Form 6-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16 UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009
Commission File Number: 001-13425
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
6500 River Road
Richmond, BC, Canada
V6X 4G5
(604) 273 7564
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F o Form 40-F þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
o
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing information contained in this Form,
the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to
Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all information and
footnotes required by Canadian or United States generally accepted accounting principles for a
complete set of annual financial statements. However, in the opinion of management, all
adjustments (which consist only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation
of the results of operations for the relevant periods have been made. Results for the interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year or any other
period. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the summary of accounting
policies and the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, a copy of which has been filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These policies have been applied on a consistent
basis.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Retained Earnings
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
120,459 |
|
|
$ |
115,822 |
|
|
$ |
204,134 |
|
|
$ |
197,216 |
|
Direct expenses |
|
|
16,113 |
|
|
|
16,381 |
|
|
|
24,966 |
|
|
|
26,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,346 |
|
|
|
99,441 |
|
|
|
179,168 |
|
|
|
170,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,607 |
|
|
|
5,983 |
|
|
|
14,596 |
|
|
|
11,587 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
41,384 |
|
|
|
42,778 |
|
|
|
81,202 |
|
|
|
84,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,991 |
|
|
|
48,761 |
|
|
|
95,798 |
|
|
|
96,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
55,355 |
|
|
|
50,680 |
|
|
|
83,370 |
|
|
|
74,206 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(514 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
2,346 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
Gain (loss) on disposition of capital assets |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
7,217 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
7,310 |
|
Other |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
10,455 |
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
|
12,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
56,073 |
|
|
|
61,135 |
|
|
|
85,495 |
|
|
|
86,470 |
|
Income tax expense (recovery): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
16,051 |
|
|
|
16,904 |
|
|
|
24,223 |
|
|
|
25,239 |
|
Future |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
(1,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,226 |
|
|
|
15,216 |
|
|
|
26,769 |
|
|
|
24,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
38,847 |
|
|
$ |
45,919 |
|
|
$ |
58,726 |
|
|
$ |
62,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share (note 6 (d)): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings, beginning of period |
|
$ |
368,285 |
|
|
$ |
300,092 |
|
|
$ |
357,845 |
|
|
$ |
292,046 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
38,847 |
|
|
|
45,919 |
|
|
|
58,726 |
|
|
|
62,326 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
|
|
(8,377 |
) |
|
|
(18,906 |
) |
|
|
(16,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings, end of period |
|
$ |
397,665 |
|
|
$ |
337,634 |
|
|
$ |
397,665 |
|
|
$ |
337,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 3 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
272,137 |
|
|
$ |
107,275 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
115,103 |
|
|
|
60,375 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
6,363 |
|
|
|
9,711 |
|
Advances against auction contracts |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
|
7,615 |
|
|
|
12,088 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
Future income tax asset |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,482 |
|
|
|
193,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital assets (note 3) |
|
|
520,479 |
|
|
|
453,642 |
|
Other assets (note 4) |
|
|
12,594 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
40,721 |
|
|
|
40,233 |
|
Future income tax asset |
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
979,954 |
|
|
$ |
689,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction proceeds payable |
|
$ |
235,505 |
|
|
$ |
62,717 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
96,144 |
|
|
|
84,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,649 |
|
|
|
146,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 5) |
|
|
120,637 |
|
|
|
67,411 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Future income tax liability |
|
|
12,745 |
|
|
|
10,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,091 |
|
|
|
224,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital (note 6) |
|
|
98,412 |
|
|
|
94,366 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
14,852 |
|
|
|
14,355 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
397,665 |
|
|
|
357,845 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
3,934 |
|
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514,863 |
|
|
|
465,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
979,954 |
|
|
$ |
689,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 7)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 4 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
94,366 |
|
|
$ |
14,355 |
|
|
$ |
357,845 |
|
|
$ |
(1,404 |
) |
|
$ |
465,162 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
Stock compensation
tax adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,439 |
) |
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,879 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,970 |
) |
|
|
(10,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
|
94,452 |
|
|
|
14,896 |
|
|
|
368,285 |
|
|
|
(12,374 |
) |
|
|
465,259 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
|
(677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
Stock compensation
tax adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,847 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,308 |
|
|
|
16,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
98,412 |
|
|
$ |
14,852 |
|
|
$ |
397,665 |
|
|
$ |
3,934 |
|
|
$ |
514,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
38,847 |
|
|
$ |
45,919 |
|
|
$ |
58,726 |
|
|
$ |
62,326 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
16,308 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
5,338 |
|
|
|
5,743 |
|
Reclassification to net earnings of foreign
currency translation gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
55,155 |
|
|
$ |
46,300 |
|
|
$ |
64,064 |
|
|
$ |
65,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 5 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
38,847 |
|
|
$ |
45,919 |
|
|
$ |
58,726 |
|
|
$ |
62,326 |
|
Items not involving cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,607 |
|
|
|
5,983 |
|
|
|
14,596 |
|
|
|
11,587 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
Future income taxes |
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
(1,095 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(1,887 |
) |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(2,445 |
) |
Net loss (gain) on disposition of capital assets |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(7,217 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(7,310 |
) |
Changes in non-cash working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
29,983 |
|
|
|
(69,018 |
) |
|
|
(51,466 |
) |
|
|
(138,383 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
|
13,796 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
Advances against auction contracts |
|
|
6,979 |
|
|
|
(4,520 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(4,518 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
(6,253 |
) |
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
(2,108 |
) |
|
|
(773 |
) |
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
4,434 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction proceeds payable |
|
|
(19,705 |
) |
|
|
54,219 |
|
|
|
162,626 |
|
|
|
221,187 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
(9,558 |
) |
|
|
10,670 |
|
|
|
(14,198 |
) |
Other |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
65,846 |
|
|
|
26,602 |
|
|
|
204,148 |
|
|
|
127,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital asset additions |
|
|
(43,763 |
) |
|
|
(26,068 |
) |
|
|
(79,203 |
) |
|
|
(52,710 |
) |
Proceeds on disposition of capital assets |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
19,161 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
19,686 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
(42,801 |
) |
|
|
(6,907 |
) |
|
|
(82,976 |
) |
|
|
(33,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of share capital |
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
3,363 |
|
|
|
2,093 |
|
Dividends on common shares |
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
|
|
(8,377 |
) |
|
|
(18,906 |
) |
|
|
(16,738 |
) |
Repayment of short-term debt |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(24,362 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(24,362 |
) |
Issuance of short-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,541 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
34,477 |
|
Issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
51,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
29,841 |
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
35,778 |
|
|
|
(4,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in foreign currency rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
9,365 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
7,912 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
62,251 |
|
|
|
22,370 |
|
|
|
164,862 |
|
|
|
92,837 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
209,886 |
|
|
|
220,782 |
|
|
|
107,275 |
|
|
|
150,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
272,137 |
|
|
$ |
243,152 |
|
|
$ |
272,137 |
|
|
$ |
243,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
1,236 |
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
$ |
2,141 |
|
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
19,630 |
|
|
$ |
16,370 |
|
|
$ |
23,448 |
|
|
$ |
19,428 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
- 6 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
1. |
|
Significant accounting policies: |
|
(a) |
|
Basis of presentation: |
|
|
|
|
These unaudited consolidated financial statements present the financial position, results
of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows of
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (the Company) and its subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
|
|
|
|
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to interim financial
information and are based on accounting principles and practices consistent with those used
in the preparation of the annual consolidated financial statements. These consolidated
financial statements are not materially different from those that would be presented in
accordance with United States GAAP, except as disclosed in note 9. The interim consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the December 31, 2008 audited
consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Revenue recognition: |
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues are comprised mostly of auction commissions, which are earned by the
Company acting as an agent for consignors of equipment and other assets, but also include
net profits on the sale of inventory, internet and proxy purchase fees, administrative and
documentation fees on the sale of certain lots, and auction advertising fees. All revenue
is recognized when the auction sale is complete and the Company has determined that the
auction proceeds are collectible. |
|
|
|
|
Auction commissions represent the percentage earned by the Company on the gross proceeds
from equipment and other assets sold at auction. The majority of auction commissions is
earned as a pre-negotiated fixed rate of the gross selling price. Other commissions are
earned when the Company guarantees a certain level of proceeds to a consignor. This type
of commission typically includes a pre-negotiated percentage of the guaranteed gross
proceeds plus a percentage of proceeds in excess of the guaranteed amount. If actual
auction proceeds are less than the guaranteed amount, commission is reduced; if proceeds
are sufficiently lower, the Company can incur a loss on the sale. Losses, if any,
resulting from guarantee contracts are recorded in the period in which the relevant auction
is completed. If a loss relating to a guarantee contract to be sold after a period end is
known at the financial statement reporting date, the loss is accrued in the financial
statements for that period. The Companys exposure from these guarantee contracts
fluctuates over time (see note 7). |
- 7 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
1. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued): |
|
(b) |
|
Revenue recognition (continued): |
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues also include net profit on the sale of inventory items. In some cases,
incidental to its regular commission business, the Company temporarily acquires title to
items for a short time prior to a particular auction sale. The auction revenue recorded is
the net gain or loss on the sale of the items. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Comparative figures: |
|
|
|
|
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted
in the current period. |
2. |
|
Seasonality of operations: |
|
|
|
The Companys operations are both seasonal and event driven. Auction revenues tend to be
highest during the second and fourth calendar quarters. The Company generally conducts more
auctions during these quarters than during the first and third calendar quarters. Mid-December
through mid-February and July through August are traditionally less active periods. |
|
|
|
In addition, the Companys revenue is dependent upon the timing of such events as fleet
upgrades and realignments, contractor retirements, and the completion of major projects, among
other things. These events are not predictable and are usually unrelated to fiscal quarters,
making quarter-to-quarter comparability difficult. |
- 8 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net book |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Cost |
|
|
depreciation |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
201,746 |
|
|
$ |
16,150 |
|
|
$ |
185,596 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
178,850 |
|
|
|
36,143 |
|
|
|
142,707 |
|
Land and buildings under development |
|
|
128,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,882 |
|
Computer software |
|
|
31,926 |
|
|
|
11,224 |
|
|
|
20,702 |
|
Yard equipment |
|
|
25,277 |
|
|
|
11,817 |
|
|
|
13,460 |
|
Automotive equipment |
|
|
18,850 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
|
|
11,686 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
15,630 |
|
|
|
7,101 |
|
|
|
8,529 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
13,629 |
|
|
|
6,023 |
|
|
|
7,606 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
3,738 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
618,528 |
|
|
$ |
98,049 |
|
|
$ |
520,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net book |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Cost |
|
|
depreciation |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
173,901 |
|
|
$ |
13,649 |
|
|
$ |
160,252 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
163,044 |
|
|
|
35,153 |
|
|
|
127,891 |
|
Land and buildings under development |
|
|
112,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,807 |
|
Computer software |
|
|
25,214 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
17,214 |
|
Yard equipment |
|
|
21,831 |
|
|
|
10,424 |
|
|
|
11,407 |
|
Automotive equipment |
|
|
17,811 |
|
|
|
6,868 |
|
|
|
10,943 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
11,629 |
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
6,211 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
11,138 |
|
|
|
5,519 |
|
|
|
5,619 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
540,811 |
|
|
$ |
87,169 |
|
|
$ |
453,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company capitalized interest of $1,978,000 (six
months ended June 30, 2008 $1,205,000) to the cost of land and buildings under development.
- 9 -
|
RITCHIE
BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited) |
4. |
|
Other non-current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note receivable |
|
$ |
5,189 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Long-term prepaids |
|
|
3,144 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
4,261 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,594 |
|
|
$ |
1,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The note receivable is secured by a property the Company is leasing and a neighbouring
property. The note is repayable in monthly installments of principal plus interest, with final
payment due in 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Term loan, denominated in Canadian dollars, unsecured,
bearing interest at 6.385%, due in quarterly
installments of interest only, with full amount of the
principal due in 2016. |
|
$ |
51,437 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan, unsecured, bearing interest at 5.610%, due
in quarterly installments of interest only, with full
amount of the principal due in 2011. |
|
|
29,949 |
|
|
|
29,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loan, denominated in Canadian dollars, unsecured,
bearing interest at Canadian prime rate, due in
monthly installments of interest only. The revolving
credit facility is available until January 2014. |
|
|
26,398 |
|
|
|
25,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan, denominated in Canadian dollars, secured by
a general security agreement, bearing interest at
4.429%, due in monthly installments of interest only,
with the full amount of the principal due in 2010. |
|
|
12,853 |
|
|
|
12,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
120,637 |
|
|
$ |
67,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 10 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
5. |
|
Long-term debt (continued): |
The following credit facilities are available to the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committed revolving credit facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available |
|
$ |
188,349 |
|
|
$ |
189,524 |
|
Expires January 2014 |
|
|
168,349 |
|
|
|
169,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncommitted credit facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available |
|
$ |
300,937 |
|
|
$ |
322,792 |
|
Expires November 2011 |
|
|
198,418 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
(a) |
|
Shares issued: |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued and outstanding are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
104,887,720 |
|
Issued for cash, pursuant to stock options exercised |
|
|
316,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
105,203,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys common shares were subdivided on a three-for-one basis effective April 24,
2008. Shareholders of record at the close of business on April 24, 2008 received two
additional common shares for each common share held at that date. The stock split
effectively tripled the number of common shares and stock options outstanding on that date.
All share, stock option and per share information in these consolidated financial
statements have been restated to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.
- 11 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
6. |
|
Share capital (continued): |
|
(b) |
|
Stock option plan: |
|
|
|
|
Stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Under Option |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,473,634 |
|
|
$ |
14.23 |
|
Granted |
|
|
932,000 |
|
|
|
14.50 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(316,100 |
) |
|
|
10.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
3,089,534 |
|
|
$ |
14.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
2,137,524 |
|
|
$ |
14.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The options outstanding at June 30, 2009 expire on dates ranging to March 5, 2019.
The following is a summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable at June 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Range of |
|
Number |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.89 - $4.35 |
|
|
161,900 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
|
|
161,900 |
|
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
$4.44 - $5.18 |
|
|
211,324 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
211,324 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
$8.82 - $10.80 |
|
|
425,800 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
9.68 |
|
|
|
425,800 |
|
|
|
9.68 |
|
$14.23 - $14.70 |
|
|
1,416,100 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
14.56 |
|
|
|
475,100 |
|
|
|
14.67 |
|
$18.67 |
|
|
431,100 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
18.67 |
|
|
|
431,100 |
|
|
|
18.67 |
|
$24.39 - $25.76 |
|
|
443,310 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
24.41 |
|
|
|
432,300 |
|
|
|
24.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,089,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,137,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Stock-based compensation: |
|
|
|
|
The Company uses the fair value based method to account for employee stock-based
compensation awards. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company
recognized compensation cost of $1,061,000 (six months ended June 30, 2008 $1,155,000) in
respect of options granted in 2009 and 2008 under its stock option plan. |
- 12 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
6. |
|
Share capital (continued): |
|
(c) |
|
Stock-based compensation (continued): |
|
|
|
|
For the purposes described above, the fair value of the stock option grants was estimated
on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
2.48 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
Expected lives |
|
5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Volatility |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was $3.74 per option (six months ended June 30, 2008 $5.27). The fair
value method requires that this amount be amortized over the relevant vesting periods of
the underlying options.
|
(d) |
|
Net earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
The computations for basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
amount |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings per share |
|
$ |
38,847 |
|
|
|
105,066,310 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
58,726 |
|
|
|
104,981,514 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
968,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share |
|
$ |
38,847 |
|
|
|
106,034,620 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
58,726 |
|
|
|
105,590,921 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share |
|
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
amount |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings per share |
|
$ |
45,919 |
|
|
|
104,714,893 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
62,326 |
|
|
|
104,635,006 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,057,824 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,095,806 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share |
|
$ |
45,919 |
|
|
|
105,772,717 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
62,326 |
|
|
|
105,730,812 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, stock options to purchase 443,310 common shares
(six months ended June 30, 2008 nil) were outstanding but were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share as they were anti-dilutive.
- 13 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
7. |
|
Commitments and contingencies: |
|
|
|
The Company is subject to legal and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of its
business. The Company does not believe that the results of these claims will have a material
effect on its financial position or results of operations. |
|
|
|
In the normal course of its business, the Company will in certain situations guarantee to a
consignor a minimum level of proceeds in connection with the sale at auction of that
consignors equipment. At June 30, 2009, outstanding guarantees under contract for industrial
equipment to be sold prior to the end of the third quarter of 2009 totaled $20,695,000
(December 31, 2008 $5,829,000 to be sold prior to the end of the first quarter of 2009). The
Company also had guarantees under contract totaling $4,566,000 relating to agricultural
auctions to be held prior to the end of the second quarter of 2010 (December 31, 2008 -
$12,094,000 to be sold prior to the end of the second quarter of 2009). All amounts are
undiscounted and do not reflect estimated proceeds from sale at auction. No liability has been
recorded with respect to these guarantee contracts. |
|
8. |
|
Financial instruments: |
|
(a) |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
Carrying amounts of certain of the Companys financial instruments, including accounts
receivable, auction proceeds payable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities
approximate their fair values due to their short terms to maturity. Based on lending rates
currently available to the issuer of the note receivable for notes with similar terms, the
fair value of its note receivable as at June 30, 2009 was approximately $5,626,000. Based
on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms, the
fair value of its long-term debt as at June 30, 2009 was approximately $122,569,000
(December 31, 2008 $69,756,000). |
|
|
(b) |
|
Financial risk management |
|
|
|
|
The Company is exposed to a variety of financial risks by virtue of its activities,
including foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The
Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the oversight of the Companys risk
management. |
- 14 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
8. |
|
Financial instruments (continued): |
|
(b) |
|
Financial risk management (continued): |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange risk |
|
|
|
|
The Company operates internationally and is exposed to currency risk, primarily relating to
the Canadian and U.S. dollars, and the Euro, arising from sales, purchases and loans that
are denominated in currencies other than the respective functional currencies of the
Companys international operations. The Company also has various investments in non-U.S.
dollar self-sustaining operations, whose net assets are exposed to foreign currency
translation risk. The Company has elected not to actively manage this exposure at this
time. Refer to further discussion in the section entitled Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure about Market Risk contained in the Companys Management Discussion and Analysis. |
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30, 2009, the currently quantifiable effect, with other
variables unchanged, of a 1% strengthening (weakening) of the U.S. dollar against the
Canadian dollar and Euro on the Companys financial statements is as follows: |
|
|
|
decrease (increase) net earnings by approximately $115,000 due to the translation
of the foreign operations statements of operations into the Companys reporting
currency, the U.S. dollar; |
|
|
|
increase (decrease) net earnings by approximately $110,000 due to the revaluation
of significant foreign currency denominated monetary items; and |
|
|
|
decrease (increase) other comprehensive income by approximately $2,300,000. |
Interest rate risk
The Companys interest rate risk mainly arises from the interest rate impact on the
Companys cash and cash equivalents and floating rate debt. Cash and cash equivalents earn
interest based on market interest rates. As at June 30, 2009, the Company is not exposed
to significant interest rate risk on its cash and cash equivalents.
The Companys interest rate management policy is generally to borrow at fixed rates.
However, floating rate funding has been used if the terms of borrowings are favorable. The
Company will consider utilizing derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps to
minimize its exposure to interest rate risk. As at June 30, 2009, approximately 22% of the
Companys borrowings are at floating rates of interest. The weighted average interest rate
paid by the Company on its outstanding floating rate borrowings during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was 2.59%.
- 15 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
8. |
|
Financial instruments (continued): |
|
(b) |
|
Financial risk management (continued): |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate risk (continued) |
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the majority of the Companys interest was
capitalized as it relates to the development of various new auction sites. As a result,
changes in interest rates on these borrowings will not materially affect the Companys net
earnings or other comprehensive income until such time as these developments are put into
use. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, with other variables unchanged, a 100 basis
points or 1% increase or decrease in interest rates would have no significant impact on the
Companys financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Credit risk |
|
|
|
|
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company arising from the non-performance
by counterparties of contractual financial obligations. The Company is not exposed to
significant credit risk on accounts receivable because it does not extend credit to buyers
at its auctions, and it has a large diversified customer base. In addition, assets
purchased at the Companys auctions are not normally released to the buyers until the
Company receives payment in full. The Companys maximum exposure to credit risk on
accounts receivable at the reporting date is the carrying value of its accounts receivable,
less those receivables relating to assets that have not been released to the buyers. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys credit risk exposure on liquid financial assets, being cash and cash
equivalents, is limited since it maintains its cash and cash equivalents in a range of
large financial institutions around the world. |
|
|
|
|
The Company limits its credit risk on its note receivable by performing credit verification
procedures prior to the issuance of the note receivable. In addition, the note receivable
is secured by a property the Company is leasing and a neighbouring property, and is
monitored on an ongoing basis. To date, the counterparty has not failed to meet its
financial obligations to the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity risk |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial
obligations as they fall due. The Company manages its liquidity risk by maintaining
adequate cash and cash equivalent balances, generally by releasing payments to consignors
only after receivables from buyers have been collected. The Company also utilizes its
established lines of credit (note 5) for short-term borrowings on an as-needed basis. The
Company continuously monitors and reviews both actual and forecast cash flows to ensure
there is sufficient working capital to satisfy its operating requirements. |
- 16 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
9. |
|
United States generally accepted accounting principles: |
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, which
differ, in certain respects, from accounting practices generally accepted in the United States
and from requirements promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
The amounts in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income that differ
from those reported under Canadian GAAP are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings under Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
38,847 |
|
|
$ |
45,919 |
|
|
$ |
58,726 |
|
|
$ |
62,326 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment on
settlement intercompany loans (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings under US GAAP |
|
$ |
38,847 |
|
|
$ |
45,919 |
|
|
$ |
58,726 |
|
|
$ |
60,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
under Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
16,308 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
5,338 |
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
under US GAAP |
|
|
16,308 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
5,338 |
|
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income under US GAAP |
|
$ |
55,155 |
|
|
$ |
46,300 |
|
|
$ |
64,064 |
|
|
$ |
65,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share in accordance
with US GAAP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
The amounts in the consolidated balance sheets that differ from those reported under Canadian
GAAP are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
US GAAP |
|
|
GAAP |
|
|
US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital assets (b) |
|
$ |
520,479 |
|
|
$ |
559,866 |
|
|
$ |
453,642 |
|
|
$ |
474,720 |
|
Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities (b) |
|
|
96,144 |
|
|
|
135,531 |
|
|
|
84,114 |
|
|
|
105,192 |
|
Retained earnings (a) |
|
|
397,665 |
|
|
|
383,214 |
|
|
|
357,845 |
|
|
|
342,961 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) (a) |
|
|
3,934 |
|
|
|
18,385 |
|
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
13,480 |
|
- 17 -
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
(Information as at June 30, 2009 and for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is unaudited)
9. |
|
United States generally accepted accounting principles (continued): |
|
(a) |
|
The Company had a number of outstanding intercompany loan balances where settlement
was not planned or anticipated in the foreseeable future, which were considered part of
net investments in foreign operations. As such, foreign exchange gains or losses arising
from these intercompany loans were reported in the cumulative translation adjustment
account. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, a number of the intercompany loans
were settled or planned to be settled, which resulted in the reclassification to net
earnings of foreign currency translation gains of $2,153,000, inclusive of tax of $68,000.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, foreign currency translation gains of
$14,884,000, net of tax of $139,000, were reclassified to net earnings. Under US GAAP, the
reclassification of the pro rata portion of foreign exchange gains or losses in
accumulated other comprehensive income to net earnings only occurs when the reduction in
the net investment is the result of a complete sale, or complete or substantially complete
liquidation, which has not occurred in this case. |
|
|
(b) |
|
The Company sold its new headquarters building under construction and will lease the
property from the purchaser upon construction completion. Under US GAAP, the Company is
required to record an asset under construction as prescribed by the Emerging Issue Task
Force (EITF) 97-10, The Effect of Lessee Involvement in Asset Construction, as the
Company is deemed the owner of the construction project during the construction period.
Reimbursements from the lessor to the Company during the construction period are recorded
as accounts payable and accrued liabilities, as construction is expected to be completed
within one year. Upon the completion of construction, a sale-leaseback transaction will
occur and the Company will lease the headquarters facility from the lessor. Amounts
recorded under asset under construction and accounts payable and accrued liabilities will
be derecognized upon completion of construction. |
- 18 -
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The following discussion summarizes significant factors affecting the consolidated operating
results and financial condition of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (Ritchie Bros., the
Company, we or us) for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008. This discussion should be read in conjunction
with our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the period ended
June 30, 2009, and with the disclosures below regarding forward-looking statements and risk
factors. You should also consider our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
and our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for
the year ended December 31, 2008, which are included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 40-F.
The date of this discussion is as of August 4, 2009. Additional information relating to our
company, including our Annual Information Form, is available by accessing the SEDAR website at
www.sedar.com. Our Annual Report on Form 40-F is available on the SECs EDGAR system at
www.sec.gov. None of the information on the SEDAR or EDGAR websites is incorporated by reference
into this document by this or any other reference.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in Canada, or Canadian GAAP. There are no material measurement differences between
those financial statements and the financial position and results of operations that would be
reported under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, except
as described in note 9 to the interim consolidated financial statements. Amounts discussed below
are based on our interim consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian
GAAP and are presented in United States dollars. Unless indicated otherwise, all tabular dollar
amounts, including related footnotes, presented below are expressed in thousands of dollars, except
per share amounts.
Ritchie Bros. is the worlds largest auctioneer of industrial equipment, selling more equipment to
on-site and online bidders than any other company in the world. Our world headquarters are located
in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, and as of the date of this discussion, we operated from over
110 locations in more than 25 countries, including 39 auction sites worldwide. We sell, through
unreserved public auctions, a broad range of industrial assets, including equipment, trucks and
other assets used in the construction, transportation, agricultural, material handling, mining,
forestry, petroleum and marine industries. Our purpose is to use unreserved auctions to create a
global marketplace for our customers.
We operate mainly in the auction segment of the global industrial equipment marketplace. Our
primary target markets within that marketplace are the used truck and equipment sectors, which are
large and fragmented. The world market for used trucks and equipment continues to grow, primarily
as a result of the increasing, cumulative supply of used trucks and equipment, which is driven by
the ongoing production of new trucks and equipment. Industry analysts estimate that the world-wide
value of used truck and equipment transactions, of the type of equipment we sell at our auctions,
is greater than $100 billion per year. Although we sell more used equipment than any other company
in the world, our share of this fragmented market is in the range of 3%.
In recent periods, approximately 80% of the value of the items sold at our auctions was purchased
by end users of trucks and equipment (retail buyers), such as contractors, with the remainder being
purchased primarily by truck and equipment dealers and brokers (wholesale buyers). Consignors to
our auctions represent a broad mix of equipment owners, the majority being end users of equipment,
with the balance being finance companies, truck and equipment dealers and equipment rental
companies, among others. Consignment volumes at our auctions are affected by a number of factors,
including regular fleet upgrades and reconfigurations, financial pressure, retirements, and
inventory reductions, as well as by the timing of the completion of major construction and other
projects.
- 19 -
We compete directly for potential purchasers of industrial assets with other auction companies.
Our indirect competitors include truck and equipment manufacturers, distributors and dealers that
sell new or used industrial assets, and equipment rental companies that offer an alternative to
purchasing. When sourcing equipment to sell at our auctions, we compete with other auction
companies, truck and equipment dealers and brokers, and equipment owners that have traditionally
disposed of equipment through private sales.
We have several key strengths that we believe provide distinct competitive advantages and will
enable us to grow and make our auctions more appealing to both buyers and sellers of industrial
assets. Some of our principal strengths include:
|
|
Our reputation for conducting only unreserved auctions and our widely recognized commitment
to honesty and fair dealing. |
|
|
Our ability to transcend local market conditions and create a global marketplace for
industrial assets by attracting diverse audiences of mainly end-user bidders from around the
world to our auctions. |
|
|
Our size, financial strength and access to capital, the international scope of our
operations, our extensive network of auction sites, and our unparalleled marketing skills. |
|
|
Our ability to enhance our live auctions with technology using our online bidding service,
and our Virtual Ramp, which projects equipment photos onto a large screen to allow bidders to
view each item as they bid. |
|
|
Our in-depth experience in the marketplace, including our equipment valuation expertise and
proprietary customer and equipment databases. |
|
|
Our dedicated and experienced workforce, which allows us to, among other things, enter new
geographic markets, structure deals to meet our customers needs and provide high quality and
consistent service to consignors and bidders. |
Strict adherence to the unreserved auction process is one of our founding principles and, we
believe, one of our most significant competitive advantages. When we say unreserved we mean that
there are no minimum or reserve prices on anything sold at a Ritchie Bros. auction each item
sells to the highest bidder on sale day, regardless of the price. In addition, consignors (or
their agents) are not allowed to bid on, buy back or in any way influence the selling price of
their own equipment. We maintain this commitment to the unreserved auction process because we
believe that an unreserved auction is a fair auction.
We attract a broad base of bidders from around the world to our auctions. Our worldwide marketing
efforts help to attract bidders, and they are willing to travel long distances or participate
online in part because of our reputation for conducting fair auctions. These multinational bidding
audiences provide a global marketplace that allows our auctions to transcend local market
conditions, which we believe is a significant competitive advantage. Evidence of this is the fact
that in recent periods an average of approximately 60% of the value of equipment sold at our
auctions left the region of the sale.
We believe that our ability to consistently draw significant numbers of local and international
bidders to our auctions, most of whom are end users rather than resellers, is appealing to sellers
of used trucks and equipment and helps us to attract consignments to our auctions. Higher
consignment volumes attract more bidders, which in turn attract more consignments, and so on in a
self-reinforcing process that has helped us to achieve substantial momentum in our business.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we had over 177,000 bidder registrations at our
industrial auctions, compared to almost 140,000 in the first half of 2008. We received over 18,000
industrial asset consignments (typically comprised of multiple lots) in the six months ended June
30, 2009, compared to over 18,000 during the same period in 2008.
- 20 -
In spite of the difficulties being faced by many companies as a result of the current economic
environment, we believe our business remains strong. Financial and economic uncertainty acts as an
incentive for equipment owners to turn their surplus assets into cash quickly, efficiently and for
fair market value, which we believe benefits our business. In addition, at our auctions during the
first half of 2009, we experienced a 26% increase in the number of bidder registrations. Our
strategy, which is discussed further below, is designed in part to increase our share of the large
and highly fragmented used equipment market, and market share gains tend not to be affected by
economic uncertainty. Also, there is still a significant amount of infrastructure and other
construction projects being undertaken around the world, which we believe benefits our business by
generating equipment buying and selling activity at our auctions.
In our experience over the last 50 years, when cash flow or credit is tight and there is
uncertainty in the market, traditional buyers of new equipment are more likely to look for good
quality, late model used equipment, resulting in steady demand for equipment at our auctions. That
being said, our customers so far do not appear to be having material difficulty accessing credit to
fund their auction purchases.
Although equipment prices generally trended down in the latter half of 2008, the decreases were not
dramatic in our opinion, and prices appear to have remained relatively stable to date in 2009. In
past downward cycles we have generally seen price decreases more than offset by increased
consignment volumes and a changing mix of equipment sold at our auctions. We have re-examined our
growth strategy, including operating and capital plans, and overall we continue to believe our
business model is well suited to current economic conditions. We also believe that designing and
executing our strategy will continue to be a more significant determinant of our ability to grow
our earnings than the macro economic environment, in part because our share of the world market for
used trucks and equipment is so small our growth is only partly dependent on, or impacted by,
growth or contraction in the broader used truck and equipment market.
Growth Strategies
Our long-term mission is to be the worlds largest marketplace for commercial and industrial
assets. Our principal goals are to grow our earnings per share at a manageable pace over the long
term while maintaining a reasonable return on invested capital, and to maintain and enhance the
Ritchie Bros. culture. Our preference is to pursue sustainable growth with a consistently high
level of customer service, rather than targeting aggressive growth and risking erosion of the
strong customer relationships and high level of customer service that we believe differentiate us
from our competitors.
To grow our business, we are focusing simultaneously on three different fronts, and we believe
these three key components of our strategy work in unison.
People are a key driver of our growth, and one of our key strategies is to build the team that
will help us achieve our goals. This includes recruiting, training and developing the right
people, as well as enhancing the productivity of our sales force and our administrative support
teams by giving them the tools and training they need to be effective. This component of our
strategy also includes active succession planning and leadership development, with a focus on
developing employees from within our company.
Our ability to recruit, train and retain capable new members for our sales team has a
significant influence on our rate of growth. Ours is a relationship business and our Territory
Managers are the main point of contact with our customers. We look for bright, hard-working
individuals with positive attitudes, and we are committed to providing our people with a great
workplace and opportunities to grow with the company and become future leaders of our global
team.
- 21 -
We intend to continue to expand our presence in existing markets and enter new markets, and to
expand our international auction site network to handle expected growth in our business. When
we talk about markets, we are referring to geographic markets and industry sectors.
Although we expect that most of our growth in the near future will come from expanding our
business and increasing our penetration in regions where we already have a presence, such as
the United States and Western Europe, we anticipate that emerging markets in developing
countries will be important in the longer term. Our sales offices in many of these emerging
markets have been established to position us to take advantage of these future growth
opportunities, and we anticipate continued investment in frontier markets in the future.
We plan to expand our worldwide network of auction sites, adding an average of at least two new
permanent auction sites or regional auction units to our network per year. In addition, we
will be expanding or replacing existing sites as necessary to facilitate increased sales
volumes. Our shorter-term focus for this expansion is the United States, Western Europe and
Asia. In addition, we intend to continue to hold offsite auctions in new regions to expand the
scope of our operations.
We also aim to increase our market share in our core markets of construction, transportation
and agricultural equipment, and to sell more assets in categories that are complementary to
these core markets. Examples of these complementary categories include mining, forestry and
petroleum assets.
We are committed to developing and continually refining the processes and systems that we use
to conduct our business. We believe that this continuous improvement focus will allow us to
grow our revenues faster than our operating costs in the future. We also intend to use
technology to facilitate our growth and enhance the quality and service level of our auctions.
Over the past few years, we have made significant progress in developing business processes and
systems that are efficient, consistent and scalable, including the successful implementation of
a new enterprise resource planning system.
We believe that these three components work together because our people help us to achieve our
growth objectives, our places give us focus areas for and the capacity to handle growth, and our
processes help us to achieve that growth with efficiency and consistency while continuing to
deliver value to our customers.
Operations
The majority of our industrial auctions are held at our permanent auction sites, where we own the
land and facilities, or at regional auction units, where we usually lease the land and typically
have more modest facilities. We also hold off-site auctions at temporary locations, often on land
owned by one of the main consignors to the particular auction. Most of our agricultural auctions
are off-site auctions that take place on the consignors farm. During the first six months of
2009, 90% of our gross auction proceeds was attributable to auctions held at our permanent auction
sites and regional auction units (first half of 2008 90%). Gross auction proceeds represent the
total proceeds from all items sold at our auctions (please see Sources of Revenue and Revenue
Recognition below).
During the first half of 2009, we conducted 92 unreserved industrial auctions at locations in North
America, Europe, the Middle East, and Australia (first half of 2008 92). We also held 98
unreserved agricultural auctions during the first half of 2009 in Canada (first half of 2008
110). Although our auctions have varied in size over the last 12 months, our average industrial
auction during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2009 attracted almost 1,700 bidder registrations
(12 months ended June 30, 2008 over 1,400) and featured over 1,400 lots (12 months ended June
30, 2008 over 1,300) consigned by 185
consignors (12 months ended June 30, 2008 193), generating average gross auction proceeds of
approximately $17.6 million per auction (12 months ended June 30, 2008 $17.8 million).
- 22 -
We sold almost $425 million of trucks, equipment, and other assets to online bidders during the
first half of 2009, representing a 15% increase compared to the first half of 2008 (first half of
2008 almost $370 million).
Approximately 55% of our auction revenues in the first half of 2009 was earned from operations in
the United States (first half of 2008 57%), 23% was generated from auctions in Canada (first
half of 2008 21%) and the remaining 22% was earned from auctions in countries other than the
United States and Canada, primarily in Europe, the Middle East, Australia, and Mexico (first half
of 2008 22%). We had 1,111 full-time employees at June 30, 2009, including 293 sales
representatives and 19 trainee territory managers, compared to 1,037 and 261 and 20, respectively,
at June 30, 2008.
We are a public company and our common shares are listed under the symbol RBA on the New York and
Toronto Stock Exchanges. On August 4, 2009, we had 105,203,820 common shares issued and
outstanding and stock options outstanding to purchase a total of 3,089,540 common shares. On April
24, 2008, our issued and outstanding common shares were split on a three-for-one basis. All share
and per share amounts in this document reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.
Sources of Revenue and Revenue Recognition
Gross auction proceeds represent the total proceeds from all items sold at our auctions. Our
definition of gross auction proceeds may differ from those used by other participants in our
industry. Gross auction proceeds is an important measure we use in comparing and assessing our
operating performance. It is not a measure of our financial performance, liquidity or revenue and
is not presented in our consolidated financial statements. We believe that auction revenues, which
is the most directly comparable measure in our Statement of Operations, and certain other line
items, are best understood by considering their relationship to gross auction proceeds. Auction
revenues represent the revenues we earn in the course of conducting our auctions. The portion of
our gross auction proceeds that we do not retain is remitted to our customers who consign the items
we sell at our auctions.
Auction revenues are comprised of auction commissions earned from consignors through straight
commission and guarantee contracts, net profits or losses on the sale of inventory items,
administrative and documentation fees on the sale of certain lots, auction advertising fees, and
the fees applicable to purchases made through our internet and proxy bidding systems. All revenue
is recognized when the auction sale is complete and we have determined that the auction proceeds
are collectible.
Straight commissions are our most common type of auction revenues and are generated by us when we
act as agent for consignors and earn a pre-negotiated, fixed commission rate on the gross sales
price of the consigned equipment at auction. In the last 5 years, straight commission sales have
represented approximately 75% of our gross auction proceeds volume on an annual basis.
In the normal course of business, we sometimes guarantee minimum sales proceeds to the consignor
and earn a commission based on the actual results of the auction, typically including a
pre-negotiated percentage of any sales proceeds in excess of the guaranteed amount. The consigned
equipment is sold on an unreserved basis in the same manner as other consignments. If the actual
auction proceeds are less than the guaranteed amount, our commission is reduced, and if the
proceeds are sufficiently less, we can incur a loss on the sale. We factor in a higher rate of
commission on these sales to compensate for the increased risk we assume.
Our financial exposure from guarantee contracts fluctuates over time, but in recent periods,
industrial and agricultural auction guarantees have had an average period of exposure (days
remaining until date of auction as at quarter-end) of approximately 30 days and 80 days,
respectively. At June 30, 2009, our outstanding industrial and agricultural guarantees totaled
approximately $25 million, of which approximately $19 million had already been sold at our auctions
as of the date of this discussion. The
combined financial exposure from guarantee contracts at any period end can fluctuate significantly
depending on the timing of auctions; however, the quarter-end balances averaged approximately $52
million over the last 12 months. Losses, if any, resulting from guarantee contracts are recorded
in the period in which the relevant auction is completed, unless the loss is incurred after the
period end but before the financial reporting date, in which case the loss is accrued in the
financial statements for the period end. In recent periods, guarantee contracts have represented
approximately 15% of gross auction proceeds on an annual basis.
- 23 -
Auction revenues also include the net profit or loss on the sale of inventory in cases where we
acquire ownership of equipment for a short time prior to an auction sale. We purchase equipment
for specific auctions and sell it at those auctions in the same manner as consigned equipment.
During the period that we retain ownership, the cost of the equipment is recorded as inventory on
our balance sheet. The net gain or loss on the sale is recorded as auction revenues. In recent
periods, inventory contracts have represented approximately 10% of gross auction proceeds on an
annual basis. We generally refer to our guarantee and outright purchase business as our
underwritten or at-risk business.
The choice by consignors between straight commission, guarantee, or outright purchase arrangements
depends on many factors, including the consignors risk tolerance and sale objectives. In
addition, we do not have a target for the relative mix of contracts. As a result, the mix of
contracts in a particular quarter or year fluctuates and is not necessarily indicative of the mix
in future periods. The composition of our auction revenues and our auction revenue rate (i.e.
auction revenues as a percentage of gross auction proceeds) are affected by the mix and performance
of contracts entered into with consignors in the particular period and fluctuate from period to
period. Our auction revenue rate performance is presented in the table below.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our comparative historical auction revenue rates have been reclassified to conform with the
presentation adopted in 2008. The revised presentation had an insignificant impact on auction
revenue rates for the periods 2004 through 2007. On an annual basis, the impact on auction
revenue rates during this period was in the range of one to 12 basis points. |
- 24 -
Prior to 2008, our expected average annual auction revenue rate was in the range of 9.50% to
10.00%. At the beginning of 2008, we made changes to certain of our existing fees charged to our
customers, including the minimum commission rate applicable to low value lots and the consignor
document administration fee. These fees were increased slightly to reflect increased costs of
conducting auctions. In addition, effective January 2008, we made certain reclassifications in our
Statement of Operations that affected our auction revenue rate, including the reclassifications of
interest income from auction revenues to other income and auction advertising fees and
documentation fees from direct expenses to auction revenues. These changes were made to improve
the presentation in our financial statements and had no impact on our reported net earnings. As a
result of the changes to our existing fees and the reclassifications, we increased our expected
annual average auction revenue rate to be in the range of 9.75% to 10.25%. However, our past
experience has shown that our auction revenue rate is difficult to estimate precisely, meaning our
actual auction revenue rate in future periods may be above or below our expected range. For the
first half of 2009, we achieved an auction revenue rate of 10.70% (first half of 2008 10.14%).
The increase compared to our experience in the first half of 2008 related primarily to the
performance of our underwritten business, which performed better in 2009 than in 2008. We continue
to expect our annual average auction revenue rate to be in the range of 9.75% to 10.25%.
The largest contributor to the variability of our auction revenue rate is the performance, rather
than the amount, of our underwritten business. In a period when our underwritten business performs
better than average, our auction revenue rate typically exceeds the expected average rate.
Conversely, if our underwritten business performs below average, our auction revenue rate will
typically be below the expected average rate.
Our gross auction proceeds and auction revenues are influenced by the seasonal nature of the
auction business, which is determined mainly by the seasonal nature of the construction and natural
resources
industries. Gross auction proceeds and auction revenues tend to be higher during the second and
fourth calendar quarters, during which time we generally conduct more business than in the first
and third calendar quarters. This seasonality contributes to quarterly variability in our net
earnings because a significant portion of our operating costs is relatively fixed.
Gross auction proceeds and auction revenues are also affected on a period-to-period basis by the
timing of major auctions. In newer markets where we are developing operations, the number and size
of auctions and, as a result, the level of gross auction proceeds and auction revenues, are likely
to vary more dramatically from period to period than in our established markets where the number,
size and frequency of our auctions are more consistent. In addition, economies of scale are
achieved as our operations in a region evolve from conducting intermittent auctions, to
establishing a regional auction unit, and ultimately to developing a permanent auction site.
Economies of scale are also achieved when our auctions increase in size.
Because of these seasonal and period-to-period variations, we believe that our gross auction
proceeds and auction revenues are best compared on an annual basis, rather than on a quarterly
basis.
Developments in 2009
Highlights of the first half of 2009 included:
|
|
Our sales force increased by 11% during the first half of 2009, demonstrating our success
in executing our people strategy. |
|
|
We broke regional gross auction proceeds records in Denver, Colorado; Houston, Texas;
Dubai, UAE; Moncofa, Spain; Paris, France; Edmonton, Alberta; and Montreal, Quebec. |
|
|
We held our first auctions at our replacement permanent auction sites in Houston, Texas;
Minneapolis, Minnesota; and our new permanent auction site in London, Ontario. |
|
|
We completed the purchase of approximately 62 acres of land in Caorso, Italy, on which we
intend to build a new permanent auction site to replace our existing regional auction unit in
that region. |
- 25 -
|
|
We completed the purchase of approximately 74 acres of land in Madrid, Spain, on which we
intend to build a new permanent auction site to complement our existing regional auction unit
in Moncofa, Spain. |
|
|
We completed the purchase of approximately 67 acres of land near St. Louis, Missouri, on
which we intend to build a new permanent auction site. |
|
|
We conducted our first auction at our new regional auction unit in Geelong, Australia,
which replaced our regional auction unit in Melbourne, Australia. |
|
|
We conducted our first auction at our new property near Mexico City, Mexico. We are in the
process of building a permanent auction facility on that property, which is expected to open
in the latter half of 2009. |
|
|
We extended the term of the lease on our regional auction unit in Las Vegas, Nevada to 25
years. |
|
|
We entered into an arrangement with uShip.com, the worlds largest online shipping
marketplace, to provide online shipping solutions to our customers participating in our U.S.
and Canadian auctions. |
|
|
We added new functionality to our online bidding service, which allows bidders to
participate remotely in more than one auction at a time. |
Overall Performance
During the first half of 2009, we recorded auction revenues of $204.1 million and net earnings of
$58.7 million, or $0.56 per diluted common share. This performance compares to auction revenues of
$197.2 million and net earnings of $62.3 million, or $0.59 per diluted share, during the first half
of 2008. We ended the first half of 2009 with working capital of $73.8 million, compared to $47.1
million at December 31, 2008.
Adjusted net earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $58.1 million, or $0.55 per
diluted share, which compares to adjusted net earnings of $53.2 million, or $0.50 per diluted share
for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We define adjusted net earnings as financial statement net
earnings excluding the after-tax effects of sales of excess properties and significant foreign
exchange gains or losses resulting from financing activities that we do not expect to recur in the
future (please see our reconciliation below).
Adjusted net earnings is a non-GAAP measure that does not have a standardized meaning, and is
therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. We believe
that comparing adjusted net earnings as defined above for different financial periods provides more
useful information about the growth or decline of our net earnings for the relevant financial
period, and identifies the impact of items which we do not consider to be part of our normal
operating results.
Our adjusted net earnings for the first half of 2009 grew by approximately 9% compared to the first
half of 2008 as a result of a stronger auction revenue rate combined with lower operating costs.
- 26 -
A reconciliation of our net earnings under Canadian GAAP to adjusted net earnings is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net earnings under Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
58,726 |
|
|
$ |
62,326 |
|
Gain on sale of excess property(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,304 |
) |
Net foreign
exchange impact on financing transactions(2) |
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
(1,988 |
) |
Tax relating to reconciling items |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net earnings |
|
$ |
58,062 |
|
|
$ |
53,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded a gain of $8,304 ($7,295, or $0.07
per diluted share, after tax) on the sale of our headquarters property in Richmond, British
Columbia. |
|
(2) |
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a foreign exchange gain of $759
($664, or $0.01 per diluted share, after tax) on United States dollar denominated bank debt
held by a subsidiary that has the Canadian dollar as its functional currency. The
equivalent amount in 2008 was a foreign exchange loss of $781 ($668, or $0.01 per diluted
share, after tax). We have highlighted this amount because in January 2009, the Canadian
subsidiary assigned the bank debt to an affiliate whose functional currency is the United
States dollar to eliminate the future impact of currency fluctuations. In addition, during
the first half of 2008, we reclassified to net earnings foreign currency translation gains
reported in the cumulated translation adjustment account of $2,769 ($2,467, or $0.02 per
diluted share, after tax) as a result of the settlement of a number of foreign currency
denominated intercompany loans that were considered long-term in nature. We did not settle
any long-term intercompany loans during the first half of 2009 that resulted in a
significant foreign exchange adjustment. We do not expect the foreign exchange gains or
losses on these financing transactions to recur in future periods. |
Results of Operations
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
We conduct operations around the world in a number of different currencies, but our reporting
currency is the United States dollar. In the first half of 2009, approximately 40% of our revenues
and approximately 50% of our operating costs were denominated in currencies other than the United
States dollar. The proportion of revenues denominated in currencies other than the United States
dollar in a given period will differ from the annual proportion depending on the size and location
of auctions held during the period.
The main currencies other than the United States dollar in which our revenues and operating costs
are denominated are the Canadian dollar and the Euro. In recent periods there have been
significant fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar and Euro relative to the United States
dollar. These fluctuations affect our reported auction revenues and operating expenses when
non-United States dollar amounts are converted into United States dollars for financial statement
reporting purposes. It is difficult, if not impossible, to quantify how foreign exchange rate
movements affect such variables as supply and demand for the assets we sell. However, excluding
these impacts, the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations on our translated auction revenues and
operating expenses in our consolidated financial statements has largely offset, making the impact
of the currency fluctuation on our net earnings insignificant. Excluding the foreign exchange
impacts on financing transactions discussed in Overall Performance above, our adjusted net
earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2009 included a $0.2 million pre-tax loss (first half of
2008 $0.5 million pre-tax gain) resulting from the revaluation and settlement of our foreign
currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities.
- 27 -
United States Dollar Exchange Rate Comparison
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
in U.S. $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average value of one U.S. dollar: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
$ |
1.2062 |
|
|
$ |
1.0070 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Euro |
|
|
0.7512 |
|
|
|
0.6536 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Auction Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
204,134 |
|
|
$ |
197,216 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Gross auction proceeds |
|
$ |
1,907,622 |
|
|
$ |
1,945,515 |
|
|
|
-2 |
% |
Auction revenue rate |
|
|
10.70 |
% |
|
|
10.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Our auction revenues increased in the first half of 2009 compared to the equivalent period in 2008
primarily as a result of a higher auction revenue rate, partially offset by slightly lower gross
auction proceeds and the impact of currency fluctuations. Our underwritten business (guarantee and
inventory contracts) represented 19% of our total gross auction proceeds in the first six months of
2009 (first six months of 2008 27%). As discussed above under Sources of Revenue and Revenue
Recognition, we do not have a target for the relative mix of contracts. The mix of contracts
experienced in the first half of 2009 was driven by our consignors risk tolerance and sale
objectives, and is not necessarily indicative of the mix in future periods or a trend. Our 2009
first half gross auction proceeds in local currency, being the United States, Canadian and
Australian dollar and the Euro, increased by 6% compared to the first half of 2008.
Our auction revenue rate for the first half of 2009 was 10.70%, which was higher than our expected
range of 9.75% to 10.25%. The increase compared to our experience in the first half of 2008
related primarily to the performance of our underwritten business, which performed better in 2009
than in 2008. We continue to believe our sustainable average auction revenue rate will be in the
range of 9.75% to 10.25%, although our experience has shown that our auction revenue rate is
difficult to estimate precisely. Our actual auction revenue rate in future periods may be above or
below our expected range.
Our auction revenues and our net earnings are influenced to a great extent by small changes in our
auction revenue rate. For example, a 10 basis point (0.1%) increase or decrease in our auction
revenue rate during the first six months of 2009 would have impacted auction revenues by
approximately $1.9 million, of which approximately $1.3 million or $0.01 per common share would
have flowed through to net earnings after tax in our statement of operations, assuming no other
changes. This factor is important to consider when evaluating our current and past performance, as
well as when assessing future prospects.
- 28 -
Direct Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses |
|
$ |
24,966 |
|
|
$ |
26,496 |
|
|
|
-6 |
% |
Direct expenses as a percentage of gross auction proceeds |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses are the costs we incur specifically to conduct an auction. Direct expenses include
the costs of hiring temporary personnel to work at the auction, advertising costs directly related
to the auction, travel costs for employees to attend and work at the auction, security hired to
safeguard equipment at the auction site and rental expenses for temporary auction sites. At each
quarter end, we estimate the direct expenses incurred with respect to auctions completed near the
end of the period. In the subsequent quarter, these accruals are adjusted, to the extent
necessary, to reflect actual costs incurred.
Our direct expense rate, which represents direct expenses as a percentage of gross auction
proceeds, fluctuates from period to period based in part on the size and location of the auctions
we hold during a particular period. The direct expense rate generally decreases as the average
size of our auctions increases. In addition, we usually experience lower direct expense rates for
auctions held at our permanent auction sites compared to auctions held at offsite locations, mainly
as a result of the economies of scale and other efficiencies that we typically experience at
permanent auction sites. Our direct expense rate for the first half of 2009 is comparable to the
rate for the first half of 2008.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
14,596 |
|
|
$ |
11,587 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Depreciation is calculated on either a straight line or a declining balance basis on capital assets
employed in our business, including buildings, computer hardware and software, automobiles and yard
equipment. Depreciation increased in the first half of 2009 compared to the first half of 2008 as
a result of depreciation relating to new assets that we have put into service in recent periods,
such as our new permanent auction sites in London, Ontario; Kansas City, Missouri; Paris, France;
Houston, Texas; and Minneapolis, Minnesota; and new computer hardware and software. We expect our
depreciation in future periods to increase in line with our on-going capital expenditures.
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
81,202 |
|
|
$ |
84,927 |
|
|
|
-4 |
% |
General and administrative expenses, or G&A, include such expenditures as personnel (salaries,
wages, bonuses and benefits), information technology, non-auction related travel, repairs and
maintenance, leases and rentals and utilities. G&A expenses exclude foreign exchange gains or
losses resulting from the revaluation and settlement of monetary assets and liabilities which was
reclassified to other income at the end of 2008. Our G&A for the period ended June 30, 2008 has
been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted in 2008.
Foreign currency fluctuations resulted in a decrease in our G&A of approximately $8.4 million in
the first half of 2009 compared to the first half of 2008 in connection with the translation into
United States dollars for reporting purposes of our foreign operations G&A expenses.
- 29 -
Our ongoing investments in our people, places and processes continued to contribute to the growth
in our gross auction proceeds in local currency and adjusted earnings during the first half of
2009. Our future success is dependent upon adding people to grow our business, building the places
required to handle our anticipated future growth, and developing and implementing processes to help
gain efficiencies and ensure consistency. Our sales force and administrative support teams are
instrumental in carrying out these building and development programs and are necessary to
facilitate and accommodate that growth. Personnel costs are the largest component of our G&A, and
our workforce increased 7% between June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008. Our ongoing expansion will
continue to influence future levels of G&A.
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
|
-56 |
% |
Interest expense is comprised mainly of interest paid on long-term debt and revolving credit
facilities. Interest expense decreased in the first half of 2009 compared to the same period in
2008 primarily due to an increase in the amount of interest we capitalized to property under
development.
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
2,346 |
|
|
|
-48 |
% |
Interest income, which is earned on our excess cash balances invested in conservative and liquid
investments, is significantly affected by market interest rates. In recent periods, market
interest rates in Canada and the United States have decreased dramatically, which resulted in a
decrease in our interest income. In addition, our interest income can fluctuate from period to
period depending on our cash position, which is affected by the timing, size and number of auctions
held during the period, as well as the timing of the receipt of auction proceeds from buyers and
payments to consignors.
Foreign exchange gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain |
|
$ |
530 |
|
|
$ |
2,445 |
|
|
|
-78 |
% |
Foreign exchange gains or losses arise when foreign currency denominated monetary items are
revalued to the exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. The gain or loss recognized in
any given period is affected by changes in foreign exchange rates as well as the composition of our
foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. In the first half of 2008, the foreign
exchange gain included the reclassification of foreign exchange translation gains of $2.8 million
previously recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account as a result of the settlement
of a number of foreign currency denominated intercompany loans that had been considered long-term
(see discussion under Overall Performance). We did not settle any intercompany loans in 2009
that resulted in a significant foreign exchange adjustment.
- 30 -
Gain (loss) on Disposition of Capital Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on disposition of capital
assets |
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
$ |
7,310 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
The gain on disposition of capital assets in the first half of 2008 included a $8.3 million gain
recorded on the sale of our headquarters property located in Richmond, British Columbia, partially
offset by the write off of costs incurred on a property development project that was no longer
considered viable. There were no significant asset dispositions in 2009.
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
26,769 |
|
|
$ |
24,144 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
27.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes have been estimated using the tax rates in effect in each of the tax jurisdictions in
which we earn our income. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was higher
than the rate we experienced in the first half of 2008 as a result of adjustments recorded in 2008
to reflect our actual cash tax expenses arising from our 2007 tax filings, and a higher proportion
of our earnings being taxed in higher tax rate jurisdictions in 2009 compared to 2008. Income tax
rates in future periods will fluctuate depending upon the impact of unusual items and the level of
earnings in the different tax jurisdictions in which we earn our income.
Net Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
58,726 |
|
|
$ |
62,326 |
|
|
|
-6 |
% |
Net earnings per share basic |
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
-7 |
% |
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
-5 |
% |
Our net earnings in the first half of 2009 decreased compared to the equivalent period in 2008 due
to the gains on sale of the headquarters property in 2008, offset by a higher auction revenue rate
and lower operating costs achieved in 2009. Adjusted net earnings (see discussion above under
Overall Performance) for the first half of 2009 were $58.1 million, or $0.55 per diluted share,
compared to adjusted net earnings of $53.2 million, or $0.50 per diluted share in the first half of
2008, representing a 9% increase in 2009. Adjusted net earnings in the first half of 2009 were
higher compared to the first half of 2008 due to an increase in our auction revenue rate, and lower
operating costs.
- 31 -
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
United States Dollar Exchange Rate Comparison
The proportion of revenues and expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States
dollars in a given period will differ from the annual proportion depending on the size and location
of auctions held during the period, but is usually roughly consistent with the rates we expect to
experience on a full year basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change |
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
in
U.S. $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average value of one U.S. dollar: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
$ |
1.1672 |
|
|
$ |
1.0100 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Euro |
|
|
0.7343 |
|
|
|
0.6400 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Auction Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
120,459 |
|
|
$ |
115,822 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Gross auction proceeds |
|
$ |
1,109,331 |
|
|
$ |
1,163,546 |
|
|
|
-5 |
% |
Auction revenue rate |
|
|
10.86 |
% |
|
|
9.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The increase in auction revenues in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the equivalent period in
2008 was due to a higher auction revenue rate, offset by slightly lower gross auction proceeds.
Our underwritten business represented 22% of gross auction proceeds in the second quarter of 2009
(second quarter of 2008 31%), which is within the range we have experienced in recent periods.
The mix of contracts experienced in the second quarter of 2009 was driven by our consignors risk
tolerance and sale objectives, and is not necessarily indicative of the mix in future periods or a
trend. As discussed above under Sources of Revenue and Revenue Recognition, we do not have a
target for the relative mix of contracts.
Direct Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses |
|
$ |
16,113 |
|
|
$ |
16,381 |
|
|
|
-2 |
% |
Direct expenses as a percentage of
gross auction proceeds |
|
|
1.45 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Our direct expense rate fluctuates from period to period based in part on the size and location of
the auctions we hold during a particular period. Our direct expense rate in the second quarter of
2009 was comparable to our rate in the second quarter of 2008.
- 32 -
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
7,607 |
|
|
$ |
5,983 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization in the second quarter of 2009 increased compared to the second
quarter of 2008 as a result of depreciation relating to new assets that we have put into service in
recent periods, such as new auction facilities and computer hardware and software.
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
41,384 |
|
|
$ |
42,778 |
|
|
|
-3 |
% |
The decrease in our G&A was due to operating efficiencies and currency fluctuations, offset by our
increased headcount. Our workforce grew by 7% between June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009, which
resulted in higher personnel costs for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The stronger United States
dollar during the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008 resulted in a
decrease of approximately $3.6 million in our G&A when our foreign operations expenses were
translated into our reporting currency, the United States dollar.
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
601 |
|
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
|
-43 |
% |
The decrease in interest income during the second quarter of 2009 was due to a decrease in market
interest rates in 2009 compared to 2008.
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
$ |
(167 |
) |
|
$ |
1,887 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Foreign exchange gains or losses arise when foreign currency denominated monetary items are
revalued to the exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. The gain or loss recognized in
any given period is affected by changes in foreign exchange rates as well as the composition of our
foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. In the second quarter of 2008, the foreign
exchange gain included the reclassification of foreign exchange translation gains of $0.7 million
previously recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account as a result of the settlement
of a number of foreign currency denominated intercompany loans that had been considered long-term
(see discussion under Overall Performance). We did not settle any intercompany loans in 2009
that resulted in a significant foreign exchange adjustment.
- 33 -
Gain (loss) on Disposition of Capital Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on disposition of capital
assets |
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
7,217 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
The gain on disposition of capital assets in the first half of 2008 included a $8.3 million gain
recorded on the sale of our headquarters property located in Richmond, British Columbia, partially
offset by the write off of costs incurred on a property development project that was no longer
considered viable. There were no significant asset dispositions in the second quarter of 2009.
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
17,226 |
|
|
$ |
15,216 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes have been estimated using the tax rates in effect in each of the tax jurisdictions in
which we earn our income. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was higher
than the rate we experienced in the same quarter in 2008 as a result of adjustments recorded in the
second quarter of 2008 to reflect our actual cash tax expenses arising from our 2007 income tax
filings. In addition, the gain recorded in the second quarter of 2008 on the sale of our
headquarters property was subject to a lower tax rate. Income tax rates in future periods will
fluctuate depending upon the impact of any unusual items and the level of earnings in the different
tax jurisdictions in which we earn our income.
Net Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
38,847 |
|
|
$ |
45,919 |
|
|
|
-15 |
% |
Net earnings per share basic |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
-16 |
% |
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
-14 |
% |
Net earnings in the second quarter of 2009 were lower than our net earnings in the comparable
period in 2008 primarily as a result of the sale of our headquarters property in 2008. Adjusted
net earnings (see discussion above under Overall Performance) for the second quarter of 2009 were
$38.8 million, or $0.37 per diluted share, compared to adjusted net earnings of $37.9 million, or
$0.36 per diluted share in the second quarter of 2008, representing a 2% increase in 2009.
Adjusted net earnings in the second quarter 2009 were higher compared to the equivalent period in
2008 due to an increase in our auction revenue rate, and lower operating costs.
A reconciliation of our net earnings under Canadian GAAP to adjusted net earnings is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net earnings under Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
38,847 |
|
|
$ |
45,919 |
|
Gain on sale of excess property(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,304 |
) |
Net foreign
exchange impact on financing transactions(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(885 |
) |
Tax relating to reconciling items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net earnings |
|
$ |
38,847 |
|
|
$ |
37,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded a gain of $8,304 ($7,295, or
$0.07 per diluted share, after tax) on the sale of our headquarters property in Richmond,
British Columbia. |
- 34 -
|
|
|
(2) |
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded a foreign exchange gain of
$205 ($175, or less than $0.01 per diluted share, after tax) on United States dollar
denominated bank debt held by a subsidiary that has the Canadian dollar as its functional
currency. We have highlighted this amount because in January 2009, the Canadian
subsidiary assigned the bank debt to an affiliate whose functional currency is the United
States dollar to eliminate the future impact of currency fluctuations. No amounts were
recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2009. In addition, during the second quarter
of 2008, we reclassified to net earnings foreign currency translation gains reported in
the cumulated translation adjustment account of $680 ($507, or less than $0.01 per diluted
share, after tax) as a result of the settlement of a number of foreign currency
denominated intercompany loans that were considered long-term in nature. We did not
settle any long-term intercompany loans during the second quarter of 2009 that resulted in
a significant foreign exchange adjustment. We do not expect the foreign exchange gains or
losses on these financing transactions to recur in future periods. |
Summary of Quarterly Results
The following tables present our unaudited consolidated quarterly results of operations for each of
our last eight fiscal quarters. This data has been derived from our unaudited consolidated
financial statements, which were prepared on the same basis as our annual audited consolidated
financial statements and, in our opinion, include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for
the fair presentation of such information. These unaudited quarterly results should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, and our discussion above about the seasonality of our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2009 |
|
|
Q1 2009 |
|
|
Q4 2008 |
|
|
Q3 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross auction proceeds (1) |
|
$ |
1,109,331 |
|
|
$ |
798,291 |
|
|
$ |
853,927 |
|
|
$ |
767,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
120,459 |
|
|
$ |
83,675 |
|
|
$ |
81,693 |
|
|
$ |
75,909 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
38,847 |
|
|
|
19,879 |
(2) |
|
|
27,140 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
11,934 |
(2) |
Adjusted net earnings |
|
|
38,847 |
|
|
|
19,215 |
|
|
|
19,222 |
|
|
|
13,025 |
|
|
Net earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Adjusted net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2008 |
|
|
Q1 2008 |
|
|
Q4 2007 |
|
|
Q3 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross auction proceeds (1) |
|
$ |
1,163,546 |
|
|
$ |
781,969 |
|
|
$ |
873,306 |
|
|
$ |
667,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
115,822 |
|
|
$ |
81,394 |
|
|
$ |
82,129 |
(5) |
|
$ |
67,174 |
(5) |
Net earnings |
|
|
45,919 |
(2)(3)(4) |
|
|
16,407 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
16,966 |
(2) |
|
|
14,903 |
(2) |
Adjusted net earnings |
|
|
37,942 |
|
|
|
15,290 |
|
|
|
16,945 |
|
|
|
13,161 |
|
|
Net earnings per share basic(6) |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted(6) |
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
Adjusted net earnings per share
diluted(6) |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Gross auction proceeds represents the total proceeds from all items sold at our
auctions. Gross auction proceeds is not a measure of revenue and is not presented in our
consolidated financial statements. Please see further discussion above under Sources of
Revenue and Revenue Recognition. |
- 35 -
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Net earnings included the impact of foreign exchange on United States dollar
denominated bank debt held by a Canadian subsidiary, which was assigned in January 2009 to
an affiliate whose functional currency is the United States dollar to eliminate the impact
of currency fluctuations on this debt in future periods. Please see further discussion
above under Overall Performance. The foreign exchange impact of this bank debt in the
first quarter of 2009 was a $759 gain ($664, or $0.01 per diluted share, after tax). The
impact in the fourth, third, second and first quarters of 2008 was a $3,778 loss ($3,230,
or $0.03 per diluted share, after tax), a $1,276 loss ($1,091, or $0.01 per diluted share,
after tax), a $205 gain ($175, or less than $0.01 per diluted share, after tax), and a
$986 loss ($843, or $0.01 per diluted share, after tax), respectively. The impact in the
fourth and third quarters of 2007 was a $24 gain ($21, or less than $0.01 per diluted
share, after tax), and a $2,039 gain ($1,742, or $0.02 per diluted share, after tax). |
|
(3) |
|
Net earnings in the fourth quarter of 2008 included the reclassification of foreign
currency translation gain of $12,254 ($11,148, or $0.11 per diluted share, after tax)
relating to the settlement of foreign currency denominated intercompany loans. Amounts
included in the second and first quarters of 2008 were $680 ($507, or less than $0.01 per
diluted share, after tax) and $2,089 ($1,960, or $0.02 per diluted share, after tax)
respectively. We have highlighted these amounts as we do not expect these items to recur
in future periods. |
|
(4) |
|
Net earnings in the second quarter of 2008 included a gain of $8,304 recorded on the
sale of our headquarters property in Richmond, British Columbia ($7,295, or $0.07 per
basic and diluted share, after tax). Excluding this amount, net earnings would have been
$38,624, or $0.37 per basic and diluted share. |
|
(5) |
|
Auction revenues have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted in
2008. Please see discussion above under Sources of Revenue and Revenue Recognition. |
|
(6) |
|
Net earnings per share amounts have been adjusted on a retroactive basis to reflect
the April 24, 2008 three-for-one stock split. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
73,833 |
|
|
$ |
47,109 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
Our cash position can fluctuate significantly from period to period, largely as a result of
differences in the timing, size and number of auctions, the timing of the receipt of auction
proceeds from buyers, and the timing of the payment of net amounts due to consignors. We generally
collect auction proceeds from buyers within seven days of the auction and pay out auction proceeds
to consignors approximately 21 days following an auction. If auctions are conducted near a period
end, we may hold cash in respect of those auctions that will not be paid to consignors until after
the period end. Accordingly, we believe that working capital, including cash, is a more meaningful
measure of our liquidity than cash alone. For the six months ended June 30 2009, our working
capital increased by $26,724, mostly as a result of our positive operating results and the
incurrence of debt, offset by our capital expenditures.
There are a number of factors that could potentially impact our working capital, such as current
global economic conditions, which may affect the financial stability of our buyers and their
ability to pay on a timely basis. However, we have substantial borrowing capacity in the event of
any temporary working capital requirements. As at June 30, 2009, we had $489 million of unused
credit facilities, which includes a $168 million five-year committed revolving credit facility
expiring in January 2014, and a $198 million three-year uncommitted non-revolving credit facility
expiring in November 2011. We believe our existing working capital and established credit
facilities are sufficient to satisfy our present operating requirements, as well as to fund future
growth initiatives, such as property acquisitions and development. Our access to capital resources
has not been impacted by the current credit environment, and we do not expect that the current
economic environment will have a material adverse impact on our capital resources or our business.
However, there can be no assurance that the cost or availability of future borrowings under our
credit facilities will not be affected should there be a prolonged capital market disruption.
- 36 -
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
$ |
204,148 |
|
|
$ |
127,426 |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
Investing |
|
|
(82,976 |
) |
|
|
(33,024 |
) |
|
|
151 |
% |
Financing |
|
|
35,778 |
|
|
|
(4,526 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
Similar to the discussion above concerning our cash position, our cash provided by operations can
fluctuate significantly from period to period, largely as a result of differences in the timing,
size and number of auctions during the period, the timing of the receipt of auction proceeds from
buyers, and the timing of the payment of net amounts due to consignors. Therefore, we do not
believe that the change in our cash position provided by operations during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 is indicative of a trend.
Capital asset additions were $79.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $52.7
million in the equivalent period of 2008. Our capital expenditures in the first half of 2009
related primarily to the acquisition of land in Caorso, Italy; Madrid Spain and St. Louis,
Missouri; the expansion of our existing permanent auction site in Orlando, Florida and the
construction of our new permanent auction sites and regional auction units in Houston, Texas; Las
Vegas, Nevada; Grande Prairie, Alberta; Chilliwack, British Columbia; Mexico City, Mexico; and
Tokyo, Japan. Capital asset additions also included investments in computer software and hardware
as part of our process improvement initiatives. Exchange rate changes relating to capital assets
held in currencies other than the United States dollar, which are not reflected as capital assets
additions on the consolidated statements of cash flows, resulted in an increase of $7.1 million in
the capital assets reported on our consolidated balance sheet as at June 30, 2009, compared to an
increase of $2.8 million as at June 30, 2008.
Based on our most recent review of our auction site development and process improvement
initiatives, we expect that our annual capital expenditures will be in the range of $160 million in
2009 and in the range of $100 million per year for the next several years thereafter, which is less
than our previous guidance of roughly $150 million per year for the next several years. The
reduced guidance reflects our current view of opportunities and timing of projects. We still
intend to add auction facilities in selected locations around the world as appropriate
opportunities arise, either to replace existing facilities or to establish new sites. We plan to
add an average of at least two new permanent auction sites or regional auction units to our network
per year, as well as a number of replacement facilities. Actual expenditures will vary depending
on the availability and cost of suitable expansion opportunities and prevailing business and
economic conditions. Depending on the scope of the required system improvements, the process
improvement expenditures will likely be primarily for hardware, the development, purchase and
implementation of software, and related systems. We expect to fund future capital expenditures
from operating cash flows and credit facilities.
During the first half of 2009, we provided a secured loan of $5.3 million with market terms to a
lessor with whom we have a long-term property lease. The loan is repayable in monthly installments
of principal and interest, with the balance due in March 2013. The loan is secured by the
underlying property and a neighbouring property.
We declared and paid regular quarterly cash dividends of $0.09 per share for each of the quarters
ended December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009. The payments of the above-mentioned dividends were
made in the first half of 2009 and the total dividend payments for the first half of 2009 were
$18.9 million compared to total dividend payments of $16.7 million in the first half of 2008. All
dividends we pay are eligible dividends for Canadian income tax purposes unless indicated
otherwise.
- 37 -
Long-term Debt and Credit Facilities
Our long-term debt and available credit facilities at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion
of long-term debt) |
|
$ |
120,637 |
|
|
$ |
67,411 |
|
|
|
79 |
% |
|
Revolving credit facilities total
available: |
|
$ |
317,519 |
|
|
$ |
287,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities total unused: |
|
$ |
290,868 |
|
|
$ |
262,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-revolving credit facilities total
available: |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-revolving credit facilities total
unused: |
|
$ |
198,418 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total unused credit facilities |
|
$ |
489,286 |
|
|
$ |
512,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
Our credit facilities are with financial institutions in the United States, Canada, The Netherlands
and The United Kingdom. Certain of the facilities include commitment fees applicable to the unused
credit amount. As at June 30, 2009, we had fixed rate and floating rate long-term debt bearing
interest rates ranging from 2.25% to 6.385%. We were in compliance with all financial covenants
applicable to our debt at June 30, 2009. Our long term debt and credit facilities have increased
in the six months ended June 30, 2009 in order to fund our auction site development initiatives.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Although we cannot accurately anticipate the future effect of inflation on our financial condition
or results of operations, inflation historically has not had a material impact on our operations.
Because we conduct operations in local currencies in countries around the world, yet have the
United States dollar as our reporting currency, we are exposed to currency fluctuations and
exchange rate risk on all operations conducted in currencies other than the United States dollar.
We cannot accurately predict the future effects of foreign currency fluctuations on our financial
condition or results of operations, or quantify their effects on the macroeconomic environment.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, approximately 40% of our revenues were earned in currencies
other than the United States dollar and approximately 50% of our operating costs were denominated
in currencies other than the United States dollar. The proportion of revenues denominated in
currencies other than the United States dollar in a given period will differ from the annual
proportion depending on the size and location of auctions held during the period. However, on an
annual basis, we expect these amounts to substantially offset and generally act as a natural hedge
against exposure to fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar. We have not adopted a
long-term hedging strategy to protect against foreign currency fluctuations associated with our
operations denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar, but we may consider
hedging specific transactions if we deem it appropriate in the future.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded an increase in our foreign currency
translation adjustment balance of $5.3 million, compared to an increase of $3.6 million in the
first six months of 2008. Our foreign currency translation adjustment arises from the translation
of our net assets denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar into our reporting
currency. Changes in this balance arise primarily from the strengthening or weakening of
non-United States currencies against the United States dollar.
We have not experienced significant interest rate exposure historically, as our long-term debt
generally bears fixed rates of interest. However, borrowings under our new five-year global
revolving credit facility are only available at floating rates of interest. If our portfolio of
floating rate debt increases, we may
consider the use of interest rate swaps to mitigate our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. As
at
June 30, 2009, we had a total of $26.7 million (December 31, 2008 $25.4 million) in revolving
loans bearing floating rates of interest.
- 38 -
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Legal and Other Proceedings
From time to time we have been, and expect to continue to be, subject to legal proceedings and
claims in the ordinary course of our business. Such claims, even if lacking merit, could result in
the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. We are not aware of any legal
proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material
adverse effect on us or on our financial condition or results of operations or that involve a claim
for damages, excluding interest and costs, in excess of 10% of our current assets.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
On January 1, 2009, we adopted The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Handbook Section
3064, Goodwill and Intangible Assets. Section 3064 establishes new standards for the recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure of goodwill and intangible assets. The adoption of Section
3064 had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Other than our adoption of the new standard described above, there have been no significant changes
in our critical accounting policies and estimates since our Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations as at and for the year ended December 31, 2008, which
is included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 40-F.
International Financial Reporting Standards
In February 2008, the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Accounting Standards Board
confirmed its strategy of replacing Canadian GAAP with International Financial Reporting Standards
(or IFRS) for Canadian publicly accountable enterprises. IFRS will be effective for our interim
and annual financial statements effective January 1, 2011. The conversion to IFRS will impact our
accounting policies, information technology and data systems, internal control over financial
reporting, and financial statement presentation and disclosure. The transition may also impact our
operations, including such areas as contractual arrangements, debt covenants, and compensation
arrangements.
We commenced our IFRS conversion project in 2007 and have established a conversion plan and an IFRS
project team. We have identified the standards that may have an impact on our financial
statements, business processes and systems, and have completed our detailed analysis of the
standards, including the evaluation of policy choices. We have conducted initial training sessions
targeted to various levels of our organization.
We are currently performing a detailed assessment of the qualitative and quantitative impact of
IFRS on our accounting policies and the impact of the IFRS transitional exemption options. We
expect to finalize this assessment and the preparation of draft financial statements during the
fourth quarter of 2009. In addition, we will be identifying the impacts on our business processes,
our information systems, and our people during that period.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, continuing into 2010, we intend to examine the design of our
business, reporting and system processes to support the compilation of IFRS compliant financial
data for our opening
IFRS balance sheet and subsequent IFRS financial statements. We will also be performing training,
testing of our internal control environment and determining updated processes for disclosure
controls and procedures.
- 39 -
We are continuing to assess the financial reporting impacts of the adoption of IFRS, and at this
time, the impact on our future financial position or results of operations is not reasonably
determinable, as the International Accounting Standard Board will continue to issue new accounting
standards during the period leading up to the changeover date.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the six months
ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on
current expectations and estimates about our business, and include, among others, statements
relating to:
|
|
|
our future performance; |
|
|
|
growth of our operations; |
|
|
|
growth of the world market for used trucks and equipment; |
|
|
|
increases in the number of consignors and bidders participating in our auctions; |
|
|
|
the impact of the current economic environment on our operations and capital resources,
and our customers, including the number of bidders and buyers attending our auctions and
consignment volumes at those auctions; the demand for our services during challenging
economic times and equipment at our auctions; our bidders ability to access credit to
fund their purchases; the impact of the economic environment on equipment prices, risk and
our business model; |
|
|
|
our principal operating strengths, our competitive advantages, and the appeal of our
auctions to buyers and sellers of industrial assets; |
|
|
|
our ability to draw consistently significant numbers of local and international
end-user bidders to our auctions; |
|
|
|
our long-term mission to be the worlds largest marketplace for commercial and
industrial assets; |
|
|
|
our people, including our ability to recruit, train, retain and develop the right
people to help us achieve our goals and sales force increases; |
|
|
|
our places, including: our ability to add the capacity necessary to accommodate our
growth; our ability to increase our market share in our core markets and regions and our
ability to expand into complimentary market sectors and new geographic markets, including
our ability to take advantage of growth opportunities in emerging markets; and the
acquisition and development of auction facilities and the related impact on our capital
expenditures; |
|
|
|
our processes, including our process improvement and system continuity initiatives,
and their effect on our business, results of operations and capital expenditures,
particularly our ability to grow revenues faster than operating costs; |
|
|
|
the relative percentage of gross auction proceeds represented by straight commission,
guarantee and inventory contracts; |
- 40 -
|
|
|
our auction revenue rates, the sustainability of those rates, and the impact of our
commission rate and fee changes implemented in 2008, as well as the seasonality of gross
auction proceeds and auction revenues; |
|
|
|
our direct expense and income tax rates, depreciation expenses and general and
administrative expenses; |
|
|
|
our future capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
our internet initiatives and the level of participation in our auctions by internet
bidders; |
|
|
|
the proportion of our revenues and operating costs denominated in currencies other than
the United States dollar or the effect of any currency exchange and interest rate
fluctuations on our results of operations; and |
|
|
|
financing available to us and the sufficiency of our working capital to meet our
financial needs. |
Forward-looking statements are typically identified by such words as anticipate, believe,
could, continue, estimate, expect, intend, may, ongoing, plan, potential,
predict, will, future, period to period, long-term, or the negative of these terms, and
similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions that are difficult to predict. While we have not described all potential risks related
to our business and owning our common shares, the important factors listed under Risk Factors
below are those that we consider may affect our performance significantly or could cause our actual
financial and operational results to differ significantly from our predictions. Except as required
by applicable securities law and regulations of relevant securities exchanges, we do not intend to
update publicly any forward-looking statements, even if our predictions have been affected by new
information, future events or other developments. You should consider our forward-looking
statements in light of these and other relevant factors.
Risk Factors
Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and our past performance is no
guarantee of our performance in future periods. Some of the more important risks that we face are
outlined below and holders of our common shares should consider these risks. The risks and
uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair
our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of
operations and financial condition would suffer.
We may incur losses as a result of our guarantee and outright purchase contracts and advances to
consignors.
In recent periods, approximately 75% of our business is conducted on a straight commission basis.
In certain other situations we will either offer to:
|
|
|
guarantee a minimum level of sale proceeds to the consignor, regardless of the ultimate
selling price of the consignment at the auction; or |
|
|
|
purchase the equipment outright from the consignor for sale in a particular auction. |
The level of guaranteed proceeds or inventory purchase price is based on appraisals performed on
equipment by our internal personnel. Inaccurate appraisals could result in guarantees or inventory
values that exceed the realizable auction proceeds. If auction proceeds are less than the
guaranteed amount, our commission will be reduced or, if sufficiently lower, we will incur a loss.
If auction proceeds are less than the purchase price we paid for equipment that we take into
inventory temporarily, we will incur a loss. Because all of our auctions are unreserved, there is
no way for us to protect against these types of losses by bidding on or acquiring any of the items
at the auction. In recent periods, guarantee and inventory contracts have generally represented
approximately 25% of our annual gross auction proceeds.
- 41 -
Occasionally we advance to consignors a portion of the estimated auction proceeds prior to the
auction. We generally make these advances only after taking possession of the assets to be
auctioned and upon receipt of a security interest in the assets to secure the obligation. If we
were unable to auction the assets or if auction proceeds were less than amounts advanced, we could
incur a loss.
We may incur losses if we are required to make payments to buyers and lienholders because we are
unable to deliver clear title on the assets sold at our auctions.
In jurisdictions where title registries are commercially available, we guarantee to our buyers that
each item purchased at our auctions is free of liens and other encumbrances, up to the purchase
price paid at our auction. If we are unable to deliver clear title, we provide the buyer with a
full refund of the purchase price. While we exercise considerable effort to ensure that all liens
have been identified and, if necessary, discharged prior to the auction, we occasionally do not
properly identify or discharge liens and have had to make payments to the relevant lienholders or
purchasers. We will incur a loss if we are unable to recover sufficient funds from the consignors
to offset these payments, and aggregate losses from these payments could be material.
We may have difficulties sustaining and managing our growth.
One of the main elements of our strategy is to continue to grow our business, primarily by
increasing our presence in markets in which we already operate and by expanding into new geographic
markets and market segments in which we have not had a significant presence in the past. As part of
this strategy, we may from time to time acquire additional assets or businesses from third parties.
We may not be successful in growing our business or in managing this growth. For us to grow our
business successfully, we need to accomplish a number of objectives, including:
|
|
|
recruiting and retaining suitable sales personnel; |
|
|
|
identifying and developing new geographic markets and market sectors; |
|
|
|
identifying and acquiring, on terms favourable to us, suitable land on which to build
new auction facilities and, potentially, businesses that might be appropriate acquisition
targets; |
|
|
|
managing expansion successfully; |
|
|
|
obtaining necessary financing on terms favourable to us, and securing the availability
of our credit facilities to fund our growth initiatives; |
|
|
|
receiving necessary authorizations and approvals from governments for proposed
development or expansion; |
|
|
|
integrating successfully new facilities and any acquired businesses into our existing
operations; |
|
|
|
achieving acceptance of the auction process in general by potential consignors, bidders
and buyers; |
|
|
|
establishing and maintaining favourable relationships with consignors, bidders and
buyers in new markets and market sectors, and maintaining these relationships in our
existing markets; |
|
|
|
succeeding against local and regional competitors in new geographic markets; |
|
|
|
capitalizing on changes in the supply of and demand for industrial assets, in our
existing and new markets; and |
|
|
|
designing and implementing business processes and operating systems that are able to
support profitable growth. |
- 42 -
We will likely need to hire additional employees to manage our growth. In addition, growth may
increase the geographic scope of our operations and increase demands on both our operating and
financial systems. These factors will increase our operating complexity and the level of
responsibility of existing and new management personnel. It may be difficult for us to attract and
retain qualified sales personnel, managers and employees, and our existing operating and financial
systems and controls may not be adequate to support our growth. We may not be able to improve our
systems and controls as a result of increased costs, technological challenges, or lack of qualified
employees. Our past results and growth may not be indicative of our future prospects or our ability
to expand into new markets, many of which may have different competitive conditions and demographic
characteristics than our existing markets.
In addition, we continue to pursue our strategy of investing in our people, places and processes to
give us the capacity to handle expected future growth, including investments in frontier markets
that may not generate profitable growth in the near term. Planning for future growth requires
investments to be made now in anticipation of growth that may not materialize, and if we are not
successful growing our gross auction proceeds our earnings may be impacted. A large component of
our G&A is considered fixed costs that we will incur regardless of gross auction proceeds growth.
There can be no assurances that our gross auction proceeds and auction revenues will grow at a more
rapid rate than our fixed costs, especially in the event of a deep and prolonged recession, which
would have a negative impact on our margins and earnings per share.
Disruptions to credit and financial markets, economic uncertainty and a sustained economic downturn
could harm our operations.
The current global economic and financial market crisis has caused, among other things, a general
tightening in credit markets, lower levels of liquidity, and increases in default and bankruptcy
rates, all of which may have a negative impact on our operations, financial condition and liquidity
and ability to grow our business. Our operations and access to our cash balances in the future are
dependent upon the economic viability of our key suppliers and the various financial institutions
we utilize. Our future operations may be disrupted if we cannot obtain products and services
necessary for our auction operations from our key suppliers, or if we lose access to our cash
balances. In addition, our future auction revenues may decrease if our consignors choose not to
sell their assets as a result of current economic conditions, or if our buyers are unable to obtain
financing for assets purchases, or if our customers are in financial distress. In addition, our
lenders may be unable to advance funds to us under existing credit facilities, which could harm our
liquidity and ability to operate or grow our business. The timing and nature of any recovery in
credit and financial markets remain uncertain, and there can be no assurance that market conditions
will improve in the near future and that our results of operations will not be adversely affected.
Decreases in the supply of, demand for, or market values of industrial assets, primarily used
industrial equipment, could harm our business.
Our auction revenues could be reduced if there was significant erosion in the supply of, demand
for, or market values of used industrial equipment, which would affect our financial condition and
results of operations. We have no control over any of the factors that affect the supply of, and
demand for, used industrial equipment, and the circumstances that cause market values for
industrial equipment to fluctuate, including but not limited to economic uncertainty, disruptions
to credit and financial markets, a sustained economic recession, lower commodity prices, and our
customers restricted access to capital, are beyond our control. Any increase in the volume or
change in the mix of equipment at our auctions may not be sufficient to offset declines in the
market value for that equipment as a result of the current economic environment. In addition, price
competition and availability of industrial equipment directly affect the supply of, demand for, and
market value of used industrial equipment. Climate change initiatives, including significant
changes to engine emission standards applicable to industrial equipment, may also impact the supply
of, demand for or market values of industrial equipment.
- 43 -
Damage to our reputation for fairness, integrity and conducting only unreserved auctions could harm
our business.
Strict adherence to the unreserved auction process is one of our founding principles and, we
believe, one of our most significant competitive advantages. Closely related to this is our
reputation for fairness and honesty in our dealings with our customers. Our ability to attract new
customers and continue to do business with existing customers could be harmed if our reputation for
fairness, integrity and conducting only unreserved auctions was damaged. If we are unable to
maintain our reputation and police and enforce our policy of conducting unreserved auctions, we
could lose business and our results of operations would suffer.
Competition in our core markets could result in reductions in our future revenues and
profitability.
The used truck and equipment sectors of the global industrial equipment market, and the auction
segment of those markets, are highly fragmented. We compete directly for potential purchasers of
industrial equipment with other auction companies. Our indirect competitors include equipment
manufacturers, distributors and dealers that sell new or used equipment, and equipment rental
companies. When sourcing equipment to sell at our auctions, we compete with other auction
companies, equipment dealers and brokers, and equipment owners that have traditionally disposed of
equipment in private sales.
Our direct competitors are primarily regional auction companies. Some of our indirect competitors
have significantly greater financial and marketing resources and name recognition than we do. New
competitors with greater financial and other resources may enter the industrial equipment auction
market in the future. Additionally, existing or future competitors may succeed in entering and
establishing successful operations in new geographic markets prior to our entry into those markets.
They may also compete against us through internet-based services. If existing or future competitors
seek to gain or retain market share by reducing commission rates, we may also be required to reduce
commission rates, which may reduce our revenue and harm our operating results and financial
condition, or we may lose market share.
Our substantial international operations expose us to foreign exchange rate fluctuations and
political and economic instability that could harm our results of operations.
We conduct business in many countries around the world and intend to continue to expand our
presence in international markets, including emerging markets. Fluctuating currency exchange rates,
acts of terrorism or war, and changing social, economic and political conditions and regulations,
including income tax and accounting regulations, and political interference, may negatively affect
our business in international markets and our related results of operations. Currency exchange rate
fluctuations between the different countries in which we conduct our operations impact the
purchasing power of buyers, the motivation of consignors, asset values and asset flows between
various countries, including those in which we do not have operations. These factors and other
global economic conditions may harm our future business and our operating results.
Although we report our financial results in United States dollars, a significant portion of our
auction revenues is generated at auctions held outside the United States, mostly in currencies
other than the United States dollar. Currency exchange rate changes against the United States
dollar, particularly for the Canadian dollar and the Euro, could affect the presentation of our
results in our financial statements and cause our earnings to fluctuate.
We may incur losses as a result of legal and other claims.
We are subject to legal and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business. While
the results of these claims have not historically had a material effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations, we may not be able to defend ourselves adequately against these
claims in the future and we may incur losses. Aggregate losses from and the legal fees associated
with these claims could be material.
- 44 -
Our operating results are subject to quarterly variations.
Historically, our revenues and operating results have fluctuated from quarter to quarter. We expect
to continue to experience these fluctuations as a result of the following factors, among others:
|
|
|
the size, timing and frequency of our auctions; |
|
|
|
the seasonal nature of the auction business in general, with peak activity typically
occurring in the second and fourth calendar quarters, mainly as a result of the seasonal
nature of the construction and natural resources industries; |
|
|
|
the performance of our underwritten business (guarantee and outright purchase
contracts); |
|
|
|
general economic conditions in our markets; and |
|
|
|
the timing of acquisitions and development of auction facilities and related costs. |
In addition, we usually incur substantial costs when entering new markets, and the profitability of
operations at new locations is uncertain as a result of the increased variability in the number and
size of auctions at new sites. These and other factors may cause our future results to fall short
of investor expectations or not to compare favourably to our past results.
We do not currently have a formal business continuity plan, which exposes our business to risks.
We depend on our information and other systems for the continuity and effective operation of our
business. In the event of a significant interruption to our business, or the loss of key systems
as a result of a natural or other disaster, we do not currently have plans in place to ensure that
our business continues to operate in an effective manner. Although we are in the process of
implementing a formal business continuity plan, our business, results of operations and financial
conditions could be materially affected in the event of a significant interruption of our business.
We are in the process of implementing a formal disaster recovery plan, including a data center
co-location plan. However, these plans are not yet complete. If we were subject to a disaster,
serious security breach or threat to business continuity, it could materially damage our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Our internet-related initiatives are subject to technological obsolescence and potential service
interruptions and may not contribute to improved operating results over the long-term; in addition,
we may not be able to compete with technologies implemented by our competitors.
We have invested significant resources in the development of our internet platform, including our
online bidding service. We use and rely on intellectual property owned by third parties, which we
license for use in providing our online bidding service. Our internet technologies may not result
in any material long-term improvement in our results of operations or financial condition and may
require further significant investment to avoid obsolescence. We may also not be able to continue
to adapt our business to internet commerce and we may not be able to compete effectively against
internet auction services offered by our competitors.
The success of our online bidding service and other services that we offer over the internet,
including equipment-searching capabilities and historical price information, will continue to
depend largely on the performance and reliability of the hardware and software we utilize, our
ability to use suitable intellectual property licensed from third parties, further development and
maintenance of our infrastructure and the internet in general. Our ability to offer online services
depends on the performance of the internet, as well as some of our internal hardware and software
systems.
Viruses, worms and other similar programs, which have in the past caused periodic outages and
other internet access delays, may in the future interfere with the performance of the internet and
some of our internal systems. These outages and delays could reduce the level of service we are
able to offer over the
internet. We could lose customers and our reputation could be harmed if we were unable to provide
services over the internet at an acceptable level of performance or reliability.
- 45 -
The availability and performance of our internal technology infrastructure, as well as the
implementation of an enterprise resource planning system, are critical to our business.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our website, enterprise resource
planning system, processing systems and network infrastructure are important to our reputation and
our business. We will need to continue to expand and upgrade our technology, transaction processing
systems and network infrastructure both to meet increased usage of our online bidding service and
other services offered on our website and to implement new features and functions. Our business and
results of operations could be harmed if we were unable to expand and upgrade in a timely manner
our systems and infrastructure to accommodate any increases in the use of our internet services, or
if we were to lose access to or the functionality of our internet systems for any reason.
We use both internally developed and licensed systems for transaction processing and accounting,
including billings and collections processing. We have recently improved these systems to
accommodate growth in our business. If we are unsuccessful in continuing to upgrade our technology,
transaction processing systems or network infrastructure to accommodate increased transaction
volumes, it could harm our operations and interfere with our ability to expand our business.
Our business could be harmed if we lost the services of one or more key personnel.
The growth and performance of our business depends to a significant extent on the efforts and
abilities of our executive officers and senior managers. Our business could be harmed if we lost
the services of some of these individuals. We do not maintain key man insurance on the lives of any
of our executive officers. Our future success largely depends on our ability to attract, develop
and retain skilled employees in all areas of our business, and to plan effectively for succession.
Our future expenses may increase significantly or our operations and ability to expand may be
limited as a result of environmental and other regulations.
A variety of federal, provincial, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including local tax
and accounting rules, apply to our business. These relate to, among other things, the auction
business, imports and exports of equipment, worker safety, privacy of customer information, and the
use, storage, discharge and disposal of environmentally sensitive materials. Complying with
revisions to laws, rules and regulations could result in an increase in expenses and a
deterioration of our financial performance. Failure to comply with applicable laws, rules and
regulations could result in substantial liability to us, suspension or cessation of some or all of
our operations, restrictions on our ability to expand at present locations or into new locations,
requirements for the acquisition of additional equipment or other significant expenses or
restrictions.
The development or expansion of auction sites depends upon receipt of required licenses, permits
and other governmental authorizations. Our inability to obtain these required items could harm our
business. Additionally, changes or concessions required by regulatory authorities could result in
significant delays in, or prevent completion of, such development or expansion.
Under some environmental laws, an owner or lessee of, or other person involved in, real estate may
be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances located on or
in, or emanating from, the real estate, and related costs of investigation and property damage.
These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner, lessee or other person knew
of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental
contamination may exist at our owned or leased auction sites, or at other sites on which we may
conduct auctions, or properties that we may be selling by auction, from prior activities at these
locations or from neighbouring properties. In addition, auction sites that we acquire or lease in
the future may be contaminated, and future use of or
conditions on any of our properties or sites could result in contamination. The costs related to
claims arising from environmental contamination of any of these properties could harm our financial
condition and results of operations.
- 46 -
There are restrictions in the United States and Europe that may affect the ability of equipment
owners to transport certain equipment between specified jurisdictions. One example of these
restrictions is environmental certification requirements in the United States, which prevent
non-certified equipment from entering into commerce in the United States. If these restrictions, or
changes to environmental laws, were to inhibit materially the ability of customers to ship
equipment to or from our auction sites, they could reduce gross auction proceeds and harm our
business.
International bidders and consignors could be deterred from participating in our auctions if
governmental bodies impose additional export or import regulations or additional duties, taxes or
other charges on exports or imports. Reduced participation by international bidders and consignors
could reduce gross auction proceeds and harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur as a result of our operations.
We maintain property and general liability insurance. This insurance may not remain available to us
at commercially reasonable rates, and the amount of our coverage may not be adequate to cover all
liability that we may incur. Our auctions generally involve the operation of large equipment close
to a large number of people, and despite our focus on safe work practices, an accident could damage
our facilities or injure auction attendees. Any major accident could harm our reputation and our
business. In addition, if we were held liable for amounts exceeding the limits of our insurance
coverage or for claims outside the scope of our coverage, the resulting costs could harm our
results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is subject to risks relating to our ability to safeguard the security and privacy of
our customers confidential information.
We maintain proprietary databases containing confidential personal information about our customers
and the results of our auctions, and we must safeguard the security and privacy of this
information. Despite our efforts to protect this information, we face the risk of inadvertent
disclosure of this sensitive information or an intentional breach of our security measures.
Security breaches could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and
possible liability. We may be required to make significant expenditures to protect against security
breaches or to alleviate problems caused by any breaches. Our insurance policies may not be
adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches.
We may not continue to pay regular cash dividends.
We declared and paid total quarterly cash dividends of $0.18 per outstanding common share in the
first half of 2009. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the
discretion of our Board of Directors, after taking into account our operating results, financial
condition, cash requirements, financing agreement restrictions and other factors our Board may deem
relevant. We may be unable or may elect not to continue to declare and pay dividends, even if
necessary financial conditions are met and sufficient cash is available for distribution.
- 47 -
Certain global conditions may affect our ability to conduct successful auctions.
Like most businesses with global operations, we are subject to the risk of certain global
conditions, such as pandemics or other disease outbreaks that could hinder our ability to conduct
our scheduled auctions, or restrict our customers travel patterns or their desire to attend
auctions. If this situation were to occur, we may not be able to generate sufficient equipment
consignments to sustain our business or to attract enough
bidders to our auctions to achieve world fair market values for the items we sell. This could harm
our results of operations and financial condition.
The impact of the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (or IFRS) in 2011 is
uncertain.
As a publicly accountable Canadian enterprise, we are required by the Canadian Accounting Standards
Board to adopt IFRS beginning January 2011. We have not yet determined the full impact of the
adoption of IFRS on our consolidated financial statements, or how our reported financial results
will differ from those reported under current Canadian GAAP.
- 48 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Jeremy Black
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Black, |
|
|
|
Corporate Secretary |
|