PUBLICIS GROUPE SA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 20-F
|
|
|
o
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR
12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
OR |
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2004 |
|
OR |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD
FROM TO |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-14736
Publicis Groupe S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
(Translation of Registrants
name into English) |
|
133, AVENUE DES CHAMPS-ELYSÉES
75008 PARIS
France
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
REPUBLIC
OF FRANCE
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization) |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class: |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered: |
|
|
|
Ordinary shares, nominal value
0.40 per
share, represented by American Depositary Shares (as evidenced
by American Depositary Receipts), each American Depositary Share
representing one share |
|
The New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the
issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close
of the period covered by the annual report:
|
|
|
Ordinary shares, nominal value
0.40 per
share |
|
182,415,932(1) |
(title of class)
|
|
(number of ordinary shares) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the
registrant has elected to
follow: Item 17 o Item 18 þ
(1) Excluding 13,065,009 ordinary shares held in treasury.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make some forward-looking statements in this annual report.
When we use the words aim(s), expect(s),
feel(s), will, may,
believe(s), anticipate(s) and similar
expressions in this annual report, we are intending to identify
those statements as forward-looking. Forward-looking statements
are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those projected. You should
not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date of this annual report. Other
than in connection with applicable securities laws, we undertake
no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances after the date of this annual
report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. We
urge you to review and consider the various disclosures we make
concerning the factors that may affect our business carefully,
including the disclosures made under Key
Information Risk Factors, Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects, and Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. Unless
otherwise indicated, information and statistics presented in
this document regarding market trends and our market share
relative to our competitors are based on our own research and
various publicly available sources.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to our competitive
positions made in this annual report are in terms of revenue
generated.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ii
PART I
|
|
Item 1. |
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and
Advisers |
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 2. |
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable |
Not applicable.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial
data of our company and should be read in conjunction with our
financial statements and the information provided under
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and
Risk Factors. The selected financial
data presented below have been prepared on a basis consistent
with that used in our consolidated financial statements. Prior
years have been restated as necessary for a consistent
presentation. Our consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in France (French GAAP), which differ in
certain significant respects from accounting principles
generally accepted in the
U.S. (U.S. GAAP). See note 31 to our
consolidated financial statements for (i) a discussion of
the principal differences between French GAAP and U.S. GAAP
as they relate to us and (ii) a reconciliation to
U.S. GAAP of our consolidated net income and consolidated
shareholders equity as calculated under French GAAP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002(3) | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In Millions of Euros, Except Per Share Data) | |
Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in accordance with French GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
Group net income
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Basic earnings per share(1)
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
Diluted earnings per share(1)(4)
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
Dividends per share(1)
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
185 |
|
Group net income
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(647 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
Basic earnings per share(1)
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
(4.76 |
) |
|
|
0.31 |
|
Diluted earnings per share(1)(4)
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
(4.76 |
) |
|
|
0.31 |
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002(3) | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In Millions of Euros, Except Per Share Data) | |
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in accordance with French GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible and intangible assets, net
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,721 |
|
|
|
10,881 |
|
|
|
10,978 |
|
|
|
4,896 |
|
|
|
4,130 |
|
Bank borrowings and overdrafts (short and long-term)
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible and intangible assets, net
|
|
|
7,450 |
|
|
|
8,006 |
|
|
|
8,253 |
|
|
|
3,813 |
|
|
|
4,273 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
13,231 |
|
|
|
14,241 |
|
|
|
14,367 |
|
|
|
6,955 |
|
|
|
7,100 |
|
Bank borrowings and overdrafts (short- and long-term)
|
|
|
2,911 |
|
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
3,540 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
2,622 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Per share data have been adjusted to reflect the 10-for-1 stock
split that occurred on August 29, 2000. |
|
(2) |
2000 amounts include the operations of Saatchi &
Saatchi for the period between the acquisition date in September
2000 through December 31, 2000. |
|
(3) |
2002 amounts include the operations of Bcom3 Group, Inc. for the
period between the acquisition date in September 2002 through
December 31, 2002. |
|
(4) |
Diluted earnings per share were computed with reference to the
fully-diluted weighted average number of shares of 251,607,849
in 2004; 239,540,546 in 2003; 171,025,567 in 2002; 139,645,986
in 2001 and 110,454,999 in 2000. |
EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION
Share capital in our company is represented by ordinary shares
with a nominal value of
0.40 per
share (hereinafter generally referred to as our
shares). Our shares are denominated in euros. Because we
intend to pay cash dividends denominated in euros, exchange rate
fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar amounts that
shareholders will receive on conversion of dividends from euros
to dollars.
2
The following table shows the euro/ U.S. dollar exchange
rate for 2000 through June 14, 2005 based on the noon
buying rate expressed in euros per dollar. For information
regarding the effect of currency fluctuations on our results of
operations, see Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period End | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
June, 2005 (through June 14)
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
May, 2005
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
April, 2005
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
March, 2005
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
February, 2005
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
January, 2005
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
December, 2004
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
2004
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
2003
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
2002
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
2001
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
2000
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
|
(1) |
For yearly totals, the average of the noon buying rates for
euros on the last business day of each month during the relevant
period. |
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risk factors described below
in addition to the other information presented in this annual
report.
|
|
|
We may have difficulty competing in the highly competitive
advertising and communications industry |
The advertising and communications industry is highly
competitive, and we expect it to remain so. Our competitors in
the advertising and communications business run the gamut from
large multinational marketing and communications companies to
smaller agencies that operate only in local or regional markets.
New competitors also include systems integrators, database
marketing and modeling companies and telemarketers offering
technological solutions to marketing and communications issues
faced by clients. We must compete with these companies and
agencies to maintain existing client relationships and to obtain
new clients and assignments. Some clients require us to compete
for business at mandatory periodic intervals. Client conflicts
can, from time to time, give our competitors opportunities to
seek business from our clients.
|
|
|
We may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic
conditions in the markets in which we operate |
The advertising and communications industry is subject to
downturns corresponding to those in general economic conditions
and changes in client business and marketing budgets. Because
some clients have responded, and may respond in the future, to
general economic downturns by reducing their marketing budgets
in order to meet earnings goals, downturns can be more severe in
the advertising and communications industry than in other
industries. For this reason, our prospects, business, financial
condition and results of operations may be materially adversely
affected by continuing unfavorable general economic conditions,
or a further downturn in those conditions, in one or more
markets and related changes in clients marketing budgets.
3
|
|
|
We may not be successful in identifying appropriate
acquisition candidates or investment opportunities, completing
acquisitions or investments on satisfactory terms or integrating
newly acquired companies |
Our business strategy includes enhancing the range of our
existing advertising and communications capabilities. We intend
to implement this strategy in part by making acquisitions and
other investments. We may not be successful in identifying
appropriate acquisition candidates or investment opportunities
or consummating acquisitions or investments on terms
satisfactory to us. In addition, we may not succeed in
integrating any newly acquired companies into our existing
operations in a way that produces the synergies or other
benefits we hope to achieve. Furthermore, we may use our shares
as consideration in future acquisitions and investments, which
could result in dilution to existing shareholders.
|
|
|
We are exposed to a number of risks from operating in
developing countries |
We conduct business in various developing countries around the
world. The risks associated with conducting business in
developing countries can include slower payment of invoices,
nationalization, social, political and economic instability,
increased currency exchange risk and currency repatriation
restrictions, among other risks. We may not be able to insure or
hedge against these risks. In addition, commercial laws in many
of these countries can be vague, arbitrary, contradictory,
inconsistently administered and retroactively applied. It is,
therefore, difficult for us to determine with certainty at all
times the exact requirements of these laws. If we are deemed not
to be in compliance with applicable laws in developing countries
in which we conduct business, our prospects, business and
results of operations could be harmed and our financial
condition could be weakened.
|
|
|
We are exposed to potential liabilities, including
liabilities arising from allegations that our clients
advertising claims are false or misleading or that our
clients products are defective |
From time to time, we may be, or may be joined as, a defendant
in litigation brought against our clients by third parties,
including our clients competitors, governmental or
regulatory authorities or consumers. These actions could involve
claims alleging that:
|
|
|
|
|
advertising claims made with respect to our clients
products or services are false, deceptive or misleading; |
|
|
|
our clients products are defective or injurious; or |
|
|
|
marketing and communications materials created for our clients
infringe on the proprietary rights of third parties. |
The damages, costs, expenses or attorneys fees arising
from any of these claims could have an adverse effect on our
prospects, business, results of operations and financial
condition to the extent that we are not adequately insured and
are not indemnified against them by clients. In addition, our
contracts with clients generally require us to indemnify clients
against claims brought by competitors or others claiming that
our advertisements or other communications infringe upon their
intellectual property rights.
|
|
|
Our ability to maintain our competitive position depends
on retaining the services of our management and attracting and
retaining other key employees |
The loss of the services of key members of our management could
harm our business and results of operations. In addition, our
success has been, and is expected to continue to be, highly
dependent upon the skills of our creative, research, media and
account personnel and practice group specialists, and their
relationships with our clients. If we are unable to continue to
attract and retain additional key personnel, or if we are unable
to retain and motivate our existing key personnel, our
prospects, business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially adversely affected.
4
|
|
|
We receive a significant percentage of our revenue from
large clients |
A significant reduction in the advertising and communications
spending by, or the loss of one or more of, our largest clients
could weaken our financial condition and cause our business and
results of operations to suffer. Our major clients may not
continue to use our services to the same extent, or at all, in
the future. Clients can typically cancel contracts with their
advertising agencies on 90 to 180 days notice. In
addition, clients generally are able to reduce advertising and
communications spending or cancel projects at any time for any
reason.
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations may negatively affect
our financial results, the price of our shares and the value of
dividends received by holders of our American Depositary
Shares |
We hold assets and liabilities, earn income and pay expenses of
our subsidiaries in a variety of currencies. Our consolidated
financial statements are presented in euros. Therefore, when we
prepare our consolidated financial statements, we must translate
our assets, liabilities, income and expenses in currencies other
than the euro into euros at then-applicable exchange rates.
Consequently, increases and decreases in the value of the euro
will affect the value of these items in our consolidated
financial statements, even if their value has not changed in
their original currency. In this regard, an increase in the
value of the euro relative to other currencies may result in a
decline in the reported value, in euros, of our interests held
in those currencies. To the extent this has a negative effect on
our financial condition as presented in our consolidated
financial statements, it could cause the price of our shares to
decline. Conversely, if the relative value of the euro to the
U.S. dollar declines, the U.S. dollar equivalent of
cash dividends paid in euros on our American Depositary Shares
(ADSs) will decline as well.
|
|
|
The ability of holders of our ADSs to influence the
governance of our company may be limited |
Holders of our ADSs may not have the same ability to influence
the governance of our company as shareholders in some
U.S. companies would. For example, holders of our ADSs may
not receive voting materials in time to ensure that they can
instruct the depositary to vote their shares. In addition, the
depositarys liability to holders of our ADSs for failing
to carry out voting instructions or for the manner of carrying
out voting instructions is limited by contract.
|
|
|
Some provisions of French law and our statuts
(bylaws) could have anti-takeover effects |
French law requires any person who acquires more than 5%, 10%,
20%, one-third, one-half or two-thirds of our outstanding shares
or voting rights to inform us within 15 days of crossing
the threshold percentage. A person acquiring more than 10% or
20% of our share capital or voting rights must include in the
report a statement of the persons intentions relating to
future acquisitions or participation in the management of our
company for the following 12-month period. Shareholders who fail
to comply with this requirement may be deprived of voting rights
for a period of up to five years and may, in some cases, be
subject to criminal fines. In addition, our statuts
(bylaws) provides double voting rights for shares owned by
the same shareholder in registered form for at least two years.
Our statuts further provide that any person who acquires
or disposes of more than 1% of our outstanding shares or voting
rights must inform us within 15 days of crossing the
threshold percentage and that we may require a corporate entity
holding shares representing more than 2.5% of our share capital
or voting rights to disclose to us the identity of all persons
holding, directly or indirectly, more than one-third of the
share capital or voting rights of that entity. Shareholders who
fail to comply with these requirements may be deprived of voting
rights. Finally, our shareholders have authorized our management
board to increase our capital in response to a third-party
tender offer for our shares. These circumstances could have the
effect of discouraging or preventing a change in control of our
company without the consent of our current management. Giving
effect to the provision of our statuts that gives double
voting rights to shares owned by the same shareholder in
registered form for at least two years, we estimate that the
chairperson of our supervisory board, Ms. Elisabeth
Badinter, owns 17.2% of the voting power of our company.
5
|
|
|
We are subject to corporate disclosure standards that are
less demanding than those applicable to some
U.S. companies |
As a foreign private issuer, we are not required to comply with
the notice and disclosure requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act),
relating to the solicitation of proxies for shareholders
meetings. Although we are subject to the periodic reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act, the periodic disclosure
required of non-U.S. issuers under the Exchange Act is more
limited than the periodic disclosure required of
U.S. issuers. Therefore, there may be less publicly
available information about our company than is regularly
published by or about other public companies in the U.S.
|
|
|
We will be obligated to adopt new accounting standards in
2005 that may have a material impact on our accounts and may
render a comparison between financial periods more
difficult |
In June 2002, the European Union (the EU) adopted
new regulations requiring all listed EU companies, including us,
to apply International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) (previously known as International Accounting
Standards or IAS) in their financial statements from
January 1, 2005. The IFRS may have a material impact on
important items in our consolidated financial statements. For
further information on the impact of IFRS, see Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects Move to IFRS
Accounting Standards.
|
|
Item 4. |
Information on the Company |
HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
The legal name of our company is Publicis Groupe S.A. and its
commercial name is Publicis. Our company is a société
anonyme, a form of corporation. It was incorporated in 1938,
pursuant to the French commercial code, for a term of
99 years. Our registered office is located at 133, avenue
des Champs-Elysées, 75008 Paris, France, and the phone
number of that office is 33 1 44 43 70 00.
Historical Background
Our company was founded in 1926 by Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet,
known as the father of modern advertising in France
and the David Ogilvy of French advertising because
of his drive for innovation, his creativity in developing
successful campaigns for clients and the new standards of
excellence he set. Among his early innovations was the use of
radio for advertising. In 1934, due to a ban on advertising on
Frances government-owned radio stations, he created Radio
Cité, the countrys first private station. He launched
Régie Presse, a subsidiary dedicated to the sale of
advertising space in the press, in 1937.
When the Second World War began, Mr. Bleustein-Blanchet
decided to shut down both our company and Radio Cité. We
reopened in 1946 and won our first major post-war client,
Colgate Palmolive, a year later. Through Régie Presse, we
also expanded into the sale of media space in mass transit
systems. Realizing the importance of monitoring consumer habits
and expectations, Mr. Bleustein-Blanchet established a
market research unit as part of our company. Our expansion
continued in the 1940s and 50s in other ways as
well. Nestlé became a client in 1952; Shell joined us in
1954. We moved our headquarters to its current location on the
Champs-Elysées in Paris in 1957.
Our reputation for innovation was strengthened in 1968 when we
created the first television advertising campaign in France.
Also in 1968, we provided communications advice to Saint Gobain
in its successful defense of a hostile takeover attempt by BSN,
the first hostile takeover bid in French business history.
Clients won in the 1960s included Renault and
LOréal.
We became a public company in 1970. In 1972, our headquarters
building was destroyed by fire and we had to rebuild it. We
began pursuing a strategy of expansion in Europe through
acquisitions the same year, purchasing the Intermarco network in
the Netherlands (with offices in Belgium, Germany, Scandinavia,
Italy and Spain) and Farner in Switzerland (with offices in
Germany and Austria). By 1974, we were present in 14 European
countries. We made our first inroads in interactive
communications in this period with the founding
6
of SGIP, since renamed Publicis Technology. Our current chief
executive officer, Maurice Lévy, joined our company in 1971
and became chief operating officer of Publicis Conseil in 1976.
In 1978, our European expansion continued through our
acquisition of the McCormick agency, a well-known U.K. firm.
In 1981, we opened our first New York office. In 1984, we
regrouped our network, then present in 23 countries, under the
Publicis name. We founded our media buying
subsidiary Optimedia in 1987, and it began operations in France,
the U.K. and Switzerland. Also in 1987, Maurice Lévy became
our chief executive officer and president of our management
board. We entered into a major strategic alliance with
U.S.-based Foote, Cone & Belding Communications
(FCB) in 1988. We merged our operations in Europe
with those of FCB, thus becoming the leading advertising network
in Europe. We managed the combined European operations, making
substantial investments in developing them, particularly in
Spain and Italy. Through FCB, we also raised our profile among
corporations in the U.S. In 1989, we began expanding into
eastern Europe. The same year, we won Whirlpools worldwide
account and launched a European direct marketing network, since
renamed Publicis Dialog.
Our expansion accelerated in the 1990s. We created BMZ, a
new network operating in Germany, France, the U.K., Belgium, the
Netherlands and Italy, in 1992. The next year we acquired FCA,
the fourth largest communications group in France. We then
merged FCA and BMZ to create FCA!BMZ, a subsidiary with
operations in 12 European countries. In 1994, we merged our New
York office with Bloom, a U.S. subsidiary of FCA, as part
of an effort to further increase our presence in the
U.S. Coca-Cola became a client in 1994. We discontinued our
alliance with FCB in 1995 due to strategic differences with its
parent company, True North Communications, Inc.
Mr. Bleustein-Blanchet died in 1996, and Elisabeth
Badinter, Mr. Bleustein-Blanchets daughter, succeeded
him as chair of the supervisory board.
We began our expansion outside of Europe and the U.S. in
1996, acquiring operations in Mexico, Brazil and Canada. Over
the next three years, we built an impressive international
network with a string of acquisitions in eastern Europe, the
Middle East, Latin America and the Asia/ Pacific region. We also
expanded in the U.S. during this period, acquiring Hal
Riney & Partners and EvansGroup in 1998 and a 49%
interest in Burrell Communications in 1999. At the beginning of
2000, we had operations in 130 locations in
76 countries and ranked tenth worldwide among
communications groups.
The last five years have seen continued pursuit of our expansion
strategy. We acquired all of the controlling interests in a
number of major U.S. agencies in 2000, including the Fallon
Group and Frankel & Company, thus becoming a major
competitor in the U.S. market. We dramatically increased
the size of our operations in 2000 with the acquisition of
Saatchi & Saatchi plc. In addition, in 2000 we became
one of the worlds leading healthcare communications
companies as a result of our acquisition of Nelson
Communications. Reflecting our increasingly international focus,
our shares, represented by ADSs, began trading on the New York
Stock Exchange in 2000.
In 2001, we created the worlds third-largest media
consultancy and buying group by combining our wholly owned
subsidiary Optimedia with Zenith Media, a firm we held jointly
with Cordiant Communications Group plc. Upon completion of the
transaction, we held a 75% interest in the resulting entity,
ZenithOptimedia Group.
In September 2002, we acquired Bcom3 Group, Inc.
(Bcom3), creating the fourth-largest advertising and
communications firm in the world, with annual revenue in 2002 of
approximately $4.8 billion (including Bcom3 for the full
year). The merger also created one of the worlds largest
media consultancy and media buying firms, combining
ZenithOptimedia Group with Starcom MediaVest. Adding
Bcom3s renowned advertising and communications
agencies which include Leo Burnett, Manning
Selvage & Lee, Medicus and Bartle Bogle
Hegarty enhanced our ability to provide premier
advertising and communications services to clients on a
worldwide basis.
The merger also opened the way for a long-term strategic
partnership with Dentsu, Inc., the number one communications
group in Japan and Asia as a whole and formerly a
Bcom3 shareholder. This partnership is designed to offer
our clients privileged access to the Japanese market, in
particular in the area of media buying
7
and consultancy. We are today the only communications group in
the world providing clients with media-purchasing services
spanning the whole world including Japan. As part of our
partnership, we created a sports marketing agency, iSe
International Sports and Entertainment AG, with Dentsu in 2003.
Other significant events included a number of measures that
helped to improve and rationalize our operational and capital
structure:
|
|
|
|
|
In 2003, we dissolved Bcom3s DArcy network and
successfully transferred its assets to our other networks with
minimal client loss. We integrated Bcom3s businesses and
back-office functions with our other operations. We also
continued our program of consolidating the office space used by
Bcom3 and our other operations and rationalizing the related
leaseholdings; and |
|
|
|
We simplified our ownership structure by merging with three
investment vehicle entities that had been used by members of the
Bleustein-Blanchet family, employees of our company and some
other investors to hold shares in our company indirectly. The
merger was effected pursuant to an agreement entered into in
1998. |
A key highlight of 2004 was the inclusion of our ordinary shares
in the Paris stock markets top index, the CAC 40.
During 2004, there were few significant acquisitions with the
exceptions of Thompson Murray, a U.S. shopper-marketing
agency that will be a key component of the future
Saatchi & Saatchi X worldwide marketing services
network, and of a majority interest in United Campaigns,
Publicis Worldwides partner agency in Russia.
Other significant events in 2004 included the creation of
Publicis Groupe Media and a new management team for Leo Burnett:
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2004, we officially launched Publicis Groupe Media
(PGM), a new management structure shared by our two
media buying and media consultancy brands, Starcom MediaVest
Group and ZenithOptimedia. The structure is designed to generate
a variety of initiatives to enhance service to clients, while at
the same time benefiting from synergies in research spending,
development of consultancy tools, specialized expertise and
back-office services; and |
|
|
|
We recruited Tom Bernardin as part of the succession plan for
Linda Wolf and appointed him president of Leo Burnett Worldwide
and CEO of Leo Burnett USA. A reorganization of Leo Burnett
Worldwide followed Mr. Bernardins appointment at both
central and regional levels and at Leo Burnett USA. |
At the management board level, the departure of Roger Haupt for
personal reasons and the appointment of Jack Klues mark a new
stage in the development of management structures at a point
when integration of Bcom3 has been brought to a successful
conclusion. Restructuring in connection with this integration,
involving in particular the development of shared resource
centers and reorganization of real estate, helped us to continue
to achieve our objectives in 2004, in particular in terms of
operating margin.
PRINCIPAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AND DIVESTITURES
As a result of our strategy of global expansion, our principal
capital expenditures since the beginning of 2001 have been
associated with acquisitions of other advertising and
communications firms. Following our acquisition of Bcom3 in
2002, we reached the point of being among the worlds
largest advertising and communications firms and consequently
adopted a more selective acquisition strategy. Our capital
expenditures in 2001 included our acquisitions of all of or
controlling interests in:
|
|
|
|
|
Fisch.Maier Direkt, Switzerlands leading direct
marketing firm; |
|
|
|
Carré Noir, one of the best design agencies in
France; |
|
|
|
FusionDMin San Francisco, a large independent
customer relationship management agency since merged with
Publicis Dialog; |
8
|
|
|
|
|
Creative AIM, a U.S. grassroots marketing agency; |
|
|
|
Sanchez & Levitan, among the largest agencies in
the U.S. focused on the rapidly-growing Hispanic
community; and |
|
|
|
The Triangle Group, the largest independent sales
promotion group in the U.K. |
We invested a total of
77 million
in making these expansion-related investments. We invested an
additional
102 million in other property, plant and equipment (net of
disposals), and spent
120 million
repurchasing our own shares.
In 2002, our largest acquisition, Bcom3, was made in exchange
for shares and other securities and therefore did not require
any capital expenditures as such. Excluding Bcom3, we made only
a limited number of acquisitions in keeping with our strategy.
Several other acquisitions did involve capital expenditures,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Gravitas, a Japanese relationship marketing agency
specializing in marketing services and public relations; |
|
|
|
Johnston & Associates, a U.S. lobbying firm; |
|
|
|
Direct n More, a direct marketing agency in Austria; |
|
|
|
Magnesium, a Belgian marketing services specialist; |
|
|
|
Media Publics, a French firm engaged in developing sales
incentives and related programs; |
|
|
|
Sales Story and Stella, two relationship marketing
companies; |
|
|
|
ECA2, a French events marketing company; and |
|
|
|
Van Sluis Consultants, a Dutch public relations agency. |
These acquisitions involved capital expenditures of
approximately
75 million
in total. We invested an additional
64 million
in other property, plant and equipment (net of disposals), and
spent
180 million
repurchasing our own shares. We also spent
196 million
to redeem the CVRs issued in connection with our acquisition of
Saatchi & Saatchi.
In 2003, our capital expenditures related primarily to the
acquisition of a 25% interest in ZenithOptimedia and a 32%
interest in Starcom Motive. These acquisitions involved capital
expenditures of approximately
183 million
in total. We invested an additional
118 million
in other property, plant and equipment (net of disposals) in
2003.
Our significant acquisitions in 2004 were limited to Thompson
Murray, a U.S. shopper-marketing agency that will be a key
component of our future Saatchi & Saatchi X
worldwide marketing services network, and the purchase of a
majority interest in United Campaigns, Publicis Worldwides
partner agency in Russia. We also acquired an event
communication agency in the U.S., CLT, and made earn-out
payments and acquired minority interests in various agencies,
parts of which had been acquired in the past, such as Triangle
Group, GrupoK/ Arc, Media Estrategia, and ECA2. These
acquisitions involved capital expenditures of approximately
104 million
in total.
For information concerning our level of ownership in the
foregoing acquired agencies, and our other subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004, see note 30 to our consolidated
financial statements. We have made no material divestitures
since the beginning of 2001.
There have been no public takeover offers by third parties in
respect of our shares since January 1, 2004, nor, except as
described under Historical Background,
have we made any public takeover offers in respect of other
companies shares since that date.
9
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
We provide services primarily in the following areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional advertising services. We provide traditional
advertising services primarily through the Publicis,
Saatchi & Saatchi and Leo Burnett networks. We also
conduct our traditional advertising operations through smaller
units, such as Fallon Worldwide and our 49% interest in Bartle
Bogle Hegarty, a U.K.-based agency. We generated approximately
55% of our 2004 revenue through these activities. |
|
|
|
Specialized agencies and marketing services. We provide
specialized communications services, such as public relations,
corporate and financial communications, healthcare
communications, direct marketing, sales promotion, interactive
communications and design (collectively referred to as
SAMS) through subsidiaries including Publicis
Healthcare Communications Group (Nelson, Medicus, Klemtner/
Saatchi & Saatchi Healthcare), ARC Worldwide, Publicis
Dialog, Publicis Consultants and Manning Selvage & Lee.
Some of these businesses generally act in conjunction with one
of our advertising networks, while others operate independently.
In 2004, approximately 22% of our revenue came from the
provision of SAMS services. |
|
|
|
Media Operations. We conduct media buying operations
through ZenithOptimedia Group and Starcom MediaVest Group. Our
media sales activities are conducted through
Médias & Régies Europe. Approximately 23% of
our 2004 revenue was generated by these operations. |
Clients
We provide advertising and communications services to national
and multinational clients around the world. A relatively high
proportion of our clients are local clients of our subsidiaries
around the world, something that we believe is advantageous in
that locally-managed clients are often more profitable than
those managed on a regional or global basis. Locally-managed
clients also tend to be focused on the discrete markets in which
they operate and therefore diversify our exposure to
fluctuations in general market conditions. Finally,
locally-managed clients give us an opportunity to take advantage
of, and add to, our intimate knowledge of national and local
cultures and business environments and to raise our profile in
local markets. No one client accounted for more than 10% of our
total revenue in 2004.
The following chart lists our largest clients in 2004:
|
|
|
Publicis
|
|
|
Allied Domecq
Coca-Cola
Deutsche Telekom
Hewlett-Packard
LOréal
Nestlé
Procter & Gamble |
|
Renault
Sanofi-Aventis
Sprint
Telefónica
UBS
Zurich Financial |
|
Saatchi & Saatchi
|
|
|
BristolMyersSquibb
Carlsberg International
Deutsche Telekom
Diageo/ GuinnessUDV
Fromageries Bel
General Mills
Novartis |
|
Procter & Gamble
Toyota/Lexus
Visa Europe |
10
|
|
|
Leo Burnett
|
|
|
Allstate
ConAgra
Fiat
Hallmark
Kellogg/ Keebler
McDonalds
Nintendo |
|
Philip Morris
Procter & Gamble
U.S. Army
Visa International
Walt Disney
General Motors |
|
ZenithOptimedia
|
|
|
Allied Domecq
Astra Zeneca
British Airways
Hewlett-Packard
Kingfisher
LOréal
Nestlé |
|
Sanofi-Aventis
Toyota
Verizon |
|
Starcom MediaVest
|
|
|
Allstate
Coca-Cola
General Motors
Kellogg/ Keebler
Mars
Miller Beer
Morgan Stanley |
|
Philip Morris
Procter & Gamble
Sara Lee
Sun Microsystems
U.S. Army
Walt Disney |
Strategy
With our acquisition of Saatchi & Saatchi in 2000, and
our acquisition of Bcom3 and formation of a partnership with
Dentsu in 2002, we became a world leader in the advertising and
communications industry in terms of geographical presence, array
of services and flexibility. Now that we are in the top tier of
advertising and communications groups worldwide, our overall
priority is to take advantage of the synergies created by our
acquisitions by increasing on a country-by-country basis the
scope of services we provide to clients, particularly services
for which demand is growing rapidly. We also intend to continue
pursuing our strategy of making selected acquisitions to round
out our geographical presence and service offerings. The main
components of our strategy are to:
|
|
|
|
|
Expand our SAMS operations specialized
agencies and marketing services |
We currently have a number of operations that complement our
traditional advertising services by providing direct marketing,
sales promotion, design, corporate communications, financial
communications, interactive communications and public relations
services. Demand for these services from our traditional
advertising clients is growing; in addition, providing them
helps us to build and maintain a holistic
relationship between us and our clients. Demand is also
growing for specialized communications services such as those
directed at particular ethnic groups and those relating to
specific areas such as healthcare and human resources. We intend
to take advantage of these trends by growing our existing SAMS
operations and by making selective acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
Make selective acquisitions to achieve critical mass in
other selected markets |
We rank among the top advertising and communications firms in
most of the major countries in which we operate, and we believe
this gives us a visibility that is useful in the competition for
new clients. In some countries, however, we have only limited
operations, and acquisitions may be required in order for us to
reach a position of market leadership. In addition, we believe
that our extensive international experience gives us a
11
competitive advantage in pursuing opportunities for growth in
emerging economies. For these reasons, we intend to seek
acquisition candidates in selected markets around the world in
order to expand into promising new markets and, where necessary,
to enhance our competitive positions.
Financial Targets
We believe that pursuing the strategy outlined above, and
continuing the process of integrating our operations with those
of the companies we acquired, will allow us to enhance our
profitability and maximize shareholder value significantly over
the near term. Our primary financial goal is to achieve a 17%
operating margin by the 2008 fiscal year (defining
operating margin as operating income before
amortization of acquisition-related intangibles divided by
revenue, in each case as determined under currently applicable
French GAAP).
Markets
We conduct operations in 104 countries and 196 cities
around the world. Our primary markets are Europe and the
U.S. Below, we show the contribution of selected
geographical markets to our revenue for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (in millions of euros):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Europe | |
|
North America | |
|
Rest of the World | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2004
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
2003
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
2002
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
SERVICES AND BUSINESS STRUCTURE
We provide a full range of advertising and communications
services, designing a customized package of services to meet
each clients particular needs. These services generally
fall into three major categories: traditional advertising, SAMS
and media services.
Traditional Advertising
Traditional advertising services principally involve the
creation of advertising for products, services and brands. They
may also include strategic planning involving analysis of a
product, service or brand compared to its competitors through
market research, sociological and psychological studies and
creative insight. The creation of advertising includes the
writing, design and development of concepts. When a concept has
been approved by a client, we supervise the production of
materials necessary to implement it, including film, video,
print and electronic materials. Our advertising programs involve
all media, including television, magazines, newspapers, cinema,
radio, outdoor, electronic and interactive media.
Our primary networks Publicis, Saatchi &
Saatchi and Leo Burnett Worldwide primarily provide
traditional advertising services, but each has some SAMS
operations as well. We are continuing to develop other networks
as well, including Bartle Bogle Hegarty (in which we have a 49%
interest) and Fallon Worldwide.
|
|
|
|
|
Publicis. This network is comprised of Publicis
advertising agencies in 83 countries around the world, including
Europe, the U.S. (where its agencies include
Publicis & Hal Riney, Burrell Communications and
Bromley Communications), the Middle East, South Africa, the
Asia/Pacific region, Latin America and Canada. Its SAMS
operations include Media System, a provider of human resources
communications operating in France, Publicis Dialog, a marketing
services and interactive communications unit with operations in
36 countries. |
12
|
|
|
|
|
Saatchi & Saatchi. This network consists
principally of Saatchi & Saatchi agencies in 80
countries around the world. It also includes The Facilities
Group, a U.K. firm that provides a range of technical and
creative services in the areas of design, artwork, print and
audiovisual production, and Saatchi & Saatchi X, a
worldwide marketing services network organization based in the
U.S. |
|
|
|
Leo Burnett. Headquartered in Chicago, the Leo Burnett
network operates full service advertising agencies in 83
countries around the world. It also operates a number of SAMS
units that focus primarily on direct, database and interactive
marketing and sales promotion under the ARC Worldwide banner in
37 countries. |
|
|
|
Fallon Worldwide. The principal offices of this network
are located in Minneapolis, New York City, London, Sao Paulo,
Singapore and Hong Kong. |
|
|
|
Bartle Bogle Hegarty. This U.K.-based network, in which
we have a 49% interest, has offices in London, Singapore, Tokyo,
New York and Sao Paulo. |
|
|
|
Others. Other units in this category include the Kaplan
Thaler Group, a New York-based agency, and Japans Beacon
Communications. |
SAMS
The full range of specialized communications services we offer
complements our traditional advertising activities. Services
provided by our SAMS operations include:
|
|
|
|
|
Direct marketing/customer relationship management.
Customer relationship management (or CRM) focuses on
building clients relationships with individual customers
through the use of direct marketing techniques and other means
(as opposed to traditional advertising services, which target
groups of consumers or the public at large). Through our CRM
operations, we assist clients in creating programs to reach
individual customers and enhance brand loyalty. In addition, we
provide the appropriate tools and database support to maximize
the efficiency of those programs. |
|
|
|
Sales promotion. Our sales promotion operations seek to
increase sales and awareness of clients products and
consumer loyalty through point-of-sale promotions, coupon
programs and similar means. |
|
|
|
Specialized advertising services. Our specialized
agencies provide services that are generally similar to those
offered by our traditional agencies. Unlike traditional
agencies, however, our specialized operations focus on
particular areas of advertising that have distinct
characteristics and require special knowledge and experience. We
provide specialized services primarily in the following areas: |
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare communications. We have a network of agencies
that work exclusively with clients in the healthcare industry to
reach consumers and doctors and other medical professionals
through advertising campaigns, medical conferences and symposia
and other means. These agencies also provide marketing services
such as public relations, consulting and sales personnel
recruitment and training. |
|
|
|
Human resources communications. Through our human
resources operations, we create employee recruitment-related
advertising, including classified advertising and campaigns to
improve a clients overall image with prospective
applicants, for companies seeking job applicants and recruiting
firms. We also assist clients in developing internal
communications programs. |
|
|
|
Multicultural communications. Some of our agencies have
developed expertise in creating advertising and communications
services aimed at specific ethnic groups, particularly
African-Americans and Hispanics in the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and financial communications. We provide
corporate and financial communications services designed to help
clients deliver their message to investors and the public and,
in particular, to help clients achieve their goals in connection
with mergers and acquisitions, initial public offerings, |
13
|
|
|
|
|
spin-offs, proxy contests and similar matters. We also provide
services aimed at helping clients address the communications and
public relations aspects of publicized crises and other major
events. |
|
|
|
Public relations. Our public relations services are
designed to assist clients with the management of their ongoing
relations with the press and the public. These services include:
(i) strategic message and identity development to help
clients position themselves in their markets and differentiate
themselves from their competitors, (ii) product and company
launch or re-launch services, which aim to create awareness of
and position a product or company with customers, and
(iii) media relations services, which help clients enhance
their brand recognition and image. |
|
|
|
Design. Our design services are intended to enhance the
visual symbols that affect a clients image and to ensure
that the design and packaging of products are consistent with
the means used to market them. |
|
|
|
Interactive communications. Our interactive
communications services consist primarily of website and
intranet design, Internet-related direct marketing and related
services and banner advertisement design. |
We provide SAMS services both through our traditional
advertising networks and through independent operations. Our
SAMS business units include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Direct marketing CRM/sales promotion/digital
communications. Our CRM, sales promotion and related
operations include ARC Worldwide and Publicis Dialog. |
|
|
|
Specialized advertising services. Our healthcare
operations are carried out through the Publicis Healthcare
Communications Group. Other specialized agencies include Burrell
Communications and Vigilante, Lápiz and Bromley
Communications in multicultural communications and Media System
in human resources communications. |
|
|
|
Corporate and financial communications and public
relations. We provide these services primarily through
Publicis Consultants, a specialized agency focusing upon
corporate communications, financial communications, public
relations and design, and Manning Selvage & Lee, a
public relations agency. Publicis Consultants has offices in the
U.S. (where its operations include Winner &
Associates), as well as France and elsewhere in Europe. Manning
Selvage & Lee has its headquarters in New York and
offices in countries around the world. Both units are now part
of a management board called PRCC, Public Relations and
Corporate Communications Group. |
|
|
|
Other. Our SAMS units in other categories include Capps
Digital or Mundocom in pre-press and Market Forward in digital
asset management. |
Media Operations
|
|
|
|
|
Media buying and media planning. Our media buying
services are often, though not always, provided in conjunction
with other advertising services. Through our media buying
operations, we analyze various media outlets, including
television, print, radio, Internet and outdoor venues, and
demographic and ratings information. In light of this analysis,
we help plan the most effective means of pursuing an advertising
or communications strategy. We then book the media space
necessary to implement the strategy, using our experience and
buying power to obtain favorable rates for our clients. |
|
|
|
Media sales. Our media sales operations sell advertising
space in outdoor media, print, radio and movie theaters to
advertising and media buying firms on behalf of media companies.
In some instances, they sell space to advertising and media
buying operations that are part of our group. They do so,
however, on an arms-length basis, dealing with those
businesses on the same terms as other customers. |
14
Business Structure
|
|
|
|
|
Media buying and media planning. Our media buying
operations consist primarily of ZenithOptimedia Group and
Starcom MediaVest Group. ZenithOptimedia conducts media services
operations in 53 countries around the world. It has a strong
presence in the U.K., the U.S., Germany, France and Spain.
Starcom MediaVest conducts media services operations in 71
countries around the world, with a particularly strong presence
in the U.S. |
|
|
|
Media Sales. We conduct media sales activities through
Médias & Régies Europe through subsidiaries
including Métrobus and Régie 1 (France), Publisistemas
(Spain) and Médiavision (France and international). |
Research Programs
We have developed a number of programs designed to enhance the
effectiveness of our communications services by providing
anthropological, psychological and cultural insights into the
behavior and attitudes of consumers and other target audiences.
These programs include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Context Analysis. A media-screening tool used by Publicis
network agencies in the network involved in strategic planning.
Context Analysis uses sociological methods to track new trends
and analyze the way the media covers them. |
|
|
|
Holistic Difference. Holistic Difference, developed by
the Publicis network, is a continuous research cycle of consumer
insight into the brand the connections that communications can
make between the brand and the consumer and the effect these
have on the business results. |
|
|
|
The Ideas Brief. A system developed by Saatchi &
Saatchi to help an agency identify ideas for transforming a
clients business, brand and reputation. The system has
three parts: the Equity Onion, which is used to
identify a brands core value of essence, the Brand
Axle, used to identify the extent to which a brand
associated with one product can be successfully used to market
other products and the Brand Temple for
multi-product companies that use several sub-brands. |
|
|
|
The Ideas Toolkit. A Saatchi & Saatchi program
that facilitates the monitoring of the effectiveness of a
communications program using anthropological and psychological
methods. |
|
|
|
The Lovemaker. A joint venture with QiQ. A unique
approach using quantitative research with an intense qualitative
element to determine the degree to which a brand is a lovemark
and benchmarks it against other brands either in the category or
in the broader market. |
|
|
|
The Lovemarks Hothouse. A joint venture with On Your
Feet. A practical, non-theoretical workshop which taps into the
emotional and experiential potential of the brand the
organization behind it. It is intended to make lovemarks theory
and strategy actionable. |
|
|
|
The Brand Belief System. A tool used in the Leo Burnett
network to analyze and develop the customer loyalty effects of a
communication strategy. |
|
|
|
Zoom. Zoom (Zenith Optimisation of Media) is a series of
tools used, among other things, to model the effectiveness of
proposed advertising campaigns, evaluate media outlets and
media-use strategies and track audience responses to major
events. |
|
|
|
Tardiis. Tardiis is a state of the art TV optimizer
exclusively developed for Starcom MediaVest Group
(SMG). It harnesses the power of viewing at the
program level to provide optimized schedules for individual
brands, as well as allocating programs across multiple products
and demos for multi-brand clients. Using Tardiis, SMG clients
have saved an average of 15% of their TV spend. |
|
|
|
InnoVestSM.
A proprietary system for accelerating and deepening the
acceptance of new products and services based on the
sociological phenomenon known as Diffusion of
Innovation. |
|
|
|
Media
PathwaysSM.
A unique qualitative and quantitative research procedure for
understanding the link between media, lifestyle and category
usage among a brands marketing target. Media Pathways |
15
|
|
|
|
|
provides a method for obtaining ideas for new communication
options as well as more effective ways to use existing options. |
|
|
|
Media Scopes. Project-based tools to address tactical
media issues including: |
|
|
|
|
|
TargetScope Surveys of key demographic groups to
identify media opportunities, e.g., Kidscope, an online
research tool that talks to kids all over the world about
attitudes, motivations and communication vehicles. |
|
|
|
Event Tracker A series of studies to evaluate the
effectiveness of advertiser participation in major global/local
TV events such as the Olympics and the Academy Awards. |
|
|
|
IP Tracker an online tracking tool which collects
data on awareness and use of web sites as well as deep dives
into areas which enable development and evaluation of the most
effective on line/off line communication programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
BattleField. This tool provides strategic insights into
category and brand dynamics by comparing brand(s) against
competition in terms of share, volume and value, pricing,
adspend, share of voice and tracking/recall scores.
Battlefield Modeling hones in on the impact that
advertising has on brand sales. |
|
|
|
Brand Contact Audit (BCA) and Consumer Contact Audit
(CCA). These are disciplined and objective assessments based
on all traditional and non-traditional contact points to help
identify optimal targeting opportunities. |
|
|
|
Wear-out. Wear-out is a proven media-based assessment of
actual wearout factors that allows us to understand and quantify
the decay in effectiveness of television and radio commercials
over time. |
|
|
|
Budget Allocation Time (BAT). BAT is
SMGs scheduling tool that allows planners to optimize the
impact of schedules based on media costs, sales patterns and the
brands advertising responsiveness. |
|
|
|
The Brand
Librarytm.
This is a worldwide, econometric database of advertisings
impact on sales. |
|
|
|
Brand Impactor. Brand Impactor runs off data from the
Brand
Librarytm
to allow our planners to predict key advertising factors, of
speed, frequency, and strength. |
|
|
|
Market Contact Audit. Through a worldwide license
agreement with Integration, the independent consulting firm that
developed MCA, SMG delivers an assessment of impact/potential of
alternate contact points with brand target, common currency to
compare effectiveness of contact options, prioritization of most
influential contact options and efficiency assessment for
contacts by linking effectiveness with cost data. |
|
|
|
Passion
Groupstm.
A quantitative and qualitative means of creating targets based,
not on age and gender, but on the consumers interest and
participation in activities from the job to having fun, as well
as mindsets and lifestyles. |
Competition
Our principal competitors include major international
advertising and communications groups, such as Omnicom Group,
Inc., the Interpublic Group, WPP Group plc and Havas,
independent local advertising agencies in markets around the
world and SAMS businesses that focus on specialized areas of
communications services.
Advertising and communications markets are generally highly
competitive, and we continuously compete with national and
international agencies for business. Competition may increase in
the near future as a result of multinational clients
increasing consolidation of their advertising accounts with a
very limited number of firms.
16
Governmental Regulation
Our business is subject to government regulation in France, the
U.S. and elsewhere. As the owner of advertising agencies
operating in the U.S. which create and place print,
television, radio and Internet advertisements, we are subject to
the U.S. Federal Trade Commission Act. This statute
regulates advertising in all media and requires advertisers and
advertising agencies to have substantiation for advertising
claims before disseminating advertisements. In the event that
any advertising we create is found to be false, deceptive or
misleading, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission Act could
potentially subject us to liability.
In France, media buying activities are subject to the Loi Sapin,
a law intended to require transparency in media buying
transactions. Pursuant to the Loi Sapin, an advertising agency
may not purchase advertising space from media companies and then
resell the space on different terms to clients. Instead, the
agency must act exclusively as the agent of its clients when
purchasing advertising space. The Loi Sapin applies to
advertising activities in France when both the media company and
the client or the advertising agency are French or located in
France. We are not aware of any existing, or contemplated,
similar legislation in the other countries in which we operate.
Governmental authorities in a variety of countries have proposed
and enacted limitations on the collection and use of information
regarding Internet users. In addition to government activity, a
number of industry and privacy advocacy groups from time to time
consider various new, additional or different self-regulatory
standards. Because our marketing services activities rely on the
collection and use of client data, new regulations or standards
imposed in this area could have an adverse impact on our
operations.
Seasonality
Clients advertising and communications expenditures
typically fluctuate in response to actual or expected changes in
consumer spending. Because consumer spending in many of our
major markets is typically lower in the beginning of the year
(following the holiday season) and in July and August (the most
popular vacation months in Europe and North America) than at
other times of the year, advertising and communications
expenditures are typically lower as well. Accordingly, our
results of operations are often stronger in the second and
fourth quarters of the year than they are in the first and third
quarters.
Raw Materials
Our business is not typically affected in any material respect
by changes in the availability or prices of any raw materials.
Marketing Channels
We market our services primarily by analyzing the communications
needs of our clients and prospective clients and by
demonstrating to such clients and prospective clients how we
propose to meet those needs. Our strong brands and reputation
are key elements of our marketing strategy.
Organizational Structure
We conduct our operations through approximately 950 direct and
indirect subsidiaries. Information concerning our consolidated
subsidiaries is provided in note 30 to our consolidated
financial statements.
Property, Plants and Equipment
We conduct operations in 196 cities around the world. In
general, we lease, rather than own, the office properties we
use. As of December 31, 2004, we owned real property assets
with a net book value of
45 million.
Our principal real property asset is the building we own and use
as our headquarters at 133 avenue des Champs-Elysées in
Paris. We use approximately 12,000 square meters of office
space in the building for advertising and communications
activities and approximately 1,500 square meters of
commercial property are occupied by the Publicis Drugstore and
two public cinemas.
17
We own four floors of the building occupied by Leo Burnett at 15
rue du Dôme in Boulogne, a suburb of Paris. We also have a
capital lease contract expiring in 2007 for the two other floors
in this building. Following the acquisition of
Saatchi & Saatchi, we also own a six-story building
located at 30 rue Vital Bouhot in Neuilly-sur-Seine, a suburb of
Paris, comprising approximately 5,660 square meters of
office space which is for the most part occupied by us.
Outside of France, we also own buildings in Brussels, Amsterdam,
Lisbon, Lima and Seoul, comprising a total of 14,000 square
meters, all in city center locations.
We have significant information systems equipment dedicated to
the creation and production of advertising, management of media
buying and administrative functions.
The net book value of assets under capital leases in the
consolidated balance sheet is
98 million
at December 31, 2004. The principal assets capitalized are
two floors of the office building located in rue du Dôme in
Boulogne Billancourt (a Paris suburb) and the Leo Burnett office
building in Chicago. Leo Burnetts capital lease contract
is in respect of assets with a value of
91 million
depreciable over 40 years and has been valued by an
independent expert. The office building is located at 35 West
Wacker Drive in Chicago, Illinois (United States).
|
|
Item 5. |
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this annual report. Our consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with French GAAP,
which differs in certain significant respects from
U.S. GAAP. See note 31 to our consolidated financial
statements for (i) a discussion of the principal
differences between French GAAP and U.S. GAAP as they
relate to us and (ii) a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of
our consolidated net income and consolidated shareholders
equity as calculated under French GAAP. The following discussion
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described
under Key Information Risk Factors.
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK FOR 2005
Our company grew dramatically in the 2001-2004 period, becoming
one of the four largest advertising and communications groups in
the world. This growth resulted primarily from acquisitions.
Although market conditions were generally weak over much of the
period, improvement in the performance of our existing
businesses made some contribution to our growth as well.
We believe our prospects for 2005 are favorable, with positive
trends in advertising firms across all geographical regions,
even without exceptional events such as the Olympic Games or the
European Football Championship. Considering the scale of new
business booked in 2004 and early 2005, we expect to once again
be able to outpace the market and post strong organic growth. We
believe our operating margin should increase due to
restructuring initiatives taken in 2004 as well as
rationalization projects now under way. We will also be
continuing efforts to improve management of working capital and
cash to reduce debt and earn a rating that places us among the
industrys best performers in this area too.
In geographical terms, we expect North America, the Asia/
Pacific region and Latin America to post consistently good
growth, whereas Europe is expected to lag, in particular due to
tougher economic conditions in France, Germany and northern
Europe.
The significant accounts we won in 2004 include the following:
Publicis. Globally, Publicis won new accounts with
Sanofi-Aventis (with several Groupe entities), and Zurich
Financial. Within the U.S., new clients included 24-Hour
Fitness, Beringer Blass Wine Estates, GSK/ Oskal,
LOréal/ SoftSheen-Carson, Nestlé/ Hot Pockets,
Sprint/ Local Consumer Solutions Division and
18
Whirlpool/ Gladiator GarageWorks. In Europe, Publicis conducted
new business with Bundesversicherungsanstalt (Germany); Renault
and Agencia Tributaria (Spain); the Ministry of Health, Lee
Cooper, Coeur de Lion and Fidelity Investments (France); UDC,
Region of Calabria, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Public
Works, Manetti & Roberts beauty products and
Nestlé/ Buitoni (Italy); Fortis Bank (Belgium); Paddy Power
and Powergen (U.K.). Finally, in the Asia/ Pacific region,
Publicis won new accounts with LOréal/ MiniNurse
(China); Purefoods (Philippines); Jetstar and Gulf Air
(Australia); Excelcomindo (Indonesia); Renault Samsung Motors
(extension); Korea Telecom, S Oil, Daewoo Consumer Electronics
and Hyundai Card S (Korea); and Shu Uemura (Japan).
Leo Burnett. Within the U.S., new accounts included
ConAgra/ Life Choice and Pam Cooking Spray, PetsMart and
Simmons. In Europe, Leo Burnett conducted new business with
Fissler (Germany); Loterias del Estado and the Red Cross
(Spain); Grana Padano (Italy); Caixa de Credito Agricola and
Sogrape wines (Portugal); Meat and Livestock Commission, Norwich
Union and Scottish Widows (U.K.); l Swisscanto pension funds
(Switzerland); and Unibanka (Slovakia). In the Asia/ Pacific
region, Leo Burnett won new accounts with McDonalds
(Australia); GM/ Cadillac (China); and McDonalds (Thailand
and India). In Latin America, Leo Burnett worked with
Supermercados Norte (Argentina); Swatch (Brazil); EASY DIY
stores (Chile); and Mexicana de Aviacion, Bacardi and Aeromexico
(Mexico). In the rest of the world, new accounts included
Telenor (Pakistan) and Ibrahim Ulagay pharmaceuticals (Turkey).
Saatchi & Saatchi. Globally, new accounts
included Lego/ Duplo and Clikits Universe, Novartis/ Theraflu,
Triaminic, Voltaren and Otrivin, P&G/ Prilosec (project).
Within the U.S., new accounts included Air Tahiti Nui,
MovieLink, Olympic Paint and Yoplait (extension). In Europe,
Saatchi & Saatchi conducted new business with Toyota/
Lexus (extension) and Sagatiba Rum (Europe); Suez
(corporate) and Axa (credit) (France); Friesland Hellas/
NoyNoy Yoghurts (extension) and OTE (telecom operator)
(Greece); ENEL/ Terna (extension Italy); Snipp
Juices (Czech Republic); Visa (extension), P&G/ Olay Daily
Facials, Saga Services automobile insurance and WRAP (Water and
Resources Action Programme) (U.K.); and FöreningsSparbanken
(Sweden). In the Asia/ Pacific region, Saatchi &
Saatchis new business included Pacific Brands and Emirates
Airline (Australasia); Lion Nathan/ Tooheys New
(extension) and Sydney Morning Herald (Australia);
Snowflake Beer (China); Reliance Infocom (India); and DB
breweries (New Zealand). Finally, in the rest of the world, new
accounts included Ritz-Carlton Hotels (North America, Caribbean
and Mexico); Embratel Telecom (Brazil); and Qatar Airlines
(Qatar).
Other advertising networks and agencies. Fallon
Worldwides new accounts included ConAgra Snack Foods,
Starz Encore and United TED (U.S.); ConAgra and Volkswagen/ Golf
(Japan); and BT Broadband, EMAP Magazine, Holsten Pils, Jacobs
Creek Wines and OMSCO (U.K.). The Kaplan Thaler Group
(U.S.)s new accounts included Eight OClock Coffee,
Foxwood Resort Casino and U.S. Bank. MS&L won new
accounts with Equifax and Sanofi-Aventis (extension) (U.S.); and
P&G (extension U.K.). Bromley Communications
(U.S.) won new accounts with San Antonio Convention and
Visitors Bureau and Circuit City. Conill Advertising (U.S.)
conducted new business with T-Mobile. Finally, Beacon
Communications (Japan) conducted new business with
McDonalds (jointly with Dentsu), Toys R Us,
Skymark Airlines, and Diageo Spirits.
Starcom MediaVest Group (media buying and consultancy).
In the U.S., Starcom won new accounts with Applebees
Restaurants, Caterpillar, Finnish Line, General Motors
(out-of-home), Heineken/ Dos Equis, Heinz Frozen Foods, Lego,
Mars/ Masterfoods, Oracle, Procter & Gamble
(media-planning) and Chuck E. Cheese restaurants. Within Europe,
new accounts included Interbrew/ Becks (Italy,
Netherlands, Czech Republic and Ukraine); Kraft Foods (U.K. and
Sweden + extension in the U.S.); Versatel (Germany); Kraft
Foods, State Lottery, Sunny Delight and Treasury (Spain);
Capital One, Levis and Sacla (Italy); U.S. Pharmacia
(Poland); Vattenfall (electricity) and Lindex (Sweden);
Raiffeisen Bank (Czech Republic); and Barclays/ First
Plus, Harveys and Pizza Hut (U.K.). In the rest of the
world, Starcom conducted new business with Diageo/ Johnnie
Walker Black Label (Asia); General Mills (China); Coca-Cola
(Hong Kong); and Coca-Cola (Peru).
ZenithOptimedia (media buying and consultancy). Globally,
ZenithOptimedia won a new account with Nestlé. In the U.S.,
new accounts included Ferrero and WildBlue. Within Europe,
ZenithOptimedia
19
conducted new business with AMB Generali Holding, Frosta and
Nordsee (Germany); Telenet (Belgium); Bolton (Italy); Heineken,
Grupo SOS Cuetara, Honda, Multiopticas and Sygma bank (Spain);
Cinna, Intermarché, Karavel/ Promovacances, Ligne Roset,
Ile de France region and Siemens Corporate (France); and
Associated British Foods, O2, Transitions Optical and Wella
(U.K.). Finally, in the Asia/ Pacific region, new accounts
included News Corporation and Jetstar (Australia); SmarTone
(Hong Kong); Nokia (India); and Taiwan Telecom Group.
Specialized agencies. Arc North America (U.S.) won new
accounts with Buena Vista Datacasting/ Movie Beam, California
State, Capital One, Häagen Dazs, P&G/ Always, Whisper,
PUR, Respiratory brands and other products, and Zales.
Publicis Healthcare Communications Group won new accounts with
BMS/ SRC Kinese and Galderma International/ Clobex (worldwide);
Yamanouchi (project Europe); Eli Lilly and Novartis/
Prexige (Germany); Abbott/ Humira, AstraZeneca/ Symbicort,
Avapro/ Avalide, Bayer/ Pravachol, Berlex/ Bonefos,
Bristol-Myers Squibb+Sanofi-Synthélabo/ Plavix, NitroMed/
BiDil, Roche+GsK/ Boniva, Sanofi-Synthélabo/ Eloxatin,
Hyalgan and Uroxatral, Schering-Plough+GsK/ Levitra (U.S.);
several brands for Boots Healthcare International, Crookes
Healthcare OTC products and Lundbeck/ Cipralex (U.K.).
The most important accounts lost during the year were:
|
|
|
|
|
Toys R Us, Lexmark, Earthlink and Subway (U.S.) in
advertising; and |
|
|
|
Miramax and Paramount Pictures (U.S.) and SC Johnson (Europe) in
media consultancy and media buying. |
In addition, we have won a number of new accounts since the
beginning of 2005, including media-buying for General Motors in
the U.S. and JPMorgan Chase globally, advertising for Revlon and
American Express Financial Services in the U.S. and for
Schering-Plough globally. We expect that these new contracts
will help to largely offset accounts lost in 2004.
Other Factors
Among the factors that could cause our results of operations to
differ materially from our expectations are those described
under Key Information Risk Factors.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based on our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with French
GAAP. The reported financial condition and results of operations
are sensitive to accounting methods, assumptions, estimates and
judgments that underlie the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements. We base our estimates on our experience
and on various other assumptions deemed reasonable, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of our assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ
significantly from these estimates.
When comparing our performance between years, we discuss
non-GAAP financial measures relating to the impact that foreign
currency rate changes, acquisitions/ dispositions and organic
growth have on reported revenue. For example, we determine
organic revenue growth by adjusting reported revenue of the
prior year:
|
|
|
|
|
To apply current year foreign exchange rates to prior year local
currency figures; |
|
|
|
For entities acquired, by including current year revenue in
prior year revenue; and |
|
|
|
For entities sold, by excluding prior year revenue so that the
period of consolidation is similar in both years. |
Our management believes that discussing organic revenue provides
a better understanding of our revenue performance and trends
than reported revenue because it allows for more meaningful
comparisons of current
20
period revenue to that of prior periods. Our management also
believes that organic revenue determined on a generally
comparable basis is a common measure of performance in the
industry in which we operate.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with French GAAP, which requires the use of estimates and
assumptions. We believe that, of our significant accounting
policies (which are summarized in note 1 to our
consolidated financial statements), the following involve the
greatest degree of judgment and complexity, and are therefore
most likely to affect our consolidated net income materially if
various assumptions were changed significantly. For a discussion
of certain similar accounting policies under U.S. GAAP, see
Critical Accounting Policies under
U.S. GAAP.
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
Accounts receivable is presented net of our allowance for
doubtful accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is
recognized for accounts receivable for which there is a
collection risk. The allowance is assessed based on past
experience, reviews of ageing and analysis of specific accounts.
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, Goodwill and Intangible
Assets |
We amortize property and equipment, goodwill and intangible
assets over their useful lives. Useful lives are based on our
estimate of the period that the assets will generate revenue.
Assets are reviewed for impairment whenever changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable.
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax
assets to the amount determined to be realizable. Significant
management judgment is required in assessing the amount of
valuation allowance required. In the event we were to determine
that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the
future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to
the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such
determination was made. Likewise, should we determine that we
would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax
asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset
would be charged to income in the period such determination was
made.
Substantially all of our revenue is derived from commissions and
fees for advertising and communications services. A written
agreement with clients (e.g., purchase order, letter,
contract) indicating the nature and the amount of the work to be
performed is a prerequisite for any recognition of revenue. For
commission based customer arrangements, including advertising
creation and media space buying services, revenue is recognized
at the date of broadcast or publication. For sales of technical
advertising (e.g., radio, television, movies, brochures,
mailings, studies), revenue is recognized following final client
acceptance of the delivered product. For fees (e.g.,
project based arrangements, fixed-fee contracts, time-based
arrangements), revenue is recognized when the service is
rendered, based on the percentage of completion method. Some of
our contractual arrangements with clients also include
performance incentives that allow us to receive additional
payments based upon our performance for the client measured
against specified qualitative and quantitative objectives. We
recognize the incentive portion of the revenue under these
arrangements when the client achieves the relevant goals, the
bonus is no longer contingent or refundable under the
contractual arrangement with the client and when collectibility
is assured.
Except where otherwise indicated, information regarding
operations acquired in the 2002-2004 period is included in our
consolidated financial statements only from the date of
acquisition. For example, we include only three months (plus
five days) of results for Bcom3 in our 2002 consolidated
financial statements because
21
we acquired it at the end of September 2002. We have not
disposed of any material operations since the beginning of 2002.
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS 2004 COMPARED TO 2003
Our Company as a Whole
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
|
( millions) | |
2003 (as published)
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
Components of revenue changes (excluding organic growth):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
Other changes in scope of consolidation
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
2003 Revenue at comparable exchange rates and scope of
consolidation
|
|
|
3,679 |
|
|
Organic growth(1)
|
|
|
146 |
|
2004
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
(1) |
In percentage terms, organic growth was 4%, or
146 million
divided by 2003 revenue at comparable exchange rates and scope
of consolidation of
3,679 million. |
Consolidated revenue of Publicis to December 31, 2004 came
to
3,825 million,
edging down just 1% from
3,863 million
in 2003. This is principally due to the decline of the
U.S. dollar against the euro, since revenue for the year
showed an organic rise of 4%. The effect of changes in the scope
of consolidation was limited.
With the euro up sharply against the dollar, translation of
dollars into euros accounted for
156 million
out of a total negative foreign-exchange impact of
183 million
altogether. The average euro value of the dollar was down 9%
from 2003 to 2004. Other currencies had only a marginal impact
on consolidated financial data. Importantly, the effects faded
somewhat as of the second quarter.
At constant exchange rates and scope of consolidation, revenue
showed an organic rise of 4%. This overall figure reflected the
combined effects of like-for-like rises that included 2% in
Europe, 2.7% in North America, 10% in the Asia/ Pacific region,
15.9% in Latin America and 22.1% for the rest of the world
(i.e., Africa and the Middle East).
Expenses
Total operating expenses were down 2.1% to
3,118 million
from
3,186 million
in 2003. As a percentage of revenue, expenses decreased from
82.4% in 2003 to 81.5% in 2004. Payroll expense amounted to
2,197 million,
or 57.4% of revenue, down a full percentage point from 58.3% in
2003. This is in large part attributable to the effects of
restructuring in connection with the integration of Bcom3 and
the establishment of shared resource centers. The decline is all
the more significant as staff numbers were up by 907 at constant
scope and structure. Other operating expense, amounting to
921 million,
represented a nearly constant 24% of revenue. Operating income
before depreciation and amortization thus rose 4.4%, from
677 million
or 17.5% of revenue in 2003 to
707 million
or 18.5% in 2004.
Depreciation and
Amortization
Depreciation and amortization for the year ended
December 31, 2004 amounted to
117 million
or 3.1% of revenue, down from
124 million
in 2003.
22
Operating Income
For the reasons stated above, our operating income before
depreciation and amortization rose 4.4% to
707 million
in 2004. Operating income before amortization and impairment of
the value of acquisition-related intangibles rose 6.7% from
553 million
in 2003 to
590 million,
bringing a sharp rise of 110 basis points in operating
margin (operating income before goodwill and amortization of
acquisition-related intangibles/revenue), from 14.3% to 15.4%,
beating the Publicis Groupe target.
In 2004 Publicis Groupe recognized impairment of the value of
acquisition-related intangibles in a total amount of
123 million,
much of this being for the value of Nelson Communications
client portfolios and the Nelson brand, which have suffered
steep declines since the acquisition of the company in 2000. The
bulk of the remainder concerned the client portfolios of Frankel
and, to a lesser extent, Fallon, both also acquired in 2000.
Financial Income/
Expense
Net interest and other financial items represented a charge of
39 million,
compared with
60 million
in 2003, a steep decline reflecting a number of changes and
recent moves to simplify the balance sheet. Interest expense on
Interpublic exchangeable bonds was eliminated as a result of the
exercise of holders put options in March 2004. Results
also reflect the impact over four months of the redemption of
the bond component of bonds with attached equity warrants
(OBSAs) and a significant contribution from Credit Linked Notes
(CLN). These contributed to interest income from
January to September and their sale at the end of September 2004
also had a positive effect, mainly through reversal of
interest-income deferrals. Charges for other debt, primarily at
fixed interest rates, showed no significant change.
Exceptional Income/
Charge
Exceptional items represented a net income of
23 million
in 2004, up from a charge of
7 million
in 2003. The 2004 income resulted from redemption of the bond
component of bonds with attached equity warrants (OBSAs) and the
sale of CLN in September 2004 led to recognition of a
26 million
capital gain in addition to an exceptional charge of
3 million,
mostly representing capital losses on other disposals.
Income Tax
We incurred income tax of
134 million
in 2004, down from
172 million
in 2003. The effective tax rate came to 33.8%, compared to 37.8%
in 2003. This decrease is in large part attributable to the
first benefits of measures taken to optimize Publicis
Groupes tax position and simplify legal structures in the
wake of the Bcom3 acquisition. Publicis Groupe also reversed
deferred tax liabilities of
130 million
relating to the redemption of the bond component of bonds with
attached equity warrants (OBSAs), reflecting the
difference between the fair value and book value of these
securities. This impact has not been included in the effective
tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2004 (see
notes 2.1 and 8 to our consolidated financial statements).
Income from Companies
Accounted for by the Equity Method
There was no material change in our interest in the income of
affiliates accounted for by the equity method
( 6 million
in 2004 compared to
4 million
in 2003).
Goodwill Amortization
Amortization of goodwill amounted to
188 million
in 2004, up from
113 million
in 2003. This increase included
88 million
in exceptional amortization relating to Triangle, Publicis
Casadevall Pedreño, Publicis Peru and Winner &
Associates, to mention only the most significant ones.
23
Minority Interests
Minority interests in income increased from
24 million
in 2003 to
26 million
in 2004, due primarily to the rise in earnings of agencies with
minority shareholders outweighing the effects of the 2003 buyout
of minority shareholders in ZenithOptimedia and Starcom Motive.
Net Income and Earnings Per
Share
After amortization of goodwill, net income after minority
interests came to
210 million,
a rise of 40% from
150 million
in 2003.
Earnings per share before amortization of goodwill and
impairment of acquisition-related intangible items and excluding
exceptional items came to
1.74, up
21% from
1.44 in
2003, while earnings per share after these items came to
1.15 after
0.82
a rise of 40% exactly matching that in total net income. Fully
diluted earnings per share before amortization of goodwill and
impairment of acquisition-related intangible items and excluding
exceptional items rose 14% to
1.40 while
fully diluted earnings per share after these items was also up
29% at
0.97.
By Geographical Area
Europe
Publicis. Publicis business in France suffered from
the loss in 2003 of the Carrefour account, while new accounts
had still to yield their full benefits. Revenue was also hit by
the persistent difficulties of human-resource communications at
Media System and the temporary negative effects of the merger
between Publicis Etoile and Publicis Dialog. In the U.K.,
business was satisfactory, with the Allied Domecq account making
a positive contribution. Performance in the Northern
Europe region suffered from lackluster market conditions
in Germany and the Netherlands, compounded by agency
reorganization and management changes, as well as particularly
testing conditions in Scandinavia during the first half. In the
southern Europe region, Publicis Worldwide faced divergent
trends: Italy got back onto an encouraging growth path, but the
Spanish market, which had a very good year in 2003, suffered
from the effects of the change of government on government
advertising at the end of the year, and markets were down from
the previous year in both Portugal and Greece.
Leo Burnett. Leo Burnett continued to show a moderate
overall decline, mainly because of the loss of the Philips
account combined with cutbacks in Fiats advertising
investment and delays in benefits from the merger with
DArcy in countries including France and Italy. Conditions
remained difficult in Northern Europe, particularly Norway,
Denmark and the Netherlands, but Leo Burnett Germany posted a
healthy rise in revenue.
Saatchi & Saatchi. At Saatchi & Saatchi
revenue returned to a steady path, with the new Europe-wide
account for the Bel Group and a healthy inflow of new business
from local clients contributing to improvement on key markets
including France and Germany. The London agency continued to
suffer from the loss of accounts in 2003 and internal
reorganization, leading in particular to the appointment of a
new CEO, Lee Daley. Agencies in Spain and Italy benefited from
favorable market conditions and new accounts.
Starcom MediaVest Group. Business was satisfactory on the
whole, although not in France and Italy. Starcom MediaVest U.K.
benefited from new accounts including Cadbury, Western Union,
Sun Microsystems, Barclay Card, Oracle and Kraft, while the
German agency put in a good performance backed by business with
Cadillac and Procter & Gamble. Starcom MediaVest Russia
continued to report strong growth.
ZenithOptimedia Group. ZenithOptimedia Group also
experienced strong growth in 2004. ZenithOptimedia U.K. was able
to offset the loss of British Telecom and KFC accounts with the
arrival of UIP, Procter & Gamble and, more recently,
O2, combined with the increased media presence of some existing
clients. In continental Europe, trends improved throughout the
year, with revenue up sharply, particularly in France, Germany,
Belgium and Spain, although conditions were difficult in Italy
and the Netherlands.
24
Médias & Régies Europe. Specializing
in media sales and representation, Médias &
Régies Europe clearly returned to growth in 2004 over the
previous year, against a backdrop of economic firming. The
strongest sectors were radio and outdoor advertising. Cinema
advertising representation through Médiavision staged a
spectacular recovery from the second quarter on. Sales for the
press were also back on an upward track.
North America
Publicis. A decline in Canadas business was
temporary, being essentially attributable to a freeze on the
advertising outlays of Quebec government agencies. This was
later offset by a strong showing in new business, particularly
in Toronto. In the U.S., Publicis USA posted an excellent
performance driven by new accounts and a rise in business with
existing clients and Bromleys successes in Hispanic
communications.
Leo Burnett. Advertising revenue booked by Leo Burnett
USA and Chemistri in the U.S. edged down as new accounts
booked in 2004 (e.g., Petsmart, ConAgra) and longstanding
ties to major clients failed to fully offset the loss of
accounts including Delta Airlines, Gateway, Polaroid, Toys
R Us, and Starbucks in late 2003 and early
2004. Major management changes and reorganization at Leo Burnett
USA should turn the trend around in 2005. Arc North America, the
marketing services unit that results from the merger of Frankel,
Arc, Semaphore Partners and iLeo, and is now part of the Leo
Burnett network, posted a decline in revenue reflecting the
continued revamp of its offering and organization.
Saatchi & Saatchi. Revenue suffered from the
loss of the Johnson & Johnson account at the end of
2003, which was not offset by any significant new business in
2004. Major reorganization of the New York agency under its new
CEO Mary Baglivo should start to yield benefits in the course of
2005.
Fallon USA. Fallon USA showed continued growth, driven by
Virgin Mobile and increased spending from major traditional
clients, cushioning the impact of the loss of Subway.
Starcom MediaVest Group. Performance at Starcom MediaVest
Group benefited from large accounts including Coca-Cola/ USA and
Mars/ Masterfoods as well as the extensions of business with
Procter & Gamble and brisk media business with large
clients. The Diversified Services Division continued to post
strong growth with sports marketing and event specialist Relay
benefiting from increased business.
ZenithOptimedia. Business in the U.S. and Canada was
strong, reflecting accounts booked last year that include
AstraZeneca, Toyota Scion, Abbott Laboratories, Sprint and
Sanofi in the U.S., and Kia, Pfizer, Prizm, General Mills,
Cadbury and Canada Post in Canada, as well as increased spending
by some existing clients.
Healthcare. Medicus USA made an excellent showing,
expanding business with existing clients such as
Sanofi-Synthélabo and AstraZeneca, at the same time posting
particularly good results in Medical Education. Klemtner revenue
picked up, in particular with Sanofi, Roche and Schering Plough
accounts, but Nelson Lifebrands suffered continued declines as a
result of accounts lost, reduced client spending, and
reorganization of the agency.
Publicis. Publicis revenue in Latin America showed
strong rises except in Brazil, where the main negative fact was
the loss of the Carrefour account, while overall performance in
Asia was satisfactory, although short of the mark in Malaysia
and Thailand. Finally, revenue showed a healthy rise in the
Middle East.
Leo Burnett. Growth was strong in other parts of the
world. Business in Latin America benefited from firm trends in
Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil, reflecting increased
spending from certain international clients. In the Asia/
Pacific region, strong showings in China, India, Thailand and
Malaysia, with a large number of new accounts booked, including
Cadillac in China and McDonalds in several countries,
including Japan, more than offset difficulties encountered in
Singapore and Australia. Revenue also showed a healthy rise in
the Middle East, benefiting from growth in local accounts.
25
Saatchi & Saatchi. Revenue rose steeply in both
Latin America, where Brazil, Argentina and Puerto Rico were main
contributors, and in the Asia/ Pacific region, particularly
China, Southeast Asia and Australia, with the last benefiting
from the new Westpac account.
Starcom MediaVest Group. Business at Starcom MediaVest
Group was also on a very favorable track in the Middle East and
in Latin America, with business in Colombia and Venezuela driven
by accounts with international clients, as well as in the Asia/
Pacific region, specifically China, India and Southeast Asia.
However, business in Australia, continued to suffer from the
loss of accounts with the Queensland Government and
Woolworths in 2003.
Healthcare. Business in the Asia/ Pacific region (Japan
and Australia) continued to face stiff competition and revenue
declined from 2003.
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS 2003 COMPARED TO 2002
Our Company as a Whole
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
|
( millions) | |
2002 (as published)
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
2002 Pro-forma revenue including Bcom3 for the entire year
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
Components of revenue changes (excluding organic growth):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
Changes in scope of consolidation
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
2002 Revenue at comparable exchange rates and scope of
consolidation
|
|
|
3,788 |
|
|
Organic growth(1)
|
|
|
75 |
|
2003
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
(1) |
In percentage terms, organic growth was 2%, or
75 million
divided by 2002 revenue at comparable exchange rates and scope
of consolidation of
3,788 million. |
Our revenue for 2003 came to
3,863 million,
an increase of 32.0% from the
2,926 million
generated in 2002. This increase was primarily due to the
inclusion of a full year of results from Bcom3 (which was
consolidated over one quarter and five days in 2002), partially
offset by the negative effects of changes in exchange rates. The
bulk (70%) of the exchange rate effect resulted from the rise of
the euro against the dollar. Organic growth was 2%, reflecting
stronger results, mostly in the second half of the year, in
North America, the Asia/ Pacific region, Latin America, Africa
and the Middle East. Growth in those areas more than offset
continued contraction in Europe.
Expenses
Total operating expenses rose 33.1% to
3.2 billion
from
2.4 billion
in 2002. As a percentage of revenue, expenses rose from 81.8% in
2002 to 82.5% in 2003. This increase primarily reflected a rise
in payroll expenses from 56.7% to 58.3%, which can be explained
by (i) the fact that in 2002, Bcom3 was consolidated only
for what is typically its most profitable quarter and therefore
contributed to an improved personnel cost ratio and
(ii) the addition of payroll expenses relating to temporary
and free-lance employees (which had previously been classified
as other operating expenses). The latter change also
contributed to a reduction in other operating expenses, which
fell from 25.1% of revenue to 24.1% of revenue in 2003, although
the effect of cost savings from the continuing integration of
Bcom3 played a larger role.
26
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
Depreciation and amortization on all assets other than goodwill
rose from
104 million
in 2002 to
124 million
in 2003, as a result of the consolidation of Bcom3 for the full
year.
For the reasons stated above, our operating income before
depreciation and amortization rose 27% to
677 million
in 2003. Operating income before amortization of
acquisition-related intangibles rose from
429 million
to
553 million
and overall operating income increased from
405 million
to
522 million.
Operating margin, which we define as operating income before
amortization of acquisition-related intangibles divided by
revenue, fell slightly from 14.7% to 14.3%. This decline
resulted from the fact that, in 2002, Bcom3 was consolidated
only for what is typically its most profitable quarter.
|
|
|
Financial Income/ Expense |
We incurred net financial expense of
60 million
in 2003, up from
28 million
in 2002. This increase reflects primarily (i) an increase
in indebtedness, (ii) the inclusion of interest payments on
our ORANE bonds, which had previously been treated as dividend
payments (see note 2.2 to our consolidated financial
statements for a description of those bonds), and (iii) the
full year effect of interest on discounted Bcom3 property lease
provisions.
|
|
|
Exceptional Income/ Charge |
Exceptional items represented a net charge of
7 million
in 2003, up from a charge of
3 million
in 2002. The 2003 charge resulted from capital losses incurred
in connection with asset sales
( 2 million)
and write-downs relating to discontinued operations
( 5 million).
We incurred income tax of
172 million
in 2003, up from
132 million
in 2002. The effective tax rate came to 37.8%, compared to 35.3%
in 2002. This increase was caused by interest payments on our
ORANE bonds as well as the fact that an increased proportion of
our revenue was generated in countries with relatively high
corporate taxes, in particular the U.S.
|
|
|
Income from Companies Accounted for by the Equity
Method |
There was no material change in our interest in the income of
affiliates accounted for by the equity method
( 4 million
in 2003 compared to
3 million
in 2002).
Amortization of goodwill amounted to
113 million
in 2003, up from
69 million
in 2002, due primarily to the acquisition of Bcom3.
Minority interests in income fell from
29 million
in 2002 to
24 million
in 2003, due primarily to our acquisition of all of the stock of
ZenithOptimedia Group and Starcom Motive we did not previously
own.
|
|
|
Net Income and Earnings Per Share |
For the reasons stated above, consolidated net income amounted
to
150 million,
up from
147 million
in 2002. Net earnings per share came to
0.82, down
from 0.99
in 2002.
27
By Geographical Area
In France, market conditions continued to be unfavorable
throughout the year. Although group revenue rose, this was due
primarily to the Bcom3 acquisition. Our existing operations
reported negative revenue growth due to weak results from our
advertising, media sales and marketing services operations.
Revenue from the rest of Europe increased also as the result of
the Bcom3 acquisition. As in France, revenue growth from
existing operations was negative, due to challenging market
conditions.
The Publicis Worldwide network experienced difficulties early in
the year in a number of countries, including Germany,
Switzerland, Italy and Spain, but achieved significant
improvements in those markets as the year progressed. Growth was
satisfactory in the U.K. through-out the year. Poor economic
conditions, however, led to negative revenue growth in the
Netherlands and Scandinavia.
The Leo Burnett Worldwide network experienced difficulties in
the region in 2003, in part due to the problems faced by Fiat,
one of its major clients. In addition, market conditions were
poor in Scandinavia and, until the end of the year, in Italy and
Spain as well.
Saatchi & Saatchi also had a difficult year in the
region. The London office lost accounts with the British Army
and Sony and its German operations faced the loss of an account
with Commerzbank. Saatchi & Saatchis winning of a
new account with the Bel Group, however, improves its outlook in
the region for 2004.
Our media services operations reported mixed results, with
positive showings in some countries, such as Spain, the U.K. and
Russia, and declines in others, such as Germany and Italy.
In North America, our revenue was
1,737 million,
up 34.1% from
1,295 million
in 2002. This increase was caused primarily by the inclusion of
a full year of results from Bcom3, although improving market
conditions contributed as well.
The Publicis Worldwide networks operations benefited from
the Hewlett-Packard/ Compaq account won in 2002 as well as from
accounts (including Procter & Gamble and Heineken)
transferred by DArcy, a network we dissolved during the
year. These accounts more than made up for losses of accounts
with Ciba Vision and TGI Friday.
Leo Burnett suffered the full effect of the loss of the USPS
account in 2002, as well as losses in 2003 of accounts with
Delta Airlines and Polaroid. However, these losses were almost
completely offset by increased spending from existing clients.
Moreover, we expect that accounts with new clients, including
Gateway Computers, ConAgra/ Healthy Choice, Wella and
McDonalds/ Big Mac, will offset the effect of accounts
lost late in 2003, in particular Philips. Saatchi &
Saatchi had positive growth in the region in 2003, mostly due to
increased spending from major clients such as Toyota, General
Mills and Procter & Gamble. Saatchi &
Saatchis outlook for 2004, however, may be adversely
affected by the loss of its U.S. account with
Johnson & Johnson/ Tylenol, Pepcid, Saint Joseph
Aspirin and Mylanta at the end of 2003.
Fallon resumed growth after a difficult year in 2002, winning
accounts with clients including Virgin Mobile. Kaplan Thaler
generated strong revenue growth as well.
Our media services operations also reported gains, as the
effects of lost accounts (including those with Burger King,
Dennys and Exxon Mobil) were more than offset by increased
spending from other clients (including GM, Procter &
Gamble, Kraft and Allstate), improved market conditions and
gains from clients added in 2002, especially Miramax. Starcom
MediaVests Diversified Services Group, which provides a
variety of marketing services, reported significant growth.
On the other hand, a number of SAMS units, including the
Publicis Healthcare Communications Group and Frankel, had
disappointing years, due in part to the management time and
attention required to be invested in the process of
restructuring and rationalizing those operations.
28
In the rest of the world, our revenue was
583 million,
up from
388 million
in 2002. Although this was primarily due to the Bcom3
acquisition, improving market conditions in a number of regions
also had an impact.
For Publicis Worldwide, revenue growth was strong across most of
Latin America. The primary exception was Brazil, which suffered
poor economic conditions throughout most of the year, though
some improvement was evident in the fourth quarter. Growth in
Australia/ Southeast Asia, Malaysia and Singapore more than
offset disappointing performances in China, Thailand, Taiwan and
Korea.
Leo Burnett generated strong growth in a number of markets,
especially in the Asia/ Pacific region (despite the continuing
effects of its loss of the Woolworths account in
Australia), the Middle East and Latin America (except
Venezuela). Saatchi & Saatchi reported significant
revenue growth, also due to improving conditions in Latin
America and the Asia/ Pacific region.
Our media services operations reported gains throughout Asia,
but reported little growth in South America, despite the effects
of the BellSouth contract.
LIQUIDITY
We meet our need for liquidity primarily through a combination
of cash generated from operations and bank loans.
Net cash flow from operating activities reflects funds generated
from operations and changes in operating assets and liabilities.
Net cash from operating activities was
770 million
in 2004, up from 559 million in 2003. This increase
reflected the restructuring charges relating to the integration
of Bcom3 more than offset by a reduction of our working capital
requirement resulting from our focus on cash program.
Net cash flow from investing activities includes acquisitions
and divestitures of intangible and tangible assets, acquisitions
of businesses, investments in companies accounted for using the
equity method and net differences in other investments and
marketable securities. Net cash used in investing activities was
a generation of
255 million
in 2004, as compared to the use of
677 million
in 2003. The improvement is largely attributable to the proceeds
received in 2004
( 487 million)
in connection with the sale of the CLN purchased in 2003 for
380 million.
In addition, cash used for acquisitions (net of cash from
disposals) decreased from
200 million
in 2003 to
124 million
in 2004, primarily as a result of buyout payments.
Net cash flow from financing activities includes dividends,
changes in debt position and share repurchase programs. Net cash
used in financing activities were
927 million
in 2004, compared to net cash provided by financing activities
of
450 million
in 2003. Net cash used in 2004 resulted largely from the
redemption of the bond components of the OBSA for an amount of
558 million
and from the IPG exchangeable bonds for an amount of
193 million.
In 2003, the net cash provided by financing activities was due
to an increase in indebtedness.
There are no significant legal or economic restrictions on the
ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to us in the form
of dividends, loans or advances.
Currently unused sources of liquidity include short-term bank
facilities and a one billion five-year syndicated credit
facility. We expect that we will be able to satisfy our cash
requirements for the next 12 months from cash flow
generated by operations and these sources of funds. With respect
to acquisitions made in the ordinary course of our business, our
general policy is to avoid dilution of existing shareholders by
using cash or treasury shares to make acquisitions, although we
may incur some additional indebtedness in connection with
acquisitions.
29
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND INDEBTEDNESS
As of December 31, 2004, we had total outstanding financial
indebtedness of
1,960 million
(compared to
3,188 million
as of December 31, 2003). This indebtedness was comprised
of the following:
7 million
in obligations under our 2% notes due 2007,
929 million
in obligations under our 1.0% notes due 2018 (including
239 million
in redemption premium),
672 million
in obligations under our 0.75% notes due 2008,
29 million
in bank loans,
172 million
of bank overdrafts,
139 million
in capitalized lease obligations and
12 million
in accrued interest. Net financial indebtedness was
563 million,
a figure calculated by subtracting from the total
(i) 202 million
of the redemption premium noted above,
(ii) 67 million
in marketable securities and
(iv) 1,128 million
in cash and cash equivalents. See Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for a summary of
the maturity, currency and interest rate structure of our
indebtedness and for information concerning our use of financial
instruments for hedging purposes.
As described under Information on the Company
Business Overview Seasonality, we often
generate greater revenue in the second and fourth quarters of
the year than we do in the first and third quarters. As a
result, our financing needs are sometimes greater in the first
and third quarters.
COMMITMENTS FOR CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
As of December 31, 2004, we had no material commitments for
capital expenditures other than those relating to earn-out
provisions recorded in the balance sheet, pursuant to which we
may be required to pay former owners of acquired companies a
maximum of
90 million.
We intend to finance these expenditures through cash from
operations and, if necessary, additional bank loans.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
As described under Information on the Company
Services and Business Structure Research
Programs, we have a variety of programs designed primarily
to use psychological, anthropological and other methods to
assess and enhance the efficiency of our advertising and
communications services. In addition, we have developed a number
of systems that use advanced technology to address clients
needs, including Siren Technologies, an in-store updateable
digital signage system, and BrandGuard, an integrated on-line
marketing and communications system designed to enhance
clients control of their brand assets.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS
Commitments presented below are gross amounts that have not been
discounted to present value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Falling Due | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
One to five | |
|
More than | |
Contractual Commitments |
|
Total | |
|
one Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Five Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Commitments given
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease commitments
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Commitments and options to purchase minority interests
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Commitments to sell investments
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees(1)
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Total
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
Commitments and options to purchase minority interests
Commitments and options to purchase minority interests have been
estimated at the balance sheet date on the basis of contractual
clauses and the latest available data. Commitments to purchase
minority interests
30
are monitored centrally and are valued on the basis of
contractual clauses and projections in respect of the relevant
data over the period of the contract.
Guarantees
These principally comprise:
|
|
|
|
|
a guarantee given to a bank in an amount of 88 million
euros, as owner of a 45% shareholding in a company called iSe
(International Sports & Entertainment AG), which is
committed to paying a total of 176 million euros in January
2005, for the acquisition of a license from FIFA; |
|
|
|
guarantees given to various banks in an amount of
113 million euros in respect of future media space buying
transactions on behalf of the Groups clients; and |
|
|
|
guarantees of payment of property taxes and charges relating to
the Leo Burnett building in Chicago, for a total amount of
71 million euros over the period up to 2012. |
The maturity schedule in respect of financial indebtedness and
finance lease indebtedness is set out in note 23 to our
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following Due | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
One to five | |
|
More than | |
Other commercial Commitments |
|
Total | |
|
one Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Five Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Commitments received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unutilized credit lines(1)
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments given
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other commercial commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See Liquidity Risk in note 1.2 to our
consolidated financial statements. |
Commitments related to bonds and to ORANEs
Bond convertible into Interpublic Group (IPG)
shares 2% January 2007
The terms of this bond provide, since June 30, 2003, the
option for bearers to request the exchange of their bonds for a
number of shares of Interpublic Group representing a premium of
30% over the reference price (being a conversion price of 36.74
USD), on the basis of 244.3 shares per bond.
However, following the exercise of the put option in
February 2004, only 750 convertible bonds remain in circulation
at December 31, 2004. Publicis could thus be required, in
case of a request for exchange, to deliver a maximum of 183,223
Interpublic Group shares in redemption of the bond.
OCEANE 2018 2.75% actuarial January 2018
With respect to the OCEANEs, bondholders may request that bonds
be converted, at the rate of one share for each bond (which
bonds had a unit value of 39.15 euros on issue), at any time
after January 18, 2002 until the seventh business day
before the maturity date (January 2018). Publicis therefore has
a commitment to deliver, if requests for conversion are made,
17,624,521 shares which may, at Publicis discretion,
be either new shares to be issued or existing shares held in its
portfolio.
In addition, the bondholders have the possibility of requesting
early redemption in cash, of all or part of the bonds they own,
on January 18 in 2006, 2010, and 2014. The early redemption
price is calculated in such a way as to provide a gross annual
actuarial yield on the bond of 2.75% at the date of redemption.
31
OCEANE 2008 0.75% July 2008
With respect to the OCEANEs, the bondholders may request that
bonds be converted, at the rate of one share for each bond (with
a value of 29 euros on issue), at any time after August 26,
2003 until the seventh business day before the maturity date
(July 2008). Publicis therefore has a commitment to deliver
23,172,413 shares which may, at Publicis discretion,
be either new shares to be issued or existing shares held in its
portfolio.
ORANEs Bonds redeemable in new or existing
shares September 2022
Each ORANE gives a right to receive 18 new or existing Publicis
shares, at the rate of one bond per year, over the period from
September 1, 2005 until the twentieth anniversary of
issuance of the bond (2022). Publicis therefore has the
obligation to deliver 1,562,500 shares each year from 2005
to 2022, being a total of 28,125,000 shares, which may, at
Publicis discretion, be either new shares to be issued or
existing shares held in its portfolio.
Equity warrants
The exercise of the equity warrants, which could occur at any
time between September 24, 2013 and September 24,
2022 would lead to an increase in Publicis
capital stock. At a maximum, Publicis is committed to issuing
(in the case where all equity warrants were to be exercised)
28,125,000 shares with a par value of 0.40 euros and a
premium of 30.1 euros.
It should be noted that at December 31, 2004 no material
commitment such as a pledge, a guarantee or a mortgage or other
security over assets, nor any other material off-balance sheet
commitment as defined by current accounting standards, exists.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our estimates of amounts due
pursuant to contractual obligations to which we were subject as
of December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
More than | |
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of euros) | |
Long-Term Debt Obligations(1)
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
Capital (Finance) Lease Obligations
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Purchase Obligations(2)
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Balance Sheet under
French GAAP(3)
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Total
|
|
|
3,504 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Long-term debt obligations were comprised of the following:
7 million
in obligations under our 2% notes due 2007,
929 million
in obligations under our 1.0% notes due 2018 (including
239 million
in redemption premium),
672 million in obligations under our 0.75% notes due
2008,
29 million
in bank loans,
172 million
of bank overdrafts and
12 million
in accrued interest. Excluding bank overdrafts, most of our debt
consists of bonds which do not include specific covenants, but
only standard credit default event clauses triggered by
liquidation, bankruptcy, or default (either on the debt itself
or on other indebtedness if the amount defaulted on exceeds a
specified threshold). Early redemption options relate to OCEANE
2018 and are exercisable by bondholders only in 2006, 2010 and
2014, except in the case of our 2.0% notes due 2007, which
were classified as short-term debt as of December 31, 2003.
In February |
32
|
|
|
2004, the vast majority of the holders of these bonds exercised
their right to early redemption effective as of March 1,
2004 for an aggregate amount of
193 million. |
|
(2) |
Purchase obligations relate to standard put options to
repurchase minority interests, the value of which has been
estimated on the basis of contractual clauses as of the latest
available date. |
|
(3) |
Other long term liabilities reflected on the balance sheet under
French GAAP relate to earn-out provisions (see
Commitments for Capital Expenditures). |
MOVE TO IFRS ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The consolidated accounts of Publicis, as required by European
law, must be presented in accordance with International
Financial and Reporting Standards (IFRS) as from
January 1, 2005, with comparative information shown for
2004. With the final adoption in April 2005 of new SEC
regulations regarding the periods to be presented under a
comprehensive set of GAAP which allow foreign private issuers
such as our company to include only two years of audited
consolidated financial statements for their first year of
reporting under IFRS, we intend to select January 1, 2004
as our transition date to IFRS and will therefore present
restated 2004 and 2005 IFRS consolidated financial statements in
our Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005
and continue to report under French GAAP as primary GAAP for
2004. As from January 2004, under the guidance of Group
financial management, Publicis created IFRS impact task forces,
whose objective was to identify the principal accounting
differences and to prepare the opening balance sheet at
January 1, 2004, in accordance with the rules applicable in
2005. The amounts of the principal adjustments to the opening
consolidated IFRS balance sheet, at January 1, 2004, and on
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004, have been calculated; however the
process of exhaustively identifying all differences with current
standards is currently being finalized. The opening consolidated
IFRS balance sheet, and a pro-forma consolidated income
statement and balance sheet for 2004 prepared under IFRS
standards, will be published, at the latest, at the time of
publication of Publicis interim report for the six months
ended June 30, 2005.
It should be noted that the work performed has been on the basis
of the IFRS standards and interpretations published to date.
Future changes in IFRS and the finalization of implementation of
the standards within Publicis could require additional
adjustments.
Taking account of the above, the results of work performed as of
June 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
In the context of first time adoption of IFRS (options envisaged
under IFRS 1), the following policies have been retained by
Publicis for the opening balance sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
Business combinations completed before January 1, 2004,
particularly the acquisition of Saatchi & Saatchi,
which was treated in accordance with the authorized alternative
method under article 215 in French GAAP, have not been
retrospectively restated; |
|
|
|
Revaluation to market value at January 1, 2004 of the
Publicis building situated at 133 avenue des Champs Elysées
in Paris, this value being set permanently as the new historical
cost; |
|
|
|
Application of the accounting treatment applicable to stock
options for plans put in place after November 7, 2002; |
|
|
|
Application of financial instruments standards as of
January 1, 2004; |
|
|
|
Recognition of all actuarial gains and losses on pension
commitments by deduction from shareholders equity; and |
|
|
|
Transfer of foreign currency translation adjustments included in
opening shareholders equity to an other reserves
account caption. |
|
|
|
|
|
The main adjustments identified to Publicis consolidated
accounts are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments: breakdown of bonds which are
convertible or reimbursable in shares into their components; |
33
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the debt component is determined at the date
of issuance through discounting future cash flows using a market
interest rate for a loan with similar characteristics but
without the conversion option. The value of the conversion
option, which is calculated as the difference between the fair
value of the instrument as a whole and the fair value of the
debt component, is reclassified to shareholders equity; |
|
|
|
The impact on results is the difference between the market rate
retained and the contractual actuarial rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments: Interpublic Group
(IPG) shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
IPG shares are valued in the opening balance sheet and
subsequent balance sheets at their fair value (per the stock
market). Future changes in fair value are taken to
shareholders equity. |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments: foreign exchange hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of hedging instruments held in respect of third
party receivables and payables and of forecasted flows is
recognized in the balance sheet. |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fair Value hedge, the change in fair value is recorded
in the income statement. The effect on the income statement is
offset by the revaluation of the hedged item; |
|
|
|
For the Cash Flow hedge, the change in fair value is recorded in
a specific account caption in shareholders equity. The amount
initially recognized in shareholders equity is reversed to
the income statement when the transaction occurs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments: conditional commitments to acquire
minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
These conditional commitments must be recognized in other
liabilities in the balance sheet when the Group is committed to
making the acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments: CLN |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation of the entity that issued the CLN, which was
effective under French standards as from January 1, 2004,
did not include recognition of the associated derivatives (asset
swap and credit default swap). Under IFRS, the asset swap and
the credit default swap are recognized at fair value on the
balance sheet, with changes in fair value being taken to the
income statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of options granted, determined at the date of the
grant, is amortized through the income statement over the
vesting period of the options. |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is no longer amortized but, rather, is subject to
annual impairment tests. |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes tax loss carryforwards of
acquired companies: |
|
|
|
|
|
The tax advantage arising from use of tax losses of acquired
companies (which arose in periods prior to acquisition) is
neutralized by a reduction of goodwill of equal amount. |
|
|
|
|
|
The calculation of earnings per share is considerably modified: |
|
|
|
|
|
The denominator takes account, for both basic and diluted
earnings per share, of the average number of shares in issue,
increased by the number of future shares to be issued under
instruments in respect of which future conversion is obligatory
(ORANEs). |
34
|
|
|
|
|
The presentation of the consolidated financial statements will
be significantly modified under IFRS: |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment expense (previously presented after net
income of consolidated companies) is henceforth included at the
operating income level. The same applies to exceptional items,
notably capital gains and losses on disposal; |
|
|
|
Interest expense related to discounting of pension and other
post employment benefit commitments are no longer recognized in
personnel costs but, rather, are included in financial costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet presentation will need to be changed to separately
show current and non-current items (notably in respect of the
provisions for contingencies and charges caption) and to
separately present deferred tax assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Group performed an analysis of the entities presented in its
internal reporting in order to determine whether such entities
constituted business segments to be disclosed separately. It
appears, after regrouping services under a number of criteria
(nature of products or services, production processes, type or
category of clients, methods of distribution and supply of
services, nature of regulatory environment), that the different
activities identified do not present any significant divergences
in terms of either profitability or risk. |
In view of this analysis, and after taking account of practices
in the sector, the Group considers that it operates in a single
segment, being Communications.
Lastly, as regards the information systems environment in the
context of the IFRS changeover project, work is in progress.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FRENCH GAAP AND
U.S. GAAP
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with French GAAP, which differ in certain significant respects
from U.S. GAAP. As a result, under U.S. GAAP, our net
income (loss) amounted to
343 million
in 2004,
155 million
in 2003 and
(14) million
in 2002, compared to
210,
150 million
and
147 million,
respectively, under French GAAP. Under U.S. GAAP,
shareholders equity amounted to
3,570 at
December 31, 2004,
3,403 million
at December 31, 2003,
3,846 million
at December 31, 2002, compared to
881,
726 million
and
1,501 million,
respectively, under French GAAP.
The differences between French GAAP and U.S. GAAP are more
fully described in note 31 to our consolidated financial
statements. In terms of their effect on our net income, the
differences consist mainly of:
|
|
|
|
|
The amortization of tangible assets, intangible assets related
to the business combination with Saatchi & Saatchi,
which was treated as a purchase under U.S. GAAP but was
accounted for using the alternative method under French GAAP
(which is similar to the pooling of interests method formerly
available under U.S. GAAP). The amortization expense of
tangible and intangible assets related to the Saatchi &
Saatchi business combination amount to
32 million,
33 million
and
36 million
in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively; |
|
|
|
The change in contingent value rights issued in connection with
the business combination with Saatchi & Saatchi, which
is recognized in earnings under U.S. GAAP and resulted in a
charge of nil in 2004 and 2003 and
31 million
in 2002; under French GAAP, those rights were not recorded as a
liability until December 31, 2001; |
|
|
|
Restructuring charges capitalized as part of net assets acquired
for certain business combinations that are disallowed and
charged to expense under U.S. GAAP amounted to nil,
129 million
and
10 million
in 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively; |
35
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair values of certain embedded derivatives
inherent in our 2.0% notes due 2007 which are recognized in
earnings under U.S. GAAP, but are considered to be
off-balance sheet commitments under French GAAP; |
|
|
|
In accordance with the adoption of SFAS 142, as a result of
the transitional impairment test, the net impairment charge of
160 million
recorded in 2002 as a Cumulative effect of accounting
change on the consolidated statement of operations to
write down the carrying value of intangibles with indefinite
useful lives to their fair values; |
|
|
|
The reversal of goodwill amortization expense recorded under
French GAAP, as goodwill is no longer amortized under
U.S. GAAP but reviewed annually for impairment. The
goodwill amortization reversal in 2004, 2003 and 2002 amounted
to
188 million,
113 million
and
75 million,
respectively; |
|
|
|
Compensation arrangements related to acquisitions, which were
recorded using the purchase accounting method in our
consolidated financial statements in French GAAP and are
recorded as compensation expense when incurred under
U.S. GAAP; |
|
|
|
The consolidation of the entity that issued the credit linked
notes; the entity is not consolidated under French GAAP, due to
the absence of an interest in the entitys capital as of
December 31, 2003, but is considered a variable interest
entity subject to consolidation under U.S. GAAP. The
derivatives were fair valued with difference in fair value
recognized in the statement of income under U.S. GAAP.
Under French GAAP, the derivatives were accounted as off-balance
sheet commitments. As of January 1, 2004, the entity has
been consolidated under French GAAP, but the derivatives
continue to be accounted for as off-balance sheet
commitments; and |
|
|
|
The reversal of the interest income recorded through the
amortization of equity warrants classified as long-term debt in
accordance with French GAAP, but classified as paid-in capital
under U.S. GAAP. |
In addition, classification differences between French GAAP and
U.S. GAAP give rise to differences in operating income,
relating in particular to the amortization of goodwill.
The differences between French GAAP and U.S. GAAP in terms
of their effect on shareholders equity at
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 relate primarily to:
|
|
|
|
|
The accounting for the business combination with
Saatchi & Saatchi, which was treated as a purchase
under U.S. GAAP but was accounted for using the derogatory
method under French GAAP; |
|
|
|
The valuation of marketable securities, which are recorded at
fair value under U.S. GAAP and historical cost under French
GAAP; |
|
|
|
The impact of goodwill related to an acquisition in 1993
written-off to shareholders equity under previous French
accounting guidance; |
|
|
|
The difference in purchase price for the business combination
with Bcom3 (i.e., at fair value of the securities issued
in the exchange as of the date of announcement of the
acquisition under U.S. GAAP, but as of the date of
acquisition under French GAAP); |
|
|
|
The accounting for Bcom3s 1997 sale-leaseback transaction,
which is treated as a financing lease under U.S. GAAP with
the building and the related financing obligation reflected at
fair value at the acquisition date, but treated as a capital
lease under French GAAP with the related assets capitalized at
their fair value at the acquisition date but only for the
portion of the building leased back by Bcom3 and the related
debt consisting of the present value of the minimum lease
payments; |
|
|
|
The reversal of accumulated amortization expenses on goodwill,
as under U.S. GAAP, goodwill are no longer amortized but
tested for impairment annually; |
|
|
|
The formation of ZenithOptimedia Group, the assets of which were
revalued under French GAAP in 2002 and 2001 but were written up
to fair value under U.S. GAAP in 2000; |
36
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that under U.S. GAAP, treasury shares are deducted
from shareholders equity at the amount at which they were
repurchased, while under French GAAP, they are recorded as an
investment if they are reserved for issuance upon the exercise
of stock options; and |
|
|
|
The minimum pension liability adjustment, not recognized under
French GAAP. |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES UNDER U.S. GAAP
In addition to the accounting methods described in
Basis of Presentation Critical
Accounting Policies, we believe that the application of
the following U.S. critical accounting policies, which
differ from those used for French GAAP, requires reliance upon
significant judgments, estimates and assumptions. We believe
that, of our significant accounting policies, the following
involve the greatest degree of judgment and complexity, and are
therefore most likely to affect our net income under
U.S. GAAP materially if various assumptions were changed
significantly.
|
|
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
Goodwill has been calculated under U.S. GAAP by comparing
the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired with the fair
value of the consideration, including associated transaction
costs. Until 2002, such goodwill was amortized over
40 years. Effective January 1, 2002, goodwill and
intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer
amortized but are subject to annual impairment tests due to our
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142). Intangible assets with a definite
life continue to be amortized over their useful lives and are
tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate
that a carrying amount of an asset (asset group) may not be
recoverable.
In our French GAAP consolidated financial statements, deferred
taxes have not been recognized due to the uncertainty of their
recoverability. For U.S. GAAP purposes, deferred tax assets
have been recorded and a 100% valuation allowance has been
provided because the recoverability of the deferred tax assets
was not considered to satisfy the applicable more likely
than not standard.
Under U.S. GAAP, we account for stock options using the
intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25), and have adopted the disclosure provisions of
SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123) and other interpretations.
When stock options are granted to employees or directors with an
exercise price inferior to the fair value of the underlying
shares at the date of grant, the resulting premium is
immediately reflected in shareholders equity. This premium
is offset in shareholders equity by an equivalent deferred
compensation amount. Therefore, there is no impact on total
shareholders equity. The deferred compensation amount is
amortized as compensation expense in the income statement over
the vesting period of the options.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
reached a consensus on EITF 03-1, The Meaning of
Other Than Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain
Investments. EITF 03-01 contains additional guidance
for determining when an investment is impaired. The effective
date for applying this guidance is currently suspended pending
the issue of a further FASB Staff Position statement. In the
opinion of Publicis, adoption of the additional guidance would
not have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (FAS 123R).
FAS 123R requires that Publicis
37
recognizes the cost of share-based payments granted to employees
measured at the grant-date fair value of the award. Publicis is
required to adopt FAS 123R effective January 1, 2006
to all share-based grants made or modified after June 15,
2005 and for the unvested portion of outstanding share-based
grants made prior to June 15, 2005. Publicis is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting FAS 123R.
In March 2004, the FASB ratified the consensus reached on EITF
Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and the
Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128,
Earnings Per Share. EITF 03-6 clarifies what
constitutes a participating security and requires the use of the
two-class method for computing basic earnings per share when
participating securities exist. EITF 03-6 is effective
April 1, 2004 and requires retroactive adjustment to
earnings per share presented for prior periods. The adoption did
not have any impact on the consolidated financial statements of
Publicis.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153
Exchanges of Non-Monetary Assets as an amendment to
APB Opinion No. 29 Accounting for Non-Monetary
Transactions. APB 29 prescribes that exchanges of
non-monetary transactions should be measured based on the fair
value of the assets exchanged, while providing an exception for
non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets.
SFAS 153 eliminates the exception provided in APB 29
and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of
non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance.
SFAS 153 is to be applied prospectively and is effective
for all non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2005. Publicis does not expect
there to be any material effect on the consolidated financial
statements upon adoption of the new standard.
|
|
Item 6. |
Directors, Senior Management and Employees |
DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
We have a two-tier management structure pursuant to which a
management board (directoire) manages our day-to-day
affairs under the general supervision of a supervisory board
(conseil de surveillance), the members of which are
elected by shareholders. The members of our management board are
also our senior managers. We refer to members of the supervisory
board and management board collectively as directors.
Supervisory Board
The supervisory board has the responsibility of exercising
whatever ongoing supervisory authority over the management and
operations of our company it deems appropriate. Throughout the
year it carries out such inspections as it considers appropriate
and is given access to any documents it considers necessary. The
supervisory board also reviews the annual accounts prepared by
the management board and presents a report on those accounts to
the shareholders at the annual shareholders meeting. It
authorizes the management board to take actions related to
strategic decisions, including those related to transactions
that could substantially affect the scope of our activities and
significant agreements. In addition, under French law, the
supervisory board holds certain specific powers, including the
power to appoint the members of the management board. Our
statuts (bylaws) provide that each member is elected
by the shareholders at an ordinary general shareholders
meeting. Members of the supervisory board can be removed from
office by a majority shareholder vote at any time. They meet as
often as the interests of our company require. Pursuant to our
statuts, each member of the supervisory board must own at
least 200 of our shares.
38
The following table sets forth, for each member of our
supervisory board, the members current function in our
company and principal business activities outside of our
company, the date the members current term of office is
scheduled to expire and the date the member joined the
supervisory board.
|
|
|
Elisabeth Badinter
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
November 1987 (appointed as chairperson of the supervisory board
in April 1996) |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2006 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Chairperson of the supervisory board Chairperson of the
supervisory board of Médias & Régies Europe |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Author |
|
Robert Badinter
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 1996 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2008 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Professor Emeritus, University of Paris I
(Panthéon-Sorbonne); honorary attorney |
|
Simon Badinter
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 1999 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2011 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Chairman of the management board and director of international
development, Médias & Régies Europe SA
(France) Member of supervisory board of
Médiavision & Jean Mineur SA (France) Director of
Métrobus SA (France), Gestion Omni Media Inc. (Canada) and
Omni Media Cleveland Inc. (USA) Chairman and chief executive
officer of Médias & Régies America Inc. (USA)
Chairman and chief executive officer of development office of
Médias & Régies Europe Inc. (USA) |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
None |
|
Monique Bercault
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 1998 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2010 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
|
|
Technical consultant to the chairman of the management board of
Médias & Régies Europe SA (France) |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
None |
39
|
|
|
Michel Cicurel
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 1999 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2010 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Chairman of the management board of La Compagnie
Financière Edmond de Rothschild Banque SA and
Compagnie-Financière Saint-Honoré SA (France) |
|
|
Chairman of the board of ERS SA, Edmond de Rothschild SGR
(Italy) and Edmond de Rothschild SIM (Italy) |
|
|
Chairman of the supervisory board of Edmond de Rothschild
Private Equity Partners SAS |
|
|
Member of the board of Banque Privée Edmond de Rothschild
(Switzerland), Edmond de Rothschild Limited (U.K.),
La Compagnie Financière Holding Edmond et Benjamin de
Rothschild (Switzerland), La Compagnie de Trésorerie
Benjamin de Rothschild (Switzerland), Bouygues Telecom SA
(France), Cdb Web Tech (Italy), Cir International (Luxembourg),
Rexecode (France), Société Générale SA
Permanent representative of Compagnie Financière Edmond de
Rothschild Banque, Edmond de Rothschild Corporate Finance SA
(France), Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management SA (France),
Edmond de Rothschild Financial Services SA (France), Edmond de
Rothschild Multi Management SAS (France), Equity Vision SA
France and Assurances et Conseils Saint-Honoré (France)
Member of the board of Limited Partners of Rothschild &
Compagnie Banque SCS (France) |
|
|
Permanent representative of Compagnie-Financière
Saint-Honoré on the board of Cogifrance SA (France)
Auditor, Paris-Orléans SA |
|
Michel David-Weill
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 1990 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2008 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Chairman of Lazard LLC (USA) (until May 2005) |
|
|
Chairman and chief executive officer of Lazard Frères
Banque SA (France) (until September 2004) |
|
|
Chairman and managing partner of Maison Lazard SAS (France)
(until May 2005) President of Malesherbes SAS (France) Chairman
of the board of Rue Impériale SA (Until May 2004) |
|
|
Vice-chairman of the board of Groupe Danone SA (France) |
|
|
Chairperson of the supervisory board of Eurazeo SA (France) |
40
|
|
|
|
|
Managing partner of Lazard Frères SAS (France) (until May
2005), Partena SCS (France) and Partemiel SNC (France) Manager
of Parteman SNC (France) and Parteger SNC (France) and BCNA |
|
Sophie Dulac |
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 1998 (appointed as vice-chairperson in June 1999) |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2010 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director, vice-chairperson |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Manager of Sophie Dulac Productions SARL (France), Sophie Dulac
Distribution SARL (France) |
|
|
Chairperson of the board of Les Ecrans de Paris SA (France)
Vice-chairperson of the board of CIM de Momarte SA (France) |
|
Yutaka Narita |
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
September 2002 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2008 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Principal advisor & chairman of Dentsu Group, Dentsu
Inc. |
|
|
Chairman of the Renovation Committee of the Tokyo Chamber of
Commerce President of the Japan Advertising Agencies Association |
|
|
Chairman of the Japan Audit Bureau of Circulation |
|
|
Executive director of FM Japan Ltd., Broadcasting System of
Niigata Inc., Nippon Venture Capital Co., Ltd. Tokyo
Broadcasting System, Inc., Television Nishinippon Corporation
and SBC Ltd Member of the Foundation Board of the Institute for
Management Development Member of the French Chamber of Commerce
and Industry in Japan and the Strategic Council on
Attractiveness of France Trustee of the Japan Association of
Corporate Executives |
|
|
Professor Emeritus, Beijing University |
41
|
|
|
Tateo Mataki
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
September 2004 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2008 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
President and chief executive officer of Dentsu Inc. |
|
|
Vice president of Japan Marketing Association International
Advertising Association Japan Chapter Organizing Committee for
the IAAF World Championship in Athletics 2007 Member of
Controlling Committee of Japan Advertising Agencies Association
Member of the Nippon Academy Award Association and The Tokyo
Chamber of Commerce and Industry Representative of Supporting
Member of the National Federation of UNESCO Associations in
Japan Senior Corporate Advisor to Iwate Broadcasting Co., Ltd. |
|
Hélène Ploix
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 1998 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2010 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
President of Pechel Industries Partenaires SAS, Pechel
Industries SAS (France) and Pechel Services SAS (France) Member
of the board of Lafarge (France), BNP Paribas (France), Boots
Group (U.K.), Ferring (Switzerland) Permanent representative of
Pechel Industries on the boards of Aquarelle.com Group SA
(France), Quinette Gallay SA (France), CVBG-Dourthe Kressman SA
(France), Xiring SA (France), CAE International SA (France)
Manager of Hélène Ploix EURL |
|
Felix George Rohatyn
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 2001 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2007 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
President of Rohatyn Associates LLC (USA) |
|
|
Director of LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton S.A. and
Rothschilds Continuation Holdings AG Member of supervisory board
of Lagardère Group S.A. (France) |
42
|
|
|
Robert Seelert
|
|
|
Initially appointed
|
|
August 2000 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2006 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director and chairman of Saatchi & Saachi Worldwide,
Inc. (USA) Director and chief executive officer of
Saatchi & Saatchi Holdings Worldwide, Inc. (USA);
Saatchi & Saatchi Compton Worldwide, Inc. (USA);
Saatchi & Saatchi North America, Inc. (USA); Zenith
Trustees Limited (USA) |
|
Amaury-Daniel de Seze
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 1998 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2010 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
President of PAI Partners SAS (France), Financière PAI SAS
(France) Director of Eiffage SA (France), Erbé SA
(Belgium), Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA (Belgium), Groupe
Industriel Marcel Dassault SA (France), Power Corporation du
Canada Holding Ltd. (Canada), Pargesa Holding SA (Switzerland),
United Biscuits Holdings Ltd. (U.K.), UGC SA (France), Novalis
SAS (France) Member of the supervisory board of Gras Savoye SCA
(France) |
|
Henri-Calixte Suaudeau
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
November 1987 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2006 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director of Publicis Conseil SA (France) |
|
Gérard Worms
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 1998 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
June 2010 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Managing partner of Rothschild et Cie |
|
|
Banque (France) and Rothschild et Cie |
|
|
SCS (France) President of S.G.I.M. SA (France) |
|
|
Member of the supervisory board of Métropole
Télévision SA (France), Médias et Régies
Europe SA (France), and Paris-Orléans SA (France) Director
of Editions Atlas SA (France) and Cofide SA (Italy) Auditor of
Ondéo Degrémont SA (France), SIACI SA (France) |
Business Experience of
Supervisory Board Members
Elisabeth Badinter, born on March 5, 1944, is
the daughter of Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet. Ms. Badinter is
a philosopher and was a lecturer at the Ecole Polytechnique, and
is the author of numerous books. She has been a member of our
supervisory board since 1987 and its chair since 1996.
43
Robert Badinter, born on March 30, 1928, is
the husband of Elisabeth Badinter. Mr. Badinter has served
as the president of Frances Constitutional Court. He has
also been a practicing attorney. He is now a professor of law at
the Paris I University (Panthéon Sorbonne).
Simon Badinter, born on June 23, 1968, is the
son of Elisabeth Badinter and Robert Badinter. Mr. Badinter
joined Médias & Régies Europe in 1991. He was
appointed chairman and chief executive officer of
Médias & Régies Europe in 2004.
Monique Bercault, born on January 13, 1931,
has held a variety of positions with our company since joining
us in 1953. In 1972, she was named head of human resources at
the predecessor company of Médias & Régies
Europe.
Michel Cicurel, born on September 5, 1947, is
currently chair of Compagnie Financière Edmond de
Rothschild Banque and Compagnie-Financière
Saint-Honoré. He was previously a senior official in the
French Treasury Department, after which he served as deputy
general manager of Compagnie Bancaire, general manager of Cortal
Bank, president of Dumenil-Leble Bank and administrator, general
manager and vice president of Cerus.
Michel David-Weill, born on November 23,
1932, has held a variety of senior positions in the Lazard
group, which he joined in 1961. Among other things, he was the
chair of Lazard LLC, chairman and chief executive officer of
Lazard Frères Banque and chairman and managing partner of
Maison Lazard SAS until May 2005. He is also currently
vice-chairman and director of the Danone Group.
Sophie Dulac, born on December 26, 1957, is
the niece of Elisabeth Badinter and granddaughter of Marcel
Bleustein-Blanchet. Ms. Dulac is the founder and manager of
a recruitment counseling company. She has been a member of our
supervisory board since 1997 and a vice president of our company
since 1999.
Yutaka Narita, born on September 19, 1929,
joined Dentsu in 1953. In 1971, he became director of the
newspaper/magazine division and later director of one of
Dentsus account services divisions. Since he became a
member of the Dentsu board of directors in 1981, he served as
managing director from 1983-1989 and was subsequently promoted
to senior managing director. In 1993 he became the ninth
president of Dentsu, and, as of June 27, 2002, he became
chairman and chief executive officer of Dentsu.
Tateo Mataki, born on March 2, 1939,
has been president and chief executive officer of Dentsu Inc.
since 2004. Mr. Mataki joined Dentsu in 1962, where he held
several positions until he joined the Dentsu board of directors
in 1995 first as managing directors for the Newspaper and
Magazines Divisions, then as senior managing director in charge
of Account Services. Named executive vice president in 1999, he
became the tenth president of Dentsu in 2002.
Hélène Ploix, born on September 25,
1944, has served as president of the Banque Industrielle et
Mobilière Privée, adviser to the French Prime
Minister, director of the International Monetary Fund and the
World Bank, deputy general manager of the Caisse des
Dépôts et Consignations and president of the Caisse
Autonome de Refinancement and CDC Participations. She has been
president of Pechel Industries since 1997.
Felix George Rohatyn, born on May 29, 1928,
served as the U.S. Ambassador to France from 1997 until
2000. He had previously been a managing director of Lazard
Frères and Company. He joined Lazard Frères in 1948
and became a partner there in 1961. From 1968 to 1972, he has
also served as a member of the Board of Governors of the New
York Stock Exchange. From 1975 to 1993, he was chairman of the
Municipal Assistance Corporation of the City of New York.
Robert Seelert, born on September 1, 1942,
worked from 1966 to 1989 for General Foods Corporation, serving
as president and chief executive officer of its Worldwide Coffee
and International Foods subsidiary from 1986 until 1989. He
served as president and chief executive officer of Topco
Associates, Inc. from 1989 to 1991 and held the same positions
for Kayser Roth Corporation from 1991 to 1994. He became chief
executive officer of Cordiant in 1995 and took the same position
with Saatchi & Saatchi in 1997. He was appointed
chairman of Saatchi & Saatchi in 1999.
44
Amaury-Daniel de Sèze, born on May 7,
1946, has held senior operating and management positions in a
number of major companies. He was appointed general manager of
Volvo France in 1981 and served as its chairman from 1986 to
1993. From 1990 to 1993, he was also president of Volvos
European operations, senior vice president of AB Volvo and a
member of the executive committee of the Volvo group (AB Volvo).
He has served on the boards of the French Postal Service,
Schneider, Sema Group, Bruxelles Lambert group, Poliet,
Clemessy, Compagnie de Fives Lille and Eiffage, among others.
Henri-Calixte Suaudeau, born on February 4,
1936, joined our company in 1989 and served as president of our
Drugstore subsidiary until 1999. Prior to 1989, he was an estate
administrator and real estate valuation consultant for the
French court system. He has led our real estate department since
1997.
Gérard Worms, born on August 1, 1936,
began his career as a technical adviser in the French civil
service. Beginning in 1972, he held general management positions
at the Hachette group, the Rhône Poulenc group and then at
Société Générale de Belgique. From 1990 to
1995, he served as chairman and chief executive officer of the
Compagnie de Suez and Chair of the Indosuez Bank. From 1995 to
1999, he was chairman of the Conseil des Commanditaires of
Rothschild et Cie Banque (Paris).
Management Board
Under French law, the management board has broad powers to act
on behalf of our company to further our corporate purposes,
subject to those powers expressly granted by law to the
supervisory board and to our shareholders. The management board
must obtain the authorization of the supervisory board to enter
into certain transactions. However, these restrictions cannot be
used to rescind a transaction with a third party who has entered
into the transaction in good faith.
Pursuant to our statuts, the management board must have
at least two but no more than five members. Our supervisory
board may fill any vacancies on the management board within two
months. The supervisory board also appoints one of the members
of the management board as chairperson. Under French law, the
chairperson of the management board is appointed and may be
removed as chairperson (but not as a member of the management
board) at any time by the supervisory board with or without
cause. A member of our management board may be removed by the
shareholders or by the supervisory board. The management board
meets as often as the interests of our company require. Under
French law, members of the management board must be natural
persons, but need not be shareholders of our company. There is
no limitation, other than applicable age limits, on the number
of terms that a member of the management board may serve.
The following table sets forth, for each member of our
management board, the members current function in our
company and principal business activities outside of our
company, the date the members current term of office is
scheduled to expire and the date the member joined the
management board.
|
|
|
Claudine Bienaimé
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
January 2004 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
December 2007 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director and General Secretary |
|
|
Director of: |
|
|
Publicis Conseil SA (France), Médiasystem SA (France),
Solange Stricker Associés SA (France), Groupe
Zenithoptimedia SA (France), Publicis Groupe Investissements BV
(Netherlands), Publicis Holdings BV (Netherlands), Publicis
Groupe Holdings BV (Netherlands) |
45
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent representative of Publicis Conseil SA (France) on the
board of: Publicis EtNous SA (France), Paname Communication SA
(France), Carré Noir SA (France), Publicis Dialog SA
(France), Re: Sources France SAS, Loeb & Associés
SA (France), Corporate Factory SAS (France), World Advertising
Movies SA (France), Publicis Atlantique SA (France), Publicis
Koufra SA (France), Publicis Cachemire SA (France), Implication
(France) and 2ème Communication SA (France) Sopofam SA
(France) |
|
|
Manager of: |
|
|
Drugstore Champs Elysées SNC (France) |
|
|
Member of the Management Committee of SFPP Holdings SAS (France) |
|
|
General secretary of Publicis Groupe SA (France) |
|
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Chief executive officer of Société Immobilière du
Boisdormant SA (France) |
|
|
Acting general director of: |
|
|
Rosclodan SA (France), |
|
|
Director of Gévelot SA (France), P.C.M. Pompes SA
(France), Gévelot Extrusion SA (France), Gurtner SA (France) |
Jack Klues
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
January 2005 |
Expiration Date of Term
|
|
December 2007 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director
President and director of:
Starcom Worldwide, Inc. (USA) |
|
|
Starcom Media Vest Group Holdings, Inc. (USA) |
|
|
Director of: |
|
|
Starlink Services, Inc (USA) |
|
|
Starcom Worldwide SA (France), |
|
|
Starcom Worldwide SA de CV (Mexico), |
|
|
Relay, Inc. (USA), |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Director of Off the Street Club |
46
|
|
|
Maurice Lévy
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
November 1987 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
December 2007 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Chairman of the Management Board |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Publicis Conseil SA
(France) |
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Publicis USA
Holdings, Inc. (USA) |
|
|
Member of the supervisory board of Médias &
Régies Europe SA (France) |
|
|
Director of: |
|
|
Optimedia Holdings Limited (U.K.), Multi Market Services Limited
(U.K.), Zenith Optimedia Group Limited (U.K.), Publicis
Communication (Pty) Limited (South Africa), Publicis
Johannesburg (Pty) Limited (South Africa), Optimedia SA Pty Ltd
(South Africa), Publicis Communication Pty Limited (Australia),
Publicis Communication Limited (New Zealand), Publicis Canada
Inc. (Canada), Publicis-Unitros SA (Chile), Publicis Advertising
2000 Limited (Israel), Fallon Group, Inc. (USA),
Publicis & Hal Riney (USA), Publicis.Wet Desert Sdn Bhd
(Malaysia), Publicis Pakistan Pvt (Pakistan), Publicis Ad-Link
Group Limited (China), Publicis Graphics Group Holding SA
(Luxembourg), Venice Holdings Pty Limited (Australia), Mojo
Custodians Pty Limited (Australia), Omagh Pty Limited
(Australia), Optimedia Australia Pty Limited (Australia),
Papagena Pty Limited (Australia), Publicis Loyalty Pty Limited
(Australia), Publicis Mojo Pty Limited (Australia), Publicis
Dialog Pty Limited (Australia), Publicis Mojo Limited (New
Zealand), A.B. Data Limited (Israel), Triangle Holdings Limited
(U.K.), Philadelphia Merger Corp. (USA), Asia Baseline Holdings,
Inc. (Philippines) |
|
|
President and Director of U.S. International Holding
Company, Inc. (USA) and DArcy Masius Benton &
Bowles, Inc. (USA) |
|
|
Permanent representative of Publicis Groupe SA (France) on the
board of Publicis Technology SA (France) |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
President of the Palais de Tokyo, site de création
contemporaine (French association under law 1901) |
Kevin Roberts
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
September 2000 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
December 2007 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
|
|
President of Saatchi & Saatchi Worldwide Inc. (USA) |
47
|
|
|
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Member of the board of Red Rose Limited (New Zealand), Red Rose
Charitable Services Limited (New Zealand), Inspiros Worldwide
Limited (New Zealand), NZ Edge.com Holding Limited (New
Zealand), Lion Nathan plc (U.K.), New Zealand Rugby Football
Union (U.K.), North Harbour Rugby Football Union (U.K.) |
Bertrand Siguier
|
|
|
Initially Appointed
|
|
June 1999 |
Expiration Date of Current Term
|
|
December 2007 |
Principal Function in Publicis
|
|
Director |
|
|
President of SFPP Holding SAS (France) |
|
|
President of the management board of Publicis sp.z.o.o. (Poland) |
|
|
Director of: |
|
|
Publicis Cachemire SA (France), Publicis Technology SA (France),
Publicis Canada Inc. (Canada), Multi Market Services Limited
(U.K.), Publicis & Hal Riney (USA), Publicis Srl
(Italy), Carré Noir Roma Srl (Italy), Publicis Hellas
Advertising (Greece), Publicis Graphics Group Holding SA
(Luxembourg), Publicis Communication Limited (New Zealand),
Publicis Mojo Limited (New Zealand), Publicis Communication Pty
Limited (Australia), Republic Srl (Italy), Publicis Graphics
Group Holding SA (Luxembourg), Publicis Wet Desert Sdn Bhd
(Malaysia), Publicis Communication (Pty) Ltd (South Africa),
Deputy chairman of iSe International Sport and Entertainment AG
(Switzerland), Statutory Auditor of Beacon Communications k.k.
(Japan) |
Principal Business Activities Outside Publicis
|
|
Board member of Gantois SA (France), HM Editions (France) |
|
|
|
Business Experience of Management Board Members |
Claudine Bienaimé, born on November 23,
1939, has been working for our company since 1966 in a variety
of management positions, including general secretary of Publicis
Conseil Groupe and chairperson of Publicis Centre Media. Since
2001 she has been general secretary of our company.
Jack Klues, born on December 8, 1954, is
chief executive officer of Starcom MediaVest Group. He is also a
founding member of Publicis Groupe Media, a management board
formed in 2004 to oversee and guide our media networks of SMG
and ZenithOptimedia. He began his career in 1977 in the Leo
Burnett Media department. He rose through the ranks of the media
department and was named to the Leo Burnett Company board of
directors prior to launching Starcom Worldwide in 1998. He
became chairman of the new global company, and then became chief
executive officer of SMG when the media companies became sister
companies in the formation of Bcom3.
Maurice Lévy, born on February 18, 1942,
joined our company in 1971 and was given responsibility for our
data processing and information technology systems. He was
successively appointed general secretary (1973), managing
director (1976) and chair and chief executive officer
(1981) of Publicis Conseil. He became vice chair of our
company in 1986 and chair of our management board in 1988.
48
Kevin Roberts, born on October 20, 1949,
joined Saatchi & Saatchi as chief executive officer and
Cordiant as a director in 1997. In 1999, he became chief
executive officer of Saatchi & Saatchi.
Mr. Roberts had previously been a group marketing manager
for Procter & Gamble, which he left in 1982 to become
regional president of Pepsi-Cola Middle East. In 1987, he was
appointed regional president of Pepsi-Cola Canada. He became
chief operating officer and director of Lion Nathan Limited in
1989.
Bertrand Siguier, born on June 10, 1941, was
a financial analyst at the Neuflize Schlumberger Mallet Bank
from 1967 to 1969. He joined our account management department
in 1969. Throughout his tenure with us, Mr. Siguier has
been involved with managing some of our most important client
accounts. He served as deputy manager and international
coordinator of Publicis Intermarco Farner from 1974 until 1979,
when he became deputy managing director of our agency in London.
He joined the board of directors of Publicis Conseil in 1982,
serving there until his appointment as vice president of
Publicis Communications in 1988. He has been a member of our
management board since 1999.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Except as noted above, there are no familial relationships
between any of our directors. We have no agreements with any of
our directors providing for benefits to be paid upon termination
of employment, nor do any of our subsidiaries have any such
agreements, except as described in Additional
Information Material Contracts
Agreements with Directors. Except as described under
Additional Information Material
Contracts, none of our directors were selected pursuant to
arrangements or understandings with major shareholders,
customers, suppliers or others.
49
COMPENSATION
With respect to the 2004 fiscal year, we paid compensation to
our directors in the amounts set forth in the following table
(amounts are in euros and do not reflect deductions relating to
taxes or social charges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross | |
|
Including Base | |
|
|
Compensation(1) | |
|
Compensation of | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Management Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maurice Lévy
|
|
|
3,200,073 |
|
|
|
800,073 |
|
Claudine Bienaimé
|
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
Roger Haupt(2)
|
|
|
5,531,621 |
|
|
|
764,864 |
|
Kevin Roberts(3)
|
|
|
5,496,604 |
|
|
|
805,120 |
|
Bertrand Siguier
|
|
|
551,296 |
|
|
|
301,296 |
|
|
Supervisory Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elisabeth Badinter
|
|
|
228,939 |
|
|
|
182,939 |
|
Sophie Dulac
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Badinter
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Michel David-Weill
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Henri-Calixte Suaudeau
|
|
|
144,056 |
|
|
|
53,647 |
|
Monique Bercault
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hélène Ploix
|
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gérard Worms
|
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amaury-Daniel de Sèze
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Simon Badinter(3)
|
|
|
188,088 |
|
|
|
144,922 |
|
Michel Cicurel
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert L. Seelert(3)
|
|
|
288,273 |
|
|
|
241,536 |
|
Felix George Rohatyn
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Yutaka Narita
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fumio Oshima
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tateo Mataki(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Bonuses are paid to our directors based upon the achievement of
qualitative and quantitative performance indicators relating to
our financial results, as assessed by our compensation
committee. See Additional Information Material
Contracts Agreements with Directors for
further information concerning the determination of bonuses
awarded to certain of our directors. |
|
(2) |
Mr. Roger Haupt resigned from the management board
effective as of December 31, 2004. His 2004 compensation
includes a retirement indemnity. Jack Klues replaced
Mr. Haupt on the management board on January 1, 2005. |
|
(3) |
The compensation (other than attendance fees) of Roger Haupt,
Kevin Roberts, Simon Badinter and Robert L. Seelert is defined
and paid in dollars. The conversion into euros was made at an
average rate of $1 =
0.80512 in
2004. |
|
(4) |
Mr. Mataki was appointed to the supervisory board on
September 9, 2004 to replace Mr. Oshima. |
In addition, during 2004 we granted Maurice Lévy, Bertrand
Siguier and Kevin Roberts conditional options to purchase our
shares (300,000 in the case of Mr. Lévy, 75,000 in the
case of Mr. Siguier and 200,000 in the case of
Mr. Roberts). The exercise of these options is subject to
meeting certain objectives over the course of a 3-year plan.
These options have an exercise price of
24.82 per
share. If the objectives are met, these options will become
exercisable in 2006 and 2007 and will expire in 2014.
50
We did not set aside or accrue any material amount of funds to
provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for our
directors in their capacities as such during the 2004 fiscal
year, except with respect to the obligations described under
Additional Information Material
Contracts Agreements with Directors and under
Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements 2004 note 22
Provisions for Contingencies and charges Pensions
and other post employment benefits.
51
BOARD PRACTICES
Our supervisory board has established an appointments and
remuneration committee and an audit committee. The appointments
and remuneration committee is currently comprised of Michel
Cicurel, Elisabeth Badinter, Henri-Calixte Suaudeau and
Gérard Pedraglio. Michel Cicurel chairs the committee. The
committee reviews and makes recommendations to the supervisory
and management boards concerning the appointment of managers of
our company and our principal subsidiaries and the remuneration
of those managers.
The audit committee is comprised of Gérard Worms,
Hélène Ploix and Jean-Paul Morin. Gérard Worms
chairs the committee. The committee oversees the organization
and execution of our audits with a view to ensuring the
consistency and accuracy of the financial statements and reviews
our financial procedures and the implementation of
recommendations of our external auditors. The audit committee is
also responsible for approving the budget for external audits.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2004, we employed approximately 36,384
people worldwide. Our employees are distributed geographically
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
14,151 |
|
North America
|
|
|
11,308 |
|
Rest of World
|
|
|
10,925 |
|
Our employees membership in trade unions varies from
country to country, and we are party to numerous collective
bargaining agreements. As is generally required by law, we
renegotiate our labor agreements in Europe annually in each
country in which we operate. There is no material level of trade
union membership in our U.S. operations. We believe that
our relationship with our employees is good.
SHARE OWNERSHIP
As of December 31, 2004, none of our directors owned 1% or
more of our shares except as described under Major
Shareholders and Related Party Transactions Major
Shareholders, and except for Maurice Lévy, who
beneficially owned 4,465,728 of our shares (including
3,000,000 shares owned through sociétés civiles
owned by Mr. Lévy and his family), or approximately
2.28% of our total outstanding shares. Our directors as a group
(excluding Elisabeth Badinter) owned approximately 3.8% of our
shares. See Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions Major Shareholders for further
information concerning ownership of our shares by
Ms. Badinter. Our directors as a group also owned options
to purchase 1,831,690 of our shares (450,690 of which are
currently exercisable). The exercise of 626,000 of these options
will be subject to meeting objectives over the course of a
3-year plan. These options have exercise prices ranging from
5.63 to
43.55 per
share and will expire between 2007 and 2014.
We have a number of stock option plans for the benefit of our
directors, managers and other employees. In addition, before we
acquired them, Saatchi & Saatchi and Nelson
Communications had in place stock option plans for their
directors and employees. When the acquisitions of each of those
firms was completed, options under the relevant plans were
converted into options to purchase our shares. See note 28
to our financial statements for a summary of each of the plans
we currently maintain.
52
|
|
Item 7. |
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions |
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
As of May 31, 2005, to the best of our knowledge, no person
held 5% or more of our shares, except as described below. All
our shareholders have the same proportional voting rights with
respect to the shares they hold, except that shares owned by the
same shareholder in registered form for at least two years carry
double voting rights.
On May 31, 2005, the percentage ownership in our company
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
Shareholder |
|
Shares Held | |
|
Total Shares(6) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Elisabeth Badinter
|
|
|
20,072,339 |
(1) |
|
|
10.27 |
%(1)(2) |
Dentsu
|
|
|
17,720,132 |
(3) |
|
|
9.06 |
%(3)(4) |
SEP (Dentsu-Badinter)(5)
|
|
|
10,970,744 |
|
|
|
5.61 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Does not include shares held by Dentsu and the SEP with respect
to which Ms. Badinter may be deemed to be the beneficial
owner due to the contractual arrangements described in
Additional Information Material
Contracts Elisabeth Badinter/ Dentsu
Shareholders Agreement in this annual report.
Including such shares, Ms. Badinter would be deemed to
beneficially own 48,763,215 shares, representing 24.95% of
our total shares. |
|
(2) |
Does not reflect the effect on voting power of the double voting
rights provision of our statuts. Including the effect of
that provision, Ms. Badinters 20,072,339 shares
represented 17.2% of our voting power. |
|
(3) |
Does not include shares held by Ms. Badinter and the SEP
with respect to which Dentsu may be deemed to be the beneficial
owner due to the contractual arrangements described in
Additional Information Material
Contracts Elisabeth Badinter/ Dentsu
Shareholders Agreement in this annual report.
Including such shares, Dentsu would be deemed to beneficially
own 48,763,215 shares, representing 24.95% of our total
shares. |
|
(4) |
Does not reflect the effect on voting power of the statuts
referred to above. Including the effect of that provision
Dentsus 17,720,132 shares represented 15.06% of our
voting power. Pursuant to an agreement between our company and
Dentsu, its voting rights are capped at 15% of our total voting
power. |
|
(5) |
This silent partnership was created in September 2004 by Dentsu
and Ms. Badinter to implement the 15% limitation on voting
rights of Dentsu. For a description of the SEP, see
Additional Information Material
Contracts Elisabeth Badinter/ Dentsu
Shareholders Agreement in this annual report. |
|
(6) |
The percentages are calculated based on our total shares,
including the 13,065,009 treasury shares. Excluding such shares,
the percentages in the table for Ms. Badinter, Dentsu and
the SEP would be 11.00%, 9.71% and 6.01%, respectively. |
53
Below we show the percentage ownership in our company of the
persons listed above, and an additional shareholder, as of
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
Total Shares(4) | |
|
|
| |
Shareholder |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Elisabeth Badinter
|
|
|
4.0 |
%(1) |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
Société Anonyme Somarel
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dentsu
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
%(2) |
SEP (Dentsu-Badinter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Does not include Ms. Badinters indirect interest in
our company held through Somarel. Including her pro rata portion
of the shares held by Somarel, her percentage ownership of our
company as of December 31, 2002 was 12.05%. See
Related Party Transactions
Somarel. |
|
(2) |
Does not reflect the effect on voting power of the statuts
referred to above. Including the effect of that provision
Dentsu had 15.04% of the voting power. Pursuant to an agreement
between our company and Dentsu, its voting rights are capped at
15% of our total voting power. |
|
(3) |
Dentsus percentage ownership for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 includes 6,827,629 shares
in which, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as
of March 7, 2002, among Bcom3, Boston Three Corporation and
Dentsu, Dentsu held bare legal title and voting rights until
September 24, 2004. Dentsu did not hold the economic
interests in such shares, which were held by certain former
holders of Class A common stock of Bcom3. On
September 24, 2004, the bare legal title and related voting
rights to such shares reverted automatically to such former
holders and Dentsu no longer possessed any interest in them. |
|
(4) |
The percentages are calculated based on our total shares,
including our treasury shares. |
To the best of our knowledge, our company is not directly or
indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or any
governmental entity.
Ownership by U.S. Holders
To the best of our knowledge, as of December 31, 2004,
approximately 30.8 million, or 16.0%, of our shares
(including shares represented by ADSs) were held in the
U.S. by approximately 800 holders.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Except as described under Directors, Senior Management and
Employees Directors and Senior
Management Additional Information and
Additional Information Material
Contracts our company (inclusive of its subsidiaries) has
not, since January 1, 2004, engaged in any material
transactions with related parties, nor has it agreed to engage
in any such transactions.
|
|
Item 8. |
Financial Information |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Consolidated Financial Statements
See our consolidated financial statements contained in
Item 18 of this annual report.
Litigation
In the ordinary course of our business, we are named, from time
to time, as a defendant in various legal proceedings. We
maintain liability insurance and believe that our coverage is
sufficient to protect us adequately from any material financial
loss as a result of any legal claims made against us.
54
Dividend Policy
On July 5, 2005, we intend to pay a dividend of
0.30 per
share (par value
0.40 per
share) with respect to the 2004 fiscal year. This represents a
15.4% increase over the dividend paid with respect to the 2003
fiscal year. Our current intention is to continue staged
increases in the percentage of profits we pay as dividends. The
payment and amount of any future dividends will depend on a
number of factors, including our financial performance and net
income, general business conditions and our business plans and
investment policies. See Additional
Information Memorandum and Articles of
Association Rights, Preferences and Restrictions
Applicable to Our Shares Dividends.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
See Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects Overview and Outlook for 2005 and
note 29 to our financial statements.
55
|
|
Item 9. |
The Offer and Listing |
OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS
Market Price Information
Our shares trade on Euronext Paris and, since September 12,
2000, our ADSs have traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The
tables below set forth, for the periods indicated, the reported
high and low sales prices of our shares on the Euronext Paris in
euros and the reported high and low sales prices of our ADSs on
the New York Stock Exchange in dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euronext Paris () | |
|
NYSE ($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Last Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May, 2005
|
|
|
23.89 |
|
|
|
22.14 |
|
|
|
30.00 |
|
|
|
28.66 |
|
April, 2005
|
|
|
24.27 |
|
|
|
21.43 |
|
|
|
31.32 |
|
|
|
27.86 |
|
March, 2005
|
|
|
25.35 |
|
|
|
23.01 |
|
|
|
33.38 |
|
|
|
30.60 |
|
February, 2005
|
|
|
24.65 |
|
|
|
22.72 |
|
|
|
31.72 |
|
|
|
29.76 |
|
January, 2005
|
|
|
24.50 |
|
|
|
22.85 |
|
|
|
32.51 |
|
|
|
29.84 |
|
December, 2004
|
|
|
25.54 |
|
|
|
23.55 |
|
|
|
33.93 |
|
|
|
31.50 |
|
Last Two Years By Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
24.65 |
|
|
|
22.72 |
|
|
|
33.38 |
|
|
|
29.76 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
25.70 |
|
|
|
22.01 |
|
|
|
33.93 |
|
|
|
28.15 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
24.75 |
|
|
|
20.25 |
|
|
|
29.78 |
|
|
|
24.98 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
26.48 |
|
|
|
21.85 |
|
|
|
32.00 |
|
|
|
26.68 |
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
29.58 |
|
|
|
23.37 |
|
|
|
37.50 |
|
|
|
28.60 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
27.99 |
|
|
|
23.45 |
|
|
|
32.75 |
|
|
|
27.77 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
29.35 |
|
|
|
22.15 |
|
|
|
31.42 |
|
|
|
25.54 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
25.10 |
|
|
|
15.22 |
|
|
|
29.32 |
|
|
|
16.60 |
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
22.69 |
|
|
|
13.83 |
|
|
|
23.40 |
|
|
|
15.47 |
|
Last Five Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
29.58 |
|
|
|
20.25 |
|
|
|
37.50 |
|
|
|
24.98 |
|
2003
|
|
|
29.35 |
|
|
|
13.83 |
|
|
|
32.75 |
|
|
|
15.47 |
|
2002
|
|
|
39.90 |
|
|
|
16.70 |
|
|
|
34.95 |
|
|
|
16.70 |
|
2001
|
|
|
39.27 |
|
|
|
15.83 |
|
|
|
36.88 |
|
|
|
14.75 |
|
2000
|
|
|
69.70 |
|
|
|
29.10 |
|
|
|
37.44 |
|
|
|
25.75 |
|
Trading of our shares on Euronext Paris was suspended for part
of the day on March 7, 2002 immediately prior to the
announcement of our acquisition of Bcom3.
56
|
|
Item 10. |
Additional Information |
MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
Objects and Purposes
Under Article 2 of our statuts, our corporate
purposes are to:
|
|
|
|
|
produce and develop advertising; |
|
|
|
organize shows and radio or television broadcasts, set up radio,
television and other programs, use movie theaters, recording or
broadcasting studios and projection and viewing rooms, publish
documents and publish music, sketches, scripts and theater
productions; and |
|
|
|
carry out commercial, financial, industrial and real and movable
property transactions directly or indirectly related to the
above in order to foster our growth. |
We may also acquire interests in other businesses, regardless of
such businesses purposes.
Directors
Our statuts provide that a member of our supervisory
board must own at least 200 of our shares for as long as he or
she serves as a director. Members of our management board are
not required to own any of our shares.
Each director is eligible for reappointment upon the expiration
of his or her term of office. Members of the supervisory board
serve six-year terms. Members over 75 years of age may not
constitute more than one-third of the supervisory board. Should
this limit be exceeded, the oldest member of the supervisory
board will automatically be retired. Members of the management
board serve four-year terms. No member of the management board
may serve after the ordinary shareholders meeting
following his or her 70th birthday. The members of the
management board may be dismissed either by the supervisory
board or by the shareholders at a general meeting. The members
of the supervisory board may be dismissed only by the general
meeting of shareholders.
Under the French commercial code, any transaction directly or
indirectly between a company and one of its directors that
cannot be reasonably considered in the ordinary course of
business of the company is subject to the prior consent of the
supervisory board. Any such transaction concluded without the
prior consent of the supervisory board can be nullified if it
causes prejudice to the company. An interested director, or a
person acting on the directors behalf, can be held liable
on this basis. The statutory auditor must be informed of the
transaction within one month following its conclusion and must
prepare a report to be submitted to the shareholders for
approval at their next meeting. At the meeting, the interested
director may not vote on the resolution approving the
transaction, nor may his or her shares be taken into account in
determining the outcome of the vote or whether a quorum is
present. In the event the transaction is not ratified by the
shareholders at a shareholders meeting, it will remain
enforceable by third parties against the company, but the
company may in turn hold the interested director and, in some
circumstances, the other directors, liable for any damages it
may suffer as a result. In addition, the transaction may be
canceled if it is fraudulent. In the case of transactions with
directors that can be considered within the companys
ordinary course of business, the interested director must
provide a copy of the governing agreement to the chairperson of
the supervisory board, and the members of the supervisory board
and the statutory auditor must be informed of the principal
terms of each such transaction. Similar limitations apply to
transactions between a company and a holder of shares carrying
5% or more of its voting power (or, if such shareholder is a
legal entity, the entitys parent, if any). Certain
transactions between a corporation and one of its directors are
prohibited under the French commercial code. Members of our
supervisory board are not authorized, in the absence of a
quorum, to vote compensation to themselves or other supervisory
board members.
57
Rights, Preferences and Restrictions Applicable to Our
Shares
Dividends on our shares are distributed to shareholders pro
rata. Outstanding dividends are payable to shareholders of
record on the last business day before the date of payment. The
dividend payment date is decided by the shareholders at an
ordinary general meeting (or by the management board in the
absence of such a decision by the shareholders). Under the
French commercial code, we must pay any dividends within nine
months of the end of our fiscal year unless otherwise authorized
by court order. Subject to certain conditions, our management
board can effect the distribution of interim dividends at any
time until our financial statements for the relevant year are
approved by shareholders. Dividends on shares that are not
claimed within five years of the date of declared payment revert
to the French government.
Each of our shares carries the right to cast one vote in
shareholder elections, except that a share held by the same
shareholder in registered form for at least two years carries
the right to cast two votes. There is no requirement in the
French commercial code or our statuts that requires
directors to serve concurrent terms. Accordingly, fewer than all
of the members of our supervisory board will ordinarily stand
for reelection at any particular shareholders meeting.
If our company is liquidated, any assets remaining after payment
of our debts, liquidation expenses and all of our remaining
obligations will be distributed first to repay in full the
nominal value of our shares. Any surplus will be distributed pro
rata among shareholders in proportion to the nominal value of
their shareholdings.
|
|
|
Preferential Subscription Rights |
Under the French commercial code, if we issue additional shares,
or any equity securities or other specific kinds of additional
securities carrying a right, directly or indirectly, to purchase
equity securities issued by our company for cash, current
shareholders will have preferential subscription rights to those
securities on a pro rata basis. These preferential rights will
require us to give priority treatment to those shareholders over
other persons wishing to subscribe for the securities. The
rights entitle the holder to subscribe to an issue of any
securities that may increase our share capital by means of a
cash payment or a set-off of cash debts. Preferential
subscription rights are transferable during the subscription
period relating to a particular offering, and may be listed on
the Euronext Paris. A two-thirds majority of our shares entitled
to vote at an extraordinary general meeting may vote to waive
preferential subscription rights with respect to any particular
offering. French law requires a companys board of
directors and independent auditors to present reports that
specifically address any proposal to waive preferential
subscription rights. In the event of a waiver, the relevant
securities issuance must be completed within the period
prescribed by law. The shareholders may also decide at an
extraordinary general meeting to give existing shareholders a
non-transferable priority right to subscribe for the new
securities during a limited period of time. Shareholders may
also waive their own preferential subscription rights with
respect to any particular offering.
|
|
|
Amendments to Rights of Holders |
Shareholder rights can be amended only by action of an
extraordinary general meeting of the class of shareholders
affected. Two-thirds of the shares of the affected class voting
either in person or by mail or proxy must approve any proposal
to amend shareholder rights. The voting and quorum requirements
for this type of special meeting are the same as those
applicable to an extraordinary general meeting, except that the
quorum requirements for a special meeting are 50% of the voting
shares, or 25% upon resumption of an adjourned meeting.
58
Except as described under Anti-Takeover
Provisions, our statuts do not contain any
provisions that discriminate against existing or prospective
holders of substantial numbers of our shares. See also
Anti-Takeover Effects of Applicable Law and
Regulations.
|
|
|
Ordinary and Extraordinary Meetings |
In accordance with the French commercial code, there are two
types of shareholders general meetings: ordinary and
extraordinary.
Ordinary general meetings of shareholders are required for
matters that are not specifically reserved by law to
extraordinary general meetings, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
electing, replacing and removing members of the supervisory
board; |
|
|
|
appointing independent auditors; |
|
|
|
declaring dividends or authorizing dividends to be paid in
shares; |
|
|
|
approving the companys annual financial statements; and |
|
|
|
issuing debt securities. |
Extraordinary general meetings of shareholders are required for
approval of matters such as amendments to our statuts,
including any amendment required in connection with
extraordinary corporate actions. Extraordinary corporate actions
include:
|
|
|
|
|
changing our companys name or corporate purpose; |
|
|
|
increasing or decreasing our share capital; |
|
|
|
creating a new class of equity securities; |
|
|
|
authorizing the issuance of investment certificates or
convertible or exchangeable securities; |
|
|
|
establishing any other rights to equity securities; |
|
|
|
selling or transferring substantially all of our assets; and |
|
|
|
voluntarily liquidating our company. |
|
|
|
Calling Shareholders Meetings |
The French commercial code requires our management board to
convene an annual ordinary general meeting of shareholders for
approval of the annual accounts. This meeting must be held
within six months of the end of each fiscal year. This period
may be extended by an order of the president of the Tribunal de
Commerce. The management board and the supervisory board may
also convene an ordinary or extraordinary meeting of
shareholders upon proper notice at any time during the year. If
the management board and our supervisory board fail to convene
an annual shareholders meeting, our independent auditors
or a court-appointed agent may call the meeting. Any of the
following may request the court to appoint an agent:
|
|
|
|
|
one or several shareholders holding at least 5% of our share
capital; |
|
|
|
in cases of urgency, designated employee representatives or any
interested party; |
|
|
|
duly qualified associations of shareholders who have held their
shares in registered form for at least two years and who
together hold at least 1% of the voting rights of our
company; or |
|
|
|
in a bankruptcy, our liquidator or court-appointed agent may
also call a shareholders meeting in some instances. |
Shareholders holding more than 50% of our share capital or
voting rights may also convene a shareholders meeting
after a public offer to acquire control of our company or a sale
of a controlling stake in our capital.
59
|
|
|
Notice of Shareholders Meetings |
We must announce general meetings at least 30 days in
advance by means of a preliminary notice published in the
Bulletin des Annonces Legales Obligatoires (the
BALO). The preliminary notice must first be sent to
the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (the
AMF). The AMF also recommends that a summary of such
preliminary notice be published in a newspaper of national
circulation in France. The preliminary notice must disclose,
among other things, the time, date and place of the meeting,
whether the meeting will be ordinary or extraordinary, the
agenda, a draft of the resolutions to be submitted to the
shareholders, a description of the procedures which holders of
bearer shares must follow to attend the meeting, the procedure
for voting by mail and a statement informing the shareholders
that they may propose additional resolutions to the management
board within ten days of the publication of the notice.
We must send a final notice containing the agenda and other
information about the meeting at least 15 days prior to the
meeting or at least six days prior to the resumption of any
meeting adjourned for lack of a quorum. The final notice must be
sent by mail to all registered shareholders who have held shares
for more than one month prior to the date of the preliminary
notice. The final notice must also be published in the BALO and
in a newspaper authorized to publish legal announcements in the
local administrative department in which our company is
registered, with prior notice having been given to the AMF.
In general, shareholders can take action at shareholders
meetings only on matters listed in the agenda for the meeting.
One exception to this rule is that shareholders may take action
with respect to the dismissal of members of the supervisory
board, regardless of whether this action is on the agenda.
Additional resolutions to be submitted for approval by the
shareholders at the meeting may be proposed to the management
board (within ten days of the publication of the preliminary
notice in the BALO) by:
|
|
|
|
|
designated employee representatives; |
|
|
|
one or several shareholders holding a specified percentage of
shares; or |
|
|
|
a duly qualified association of shareholders who have held their
shares in registered form for at least two years and who
together hold at least 1% of the voting rights in our company. |
The management board must submit properly proposed resolutions
to a vote of the shareholders.
During the two weeks preceding a meeting of shareholders, any
shareholder may submit written questions to the management board
relating to the agenda for the meeting. The management board
must respond to these questions during the meeting.
|
|
|
Attendance and Voting at Shareholders Meetings |
Each share confers on the shareholder the right to cast one
vote, except that shares owned by the same shareholder in
registered form for at least two years carry double voting
rights. Shareholders may attend ordinary meetings and
extraordinary shareholders meetings and exercise their
voting rights, subject to the conditions specified in the French
commercial code and our statuts. There is no requirement
that shareholders have a minimum number of shares in order to
attend or to be represented at an ordinary or extraordinary
general meeting.
To participate in any general meeting, a holder of shares held
in registered form must have shares registered in his or her
name in a shareholder account maintained by us or on our behalf
by an agent appointed by us at least five days prior to the date
set for the meeting. A holder of bearer shares must obtain a
certificate from the accredited intermediary with whom the
holder has deposited his or her shares. This certificate must
indicate the number of bearer shares the holder owns and must
state that these shares are not transferable until the time
fixed for the meeting. The holder must deposit this certificate
at the place specified in the notice of the meeting at least
five days before the meeting.
60
|
|
|
Proxies and Votes by Mail |
In general, all shareholders who have properly registered their
shares or duly presented a certificate from their accredited
financial intermediary may participate in general
shareholders meetings. Shareholders may participate in
general meetings either in person or by proxy. Shareholders may
vote in person, by proxy or by mail.
Proxies will be sent to any shareholder on request. To be
counted, such proxies must be received at our registered office,
or at any other address indicated on the notice convening the
meeting, prior to the date of the meeting. A shareholder may
grant proxies to his or her spouse or to another shareholder. A
shareholder that is a corporation may grant proxies to a legal
representative. Alternatively, the shareholder may send us a
blank proxy without nominating any representative. In this case,
the chair of the meeting will vote blank proxies in favor of all
resolutions proposed by the management board and against all
others.
With respect to votes by mail, we are required to send
shareholders a voting form. The completed form must be returned
to us at least three days prior to the date of the
shareholders meeting.
The French commercial code requires that shareholders having at
least 25% of the shares entitled to voting rights must be
present in person or be voting by mail or by proxy to fulfill
the quorum requirement for:
|
|
|
|
|
an ordinary general meeting; or |
|
|
|
an extraordinary general meeting where an increase in our share
capital is proposed through incorporation of reserves, profits
or share premium. |
The quorum requirement is one-third of the shares entitled to
voting rights, determined on the same basis, for any other
extraordinary general meeting.
If a quorum is not present at a meeting, the meeting is
adjourned. When an adjourned meeting is resumed, there is no
quorum requirement for an ordinary meeting or for an
extraordinary general meeting where an increase in our share
capital is proposed through incorporation of reserves, profits
or share premium. However, only questions that were on the
agenda of the adjourned meeting may be discussed and voted upon.
In the case of any other reconvened extraordinary general
meeting, shareholders having at least 25% of outstanding voting
rights must be present in person or be voting by mail or proxy
for a quorum. If a quorum is not present, the reconvened meeting
may be adjourned for a maximum of two months. Any deliberation
by the shareholders taking place without a quorum is void.
Holders of a simple majority of a companys voting power
present, voting by mail or represented by proxy may pass any
resolution on matters required to be considered at an ordinary
general meeting, or concerning a capital increase by
incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium at an
extraordinary general meeting. At any other extraordinary
general meeting, a two-thirds majority of the voting power
present, voting by mail or represented by proxy is required.
A unanimous shareholder vote is required to increase liabilities
of shareholders.
Abstention from voting by those present or those represented by
proxy or voting mail is counted as a vote against the resolution
submitted to the shareholder vote.
In general, a shareholder is entitled to one vote per share at
any general meeting, except that shares owned by the same
shareholder in registered form for at least two years carry
double voting rights. Under the French commercial code, shares
of a company held by entities controlled directly or indirectly
by that company are not entitled to voting rights and are not
considered for quorum purposes.
61
|
|
|
Limitations on Right to Own Securities |
Our statuts contain no provisions that limit the right of
shareholders to own our securities or hold or exercise voting
rights associated with those securities. See
Exchange Controls for a description of
certain requirements imposed by the French commercial code.
Our statuts provide double voting rights for shares held
by the same shareholder for at least two years. Our statuts
further provide that any person or group that fails to
notify us within 15 days of acquiring or disposing of 1% or
any multiple of 1% of our shares will be deprived of voting
rights for shares in excess of the unreported fraction. In
addition, our statuts provide that we may require a
corporate entity holding shares representing more than 2.5% of
our share capital or voting rights to disclose to us the
identity of all persons holding, directly or indirectly, more
than one-third of the share capital or voting rights of that
entity. Shareholders who fail to comply with this requirement
may be deprived of voting rights until the required disclosure
is made. Finally, our shareholders have authorized our
management board to increase our capital in response to a third
party tender offer for our shares. The exercise of this
authority would be subject to the control of the AMF.
|
|
|
Anti-Takeover Effects of Applicable Law and
Regulations |
The French commercial code provides that any individual or
entity, acting alone or in concert with others, that becomes the
owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 5%, 10%, 20%,
one-third, 50% or two-thirds of the outstanding shares or voting
rights of a listed company in France, such as our company, or
that increases or decreases its shareholding or voting rights
above or below any of those percentages, must notify the company
within 15 calendar days of the date it crosses such thresholds
of the number of shares it holds and their voting rights. The
individual or entity must also notify the AMF within five
trading days of the date it crosses these thresholds.
French law and AMF regulations impose additional reporting
requirements on persons who acquire more than 10% or 20% of the
outstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company. These
persons must file a report with the company, the AMF within
15 days of the date they cross the threshold. In the
report, the acquiror must specify its intentions for the
following 12-month period, including whether or not it intends
to continue its purchases, to acquire control of the company in
question or to nominate candidates for the board of directors.
The AMF makes the notice public. The acquiror must also publish
a press release stating its intentions in a financial newspaper
of national circulation in France. The acquiror may amend its
stated intentions, provided that it does so on the basis of
significant changes in its own situation or that of its
shareholders. Upon any change of intention, it must file a new
report.
To permit holders to give the required notice, we are required
to publish in the BALO no later than 15 calendar days after
the annual ordinary general shareholders meeting
information with respect to the total number of voting rights
outstanding as of the date of such meeting. In addition, if the
number of outstanding voting rights changes by 5% or more
between two annual ordinary general meetings, we are required to
publish in the BALO, within 15 calendar days of such change, the
number of voting rights outstanding and provide the AMF with
written notice of such information. The AMF publishes the total
number of voting rights so notified by all listed companies in a
weekly notice (avis), noting the date each such number was last
updated.
If any person fails to comply with the legal notification
requirement, the shares or voting rights in excess of the
relevant threshold will be deprived of voting rights for all
shareholders meetings until the end of a two-year period
following the date on which their owner complies with the
notification requirements. In addition, any shareholder who
fails to comply with these requirements may have all or part of
his or her voting rights suspended for up to five years by the
Commercial Court at the request of the chair, any shareholder or
the AMF and may be subject to a fine.
62
The French commercial code authorizes French companies to
require persons holding their shares in bearer form to disclose
the beneficial owner(s) of those shares. The voting and dividend
rights associated with the shares can be suspended until the
required disclosure is made.
Under AMF regulations, and subject to limited exemptions granted
by the AMF, any person or persons acting in concert that own in
excess of one-third of the share capital or voting rights of a
French listed company must initiate a public tender offer for
the balance of the share capital of such company.
In addition, a number of provisions of the French commercial
code allow corporations to adopt statuts that have
anti-takeover effects, including provisions that allow:
|
|
|
|
|
limitations on the voting power of shareholders; and |
|
|
|
shareholders agreements that provide for preemptive rights
in case of a sale of shares by a shareholder. |
MATERIAL CONTRACTS
Strategic Alliance Agreement
On November 30, 2003, we entered into an agreement (the
Alliance Agreement) to form a strategic alliance
with Dentsu. The Alliance Agreement supersedes and gives further
effect to the strategic alliance memorandum of understanding we
entered into with Dentsu on March 7, 2002.
Pursuant to the Alliance Agreement, we agreed to terminate, and
to cause Saatchi & Saatchi and Zenith Optimedia to
terminate, our arrangements and agreements with partners in
Japan. We also agreed to partner with Dentsu in Japan
exclusively and not to initiate any new activity in Japan
without prior consultation with Dentsu. Subject to certain
exceptions, we will represent Dentsu and its clients in the
Americas, Europe, Australia and New Zealand.
Under the agreement, Dentsu will consult with us before making
any investments, initiating any joint ventures or other new
ventures in Australia, Europe or the Americas, and will not
partner with WPP, Interpublic, Omnicom or Havas. We will not
partner with any of those companies or Hakuhodo. We agreed to
the continued expansion of the Dentsu network in Asia and
acknowledged the existing Dentsu partnership with WPP and Dentsu
Young & Rubicam, and Dentsu agreed not to expand that
partnership.
In addition, we and Dentsu will share knowledge, research and
learning that can be used to develop and improve services to
multinational clients. We and Dentsu also indicated our
expectation that we will jointly develop various communications
businesses internationally, including, in particular, sports
marketing businesses. Pursuant to the agreement, we founded iSe
International Sports and Entertainment AG in 2003. Our company
and Dentsu each has a 45% interest in iSe; Fuji television
Network, Inc. and Tokyo Broadcasting Service each has a 4%
interest; SportsMondial owns the remaining 2%.
Finally, we and Dentsu agreed to form an executive group, to be
comprised of our chief executive and chief operating officers
and two executives from Dentsu, to manage our alliance. We and
Dentsu will keep each other informed through this executive
group of our respective expansion plans in Asia (excluding, in
the case of Dentsu, Japan).
The Alliance Agreement has a term of 20 years, subject to
early termination by either party in the event that Dentsu
ceases to own at least 10% of our shares.
Publicis/ Dentsu Shareholders Agreement
On November 30, 2003, we entered into a shareholders
agreement (the Publicis/Dentsu Agreement) with
Dentsu regarding certain terms of its shareholding in our
company. The Publicis/Dentsu Agreement supersedes and gives
further effect to the shareholders agreement memorandum of
understanding we entered into with Dentsu on March 7, 2002.
63
Under the Publicis/Dentsu Agreement, so long as Dentsu owns at
least 10% of our shares (calculated in a specified manner), we
will propose to our shareholders resolutions for the appointment
of two Dentsu designees to our supervisory board. Until
July 1, 2012, Dentsu will be subject to a
standstill limiting its ownership of our shares to
the number of shares that entitles it to 15% of our total voting
power. Dentsu also agreed that it will not transfer any of our
shares until July 1, 2012, and that any transfers after
that date will be subject to certain restrictions.
On September 24, 2004, we and Dentsu entered into an
amendment of the Publicis/Dentsu Agreement. Such amendment was
entered into to reflect the agreements and amendments entered
into by and between Dentsu and Elisabeth Badinter on
September 24, 2004 as described below under Elisabeth
Badinter/Dentsu Shareholders Agreement.
The Publicis/Dentsu Agreement will expire on July 1, 2012,
unless we and Dentsu agree to renew it for an additional
10 year term.
Elisabeth Badinter/Dentsu Shareholders Agreement
On December 2, 2003, Elisabeth Badinter and Dentsu entered
into a shareholders agreement to govern their relationship
as shareholders of our company (the Badinter/Dentsu
Agreement). The Badinter/Dentsu agreement supersedes and
gives further effect to the memorandum of understanding entered
into by Ms. Badinter and Dentsu on March 7, 2002 and
the letter agreement, dated March 7, 2002, of Dentsu.
Under the Badinter/Dentsu Agreement, Ms. Badinter agreed
that Dentsu will be entitled to designate two members to our
supervisory board so long as it owns at least 10% of our
outstanding shares (calculated in a specified manner). Dentsu
agreed to vote (i) to elect Ms. Badinter or her
designee as chairperson of the supervisory board, (ii) to
elect to the supervisory board such persons designated by her,
and (iii) in favor of appointments of or changes in the
members of our management proposed by Ms. Badinter,
provided that Ms. Badinter shall have previously consulted
with Dentsu on such appointments or changes.
The Badinter/Dentsu Agreement provides for the creation of a
special committee by Ms. Badinter and Dentsu, to be
comprised of members of the supervisory board designated by
Ms. Badinter and Dentsu. The role of the committee is to
(i) examine all strategic decisions to be submitted for the
approval of the supervisory board and/or the vote of the
shareholders, (ii) determine the vote on matters on which
Dentsu has agreed to vote as directed by Ms. Badinter and
(iii) in the case of a meeting convened at the direction of
Dentsu, examine such other matters identified by a member of the
committee designated by Dentsu.
In addition, Dentsu agreed that it will vote its shares as
directed by Ms. Badinter on a number of matters, including
those relating to certain merger or similar business
combinations involving our company. Dentsu also agreed
(i) not to transfer any of our shares (or any of the
warrants that it received in connection with our acquisition of
Bcom3) until July 12, 2012 (subject to specified
exceptions), and (ii) to be subject to specified
restrictions on any transfer of shares or warrants, and a right
of first refusal of Ms. Badinter with respect to any
transfer, in each case after July 12, 2012.
Under the Badinter/Dentsu Agreement, Dentsu is prohibited from
owning a number of our shares that would entitle it to exercise
more than 15% of the total voting power of our shares (as
calculated in a manner specified in the agreement), subject to
specified exceptions. Dentsu also agreed not to vote any shares
that represent voting rights in excess of the 15% threshold at
any shareholders meeting.
Dentsu agreed not to enter into specified agreements with third
parties concerning the direction and management of our company
without the prior written permission of Ms. Badinter.
On September 24, 2004, Ms. Badinter and Dentsu formed
a partnership (the Societé en Participation
(SEP)) and approved by-laws (statuts) of the
SEP, an unofficial English translation of which is attached as
an exhibit to this annual report and incorporated herein by
reference. The by-laws (statuts) provide that the purpose
of the SEP is to exercise the voting rights attached to the
shares for which the right to exercise voting rights was
contributed to the SEP. On September 24, 2004, Dentsu
contributed to the SEP the right to exercise the voting rights
of 11,181,399 ordinary shares of Publicis, and on
October 1, 2004, Ms. Badinter
64
contributed to the SEP the right to exercise the voting rights
of one (1) ordinary share of Publicis. The term of the SEP
expires on the earlier of September 24, 2014 or the date on
which the EB Shareholders Agreement terminates, except in
the event of extension or prior dissolution, as decided by
Ms. Badinter and Dentsu unanimously. The by-laws
(statuts) provide that Dentsu will, during the duration
of the existence of the SEP, contribute to the SEP the right to
exercise the voting rights in respect of those shares it holds
which would cause it to have voting rights in excess of 15% of
Publiciss voting power. The by-laws also provide that, to
the extent Dentsus voting power in Publicis falls below
15%, the right of the SEP to exercise the voting rights attached
to the shares held by the SEP will immediately end only to the
extent that it allows Dentsu to have voting rights equal to 15%
of the voting power of Publicis. The by-laws (statuts)
provide that there will be one manager of the SEP who will be
appointed and dismissed unanimously by Ms. Badinter and
Dentsu and who shall initially be Ms. Badinter. The manager
has the power to manage the SEP and, among other things,
exercise the voting rights attached to the shares held by the
SEP.
On September 24, 2004, Ms. Badinter and Dentsu entered
into an amendment of the Badinter/Dentsu Agreement, pursuant to
which such agreement was amended, among other things, to provide
Ms. Badinter with a first offer right to purchase any
ordinary shares of Publicis for which the right to exercise the
voting rights has been contributed by Dentsu to the SEP and
which Dentsu wishes to dispose or otherwise transfer to a party
other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dentsu, subject to
specified exceptions
Each of the foregoing summaries is qualified in its entirety by
the full text of the Alliance Agreement, the by-laws
(statuts) of the SEP, the Publicis/Dentsu Agreement (and
the amendment thereof) and the Badinter/Dentsu Agreement (and
the amendment thereof), as the case may be, each of which is
attached as an exhibit to this annual report.
Agreements with Directors
Through subsidiaries, we have employment agreements with Kevin
Roberts, Jack Klues and Robert Seelert. The material terms of
those agreements are as follows:
Our agreement with Mr. Roberts (and a related agreement
with a consulting firm owned by Mr. Roberts) generally
provide that if we terminate Mr. Roberts employment
without cause or he terminates his employment for
good reason (as those terms are defined in the
agreements), we may be required to pay to him amounts in cash up
to (i) his salary and the cost of other benefits for one
year following termination and (ii) bonuses he would have
earned if employed until September 2005. In addition,
Mr. Roberts is entitled to bonuses equaling 100% of his
annual salary for years in which performance targets are
satisfied and greater amounts agreed by us for years in which
employment targets are exceeded. Both of these agreements were
entered into prior to our acquisition of Saatchi &
Saatchi in 2000.
Our agreement with Mr. Klues provides that he will continue
to serve as the chief executive officer of SMG. If
Mr. Klues is terminated without cause or if he terminates
his employment as a result of a constructive discharge, we may
be required to pay him amounts equal to (i) his base
salary, (ii) his target annual incentive award opportunity
and (iii) a pro-rated amount of any annual incentive
compensation for the year of his termination. Mr. Klues
will receive a base salary plus an annual incentive opportunity
ranging from zero to 160% of his base salary. Mr. Klues
target annual incentive opportunity is 80% of his base salary.
Our agreement with Mr. Seelert provides that we may be
obligated to provide salary and other benefits to
Mr. Seelert within the contract period if we terminate his
employment.
Each of the foregoing summaries is qualified in its entirety by
the full text of each of the employment agreements with
Messrs. Roberts, Klues and Seelert, each of which is
attached as an exhibit to this annual report.
In addition, (i) one of our subsidiaries has agreed to pay
Mr. Roberts cash annuities totaling a maximum of $5,770,000
over the five-year period 2002-06 in replacement of supplemental
pension agreements entered into prior to our acquisition of
Saatchi & Saatchi in 2000 and (ii) our supervisory
board has agreed to pay to Maurice Lévy a deferred bonus
equal to the amount of bonuses paid to him since 2004 upon the
termination of
65
his employment planned for 2010, provided he does not compete
with us for three years following such termination.
In November and December of 2004, Publicis and a subsidiary of
Publicis entered into consulting agreements with Roger Haupt, a
former member of our management board, who resigned from the
management board effective as of December 31, 2004.
In replacement of agreements entered into prior to our
acquisition of Bcom3 in 2002, we entered into a consulting
services agreement with Mr. Haupt on November 8, 2004,
pursuant to which Mr. Haupt will provide us with consulting
services for the term of the agreement, which began on
January 1, 2005 and continues until December 31, 2007.
Mr. Haupt is entitled to be paid consultant fees over the
term of the agreement in an aggregate amount of $1,425,000. He
is also entitled to be reimbursed for travel expenses (excluding
business entertainment expenses) and he agreed not to accept as
clients our competitors without our prior permission. In
addition, during the term of the consulting services agreement,
Mr. Haupt agreed not to compete with us in certain
circumstances.
As provided in his employment contract with Bcom3, on
December 21, 2004, Leo Burnett Worldwide, Inc. entered into
an executive consulting agreement with Mr. Haupt, which
provides that for the five-year period commencing
January 1, 2005 and ending December 31, 2009,
Mr. Haupt will provide executive consulting services to us.
Mr. Haupt is entitled to a yearly salary of $427,500 for
each of the five years of the term of his employment and is
entitled to participate in employee plans during the period
(except Mr. Haupt is not entitled to participate in any
bonus plan or long-term disability or supplemental long-term
disability plan). In addition, during the period of the
executive consulting agreement, Mr. Haupt agreed to not
compete with us in certain circumstances.
Each of the foregoing summaries of Mr. Haupts
agreements is qualified in its entirety by the full text of each
of the consulting agreements for Mr. Roger Haupt, each of
which is attached as an exhibit to this annual report.
EXCHANGE CONTROLS
The French commercial code currently does not limit the right of
nonresidents of France or non-French persons to own and vote
shares. However, nonresidents of France must file an
administrative notice with French authorities in connection with
the acquisition of a controlling interest in our company. Under
existing administrative rulings, ownership of 20% or more of our
share capital or voting rights is regarded as a controlling
interest, but a lower percentage might be held to be a
controlling interest in some circumstances depending upon
factors such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquiring partys intentions; and |
|
|
|
the acquiring partys ability to elect directors, and
financial reliance by us on the acquiring party. |
French exchange control regulations currently do not limit the
amount of payments that we may remit to nonresidents of France.
Laws and regulations concerning foreign exchange controls do
require, however, that all payments or transfers of funds made
by a French resident to a nonresident be handled by an
accredited intermediary. In France, all registered banks and
most credit establishments are accredited intermediaries.
TAXATION
The following discussion is a summary description of the
material U.S. and French tax consequences that may apply to you
as a holder of our shares.
66
This discussion applies only to holders who are U.S. Tax
Residents. A U.S. Tax Resident is a holder who:
|
|
|
|
|
is not a French tax resident; |
|
|
|
is a tax resident of the U.S. pursuant to Article 4 of
the Convention Between the Government of the U.S. of
America and the Government of the French Republic for the
Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal
Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital (which was
signed on August 31, 1994 and generally became effective on
January 1, 1996) (the Treaty); |
|
|
|
is a citizen or resident of the U.S. for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, is a U.S. domestic corporation or is
otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net
income basis in respect of our shares; and |
|
|
|
does not hold our shares in connection with a permanent
establishment or a fixed base in France pursuant to
Article 5 of the Treaty through which the holder carries on
a business or performs personal services. |
Further, this discussion applies only to holders for whom all
the following requirements are met:
|
|
|
|
|
the holder owns, directly or indirectly, less than 10% of our
share capital; |
|
|
|
the holder is a U.S. Tax Resident; |
|
|
|
the holder is entitled to the benefits of the Treaty under the
limitations on benefits article of the Treaty
(Article 30); |
|
|
|
the ownership of our shares is not effectively connected with a
permanent establishment or a fixed base in France; |
|
|
|
the holder holds our shares as capital assets; and |
|
|
|
the holders functional currency is the U.S. dollar. |
YOU ARE STRONGLY URGED TO CONSULT YOUR OWN TAX ADVISER REGARDING
THE CONSEQUENCES TO YOU OF ACQUIRING, OWNING OR DISPOSING OF OUR
SHARES, RATHER THAN RELYING ON THIS SUMMARY. The summary may not
apply to you or may not completely or accurately describe tax
consequences to you. For example, special rules may apply to
U.S. expatriates, insurance companies, tax-exempt
organizations, financial institutions, persons subject to the
alternative minimum tax, securities broker-dealers, traders in
securities that elect to mark-to-market and persons holding
their shares as part of a conversion transaction or constructive
sale, among others. Those special rules are not discussed in
this annual report. This description does not address all
aspects of U.S. and French tax laws and tax treaties that may be
relevant in light of the particular circumstances of a
U.S. Tax Resident holder of our shares. This description is
based on U.S. and French tax laws, conventions and treaties in
force as of the date of this annual report, all of which are
subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, or
different interpretations. Also, this summary does not discuss
any tax rules other than U.S. federal income tax and French
tax rules. Further, the U.S. and French tax authorities and
courts are not bound by this summary and may disagree with its
conclusions. The individual circumstances of each U.S. Tax
Resident holder may affect the tax consequences of holding and
disposing of our shares. The particular facts or circumstances
of a U.S. Tax Resident holder that may so affect the
consequences are not discussed here. All holders of our shares
are advised to consult their own tax advisers as to the
particular tax consequences to them of acquiring, owning and
disposing of our shares, including their eligibility for the
benefits of the Treaty, the applicability and effect of state,
local, foreign and other tax laws and possible changes in tax
laws.
Dividends paid to a shareholder having his or her tax residence
outside France by a French company are generally subject to a
25% French withholding tax under French tax laws.
67
Under the Treaty, this withholding tax is reduced to 15% if all
the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
(i) |
our shares are beneficially owned by a U.S. Tax Resident, |
|
|
(ii) |
such ownership is not effectively connected with a permanent
establishment or a fixed base that the holder has in
France, and |
|
|
(iii) |
the holder has previously established that he or she is a
U.S. Tax Resident in accordance with the following
procedures: |
|
|
|
|
|
the U.S. Tax Resident must complete French Treasury
Form RF1 A EU-No. 5053 or Claim for relief under
the tax treaty between France and ... form and send
it to the paying establishment before the date of payment of the
dividend. |
|
|
|
if the U.S. Tax Resident cannot complete French Treasury
Form RF1 A EU-No. 5053 or Claim for relief under
the tax treaty between France and ... form before the
date of payment of the dividend, he or she may complete a
simplified certificate and send it before receiving such payment
to the institution which holds the shares on its behalf. This
certificate must state that the beneficial owner fulfills the
following conditions: |
|
|
|
|
|
the holder is a U.S. Tax Resident; |
|
|
|
the holders ownership of the shares is not effectively
connected with a permanent establishment or a fixed base in
France; |
|
|
|
the holder owns all the rights attached to the full ownership of
the shares including, among other things, the dividend rights; |
|
|
|
the holder fulfills all the requirements under the Treaty to be
entitled to the reduced rate of withholding tax, and |
|
|
|
the holder claims the reduced rate of withholding tax. |
If a U.S. Tax Resident has not completed French Treasury
Form RF1 A EU-No. 5053 or Claim for relief under the
tax treaty between France and ... form or the
simplified certificate before the dividend payment date, the
paying establishment will deduct French withholding tax at the
rate of 25%. In that case, the holder may claim a refund of the
excess withholding tax by completing French Treasury
Form RF1 A-No. 5053 or Claim for relief under
the tax treaty between France and ... form and
sending it, by intermediary of the paying establishment, to the
French tax authorities before December 31 of the second
calendar year following the calendar year during which the
withholding tax is levied.
Under (i) and (ii) above, the 15% withholding tax rate
may also apply to dividends paid to a U.S. partnership or
similar pass-through entity as described in article 4.2.(b)(iv)
of the Treaty and whose income is subject to U.S. tax
either in its hands or in the hands of its partners who are
U.S. Tax Residents (U.S. Tax Resident
Partnership).
Specific procedures will apply if our shares are held through a
U.S. Tax Resident Partnership. U.S. Tax Residents who
will own their shares through a U.S. Tax Resident
Partnership are advised to consult their own tax advisers as to
the conditions and formalities under which they may benefit from
the above-mentioned reduction of the French withholding tax.
Additional specific rules apply to tax-exempt U.S. pension
funds and various other U.S. entities, including certain
state-owned institutions (with respect to dividends derived from
the investment of retirement assets) and not-for-profit
organizations mentioned in article 4.2.(b)(i) and (ii) of
the Treaty and U.S. Tax Resident individuals (with respect
to dividends they beneficially own and that are derived from
individual retirement accounts).
68
These entities or persons may be eligible for a reduced
withholding tax rate of 15% subject to the same withholding
tax filing requirements as eligible U.S. Tax Resident
holders, except that they may have to supply additional
documentation evidencing their entitlements to these benefits.
These entities or persons are advised to consult their own tax
advisers as to the conditions under which they may benefit from
the above-mentioned reduction of the French withholding tax.
|
|
|
U.S. Federal Income Taxes |
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the gross amount of a
dividend, including any French withholding tax, will be included
in your gross income as dividend income when payment is received
by you, to the extent they are paid or declared paid out of our
current or accumulated earnings and profits as calculated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. Dividends paid by our
company will not give rise to any U.S. dividends received
deduction. They will generally constitute foreign source
passive income for foreign tax credit purposes. For
recipients predominantly engaged in the active conduct of a
banking, insurance, financing or similar business, dividends
paid by our company will generally constitute foreign source
financial services income for foreign tax credit
purposes.
Also for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the amount of
any dividend paid in euros, including any French withholding
taxes, will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of the euros
on the date the dividend is included in income, regardless of
whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars.
You will generally be required to recognize U.S. source
ordinary income or loss when you sell or dispose of euros. You
may also be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss
if you receive a refund under the Treaty of tax withheld in
excess of the treaty rate. This foreign currency gain or loss
will generally be U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
To the extent that any dividends paid exceed our current and
accumulated earnings and profits as calculated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, the distribution will be
treated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
first, as a tax-free return of capital, which will cause a
reduction in the adjusted basis of your shares. This adjustment
will increase the amount of gain, or decrease the amount of
loss, that you will recognize if you later dispose of those
shares; and |
|
|
|
second, the balance of the dividend in excess of the adjusted
basis will be taxed as capital gain recognized on a sale or
exchange. |
French withholding tax imposed on the dividends you receive at
15% under the Treaty is treated as payment of a foreign income
tax. You may take this amount as a credit against your
U.S. federal income tax liability, subject to specific
conditions and limitations.
Under the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003
(the Act), the maximum rate of U.S. federal
income tax applicable to qualified dividend income
of an individual is generally 15 percent. Qualified
dividend income includes dividends received during the
taxable year from qualified foreign corporations if
certain requirements are met. For example, in order to be
eligible for the reduced rates, a shareholder must hold the
stock with respect to which the dividend is paid for more than
60 days during the 121 day period surrounding the
ex-dividend date for the dividend. In addition, a shareholder
will not be entitled to the reduced rates if such shareholder is
under an obligation to make related payments with respect to
positions in substantially similar or related property (whether
pursuant to a short sale, a hedge or otherwise). A
qualified foreign corporation is a foreign
corporation that is eligible for benefits of a comprehensive
income tax treaty with the U.S. which the Secretary
determines is satisfactory for purposes of the rules relating to
the reduced tax on dividends and which includes an exchange of
information program. The Joint Committee on Taxation stated that
until the Treasury Department issues guidance regarding the
determination of treaties as satisfactory for this purpose, a
foreign corporation will be considered to be a qualified foreign
corporation if it is eligible for the benefits of a
comprehensive income tax treaty with the U.S. that includes
an exchange of information program (other than the current
U.S.-Barbados income tax treaty). In addition, a foreign
corporation is treated as a qualified foreign
corporation with respect to any dividend paid by such
corporation if the stock with respect to which the dividend is
paid is readily tradable on
69
an established securities market in the U.S. Nevertheless,
a foreign corporation is not a qualified foreign
corporation if, for the taxable year in which the dividend
was paid, or the preceding taxable year, the corporation is a
foreign personal holding company (an FPHC), a
foreign investment company (a FIC) or a passive
foreign investment company (a PFIC). Publicis has
not examined whether it is or has been a FPHC, a FIC or a PFIC,
but Publicis believes that it is not and has not been a FPHC, a
FIC or a PFIC. Accordingly, Publicis believes that dividends
paid by Publicis with respect to the ADSs traded on the New York
Stock Exchange should be eligible for the reduced tax rates for
a shareholder who meets the holding period and other
requirements of the Act. Under the Act, in connection with
determining a shareholders foreign source income for
purposes of the shareholders foreign tax credit
limitation, special rules apply to the receipt of
qualified dividend income. In addition, the Treasury
Department has announced its intention to promulgate rules
pursuant to which shareholders will be permitted to rely on
certifications from issuers to establish that dividends are
treated as qualified dividends. All shareholders should consult
their tax advisers to determine the consequences of the Act to
them.
|
|
|
Taxation of Capital Gains |
Under French tax law, capital gains realized upon the sale of
our shares by holders who are not French residents for French
tax purposes (and who do not hold their shares in connection
with a permanent establishment or a fixed base in France) are
not taxable in France provided that the vendor and any related
persons have not directly or indirectly held more than 25% of
rights to our earnings (droits aux bénéfices
sociaux) at any time during the five years preceding the
sale.
If the holder is a U.S. Tax Resident, the holder will not
be subject to French tax on any capital gain if the holder sells
or exchanges its shares, unless the holder has a permanent
establishment or fixed base in France and the shares sold or
exchanged were part of the business property of that permanent
establishment or fixed base.
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, you will
recognize capital gain or loss if you sell or exchange your
shares in the same manner as you would if you were to sell or
exchange any other shares held as capital assets. Any gain or
loss will generally be U.S. source gain or loss. If you are
an individual, any capital gain will generally be subject to
U.S. federal income tax at preferential rates if you meet
the specified minimum holding periods.
We believe that we will not be treated as a passive foreign
investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes for the current taxable year or for future taxable
years. However, an actual determination of PFIC status is
fundamentally factual in nature and cannot be made until the
close of the applicable taxable year. We will be a PFIC for any
taxable year in which either:
|
|
|
|
|
75% or more of our gross income is passive income; or |
|
|
|
our assets that produce passive income or that are held for the
production of passive income amount to at least 50% of the value
of our total assets on average. |
If we were to become a PFIC, the tax applicable to distributions
on our shares and any gains you realize when you dispose of our
shares may be less favorable to you. You should consult your own
tax advisers regarding the PFIC rules and their effect on you if
you purchase our shares.
|
|
|
French Estate and Gift Taxes |
Under The Convention Between the U.S. of America and
the French Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the
Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Estates,
Inheritance and Gifts of November 24, 1978, if an
individual holder transfers its shares in our company by gift,
or if they are
70
transferred by reason of the holders death, that transfer
will only be subject to French gift or inheritance tax if one of
the following applies:
|
|
|
|
|
the individual holder is domiciled in France at the time of
making the gift, or at the time of the individual holders
death; or |
|
|
|
the individual holder used our shares in conducting a business
through a permanent establishment or fixed base in France, or
the individual holder held our shares for that use. |
The French wealth tax does not generally apply to our shares if
the holder is an individual who is a tax resident of the
U.S. for purposes of the Treaty, provided that:
|
|
|
|
|
the individual holder does not own, alone or with related
persons, directly or indirectly, shares, rights or interests the
total of which gives right to at least 25% of our
earnings; and |
|
|
|
the shares are not held in connection with a permanent
establishment or a fixed base in France. |
Under French tax law, an individual having his or her tax
residence outside France is taxable only on such
individuals French assets. However, financial investments
made by such individuals, provided they represent less than 5%
of the share capital of the French company and are made in
companies other than real property companies, are exempt from
wealth tax.
|
|
|
U.S. Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding |
Dividend payments on our shares and proceeds from the sale,
exchange or other disposition of the shares may be subject to
information reporting to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service
and possible U.S. backup withholding. U.S. federal
backup withholding generally is a withholding tax imposed at the
rate of 28% on specified payments to persons that fail to
furnish required information. Backup withholding will not apply
to a holder who furnishes a correct taxpayer identification
number or certificate of foreign status and makes any other
required certification, or who is otherwise exempt from backup
withholding. Any U.S. persons required to establish their
exempt status generally must file Internal Revenue Service
Form W-9, entitled Request for Taxpayer
Identification Number and Certification.
Amounts withheld as backup withholding may be credited against
your U.S. federal income tax liability. You may obtain a
refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund
with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and furnishing any
required information in a timely manner.
DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
We are subject to the periodic reporting and other informational
requirements of the Exchange Act. Under the Exchange Act, we are
required to file reports and other information with the SEC.
Copies of reports and other information, when so filed, may be
inspected without charge and may be obtained at prescribed rates
at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at
Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information
regarding the Washington, D.C. Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The public may also view our
annual reports and other documents filed with the SEC on the
Internet at www.sec.gov. As a foreign private issuer, we
are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the
furnishing and content of quarterly reports and proxy
statements, and our officers, directors and principal
shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing
profit recovery provisions in Section 16 of the Exchange
Act.
71
ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITIES AGAINST FOREIGN
PERSONS
Our company is a corporation organized under the laws of France.
The majority of our directors are citizens and residents of
countries other than the U.S., and the majority of our assets
are located outside of the U.S. Accordingly, it may be
difficult for investors:
|
|
|
|
|
to obtain jurisdiction over our company or our directors in
courts in the U.S. in actions predicated on the civil
liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws; |
|
|
|
to enforce judgments obtained in such actions against us or our
directors; |
|
|
|
to obtain judgments against us or our directors in original
actions in non-U.S. courts predicated solely upon the
U.S. federal securities laws; or |
|
|
|
to enforce against us or our directors in non-U.S. courts
judgments of courts in the U.S. predicated upon the civil
liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. |
Each of the foregoing statements applies to our auditors as well.
|
|
Item 11. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
As a result of our global operating activities and our financing
activities, we are subject to various market risks relating
primarily to foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest
rate risk.
INTEREST RATE RISK
As of December 31, 2004, we had total outstanding financial
indebtedness (under French GAAP) of
1,960 million.
This indebtedness was comprised of the following:
7 million
in obligations under our 2% notes due 2007,
929 million
in obligations under our 1.0% notes due 2018 (including
239 million
in redemption premium),
672 million
in obligations under our 0.75% notes due 2008,
29 million
in bank loans,
172 million
of bank overdrafts,
139 million
in capitalized lease obligations and
12 million
in accrued interest. Of the total indebtedness outstanding at
the end of 2004,
220 million
was due within one year,
672
million was due after more than one year but within five years
and the remainder was due after more than five years. Other than
our obligations under the 2.0% notes due 2007, the
1.0% notes due 2018 and the 0.75% notes due 2008, our
debt bore interest at variable rates; the average annual
interest rate for 2004 was 3.4%.
We do not have any long-term borrowings at variable interest
rates. Consequently, a hypothetical increase of 1% in average
interest rate would not have an impact on our annual interest
expense.
As of December 31, 2004, approximately 87% of our debt was
denominated in euros and 7% was denominated in
U.S. dollars. Our policy is to hold cash and cash
equivalents in various currencies corresponding to the exposure
of our various subsidiaries around the world. We generally do
not use financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk.
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK
We conduct operations in 109 countries around the world. The
geographic diversity of our operations is reflected by the
currencies that make up our results of operations. In 2004, more
than two-thirds of our revenue was realized in currencies other
than the euro, including approximately 42% in U.S. dollars.
The majority of our subsidiaries carry out businesses that are
essentially local, with almost all of their revenue received in
local currency and almost all of their costs incurred in local
currency. Our exposure to losses resulting from differences
between the currencies in which we receive revenue and the
currencies in which we incur costs tends to be limited.
We hold assets and liabilities, earn income and pay expenses of
our subsidiaries in a variety of currencies. The majority of
commercial transactions are denominated in the local currencies
of the originating countries.
72
As a result, exchange rate risk is generally not significant.
However, we hedge some risk through routine foreign currency
hedging.
Our financial debt mainly consists of notes issued by us
exclusively in euros, for which no foreign currency hedging is
required. Short-term credit lines and overdrafts commonly used
by our subsidiaries are in the currency of the borrowing entity
and therefore carry no exchange-rate risk. Inter-company
loans/borrowings are hedged as appropriate, whenever they
present a net exposure to exchange-rate risk.
Off-balance sheet financial instruments held to manage foreign
currency risk are as follows:
|
|
I. |
Intercompany Receivables and Payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
Currency | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount of Currency | |
|
Fair Value of the | |
Sold |
|
Purchased | |
|
of Currency Sold | |
|
Purchased | |
|
Hedging Instrument | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Local currency, | |
|
(Local currency, | |
|
( millions) | |
|
|
|
|
in millions) | |
|
in millions) | |
|
|
AUD
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
CAD
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
CHF
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
DKK
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(40.7 |
) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
EUR
|
|
|
CHF |
|
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
EUR
|
|
|
GBP |
|
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
EUR
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(465.1 |
) |
|
|
590.2 |
|
|
|
(33.4 |
) |
GBP
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
NOK
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(41.1 |
) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
NZD
|
|
|
GBP |
|
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
SEK
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(54.5 |
) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
SEK
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(148.9 |
) |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
THB
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(232.5 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
USD
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
II. |
Third Party Receivables and Payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
Currency |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount of Currency | |
|
Fair Value of the | |
Sold |
|
Purchased |
|
of Currency Sold | |
|
Purchased | |
|
Hedging Instrument | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Local currency, | |
|
(Local currency, | |
|
( millions) | |
|
|
|
|
in millions) | |
|
in millions) | |
|
|
CHF
|
|
CHF |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
CHF
|
|
USD |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
EUR
|
|
CAD |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
EUR
|
|
GBP |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
EUR
|
|
USD |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
USD
|
|
AUD |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
USD
|
|
CAD |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
CHF |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
DKK |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
EUR |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
GBP |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
INR |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
132.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
JPY |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
905.7 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
KRW |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
6,536.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
USD
|
|
NOK |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
SEK |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
THB |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. |
Future Flows (Dividends and Interest Receivable, Firm
Sales) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
Currency |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount of Currency | |
|
Fair Value of the | |
Sold |
|
Purchased |
|
of Currency Sold | |
|
Purchased | |
|
Hedging Instrument | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Local currency, | |
|
(Local currency, | |
|
( millions) | |
|
|
|
|
in millions) | |
|
in millions) | |
|
|
EUR
|
|
CHF |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
EUR
|
|
USD |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
JPY
|
|
GBP |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
NOK
|
|
EUR |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
SEK
|
|
EUR |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
THB
|
|
EUR |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
CHF |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
CZK |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
DKK |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
EUR |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
USD
|
|
GBP |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
USD
|
|
NOK |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
PLN |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
USD
|
|
SEK |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total I + II + III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
All of these contracts mature in 2005.
Our consolidated financial statements are presented in euros.
Therefore, when we prepare our financial statements, we must
translate our assets, liabilities, income and expenses in
currencies other than the euro into euros at then-applicable
exchange rates. Consequently, increases and decreases in the
value of the euro will affect the value of these items in our
financial statements, even if their value has not changed in
their original currency. In this regard, an increase in the
value of the euro relative to other currencies may result in a
decline in the reported value, in euros, of our interests held
in those currencies. If the relative value of the euro to the
U.S. dollar increases, the U.S. dollar equivalent of
ADSs and cash dividends paid in euros on our ADSs will increase
as well.
EQUITY MARKETS RISK
Our exposure to equity markets risk relates primarily to our
investment in equity securities of unconsolidated entities,
particularly the Interpublic Group. At December 31, 2004,
the market value of our quoted equity securities amounted to
52 million, compared to a carrying value for French GAAP
purposes of
15 million.
As of December 31, 2004, we held 13,382,843 million
treasury shares, or approximately 6.85% of our total share
capital. We are thus exposed to fluctuations in the market price
of our shares. Under both French and U.S. GAAP, treasury
shares are deducted from consolidated shareholders equity.
|
|
Item 12. |
Description of Securities Other Than Equity
Securities |
Not applicable.
75
PART II
|
|
Item 13. |
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies |
None.
|
|
Item 14. |
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders
and Use of Proceeds |
None.
|
|
Item 15. |
Controls and Procedures |
Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e)) as of December 31, 2004. Based on that
evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial
officer have concluded that, as of that date, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
(i) information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) that
such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
There have been no significant changes in our internal controls
or, to our knowledge, other factors that could significantly
affect our internal controls subsequent to the evaluation date.
Therefore, no corrective actions were taken.
|
|
Item 16A. |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
The supervisory board has determined that Gerard Worms, chairman
of the audit committee, is an audit committee financial expert
and an independent director.
Item 16B. Code of
Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics (as that term is defined in the
instructions to Item 16B of Form 20-F) that applies
specifically to our chief executive officer, chief financial
officer and other principal financial officers. That code of
ethics is attached as an exhibit to this annual report. We also
adopted a code of ethics applicable to all employees that
addresses the subjects referenced in NYSE Rule 303A.10. Our
codes of ethics are available on our website, at
www.publicis.com. In addition, we undertake to provide a
copy of our codes of ethics to any person without charge upon
request. Such requests may be directed to our legal department
by phone at 33 1 44 43 70 00 or by mail to 133, avenue des
Champs-Elysées, 75008 Paris, France.
|
|
Item 16C. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Accountant Fees
Ernst & Young Audit and Mazars & Guérard
served as our independent auditors for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, for which audited
financial statements appear in this annual report.
76
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for
professional services and other services rendered by
Ernst & Young Audit and Mazars & Guérard
in 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
( millions) | |
|
( millions) | |
|
|
Ernst & Young | |
|
Mazars & | |
|
Ernst & Young | |
|
Mazars & | |
|
|
Audit | |
|
Guérard | |
|
Audit | |
|
Guérard | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Audit Related Fees
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Audit Fees are the aggregate fees billed by our
independent auditors for the audit of our individual and
consolidated annual financial statements, reviews of interim
financial statements and attestation services that are provided
in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements.
Audit-Related Fees are the aggregate fees billed by
our independent auditors for assurance and related services that
are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review
of our financial statements and are not reported under
Audit Fees. Audit-Related Fees include
consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting
standards and due diligence services.
Tax Fees are the aggregate fees billed by our
independent auditors for professional services related to tax
compliance and tax consultations, including assistance in
connection with tax audits.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The audit committee of our board of directors chooses and submit
to AGMs vote our independent auditors to audit our
financial statements, subject to the approval of our
shareholders. Since May 2003, our audit committee has followed a
policy that requires management to obtain the audit
committees approval before engaging our independent
auditors to provide any other audit or permitted non-audit
services to us or our subsidiaries.
This policy, which is designed to assure that such engagements
do not impair the independence of our auditors, requires the
audit committee to pre-approve various audit and permitted
non-audit services that may be performed by our auditors. All
services, including audit services, audit-related services, tax
services and all other services, are subject to specific
pre-approval. The audit committee is not permitted to approve
any engagement of our auditors if the services to be performed
either fall into a category of services that are not permitted
by applicable law or the services would be inconsistent with
maintaining the auditors independence.
|
|
Item 16D. |
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit
Committees |
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 16E. |
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and
Affiliated Purchasers |
Not applicable.
77
PART III
|
|
Item 18. |
Financial Statements |
78
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
and Shareholders of Publicis Groupe, S.A.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Publicis Groupe, S.A. and subsidiaries (the
Company), as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders equity and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. We were not
engaged to perform an audit of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Publicis Groupe, S.A. and its subsidiaries
at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for the years
then ended, in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in France.
Accounting principles generally accepted in France vary in
certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Information relating to the
nature and the effect of such differences is presented in
Note 31 to the consolidated financial statements.
Paris, France
March 10, 2005 except for Note 31
Summary of differences between generally accepted accounting
principles in France and the U.S., for which the date is
June 24, 2005
|
|
|
Mazars & Guérard, S.A.
|
|
Ernst & Young Audit |
/s/ Frédéric Allilaire
|
|
/s/ Bruno Perrin |
Represented by
|
|
Represented by |
Frédéric Allilaire
|
|
Bruno Perrin |
F-1
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
31 DECEMBER 2004
Consolidated Income Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
Personnel expenses
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2,197 |
) |
|
|
(2,254 |
) |
|
|
(1,659 |
) |
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(921 |
) |
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
(734 |
) |
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,118 |
) |
|
|
(3,186 |
) |
|
|
(2,393 |
) |
Operating income before depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense (excluding goodwill and
intangibles arising on acquisition)
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
Operating income before amortization of intangibles on
acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Amortization of intangibles arising on acquisition
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Impairment of intangibles arising on acquisition
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
Net financial costs
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Income of consolidated companies before taxes and exceptional
items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Exceptional items
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
Net change in deferred taxes related to the OBSA/ Credit Linked
Notes (CLN) transactions
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income of consolidated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Equity in net income of non-consolidated companies
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Net income before goodwill amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Groups share of net income before goodwill
amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
Goodwill amortization
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
Net income before minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Group net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Per share data (in euros)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares basic (thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,411 |
|
|
|
182,795 |
|
|
|
146,262 |
|
Net earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
Number of share diluted (thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,608 |
|
|
|
239,541 |
|
|
|
171,026 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
F-2
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS AT DECEMBER 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
ASSETS |
Goodwill, net
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
2,596 |
|
|
|
3,028 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
Investments and other financial assets, net
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Investments accounted for by the equity method
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
4,637 |
|
Inventory and costs billable to clients
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
OCEANE redemption premium
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,949 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
6,341 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,721 |
|
|
|
10,881 |
|
|
|
10,978 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Additional paid-in capital and retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
Other shareholders equity (ORANEs)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
ORANEs(1)
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for contingencies and charges
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
Bonds, bank borrowings and overdrafts
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
Bonds, bank borrowings and current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,472 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
8,208 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,721 |
|
|
|
10,881 |
|
|
|
10,978 |
|
Net financial debt
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Reclassification made following clarification of certain rules
by the French Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des
Marchés Financiers (the AMF)) in 2003 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In Capital | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Capital | |
|
and Retained | |
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
of Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
December 31, 2002 before deduction of treasury stock
|
|
|
196,081,129 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
Deduction of treasury stock existing at December 31, 2002(1)
|
|
|
(12,790,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002 after deduction of treasury stock
|
|
|
183,290,529 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid by Publicis Groupe S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
Increase in capital of Publicis Groupe S.A.
|
|
|
81,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative variance on mergers of Publicis/Somarel/MLMS/MLMS2
|
|
|
(784,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Consolidated net income, group share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Reclassification of ORANEs outside shareholders equity(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 before deduction of treasury stock
|
|
|
195,378,253 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduction of treasury stock existing at December 31, 2003(1)
|
|
|
(13,012,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 after deduction of treasury stock
|
|
|
182,365,864 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid by Publicis Groupe S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Increase in capital of Publicis Groupe S.A.
|
|
|
92,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of Saatchi & Saatchi provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Impact of LSF requiring consolidation of entity which issued the
CLN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Application of CNC 03-01 pensions recommendation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Reclassification of equity warrants following redemption of the
bond component of the OBSA(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Consolidated net income, group share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 before deduction of treasury stock
|
|
|
195,471,061 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
Deduction of treasury stock existing at December 31, 2004(1)
|
|
|
(13,015,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 after deduction of treasury stock
|
|
|
182,455,218 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Treasury stock held at period end, acquired in the context of
stock buyback programs, is deducted from shareholders
equity (see note 1.2 accounting
policies treasury stock). Changes during the
financial year are shown in a separate table in this note. |
|
(2) |
Following clarification issued by the French Financial Markets
Authority (AMF) on June 30, 2003 on interpretation of
criteria concerning the classification of hybrid financial
instruments in consolidated financial statements, the
ORANEs were reclassified into a separate balance sheet captioned
ORANEs outside shareholders equity. |
|
(3) |
Following the redemption of the bond component of the OBSA in
September 2004, the 28,125,000 equity warrants, which have an
exercise price of 30.5 euros, were reclassified into
shareholders equity for their amount stated net of tax
being 118 million euros (See break-down hereafter). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
I Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before minority interests
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Capital (gain) loss on disposal (before tax)
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Amortization of bond redemption premium and additional interest
on OBSA
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Depreciation and amortization on fixed assets
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Change in deferred taxes(1)
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross operating cash flow
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
Equity in net income of unconsolidated companies
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Dividends received from equity accounted investments
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in working capital requirements
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
II Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment and intangible assets
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Purchases of investments and other financial assets, net(2)
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Acquisitions of subsidiaries(3)
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
(677 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
III Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of contingent value rights attached to shares provided
as consideration for Saatchi & Saatchi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
Dividends paid to parent company shareholders
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Dividends paid to minority shareholders of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Increase in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in borrowings(4)
|
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
Net purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
Change in treatment of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(927 |
) |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
IV Impact of exchange rate fluctuations
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
Net change in consolidated cash flows (I + II + III
+ IV)
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities at January 1
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
Bank overdrafts at January 1
|
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
Net cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
Cash and marketable securities at December 31
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
Bank overdrafts at December 31
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash and cash equivalents at end of year(3)
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Including a net change in deferred taxes of 130 million
euros arising, in 2004, on the redemption of the bond component
of the OBSA and the sale of the CLN |
|
(2) |
Including, in 2003, 380 million euros in respect of the CLN
purchased in the second half of that year and, in 2004,
487 million euros in respect of proceeds of their sale in
the third quarter |
|
(3) |
After deducting the net cash of the companies acquired on the
date of their acquisition |
|
(4) |
Including 558 million euros corresponding to the redemption
of the bond component of the OBSA in the third quarter of 2004
and 193 million euros corresponding to the early
redemption, in March 2004, of nearly all the bonds convertible
into Interpublic Group (IPG) shares |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2004
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Since January 1, 2000, the consolidated financial
statements of Publicis Groupe S.A. and its subsidiaries
(Publicis or the Group) have been prepared in accordance with
the new rules and accounting policies applicable to consolidated
financial statements in France (nouvelles règles
et méthodes relatives aux comptes
consolidés), approved by the ministerial order of
June 22, 1999, which enacted Rule 99-02 of the
accounting rules and regulation committee (Comité
de Réglementation Comptable or CRC).
The consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004 reflect the effect of the following new
accounting rules applicable as from January 1, 2004:
CRC rule 04-03 issued on May 4, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
The French Financial Security Act (Loi sur la
Sécurité Financière or LSF)
of August 1, 2003 includes an accounting regulation which
removes the previous requirement that an entity hold shares in
another, controlled, entity in order to include it in its scope
of consolidation. This new regulation led Publicis to
consolidate the entity that issued the CLN as from
January 1, 2004. The effect on opening shareholders
equity is (6) million euros after tax. |
|
|
|
French national accounting committee (Conseil national
de la Comptabilité or CNC)
recommendation 03-01 issued on April 1, 2003 in relation to
accounting and valuation rules for pensions and other post
employment benefits. |
Publicis applied the recommendation concerning accounting and
valuation rules for pensions and other post employment benefits
as from January 1, 2004. Furthermore, in accordance with
the CNCs pronouncement of July 22, 2004, Publicis
opted for the recognition of actuarial gains and losses in
shareholders equity as from the initial date of
application. The effect of opening shareholders equity is
(16) million euros after tax.
|
|
1.1. |
Consolidation Principles and Policies |
Publicis prepares and reports its consolidated financial
statements in euros.
Publicis consolidates all companies over which it exercises
sole, direct or indirect, control, as well as companies which it
manages and over which it exercises a dominant influence.
Companies over which Publicis exercises significant influence,
which is presumed when the Groups ownership percentage is
greater than 20%, are consolidated using the equity method.
Certain companies that meet the criteria listed above are not
consolidated, because of their non-significant nature
(i.e., where non-group revenue are less than
2 million).
Consolidating all of these companies would not have a
significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The list of the principal consolidated companies together with
their method of consolidation is presented in note 31.
|
|
|
Translation of Financial Statements of Foreign
Subsidiaries |
The local currency denominated financial statements of
subsidiaries located outside of the euro zone are translated
into euros in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates; |
|
|
|
Income statement items are translated at average exchange rates
for the year; |
F-6
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Translation gains and losses resulting from the application of
these rates are recognized in retained earnings for the Group
share with the remainder being recorded in minority interests in
the balance sheet. |
The financial statements of subsidiaries based in
hyper-inflationary economies are also translated in accordance
with the above principles. This is justified by the fact that
Publicis has a very limited presence in such economies (such
subsidiaries, taken together, contribute less than 1.3% of
consolidated revenue).
The consolidated financial statements, and the financial
statements of the parent company and almost all consolidated
companies, are prepared to a December 31 year-end.
|
|
|
Elimination of Intercompany Transactions |
Transactions between consolidated entities are fully eliminated,
as are the corresponding receivables and payables. Similarly
intercompany gains or losses on sale, internal dividends and
provisions relating to subsidiaries are eliminated on
consolidation.
The correct elimination of both income statement items and
intercompany items in the balance sheet is based on a
reconciliation process carried out at two levels:
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany transactions are systematically reconciled at each
month-end closing under a standardized and documented process
applied by each Group entity and each of its counterpart
entities; |
|
|
|
A control is carried out centrally to ensure that intercompany
transactions declared at month-end are reconciled. All
intercompany balance declarations are reconciled individually by
pair of companies. Differences resulting from simple errors in
the declaration process that should not have an impact on the
Groups results are adjusted in the appropriate balance
sheet account captions. If necessary, residual differences are
corrected by an adjustment to the consolidated income statement. |
Publicis records costs of research and studies as expenses in
the period in which they are incurred. In 2004, these costs
amounted to 25 million euros, as against 27 million
euros in 2003.
These costs relate primarily to the following items: studies and
tests related to advertising campaigns, development costs in
respect of internet sites and related tools, research programs
in respect of consumer behavior and advertisers needs in
various areas, and studies and modeling conducted in order to
optimize media purchases for the Groups clients.
Goodwill arising on consolidation represents the difference
between the acquisition cost of investments in consolidated
companies (including potential additional purchase price
consideration, which is recognized in other liabilities when its
payment is probable and it can be measured reliably) and the
Groups share in the fair value of identified assets and
liabilities at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is tracked in
local currency with foreign currency translation differences
being recognized at year-end.
Goodwill is recognized in the balance sheet and is amortized on
a straight-line basis in accordance with the following policies:
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill amounts of less than
150,000
are amortized immediately in full; |
|
|
|
Goodwill related to single country media buying and sales
entities is amortized over five years; |
F-7
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill related to international media buying networks is
amortized over twenty years; |
|
|
|
Goodwill related to advertising and marketing services entities
and full service communications networks is amortized over a
period varying from 10 to 40 years, depending on the
country, size and the specific characteristics of each agency. |
Where an indicator shows that one of these assets may have been
impaired, an impairment test is performed by reference to the
assets value in use, determined on the basis of the
present value of estimated future cash flows. Calculations are
based on five-year cash flow forecasts, a terminal growth rate
for subsequent cash flows and the application of a discount rate
to all future flows: in 2004 the discount rate used varied
between 9% and 9.5%, and the terminal growth rate varied between
3.5% and 4% depending on the specific characteristics of the
businesses in question.
|
|
|
Fair Value Adjustments on Acquisition |
On first consolidation of enterprises over which the group
exercises sole control, their identifiable assets and
liabilities are measured at fair value. The difference between
the value at which such assets and liabilities are initially
recognized in the consolidated balance sheet and their prior
carrying value in the balance sheet of the controlled enterprise
constitutes a fair value adjustment on acquisition.
Fair value adjustments on acquisition are amortized over the
life of the related assets and liabilities.
Other intangible assets are comprised primarily of tradenames,
client relationships and software.
Tradenames with a finite useful life and client relationships
are amortized over their useful lives. In practice, tradenames
are not amortized as they are considered to have indefinite
useful lives. Client relationships are amortized over a period
from 13 to 40 years.
The method used to determine the amount of any impairment of
intangible assets is based on discounted future cash flows. More
precisely, for tradenames, the group uses the royalty
savings method, which takes into account the future cash
flows that the tradename would generate in royalties if a third
party were prepared to pay them for use of the tradename. As
regards client relationships, the method takes into account the
discounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the
clients. Independent experts perform the valuations. The
financial factors used are consistent with those used for
valuation of goodwill balances.
Capitalized software includes both software for internal use and
software used for sales and marketing purposes, and is stated
either purchase cost or, when developed internally, at
production cost.
Software is generally amortized over a period of one or two
years and never over more than three years.
Property and equipment is stated at historical cost. This is
based either on its purchase price or on its value on
contribution. A limited number of assets have been revalued in
accordance with French legislation; the value of such assets is
minor in terms of materiality.
Property and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis
over the assets useful economic lives.
Useful lives of property and equipment are generally as follows
(straight-line method):
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings: between 20 and 50 years. |
|
|
|
Fixtures, fittings and general installations:
10 years. |
|
|
|
Billboards: 4 to 7 years. |
|
|
|
Office furniture and equipment: 5 to 10 years. |
F-8
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles: 4 years. |
|
|
|
Computer hardware: 2 to 4 years. |
Assets acquired under capital leases are recognized in property
and equipment and a corresponding liability is recognized in
financial debt. Such assets are depreciated over the periods as
described above. In the income statement, the lease rental
expenses are replaced by the interest expense on the debt and
the depreciation expense relating to the assets.
|
|
|
Investments in Non-consolidated Companies |
Investments in non-consolidated companies are stated at
acquisition cost. A provision for impairment is recognized when
their carrying amount exceeds their value in use, which is
determined on the basis of criteria such as revalued net assets,
capitalized earnings, quoted stock prices, the outlook for the
sector or industry and the strategic value of the investment to
the Group.
Other investments are stated at acquisition cost. A provision
for impairment is recognized, if required, on the basis of a
comparison with their value at the balance sheet date, which is
based on the average market price for the last month of the year
for listed investments and on probable sale price for non-listed
investments.
|
|
|
Loans and Advances to Equity Accounted and
Non-consolidated Companies |
This account caption records financial receivables held by
consolidated companies on both equity accounted companies and
non-consolidated companies in which the Group has an investment.
A provision is recorded against these receivables when there is
a recoverability risk resulting from the financial condition of
the entities in question. Such provisions are included in the
caption Provisions on investments and other financial
assets.
|
|
|
Inventory and Costs Billable to Clients |
Inventory and costs billable to represent primarily comprise
work-in-progress related to the advertising business, consisting
of technical, creative and production work (e.g., graphic
design, TV and radio production, editing), which is billable,
but has not yet been billed to clients. A provision is recorded
when the net realizable value is lower than the production costs
incurred. Unbillable work or costs incurred relating to new
client development activities are not recognized in assets
except when they constitute expenses incurred during the
proposal process which may be billed to the client under the
terms of the contract.
Accounts receivable are stated at their nominal value. An
allowance for doubtful accounts is recognized for receivables
for which there is a risk of non-recovery.
Accounts receivable denominated in foreign currencies are valued
at the year-end exchange rate. Unrealized foreign exchange gains
and losses are recognized in the income statement.
The gross value of marketable securities is stated at
acquisition or subscription price. If necessary, a provision is
recognized on the basis of the average stock market price during
the last month of the year.
F-9
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pursuant to the recommendations of the French National
Accounting Committee (CNC), treasury stock held in
the companys portfolio at year end in the context of stock
buyback programs is, because of its possible uses (such programs
having several objectives), deducted from shareholders
equity.
This does not apply to treasury stock held in the context of the
liquidity contract put in place in November 2004, which is
recognized as an asset under marketable securities.
The group does not use derivative financial instruments other
than routine foreign currency hedging contracts. Gains and
losses are recognized in the income statement over the residual
life of the hedged instruments and symmetrically match
recognition of income and expenses in respect of such hedged
instruments.
|
|
|
Pensions and Other Post-employment Benefits |
The Group applies the preferred method under rule 99-02 of the
CRC, recognizing all pensions and post-employment benefits in
the balance sheet. The group applies the CNCs
recommendation 2003-R01 Accounting and valuation rules for
pensions and other post employment benefits as from
January 1, 2004.
Provisions are measured in accordance with the laws and
regulations specific to each country. Thus:
|
|
|
|
|
The German and Italian regulatory requirements are applied in
respect of lump sum payments on retirement; |
|
|
|
In France, the terms of the advertising industrys
collective bargaining agreement are applied; |
|
|
|
In the U.K. and the U.S., pensions and other post-employment
benefit obligations are outsourced in plans managed by insurance
companies. |
These plans may be either:
|
|
|
|
|
Defined contribution plans: the amount of Group contributions to
the plan is recognized as an expense during the period; |
|
|
|
Defined benefit plans: the cost of defined benefits is
separately determined for each plan using the projected unit
cost actuarial method. Actuarial gains and losses are recognized
in income or expense when cumulative non-recognized actuarial
gains and losses for a given scheme exceed 10% of the greater of
the amount of the defined benefit commitment obligation or the
fair value of plan assets. These gains and losses are recognized
over the expected average residual working life of the employees
covered by the plans. |
|
|
|
Provisions for Litigation and Claims |
The group recognizes a provision in each case where a risk
related to litigation or a claim of any type (commercial,
regulatory, tax or employee related) is identified, where it is
probable that an outflow of resources will be necessary to
extinguish this risk and where a reliable estimate of costs to
be incurred can be made. In such cases, the amount of the
provision is determined by the agencies and their experts, under
the supervision of the Groups head office teams, on the
basis of their best estimate of the probable costs related to
the litigation or the claim.
Restructuring costs are fully provided for in the period in
which the decision to implement the restructuring plan is made
and announced.
F-10
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In the context of acquisitions, provisions are recognized as
soon as the programs have been clearly defined and their cost
has been estimated. They are included in the calculation of
goodwill.
These costs consist primarily of severance and early retirement
payments, other employment expenses, and in some cases
write-downs of property and equipment and other assets.
|
|
|
Vacant property provisions |
A provision is recognized for the amount of rent and related
expenses to be paid net of any sublease revenue to
be received for all buildings that are sublet or
vacant and are not intended to be used in the context of the
Groups principal activities.
In the context of acquisitions, provisions are also recorded
when the acquired company has property rental contracts with
less favorable terms than those prevailing in the market at the
acquisition date.
Bonds are recognized at par value. In cases where a redemption
premium exists, the bond liability is increased by the total
amount of such a premium. This entry is balanced by recognition
in assets of an identical redemption premium amount, which is
amortized over the life of the bond on an actuarial basis.
When securities are issued as consideration for an acquisition,
they are recognized at their fair value at that date.
A written agreement with clients (i.e., purchase order,
letter, contract) indicating the nature and the amount of the
work to be performed is required for the recognition of revenue.
The Groups revenue recognition policies are summarized
below:
|
|
|
|
|
For commission based customer arrangements (excluding
production): |
|
|
|
|
|
advertising creation: recognition at date of publication or
broadcast; |
|
|
|
media space buying services: recognition at date of publication
or broadcast. |
|
|
|
|
|
For other customer arrangements (i.e., project based
arrangements, fixed fee arrangements, time-based arrangements)
and production: |
|
|
|
Revenue is recognized in the accounting period in which the
service is rendered. Services are considered to be rendered by
reference to the percentage-of-completion method, irrespective
of whether invoices have been issued to the client or not, once
the outcome of the transaction can be estimated reliably. |
Net income is taxed based on the tax laws and regulations in
effect in the respective countries where the income is
recognized. Deferred taxes, resulting from temporary differences
between the tax value and the carrying amount of assets and
liabilities, are recognized in accordance with French accounting
standards.
Taxable and deductible temporary differences are identified by
date of maturity and entity-by-entity and are offset, if
applicable, on a year-by-year basis.
Deferred taxes are calculated based on the tax laws and tax
rates in effect at year-end, unless different tax rates have
been legally enacted for future periods. The impact of changes
in tax rates is recorded in the income statement in the period
in which the change in the tax rate is decided.
F-11
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred tax assets are only recognized when the taxable
entities in question are reasonably assured of being able to
utilize them in future periods.
Publicis presents items that do not result from normal
operations under the Exceptional items caption.
Items appearing under this heading include gains and losses on
the sale of non-current assets and the termination costs of
discontinued business operations.
|
|
|
Exposure to Interest Rate Risk |
The period to maturity of financial assets and liabilities at
December 31, 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1 Year | |
|
1 to 5 Years | |
|
>5 Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of euros) | |
|
Financial liabilities(1)
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
Financial assets(2)
|
|
|
(1,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(1,397 |
) |
Net position before financial management(3)
|
|
|
(975 |
) |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
Off-balance sheet instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net position after financial management
|
|
|
(975 |
) |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Gross financial indebtedness |
|
(2) |
Redemption premium on Oceane, marketable securities and cash |
|
(3) |
Equal to net financial indebtedness as defined in
note 23 Bonds, Bank borrowings and overdrafts |
Group management determines the mix between fixed and
variable-rate debt and periodically reviews its decision based
on interest rate trend forecasts.
At the end of 2004, the Groups gross financial
indebtedness is comprised, for almost 90% of its amount, of
fixed rate loans at an average interest rate of 3.4%. Net
variable rate indebtedness, after deducting cash and cash
equivalents, is negative: an increase of 1% of short-term
interest rates would have a positive effect of 10 million
euros on the groups pre-tax profits.
During 2004, the Group did not use derivative financial
instruments to hedge against interest rate risks.
To protect itself from liquidity risk, Publicis has substantial
cash and cash equivalents (cash at bank and marketable
securities totaling
1.195 million at December 31, 2004), as well as unused
credit lines amounting to
1.476 million, which allow it to meet the short-term
portion of its financial debt.
These credit lines include, in an amount of one billion euros, a
multicurrency loan facility, which has not been drawn down at
December 31, 2004.
Further, excluding bank overdrafts, most of the Groups
debt consists of bonds which do not include specific covenants.
They only include standard credit default event
clauses (i.e., liquidation, bankruptcy or default,
either on the debt itself or on repayment of another debt if
higher than a given threshold). The only early redemption
options exercisable by bondholders are in respect of the Oceane
2018 and are exercisable successively in January 2006, 2010 and
2014.
The majority of sales transactions are denominated in the local
currencies of the countries in which they are transacted. As a
result, exchange rate risk relating to such transactions is not
very significant and is occasionally hedged through foreign
currency hedging contracts.
F-12
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Groups financial indebtedness is mainly comprised of
bonds, issued by the parent company (see note 23), which
are solely denominated in euros and are not subject to exchange
rate hedges. Short-term credit lines and bank overdrafts used in
the ordinary course of business by subsidiaries are denominated
in the functional currency of the local company. No exchange
rate risk thus exists in respect of these balances.
As regards intercompany loans and borrowings, these are subject
to appropriate hedges if they present a net exposure to exchange
rate risk. It should however be noted that, as most treasury
needs of subsidiaries are financed at country level through cash
pooling mechanisms, international financing operations are
limited in number and in duration.
The table below summarizes hedging contracts in place at
December 31, 2004:
I Intercompany Receivables and Payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency | |
|
Currency | |
|
Amount of Currency | |
|
Amount of Currency | |
|
Fair Value of the | |
Sold | |
|
Purchased | |
|
Sold | |
|
Purchased | |
|
Hedging Instrument | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Local currency, | |
|
(Local currency, | |
|
(Euro in millions) | |
|
|
|
|
in millions) | |
|
in millions) | |
|
|
|
AUD |
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
CAD |
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
CHF |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
DKK |
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(40.7 |
) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
EUR |
|
|
|
CHF |
|
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
GBP |
|
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
EUR |
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(465.1 |
) |
|
|
590.2 |
|
|
|
(33.4 |
) |
|
GBP |
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
NOK |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(41.1 |
) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
NZD |
|
|
|
GBP |
|
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
SEK |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(54.5 |
) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
SEK |
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(148.9 |
) |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
THB |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(232.5 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
II Third Party Receivables and Payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency | |
|
Currency | |
|
Amount of Currency | |
|
Amount of Currency | |
|
Fair Value of the | |
Sold | |
|
Purchased | |
|
Sold | |
|
Purchased | |
|
Hedging Instrument | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Local currency, | |
|
(Local currency, | |
|
(Euro in millions) | |
|
|
|
|
in millions) | |
|
in millions) | |
|
|
|
CHF |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
CHF |
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
CAD |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
GBP |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
EUR |
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
USD |
|
|
|
AUD |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
CAD |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
CHF |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
DKK |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
GBP |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
INR |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
132.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
JPY |
|
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
905.7 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
KRW |
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
6536.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
NOK |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
SEK |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
THB |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
III Future Flows (dividends and interest
receivable, firm sales)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency | |
|
Currency | |
|
Amount of Currency | |
|
Amount of Currency | |
|
Fair Value of the | |
Sold | |
|
Purchased | |
|
Sold | |
|
Purchased | |
|
Hedging Instrument | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Local currency, | |
|
(Local currency, | |
|
(Euro in millions) | |
|
|
|
|
in millions) | |
|
in millions) | |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
CHF |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
JPY |
|
|
|
GBP |
|
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
NOK |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
SEK |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
THB |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
CHF |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
CZK |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
DKK |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
GBP |
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
NOK |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
PLN |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
SEK |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL I + II + III |
|
|
(38.7 |
) |
In addition, changes in exchange rates between other currencies
and the euro (the Groups reporting currency) may have an
impact on the Groups consolidated balance sheet and income
statement.
For information purposes, the breakdown of Group revenue by
currency of origination is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues by Currency |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Euro
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
US dollar
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
Pound sterling
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Others
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A fall of 1% in the value of the euro with respect to all other
currencies would have the following, favorable, effect:
|
|
|
|
|
28 million euros on 2004 consolidated revenue; |
|
|
|
4 million euros on 2004 operating income. |
A fall of 1% in the value of the euro with respect to the dollar
would have the following, favorable, effect:
|
|
|
|
|
16 million euros on 2004 consolidated revenue; |
|
|
|
3 million euros on 2004 operating income. |
Country Risk
Publicis operations in geographic regions considered to be
at risk (Asia, Latin America) continue to represent a relatively
minor share (11%) of consolidated revenue.
F-15
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Exposure to Share Related
Risks
The main shareholdings that are exposed to a significant market
risk are treasury stock in Publicis and shares in Interpublic
Group (IPG):
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock in Publicis: |
A decline in the value of treasury stock purchased in the
context of stock buyback programs would not have an impact on
earnings as the carrying value of such treasury stock is
deducted from shareholders equity.
For treasury stock acquired in the context of the liquidity
contract, a reduction of 10% in its value would, on the basis of
shares held at December 31, 2004, generate an income
statement expense of 0.9 million euros.
Given Publicis substantial unrealized capital gain on
IPG shares at December 31, 2004 (market value
represents more than three and a half times the carrying value
in the consolidated financial statements), a 10% decrease
in their market value would not be sufficient to require
recognition of a provision.
The effect of a 10% decrease in the market value of
stockholdings owned by Publicis is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock Purchased | |
|
|
|
|
in the Context of: | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Stock Buyback | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
Programs | |
|
Liquidity Contract | |
|
(IPG Shares) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Asset position
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share and Diluted Earnings Per Share |
Earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the
period. Treasury stock acquired in the context of stock buyback
programs is not included in the total number of shares in issue
for the purposes of this calculation.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated on the basis of the
weighted average number of shares that would result from the
exercise of stock options and equity warrants outstanding at the
balance sheet date, together with the conversion of all
convertible bonds (OCEANEs) into shares and redemption of all
ORANEs in shares. However, instruments that have an
anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share are not taken into
account.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the treasury
stock method.
|
|
2. |
Comparability of Financial Statements |
2.1. Presentation of Financial Statements
Because of the material effect of a number of operations in
2004, it was considered that it was appropriate to show the
following items in separate captions on the face of the income
statement:
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangibles arising on acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
Net change in deferred taxes related to the OBSA/CLN
transactions. |
2.2. Bcom3 Acquisition
The acquisition of the Bcom3 group was completed on
September 24, 2002. The Group finalized its valuation of
identifiable assets and liabilities in December 2003.
F-16
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Under the terms of the agreement, Publicis provided
consideration for the acquisition by issuing the following
securities to Bcom3 shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
56,250,000 new Publicis shares with a value on issue of
30.50
(with a par value of
0.40 and a
premium of
30.10 per
share) ; |
|
|
|
Bonds with a par value of
858 million
comprised of 1,562,500 ORANEs redeemable into 28,125,000 new or
existing Publicis shares; and |
|
|
|
Bonds with a par value of
858 million,
comprised of 2,812,500 OBSAs with detachable equity warrants
granting the right to subscribe to 28,125,000 Publicis shares. |
|
|
|
Characteristics of the Bonds Issued on the Acquisition of
Bcom3 |
|
|
|
|
|
ORANEs Bonds redeemable into new or existing
shares |
|
|
|
This 20-year bond issue, given as consideration for a portion of
Bcom3 shares, is comprised of 1,562,500 ORANEs with a par value
of 549 Euros, for a total par value of
857,812,500 Euros. |
|
|
Each ORANE entitles the bearer to receive 18 existing or new
Publicis shares, at the rate of one per year commencing on
September 1, 2005 and concluding on the 20th anniversary of
the bond (2022). In parallel, the value of the ORANE is reduced
by 30.50 euros per year on each of these dates. |
|
|
ORANEs bear interest at 0.82% of par value. This interest
payable will be reviewed for the first time on payment of the
coupon for the period September 1, 2004 to
September 1, 2005, on the basis of 110% of the average of
dividends over the last three financial years, however the
revised coupon cannot be less than 0.82% of the par value of the
ORANE. |
|
|
|
|
|
OBSAs Bonds with detachable equity warrants |
|
|
|
The 20-year bond with detachable equity warrants was issued on
September 24, 2002 as consideration for a portion of the
Bcom3 shares. It was composed of 2,812,500 bonds, with a
par value of 305 Euros, for a total amount of
857,812,500 Euros. The bonds bore interest at 2.75% of par
value. |
|
|
Ten warrants were attached to each bond entitling the bearer to
subscribe, at any moment during the period from
September 24, 2013 to September 24, 2022, for a
Publicis share at an exercise price of 30.50 Euros by
making full cash payment on subscription. |
|
|
The bond component of the OBSAs was redeemed in September 2004
in the context of the program to simplify the balance sheet
structure, the equity warrants remain exercisable under the
conditions outlined above. |
Pursuant to Rule 99-02 of the CRC, the securities provided
as consideration for the acquisition were valued at fair value
at the date of acquisition, September 24, 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
The 56,250,000 new Publicis shares were valued at the market
price at the date of acquisition
( 17.60 per
share), representing a total value of
990 million. |
|
|
|
The 1,562,500 ORANEs were valued at
495 million, corresponding to their fair value at the date
of acquisition, determined on the basis of the stock market
price of Publicis shares at that date. Based on the results of a
detailed assessment of the characteristics of this financial
instrument, the ORANEs have been classified in a separate
caption ORANEs, outside shareholders equity, in the
consolidated balance sheet. |
F-17
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
The OBSAs were valued at
642 million,
an amount which includes the present value of the bond component
at the acquisition date
( 445 million)
and the fair value of the equity warrants
( 197 million).
Both of these values were calculated jointly by our internal
experts and our adviser banks using a 8.5% discount rate for the
bond component of the OBSA and using the Black &
Scholes model to measure the value of the equity warrants at the
acquisition date (with volatility assumptions between 33% to
35%). |
The total acquisition price of
2,257 million
breaks down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
|
|
| |
Value of Publicis shares
|
|
|
990 |
|
Value of ORANEs
|
|
|
495 |
|
Value of OBSAs
|
|
|
642 |
|
Net deferred tax liability on the OBSA valuation adjustment
|
|
|
74 |
|
Acquisition expenses (net of tax)
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
Final goodwill of
1,874 million
breaks down as follows (amounts net of tax, with a tax effect of
165 million):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
|
|
| |
Purchase price
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
Bcom3 negative shareholders equity under
French accounting standards
|
|
|
68 |
|
+ Fair value of identified assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
|
141 |
|
Vacant property provisions
|
|
|
168 |
|
Retirement obligation provisions
|
|
|
45 |
|
Other items
|
|
|
64 |
|
Allocated to plant and equipment
|
|
|
59 |
|
Allocation to intangible assets
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
Effect of foreign exchange
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gross goodwill at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is amortized over 40 years.
F-18
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Allocation to Intangible Assets |
The intangible assets resulting from the identification of
Bcom3s assets and liabilities, as determined by an
independent expert, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
|
|
| |
Client relationships
|
|
|
309 |
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
387 |
|
Other
|
|
|
7 |
|
Allocation to intangible assets(1)
|
|
|
703 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities on the above
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total allocation made at the end of 2003
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
As of 31 December 2004, taking account of the effect of
changes in foreign exchange rates of
114 million euros, the gross value of intangible
assets as allocated is 589 million euros. |
Client relationships are amortized over their estimated useful
lives, being 17 years. Tradenames are not amortized as they
are considered to have an indefinite useful life.
|
|
2.3. |
Other Changes in Scope of Consolidation |
The Group completed several acquisitions which, though not
material on an overall basis because of their size, were
important for several of our businesses (United Campaigns in
Russia, Thompson Murray and CLT in the U.S.). All these
acquisitions taken together represent less than 1% of
consolidated revenues and made a positive contribution of 1% to
net income before goodwill amortization.
No material disposal took place in the year. All disposals and
discontinued activities taken together represent less than 1% of
consolidated revenue.
|
|
3. |
Personnel Expenses and Headcount |
Personnel expenses include salaries, commissions, bonuses,
employee profit sharing and holiday pay. Personnel expenses also
include both social security charges related to salaries and
other employee benefits. Taxes other than income taxes that are
based on the level of salaries are however included in other
operating expenses.
|
|
|
Remuneration of Supervisory Board and Management Board
Members |
Remuneration paid to members of the supervisory board and the
management board during 2004 amounted to
1 million euros and 15 million euros
respectively, as against 1.1 million euros and
7.6 million euros in 2003.
F-19
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
By geographical zone:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
3,810 |
|
Other European countries
|
|
|
10,356 |
|
|
|
10,032 |
|
|
|
10,417 |
|
North America
|
|
|
11,308 |
|
|
|
11,139 |
|
|
|
11,409 |
|
Rest of world
|
|
|
10,925 |
|
|
|
10,295 |
|
|
|
10,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
36,384 |
|
|
|
35,166 |
|
|
|
35,681 |
|
Breakdown By Function (in %):(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
22% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creative
|
|
|
17% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and specialized activities
|
|
|
15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media and research
|
|
|
22% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administration and Management
|
|
|
17% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The breakdown envisaged by rule 99-02, under which headcount is
analyzed between managers (cadres in the
French text), clerical staff and workers, does not appear to be
relevant in the context of the sector of activity in which the
Group operates and, also, as most of the Groups operations
are based outside France where the concept of a specific
manager category does not generally exist. The Group
thus preferred to analyze headcount by function. |
|
|
4. |
Other Operating Expenses |
Other operating expenses include all external charges other than
production and media purchases. They also include taxes (other
than income taxes) and additions to and reversals of provisions.
|
|
5. |
Depreciation and Amortization Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Amortization expense on other intangible assets (excluding
goodwill and intangibles arising on acquisition)
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization on other intangible assets and
property and equipment
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Amortization of intangibles arising on acquisition
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Impairment of intangibles arising on acquisition
|
|
|
123 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill amortization
|
|
|
188 |
(2) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
(1) |
In the context of reorganization of the Group, Publicis decided
to refocus its activities on its top tradenames and to rapidly
discontinue use of certain less attractive tradenames. The
average useful life of client relationship intangibles was also
reduced. In consequence, the Group recorded an impairment loss
of 123 million euros, which mainly concerns Fallon, Frankel
and Nelson. These impairment losses were calculated on the basis
of reports prepared by independent experts. |
F-20
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
(2) |
Including 88 million euros of exceptional goodwill
amortization which mainly related to Triangle U.K.
(12 million euros), Casadevall &
Pedreno Spain (9), Publicis Peru (9),
Winner & Associates USA (6), Publicis
Graphics Lebanon (6), Publicis Salles
Norton Brazil (6), Publicis Basic Philippines (5),
Wet Desert Malaysia (4), Ariely Israel
(4). No other impairment loss in respect of a subsidiary
exceeded 3 million euros. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Interest and other financial costs, net
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Dividends received from non-consolidated companies
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Provisions against treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Financial expense on unwinding of discounts on long-term
provisions
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Discontinuance of activities and other adjustments to structures
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Capital gains on redemption of the bond component of the OBSA
and sale of the CLN
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other capital gains (losses) on disposal
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceptional items
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
Analysis of Income Tax Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Current tax expense
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
Deferred tax expense excluding exceptional items
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
Net change in deferred taxes related to capital gains on
redemption of the bond component of the OBSA and the sale of the
CLN
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (including net change in deferred
taxes related to capital gains on disposal)
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
F-21
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Effective Tax Rate
The effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004(1) | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Income of consolidated companies before taxes and goodwill
amortization
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Exceptional capital gain on redemption of the bond component of
the OBSA and sale of the CLN(1)
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income of consolidated companies before taxes, goodwill
amortization and OBSA/ CLN capital gain
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
French tax rate
|
|
|
34.33 |
% |
|
|
34.33 |
% |
|
|
34.33 |
% |
Expected tax expense:
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
Effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences in income tax rates
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Use of prior tax losses and recognition of deferred
tax assets in respect of prior year losses
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Losses in year for which no deferred tax asset was
recognized and provisions against deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Permanent differences
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Income taxes per the income statement:(1)
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
In 2004, the transactions involving the redemption of the bond
component of the OBSA and the sale of the CLN led to recognition
of an exceptional gain of 26 million euros together with a
net change in deferred taxes of 130 million euros. These
transactions were excluded from the calculation of the effective
tax rate in order to enable comparison with prior financial
years. If exceptional items are not excluded the effective tax
rate in 2004 was 0.9%. |
It should be noted that various subsidiaries in the Group have
tax loss carryforwards in respect of which a deferred tax asset
has not been recognized in the consolidated balance sheet
because of uncertainties related to restricted possibilities for
use of these losses and to their expiry in the relatively near
future. They amount to 460 million euros at
December 31, 2004, of which 260 million euros are of
French origin.
F-22
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Deferred Taxes Recognized in the Balance Sheet |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the
following balance sheet account captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Other receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term portion
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Long-term portion
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Provisions for contingencies and charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term portion
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Long-term portion
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
Sources of Deferred Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
Deferred tax assets arising from loss carryforwards
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities arising from temporary differences
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities attributable to restatement of assets
and liabilities at fair value on acquisitions
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
9. |
Investments Accounted for by the Equity Method |
Investments accounted for by the equity method at
December 31, 2004 amounted to
17 million
(at December 31, 2003:
30 million;
at December 31, 2002:
33 million).
Changes in this account caption in 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet | |
|
|
value | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of | |
|
|
euros) | |
Total at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
30 |
|
New acquisitions
|
|
|
1 |
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Group share of earnings in 2004
|
|
|
6 |
|
Dividends paid in 2004
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
17 |
|
F-23
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The main entities accounted for under the equity method are
Bartle, Bogle Hegarty (BBH) and International Sports and
Entertainment (iSe). Their carrying values on the balance
sheet amount to 9 million euros and 1 million euros,
respectively. iSe, which was created jointly in 2003 between
Publicis (45%) and Dentsu (45%), won the Hospitality and
Prestige Ticketing program in respect of the FIFA 2006
World Cup Football Championship.
|
|
10. |
Earnings Per Share and Diluted Earnings Per Share |
Earnings per share is calculated taking into account Group
net income of 210 million euros and an average number of
shares of 182,410,451, as against Group net income of
150 million euros and 182,795,496 shares in 2003.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated taking into account net
income of 210 million euros, adjusted for an amount of
34 million euros representing financial costs related to
both the OCEANEs and the ORANEs, being adjusted income of
244 million euros, as against 181 million euros in
2003.
The average number of shares taken into consideration is
251,607,849, after taking into account potential share issues
resulting from the conversion of financial debt and the exercise
of stock options and equity warrants in circulation, in all
cases where such instruments have a dilutive effect of earnings
per share. In this respect it should be noted that the
calculation of dilution, when funds are obtained at the date of
exercise of rights attached to certain instruments, is performed
using the treasury stock method. Thus potential exercise of
stock options whose exercise price is greater than
24.36 euros (being the average share price in December
2004), and of equity warrants whose exercise price is
30.5 euros, was not taken into consideration in determining
the diluted number of shares. The number of shares taken into
consideration in 2003 was 239,540,546.
11. Goodwill and Intangible
Assets, Net
Goodwill balances in respect of consolidated companies can be
analyzed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North | |
|
Rest of the | |
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
America | |
|
World | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Net value 2002
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
3,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net value 2003
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
2,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 financial year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross goodwill at January 1, 2004
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
Acquisitions in 2004 and effects of foreign currency fluctuations
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross value
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
2,923 |
|
Cumulative amortization
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net value 2004
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Changes in Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Value | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Tradenames and | |
|
Software and | |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill | |
|
Client Relationships | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
4,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Translation and other
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
3,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Translation and other
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,923 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
3,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of fair value of identified intangible assets at
acquisition date was performed by independent experts in respect
of material acquisitions (Bcom3, Fallon, Frankel, Nelson,
ZenithOptimedia).
|
|
|
Changes in Accumulated Amortization of Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Amortization | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Tradenames and | |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill | |
|
Client Relationships | |
|
Software and Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Decreases
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Translation and other
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases(1)
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
Decreases
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Translation and other
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Including 88 million euros of impairment losses in respect
of goodwill and 123 million euros of impairment losses in
respect of tradenames and client relationships (see
note 5 Depreciation and Amortization). |
F-25
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
12. |
Property and Equipment, Net |
|
|
|
Changes in Gross Value of Property and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Value | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Land and | |
|
|
|
|
Buildings | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to scope of consolidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Disposals and write offs
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
Translation and other
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to scope of consolidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Disposals and write offs
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
Translation and other
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net book value of land and buildings of which Publicis is
the proprietor is
45 million.
The Groups principal property asset is its corporate
headquarters located at 133 avenue des Champs-Elysées
in Paris. This seven-story building comprises about
12,000 square meters of office space primarily occupied by
Group companies and 1,500 square meters of commercial
property occupied by the Publicis Drugstore and two public
cinemas. Following the completion of the major renovation
program of the Drugstore and the cinemas, started at the end of
2001, the Drugstore re-opened to the public as of
February 4, 2004.
The parent company, Publicis Groupe S.A., also owns four floors
of the building occupied by Leo Burnett at 15 rue du
Dôme in Boulogne, a suburb of Paris. Publicis also has a
capital lease contract expiring in 2007 for the two other floors
in this building. Following the acquisition of
Saatchi & Saatchi, the Group also owns a six-story
building located at 30 rue Vital Bouhot in
Neuilly-sur-Seine, a suburb of Paris, comprising approximately
5,660 square meters of office space which is for the most
part occupied by Group companies.
Outside France, Publicis agencies own buildings in Brussels,
Amsterdam, Lisbon, Lima and Seoul, comprising a total of
14,000 square meters, all in city center locations.
|
|
|
Other Property and Equipment |
The Group has significant information systems equipment
dedicated to the creation and production of advertising,
management of media buying and administrative functions.
In addition, gross property and equipment includes
80 million
( 20 million
net book value) of billboards and furniture and fixtures
belonging to the Groups outdoor display companies,
principally JC Decaux Nederland (ex-Publex) in the Netherlands,
and Métrobus, a media sales unit specializing in public
transportation advertising space.
F-26
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Assets Under Capital Leases |
The net book value of such assets in the consolidated balance
sheet is
98 million
at December 31, 2004. The principal assets capitalized are
two floors of the office building located in rue du Dôme in
Boulogne Billancourt (a Paris suburb) and the Leo Burnett office
building in Chicago. Leo Burnetts capital lease contract
is in respect of assets with a value of
91 million
depreciable over 40 years and has been valued by an
independent expert. The office building is located at 35 West
Wacker Drive in Chicago (U.S.).
|
|
|
Changes in Accumulated Depreciation of Property and
Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Land and | |
|
|
|
|
Buildings | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to scope of consolidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Increases
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Decreases
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
Translation and other
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to scope of consolidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Increases
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Decreases
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
Translation and other
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
Investments and Other Financial Assets, Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Investments in non-consolidated companies
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Loans and advances to equity accounted and non- consolidated
companies
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
CLN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial assets, gross
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross value
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Provisions on investments and other financial assets
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net value
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2003, Publicis invested in 380 million euros of CLN
related to the credit risk of Publicis. The company that issued
the CLN is an entity controlled by Publicis under the criteria
set out in CRC rule 99-02, however it was not consolidated at
December 31, 2003 due to Publicis not having a shareholding
in the entity at December 31, 2003.
F-27
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As from January 1, 2004, in accordance with the requirement
of the French Financial Security act (LSF) that special
purpose entities controlled under the criteria set out in CRC
rule 99-02 be consolidated, the company that issued the CLN has
been included in Publicis scope of consolidation.
The consequences are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
In the opening balance sheet at January 1, 2004, a
provision of 5 million euros against the Italian state
treasury bills, previously recorded in the balance sheet of the
company that issued the CLN, was recognized through consolidated
shareholders equity (having an after tax effect of
(3) million euros on consolidated shareholders
equity); |
|
|
|
Remuneration of the CLN is limited to interest earned on the
Italian state treasury bills. The effect of the resulting
adjustment on opening shareholders equity is
(3) after tax; |
|
|
|
Under French GAAP, the Asset Swap and the Credit Default Swap
are not recognized in the balance sheet but, rather, are
included in off-balance sheet commitments. |
In September 2004, in the context of the program to simplify the
Groups balance sheet, all the CLN were sold. The overall
effect of this transaction and the transaction involving the
redemption of the bond component of the OBSA is 26 million
euros (before tax effect) and is included in exceptional items.
Breakdown of investments in
non-consolidated companies at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% | |
|
Gross | |
|
Net | |
|
Market | |
|
|
Ownership | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Interpublic Group (IPG)
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary information concerning IPG (consolidated figures):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of dollars) | |
Revenue
|
|
|
5,863 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
(452 |
) |
Shareholders equity at December 31
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
14. |
Inventory and Costs Billable to Clients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Gross book value
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Provisions against inventories
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Net book value
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
F-28
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
3,323 |
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
3,716 |
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Gross value
|
|
|
3,334 |
|
|
|
3,326 |
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
Net book value
|
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
All receivables are due in less than one year.
It should be noted that when Publicis buys media space as an
agent on behalf of its clients in France (transactions for which
there is no income statement movement), the related accounts
receivable are recorded in Other receivables in the
balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Taxes receivable
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Receivables on transactions performed as an agent
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Advances to suppliers
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Gross book value
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Provision
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Net book value (excluding deferred tax assets)
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Net book value (including deferred tax assets)
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
Other receivables are due within one year, with the exception of
deferred tax assets.
Deferred tax assets at December 31, 2003 include
68 million euros related to restructuring and vacant
property provisions recognized in respect of the Bcom3
acquisition.
|
|
17. |
OCEANE Redemption Premium |
The gross amount of the OCEANE redemption premium at
December 31, 2004 is 239 million euros. The redemption
premium is amortized using the actuarial method over the 16-year
term of the bond. At December 31, 2004, accumulated
amortization of the premium was 37 million euros.
|
|
18. |
Marketable Securities |
The net book value of the portfolio of marketable securities at
December 31, 2004 is 67 million euros, consisting
primarily of money market funds, mutual funds, certificates of
deposit and bonds. It also includes Publicis treasury stock
purchased in the context of the liquidity contract
the net amount of such treasury stock is 9 million euros at
December 31, 2004. The market value of marketable
securities is equal to their book value.
F-29
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Changes in Composition of the Treasury Stock Portfolio
Held in the Context of Stock Buyback Programs |
The following movements took place on the treasury stock
portfolio in 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Deducted | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
from Shareholders | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros | |
|
|
except for number of shares) | |
Treasury stock held at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
13,012,389 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
Purchases in 2004 at an average price of
25.58
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
(16,546 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock held at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
13,015,843 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Reclassification of Equity Warrants into
Shareholders Equity |
The net amount reclassified is 118 million euros broken
down as follows (millions of euros):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at date of acquisition
|
|
|
197 |
|
Amortization over 20 years, cumulative amount at
September 17, 2004
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
Net amount reclassified
|
|
|
118 |
|
Impact of the
Saatchi & Saatchi Acquisition
The acquisition of Saatchi & Saatchi, which was
completed in 2000, was treated in accordance with the authorized
alternative method under article 215 of Rule 99-02 of the
CRC which enabled Publicis to substitute the value of the net
assets acquired, adjusted to comply with Group accounting
policies, for the purchase price of the shares of
Saatchi & Saatchi. As a result, no goodwill was
recognized in the balance sheet in respect of this acquisition,
rather the accounting treatment gave rise to a net reduction of
431 million euros in consolidated shareholders equity.
Had the authorized alternative method not been applied, this
acquisition would have led to the recognition of
2,313 million euros in goodwill and a corresponding annual
amortization charge (over a 40-year period) of 58 million
euros, which would have given rise to 246 million euros of
cumulative amortization by the end of 2004.
It should be noted that a valuation is carried out annually by
independent experts in the context of preparation of the 20-F
filing, and would have led to recognition of an additional
provision for impairment of 807 million euros at
December 31, 2003. The valuation for 2004 is still
in-progress and will be finalized in the context of preparation
of the 20-F, which must be filed no later than June 30,
2005.
Deduction of Goodwill from
Shareholders Equity
Over the last 10 years, the only significant amount of
goodwill to be deducted from shareholders equity related
to the acquisition of the FCA Group, for which goodwill of
54 million
had been calculated. This goodwill, which related to all of the
subsidiaries of the FCA network, would have been amortized over
periods ranging from 10 to 40 years.
F-30
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of acquisitions
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Dividends paid by subsidiaries to minority shareholders
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Consolidated net income for the period, minority interest
|
|
|
24 |
|
Translation adjustment and other
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of acquisitions
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Dividends paid by subsidiaries to minority shareholders
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Consolidated net income for the period, minority interest
|
|
|
26 |
|
Translation adjustment and other
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
As consideration for the Bcom3 acquisition, Publicis issued
1,562,500 ORANEs with a par value of 858 million euros.
This bond issue was recognized in shareholders equity for
its fair value at the date of acquisition, i.e.,
495 million euros. As from June 30, 2003, and in
compliance with the clarification issued by the French Financial
Markets Authority (AMF), the Group reclassified the entire
amount of the bond from Shareholders equity to a
separate caption ORANEs outside shareholders
equity.
|
|
22. |
Provisions for Contingencies and Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Post- | |
|
Deferred | |
|
Litigation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacant | |
|
|
|
Employment | |
|
Tax | |
|
and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring | |
|
Property | |
|
Sub-Total | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Claims | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Updating of Bcom3 provisions(1)
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
Increases
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Reversals
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
Translation and other
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Reversals
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
Translation and other
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Adjustments made to provisions in the year following the
acquisition of Bcom3 did not affect the income statement, but
rather adjusted the original goodwill balance. |
F-31
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Provisions include, in particular, provisions for pensions and
other post employment benefits and provisions for litigation and
claims. They represent the Groups best estimates on the
basis of the information available.
Reversals of provisions mainly correspond to utilization in the
year.
This account includes the tax effect of restatement to fair
value of intangible assets in the context of the Zenith
( 35 million)
and Bcom3
( 87 million)
acquisitions.
The deferred tax liability relating to the bond component of the
OBSA was fully reversed for its value in September 2004 at the
date of redemption of the bond component, being 131 million
euros. The double entry was a credit to deferred tax income in
the income statement. The deferred tax asset on the optional
component of the OBSA (62 million euros at the date of
transfer), previously carried as a deduction from the deferred
tax liability on the bond component, was neutralized, as the
equity warrants were reclassified for their amount stated net of
tax into shareholders equity (See note 19
shareholders equity).
|
|
|
Restructuring Provisions and Property Provisions |
Restructuring provisions and property provisions result mainly
from the acquisition of Bcom3.
Restructuring Provisions
|
|
|
These provisions are based on estimated closing or restructuring
costs for certain activities as a result of plans announced
publicly but not yet carried out at year-end 2003 (principally
severance pay). The plans, detailed by project and nature, were
approved by General Management before being announced. The plans
are monitored centrally in order to ensure that the provision is
applied to costs incurred and in order to justify the remaining
balance on the basis of outstanding costs to be incurred.
Modifications made, up to the end of 2003, to the provisions set
up after the Bcom3 acquisition were adjusted against the related
goodwill. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vacant Property Provisions |
|
|
|
These are principally comprised of provisions related to the
acquisition of Bcom3, for an amount of 154 million euros at
December 31, 2004, and of provisions related to
Saatchi & Saatchi. These provisions relate mainly to
New York City for a total amount of 98 million euros
including 48 million euros for the rental contract related
to the property at 375 Hudson Street in New York City.
Valuations have been carried out by independent experts. |
F-32
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pensions and Other
Post-employment Benefits
The Group has a certain number of commitments under defined
benefit plans (pension plans and health cover). Commitments
under material plans are calculated in accordance with American
standards FAS 87 and FAS 106 on an annual basis. The
calculations for these defined benefit plans have been carried
out by independent experts in the U.S., England and Germany.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
|
Pension | |
|
Employment | |
|
|
|
Pension | |
|
Employment | |
|
|
Total | |
|
Plans | |
|
Health Cover | |
|
Total | |
|
Plans | |
|
Health Cover | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Present value of funded obligations
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess of present value of funded obligations over the fair
value of plan assets
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of unfunded obligations
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Present value of funded and unfunded obligations (net of plan
assets)
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial gains (losses)(1)
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Balance sheet liability related to defined benefit plans
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Balance sheet liability related to defined contribution plans
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total balance sheet liabilities
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Actuarial gains and losses are recognized in accordance with the
accounting policy presented in note 1.2. At January 1,
2004, in application of recommendation R 03-01 of the
French National Accounting Committee (CNC), accumulated
actuarial gains and losses were recognized in shareholders
equity. |
F-33
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The amounts recognized in the income statement were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Defined Benefit | |
|
Post-Employment | |
|
Defined Benefit | |
|
Post-Employment | |
|
|
Pension Plans | |
|
Health Cover | |
|
Pension Plans | |
|
Health Cover | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Cost of services rendered in the year
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Financial cost related to the unwinding of discounting of
provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) recognized for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Past service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on curtailment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contribution to personnel expenses
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The main actuarial assumptions at the balance sheet date
(expressed as weighted averages) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate at December 31
|
|
|
5.75% |
|
|
|
6% |
|
Expected rate of return on plan assets at December 31
|
|
|
8% |
|
|
|
8% |
|
Future salary increases
|
|
|
3.75% |
|
|
|
3.75% |
|
Future pension increases
|
|
|
2.5% |
|
|
|
2.25% |
|
Annual increase in
|
|
|
8.75% initially |
|
|
|
11.75% initially |
|
healthcare expenses
|
|
|
5% subsequently |
|
|
|
5% subsequently |
|
Changes in the present value of funded and unfunded liabilities
(net of plan assets) during 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit | |
|
Post-Employment | |
|
|
Pension Plans | |
|
Health Cover | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Present value of funded and unfunded obligations (net of plan
assets) at start of year
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Expense recognized in the income statement
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Actuarial gains/losses
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Contributions paid
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Present value of funded and unfunded obligations (net of plan
assets) at end of year
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
The total amount of pensions and other post employment benefits
of members of the management board included in this account
caption is 17.6 million euros at December 31, 2004.
At December 31, 2004, the amount of obligations covered by
insurance amounted to 21 million euros.
F-34
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The allocation of defined benefit pension plan assets among
different asset categories is as follows (expressed as weighted
averages):
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
64.5% |
|
Bonds
|
|
|
31.0% |
|
Property
|
|
|
2.5% |
|
Other
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23. |
Bonds, Bank Borrowings and Overdrafts |
In September 2004, Publicis completed two transactions in the
context of its balance sheet simplification program:
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of the bond component of the OBSA, a 20-year bond
issued in September 2002; |
|
|
|
Sale of the CLN, subscribed in 2003 in the context of liquidity
enhancing transactions relating to the bond component of the
OBSA. |
These two transactions resulted in a net payment of
70 million euros and generated a consolidated capital gain
before tax of 26 million euros, and tax income through a
reduction in net deferred tax liabilities of 130 million
euros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
Number of |
|
|
|
| |
Securities |
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
|
|
Bonds (excluding accrued interest) issued by Publicis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Groupe S.A.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
Bond convertible into IPG shares 2%
January 2007(1) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
17,624,521
|
|
OCEANE 2.75% January 2018 |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
OCEANE January 2018 redemption premium |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
23,172,413
|
|
OCEANE 0.75% July 2008 |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OBSA 2.75% September 2022
bond component(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
OBSA equity warrants with an exercise price of
30.50(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
Other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
Other short-term lines of credit |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The majority of the holders of the bond convertible into
Interpublic Group (IPG) shares exercised their right to
early reimbursement in cash on March 1, 2004 for an amount
of 193 million euros out of a total of 200 million
euros. |
|
(2) |
Following the redemption of the bond component of the OBSA,
described above, the equity warrants previously attached to the
OBSA were reclassified into shareholders equity at
December 31, 2004. |
Bonds issued by Publicis Groupe S.A., all of which are fixed
rate and in euros, are not hedged against interest rate
fluctuations.
F-35
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net financial indebtedness, after deducting cash, marketable
securities and the CLN, amounts to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
December 31 | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Bonds, bank borrowings and overdrafts, gross
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
CLN, including interest (included in other financial assets,
net)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
OCEANE redemption premium
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(227 |
) |
Marketable securities
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
Cash
|
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
(1,219 |
) |
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financial indebtedness
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The CLN, subscribed in 2003, were all sold in September 2004. |
|
|
|
Analysis by Date of Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Due in less than one year
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Due in more than five years
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Euros
|
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
1,883 |
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
Other currencies
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis by Interest Rate Category |
The Groups financial indebtedness is comprised of fixed
rate loans (for almost 90% of its amount at December 31,
2004) at an average interest rate for 2004 of 3.4% (this rate
takes account of interest related to the unwinding of the
discount on the bond component of the OBSA). Variable rate
indebtedness (approximately 10% of indebtedness at
December 31, 2004) incurred an average interest rate of 3%
in 2004.
The Accounts payable caption includes all trade
accounts payable (including notes payable and accrued purchases)
related to the purchase of goods and services, except for
purchases of media space in France under the Sapin Law (Loi
Sapin), which are included in Accrued expenses and
other liabilities. These liabilities are payable within
one year.
F-36
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
25. |
Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Payables on transactions performed as an agent (media space
purchases)
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Liabilities related to purchase of investments
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Advances received
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Other payables(1)
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
Deferred revenue and other liabilities
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Total
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These include payables related to personnel, payroll taxes,
taxes (other than income tax) and to suppliers of fixed assets.
They also include advances from companies that are neither
consolidated nor accounted for by the equity method |
|
|
|
The majority of accrued expenses and other liabilities at
December 31, 2004 are payable within one year. |
|
|
26. |
Off-balance Sheet Commitments |
Commitments presented below are gross amounts that have not been
discounted to present value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Falling Due | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
One to Five | |
|
More than | |
Contractual Commitments |
|
Total | |
|
One Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Five Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Commitments given
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease commitments
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Commitments and options to purchase minority interests
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Commitments to sell investments
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees(1)
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Total
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Options to Purchase Minority
Interests |
Commitments and options to purchase minority interests have been
estimated at the balance sheet date on the basis of contractual
clauses and the latest available data. Commitments to purchase
minority interests are monitored centrally and are valued on the
basis of contractual clauses and projections in respect of the
relevant data over the period of the contract.
These principally comprise:
|
|
|
|
|
a guarantee given to a bank in an amount of 88 million
euros, as owner of a 45% shareholding in a company called iSe
(International Sports & Entertainment AG), which is
committed to paying a total of 176 million euros in January
2005, for the acquisition of a license from FIFA; |
|
|
|
guarantees given to various banks in an amount of
113 million euros in respect of future media space buying
transactions on behalf of the Groups clients; |
F-37
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
guarantees of payment of property taxes and charges relating to
the Leo Burnett building in Chicago, for a total amount of
71 million euros over the period up to 2012. |
The maturity schedule in respect of financial indebtedness and
finance lease indebtedness is set out in note 23 to the
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following Due | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
One to Five | |
|
More Than | |
Other Commercial Commitments |
|
Total | |
|
One Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Five Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
Commitments received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unutilized credit lines(1)
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments given
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other commercial commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
See note 1.2 Liquidity risk |
|
|
|
Commitments Related to Bonds and to ORANEs |
|
|
|
|
|
Bond convertible into Interpublic Group
(IPG) shares 2% January 2007 |
|
|
|
The terms of this bond provide, since June 30, 2003, the
option for bearers to request the exchange of their bonds for a
number of shares of Interpublic Group representing a premium of
30% over the reference price (being a conversion price of 36.74
USD), on the basis of 244.3 shares per bond. |
|
|
However, following the exercise of the put option
in February 2004, only 750 convertible bonds remain in
circulation at December 31, 2004. Publicis could thus be
required, in case of a request for exchange, to deliver a
maximum of 183,223 Interpublic Group shares in redemption of the
bond. |
|
|
|
|
|
OCEANE 2018 2.75% actuarial January 2018 |
|
|
|
With respect to the OCEANEs, bondholders may request that bonds
be converted, at the rate of one share for each bond (which
bonds had a unit value of 39.15 euros on issue), at any time
after January 18, 2002 until the seventh business day
before the maturity date (January 2018). Publicis therefore has
a commitment to deliver, if requests for conversion are made,
17,624,521 shares which may, at Publicis discretion,
be either new shares to be issued or existing shares held in its
portfolio. |
|
|
In addition, the bondholders have the possibility of requesting
early redemption in cash, of all or part of the bonds they own,
on January 18 in 2006, 2010, and 2014. The early redemption
price is calculated in such a way as to provide a gross annual
actuarial yield on the bond of 2.75% at the date of redemption. |
|
|
|
|
|
OCEANE 2008 0.75% July 2008 |
|
|
|
With respect to the OCEANEs, the bondholders may request that
bonds be converted, at the rate of one share for each bond (with
a value of 29 euros on issue), at any time after August 26,
2003 until the seventh business day before the maturity date
(July 2008). Publicis therefore has a commitment to deliver
23,172,413 shares which may, at Publicis discretion,
be either new shares to be issued or existing shares held in its
portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
|
ORANEs Bonds redeemable in new or existing
shares September 2022 |
|
|
|
Each ORANE gives a right to receive 18 new or existing Publicis
shares, at the rate of one bond per year, over the period from
September 1, 2005 until the twentieth anniversary of
issuance of the bond (2022). Publicis therefore has the
obligation to deliver 1,562,500 shares each year from 2005
to 2022, being a total of 28,125,000 shares, which may, at
Publicis discretion, be either new shares to be issued or
existing shares held in its portfolio. |
F-38
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The exercise of the equity warrants, which could occur at any
time between September 24, 2013 and September 24,
2022 would lead to an increase in Publicis
capital stock. At a maximum, Publicis is committed to issuing
(in the case where all equity warrants were to be exercised)
28,125,000 shares with a par value of 0.40 euros and a
premium of 30.1 euros.
It should be noted that at December 31, 2004 no material
commitment such as a pledge, a guarantee or a mortgage or other
security over assets, nor any other material off-balance sheet
commitment as defined by current accounting standards, exists.
|
|
|
Information by geographic region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe | |
|
America | |
|
Rest of the World | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Millions of euros) | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
Operating income before depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
Operating income before amortization of intangibles on
acquisition
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
Groups share of net income after tax*
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
Goodwill, intangibles and property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
Operating income before depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
Operating income before amortization of intangibles on
acquisition
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
Groups share of net income after tax*
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
Goodwill, intangibles and property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
3,975 |
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
Operating income before depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
Operating income before amortization of intangibles on
acquisition
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
Groups share of net income after tax*
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
Goodwill, intangibles and property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
* |
Before goodwill amortization |
Information by Business Segment:
It is no longer meaningful to present two distinct business
segments given the scale of the Groups Communications
business since its acquisition of Bcom3. The Group thus now
operates in a single business segment. Its operational structure
may no longer be represented as comprising a set of companies
categorized into distinct segments or businesses. This new
structure, which has been in the making for several years, is
F-39
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
designed to provide the Groups clients with a global,
holistic service offering, which meets all of their
communications needs.
A segmental analysis of the Group by business segment is
therefore no longer meaningful in view of the Groups
current organizational structure.
|
|
28. |
Publicis Groupe S.A. Stock Option Plans |
|
|
A. |
Stock option plans originated by Publicis |
At December 31, 2004, the status of outstanding
options both subscription options and options to
purchase existing shares was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised at | |
|
Options | |
|
Options | |
|
Options | |
|
Options at | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Granted in | |
|
Exercised | |
|
Lapsed in | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Price | |
|
Expiry | |
0.40 Par Value Shares |
|
Option Type | |
|
Grant Date | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
in 2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
(euros) | |
|
Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fourth tranche
|
|
|
Subscription |
|
|
|
22/03/1994 |
|
|
|
28,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,760 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
Fifth tranche
|
|
|
Subscription |
|
|
|
30/03/1995 |
|
|
|
45,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,220 |
|
|
|
6.63 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Sixth tranche
|
|
|
Subscription |
|
|
|
26/04/1996 |
|
|
|
51,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,420 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Seventh tranche
|
|
|
Subscription |
|
|
|
20/03/1997 |
|
|
|
39,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,800 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Eighth tranche
|
|
|
Subscription |
|
|
|
11/03/1998 |
|
|
|
58,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,500 |
|
|
|
8.66 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Ninth tranche
|
|
|
Subscription |
|
|
|
4/11/1998 |
|
|
|
301,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,500 |
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Tenth tranche
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
7/09/2000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
43.55 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Eleventh tranche
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
23/04/2001 |
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
33.18 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Twelfth tranche
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
26/11/2001 |
|
|
|
2,943,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteenth tranche
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
18/01/2002 |
|
|
|
104,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,600 |
|
|
|
29.79 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
Fourteenth tranche
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
10/06/2002 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
32.43 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
Fifteenth tranche
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
8/07/2002 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
29.79 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
Sixteenth tranche
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
28/08/2003 |
|
|
|
517,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517,067 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Seventeenth tranche
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
28/08/2003 |
|
|
|
9,498,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,484,000 |
|
|
|
8,014,000 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
2013 |
(1) |
Eighteenth tranche
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
28/09/2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Nineteenth tranche
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
28/09/2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,959,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,959,086 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
2014 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,292,882 |
|
|
|
1,970,086 |
|
|
|
54,880 |
|
|
|
4,455,895 |
|
|
|
11,752,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Conditional options the exercise of which is subject to meeting
objectives over the course of a 3-year plan. |
|
|
B. |
Stock option plans originally put in place by
Saatchi & Saatchi |
The existing Saatchi & Saatchi option plans confer a
right, when exercised, to conversion into Publicis shares based
on the ratio applied for the exchange of shares when
Saatchi & Saatchi was acquired by Publicis (18,252
Publicis Groupe S.A. shares for 100 Saatchi & Saatchi
shares).
The number of options remaining to be exercised is broken down
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercised During | |
|
|
|
Outstanding at | |
at December 31, 2003 |
|
2004 | |
|
Lapsed in 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
43,545
|
|
|
37,928 |
|
|
|
5,617 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
C. |
Stock option plans originally put in place by
Nelson |
On the acquisition of Nelson, these plans were converted into
Publicis share purchase plans.
F-40
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The number of outstanding options at year-end is broken down as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
Outstanding |
|
Exercised During | |
|
|
|
at December 31, | |
at December 31, 2003 |
|
2004 | |
|
Lapsed in 2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
137,034
|
|
|
16,546 |
|
|
|
12,620 |
|
|
|
107,868 |
(1) |
|
|
(1) |
The latest exercise date for these options ranges between 2008
and 2009 |
In the context of its program to simplify its balance sheet
structure, on January 5th 2005 Publicis announced its
intention to propose the early redemption of its OCEANE 2018
bonds. Publicis offer, which covered all such bonds, led
to the effective redemption, for a price of 462 million
euros, of 62% of existing bonds.
This transaction was financed by the creation, at the beginning
of January 2005, of a standard bond carrying a fixed interest
rate of 4.125%. This bond, in a total amount of 750 million
euros, was fully subscribed on January 28, 2005. Its
duration is 7 years and the principal balance will be
repaid on the maturity date, January 31, 2012.
Lastly, the group swapped this bond from euro fixed rate to
U.S. variable rate in order to put in place dollar
financing to hedge its net dollar-denominated assets, and thus
to significantly reduce sensitivity of Group shareholders
equity to future exchange rate fluctuations between the euro and
the U.S. dollar.
|
|
30. |
List of Principal Consolidated Companies at December 31,
2004 |
The list of principal consolidated companies is a summarized
one, in which holding companies and relatively small companies
(this distinction generally being made on the basis of their
revenue) are not listed in order place emphasis on the most
important operating companies
1) Fully
Consolidated Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Company |
|
Control % | |
|
Country |
|
City |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Publicis Conseil
|
|
|
99.61 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Publicis Koufra
|
|
|
98.84 |
|
|
France |
|
Strasbourg |
Publicis Cachemire
|
|
|
70.17 |
|
|
France |
|
Lyon Bordeaux, Brest, Rennes, |
Publicis Atlantique
|
|
|
99.87 |
|
|
France |
|
Nantes |
Publicis Meetings(c)
|
|
|
95.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Publicis Events(b)
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Paname Communication
|
|
|
99.79 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Guillaume Tell
|
|
|
95.01 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Publicis Dialog
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
ECA 2
|
|
|
99.94 |
|
|
France |
|
Neuilly-sur-Seine |
Médiasystem
|
|
|
99.96 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Publicis Consultants
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Carré Noir
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Saatchi & Saatchi France
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Leo Burnett France
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Mundocom
|
|
|
99.93 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Medicus Paris
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
F-41
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Company |
|
Control % | |
|
Country |
|
City |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Starcom Worldwide(a)
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
ZenithOptimedia France
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Medias et Regies Europe
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Le Monde Publicité
|
|
|
49.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Espaces Libération
|
|
|
49.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Metrobus
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Mediavision
|
|
|
66.63 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Régie I
|
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Drugstore Champs-Elysées
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
France |
|
Paris |
Publicis Johannesburg
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
South Africa |
|
Johannesburg |
Publicis Germany
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Germany |
|
Frankfurt, Berlin, Hamburg |
BMZ
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Germany |
|
Düsseldorf |
Publicis Kommunikationsagentur
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Germany |
|
Erlangen, Munich |
Saatchi & Saatchi Germany
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Germany |
|
Frankfurt |
Leo Burnett Germany(a)
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Germany |
|
Frankfurt |
Starcom Frankfurt
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Germany |
|
Frankfurt |
Zenith More Media
|
|
|
90.50 |
|
|
Germany |
|
Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Munich |
Optimedia Germany
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Germany |
|
Düsseldorf, Frankfurt |
Publicis Communication
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Australia |
|
Brisbane, Melbourne, Sydney |
Optimedia Australia
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Australia |
|
Brisbane, Melbourne |
Saatchi & Saatchi Communication (a)
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Australia |
|
Sydney |
Leo Burnett
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Australia |
|
Sydney |
Starcom Worldwide Australia
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Australia |
|
Sydney |
Publicis Austria
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Austria |
|
Vienna |
Saatchi & Saatchi Austria
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Austria |
|
Vienna |
Publicis Belgium
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Belgium |
|
Brussels |
Saatchi & Saatchi Belgium
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Belgium |
|
Brussels |
Leo Burnett Brussels
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Belgium |
|
Brussels |
Publicis Salles Norton
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
São Paulo, Brasilia, Porto Allegre, Rio de Janeiro |
Finance Nazca Publicidade Brazil
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
São Paulo |
Leo Burnett Publicidade
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
São Paulo |
Publicis Canada
|
|
|
70.00 |
|
|
Canada |
|
Montreal, Toronto |
Saatchi & Saatchi Canada
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Canada |
|
Toronto |
Leo Burnett Company
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Canada |
|
Toronto |
Bensimon Byrne
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Canada |
|
Toronto |
MediaVest Toronto
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Canada |
|
Toronto |
Starcom Toronto
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Canada |
|
Toronto |
Zenith Optimedia Canada
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Canada |
|
Montreal, Toronto |
Saatchi & Saatchi Great Wall Advertising Co.
|
|
|
51.00 |
|
|
China |
|
Beijing |
Leo Burnett China
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
China |
|
Hong Kong |
F-42
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Company |
|
Control % | |
|
Country |
|
City |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Leo Burnett Shanghai Advertising Co.
|
|
|
70.00 |
|
|
China |
|
Shanghai |
Publicis Ad Link
|
|
|
66.00 |
|
|
China |
|
Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Guangzhou |
Publicis Welcomm
|
|
|
60.00 |
|
|
Korea |
|
Seoul |
Leo Burnett Korea
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Korea |
|
Seoul |
Publicis Denmark
|
|
|
85.00 |
|
|
Denmark |
|
Copenhagen |
Saatchi & Saatchi Denmark
|
|
|
75.00 |
|
|
Denmark |
|
Copenhagen |
Publicis Spain
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Spain |
|
Madrid, Barcelona, Seville, Valencia, Alicante |
Publicis Casadevall y Pedreño
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Spain |
|
Barcelona, Madrid |
Saatchi & Saatchi Spain
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Spain |
|
Madrid |
Vitruvio-Leo Burnett
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Spain |
|
Madrid |
Grupo K/ Arc
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Spain |
|
Madrid |
Starcom Worldwide Media Estrategia
|
|
|
74.00 |
|
|
Spain |
|
Madrid |
Optimedia Spain
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Spain |
|
Madrid |
Zenith Media Spain
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Spain |
|
Madrid |
Publicis USA
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York, Dallas, Seattle, Indianapolis |
Publicis & Hal Riney
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
San Francisco, Atlanta, New York, |
Publicis Dialog
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Dallas, New York, Chicago, Salt Lake City,
San Francisco, Boise |
Winner & Associates
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Los Angeles |
Johnston & Associates
|
|
|
80.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Washington |
Bromley Communications
|
|
|
49.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Miami, Dallas, Los Angeles, New York, San Antonio |
Saatchi & Saatchi North America
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York |
Saatchi & Saatchi Conill
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York, Los Angeles, Miami |
Thompson Murray(c)
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Fayetteville |
Leo Burnett USA
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Chicago |
Chemistri
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Troy |
Chemistri Martin Group
|
|
|
70.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Troy |
Arc Integrated Marketing
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Greenwich |
Ileo
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Chicago |
Semaphore Partners
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Columbia |
Frankel
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Chicago |
Fallon USA
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Minneapolis |
Williams Labadie
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Chicago |
Kaplan Thaler Group
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York |
Manning Selvage & Lee
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York, Detroit, Los Angeles, San Antonio, Washington,
Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta, Boston |
Masius USA
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York |
F-43
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Company |
|
Control % | |
|
Country |
|
City |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Rowland
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Rochester |
CLT Meetings(c)
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Miami |
Burrell Communications
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
Chicago |
Lápiz
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Chicago |
Vigilante
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York |
Capps Digital
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Chicago |
Nelson Communications,
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York, Princeton |
New World Health
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York |
Medicus Group International
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, New York,
San Antonio, San Francisco, Washington |
Medicus Discovery East
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Stamford |
Saatchi & Saatchi Healthcare Com(a)
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York |
Publicis Selling Solutions
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Lawrenceville |
Arista Marketing Assoc
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York |
Science Oriented Solutions
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York |
Starcom USA
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Miami |
Starlink Services
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Chicago |
Planworks
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Chicago |
MediaVest Worldwide
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York, California, Chicago |
SMG Directory Marketing
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Troy |
Relay St Louis
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
Saint Louis |
Optimedia USA
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York |
Zenith Media USA
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.S. |
|
New York |
Publicis Finland
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Finland |
|
Helsinki |
Publicis Hellas
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Greece |
|
Athens |
Leo Burnett Greece
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Greece |
|
Athens |
Publicis Hungary
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Hungary |
|
Budapest |
Saatchi & Saatchi Hungary
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Hungary |
|
Budapest |
Publicis Ambience Advertising
|
|
|
94.00 |
|
|
India |
|
Bombay |
Leo Burnett Bombay
|
|
|
85.00 |
|
|
India |
|
Bombay |
Publicis Ariely
|
|
|
75.00 |
|
|
Israel |
|
Tel Aviv |
Publicis Italy
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Italy |
|
Milan, Rome |
Saatchi & Saatchi Italy
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Italy |
|
Rome, Milan |
Leo Burnett Italy
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Italy |
|
Milan |
Adverbox
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Italy |
|
Milan |
Starcom Italy
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Italy |
|
Milan |
ZenithOptimedia Italy
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Italy |
|
Milan |
MS&L Italy
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Italy |
|
Milan |
Publicis Japan
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Japan |
|
Tokyo |
Saatchi & Saatchi Japan
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Japan |
|
Tokyo |
F-44
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Company |
|
Control % | |
|
Country |
|
City |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Beacon Communications
|
|
|
66.00 |
|
|
Japan |
|
Tokyo |
Medicus Tokyo
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Japan |
|
Tokyo |
Starcom Japan
|
|
|
66.00 |
|
|
Japan |
|
Tokyo |
Publicis Graphics
|
|
|
60.00 |
|
|
Lebanon, Jordan, Bahrain, Egypt, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait,
Turkey |
|
Beirut, Amman, Bahrain, Cairo, Dubai, Jeddah, Riyadh, Kuwait,
Istanbul |
Publicis Wet Desert
|
|
|
70.00 |
|
|
Malaysia |
|
Kuala Lumpur |
Saatchi & Saatchi Malaysia
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Malaysia |
|
Petalung Jaya |
Leo Burnett Advertising
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Malaysia |
|
Kuala Lumpur |
Publicis Arredondo de Haro
|
|
|
68.66 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Mexico |
Leo Burnett Mexico
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Mexico |
Starcom Worldwide
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Mexico |
LB Oslo Gruppen
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Norway |
|
Oslo |
Publicis Mojo
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
New Zealand |
|
Auckland |
Saatchi & Saatchi New Zealand
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
New Zealand |
|
Wellington |
Publicis Amsterdam
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Netherlands |
|
Amsterdam |
Leo Burnett Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Netherlands |
|
Amsterdam |
Saatchi & Saatchi Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Netherlands |
|
Amsterdam |
ZenithOptimedia Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Netherlands |
|
Amsterdam |
JC Decaux Netherlands
|
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
Netherlands |
|
Amsterdam |
Publicis Pologne
|
|
|
85.00 |
|
|
Poland |
|
Warsaw |
Leo Burnett Warsaw
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Poland |
|
Warsaw |
Publicis Portugal
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Portugal |
|
Lisbon |
BMZ/ Park
|
|
|
72.09 |
|
|
Portugal |
|
Lisbon |
LB Lisbon
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Portugal |
|
Lisbon |
Leo Burnett Prague
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Czech Republic |
|
Prague |
Publicis U.K.
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
Mundocom Comma
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
Saatchi & Saatchi U.K.
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
The Facilities Group
|
|
|
70.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
Leo Burnett
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
Arc Integrated Marketing(a)
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
Fallon U.K.
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
The Triangle Group
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
Masius U.K.
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
MS&L U.K.
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
The Medicus Group
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
Starcom Media Vest
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
Zenith Optimedia U.K.
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
Leo Burnett Moscow
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Russia |
|
Moscow |
Publicis United(c)
|
|
|
60.00 |
|
|
Russia |
|
Moscow |
Starcom Russia
|
|
|
99.00 |
|
|
Russia |
|
Moscow |
F-45
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Company |
|
Control % | |
|
Country |
|
City |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Mother Tongue
|
|
|
99.00 |
|
|
Russia |
|
Moscow |
Publicis Eurêka
|
|
|
60.00 |
|
|
Singapore |
|
Singapore |
Saatchi & Saatchi Singapore
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Singapore |
|
Singapore |
Leo Burnett Singapore
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Singapore |
|
Singapore |
LB Stockholm Annonsbyra
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Sweden |
|
Stockholm |
JKL Stockholm
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Sweden |
|
Stockholm |
Starcom Sweden(d)
|
|
|
91.03 |
|
|
Sweden |
|
Stockholm |
Publicis Zürich
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Switzerland |
|
Zurich |
Fischmeier
|
|
|
80.00 |
|
|
Switzerland |
|
Adliswil |
Publicis Taiwan
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Taiwan |
|
Taipei |
Saatchi & Saatchi Taiwan
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Taiwan |
|
Taipei |
Leo Burnett Taiwan
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Taiwan |
|
Taipei |
Star Reachers Group
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Thailand |
|
Bangkok |
Publicis Thailand
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Thailand |
|
Bangkok |
Saatchi & Saatchi Thailand
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Thailand |
|
Bangkok |
LB Istanbul Markom
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Turkey |
|
Istanbul |
Leo Burnett United Arab Emirates(a)
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
UAE |
|
Dubai |
Starcom United Arab Emirates
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
UAE |
|
Dubai |
Leo Burnett Venezuela
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Venezuela |
|
Caracas |
Saatchi & Saatchi Vietnam
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
Vietnam |
|
Ho Chi Minh City |
|
|
|
2) Companies Accounted for by the Equity
Method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Company |
|
Control % | |
|
Country |
|
City |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Bartle Bogle Hegarty (BBH)
|
|
|
49.00 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
London |
International Sports and Entertainment (iSe)
|
|
|
45.00 |
|
|
Switzerland |
|
Zurich |
Key:
(a) Change of name:
|
|
|
1/Starcom Worldwide (ex Mediavest Paris) |
|
|
2/Leo Burnett Germany (ex Michael Conrad & Leo Burnett
GMBH) |
|
|
3/Saatchi & Saatchi Communications (ex
Saatchi & Saatchi Advertising) |
|
|
4/Saatchi & Saatchi Healthcare Com. (ex Klemtner
Advertising) |
|
|
5/Arc Integrated Marketing (ex Imp Marketing) |
|
|
6/Leo Burnett United Arab Emirates (ex Radius Leo Burnett
Advertising) |
(b) Creation
(c) Acquisition
(d) Creation and merger of Media Synergi and Media Taktik
F-46
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Companies included in the 2003 list which are no longer on the
list in 2004:
Mergers: Verbe (France), Atelier (Italy).
Disposals: Regiscope (France), Publicis Dialog (Germany).
|
|
31. |
Summary of differences between generally accepted accounting
principles in France and the United States |
The Groups consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in France (French GAAP), which differ from
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
(U.S. GAAP). The significant differences
applicable to the Group are summarized below:
The Group implemented restructuring plans related to its
acquisitions made in 2002. In accordance with French GAAP, the
restructuring costs and costs related to vacant properties of
the acquiring entity are included in the liabilities assumed to
the extent they relate to excess capacity, whereas under
U.S. GAAP, these costs are excluded from the liabilities
assumed. As such, under French GAAP, in 2003 and 2002,
respectively, approximately
122 million
and
10 million
was capitalized as part of the purchase price that is disallowed
under U.S. GAAP.
Additionally, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, restructuring
plans related to acquired businesses must be finalized and
quantified within one year of acquisition, and under French
GAAP, the plans must be finalized within the fiscal year end
following an acquisition. As such, under French GAAP in 2003,
approximately
7 million
was capitalized as part of the purchase price that was
disallowed under U.S. GAAP.
B. Accounting
for Convertible Debt
The Group issued a debenture loan in December 2001 with a face
value of
200 million
payable at par in January 2007 and paying a fixed annual yield
of 2%. The bondholder may exchange the bonds as of June 30,
2003 into Interpublic Group shares representing a premium of 30%
in relation to the reference price of $28.26 (which represents
an exchange price of $36.74) (Exchange Option) or
repaid in cash at the choice of Publicis (Cash Settlement
Right). The bonds may be redeemed at the choice of
Publicis as from January 10, 2005, if the Interpublic Group
share price exceeds the initial exchange price of $36.74 by 30%
during a period of 20 trading days (Call Option).
Bondholders may request from Publicis the redemption of their
bonds at par on March 1, 2004.
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Call Option, Exchange
Option, and Cash Settlement Right are considered to be embedded
derivative instruments and are required to be separately
accounted for under SFAS 133 at fair value with changes in
fair value reflected through the income statement. The change in
the fair value of the Call Option, Cash Settlement Right and
Exchange Option resulted in an expense of
6 million
for the 2003 fiscal year (compared to income of
11 million
in 2002). Under French GAAP, these instruments are considered to
be an off-balance sheet commitment and are not recorded.
In March 1, 2004 the majority of the Bondholders exercised
their put option for a total amount of
193 million,
which decreased the debt from
200 million
to
7 million.
C. Accounting
for OCEANEs
In January 2002, the Group issued OCEANES (bonds that may be
converted into or exchanged for new or existing shares), with a
face value of
690 million
and a maturity period of 16 years. Unless previously
redeemed, these bonds will be fully redeemed at maturity, i.e.
January 18, 2018, for an amount equivalent to 134.59% of
par, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any (redemption
premium). Under French GAAP, the
F-47
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
redemption premium asset of
239 million
is recognized at issuance (with a corresponding credit to
long-term debt to reflect the gross redemption obligation in
2018) and amortized under the actuarial method over the 16-year
term of the bond.
Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with APB Opinion
No. 14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt
Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants (APB 14), the
hybrid instrument must be reflected on the balance sheet at fair
value. The amount received from the investors of
690 million
represents the fair value of the instrument at issuance; the
redemption premium is recorded over time using the effective
interest method such that, at redemption, the recorded
obligation will reflect the redemption amount. As of
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, this resulted in an
adjustment to the balance sheet to reverse the asset and related
liability recognized under French GAAP, which amounted to
202 million,
215 million
and
227 million,
respectively, to conform to U.S. GAAP.
D. Treasury
Shares
Under French GAAP, treasury stock held in the Groups
portfolio at year-end is either deducted from shareholders
equity, or recognized as an asset under marketable securities
depending on its function, with any decrease in the value of the
shares recorded as marketable securities recorded through the
income statement.
Under U.S. GAAP, treasury shares are deducted from
shareholders equity at the amount at which they were
repurchased. Subsequent fluctuations in the market price of
treasury shares are not recorded under U.S. GAAP.
As of December 31, 2004,
9 million
of treasury shares were held in the context of the liquidity
contract put in place in November 2004. These treasury shares
were shown as marketable securities under French GAAP. Under
U.S. GAAP, these assets were reclassified to
stockholders equity. In addition, under French GAAP, there
was no income statement impact recognized in 2004 for a decrease
in value of treasury shares recognized as marketable securities.
E. Accounting
for Business Combination with Bcom3
Under French GAAP, in accordance with the Article 210 of
Rule 99-02 of the CRC (Comité de Réglementation
Comptable), the purchase price of the Bcom3 shares equals
the fair value of the securities issued in the combination as of
the date of consummation of the acquisition, or
September 24, 2002. This resulted in the new Publicis
shares and the ORANEs being valued at the prevailing market
price at the date of acquisition
( 17.6 per
share). Under French GAAP until June 30, 2003, based on the
results of a detailed assessment of this financial instrument,
the ORANEs were classified as shareholders equity with the
related interest treated as dividends. Beginning July 1,
2003, following clarifications of the AMF concerning the
classification of hybrid instruments on the balance sheet under
French GAAP, the ORANEs were reclassified outside
shareholders equity with the related interest for the year
treated as interest expense. The OBSAs were valued at an amount
consisting of the present value of the debt component and the
fair value of the equity warrants at the acquisition date. These
values were calculated by applying a 8.5% discount rate for the
debt component of the OBSA and using the Black-Scholes model to
measure the value of the equity warrants at the acquisition date
(with volatility assumptions between 33% to 35%). Both the notes
and the detachable warrants are classified as long-term debt in
accordance with French GAAP. The equity warrants are amortized
and recorded as interest income over 20 years under French
GAAP.
Under U.S. GAAP, the value of the ordinary shares exchanged
for Bcom3 stock and ORANEs issued is based on the five-day
average of Publicis share price of
36.41 per
share (two days before the public announcement of the
acquisition on March 7, 2002, the day of announcement, and
two days after). Under U.S. GAAP, the ORANEs are classified
as long-term debt in accordance with APB 14, with the
related interest classified accordingly. Additionally, the notes
and detachable warrants comprising the OBSAs are recorded on a
pro rata basis based on their relative fair values at the date
of announcement. Detachable warrants are required to be
separately accounted for as paid-in capital under APB 14,
and the notes portion is
F-48
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
classified as long-term debt. The U.S. GAAP values were
calculated by applying a 7% discount rate for the bond component
of the OBSA and using the Black-Scholes model to measure the
value of the equity warrants at the announcement date (with
volatility assumption of 30% at that date).
In 2004, the Group redeemed the debt component of the OBSA. The
detachable warrants were reclassified, net of tax, from
long-term debt to shareholders equity under French GAAP.
The difference of the debt value between French GAAP and
U.S. GAAP was recognized as an adjustment to the income
statement in computing net income in accordance with
U.S. GAAP.
F. Sale-leaseback
Transaction
Under French GAAP, Bcom3s 1997 sale-leaseback transaction
related to the Leo Burnett office building in Chicago is treated
as a capital lease. The related assets are capitalized at their
fair value at the acquisition date for the portion of the
building leased-back by the Group and the related debt consists
of the present value of the minimum lease payments over the
lease term discounted at the internal borrowing rate of the
Group.
Under U.S. GAAP, this transaction is accounted for as a
financing lease, with the building and the related financing
obligation continuing to be reflected in the Groups
financial statements at their fair value at the acquisition date.
|
|
G. |
Accounting for the Business Combination with
Saatchi & Saatchi |
Under French GAAP, the business combination with
Saatchi & Saatchi was accounted for in accordance with
the alternative method under Article 215 of Rule 99-02
of the CRC as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities are recorded at historical cost less
accumulated depreciation at the combination date; |
|
|
|
The results of operations and cash flows are combined from the
acquisition date to year-end; |
The derogatory method is similar to the pooling of interests
method under U.S. GAAP, except that the results and cash
flows are combined only from the acquisition date to the end of
the period (and no for the pre-acquisition periods as well).
Under U.S. GAAP, the acquisition did not qualify as a
pooling of interests. Consequently, the transaction must be
accounted for using purchase accounting principles, with
Publicis Groupe, S.A. being the acquiror on September 8,
2000. This gives rise to a number of differences as follows:
|
|
|
1) Goodwill and Intangible
Assets |
Goodwill has been calculated under U.S. GAAP by comparing
the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed with the fair value of the consideration
given, including related transaction costs. Such goodwill was
amortized over 40 years until January 1, 2002. In
2004, 2003 and 2002, no goodwill is amortized due to the
Groups adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). Under SFAS 142,
goodwill is no longer amortized, but reviewed at least annually
for impairment. Other intangible assets include principally
trademarks with indefinite useful lives and major client
relationships amortized over 7 to 40 years.
|
|
|
2) Impairment of Goodwill |
Under U.S. GAAP goodwill in the amount of approximately
586 million was written off through a charge to income in
2001. That write-off, which relates to goodwill associated with
the acquisition of Saatchi & Saatchi in 2000,
represents the amount necessary to write-down the carrying value
of goodwill for those businesses to the Companys best
estimate of its fair value, as of December 31, 2001, based
on the Companys accounting policy described in
note 1.2. Goodwill was not recorded for the
Saatchi & Saatchi acquisition under French GAAP, as
described above.
F-49
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
3) Contingent Value Rights |
In connection with the acquisition of Saatchi &
Saatchi, the Company issued contingent value rights (CVRs) to
the former shareholders of Saatchi & Saatchi. Each CVR
represented a right to receive a cash payment if the market
price of Publicis shares 18 months after the acquisition
date was below its level at the acquisition date, limited to a
maximum payment per CVR of 10% of the market price at the
acquisition date. The CVRs were actively traded on the Paris
stock exchange until their maturity. Under French GAAP, the CVRs
were originally considered to be an off-balance sheet
commitment, and were not recorded until payment was considered
to be highly probable. Additionally, fluctuations in the amount
to be paid were recorded against equity. The CVRs were not
recorded under French GAAP until December 31, 2001.
Under U.S. GAAP, the fair value of the CVRs at the
acquisition date is included in the cost of acquisition and
reflected as a liability in purchase accounting. Subsequent
changes in the fair value of the CVRs are adjusted through
earnings.
In March 2002, all outstanding CVRs matured at an amount of
approximately
196 million. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the
difference between the fair value of the CVRs at
December 31, 2001,
165 million, and the amount paid out of
196 million, or
31 million, is recognized as an expense in 2002. Under
French GAAP, as of December 31, 2001 an amount of
195 million was recognized as a liability and an additional
1 million
was recognized in 2002.
In connection with the acquisition of Saatchi &
Saatchi, the Group agreed to exchange options to purchase
Publicis shares for Saatchi & Saatchi shares obtained
through the exercise of outstanding stock options of
Saatchi & Saatchi at the acquisition date. Under French
GAAP, stock options are not recorded in shareholders
equity until they are exercised.
Under U.S. GAAP, to the extent options are granted by the
acquiring company for outstanding vested options or options that
vest upon change in control of the target company, the fair
value of the new options is included as part of the purchase
price and allocated to the assets acquired. The fair value of
options exchanged for outstanding unvested options is also
included as part of the purchase price and a portion of the
unvested intrinsic value is allocated to unearned compensation
cost and amortized over the remaining vesting period. The amount
of unearned compensation cost is deducted from the fair value of
the options in determining the purchase price.
|
|
|
5) Net Operating Loss Carry
Forwards |
In connection with the business combination with
Saatchi & Saatchi, Publicis acquired approximately
503 million
in net operating loss carryforwards related to former
Saatchi & Saatchi operations. For all net operating
loss carryforwards, in the French GAAP financial statements,
deferred taxes have not been recognized due to the uncertainty
of their recoverability.
For U.S. GAAP purposes, deferred tax assets have been
recorded and a 100% valuation allowance has been provided
because the recoverability of the deferred tax assets was not
considered to satisfy the applicable more likely than
not standard.
In 2004, 2003 and 2002, under French GAAP, Publicis realized tax
benefits by using Saatchi & Saatchi loss carryforwards
to offset taxable income and recorded a tax credit in the income
statement. Under U.S. GAAP, any tax benefit realized by
using these loss carryforwards reduces the recorded goodwill
with no effect on income tax expense in the income statement.
F-50
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
H. Accounting for Zenith
Optimedia Group |
Under French GAAP, the formation of the Zenith Optimedia Group
in 2001 resulted in the revaluation of the Zenithmedia net
assets acquired in conjunction with the acquisition of
Saatchi & Saatchi.
Under French GAAP, the acquisition of Saatchi & Saatchi
was treated in a manner similar to a pooling of interests. Under
U.S. GAAP, the acquisition was accounted for as a purchase
and the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (excluding the
portion attributable to minority interests) were recorded at
their fair value on the date of acquisition (2000). Under French
GAAP, the Zenithmedia assets were recorded at their fair value
upon formation in 2001, with final adjustments to the purchase
price allocation in 2002. Under U.S. GAAP these entries are
reversed.
In 2003, Publicis acquired the remaining minority interests of
the Zenith Optimedia Group and recorded
76 million
of additional goodwill.
|
|
I. |
Accounting for Goodwill |
Under French GAAP, in 1993, the goodwill arising from the
acquisition of the FCA Group paid for by issuing new shares was
written off through shareholders equity.
Under U.S. GAAP, such goodwill has been capitalized and
amortized over 40 years through December 31, 2001.
Beginning January 1, 2002, with the adoption of
FAS 142, goodwill is no longer amortized, but reviewed
annually for impairment.
|
|
J. |
Accounting for Compensation Arrangements |
In the French financial statements, certain compensation
arrangements with employees of acquired companies have been
accounted for as element of purchase price in purchase
accounting.
Under U.S. GAAP, to the extent that the compensation is
related to continuing employment with the group, it is recorded
as compensation expense in the periods in which it is earned.
|
|
K. |
Valuation of Marketable Securities and Investments in
Non-consolidated Entities |
In accordance with French regulations, the Groups policy
is to value marketable securities at the lower of aggregate cost
or market value. Investments in non-consolidated entities in
which Publicis owns less than 20% are stated at cost and an
allowance is recorded (with a corresponding charge to income)
when a recoverable value, based upon managements analysis
of the specific nature of each investment, appears to be
permanently less than carrying value. Allowances can be
subsequently reversed if the estimated recoverable value of the
investments increases. Unrealized gains on marketable securities
and investments are not recognized.
Under U.S. GAAP (SFAS No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities),
marketable equity securities and other investments in debt
securities with readily determinable fair values, other than
investments accounted for under the equity method, are divided
into three categories: trading (used as part of a companys
cash management activities), held-to-maturity (a company has the
positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity)
and available-for-sale (all other securities). All of
Publicis marketable securities and investments with
readily determinable fair values are considered to be
available-for-sale and are reflected at market value on the
closing date on the face of the balance sheet. All unrealized
gains and unrealized losses are recorded as a separate component
of shareholders equity. Unrealized losses that are other
than temporary are charged to income and any write-down is
irreversible.
|
|
L. |
Derivatives and Hedging |
Under U.S. GAAP, the Group applies the provisions of
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133).
SFAS 133, as amended by SFAS Nos. 137 and 138,
establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments and hedging activities. It requires an
F-51
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or
liabilities on the balance sheet. SFAS 133 also requires
changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments to be
recorded in either net earnings or other comprehensive income,
depending on their intended use.
Publicis manages foreign currency risks using derivative
financial instruments including foreign exchange futures
contracts and currency swaps. All such instruments are entered
into for hedging purposes. Income and expenses resulting from
the use of these instruments are recorded in the consolidated
statement of income on a symmetrical basis with the underlying
item being hedged. Initial differences between the contract rate
and the spot rate on the day the Group entered into forward
exchange contracts and currency swaps designated as hedging
operations are recorded in income over the life of the contract
as an adjustment to interest expense. Subsequent gains and
losses generated on these contracts due to fluctuations in
exchange rates are recorded as exchange rate corrections
resulting from the item hedged.
Under U.S. GAAP, all derivative instruments (including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) are
recognized in the balance sheet at their fair value and changes
in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings. Publicis
does not use any derivative instruments other than routine
foreign currency hedging contracts designated as fair value
hedges, with changes in fair value of these derivatives and of
the underlying items being hedged recognized in earnings.
|
|
M. |
Accounting for Credit Linked Notes |
Through December 31, 2003, under French GAAP, the entity
that issued the CLN has not been consolidated and, therefore,
interest income was computed based on the CLN yield.
Under U.S. GAAP, the entity that issued the CLN is a
variable interest entity, which was consolidated by the Group
according to the FIN 46 Consolidation of Variable
Interests Entities. The government treasury bonds
replacing the CLN following consolidation are classified as
available for sale and valued at fair value with differences in
fair value reflected directly in shareholders equity.
The Asset Swap and the Credit Default Swap are derivatives
valued at fair value with differences in fair value recognized
in the statement of income.
Under French GAAP, the entity has been consolidated from
January 1, 2004. The Asset Swap and the Credit Default Swap
continue to be accounted for as off-balance sheet commitments.
In September 2004, the CLN, including the Asset Swap and the
Credit Default Swap, were fully redeemed in connection with the
redemption of the debt component of the OBSA (See description E
Accounting for business combination with Bcom3).
|
|
N. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to
have indefinite lives (principally trademarks) are not amortized
but are subject to annual impairment tests. Intangible assets
with a definite life are amortized over their estimated useful
lives and are tested for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate that a carrying amount of an asset (asset
group) may not be recoverable.
In accordance with SFAS 142, the Group completed the
initial impairment test as of January 1, 2002 by comparing
the fair value of their reporting units using the
discounted cash flows method to their carrying
values. Prior to adoption of SFAS 142, the Group assessed
the recoverability of goodwill for each entity by comparing the
undiscounted projected future earnings before interest and after
taxes over its economic life to its carrying amount. As a result
of the transitional impairment test, the Group recorded a charge
of
223 million
on January 1, 2002 in relation to intangibles with
indefinite useful lives, namely trademarks; this charge has been
recorded as a Cumulative effect of accounting change
on the consolidated statement of operations. As of
December 31 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Group performed its
annual impairment review for goodwill and intangibles with
indefinite useful lives, which did not result in additional
impairment.
F-52
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In accordance with EITF Issue No. 01-14, Income
Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for
Out-of-Pocket Expenses Incurred
(EITF 01-14), the Group recorded approximately
43 million
of reimbursed out-of-pocket costs in both revenue
and other general expenses for the 2002 fiscal year. Publicis
clarified its policy, in accordance with French GAAP, concerning
the classification of out-of-pocket expenses and for the year
2004 and 2003, reimbursements of such expenses are classified
within revenue. Accordingly there is no difference between
French GAAP and U.S. GAAP in 2003 and 2004.
|
|
P. |
Minimum Pension Liability |
No minimum liability adjustment is recognized under French GAAP,
whereas under U.S. GAAP, a minimum pension liability is
required to be recognized when the accumulated benefit
obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets by an amount in
excess of accrued or prepaid pension cost as capitalized by
actuarial methods. The additional minimum liability is offset by
an intangible asset up to the amount of any unrecognized prior
service cost, and the excess is recorded in comprehensive
income, net of tax.
|
|
Q. |
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards in Connection with Bcom3
Acquisition |
In connection with acquisition of Bcom3, Publicis acquired net
operating loss carryforwards related to former Bcom3 operations.
For all net operating loss carryforwards, in the consolidated
financial statements prepared under French GAAP, deferred taxes
have not been recognized due to the uncertainty of their
recoverability. For U.S. GAAP purposes, deferred tax assets
have been recorded and a 100% valuation allowance has been
provided because the recoverability of the deferred tax assets
was not considered to satisfy the applicable more likely
than not criteria. In 2004, under French GAAP, Publicis
realized tax benefits by using Bcom3 loss carryforwards to
offset taxable income and recorded a tax benefit of
5 million
in the income statement. Under U.S. GAAP, any tax benefit
realized by using these carryforwards reduced the recorded
goodwill with no effect on income tax expense in the income
statement.
|
|
R. |
Recognition of Actuarial Gains and Losses on
Pensions |
Under French GAAP, the recommendation R-03-01, issued in April
2003 of the Conseil National de la Comptabilité
on pensions allows companies to recognize all cumulative
actuarial gains and losses directly in equity on January 1,
2004. The Group has chosen this option and pension liabilities
have been increased by
23 million
as of January 1, 2004, resulting in a decrease in
shareholders equity by
14 million, net of income taxes.
Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with FAS 87
Employers Accounting for Pensions the Group
recognizes amortization of the unrecognized net gain or loss if,
as of the beginning of the year, that unrecognized net gain or
loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit
obligation or the market-related value of plan assets. If
amortization is required, the amortization is computed as that
excess divided by the average remaining service period of active
employees expected to receive benefits under the pension plan.
Amounts presented, as Exceptional Items in the
consolidated income statement under French GAAP do not meet the
definition of extraordinary items under U.S. GAAP, as these
items are not both unusual and infrequent.
F-53
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Income and Comprehensive Income to
U.S. GAAP |
The following is a reconciliation of net income as reported in
the consolidated statements of income under French GAAP to net
income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) as adjusted for
the effects of the application of U.S. GAAP for each of the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
Ref. | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per | |
|
|
|
|
share data) | |
Net income reported
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Adjustments to conform to U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Accounting for convertible debt
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
Interest on ORANEs
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Accounting for equity warrants
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Accounting for sale-leaseback transaction
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Compensation arrangements
|
|
|
J |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Consolidation of variable-interest entity
|
|
|
M |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Pension
|
|
|
R |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Loss carryforward (Bcom3)
|
|
|
Q |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Reversal of amortization expense on goodwill
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
Adjustments related to the business combination with
Saatchi & Saatchi:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense on tangible assets,
intangible assets and goodwill
|
|
|
G-1 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
G-2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Contingent value rights
|
|
|
G-3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Stock compensation
|
|
|
G-4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Loss carryforwards
|
|
|
G-5 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments related to Saatchi & Saatchi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as determined under U.S. GAAP before
cumulative effect of accounting change and tax effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of all above adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change (SFAS 142), net of
income taxes of
63 million
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as determined under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
Ref. | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per | |
|
|
|
|
share data) | |
Earnings per share as determined under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Net income (loss) as determined under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
K |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
P |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Certain elements of the consolidated statement of income have
been classified as non-operating expenses although they would
have been considered operating expenses under U.S. GAAP.
The consolidated statement of operations prepared under
U.S. GAAP reflecting all of the above reconciling items is
presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of euros) | |
Revenues
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
2,969 |
|
Salaries and related expenses
|
|
|
(2,199 |
) |
|
|
(2,284 |
) |
|
|
(1,669 |
) |
Office and general expenses
|
|
|
(924 |
) |
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
(790 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) after income taxes
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Equity in net income of non-consolidated companies
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting
changes
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change (SFAS 142), net of
taxes of
63 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of shareholders equity to
U.S. GAAP |
The following is a reconciliation of shareholders equity
as reported in the consolidated balance sheet to
shareholders equity as adjusted for the effects of the
application of U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Ref | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In millions of euros) | |
Shareholders equity as reported in the consolidated
balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
Adjustments to conform to U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Accounting for convertible debt
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Bcom3 business combinations fair value date of announcement
under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
Accounting for sale-leaseback transaction
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Accounting for Zenith Optimedia Group
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Goodwill written-off to equity, gross
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Accumulated amortization on goodwill written-off to equity
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Compensation arrangements
|
|
|
J |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Valuation of marketable securities
|
|
|
K |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Consolidation of variable-interest entity
|
|
|
M |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Reversal of amortization expense on goodwill
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Intangibles impairment
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
Loss carryforward
|
|
|
Q |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses
|
|
|
R |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
P |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
Adjustments related to the business combinations with
Saatchi & Saatchi:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saatchi & Saatchi business combinations recorded as a
purchase under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
G-1 |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
G-2 |
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
Contingent value rights
|
|
|
G-3 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Stock options Saatchi & Saatchi
|
|
|
G-4 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Loss carryforwards
|
|
|
G-5 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments Saatchi & Saatchi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
1,952 |
|
Tax effect of above adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity as adjusted for U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Following the Bcom3 and Saatchi & Saatchi acquisitions,
and other U.S. GAAP adjustments described above, the
consolidated balance sheets as presented under U.S. GAAP at
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Assets |
Goodwill, net
|
|
|
5,315 |
|
|
|
5,214 |
|
|
|
5,422 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
1,950 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Investments and other financial assets, net
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Investments accounted for by the equity method
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non current assets, net
|
|
|
7,788 |
|
|
|
8,332 |
|
|
|
8,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory and costs billable to clients
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
5,443 |
|
|
|
5,909 |
|
|
|
5,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
13,231 |
|
|
|
14,241 |
|
|
|
14,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
Capital stock
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,752 |
|
|
|
4,760 |
|
|
|
4,767 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
(571 |
) |
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
Short-term borrowings and overdrafts
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
5,789 |
|
|
|
6,132 |
|
|
|
5,953 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, less current
portion
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
2,789 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
Provisions for contingencies and charges
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
13,231 |
|
|
|
14,241 |
|
|
|
14,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of shareholders equity for U.S. GAAP
purposes as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Share capital
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,752 |
|
|
|
4,760 |
|
|
|
4,767 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
(571 |
) |
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,332 |
|
|
|
4,053 |
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity as adjusted for
U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental U.S. GAAP Disclosures |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows |
The consolidated statement of cash flows prepared under French
GAAP presents substantially the same information as that
required under U.S. GAAP but they differ with regard to the
classification of items within them and as regards the
definition of cash (treasury) under French GAAP and cash
and cash equivalents under U.S. GAAP.
A reconciliation of cash or treasury under French GAAP to cash
and cash equivalents under U.S. GAAP is presented as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Cash and cash equivalents under French GAAP
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
Less: Marketable securities
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
Add: Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents under U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The cash flows under U.S. GAAP can be summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
Cash provided by/(used in) investing activities
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
Cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing activities primarily relate to the Bcom3
acquisition in 2002.
Cash provided by financing activities includes
(857) million,
519 million,
and
445 million
change in borrowings per the French GAAP accounts. A breakdown
of the change in borrowings is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Proceeds from borrowings of long-term debt
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
Repayments of borrowings of long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A breakdown of the change in net working capital requirement is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and other receivables
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Inventory and costs billable to clients
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
Accounts payable and other current liabilities
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in working capital requirements
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Interest paid
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
|
|
|
Concentration of Credit Risk |
Credit limits, ongoing credit evaluation and account monitoring
procedures are utilized to minimize the risk of loss. Collateral
is generally not required. Expected losses are provided for
currently and actual losses have been within managements
expectations.
The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of
intangible assets, by major class, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Net Carrying | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Depreciation* | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of euros) | |
At December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames and client relationships
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
Software and other
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames and client relationships
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
Software and other
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames and client relationships
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
1,903 |
|
Software and other
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes impairment of
346 million,
223 million and
223 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively. |
Consolidated amortization expense related to intangible assets,
subject to amortization, for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was
71 million,
79 million
and
52 million respectively.
Estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets
subject to amortization, calculated upon such assets held as at
December 31, 2004, for each of the next five fiscal years
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions | |
Year Ending December 31, |
|
of euros) | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
83 |
|
2006
|
|
|
86 |
|
2007
|
|
|
88 |
|
2008
|
|
|
91 |
|
2009
|
|
|
95 |
|
F-61
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In 2004, Publicis has made the following acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
40% of the minority interests of Fallon U.K.; |
|
|
|
100% of Thomsonmurray Inc. and CLT Meetings; and |
|
|
|
Other non significant entities. |
These acquisitions taken as a whole represent less than 1% of
the total revenue and the total assets of the Group.
In 2003, upon the conclusion of the agreement signed with
Cordiant in September 2001, Publicis acquired Cordiants
25% stake in ZenithOptimedia Group for an amount of
107 million, thereby increasing its holding to 100%.
Goodwill of
76 million was recognized. Publicis has also purchased the
minority interests of 32.6% in Starcom Motive London for
35 million.
Non-significant acquisitions have also taken place during the
year. These acquisitions taken as a whole represent less than 1%
of the consolidated revenues and a negative contribution of 1.7%
of the total net income before amortization of goodwill.
On September 24, 2002, Publicis acquired 100% of the
outstanding shares of Bcom3, Inc., an American company
specializing in multinational advertising and marketing
services. Bcom3 has been fully consolidated since
September 24, 2002 for French and U.S. GAAP purposes.
Under the terms of the agreement, Publicis provided
consideration for the acquisition by issuing the following
securities to Bcom3 shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
56,250,000 new Publicis shares with a value on issue of
30.5 (with a
nominal value of
0.4 and a
premium of
30.1 per share); |
|
|
|
Bonds with a face value of
858 million represented by 1,562,500 ORANEs redeemable into
28,125,000 existing or new Publicis shares; |
|
|
|
Bonds with a face value of
858 million, represented by 2,812,500 OBSAs with detachable
equity warrants granting the right to subscribe to 28,125,000
Publicis shares. |
Total consideration paid in for Bcom3 amounted to
3,984 million,
resulting in additional goodwill of
3,863 million.
The components of the purchase price and allocations are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions of ) | |
|
|
| |
Consideration and acquisition costs:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Publicis shares
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
Fair value of ORANEs
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
Fair value of OBSAs
|
|
|
858 |
|
Acquisition costs (net of tax)
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions of ) | |
|
|
| |
Allocation of purchase price:
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
35 |
|
Client relationships
|
|
|
309 |
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
387 |
|
Other intangibles
|
|
|
7 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
Net liabilities assumed and other
|
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the acquisition of Bcom3, several smaller-scale
agencies were acquired, such as Gravitas in Japan,
Johnston & Associates in the United States, Van Sluis
in the Netherlands, Direct n More in Austria,
Arredondo de Haro and Art-y-maña in Mexico, Magnesium in
Belgium, Sales Story, ECA2, Stella, and Flamenco in France.
The operations of all of the businesses acquired by Publicis in
2002 contributed 5% to Group revenues and 4% to the Groups
net income before goodwill amortization.
|
|
|
Pro-forma Information Regarding the Bcom3 Acquisition |
The following pro forma information for the year ended
December 31, 2002 presents the effect of the acquisition of
Bcom3, the most significant acquisition of Publicis in 2002, as
if it had occurred as of the beginning of 2002. The pro forma
financial information is based on the historical financial
statements of Publicis and Bcom3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
French GAAP | |
|
U.S. GAAP | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
(In millions except | |
|
|
per share data) | |
Pro forma revenues
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
|
4,426 |
|
Pro forma income before cumulative effect of accounting change
(SFAS 142)
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Pro forma basic earnings per share, before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per share, before cumulative effect
of accounting change
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
Pro forma basic earnings per share
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
The Group has recorded liabilities for restructuring charges to
be incurred related to the Bcom3 acquisition on
September 24, 2002. The Group began to formulate a
restructuring plan at the acquisition date, which included the
closing of some Bcom3 locations, mainly in the city of New York,
and the consolidation of Bcom3 and Publicis facilities in other
locations. Costs included in the restructuring liabilities
consist primarily of involuntary termination benefits for former
Bcom3 employees and relocation costs. As of December 31,
2002, the Group has recorded
200 million of liabilities for restructuring charges to be
incurred related to the
F-63
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Bcom3 acquisition. Provisions for vacant property of
241 million have also been recorded to cover future losses
related to Bcom3s lease contracts mainly located in the
city of New York.
The Group has recorded liabilities for restructuring charges to
be incurred related to the Saatchi & Saatchi
acquisition, which was consummated in September 2000. The Group
began to formulate a restructuring plan at the acquisition date,
which included the closing of the Saatchi & Saatchi
headquarters in London and New York, the closing of
Saatchi & Saatchi offices in certain locations, and the
consolidation of Saatchi & Saatchi and Publicis
facilities in other locations. Costs included in the
restructuring liabilities consist primarily of involuntary
termination benefits for former Saatchi & Saatchi
employees and relocation costs. This plan was finalized in 2001
and goodwill was increased by approximately
37 million
for restructuring charges, of which none remained as of
December 31, 2003.
The impact of U.S. GAAP adjustments related to
restructuring provisions is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of | |
|
|
|
Cash | |
|
Currency | |
|
Others | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Current Year | |
|
Reserve to | |
|
Net Impact | |
|
Payments | |
|
Translation and | |
|
Changes in | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
Increase | |
|
Income | |
|
P&L | |
|
(reversal) | |
|
Reclassifications(1) | |
|
Goodwill | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
|
|
Restructuring Provisions | |
French GAAP restructuring reserve
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
U.S. GAAP restatement:
finalization of BCom3
restructuring(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP restructuring reserve
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The impact of (107) includes translation adjustment for
(11) million
and reclassifications for
(96) million
(including
42 million
to real estate provisions and
51 million
to write-off of assets). |
|
(2) |
In 2003, the Group finalized the Bcom3 restructuring plan. In
accordance with U.S. GAAP, restructuring costs related to
the acquiring entity and plans finalized after one year
following the acquisition date are excluded from the liabilities
assumed and are therefore booked through P&L. |
The impact of U.S. GAAP adjustments related to real estate
provisions is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of | |
|
|
|
Cash | |
|
Currency | |
|
Others | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Current Year | |
|
Reserve to | |
|
Net Impact | |
|
Payments | |
|
Translation and | |
|
Changes in | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
Increase | |
|
Income | |
|
P&L | |
|
(reversal) | |
|
Reclassifications(1) | |
|
Goodwill(2) | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
In millions | |
|
|
real estate provisions | |
French GAAP real estate provision
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
232 |
|
U.S. GAAP restatement:
finalization of Bcom3 restructuring(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP real estate provisions
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The impact of (1) includes translation adjustment for
(43) million
and reclassifications for
42 million
(from restructuring provisions). |
|
(2) |
The impact of
(17) million
includes additions of
29 million,
change in estimates of
(30) million
and reversal through goodwill for
(16) million. |
|
(3) |
In 2003, the Group has finalized the Bcom3 restructuring. In
accordance with U.S. GAAP, vacant properties costs related
to the acquiring entity and plans finalized after one year
following the acquisition are excluded from the liabilities
assumed and booked through P&L. |
F-64
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The U.S. GAAP restatement of
92 million
includes for
65 million
change that lead to identify double capacity in 2003 under
U.S. GAAP and
29 million
of additions booked in 2003 under French GAAP that were
disallowed under U.S. GAAP.
|
|
|
Retirement and Postretirement Plans |
The Group maintains retirement plans, some of these are defined
benefit pension plans (Defined Benefit Pensions)
which require disclosure of assets and obligations and others
are defined contribution plans which by definition have assets
equal to liabilities and, therefore, the Group shows only the
annual expense associated with such plans.
The Group also provides certain healthcare and life insurance
benefits (Postretirement Plans) to certain retired
U.S. and U.K. employees. U.S. employees hired by MacManus
before January 1, 1993 may be eligible for certain
postretirement life insurance and medical benefits depending on
years of service and other requirements. U.S. employees
hired by Leo Burnett before January 1, 2002 may be eligible
for certain postretirement medical benefits depending on years
of service and other requirements.
Effective September 24, 2002, Publicis acquired Bcom3 and
assumed the assets and liabilities of the plans as of that date.
The business combination has been accounted for by the purchase
method under SFAS 141.
The changes in the assets and benefit obligations and the
reconciliation of the Groups Defined Benefit Pensions and
Postretirement Plans in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets for the period January 1, 2004 through
December 31, 2004 and January 1, 2003 through
December 31, 2003, respectively were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Pensions | |
|
Postretirement Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Change in benefit obligation Benefit obligation at
beginning of year |
|
|
151.1 |
|
|
|
177.6 |
|
|
|
165.2 |
|
|
|
183.7 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and lump sums paid
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Effect of exchange rates
|
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(29.7 |
) |
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
149.8 |
|
|
|
198.5 |
|
|
|
151.1 |
|
|
|
177.6 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-65
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Pensions | |
|
Postretirement Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at beginning of year
|
|
|
89.7 |
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on assets
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Benefits and lump sums paid
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
99.6 |
|
|
|
118.4 |
|
|
|
89.7 |
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
|
|
(50.1 |
) |
|
|
(80.0 |
) |
|
|
(61.4 |
) |
|
|
(72.3 |
) |
|
|
(35.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service costs
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Amount recognized
|
|
|
(51.1 |
) |
|
|
(51.4 |
) |
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
(50.1 |
) |
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in Statement of Financial Position consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
|
(52.1 |
) |
|
|
(85.0 |
) |
|
|
(64.2 |
) |
|
|
(73.3 |
) |
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Intangible asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Amount recognized
|
|
|
(51.1 |
) |
|
|
(51.4 |
) |
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
(50.1 |
) |
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Pensions with accumulated benefit obligations in
excess of plan assets consist of the following as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Pensions | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
149.8 |
|
|
|
184.2 |
|
|
|
151.1 |
|
|
|
132.6 |
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
149.8 |
|
|
|
198.5 |
|
|
|
151.1 |
|
|
|
140.3 |
|
Plan assets at fair value
|
|
|
99.6 |
|
|
|
118.4 |
|
|
|
89.7 |
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
The accumulated benefit obligation on the domestic defined
benefit pension plan is
15.1 million
and
17.1 million,
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively. There are no
plan assets related to the domestic plan and no contributions
expected to be paid. The measurement date used to determine the
benefit obligation of the domestic plan is December 31,
2004.
F-66
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of net periodic benefit costs for the Defined
Benefit Pensions and Postretirement Plans for the year ending
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, are as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Pensions | |
|
Postretirement Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Service cost for benefits earned during the year
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Defined contribution cost
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement cost
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average assumptions used in determining the benefit
obligation as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively
are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Pensions | |
|
Postretirement Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00% |
|
|
|
5.00% |
|
|
|
6.25% |
|
|
|
5.62% |
|
|
|
6.00% |
|
|
|
5.75% |
|
|
|
6.25% |
|
|
|
6.25% |
|
Expected rate of future compensation increases
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3.79% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3.77% |
|
|
|
5.00% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
The weighted average assumptions used in determining the net
periodic benefit costs for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003 respectively are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Pensions | |
|
Postretirement Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25% |
|
|
|
5.19% |
|
|
|
6.75% |
|
|
|
5.64% |
|
|
|
6.25% |
|
|
|
5.75% |
|
|
|
6.75% |
|
|
|
6.75% |
|
Expected rate of future compensation increases
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3.43% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3.39% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
5.00% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Expected long-term rate on plan assets
|
|
|
8.50% |
|
|
|
7.50% |
|
|
|
8.50% |
|
|
|
7.50% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
* |
These assumptions are based on estimates of the long-term rate
for these factors over the life of the plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined | |
|
|
|
|
Benefit | |
|
Postretirement | |
|
|
Pensions | |
|
Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of euros) | |
Increase in minimum liability included in other compressive
income
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
F-67
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the U.S. plans, as of December 31, 2004, the
medical inflation rates were assumed to be 10.5%, gradually
declining to 5% in 2007, and remaining at that rate thereafter.
A one-percentage-point increase in the medical inflation rate
would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
as of December 31, 2004 by approximately
5.3 million
and increase the net periodic benefit cost for the year ended
December 31, 2004 by approximately
0.5 million.
A one-percentage-point decrease in the medical inflation rate
would decrease the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
as of December 31, 2004 by approximately
4.3 million
and decrease the net periodic benefit cost for the year ended
December 31, 2004 by approximately
0.4 million.
The weighted average allocation of funds invested in Group
pension plans as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds Invested | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Asset Category (In percentage) |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity securities
|
|
|
66% |
|
|
|
62% |
|
|
|
71% |
|
|
|
Not available |
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
33% |
|
|
|
29% |
|
|
|
26% |
|
|
|
Not available |
|
Real estate
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
Not available |
|
Other
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
|
Not available |
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
Not available |
|
The table below shows the expected cash outflows on pensions and
other post-employment benefits over the next ten years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and | |
|
|
Similar Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
|
U.S. | |
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of euros) | |
Estimated employers contribution in 2005
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Estimated benefit payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
2006
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
2007
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
2008
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
2009
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
2010 and thereafter
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
F-68
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future minimum payments as of December 31, 2004, on
long-term debt, including capital leases, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
(In millions of ) | |
2005
|
|
|
105 |
|
2006
|
|
|
57 |
|
2007
|
|
|
57 |
|
2008
|
|
|
729 |
|
2009
|
|
|
57 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Current maturities
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
Publicis capital stock consists of 195,471,061;
195,378,253 and 196,081,129 ordinary shares issued at
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, with a par
value of
0.40 each.
These amounts include shares held in treasury of 13,015,843;
13,012,389 and 12,790,600 respectively.
Employee Stock Option Plans
Publicis grants stock options through employee stock option
plans (the Plans). Under the 2000 plan, options for
a fixed number of shares (with an exercise price equal to the
average market value of Publicis stock for the last 20 days
before the grant date) are granted to employees. Under this
plan, the options vest after 5 years and expire
10 years after the date of grant. Under the 2001 plan,
options for a fixed number of shares (with an exercise price
equal to the higher of the average market value of Publicis
stock for the last 20 days before the grant date or the
cost of treasury shares) are granted to employees. Under this
plan, options vest after 4 years and expire 10 years
after the date of grant. Under the 2002 plan, options for a
fixed number of shares (with an exercise price equal to the
average purchase price of treasury shares held by Publicis at
the grant date) are granted to employees. The options vest after
4 years and expire 10 years after the date of grant.
Options were also granted in 2001 under a variable plan to
former Saatchi & Saatchi management (with an exercise
price equal to the average purchase price of treasury shares
held by Publicis at the grant date). The allotment of these
options is subject to the attainment of certain financial
objectives over the 2001-2003 period. These options vest upon
confirmation of allotment and expire 10 years after the
date of grant.
Under the 2003 plan, options for a fixed number of shares (with
an exercise price equal to the average purchase price of
treasury shares held by Publicis at the grant date) are granted
to employees. The options vest after 4 years and expire
10 years after the date of grant.
In 2003, options were also granted to employees under a
Long-Term Incentive Plan for 2003-2005 (variable plan with an
exercise price equal to the average purchase price of treasury
shares held by Publicis at the grant date). Half of these
options vest in 2006 upon the attainment of certain financial
objectives over the 2003-2005 period and expire 10 years
after the date of grant. The other half of these options vest in
2007 upon the attainment of such objectives and expire
10 years after the date of grant.
Under the 2004 plan, options for a fixed number of shares (with
an exercise price equal to the average purchase price of
treasury shares held by Publicis at the grant date) are granted
to employees. The options
F-69
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
vest after 4 years and expire 10 years after the date
of grant. In 2004, additional options were also granted to
employees under the Long-Term Incentive Plan for 2003-2005.
Under the former Publicis Communication Stock Option Plan,
options for a fixed number of shares (with an exercise price
equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant) were
granted to employees. Under this plan, the options vest
immediately and expire 10 years after the date of grant.
A summary of the status of the Plans as of December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 and changes for the years then ended, are
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2000 Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
43.55 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
43.55 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
43.55 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/ Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
43.55 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
43.55 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
43.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
33.18 |
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
33.18 |
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
33.18 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/ Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
33.18 |
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
33.18 |
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
33.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
329,600 |
|
|
|
29.83 |
|
|
|
329,600 |
|
|
|
29.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329,600 |
|
|
|
29.83 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/ Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
329,600 |
|
|
|
29.83 |
|
|
|
329,600 |
|
|
|
29.83 |
|
|
|
329,600 |
|
|
|
29.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
517,067 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517,067 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/ Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
517,067 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
517,067 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,970,086 |
|
|
|
24,82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/ Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
1,970,086 |
|
|
|
24,82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-70
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Saatchi & Saatchi Management Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
2,943,135 |
|
|
|
29.79 |
|
|
|
2,943,135 |
|
|
|
29.79 |
|
|
|
2,943,135 |
|
|
|
29.79 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/ Expired
|
|
|
2,943,135 |
|
|
|
29.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,943,135 |
|
|
|
29.79 |
|
|
|
2,943,135 |
|
|
|
29.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term 2003 Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
9,498,000 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,498,000 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/ Expired
|
|
|
1,484,000 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
8,014,000 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
9,498,000 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options related to the Publicis Communication Stock Option
Plan were converted into Publicis stock options upon the merger
of Publicis Communication into Publicis, S.A. on
December 11, 1998. A summary of the activity for this plan
is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Former Publicis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communication Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
525,080 |
|
|
|
8.67 |
|
|
|
570,050 |
|
|
|
8.54 |
|
|
|
652150 |
|
|
|
8.29 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(54,880 |
) |
|
|
5.92 |
|
|
|
(44,970 |
) |
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
|
(45,590 |
) |
|
|
6.46 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(28,760 |
) |
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,510 |
) |
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
441,440 |
|
|
|
9.16 |
|
|
|
525,080 |
|
|
|
8.67 |
|
|
|
570,050 |
|
|
|
8.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Saatchi & Saatchi Plans |
Saatchi & Saatchi had several stock option plans for
employees and management prior to the acquisition. These plans
involved several execution criteria for the grant of options. At
the time of the merger with Publicis, these plans were
simplified, and the maximum number of options that could be
granted was granted.
Two types of options remain:
|
|
|
|
1. |
Those to be issued in connection with the Equity Participation
Plan and for which the exercise price was paid at the grant
date. No additional payment will be made at the date of exercise
of the options, and |
|
|
2. |
Those to be issued related to other plans and for which the
exercise price must be paid at the date of exercise of the
options. |
F-71
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In these two cases, the beneficiaries were to receive
Saatchi & Saatchi shares upon exercise of their
options. These shares will be exchanged for new shares of
Publicis based on a rate of 18.252 Publicis shares for 100
Saatchi & Saatchi shares.
The number of options that can be exercised under the former
Saatchi & Saatchi plans, converted for simplification
purposes into Publicis shares at a rate of 0.18252, is
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Former Saatchi & Saatchi Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
43,545 |
|
|
|
9.92 |
|
|
|
80,503 |
|
|
|
10.90 |
|
|
|
266,046 |
|
|
|
11.71 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(37,928 |
) |
|
|
9.92 |
|
|
|
(36,958 |
) |
|
|
12.22 |
|
|
|
(185,543 |
) |
|
|
10.33 |
|
Forfeited/ Expired
|
|
|
(5,617 |
) |
|
|
9.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,545 |
|
|
|
9.92 |
|
|
|
80,503 |
|
|
|
10.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former
Nelson Plan
The Group additionally granted options in connection with the
Nelson acquisition at the end of 2000. In conjunction with this
acquisition, Publicis exchanged Publicis options for those of
Nelson. A summary of the activity for this plan is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Former Nelson Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
137,034 |
|
|
|
19,32 |
|
|
|
282,154 |
|
|
|
24,40 |
|
|
|
518,730 |
|
|
|
28.11 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(16,546 |
) |
|
|
19,64 |
|
|
|
(103,522 |
) |
|
|
21,04 |
|
|
|
(65,040 |
) |
|
|
24.40 |
|
Forfeited/ Expired
|
|
|
(12,620 |
) |
|
|
19,64 |
|
|
|
(41,598 |
) |
|
|
21,57 |
|
|
|
(171,536 |
) |
|
|
23.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
107,868 |
|
|
|
17,91 |
|
|
|
137,034 |
|
|
|
19,32 |
|
|
|
282,154 |
|
|
|
24.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-72
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following information applies to options outstanding and
exercisable at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
life in Years | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Former Publicis Communication Plan
|
|
|
441,440 |
|
|
|
441,440 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9.16 |
|
2000 Plan
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
43.55 |
|
2001 Plan
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
33.18 |
|
2002 Plan
|
|
|
329,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
29.83 |
|
2003 Plan
|
|
|
517,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
2004 Plan
|
|
|
1,970,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
Saatchi & Saatchi Management Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan 2003
|
|
|
8,014,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
24.82 |
|
Former Nelson Plan
|
|
|
107,868 |
|
|
|
107,868 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17.91 |
|
Former Saatchi & Saatchi Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11,860,061 |
|
|
|
549,308 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
24.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS 123, Publicis elected to continue
to account for stock-based compensation using the
intrinsic value method under the guidelines of
APB 25, as opposed to the fair value method in
SFAS 123. For the Publicis plans, under APB 25, no
compensation expense has been recognized for the year ended
December 31, 2002 because the stock options were either
fully vested prior to these periods, or the exercise price of
options granted in these periods is greater than or equal to the
market value at the date of grant. In 2004 and in 2003, under
APB 25, the compensation expense was not significant.
SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure
requires companies that continue to account for stock-based
compensation in accordance with APB 25 to disclose certain
information using tabular presentation as presented below. If
the Group had elected to recognize compensation expense based
upon the fair value method of SFAS 123, pro forma net
earnings and earnings per common share would be as follows (for
purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of
the options granted is amortized to expense over the vesting
period of the options):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net earnings U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as reported
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense, net of tax,
included in reported net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Stock-based compensation expense determined under fair
value method for all awards, net of tax
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Basic earnings per common share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
Pro forma
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
Pro forma
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of options was estimated at the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
assumptions for 2004, 2003 and 2002: dividend yields of 1.12% in
2004, 0.91% in 2003 and zero in 2002; expected volatility of
24.0% for 2004, 30.0% for 2003 and 52.3% for 2002; risk-free
interest rate
F-73
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
ranging between 2.63% and 3.47%, depending on the maturity date,
in 2004, 4% in 2003, and 4.5% in 2002; and expected term of 2.6
for the first half of the long term incentive plan,
3.6 years for the second half in 2004 and 5 years for
the unconditional plan; and of 5 years for 2003 and 2002.
The weighted average estimated fair values of employee stock
options granted during fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 were
3.59,
8.85 and
12.47,
respectively.
The income tax disclosures required for French GAAP are included
in note 8 to the financial statements. Additional
information required for U.S. GAAP purposes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of euros) | |
Net income before taxes and minority interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration dates of net operating loss carry forwards |
In connection with the business combination with
Saatchi & Saatchi, Publicis acquired approximately
361 million
in net operating loss carryforwards related to former
Saatchi & Saatchi operations. At December 31,
2004, the remaining net loss carryforwards related to these
operations amounted to
278
million, which will expire between 2005 and 2009. The Company
has not recognized these operating loss carryforwards in the
French financial statements due the uncertainty of their
realizibility. For U.S. GAAP purposes, the deferred tax
assets acquired in connection with this business combination has
been 100% reserved.
Additionally, under French GAAP, at December 31, 2004, the
Group had approximately
460 million
of operating loss carryforwards, of which
14 million
will expire between 2005 and 2009 and
21 million
will expire between 2009 and 2019. The remaining
425 million
have no expiration. The Group has not recognized these operating
loss carry forwards in the French financial statements due to
the uncertainty of their realizibility.
Basic earnings per share under French GAAP is calculated by
dividing net income by the weighted average number of ordinary
shares outstanding during the period after deduction of the
weighted average number of shares of treasury stock. In 2002,
the ORANEs were accounted for as equity instruments under French
GAAP, but as debt under U.S. GAAP with the related interest
classified accordingly. In 2003, following clarification of
certain rules by the AMF (see note 21), the ORANEs were
reclassified as other equity under French GAAP and
the recognition of interest paid in respect of ORANEs is now
treated as a financial cost and no longer as a distributed
dividend.
Diluted earnings per share numerator represents net income,
increased by the OCEANEs and ORANEs after-tax
interest expense that would have been avoided if converted.
Diluted earnings per share
F-74
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
denominator takes into account share equivalents having a
dilutive effect. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of
stock options to employees, conversion of all convertible bonds
(OCEANEs) and the redemption of all ORANEs into shares. However,
in light of prevailing share price levels, the potential
dilutive effect of the OBSA equity warrants has not been taken
into account. The dilutive effect of stock options is calculated
using the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per common share under French GAAP, which,
other than the impact of the interest on the ORANEs on the
numerator of basic earnings per share in the 2002 fiscal year,
is calculated in the same manner for French and U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions except per | |
|
|
share data) | |
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations (French GAAP)
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
After-tax interest expense on ORANEs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings available to shareholders for basic
earnings per share
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations (French GAAP)
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
After-tax saving of OCEANEs and ORANEs interest if converted
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings available to shareholders for diluted
earnings per share
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share
weighted-average shares
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential dilutive common shares employee stock
options
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Potential dilutive common shares OCEANEs
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Potential dilutive common shares ORANEs
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share adjusted
weighted-average shares and assumed conversions
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings available to shareholders per common share
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings available to shareholders per common share
assuming dilution
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-75
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Group leases certain premises and equipment under both
capital and operating leases. Property leases typically provide
for renewal options. The following is a schedule of future
minimum lease payments for capital and operating leases in
effect at December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Sublease | |
|
Operating Leases, | |
Years Ending December 31, |
|
Capital Leases | |
|
Operating Leases | |
|
Income | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of euros) | |
|
|
2005
|
|
|
8,4 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
2006
|
|
|
8,6 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
218 |
|
2007
|
|
|
8,8 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
205 |
|
2008
|
|
|
8,4 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
190 |
|
2009
|
|
|
8,7 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
183 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
402,7 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
445,6 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
1,336 |
|
Less: amount representing interest
|
|
|
(175,6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligation under capital leases
|
|
|
270,0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(8,4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
|
261,6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plants and equipment at December 31 include the
following for capitalized leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of ) | |
Land
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Less allowances for depreciation
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net rental expenses for operating leases was
186 million,
201 million
and
169 million
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.
|
|
|
Related parties transaction |
International Sports and Entertainment AG(iSe):
In January 2003 Publicis Group, Dentsu and Sports Mondial
entered into a Shareholders Agreement pursuant to which
they agreed to create a joint venture, International Sports and
Entertainment AG (iSe). At inception, Publicis
contributed CHF 6.7 million
( 4 million)
in capital to the joint venture in exchange for equity interests
in the joint venture of 45%. The joint venture is incorporated
in Zurich (Switzerland). The joint venture is engaged in the
provision for services to various sports federations and the
acquisition, sale and marketing of sponsorship and television
rights in relation to sporting and entertainment event
federations. On June 2003, iSe entered into an agreement with
FIFA to be appointed as the exclusive worldwide agency for the
sale and management of the FIFA hospitality program for the 2006
FIFA World Cup in Germany in exchange for
CHF 270 million.
On behalf of iSe, Publicis agreed to provide the banks providing
the letter of credit to FIFA with a collateral guarantee (50% of
the total amount). In connection with this contract, Publicis
has provided a
F-76
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
French bank with a guarantee in the amount of
88 million
(CHF 135 million). In January 2005 iSe paid the
CHF 270 to FIFA and the collateral guarantee contract
between iSe and Publicis has been terminated.
Publicis assessed its interests in iSe and determined that iSe
is a variable interest entity (VIE). Given the commitments of
Publicis towards the other owner of iSe, Publicis is not deemed
the primary beneficiary and has not consolidated the VIE.
As of December 31, 2004 total investment of Publicis Groupe
in iSe amounted to
4 million.
ISe is consolidated under the equity method.
Barter Bogle Hegarty LLC (BBH):
Publicis Groupe holds 49% of the capital of BBH. BBH is an
advertising agency and is engaged in the planning, creation,
supervision and placement of advertising in various media, as
well as providing certain studio services. BBH serves clients
primarily in the U.S. in several industries, including consumer
products and technology, among other industries.
As of December 31, 2004 total investment of Publicis Groupe
in BBH amounted to
9 million.
The entity is accounted for under the equity method. BBH paid
dividends of
4 million
in 2004 to Publicis Group.
|
|
|
Fair value of instruments |
The following table presents the carrying amounts in accordance
with U.S. GAAP and estimated fair value of the Groups
financial instruments at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions of euros) | |
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
Investments (IPG and other)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Long-term debt, including current maturities
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
Embedded Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Other Derivative instruments
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent value rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the
fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it
is practicable to estimate that value:
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities |
The carrying values of cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities approximate fair value due to the relatively short
maturity of these instruments (between three months and one
year).
Investments consist of available-for-sale securities, primarily
those that are publicly traded, and other investments. The
available-for-sale securities are carried at market value and
the unrealized gains and losses on these securities are included
in shareholders equity. As of December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002, unrealized gains of
30 million,
36 million
and
51 million, respectively, have been recorded in
shareholders equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Other long-term investments are carried at cost, which
approximates estimated fair value.
F-77
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Groups long-term debt consists of floating rate debt
and fixed interest debt. The main difference as of
December 31, 2004 between the carrying value and the fair
value relates to the ORANEs.
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
The carrying value of derivatives (foreign exchange futures
contracts and currency swaps) equals the fair value. Fair value
has generally been determined by reference to market prices
resulting from trading on a national securities exchange or in
an over-the-counter market. In cases where quoted market prices
are not available, fair value is based on estimates using
present value or other valuation techniques.
Contingent value rights were publicly traded until their
maturity in March 2002. The liability related to these rights
was carried at market value and changes in market value were
recorded in earnings.
Segment Information
The Group operates in one industry segment, advertising and
communications. All of the Groups operations fall within
one reportable segment as defined in SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF 03-1,
The Meaning of Other Than Temporary Impairment and its
Application to Certain Investments. EITF 03-01
contains additional guidance for determining when an investment
is impaired. The effective date for applying this guidance is
currently suspended pending the issue of a further FASB Staff
Position statement. In the opinion of Publicis, adoption of the
additional guidance would not have a material effect on the
consolidated financial statements.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (FAS 123R).
FAS 123R requires that Publicis recognizes the cost of
share-based payments granted to employees measured at the
grant-date fair value of the award. Publicis is required to
adopt FAS 123R effective January 1, 2006 to all
share-based grants made or modified after June 15, 2005 and
for the unvested portion of outstanding share-based grants made
prior to June 15, 2005. Publicis is currently evaluating
the impact of adopting FAS 123R.
In March 2004, the FASB ratified the consensus reached on EITF
Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and the
Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128,
Earnings Per Share. EITF 03-6 clarifies what
constitutes a participating security and requires the use of the
two-class method for computing basic earnings per share when
participating securities exist. EITF 03-6 is effective
April 1, 2004 and requires retroactive adjustment to
earnings per share presented for prior periods. The adoption did
not have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements of Publicis.
In December 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 153
Exchanges of Non-Monetary Assets as an amendment to
APB Opinion No. 29 Accounting for Non-Monetary
Transactions. APB 29 prescribes that exchanges of
non-monetary transactions should be measured based on the fair
value of the assets exchanged, while providing an exception for
non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets.
SFAS 153 eliminates the exception provided in APB 29
and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of
non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance.
SFAS 153 is to be applied prospectively and is effective
for all non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2005. Publicis does not expect
there to be any material effect on the Consolidated Financial
Statements upon adoption of the new standard.
F-78
The following exhibits are included herein:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Statuts (bylaws) of Publicis Groupe S.A. (unofficial
English translation) (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 1 to the Annual Report of Publicis Groupe S.A. on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
2 |
|
|
We agree to furnish a copy of an English translation of any
instrument defining the rights of holders of our long term
indebtedness to the SEC upon its request. |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Strategic Alliance Agreement, dated as of November 30,
2003, by and between Publicis Groupe S.A. and Dentsu Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.3 to the
Schedule 13D/A filed by Dentsu Inc. on December 5,
2003). |
|
4.2 |
|
|
Shareholders Agreement, dated as of November 30,
2003, by and between Publicis Groupe S.A. and Dentsu Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.4 to the
Schedule 13D/A filed by Dentsu Inc. on December 5,
2003). |
|
4.3 |
|
|
First Amendment to Shareholders Agreement, dated as of
September 24, 2004, by and between Publicis Groupe S.A. and
Dentsu Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.11
to the Schedule 13D/A filed by Dentsu Inc. on
October 7, 2004). |
|
4.4 |
|
|
Shareholders Agreement, dated as of November 30,
2003, by and between Elisabeth Badinter and Dentsu Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.5 to the
Schedule 13D/A filed by Dentsu Inc. on December 5,
2003). |
|
4.5 |
|
|
First Amendment to Shareholders Agreement, dated as of
September 24, 2004, by and between Elisabeth Badinter and
Dentsu Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.10
to the Schedule 13D/A filed by Dentsu Inc. on
October 7, 2004). |
|
4.6 |
|
|
CEO Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2001,
among Roger A. Haupt, Bcom3 Group, Inc., Leo Burnett Worldwide,
Inc., and Leo Burnett USA, Inc. (Haupt Employment
Agreement) (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.5 to the report on Form 10 of Bcom3 Group,
Inc. filed on April 30, 2001). |
|
4.7 |
|
|
Amendment to Haupt Employment Agreement dated as of
March 26, 2003 (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 4.5 to the Annual Report of Publicis Groupe S.A. on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
4.8 |
|
|
Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2000, by and between
Saatchi & Saatchi North America, Inc. and Kevin Roberts
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.5 to the Annual
Report of Publicis Groupe S.A. on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
4.9 |
|
|
Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000, by and among
Saatchi & Saatchi North America, Inc.,
Saatchi & Saatchi Limited and Red Rose Limited
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.5 to the Annual
Report of Publicis Groupe S.A. on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
4.1 |
0 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of September 8, 2002, by and
between Saatchi & Saatchi North America, Inc. and
Robert L. Seelert (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 4.5 to the Annual Report of Publicis Groupe S.A. on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
4.1 |
1 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2004, by and
among Jack Klues, Publicis Groupe S.A. and Starcom Worldwide
division of Leo Burnett USA, Inc. |
|
4.1 |
2 |
|
Executive Consulting Agreement, dated as of December 21,
2004, by and between Leo Burnett Worldwide, Inc. and Roger Haupt. |
|
4.1 |
3 |
|
Consulting Services Agreement, dated as of November 8,
2004, by and between Publicis Groupe S.A. and Roger A. Haupt. |
|
4.1 |
4 |
|
By-Laws (statuts) of the Societe en Participation by and
between Elisabeth Badinter and Dentsu Inc., adopted
September 24, 2004 (unofficial English translation)
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.9 to the
Schedule 13D/A filed by Dentsu Inc. on October 7,
2004). |
|
8 |
|
|
List of Subsidiaries. See note 30 to our financial
statements. |
|
11 |
|
|
Code of Ethics. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
Certification by Maurice Lévy, Chairman of the Management
Board and Chief Executive Officer, required by Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
99.2 |
|
|
Certification by Jean-Michel Etienne, Chief Financial Officer,
required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
99.3 |
|
|
Certification by Maurice Lévy, Chairman of the Management
Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Jean-Michel Etienne,
Chief Financial Officer, required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly
caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report
on its behalf.
|
|
|
______________________________________
Name: Maurice Lévy |
|
Title: Chief Executive Officer and |
|
Chairman
of the Management Board |
Dated: June 24, 2005