e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
     
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission file number 000-23550
Fentura Financial, Inc.
 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Michigan   38-2806518
     
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (IRS Employee Identification No.)
175 N Leroy, P.O. Box 725, Fenton, Michigan 48430
 
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(810) 629-2263
 
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes   o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) o Yes   o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o 
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o   No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: October 23, 2009
Class — Common Stock               Shares Outstanding — 2,225,214
 
 

 


 

Fentura Financial Inc.
Index to Form 10-Q
         
    Page  
 
    3  
 
       
    3-24  
 
       
    24-37  
 
       
    38-40  
 
       
    40  
 
       
    41  
 
       
    41  
 
       
    41  
 
       
    41  
 
       
    41  
 
       
    41  
 
       
    41  
 
       
    41  
 
       
    42  
 
       
    43  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fentura Financial, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
                 
    September 30,  
    2009   Dec 31,
(000s omitted except share data)   (unaudited)   2008
 
ASSETS
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 18,814     $ 13,626  
Federal funds sold
    27,250       0  
     
Total cash & cash equivalents
    46,064       13,626  
Securities-available for sale
    49,405       47,065  
Securities-held to maturity, (fair value of $5,636 at September 30, 2009 and $6,784 at December 31, 2008)
    5,577       6,765  
     
Total securities
    54,982       53,830  
Loans held for sale
    1,434       690  
Loans:
               
Commercial
    270,542       289,523  
Real estate loans — construction
    34,072       48,777  
Real estate loans — mortgage
    30,829       37,828  
Consumer loans
    50,438       52,910  
     
Total loans
    385,881       429,038  
Less: Allowance for loan losses
    (14,485 )     (10,455 )
     
Net loans
    371,396       418,583  
Bank owned life insurance
    7,138       7,282  
Bank premises and equipment
    16,111       16,879  
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
    1,900       1,900  
Accrued interest receivable
    2,020       2,231  
Acquisition intangibles
    189       293  
Equity investment
    0       1,360  
Other real estate owned
    6,856       5,983  
Assets of held for sale operations
    41,195       45,650  
Other assets
    5,707       10,297  
     
Total assets
  $ 554,992     $ 578,604  
     
LIABILITIES
               
Deposits:
               
Non-interest bearing deposits
  $ 63,786     $ 64,325  
Interest bearing deposits
    405,080       405,039  
     
Total deposits
    468,866       469,364  
Short term borrowings
    34       1,500  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    9,981       12,707  
Subordinated debentures
    14,000       14,000  
Note payable
    0       1,000  
Liabilities of held for sale operations
    38,164       42,174  
Accrued taxes, interest and other liabilities
    4,400       1,735  
     
Total liabilities
    535,445       542,480  
     
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Common stock — no par value 2,225,214 shares issued (2,185,765 at Dec. 31, 2008)
    42,883       42,778  
Retained deficit
    (22,548 )     (4,677 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (788 )     (1,977 )
     
Total shareholders’ equity
    19,547       36,124  
     
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 554,992     $ 578,604  
     
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

Fentura Financial, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30     September 30  
(000s omitted except per share data)   2009     2008     2009     2008  
 
INTEREST INCOME
                               
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 5,936     $ 7,013     $ 18,399     $ 21,364  
Interest and dividends on securities:
                               
Taxable
    404       458       1,213       1,503  
Tax-exempt
    135       148       418       403  
Interest on federal funds sold
    1       31       1       139  
     
Total interest income
    6,476       7,650       20,031       23,409  
INTEREST EXPENSE
                               
Deposits
    2,277       2,892       7,503       9,702  
Borrowings
    227       350       829       1,259  
     
Total interest expense
    2,504       3,242       8,332       10,961  
     
NET INTEREST INCOME
    3,972       4,408       11,699       12,448  
Provision for loan losses
    1,940       700       11,306       5,155  
     
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    2,032       3,708       393       7,293  
NON-INTEREST INCOME
                               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    519       651       1,435       1,871  
Gain on sale of mortgage loans
    100       42       612       260  
Trust and investment services income
    458       456       1,285       1,428  
Gain on sale of securities
    12       0       12       0  
Loss on equity investment
    0       (239 )     (1,360 )     (696 )
Other income and fees
    391       270       1,461       1,089  
     
Total non-interest income
    1,480       1,180       3,445       3,952  
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
                               
Salaries and employee benefits
    2,129       2,534       6,752       8,126  
Occupancy
    428       453       1,378       1,450  
Furniture and equipment
    385       453       1,212       1,432  
Loan and collection
    984       135       2,302       504  
Advertising and promotional
    39       108       126       323  
Loss on security impairment
    0       233       200       843  
Loss on impairment of held for sale operations
    0       0       700       0  
Other operating expenses
    1,015       861       3,458       2,424  
     
Total non-interest expense
    4,980       4,777       16,128       15,102  
     
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before income tax
    (1,468 )     111       (12,290 )     (3,857 )
Federal income tax expense/(benefit)
    (332 )     (101 )     5,028       (1,490 )
     
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations
  $ (1,136 )   $ 212     $ (17,318 )   $ (2,367 )
Net income/(loss) from held for sale operations, net of tax
    289       83       (553 )     (134 )
     
Net income/(loss)
  $ (847 )   $ 295     $ (17,871 )   $ (2,501 )
     
Income/(loss) per share from continuing operations
                               
Basic
  $ (0.51 )   $ 0.10     $ (7.88 )   $ (1.09 )
 
                       
Diluted
  $ (0.51 )   $ 0.10     $ (7.88 )   $ (1.09 )
 
                       
Net income/(loss) per share
                               
Basic
  $ (0.38 )   $ 0.14     $ (8.13 )   $ (1.15 )
 
                       
Diluted
  $ (0.38 )   $ 0.14     $ (8.13 )   $ (1.15 )
 
                       
Cash Dividends declared
  $ 0.00     $ 0.00     $ 0.00     $ 0.00  
 
                       
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

Fentura Financial, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
(000s omitted)   2009     2008  
COMMON STOCK
               
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 42,778     $ 42,478  
Issuance of shares under
               
Director stock purchase plan & Dividend reinvestment program (39,449 and 17,187 shares)
    105       254  
Stock compensation expense
    0       6  
 
           
Balance, end of period
    42,883       42,738  
 
RETAINED DEFICIT
               
Balance, beginning of period
    (4,677 )     7,488  
Net loss
    (17,871 )     (2,501 )
 
           
Balance, end of period
    (22,548 )     4,987  
 
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
               
Balance, beginning of period
    (1,977 )     (470 )
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities, net of tax
    1,189       (1,054 )
 
           
Balance, end of period
    (788 )     (1,524 )
 
           
Total Shareholders’ Equity
  $ 19,547     $ 46,201  
 
           
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

Fentura Financial, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
                 
    Nine Months Ended
    September 30,
(000s omitted)   2009   2008
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
               
Net loss
  $ (17,871 )   $ (2,501 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash Provided by Operating Activities:
               
Stock compensation expense
    0       6  
Depreciation and amortization
    811       610  
Establishment of deferred tax asset valuation allowance
    5,924       0  
Provision for loan losses
    11,306       5,155  
Loans originated for sale
    (49,629 )     (19,918 )
Proceeds from the sale of loans
    49,497       20,372  
(Gain) on sales of loans
    (612 )     (260 )
(Gain) Loss on sale of securities
    (12 )     0  
(Gain) Loss on sale of fixed assets
    0       (118 )
(Gain) Loss on other real estate owned
    645       (70 )
Loss on security impairment
    200       843  
Loss on equity investment
    1,360       697  
Earnings from bank owned life insurance
    (59 )     (159 )
Net (increase) decrease in interest receivable & other assets
    (1,347 )     (21,774 )
Net increase (decrease) in interest payable & other liabilities
    (3,783 )     1,972  
     
Total Adjustments
    14,301       (12,644 )
     
Net cash (used in) operating activities
    (3,570 )     (15,145 )
     
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITES:
               
Proceeds from maturities of securities — HTM
    1,183       1,326  
Proceeds from maturities of securities — AFS
    7,714       6,961  
Proceeds from sales of securities — AFS
    4,000       1,999  
Proceeds from calls of securities — AFS
    2,000       11,112  
Purchases of securities — AFS
    (14,560 )     (7,067 )
Net decrease in loans
    41,379       14,912  
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance
    203       0  
Sales of other real estate owned
    1,876       2,613  
Acquisition of premises and equipment, net
    (79 )     76  
     
Net cash provided by investing activities
    43,716       31,932  
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Net (decrease) in deposits
    (498 )     (33,513 )
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings
    (1,466 )     1,726  
Net (decrease) in repurchase agreements
    0       (5,000 )
Repayment of notes payable
    (1,000 )     0  
Purchase of advances from FHLB
    55,495       25,001  
Repayments of advances from FHLB
    (58,221 )     (23,024 )
Net proceeds from stock issuance and purchase
    105       255  
     
Net cash (used in) financing activities
    (5,585 )     (34,555 )
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents
  $ 32,438     $ (14,154 )
Change in cash and cash equivalents of held for sale operations
    (2,123 )     3,614  
     
Cash and cash equivalents — Beginning
  $ 13,626     $ 27,041  
     
Cash and cash equivalents — Ending
  $ 46,064     $ 12,887  
     
Cash paid for:
               
Interest
  $ 8,506     $ 11,043  
Income Taxes
  $ 3,981     $ 0  
Noncash Disclosures:
               
Transfers from loans to other real estate
  $ 3,394     $ 6,917  

6


Table of Contents

Fentura Financial, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
(000s Omitted)   2009   2008   2009   2008
 
Net loss
  $ (847 )   $ 295     $ (17,871 )   $ (2,501 )
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
                               
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period
    547       (75 )     764       332  
Impairment loss recognized during period
    0       (233 )     (200 )     (843 )
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in income
    12       0       12       0  
Tax effect
    593       (328 )     613       (543 )
     
Other comprehensive income (loss)
    1,152       (636 )     1,189       (1,054 )
     
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 305     $ (341 )   $ (16,682 )   $ (3,555 )
     
Fentura Financial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2008, September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009 include Fentura Financial, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, The State Bank in Fenton, Michigan; Davison State Bank in Davison, Michigan; and West Michigan Community Bank in Hudsonville, Michigan (the “Banks”), as well as Fentura Mortgage Company, West Michigan Mortgage Company, LLC, and the other subsidiaries of the Banks. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
On March 17, 2009, The Corporation entered into an agreement to sell all of the stock of one of its bank subsidiaries, Davison State Bank, to a private, non-affiliated, investor group. The transaction is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2009. At September 30, 2009, Davison had assets of $41.2 million, loans of $25.6 million; deposits of $36.1 million, equity of $3.0 million and a year-to-date net loss of $553,000. The agreement calls for consideration to be received of $3.0 million plus or minus certain closing equity adjustments. The Corporation recorded an estimated loss on the sale of Davison State Bank of $700,000 in the first quarter of 2009. The agreement also provides for a termination payment of $150,000 if either party breaches the agreement.
Financial statements are presented with held for sale operations separately presented on the balance sheet and income statement. The presentations have been updated for September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 to reflect the held for sale operations results.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. For further information, refer to the

7


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Reclassifications: Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs less recoveries. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.
A loan is impaired when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as residential mortgage, consumer, and on an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral.
Income Taxes: Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
The Corporation recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
Dividend Restriction: Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the Banks to the Corporation or by the Corporation to shareholders. The Banks have been restricted from dividend payments in efforts of preserving their individual capital levels.
Stock Option Plans: The Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan provides for granting options to nonemployee directors to purchase the Corporation’s common stock. No options have been granted in 2009. The purchase price of the shares is the fair market value at the date of the grant, and there is a three-year vesting period before options may be exercised. Options to acquire no more than 8,131 shares of stock may be granted under the Plan in any calendar year and options to acquire not more than 73,967 shares in the aggregate may be outstanding at any one time.
The Employee Stock Option Plan grants options to eligible employees to purchase the Corporation’s common stock at or above, the fair market value of the stock at the date of the grant. Awards granted under this plan are limited to an aggregate of 86,936 shares. The administrator of the plan is a committee of directors. The administrator has the power to determine the number of options to be granted, the exercise price of the options and other terms of the options, subject to consistency with the terms of the Plan.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. Expected volatilities are based

8


Table of Contents

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
on historical volatilities of the Corporation’s common stock. The Corporation uses historical data to estimate option exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. (Employee and management options are tracked separately.) The expected term of options granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. Shares that are issued upon option exercise come from authorized but unissued shares.
The following table summarizes stock option activity:
                 
    Number of   Weighted
    Options   Average Price
 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008
    26,597     $ 29.85  
Options granted 2009
    0     $ 0.00  
Options forfeited 2009
    (2,592 )   $ 30.31  
 
               
Options outstanding at September 30, 2009
    24,005     $ 29.80  
 
               
NOTE 2 — ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
New Accounting Pronouncements:

In December 2007, the FASB issued statements regarding Business Combinations, which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Corporation’s results of operations or financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a statement regarding Non-controlling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements, which changed the accounting and reporting for minority interests, re-characterizing them as non-controlling interests and classifying them as a component of equity within the consolidated balance sheets. This is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s results of operations or financial position.
In June 2008, the FASB issued a statement regarding Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. This addresses whether these types of instruments are participating prior to vesting and, therefore need to be included in the earning allocation in computing earnings per share under the two class method described in the statement regarding Earnings Per Share. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period earnings per share data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively. The adoption of this statement on January 1, 2009 had no effect on the Corporation’s results of operations or financial position.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a statement regarding the Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, which amends existing guidance for determining whether impairment is other-than-temporary for debt securities. This statement requires an entity to assess whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized in earnings. For securities that do not meet the

9


Table of Contents

NOTE 2 — ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (continued)
aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment recognized in earnings is limited to the amount related to credit losses, while impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.

Additionally, the statement expands and increases the frequency of existing disclosures about other-than-temporary impairments for debt and equity securities. This statement is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Corporation adopted this statement in the second quarter. The adoption did not have any effect on the results of operations or financial position.
In April 2009, the FASB issued a statement regarding determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset and liability have significantly decreased and identifying transactions that are not orderly. This statement emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants. The statement provides a number of factors to consider when evaluating whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability in relation to normal market activity. In addition, when transactions or quoted prices are not considered orderly, adjustments to those prices based on the weight of available information may be needed to determine the appropriate fair value. The statement also requires increased disclosures. This statement is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Corporation adopted this statement in the second quarter. The adoption did not have any effect on the results of operations or financial position.
In April 2009, the FASB issued statements regarding interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments. This statement amends the FASB statement regarding disclosures about fair value of financial instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies that were previously only required in annual financial statements. This statement is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Corporation adopted this statement in the second quarter and the relevant disclosures have been added to Note 3.
In July 2009, the FASB issued a statement regarding the codification of financial accounting standards and the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles. The objective of this statement is to replace the statement previously titled, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, and to establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
In February 2008, FASB issued a statement regarding the effective date of fair value disclosures. This statement delays the effective date of the, “Fair Value measure for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this statement on January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

10


Table of Contents

NOTE 2 — ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (continued)
In May, 2009, the FASB issued a statement regarding subsequent events. This SFAS adopts part of the auditing literature regarding subsequent event transactions into the accounting standards. Though the criteria used to measure subsequent events did not change, the relevant terms of Type 1 and Type 2 subsequent events were changed to ‘recognized subsequent events’ and ‘nonrecognized subsequent events’ respectively. This standard also requires public companies to disclose the date upon which subsequent events were measured, which is the date the financial statements are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The Corporation evaluated subsequent events as of and through the date November 11, 2009.
NOTE 3 — SECURITIES
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the available for sale and held to maturity securities portfolio at September 30, 2009 and the corresponding amounts of unrealized gains and losses therein:
                                 
(000s omitted)           Gross     Gross        
Available for Sale   Amortized     Unrecognized     Unrecognized        
2009   Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
U.S. Government & federal agency
  $ 7,558     $ 58     $ (52 )   $ 7,564  
State and municipal
    7,868       290       (15 )     8,143  
Mortgage-backed — residential
    15,909       275       (9 )     16,175  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    16,616       201       (1,123 )     15,694  
Equity securities
    2,363       36       (570 )     1,829  
 
                       
 
  $ 50,314     $ 860     $ (1,769 )   $ 49,405  
 
                       
                                 
(000s omitted)           Gross     Gross        
Held to Maturity   Amortized     Unrecognized     Unrecognized        
2009   Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
State and municipal
  $ 5,575     $ 74     $ (15 )   $ 5,634  
Mortgage-backed — residential
    2       0       0       2  
 
                       
 
  $ 5,577     $ 74     $ (15 )   $ 5,636  
 
                       
The amortized cost and fair value of the securities portfolio are shown by expected maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Contractual maturities of securities at September 30, 2009 were as follows:
                 
    Available for Sale  
    Amortized     Fair  
(000s omitted)   Cost     Value  
Due in one year or less
  $ 7,094     $ 7,121  
Due from one to five years
    4,529       4,552  
Due from five to ten years
    3,803       4,034  
Mortgage-backed securities
    15,909       16,175  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    16,616       15,694  
Equity securities
    2,363       1,829  
 
           
 
  $ 50,314     $ 49,405  
 
           

11


Table of Contents

NOTE 3 — SECURITIES (continued)
                 
    Held to Maturity  
    Amortized     Fair  
(000s omitted)   Cost     Value  
Due in one year or less
  $ 2,642     $ 2,650  
Due from one to five years
    2,166       2,180  
Due from five to ten years
    767       804  
Due after ten years
    0       0  
Mortgage-backed securities
    2       2  
 
           
 
  $ 5,577     $ 5,636  
 
           
At September 30, 2009, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders’ equity.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Corporation had $1,999,000 in proceeds from the sales of securities and no gain or loss on securities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $4,000,000 in proceeds from the sale of securities with a gain of $12,000.
Securities with unrealized losses at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position are as follows:
2009
                                                 
Available for Sale                  
(000s omitted)   Less than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
Description of   Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
Securities   Value     Loss     Value     Loss     Value     Loss  
US Government & federal agency
  $ 3,506     $ (52 )   $ 0     $ 0     $ 3,506     $ (52 )
State & municipal
    0       0       685       (15 )     685       (15 )
Mortgage-backed
    1,276       (9 )     0       0       1,276       (9 )
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    0       0       5,042       (1,123 )     5,042       (1,123 )
Equity securities
    0       0       1,315       (570 )     1,315       (570 )
 
                                   
Total available for sale
  $ 4,782     $ (61 )   $ 7,042     $ (1,708 )   $ 11,824     $ (1,769 )
 
                                   
2009
                                                 
Held to Maturity                  
(000s omitted)   Less than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
Description of   Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
Securities   Value     Loss     Value     Loss     Value     Loss  
State & municipal
  $ 321     $ (1 )   $ 641     $ (14 )   $ 962     $ (15 )
 
                                   
Total held to maturity
  $ 321     $ (1 )   $ 641     $ (14 )   $ 962     $ (15 )
 
                                   

12


Table of Contents

NOTE 3 — SECURITIES (continued)
2008
                                                 
Available for Sale                  
(000s omitted)   Less than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
Description of   Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
Securities   Value     Loss     Value     Loss     Value     Loss  
State & municipal
  $ 2,790     $ (91 )   $ 1,583     $ (80 )   $ 4,373     $ (171 )
Mortgage-backed
    3,968       (83 )     19,550       (2,310 )     23,518       (2,393 )
Equity securities
    1,049       (598 )     188       (228 )     1,237       (826 )
 
                                   
Total available for sale
  $ 7,807     $ (772 )   $ 21,321     $ (2,618 )   $ 29,128     $ (3,390 )
 
                                   
2008
                                                 
Held to Maturity                  
(000s omitted)   Less than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
Description of   Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
Securities   Value     Loss     Value     Loss     Value     Loss  
State & municipal
  $ 0     $ 0     $ 682     $ (29 )   $ 682     $ (29 )
 
                                   
Total held to maturity
  $ 0     $ 0     $ 682     $ (29 )   $ 682     $ (29 )
 
                                   
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
In determining OTTI management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.
When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss, the OTTI shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment.
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation’s security portfolio consisted of 127 securities, 25 of which were in an unrealized loss position. The majority of unrealized losses are related to the Corporation’s collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and equity securities, as discussed below:

13


Table of Contents

NOTE 3 — SECURITIES (continued)
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs) and Equity Securities
The Corporation’s unrealized losses relate primarily to its investment in collateralized mortgage obligation securities. The decline in fair value is primarily attributable to temporary illiquidity and the financial crisis affecting these markets and not necessarily the expected cash flows of the individual securities. These nine investments total $16.6 million of book value. The majority of these securities were issued by U.S. government sponsored agencies, Ginnie Mae and Federal Home Loan Bank, all of which hold AAA ratings by a major rating agency. In addition, the portfolio contains four private label securities. The ratings held on the private label securities are AAA on two of the securities, BB on one and CCC on the fourth. The underlying collateral of these CMOs is comprised largely of 1-4 family residences located in geographically diverse locations. In each of these securities the Corporation lies in the senior tranche and receives payments before other tranches. For private label securities, management completes an analysis to review the recent performance of the mortgage pools underlying the instruments. Management reviews historical and payment streams, delinquency ratios, geographic distribution, ratings, projected future cash flows and general market conditions. Following the September 30, 2009 analysis, managements review did not indicate other-than-temporary impairment on these securities.
The Corporation also holds investments in equity securities. The majority of the equity securities are investments into bank holding companies within Michigan. One equity investment is held in a Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) money market instrument. On a quarterly basis, management reviews the Corporation’s investment in these equity securities. Management reviews current market prices on publicly traded equity securities and compares the current price to the book price. Any difference is adjusted as a temporary valuation difference, unless other resources provide other information. Equity securities that are not publicly traded receive a multi-faceted review utilizing call report data. Management reviews such performance indicators as earnings, ROE, ROA, non-performing assets, brokered deposits and capital ratios. Management draws conclusions from this information, as well as any published information or trading activity received from the individual institutions, to assist in determining if a temporary valuation adjustment is warranted. The equity securities portfolio has an amortized cost of $2,363,000. Currently, the equity securities have a net unrecognized loss of $534,000, for a fair value of $1,829,000. As of the end of the second quarter, management performed its review and determined that an other than temporary impairment was necessary on one equity security in the portfolio.
The determination was made based on the age of the denovo, unfavorable changes in performance of their loan portfolio and decreases in capital ratios. The impairment taken on the individual security totaled $200,000. At September 30, 2009, management performed its quarterly review of the equity securities portfolio. Management concluded that the performance of the underlying banks remained relatively stable and did not provide other-than-temporary impairment as management anticipates improved performance of these institutions as economic conditions stabilize.
Other Securities
At September 30, 2009, approximately 81% of the mortgage-backed securities held by the Corporation were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, institutions which the government has affirmed its commitment to support. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Corporation does not have the intent to sell these mortgage-backed securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Corporation does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009.
The Corporation’s mortgage-backed securities portfolio includes non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations with a market value of $5.0 million which had unrealized losses of approximately $1.1 million at September 30, 2009. The Corporation monitors to insure it has adequate credit support and as of

14


Table of Contents

NOTE 3 — SECURITIES (continued)
September 30, 2009, the Corporation believes there is no OTTI and does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery.
NOTE 4 — LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Major categories of loans at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, are as follows:
                 
(000s omitted)   September 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
Commercial
  $ 268,438     $ 289,523  
Real estate — construction
    34,072       48,777  
Real estate — mortgage
    30,829       37,828  
Consumer
    50,438       52,910  
 
           
 
    383,777       429,038  
Less allowance for loan losses
    14,485       10,455  
 
           
 
  $ 369,292     $ 418,583  
 
           
The Corporation has originated primarily residential and commercial real estate loans, commercial, construction and installment loans. The Corporation estimates that the majority of their loan portfolio is based in Genesee, Oakland and Livingston counties within southeast Michigan; in Kent and Ottawa counties in west Michigan, with the remainder of the portfolio distributed throughout Michigan. The ability of the Corporation’s debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate and general economic conditions in these areas.
Activity in the allowance for loan losses, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 is as follows:
                 
(000s omitted)   September 30, 2009     September 30, 2008  
Balance, January 1,
  $ 10,455     $ 7,592  
Provision for loan losses
    11,306       5,155  
Loans charged off
    (7,524 )     (3,182 )
Loan recoveries
    248       457  
 
           
Balance, end of period
  $ 14,485     $ 10,022  
 
           
Activity in the allowance for loan losses, for the three month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 is as follows:
                 
(000s omitted)   September 30, 2009     September 30, 2008  
Balance, July 1,
  $ 13,970     $ 11,380  
Provision for loan losses
    1,940       700  
Loans charged off
    (1,567 )     (2,253 )
Loan recoveries
    142       195  
 
           
Balance, end of period
  $ 14,485     $ 10,022  
 
           
Loan impairment is measured by valuing the underlying collateral or by estimating the expected future cash flows and discounting them at the respective effective interest rate.
The recorded investment in these loans is as follows at September 30:
                 
(000s omitted)   September 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
Period end loans not requiring allocation
  $ 6,798     $ 19,086  
Period end loans requiring allocation
    40,838       29,090  
 
           
 
  $ 47,636     $ 48,176  
 
           
Amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated
  $ 8,504     $ 5,642  

15


Table of Contents

NOTE 4 — LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (continued)
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual were as follows:
                 
(000s omitted)   September 30, 2009   December 31, 2008
Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual
  $ 193     $ 667  
Renegotiated loans
  $ 2,568     $ 942  
Nonaccrual loans
  $ 23,052     $ 24,325  
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans.
NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUE
Statement 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing and asset or liability.
The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). The remaining fair values of securities (Level 3 inputs) are based on the reporting entity’s own assumptions and basic knowledge of market conditions and individual investment performance. The Corporation reviews the performance of the securities that comprise Level 3 on a quarterly basis.
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

16


Table of Contents

NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUE (continued)
                                 
    Fair Value Measurements Using
                    Significant    
            Quoted Prices in   Other   Significant
            Active Markets   Observable   Unobservable
            for Identical   Inputs   Inputs
(000s omitted)   Total   Assets (Level 1)   (Level 2)   (Level 3)
     
Assets:
                               
Available for sale securities
                               
US Gov’t and federal agency
  $ 7,563     $ 0     $ 7,563     $ 0  
State and municipal
    8,143       0       8,143       0  
Mortgage backed/CMO securities
    31,856       0       31,856       0  
Equity securities
    1,843       20       1,823       0  
     
 
                               
September 30, 2009
  $ 49,405     $ 20     $ 49,385     $ 0  
 
 
                               
Available for sale securities
                               
US Gov’t and federal agency
  $ 8,186     $ 0     $ 8,186     $ 0  
State and municipal
    7,762       0       7,762       0  
Mortgage backed/CMO securities
  $ 29,380       0       29,380       0  
Equity securities
  $ 1,737     $ 9       0     $ 1,728  
     
 
                               
December 31, 2008
  $ 47,065     $ 9     $ 45,328     $ 1,728  
The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
                         
    Fair Value Measurements Using Significant  
    Unobservable Inputs  
    (Level 3)  
(000s omitted)   Asset     Liability     Total  
Beginning balance, Jan. 1, 2009
  $ 1,229     $ 0     $ 1,229  
Total gains or losses (realized / unrealized)
                       
Included in earnings
    108               108  
Loss on security impairment
    (200 )     0       (200 )
Included in other comprehensive income
    248       0       248  
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
                       
Transfers in and / or out of Level 3
    (1,385 )     0       (1,385 )
 
                 
Ending balance, September 30, 2009
  $ 0     $ 0     $ 0  
At June 30, 2009, $1,385,000 of equity securities were transferred from level 3 inputs to level 2 inputs due to the existence of observable trades in markets that are not active.

17


Table of Contents

NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUE (continued)
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
                                         
                    Fair Value Measurements Using
                    Quoted Prices        
                    in Active   Significant    
                    Markets for   Other   Significant
                    Identical   Observable   Unobservable
                    Assets   Inputs   Inputs
(000s omitted)           Total   (Level 1)   (Level 2)   (Level 3)
Assets:
                                       
Impaired loans
  September 30, 2009   $ 32,334     $ 0     $ 0     $ 32,334  
Other real estate owned
  September 30, 2009   $ 976     $ 0     $ 0     $ 976  
Impaired loans
  December 31, 2008   $ 19,970     $ 0     $ 0     $ 19,970  
The following represent impairment charges recognized during the period: At September 30, 2009, impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $40,838,000 with a valuation allowance of $8,504,000 resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $1,300,000 for the period. This is compared to December 31, 2008 when the fair value of the collateral dependent impaired loans was $29,090,000 with a valuation allowance of $5,642,000.
At September 30, 2009, other real estate owned measured at fair value using collateral valuation methods (Level 3 inputs) has a carrying value of $976,000. During the period ended September 30, 2009, other real estate owned incurred valuation losses totaling $462,000.
Carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments, not previously presented, at year end were as follows:
                                 
    September 30, 2009   December 31, 2008
(000s omitted)   Carrying
Amount
  Fair Value   Carrying
Amount
  Fair Value
Assets:
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 46,064     $ 46,064     $ 13,626     $ 13,626  
Securities — held to maturity
    5,577       5,636       6,765       6,784  
FHLB stock
    1,900       n/a       1,900       n/a  
Loans held for sale
    1,434       1,434       690       690  
Loans
    383,777       364,670       429,038       408,387  
Accrued interest receivable
    2,020       2,020       2,231       2,231  
 
                               
Liabilities:
                               
Deposits
  $ 468,866     $ 463,403     $ 469,364     $ 433,398  
Short-term borrowings
    34       34       1,500       1,500  
FHLB advances
    9,981       9,670       12,707       12,505  
Subordinated debentures
    14,000       12,656       14,000       14,061  
Accrued interest payable
    855       855       590       590  

18


Table of Contents

NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUE (continued)
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate their fair values.
Securities (including mortgage-backed securities)
Fair values for securities held to maturity are based on similar information previously presented for securities available for sale.
FHLB Stock
It was not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
Loans held for sale
The market value of these loans represents estimated fair value. The market value is determined in the aggregate on the basis of existing forward commitments or fair values attributable to similar loans.
Loans
For variable rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value for other loans is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.
Off-balance-sheet instruments
The fair value of off-balance sheet items is not considered material.
Deposit liabilities
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The carrying amounts for variable rate, fixed term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed certificates of deposit are estimated using discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on similar certificates. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
Short-term borrowings
The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.
Note Payable
The carrying amount of the note payable approximates its fair value.
FHLB advances
Rates currently available for FHLB debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of the existing debt.
Repurchase agreements
Rates currently available for repurchase agreements with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of the existing repurchase agreements.

19


Table of Contents

NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUE (Continued)
Subordinated Debentures
The estimated the fair value of the existing subordinated debentures is calculated by comparing a current market rate for the instrument compared to the book rate. The difference between these rates computes the fair value.
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Corporation’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Corporation’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on management’s judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
NOTE 6 — INCOME TAXES
A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. The deferred tax position has been impacted by several significant transactions in the past few years. These transactions included other than temporary impairment write-offs of certain investments, goodwill impairment, and continued elevated levels of provision for loan losses. As a result, the Corporation is in a cumulative loss position over the past few years and under the applicable accounting guidance, has concluded that it is not “more likely than not” that we will be able to realize our deferred tax assets and accordingly have established a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax asset at June 30, 2009. As a result, our net deferred tax asset of $6.6 million at December 31, 2008 was reduced to $0 at June 30, 2009 and remains at $0 at September 30, 2009. The valuation allowance will be analyzed quarterly for changes affecting the deferred tax assets, and as financial conditions improve and we return to consistent profitability, portions may be reduced or eliminated.
The income tax benefit, from continuing operations, for the third quarter of 2009 was $332,000. As compared to a benefit of $101,000 for the third quarter of 2008. For the nine months ending September 30, 2009, the income tax expense, from continuing operations, is $5,028,000 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 which resulted in a benefit of $1,490,000. The 2009 figures include adjustments to the tax asset valuation allowance as a result of changes in other comprehensive income.
Normally, the calculation for the income tax expense (benefit) does not consider the tax effects of changes in other comprehensive income (“OCI”), which is a component of shareholders’ equity on the balance sheet. However, an exception is warranted when there is a pre-tax loss in continuing operations. When this is the case, pre-tax income from other categories, such as changes in OCI, are included in the calculation of the tax expense or benefit for the current year. For the third quarter of 2009, this resulted in an increase to the income tax benefit.
NOTE 7 — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the computation of basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share is presented below. Earnings per common share are presented below for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:

20


Table of Contents

NOTE 7 — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (continued)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
     
(000s omitted except share and per share data)   2009     2008     2009     2008  
     
Basic
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ (847 )   $ 295     $ (17,871 )   $ (2,501 )
 
                       
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    2,210,613       2,175,186       2,198,233       2,171,758  
 
                       
Basic income (loss) per common share
  $ (0.38 )   $ 0.14     $ (8.13 )   $ (1.15 )
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ (847 )   $ 295     $ (17,871 )   $ (2,501 )
 
                       
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share
    2,210,613       2,175,186       2,198,233       2,171,758  
Add: Dilutive effects of assumed exercises of stock options
    0       0       0       0  
 
                       
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares
    2,210,613       2,175,186       2,198,233       2,171,758  
 
                       
Diluted income (loss) per common share
  $ (0.38 )   $ 0.14     $ (8.13 )   $ (1.15 )
 
                       
There were no stock options for the three or nine month period ended September 30, 2009 that were dilutive, as a result of the net loss the period. Stock options for 27,506 shares and 27,325 shares of common stock for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2008 were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share because they were antidilutive.
NOTE 8 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
There are various contingent liabilities that are not reflected in the financial statements including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE 9 — HELD FOR SALE OPERATIONS
On March 17, 2009, The Corporation entered into an agreement to sell all of the stock of one of its bank subsidiaries, Davison State Bank, to a private, non-affiliated, investor group. The transaction is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2009. At September 30, 2009, Davison had assets of $41.2 million, loans of $25.6 million; deposits of $36.1 million, equity of $3.0 million and a year-to-date net loss of $553,000. The agreement calls for consideration to be received of $3.0 million plus or minus certain closing equity adjustments. The Corporation recorded an estimated loss on the sale of Davison State Bank of $700,000 in the first quarter of 2009. The agreement also provides for a termination payment of $150,000 if either party breaches the agreement. This transaction will have minimal impact to 2009 core earnings due to the proportionate size of Davison State Bank. The Corporation projects cost savings for 2010 and beyond, as a result of this transaction.
A condensed balance sheet of held for sale operations is presented below for the periods ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. A condensed statement of income of held for sale operations are presented for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008.

21


Table of Contents

NOTE 9 — HELD FOR SALE OPERATIONS (continued)
DAVISON STATE BANK
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET OF HELD FOR SALE OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
                 
    September 30,   Dec 31,
(000s omitted)   2009   2008
ASSETS
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 5,204     $ 7,327  
Securities — available for sale
    7,277       5,657  
Securities — held to maturity
    440       1,190  
Loans, net of allowance ($633-2009, $1,318-2008)
    24,936       28,954  
Other assets
    3,338       2,522  
     
Total assets
  $ 41,195     $ 45,650  
     
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Deposits:
               
Non-interest bearing
  $ 9,478     $ 9,361  
Interest bearing
    26,612       31,004  
     
Total deposits
    36,090       40,365  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    2,000       2,000  
Accrued taxes, interest and other liabilities
    74       (191 )
Shareholders’ equity
    3,031       3,476  
     
Total liabilities and shareholders’ Equity
  $ 41,195     $ 45,650  
     
DAVISON STATE BANK
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF HELD FOR SALE OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    September 30   September 30
     
(000s omitted)   2009   2008   2009   2008
 
Interest income
  $ 494     $ 658     $ 1,556     $ 2,035  
Interest expense
    151       232       510       761  
     
Net interest income
    343       426       1,046       1,274  
Provision for loan losses
    35       36       190       473  
     
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    308       390       856       801  
 
                               
Non-interest income
    143       166       405       504  
Non-interest expense
    418       444       1,395       1,536  
     
Income (loss) before federal income tax
    33       112       (134 )     (231 )
     
Federal income tax expense/(benefit)
    (256 )     29       419       (97 )
     
Net income (loss)
  $ 289     $ 83     $ (553 )   $ (134 )
     
NOTE 10-REGULATORY MATTERS
Bank holding companies and their bank subsidiaries are required by banking industry regulators to maintain certain levels of capital. These are expressed in the form of certain ratios. These ratios are based on the degree of credit risk in the Corporation’s assets. All assets and off-balance sheet items such as outstanding loan commitments are assigned risk factors to create an overall risk-weighted asset total. Capital is separated into two levels, Tier I capital (essentially total common shareholders’ equity plus qualifying cumulative preferred securities (limited to 33% of common equity, less goodwill) and Tier II capital (essentially the allowance for loan losses limited to 1.25% of gross risk-weighted assets). Capital levels are then measured as a percentage of total risk weighted assets. The regulatory minimum for Tier I

22


Table of Contents

NOTE 10-REGULATORY MATTERS (continued)
capital to risk weighted assets is 4% and the minimum for Total capital (Tier I plus Tier II) to risk weighted assets is 8%. The Tier I leverage ratio measures Tier I capital to average assets and must be a minimum of 3%. As reflected in the table below, at September 30, 2009 and at December 31, 2008, the Corporation was in excess of the minimum capital and leverage requirements necessary to be considered an “adequately capitalized” banking company. In addition, each of the three subsidiary banks was considered “adequately capitalized” at September 30, 2009.
                                                 
                                    To Be Well Capitalized
                                    Under Prompt
                    For Capital Adequacy   Corrective Action
    Actual   Purposes   Provisions
(000s omitted)   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
As of September 30, 2009
                                               
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
                                               
Consolidated
  $ 39,924       8.8 %   $ 36,329       8.0 %   NA   NA
The State Bank
    24,423       8.4       23,269       8.0       29,087       10.0  
Davison State Bank
    3,594       10.3       2,805       8.0       3,507       10.0  
West Michigan Community Bank
    11,750       9.1       10,378       8.0       12,973       10.0  
 
                                               
Tier 1 Capital
                                               
Consolidated
    34,142       7.5       18,164       4.0     NA   NA
The State Bank
    20,700       7.1       11,635       4.0       17,452       6.0  
Davison State Bank
    3,179       9.1       1,403       4.0       2,104       6.0  
West Michigan Community Bank
    10,106       7.8       5,189       4.0       7,784       6.0  
 
                                               
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
                                               
Consolidated
    34,142       6.1       22,494       4.0     NA   NA
The State Bank
    20,700       5.7       14,421       4.0       18,027       5.0  
Davison State Bank
    3,179       7.6       1,683       4.0       2,103       5.0  
West Michigan Community Bank
    10,106       6.3       6,390       4.0       7,987       5.0  
                                                 
                                    To Be Well Capitalized
                                    Under Prompt
                    For Capital Adequacy   Corrective Action
    Actual   Purposes   Provisions
(000s omitted)   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
As of December 31, 2008
                                               
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
                                               
Consolidated
  $ 58,194       11.4 %   $ 40,726       8.0 %   NA   NA
The State Bank
    34,807       10.7       25,952       8.0       32,440       10.0  
Davison State Bank
    4,170       11.7       2,863       8.0       3,578       10.0  
West Michigan Community Bank
    15,656       10.8       11,558       8.0       14,448       10.0  
 
                                               
Tier 1 Capital
                                               
Consolidated
    51,827       10.2       20,363       4.0     NA   NA
The State Bank
    30,720       9.5       12,976       4.0       19,464       6.0  
Davison State Bank
    3,712       10.4       1,431       4.0       2,147       6.0  
West Michigan Community Bank
    13,834       9.6       5,779       4.0       8,669       6.0  
 
                                               
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
                                               
Consolidated
    51,827       8.8       23,320       4.0     NA   NA
The State Bank
    30,720       8.5       14,498       4.0       18,123       5.0  
Davison State Bank
    3,712       8.2       1,804       4.0       2,255       5.0  
West Michigan Community Bank
    13,834       8.1       6,833       4.0       8,541       5.0  

23


Table of Contents

NOTE 10-REGULATORY MATTERS (continued)
As previously mentioned, West Michigan Community Bank (WMCB) entered into a consent order in the first quarter of 2009 due primarily to Tier 1 capital falling below 8%. The consent order restricts dividend payments to the Holding Company and requires WMCB to increase the Tier 1 capital level. The consent order does not place any restrictions on the Holding Company. WMCB Tier 1 capital at September 30, 2009 was 6.6%. The regulatory agencies are completing audits of the remaining two banks. Tier 1 capital at September 30, 2009 was 5.8% at The State Bank and 7.8% at Davison State Bank.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, it is expected that a second bank will enter into a written agreement with the banks regulators. The agreement is expected to address asset quality and capitalization concerns.
Since December 31, 2008, the subsidiary banks of the Corporation have reduced their risk rating from well capitalized to adequately capitalized. These changes in ratings may impact the banks liquidity position. The bank’s ability to obtain brokered CDs will be limited.
The Corporation’s primary source of cash to service its subordinated debt and notes payable is dividends from the three subsidiary banks. As the subsidiary banks are working to preserve capital and not up streaming dividends to the Holding Company, the Corporation has elected to defer interest payments for five years on $14,000,000 of subordinated debentures. The reason for the interest deferral is to maintain liquidity at the Holding Company. The Corporation is not in default under either of the indentures. During this five year period, the Corporation is precluded from paying dividends on its outstanding common stock. The Corporation subsequently may give notice that it elects to shorten the deferral period, pay accrued interest and return to the normal course of dividend payments.
ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain of the Corporation’s accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Corporation’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances, which could affect these judgments, include, but without limitation, changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses and determining the fair value of securities, carrying value of deferred tax assets and other financial instruments.
The Corporation evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and the ability of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, the Corporation may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of the reviews of the issuer’s financial condition.
Results of Operations
The Corporation posted a loss of $847,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 versus income of $295,000 for the same period in 2008. Charges in the third quarter included provision for loan losses of $1,940,000, loan and collection expenses totaling $984,000. Partially offsetting those charges were additional tax benefits which totaled $289,000.

24


Table of Contents

As briefly described above, the Corporation provided an additional $1,940,000 of provision for loan losses in the third quarter of 2009. The total provision for the first nine months of 2009 is $11,306,000. This is compared to $700,000 in the third quarter of 2008 and $5,155,000 for the first nine months of 2008. Lower appraised values for loans in the Corporation’s substandard category and softness in the commercial real estate market were significant factors behind the additional provision amounts.
The Corporation’s return to profitability will be driven by cost reduction initiatives and aggressive loan and deposit pricing. These coupled with the sale of Davison State Bank will be positive factors in future quarters. The markets in which the Corporation operates, however, have not shown signs of recovery as evidenced by the $1,940,000 in provision for loan losses for the quarter. The possibility of further loan losses coupled with the Corporation’s losses the last three years creates uncertainty regarding the usefulness of these deferred tax assets. In uncertain situations, accounting rules require these assets to be offset by a valuation allowance. In future periods, if it becomes more likely these assets can be utilized by the Corporation, and the valuation allowance can be reversed. Evidence to substantiate the reversal would be quarterly profitability, projection of sufficient future taxable income to utilize the deferred tax assets and an increase in the value of certain capital assets.
The banking industry uses standard performance indicators to help evaluate a banking institution’s performance. Return on average assets is one of these indicators. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation’s return on average assets (annualized) was (0.15%) compared to 0.01% for the same period in 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation’s return on average assets (annualized) was (4.16%) compared to (0.65%) for the same period in 2008. Net loss per share, basic and diluted, was ($0.38) in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $0.14 net income per share basic and diluted for the same period in 2008. Net loss per share — basic and diluted was ($8.13) for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to ($1.15) net loss per basic and diluted share for the same period in 2008.
On March 17, 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement to sell all of the stock of one of its bank subsidiaries, Davison State Bank, to a private non-affiliated, investor group. The transaction is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2009. In the first quarter of 2009, the Corporation recorded, in other operating expenses, an estimated loss on the sale of $700,000 along with estimated sale related expenses of $150,000. In accordance with accounting rules, Davison State Bank is now deemed an “operation held for sale”. In addition, Davison State Bank’s results have been excluded from current period results and prior period results have been restated to exclude their results as well. Operating results for Davison State Bank are detailed in Note 8. The Corporation’s net income includes a line item after Net Loss from Continuing Operations to account for Davison State Bank’s performance in 2008 and 2009.
The Corporation is evaluating other opportunities which could improve the capital position of the Corporation. These opportunities include divestiture of other bank subsidiaries and branches.
The Corporation invested in an Arizona bank to diversify outside the Michigan market. The Arizona economy has experienced similar economic conditions as Michigan, which raised concerns regarding the financial viability of the Arizona bank. As a result, the Corporation elected to write off the remaining investment in the Arizona bank during the second quarter of 2009. The write off brings the 2009 total charges to $1,360,000.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income and average balances and yields on major categories of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are summarized in Table 2. Table 3 summarizes net interest income, average balances and yields on major categories of interest-earning assets and interest-earning liabilities for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.

25


Table of Contents

Table 1 below displays the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2008. The information displayed is with respect to the effects on interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in volume and rate.
Table 1
                         
    NINE MONTHS ENDED  
    SEPTEMBER 30,  
    2009 COMPARED TO 2008  
    INCREASE (DECREASE)  
    DUE TO  
            YIELD/        
(000s omitted)   VOL     RATE     TOTAL  
 
Taxable securities
  $ (267 )   $ (23 )   $ (290 )
Tax-exempt securities (1)
    (34 )     56       22  
Federal funds sold
    (92 )     (46 )     (138 )
 
                       
Total loans (1)
    (1,335 )     (1,627 )     (2,962 )
Loans held for sale
    21       (12 )     9  
     
Total earning assets
    (1,707 )     (1,652 )     (3,359 )
 
                       
Interest bearing demand deposits
    (71 )     (460 )     (531 )
Savings deposits
    (8 )     (248 )     (256 )
Time CD’s $100,000 and over
    (334 )     (535 )     (869 )
Other time deposits
    231       (774 )     (543 )
Other borrowings
    (246 )     (184 )     (430 )
     
Total interest bearing liabilities
    (428 )     (2,201 )     (2,629 )
     
 
                       
Net Interest Income
  $ (1,279 )   $ 549     $ (730 )
 
                 
 
(1)   Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 34%.
As indicated in Table 1, during nine months ended September 30, 2009, net interest income decreased $730,000 compared to the same period in 2008. Total average earning assets declined 8.0% in balances year-over-year and resulted in a 6.6% decline in yield on these assets. Management was successful in offsetting this lost income by reducing average interest rates on interest bearing liabilities. Management reduced the cost of interest bearing liabilities from 3.28% at September 30, 2008 to 2.58% at September 30, 2009. This is a 21.3% reduction in rate when comparing the two periods.
As indicated in Table 2, the Corporation’s net interest margin (with consideration of full tax equivalency) improved to 3.40% compared to 3.32% for the same period in 2008, as a result of management’s strategy described above in Table 1. Average earning assets decreased 8.0% or approximately $41,092,000 comparing the nine months of 2009 to the same time period in 2008. Loans, the highest yielding component of earning assets, represented 87.2% of earning assets in 2009 compared to 85.2% in 2008. Average interest bearing liabilities decreased 3.1% or $13,955,000 comparing the first nine months of 2009 to the same time period in 2008. Non-interest bearing deposits amounted to 14.3% of average earning assets in the first nine months of 2009 compared with 12.8% in the same time period of 2008.
Table 3 shows net interest income (displayed with consideration of full tax equivalency), average balance sheet amounts, and the corresponding yields for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $4,056,000, a decrease of $438,000, or 9.7%, over the same period in 2008. The decrease is due to a decrease in balances of earning assets of 9.1% as well as a decrease of 8.1% in their average yield. During this same period, interest

26


Table of Contents

bearing liability rates decreased 23.0%. Management reduced interest bearing liability rates from 3.00% to 2.31% during the three month period. The Corporation’s net interest margin (with consideration of full tax equivalency), decreased modestly to 3.52% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 when compared with 3.60% for the same time in 2008. While maintaining average balances, management has been successful in reducing offering rates on interest bearing accounts including demand, savings and certificates of deposit. For the third quarter of 2009 compared to 2008, average earning assets decreased 9.1% or $45,582,000. The largest decrease was in the loan portfolio as the Banks continued to reduce loan outstandings, while certain loans moved into a non-performing status. Loans decreased 9.6% or $41,663,000 comparing the third quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of 2008. Loans represented 85.7% of earning assets in 2009 compared to 86.2% in 2008. Average interest bearing liabilities decreased $5,388,000 or 1.2% comparing the third quarter of 2009 to 2008. Non-interest bearing liabilities were 14.8% of average earning assets for the third quarter of 2009 versus 13.4% in the third quarter of 2008.
Management reviews economic forecasts and strategy on a monthly basis. Accordingly, the Corporation will continue to strategically manage the balance sheet structure in an effort to create stability in net interest income. The Corporation expects to continue to selectively seek out new loan opportunities while continuing to maintain sound credit quality.
Management continually monitors the Corporation’s balance sheet in an effort to insulate net interest income from significant swings caused by interest rate volatility. If market rates change in 2009, corresponding changes in funding costs will be considered to avoid the potential negative impact on net interest income. The Corporation’s policies in this regard are further discussed in the section titled “Interest Rate Sensitivity Management.”

27


Table of Contents

Table 2 Average Balance and Rates
                                                 
    NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,  
    2009     2008  
    AVERAGE     INCOME/     YIELD/     AVERAGE     INCOME/     YIELD/  
(000s omitted)(Annualized)   BALANCE     EXPENSE     RATE     BALANCE     EXPENSE     RATE  
         
ASSETS
                                               
Securities:
                                               
U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies
  $ 37,997     $ 1,143       4.02 %   $ 45,266     $ 1,411       4.16 %
State and Political (1)
    13,902       633       6.09 %     14,697       611       5.55 %
Other
    4,309       70       2.17 %     7,529       92       1.63 %
         
Total Securities
    56,208       1,846       4.39 %     67,492       2,114       4.18 %
Fed Funds Sold
    2,332       1       0.06 %     6,964       139       2.67 %
Loans:
                                               
Commercial
    320,436       14,453       6.03 %     342,455       16,787       6.55 %
Tax Free (1)
    2,656       129       6.48 %     1,985       97       6.53 %
Real Estate-Mortgage
    35,113       1,614       6.15 %     37,217       1,770       6.35 %
Consumer
    51,351       2,185       5.69 %     53,543       2,689       6.71 %
         
Total loans
    409,556       18,381       6.00 %     435,200       21,343       6.55 %
Allowance for Loan Losses
    (11,891 )                     (9,193 )                
Net Loans
    397,665       18,381       6.18 %     426,007       21,343       6.69 %
         
Loans Held for Sale
    1,657       62       5.00 %     1,189       53       5.95 %
         
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS CONTINUING OPERATIONS
  $ 469,753     $ 20,290       5.77 %   $ 510,845     $ 23,649       6.18 %
         
Cash Due from Banks
    32,115                       13,338                  
Assets of Held for Sale Operations
    43,457                       45,899                  
All Other Assets
    39,433                       44,428                  
 
                                           
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 572,867                     $ 605,317                  
 
                                           
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
                                               
Deposits:
                                               
Interest Bearing — DDA
  $ 88,275     $ 523       0.79 %   $ 94,275     $ 1,054       1.49 %
Savings Deposits
    74,373       236       0.42 %     75,347       492       0.87 %
Time CDs $100,000 and Over
    128,744       4,067       4.22 %     137,547       4,936       4.79 %
Other Time CDs
    114,512       2,677       3.13 %     106,490       3,220       4.04 %
         
Total Deposits
    405,904       7,503       2.47 %     413,659       9,702       3.13 %
Other Borrowings
    26,133       829       4.24 %     32,333       1,259       5.20 %
         
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
  $ 432,037     $ 8,332       2.58 %   $ 445,992     $ 10,961       3.28 %
         
Non-Interest bearing — DDA
    67,163                       65,509                  
Liabilities of Held for Sale Operations
    40,384                       42,016                  
All Other Liabilities
    3,012                       2,866                  
Shareholders’ Equity
    30,271                       48,934                  
 
                                           
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 572,867                     $ 605,317                  
 
                                       
Net Interest Rate Spread
                    3.20 %                     2.90 %
 
                                           
Net Interest Income /Margin
          $ 11,958       3.40 %           $ 12,688       3.32 %
                         
 
(1)   Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 34%.

28


Table of Contents

Table 3 Average Balance and Rates
                                                 
    THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,  
    2009     2008  
    AVERAGE     INCOME/     YIELD/     AVERAGE     INCOME/     YIELD/  
(000s omitted)(Annualized)   BALANCE     EXPENSE     RATE     BALANCE     EXPENSE     RATE  
         
ASSETS
                                               
Securities:
                                               
U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies
  $ 40,316     $ 384       3.78 %   $ 40,740     $ 427       4.22 %
State and Political (1)
    13,429       205       6.04 %     14,759       224       6.11 %
Other
    3,805       20       2.09 %     6,886       31       1.81 %
         
Total Securities
    57,550       609       4.20 %     62,385       682       4.40 %
Fed Funds Sold
    6,919       1       0.06 %     6,341       31       1.97 %
Loans:
                                               
Commercial
    305,122       4,677       6.08 %     340,638       5,543       6.54 %
Tax Free (1)
    2,521       41       6.44 %     1,964       30       6.21 %
Real Estate-Mortgage
    32,701       498       6.04 %     36,318       567       6.28 %
Consumer
    50,678       720       5.64 %     53,765       872       6.52 %
         
Total loans
    391,022       5,936       6.02 %     432,685       7,012       6.52 %
Allowance for Loan Losses
    (14,127 )                     (11,412 )                
Net Loans
    376,895       5,936       6.25 %     421,273       7,012       6.69 %
         
Loans Held for Sale
    1,022       14       5.43 %     684       11       6.47 %
         
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS CONTINUING OPERATIONS
  $ 456,513     $ 6,560       5.70 %   $ 502,095     $ 7,736       6.20 %
         
Cash Due from Banks
    40,618                       13,242                  
Assets of held for sale operations
    42,117                       46,297                  
All Other Assets
    37,205                       44,094                  
 
                                           
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 562,326                     $ 594,316                  
 
                                           
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
                                               
Deposits:
                                               
Interest bearing — DDA
  $ 88,906     $ 113       0.50 %   $ 94,357     $ 297       1.27 %
Savings Deposits
    77,020       31       0.16 %     77,875       158       0.82 %
Time CDs $100,000 and Over
    124,411       1,272       4.06 %     127,750       1,475       4.64 %
Other Time CDs
    115,117       861       2.97 %     104,080       962       3.72 %
         
Total Deposits
    405,454       2,277       2.23 %     404,062       2,892       2.88 %
Other Borrowings
    24,244       227       3.71 %     31,024       350       4.54 %
         
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES
  $ 429,698     $ 2,504       2.31 %   $ 435,086     $ 3,242       3.00 %
         
Non-Interest bearing — DDA
    67,685                       67,284                  
Liabilities of held for sale operations
    39,476                       42,572                  
All Other Liabilities
    5,300                       2,151                  
Shareholders’ Equity
    20,167                       47,223                  
 
                                           
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 562,326                     $ 594,316                  
 
                                       
Net Interest Rate Spread
                    3.39 %                     3.20 %
 
                                           
Net Interest Income /Margin
          $ 4,056       3.52 %           $ 4,494       3.60 %
                         
 
(1)   Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 34%.

29


Table of Contents

Allowance and Provision For Loan Losses
The Corporation maintains formal policies and procedures to control and monitor credit risk. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. While the Corporation’s loan portfolio has no significant concentrations in any one industry or any exposure in foreign loans, the loan portfolio has a concentration connected with commercial real estate, construction and land development loans. The concentration of loans in construction and land development loans was $34.1 million or 8.8% of gross loans at September 30, 2009. This is down from $48.8 million or 11.4% of gross loans at December 31, 2009. Specific strategies have been deployed to reduce the concentration levels and limit exposure to this type of lending in the future. The Michigan economy, employment levels and other economic conditions in the Corporation’s local markets may have a significant impact on the level of credit losses. Management continues to identify and devote attention to credits that are not performing as agreed. Of course, deterioration of economic conditions could have an impact on the Corporation’s credit quality, which could impact the need for greater provision for loan losses and the level of the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans. Non-performing loans are discussed further in the section titled “Non-Performing Assets.”
The allowance for loan losses reflects management’s judgment as to the level considered appropriate to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s methodology in determining the adequacy of the allowance is based on ongoing quarterly assessments and relies on several key elements, which include specific allowances for identified problem loans and a formula-based risk-allocated allowance for the remainder of the portfolio. This includes a review of individual loans, size, and composition of the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, current economic conditions, financial condition of borrowers, the level and composition of non-performing loans, portfolio trends, estimated net charge-offs and other pertinent factors. While we consider the allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, delinquencies, or loss rates. Although portions of the allowance have been allocated to various portfolio segments, the allowance is general in nature and is available for the portfolio in its entirety.
At September 30, 2009, the allowance was $14,485,000, or 3.77% of total loans compared to $10,455,000, or 2.44%, at December 31, 2008, an increase of $4,030,000 during the first nine months of 2009. Non performing loan levels, discussed later, increased during the period and net charge-offs increased to $7,276,000 during the first nine months of 2009 compared to $2,725,000 during the first nine months of 2008. The Corporation has experienced continued decline in property values, which have necessitated collateral re-evaluation and in some cases reduction of our book value to market value. Additionally, as loans are renewed, a higher level of scrutiny of the individual business health has lead to increased risk weighting and therefore additional reserve to cover the potential shortfall. As of September 30, 2009, management has reviewed historical losses and following analysis of those losses, believes that the allowance is appropriate given identified risk in the loan portfolio based on current asset quality.
Table 4 below summarizes loan losses and recoveries for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008. During the first nine months of 2009, the Corporation experienced net charge-offs of $7,276,000 or 1.90% of gross loans compared with net charge-offs of $2,725,000 or 0.64% of gross loans in the first nine months of 2008. The provision for loan loss was $11,306,000 in the first nine months of 2009 and $5,155,000 for the same time period in 2008. As a result of continuing credit quality deterioration and the review of historical losses by loan type, additional provision for loan losses was taken in the first three quarters of 2009. The substantial increase in provision for loan loss was to provide specific reserves for non-performing and substandard loans, increased charge-offs and continuing weakness in the Michigan economy.
Davison State Bank had net charge-offs of $825,000 in the first nine months of 2009 and $190,000 of loan loss provision for the first nine months of 2009.

30


Table of Contents

Table 4 Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses
                 
    Nine Months Ended September 30,
(000s omitted)   2009   2008
     
Balance at Beginning of Period
  $ 10,455     $ 7,592  
     
Charge-Offs:
               
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture
    (6,263 )     (2,656 )
Real Estate-Mortgage
    (738 )     (230 )
Installment Loans to Individuals
    (523 )     (296 )
     
Total Charge-Offs
    (7,524 )     (3,182 )
Recoveries:
               
Commercial, Financial and Agriculture
    166       266  
Real Estate-Mortgage
    7       0  
Installment Loans to Individuals
    75       191  
     
Total Recoveries
    248       457  
     
Net Charge-Offs
    (7,276 )     (2,725 )
Provision
    11,306       5,155  
     
Balance at End of Period
  $ 14,485     $ 10,022  
     
Ratio of Net Charge-Offs to Gross Loans
    1.89 %     0.64 %
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income increased during the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008; this was due to the partial write-off of the investment in Valley Capital Bank during the third quarter of 2008. Overall non-interest income, of continuing operations, was $1,480,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $1,180,000 for the same period in 2008. This represents an increase of 25.4%. On a year to date basis, non-interest income at September 30, 2009 was $3,445,000 compared with $3,952,000 at September 30, 2008. This represents a decrease of 12.8%.
The most significant category of non-interest income is service charges on deposit accounts. These fees from continuing operations were $519,000 in the third quarter of 2009, compared to $651,000 for the same period of 2008. This represents a decrease of 20.3% from year to year. The decrease is a result of a decrease in NSF charges as customers have become more mindful of the usage of the overdraft privilege product. On a year to date basis, service charges on deposits accounts decreased 23.3% to $1,435,000 at September 30, 2009.
Gain on the sale of mortgage loans originated by the Banks and sold into the secondary market increased by $58,000 or 138.1% to $100,000 in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $42,000 for the same period in 2008. As market conditions continue to be favorable for mortgage rates, consumers in the market continue to refinance their homes, taking advantage of historically low rates. Management sees this as a short term rise in mortgage refinance and believes that it will taper off as the year continues. On a year to date basis, the gain on the sale of mortgage loan has increased 135.4% over the first nine months of 2008.
Trust, investment and financial planning services income increased $2,000 or 0.4% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in the prior year. As the markets have somewhat stabilized, investment customers have maintained their portfolios, awaiting market improvements. On a year to date basis, trust and wealth management income has decreased 10.0% compared to 2008.
Other operating income increased by $372,000 or 1200.0% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same time period in 2008. The primary driver of the improvement was the loss on the equity investment in the third quarter of 2008. Additionally, increased fee collections on electronic and card services have added to the bottom line. Offsetting those increases, the Banks recognized larger losses on sales of real estate owned. On a year to date basis, other operating income decreased $280,000 or 71.2%. This was due to the 2008 write down of the Arizona investment which totaled $696,000, along with $90,000 in losses on sale of real estate owned and $118,000 of loss on the sale of fixed assets. In addition, one of the Banks received proceeds from a bank owned life insurance policy providing a benefit of $203,000, in the first quarter of 2009.

31


Table of Contents

Non-Interest Expense
Total non-interest expense, from continued operations, increased 4.2% to $4,980,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared with $4,777,000 in the same period of 2008. The increase can be attributed to increases in loan and collection costs of $984,000, related to other real estate owned (ORE), and an increase in accruals for FDIC assessments. Partially offsetting these increases were decreases in salary and benefits costs, advertising costs and reductions in occupancy and furniture and equipment expenses. On a year to date basis, non-interest expense increased 6.8% versus last year through September 30, 2009. In addition to the items that occurred in the quarter, as mentioned above, the year-to-date increase was largely attributed to the FDIC special assessment of $255,000, the estimated loss on sale of Davison State Bank of $700,000 and an additional $150,000 in estimated transaction costs in conjunction with an agreement to sell this bank.
Salary and benefit costs, the Corporation’s largest non-interest expense category, were $2,129,000 in the third quarter of 2009, compared with $2,534,000, or a decrease of 16.0%, for the same time period in 2008. The decrease in cost was due to strategic staff reduction, pay reductions for all staff, elimination of performance incentive payments and reduction of retirement benefits for all employees. On a year to date basis, salary and benefit costs have decreased 16.9%.
Occupancy expenses, at $428,000, decreased in the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 by $25,000 or 5.5%. The expenses decreased $72,000 or 5.0% from year-to-year as management worked to reduce expenses through contract and service negotiation.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, furniture and equipment expenses were $385,000 compared to $453,000 for the same period in 2008, a decrease of 15.0%. This is the result of decreases, totaling $101,000, in depreciation on furniture and equipment, as some items have become fully depreciated. Other furniture and equipment related expenses remained relatively flat when comparing the third quarter of 2009 to the same time in 2008. On a year to date basis, furniture and equipment expenses decreased $220,000 or 15.4%.
Loan and collection expenses, from continuing operations, at $984,000, were up $849,000 or 628.9% during the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same time period in 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in other loan expense relating to other real estate owned, in the form of property taxes and property maintenance. As the Banks continue to become owners of these properties, resulting from the unfavorable changing economy in Michigan, we anticipate these expenses to be above desired levels until the economic situation begins to become more favorable. On a year to date basis, loan and collection expenses increased $1,798,000 or 356.7%.
Advertising expenses of $39,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased 63.9% compared with $108,000 for the same period in 2008. The Corporation has reduced expenditures for advertising, sponsorships and community donations. On a year to date basis, advertising expenses decreased $197,000 or 61.0%.
Other operating expenses, from continued operations, were $1,015,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $861,000 in the same time period in 2008, an increase of $154,000 or 17.9%. The Banks had three contributors to this increase: legal expenses, audit fees and FDIC assessments. Offsetting these increases were reductions in stationery and supplies, communication expense, transportation expense, property security, business development expense and other losses.
At the end of the second quarter, the Corporation evaluated the performance of the equity securities which it holds. Management concluded that the performance of the institution, which is a late phase denovo, should have improved greater than results show. From the analysis, a $200,000 permanent write down of one of the securities was taken.

32


Table of Contents

Financial Condition
Proper management of the volume and composition of the Corporation’s earning assets and funding sources is essential for ensuring strong and consistent earnings performance, maintaining adequate liquidity and limiting exposure to risks caused by changing market conditions. The Corporation’s securities portfolio is structured to provide a source of liquidity through maturities and to generate an income stream with relatively low levels of principal risk. The Corporation does not engage in securities trading. Loans comprise the largest component of earning assets and are the Corporation’s highest yielding assets. Customer deposits are the primary source of funding for earning assets while short-term debt and other sources of funds could be further utilized if market conditions and liquidity needs change.
The Corporation’s total assets were $555 million at September 30, 2009 compared to total assets of $579 million at December 31, 2008. This includes assets from discontinued operations of $41 million at September 30, 2009 and $46 million at December 31, 2008. Loans comprised 69.1% of total assets at September 30, 2009 compared to 74.2% at December 31, 2008. Loans declined $45.3 million during the first nine months of 2009. On the liability side of the balance sheet, the ratio of non-interest bearing deposits to total deposits was 13.6% at September 30, 2009 and 13.7% at December 31, 2008. Interest bearing deposit liabilities totaled $405.0 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $405.0 million at December 31, 2008. Total deposits decreased $498,000 with non-interest bearing demand deposits decreasing $539,000 and interest bearing deposits increasing $41,000. Short-term borrowings decreased $1,466,000 due to the decrease in treasury tax and loan payments outstanding at the end of the two periods. FHLB advances decreased $2.7 million comparing the two periods.
Bank premises and equipment decreased $768,000 to $16.1 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $16.9 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease was a result of normal depreciation.
Non-Performing Assets
Non-performing assets include loans on which interest accruals have ceased, loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing, loans that have been renegotiated, and real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Table 5 reflects the levels of these assets at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Non-performing assets increased from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009. The increase of $4,192,000 was primarily due to increased levels of renegotiated loans, non-accrual loans and REO-in-Redemption. Renegotiated loans increased $1,626,000 to $2,568,000 at September 30, 2009. Non-accrual loans increased $478,000 to $23,052,000 and REO-in-redemption increased $1,714,000 to $2,104,000. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing decreased as balances moved into non-accrual loans. Non-accrual loans increased $478,000, when compared to December 31, 2008 due to continued deterioration in loan repayment abilities of borrowers. REO-in-Redemption balance is comprised of eight commercial properties and three residential properties for a total of $2,104,000 at September 30, 2009. Marketability of these properties is dependent on the real estate market. Renegotiated loans increased from $942,000 at December 31, 2008 to a total of $2,568,000 at September 30, 2009.
The level and composition of non-performing assets are affected by economic conditions in the Corporation’s local markets. Non-performing assets, charge-offs, and provisions for loan losses tend to decline in a strong economy and increase in a weak economy, potentially impacting the Corporation’s operating results. In addition to non-performing loans, management carefully monitors other credits that are current in terms of principal and interest payments but, in management’s opinion, may deteriorate in quality if economic conditions change.

33


Table of Contents

Certain portions of the Corporation’s non-performing loans included in Table 5 are considered impaired. The Corporation measures impairment on all large balance non-accrual commercial loans. Certain large balance accruing loans rated watch or lower are also measured for impairment. Impairment losses are believed to be adequately covered by the allowance for loan losses.
The Corporation maintains policies and procedures to identify and monitor non-accrual loans. A loan is placed on non-accrual status when there is doubt regarding collection of principal or interest, or when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more. Interest accrued but not collected is reversed against income for the current quarter when the loan is placed on non-accrual status.
Davison State Bank had non-performing loans of $1,284,000 and non-performing assets of $2,314,000 at September 30, 2009, compared to $1,751,000 of non-performing loans and $2,117,000 of non-performing assets at December 31, 2008.
Table 5 — Non-Performing Assets and Past Due Loans
                 
    September 30,   December 31,
(000s omitted)   2009   2008
     
Non-Performing Loans:
               
Loans Past Due 90 Days or More & Still Accruing
  $ 193     $ 667  
Non-Accrual Loans
    23,052       22,574  
Renegotiated Loans
    2,568       942  
     
Total Non-Performing Loans
    25,813       24,183  
     
Other Non-Performing Assets:
               
Other Real Estate
    6,856       5,983  
REO in Redemption
    2,104       390  
Other Non-Performing Assets
    0       25  
     
Total Other Non-Performing Assets
    8,960       6,398  
     
Total Non-Performing Assets
  $ 34,773     $ 30,581  
     
Non-Performing Loans as a % of Total Loans
    6.73 %     5.63 %
Allowance for Loan Losses as a % of Non-Performing Loans
    56.12 %     43.23 %
Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More to Total Loans
    0.05 %     0.16 %
Non-performing Assets as a % of Total Assets
    6.27 %     5.29 %
Liquidity and Interest Rate Risk Management
Asset/Liability management is designed to assure liquidity and reduce interest rate risks. The goal in managing interest rate risk is to maintain a strong and relatively stable net interest margin. It is the responsibility of the Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO) to set policy guidelines and to establish short-term and long-term strategies with respect to interest rate exposure and liquidity. The ALCO, which is comprised of key members of management, meets regularly to review financial performance and soundness, including interest rate risk and liquidity exposure in relation to present and prospective markets, business conditions, and product lines. Accordingly, the committee adopts funding and balance sheet management strategies that are intended to maintain earnings, liquidity, and growth rates consistent with policy and prudent business standards.
Liquidity maintenance together with a solid capital base and strong earnings performance are key objectives of the Corporation. The Corporation’s liquidity is derived from a strong deposit base comprised of individual and business deposits. Deposit accounts of customers in the mature market

34


Table of Contents

represent a substantial portion of deposits of individuals. The Banks’ deposit base plus other funding sources (federal funds purchased, short-term borrowings, FHLB advances, repurchase agreements, other liabilities and shareholders’ equity) provided primarily all funding needs in the first nine months of 2009. While these sources of funds are expected to continue to be available to provide funds in the future, the mix and availability of funds will depend upon future economic conditions. The Corporation does not foresee any difficulty in meeting its funding requirements.
Primary liquidity is provided through short-term investments or borrowings (including federal funds sold and purchased) while the securities portfolio provides secondary liquidity. The securities portfolio has increased $1.2 million since December 31, 2008. The Corporation has invested excess deposits into the securities and loan portfolios. The goal of this reinvestment is to increase yield and income versus keeping the excess funds in federal funds sold which has a lower yield. The Corporation regularly monitors liquidity to ensure adequate cash flows to cover unanticipated reductions in the availability of funding sources.
Interest rate risk is managed by controlling and limiting the level of earnings volatility arising from rate movements. The Corporation regularly performs reviews and analysis of those factors impacting interest rate risk. Factors include maturity and re-pricing frequency of balance sheet components, impact of rate changes on interest margin and prepayment speeds, market value impacts of rate changes, and other issues. Both actual and projected performance are reviewed, analyzed, and compared to policy and objectives to assure present and future financial viability.
The Corporation had cash used in financing activities resulting from the decrease of deposits, short term borrowings and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. In the first nine months of 2009 deposits, from continuing operations, decreased $498,000, while short term borrowings decreased $1,466,000 and Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $2,726,000. Cash provided by investing activities was $41,662,000 in first nine months of 2009 compared to $31,932,000 in first nine months of 2008. The change in investing activities was due to payoffs of loans, primarily in the commercial loan portfolio.
Capital Management
Total shareholders’ equity decreased 45.9% to $19,547,000 at September 30, 2009 compared with $36,124,000 at December 31, 2008. As indicated on the balance sheet at December 31, 2008, the Corporation had an accumulated other comprehensive loss of $1,977,000 compared to accumulated other comprehensive loss at September 30, 2009 of $410,000. The decrease in the loss position is attributable to a combination of the fluctuation of the market price of securities held in the available for sale portfolio, largely in relation to private label securities and bank stocks owned. In addition, other components of the decrease in shareholders’ equity was a result of high levels of provision for loan losses year-to-date, the establishment of the deferred tax valuation allowance in the second quarter the final write-off of the Arizona investment and a write down on another equity investment.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
Bank holding companies and their bank subsidiaries are required by banking industry regulators to maintain certain levels of capital. These are expressed in the form of certain ratios. These ratios are based on the degree of credit risk in the Corporation’s assets. All assets and off-balance sheet items such as outstanding loan commitments are assigned risk factors to create an overall risk-weighted asset total. Capital is separated into two levels, Tier I capital (essentially total common shareholders’ equity plus qualifying cumulative preferred securities (limited to 33% of common equity, less goodwill) and Tier II capital (essentially the allowance for loan losses limited to 1.25% of gross risk-weighted assets). Capital levels are then measured as a percentage of total risk weighted assets. The regulatory minimum for Tier I capital to risk weighted assets is 4% and the minimum for Total capital (Tier I plus Tier II) to risk weighted assets is 8%. The Tier I leverage ratio measures Tier I capital to average assets and must be a minimum of 3%. As reflected in Note 10, at September 30, 2009 and at December 31, 2008, the Corporation was in excess of the minimum capital and leverage requirements necessary to be considered an “adequately capitalized” banking company.

35


Table of Contents

The FDIC has adopted a risk-based insurance premium system based in part on a bank’s capital adequacy. Under this system, a depository institution is classified as well capitalized, adequately capitalized, or undercapitalized according to its regulatory capital levels. Subsequently, a financial institution’s premium levels are based on these classifications and its regulatory supervisory rating (the higher the classification the lower the premium). It is the Corporation’s goal to maintain capital levels sufficient to retain a designation of “well capitalized.”
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Banks to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined).
As previously mentioned, West Michigan Community Bank (WMCB) entered into a consent order in the first quarter of 2009 due primarily to Tier 1 capital falling below 8%. The consent order restricts dividend payments to the Holding Company and requires WMCB to increase the Tier 1 capital level. The consent order does not place any restrictions on the Holding Company. WMCB Tier 1 capital at September 30, 2009 was 6.6%. The regulatory agencies are completing audits of the remaining two banks. Tier 1 capital at September 30, 2009 was 5.8% at The State Bank and 7.8% at Davison State Bank.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, it is expected that a second bank will enter into a written agreement with the banks regulators. The agreement is expected to address asset quality and capitalization concerns.
The Corporation’s principal source of funds for dividend payments is dividends received from the Banks. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval of regulatory agencies. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current year’s net profits, combined with the retained net profits of the preceding two years, subject to the capital requirements described above.
The Corporation’s primary source of cash to service its subordinated debt and notes payable is dividends from the three subsidiary banks. As the subsidiary banks are working to preserve capital and not up streaming dividends to the Holding Company, the Corporation has elected to defer interest payments for five years on $14,000,000 of subordinated debentures. The reason for the interest deferral is to maintain liquidity at the Holding Company. The Corporation is not in default under either of the indentures. During this five year period, the Corporation is precluded from paying dividends on its outstanding common stock. The Corporation subsequently may give notice that it elects to shorten the deferral period, pay accrued interest and return to the normal course of dividend payments.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, and actual results could differ from those estimates.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level we believe is adequate to absorb probable losses identified and inherent in the loan portfolio. Our evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is an estimate based on reviews of individual loans, assessments of the impact of current and anticipated economic conditions on the portfolio, and historical loss experience. The allowance for loan

36


Table of Contents

losses represents management’s best estimate, but significant downturns in circumstances relating to loan quality or economic conditions could result in a requirement for an increased allowance for loan losses in the near future. Likewise, an upturn in loan quality or improved economic conditions may result in a decline in the required allowance for loan losses. In either instance unanticipated changes could have a significant impact on operating earnings.
The allowance for loan losses is increased through a provision charged to operating expense. Uncollectible loans are charged-off through the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries of loans previously charged-off are added to the allowance for loan losses. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that contractual interest and principal payments will not be collected either for the amounts or by the dates as scheduled in the loan agreement.
Our accounting for income taxes involves the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities primarily associated with differences in the timing of the recognition of revenues and expenses for financial reporting and tax purposes. Management has reviewed the deferred tax position for the Corporation at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Management has concluded that recognition of a valuation allowance for deferred taxes became necessary at the end of the second quarter. Following in depth analysis and discussion, management recognized a total of $5,998,000 of these taxes, from continuing operations at June 30, 2009. These dollars became an expense to the Corporation and directly impacted earnings for the second quarter and year to date period. Adjustments to the reserve as a result of quarterly analysis, has adjusted the reserve to $5,924,000 at September 30, 2009. The valuation allowance will continued to be evaluated on a quarterly basis.
The Corporation evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and the ability of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, the Corporation may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of the reviews of the issuer’s financial condition.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
At September 30, 2009, the Banks had outstanding standby letters of credit of $189,000 and unfunded loan commitments outstanding of $53.8 million. Because these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed to fund these outstanding commitments, the Banks have the ability to fund these commitments.

37


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information concerning quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk contained on page 54 in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference.
Fentura Financial, Inc. faces market risk to the extent that both earnings and the fair value of its financial instruments are affected by changes in interest rates. The Corporation manages this risk with static GAP analysis and has begun simulation modeling. For the first nine months of 2009, the results of these measurement techniques were within the Corporation’s policy guidelines. The Corporation does not believe that there has been a material change in the nature of the Corporation’s primary market risk exposures, including the categories of market risk to which the Corporation is exposed and the particular markets that present the primary risk of loss to the Corporation, or in how those exposures have been managed in 2009 compared to 2008.
The Corporation’s market risk exposure is mainly comprised of its vulnerability to interest rate risk. Prevailing interest rates and interest rate relationships in the future will be primarily determined by market factors, which are outside of the Corporation’s control. All information provided in this section consists of forward-looking statements. Reference is made to the section captioned “Forward Looking Statements” in this quarterly report for a discussion of the limitations on the Corporation’s responsibility for such statements.
Interest Rate Sensitivity Management
Interest rate sensitivity management seeks to maximize net interest income as a result of changing interest rates, within prudent ranges of risk. The Corporation attempts to accomplish this objective by structuring the balance sheet so that re-pricing opportunities exist for both assets and liabilities in roughly equivalent amounts at approximately the same time intervals. Imbalances in these re-pricing opportunities at any point in time constitute a bank’s interest rate sensitivity. The Corporation currently does not utilize derivatives in managing interest rate risk.
An indicator of the interest rate sensitivity structure of a financial institution’s balance sheet is the difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities, and is referred to as “GAP.” Table 7 sets forth the distribution of re-pricing of the Corporation’s earning assets and interest bearing liabilities as of September 30, 2009, the interest rate sensitivity GAP, as defined above, the cumulative interest rate sensitivity GAP, the interest rate sensitivity GAP ratio (i.e. interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate sensitive liabilities) and the cumulative sensitivity GAP ratio. The table also sets forth the time periods in which earning assets and liabilities will mature or may re-price in accordance with their contractual terms.

38


Table of Contents

Table 7 GAP Analysis — September 30, 2009
                                         
    Within   Three   One to   After    
    Three   Months to   Five   Five    
(000s omitted)   Months   One Year   Years   Years   Total
     
 
Earning Assets:
                                       
Federal Funds Sold
  $ 27,250     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 27,250  
Securities
    8,844       12,719       17,779       15,640       54,982  
Loans
    66,546       92,869       176,018       48,344       383,777  
Loans Held for Sale
    1,434       0       0       0       1,434  
FHLB Stock
    1,900       0       0       0       1,900  
     
Total Earning Assets
  $ 105,974     $ 105,588     $ 193,797     $ 63,984     $ 469,343  
     
 
                                       
Interest Bearing Liabilities:
                                       
Interest Bearing Demand Deposits
  $ 99,324     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 99,324  
Savings Deposits
    77,698       0       0       0       77,698  
Time Deposits Less than $100,000
    20,929       57,542       32,733       30       111,234  
Time Deposits Greater than $100,000
    22,372       29,272       65,180       0       116,824  
Short term borrowings
    34       0       0       0       34  
Other Borrowings
    0       4,028       5,098       855       9,981  
Subordinated debentures
    14,000       0       0       0       14,000  
     
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities
  $ 234,357     $ 90,842     $ 103,011     $ 885     $ 429,095  
     
Interest Rate Sensitivity GAP
    ($128,383 )   $ 14,746     $ 90,786     $ 63,099     $ 40,248  
Cumulative Interest Rate Sensitivity GAP
    ($128,383 )     ($113,637 )     ($22,851 )   $ 40,248          
Interest Rate Sensitivity GAP
    (0.45 )     1.16       1.88       72.28          
Cumulative Interest Rate Sensitivity GAP Ratio
    (0.45 )     0.71       2.59       74.87          
As indicated in Table 7, the short-term (one year and less) cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap is negative. Accordingly, if market interest rates increase, this negative gap position could have a short-term negative impact on interest margin. Conversely, if market rates decline this should theoretically have a short-term positive impact. However, gap analysis is limited and may not provide an accurate indication of the impact of general interest rate movements on the net interest margin since the re-pricing of various categories of assets and liabilities is subject to the Corporation’s needs, competitive pressures, and the needs of the Corporation’s customers. In addition, various assets and liabilities indicated as re-pricing within the same period may in fact re-price at different times within such period and at different rate volumes. These limitations are evident when considering the Corporation’s gap position at September 30, 2009 and the change in net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same time period in 2008. At September 30, 2009, the Corporation was negatively gapped through one year. Interest rates have stayed steady since 2008 and rates are expected to remain flat for the next 3 months. Further, net interest margin increased when the nine months of 2009 is compared to the same period in 2008. This occurred as short-term, higher priced deposits matured and were re-priced to lower rates. In addition to GAP analysis, the Corporation, as part of managing interest rate risk, also performs simulation modeling, which measures the impact of upward and downward movements of interest rates on interest margin and the market value of equity. Assuming continued success at achieving repricing of loans to higher rates at a faster pace than repricing of deposits, simulation modeling indicates that an upward movement of interest rates could have a positive impact on net interest income. Because management believes that it should be able to continue these repricing relationships, it anticipates improved performance in net interest margin.
Forward Looking Statements
This report includes “forward-looking statements” as that term is used in the securities laws. All statements regarding our expected financial position, business and strategies are forward-looking statements. In addition, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “seeks,” “expects,” “plans,”

39


Table of Contents

“intends,” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The presentation and discussion of the provision and allowance for loan losses and statements concerning future profitability or future growth or increases, are examples of inherently forward looking statements in that they involve judgments and statements of belief as to the outcome of future events. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and our future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in: interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in our market area and accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further information concerning us and our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 4T: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)   Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, have concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Corporation would be made known to them by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this Form 10-Q was being prepared.
(b)   Changes in Internal Controls. During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

40


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings. — None
Item 1A.   Risk Factors — There have been no material changes in the risk factors applicable to the Corporation from those disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, except as disclosed below.
      Since December 31, 2008, the subsidiary banks of the Corporation have reduced their risk rating from well capitalized to adequately capitalized. These changes in ratings may impact the banks liquidity position. The bank’s ability to obtain brokered CDs will be limited.
Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. — None
Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities. — None
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders — None
Item 5.   Other Information. — None
Item 6.   Exhibits.
  (a)   Exhibits
  31.1   Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  31.2   Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  32.1   Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  32.2   Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

41


Table of Contents

Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  Fentura Financial, Inc.
 
 
Dated: November 11, 2009  /s/ Donald L. Grill    
  Donald L. Grill   
  President & CEO   
 
     
Dated: November 11, 2009  /s/ Douglas J. Kelley    
  Douglas J. Kelley   
  Chief Financial Officer   
 
         

42


Table of Contents

         
     
     
     
     
 
EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit   Description
 
   
31.1
  Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.1
  Certificate of the Chief Executive Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of Fentura Financial, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

43