
Atlantic Gulf Coast Inc., Kerr-McGee Corporation, Pelto Oil
Company, Spectrum Oil and Gas Company and Shell Oil Company.
From 2004 to 2008, Mr. Backsen was Vice
PresidentExploration for Andex Resources, LLC, a private
oil and gas producing company, and was responsible for sourcing
exploration joint ventures. From 2000 to 2004, Mr. Backsen
was a consulting geologist for Continental Land & Fur
Co., Inc. and Grant Geophysical, Inc., for whom he screened
exploratory prospects in the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast
Basins. Mr. Backsen earned a Bachelor of Science degree and
Masters of Science degree in Geology from Iowa State University.
Lon McCain became a member of the Companys Board on
June 1, 2005. Mr. McCain was Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer of Westport Resources Corporation, a
large, publicly traded exploration and production company, from
2001 until the sale of that company to Kerr-McGee
92
Corporation in 2004. From 1992 until joining Westport,
Mr. McCain was Senior Vice President and Principal of
Petrie Parkman & Co., an investment banking firm
specializing in the oil and gas industry. From 1978 until
joining Petrie Parkman, Mr. McCain held senior financial
management positions with Presidio Oil Company, Petro-Lewis
Corporation and Ceres Capital. He currently serves as a director
of Transzap Inc., Cheniere Energy Partners L.P. and Continental
Resources Inc. Mr. McCain was an Adjunct Professor of
Finance at the Daniels College of Business of the University of
Denver from 1982 to 2004. Mr. McCain received a Bachelor of
Science degree in Business Administration and a Masters of
Business Administration/Finance from the University of Denver.
Cassidy J. Traub was appointed to the Companys
Board on December 7, 2009. Mr. Traub is a Vice
President at Oaktree Capital Management, an affiliate of Oaktree
Holdings, in the Principal Group. Prior to joining Oaktree
Capital Management in 2005, Mr. Traub spent over two years
as an Analyst at UBS Investment Bank, where he was involved in
various aspects of mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts,
initial public offerings and debt financings. He is currently a
member of the board of directors of several private companies.
Mr. Traub received an A.B. degree in Economics with an
emphasis in Finance from Princeton University.
There are no family relationships between any of the executive
officers or directors of Crimson Exploration.
Compensation of
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Paid in Cash ($)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
B. James
Ford(2)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
45,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,667
|
|
Lon McCain
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
62,250
|
|
|
|
9,435
|
|
|
|
71,685
|
|
Lee B. Backsen
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
49,667
|
|
|
|
9,435
|
|
|
|
59,102
|
|
Adam C.
Pierce(2)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
47,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,667
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the dollar amount of compensation expense we recognized
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The awards for
which compensation expense was recognized consist of awards
granted on May 10, 2007 and July 22, 2008. The amounts
above do not include awards granted on March 25, 2009 under
the Plan for the 2008 service year. As of December 31,
2008, there were 10,160 shares outstanding granted pursuant
to restricted stock awards to our directors. |
|
(2) |
|
Messrs. Ford, Pierce and Baker, as employees of Oaktree
Capital Management, elected not to receive stock awards during
2008, 2007 and 2006. |
Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board
approved on November 21, 2008, an amended compensation plan
for non-employee directors (the Plan) providing for
a $30,000 annual retainer, with a $2,000 meeting attendance fee
($1,000 if by telephone) for each full board, Audit and
Compensation Committee meeting. The chairman of the Audit and
Compensation Committee is entitled to receive an annual retainer
of $13,500 and $6,000, respectively. The amended board
compensation plan was effective June 1, 2008, which was the
beginning of the
2008-2009
board year.
Under the Plan, each non-employee director receives $50,000 of
restricted common stock for his first year of service subject to
a three-year vesting schedule. Upon re-election, each
non-employee director receives $50,000 in restricted common
stock, subject to a one-year vesting requirement. The number of
shares to be awarded is determined based on the fair market
value of our common stock as of the close of trading on the date
of grant.
The Plan replaced the previous director compensation plan for
non-employee directors, which had been approved on June 1,
2005 and was in effect until May 31, 2008. Under the
previous plan, non-employee directors were entitled to a $10,000
annual retainer, with a $2,000 meeting attendance fee ($1,000 if
by telephone) for a maximum of $8,000 per director per year,
with an additional fee
93
payable for attendance of committee meetings held on days other
than those on which the Board meets. The chairman of each of the
Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee was also entitled
to receive an annual retainer of $5,000 and $2,500, respectively.
In addition, the Plan provides for reimbursement of expenses for
all directors in the performance of their duties, including
reasonable travel expenses incurred attending meetings. Employee
directors are not paid additional compensation for serving as a
director.
Board
Composition
Under our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, the number of
directors at any one time are set by resolution of the Board.
Currently, the Board consists of six members, five of whom we
expect will qualify as independent under the NASDAQ
Stock Market Rules. In connection with this offering, the Board
has acted by resolution to increase the total number of
directors to six and appointed one additional director,
Mr. Traub, who we expect will qualify as
independent under the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules and
Rule 10A-3(b)(1)
under the Exchange Act to fill that vacancy. In connection with
this appointment, Oaktree Holdings, as the majority holder of
the Series G Preferred Stock, has permitted the total
number of directors elected by the holders of the Series G
Preferred Stock to equal 50% of the total number of directors,
but has reserved the right to increase the number of
Series G Preferred Stock director appointees until the
conversion of all the Series G Preferred Stock.
The Board has reviewed the independence of the members of the
Board of Directors in accordance with the guidelines set out in
Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules. As a
result of the review, the Board has determined that
Messrs. Backsen, Ford, McCain, Pierce and Traub each will
qualify as independent directors upon the consummation of this
offering in accordance with Rule 5605(a)(2). In making its
independence determinations, the Board noted in particular the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Ford is a managing director, Mr. Pierce is a vice
president and Mr. Traub is a vice president of Oaktree
Capital Management, an affiliate of Oaktree Holdings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oaktree Holdings and OCM Crimson together beneficially own
8,427,884 shares of our common stock, including
76,710 shares of our Series G Preferred Stock, and
Oaktree Holdings beneficially owns 2,000 shares of our
Series H Preferred Stock, and after completion of this
offering Oaktree Holdings and OCM Crimson will continue to own a
significant number of shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oaktree Holdings is the payee of an unsecured subordinated
promissory note made by the Company in the aggregate principal
amount of $2.0 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
An affiliate of Oaktree Holdings is a holder of a significant
amount of debt under our second lien term loan agreement that it
acquired in the secondary market from unaffiliated third parties.
|
The Board noted that The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(NASDAQ) does not view ownership of even a
significant amount of stock, by itself, as a bar to an
independence finding. The Board also noted that Oaktree Capital
Management is comprised of nine principals and approximately
580 employees with offices in 14 cities worldwide, has
its headquarters in Los Angeles and has over $60 billion in
assets under management. The Board determined that none of the
above factors caused any of Messrs. Ford, Pierce or Traub to
have a relationship with the Company that would impair their
independence for the purposes of Rule 5605(a)(2).
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for the
annual election of directors. At each annual meeting of
stockholders, our directors will be elected for a one-year term
and serve until their respective successors have been elected
and qualified. It is anticipated that the Board of Directors
will meet at least quarterly.
94
The Board held six meetings during 2008. No director
during the last fiscal year attended fewer than 75% of the total
number of meetings of the Board and committees on which that
director served.
Stockholders desiring to communicate with the Board may do so by
mail addressed as follows: Board of Directors, Crimson
Exploration Inc., 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 2900, Houston,
Texas 77002. We believe our responsiveness to stockholder
communications to the Board has been excellent.
The Company encourages, but does not require, directors to
attend annual meetings of stockholders. At the Companys
2008 stockholder meeting, all members of the Board at the time
of the meeting attended.
Board
Committees
The Board has the authority to appoint committees to perform
certain management and administrative functions. The Board has
established a Compensation Committee, an Audit Committee and, a
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Following
completion of this offering, the Audit Committee will have three
members and each of the Compensation Committee and Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee will have three members, all
of whom will qualify as independent under the rules
and regulations of the SEC and NASDAQ.
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee was established to review and appraise the
audit efforts of our independent accountants, and monitor our
accounts, procedures and internal controls. During 2008, the
Audit Committee consisted of Mr. McCain and
Mr. Pierce. Mr. Pierce replaced Mr. Skardon F.
Baker, who served on the Audit Committee until his resignation
from the Board on January 24, 2008. Mr. Traub was
appointed to serve on our Audit Committee on December 7,
2009. The Audit Committee met four times in 2008. The Board has
determined that Mr. McCain is an audit committee
financial expert as defined under applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC. Our Audit Committee has adopted a
charter, which is posted on our website
www.crimsonexploration.com under Corporate
Governance.
Compensation
Committee
The function of the Compensation Committee is to recommend for
approval by the Board the annual salaries and other compensation
for our executive officers and key employees. Our Compensation
Committee consists of Messrs. Ford and Backsen. The
committee met three times in 2008. Our Compensation Committee
has adopted a written charter, which is posted on our website
www.crimsonexploration.com under Corporate
Governance. The Compensation Committee has the following
authority and responsibilities:
|
|
|
|
|
To establish and review our overall compensation philosophy;
|
|
|
|
To review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to
our executive officers compensation, evaluate the
performance of such officers and recommend for approval by the
Board, the benefits, direct and indirect, of our executive
officers based on this evaluation;
|
|
|
|
To review and recommend to the Board for approval all our equity
compensation plans that are not otherwise subject to the
approval of the stockholders;
|
|
|
|
To review and make recommendations to the Board for approval of
all equity awards;
|
|
|
|
To review and monitor all employee pension, profit-sharing and
benefit plans, if any; and
|
|
|
|
To make recommendations to the Board with regard to our
compensation and benefit programs and practices for all
employees.
|
While the Compensation Committee is not prohibited from
delegating its functions, the Compensation Committee has not
done so in the past, although it may consider senior
managements
95
recommendations regarding appropriate compensation for members
of management reporting to them, as discussed under
Compensation Discussion and Analysis below.
Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee
Prior to this offering the Board did not have a Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee and the functions of this
committee were performed by the whole Board. In connection with
this offering, the Board of Directors has appointed
Messrs. Ford, Backsen and McCain to serve as the members of
the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee will identify and recommend
nominees to the Board of Directors and oversee compliance with
our corporate governance guidelines. Prior to the completion of
this offering the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
will adopt a written charter addressing director nominations and
post a copy on our website www.crimsonexploration.com under
Corporate Governance.
The Board believes that candidates for director should have
certain minimum qualifications, including being able to read and
understand financial statements and having the highest personal
integrity and ethics. Previously the Board has, and after this
offering the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will,
consider such factors as relevant expertise and experience,
ability to devote sufficient time to the affairs of the Company,
demonstrated excellence in his or her field, the ability to
exercise sound business judgment and the commitment to
rigorously represent the long-term interests of the
Companys stockholders. Candidates for director will be
reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board,
the operating requirements of the Company and the long-term
interests of stockholders.
The Board currently does not, and immediately following this
offering the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will
not, have a formal process in place for identifying and
evaluating nominees for directors. Instead, the Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee will use its network of
contacts to identify potential candidates. The Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee will conduct any appropriate
and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications
of possible candidates after considering the function and needs
of the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
will meet to discuss and consider such candidates
qualifications and then select a nominee for recommendation to
the Board by a majority vote.
The Board has not established procedures for considering
nominees recommended by stockholders. The Board believes that
nominees should be considered on a case-by-case basis on each
nominees merits, regardless of who recommended such
nominee.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our executive officers serves, or has served during the
past fiscal year, as a member of the board of directors or
compensation committee of any other company that has one or more
executives serving as a member of our board of directors or
compensation committee.
Code of
Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics as defined by the
applicable rules of the SEC, and it has been posted on our
website at www.crimsonexploration.com.
96
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis contains
statements regarding future individual and company performance
targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the
limited context of our executive compensation program and should
not be understood to be statements of managements
expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We
specifically caution stockholders not to apply these statements
to other contexts.
Introduction
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (1) provides an
overview of our compensation policies and programs;
(2) explains our compensation objectives, policies and
practices with respect to our executive officers; and
(3) identifies the elements of compensation for each of the
individuals identified in the following table, whom we refer to
in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis as our named
executive officers.
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Principal Position
|
|
Allan D. Keel
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
E. Joseph Grady
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Tracy Price
|
|
Senior Vice PresidentLand/Business Development
|
Jay S. Mengle
|
|
Senior Vice PresidentOperations and Engineering
|
Thomas H. Atkins
|
|
Senior Vice PresidentExploration
|
Objectives and
Philosophy of Our Executive Compensation Program
Due to an aging of the industry employee base, and a shortage of
new entrants into the industry, competition for high-caliber
personnel experienced in the oil and gas industry has become
very intense. Accordingly, the objective of our compensation
program is to establish a competitive compensation program with
appropriate compensation packages for the wide variety of duties
performed by our named executive officers. In addition, we have
sought to establish a competitive compensation program that
motivates our executive officers to enhance long-term
stockholder value.
Recognizing that attracting, retaining and motivating our
executive officers to successfully perform demanding roles is
critical to meeting our strategic business and financial goals,
our compensation philosophy is that the compensation paid to our
executive officers should be directly and materially linked to
our achievement of our specific annual, long-term and strategic
goals and to each officers individual contribution to the
attainment of those goals. We believe our overall compensation
strategy of offering a balanced combination of annual and
long-term compensation to our executive officers based upon
corporate and individual performance helps maximize stockholder
return.
To achieve these objectives, we have historically evaluated the
compensation paid to our executive officers based upon the
following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the appropriate mix of salary, cash incentives and equity
incentives;
|
|
|
|
company growth and financial and operational performance, as
well as individual performance; and
|
|
|
|
market analysis of the compensation packages of our executive
officers compared to the compensation packages of executive
officers at other oil and gas industry companies that are
similar to ours in their operations, among other factors.
|
97
Except as otherwise noted below, we do not assign relative
weights or rankings to these factors. Instead, the Compensation
Committee makes subjective determinations of compensation levels
based upon a consideration of all of these factors.
Setting
Executive Compensation
On behalf of our Board, the Compensation Committee reviews,
evaluates and approves all compensation for our executive
officers, including our compensation philosophy, policies and
plans. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
also play important roles in the executive compensation process,
including evaluating the other executive officers and assisting
in the development of performance target goals. For example, at
least once each year the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer present to the Compensation Committee their
evaluation of each of the other named executive officers
(including, the Chief Executive Officers evaluation of the
Chief Financial Officer), which includes a review of
contribution and performance over the past year, strengths,
weaknesses, development plans and succession potential.
Following these presentations and a review of all relevant data,
the Compensation Committee makes its own assessments and
recommends to the Board approval of the compensation for each
named executive officer. Although the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer each may make recommendations to
the Compensation Committee regarding his own compensation, to
the extent events or circumstances are applicable to all named
executive officers as a group regarding compensation decisions,
all final decisions regarding executive compensation remain with
the Compensation Committee or our Board. In this way all
compensation elements are reviewed and approved by the
Compensation Committee or our Board. The Compensation Committee
does take into consideration the named executive officers
total compensation, including base salary annual incentives and
long-term incentives, both cash and equity, when considering
market based adjustments to the named executive officers
compensation.
In January 2008, the Compensation Committee retained
Longnecker & Associates, an experienced compensation
consulting firm that specializes in the energy industry and that
has access to national compensation surveys and our compensation
information, to conduct a company-wide review of our
compensation policies and programs to determine our level of
competitiveness in the oil and gas industry and advise the
Compensation Committee as to whether modifications should be
adopted in order to attract, motivate and retain key employees.
The Compensation Committee is compensated by the Company. After
our acquisition of the STGC Properties from EXCO in 2007, which
significantly increased the size of our company, we felt that it
had become increasingly important, given our growing need for
highly skilled and experienced personnel in highly competitive
labor market, to take additional measures to ensure that we were
appropriately compensating our key employees and rewarding
performance in a manner consistent with similar employers of a
similar size. Additionally, the initial terms of the employment
contracts for Messrs. Keel and Grady were set to expire in
2008, and the initial terms of the employment contracts for
Messrs. Price, Mengle and Atkins expired in 2007.
Accordingly, for these reasons we felt that it was appropriate
to engage a compensation consultant at the beginning of 2008 to
assist the Compensation Committee in its compensation review.
The results of that review, as well as the latest ECI surveys
using data from the selected Peer Group, were utilized by the
Compensation Committee in determining and modifying the
executive compensation levels for fiscal 2008. The Compensation
Committee determined that no changes to executive compensation
levels were necessary for fiscal 2009 upon the recommendation of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
The Compensation Committee did not retain independent
compensation consultants to assist it in evaluating executive
compensation matters for fiscal years 2006 or 2007. Instead, the
Compensation Committee made comparisons of our executive
compensation program to the compensation paid to executives of
other companies within the oil and gas industry. Energy industry
compensation surveys from Effective Compensation Inc.
(ECI) were used. ECI surveys were utilized as they
are specific to the energy industry and derive their data from
direct contributions from a large number of participating
companies that we consider to be our peers. The ECI surveys
compile data from most companies that
98
we currently consider to be in our peer group, as well as
companies somewhat larger than us but with which we compete for
talent. The surveys were used to compare our executive
compensation program against companies (the Peer
Group) that have comparable market capitalization,
revenues, capital expenditure budgets, geographic focus and
number of employees.
With respect to compensation decisions made in 2008, the
selected Peer Group for 2008 included Swift Energy Company,
Comstock Resources, Inc., Continental Resources, Inc., Energy
XXI, PetroQuest Energy, Inc., Concho Resources, Inc., Callon
Petroleum Company, Delta Petroleum Corp., Edge Petroleum Corp.,
Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, Dune Energy, Inc. and Gastar
Exploration Limited. The Compensation Committee regularly
reviews and refines the Peer Group as appropriate. When we refer
to peers, peer group or peer
companies or similar phrases, we are referring to this
list of companies, as it may be updated by the Compensation
Committee from time to time.
The Company believes that each element of compensation has been
designed to complement the other components and, when considered
together, to meet the Companys compensation objectives;
however, the Company does not have a policy or target for the
allocation between
short-term
and long-term or cash and non-cash incentive compensation.
Elements of
Our Executive Compensation Program
General
The principal components of our executive compensation program
include:
|
|
|
|
|
base salary;
|
|
|
|
performance-based cash incentive compensation;
|
|
|
|
discretionary cash incentive compensation;
|
|
|
|
long-term equity-based incentive compensation;
|
|
|
|
overriding royalty interest plan compensation;
|
|
|
|
severance benefits; and
|
|
|
|
other health and fringe benefits.
|
Base
Salary
We provide base salaries to our executive officers to compensate
them for services rendered during the year at levels that we
believe are competitive in the oil and gas industry and that are
designed to allow us to attract, motivate and retain executive
officers. Base salaries are a major component of the total
annual cash compensation paid to our executive officers and are
reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee. Base salary
determinations are made by the Board taking into consideration
salary recommendations from the Compensation Committee. The
Compensation Committee will consider senior managements
recommendations as to appropriate compensation for members of
management reporting to them.
All of our executive officers are subject to employment
agreements that provide for a fixed base salary. These salaries
were determined after taking into account many factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the historic salary structure within our company;
|
|
|
|
the responsibilities of the officer;
|
|
|
|
the scope, level of expertise and experience required for the
officers position;
|
|
|
|
the strategic impact of the officers position;
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
the potential future contribution and demonstrated individual
performance of the officer; and
|
|
|
|
salaries paid for comparable positions at similarly-situated
companies.
|
At the time the employment agreements were entered into, we set
base salaries at the base salary comparables at or near the
50th percentile of salaries of comparable executive
officers of what we considered our peer group of companies.
After a consideration of the factors described above, we did not
increase the base salary levels of our named executive officers
during fiscal 2006 or 2007. Subsequent changes to those initial
salaries were made after consideration of our performance,
individual performance and competitive salaries prevalent in the
oil and gas industry. In early 2008, our Board, based on the
recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved increases
to the annual base salaries of the named executive officers as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Former Base Salary
|
|
|
New Base Salary
|
|
|
Allan D. Keel
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
|
$
|
370,000
|
|
E. Joseph Grady
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
|
$
|
340,000
|
|
Jay S. Mengle
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
Thomas H. Atkins
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
Tracy Price
|
|
$
|
185,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
In addition, in 2008 our Board approved and we entered into
amended and restated employment agreements with our named
executive officers to reflect these base salary increases and
to, among other things, modify provisions relating to the
federal income tax treatment of certain arrangements in order to
meet the December 31, 2008 deadline for compliance with
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), reflect other market-based
changes in compensation approved in early 2008 by the
Compensation Committee and provide for new terms of the
agreements, since the initial terms of the existing employment
agreements expired. This Code section governs the treatment of
deferred compensation which is broadly defined and thus has the
potential to impact numerous types of compensation arrangements
between us and our employees. If violated, Section 409A can
result in adverse tax consequences to the employee. The
Section 409A amendments to our compensation arrangements
were intended to prevent any such adverse tax result on our
employees. See Narrative Disclosure to Summary
Compensation Table and Grants of Plan Based Awards
TableEmployment Agreements.
Performance-Based
Cash Incentive Compensation
All of our employees, including our named executive officers,
are eligible to participate in an annual, performance-based cash
incentive compensation plan that is designed to reward employees
on the basis of our company attaining pre-determined performance
measures.
The Compensation Committee annually approves the quantitative
performance goals for five separate categories under the plan,
usually within the first two months of the plan year. The
categories are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee
with input from our executive officers and adjusted, as needed,
in order to reflect our current structure and operations. For
fiscal 2007 and 2008, the categories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas Production Levels
(Production). The Production goal is
based on targeted performance levels for the fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization
and Exploration Expenses
(EBITDAX). EBITDAX is a non-GAAP
measure we use as an approximation of net income (loss). Our
definition of EBITDAX may differ from that of other companies
and excludes Exploration (Geological &
Geophysical) expenses, Exploration Dry Hole Costs
(DHC) and other non-cash charges normally considered
expenses by oil and gas companies utilizing successful efforts
method of accounting.
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
Replacement of Oil and Natural Gas Reserves Depleted by
Production (Reserve
Replacement). Reserve Replacement is a
measure of our ability to replace oil and gas reserves over and
above equivalent reserves depleted by oil and gas production
during the fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
Finding and Development Costs
(F&DC). F&DC measures the
cost to locate prospects, acquire production rights, drill and
complete wells and install or construct production equipment and
facilities per equivalent unit of proved reserves added ($/Mcfe)
during the fiscal year, inclusive of revisions of prior year
reserve estimates.
|
|
|
|
Return on Invested Capital
(ROIC). ROIC is a measure of earnings
before taxes (but excludes certain expenses, including
exploration costs and dry hole costs, non-cash equity-based
compensation expenses, gains/losses from mark to market
accounting on derivatives and gains/losses from asset
impairment), divided by average stockholders equity for
the year (consisting of the par value of our preferred stock and
common stock plus additional paid-in capital).
|
Each performance category was selected based on the Compensation
Committees belief that it most accurately measures our
corporate performance in relation to comparable oil and gas
companies within our peer group.
Each year, the Compensation Committee establishes the
minimum, target and maximum
performance levels for each of the five performance categories
and their appropriate weighting. For each executive officer, the
Compensation Committee determines the appropriate percentage
allocation to be assigned for each category. In most cases, when
determining an executive officers bonus, the Compensation
Committee gives equal weight to each category except when a
particular performance category bears a more direct relationship
to the executive officers areas of responsibility, in
which case a particular performance category may be more heavily
weighted. The weighting for each named executive officer for
fiscal 2007 for each of the five categories was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
Mr. Keel
|
|
|
Mr. Grady
|
|
|
Mr. Price
|
|
|
Mr. Mengle
|
|
|
Mr. Atkins
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
EBITDAX
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Reserve Replacement
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
F&DC
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
ROIC
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
For fiscal 2008, the Compensation Committee determined weights
to be assigned to each performance category, based on the
importance of each category to our overall success, and applied
to each executive officer equally. The weighting assigned to
each performance category applicable to Messrs. Mengle and
Atkins was modified for fiscal 2008 in order to better reflect
the overall contribution of these officers to the performance
goals of the Company for 2008. The weighting for each named
executive officer for fiscal 2008 for each of the five
categories is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
EBITDAX
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Reserve Replacement
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
F&DC
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
ROIC
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Should our financial and operating results meet or exceed either
the pre-determined minimum, target and
maximum values assigned a particular performance
category (with linear interpolations between each level), then
each executive officer is paid an annual bonus that is a
percentage of their annual salary. The Compensation Committee
retains the right to make what it
101
determines to be appropriate adjustments to actual results for
the year, to the extent it believes that adjustments are
warranted. For example, in determining the actual level of
EBITDAX and ROIC for a particular year, it may exclude the
effects of certain non-cash income/expense items such as the
mark to market benefit/charge to our results of operations as
required by GAAP and non-cash charges to our results of
operations related to non-cash equity-based compensation charges
for stock options or the variance in EBITDAX and ROIC caused by
the variance in realized oil and gas prices compared to those
incorporated into the performance goals (since prices are
largely not within managements control).
For fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee established the
target bonus percentage for each executive officer after taking
into account the importance of the position held by that officer
to us achieving our performance goals during the year as well as
published compensation surveys. The actual percentage of annual
salary that was paid as an annual cash incentive bonus for 2007
ranged from 20% to 100% of the annual salaries for
Messrs. Keel and Grady and from 20% to 70% of the annual
salaries for Messrs. Price, Mengle and Atkins. The maximum
values were originally determined at the time we entered into
the employment agreements with each executive officer.
For fiscal 2008, as part of our compensation review process, the
Compensation Committee in mid-2008 revised the target bonus
percentage for each executive officer after taking into account
Longnecker & Associates data and suggestions. As
a result of this revision, the actual percentage of annual
salary to be potentially paid as an annual cash incentive bonus
for 2008 ranged from 50% to 120% of the annual salaries for
Messrs. Keel and Grady and from 40% to 100% of the annual
salaries for Messrs. Price, Mengle and Atkins. This
adjustment was made so that our Performance-Based Cash Incentive
Compensation Plan would be more in line with performance-based
incentive plans offered to the executive officers of companies
we consider to be in our peer group in our industry.
The actual percentage of annual salary potentially paid to an
executive officer as a bonus is dependent upon the extent to
which we meet or exceed our pre-determined performance goals.
Payment of annual cash incentive bonuses to our executive
officers is not guaranteed and is based upon our actual
performance during the fiscal year, including meeting at least
the minimum performance targets we set. Bonuses are
typically paid out in cash during the first quarter of the year
following the fiscal year in which they are earned, at the
discretion of the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee established the minimum,
target and maximum performance levels
(with linear interpolations between each level) for fiscal 2008
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum level is equal to 80% of the
target level of performance goal and is the level at
which payout under the plan begins for the applicable
performance measure. If the actual performance level for a
measure is below the minimum level, no payout occurs with
respect to that measure.
|
|
|
|
The target level is that at which 100% of the
applicable performance goal is attained, and represents the
expected payout level.
|
|
|
|
The maximum level is that at which 120% of the
applicable target performance goal is attained.
|
After giving consideration to past Company performance and peer
performance, the Compensation Committee set these performance
levels so that the attainment of the targets is not assured and
requires significant effort by our executives. We believe that
the disclosure of performance targets would result in
competitive harm to us and are therefore omitted since we are
engaged in a highly competitive business, we may pursue
opportunities in areas without first publicly disclosing our
intention to do so and disclosure of these targets might enable
our competitors to determine our strategic areas of interest and
priorities throughout the year. We also believe that disclosure
of our performance targets would undermine our on-going efforts
to retain officers and other employees in a competitive
employment atmosphere. Our business is highly dependent on
attracting and keeping qualified, skilled employees. We believe
that public disclosure of the performance targets used to
102
determine the named executive incentive compensation would
materially increase the ability of competitors to track current
year bonus potential and tailor compensation packages designed
to persuade officers and other employees to leave the Company.
In addition, it would give our competitors an unfair
informational advantage with respect to competing for
prospective employees.
The Compensation Committee adjusted the minimum,
target and maximum performance levels
from 40%, 100% and 115% for 2007, respectively, to the current
levels for 2008 because the prior performance levels were not
reflective of competitive incentive compensation levels offered
by the Companys industry peer group companies.
For fiscal 2008, as part of our compensation review process, our
Board, upon the recommendation of our Compensation Committee
revised the minimum, target and
maximum performance levels (with linear
interpolations between each level) as that at which 80%, 100%
and 120% of the expected applicable target
performance goal for each measure will occur, respectively.
In 2008, in recognition of the Companys low stock price,
the Companys strategy of conserving cash to pay down debt
during this low commodity price environment and the negative
reserve revisions at the end of 2008, the Companys
executives voluntarily waived the performance-based cash
incentive compensation to which they were entitled under the
plan for the 2008 fiscal year.
If the Companys executives had not voluntarily waived the
performance-based cash incentive compensation to which they were
entitled under the plan for the 2008 fiscal year, each
executives compensation would have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Performance-Based
|
|
Name
|
|
2008 Base Salary
|
|
|
Cash Incentive Compensation
|
|
|
Allan D. Keel
|
|
$
|
370,000
|
|
|
$
|
117,237
|
|
E. Joseph Grady
|
|
$
|
340,000
|
|
|
$
|
107,732
|
|
Tracy Price
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
51,825
|
|
Jay S. Mengle
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
|
$
|
55,935
|
|
Tommy H. Atkins
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
51,730
|
|
As a result of anticipated low commodity prices for 2009 and the
corresponding negative impact on revenues, a reduced capital
expenditure budget, and the resulting impact on the ability to
formulate meaningful performance goals for the plan for 2009,
upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board
has suspended the performance-based cash incentive compensation
plan for the executive officers and all other Company employees
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.
Discretionary
Cash Incentive Compensation
As one way of accomplishing our executive compensation program
objectives, the Compensation Committee has the ability to award
discretionary cash bonuses to our executive officers for their
contribution to our financial and operational success. These
amounts are in addition to amounts awarded under our annual
performance-based cash incentive compensation plan, and are
typically awarded in cases where awards under our performance
incentive plans are not commensurate with the performance and
contribution of any individual executive.
In March 2008, Mr. Atkins was awarded a discretionary cash
bonus of $40,000 in recognition of his success in developing an
internal prospect generation capability, including a technical
team, which was an individual effort that the Compensation
Committee believed was not adequately rewarded under the annual
cash incentive compensation plan described above. No other
discretionary cash bonuses were awarded to any executive officer
in, or for, year 2008 performance.
103
Long-Term
Equity-Based Incentive Compensation
We grant equity awards to give our executive officers a
longer-term stake in the Company, act as a long-term retention
tool and align employee and stockholder interests by increasing
compensation as stockholder value increases. In addition, the
Compensation Committee occasionally grants equity awards in
recognition of outstanding service to the Company. To achieve
these objectives, the Compensation Committee has generally
relied on the issuance of restricted stock and stock options.
General
We believe that stock options reduce stockholder dilution,
conserve shares available under our stock plans, align
employees compensation goals with the creation of
stockholder value and encourage our executive officers to take
necessary and appropriate steps to increase our stock price. We
believe that restricted stock encourages our executive officers
to adopt a view towards long-term value while providing a
retention incentive even in the event of a decline in the stock
price. The Board believes that stock options and restricted
stock awards are an effective incentive for executive officers,
managers and other key employees to create value for us and our
stockholders since the value of restricted stock and options
bear a direct relationship to appreciation in our stock price.
In addition, by using stock-based compensation, we can focus
much needed cash flow, which would otherwise be paid out as
compensation, back into the daily operations of our business.
No stock options were granted to our executive officers in
fiscal 2006, 2007 or 2008. We chose to provide equity
compensation in the form of restricted stock rather than stock
options because restricted stock awards incentivize our
executive officers to build long-term value for our stockholders
and provide a greater retention incentive in the current
economic environment and at this stage of the Companys
development.
For fiscal 2008, as part of our compensation review process, we
made several changes to our long-term equity-based incentive
compensation. We made these changes to improve the retention
incentives for our executive officers and to provide better
incentives for the creation of long-term value for our
stockholders.
In September 2008, we provided our five named executive officers
and six other employees holding outstanding stock options with
an exercise price of $17.00 per share (which were initially
granted to our executives in connection with the
recapitalization of the Company in 2005 and to the other
employees as part of their initial compensation package) the
option to exchange their substantially vested stock options for
shares of unvested restricted stock at the rate of two stock
options for one share of restricted stock. The ratio of options
to shares of restricted stock was based on an estimated
valuation of the exchanged options, which were substantially
vested but out-of-the money, as compared to an estimated value
for a number of equivalent unvested shares of restricted common
stock, taking into account market prices and the proposed
vesting schedule, among other factors. All of our executive
officers agreed to exchange their $17.00 options for shares of
restricted stock. The restricted stock granted pursuant to the
exchange offer will vest as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
50% of the restricted shares received by each holder will vest
over four years at a rate of 25% each year, or 100% upon a
change of control or 100% upon the death or disability of an
executive officer; and
|
|
|
|
50% of the restricted shares received by each holder will vest
upon the earlier of the fifth anniversary of the grant date or a
change of control or upon the death or disability of an
executive officer.
|
LTIP
In addition, our Compensation Committee and Board also approved
in 2008 a performance-based long-term equity incentive plan (the
LTIP) designed to reward employees with equity based
compensation on the basis of the Company attaining
pre-determined performance measures, similar to
104
our performance-based cash incentive compensation plan. All
grants made under the LTIP are performance based, are calculated
as a percentage of base salary earned during the plan year and
are to be made in the form of restricted stock and stock option
grants under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. All restricted stock
awards and stock options granted pursuant to this plan will vest
over four years at a rate of 25% each year.
In 2008 we amended our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the
maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be
issued upon exercise of all awards under the 2005 Stock
Incentive Plan by one million shares, and among other things, to
accommodate LTIP awards, to make certain adjustments for the
Companys reincorporation from Texas to Delaware, to make
other changes to conform the 2005 Stock Incentive Plans
provisions to the final regulations under Section 409A of
the Code and for certain other conforming and clarifying changes.
The pre-determined performance measures will be the same as the
measures under the performance-based cash incentive compensation
plan and consistent with our existing criteria for performance
awards under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan: (i) Production;
(ii) EBITDAX; (iii) Reserve Replacement;
(iv) F&DC; and (v) ROIC.
The Compensation Committee has established the
minimum, target and maximum
performance levels for each of these five performance categories
and their appropriate weighting. The weighting assigned to each
performance category is based on the importance of each category
to our overall success, and are to be applied to each executive
officer equally. The weighting for fiscal 2008 for each of the
five categories was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
EBITDAX
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Reserve Replacement
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
F&DC
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
ROIC
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Should our financial and operating results meet or exceed either
the pre-determined minimum, target and
maximum values assigned a particular performance
category with linear interpolations between each level, then
each executive officer is granted a dollar value of restricted
stock awards and stock options based on a percentage of his or
her annual salary.
The Compensation Committee established the minimum,
target and maximum performance levels
for fiscal 2008 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum level is equal to 80% of the target
level and is the level at which payout under the plan begins for
the applicable performance measure. If the actual performance
level for a measure is below the minimum level, no payout occurs
with respect to that measure.
|
|
|
|
The target level is that at which 100% of the
expected payout for the applicable performance measure will
occur.
|
|
|
|
The maximum level is that at which 150% of the
expected payout for the applicable performance measure will
occur.
|
After giving consideration to past company performance and peer
performance, we have set these performance levels so that the
attainment of the targets is not assured and requires
significant effort by our executives.
The actual percentage of annual salary paid to an executive
officer as a bonus is dependent upon the extent to which we meet
or exceed our pre-determined performance goals. Payment of
annual equity incentive bonuses to our executive officers is not
guaranteed and will be based upon our actual performance during
the fiscal year, including meeting at least the
minimum performance
105
targets. The Compensation Committee does not have the discretion
to modify the minimum, target and maximum levels for a fiscal
year.
All grants will consist of 50% restricted stock awards and 50%
stock option awards. The restricted stock awards will be based
on our stock price at the time of the grant, and the dollar
value of the stock options will be calculated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
For fiscal 2008, the Compensation Committee established the
target bonus percentage for each executive officer after taking
into account the position held by that officer and the
importance of that officer to achieving our performance goals
during the year, as well as published compensation surveys. The
actual percentage of annual salary to be paid as the annual
equity incentive bonus in 2008 ranged from 75% to 450% of the
annual salary of Mr. Keel, 75% to 350% of the annual salary
of Mr. Grady and from 50% to 300% of the annual salaries
for Messrs. Price, Mengle and Atkins.
Mr. Keels annual equity incentive bonus potential is
higher than that of other currently employed executives
primarily because of the compensation levels of comparable
executives of peer group companies against whom his compensation
is targeted and his greater influence over and responsibility
for the entire Company. In addition, Mr. Keels
compensation reflects his leadership in developing strategic
alternatives for the Company to enhance stockholder value.
Mr. Gradys annual equity incentive bonus potential is
higher than that of other named executive officers, except for
that of Mr. Keel, primarily because of his seniority,
experience and stature in the industry, his reporting
relationship to the Chief Executive Officer, the compensation
levels of comparable executives of peer group companies against
whom his compensation is targeted and his greater influence over
and responsibility for the entire Company.
Mr. Prices, Mr. Mengles and
Mr. Atkins annual equity incentive bonus potential
levels reflect their roles and responsibilities as officers of
the Company and their individual contributions to the Company
and the officer team.
For fiscal 2008, equity grants under the plan were approved
during the first quarter of 2009, at the recommendation of the
Compensation Committee and approval of the Board. See
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Tables
and Grants of Plan-Based Awards TableStock Awards.
For fiscal 2009, equity grants under the plan were suspended at
the recommendation of the Compensation Committee as a result of
anticipated low commodity prices for 2009 and the corresponding
negative impact on revenues and a reduced capital expenditure
budget.
Overriding
Royalty Interest Plan Compensation
We provide compensation to our executive officers through our
Overriding Royalty Interest Plan (the ORRI Plan),
which is designed to reward the efforts of employees who are
successful in exploring for oil and natural gas on our behalf.
The program is available only to those employees that are
directly involved in oil and natural gas exploration efforts,
including Mr. Atkins, our Senior Vice
PresidentExploration, who is the only named executive
officer entitled to benefits under this plan. In order to be
able to participate in the plan, a potential candidate must be
recommended for participation by our president and approved by
the Compensation Committee. Under the ORRI Plan, the
participants share a portion of the gross revenue interest
attributable to the original working interest held by us in
certain of the oil and natural gas producing properties
generated by the exploration program. In 2008, the Board
approved several amendments to the ORRI Plan which included the
following: (i) leasehold acreage in which the Company held
less than a 73% net revenue interest would not be included in
the program and no overriding royalty interest revenue
distributions would be made from such properties;
(ii) leasehold acreage acquired for the pursuit of
unconventional, resource type plays would be considered an
acquisition of probable reserves rather than an
Exploratory Prospect under the ORRI Plan and
therefore, except as provided for in (iii), not subject to the
overriding royalty interest distribution provided for in the
ORRI Plan, and (iii) the Company could award up to a 1%
overriding royalty interest in an unconventional resource play
to the Senior Vice
106
PresidentExploration and any other participants it deems
appropriate up to a maximum of 0.0125% per participant.
During fiscal 2008, the amount of $43,045 was paid to
Mr. Atkins pursuant to the ORRI Plan.
Severance
Benefits
Each of the employment agreements to which most of our executive
officers are subject provide for severance and change of control
payments upon a termination or change of control. Payments that
are payable upon a termination or change of control are included
in the respective employment agreement between the executive
officer and the Company. The Company believes that the executive
officers should be provided an incentive to consummate a change
of control that would generate attractive returns for our
stockholders. Without such an incentive, the executive officers
may not diligently pursue such opportunities. In addition,
severance provisions were included as a means of attracting and
retaining executives and to provide replacement income if their
employment is terminated because of a termination, except in
certain circumstances. Each employment agreement contains
similar but not identical provisions regarding payments upon
termination or change of control and relevant provisions of
those agreements are provided in the section titled
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of
Control.
Other
Benefits
In addition to base salaries, incentive compensation, equity
awards, overriding royalty interest plan compensation and
severance benefits, we provide other forms of compensation that
are periodically reviewed by the Compensation Committee. Except
as otherwise indicated, these benefits are available to all
employees, including our named executive officers, and are
offered for the purpose of providing competitive compensation
and benefits to attract new employees and secure the continued
employment of current employees.
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) Plan. We have a defined contribution
401(k) Plan that is designed to assist our executive officers
and employees in providing for their retirement. Effective
June 1, 2008, upon the recommendation of the Compensation
Committee, the Board approved an amendment to the Companys
401(k) Plan to provide for 100% matching of each
participants deferral contributions up to 6% of the
participants compensation. In order to maintain the
safe-harbor non-discrimination provisions of the
401(k) Plan, in lieu of 100% matching during the second half of
2008 the Company made a one-time discretionary contribution to
the 401(k) Plan for each participant during December 2008.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company began matching 100%
of each participants deferral contributions up to 6% of
the participants compensation.
|
|
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefits. As with all of
our employees generally, our executive officers are eligible to
participate in medical, dental, vision, life insurance and
accidental death and disability to meet their health and welfare
needs. These benefits are provided so as to assure that we are
able to maintain a competitive position in terms of attracting
and retaining officers and other employees. This is a fixed
component of compensation and the benefits are provided on a
non-discriminatory basis to all of our employees.
|
|
|
|
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits. We
believe that the total mix of compensation and benefits provided
to our executive officers is competitive and perquisites should
generally not play a large role in our executive officers
total compensation. As a result, the perquisites and other
personal benefits we provide to our executive officers are
limited and typically do not exceed $10,000 per person in any
fiscal year.
|
107
Other
Matters
Tax and
Accounting Treatment of Executive Compensation
Decisions
We consider the anticipated tax treatment of our executive
compensation program when setting levels and types of
compensation. Section 162(m) of the Code generally
disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation
in excess of $1.0 million per person paid in any year to a
companys chief executive officer or any of its three other
most highly compensated executive officers (other than the chief
financial officer and the chief executive officer), with certain
performance-based compensation being specifically
exempt from this deduction limit. During fiscal 2007 and 2008,
none of our employees subject to this limit received
Section 162(m) compensation in excess of $1.0 million.
Consequently, the requirements of Section 162(m) did not
affect the tax deductions available to us in connection with our
senior executive compensation program for fiscal 2007 and 2008.
We account for stock-based awards based on their grant date fair
value, as determined under GAAP. In connection with its approval
of stock-based awards, the Compensation Committee is cognizant
of and sensitive to the impact of such awards on stockholder
dilution. The Compensation Committee also endeavors to avoid
stock-based awards made subject to a market condition, which may
result in an expense that must be marked to market on a
quarterly basis. The accounting treatment for stock-based awards
does not otherwise impact the Compensation Committees
compensation decisions.
Stock Ownership
Guidelines and Hedging Prohibition
We do not currently have ownership requirements or a stock
retention policy for our named executive officers. We do not
have a policy that restricts our executive officers from
limiting their economic exposure to our stock. We will continue
to periodically review best practices and re-evaluate our
position with respect to stock ownership guidelines and hedging
prohibitions.
Summary
Compensation
The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation
awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers
for services rendered in all capacities during the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008.
Summary
Compensation Table for the Fiscal Years ended December 31,
2006, 2007 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus(1)
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Awards(3)
|
|
Compensation(4)
|
|
Compensation(5)
|
|
Total
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Allan D. Keel
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,553
|
|
|
|
2,471,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,376
|
|
|
|
3,007,089
|
|
Chief Executive
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
73,282
|
|
|
|
2,153,250
|
|
|
|
105,600
|
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
|
|
2,681,732
|
|
Officer and President
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
2,009,700
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
2,349,100
|
|
E. Joseph Grady
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,435
|
|
|
|
823,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,500
|
|
|
|
1,291,655
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
70,367
|
|
|
|
717,750
|
|
|
|
96,800
|
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
1,213,717
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,919
|
|
|
|
669,900
|
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
|
29,641
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,008,460
|
|
Tracy Price
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,435
|
|
|
|
590,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,708
|
|
|
|
912,248
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
54,469
|
|
|
|
580,498
|
|
|
|
70,300
|
|
|
|
7,400
|
|
|
|
947,667
|
|
Land/Business Development
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
11,600
|
|
|
|
11,562
|
|
|
|
522,448
|
|
|
|
44,400
|
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
776,860
|
|
Jay S. Mengle
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,435
|
|
|
|
295,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,483
|
|
|
|
627,970
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
54,031
|
|
|
|
290,249
|
|
|
|
64,800
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
697,080
|
|
Engineering
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
261,224
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
528,274
|
|
Tommy H. Atkins
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,636
|
|
|
|
251,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,129
|
(7)
|
|
|
603,887
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
54,031
|
|
|
|
247,249
|
|
|
|
43,200
|
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
571,680
|
|
Exploration
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
222,524
|
|
|
|
75,600
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
491,174
|
|
108
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For a description of the amounts included in this column, see
Compensation Discussion and AnalysisElements
of Our Executive Compensation ProgramDiscretionary Cash
Incentive Compensation. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the dollar amount of compensation expense we recognized
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
in accordance with GAAP. Pursuant to SEC rules and regulations,
the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures
related to service-based vesting conditions. These amounts
reflect our accounting expense for these awards, and do not
correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by our
executive officers. Assumptions used in the calculation of these
amounts are included in Note 6 to our audited financial
statements included in our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, as applicable. The awards for which compensation expense
was recognized consist of awards granted on August 1, 2007
and March 1, 2006. See Narrative Disclosure to
Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards
Table below for a description of the material features of
these awards. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes the dollar amount of compensation expense we recognized
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
in accordance with GAAP. Pursuant to SEC rules and regulations,
the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures
related to service-based vesting conditions. These amounts
reflect our accounting expense for these awards, and do not
correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by our
executive officers. Assumptions used in the calculation of these
amounts are included in Note 13 to our audited financial
statements included in our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, as applicable. The awards for which compensation expense
was recognized consist of awards granted on February 28,
2005 for Messrs. Keel and Grady and April 1, 2005 for
Messrs. Price, Mengle and Atkins. See Narrative
Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table below for a description of the
material features of these awards. No options were granted to
our executive officers in fiscal 2008, 2007 or fiscal 2006. |
|
(4) |
|
For a description of the amounts included in this column, see
Compensation Discussion and AnalysisElements
of Our Executive Compensation ProgramPerformance-Based
Cash Incentive Compensation. |
|
(5) |
|
Except as otherwise noted, these amounts represent 401(k) plan
matching contributions during fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006. |
|
(6) |
|
Pursuant to his employment contract, Mr. Grady was
reimbursed a total of $27,441 for commuting costs incurred by
him prior to his relocation to Houston, Texas in late 2006.
Reimbursements were for temporary housing and air fare. In
addition, we contributed $2,200 to Mr. Gradys 401(k)
plan during fiscal 2006. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Atkins was paid $43,045 pursuant to the Companys
ORRI Plan during 2008. For a description of the amounts included
in this column, see Compensation Discussion and
AnalysisElements of Our Executive Compensation
ProgramOverriding Royalty Interest Plan
Compensation. Mr. Atkins also received a contribution
from us of $9,084 to his 401(k) plan for the fiscal year. |
109
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2008
The following table provides information concerning each grant
of an award made to our named executive officers under any plan,
including awards, if any, that have been transferred during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
and Option
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Approval
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Stock or
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Units
(#)(3)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Allan D. Keel
|
|
|
9/8/08
|
|
|
|
8/15/08
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
314,500
|
|
|
|
444,000
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
2,470,500
|
|
E. Joseph Grady
|
|
|
9/8/08
|
|
|
|
8/15/08
|
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
|
|
289,000
|
|
|
|
408,000
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
823,500
|
|
Tracy Price
|
|
|
9/8/08
|
|
|
|
8/15/08
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
823,500
|
|
Jay S. Mengle
|
|
|
9/8/08
|
|
|
|
8/15/08
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
154,000
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
411,750
|
|
Thomas H. Atkins
|
|
|
9/8/08
|
|
|
|
8/15/08
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
38,350
|
|
|
|
350,903
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, the amounts
included in the threshold, target and
maximum columns represent, assuming the attainment
of the appropriate targeted performance goals, 50%, 85% and
120%, respectively, of the annual base salaries for
Messrs. Keel and Grady and 40%, 70% and 100%, respectively,
of the annual base salaries for Messrs. Price, Mengle and
Atkins. |
|
(2) |
|
Under our performance-based cash incentive compensation plan,
this category is referred to as the minimum payout
level. |
|
(3) |
|
The executive officers elected to exchange substantially vested
stock options with an exercise price of $17.00 per share for
unvested restricted stock at the rate of two stock options for
one share of restricted stock. |
Narrative
Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table
The following is a discussion of material factors necessary to
an understanding of the information disclosed in the Summary
Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.
Employment
Agreements
The Company has entered into amended and restated employment
agreements with its executive officers during 2008. The
compensation provisions of the employment agreements were
designed with input from Longnecker & Associates and
ECI and contain a compensation package designed to motivate and
retain the executive officers.
Between December 29 and 31, 2008, the Company entered into
amended and restated employment agreements with each of its
named executive officers.
The agreements were entered into to, among other things, modify
provisions relating to the federal income tax treatment of
certain arrangements in order to meet the December 31, 2008
deadline for compliance with Section 409A of the Code,
reflect market-based changes in compensation approved in
mid-2008 by the Compensation Committee and the Board and
provide for new terms of the agreements, since the initial terms
of the existing employment agreements expired. In addition, the
amended and restated employment agreements were entered into to
provide an incentive for consistent, longer-term performance and
achievement of strategic objectives to compensate our named
executives for the value of their contributions, provide total
compensation that is flexible enough to respond to changing
market conditions and that aligns compensation with performance
and provides total compensation that will motivate and retain
our executive officers, support an internal culture of Company
loyalty and dedication to the Companys interests.
110
The agreements entered into with Messrs. Keel and Grady
each provide for a term of three years and the agreements
entered into with Messrs. Mengle, Atkins and Price each
provide for a term of two years. Each agreement provides for
automatic yearly extensions of the term, after the initial term,
unless the Company or the officer elects not to extend the
agreement.
Each agreement provides for a base salary (which is subject to
increase at the discretion of the Companys Board or a
committee thereof) and participation in the Companys
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Plan and LTIP. The initial base
salaries of each executive are as follows: Mr. Keel,
$370,000; Mr. Grady, $340,000; Mr. Mengle, $220,000;
Mr. Atkins, $200,000; and Mr. Price, $200,000.
Under the Companys Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Plan, the
executives are eligible to receive cash bonuses contingent upon
attainment of annual personal and corporate goals established by
the Board of the Company or a committee thereof. The agreements
entered into with Messrs. Keel and Grady provide that each
executive is eligible to receive a bonus based upon
minimum, target and maximum
award levels of no less than 50%, 85% and 120%, respectively, of
such executives base salary, and the agreements entered
into with Messrs. Mengle, Atkins and Price provide that
each executive is eligible to receive a bonus based upon
minimum, target and maximum
award levels of no less than 40%, 70% and 100%, respectively, of
such executives base salary. No cash awards are paid under
this plan if the criteria for at least the minimum
award level are not met.
Under the Companys LTIP, the executives are eligible to
receive stock options and restricted stock awards contingent
upon attainment of annual personal and corporate goals
established by the Board of the Company or a committee thereof.
The agreement entered into with Mr. Keel provides that he
is eligible to receive an equity award based upon
minimum, target and maximum
award levels of no less than 75%, 225% and 450%, respectively,
of his base salary; the agreement entered into with
Mr. Grady provides that he is eligible to receive an equity
award based upon minimum, target and
maximum award levels of no less than 75%, 175% and
350%, respectively, of his base salary; and the agreements
entered into with Messrs. Mengle, Atkins and Price provide
that each executive is eligible to receive an equity award based
upon minimum, target and
maximum award levels of no less than 50%, 150% and
300%, respectively, of such executives base salary. The
equity awards to each executive for a year shall consist of 50%
restricted stock awards and 50% stock options, each subject to
vesting over four years. No equity awards are granted under this
plan if the criteria for at least the minimum award
level are not met.
The employment agreements also contain provisions for payment of
severance benefits upon termination of employment. A discussion
of applicable severance benefits is provided below under
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of
Control.
Stock
Awards
In August 2007, Messrs. Keel, Grady, Price, Mengle and
Atkins were each awarded 50,000 shares of restricted common
stock that vest over a four year period in annual increments
commencing August 1, 2008, according to the following
schedule: 33% (year 1), 23% (year 2), 22% (year 3) and 22%
(year 4). These awards were made in partial compensation for
their efforts in consummating the EXCO acquisition and in
recognition of the need to adjust executive officer compensation
in order to be competitive with salaries being paid to
similarly-situated oil and gas executives. The closing price of
our common stock on the date of grant was $7.35 per share.
All of our named executive officers elected in September 2008 to
exchange their substantially vested options exercisable at
$17.00 per share for half as many shares of unvested restricted
stock. See Executive CompensationCompensation
Discussion and AnalysisElements of Our Executive
Compensation ProgramLong-Term Equity Based Incentive
Compensation.
On March 4, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved the
bonus award of restricted Company common stock to
Messrs. Keel, Grady, Mengle, Price and Atkins and other
participating Company employees pursuant to the Companys
LTIP for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
111
Mr. Keel received approval for 123,459 shares,
Mr. Grady received approval for 89,799 shares,
Mr. Mengle received approval for 47,827 shares,
Mr. Price received approval for 44,312 shares and
Mr. Atkins received approval for 44,321 shares. As all
executive officers elected not to accept a cash award pursuant
to the Companys Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Plan for the
2008 fiscal year, the Board, upon the recommendation of the
Compensation Committee, elected to award bonuses earned for 2008
under the LTIP in the form of unvested restricted shares of
common stock only, rather than 50% in unvested restricted stock
and 50% in unvested stock options. These stock awards will vest
25% per year, over the first through fourth anniversaries from
the date of grant, at which time 100% of the stock awards will
be vested. As the executives voluntarily agreed to give up
additional cash compensation, the Compensation Committee
believed it appropriate that the executives receive such equity
grants in lieu of cash, which the Compensation Committee
believed would also act as a long-term retention tool and better
align employee and stockholder interests.
Option
Awards
On February 28, 2005, we entered into stock option
agreements with Messrs. Keel and Grady in conjunction with
their commencement of employment with us. Mr. Keel received
options to purchase 270,000 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $9.70 per share, options to purchase
405,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$12.50 per share and options to purchase 540,000 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $17.00 per share.
Mr. Grady received options to purchase 90,000 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $9.70 per share,
options to purchase 135,000 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $12.50 per share and options to purchase
180,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$17.00 per share.
On April 1, 2005, we entered into stock option agreements
with Messrs. Price, Mengle and Atkins in conjunction with
their commencement of employment with us. Mr. Price
received options to purchase 90,000 shares of our common
stock at an exercise price of $11.60 per share and options to
purchase 180,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise
price of $17.00 per share. Mr. Mengle received options to
purchase 45,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise
price of $11.60 per share and options to purchase
90,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$17.00 per share. Mr. Atkins received options to purchase
38,300 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$11.60 per share and options to purchase 76,700 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $17.00 per share.
The options vest with respect to 15% of the shares on the first
anniversary of the grant date and thereafter at the end of each
full succeeding year from the grant date according to the
following schedule: 25% on the second anniversary, 25% on the
third anniversary and 35% on the fourth anniversary of the grant
date.
All of our named executive officers elected in September 2008 to
exchange their substantially vested options exercisable at
$17.00 per share for half as many shares of unvested restricted
stock. See Compensation Discussion and
AnalysisElements of Our Executive Compensation
ProgramLong-Term Equity Based Incentive Compensation.
112
Salary and Cash
Incentive Awards in Proportion to Total Compensation
The following table sets forth the percentage of each named
executive officers total compensation that we paid in the
form of base salary and annual cash incentive awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Total Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in Base Salary and
|
|
Name
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Awards
|
|
|
Allan D. Keel
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
12.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
16.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
13.28
|
%
|
E. Joseph Grady
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
26.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
34.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
28.36
|
%
|
Tracy Price
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
21.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
32.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
29.53
|
%
|
Jay S. Mengle
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
35.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
49.46
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
44.30
|
%
|
Tommy H. Atkins
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
33.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
46.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
52.04
|
%
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards Value at 2008 Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information concerning unexercised
options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan
awards for our named executive officers as of December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31,
2008(6)
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
or Units of Stock
|
|
|
Shares or Units of
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options
|
|
|
Unexercised Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
That Have Not
|
|
|
Stock That Have
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
Exercisable(1)
|
|
|
(#)
Unexercisable(2)
|
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
|
Not Vested
($)(5)
|
|
|
Allan D. Keel
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
94,500
|
|
|
|
9.70
|
|
|
|
2/28/2015
|
|
|
|
33,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
103,850
|
|
|
|
|
263,250
|
|
|
|
141,750
|
|
|
|
12.50
|
|
|
|
2/28/2015
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
837,000
|
|
E. Joseph Grady
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
|
|
31,500
|
|
|
|
9.70
|
|
|
|
2/28/2015
|
|
|
|
33,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
103,850
|
|
|
|
|
87,750
|
|
|
|
47,250
|
|
|
|
12.50
|
|
|
|
2/28/2015
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
279,000
|
|
Tracy Price
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
|
|
31,500
|
|
|
|
11.60
|
|
|
|
4/1/2015
|
|
|
|
33,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
103,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
279,000
|
|
Jay S. Mengle
|
|
|
29,250
|
|
|
|
15,750
|
|
|
|
11.60
|
|
|
|
4/1/2015
|
|
|
|
33,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
103,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
139,500
|
|
Thomas H. Atkins
|
|
|
24,895
|
|
|
|
13,405
|
|
|
|
11.60
|
|
|
|
4/1/2015
|
|
|
|
33,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
103,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,350
|
(4)
|
|
|
118,885
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The exercisable but unexercised options vested on the first,
second, and third anniversary dates of the date of grant. For
Messrs. Keel and Grady the vesting dates were
February 28th of 2006, 2007, and 2008 and April 1st of
2006, 2007, and 2008 for Messrs. Price, Mengle and Atkins. |
|
(2) |
|
The underlying securities of unexercised and unexercisable
options vest on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant. For
Messrs. Keel and Grady the initial date of grant was
February 28, 2005 with a corresponding 100% vesting date on
February 28, 2009 and for Messrs. Price, Mengle and
Atkins the initial date of grant was April 1, 2005 with a
corresponding 100% vesting date of April 1, 2009. All of
our named executive officers elected in September 2008 to
exchange all unexercised options which had an exercise price of
$17.00 per share for half as many shares of restricted stock.
See Compensation Discussion and
AnalysisLong-Term Equity Based Incentive
Compensation. |
113
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The restricted stock awards reflected in this row vest over a
four year period in annual increments commencing August 1,
2008, according to the following schedule: 33% (year 1), 23%
(year 2), 22% (year 3) and 22% (year 4). |
|
(4) |
|
The restricted stock awards reflected in this row vest over a
five year period in annual increments commencing
September 8, 2009, according to the following schedule:
12.5% (year 1), 12.5% (year 2), 12.5% (year 3), 12.5% (year
4) and 50.0% (year 5). |
|
(5) |
|
The market value of the unvested restricted stock was determined
using the closing price of our common stock on December 31,
2008 of $3.10 per share. |
|
(6) |
|
Upon a change in control, all unvested equity awards held by the
named executive officers will become vested and, in the case of
options, exercisable. See Potential Payments upon
Termination or Change of ControlSeverance Payments. |
Option Exercises
and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2008
The following table provides information concerning each vesting
of stock, including restricted stock, restricted stock units and
similar instruments, during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 on an aggregated basis with respect to
each of our named executive officers. During this time, no named
executive officers exercised any stock option awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
|
|
During the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
Name
|
|
Acquired on Vesting (#)
|
|
|
on Vesting ($)
|
|
|
Allan D. Keel
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
200,475
|
(1)
|
E. Joseph Grady
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
200,475
|
(1)
|
Tracy Price
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
200,475
|
(1)
|
Jay S. Mengle
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
200,475
|
(1)
|
Thomas H. Atkins
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
200,475
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The restricted stock was issued in fiscal 2007 and vested on
August 1, 2008. The value was determined using the closing
price of our common stock of $12.15/share on the vesting date.
Based on the $12.15 share price, 4,125 shares were
withheld from each named executive officer in satisfaction of
federal tax withholding obligations. |
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change of Control
Payments that would have been payable to executive officers
having employment agreements with us upon a termination or
change of control are included in the respective employment
agreement between the executive officer and the Company. Each
employment agreement contains similar but not identical
provisions regarding payments upon termination or change of
control and relevant provisions of those agreements are
described above under the Summary Compensation Table, as well as
below.
Each of the employment agreements provides for severance and
change of control payments in the event we terminate an
officers employment without Cause or if the
officer terminates for Good Reason or due to his
death or disability. The employment agreements also provide for
acceleration of vesting of equity awards if we terminate an
officer without Cause or if an officer terminates
for Good Reason, if such awards are not subject to
performance-based vesting, or upon death or disability.
Cause generally means (A) continued
failure by the executive officer to perform substantially the
executives duties and responsibilities (other than a
failure resulting from permanent disability) that is materially
injurious to the Company and that remains uncorrected for
10 days after receipt of appropriate written notice from
the Board; (B) reliable evidence of engagement in willful,
reckless or grossly negligent misconduct that is materially
injurious to the Company or any of its affiliates,
114
monetarily or otherwise; (C) except as provided by (D), the
indictment of the executive with a crime involving moral
turpitude or a felony, provided that if the criminal charge is
dismissed with prejudice or if executive is acquitted at trial
or on appeal, the executive will be deemed to have been
terminated without Cause; (D) the indictment of the
executive with an act of criminal fraud, misappropriation or
personal dishonesty, provided that if the criminal charge is
subsequently dismissed with prejudice or the executive is
acquitted at trial or on appeal then the executive will be
deemed to have been terminated without Cause; or (E) a
material breach by the executive of any provisions of the
employment agreement that is materially injurious to the Company
and that remains uncorrected for 10 days following written
notice of such breach by the Company to the executive
identifying the provision of the employment agreement that the
Company determined has been breached.
Good Reason generally means one or more of
the following conditions arising not more than six months before
the executives termination date without the
executives consent: (A) a material breach by the
Company of any provision of the employment agreement;
(B) assignment by the Board or a duly authorized committee
thereof to the executive of any duties that materially and
adversely alter the nature or status of the executives
position, job descriptions, duties, title or responsibilities
from those of such executive officers prior position, or
eligibility for Company compensation plans; (C) requirement
by the Company for the executive officer to relocate anywhere
other than the greater Houston, Texas metropolitan area, except
for required travel on Company business to an extent
substantially consistent with his obligations under their
employment agreement; (D) a material reduction in the
executive officers base salary in effect at the relevant
time; or (E) exclusion of the executive officer from
eligibility for the Companys active bonus or benefits plan
as described above. Notwithstanding anything in the
executives employment agreement to the contrary, Good
Reason will exist only if the executive provides notice to the
Company of the existence of the condition otherwise constituting
Good Reason within 90 days of the initial existence of the
condition, and the Company fails to remedy the condition on or
before the 30th day following its receipt of such notice.
Change of Control means the occurrence of any
one or more of the following events:
(i) The Company is not the surviving entity in any merger,
consolidation or other reorganization (or survives only as a
subsidiary of any entity other than a previously wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company), or in the case of a reverse merger
in which Company management and the executive officer do not
assume control of the surviving entity;
(ii) The Company sells or exchanges in a single transaction
or in a series of related transactions occurring in the
12-month
period ending on the date of the most recent sale or exchange,
assets having a gross fair market value equal to 40% or more of
the total gross fair market value (determined without regard to
any liabilities associated with such assets) of all of the
Companys assets immediately before such transfer or
transfers, to any other person or entity (other than to
(A) an entity controlled by the Company immediately after
the transfer, (B) a shareholder of the Company (immediately
before the transfer) in exchange for or with respect to its
stock, (C) a person or entity that directly or indirectly
owns 50% or more of the total value or voting power of all
outstanding stock of the Company immediately after the transfer,
(D) an entity, 50% or more of the total value or voting
power of which is directly or indirectly owned by the Company
immediately after the transfer);
(iii) Any person or entity, including a group
as contemplated by Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act
other than Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. or its affiliates,
or any other person, entity or group that is considered to own
more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Companys
voting stock (based upon voting power), acquires or gains
ownership or control (including, without limitation, power to
vote) of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the
Companys voting stock (based upon voting power); or
(iv) As a result of or in connection with a contested
election of directors, a majority of members of the Board is
replaced by directors whose election is not endorsed by a
majority of members of the Board before the date of the election.
115
Severance
Payments
Assuming termination or a change of control of the Company on
December 31, 2008, each named executive officer would have
been entitled to the payments provided below. These numbers
could not be determined with any certainty unless or until the
applicable scenario below actually occurred, thus the amounts
are solely estimates and the actual payout to each executive
officer in the event of one of these scenarios below is subject
to change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination By
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination By
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Without
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Employee For
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Upon Change of
|
|
|
Permanent
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Name
|
|
Good Reason
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Good
Reason(4,5,7)
|
|
|
Without
Cause(4,5,7)
|
|
|
Control(4,5,7)
|
|
|
Disability(6)
|
|
|
Control(8)
|
|
|
Allan D. Keel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
Payments(1,3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,422,044
|
|
|
$
|
1,422,044
|
|
|
$
|
1,422,044
|
|
|
$
|
1,110,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Health Insurance
Continuation(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,256
|
|
|
|
76,256
|
|
|
|
76,256
|
|
|
|
76,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested & Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,500
|
|
|
|
303,500
|
|
|
|
303,500
|
|
|
|
303,500
|
|
|
|
303,500
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
|
E. Joseph Grady
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
Payments(1,3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,306,032
|
|
|
$
|
1,306,032
|
|
|
$
|
1,306,032
|
|
|
$
|
1,020,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Health Insurance
Continuation(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,256
|
|
|
|
76,256
|
|
|
|
76,256
|
|
|
|
76,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested & Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
Tracy Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
Payments(2,3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
540,600
|
|
|
$
|
540,600
|
|
|
$
|
540,600
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Health Insurance
Continuation(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,837
|
|
|
|
50,837
|
|
|
|
50,837
|
|
|
|
50,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested & Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
|
|
123,500
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
Jay S. Mengle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
Payments(2,3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
569,600
|
|
|
$
|
569,600
|
|
|
$
|
569,600
|
|
|
$
|
440,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Health Insurance
Continuation(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,081
|
|
|
|
38,081
|
|
|
|
38,081
|
|
|
|
38,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested & Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,500
|
|
|
|
78,500
|
|
|
|
78,500
|
|
|
|
78,500
|
|
|
|
78,500
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
Tommy H. Atkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
Payments(2,3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
486,400
|
|
|
$
|
486,400
|
|
|
$
|
486,400
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Health Insurance
Continuation(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,837
|
|
|
|
50,837
|
|
|
|
50,837
|
|
|
|
50,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested & Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,850
|
|
|
|
71,850
|
|
|
|
71,850
|
|
|
|
71,850
|
|
|
|
71,850
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,300
|
|
|
|
38,300
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the event the employment of Messrs. Keel and Grady is
terminated by the Company without Cause or by them for Good
Reason, and subject to their observance of certain non-compete
and release of liability agreements, each will receive a
severance payment consisting of (i) a cash amount equal to
2.99 times the sum of the current calendar years Base
Salary and the prior years Annual Cash Incentive Bonus,
(B) health insurance benefits for 36 months from the
termination date at no charge to the executive, and
(C) acceleration to 100% vested status for all stock, stock
options and other equity awards to the extent such awards (other
than stock options and stock appreciation rights) are not
subject to performance-based vesting for purposes of qualifying
as performance-based compensation for purposes of
Section 162(m) of the Code. Had the employment of
Messrs. Keel and Grady been terminated by the Company
without Cause or by them for Good Reason in 2008, Mr. Keel
would have been paid $1,442,044 and Mr. Grady would have
been paid $1,306,032 plus the value of health insurance benefits
for three years from the termination date, estimated at $25,419
per year. |
116
|
|
|
(2) |
|
In the event the employment of Messrs. Price, Mengle and
Atkins is terminated by the Company without Cause or by them for
Good Reason, and subject to their observance of certain
non-compete and release of liability agreements, each will
receive a severance payment consisting of (i) a cash amount
equal to 2 times the sum of the current calendar years
Base Salary and the prior years Annual Cash Incentive
Bonus, (B) health insurance benefits for 24 months
from the termination date at no charge to the executive, and
(C) acceleration to 100% vested status for all stock, stock
options and other equity awards to the extent such awards (other
than stock options and stock appreciation rights) are not
subject to performance-based vesting for purposes of qualifying
as performance-based compensation for purposes of
Section 162(m) of the Code. Had the employment of
Messrs. Price, Mengle and Atkins been terminated by the
Company without Cause or by them for Good Reason in 2008,
Mr. Price would have been paid $540,600, Mr. Mengle
would have been paid $569,600 and Mr. Atkins would have
been paid $486,400 plus the value of health insurance benefits
for two years from the termination date, estimated at $25,419
per year for Messrs. Price and Atkins and $19,040 per year
for Mr. Mengle. |
|
(3) |
|
If no annual cash incentive bonus was paid to Messrs. Keel
and Grady for the year before the year in which such
officers employment was terminated, if termination was by
the Company without Cause or by the executive officer for Good
Reason, Messrs. Keel and Grady are entitled to receive 2.99
times the amount of discretionary bonuses paid to such officer,
and Messrs. Mengle, Price and Atkins are entitled to
receive 2 times the amount of discretionary bonuses paid to such
officer within the 12 month period preceding termination.
Because an Annual Cash Incentive Bonus was paid to all the
executive officers for 2007 in 2008, the applicable columns do
include such Annual Cash Incentive Bonus. |
|
(4) |
|
If not in connection with a Change of Control, the Company
terminates the executive officers employment without Cause
or the officer terminates his employment for Good Reason, the
executive officer will receive half of the cash severance amount
in a lump sum within 15 days of his termination date and
half the number of months of health insurance benefit
continuation. The executive officer will not be entitled to the
remainder of the cash severance payment, and the remaining
number of months of health insurance continuation, unless the
executive officer gives notice to the Company within
30 days before conclusion of 50% of the Non-Compete Term
that he agrees, for the remainder of the Non-Compete Term to
comply with the non-compete and non-solicitation provisions of
such officers respective employment agreement. In such
event, the executive officer will receive the remainder of his
cash severance payment and an extension of his health insurance
benefits for 18 months for Messrs. Keel and Grady and
12 months for Messrs. Mengle, Price and Atkins payable
in a lump sum within 15 days after the date of conclusion
of 50% of the Non-Compete Term. |
|
(5) |
|
Under each executive officers stock option agreements and
restricted stock awards under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, in
the event of a Change of Control, termination by the Company
without Cause or termination by the executive officer for Good
Reason, each executive officers unvested options and
unvested restricted stock will become fully vested and, in the
case of options, exercisable with respect to 100% of such
shares, resulting in the vesting of 539,750 shares for
Mr. Keel, 202,250 shares for Mr. Grady,
155,000 shares for Mr. Price, 94,250 shares for
Mr. Mengle and 85,255 shares for Mr. Atkins. As
of December 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the option
shares held by the executive officers was $0.00 as the closing
price of the Companys common stock on that date was less
than the weighted average exercise price of the stock options. |
|
(6) |
|
In the event of death or disability, each executive officer will
be entitled to: (i) his pro rata Base Salary and pro rata
Target Annual Cash Incentive Bonus through the date of
termination for the year in which termination occurs, plus a
lump sum amount equal to the greater of: (1) the remainder
of the base salary that would have been earned by the executive
officer under the executives employment agreement between
the date of his death or permanent disability and the expiration
of the then current term of the employment agreement, or
(2) 12 months of base salary plus the executives
Target Annual Cash Incentive Bonus for the year of termination;
and (ii) full acceleration of vesting for all stock, stock
option and other equity awards. Such an event would result in
the vesting of |
117
|
|
|
|
|
539,570 shares for Mr. Keel, 202,250 shares for
Mr. Grady, 155,000 shares for Mr. Price,
94,250 shares for Mr. Mengle and 85,255 shares
for Mr. Atkins. As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate
value of the option shares was $0.00, as the closing price of
the Companys common stock on that date was less than the
weighted average exercise price of the stock options. |
|
(7) |
|
If the severance payment is made as a result of termination by
the Company without Cause or by the Employee for Good Reason
within 12 months after a Change of Control, the Company
will pay the entire cash severance amount in a lump sum on the
executive officers date of termination. |
|
(8) |
|
Upon a change in control, each executive officers unvested
options and unvested restricted stock will become fully vested
and, in the case of options, exercisable with respect to 100% of
such shares, resulting in the vesting of 539,750 shares for
Mr. Keel, 202,250 shares for Mr. Grady,
155,000 shares for Mr. Price, 94,250 shares for
Mr. Mengle and 85,255 shares for Mr. Atkins. As
of December 31, 2008, the aggregate value of the option
shares held by the executive officers was $0.00 as the closing
price of the Companys common stock on that date was less
than the weighted average exercise price of the stock options.
For all the shares of restricted stock granted on or before
December 31, 2008, acceleration of vesting will occur upon
a Change in Control as defined in the Companys
2005 Stock Incentive Plan, rather than a Change of Control as
defined in the applicable employment agreement. Under the 2005
Stock Incentive Plan, Change in Control means
(a) the direct or indirect sale, transfer, conveyance or
other disposition (other than by way of merger or
consolidation), in one or a series of related transactions, of
all or substantially all of the properties or assets of the
Company to any person (as that term is used in
Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) other than Oaktree
Holdings or its affiliates; (b) the adoption of a plan
relating to the liquidation or dissolution of the Company;
(c) the consummation of any transaction (including, without
limitation, any merger or consolidation) the result of which is
that any person or group (as such terms
are used in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) other than
Oaktree Holdings or its affiliates, becomes the beneficial owner
directly or indirectly of more than 50% of the voting power of
the Company; or (d) incumbent directors cease for any
reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board, excluding
certain reincorporation or holding company transactions or a
public offering resulting in the Company being listed or
approved for listing on a national securities exchange. |
|
(9) |
|
If the employment of Messrs. Keel or Grady is terminated by
reason of death or permanent disability, the executive
officers family members that are covered by the Company
group health plan may be reimbursed for group health plan
continuation coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act (COBRA) for up to 36 months,
provided a member of the executive officers family
provides timely notice to the health plan administrator of the
executive officers death or permanent disability. If the
employment of Messrs. Mengle, Price or Atkins employment is
terminated by reason of death or permanent disability, the
executive officers family members that are covered by the
Company group health plan may be reimbursed for group health
plan continuation coverage under COBRA for up to 24 months,
provided a member of the executive officers family
provides timely notice to the health plan administrator of the
executive officers death or permanent disability. |
Non-Compete
and Non-Solicitation Provisions
The agreements generally require that each executive officer not
engage in competition with the Company in any geographic area in
which the Company owns a material amount of oil, gas or other
mineral properties, during the period commencing upon execution
until the date ending: (A) on the date of termination if
terminated by the Company for Cause, or (B) in all other
cases of termination, at the end of a period of consecutive
months following the date of termination equivalent to 50% of
the number of months for which the executive officer is entitled
to receive severance benefits assuming (if applicable) the
executive officer will give the required notice as described in
the employment agreement. Each executive officer is also subject
to non-solicitation provisions during the term of the
non-compete provisions prohibiting the executive officer from
inducing or soliciting any other executive or officer of the
Company to terminate their employment with the Company.
118
Gross Up
Payments
Pursuant to the respective employment agreements, if it is
determined that any payment, award, benefit or distribution (or
an acceleration of any payment, award, benefit or distribution)
to an executive officer by the Company or by another entity in
the event of a Change of Control is subject to the imposition of
an excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, or any
interest or penalties are incurred by the executive officer with
respect to such excise tax, the Company will pay the executive
officer an additional payment in an amount equal to that
required to result in the executive officer receiving, after
application of the excise tax, a net amount that would have been
received by the executive officer had the excise tax not applied.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table shows our stockholder approved and
non-stockholder approved equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
Exercise of Outstanding
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
Plan Category
|
|
Options, Warrants and
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Reflected in Column
|
(a)(b)(c)
|
|
Rights
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
(a))
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
1,663,540
|
|
|
$
|
10.39
|
|
|
|
1,509,720
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,663,540
|
|
|
$
|
10.39
|
|
|
|
1,509,720
|
|
Our two equity compensation plans with outstanding options that
have been approved by our stockholders to-date are our
(i) 2004 Stock Option and Compensation Plan and
(ii) Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
(2005 Plan). Although we sought and obtained
stockholder approval of the 2004 Stock Option and Compensation
Plan, neither the plan itself nor the outstanding grants were
contingent on stockholder approval. The Companys 1994
Employee Stock Option Plan has no outstanding options available
for conversion to common stock and there are no outstanding
warrants that may be converted to common stock.
As of December 31, 2008, we had issued options for
1,619,240 shares of common stock at a weighted-average
exercise price of $10.53 per share under our 2005 Plan. As of
December 31, 2008, the aggregate number of shares of our
common stock that may be issued and outstanding pursuant to the
exercise of awards under our 2005 Plan may not exceed
3,852,500 shares, reduced by 153,500 shares (the
number of shares of outstanding options and awards granted under
the 2004 Stock Option and Compensation Plan, unless and to the
extent such options and awards are cancelled or forfeited). As
of December 31, 2008, awards covering a total of
1,509,720 shares of common stock were currently available
to be issued under our 2005 Plan. However, on March 4,
2009, the Compensation Committee approved the award of shares of
restricted common stock and stock options to Company employees
pursuant to the Companys LTIP for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2008. A total of 648,936 shares of
unvested restricted common stock and stock options for
488,660 shares of common stock have been approved for
issuance pursuant to the LTIP for the fiscal year 2008. During
the first quarter 2009, 45,000 shares of stock options
granted under the 2005 Plan were forfeited as a result of
employees leaving the employment of the Company prior to full
vesting of the option shares and the employees not timely
exercising their option rights pursuant to their respective
stock option award agreements. Pursuant to the provisions of the
2005 Plan the forfeited shares were available for issuance under
the 2005 Plan. As a result, the Company has 417,037 shares
available to be awarded pursuant to the 2005 Plan as of
April 9, 2009.
There are options outstanding for 44,300 shares of common
stock with a weighted-average exercise price of $4.90 per share
under the 2004 Stock Option Compensation Plan. There are no
outstanding options issued under the 1994 Employee Stock Option
Plan as all options have either been exercised or have expired.
119
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of common stock by each person known to us
to own beneficially 5% or more of the outstanding common stock,
each director, certain named executive officers, and the
directors and executive officers as a group. The persons named
in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect
to all shares of common stock owned by them, unless otherwise
noted.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC. For the purpose of calculating the number of shares
beneficially owned by a stockholder and the percentage ownership
of that stockholder, shares of common stock subject to options
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within
60 days of the date of this prospectus by that stockholder
are deemed outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to Offering
|
|
After Offering
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent(1)
|
|
Allan D.
Keel(2,3)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
1,161,878
|
|
|
|
16.27
|
|
|
|
1,176,630
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
|
|
|
Series G
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Joseph
Grady(3,4)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
450,317
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
|
|
|
450,317
|
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
Tracy
Price(3,5)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
266,539
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
266,539
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Jay S.
Mengle(3,6)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
205,064
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
|
205,064
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Thomas H.
Atkins(3,7)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
165,368
|
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
|
165,368
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
B. James
Ford(8,9)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Adam C.
Pierce(8,9)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Lee B.
Backsen(3,14)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
29,381
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
29,381
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Lon
McCain(3,14)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
29,381
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
29,381
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Cassidy J. Traub
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All current directors and officers as a group
(10 persons)(10)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
2,307,928
|
|
|
|
30.69
|
|
|
|
2,322,680
|
|
|
|
6.79
|
|
|
|
Series G
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oaktree
Holdings(9,11)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
8,427,884
|
|
|
|
65.65
|
|
|
|
10,314,071
|
|
|
|
31.13
|
|
|
|
Series G
|
|
|
76,710
|
|
|
|
95.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series H
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
90.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Virgil
Waggoner(12,13)
|
|
Common
|
|
|
425,333
|
|
|
|
6.63
|
|
|
|
425,333
|
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes less than 1% of class beneficially owned. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes an offering price of $7.00 per share. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Reported common stock includes 438,886 shares of common
stock held directly and, prior to offering, includes
47,992 shares underlying convertible Series G
Preferred Stock including the related right to convert accrued
dividends on the Series G Preferred Stock at
September 30, 2009 and, after offering, includes
62,744 shares underlying convertible Series G
Preferred Stock converted to common stock including the related
right to convert accrued dividends based upon a December 2009
conversion date, and options to acquire 675,000 shares of
common stock. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Stockholders current address is 717 Texas Avenue,
Suite 2900, Houston, Texas 77002. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Reported common stock includes 225,317 shares held directly
and options to acquire 225,000 shares of common stock. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Reported common stock includes 176,539 shares held directly
and options to acquire 90,000 shares of common stock. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Reported common stock includes 154,414 shares held
directly, 5,650 shares held by his wife and options to acquire
45,000 shares of common stock. |
120
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Reported common stock includes 127,068 shares held directly
and options to acquire 38,300 shares of common stock. |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Excludes shares held by Oaktree Capital Management, LLC, of
which Messrs. Ford and Pierce both disclaim beneficial
ownership. |
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Stockholders address is
c/o Oaktree
Capital Management, LLC, 333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles,
California 90071. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Reported common stock includes 1,186,636 and
1,249,380 shares of common stock held directly prior to and
after offering, respectively, 5,650 shares held indirectly,
1,073,300 shares subject to currently exercisable options,
and 47,992 shares underlying convertible preferred stock,
including the related right to convert accrued dividends on the
Series G Preferred Stock prior to this offering. |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Reported common stock, prior to the offering, includes
6,135,683 shares of common stock and 285,715 shares of
common stock underlying Series G and Series H
convertible preferred stock, respectively, including the related
right to convert accrued dividends on the Series G
Preferred Stock at September 30, 2009, and after offering,
includes 8,021,870 and 285,715 shares of common stock
underlying convertible Series G Preferred Stock and
Series H Preferred Stock, respectively, converted to common
stock, including the related right to convert accrued dividends
on the Series G Preferred Stock based upon a December 2009
conversion date, and 2,006,486 shares of common stock in
each case held directly by Oaktree Holdings, except with respect
to 10 shares of Series G Preferred Stock and the
shares of common stock underlying the 10 shares of
Series G Preferred Stock held by OCM Crimson. OCM Principal
Opportunities Fund III, L.P. (POF III) is the
managing member of Oaktree Holdings and, therefore, has
investment and voting control over the securities held by
Oaktree Holdings. OCM Principal Opportunities Fund III GP,
LLC (POF III GP) is the general partner of POF III,
Oaktree Fund GP I, L.P. (GP I) is the
managing member of POF III GP, Oaktree Capital I, L.P.
(Capital I) is the general partner of GP I, OCM
Holdings I, LLC (Holdings I) is the general
partner of Capital I, Oaktree Holdings LLC
(Holdings) is the managing member of
Holdings I, Oaktree Capital Group, LLC (OCG) is
the managing member of Holdings, Oaktree Capital Group Holdings
L.P. (OCH) is the holder of a majority of the voting
units of OCG, and Oaktree Capital Group Holdings GP, LLC is the
general partner of OCH. |
|
|
|
(12) |
|
Stockholders address is 6605 Cypresswood Drive,
Suite 250, Spring, Texas 77379. |
|
|
|
(13) |
|
Reported common stock includes 425,333 held directly. |
|
|
|
(14) |
|
Reported common stock includes 29,381 shares each held
directly by Messrs. McCain and Backsen. |
121
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with our directors, executive officers, principal
stockholders or affiliates must be at terms that are no less
than favorable to us than those available from third parties and
must be approved in advance by a majority of disinterested
members of the Board.
There were no related party transactions during the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2007 or the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008.
On December 8, 2009, with the approval of an independent
committee of our Board of Directors and the consent of Oaktree
Holdings and OCM Crimson, holders in the aggregate of
approximately 95% of the outstanding Series G Preferred
Stock, we filed an amendment to the Certificate of Designations
governing the terms of our Series G Preferred Stock to
provide for the conversion of all such shares, plus the accrued
but unpaid dividends thereon, into shares of our common stock in
connection with this offering. The number of shares of common
stock to be issued per share of Series G Preferred Stock
will be equal to (i) the sum of $500 plus the accrued but
unpaid dividends with respect to such share divided by
(ii) the lesser of $9.00 and the price to the public for
our common stock received in this offering. Assuming an offering
price of $7.00 per share, which is the midpoint in the range
provided on the cover page of this prospectus,
8,418,206 shares of common stock will be issued in
connection with the conversion of all outstanding shares of
Series G Preferred Stock.
As a result of the conversion of Series G Preferred Stock
in connection with this offering, Oaktree Holdings and OCM
Crimson, the holders of an aggregate 76,710 shares of our
Series G Preferred Stock, and Allan D. Keel, our President
and CEO and the holder of 600 shares of our Series G
Preferred Stock, will receive 8,021,870 shares and
62,744 shares, respectively, of our common stock, in each
case assuming an offering price of $7.00 per share, which is the
midpoint in the range provided on the cover page of this
prospectus.
Pursuant to the Certificate of Designations governing the terms
of the Series H Preferred Stock, if Oaktree Holdings or its
affiliates convert all of their shares of Series G
Preferred Stock into common stock, all shares of Series H
Preferred Stock automatically also are converted into shares of
our common stock. As of September 30, 2009, Oaktree
Holdings was the holder of record of 2,000 shares of our
Series H Preferred Stock, all of which will be converted
into shares of our common stock in connection with this
offering. Our Series H Preferred Stock is convertible into
that number of shares of our common stock having a value equal
to $500 divided by $3.50. We anticipate issuing
285,715 shares of our common stock to Oaktree Holdings in
connection with the conversion of all of our Series H
Preferred Stock.
Effective December 7, 2009, we and Oaktree Holdings entered
into an amendment and waiver of our shareholders rights
agreement, dated February 28, 2005, whereby Oaktree
Holdings waived certain preemptive and registration rights with
respect to this offering. Under this agreement as amended, we
are obligated to engage in up to four demand registrations and
Oaktree Holdings has unlimited piggyback registration rights.
Any underwritten offering effected pursuant to these demand and
piggyback registration rights will be subject to customary
underwriters cutbacks and holdback restrictions on other
sales. Effective December 7, 2009, we and Oaktree Holdings
entered into a termination agreement and waiver of a
registration rights agreement dated May 8, 2007, whereby
Oaktree Holdings waived certain registration rights with respect
to this offering and agreed to terminate that agreement upon the
closing of this offering.
On May 13, 2009 and November 6, 2009, an affiliate of
Oaktree Holdings, in its capacity as a lender under our second
lien term loan agreement, entered into a second amendment and a
third amendment and waiver to our second lien term loan
agreement. No fees or other consideration was paid in connection
with such amendments and waiver. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital
resourcesSecond Lien Term Loan Agreement.
122
On November 6, 2009, we made an unsecured promissory note
in aggregate principal amount equal to $10 million in favor
of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. As a condition to its
willingness to advance funds to us in return for our unsecured
promissory note, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association required
that Oaktree Holdings provide credit support for this promissory
note by depositing into escrow $10 million. Under the terms
of the escrow agreement, upon the occurrence of any event of
default under this promissory note, on January 10, 2010,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association may, at its option, cause
this promissory note to be assigned to Oaktree Holdings and draw
upon the funds in escrow as payment for the assignment. In
consideration of Oaktree Holdings willingness to provide
deposit into escrow $10 million as credit support for this
promissory note, on November 6, 2009 we made an unsecured
subordinated promissory note in aggregate principal amount equal
to $2 million in favor of Oaktree Holdings.
123
DESCRIPTION OF
CAPITAL STOCK
General
The following descriptions are summaries of material terms of
our common stock, preferred stock, certificate of incorporation
and bylaws. This summary is qualified by reference to our
certificate of incorporation, bylaws and the designations of our
preferred stock, which are filed as exhibits to the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and by the
provisions of applicable law.
We are authorized to issue 200.0 million shares of common
stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 10 million
shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of
December 4, 2009, there were 6,416,401 shares of our
sole class of common stock issued and outstanding and held by
approximately 275 record owners.
Our common stock is traded on the OTCBB under the symbol
CXPO. In connection with this offering, we have
applied to list our stock on the NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol CXPO. Fidelity Transfer Company is the
transfer agent for the common stock.
Our Common
Stock
Voting
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share
held of record on each matter submitted to a vote of
stockholders, including the election of directors, and do not
have any right to cumulate votes in the election of directors.
Dividends
Subject to the rights and preferences of the holders of any
series of preferred stock which may at the time be outstanding,
holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such
dividends as the Board from time to time may declare out of
funds legally available therefor.
Liquidation
Rights
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of our affairs, after payment of all of our debts and
liabilities and subject to the rights and preferences of the
holders of any outstanding shares of any series of our preferred
stock, the holders of common stock will be entitled to share
ratably in the distribution of any of our remaining assets.
Other
Matters
Except as described below, holders of common stock have no
conversion, preemptive or other subscription rights and there
are no redemption rights or sinking fund provisions with respect
to the common stock. Pursuant to a shareholders rights agreement
between us and Oaktree Holdings, Oaktree Holdings has a right of
first refusal to purchase any additional securities proposed to
be purchased by a third party from us. Oaktree has waived this
right in connection with this offering. This right, which is
transferable in certain circumstances, expires February 28,
2010.
Our Preferred
Stock
Our Board has the authority to issue preferred stock in one or
more classes or series and to fix the designations, powers,
preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations or
restrictions thereof including dividend rights, dividend rates,
conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption,
redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of
shares constituting any class or series, without further vote or
action by the stockholders. The issuance of preferred stock may
have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in
control of us without further action by the
124
stockholders and may adversely affect the voting and other
rights of the holders of common stock. At present, we have no
plans to issue any additional shares of preferred stock.
We have authorized 12,000 shares of Series D preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the Series D
Preferred Stock), 9,000 shares of Series E
cumulative convertible preferred stock, par value $0.01 per
share (the Series E Preferred Stock),
81,000 shares of Series G Preferred Stock and
6,500 shares of Series H Preferred Stock. As of
September 30, 2009, there were 82,600 shares of
preferred stock issued and outstanding in two series:
80,500 shares of our Series G Preferred Stock, and
2,100 shares of our Series H Preferred Stock. Of the
80,500 shares of our Series G Preferred Stock, 76,710
are held by Oaktree Holdings and OCM Crimson, and the remainder
are owned by an executive officer and nine other investors. The
2,100 shares of Series H Preferred Stock are held of
record by Oaktree Holdings, which holds 2,000 shares, and
two other investors. As of September 30, 2009, all the
shares of Series D Preferred Stock and Series E
Preferred Stock had converted into shares of common stock. Our
preferred stock is senior to our common stock regarding
liquidation. In connection with this offering, all our
outstanding Series G Preferred Stock and Series H
Preferred Stock will be converted into shares of our common
stock. See Prospectus SummaryPreferred Stock
Conversion. We intend to file certificates of elimination
for the certificates of designation for each of the
Series D Preferred Stock, Series E Preferred Stock,
Series G Preferred Stock and Series H Preferred Stock
for the purposes of eliminating from our certificate of
incorporation all matters set forth in such certificates
governing the preferred stock.
Outstanding
Options
At November 18, 2009, we had outstanding options for the
purchase of approximately 2.0 million shares of common
stock at prices ranging from $2.40 to $16.55 per share,
including employee stock. If we issue additional shares,
existing stockholders percentage ownership of us may be
further diluted.
Anti-Takeover
Effects of Delaware Laws and Our Charter and Bylaws
Provisions
Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws. Certain provisions in our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws summarized below may be deemed to have
an anti-takeover effect and may delay, deter, or prevent a
tender offer or takeover attempt that a stockholder might
consider to be in its best interests, including attempts that
might result in a premium being paid over the market price for
the shares held by stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions
that (unless, as a general matter, a preferred stock designation
provides otherwise for that series of preferred stock):
|
|
|
|
|
permit us to issue, without any further vote or action by the
stockholders, additional shares of preferred stock in one or
more series and, with respect to each such series, to fix the
number of shares constituting the series and the designation of
the series, the voting powers (if any) of the shares of the
series, and the preferences and relative, participating,
optional, and other special rights, if any, and any
qualification, limitations or restrictions of the shares of such
series;
|
|
|
|
require special meetings of the stockholders to be called by the
Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the
President, or by resolution of a majority of the board of
directors;
|
|
|
|
require business at special meetings to be limited to the stated
purpose or purposes of that meeting;
|
|
|
|
require that stockholder action be taken at a meeting rather
than by written consent, unless approved by our board of
directors;
|
|
|
|
require that stockholders follow certain procedures, including
advance notice procedures, to bring certain matters before an
annual meeting or to nominate a director for election; and
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
permit directors to fill vacancies in our board of directors.
|
The foregoing provisions of our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws could discourage potential acquisition proposals and
could delay or prevent a change of control. These provisions are
intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability
in the composition of the board of directors and in the policies
formulated by the board of directors and to discourage certain
types of transactions that may involve an actual or threatened
change of control. These provisions are designed to reduce our
vulnerability to an unsolicited acquisition proposal. The
provisions also are intended to discourage certain tactics that
may be used in proxy fights. However, such provisions could have
the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for
our shares and, as a consequence, they also may inhibit
fluctuations in the market price of our common stock that could
result form actual or rumored takeover attempts. Such provisions
also may have the effect of preventing changes in our management.
Business Combinations. After this offering, we
will be subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law. In general, Section 203
prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in
a business combination with an interested
stockholder for a period of three years after the date of
the transaction in which the person became an interested
stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a
prescribed manner.
Section 203 defines a business combination as a
merger, asset sale or other transaction resulting in a financial
benefit to the interested stockholders. Section 203 defines
an interested stockholder as a person who, together
with affiliates and associates, owns, or, in some cases, within
three years prior, did own, 15% or more of the
corporations voting stock. Under Section 203, a
business combination between us and an interested stockholder is
prohibited unless:
|
|
|
|
|
our board of directors approved either the business combination
or the transaction that resulted in the stockholders becoming an
interested stockholder prior to the date the person attained the
status;
|
|
|
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding
at the time the transaction commenced, excluding, for purposes
of determining the number of shares outstanding, shares owned by
persons who are directors and also officers and issued employee
stock plans, under which employee participants do not have the
right to determine confidentially whether shares held under the
plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
|
|
the business combination is approved by our board of directors
on or subsequent to the date the person became an interested
stockholder and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
the stockholders by the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
This provision has an anti-takeover effect with respect to
transactions not approved in advance by our board of directors,
including discouraging takeover attempts that might result in a
premium over the market price for the shares of our common
stock. With approval of our stockholders, we could amend our
certificate of incorporation in the future to elect not to be
governed by the anti-takeover law. Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law will not apply to Oaktree
Holdings.
126
CERTAIN UNITED
STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following general discussion summarizes certain
U.S. federal income and, to a limited extent, estate tax
consequences relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition
of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
(as defined below). Except where noted, this summary deals only
with common stock that is held as a capital asset
(generally, property held for investment).
A
non-U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of common stock (other than a
partnership or entity treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) that is not for
U.S. federal income tax purposes any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created
or organized under the laws of the United States, any of its
states or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate if its income is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of the source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary
supervision over administration of the trust and one or more
U.S. persons have authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust, or if the trust has validly elected to
continue to be treated as a domestic trust under applicable
U.S. Treasury regulations.
|
This summary is based upon provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and Treasury
regulations, administrative rulings and judicial decisions, all
as of the date hereof. Those authorities may be changed, perhaps
retroactively, so as to result in U.S. federal income and
estate tax consequences different from those summarized below.
This summary does not address all aspects of U.S. federal
income and estate taxes and does not deal with
non-U.S.,
state, local, alternative minimum tax or other tax
considerations that may be relevant to
non-U.S. holders
in light of their personal circumstances. In addition, this
summary does not address tax considerations applicable to
investors that may be subject to special treatment under the
United States federal income tax laws such as (without
limitation):
|
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or foreign currency;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt entities;
|
|
|
|
banks;
|
|
|
|
thrifts;
|
|
|
|
regulated investment companies;
|
|
|
|
real estate investment trusts;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that have elected the
mark-to-market
method of accounting for their securities;
|
|
|
|
controlled foreign corporations;
|
|
|
|
passive foreign investment companies;
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
persons that hold our common stock as part of a
straddle, a hedge or a conversion
transaction;
|
|
|
|
certain U.S. expatriates; and
|
|
|
|
pass-through entities for U.S. tax purposes (e.g.,
partnerships) or investors who hold our common stock through
pass-through entities.
|
127
If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds our common
stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon
the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.
If you are a partner of a partnership (including an entity
treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes) holding our common stock, you should consult your tax
advisor.
We have not sought any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service
(the IRS) with respect to the statements made and
the conclusions reached in the following summary, and there can
be no assurance that the IRS will agree with such statements and
conclusions. If you are considering buying our common stock,
we urge you to consult your tax advisor about the particular
U.S. federal, state, local and
non-U.S. tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our
common stock, and the application of the U.S. federal
income tax laws to your particular situation.
Dividends
We do not presently expect to declare or pay any dividends on
our common stock in the foreseeable future. However, if we do
make distributions on our common stock, such distributions will
constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes
to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and
profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax
principles. Distributions in excess of earnings and profits will
constitute a return of capital that is applied against and
reduces the
non-U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis in our common stock. Any remaining excess
will be treated as gain realized on the sale or other
disposition of our common stock and will be treated as described
under Gain on Disposition of Common Stock below. Any
dividend paid to a
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock ordinarily will be subject to withholding of
U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30%, or such lower
rate as may be specified under an applicable income tax treaty,
unless the dividend is effectively connected with a trade or
business carried on by the
non-U.S. holder
within the U.S. In order to receive a reduced treaty rate,
a
non-U.S. holder
must provide us with IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or applicable substitute or successor form) properly certifying
eligibility for the reduced rate.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
that are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business by the
non-U.S. holder
in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income
tax treaty, are attributable to a permanent establishment or
fixed base in the United States) generally will be exempt from
the withholding tax described above and instead will be subject
to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at the
regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates in the same
manner as if the
non-U.S. holder
were a United States person, as defined under the Code. In such
cases, we will not have to withhold U.S. federal income tax
if the
non-U.S. holder
complies with applicable certification and disclosure
requirements. In order to obtain this exemption from withholding
tax, a
non-U.S. holder
must provide us with an IRS
Form W-8ECI
(or applicable substitute or successor form) properly certifying
eligibility for such exemption. Any such effectively connected
dividends received by a foreign corporation may be subject to an
additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30% or
such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable tax treaty.
Gain on
Disposition of Common Stock
Any gain realized on the disposition of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax
unless:
|
|
|
|
|
such gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade
or business by the
non-U.S. holder
in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income
tax treaty, is attributable to a permanent establishment or
fixed based in the United States);
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of the disposition,
and certain other conditions are met; or
|
|
|
|
we are or have been a United States real property holding
corporation, or USRPHC, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
|
128
An individual
non-U.S. holder
who has gain that is described in the first bullet point
immediately above will be subject to tax on the gain derived
from the disposition under regular graduated U.S. federal
income tax rates. If a
non-U.S. holder
that is a foreign corporation has gain described under the first
bullet point immediately above, it generally will be subject to
tax on its gain in the same manner as if it were a United States
person, as defined under the Code, and, in addition, may be
subject to the branch profits tax equal to 30% of its
effectively connected earnings and profits or at such lower rate
as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
An individual
non-U.S. holder
who meets the requirements described in the second bullet point
immediately above will be subject to a flat 30% tax on the gain
derived from the disposition, which may be offset by
U.S. source capital losses, even though the individual is
not considered a resident of the United States.
With respect to our status as a USRPHC, we believe that we
currently are, and expect to remain for the foreseeable future,
a USRPHC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, so
long as our common stock is considered to be regularly
traded on an established securities market, a
non-U.S. holder
will be taxable on gain recognized on the disposition of our
common stock only if the
non-U.S. holder
actually or constructively holds or held more than 5% of such
common stock at any time during the five-year period ending on
the date of disposition or, if shorter, the
non-U.S. holders
holding period for our common stock. If our common stock were
not considered to be regularly traded on an established
securities market, all
non-U.S. holders
would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a
disposition of our common stock.
Non-U.S. holders
should consult their tax advisors with respect to the
application of the foregoing rules to their ownership and
disposition of our common stock.
Federal Estate
Tax
If you are an individual, common stock owned or treated as being
owned by you at the time of your death will be included in your
gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes and may
be subject to U.S. federal estate tax, unless an applicable
estate tax treaty provides otherwise.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
We must report annually to the IRS and to each
non-U.S. holder
the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld
with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether
withholding was required. Copies of the information returns
reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made
available to the tax authorities in the country in which the
non-U.S. holder
resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty.
A
non-U.S. holder
will be subject to backup withholding for dividends paid to such
holder unless such holder certifies under penalties of perjury
that it is a
non-U.S. holder
(and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know
that such holder is a United States person, as defined under the
Code), or such holder otherwise establishes an exemption.
Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances,
backup withholding (at the applicable rate) will apply to the
proceeds of a sale of our common stock within the United States
or conducted through certain U.S. related financial
intermediaries, unless the beneficial owner certifies under
penalties of perjury that it is a
non-U.S. holder
(and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know
that the beneficial owner is a United States person, as defined
under the Code), or such owner otherwise establishes an
exemption.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a
refund or a credit against a
non-U.S. holders
U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required
information is furnished to the IRS.
129
UNDERWRITING
Barclays Capital Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC are
acting as the representatives of the underwriters and the joint
book-running managers of this offering. Under the terms of an
underwriting agreement, which will be filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement, each of the underwriters named below has
severally agreed to purchase from us the respective number of
shares of common stock shown opposite its name below:
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
Underwriters
|
|
Shares
|
|
Barclays Capital Inc.
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.
|
|
|
RBS Securities Inc.
|
|
|
Pritchard Capital Partners, LLC
|
|
|
Johnson Rice & Company L.L.C.
|
|
|
Rodman & Renshaw, LLC
|
|
|
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
18,000,000
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters
obligation to purchase shares of common stock depends on the
satisfaction of the conditions contained in the underwriting
agreement including:
|
|
|
|
|
the obligation to purchase all of the shares of common stock
offered hereby (other than those shares of common stock covered
by their option to purchase additional shares as described
below), if any of the shares are purchased;
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties made by us to the
underwriters are true;
|
|
|
|
there is no material change in our business or in the financial
markets; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
we deliver customary closing documents to the underwriters.
|
Commissions and
Expenses
The following table summarizes the underwriting discounts and
commissions we will pay to the underwriters. These amounts are
shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional shares. The
underwriting fee is the difference between the initial price to
the public and the amount the underwriters pay to us for the
shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Exercise
|
|
Full Exercise
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
The representatives of the underwriters have advised us that the
underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
directly to the public at the public offering price on the cover
of this prospectus and to selected dealers, which may include
the underwriters, at such offering price less a selling
concession not in excess of $ per
share. After the offering, the representatives may change the
offering price and other selling terms. Sales of shares made
outside of the United States may be made by affiliates of the
underwriters.
The expenses of the offering that are payable by us are
estimated to be $855,240 (excluding underwriting discounts and
commissions).
130
Option to
Purchase Additional Shares
We have granted the underwriters an option exercisable for
30 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase,
from time to time, in whole or in part, up to an aggregate of
2,700,000 shares at the public offering price less
underwriting discounts and commissions. This option may be
exercised if the underwriters sell more than
18,000,000 shares in connection with this offering. To the
extent that this option is exercised, each underwriter will be
obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase its pro
rata portion of these additional shares based on the
underwriters percentage underwriting commitment in the
offering as indicated in the table at the beginning of this
Underwriting Section.
Lock-Up
Agreements
We, all of our directors and executive officers and Oaktree
Holdings and OCM Crimson have agreed that, subject to certain
exceptions, without the prior written consent of Barclays
Capital Inc., we and they will not directly or indirectly
(1) offer for sale, sell, pledge, or otherwise dispose of
(or enter into any transaction or device that is designed to, or
could be expected to, result in the disposition by any person at
any time in the future of) any shares of common stock
(including, without limitation, shares of common stock that may
be deemed to be beneficially owned by us or them in accordance
with the rules and regulations of the SEC and shares of common
stock that may be issued upon exercise of any options or
warrants) or securities convertible into or exercisable or
exchangeable for common stock, (2) enter into any swap or
other derivatives transaction that transfers to another, in
whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership
of the common stock, (3) make any demand for or exercise
any right or file or cause to be filed a registration statement,
including any amendments thereto, with respect to the
registration of any shares of common stock or securities
convertible, exercisable or exchangeable into common stock or
any of our other securities, or (4) publicly disclose the
intention to do any of the foregoing for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus except
(a) the issuance of common stock pursuant to the exercise
by directors or officers (or their estates or other permitted
successors in interest) of stock options or other equity awards
outstanding on the date hereof, (b) grants of stock
options, restricted stock or other equity awards pursuant to the
terms of a plan in effect on the date hereof covering directors
and employees, (c) transfers to family members or a trust,
so long as such parties agree to be
locked-up
for the remainder of the
lock-up
period, (d) the withholding or repurchase by the Company of
shares of common stock for the purpose of satisfying tax
liabilities associated with the vesting or exercise of awards
granted pursuant to an equity plan of the Company existing as of
the date hereof and (e) private issuances of securities in
connection with acquisitions (provided the recipients of such
securities agree in writing to be subject to similar
restrictions).
The 180-day
restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be
extended if:
|
|
|
|
|
during the last 17 days of the
180-day
restricted period we issue an earnings release or material news
or a material event relating to us occurs; or
|
|
|
|
prior to the expiration of the
180-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
180-day
period;
|
in which case the restrictions described in the preceding
paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
announcement of the material news or material event, unless such
extension is waived in writing by Barclays Capital Inc.
Barclays Capital Inc., in its sole discretion, may release the
common stock and other securities subject to the
lock-up
agreements described above in whole or in part at any time with
or without notice. When determining whether or not to release
common stock and other securities from
lock-up
agreements, Barclays Capital Inc. will consider, among other
factors, the holders reasons for requesting the release,
the number of shares of common stock and other securities for
which the release is being requested and market conditions at
the time.
131
Indemnification
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and
to contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required
to make for these liabilities.
Stabilization,
Short Positions and Penalty Bids
The representatives may engage in stabilizing transactions,
short sales and purchases to cover positions created by short
sales, and penalty bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging,
fixing or maintaining the price of the common stock, in
accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum.
|
|
|
|
A short position involves a sale by the underwriters of shares
in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated
to purchase in the offering, which creates the syndicate short
position. This short position may be either a covered short
position or a naked short position. In a covered short position,
the number of shares involved in the sales made by the
underwriters in excess of the number of shares they are
obligated to purchase is not greater than the number of shares
that they may purchase by exercising their option to purchase
additional shares. In a naked short position, the number of
shares involved is greater than the number of shares in their
option to purchase additional shares. The underwriters may close
out any short position by either exercising their option to
purchase additional shares
and/or
purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source
of shares to close out the short position, the underwriters will
consider, among other things, the price of shares available for
purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which
they may purchase shares through their option to purchase
additional shares. A naked short position is more likely to be
created if the underwriters are concerned that there could be
downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market
after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase
in the offering.
|
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions.
|
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions.
|
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result,
the price of the common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on Nasdaq or otherwise and, if commenced, may be
discontinued at any time.
Neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation
or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect
that the transactions described above may have on the price of
the common stock. In addition, neither we nor any of the
underwriters make representation that the representative will
engage in these stabilizing transactions or that any
transaction, once commenced, will not be discontinued without
notice.
Electronic
Distribution
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
Internet sites or through other online services maintained by
one or more of the underwriters
and/or
selling group members participating in this offering, or by
their affiliates. In those cases, prospective investors may view
offering terms online and, depending upon the particular
underwriter or selling group member,
132
prospective investors may be allowed to place orders online.
The underwriters may agree with us to allocate a specific number
of shares for sale to online brokerage account holders. Any such
allocation for online distributions will be made by the
representatives on the same basis as other allocations.
Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information
on any underwriters or selling group members web
site and any information contained in any other web site
maintained by an underwriter or selling group member is not part
of the prospectus or the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part, has not been approved
and/or
endorsed by us or any underwriter or selling group member in its
capacity as underwriter or selling group member and should not
be relied upon by investors.
The NASDAQ Global
Market
We have applied to list our shares of common stock on the NASDAQ
Global Market under the symbol CXPO.
Discretionary
Sales
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend to
confirm sales to discretionary accounts that exceed 5% of the
total number of shares offered by them. The underwriters have
informed us that they do not intend to confirm sales to
discretionary accounts without the prior specific written
approval of the customer.
Stamp
Taxes
If you purchase shares of common stock offered in this
prospectus, you may be required to pay stamp taxes and other
charges under the laws and practices of the country of purchase,
in addition to the offering price listed on the cover page of
this prospectus.
Relationships/FINRA
Rules
Certain of the underwriters and their related entities have
engaged, and may in the future engage, in commercial and
investment banking and derivative transactions with us in the
ordinary course of their business. They have received, and
expect to receive, customary compensation and expense
reimbursement for these commercial and investment banking and
derivative transactions.
Affiliates of each of RBS Securities Inc. and Morgan
Keegan & Company, Inc. are lenders under our revolving
credit facility and will receive their respective share of any
repayment by us of amounts outstanding under our revolving
credit facility from the proceeds of this offering. See
Use of Proceeds. Because we intend to use the net
proceeds from this offering to repay loans outstanding under our
revolving credit facility, each of the underwriters whose
affiliates will receive at least 5% of the net proceeds is
considered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or
FINRA, to have a conflict of interest with us in regards to this
offering. Accordingly, this offering is being conducted in
compliance with Rule 2720 of the NASD Conduct Rules (which
are part of the FINRA Rules).
Selling
Restrictions
United
Kingdom
This prospectus is only being distributed to, and is only
directed at, persons in the United Kingdom that are qualified
investors within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the
Prospectus Directive (Qualified Investors) that are
also (i) investment professionals falling within
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the Order) or
(ii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom it
may lawfully be communicated, falling within
Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons
together being referred to as relevant persons).
This prospectus and its contents are confidential and should not
be distributed, published or reproduced (in whole or in part) or
disclosed by recipients to any other persons in the United
Kingdom.
133
Any person in the United Kingdom that is not a relevant persons
should not act or rely on this document or any of its contents.
European
Economic Area
In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area
that has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a relevant
member state), with effect from and including the date on which
the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that relevant member
state (the relevant implementation date), an offer of securities
described in this prospectus may not be made to the public in
that relevant member state other than:
|
|
|
|
|
to any legal entity that is authorized or regulated to operate
in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated,
whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
|
|
|
|
to any legal entity that has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year;
(2) a total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than 50,000,000,
as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts;
|
|
|
|
to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified
investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive) subject to
obtaining the prior consent of the representative; or
|
|
|
|
in any other circumstances that do not require the publication
of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus
Directive,
|
provided that no such offer of securities shall require us or
any underwriter to publish a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
For purposes of this provision, the expression an offer of
securities to the public in any relevant member state
means the communication in any form and by any means of
sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the
securities to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide
to purchase or subscribe the securities, as the expression may
be varied in that member state by any measure implementing the
Prospectus Directive in that member state, and the expression
Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/EC and
includes any relevant implementing measure in each relevant
member state.
We have not authorized and do not authorize the making of any
offer of securities through any
financial intermediary on their behalf, other than offers made
by the underwriters with a view to
the final placement of the securities as contemplated in this
prospectus. Accordingly, no purchaser
of the securities, other than the underwriters, is authorized to
make any further offer of the
securities on behalf of us or the underwriters.
134
WHERE YOU CAN
FIND MORE INFORMATION
Crimson Exploration has historically filed annual, quarterly and
current reports, proxy statements and other information with the
SEC. We will continue to fulfill our obligations with respect to
such requirements by filing periodic reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. We intend to furnish our
stockholders with annual reports containing consolidated
financial statements certified by an independent public
accounting firm.
You may read and copy any document we have or will file with the
SEC at the SECs public website
(http://www.sec.gov)
or at the Public Reference Room of the SEC located at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Copies of such materials, including copies of all or any portion
of the registration statement, can be obtained from the Public
Reference Room of the SEC at prescribed rates. You can call the
SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
to obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room.
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act relating to this offering. This
prospectus, which is part of the registration statement, does
not contain all of the information provided in the registration
statement and the exhibits to the registration statement. For
further information with respect to us and this offering, you
should refer to the registration statement and the exhibits
filed as a part of the registration statement. If we have made
references in this prospectus to any contracts, agreements or
other documents and also filed any of those contracts,
agreements or other documents as exhibits to the registration
statement, you should read the relevant exhibit for a more
complete understanding of the document or the matter involved.
You may obtain copies of this information, including the
documents referenced in this prospectus and filed as exhibits to
the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part,
at no charge by writing or telephoning us at the following
address and telephone number:
Crimson
Exploration Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
717 Texas Avenue, Suite 2900
Houston, Texas 77002
713-236-7400
We also maintain an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements, and other information regarding
issuers that file electronically with the SEC at
http://www.crimsonexploration.com.
The information contained on our website or connected thereto
shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this prospectus or
the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a
part, and you should not rely on any such information in making
your decision whether to purchase our securities.
135
LEGAL
MATTERS
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP will pass upon for
us the validity of the shares of our common stock offered
hereby. Certain legal matters in connection with the offering
will be passed upon for the underwriters by Vinson and Elkins
L.L.P.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and schedules included in
this prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement have
been so included in reliance upon the reports of Grant Thornton
LLP, independent registered public accountants, upon the
authority of said firm as experts in giving said reports.
Estimates of our proved crude oil and natural gas reserves
included herein were based in part upon an engineering reports
prepared by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.,
independent petroleum engineers. These estimates are included
herein in reliance on the authority of such firm as an expert in
such matters.
136
Appendix A
GLOSSARY OF
SELECTED TERMS
The following is a description of the meanings of some of the
oil and gas industry terms used in this prospectus.
2D seismic or 3D seismic. Geophysical
data that depict the subsurface strata in two dimensions or
three dimensions, respectively.
3-D seismic
typically provides a more detailed and accurate interpretation
of the subsurface strata than
2-D seismic.
Bbl. One stock tank barrel, or 42
U.S. gallons liquid volume, used in this prospectus in
reference to crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
Bcf. Billion cubic feet of natural gas.
Bcfe. Billion cubic feet equivalent,
determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl
of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
Btu or British thermal unit. The quantity of
heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by
one degree Fahrenheit.
Completion. The process of treating a drilled
well followed by the installation of permanent equipment for the
production of natural gas or oil, or in the case of a dry hole,
the reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency.
Condensate. Liquid hydrocarbons associated
with the production of a primarily natural gas reserve.
Developed acreage. The number of acres that
are allocated or assignable to productive wells or wells capable
of production.
Development well. A well drilled into a proved
natural gas or oil reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic
horizon known to be productive.
Dry hole. A well found to be incapable of
producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such that
proceeds from the sale of such production exceed production
expenses and taxes.
Exploratory well. A well drilled to find and
produce natural gas or oil reserves not classified as proved, to
find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be
productive of natural gas or oil in another reservoir or to
extend a known reservoir.
Field. An area consisting of either a single
reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to
the same individual geological structural feature
and/or
stratigraphic condition.
Gross acres or gross wells. The total acres or
wells, as the case may be, in which a working interest is owned.
MBbls. Thousand barrels of crude oil or other
liquid hydrocarbons.
Mcf. Thousand cubic feet of natural gas.
Mcfe. Thousand cubic feet equivalent,
determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl
of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
MMBbls. Million barrels of crude oil or other
liquid hydrocarbons.
MMBtu. Million British Thermal Units.
MMcf. Million cubic feet of natural gas.
MMcfe. Million cubic feet equivalent,
determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl
of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
A-1
MMcfe/d. Mmcfe per day.
Net acres or net wells. The sum of the
fractional working interest owned in gross acres or gross wells,
as the case may be.
Plugging and abandonment. Refers to the
sealing off of fluids in the strata penetrated by a well so that
the fluids from one stratum will not escape into another or to
the surface. Regulations of all states require plugging of
abandoned wells.
Productive well. A well that is found to be
capable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such
that proceeds from the sale of the production exceed production
expenses and taxes.
Prospect. A specific geographic area which,
based on supporting geological, geophysical or other data and
also preliminary economic analysis using reasonably anticipated
prices and costs, is deemed to have potential for the discovery
of commercial hydrocarbons.
Proved developed reserves. Has the meaning
given to such term in
Rule 4-10(a)(3)
of
Regulation S-X,
which defines proved developed reserves as reserves that can be
expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing
equipment and operating methods. Additional oil and gas expected
to be obtained through the application of fluid injection or
other improved recovery techniques for supplementing the natural
forces and mechanisms of primary recovery should be included as
proved developed reserves only after testing by a pilot project
or after the operation of an installed program has confirmed
through production response that increased recovery will be
achieved.
Proved reserves. Has the meaning given to such
term in
Rule 4-10(a)(2)
of
Regulation S-X,
which defines proved reserves as the estimated quantities of
crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids which geological
and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing
economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of
the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of
changes in existing prices provided only by contractual
arrangements, but not on escalations based upon future
conditions.
Reservoirs are considered proved if economic producibility is
supported by either actual production or conclusive formation
test. The area of a reservoir considered proved includes
(A) that portion delineated by drilling and defined by
gas-oil
and/or
oil-water contacts, if any, and (B) the immediately
adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which can be reasonably
judged as economically productive on the basis of available
geological and engineering data. In the absence of information
on fluid contacts, the lowest known structural occurrence of
hydrocarbons controls the lower proved limit of the reservoir.
Reserves which can be produced economically through application
of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injection) are
included in the proved classification when successful testing by
a pilot project, or the operation of an installed program in the
reservoir, provides support for the engineering analysis on
which the project or program was based.
Estimates of proved reserves do not include the following:
(A) Oil that may become available from known reservoirs but
is classified separately as indicated additional reserves;
(B) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, the
recovery of which is subject to reasonable doubt because of
uncertainty as to geology, reservoir characteristics, or
economic factors; (C) crude oil, natural gas, and natural
gas liquids, that may occur in undrilled prospects; and
(D) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that
may be recovered from oil shales, coal, gilsonite and other such
sources.
Proved undeveloped reserves. Has the meaning
given to such term in
Rule 4-10(a)(4)
of
Regulation S-X,
which defines proved undeveloped reserves as reserves that are
expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or
from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is
required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage shall
be limited to those drilling units offsetting productive units
that are reasonably certain of production when drilled. Proved
reserves for other undrilled units can be claimed only where it
can be demonstrated with certainty that there is
A-2
continuity of production from the existing productive formation.
Under no circumstances should estimates for proved undeveloped
reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application
of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is
contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective
by actual tests in the area and in the same reservoir.
Reservoir. A porous and permeable underground
formation containing a natural accumulation of producible
natural gas
and/or oil
that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is
separate from other reservoirs.
Trucking. The provision of trucks to move our
drilling rigs from one well location to another and to deliver
water and equipment to the field.
Undeveloped acreage. Lease acreage on which
wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would
permit the production of commercial quantities of natural gas
and oil regardless of whether such acreage contains proved
reserves.
Working interest. The operating interest that
gives the owner the right to drill, produce and conduct
operating activities on the property and receive a share of
production and requires the owner to pay a share of the costs of
drilling and production operations.
A-3
February 13,
2009
Mr. Rusty Shepherd
Crimson Exploration Inc.
717 Texas Avenue, Suite 2900
Houston, Texas 77002
Dear Mr. Shepherd:
In accordance with your request, we have estimated the proved
reserves and future revenue, as of December 31, 2008, to
the Crimson Exploration Inc. (Crimson) interest in certain oil
and gas properties located in the United States and in the Gulf
of Mexico, as listed in the accompanying tabulations. This
report has been prepared using constant prices and costs, as
discussed in subsequent paragraphs of this letter. The estimates
of reserves and future revenue in this report have been prepared
in accordance with the definitions and guidelines of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and, with the
exception of the exclusion of future income taxes, conform to
the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69.
Definitions are presented immediately following this letter.
As presented in the accompanying summary projections, Tables I
through IV, we estimate the net reserves and future net revenue
to the Crimson interest in these properties, as of
December 31, 2008, to be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Reserves
|
|
|
Future Net Revenue ($)
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Worth
|
|
Category
|
|
(Barrels)
|
|
|
(Barrels)
|
|
|
(MCF)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
at 10%
|
|
|
Proved Developed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Producing
|
|
|
1,164,981
|
|
|
|
1,629,635
|
|
|
|
48,457,379
|
|
|
|
240,575,200
|
|
|
|
180,036,200
|
|
Non-Producing
|
|
|
450,993
|
|
|
|
793,243
|
|
|
|
18,254,400
|
|
|
|
97,027,700
|
|
|
|
55,676,200
|
|
Proved Undeveloped
|
|
|
947,751
|
|
|
|
976,351
|
|
|
|
29,456,965
|
|
|
|
110,481,200
|
|
|
|
55,237,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Proved
|
|
|
2,563,725
|
|
|
|
3,399,229
|
|
|
|
96,168,734
|
|
|
|
448,084,000
|
|
|
|
290,949,800
|
|
Totals may not add because of rounding.
The oil reserves shown include crude oil and condensate. Oil and
natural gas liquids (NGL) volumes are expressed in barrels that
are equivalent to 42 United States gallons. Gas volumes are
expressed in thousands of cubic feet (MCF) at standard
temperature and pressure bases.
The estimates shown in this report are for proved developed
producing, proved developed non-producing, and proved
undeveloped reserves. Our estimates do not include any probable
or possible reserves that may exist for these properties. This
report does not include any value that could be attributed to
interests in undeveloped acreage beyond those tracts for which
undeveloped reserves have been estimated. Reserves
categorization conveys the relative degree of certainty;
reserves subcategorization is based on development and
production status. The estimates of reserves and future revenue
included herein have not been adjusted for risk. As shown in the
Table of Contents, for each reserves category this report
includes a summary projection of reserves and revenue along with
one-line summaries of basic data, reserves, and economics by
lease.
B-3
Future gross revenue to the Crimson interest is prior to
deducting state production taxes and ad valorem taxes. Future
net revenue is after deductions for these taxes, future capital
costs, and operating expenses but before consideration of
federal income taxes. The future net revenue has been discounted
at an annual rate of 10 percent to determine its present
worth. The present worth is shown to indicate the effect of time
on the value of money and should not be construed as being the
fair market value of the properties.
For the purposes of this report, we did not perform any field
inspection of the properties, nor did we examine the mechanical
operation or condition of the wells and their related
facilities. We have not investigated possible environmental
liability related to the properties; therefore, our estimates do
not include any costs due to such possible liability. Also, our
estimates do not include any salvage value for the lease and
well equipment or the cost of abandoning the properties.
Oil and NGL prices used in this report are based on a
December 31, 2008, West Texas Intermediate posted price of
$41.00 per barrel and are adjusted by lease for quality,
transportation fees, and regional price differentials. Gas
prices used in this report are based on a December 31,
2008, Henry Hub spot market price of $5.71 per MMBTU and are
adjusted by lease for energy content, transportation fees, and
regional price differentials. All prices are held constant
throughout the lives of the properties.
Lease and well operating costs used in this report are based on
operating expense records of Crimson. These costs include the
per-well overhead expenses allowed under joint operating
agreements along with estimates of costs to be incurred at and
below the district and field levels. Headquarters general and
administrative overhead expenses of Crimson are included to the
extent that they are covered under joint operating agreements
for the operated properties. Lease and well operating costs are
held constant throughout the lives of the properties. Capital
costs are included as required for workovers, new development
wells, and production equipment. The future capital costs are
held constant to the date of expenditure.
We have made no investigation of potential gas volume and value
imbalances resulting from overdelivery or underdelivery to the
Crimson interest. Therefore, our estimates of reserves and
future revenue do not include adjustments for the settlement of
any such imbalances; our projections are based on Crimson
receiving its net revenue interest share of estimated future
gross gas production.
The reserves shown in this report are estimates only and should
not be construed as exact quantities. The reserves may or may
not be recovered; if they are recovered, the revenues therefrom
and the costs related thereto could be more or less than the
estimated amounts. A substantial portion of these reserves are
for behind-pipe zones, undeveloped locations, and producing
wells that lack sufficient production history upon which
performance-related estimates of reserves can be based.
Therefore, these reserves are based on estimates of reservoir
volumes and recovery efficiencies along with analogy to
properties with similar geologic and reservoir characteristics;
it may be necessary to revise these estimates as additional
performance data become available. Because of governmental
policies and uncertainties of supply and demand, the sales
rates, prices received for the reserves, and costs incurred in
recovering such reserves may vary from assumptions made while
preparing this report. Also, estimates of reserves may increase
or decrease as a result of future operations.
In evaluating the information at our disposal concerning this
report, we have excluded from our consideration all matters as
to which the controlling interpretation may be legal or
accounting, rather than engineering and geologic. As in all
aspects of oil and gas evaluation, there are uncertainties
inherent in the interpretation of engineering and geologic data;
therefore, our conclusions necessarily represent only informed
professional judgment.
The titles to the properties have not been examined by
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., nor has the
actual degree or type of interest owned been independently
confirmed. The data used in
B-4
our estimates were obtained from Crimson, public data sources,
and the nonconfidential files of Netherland, Sewell &
Associates, Inc. and were accepted as accurate. Supporting
geologic, field performance, and work data are on file in our
office. We are independent petroleum engineers, geologists,
geophysicists, and petrophysicists; we do not own an interest in
these properties and are not employed on a contingent basis.
Sincerely,
NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
/s/ C.H.
(Scott) Rees III, P.E.
By: C.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
/s/ Richard B. Talley, Jr., P.E.
|
|
/s/ David E. Nice, P.G.
|
By: Richard B. Talley, Jr., P.E.
Vice President
|
|
By: David E. Nice, P.G.
Vice President
|
|
|
|
Date Signed: February 13, 2009
|
|
Date Signed: February 13, 2009
|
RBT:JJH
Please be advised that the digital document you are viewing is
provided by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
(NSAI) as a convenience to our clients. The digital document is
intended to be substantively the same as the original signed
document maintained by NSAI. The digital document is subject to
the parameters, limitations, and conditions stated in the
original document. In the event of any differences between the
digital document and the original document, the original
document shall control and supersede the digital document.
B-5
DEFINITIONS OF
OIL AND GAS RESERVES
Adapted
from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulation S-X
Rule 4-10(a)
The following definitions of proved reserves are set forth in
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Regulation S-X
Section 210.4-10(a).
Also included (in italics) are certain subsequent
interpretations set forth in the SECs Corporate Finance
Accounting Interpretations and Guidance [SEC Interpretations];
SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins: Topic 12 [SEC Topic 12]; the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69 [FASB
69]; and the 2007 Petroleum Resources Management System prepared
by the Oil and Gas Reserves Committee of the Society of
Petroleum Engineers (SPE) and reviewed and jointly sponsored by
the World Petroleum Council (WPC), the American Association of
Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), and the Society of Petroleum
Evaluation Engineers (SPEE) [SPE-PRMS].
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves. Proved oil and
gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural
gas, and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering
data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in
future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and
operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the
estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in
existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but
not on escalations based upon future conditions.
The determination of reasonable certainty is generated by
supporting geological and engineering data. There must be data
available which indicate that assumptions such as decline rates,
recovery factors, reservoir limits, recovery mechanisms and
volumetric estimates, gas-oil ratios or liquid yield are valid.
If the area in question is new to exploration and there is
little supporting data for decline rates, recovery factors,
reservoir drive mechanisms etc., a conservative approach is
appropriate until there is enough supporting data to justify the
use of more liberal parameters for the estimation of proved
reserves. The concept of reasonable certainty implies that, as
more technical data becomes available, a positive, or upward,
revision is much more likely than a negative, or downward,
revision.
Existing economic and operating conditions are the product
prices, operating costs, production methods, recovery
techniques, transportation and marketing arrangements, ownership
and/or
entitlement terms and regulatory requirements that are extant on
the effective date of the estimate. An anticipated change in
conditions must have reasonable certainty of occurrence; the
corresponding investment and operating expense to make that
change must be included in the economic feasibility at the
appropriate time. These conditions include estimated net
abandonment costs to be incurred and duration of current
licenses and permits.
If oil and gas prices are so low that production is actually
shut-in because of uneconomic conditions, the reserves
attributed to the shut-in properties can no longer be classified
as proved and must be subtracted from the proved reserve data
base as a negative revision. Those volumes may be included as
positive revisions to a subsequent years proved reserves
only upon their return to economic status. [SEC
Interpretations]
A standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
relating to an enterprises interests in (a) proved
oil and gas reserves (paragraph 10) and (b) oil
and gas subject to purchase under long-term supply, purchase, or
similar agreements and contracts in which the enterprise
participates in the operation of the properties on which the oil
or gas is located or otherwise serves as the producer of those
reserves (paragraph 13) shall be disclosed as of the
end of the year. The standardized measure of discounted future
net cash flows relating to those two types of interests in
reserves may be combined for reporting purposes. The following
B-6
DEFINITIONS OF
OIL AND GAS RESERVES
Adapted
from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulation S-X
Rule 4-10(a)
information shall be disclosed in the aggregate and for each
geographic area for which reserve quantities are disclosed in
accordance with paragraph 12:
a. Future cash inflows. These shall be
computed by applying year-end prices of oil and gas relating to
the enterprises proved reserves to the year-end quantities
of those reserves. Future price changes shall be considered only
to the extent provided by contractual arrangements in existence
at year-end.
b. Future development and production
costs. These costs shall be computed by
estimating the expenditures to be incurred in developing and
producing the proved oil and gas reserves at the end of the
year, based on year-end costs and assuming continuation of
existing economic conditions. If estimated development
expenditures are significant, they shall be presented separately
from estimated production costs.
c. Future income tax expenses. These
expenses shall be computed by applying the appropriate year-end
statutory tax rates, with consideration of future tax rates
already legislated, to the future pretax net cash flows relating
to the enterprises proved oil and gas reserves, less the
tax basis of the properties involved. The future income tax
expenses shall give effect to permanent differences and tax
credits and allowances relating to the enterprises proved
oil and gas reserves.
d. Future net cash flows. These amounts
are the result of subtracting future development and production
costs and future income tax expenses from future cash inflows.
e. Discount. This amount shall be derived
from using a discount rate of 10 percent a year to reflect
the timing of the future net cash flows relating to proved oil
and gas reserves.
f. Standardized measure of discounted future net cash
flows. This amount is the future net cash flows
less the computed discount. [FASB 69]
Reservoirs are considered proved if economic producibility is
supported by either actual production or conclusive formation
test. The area of a reservoir considered proved includes
(A) that portion delineated by drilling and defined by
gas-oil
and/or
oil-water contacts, if any; and (B) the immediately
adjoining portions not yet drilled, but which can be reasonably
judged as economically productive on the basis of available
geological and engineering data. In the absence of information
on fluid contacts, the lowest known structural occurrence of
hydrocarbons controls the lower proved limit of the reservoir.
Proved reserves may be attributed to a prospective zone if a
conclusive formation test has been performed or if there is
production from the zone at economic rates. It is clear to the
SEC staff that wireline recovery of small volumes (e.g. 100
cc) or production of a few hundred barrels per day in
remote locations is not necessarily conclusive. Analyses of
open-hole well logs which imply that an interval is productive
are not sufficient for attribution of proved reserves. If there
is an indication of economic producibility by either formation
test or production, the reserves in the legal and technically
justified drainage area around the well projected down to a
known fluid contact or the lowest known hydrocarbons, or LKH may
be considered to be proved.
In order to attribute proved reserves to legal locations
adjacent to such a well (i.e. offsets), there must be
conclusive, unambiguous technical data which supports reasonable
certainty of production of such volumes and sufficient legal
acreage to economically justify the development without going
below the shallower of the fluid contact or the LKH. In the
absence
B-7
DEFINITIONS OF
OIL AND GAS RESERVES
Adapted
from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulation S-X
Rule 4-10(a)
of a fluid contact, no offsetting reservoir volume below the
LKH from a well penetration shall be classified as proved.
Upon obtaining performance history sufficient to reasonably
conclude that more reserves will be recovered than those
estimated volumetrically down to LKH, positive reserve revisions
should be made. [SEC Interpretations]
Economic producibility of estimated proved reserves can be
supported to the satisfaction of the Office of Engineering if
geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable
certainty that those reserves can be recovered in future years
under existing economic and operating conditions. The relative
importance of the many pieces of geological and engineering data
which should be evaluated when classifying reserves cannot be
identified in advance. In certain instances, proved reserves may
be assigned to reservoirs on the basis of a combination of
electrical and other type logs and core analyses which indicate
the reservoirs are analogous to similar reservoirs in the same
field which are producing or have demonstrated the ability to
produce on a formation test. [SEC Topic 12]
Reserves which can be produced economically through application
of improved recovery techniques (such as fluid injection) are
included in the proved classification when
successful testing by a pilot project, or the operation of an
installed program in the reservoir, provides support for the
engineering analysis on which the project or program was based.
If an improved recovery technique which has not been verified
by routine commercial use in the area is to be applied, the
hydrocarbon volumes estimated to be recoverable cannot be
classified as proved reserves unless the technique has been
demonstrated to be technically and economically successful by a
pilot project or installed program in that specific rock volume.
Such demonstration should validate the feasibility study leading
to the project. [SEC Interpretations]
Estimates of proved reserves do not include the following:
(A) oil that may become available from known reservoirs but
is classified separately as indicated additional
reserves;
(B) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, the
recovery of which is subject to reasonable doubt because of
uncertainty as to geology, reservoir characteristics, or
economic factors;
(C) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that
may occur in undrilled prospects; and
(D) crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, that
may be recovered from oil shales, coal, gilsonite and other such
sources.
Geologic and reservoir characteristic uncertainties such as
those relating to permeability, reservoir continuity, sealing
nature of faults, structure and other unknown characteristics
may prevent reserves from being classified as proved. Economic
uncertainties such as the lack of a market (e.g. stranded
hydrocarbons), uneconomic prices and marginal reserves that do
not show a positive cash flow can also prevent reserves from
being classified as proved. Hydrocarbons
manufactured through extensive treatment of
gilsonite, coal and oil shales are mining activities reportable
under Industry Guide 7. They cannot be called proved oil
B-8
DEFINITIONS OF
OIL AND GAS RESERVES
Adapted
from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulation S-X
Rule 4-10(a)
and gas reserves. However, coal bed methane gas can be
classified as proved reserves if the recovery of such is shown
to be economically feasible.
In developing frontier areas, the existence of wells with a
formation test or limited production may not be enough to
classify those estimated hydrocarbon volumes as proved reserves.
Issuers must demonstrate that there is reasonable certainty that
a market exists for the hydrocarbons and that an economic method
of extracting, treating and transporting them to market exists
or is feasible and is likely to exist in the near future. A
commitment by the company to develop the necessary production,
treatment and transportation infrastructure is essential to the
attribution of proved undeveloped reserves. Significant lack of
progress on the development of such reserves may be evidence of
a lack of such commitment. Affirmation of this commitment may
take the form of signed sales contracts for the products;
request for proposals to build facilities; signed acceptance of
bid proposals; memos of understanding between the appropriate
organizations and governments; firm plans and timetables
established; approved authorization for expenditures to build
facilities; approved loan documents to finance the required
infrastructure; initiation of construction of facilities;
approved environmental permits etc. Reasonable certainty of
procurement of project financing by the company is a requirement
for the attribution of proved reserves. An inordinately long
delay in the schedule of development may introduce doubt
sufficient to preclude the attribution of proved reserves.
The history of issuance and continued recognition of permits,
concessions and commerciality agreements by regulatory bodies
and governments should be considered when determining whether
hydrocarbon accumulations can be classified as proved reserves.
Automatic renewal of such agreements cannot be expected if the
regulatory body has the authority to end the agreement unless
there is a long and clear track record which supports the
conclusion that such approvals and renewal are a matter of
course. [SEC Interpretations]
Companies should report reserves of natural gas liquids which
are net to their leasehold interests, i.e., that portion
recovered in a processing plant and allocated to the leasehold
interest. It may be appropriate in the case of natural gas
liquids not clearly attributable to leasehold interests
ownership to follow instructions to Item 3 of Securities
Act Industry Guide 2 and report such reserves separately and
describe the nature of the ownership. [SEC Topic 12]
Proved Developed Oil and Gas Reserves. Proved developed
oil and gas reserves are reserves that can be expected to be
recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and
operating methods. Additional oil and gas expected to be
obtained through the application of fluid injection or other
improved recovery techniques for supplementing the natural
forces and mechanisms of primary recovery should be included as
proved developed reserves only after testing by a
pilot project or after the operation of an installed program has
confirmed through production response that increased recovery
will be achieved.
Currently producing wells and wells awaiting minor sales
connection expenditure, recompletion, additional perforations or
bore hole stimulation treatment would be examples of properties
with proved developed reserves since the majority of the
expenditures to develop the reserves has already been spent.
Proved developed reserves from improved recovery techniques
can be assigned after either the operation of an installed pilot
program shows a positive production response to the
B-9
DEFINITIONS OF
OIL AND GAS RESERVES
Adapted
from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulation S-X
Rule 4-10(a)
technique or the project is fully installed and operational
and has shown the production response anticipated by earlier
feasibility studies. In the case with a pilot, proved developed
reserves can be assigned only to that volume attributable to the
pilots influence. In the case of the fully installed
project, response must be seen from the full project before all
the proved developed reserves estimated can be assigned. If a
project is not following original forecasts, proved developed
reserves can only be assigned to the extent actually supported
by the current performance. An important point here is that
attribution of incremental proved developed reserves from the
application of improved recovery techniques requires the
installation of facilities and a production increase. [SEC
Interpretations]
Developed Producing Reserves. Developed Producing Reserves
are expected to be recovered from completion intervals that are
open and producing at the time of the estimate. Improved
recovery reserves are considered producing only after the
improved recovery project is in operation.
Developed Non-Producing Reserves. Developed Non-Producing
Reserves include shut-in and behind-pipe Reserves. Shut-in
Reserves are expected to be recovered from (1) completion
intervals which are open at the time of the estimate but which
have not yet started producing, (2) wells which were
shut-in for market conditions or pipeline connections, or
(3) wells not capable of production for mechanical reasons.
Behind-pipe Reserves are expected to be recovered from zones in
existing wells which will require additional completion work or
future recompletion prior to start of production. In all cases,
production can be initiated or restored with relatively low
expenditure compared to the cost of drilling a new well.
[SPE-PRMS]
Proved Undeveloped Reserves. Proved
undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are expected
to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from
existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required
for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited
to those drilling units offsetting productive units that are
reasonably certain of production when drilled. Proved reserves
for other undrilled units can be claimed only where it can be
demonstrated with certainty that there is continuity of
production from the existing productive formation. Under no
circumstances should estimates for proved undeveloped reserves
be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid
injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated,
unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual
tests in the area and in the same reservoir.
The SEC staff points out that this definition contains no
mitigating modifier for the word certainty. Also, continuity of
production requires more than the technical indication of
favorable structure alone (e.g. seismic data) to meet the test
for proved undeveloped reserves. Generally, proved undeveloped
reserves can be claimed only for legal and technically justified
drainage areas offsetting an existing productive well (but
structurally no lower than LKH). If there are at least two wells
in the same reservoir which are separated by more than one legal
location and which show communication (reservoir continuity),
proved undeveloped reserves could be claimed between the two
wells, even though the location in question might be more than
an offset well location away from any of the wells. In this
illustration, seismic data could be used to help support this
claim by showing reservoir continuity between the wells, but the
required data would be the conclusive evidence of communication
from production or pressure tests. The SEC staff emphasizes that
proved reserves cannot be claimed more than one offset location
away from a productive well if there are no other wells in the
reservoir, even though seismic data may exist. The use of
high-quality, well calibrated seismic data can improve reservoir
description for performing volumetrics (e.g. fluid contacts).
However, seismic data is
B-10
DEFINITIONS OF
OIL AND GAS RESERVES
Adapted
from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulation S-X
Rule 4-10(a)
not an indicator of continuity of production and, therefore,
can not be the sole indicator of additional proved reserves
beyond the legal and technically justified drainage areas of
wells that were drilled. Continuity of production would have to
be demonstrated by something other than seismic data.
In a new reservoir with only a few wells, reservoir
simulation or application of generalized hydrocarbon recovery
correlations would not be considered a reliable method to show
increased proved undeveloped reserves. With only a few wells as
data points from which to build a geologic model and little
performance history to validate the results with an acceptable
history match, the results of a simulation or material balance
model would be speculative in nature. The results of such a
simulation or material balance model would not be considered to
be reasonably certain to occur in the field to the extent that
additional proved undeveloped reserves could be recognized. The
application of recovery correlations which are not specific to
the field under consideration is not reliable enough to be the
sole source for proved reserve calculations.
Reserves cannot be classified as proved undeveloped reserves
based on improved recovery techniques until such time that they
have been proved effective in that reservoir or an analogous
reservoir in the same geologic formation in the immediate area.
An analogous reservoir is one having at least the same values or
better for porosity, permeability, permeability distribution,
thickness, continuity and hydrocarbon saturations.
(g) Topic 12 of Accounting Series Release
No. 257 of the Staff Accounting Bulletins states:
In certain instances, proved reserves may be assigned to
reservoirs on the basis of a combination of electrical and other
type logs and core analyses which indicate the reservoirs are
analogous to similar reservoirs in the same field which are
producing or have demonstrated the ability to produce on a
formation test.
If the combination of data from open-hole logs and core
analyses is overwhelmingly in support of economic producibility
and the indicated reservoir properties are analogous to similar
reservoirs in the same field that have produced or demonstrated
the ability to produce on a conclusive formation test, the
reserves may be classified as proved. This would probably be a
rare event especially in an exploratory situation. The essence
of the SEC definition is that in most cases there must at least
be a conclusive formation test in a new reservoir before any
reserves can be considered to be proved. [SEC
Interpretations]
B-11
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Crimson Exploration Inc. Audited Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
Crimson Exploration Inc. Unaudited Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Crimson Exploration Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Crimson Exploration Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Crimson Exploration Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Houston, Texas
March 26, 2009
F-2
CRIMSON
EXPLORATION INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,882,511
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
21,078,815
|
|
|
|
30,034,558
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
77,293
|
|
|
|
230,870
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
25,191,445
|
|
|
|
198,708
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,134,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
46,347,553
|
|
|
|
36,481,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method of accounting)
|
|
|
584,093,885
|
|
|
|
407,905,609
|
|
Other property and equipment
|
|
|
3,282,088
|
|
|
|
2,710,995
|
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(138,220,237
|
)
|
|
|
(54,128,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
|
|
449,155,736
|
|
|
|
356,488,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
104,697
|
|
|
|
94,591
|
|
Debt issuance cost, net
|
|
|
2,890,094
|
|
|
|
3,982,023
|
|
Deferred charges
|
|
|
1,324,907
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
11,722,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent assets
|
|
|
16,042,500
|
|
|
|
5,964,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
511,545,789
|
|
|
$
|
398,935,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
90,368
|
|
|
$
|
100,609
|
|
Accounts payabletrade
|
|
|
47,726,858
|
|
|
|
41,432,777
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
546,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
24,369,060
|
|
|
|
3,234,553
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
1,659,371
|
|
|
|
1,407,347
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
1,265,801
|
|
|
|
2,703,959
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
8,331,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
83,989,610
|
|
|
|
48,879,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
276,690,426
|
|
|
|
260,064,226
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
11,409,171
|
|
|
|
6,148,144
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
1,491,755
|
|
|
|
12,747,019
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
15,609,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
732,709
|
|
|
|
1,443,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
305,933,376
|
|
|
|
280,402,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
389,922,986
|
|
|
|
329,281,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (see Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (see Note 12)
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
Common stock (see Note 12)
|
|
|
5,808
|
|
|
|
5,128
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
95,676,875
|
|
|
|
89,507,073
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
26,189,888
|
|
|
|
(19,859,952
|
)
|
Treasury stock (see Note 12)
|
|
|
(250,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
121,622,803
|
|
|
|
69,653,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
511,545,789
|
|
|
$
|
398,935,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral
part of these statements.
F-3
CRIMSON
EXPLORATION INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales
|
|
$
|
116,414,956
|
|
|
$
|
67,867,605
|
|
|
$
|
10,569,705
|
|
Crude oil sales
|
|
|
41,860,385
|
|
|
|
27,021,296
|
|
|
|
10,908,030
|
|
Natural gas liquids sales
|
|
|
27,404,774
|
|
|
|
14,272,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating overhead and other income
|
|
|
1,088,158
|
|
|
|
381,595
|
|
|
|
181,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
186,768,273
|
|
|
|
109,543,208
|
|
|
|
21,659,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
20,824,629
|
|
|
|
12,033,963
|
|
|
|
5,633,069
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
16,266,493
|
|
|
|
11,701,908
|
|
|
|
1,894,520
|
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
|
9,965,372
|
|
|
|
3,174,415
|
|
|
|
673,015
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
50,466,966
|
|
|
|
30,796,487
|
|
|
|
4,035,452
|
|
Impaired assets of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
35,953,586
|
|
|
|
4,362,186
|
|
|
|
3,149,980
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
22,405,639
|
|
|
|
14,541,780
|
|
|
|
8,729,674
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(15,209,706
|
)
|
|
|
(683,830
|
)
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
140,672,979
|
|
|
|
75,926,909
|
|
|
|
24,118,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
46,095,294
|
|
|
|
33,616,299
|
|
|
|
(2,458,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized
|
|
|
(21,108,603
|
)
|
|
|
(14,949,358
|
)
|
|
|
(108,961
|
)
|
Other financing costs
|
|
|
(1,501,627
|
)
|
|
|
(1,321,661
|
)
|
|
|
(228,320
|
)
|
Loss from equity in investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,843
|
)
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
49,408,961
|
|
|
|
(18,186,158
|
)
|
|
|
6,082,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
26,798,731
|
|
|
|
(34,457,177
|
)
|
|
|
5,742,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
72,894,025
|
|
|
|
(840,878
|
)
|
|
|
3,284,249
|
|
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit
|
|
|
(26,690,807
|
)
|
|
|
410,361
|
|
|
|
(1,425,305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
46,203,218
|
|
|
|
(430,517
|
)
|
|
|
1,858,944
|
|
Dividends on Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Paid 2008-$153,378; 2007-$702,948;
2006-$154,875)
|
|
|
(4,234,050
|
)
|
|
|
(4,453,872
|
)
|
|
|
(3,648,925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
$
|
41,969,168
|
|
|
$
|
(4,884,389
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,789,981
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
7.81
|
|
|
$
|
(1.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
4.46
|
|
|
$
|
(1.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
5,371,377
|
|
|
|
4,330,282
|
|
|
|
3,231,000
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
10,360,348
|
|
|
|
4,330,282
|
|
|
|
3,231,000
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral
part of these statements.
F-4
CRIMSON
EXPLORATION INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE YEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2005
|
|
|
103,250
|
|
|
|
2,899,182
|
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
|
$
|
2,899
|
|
|
$
|
72,877,718
|
|
|
$
|
(20,076,388
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,805,262
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
3,876,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,877,014
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
48,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,150
|
|
Preferred H converted
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
4,287
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of oil and gas leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
2,736,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,736,413
|
|
Current year net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,858,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,858,944
|
|
Dividends paid on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
154,854
|
|
|
|
(154,875
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2006
|
|
|
103,220
|
|
|
|
3,333,602
|
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
79,693,736
|
|
|
|
(18,372,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,325,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(354,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(354,168
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
4,531,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,532,183
|
|
Stock options and warrants exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
Preferred H converted
|
|
|
(3,020
|
)
|
|
|
431,430
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred E converted
|
|
|
(9,000
|
)
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred D converted
|
|
|
(8,000
|
)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of oil and gas leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
4,574,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,575,000
|
|
Current year net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(430,517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(430,517
|
)
|
Dividends paid on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
702,867
|
|
|
|
(702,948
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2007
|
|
|
83,200
|
|
|
|
5,127,937
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
5,128
|
|
|
|
89,507,073
|
|
|
|
(19,859,952
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,653,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
5,670,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,670,598
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
346,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,500
|
|
Preferred G converted
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred H converted
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
14,286
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,203,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,203,218
|
|
Dividends paid on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
153,362
|
|
|
|
(153,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250,594
|
)
|
|
|
(250,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2008
|
|
|
82,600
|
|
|
|
5,787,287
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
5,808
|
|
|
$
|
95,676,875
|
|
|
$
|
26,189,888
|
|
|
$
|
(250,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
121,622,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral
part of these statements.
F-5
CRIMSON
EXPLORATION INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
46,203,218
|
|
|
$
|
(430,517
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,858,944
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
50,466,966
|
|
|
|
30,796,487
|
|
|
|
4,035,452
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
(546,840
|
)
|
|
|
(268,445
|
)
|
|
|
(14,113
|
)
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
5,434,992
|
|
|
|
4,738,125
|
|
|
|
3,819,600
|
|
Debt issuance cost
|
|
|
1,091,929
|
|
|
|
1,059,033
|
|
|
|
134,131
|
|
Deferred charges
|
|
|
75,093
|
|
|
|
(1,400,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (current and deferred)
|
|
|
26,110,678
|
|
|
|
(410,361
|
)
|
|
|
1,425,305
|
|
Dry holes, abandoned property, impaired assets
|
|
|
43,309,365
|
|
|
|
5,710,125
|
|
|
|
3,209,943
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(15,209,706
|
)
|
|
|
(683,830
|
)
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
Loss from equity in investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(49,408,961
|
)
|
|
|
18,186,158
|
|
|
|
(6,082,058
|
)
|
Provision for bad debts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,904
|
|
|
|
87,436
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivabletrade, net
|
|
|
8,973,958
|
|
|
|
(22,648,152
|
)
|
|
|
(161,811
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
153,577
|
|
|
|
(5,566
|
)
|
|
|
24,120
|
|
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
27,114,462
|
|
|
|
34,871,687
|
|
|
|
5,946,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
143,768,731
|
|
|
|
69,611,648
|
|
|
|
14,287,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
34,923,332
|
|
|
|
756,650
|
|
|
|
7,950
|
|
Acquisition of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
(58,481,721
|
)
|
|
|
(253,434,220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(141,794,612
|
)
|
|
|
(59,048,764
|
)
|
|
|
(21,777,332
|
)
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(10,106
|
)
|
|
|
(45,089
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(165,363,107
|
)
|
|
|
(311,771,423
|
)
|
|
|
(21,769,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options and warrants
|
|
|
346,500
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
48,150
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(250,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on debt
|
|
|
(132,393,063
|
)
|
|
|
(68,571,595
|
)
|
|
|
(18,805,206
|
)
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
149,009,022
|
|
|
|
320,177,233
|
|
|
|
26,097,334
|
|
Debt issuance expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,591,473
|
)
|
|
|
(309,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
16,711,865
|
|
|
|
247,018,965
|
|
|
|
7,030,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(4,882,511
|
)
|
|
|
4,859,190
|
|
|
|
(451,072
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
4,882,511
|
|
|
|
23,321
|
|
|
|
474,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,882,511
|
|
|
$
|
23,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid For Interest
|
|
$
|
22,484,711
|
|
|
$
|
14,914,194
|
|
|
$
|
291,163
|
|
Cash Paid For Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
580,129
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,000
|
|
Non-Cash Stock Issuance For Oil And Gas Properties
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,575,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,736,413
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral
part of these statements.
F-6
CRIMSON
EXPLORATION INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Crimson Exploration Inc., together with its subsidiaries,
(Crimson, we, our,
us) is an independent energy company engaged in
the acquisition, development, exploitation and production of
crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids, principally in
the onshore gulf coast regions of Texas and Louisiana and in
Colorado.
Organization
In June 2005, our predecessor, GulfWest Energy Inc., a Texas
corporation (GulfWest), merged with and into
Crimson Exploration Inc., a Delaware corporation
(Crimson), for the purpose of changing our
state of incorporation from Texas to Delaware
(Reincorporation). The Reincorporation was
accomplished pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
June 28, 2005, which was approved by GulfWests
stockholders at the 2005 Annual Stockholders Meeting held
June 1, 2005.
In January 2006, we formed Crimson Exploration Operating, Inc.
(CEO), a Delaware corporation, as our wholly
owned subsidiary through which all operations are conducted.
Effective March 2, 2006, we merged all our subsidiaries,
with the exception of LTW Pipeline Co., into this newly formed
corporation. LTW Pipeline Co. remains an inactive subsidiary of
Crimson Exploration Inc.
In September 2006, we effected a reverse stock split where each
ten shares of outstanding common stock were exchanged for one
new share of common stock. All periods presented have been
adjusted to reflect the effects of the reverse stock split.
On May 8, 2007, CEO acquired certain natural gas and crude
oil properties and related assets in the South Texas and Gulf
Coast areas of Louisiana and Texas (STGC
Properties) pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase
and Sale Agreement (Purchase Agreement) from
EXCO Resources, Inc. (EXCO) through the
acquisition of 100% of the membership interest of Southern G
Holdings, LLC (SGH). These properties were
operated under SGH until SGH merged with CEO on
December 31, 2007. The consolidated statements of
operations include the results of operations of the STGC
Properties from May to present.
Segments
Our operations are considered to fall within a single industry
segment, which is the acquisition, development, exploitation and
production of natural gas and crude oil properties in the United
States.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year
financial statements to conform to the current year
presentation, including a breakout of sales by commodity, a
breakout of production and ad valorem taxes from lease operating
expenses and a reclassification of asset retirement obligations.
We reclassified accretion expense from asset retirement
obligations to depreciation, depletion and amortization. We also
reclassified net settled asset retirement obligations expense
from asset retirement obligations to exploration expenses. All
of these reclassifications were made based on the materiality of
these items to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. These
changes had no impact on Total Operating Revenues, Income (Loss)
from Operations or Net Income (Loss) as previously disclosed.
F-7
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investment instruments purchased
with remaining maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents for purposes of the consolidated statements of cash
flows and other statements. We maintain cash on deposit in
non-interest bearing accounts, which, at times, exceed federally
insured limits. We have not experienced any losses on such
accounts and believe we are not exposed to any significant
credit risk on cash and equivalents.
Use of
Estimates in the Preparation of Financial
Statements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Oil and Gas
Properties
We use the successful efforts method of accounting for natural
gas and crude oil producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral
interests in natural gas and crude oil properties are
capitalized. Costs to drill and develop development wells and
costs to drill and develop exploratory wells that find proved
reserves are also capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory wells
that do not find proved reserves, delay rentals and geological
and geophysical costs are expensed (except those costs used to
determine a drill site location).
Capitalized costs of producing natural gas and crude oil
properties and support equipment, after considering estimated
dismantlement and abandonment costs and estimated salvage
values, are depleted by the
unit-of-production
method.
On the sale of an entire interest in an unproved property, the
gain or loss on the sale is recognized, taking into
consideration the amount of any recorded impairment if the
property has been assessed individually. If a partial interest
in an unproved property is sold, the amount received is treated
as a reduction of the cost of the interest retained. On the sale
of an entire or partial interest in a proved property, the gain
or loss is recognized, based upon the fair values of the
interests sold and retained.
Oil and Gas
Reserves
The estimates of proved natural gas, crude oil and natural gas
liquids reserves utilized in the preparation of the financial
statements are estimated in accordance with guidelines
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) and the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB), which require that reserve
estimates be prepared under existing economic and operating
conditions with no provision for price and cost escalations over
prices and costs existing at year end except by contractual
arrangements.
We emphasize that reserve estimates are inherently imprecise.
Accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as more
current information becomes available. Our policy is to deplete
capitalized natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids costs
on the unit of production method, based upon these reserve
estimates. It is possible that, because of changes in market
conditions or the inherent imprecision of these reserve
estimates, that the estimates of future cash inflows, future
gross revenues, the amount of natural gas, crude oil and natural
gas liquids reserves, the remaining estimated lives of the
natural gas and crude oil properties, or any combination of the
above may be increased or reduced. See
Note 17Oil and Gas Reserves (unaudited)
for further information.
F-8
Capitalized
Interest
Interest is capitalized as part of the historical cost of
acquiring assets. Natural gas and crude oil investments in
exploration and development activities which are in progress
qualify for interest capitalization. Capitalized interest is
calculated by multiplying the Companys weighted-average
interest rate on debt by the amount of qualifying costs.
Capitalized interest cannot exceed gross interest expense. Any
associated capitalized interest is transferred to the
appropriate asset and is depleted by the unit of production
method. Capitalized interest totaled $0.9 million,
$1.3 million and $0.2 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006
respectively.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
In 2003, we adopted the Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 143, Asset
Retirement Obligations (SFAS 143)
which requires us to recognize an estimated liability for the
plugging and abandonment of our natural gas and crude oil wells
and associated pipelines and equipment. The liability and the
associated increase in the related long-lived asset are recorded
in the period in which the related assets are placed in service
or acquired. The liability is accreted to its present value each
period and the capitalized cost is depleted over the useful life
of the related asset. The accretion expense is included in
depreciation, depletion and amortization
(DD&A) expense.
The estimated liability is based on historical experience in
plugging and abandoning wells. The estimated remaining lives of
the wells is based on reserve life estimates and federal and
state regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using
an assumed credit-adjusted risk-free rate.
Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in
estimates of plugging and abandonment costs, changes in the
risk-free rate or changes in the remaining lives of the wells,
or if federal or state regulators enact new plugging and
abandonment requirements. At the time of abandonment, we
recognize a gain or loss on abandonment to the extent that
actual costs do not equal the estimated costs. This gain or loss
on abandonment is included in exploration expenses.
Other Property
and Equipment
The following tables set forth certain information with respect
to our other property and equipment. With the exception of
leasehold improvements, which is amortized over the term of the
lease, other property and equipment is recorded at cost, and we
provide for depreciation and amortization using the
straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives
of the respective assets:
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Years
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
3-5
|
Office equipment
|
|
7
|
Computer software
|
|
7
|
Gathering system
|
|
10
|
Well servicing equipment
|
|
10
|
F-9
Capitalized costs relating to other properties and equipment are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Automobiles
|
|
$
|
359,466
|
|
|
$
|
407,894
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
971,173
|
|
|
|
604,670
|
|
Computer software
|
|
|
880,713
|
|
|
|
742,019
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
695,688
|
|
|
|
581,364
|
|
Gathering system
|
|
|
271,651
|
|
|
|
271,651
|
|
Well servicing equipment
|
|
|
103,397
|
|
|
|
103,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,282,088
|
|
|
|
2,710,995
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,246,427
|
)
|
|
|
(913,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized cost
|
|
$
|
2,035,661
|
|
|
$
|
1,797,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments
We have adopted SFAS 144 Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long- Lived Assets. Accordingly,
impairments, measured using fair market value, are recognized
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of long-lived assets may not be recoverable and
the future undiscounted cash flows attributable to the asset are
less than its carrying value.
Revenue
Recognition and Oil and Gas Imbalances
The Company follows the sales (takes or cash) method
of accounting for natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
revenues. Under this method, we recognize revenues on production
as it is taken and delivered to its purchasers. The volumes sold
may be more or less than the volumes we are entitled to based on
our ownership interest in the property. These differences result
in a condition known in the industry as a production imbalance.
Our crude oil and natural gas imbalances are not significant.
Trade Accounts
Receivable
We grant credit to creditworthy independent and major natural
gas and crude oil marketing companies for the sale of natural
gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids. In addition, we grant
credit to our oil and gas working interest partners. Receivables
from our working interest partners are generally secured by the
underlying ownership interests in the properties.
The accounts receivable (A/R) balance at
year-end primarily relates to A/R Trade (net of allowance for
doubtful accounts), A/R joint interest billing (net of legal
suspense/prepayments from partners), Accrued revenue (one month
for operated properties, two months for non-operated
properties), and A/R Other. Accrued revenue is recorded net to
our interest (excludes outside interest holders).
The allowance for doubtful accounts is recognized by management
based upon a review of specific customer balances, historical
losses and general economic conditions. The allowance for
doubtful accounts at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was
$215,015.
Fair Value
Measurements
We adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), as of
January 1, 2008 as related to our financial assets and
liabilities. SFAS 157 establishes a single authoritative
definition of fair value based upon the assumptions market
participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and
creates a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information
used to develop those assumptions. Under the standard,
additional disclosures are required, including disclosures of
fair value measurements by
F-10
level within the fair value hierarchy. As a result of adoption,
we began incorporating a credit risk assumption into the
measurement of certain assets and liabilities. Adoption of
SFAS 157 did not have a significant impact on our
consolidated financial statements. See
Note 5Fair Values of Financial
Instruments for further information.
We also adopted SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159) as of January 1, 2008.
SFAS No. 159 provides companies with an option to
report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value.
Adoption had no effect on our financial position or results of
operations as we made no elections to report selected financial
assets or liabilities at fair value.
Debt Issuance
Costs
Debt issuance costs incurred are capitalized and subsequently
amortized over the term of the related debt.
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
We have adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 128 Earnings Per Share
(SFAS 128), which requires that both
basic earnings (loss) per share and diluted earnings (loss) per
share be presented on the face of the statement of operations.
Basic earnings (loss) per share are based on the
weighted-average number of outstanding common shares. Diluted
earnings (loss) per-share is based on the weighted-average
number of outstanding common shares and the effect of all
potentially diluted common shares. See
Note 14Income (Loss) Per Common Share for
further information.
Share-Based
Compensation
We adopted SFAS No. 123R Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123(R)) as of
January 1, 2006. SFAS 123(R) revised SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and
nullified Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and its
related implementation guidance. SFAS 123(R) requires
companies to measure the grant date fair value of stock options
and other stock-based compensation issued to employees and
expense the fair value over the requisite service period of the
award. It is our policy to issue new shares for any options
exercised. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
measure the fair value of stock options.
In accordance with SFAS 123(R) we estimate forfeitures in
calculating the expense related to stock-based compensation as
opposed to recognizing forfeitures as they occur. All of our
unvested options are held by our executive officers and new
employees. See Note 13Share-Based
Compensation for further information.
Income
Taxes
We record deferred tax assets and liabilities to account for the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in our financial statements and our tax returns. We
routinely assess the realizability of our deferred tax assets.
If we conclude that it is more likely than not that some portion
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized under
accounting standards, the tax asset is reduced by a valuation
allowance. We consider future taxable income in making such
assessments. Numerous judgments and assumptions are inherent in
the determination of future taxable income, including factors
such as future operating conditions.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
SEC
33-8995/34-59192. In
December 2008, the SEC adopted Release
No. 33-8995/34-59192,
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting (SEC
33-8995).
This release amends the oil and gas reporting disclosures that
exist in their current form in
Regulation S-K
and
Regulation S-X
under the
F-11
Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
to provide investors with a more meaningful and comprehensive
understanding of oil and gas reserves. The new rules include
changes for pricing used to estimate reserves; permitting
disclosure of possible and probable reserves; ability to include
non-traditional resources in reserves and the use of new
technology for determining reserves. SEC
33-8995 is
effective for fiscal years ending on or after December 31,
2009. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently
evaluating the provisions of SEC
33-8995 and
assessing the impact it may have on our financial reporting
disclosures.
SFAS 161. In March 2008, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 161, Disclosure about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161).
SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide users of
financial statements with an enhanced understanding of:
(i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments;
(ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations; and (iii) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect an entitys financial position,
financial performance and cash flows. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
early application encouraged. We are currently evaluating the
provisions of SFAS 161 and assessing the impact it may have
on our financial reporting disclosures.
SFAS 141(R). In December 2007, the FASB
issued a revision to SFAS 141 Business
Combinations (SFAS 141(R)). The
revision broadens the definition of a business combination to
include all transactions or other events in which control of one
or more businesses is obtained. Further, the statement
establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer
recognizes assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any
non-controlling interests acquired. SFAS 141(R) is
effective for business combination transactions for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
Early adoption is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the
provisions of SFAS 141(R) and assessing the impact it may
have on our financial statements when an applicable acquisition
is consummated.
SFAS 157-2. In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157. In February 2008,
FASB issued Staff Position (FSP)
No. SFAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP 157-2).
FSP 157-2
defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, for all nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized
or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually). An entity that has issued
interim or annual financial statements reflecting the
application of the measurement and disclosure provisions of
SFAS 157 prior to February 12, 2008, must continue to
apply all provisions of SFAS 157. We are currently
evaluating the provisions of
FSP 157-2
and assessing the impact it may have on our financial position,
results of operations and reporting disclosures.
|
|
3.
|
Oil and Gas
Properties
|
The following tables set forth certain information with respect
to our oil and gas producing activities (all within the United
States) for the periods presented:
Capitalized Costs Relating to Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Unproved oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
68,278,373
|
|
|
$
|
35,059,298
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
|
489,069,881
|
|
|
|
361,582,956
|
|
Wells and related equipment and facilities
|
|
|
26,745,631
|
|
|
|
11,263,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584,093,885
|
|
|
|
407,905,609
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(136,973,810
|
)
|
|
|
(53,214,845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs
|
|
$
|
447,120,075
|
|
|
$
|
354,690,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
The following table sets forth the composition of exploration
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dry holes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
605,561
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Lease rental expense
|
|
|
172,384
|
|
|
|
242,103
|
|
|
|
220,110
|
|
Geological and geophysical
|
|
|
1,692,102
|
|
|
|
1,430,046
|
|
|
|
223,386
|
|
Settled asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
745,107
|
|
|
|
69,325
|
|
|
|
161,520
|
|
Abandoned property
|
|
|
7,355,779
|
(2)
|
|
|
827,380
|
|
|
|
67,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,965,372
|
|
|
$
|
3,174,415
|
|
|
$
|
673,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mustang Island was reclassified from impairment to a dry hole. |
|
(2) |
|
In November 2008, we released undeveloped leasehold position
that we acquired from Core Natural Resources in Culberson
County, Texas in 2006, and recorded a $7.1 million
exploration expense. |
Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Producing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Property Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
$
|
60,765,315
|
|
|
$
|
238,036,360
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
57,203,337
|
|
|
|
30,407,525
|
|
|
|
8,745,363
|
|
Development Costs
|
|
|
86,685,192
|
|
|
|
30,814,788
|
|
|
|
6,465,719
|
|
Exploration Costs
|
|
|
2,520,389
|
|
|
|
13,405,017
|
|
|
|
10,783,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
207,174,233
|
|
|
$
|
312,663,690
|
|
|
|
25,994,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These costs include oil and gas property acquisition,
exploration and development activities regardless of whether the
costs were capitalized or charged to expense, including lease
rental expenses and geological and geophysical expenses.
The following table shows oil and gas property dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
21,765,688
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(1,659,588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
20,106,100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The dispositions in 2008 resulted in a net gain of
$15.2 million.
|
|
4.
|
Acquisitions and
Disposition of Oil and Gas Properties
|
Acquisition
from Smith Production Inc.
In May 2008, we acquired four producing gas fields and
undeveloped acreage in South Texas from Smith Production Inc.
(Smith) for a purchase price of
$65.0 million with an effective date of January 1,
2008. After adjustment for the estimated results of operations,
and other typical purchase price adjustments of approximately
$7.0 million for the period between the effective date and
the closing date, the cash consideration was $58.0 million,
subject to final adjustment, by the end of the first quarter of
2009. The assets acquired consist of a 25% non-operated working
interest in Samano Field located in Starr and Hidalgo Counties,
a 100% operated working interest in North Bob West Field in
Zapata County and 100% operated working interests in Brushy
Creek and Hope Fields in DeWitt County. We acquired an interest
in over 16,000 gross acres with these fields, most of which
is held by production.
F-13
The $58.0 million adjusted price, with adjustment to the
reserves for approximately one Bcfe of production for the
interim operations between the effective date and closing,
represented a purchase cost of $2.82 per Mcfe for
approximately 21 Bcfe of proved reserves and $8,300 per
Mcfe of current average daily production. We financed
this acquisition with cash flows from operations, proceeds from
the sale of assets and from borrowings available under the
senior revolving credit facility.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, seven months of
revenues and expenses, $11.7 million and $3.7 million,
respectively, were included in our financial results of
operations.
Prospect
Acquisitions
During the third and fourth quarters of 2008, we acquired
approximately 11,876 net undeveloped acres in Sabine,
Shelby and San Augustine Counties in Texas on which we will
target the Haynesville Shale, James Lime, and Travis Peak
formations. We are currently developing a drilling strategy for
this acreage, including unit and well spacing, with the
expectation that we will commence our first well during the
third quarter of 2009. We intend to continue to acquire
additional acreage that complements our existing position and
expect to have an active drilling program in this area by
mid-year 2010. We financed this acquisition with cash flows from
operations and from borrowings available under the senior credit
facility.
Fort Worth
Barnet Shale Disposition
In January 2008, we and our operator-partner entered into a
series of agreements to sell our interests in wells and
undeveloped acreage in the Fort Worth Barnett Shale Play in
Johnson and Tarrant Counties, Texas to another industry
participant active in that area. We owned a 12.5% non-operated
working interest in the assets being sold and had 1.5 Bcfe
in proved reserves at December 31, 2007. The final total
consideration paid by the buyer was based on existing wells and
undeveloped acreage owned by us and our partner at the time of
the final closing. Our share of the consideration received was
approximately $34.4 million. Proceeds received for our
interest were primarily used to repay amounts outstanding under
our senior revolving credit facility and to help finance our
acquisition of the properties from Smith. Our net book value of
these assets sold was $18.8 million, which resulted in a
gain of $15.6 million.
STGC
Properties Acquisition
On May 8, 2007, we entered into a purchase agreement with
EXCO and SGH (EXCO Purchase Agreement),
pursuant to which we acquired, for $285.0 million in cash
(excluding adjustments) and 750,000 shares of common stock,
par value $0.001 per share (Common Stock)
certain oil and natural gas properties and related assets in the
STGC Properties held by SGH immediately before the closing of
the acquisition. After considerations for typical closing
adjustments, $229.0 million of the purchase price was
allocated to proved properties and $28.6 million was
allocated to unproved properties. The properties acquired
include approximately 215 producing wells in over 30 fields. We
have an average 65% working interest in the properties and
operate more than 80% of the value acquired. The major producing
fields acquired reside in Liberty and Lavaca Counties of the
Upper Texas Gulf Coast, Brooks County of South Texas and
Calcasieu Parish of South Louisiana. The properties and related
assets were acquired through the conveyance of 100% of the
membership interests of SGH from EXCO to us. The consolidated
statements of operations include the results of operations of
the STGC Properties from May 2007 to present.
The unaudited pro forma results presented below for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 have been prepared to give
effect to the STGC Properties acquisition described above on our
results of operations as if it had been consummated on
January 1, 2006. The unaudited pro forma results do not
purport to represent what our results of operations actually
would have been if this
F-14
acquisition had been completed on such date or project our
results of operations for any future date or period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share amounts)
|
|
|
Pro forma:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
154,068
|
|
|
$
|
206,909
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
56,647
|
|
|
$
|
109,677
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
9,305
|
|
|
$
|
60,538
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
14.29
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
|
$
|
6.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Fair Values of
Financial Instruments
|
Certain of our assets and liabilities are reported at fair value
in our consolidated balance sheets. The following methods and
assumptions were used to estimate the fair values for each class
of financial instruments:
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Accounts Receivable and Accounts
Payable. The carrying amounts approximate fair
value due to the short-term nature or maturity of the
instruments.
Derivative Instruments. Our derivative
instruments consist of variable to fixed price commodity swaps,
costless collars and interest rate swaps. We value our
derivative instruments utilizing estimates of present value as
calculated by the respective counter-party financial
institutions and reviewed by management. See
Note 7Derivative Instruments for further
information.
Fair value information for financial assets and liabilities that
are measured at fair value each reporting period is as follows
at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil & natural gas swaps
|
|
$
|
2,927,972
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,927,972
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Crude oil & natural gas collars
|
|
|
36,914,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,914,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(5,685,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,685,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,156,691
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,156,691
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 157, which we adopted as of January 1,
2008, establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the
inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into
three levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest
priority to quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the
lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Level 2 inputs are inputs, other than quoted prices
included within Level 1, which are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly. We use Level 1
inputs when available as Level 1 inputs generally provide
the most reliable evidence of fair value.
DebtThe fair value of floating-rate debt is
estimated using the carrying amounts because the interest rates
paid on such debt are set for periods of three months or less.
See Note 10Debt for further information.
F-15
In December 2008, we recorded a non-cash impairment expense of
$10.2 million, primarily related to our Grand Lake Field in
Southwest Louisiana. The impairment expense was a result of low
commodity prices at year end and the underperformance of the
Grand Lake Field. In September 2008, we recorded a non-cash
impairment expense of $25.8 million related to our
Madisonville Field in Central Texas. The Madisonville impairment
relates primarily to the Rodessa formation within the
Madisonville Field. Negative performance-related reserve
revisions, including the abandonment of the Rodessa formation in
the Johnston 2U well, triggered an evaluation of the
Madisonville Field for impairment purposes. The high original
cost of drilling and developing the field and the high cost of
producing and processing sour gas, combined with lower commodity
prices resulted in the recorded costs of this field exceeding
the estimated future undiscounted cash flow of the reserves as
of September 30, 2008.
Impairment expense was $4.4 million in 2007, primarily
related to our Turkey Creek and Huff McFaddin properties, and
$3.1 million in 2006, primarily related to our Iola
property. Declining performance and lower gas prices at year end
were contributing factors in these property impairments.
F-16
|
|
7.
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
In the past we have entered into, and may in the future enter
into, certain derivative arrangements with respect to portions
of our natural gas and crude oil production, to reduce our
sensitivity to volatile commodity prices and with respect to
portions of our debt, to reduce our sensitivity to volatile
interest rates. We believe that these derivative arrangements,
although not free of risk, allow us to achieve a more
predictable cash flow and to reduce exposure to commodity price
and interest rate fluctuations. However, derivative arrangements
limit the benefit of increases in the prices of natural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids sales and limit the benefit of
decreases in interest rates. Moreover, our derivative
arrangements apply only to a portion of our production and our
debt and provide only partial protection against declines in
commodity prices and increases in interest rates. Such
arrangements may expose us to risk of financial loss in certain
circumstances. We continuously reevaluate our hedging programs
in light of changes in production, market conditions, commodity
price forecasts, capital spending and debt service requirements.
We used a mix of swaps and costless collars to accomplish our
hedging strategy. We also constructively fixed the base LIBOR
rate on $200.0 million of our variable rate debt by
entering into interest rate swaps agreements.
The following derivative contracts were in place at
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
|
|
Volume/Month
|
|
Price/Unit
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Jan 2009-Dec
2009
|
|
Swap
|
|
5,200
|
|
Bbls
|
|
$74.20
|
|
$
|
1,224,731
|
|
Jan 2009-Dec
2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
12,800
|
|
Bbls
|
|
Floor $66.55-$71.40 Ceiling
|
|
|
2,011,268
|
|
Jan 2009-Dec
2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
10,646
|
|
Bbls
|
|
Floor $115.00-$171.50 Ceiling
|
|
|
7,784,669
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
4,250
|
|
Bbls
|
|
$72.32
|
|
|
422,097
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
9,000
|
|
Bbls
|
|
Floor $65.28-$70.60 Ceiling
|
|
|
366,711
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
7,604
|
|
Bbls
|
|
Floor $110.00-$181.25 Ceiling
|
|
|
4,337,646
|
|
Jan 2011-Dec
2011
|
|
Swap
|
|
3,300
|
|
Bbls
|
|
$70.74
|
|
|
73,308
|
|
Jan 2011-Dec
2011
|
|
Collar
|
|
7,000
|
|
Bbls
|
|
Floor $64.50-$69.50 Ceiling
|
|
|
(159,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
Volume/Month
|
|
Price/Unit
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2009-Dec 2009
|
|
Swap
|
|
36,000
|
|
MMbtu
|
|
$8.32
|
|
|
950,951
|
|
Jan 2009-Dec
2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
475,000
|
|
MMbtu
|
|
Floor $7.90-$9.45 Ceiling
|
|
|
11,130,013
|
|
Jan 2009-Dec
2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
100,375
|
|
MMbtu
|
|
Floor $9.50-$18.70 Ceiling
|
|
|
4,265,493
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
29,000
|
|
MMbtu
|
|
$7.88
|
|
|
256,885
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
351,000
|
|
MMbtu
|
|
Floor $7.57-$9.05 Ceiling
|
|
|
3,432,247
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
85,167
|
|
MMbtu
|
|
Floor $9.00-$15.25 Ceiling
|
|
|
2,395,846
|
|
Jan 2011-Dec
2011
|
|
Collar
|
|
266,000
|
|
MMbtu
|
|
Floor $7.32-$8.70 Ceiling
|
|
|
1,349,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
Volume/Month
|
|
|
Fixed LIBOR Rate
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2009-Dec 2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
$
|
50,000,000
|
|
|
1.50%
|
|
|
(289,496
|
)
|
Jan 2009-May 2011
|
|
Swap
|
|
$
|
150,000,000
|
|
|
2.90%
|
|
|
(5,396,030
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net fair value asset of derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
34,156,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total net fair value asset for derivative instruments at
December 31, 2008 was $34.2 million, and the total net
fair value liability at December 31, 2007 was
$15.3 million. As a result of these agreements, we recorded
a non-cash unrealized gain, for unsettled contracts, of
$49.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31,
2008, a non-cash unrealized loss of $18.2 million for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2007. The estimated change
in fair value of the derivatives is reported in Other
Income (Expense) as unrealized gain (loss) on derivative
instruments.
F-17
For natural gas and crude oil derivatives settled during 2008,
we realized losses, reflected in operating revenues, of
$9.3 million for the twelve months ended December 31,
2008. For natural gas and crude oil derivatives settled during
2007, we realized gains of $3.0 million for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2007 and a non-cash unrealized
gain of $6.1 million for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006. For natural gas and crude oil
derivatives settled during 2006, we realized losses, reflected
in operating revenues of $0.6 million for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2006. For interest rate swaps, we
realized losses, included in interest expense, of
$4.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31,
2008. We realized gains, included in interest expense, of
$0.2 million from interest rate swaps for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2007.
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Lease acquisition costs
|
|
$
|
11,246,914
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital drilling and operating costs
|
|
|
9,202,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smith acquisition
|
|
|
1,291,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
1,244,772
|
|
|
|
1,486,116
|
|
Interest and loan fees
|
|
|
988,521
|
|
|
|
1,530,627
|
|
Other
|
|
|
394,057
|
|
|
|
217,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,369,060
|
|
|
$
|
3,234,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Asset Retirement
Obligations
|
A reconciliation of our asset retirement obligation liability is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance beginning of year
|
|
$
|
7,555,491
|
|
|
$
|
4,215,205
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
620,813
|
|
|
|
435,328
|
|
Liabilities incurred
|
|
|
4,191,364
|
|
|
|
3,184,079
|
|
Liabilities settled
|
|
|
(853,867
|
)
|
|
|
(279,121
|
)
|
Revisions
|
|
|
1,554,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of year
|
|
$
|
13,068,542
|
|
|
$
|
7,555,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008, we recognized additional liabilities incurred of
$4.2 million, primarily related to new wells acquired
through our acquisition and drilling programs. We also had
$1.6 million in revisions primarily related to increased
retirement costs at our Grand Lake facility in South Louisiana.
On May 8, 2007, we entered into a $400.0 million
amended and restated credit agreement (the Senior
Revolving Credit Agreement) with Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as agent, and various other banks, which
amended and restated our then existing senior secured revolving
credit facility dated July 15, 2005, as amended. On
May 31, 2007, the Senior Revolving Credit Agreement was
amended to provide for up to a $5.0 million swing line
facility. The Senior Revolving Credit Agreement has a term of
four years, and all principal amounts, together with all accrued
and unpaid interest, will be due and payable in full on
May 8, 2011. The Senior Revolving Credit Agreement also
provides for the issuance of
letters-of-credit
up to a $5.0 million
sub-limit.
F-18
Borrowings under the Senior Revolving Credit Agreement are
subject to a borrowing base limitation based on our proved
natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids reserves. The
borrowing base was reaffirmed at $200.0 million on
November 1, 2008. Our borrowing base is redetermined
semi-annually and is subject to one unscheduled redetermination
between scheduled redeterminations, which may lead to a decrease
in our borrowing base. We expect to undergo a borrowing base
redetermination under our Senior Revolving Credit Agreement in
the second quarter of 2009, and again in the fourth quarter of
2009. In the event a borrowing base redetermination results in a
reduction of our borrowing base, further availability to borrow
under the Senior Revolving Credit Agreement could be reduced.
Due to the recent and continuous decline in commodity prices, we
will likely incur a reduction in our borrowing base at the next
redetermination date. Additionally, if a reduced borrowing base
requires debt repayments, we may be required to curtail our
capital program further, sell assets or raise additional equity
capital to meet our obligations. In addition, it may be
difficult for us to consummate any debt or equity financing in
the near future to meet such obligations, particularly due to
the current worldwide financial and credit crises and the
decline in our stock price.
In addition, on May 8, 2007, we entered into a second lien
credit agreement (the Second Lien Credit
Agreement) with Credit Suisse, as agent, which
provides for term loans to be made to us in a single draw in an
aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million. The Second
Lien Credit Agreement replaced our then existing
$150.0 million subordinate credit facility, which was paid
off in full and terminated at closing. The Second Lien Credit
Agreement has a term of five years and all principal amounts,
together with all accrued and unpaid interest, will be due and
payable in full on May 8, 2012.
The Senior Revolving Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Credit
Agreement (the Credit Agreements) are secured
by a lien on substantially all of our assets, as well as a
security interest in the stock of our subsidiaries. The
obligations under the Second Lien Credit Agreement are
subordinate and junior to those under the Senior Revolving
Credit Agreement. Interest is payable on the Credit Agreements
as borrowings mature and renew.
The Credit Agreements include usual and customary covenants for
credit facilities of the respective types and sizes, including,
among others, limitations on liens, hedging, mergers, asset
sales or dispositions, payments of dividends, incurrence of
additional indebtedness, certain leases and investments outside
of the ordinary course of business, as well as events of
default. The Credit Agreements also contain certain financial
covenants, including (a) with respect to the Senior
Revolving Credit Agreement, maintaining (i) a ratio of
current assets (including borrowing base availability and
excluding derivative instruments) to current liabilities
(excluding current portion of long-term debt and derivative
instruments) of at least 1.0 to 1.0, (ii) an interest
coverage ratio of EBITDAX (earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization and exploration expense) to cash
interest expense of at least 3.0 to 1.0 and (iii) a minimum
leverage ratio of total debt to EBITDAX of 2.75 to 1.00 for the
fiscal quarters ending after June 30, 2008 and
(b) with respect to the Second Lien Credit Agreement,
maintaining (i) a minimum leverage ratio of total debt to
EBITDAX of 3.00 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarters ending after
September 30, 2008 and (ii) a
PV-10 Ratio
(as defined in the Second Lien Credit Agreement) less than 1.50x
for the period on or after January 1, 2008. EBITDAX is
calculated without consideration of unrealized gains and losses
related to stock derivatives accounted for under variable
accounting rules or to commodity hedges. The
PV-10 Ratio
is the ratio of
PV-10 Value
(as defined) on the relevant date to Total Net Debt (as defined)
on such date; provided that if the
PV-10 Value
calculated using only the estimated future revenues to be
generated from proved developed producing reserves (the
PDP Component, is less than 60% of the
otherwise calculated total
PV-10 Value,
then for purposes of calculating the
PV-10 Ratio,
PV-10 Value
is deemed to be the quotient of the PDP Component divided by
0.60. At December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with the
Credit Agreements covenants.
F-19
Our debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Subordinated promissory notes to various unlocatable individuals
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Notes payable to finance vehicles, payable in aggregate monthly
installments of approximately $3,600, including interest of
5.99% to 10.49% at December 31, 2008 per annum; secured by
the related equipment; due various dates through 2010
|
|
|
57,720
|
|
|
|
114,835
|
|
Senior Revolving Credit Agreement with a borrowing base of
$200.0 million, secured by all of our assets, interest at
the higher of prime or Federal Fund rate plus a margin of 0.50%,
or, at the option of the holder, LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% to
2.00% depending on the percent of the borrowing base utilized at
the time of the credit extension, due and payable in full in May
2011
|
|
|
126,673,074
|
|
|
|
110,000,000
|
|
Second Lien Credit Agreement for a term loan in a single draw,
secured by all of our assets, subordinate and junior to the
Senior Revolving Credit Agreement, floating interest rates at
LIBOR plus 5.75% or base rate plus 4.75%, maturing in May 2012
|
|
|
150,000,000
|
|
|
|
150,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,780,794
|
|
|
|
260,164,835
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(90,368
|
)
|
|
|
(100,609
|
)
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
276,690,426
|
|
|
$
|
260,064,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated annual maturities for long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
90,368
|
|
2010
|
|
|
17,352
|
|
2011
|
|
|
126,673,074
|
|
2012
|
|
|
150,000,000
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
276,780,794
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Commitments and
Contingencies
|
The following table provides our best estimate on certain of our
obligations as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Retirements
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
FIN
48(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
90,368
|
|
|
$
|
14,848,716
|
|
|
$
|
2,641,835
|
|
|
$
|
1,659,371
|
|
|
$
|
1,516,300
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
17,352
|
|
|
|
14,848,716
|
|
|
|
1,820,471
|
|
|
|
1,031,755
|
|
|
|
1,516,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
126,673,074
|
|
|
|
5,279,543
|
|
|
|
1,437,749
|
|
|
|
1,953,292
|
|
|
|
710,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
150,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,864,088
|
|
|
|
1,419,933
|
|
|
|
438,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,419,933
|
|
|
|
393,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,328
|
|
|
|
7,592,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
276,780,794
|
|
|
$
|
38,841,063
|
|
|
$
|
8,858,249
|
|
|
$
|
13,068,542
|
|
|
$
|
3,742,600
|
|
|
$
|
518,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48). We are
unable to determine when this obligation may be required to be
paid, if at all. |
F-20
Lease
Obligations
We entered into a sublease agreement for new office space under
an eighty-two (82) month lease that commenced in April
2007. We leased additional space in August 2008. Both leases
expire in January 2014.
We have entered into various vehicle leases for periods ranging
from 24 to 50 months. These contracts will expire at
various times with the latest contract expiring in September
2010. We also have various other equipment leases that expire in
12 to 36 months, with the latest contract expiring in
June 2011.
Total general and administrative rent expense for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, were approximately
$1.4 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million,
respectively. Total operational rent expense for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, were approximately
$3.4 million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million,
respectively.
Litigation
From time to time, we are involved in litigation arising out of
our operations or from disputes with vendors in the normal
course of business. As of December 31, 2008, we are not
currently engaged in any legal proceedings that are expected,
individually or in the aggregate, to have a material effect on
our consolidated financial statements.
Employment
Agreements
In December 2008, we entered into amended and restated
employment agreements with our President/Chief Executive Officer
and Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer. Each
agreement has a term of three years with automatic yearly
extensions unless we or the executive officer elects not to
extend the agreement. These agreements provide for an annual
base salary of $370,000 and $340,000, respectively. If the
contracts are terminated by us without cause or by the employee
for good reason, and the employee has been in compliance with
employee contract terms, the employee may receive a cash payment
equal to 2.99 times the sum of the current calendar years
base salary plus prior years annual cash incentive bonus,
health insurance benefits for 36 months and acceleration to
100% vested status for all stock, stock option and other equity
awards.
Also in December 2008, we entered into amended and restated
employment agreements with our three other Senior Vice
Presidents and entered into an employment agreement with our one
Vice President. Each agreement has a term of two years with
automatic yearly extensions unless we or the executive officer
elects not to extend the agreement. These agreements provide for
an annual base salary ranging from $186,300 to $220,000. If the
contracts are terminated by us without cause or by the employee
for good reason, and the employee has been in compliance with
the employee contract terms, the employee is entitled to receive
a cash payment equal to two times current year base salary plus
prior year bonus, health insurance benefits for 24 months
and acceleration to 100% vested status for all stock, stock
option and other equity awards.
F-21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series G, par value $0.01; 81,000 shares authorized;
80,500 and 81,000 issued and outstanding at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
810
|
|
Series H, par value $0.01; 6,500 shares authorized;
2,100 and 2,200 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par value $0.001; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 5,787,287
and 5,127,937 shares issued as of December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively
|
|
$
|
5,808
|
|
|
$
|
5,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, 20,625 and zero shares as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively
|
|
$
|
(250,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 80,500 shares of our Series G Preferred Stock bear
cumulative dividends of 8% per year, compounded quarterly, and
have an aggregate liquidation preference of $40.3 million,
excluding accumulated and undeclared dividends. For the first
four years after issuance, we may defer the payment of dividends
on the Series G Preferred Stock and these deferred
dividends will also be convertible into our Common Stock at
$9.00 per share. These dividends are not currently being accrued
in our financial statements until such time as they are declared
by the Board of Directors and become due and payable. In
addition, the Series G Preferred Stock is entitled to vote
on an as-converted basis with the holders of our Common Stock
and, as a class, is entitled to nominate and elect a majority of
the members of our Board of Directors. The Series G
Preferred Stock is senior to all of our outstanding capital
stock in liquidation preference.
The 2,100 shares of our Series H Preferred Stock are
required to be paid a dividend of 40 shares of Common Stock
per one share of Series H Preferred Stock per year. In
addition, the Series H Preferred Stock is convertible into
Common Stock at a conversion price of $3.50 per share. The
Series H Preferred Stock has an aggregate liquidation value
of $1.1 million and is senior to all of our outstanding
capital stock in liquidation preference other than the
Series G Preferred Stock.
All classes of preferred stockholders have a liquidation
preference over common stockholders of $500 per preferred share,
plus accrued dividends. Accumulated, unpaid and undeclared
dividends at December 31, 2008 were $14.4 million
(Series G $14.4 million; Series H $9,380). Once
dividends are declared, they may be converted to approximately
1.6 million shares of Common Stock (Series G
1.6 million; Series H 2,680).
F-22
|
|
13.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
As of December 31, 2008, we had share-based compensation,
which includes both stock options and restricted stock awarded
to employees and directors. The following table reflects
share-based compensation expense assuming a 36.5% effective tax
rate for the years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of tax $1,982,984,
$1,725,277 and $1,339,014, respectively
|
|
$
|
3,452,008
|
|
|
$
|
3,003,387
|
|
|
$
|
2,330,975
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share impact
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.72
|
)
|
Diluted income (loss) per share impact
|
|
$
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.72
|
)
|
Incentive
Plans
In the third quarter 2008, our Board of Directors formally
adopted an amendment to our performance based cash bonus plan
and adopted a new performance based long term stock bonus plan
for the benefit of all employeesthe Crimson Cash Incentive
Bonus Plan (CIBP) and the Crimson Long-Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP), respectively. Both
plans, and specific targeted performance measures for the fiscal
year 2008 under those plans, were previously approved by the
Compensation Committee. Upon achieving the established
performance levels, bonus awards are calculated as a percentage
of base salary for the plan year. The plan awards are disbursed
in the first quarter of the following year. Employees must be
employed by us at the time that final plan awards are dispersed
to be eligible.
The CIBP awards are paid out in cash (Cash
Awards). The performance targets are evaluated on a
quarterly basis and used to estimate the approximate expense
earned to date. Approximately $1.2 million was recognized
as compensation expense related to the Cash Awards for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2008.
The LTIP bonus awards are paid half in the form of restricted
Common Stock and half in the form of stock options
(Stock Awards). The Stock Awards will vest
25% per year, over the first through fourth anniversaries from
the date of grant, at which time 100% of all Stock Awards will
be vested. The number of shares of restricted Common Stock and
the number of shares underlying the stock options to be granted
as Stock Awards will be determined based upon the fair market
value of the Common Stock on the date of the grant in the first
quarter 2009. The fair value of the stock options to be awarded
as part of this plan will be determined through use of the
Black-Scholes valuation model. The Stock Awards to be granted
pursuant to this plan will be granted under the existing amended
and restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. The Board of Directors
and a majority of the Common Stock equivalents entitled to vote,
approved; among other things, an increase in the number of
available shares of Common Stock issuable under the amended and
restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan by 1,000,000 shares.
In March 2009, the Board of Directors approved the awarding of
approximately 1.1 million shares to our employees under the
performance-based Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) for the 2008 calendar year. After the
issuance of these stock awards, approximately 0.4 million
stock awards will remain in the plan. Due to the recent decline
in our stock price, the Board of Directors suspended the LTIP
for 2009. Any share-based bonus awards for fiscal year 2009 will
be awarded at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Stock
Options
Effective July 15, 2004, we implemented our 2004 Stock
Option and Compensation Plan (2004 Plan). As
of December 31, 2008, there were options to purchase
44,300 shares of Common Stock outstanding and exercisable
under the 2004 Plan. Effective February 28, 2005, we
established our 2005
F-23
Stock Incentive Plan (2005 Plan) and
authorized the issuance of up to approximately 2.9 million
shares of Common Stock pursuant to awards under the plan. In the
third quarter 2008, our Board of Directors and a majority of our
stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of our 2005
Stock Incentive Plan that provided for an increase in the number
of shares of Common Stock available for award under our 2005
Stock Incentive Plan to approximately 3.9 million shares.
Approximately 1.6 million (0.8 million vested) stock
options and 0.5 million restricted shares were outstanding
under this plan at December 31, 2008. Option awards
outstanding under both plans have exercise prices ranging from
$4.50 to $16.55 per share. At December 31, 2008, we had
approximately 1.5 million shares of Common Stock available
for future grant under the plan.
Pursuant to SFAS 123(R) for options issued under our 2005
plan, we recorded $5.0 million, $4.2 million and
$3.7 million in expense (included in general and
administrative expense on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations) for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively, and an estimated $2.5 million will be
expensed over the remaining vesting period.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions
used in the valuation are disclosed in the following table.
Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our
stock with a look back period based on the expected term. The
expected dividend yield is zero as we have never declared
dividends on our Common Stock. The expected term of options
granted represents the period of time that the options are
expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate is based on
U.S. Treasury bills with a duration equal or close to the
expected term of the options at the time of grant. The
forfeiture rate is zero and is based on historical forfeiture
rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
58.61
|
%
|
|
|
87.46
|
%
|
|
|
92.33
|
%
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
|
3.38
|
%
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
Expected dividend yields
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
F-24
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the
three years ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Underlying
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
2,411,000
|
|
|
$
|
13.60
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
13.12
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(10,700
|
)
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(6,500
|
)
|
|
|
8.30
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(103,000
|
)
|
|
|
14.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,341,800
|
|
|
|
13.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
393,000
|
|
|
|
6.86
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,730,300
|
|
|
|
12.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
126,500
|
|
|
|
12.29
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(75,000
|
)
|
|
|
5.02
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(27,000
|
)
|
|
|
8.86
|
|
Exchanged
|
|
|
(1,091,260
|
)
|
|
|
17.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,663,540
|
|
|
$
|
10.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
811,471
|
|
|
$
|
10.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$7.07, $4.53 and $7.13, respectively. The total intrinsic value
of options exercised during the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $0.5 million, $5,425
and $33,360 respectively. The weighted average remaining life
for outstanding and exercisable stock options at
December 31, 2008 was 6.9 years and 6.1 years,
respectively. The aggregate intrinsic values for outstanding and
exercisable stock options at December 31, 2008 were zero.
Restricted
Stock Awards
In the fourth quarter 2008, we issued 12,280 shares of
unvested Common Stock, pursuant to restricted stock awards in
exchange for the forfeiture of 24,560 substantially unvested
stock option grants. The fair value of the unvested Common Stock
was calculated as approximately $88,000 on the issuance date.
The fair value of the forfeited stock options, calculated using
the Black-Scholes valuation model, was approximately $37,000
immediately prior to the forfeiture. Under SFAS 123R, the
sum of the incremental value of the new award over the forfeited
options, approximately $52,000, and the unrecognized
compensation cost for the original award as of the exchange
date, approximately $45,000, are being amortized using the
straight line method over the new vesting period of five years,
or approximately $1,600 a month.
In the third quarter 2008, we issued 1,538 shares of Common
Stock pursuant to restricted stock awards to two members of our
board of directors as compensation pursuant to the Director
Compensation Plan. In the third quarter 2008, we also issued
533,350 shares of unvested Common Stock pursuant to
restricted stock awards in exchange for the forfeiture of
1,066,700 substantially vested stock option grants. The fair
value of the unvested Common Stock was calculated as
$4.9 million on the issuance date. The fair value of the
forfeited stock options, calculated using the Black-Scholes
valuation model, was $4.3 million immediately prior to the
forfeiture. Under SFAS 123R, the sum of the incremental
value of the new award over the forfeited options,
$0.6 million, and the
F-25
unrecognized compensation cost for the original award as of the
exchange date, $1.4 million, are being amortized using the
straight line method over the new vesting period of five years,
or approximately $32,000 a month.
On September 28, 2007, we issued 250,000 shares of
restricted Common Stock, pursuant to restricted stock awards, to
our executive officers in recognition of their performance in
consummating the STGC Properties acquisition and in recognition
of the need to make appropriate adjustments to compensation
commensurate with that currently provided to similarly situated
executives in this highly competitive industry, and to provide
equity incentives to those officers to remain with Crimson to
maximize return to our stockholders. The restricted stock will
vest over four years. In 2008, 82,500 shares of Common
Stock were vested, of which 20,625 shares were acquired by
us to satisfy the employees tax liability resulting from
the vesting of these shares, with the remaining shares being
released to the employees. None of the awards vested in 2007. We
expensed $191,406 during the year ended December 31, 2007
and $459,375 during the year ended December 31, 2008. On
May 10, 2007, we issued 2,818 restricted shares of our
Common Stock to certain of our directors upon reelection to the
board, pursuant to the director compensation plan. The stock
vested on May 10, 2008. We expensed $12,796 during the year
ended December 31, 2007 and expensed $7,204 during the year
ended December 31, 2008.
On May 12, 2006, we issued 2,410 restricted shares of our
Common Stock to our directors as compensation. The stock vested
on May 12, 2007. We expensed $12,742 during the year ended
December 31, 2006 and expensed $7,258 during the year ended
December 31, 2007. On February 28, 2006, we also
issued 26,234 restricted shares of our Common Stock to members
of our management in lieu of cash bonuses. The stock vested on
February 28, 2007. We expensed $163,960 during the year
ended December 31, 2006, and expensed $32,790 during the
year ended December 31, 2007.
We have not incurred any forfeiture related to the restricted
stock awards issued.
Restricted stock activity for the three years ended
December 31, 2008 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested as of January 1, 2006
|
|
|
3,410
|
|
|
$
|
8.80
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
28,644
|
|
|
|
7.57
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(3,410
|
)
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
28,644
|
|
|
|
7.57
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
252,818
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(28,644
|
)
|
|
|
7.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
252,818
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
547,168
|
|
|
|
9.12
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(85,318
|
)
|
|
|
7.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
714,668
|
|
|
$
|
8.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain of these restricted stock awards were issued separately
from the 2005 Plan.
Stock
Warrants
We have issued a number of stock warrants for a variety of
reasons, including compensation to employees, inducements
related to the issuance of debt and for the payment of goods and
services.
F-26
Following is a schedule by year of the activity related to stock
warrants, including weighted-average exercise prices of warrants
in each category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Wtd Avg
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wtd Avg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Balance, January 1
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
7.40
|
|
|
|
147,000
|
|
Warrants issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants exercised or expired
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
(144,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No warrants have been issued since 2005. All warrants have
expired.
|
|
14.
|
Income (Loss) Per
Common Share
|
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators used in computing income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
46,203,218
|
|
|
$
|
(430,517
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,858,944
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(4,234,050
|
)
|
|
|
(4,453,872
|
)
|
|
|
(3,648,925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
41,969,168
|
|
|
$
|
(4,884,389
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,789,981
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares of Common Stockbasic
(denominator)
|
|
|
5,371,377
|
|
|
|
4,330,282
|
|
|
|
3,231,000
|
|
Income (loss) per sharebasic
|
|
$
|
7.81
|
|
|
$
|
(1.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
Weighted-average number of shares of Common Stockdiluted
(denominator)
|
|
|
10,360,348
|
|
|
|
4,330,282
|
|
|
|
3,231,000
|
|
Income (loss) per sharediluted
|
|
$
|
4.46
|
|
|
$
|
(1.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
The numerator for basic earning per share is income (loss)
available to common stockholders. The numerator for diluted
earnings per share is net income in 2008 and net loss available
to common stockholders in 2007 and 2006, due to antidilution.
Potential dilutive securities (vested stock options, vested
restricted stock, vested stock warrants and convertible
preferred stock) in 2007 and 2006 have not been considered since
we reported a net loss and, accordingly, their effects would be
antidilutive. The potentially dilutive shares would have been
5,186,148 shares and 5,581,202 shares in 2007 and
2006, respectively.
Income tax expense (benefit) for 2008, 2007 and 2006 consist of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current tax expense
|
|
$
|
574,752
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
26,116,055
|
|
|
|
(410,361
|
)
|
|
|
1,425,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
26,690,807
|
|
|
$
|
(410,361
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,425,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
The following is a reconciliation of effective income tax rates
by applying the federal statutory rate of 35% to the income and
loss for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
72,894,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(840,878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,284,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) at Statutory Rate
|
|
$
|
25,512,909
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(294,307
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,149,487
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Effect for Permanent Items
|
|
|
307,425
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
35,901
|
|
|
|
−4.3
|
%
|
|
|
(14,339
|
)
|
|
|
-0.4
|
%
|
State Taxes and Other
|
|
|
870,473
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
(151,955
|
)
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
290,157
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
|
|
$
|
26,690,807
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(410,361
|
)
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,425,305
|
|
|
|
43.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $15.6 million, which are
available to reduce future taxable income and the related income
tax liability. We expect we will not be able to utilize
carryforwards of approximately $9.1 million due to the
limitations of Internal Revenue Code Section 382. The net
operating loss carryforward expires at various dates through
2026.
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
5,599,532
|
|
|
$
|
11,470,413
|
|
Income tax credits
|
|
|
397,767
|
|
|
|
117,695
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,973,543
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
5,032,928
|
|
|
|
3,175,717
|
|
Other
|
|
|
130,910
|
|
|
|
688,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets before valuation allowance
|
|
|
11,161,137
|
|
|
|
21,426,285
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(3,260,875
|
)
|
|
|
(3,442,034
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
7,900,262
|
|
|
|
17,984,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties
|
|
|
(19,712,706
|
)
|
|
|
(16,361,040
|
)
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
(12,128,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(31,840,785
|
)
|
|
|
(16,361,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets
|
|
$
|
(23,940,523
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,623,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our deferred taxes increased by approximately $25.6 million
during 2008. Deferred tax assets are shown net of a
$3.3 million valuation allowance.
We adopted the provisions of the FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48) on January 1, 2007, which
resulted in a reduction to stockholders equity of
$354,168. On the date of adoption, we had $518,219 of
unrecognized tax benefits. There were no changes to this
unrecognized tax benefit in 2007 and 2008.
Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions as income tax expense. We recorded no
potential interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized
tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions recognized
in our provision for income taxes. To the
F-28
extent that interest and penalties are assessed with respect to
uncertain tax positions, amounts accrued will be reflected as
additional income tax expense.
Our tax returns are subject to periodic audits by the various
jurisdictions in which we operate. These audits can result in
adjustments of taxes due or adjustments of the net operating
loss carryforwards that are available to offset future taxable
income.
We do not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will
significantly change due to the settlement of audits and the
expiration of statute of limitations prior to December 31,
2008. However, due to the complexity of the application of tax
law and regulations, it is possible that the ultimate resolution
of these positions may result in liabilities which could be
materially different from these estimates.
|
|
16.
|
Quarterly Results
(Unaudited)
|
Summary data relating to the results of operations for each
quarter for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
45,036,091
|
|
|
$
|
53,013,341
|
|
|
$
|
53,751,791
|
|
|
$
|
34,967,050
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
35,400,343
|
|
|
|
24,745,879
|
|
|
|
(4,316,240
|
)
|
|
|
(9,734,688
|
)
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
|
(361,339
|
)
|
|
|
(26,618,441
|
)
|
|
|
49,160,564
|
|
|
|
19,788,384
|
|
Income(loss)per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.41
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
5,149,341
|
|
|
|
5,173,463
|
|
|
|
5,351,146
|
|
|
|
5,806,988
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
5,149,341
|
|
|
|
5,173,463
|
|
|
|
10,317,629
|
|
|
|
10,580,260
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
4,547,126
|
|
|
$
|
26,658,550
|
|
|
$
|
38,008,650
|
|
|
$
|
40,328,882
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(557,405
|
)
|
|
|
9,897,272
|
|
|
|
15,672,330
|
|
|
|
8,604,102
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
|
(2,458,088
|
)
|
|
|
3,393,147
|
|
|
|
4,488,012
|
|
|
|
(10,307,460
|
)
|
Income(loss)per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.74
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
(2.02
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.74
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
$
|
(2.02
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
3,333,806
|
|
|
|
4,046,510
|
|
|
|
4,827,731
|
|
|
|
5,091,206
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
3,333,806
|
|
|
|
9,369,974
|
|
|
|
9,745,276
|
|
|
|
5,091,206
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Oil and Gas
Reserves (unaudited)
|
All information set forth herein relating to our proved
reserves, estimated future net cash flows and present values is
taken or derived from reports prepared by Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum
engineers. The estimates of these engineers were based upon
their review of production histories and other geological,
economic, ownership and engineering data provided by and
relating to us. No reports on our reserves have been filed with
any federal agency. In accordance with the SECs
guidelines, our estimates of proved reserves and the future net
revenues from which present values are derived are made using
year end natural gas and crude oil sales prices held constant
F-29
throughout the life of the properties. Operating costs,
development costs and certain production-related taxes were
deducted in arriving at estimated future net revenues, but such
costs do not include debt service, general and administrative
expenses and income taxes.
The following unaudited table sets forth proved natural gas,
crude oil and natural gas liquids reserves, all within the
United States, at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
together with the changes therein. Natural gas liquids became a
significant addition to our reserves since the acquisition of
the STGC properties in May 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mcf)
|
|
|
(Bbls)
|
|
|
Liquids (Bbls)
|
|
|
Total (Mcfe)
|
|
|
QUANTITIES OF PROVED RESERVES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005
|
|
|
24,650,263
|
|
|
|
2,707,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,895,401
|
|
Revisions
|
|
|
882,566
|
|
|
|
(21,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
751,628
|
|
Extensions, discoveries and additions
|
|
|
7,397,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,397,142
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(1,542,423
|
)
|
|
|
(184,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,651,709
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006
|
|
|
31,387,548
|
|
|
|
2,500,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,392,462
|
|
Revisions(1)
|
|
|
(21,184,471
|
)
|
|
|
(521,000
|
)
|
|
|
3,692,173
|
|
|
|
(2,157,433
|
)
|
Extensions, discoveries and additions
|
|
|
7,716,613
|
|
|
|
194,846
|
|
|
|
183,699
|
|
|
|
9,987,883
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
82,386,946
|
|
|
|
1,137,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,211,358
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(9,067,777
|
)
|
|
|
(408,864
|
)
|
|
|
(285,907
|
)
|
|
|
(13,236,403
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
|
|
91,238,859
|
|
|
|
2,903,203
|
|
|
|
3,589,965
|
|
|
|
130,197,867
|
|
Revisions(2)
|
|
|
(9,678,571
|
)
|
|
|
(408,055
|
)
|
|
|
(752,440
|
)
|
|
|
(16,641,541
|
)
|
Extensions, discoveries and additions
|
|
|
11,948,600
|
|
|
|
470,828
|
|
|
|
603,414
|
|
|
|
18,394,052
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
17,311,835
|
|
|
|
107,332
|
|
|
|
474,642
|
|
|
|
20,803,679
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(1,516,480
|
)
|
|
|
(11,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,585,120
|
)
|
Production
|
|
|
(13,135,509
|
)
|
|
|
(498,143
|
)
|
|
|
(516,352
|
)
|
|
|
(19,222,479
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008
|
|
|
96,168,734
|
|
|
|
2,563,725
|
|
|
|
3,399,229
|
|
|
|
131,946,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROVED DEVELOPED RESERVES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
27,145,360
|
|
|
|
2,249,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,641,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
67,996,730
|
|
|
|
2,266,017
|
|
|
|
2,683,678
|
|
|
|
97,694,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
66,711,779
|
|
|
|
1,615,974
|
|
|
|
2,422,878
|
|
|
|
90,944,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The reporting of net NGL sales volumes began in mid-year 2007
following the close of the EXCO acquisition. The end of year
2007 reserve report was updated to reflect this change in
reporting. The resulting changes in 2007 volumes for natural gas
and natural gas liquids are reflected in revisions. |
|
(2) |
|
Periodic revisions to the estimated reserves and future cash
flows may be necessary as a result of a number of factors,
including reservoir performance, new drilling, oil and natural
gas prices, cost changes, technological advances, new geological
or geophysical data, or other economic factors. |
F-30
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
relating to proved reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
|
$
|
749,121,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,374,500
|
|
|
$
|
313,312,927
|
|
Future production and development costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
214,969,100
|
|
|
|
258,028,900
|
|
|
|
108,693,762
|
|
Development
|
|
|
86,068,300
|
|
|
|
65,779,100
|
|
|
|
26,229,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash flows before income taxes
|
|
|
448,084,000
|
|
|
|
801,566,500
|
|
|
|
178,389,677
|
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
(46,695,950
|
)
|
|
|
(198,920,968
|
)
|
|
|
(43,534,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows after income taxes
|
|
|
401,388,050
|
|
|
|
602,645,532
|
|
|
|
134,855,631
|
|
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows
|
|
|
(140,485,818
|
)
|
|
|
(203,122,453
|
)
|
|
|
(57,442,604
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
$
|
260,902,233
|
|
|
$
|
399,523,079
|
|
|
$
|
77,413,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following reconciles the change in the standardized measure
of discounted future net cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
$
|
399,523,079
|
|
|
$
|
77,413,027
|
|
|
$
|
118,397,139
|
|
Changes from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of proved reserves
|
|
|
69,628,594
|
|
|
|
324,427,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of producing properties
|
|
|
(2,817,597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less related costs
|
|
|
77,931,000
|
|
|
|
43,636,200
|
|
|
|
12,096,684
|
|
Sales of natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
produced, net of production costs
|
|
|
(148,588,993
|
)
|
|
|
(85,425,742
|
)
|
|
|
(13,950,146
|
)
|
Revision of quantity
estimates(1)
|
|
|
(44,029,057
|
)
|
|
|
(15,028,200
|
)
|
|
|
1,980,452
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
39,952,308
|
|
|
|
10,240,157
|
|
|
|
17,156,239
|
|
Change in income taxes
|
|
|
101,522,054
|
|
|
|
(88,340,375
|
)
|
|
|
28,176,711
|
|
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
|
|
(32,461,195
|
)
|
|
|
(8,693,224
|
)
|
|
|
(946,764
|
)
|
Development costs incurred that reduced future development costs
|
|
|
20,342,054
|
|
|
|
20,561,154
|
|
|
|
6,465,719
|
|
Change in sales and transfer prices, net of production costs
|
|
|
(227,731,733
|
)
|
|
|
82,348,797
|
|
|
|
(75,110,065
|
)
|
Changes in production rates (timing) and other
|
|
|
7,631,719
|
|
|
|
38,383,535
|
|
|
|
(16,852,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
260,902,233
|
|
|
$
|
399,523,079
|
|
|
$
|
77,413,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Periodic revisions to the quantity estimates may be necessary as
a result of a number of factors, including reservoir
performance, new drilling, oil and natural gas prices, cost
changes, technological advances, new geological or geophysical
data, or other economic factors. |
F-31
CRIMSON
EXPLORATION INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
12,403,474
|
|
|
|
21,078,815
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
77,293
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
17,121,267
|
|
|
|
25,191,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
29,528,590
|
|
|
|
46,347,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method of accounting)
|
|
|
601,046,541
|
|
|
|
584,093,885
|
|
Other property and equipment
|
|
|
3,365,032
|
|
|
|
3,282,088
|
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(179,175,724
|
)
|
|
|
(138,220,237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
|
|
425,235,849
|
|
|
|
449,155,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
104,697
|
|
|
|
104,697
|
|
Debt issuance cost, net
|
|
|
3,331,976
|
|
|
|
2,890,094
|
|
Deferred charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,324,907
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
4,279,665
|
|
|
|
11,722,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent assets
|
|
|
7,716,338
|
|
|
|
16,042,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
462,480,777
|
|
|
$
|
511,545,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,525,583
|
|
|
$
|
90,368
|
|
Accounts and revenues payable
|
|
|
20,513,642
|
|
|
|
47,726,858
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
341,851
|
|
|
|
546,944
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
8,912,643
|
|
|
|
24,369,060
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
2,161,914
|
|
|
|
1,659,371
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
3,098,405
|
|
|
|
1,265,801
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
4,839,599
|
|
|
|
8,331,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
41,393,637
|
|
|
|
83,989,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
290,000,788
|
|
|
|
276,690,426
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
12,394,368
|
|
|
|
11,409,171
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
1,383,745
|
|
|
|
1,491,755
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
10,051,928
|
|
|
|
15,609,315
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
713,806
|
|
|
|
732,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
314,544,635
|
|
|
|
305,933,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
355,938,272
|
|
|
|
389,922,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (see Note 7)
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
Common stock (see Note 7)
|
|
|
6,483
|
|
|
|
5,808
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
97,565,970
|
|
|
|
95,676,875
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
9,352,931
|
|
|
|
26,189,888
|
|
Treasury stock (see Note 7)
|
|
|
(383,705
|
)
|
|
|
(250,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
106,542,505
|
|
|
|
121,622,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
462,480,777
|
|
|
$
|
511,545,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral
part of these statements.
F-32
CRIMSON
EXPLORATION INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales
|
|
$
|
16,426,246
|
|
|
$
|
33,826,275
|
|
|
$
|
55,135,137
|
|
|
$
|
92,074,941
|
|
Crude oil sales
|
|
|
6,709,774
|
|
|
|
11,389,585
|
|
|
|
21,518,736
|
|
|
|
34,150,048
|
|
Natural gas liquids sales
|
|
|
3,616,522
|
|
|
|
7,901,683
|
|
|
|
9,089,086
|
|
|
|
24,687,092
|
|
Operating overhead and other income
|
|
|
147,862
|
|
|
|
634,248
|
|
|
|
508,249
|
|
|
|
889,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
26,900,404
|
|
|
|
53,751,791
|
|
|
|
86,251,208
|
|
|
|
151,801,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
3,879,621
|
|
|
|
5,653,989
|
|
|
|
13,517,664
|
|
|
|
15,362,455
|
|
Production and ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
1,563,460
|
|
|
|
4,819,558
|
|
|
|
6,060,579
|
|
|
|
14,355,289
|
|
Exploration expenses
|
|
|
687,613
|
|
|
|
1,044,499
|
|
|
|
2,873,255
|
|
|
|
1,877,382
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
13,400,031
|
|
|
|
13,159,886
|
|
|
|
41,599,314
|
|
|
|
36,029,611
|
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,798,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,798,755
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,836,194
|
|
|
|
7,591,344
|
|
|
|
13,381,282
|
|
|
|
17,819,461
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,925
|
|
|
|
(15,271,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
23,366,919
|
|
|
|
58,068,031
|
|
|
|
77,451,019
|
|
|
|
95,971,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
3,533,485
|
|
|
|
(4,316,240
|
)
|
|
|
8,800,189
|
|
|
|
55,829,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(6,633,642
|
)
|
|
|
(5,540,319
|
)
|
|
|
(16,349,300
|
)
|
|
|
(15,871,096
|
)
|
Other financing cost
|
|
|
(382,159
|
)
|
|
|
(339,480
|
)
|
|
|
(1,109,805
|
)
|
|
|
(1,174,013
|
)
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(9,929,947
|
)
|
|
|
88,901,338
|
|
|
|
(17,237,909
|
)
|
|
|
1,664,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense) income
|
|
|
(16,945,748
|
)
|
|
|
83,021,539
|
|
|
|
(34,697,014
|
)
|
|
|
(15,380,568
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(13,412,263
|
)
|
|
|
78,705,299
|
|
|
|
(25,896,825
|
)
|
|
|
40,449,414
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
4,826,137
|
|
|
|
(28,461,407
|
)
|
|
|
9,080,238
|
|
|
|
(15,104,519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
(8,586,126
|
)
|
|
|
50,243,892
|
|
|
|
(16,816,587
|
)
|
|
|
25,344,895
|
|
Dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
(1,156,163
|
)
|
|
|
(1,083,328
|
)
|
|
|
(3,353,150
|
)
|
|
|
(3,164,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
$
|
(9,742,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,160,564
|
|
|
$
|
(20,169,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,180,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.51
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.19
|
|
|
$
|
(3.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.25
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.51
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.87
|
|
|
$
|
(3.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
6,444,013
|
|
|
|
5,351,146
|
|
|
|
6,301,280
|
|
|
|
5,225,113
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
6,444,013
|
|
|
|
10,317,629
|
|
|
|
6,301,280
|
|
|
|
10,289,138
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral
part of these statements
F-33
CRIMSON
EXPLORATION INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2008
|
|
|
82,600
|
|
|
|
5,787,287
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
5,808
|
|
|
$
|
95,676,875
|
|
|
$
|
26,189,888
|
|
|
$
|
(250,594
|
)
|
|
$
|
121,622,803
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
668,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
1,868,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,869,400
|
|
Common stock issued as dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
20,364
|
|
|
|
(20,370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,816,587
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,816,587
|
)
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,111
|
)
|
|
|
(133,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
|
|
|
82,600
|
|
|
|
6,421,564
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
6,483
|
|
|
$
|
97,565,970
|
|
|
$
|
9,352,931
|
|
|
$
|
(383,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
106,542,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral
part of these statements.
F-34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(16,816,587
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,344,895
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
41,599,314
|
|
|
|
36,029,610
|
|
Settlement of asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
(361,239
|
)
|
|
|
(421,600
|
)
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
1,869,400
|
|
|
|
4,450,871
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance cost
|
|
|
945,313
|
|
|
|
833,556
|
|
Deferred charges
|
|
|
1,324,907
|
|
|
|
(718,768
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes (benefit)
|
|
|
(9,595,940
|
)
|
|
|
14,919,519
|
|
Dry holes, abandoned property, impaired assets
|
|
|
221,960
|
|
|
|
25,798,755
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
18,925
|
|
|
|
(15,271,712
|
)
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
17,237,909
|
|
|
|
(1,664,541
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
8,675,339
|
|
|
|
1,986,366
|
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
|
|
(201,562
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(42,440,824
|
)
|
|
|
5,823,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
2,751,921
|
|
|
|
96,908,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
24,327
|
|
|
|
34,918,332
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(16,545,051
|
)
|
|
|
(82,577,152
|
)
|
Acquisition of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
493,532
|
|
|
|
(58,031,525
|
)
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(16,027,192
|
)
|
|
|
(105,696,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,500
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(133,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
91,373,659
|
|
|
|
122,169,922
|
|
Payments on debt
|
|
|
(76,578,082
|
)
|
|
|
(108,206,369
|
)
|
Debt issuance cost
|
|
|
(1,387,195
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
13,275,271
|
|
|
|
14,310,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,522,693
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,882,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,405,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
14,484,741
|
|
|
$
|
17,378,802
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
539,671
|
|
|
$
|
185,000
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral
part of these statements.
F-35
CRIMSON
EXPLORATION INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
1.
|
ORGANIZATION AND
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
|
Crimson Exploration Inc., together with its subsidiaries
(Crimson, we, our,
us), is an independent natural gas and crude oil
company engaged in the acquisition, development, exploitation
and exploration of natural gas and crude oil properties,
primarily in the onshore U.S. Gulf Coast and South Texas
regions.
PresentationThe accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(U.S.) for interim financial information and
with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
notes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) for complete financial
statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements
at September 30, 2009 (unaudited) and December 31,
2008 and for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 (unaudited) and 2008 (unaudited) contain all normally
recurring adjustments considered necessary, in the opinion of
management, for a fair presentation of our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows for such periods. Operating
results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for the year ending December 31, 2009. These unaudited
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes included in our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The accompanying financial statements include Crimson
Exploration Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Southern G
Holdings, LLC, acquired May 8, 2007, and merged with
Crimson Exploration Operating, Inc. on January 1, 2008,
Crimson Exploration Operating, Inc., formed January 5, 2006
and LTW Pipeline Co., formed April 19, 1999. All material
intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated upon
consolidation. Certain reclassifications were made to previously
reported amounts to make them consistent with the current
presentation format.
Accounting Standards CodificationOn July 1,
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) instituted a new referencing system,
which codifies, but does not amend, previously existing
nongovernmental GAAP. The FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(ASC) is now the single authoritative source
for GAAP. Although the implementation of ASC had no impact on
our financial statements, certain references to authoritative
GAAP literature within our footnotes have been changed to cite
the appropriate content within the ASC.
Adoption of ASU
2009-05In
August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2009-05,
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures: Measuring Liabilities
at Fair Value. ASU
2009-05
provides clarification on measuring liabilities at fair value
when a quoted price in an active market is not available. We
adopted ASU
No. 2009-05
(FASB ASC
820-10) as
of September 30, 2009. The adoption of this statement did
not have an impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
Subsequent EventsWe adopted the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement
No. 165, Subsequent Events, which is now
incorporated into ASC Topic No. 855 (ASC
855) as of June 30, 2009. ASC 855 requires
entities to disclose the date through which they have evaluated
subsequent events and whether the date corresponds with the
release of their financial statements. The adoption of this
statement did not have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations. We completed our review and
analysis of potential subsequent events, as of
F-36
November 16, 2009, the date these financial statements were
issued. See
Note 11-
Subsequent Events for additional disclosures.
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
InstrumentWe adopted FSP
SFAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, which is now incorporated into ASC Topic
No. 825 (ASC 825) as of June 30,
2009. This statement increases the frequency of fair value
disclosures to a quarterly instead of annual basis. The guidance
relates to fair value disclosures for any financial instruments
that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet at fair
value. The adoption of this statement did not have a material
impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity
for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not OrderlyWe
adopted the FSP
SFAS 157-4
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly which is
now incorporated into ASC Topic No. 820 (ASC
820) as of June 30, 2009. ASC 820 provides
guidelines for a broad interpretation of when to apply
market-based fair value measures. It reaffirms managements
need to use judgment to determine when a market that was once
active has become inactive and in determining fair values in
markets that are no longer active.
Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
ActivitiesWe adopted FASB Statement No. 161,
Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
which is now incorporated into ASC Topic No. 815
(ASC 815) as of January 1, 2009. ASC 815
amends and expands the disclosure requirements for derivative
instruments and hedging activities with the intent to provide
users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of:
(i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments;
(ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for; and (iii) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect an entitys financial position,
results of operations and cash flows. See
Note 5Derivative Instruments for these
additional disclosures. The adoption of this statement did not
have an impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
Business CombinationsWe adopted
SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007) Business
Combinations which is now incorporated into ASC Topic
No. 805 (ASC 805) as of January 1,
2009. The revision broadens the definition of a business
combination to include all transactions or other events in which
control of one or more businesses is obtained. Further, this
statement establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer recognizes assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any
non-controlling interests acquired. The adoption of this
statement has not had an impact on our financial position or
results of operations, because we have not yet had any business
combinations in 2009.
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157We also
adopted FSP
SFAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
is also now incorporated into ASC Topic No. 820 as of
January 1, 2009. The effective date was deferred for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) to
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. See
Note 4Fair Value Measurements for
additional disclosures. The adoption of this statement did not
have a material impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
|
|
3.
|
OIL AND GAS
PROPERTIES
|
Acquisition
from Smith Production Inc.
In May 2008, we acquired four producing gas fields and
undeveloped acreage in South Texas from Smith Production Inc.
(Smith) for a purchase price of
$65.0 million with an economic effective date of
January 1, 2008. After adjustment for the estimated results
of operations, and other typical purchase price adjustments of
approximately $7.4 million for the period between the
effective date and the closing date, the cash consideration was
approximately $57.6 million.
F-37
Fort Worth
Barnett Shale Disposition
In January 2008, we and our operator-partner entered into a
series of agreements to sell our interests in wells and
undeveloped acreage in the Fort Worth Barnett Shale Play in
Johnson and Tarrant counties, Texas to another industry
participant active in that area. We owned a 12.5% non-operated
working interest in the assets being sold and had 1.5 Bcfe
in proved reserves at December 31, 2007. The final total
consideration paid by the buyer was based on existing wells and
undeveloped acreage owned by us and our partner at the time of
the final closing. Our share of the consideration received was
approximately $34.4 million. Proceeds received for our
interest were primarily used to repay amounts outstanding under
our senior secured revolving credit facility and to help finance
our acquisition of the properties from Smith. Our net book value
of these assets sold was $18.8 million, which resulted in a
gain of $15.6 million.
|
|
4.
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
|
We use a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to
valuation techniques for measuring fair value into three levels.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted
market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest
priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Level 2
inputs are inputs, other than quoted prices included within
Level 1, which are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly. We use Level 1 inputs when
available, as Level 1 inputs generally provide the most
reliable evidence of fair value.
Certain of our assets and liabilities are reported at fair value
in our consolidated balance sheets. The following methods and
assumptions were used to estimate the fair values for each class
of financial instruments:
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Accounts Receivable and Accounts
Payable. The carrying amounts approximate fair
value due to the short-term nature or maturity of the
instruments. Our allowance for doubtful accounts as of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 remains at
$0.2 million.
Derivative Instruments. Our derivative
instruments consist of variable to fixed price commodity swaps,
costless collars and interest rate swaps. We value our
derivative instruments utilizing estimates of present value as
calculated by the respective counterparty financial institutions
and reviewed by management. See
Note 5Derivative Instruments for further
information. Fair value information for assets and liabilities
that are measured at fair value is as follows at
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil & natural gas swaps
|
|
$
|
752,273
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
752,273
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Crude oil & natural gas collars
|
|
|
21,400,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,400,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(5,234,423
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,234,423
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
16,918,782
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,918,782
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset ImpairmentsWe review a proved oil and gas
property for impairment when events and circumstances indicate a
significant decline in the recoverability of the carrying value
of such property. If events indicate a significant decline in
the recoverability of such property, we estimate the future cash
flows expected in connection with the property and compare such
future cash flows to the carrying amount of the property to
determine if the carrying amount is recoverable. If the carrying
amount of the property exceeds its estimated undiscounted future
cash flows, the carrying amount of the property is reduced to
its estimated fair value. Fair value may be estimated using
comparable market data, a discounted cash flow method, or a
combination of the two. In the discounted cash flow method,
estimated future cash flows are based on managements
expectations for the future and include estimates of future oil
and gas production, commodity prices based on commodity futures
F-38
price strips as of the date of the estimate, operating and
development costs, and a risk-adjusted discount rate. We had no
asset impairments in the nine months ended September 30,
2009.
DebtThe fair value of debt approximates the
carrying amounts on such debt. Interest rates are based on Prime
or LIBOR rates at the time the loans are renewed. See
Note 6Debt for further information.
Asset Retirement ObligationsWe estimate the fair
values of asset retirement obligations (AROs)
based on discounted cash flow projections using numerous
estimates, assumptions and judgments regarding such factors as
the existence of a legal obligation for an ARO; estimated
probabilities, amounts and timing of settlements; the
credit-adjusted risk-free rate to be used; and inflation rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
14,556,282
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,556,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Retirement Obligations Rollforward
|
|
|
Beginning January 1, 2009 liability
|
|
$
|
13,068,542
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
103,691
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
643,825
|
|
Revisions
|
|
|
1,112,951
|
|
Properties sold
|
|
|
(11,488
|
)
|
Plugging and abandonment activity
|
|
|
(361,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending September 30, 2009 liability
|
|
$
|
14,556,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS
|
In the past we have entered into, and may in the future enter
into, certain derivative arrangements with respect to portions
of our natural gas and crude oil production, to reduce our
sensitivity to volatile commodity prices, and with respect to
portions of our debt, to reduce our sensitivity to volatile
interest rates. None of our derivative instruments are
designated as cash flow hedges. We believe that these derivative
arrangements, although not free of risk, allow us to achieve a
more predictable cash flow and to reduce exposure to commodity
price and interest rate fluctuations. However, derivative
arrangements limit the benefit of increases in the prices of
natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids sales and limit
the benefit of decreases in interest rates. Moreover, our
derivative arrangements apply only to a portion of our
production and our debt and provide only partial protection
against declines in commodity prices and increases in interest
rates, respectively. Such arrangements may expose us to risk of
financial loss in certain circumstances. We continuously
reevaluate our hedging programs in light of changes in
production, market conditions, commodity price forecasts,
capital spending, interest rate forecasts and debt service
requirements.
We use a mix of commodity swaps and costless collars and
interest rate swaps to accomplish our hedging strategy.
Derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty,
subject to contractual terms which provides for net settlement,
are reported on a net basis on our consolidated balance sheets.
We have exposure to financial institutions in the form of
derivative transactions in connection with our hedges. These
transactions are with counterparties in the financial services
industry specifically with members of our bank group. These
transactions could expose us to credit risk in the event of
default of our counterparties. In addition, if any lender under
our credit facility is unable to fund its commitment, our
liquidity could be reduced by an amount up to the aggregate
amount of such lenders commitment under our credit
facility. We believe our counterparty risk is low because of the
offsetting relationship we have with each of our counterparties.
See Note 4Fair Value Measurements for
further information.
F-39
The following derivative contracts were in place at
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil
|
|
|
|
Volume/Month
|
|
Price/Unit
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec
2009
|
|
Swap
|
|
5,200 Bbls
|
|
$74.20
|
|
$
|
48,808
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec
2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
12,800 Bbls
|
|
$66.55-$71.40
|
|
|
(62,354
|
)
|
Oct 2009-Dec
2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
10,733 Bbls(1)
|
|
$115.00-$171.50
|
|
|
1,414,607
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
4,250 Bbls
|
|
$72.32
|
|
|
(104,180
|
)
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
9,000 Bbls
|
|
$65.28-$70.60
|
|
|
(627,041
|
)
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
7,604 Bbls(1)
|
|
$110.00-$181.25
|
|
|
3,398,019
|
|
Jan 2011-Dec
2011
|
|
Swap
|
|
3,300 Bbls
|
|
$70.74
|
|
|
(257,729
|
)
|
Jan 2011-Dec
2011
|
|
Collar
|
|
7,000 Bbls
|
|
$64.50-$69.50
|
|
|
(807,512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec 2009
|
|
Swap
|
|
36,000 MMbtu
|
|
$8.32
|
|
|
386,563
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec
2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
475,000 MMbtu
|
|
$7.90-$9.45
|
|
|
4,388,271
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec
2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
101,200 MMbtu(1)
|
|
$9.50-$18.70
|
|
|
1,417,191
|
|
Jan 2010-Jun 2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
45,833 MMbtu(1)
|
|
$6.25(2)
|
|
|
93,545
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
29,000 MMbtu
|
|
$7.88
|
|
|
585,266
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
351,000 MMbtu
|
|
$7.57-$9.05
|
|
|
6,666,180
|
|
Jan 2010-Dec
2010
|
|
Collar
|
|
85,167 MMbtu(1)
|
|
$9.00-$15.25
|
|
|
3,065,348
|
|
Jan 2011-Dec
2011
|
|
Collar
|
|
266,000 MMbtu
|
|
$7.32-$8.70
|
|
|
2,548,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Fixed LIBOR Rate
|
|
|
|
Oct 2009-Dec
2010
|
|
Swap
|
|
$50,000,000
|
|
1.50%
|
|
|
(500,319
|
)
|
Oct 2009- May 2011
|
|
Swap
|
|
$150,000,000
|
|
2.90%
|
|
|
(4,734,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net fair value asset of derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
16,918,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average volume per month for the remaining contract term |
|
(2) |
|
Average price for the contract term |
The total net fair value asset for derivative instruments at
September 30, 2009 was approximately $16.9 million and
at December 31, 2008 was approximately $34.2 million,
which are shown as derivative instruments in assets and
liabilities on the balance sheet.
The following table details the effect of derivative contracts
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
Contract Type
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Commodity prices
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
10,368,926
|
|
|
$
|
(5,712,364
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,809,560
|
|
|
$
|
(13,230,982
|
)
|
Interest rate
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,158,810
|
)
|
|
|
(1,304,933
|
)
|
|
|
(3,242,533
|
)
|
|
|
(2,783,796
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
9,210,116
|
|
|
$
|
(7,017,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,567,027
|
|
|
$
|
(16,014,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity prices
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
$
|
(9,585,588
|
)
|
|
$
|
87,380,831
|
|
|
$
|
(17,689,012
|
)
|
|
$
|
752,333
|
|
Interest rates
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(344,359
|
)
|
|
|
1,520,507
|
|
|
|
451,103
|
|
|
|
912,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
(9,929,947
|
)
|
|
$
|
88,901,338
|
|
|
$
|
(17,237,909
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,664,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
On November 6, 2009, we entered into a second and third
amendment to our senior secured revolving credit facility, dated
May 31, 2007, as amended (Senior Credit
Agreement). This facility provides cash availability
for acquisitions of oil and gas properties and for general
corporate cash requirements. The Senior Credit Agreement
provides for aggregate borrowings of up to $400.0 million,
with an initial borrowing base of $200.0 million that
decreased to $140.0 million, effective November 2,
2009, and is subject to semi-annual redeterminations, although
our lenders may elect to make one additional redetermination
between scheduled redetermination dates (and have expressly
reserved the right to do so between January 1, 2010 and
May 1, 2010). The next borrowing base redetermination is
scheduled for January 1, 2010. These amendments to the
Senior Credit Agreement provide, among other things, for
(i) a change in the voting percentages required for certain
amendments or waivers from 50.1% to 60%, and (ii) a waiver
of the current ratio and the leverage ratio for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009. The Senior Credit Agreement
matures on May 8, 2011. As of September 30, 2009, we
had an outstanding loan balance of $141.5 million under our
Senior Credit Agreement.
Also, on November 6, 2009, we issued an unsecured
promissory note in an aggregate principal amount of
$10.0 million to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
the administrative agent and a lender under our Senior Credit
Agreement. This promissory note bears interest at a per annum
rate equal to two-month LIBOR plus 2% and matures on
January 15, 2010; provided that upon an event of default
resulting from the failure to make any payment of principal or
interest under the promissory note, the interest rate per annum
will increase to an amount equal to the lesser of the maximum
rate of interest that may be charged under applicable law and
LIBOR plus 4% or, if the promissory note has been assigned to
any person other than any affiliate of Wells Fargo Bank, LIBOR
plus 15%. All of the proceeds of the promissory note were used
to repay indebtedness outstanding under the Senior Credit
Agreement. As support for the obligations owed under the
promissory note, OCM GW Holdings, LLC (Oaktree
Holdings), our majority stockholder, has deposited
$10.0 million in escrow for the benefit of Wells Fargo,
which may, at its option, cause the note to be assigned to
Oaktree Holdings and draw on the funds held in escrow.
As consideration for Oaktree Holdings agreement to deposit
$10.0 million in escrow as described above, we issued an
unsecured subordinated promissory note on November 6, 2009
in an aggregate principal amount of $2.0 million to Oaktree
Holdings. The indebtedness under the promissory note bears
interest at a rate equal to 8.0% per annum and matures on the
later of (i) November 8, 2012 and (ii) the date
six months after payment in full in cash of all Obligations (as
such term is defined under each of the Senior Credit Agreement
and the Second Lien Credit Agreement (defined below)), and the
termination of all commitments to extend credit under the Senior
Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Agreement. The
promissory note is subordinated in right of payment to the prior
payment in full in cash of all obligations under the Senior
Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Agreement.
On July 31, 2009, we entered into the first amendment to
our Senior Credit Agreement. This amendment to the Senior Credit
Agreement provides, among other things, for (i) the
leverage ratio to be not greater than 2.75 to 1.00 for each
fiscal quarter, (ii) the current ratio to be not less than
1.00 to 1.00 for each fiscal quarter, (iii) an increased
applicable margin on LIBOR loans to between 2.75% and 3.50%, and
base rate loans to between 1.50% and 2.00%, depending on the
percent of the borrowing base utilized at the time of the credit
extension, and (iv) an increased commitment fee on
unutilized commitments to 0.50%.
On November 6, 2009, we entered into a third amendment and
waiver to our second lien credit agreement dated May 8,
2007, as amended (the Second Lien Credit
Agreement), with lenders holding a majority of the
then outstanding term loans under such agreement, which included
an affiliate of Oaktree Holdings. The Second Lien Credit
Agreement provides for a term loan in an aggregate principal
amount of $150.0 million, with a term of five years with
all principal amounts, together with all accrued and unpaid
interest, due and payable in full on May 8, 2012. The third
F-41
amendment to our Second Lien Credit Agreement provided, among
other things, for a waiver of the leverage ratio covenant for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
The Senior Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Agreement
(the Credit Agreements) are secured by a lien
on substantially all of our assets, as well as a security
interest in the stock of our subsidiaries. The obligations under
the Second Lien Credit Agreement are junior to those under the
Senior Credit Agreement. Interest is payable on the Credit
Agreements as borrowings mature and renew.
The Credit Agreements include usual and customary affirmative
covenants for credit facilities of the respective types and
sizes, as well as customary negative covenants, including, among
others, limitations on liens, hedging, mergers, asset sales or
dispositions, payments of dividends, incurrence of additional
indebtedness, certain leases and investments outside of the
ordinary course of business, as well as events of default. The
Credit Agreements also contain certain financial and proved
reserve covenants. See Note 10 of our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for a more detailed description of our covenants under the
Credit Agreements, other than those revised above. At
September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the
aforementioned covenants, with the exception of the current
ratio under the Senior Credit Agreement and the leverage ratio
under both of the Credit Agreements. We obtained waivers of such
noncompliance from our lenders under the Credit Agreements for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009. However, without
improvement in natural gas and crude oil prices, reduction in
debt levels, improvement in production volumes
and/or other
measures, we may not be able to comply with certain covenants
under our Credit Agreements for future quarters. We continue to
pursue other public and private sources of capital which would
positively affect our debt covenant ratios and we continue to
work with our lenders on long term amendments to our covenants.
If we are unable to comply with the covenants for future
quarters, we believe that it is not probable that we would not
be able to cure future covenant violations by obtaining
additional capital or by obtaining waivers from our lenders to
cure the defaults, although we can give no assurances that any
such sources of capital will be available or that such
amendments will be entered into, or on terms acceptable to us.
If we were not able to comply with our covenants in the future,
and we were not able to obtain waivers from our lenders to cure
such defaults, our lenders would have the right to demand
acceleration of payment on all amounts outstanding under our
Credit Agreements.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we issued
approximately 0.6 million shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share (Common Stock) subject to
restricted stock awards to our employees under the
performance-based Long-Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) for the 2008 plan year. We issued
48,586 shares of restricted stock to two members of our
board of directors as compensation pursuant to the Director
Compensation Plan. We also issued 6,300 shares of Common
Stock in payment of dividends on Series H Preferred Stock
valued at $20,370 based on the closing market price on the date
the shares were issued. As a result of the vesting of
124,169 shares of restricted Common Stock,
40,713 shares of such stock were withheld by us to satisfy
the employees withholding tax liability, as provided for
in the restricted stock agreements, with the remaining shares
being released to the associated employees.
F-42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series G, par value $0.01; 81,000 shares authorized;
80,500 shares issued and outstanding at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
Series H, par value $0.01; 6,500 shares authorized;
2,100 shares issued and outstanding at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par value $0.001; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 6,421,564
and 5,787,287 shares issued and outstandingnet of
treasury shares at September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively
|
|
$
|
6,483
|
|
|
$
|
5,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, 61,338 and 20,625 shares at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
|
|
$
|
(383,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
(250,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the accumulated value of
undeclared dividends on our preferred stock at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Series G Preferred Stock
|
|
$
|
17,679,445
|
|
|
$
|
14,365,860
|
|
Series H Preferred Stock
|
|
|
6,790
|
|
|
|
9,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,706,235
|
|
|
$
|
14,375,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Until such time as the Board of Directors declares and pays
dividends on our Series G Preferred Stock, dividends shall
continue to accumulate. Dividends on our Series H Preferred
Stock are declared quarterly by our Board of Directors, and are
paid out in Common Stock the following quarter.
|
|
8.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
We have share-based compensation for employees and directors,
which includes both stock option and restricted stock awards.
The following table reflects share-based compensation expense,
assuming a 35.0% effective tax rate for the periods ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of tax of $121,594 and
$507,701, and $654,290 and $1,513,904, respectively
|
|
$
|
225,817
|
|
|
$
|
942,874
|
|
|
$
|
1,215,110
|
|
|
$
|
2,811,537
|
|
Basic earnings per share impact
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
Diluted earnings per share impact
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we awarded
approximately 0.6 million shares of restricted Common Stock
and 0.5 million shares in stock options to our employees
under our LTIP for the 2008 plan year. We also issued
48,586 shares of restricted Common Stock to two members of
our board of directors as compensation pursuant to the Director
Compensation Plan.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we issued
1,538 shares of restricted Common Stock to two members of
our board of directors as compensation pursuant to the Director
F-43
Compensation Plan. We also issued 533,350 shares of
unvested Common Stock pursuant to restricted stock awards in
exchange for the forfeiture of 1,066,700 substantially vested
stock option grants. The fair value of the unvested Common Stock
was calculated as $4.9 million on the issuance date. The
fair value of the forfeited stock options, calculated using the
Black-Scholes valuation model, was $4.3 million immediately
prior to the forfeiture. The sum of the incremental value of the
new award over the forfeited options, $0.6 million, and the
unrecognized compensation cost for the original award as of the
exchange date, $1.4 million, are being amortized using the
straight line method over the new vesting period of five years,
or approximately $32,000 a month.
Income tax benefit for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 was $9.1 million, compared to income tax expense of
$15.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The income tax benefit for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was based on our estimate of the
effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full year.
The effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate were 35%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
10.
|
RECENT ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
SEC
33-8995/34-59192. In
December 2008, the SEC adopted Release
No. 33-8995/34-59192,
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting (SEC
33-8995).
This release amends the oil and gas reporting disclosures that
exist in their current form in
Regulation S-K
and
Regulation S-X
under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 to provide investors with a more meaningful and
comprehensive understanding of oil and gas reserves. The new
rules include changes for pricing used to estimate reserves;
permitting disclosure of possible and probable reserves; ability
to include non-traditional resources in reserves and the use of
new technology for determining reserves. SEC
33-8995 is
effective for fiscal years ending on or after December 31,
2009. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently
evaluating the provisions of SEC
33-8995 and
assessing the impact it may have on our financial reporting
disclosures.
On November 6, 2009, we completed the second and third
amendments to our Senior Credit Agreement, which changed the
voting requirements for certain amendments or waivers and waived
certain covenants for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
We also issued a $10.0 million promissory note with Wells
Fargo Bank and a $2.0 million subordinated promissory note
with Oaktree Holdings.
On November 6, 2009, we completed the third amendment to
our Second Lien Credit Agreement, which waived the leverage
ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
For a complete description of these events, see
Note 6Debt.
F-44
18,000,000 Shares
Common Stock
Prospectus
,
2009
Barclays Capital
Credit Suisse
Morgan Keegan & Company,
Inc.
RBS
Pritchard Capital Partners,
LLC
Johnson Rice & Company
L.L.C.
Rodman & Renshaw,
LLC
Stifel Nicolaus
PART II
INFORMATION NOT
REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other Expenses
of Issuance and Distribution.
|
The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other
than underwriting discounts and commissions, payable by Crimson
Exploration in connection with the issuance and distribution of
the securities being registered. All amounts are estimates
except the SEC registration and The NASDAQ Global Market filing
fees.
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
9,240
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Market filing fee
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
FINRA filing fee
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Listing fee
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
Transfer agents fee
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Legal and accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
855,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 14:
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits
the Registrant to indemnify directors, officers, employees or
agents, or persons serving in such capacity at the
Registrants request at another entity, against expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred, other than
an action by or in the right of the Registrant, to which such
director, officer, employee or agent may be a party, provided
such person shall have acted in good faith and shall have
reasonably believed that his conduct was in or not opposed to
the best interests of the Registrant and, in the case of a
criminal proceeding, that he had no reasonable cause to believe
his conduct was unlawful. In connection with an action by or in
the right of the Registrant against a director, officer,
employee or agent, the Registrant has the power to indemnify
such director, officer, employee or agent for actual and
reasonable expenses (including attorneys fees) incurred in
connection with the defense or settlement of such suit
(a) if such person acted in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest
of the Registrant, and (b) if found liable to the
Registrant, only if ordered by a court of law. Section 145
provides that such section is not exclusive of any other
indemnification rights granted by the Registrant to directors,
officers, employees or agents. The Delaware General Corporation
Law provides for mandatory indemnification of directors and
officers where such director or officer is successful on the
merits in the types of proceedings discussed above.
The Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant
provides for mandatory indemnification of directors to the
fullest extent authorized or permitted by applicable law. The
right to indemnification is a contract right and includes the
right to be paid by the Registrant the expenses incurred in
defending any such proceeding in advance of its final
disposition. Our Bylaws provide that, if the Delaware General
Corporation Law requires, an advancement of expenses incurred by
a director in his capacity as a director or officer of the
Registrant may be made only upon delivery to the Registrant of
an undertaking to repay all advanced amounts if it is ultimately
determined by final nonappealable judicial decision that such
person is not entitled to be indemnified for those expenses.
The Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant also contains
a provision eliminating the liability of a director to the
Registrant or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach
of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent such
exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted
by the Delaware General Corporation Law.
II-1
The Registrant has obtained insurance on behalf of the
Registrant and its directors and officers individually against
certain liabilities. By reason of this coverage, the Registrant
and its directors and officers will be insured against most
lawsuits and claims arising from unintentional acts or
omissions, including such lawsuits and claims brought under the
federal securities laws (other than under Section 16(b) of
the Exchange Act). In addition, our directors and officers have
entered into indemnification agreements providing for
indemnification and advancement of expenses in connection with
legal proceedings.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent Sales
of Unregistered Securities.
|
As shown in the table below, since January 1, 2006, we
issued common stock not registered under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, in transactions we believe are exempt under
Section 4(2) of the Act due to the limited number of
persons involved and their relationship with us or in the case
of conversions, exempt under Section 3(a)(9) of the Act. No
underwriters were used, and no underwriting discounts or
commissions were paid in connection with the sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Conversion
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Derivative
|
|
Holder(s)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
7/11/2008
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Existing Stockholders
|
|
|
14,286
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
|
Series H Preferred Stock Conversion
|
2/7/2008
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Existing Stockholder
|
|
|
34,821
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
|
Series G Preferred Stock Conversion
|
12/20/2007
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Existing Stockholder
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
80.00
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock Conversion
|
10/05/2007
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Accredited Investors
|
|
|
2,818
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
Director Compensation
|
9/28/2007
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Accredited Investors
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
Compensation to Companys Executive Officers
|
5/29/2007
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Existing Stockholder
|
|
|
428,572
|
|
|
$
|
3.50
|
|
|
Series H Preferred Stock Conversion
|
5/29/2007
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Existing Stockholder
|
|
|
291,247
|
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
|
Series E Preferred Stock Conversion
|
5/8/2007
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Accredited Investor
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
EXCO Acquisition
|
5/12/2006
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Accredited Investors
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
Director Compensation
|
3/01/2006
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Accredited Investors
|
|
|
26,234
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
Bonus compensation to Companys Executive Officers
|
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits and
Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**1
|
.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 14, 2006, among
Crimson Exploration, Inc., Exploration Operating, Inc., Core
Natural Resources, Inc. and its stockholders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Membership Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
May 8, 2007, by and among EXCO Resources, Inc., Southern G
Holdings, LLC, Crimson Exploration Inc. and Crimson Exploration
Operating Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed May 15, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 28, 2008, by and
among Smith Production, Inc. and Crimson Exploration Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of
Series D Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
II-2
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of
Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of
Series G Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of
Series H Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.6
|
|
Bylaws of the Crimson Exploration Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.7
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation
(incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the
Companys Definitive Information Statement on
Schedule 14C filed August 18, 2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.7 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Letter Agreement by and among GulfWest Energy Inc., a Texas
corporation, GulfWest Oil & Gas Company and the
investors listed on the signature page thereof, dated
April 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 10, 2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 8, 2007, by and
between Crimson Exploration Inc. and EXCO Resources, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed May 15, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Shareholders Rights Agreement between GulfWest Energy Inc. and
OCM GW Holdings, LLC dated February 28, 2005 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99(e) of the Schedule 13D,
Reg.
No. 005-54301,
filed on March 10, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Omnibus and Release Agreement among GulfWest Energy Inc., OCM GW
Holdings, LLC and those signatories set forth on the signature
page thereto, dated as of February 28, 2005 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99(f) of the
Schedule 13D, Reg.
No. 005-54301,
filed on March 10, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Allan D. Keel
and Crimson Exploration Inc., dated December 30, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between E. Joseph
Grady and Crimson Exploration Inc., dated December 31, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.3
|
|
GulfWest Oil Company 1994 Stock Option and Compensation Plan,
amended and restated as of April 1, 2001 and approved by
the stockholders on May 18, 2001 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit I of the Companys Proxy Statement on
Form DEF 14A, filed on April 16, 2001)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.4
|
|
GulfWest Energy Inc. 2004 Stock Option Incentive Plan.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.5
|
|
GulfWest Energy Inc. 2005 Stock Option Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004)
|
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.6
|
|
Form of GulfWest Energy Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan Stock
Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
of Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 21, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Series G Subscription Agreement between GulfWest Energy
Inc. and OCM GW Holdings, LLC dated February 28, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(a) of the
Schedule 13D, Reg.
No. 005-54301,
filed on March 10, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Series A Subscription Agreement between GulfWest
Oil & Gas Company and OCW GW Holdings, LLC dated
February 28, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99(b) of the Schedule 13D, Reg.
No. 005-54301,
filed on March 10, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Oil and Gas Property Acquisition, Exploration and Development
Agreement with Summit Investment Group-Texas, L.L.C. effective
December 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Companys Registration Statement
No. 333-116048
on
Form S-1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.11
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Tracy Price
and Crimson Exploration Inc., dated December 30, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.12
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Tommy Atkins
and Crimson Exploration Inc., dated December 29, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.13
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Jay S. Mengle
and Crimson Exploration Inc., dated December 31, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.14
|
|
Summary terms of Director Compensation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.15
|
|
Form of director and officer restricted stock grant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 21, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2007,
among Crimson Exploration Inc., as borrower, Credit Suisse, as
agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed May 15, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.17
|
|
Form of executive officer restricted stock grant for grants
outside the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed August 7, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 5, 2007, to the
Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2007,
among Crimson Exploration Inc., as borrower, Credit Suisse, as
agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed June 8, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31,
2007, among Crimson Exploration Inc., as borrower, Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association and The Royal Bank of Scotland, plc, as co-lead
arrangers and joint bookrunners, and each lender from time to
time party thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed June 6, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.20
|
|
Employment Agreement between Rusty Shepherd and Crimson
Exploration Inc., dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.21
|
|
Crimson Exploration Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, Amended and
Restated Effective as of August 15, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A of the Companys Information
Statement on Schedule 14C filed September 25, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.22
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award used in connection with option
exchange and in connection with the Long-Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 11, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.23
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.24
|
|
Cash Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.25
|
|
Long Term Performance Plan Form of Restricted Stock Award
Agreement for Employees (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.26
|
|
Long Term Incentive Performance Plan Form of Stock Option
Agreement for Employees (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.27
|
|
Long Term Incentive Performance Plan Form of Restricted Stock
Award Agreement for Executive Officers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.28
|
|
Long Term Incentive Performance Plan Form of Restricted Stock
Option Agreement for Executive Officers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of May 13, 2009, to the
Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2007,
among Crimson Exploration Inc., as borrower, Credit Suisse, as
agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Amendment No. 3 and Waiver, dated as of November 6,
2009, to the Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of
May 8, 2007, among Crimson Exploration Inc., Crimson
Exploration Operating, Inc. and the lenders party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
for the quarter filed November 13, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of July 31, 2009, to the Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2007, by
and among Crimson Exploration Inc., the guarantor party thereto,
the lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed August 5, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Second Amendment, dated as of November 6, 2009, to the
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31,
2007, among Crimson Exploration Inc., the guarantor party
thereto, the lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 13, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Third Amendment and Limited Waiver, dated as of November 6,
2009, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
May 31, 2007, among Crimson Exploration Inc., the guarantor
party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 13, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Promissory Note, dated November 6, 2009, made by Crimson
Exploration Inc. to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 13, 2009)
|
II-5
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Subordinated Promissory Note, dated November 6, 2009, made
by Crimson Exploration Inc. to OCM GW Holdings, LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 13, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
(contained in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (set forth on the signature page hereto)
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
|
# |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Financial Statement Schedules
|
No financial statement schedules are included herein. All other
schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
accounting regulation of the SEC are not required under the
related instructions, are inapplicable, or the information is
included in the consolidated financial statements, and have
therefore been omitted.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes the following:
(1) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers
and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(2) (a) For purpose of determining any liability under
the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in the form of
prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or
(4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to
be part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was
declared effective; and
(b) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-6
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 1 to the
registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Houston,
State of Texas, on the 8th day of December, 2009.
Crimson Exploration Inc.
Allan D. Keel
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement has been
signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on
the dates indicated below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Allan
D. Keel
Allan
D. Keel
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
December 8, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ E.
Joseph Grady
E.
Joseph Grady
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
December 8, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Terence
Lynch
Terence
Lynch
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
December 8, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ B.
James Ford*
B.
James Ford
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Adam
C. Pierce*
Adam
C. Pierce
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lee
B. Backsen*
Lee
B. Backsen
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lon
McCain*
Lon
McCain
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2009
|
The undersigned director of Crimson Exploration Inc. hereby
constitutes and appoints Allan D. Keel and E. Joseph Grady, and
each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and
his name place and stead, in any and all capacities, to execute
any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to
this registration statement, to sign any registration statement
filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) of the Securities Act of
1933, and to cause the same to be filed with all exhibits
thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and desirable to be done in and about the premises as
fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all acts
and things that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of
them, or their or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
II-7
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement has been
signed below by the following person in the capacity and on the
date indicated below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cassidy
J. Traub
|
|
Director
|
|
December 8, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By: /s/ Allan
D. Keel
Allan
D. Keel, attorney-in-fact
pursuant to a Power of Attorney
Previously Filed
|
|
|
|
|
II-8
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**1
|
.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 14, 2006, among
Crimson Exploration, Inc., Exploration Operating, Inc., Core
Natural Resources, Inc. and its stockholders (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Membership Interest Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated
May 8, 2007, by and among EXCO Resources, Inc., Southern G
Holdings, LLC, Crimson Exploration Inc. and Crimson Exploration
Operating Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed May 15, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 28, 2008, by and
among Smith Production, Inc. and Crimson Exploration Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of
Series D Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of
Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of
Series G Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of
Series H Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.6
|
|
Bylaws of the Crimson Exploration Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.7
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation
(incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the
Companys Definitive Information Statement on
Schedule 14C filed August 18, 2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.7 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed July 5, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Letter Agreement by and among GulfWest Energy Inc., a Texas
corporation, GulfWest Oil & Gas Company and the
investors listed on the signature page thereof, dated
April 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 10, 2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 8, 2007, by and
between Crimson Exploration Inc. and EXCO Resources, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed May 15, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Shareholders Rights Agreement between GulfWest Energy Inc. and
OCM GW Holdings, LLC dated February 28, 2005 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99(e) of the Schedule 13D,
Reg.
No. 005-54301,
filed on March 10, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Omnibus and Release Agreement among GulfWest Energy Inc., OCM GW
Holdings, LLC and those signatories set forth on the signature
page thereto, dated as of February 28, 2005 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99(f) of the
Schedule 13D, Reg.
No. 005-54301,
filed on March 10, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Allan D. Keel
and Crimson Exploration Inc., dated December 30, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between E. Joseph
Grady and Crimson Exploration Inc., dated December 31, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.3
|
|
GulfWest Oil Company 1994 Stock Option and Compensation Plan,
amended and restated as of April 1, 2001 and approved by
the stockholders on May 18, 2001 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit I of the Companys Proxy Statement on
Form DEF 14A, filed on April 16, 2001)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.4
|
|
GulfWest Energy Inc. 2004 Stock Option Incentive Plan.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.5
|
|
GulfWest Energy Inc. 2005 Stock Option Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.6
|
|
Form of GulfWest Energy Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan Stock
Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
of Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 21, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Series G Subscription Agreement between GulfWest Energy
Inc. and OCM GW Holdings, LLC dated February 28, 2005
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(a) of the
Schedule 13D, Reg.
No. 005-54301,
filed on March 10, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Series A Subscription Agreement between GulfWest
Oil & Gas Company and OCW GW Holdings, LLC dated
February 28, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99(b) of the Schedule 13D, Reg.
No. 005-54301,
filed on March 10, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Oil and Gas Property Acquisition, Exploration and Development
Agreement with Summit Investment Group-Texas, L.L.C. effective
December 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Companys Registration Statement
No. 333-116048
on
Form S-1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.11
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Tracy Price
and Crimson Exploration Inc., dated December 30, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.12
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Tommy Atkins
and Crimson Exploration Inc., dated December 29, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.13
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Jay S. Mengle
and Crimson Exploration Inc., dated December 31, 2008
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.14
|
|
Summary terms of Director Compensation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.15
|
|
Form of director and officer restricted stock grant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 21, 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2007,
among Crimson Exploration Inc., as borrower, Credit Suisse, as
agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed May 15, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.17
|
|
Form of executive officer restricted stock grant for grants
outside the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed August 7, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 5, 2007, to the
Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2007,
among Crimson Exploration Inc., as borrower, Credit Suisse, as
agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed June 8, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31,
2007, among Crimson Exploration Inc., as borrower, Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association and The Royal Bank of Scotland, plc, as co-lead
arrangers and joint bookrunners, and each lender from time to
time party thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed June 6, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.20
|
|
Employment Agreement between Rusty Shepherd and Crimson
Exploration Inc., dated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.21
|
|
Crimson Exploration Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, Amended and
Restated Effective as of August 15, 2008 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A of the Companys Information
Statement on Schedule 14C filed September 25, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.22
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award used in connection with option
exchange and in connection with the Long-Term Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed September 11, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.23
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.24
|
|
Cash Incentive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.25
|
|
Long Term Performance Plan Form of Restricted Stock Award
Agreement for Employees (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.26
|
|
Long Term Incentive Performance Plan Form of Stock Option
Agreement for Employees (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.27
|
|
Long Term Incentive Performance Plan Form of Restricted Stock
Award Agreement for Executive Officers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.28
|
|
Long Term Incentive Performance Plan Form of Restricted Stock
Option Agreement for Executive Officers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of May 13, 2009, to the
Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2007,
among Crimson Exploration Inc., as borrower, Credit Suisse, as
agent, and each lender from time to time party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Amendment No. 3 and Waiver, dated as of November 6,
2009, to the Second Lien Credit Agreement, dated as of
May 8, 2007, among Crimson Exploration Inc., Crimson
Exploration Operating, Inc. and the lenders party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
for the quarter filed November 13, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of July 31, 2009, to the Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2007, by
and among Crimson Exploration Inc., the guarantor party thereto,
the lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed August 5, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Second Amendment, dated as of November 6, 2009, to the
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31,
2007, among Crimson Exploration Inc., the guarantor party
thereto, the lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 13, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Third Amendment and Limited Waiver, dated as of November 6,
2009, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
May 31, 2007, among Crimson Exploration Inc., the guarantor
party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 13, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Promissory Note, dated November 6, 2009, made by Crimson
Exploration Inc. to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 13, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Subordinated Promissory Note, dated November 6, 2009, made
by Crimson Exploration Inc. to OCM GW Holdings, LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed November 13, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
(contained in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (set forth on the signature page hereto)
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
|
|
# |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |