e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended October 3, 2008.
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number (0-21767)
ViaSat, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
33-0174996
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
6155 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, California 92009
(760) 476-2200
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, $0.0001 par value, as of
November 6, 2008 was 30,837,049.
VIASAT, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
90,790 |
|
|
$ |
125,176 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
157,844 |
|
|
|
155,484 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
59,760 |
|
|
|
60,326 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
18,685 |
|
|
|
18,664 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
17,131 |
|
|
|
15,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
344,210 |
|
|
|
375,626 |
|
Property, equipment and satellite, net |
|
|
111,922 |
|
|
|
64,693 |
|
Other acquired intangible assets, net |
|
|
20,797 |
|
|
|
25,477 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
66,407 |
|
|
|
66,407 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
19,954 |
|
|
|
18,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
563,290 |
|
|
$ |
551,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
55,323 |
|
|
$ |
52,317 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
57,248 |
|
|
|
73,957 |
|
Payables to former stockholders of acquired business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
112,571 |
|
|
|
127,375 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
18,585 |
|
|
|
17,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
131,156 |
|
|
|
144,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
264,915 |
|
|
|
255,856 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
164,689 |
|
|
|
149,140 |
|
Common stock held in treasury |
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
428,230 |
|
|
|
404,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
563,290 |
|
|
$ |
551,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
September 28, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
September 28, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
159,280 |
|
|
$ |
146,625 |
|
|
$ |
312,241 |
|
|
$ |
275,187 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
115,551 |
|
|
|
104,513 |
|
|
|
223,571 |
|
|
|
200,909 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
25,430 |
|
|
|
20,424 |
|
|
|
49,034 |
|
|
|
38,154 |
|
Independent research and development |
|
|
6,656 |
|
|
|
8,433 |
|
|
|
16,496 |
|
|
|
15,810 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
2,391 |
|
|
|
4,680 |
|
|
|
4,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
10,864 |
|
|
|
18,460 |
|
|
|
15,530 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
2,884 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
9,780 |
|
|
|
12,193 |
|
|
|
19,553 |
|
|
|
18,077 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
3,479 |
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
5,060 |
|
Minority interest in net earnings of subsidiary, net of tax |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,258 |
|
|
$ |
8,585 |
|
|
$ |
15,549 |
|
|
$ |
12,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
.30 |
|
|
$ |
.28 |
|
|
$ |
.51 |
|
|
$ |
.42 |
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
.29 |
|
|
$ |
.27 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
.40 |
|
Shares used in computing basic net income per share |
|
|
30,743 |
|
|
|
30,196 |
|
|
|
30,633 |
|
|
|
30,077 |
|
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share |
|
|
32,138 |
|
|
|
32,231 |
|
|
|
31,890 |
|
|
|
32,229 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
September 28, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,549 |
|
|
$ |
12,766 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
8,878 |
|
|
|
7,550 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
5,754 |
|
|
|
6,038 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
|
3,693 |
|
Other non-cash adjustments |
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
|
|
496 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities,
net of the effect of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(2,461 |
) |
|
|
6,981 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
(618 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(3,201 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(2,611 |
) |
|
|
8,189 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(11,989 |
) |
|
|
(5,228 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
18,403 |
|
|
|
37,688 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, equipment and satellite |
|
|
(50,556 |
) |
|
|
(9,300 |
) |
Payment related to acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
(9,826 |
) |
Sale of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Cash paid for patents and other assets |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(52,926 |
) |
|
|
(19,121 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
3,464 |
|
|
|
5,237 |
|
Payment on secured borrowing |
|
|
(4,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of stock of majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
5,830 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(34,386 |
) |
|
|
24,656 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
125,176 |
|
|
|
103,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
90,790 |
|
|
$ |
128,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock in satisfaction of a payable to former stockholders of an acquired business |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,631 |
|
Issuance of payable in connection with acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in
Treasury |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Shares
Issued |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Income |
|
Balance at March 28, 2008 |
|
|
30,500,605 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
255,856 |
|
|
$ |
149,140 |
|
|
|
(33,238 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,034 |
) |
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
404,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
216,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from
exercise of stock
options and release of
restricted stock unit
(RSU) awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock under
Employee Stock Purchase
Plan |
|
|
88,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,549 |
|
|
$ |
15,549 |
|
Foreign currency
translation, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 3,
2008 |
|
|
30,806,252 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
264,915 |
|
|
$ |
164,689 |
|
|
|
(33,238 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,034 |
) |
|
$ |
(343 |
) |
|
$ |
428,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at October 3, 2008, the condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 and
September 28, 2007, the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended
October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 and the condensed consolidated statement of stockholders
equity for the six months ended October 3, 2008 have been prepared by the management of ViaSat,
Inc. (the Company), and have not been audited. These financial statements have been prepared on the
same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 28,
2008 and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for all periods presented. These financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended March 28,
2008 included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. Interim operating results are not
necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year. The year-end condensed balance sheet
data were derived from audited financial statements, but do not include all disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and results of
operations of TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. (TrellisWare), a majority-owned subsidiary of the
Company. All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.
The Companys fiscal year is the 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Friday closest to March 31 of
the specified year. For example, references to fiscal year 2009 refer to the fiscal year ending on
April 3, 2009. The Companys quarters for fiscal year 2009 end on June 27, 2008, October 3, 2008,
January 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009. This results in a 53 week fiscal year approximately every four
to five years. Fiscal year 2009 is a 53 week year, compared with a 52 week year in fiscal year
2008. As a result of the shift in the fiscal calendar, the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
includes an additional week. The Company does not believe that the extra week results in any
material impact on its financial results.
During the Companys second quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company completed the acquisition
of JAST, S.A. (JAST), a company based in Switzerland. The acquisition was accounted for as a
purchase and accordingly, the operating results of JAST have been included from the date of
acquisition in the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Estimates have been prepared on the basis of the most current and best
available information and actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates
made by management include revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, self-insurance reserves,
allowance for doubtful accounts, warranty accrual, valuation of goodwill and other intangible
assets, valuation of derivatives, long-lived assets and valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.
Property, Equipment and Satellite
Equipment, computers and software, furniture and fixtures and the Companys satellite are
recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. The Company generally computes depreciation
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging between one to
eleven years. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized on the straight-line method over
the shorter of the lease term or the life of the improvement. Additions to property and equipment,
together with major renewals and betterments, are capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor
renewals and betterments are charged to expense. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the
cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and any
resulting gain or loss is recognized.
Satellite construction costs, including launch services and insurance, are generally procured
under long-term contracts that provide for payments over the contract periods. Satellite
construction and launch services costs are capitalized as incurred.
Payables to Former Shareholders of Acquired Businesses
In August 2007, in connection with the terms of the Companys JAST acquisition, the Company
recorded an obligation to pay the remaining portion of the initial purchase price of approximately
$0.8 million on the first anniversary of the closing date. Accordingly, in August 2008, the
Company paid approximately $0.8 million in cash to the former stockholders of JAST.
7
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Self-Insurance Liabilities
The Company has a self-insurance plan to retain a portion of the exposure for losses related
to employee medical benefits. The Company also has a self-insurance plan for a portion of the
exposure for losses related to workers compensation costs. The self-insurance policies provide for
both specific and aggregate stop-loss limits. The Company utilizes internal actuarial methods, as
well as other historical information, for the purpose of estimating ultimate costs for a particular
policy year. Based on these actuarial methods along with currently available information and
insurance industry statistics, the Company recorded self-insurance liabilities as of October 3,
2008 and March 28, 2008 of $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The Companys estimate,
which is subject to inherent variability, is based on average claims experience in the Companys
industry and its own experience in terms of frequency and severity of claims, including asserted
and unasserted claims incurred but not reported, with no explicit provision for adverse fluctuation
from year to year. This variability may lead to ultimate payments being either greater or less than
the amounts presented above. Self-insurance liabilities have been classified as current in
accordance with the estimated timing of the projected payments.
Secured Borrowings
Occasionally, the Company enters into secured borrowing arrangements in connection with
customer financing in order to provide additional sources of funding. As of October 3, 2008, the
Company had no secured borrowing arrangements. As of March 28, 2008, the Company had one secured
borrowing arrangement, under which the Company pledged a note receivable from a customer to serve
as collateral for the obligation under the borrowing arrangement. In the first quarter of fiscal
year 2009, the Company paid all obligations related to its secured borrowing totaling $4.7 million
plus accrued interest.
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, due to a payment default, the Company wrote down
the note receivable by approximately $5.3 million related to the principal and interest accrued to
date. Pursuant to a notes receivable insurance arrangement which provides for the recovery of
certain principal and interest amounts on the note, the Company has recorded a current asset of
approximately $4.5 million as of March 28, 2008 and October 3, 2008.
Indemnification Provisions
In the ordinary course of business, the Company includes indemnification provisions in certain
of its contracts, generally relating to parties with which the Company has commercial relations.
Pursuant to these agreements, the Company will indemnify, hold harmless and agree to reimburse the
indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, including but not
limited to losses relating to third party intellectual property claims. Historically, to date,
there have not been any costs incurred in connection with such indemnification clauses. The
Companys insurance policies do not necessarily cover the cost of defending indemnification claims
or providing indemnification, so if a claim was filed against the Company by any party the Company
indemnifies, the Company could incur substantial legal costs and damages. A claim would be accrued
when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. At October 3, 2008
and March 28, 2008, no such amounts were accrued.
Minority Interest
Minority interest represents the proportionate share of the equity of the Companys
consolidated majority-owned subsidiary owned by minority shareholders in that subsidiary. This
proportionate share of the equity changes when additional shares of common or preferred stock are
issued or purchased back by the majority-owned subsidiary. Such changes result in a decrease or
increase of the Companys ownership proportion, which results in the Company recording losses or
gains on investment. Minority interest is adjusted for earnings (losses) net of tax attributable to
the minority interest shareholders of the consolidated subsidiary. All earnings (losses), net of
tax, are allocated to the shareholders of the consolidated subsidiary in proportion to their share
of the equity ownership of the consolidated subsidiary. Earnings (losses), net of tax, allocated to
such minority interest shareholders are recorded as minority interest in net earnings of
subsidiary, net of tax, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
In April 2008, the Companys majority-owned subsidiary, TrellisWare, issued additional shares
of preferred stock in which the Company invested $1.8 million in order to retain a constant
ownership interest. As a result of the transaction, TrellisWare also received $1.5 million in cash
proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock to its other principal stockholders.
8
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Common Stock Held in Treasury
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company delivered 94,165 shares of common
stock-based on the vesting terms of certain restricted stock unit agreements. In order for
employees to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements related to the
delivery of common stock underlying these restricted stock unit agreements, the Company repurchased
33,238 shares of common stock with a total value of $1.0 million
during fiscal year 2008. These
repurchased shares of common stock were held in treasury as of October 3, 2008 and March 28, 2008.
Derivatives
The Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge certain
forecasted foreign currency transactions. Gains and losses arising from foreign currency forward
and option contracts not designated as hedging instruments are recorded in interest income
(expense) as gains (losses) on derivative instruments. Gains and losses arising from the effective
portion of foreign currency forward and option contracts that are designated as cash-flow hedging
instruments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as unrealized gains
(losses) on derivative instruments until the underlying transaction affects the Companys earnings
at which time they are then recorded in the same income statement line as the underlying
transaction.
During
the three and six months ended October 3, 2008, the Company settled certain foreign
exchange contracts and in connection therewith recognized a loss of approximately $0.3 million,
recorded in cost of revenues based on the nature of the underlying transactions. During the three
and six months ended September 28, 2007, the Company settled certain foreign exchange contracts and
in connection therewith recognized a gain of less than $0.1 million, recorded in cost of revenues
based on the nature of the underlying transactions. The Company had no foreign currency forward
contracts outstanding as of October 3, 2008 or March 28, 2008.
Stock-Based Payments
The Company records compensation expense associated with stock options, restricted stock unit
awards and other equity based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R). The Company recognizes these compensation costs on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. The Company recognized $2.9
million and $5.0 million of stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended
October 3, 2008, respectively, and $1.9 million and $3.7 million of stock-based compensation
expense for the three and six months ended September 28,
2007, respectively.
The Company recorded incremental tax benefits from stock options exercised and restricted
stock unit awards vesting of $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the six months ended October 3, 2008
and September 28, 2007, respectively, which is classified as part of cash flows from financing
activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. At October 3, 2008, the total
unrecognized estimated compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock
options, restricted stock units, and the employee stock purchase plan was approximately $8.5
million, $15.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. These costs are expected to be recognized
over a weighted average period of 2.5 years, 3.1 years and less than six months, respectively.
Income Taxes
On March 31, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return, and provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. For those
benefits to be
recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by
taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is
greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Companys policy
is to recognize interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of
income tax expense.
Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the
current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is established for the expected future tax
consequences resulting from differences in the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax credit and loss
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not
be realized. Deferred income tax expense (benefit) is the net change during the year in the
deferred income tax asset or liability.
9
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157 (SFAS 157), Fair Value Measurements.
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used
for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008,
the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB
Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurement for
Purpose of Lease Classification of Measurement under Statement 13, which amends SFAS 157 to
exclude accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purpose of lease
classification or measurement under SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases. In February 2008, the
FASB also issued FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the
effective date of SFAS 157 until the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 for all non-financial assets
and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS 157 does not require any
new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various
prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 was effective for financial assets and liabilities,
beginning in fiscal year 2009. Adoption of this statement for non-financial assets and liabilities
is required for an entitys first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2008 (fiscal year 2010
for the Company). The Company adopted this standard for financial assets and liabilities in the
current year without any material impact to its consolidated financial statements. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 157 will have on its consolidated financial statements
and disclosures when it is applied to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are
not measured at fair value on a recurring basis beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 157-3 (FSP 157-3), Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active, to clarify how an entity would
determine fair value in an inactive market. FSP 157-3 is effective immediately and applies to the
Companys financial statements for the quarter ended October 3,
2008. The application of the provisions of FSP 157-3 did
not materially impact the Companys consolidated financial statement disclosures for the period
ended October 3, 2008.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159 (SFAS 159), The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be
measured at fair value. As the Company did not elect to fair value any of its financial instruments
under the provisions of SFAS 159, the adoption of this statement effective March 29, 2008 did not
have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 07-3 (EITF 07-3),
Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services to Be Used in Future Research
and Development Activities. This issue provides that nonrefundable advance payments for goods or
services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities should be
deferred and capitalized. Such amounts should be recognized as an expense as the related goods are
delivered or the related services are performed. The Company adopted this standard in the current
year without any material impact to its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141R). The purpose of issuing the statement is to replace current guidance in SFAS 141 to better
represent the economic value of a business combination transaction. The changes to be effected with
SFAS 141R from the current guidance include, but are not limited to: (1) acquisition costs will be
recognized as expenses separately from the acquisition; (2) known contractual contingencies at the
time of the acquisition will be considered part of the liabilities acquired measured at their fair
value; all other contingencies will be part of the liabilities acquired measured at their fair
value only if it is more likely than not that they meet the definition of a liability; (3)
contingent consideration based on the outcome of future events will be recognized and measured at
the time of the acquisition; (4) business combinations
achieved in stages (step acquisitions) will need to recognize the identifiable assets and
liabilities, as well as non-controlling interests, in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their
fair values; and (5) a bargain purchase (defined as a business combination in which the total
acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the
consideration transferred plus any non-controlling interest in the acquiree) will require that
excess to be recognized as a gain attributable to the acquirer. SFAS 141R will be effective for the
Company in fiscal year 2010. The standard applies prospectively to business combinations for which
the acquisition date is on or after April 4, 2009, except that resolution of certain tax
contingencies and adjustments to valuation allowances related to business combinations, which
previously were adjusted to goodwill, will be adjusted to income tax expense for all such
adjustments after April 4, 2009, regardless of the date of the original business combination. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 141R will have on its consolidated financial
statements and disclosures.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 (SFAS 160), Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB
No. 51. SFAS 160, which changed the accounting
and reporting for business acquisitions and non-controlling interests in subsidiaries. The
standard was issued to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of financial
information provided to investors. Moreover, SFAS 160 eliminates the diversity that currently
exists in accounting for transactions between an entity and non-controlling interests by requiring
they be treated as equity transactions. SFAS 160 will be effective for the Company in fiscal year
2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 160 will have on its consolidated
financial statements and disclosures.
10
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (SFAS 161), Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, which requires
additional disclosures about the objectives of the derivative instruments and hedging activities,
the method of accounting for such instruments under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations,
and a tabular disclosure of the effects of such instruments and related hedged items on our
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for interim
periods beginning subsequent to November 15, 2008, commencing
for the Company with respect to its fourth quarter of fiscal year
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 161 will have on its consolidated
financial statements and disclosures.
Note 2 Revenue Recognition
A substantial portion of the Companys revenues are derived from long-term contracts requiring
development and delivery of complex equipment built to customer specifications. Sales related to
long-term contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting under
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1),
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts. Sales and
earnings under these contracts are recorded either based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to
total estimated costs expected to be incurred related to the contract or as products are shipped
under the units-of-delivery method. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full in the
period in which losses become probable and estimable. Changes in estimates of profit or loss on
contracts are included in earnings on a cumulative basis in the period the estimate is changed.
During the three months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, the Company recorded losses
of approximately $0.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, related to loss contracts. During
the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, the Company recorded losses of
approximately $1.5 million and $3.5 million, respectively, related to loss contracts.
The Company also has contracts and purchase orders where revenue is recorded on delivery of
products in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104), Revenue Recognition. In
this situation, contracts and customer purchase orders are used to determine the existence of an
arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify
delivery. The Company assesses whether the sales price is fixed or determinable based on the
payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or
adjustment, and assesses collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as
determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customers payment history.
When a sale involves multiple elements, such as sales of products that include services, the
entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair
value in accordance with EITF 00-21, Accounting for Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements and
recognized when the applicable revenue recognition criteria for each element has been met. The
amount of product and service revenue recognized is impacted by the Companys judgments as to
whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether sufficient objective and
reliable evidence of fair value exists for those elements. Changes to the elements in an
arrangement and the Companys ability to establish evidence for those elements could affect the
timing of the revenue recognition.
In accordance with EITF 00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs, the
Company records shipping and handling costs billed to customers as a component of revenues, and
shipping and handling costs incurred by the Company for inbound and outbound freight are recorded
as a component of cost of revenues.
Collections in excess of revenues represent cash collected from customers in advance of
revenue recognition and are recorded as an accrued liability.
11
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Contract costs on United States government contracts, including indirect costs, are subject to
audit and negotiations with United States government representatives. These audits have been
completed and agreed upon through fiscal year 2002. Contract revenues and accounts receivable are
stated at amounts which are expected to be realized upon final settlement.
Note 3 Fair Value Measurement
Effective March 29, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value and establishes a hierarchy that categorizes and prioritizes the sources
to be used to estimate fair value. As a basis for categorizing inputs, SFAS 157 establishes the
following hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value from market based
assumptions to entity specific assumptions:
|
|
Level 1 Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets at the measurement date. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the
market and significant to the instruments valuation. |
The following table presents the Companys hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of October 3, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
71,934 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
71,826 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
71,934 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
71,826 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following section describes the valuation methodologies the Company uses to measure
financial instruments at fair value:
Cash equivalents The Companys cash equivalents consist of money market funds, repurchase
agreements with a one day term collateralized by AAA-rated United States government securities and
certified deposit investments. Certain money market funds are valued using quoted prices for
identical assets in an active market with sufficient volume and frequency of transactions (Level
1). The remaining portion of money market funds, repurchase agreements and certified deposit
investments are valued based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in
markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), or brokers
model driven valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be obtained from or
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets (Level 2).
The Company had no foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding at October 3, 2008.
Note 4 Earnings Per Share
Potential common stock of 1,394,686 and 2,035,595 shares for the three months ended October 3,
2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively, and 1,256,262 and 2,152,570 shares for the six months
ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively, were included in the calculation of
diluted earnings per share. Antidilutive shares excluded from the
calculation were 1,652,275 and
927,616 shares for the three months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively, and
1,781,726 and 893,659 shares for the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007,
respectively. Potential common stock includes options granted and restricted stock units awarded
under the Companys equity compensation plan which are included in the earnings per share
calculations using the treasury stock method and common shares expected to be issued under the
Companys employee stock purchase plan.
12
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 5 Composition of Certain Balance Sheet Captions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
March 28, 2008 |
|
Accounts receivable, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billed |
|
$ |
82,816 |
|
|
$ |
92,516 |
|
Unbilled |
|
|
75,206 |
|
|
|
63,278 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,844 |
|
|
$ |
155,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
26,869 |
|
|
$ |
21,091 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
13,249 |
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
19,642 |
|
|
|
30,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,760 |
|
|
$ |
60,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
$ |
8,048 |
|
|
$ |
9,537 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,083 |
|
|
|
6,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,131 |
|
|
$ |
15,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment (estimated useful life 2-5 years) |
|
$ |
55,636 |
|
|
$ |
51,067 |
|
Computer equipment and software (estimated useful life 3 years) |
|
|
46,172 |
|
|
|
43,700 |
|
Furniture and fixtures (estimated useful life 7 years) |
|
|
9,907 |
|
|
|
9,192 |
|
Leasehold improvements (estimated useful life 1-11 years) |
|
|
16,107 |
|
|
|
13,849 |
|
Land |
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
Satellite under construction |
|
|
51,010 |
|
|
|
8,136 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
5,503 |
|
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,459 |
|
|
|
132,569 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(75,537 |
) |
|
|
(67,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
111,922 |
|
|
$ |
64,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other acquired intangible assets, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology |
|
$ |
44,392 |
|
|
$ |
44,392 |
|
Contracts and relationships |
|
|
18,898 |
|
|
|
18,898 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
9,076 |
|
|
|
9,076 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
9,323 |
|
|
|
9,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,689 |
|
|
|
81,689 |
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(60,892 |
) |
|
|
(56,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,797 |
|
|
$ |
25,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized software costs, net |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
1,091 |
|
Patents, orbital slots and other licenses, net |
|
|
3,487 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
11,027 |
|
|
|
10,169 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,255 |
|
|
|
4,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,954 |
|
|
$ |
18,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of warranty reserve |
|
$ |
7,053 |
|
|
$ |
6,550 |
|
Secured borrowing and accrued interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
Accrued vacation |
|
|
9,805 |
|
|
|
9,374 |
|
Accrued wages and performance compensation |
|
|
9,462 |
|
|
|
4,867 |
|
Collections in excess of revenues |
|
|
22,009 |
|
|
|
37,252 |
|
Other |
|
|
8,919 |
|
|
|
10,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,248 |
|
|
$ |
73,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued warranty |
|
$ |
5,479 |
|
|
$ |
5,129 |
|
Unrecognized tax position liabilities |
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
|
5,974 |
|
Deferred rent, long-term portion |
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
|
4,387 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,585 |
|
|
$ |
17,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 6 Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for its goodwill under SFAS No. 142 (SFAS 142), Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. The SFAS 142 goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. First, it
requires a comparison of the book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units that
have goodwill assigned to them. Reporting units within the Companys government systems and
commercial network segments have goodwill assigned to them. The Company estimates the fair values
of the reporting units using discounted cash flows. The cash flow forecasts are adjusted by an
appropriate discount rate in order to determine the present value of the cash flows. If the fair
value is determined to be less than book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of
the impairment. In this process, a fair value for goodwill is estimated, based in part on the fair
value of the operations used in the first step, and is compared to its carrying value. The
shortfall of the fair value below carrying value, if any, represents the amount of goodwill
impairment.
The Company will continue to make assessments of impairment on an annual basis in the fourth
quarter of its fiscal year or more frequently if specific triggering events occur. In assessing the
value of goodwill, the Company must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and
other factors to determine the fair value of the reporting units. If these estimates or their
related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges
that would negatively impact operating results.
The other acquired intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their
estimated useful lives of eight months to ten years. The technology intangible asset has several
components with estimated useful lives of five to nine years, contracts and relationships
intangible asset has several components with estimated useful lives of three to ten years,
non-compete agreements have useful lives of three to five years and other amortizable assets have
several components with original estimated useful lives of eight months to ten years. Amortization
expense was $2.3 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended October 3, 2008 and September
28, 2007, respectively, and $4.7 million and $4.8 million for the six months ended October 3, 2008
and September 28, 2007, respectively.
Current and expected amortization expense for each of the following periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amortization |
|
For the six months ended October 3, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2009 |
|
$ |
4,141 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2010 |
|
|
5,588 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2011 |
|
|
4,826 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2012 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2013 |
|
|
1,047 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 Line of Credit
On January 31, 2005, the Company entered into a three-year, $60.0 million revolving credit
facility (the Prior Facility) in the form of the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Loan
Agreement. On September 25, 2008, the Company signed the Sixth Amendment to the Second Amended and
Restated Revolving Loan Agreement reducing the Prior Facilitys size to $40.0 million and extending
the current term to October 31, 2008. At October 3, 2008, the Company had $5.2
million outstanding under standby letters of credit, leaving borrowing availability under the Prior
Facility of $34.8 million. The Company was in compliance with its financial loan covenants under
the Prior Facility as of October 3, 2008.
On October 31, 2008, the Company entered into a three-year, $85.0 million revolving credit
facility (the New Facility) in the form of the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement.
The New Facility amends and restates the Prior Facility. Borrowings under the New Facility are
permitted up to a maximum amount of $85.0 million, including up to $25.0 million of letters of
credit, and bear interest, at the Companys option, at either (a) the higher of the Federal Funds
rate plus 0.50% or the administrative agents prime rate as announced from time to time, or (b) at
the London interbank offered rate plus, in the case of each of (a) and (b), an
applicable margin that is based on the ratio of the Companys debt to EBITDA. As with the
Prior Facility, the New Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Companys personal
property.
14
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The New Facility contains financial covenants regarding a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum
interest coverage ratio. In addition the New Facility contains covenants that restrict, among
other things, the Companys ability to incur additional debt, sell assets, make investments and
acquisitions, make capital expenditures, grant liens, pay dividends and make certain other
restricted payments.
Note 8 Product Warranty
The Company provides limited warranties on most of its products for periods of up to five
years. The Company records a liability for its warranty obligations
when products are shipped or they are included in long-term
construction contracts based
upon an estimate of expected warranty costs. Amounts expected to be incurred within 12 months are
classified as a current liability. For mature products, the warranty cost estimates are based on
historical experience with the particular product. For newer products that do not have a history of
warranty costs, the Company bases its estimates on its experience with the technology involved and
the types of failures that may occur. It is possible that the Companys underlying assumptions will
not reflect the actual experience and in that case, future adjustments will be made to the recorded
warranty obligation. The following table reflects the change in the Companys warranty accrual
during the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
September 28, 2007 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
11,679 |
|
|
$ |
9,863 |
|
Change in liability for warranties issued in period |
|
|
4,828 |
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period |
|
|
(3,975 |
) |
|
|
(2,709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
12,532 |
|
|
$ |
11,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary
course of business. While the outcome of such matters is not presently determinable, the Company
believes that the resolution of such matters will not have a material
adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity; however, there can be
no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material impact on its
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity in
any period.
Note 10 Income Taxes
The Company currently estimates its annual effective income tax rate to be approximately 22.3%
for fiscal year 2009, as compared to the actual 28.1% effective income tax rate in fiscal year
2008. The income tax provision of approximately 5.2% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 was
lower than the expected annual effective tax rate primarily due to the recording of research and
development tax credits allowed for in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 by the Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, enacted on October 3, 2008, extending the research and
development tax credit from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009. In the first quarter of fiscal
year 2009, the Companys estimated annual effective income tax rate did not include the effect of
the extension of the research and development tax credit, which resulted in a catch-up adjustment
of approximately $0.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. Also as a result of the
extension of the research and development tax credit, approximately $0.9 million of research and
development tax credit generated in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 was recognized as a
discrete tax benefit in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.
For the three and six months ended October 3, 2008, the Companys gross unrecognized tax
benefits increased by $1.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively. In the next 12 months it is
reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by $0.9 million as a
result of the expiration of the statute of limitations for previously filed tax returns.
15
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 11 Segment Information
The Companys government systems, commercial networks and satellite services segments are
primarily distinguished by the type of customer and the related contractual requirements. The more
regulated government environment is subject to unique contractual requirements and possesses
economic characteristics which differ from the commercial networks and satellite services segments.
During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2008, the Company made management and
organizational structure changes due to a shift in product marketing and development strategies and
consequently realigned the way management organizes and evaluates financial information internally
for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The Companys satellite services segment
is comprised of its expanding maritime and airline broadband and enterprise VSAT services plus its
ViaSat-1 satellite. The Companys commercial networks segment comprises its former satellite
networks and antenna systems segments, except for the satellite services segment. The Companys
reporting segments, comprised of the government systems, commercial networks and satellite services
segments, are determined consistently with the way management currently organizes and evaluates
financial information internally for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The
following segment information reflects prior periods recast to this organizational and reporting
structure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
September 28, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
September 28, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
97,302 |
|
|
$ |
79,848 |
|
|
$ |
185,947 |
|
|
$ |
150,482 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
59,208 |
|
|
|
65,147 |
|
|
|
122,156 |
|
|
|
121,342 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
4,138 |
|
|
|
3,363 |
|
Elimination of intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
159,280 |
|
|
|
146,625 |
|
|
|
312,241 |
|
|
|
275,187 |
|
Operating profits (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems |
|
|
13,286 |
|
|
|
11,865 |
|
|
|
25,383 |
|
|
|
18,046 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
(920 |
) |
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
3,799 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
(767 |
) |
|
|
(806 |
) |
|
|
(2,825 |
) |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
Elimination of intersegment operating profits |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit before corporate and amortization |
|
|
11,586 |
|
|
|
13,365 |
|
|
|
23,102 |
|
|
|
20,570 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
(2,340 |
) |
|
|
(2,391 |
) |
|
|
(4,680 |
) |
|
|
(4,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
9,303 |
|
|
$ |
10,864 |
|
|
$ |
18,460 |
|
|
$ |
15,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles by segment for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 and
September 28, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
September 28, 2007 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
September 28, 2007 |
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
$ |
544 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
2,119 |
|
|
|
4,136 |
|
|
|
4,240 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization of intangibles |
|
$ |
2,340 |
|
|
$ |
2,391 |
|
|
$ |
4,680 |
|
|
$ |
4,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets identifiable to segments include: accounts receivable, unbilled accounts receivable,
inventory, acquired intangible assets and goodwill. Segment assets as of October 3, 2008 and March
28, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
March 28, 2008 |
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
150,527 |
|
|
$ |
139,979 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
152,460 |
|
|
|
166,858 |
|
Satellite Systems |
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
304,721 |
|
|
|
307,853 |
|
Corporate assets |
|
|
258,569 |
|
|
|
243,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
563,290 |
|
|
$ |
551,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net acquired intangible assets and goodwill included in segment assets as of October 3, 2008 and
March 28, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intangible assets |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
|
October 3, |
|
|
March 28, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
3,335 |
|
|
$ |
3,880 |
|
|
$ |
22,191 |
|
|
$ |
22,191 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
17,462 |
|
|
|
21,597 |
|
|
|
44,216 |
|
|
|
44,216 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,797 |
|
|
$ |
25,477 |
|
|
$ |
66,407 |
|
|
$ |
66,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Revenue information by geographic area for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008 and
September 28, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
September 28, 2007 |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
|
September 28, 2007 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
134,070 |
|
|
$ |
121,830 |
|
|
$ |
262,494 |
|
|
$ |
224,032 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
13,140 |
|
|
|
6,537 |
|
|
|
21,997 |
|
|
|
18,987 |
|
Asia, Pacific |
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
7,915 |
|
|
|
15,502 |
|
|
|
15,526 |
|
North America other than United States |
|
|
4,909 |
|
|
|
8,430 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
|
|
13,834 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
2,577 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
159,280 |
|
|
$ |
146,625 |
|
|
$ |
312,241 |
|
|
$ |
275,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company distinguishes revenues from external customers by geographic areas based on
customer location.
The net book value of long-lived assets located outside the United States was $0.3 million at
October 3, 2008 and $0.4 million at March 28, 2008.
Note 12 Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions
Michael Targoff, a director of the Company since February 2003, currently serves as the Chief
Executive Officer and the Vice Chairman of the board of directors of Loral Space & Communications,
Inc. (Loral), the parent of Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (SS/L), and in October 2007 also became a
director of Telesat Holdings Inc., a new entity formed in connection with Lorals acquisition of
Telesat Canada described below. John Stenbit, a director of ViaSat since August 2004, also
currently serves on the board of directors of Loral.
In October 2007, Loral and its Canadian partner, Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP),
through Telesat Holdings Inc., a joint venture formed by Loral and PSP, completed the acquisition
of 100% of the stock of Telesat Canada from BCE Inc. Loral acquired equity interests in Telesat
Holdings Inc. representing 64% of the economic interests and 33 1/3% of the voting interests. PSP
acquired 36% of the economic interests and 66 2/3% of the voting interests in Telesat Holdings Inc.
(except with respect to the election of directors as to which it held a 30% voting interest). In
connection with this transaction, Michael Targoff became a director on the board of the newly
formed entity, Telesat Holdings Inc.
In January 2008, the Company entered into several agreements with SS/L, Loral and Telesat
Canada related to the Companys anticipated high capacity satellite system. Under the satellite
construction contract with SS/L, the Company will purchase a new broadband satellite (ViaSat-1)
designed by the Company and to be constructed by SS/L for approximately $209.1 million, subject to
purchase price adjustments based on satellite performance. In addition, the Company entered into a
beam sharing agreement with Loral, whereby Loral is responsible for contributing 15% of the total
costs (estimated at approximately $60.0 million) associated with the ViaSat-1 satellite project.
The Companys construction contract of the ViaSat-1 satellite with SS/L was approved by the
disinterested members of the Companys Board of Directors, after a determination by the
disinterested members of the Companys Board that the terms and conditions of the purchase were
fair to the Company and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
During the six months ended October 3, 2008, related to the construction of the Companys
anticipated high capacity satellite system, the Company paid $36.1 million to SS/L and had an
outstanding payable as of October 3, 2008 of $10.2 million. As of March 28, 2008, the Company had a
$3.8 million outstanding payable related to SS/L. In the normal course of business, the Company
recognized $0.9 million and $3.7 million of revenue related to Telesat Canada for the three months
ended October 3, 2008 and
September 28, 2007, respectively, and $1.7 million and $6.2 million for the six months ended
October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007. Accounts receivable to Telesat Canada as of October 3, 2008
and March 28, 2008 were $3.0 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our
future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act of 1933 and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions
of our management. We use words such as anticipate, believe, continue, could, estimate,
expect, goal, intend, may, plan, project, seek, should, target, will, would,
variations of such words, and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. In
addition, statements that refer to projections of earnings, revenue, costs or other financial
items; anticipated growth and trends in our business or key markets; future growth and revenues
from our products; anticipated performance of products or services; plans, objectives and
strategies for future operations; and other characterizations of future events or circumstances,
are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are
only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to
predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any
forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited
to, product design flaws or defects; our ability to successfully integrate acquired companies; our
ability to perform under existing contracts and obtain additional contracts; our ability to develop
new products that gain market acceptance; changes in product supply, pricing and customer or end
user demand; changes in relationships with, or the financial condition of, key customers or
suppliers; changes in government regulations; changes in economic conditions globally and in the
communications markets in particular; increased competition; potential product liability,
infringement and other claims; risks associated with owning and operating satellites (including
ViaSat-1, our first broadband satellite); factors affecting the communications industry generally;
and other factors identified elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and in our most recent reports on
Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking
statements for any reason.
Overview
We are a leading producer of innovative satellite and other wireless communications and
networking systems to government and commercial customers. Our ability to apply technologies
between government and commercial customers, combined with our diversification of technologies,
products and customers, provides us with a strong foundation to sustain and enhance our leadership
in advanced wireless communications and networking technologies. Based on our history and extensive
experience in complex defense communications systems, we have developed the capability to design
and implement innovative communications solutions, which enhance bandwidth utilization by applying
our sophisticated networking and digital signal processing techniques. Our goal is to leverage our
advanced technology and capabilities to capture a considerable share of the networking and global
satellite communications equipment and services segment for both government and commercial
customers.
Our internal growth to date has historically been driven largely by our success in meeting the
need for advanced communications products for our government and commercial customers. By
developing cost-effective communications solutions incorporating our advanced technologies, we have
continued to grow the markets for our products and services.
In fiscal year 2008, we announced a change in the composition of our segments to reflect the
realignment of the organization with our recent strategic initiatives. We conduct our business
through three segments: government systems, commercial networks and satellite services. Prior
fiscal year information has been recast to facilitate comparisons to the newly established
reportable segments.
Government Systems
Our government systems business encompasses specialized products principally serving defense
customers and includes:
|
|
|
Data links, including Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) terminals,
MIDS Joint Tactical Radio System (MIDS JTRS) development and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)
technologies, |
|
|
|
|
Information security and assurance products and services, which enable military and
government users to communicate secure information over secure and non-secure networks, and |
|
|
|
|
Government satellite communication systems and products, including UHF DAMA satellite
communications products consisting of modems, terminals and network control systems, and
innovative broadband solutions to government customers to increase available bandwidth using
existing satellite capacity. |
Serving government customers with cost-effective products and solutions continues to be a
critical and core element of our overall business strategy.
18
Commercial Networks
Our commercial networks segment offers an end-to-end capability to provide customers with a
broad range of satellite communication and other wireless communications equipment solutions,
including:
|
|
|
Consumer broadband products and solutions to customers based on DOCSIS® or DVB-RCS
technology, |
|
|
|
|
Mobile broadband products and systems for airborne, maritime and ground mobile broadband
applications, |
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) networks products, |
|
|
|
|
Satellite networking systems design and technology development, and |
|
|
|
|
Antenna systems for commercial and defense applications. |
With expertise in commercial satellite network engineering, gateway construction, and remote
terminal manufacturing for all types of interactive communications services, we have the ability to
take overall responsibility for designing, building, initially operating, and then handing over a
fully operational, customized satellite network serving a variety of markets and applications. In
addition, based on our advanced satellite technology and systems integration experience, we have
developed products addressing five key broadband markets: enterprise, consumer, in-flight, maritime
and ground mobile applications.
Satellite Services
Our satellite services segment encompasses three primary areas: managed broadband services,
mobile broadband services and wholesale bandwidth services. For everyday enterprise networking or
backup protection for primary networks, our managed broadband service provides a combination of
terrestrial and satellite connections through an around-the-clock call center and network
management operation to ensure customer network availability and reliable digital satellite
communications. Our mobile broadband service includes network management services for our customers
who utilize our Arclight-based mobile communication systems or our network management center. In
2008, we began construction of a high speed Ka-band satellite system in order to provide wholesale
broadband and other services over North America. We currently plan to launch this satellite in
early 2011 and introduce service later in 2011.
Sources of Revenues
To date, our ability to grow and maintain our revenues has depended on our ability to identify
and target markets where the customer places a high priority on the technology solution, and our
ability to obtain additional sizable contract awards. Due to the nature of this process, it is
difficult to predict the probability and timing of obtaining awards in these markets.
Our products are provided primarily through three types of contracts: fixed-price,
time-and-materials and cost-reimbursement contracts. Fixed-price contracts, which require us to
provide products and services under a contract at a specified price, comprised approximately 85.3%
and 85.8% of our revenues for the three months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007,
respectively,
and 85.7% and 84.2% of our revenues for the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28,
2007, respectively. The remainder of our annual revenue was derived from cost-reimbursement
contracts (under which we are reimbursed for all actual costs incurred in performing the contract
to the extent such costs are within the contract ceiling and allowable under the terms of the
contract, plus a fee or profit) and from time-and-materials contracts (which reimburse us for the
number of labor hours expended at an established hourly rate negotiated in the contract, plus the
cost of materials utilized in providing such products or services).
Historically, a significant portion of our revenues has been derived from contracts for the
research and development of products. The research and development efforts are conducted in direct
response to the customers specific requirements and, accordingly, expenditures related to such
efforts are included in cost of sales when incurred and the related funding (which includes a
profit component) is included in revenues. Revenues for our funded research and development were
approximately $35.5 million or 22.3% and $28.2 million or 19.2% of our revenues in the three months
ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively. Revenues for our funded research and
development were approximately $64.4 million or 20.6% and $59.7 million or 21.7% of our revenues in
the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively.
19
We also incur independent research and development expenses, which are not directly funded by
a third party. Independent research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and
other personnel-related expenses, supplies, prototype materials, testing and certification related
to research and development programs. Independent research and development expenses were
approximately 4.2% and 5.8% of revenues during the three months ended October 3, 2008 and September
28, 2007, respectively, and 5.3% and 5.7% of revenues during the six months ended October 3, 2008
and September 28, 2007, respectively. As a government contractor, we are able to recover a portion
of our independent research and development expenses pursuant to our government contracts.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and
estimates that affect the amounts reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. We consider the policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of
our financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on
managements judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimation about the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain. We describe the specific risks for these critical accounting
policies in the following paragraphs. For all of these policies, we caution that future events
rarely develop exactly as forecast, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.
Revenue recognition
A substantial portion of our revenues are derived from long-term contracts requiring
development and delivery of complex equipment built to customer specifications. Certain of these
contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting under the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1),
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts. Sales and
earnings under these contracts are recorded based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to date to
total estimated costs expected to be incurred related to the contract or as products are shipped
under the units-of-delivery method.
The percentage-of-completion method of accounting requires management to estimate the profit
margin for each individual contract and to apply that profit margin on a uniform basis as sales are
recorded under the contract. The estimation of profit margins requires management to make
projections of the total sales to be generated and the total costs that will be incurred under a
contract. These projections require management to make numerous assumptions and estimates relating
to items such as the complexity of design and related development costs, performance of
subcontractors, availability and cost of materials, labor productivity and cost, overhead and
capital costs, and manufacturing efficiency. These contracts often include purchase options for
additional quantities and customer change orders for additional or revised product functionality.
Purchase options and change orders are accounted for either as an integral part of the original
contract or separately depending upon the nature and value of the item. Anticipated losses on
contracts are recognized in full in the period in which losses become probable and estimable.
During the three months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, we recorded losses of
approximately $0.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, related to loss contracts. During the
six months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, we recorded losses of approximately $1.5
million and $3.5 million, respectively, related to loss contracts.
Assuming the initial estimates of sales and costs under a contract are accurate, the
percentage-of-completion method results in the profit margin being recorded evenly as revenue is
recognized under the contract. Changes in these underlying estimates due to revisions in sales and
future cost estimates or the exercise of contract options may result in profit margins being
recognized unevenly over a contract as such changes are accounted for on a cumulative basis in the
period estimates are revised.
We believe we have established appropriate systems and processes to enable us to reasonably
estimate future cost on our programs through regular quarterly evaluations of contract costs,
scheduling and technical matters by business unit personnel and management. Historically, in the
aggregate, we have not experienced significant deviations in actual costs from estimated program
costs, and when deviations that result in significant adjustments arise, we disclose the related
impact in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
However, these estimates require significant management judgment and a significant change in future
cost estimates on one or more programs could have a material effect on our results of operations. A
one percent variance in our future cost estimates on open fixed-price contracts as of October 3,
2008 would change our income before income taxes by approximately $0.4 million.
20
We also have contracts and purchase orders where revenue is recorded on delivery of products
in accordance with SAB 104, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 Revenue Recognition. In this
situation, contracts and customer purchase orders are used to determine the existence of an
arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify
delivery. We assess whether the sales price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms
associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment, and
assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by
credit checks and analysis, as well as the customers payment history.
When a sale involves multiple elements, such as sales of products that include services, the
entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair
value in accordance with EITF 00-21, Accounting for Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements, and
recognized when the applicable revenue recognition criteria for each element has been met. The
amount of product and service revenue recognized is impacted by our judgments as to whether an
arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, what sufficient objective and reliable evidence
of fair value exists for those elements. Changes to the elements in an arrangement and our ability
to establish evidence for those elements could affect the timing of revenue recognition.
Accounting for stock-based compensation
We grant options to purchase our common stock and award restricted stock units to our
employees and directors under our equity compensation plans. Eligible employees can also purchase
shares of our common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last
day of each six-month offering period under our employee stock purchase plan. The benefits provided
under these plans are stock-based payments subject to the provisions of revised SFAS 123R,
Share-Based Payment. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123R for the three
months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 was $2.9 million and $1.9 million,
respectively. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123R for the six months ended
October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 was $5.0 million and $3.7 million, respectively. At October
3, 2008, total unrecognized estimated compensation cost including estimated forfeitures related to
non-vested stock options and restricted stock units granted prior to that date, and the employee
stock purchase plan was $8.5 million, $15.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively, which are
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years, 3.1 years and less than six
months, respectively.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
We make estimates of the collectibility of our accounts receivable based on historical bad
debts, customer credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the
allowance for doubtful accounts. Historically, our bad debts have been minimal; a contributing
factor to this is that a significant portion of our sales has been to the United States government.
More recently, commercial customers have comprised a larger part of our revenues. Our accounts
receivable balance was $157.8 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.2 million, and
$155.5 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.3 million, as of October 3, 2008 and
March 28, 2008, respectively.
Warranty reserves
We provide limited warranties on a majority of our products for periods of up to five years.
We record a liability for our warranty obligations when we ship the products based upon an estimate
of expected warranty costs. We classify the amounts we expect to incur within 12 months as a
current liability. For mature products, we estimate the warranty costs based on historical
experience with the particular product. For newer products that do not have a history of warranty
costs, we base our estimates on our experience with the technology involved and the types of
failure that may occur. It is possible that our underlying assumptions will not reflect the actual
experience, and in that case, we will make future adjustments to the recorded warranty obligation.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
We account for our goodwill under SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The SFAS
142 goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the book
value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units that have goodwill assigned to them.
Reporting units within the Companys government systems and commercial network segments have
goodwill assigned to them. If the fair value is determined to be less than book value, a second
step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In this process, a fair value for
goodwill is estimated, based in part on the fair value of the reporting unit used in the first
step, and is compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the value below carrying value, if
any, represents the
amount of goodwill impairment. We test goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter every
fiscal year, and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible
that an impairment may exist.
21
We estimate the fair values of the related operations using discounted cash flows and other
indicators of fair value. We base the forecast of future cash flows on our best estimate of the
future revenues and operating costs, which we derive primarily from existing firm orders, expected
future orders, contracts with suppliers, labor agreements, and general market conditions. Changes
in these forecasts could cause a particular reporting unit to either pass or fail the first step in
the SFAS 142 goodwill impairment model, which could significantly influence whether a goodwill
impairment needs to be recorded. We adjust the cash flow forecasts by an appropriate discount rate
derived from our market capitalization plus a suitable control premium at the date of evaluation.
Property, equipment and satellite
Equipment, computers and software, furniture and fixtures and our satellite are recorded at
cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Costs are capitalized as incurred and for our satellite
include construction, launch and insurance. Satellite construction costs, including launch services
and insurance, are generally procured under long-term contracts that provide for payments by us
over the contract periods. Satellite construction and launch services costs are capitalized to
reflect progress toward completion, which typically coincides with contract milestone payment
schedules. Insurance premiums related to satellite launches and subsequent in-orbit testing are
capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the satellite. Performance incentives
payable in future periods are dependent on the continued satisfactory performance of the satellite
in service.
Impairment of long-lived assets (Property and equipment and other intangible assets)
In accordance with SFAS No. 144 (SFAS 144) Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, we assess potential impairments to our long-lived assets, including property
and equipment and other intangible assets, when there is evidence that events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment
loss when the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset (or group of assets) are
less than the assets carrying value. Any required impairment loss would be measured as the amount
by which the assets carrying value exceeds its fair value, and would be recorded as a reduction in
the carrying value of the related asset and charged to results of operations. We have not
identified any such impairment.
Income taxes
Management evaluates the realizability of our deferred tax assets and assesses the need for a
valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. In accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, net deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on all the available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
On March 31, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty
in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109. FIN
48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be
more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized
is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being
realized upon ultimate settlement.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. In the
ordinary course of business, there are calculations and transactions where the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain. In addition, changes in tax laws and regulations as well as adverse
judicial rulings could adversely affect the income tax provision. We believe we have adequately
provided for income tax issues not yet resolved with federal, state and foreign tax authorities.
However, if these provided amounts prove to be more than what is necessary, the reversal of the
reserves would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period in which we determine that
provision for the liabilities is no longer necessary. If an ultimate tax assessment exceeds our
estimate of tax liabilities, an additional charge to expense would result.
22
Results of Operations
The following table presents, as a percentage of total revenues, income statement data for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
September 28, 2007 |
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
September 28, 2007 |
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
72.5 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
73.0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Independent research and development |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Net income |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Three Months Ended October 3, 2008 vs. Three Months Ended September 28, 2007
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
159.3 |
|
|
$ |
146.6 |
|
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
The increase in revenues from $146.6 million to $159.3 million during the second quarter of
fiscal year 2009 when compared to the same period last year was due to higher customer awards
received during the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 of $255.5 million compared to $189.5 million
in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, and the conversion of a portion of those awards into
revenues. Revenue increases in our government systems segment, which increased by $17.5 million and
our satellite service segment, which increased by $1.1 million, were offset by decreases in our
commercial networks segment of $5.9 million. The revenue increase in our government systems segment
was primarily derived from higher sales of $12.7 million from information assurance products and
related development programs and $4.0 million in next generation military satellite communication
systems. Our commercial networks segment revenue decrease was primarily due to a reduction in
sales of consumer broadband products of $10.3 million and a $2.3 million decrease in sales of our
enterprise VSAT products, offset by an increase in sales of $6.7 million related to our mobile
satellite systems.
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
115.6 |
|
|
$ |
104.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
72.5 |
% |
|
|
71.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in quarterly cost of revenues from $104.5 million to $115.6 million was primarily
due to our increased revenues. We also experienced an increase in cost of revenues as a percentage
of revenues from 71.3% to 72.5%. This increase was primarily due to product cost increases of $1.6
million in our government systems segment spread across various products groups and an increase in
cost of revenues of approximately $1.7 million in our consumer broadband products principally from
lower margin broadband development programs, offset by product cost reductions of $0.8 million in
our antenna products through improved overall program performance year over year. Cost of revenues
for the three months ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 included approximately $0.7
million and $0.5 million respectively, in stock-based compensation expense.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
20.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
The increase in selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses from $20.4 million to
$25.4 million during the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 when compared to the second quarter of
fiscal year 2008 was primarily attributable to higher support costs of approximately $1.4 million
and higher selling and proposal costs of approximately $3.0 million for new contract awards. In
addition, approximately $1.9 million in stock-based compensation expense was recorded for the three
months ended October 3, 2008 versus $1.3 million for the same period in the prior fiscal year. SG&A
expenses consisted primarily of personnel costs and expenses for business development, marketing
and sales, bid and proposal, facilities, finance, contract administration and general management.
Some SG&A expenses are difficult to predict and vary based on specific government, commercial and
satellite service sales opportunities.
Independent research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Independent research and development |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(21.1 |
)% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
decrease in independent research and development (IR&D) expenses
reflected a year over year
decrease from the commercial networks segment of approximately $1.7 million and the government
systems segment of approximately $0.1 million. The lower IR&D expenses were principally due to a
shift of some of our efforts from internal development projects to customer funded development.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
We amortize our intangible assets from prior acquisitions over their estimated useful lives
ranging from eight months to ten years. Amortization of intangible assets will decrease each year
as the intangible assets with shorter lives become fully amortized. Current and expected
amortization expense for each of the following periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amortization |
|
For the six months ended October 3, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2009 |
|
$ |
4,141 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2010 |
|
|
5,588 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2011 |
|
|
4,826 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2012 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2013 |
|
|
1,047 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
Interest income decreased to $0.6 million for the three months ended October 3, 2008 from $1.5
million for the three months ended September 28, 2007 due to lower interest rates on our
investments and lower average invested cash balances for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2008.
Interest expense
Interest expense decreased to less than $0.1 million for the three months ended October 3,
2008 compared to $0.2 million for the three months ended September 28, 2007. Commitment fees on our
line of credit availability remained relatively the same for each period. We had no outstanding
borrowings under our line of credit at October 3, 2008 or September 28, 2007.
24
Provision for income taxes
We currently estimate our annual effective income tax rate to be approximately 22.3% for
fiscal year 2009, as compared to the actual 28.1% effective income tax rate in fiscal year 2008.
The income tax provision of approximately 5.2% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 was lower
than the expected annual effective tax rate primarily due to the recording of research and
development tax credits allowed for in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 by the Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, enacted on October 3, 2008, extending the research and
development tax credit from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009. In the first quarter of fiscal
year 2009, our estimated annual effective income tax rate did not include the effect of the
extension of the research and development tax credit, which resulted in a catch-up adjustment of
approximately $0.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. Also as a result of the
extension of the research and development tax credit, approximately $0.9 million of research and
development tax credit generated in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 was recognized as a
discrete item in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Our Segment Results for the Three Months Ended October 3, 2008 vs. Three Months Ended September 28,
2007
Government Systems Segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
97.3 |
|
|
$ |
79.8 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
% |
Our government systems segment revenues increased in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
when compared to the same period last year primarily due to higher customer awards of $157.3
million in second quarter of fiscal year 2009 compared to $122.3 million in second quarter of
fiscal year 2008, and the conversion of a portion of those awards into revenues. The $17.5 million
revenue increase was comprised of higher sales of $12.7 million of information assurance products
and development programs and $4.0 million in next generation military satellite communication
systems.
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our government systems segment operating profits increased in the second quarter of fiscal
year 2009 when compared to the same period last year primarily due to increased revenues of $17.5 million
offset by growth in SG&A expense of approximately $2.6 million from selling and support costs,
product cost increases of $1.6 million spread across various products groups, and additional
non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million.
Commercial Networks Segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
$ |
65.1 |
|
|
$ |
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
)% |
Our commercial networks segment revenues decreased in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
when compared to the same period of fiscal year 2008 primarily due to a $10.3 million reduction in
consumer broadband product sales and a $2.3 million decrease in sales from our enterprise VSAT
products, offset by increased sales of $6.7 million related to mobile satellite systems.
25
Segment operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Operating profit (loss) |
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(139.9 |
)% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our commercial networks segment operating profit decreased to a loss in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2009 when compared to the same period of fiscal year 2008 primarily due to lower
revenue and associated margins, product cost increases of $1.7 million in our consumer broadband
products from lower margin broadband development programs, offset by product cost reductions of
$0.8 million in our antenna products through improved overall program performance year over year.
Our commercial networks segment experienced growth in SG&A expense of approximately $2.5 million
primarily due to higher selling and support costs and recorded additional non-cash stock-based
compensation expense of $0.4 million.
Satellite Services Segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
% |
Our satellite services segment revenues increased during the second quarter of fiscal year
2009 when compared to the same period of fiscal year 2008 due to growth in our service arrangements
supporting both the mobile broadband and enterprise managed networks services markets.
Segment operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
)% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
(27.7 |
)% |
|
|
(49.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our satellite services segment operating losses remained relatively flat in the second quarter
of fiscal year 2009 when compared to the same period last year. This was driven by an increase in
revenue of $1.1 million offset by a $0.7
million increase in SG&A expense due to higher selling and support costs.
Six Months Ended October 3, 2008 vs. Six Months Ended September 28, 2007
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
312.2 |
|
|
$ |
275.2 |
|
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
The increase in revenues from $275.2 million during the first six months of fiscal year 2008
to $312.2 million for the same period in fiscal year 2009 was due to higher customer awards
received during the first six months of fiscal year 2009 of $461.4 million compared to $325.5
million in the same period of fiscal year 2008, and the conversion of a portion of those awards
into revenues. Increased revenues were experienced in all three of our segments: our government
systems segment, which increased by $35.5 million, our commercial networks segment, which increased
by $0.8 million and our satellite services segments, which increased by $0.8 million. The revenue
increase in our government systems segment was primarily derived from higher sales of $24.2 million
in information assurance products and development programs, $10.3 million in next generation
military satellite communication systems, $5.3 million in video data link systems and $1.1 million
from our majority-owned subsidiary, Trellisware. The revenue increases were offset by a decrease
in sales of $5.4 million in next generation tactical data link development. Our commercial
networks segment revenue increase was primarily derived from higher sales of $11.9 million related
to mobile satellite systems and $2.2 million in higher sales from our antenna systems product
groups, offset by a $13.3 million reduction in sales of consumer broadband products. Our satellite
services segment revenue increase of approximately $0.8 million was primarily derived from service
arrangements supporting both the mobile broadband and enterprise managed networks services markets.
26
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
223.6 |
|
|
$ |
200.9 |
|
|
$ |
22.7 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
71.6 |
% |
|
|
73.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of revenues from $200.9 million during the first six months of fiscal
year 2008 to $223.6 million for the same period in fiscal year 2009 was primarily due to our
increased revenues. However, we did experience a slight decrease in cost of revenues as a
percentage of revenues from 73.0% for the first six months of fiscal year 2008 to 71.6% for the
same period in the current year. This improvement was primarily due to product cost reductions of
approximately $2.2 million related to better program performance in our government systems segment
spread across various product groups and better program performance in our antenna systems product
group totaling approximately $2.4 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 compared to
the same period last year. Cost of revenues for the six months ended October 3, 2008 and September
28, 2007 included approximately $1.2 million and $1.0 million respectively, in stock-based
compensation expense. Cost of revenues may fluctuate in future quarters depending on the mix of
products sold and services provided, competition, new product introduction costs and other factors.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in SG&A expenses in the first six months of fiscal year 2009 compared to the same
period of fiscal year 2008 was primarily attributable to higher support costs of approximately $6.6
million, higher selling and proposal costs of approximately $3.4 million for new contract awards
and an increase of approximately $0.8 million in stock-based compensation expense. SG&A expenses
consisted primarily of personnel costs and expenses for business development, marketing and sales,
bid and proposal, facilities, finance, contract administration and general management. Some SG&A
expenses are difficult to predict and vary based on specific government, commercial and satellite
service sales opportunities.
Independent research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Independent research and development |
|
$ |
16.5 |
|
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in IR&D expenses reflects a year-over-year increase in the government systems
segment of approximately $1.3 million for the first six months
of fiscal year 2009 when compared to the same period of fiscal year
2008 offset by a decrease in the commercial networks segment of $0.6 million.
The higher IR&D expenses were principally for the development of next generation information
assurance, data link and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technologies, next generation broadband
equipment, and our recognition of certain opportunities in these markets and the desire to invest
in the development of new technologies to meet these opportunities.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
The intangible assets from prior acquisitions are being amortized over estimated useful lives
ranging from eight months to ten years. Amortization of intangible assets will decrease each year
as the intangible assets with shorter lives become fully amortized. Current and expected
amortization expense for each of the following periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amortization |
For the six months ended October 3, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,680 |
|
|
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2009 |
|
$ |
4,141 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2010 |
|
|
5,588 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2011 |
|
|
4,826 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2012 |
|
|
3,600 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2013 |
|
|
1,047 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
27
Interest income
Interest income decreased to $1.3 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 from
$2.9 million for the same period in fiscal year 2008 due to lower interest rates on our investments
and lower average invested cash balances.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased to $0.2 million for the six months ended October 3, 2008 from
$0.3 million for the same period in fiscal year 2008. Commitment fees on our line of credit
availability remained relatively the same for each period. We had no outstanding borrowings under
our line of credit at October 3, 2008 or September 28, 2007.
Provision for income taxes
We currently estimate our annual effective income tax rate to be approximately 22.3% for
fiscal year 2009, as compared to the actual 28.1% effective income tax rate in fiscal year 2008.
The income tax provision of approximately 20.0% for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 was
lower than the expected annual effective tax rate primarily due to approximately $0.9 million of
research and development tax credit generated in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 recognized
as a discrete tax benefit in the six-month period ended October 3, 2008.
Our Segment Results for the Six Months Ended October 3, 2008 vs. Six Months Ended September 28,
2007
Government Systems Segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
185.9 |
|
|
$ |
150.5 |
|
|
$ |
35.5 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
% |
Our government systems segment revenues increased primarily due to higher customer awards of
$307.2 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2009 compared to $194.0 million in same
period of fiscal year 2008, and the conversion of a portion of those awards into revenues. The
$35.5 million revenue increase was comprised of higher sales of $24.2 million in information
assurance products and development programs, $10.3 million in next generation military satellite
communication systems, $5.3 million in video data link systems and $1.1 million from our
majority-owned subsidiary, Trellisware. The revenue increases were offset by a decrease in sales of
$5.4 million in next generation tactical data link development.
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
18.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government systems segment operating profits increased in the first six months of fiscal year
2009 when compared to the same period of fiscal year 2008 primarily
due to increased revenues of $35.5 million and product cost
reduction of approximately $2.2 million spread across various products groups,
offset by growth in SG&A expense of approximately $4.3 million from higher selling
and support costs and additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million.
28
Commercial Networks Segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
122.2 |
|
|
$ |
121.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
The growth in our commercial networks segment revenues in the first six months of fiscal year
2009 when compared to the same period of fiscal year 2008 was primarily derived from higher sales
of $11.9 million related to mobile satellite systems and $2.2 million from our antenna systems
product groups, offset by a $13.3 million reduction in sales of consumer broadband products.
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(85.3 |
)% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our commercial networks segment operating profit decreased in the first six months of fiscal
year 2009 when compared to the same period of fiscal year 2008 due to higher selling and support
costs of $5.1 million and recorded additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $0.6
million, offset by better program performance in our antenna systems product group totaling
approximately $2.4 million.
Satellite Services Segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
Our satellite services segment revenues increased in the first six months of fiscal year 2009
when compared to the same period last year by approximately $0.8 million. These revenues were primarily derived
from a growth in service arrangement awards supporting both the mobile broadband and enterprise
managed networks services markets.
Segment operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
October 3, |
|
September 28, |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
121.6 |
% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
(68.3 |
)% |
|
|
(37.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in satellite services segment operating losses of $1.6 million in the first six
months of fiscal year 2009 when compared to the same period last year was primarily driven by a
$1.7 million increase in SG&A expense from higher selling and support costs, offset by an increase in revenue of approximately $0.8 million.
Backlog
As reflected in the table below, both funded and firm backlog increased during the first six
months of fiscal year 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
October 3, 2008 |
|
March 28, 2008 |
Firm backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems segment |
|
$ |
328.2 |
|
|
$ |
206.8 |
|
Commercial Networks segment |
|
|
184.3 |
|
|
|
154.5 |
|
Satellite Services segment |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
523.6 |
|
|
$ |
374.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems segment |
|
$ |
283.9 |
|
|
$ |
186.1 |
|
Commercial Networks segment |
|
|
184.3 |
|
|
|
154.5 |
|
Satellite Services segment |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
479.3 |
|
|
$ |
353.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract options |
|
$ |
39.6 |
|
|
$ |
39.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
The firm backlog does not include contract options. Of the $523.6 million in firm backlog,
approximately $214.9 million is expected to be delivered during the remaining six months of fiscal
year 2009, and the balance is expected to be delivered in fiscal year 2010 and thereafter. We
include in our backlog only those orders for which we have accepted purchase orders. Compared to
the last fiscal year, as more of our products have been placed into market, we have seen a greater
percentage of awards from book and ship-type orders, resulting in backlog growth rate that is
relatively lower than the previous three fiscal years.
Total new awards for commercial, government and satellite services products were $255.5
million and $461.4 million for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008, respectively,
compared to $189.5 million and $325.5 million for the three and six months ended September 28,
2007, respectively.
Backlog is not necessarily indicative of future sales. A majority of our contracts can be
terminated at the convenience of the customer since orders are often made substantially in advance
of delivery, and our contracts typically provide that orders may be terminated with limited or no
penalties. In addition, purchase orders may present product specifications that would require us to
complete additional product development. A failure to develop products meeting such specifications
could lead to a termination of the related purchase order.
The backlog amounts as presented are comprised of funded and unfunded components. Funded
backlog represents the sum of contract amounts for which funds have been specifically obligated by
customers to contracts. Unfunded backlog represents future amounts that customers may obligate over
the specified contract performance periods. Our customers allocate funds for expenditures on
long-term contracts on a periodic basis. Our ability to realize revenues from contracts in backlog
is dependent upon adequate funding for such contracts. Although we do not control the funding of
our contracts, our experience indicates that actual contract fundings have ultimately been
approximately equal to the aggregate amounts of the contracts.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our operations to date primarily with cash flows from operations, bank line
of credit financing and equity financing. The general cash needs of our government systems,
commercial networks and satellite services segments can vary significantly and depend on the type
and mix of contracts in backlog (i.e., product or service, development or production, and timing of
payments), the quality of the customer (i.e., United States government or commercial, domestic or
international) and the duration of the contract. In addition, for all three of our segments,
program performance significantly impacts the timing and amount of cash flows. If a program is
performing and meeting its contractual requirements, then the cash flow requirements are usually
lower.
The cash needs of the government systems segment tend to be more a function of the type of
contract rather than customer quality. Also, United States government procurement regulations tend
to restrict the timing of cash payments on the contract. In the commercial networks and satellite
services segments, our cash needs are driven primarily by the quality of the customer and the type
of contract. The quality of the customer will typically affect the specific contract cash flow and
whether financing instruments are required by the customer. In addition, the commercial networks
and satellite services environment tends to provide for more flexible payment terms with customers,
including advance payments. The satellite services segment is currently funding construction of a
satellite and the related costs will require significant capital investment.
Cash provided by operating activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 was $18.4
million as compared to $37.7 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2008. The $19.3
million decrease in cash provided by operating activities for the first six months of fiscal year
2009 as compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2008 was primarily attributable to a year
over year net increase in cash used for net operating assets of $22.9 million, offset by higher year
over year net income of $2.8 million. Combined billed and unbilled accounts receivable, net, increased
by $2.4 million due to collections made in our commercial networks segment spread across
various consumer satellite networks customers, offset by new sales and increased unbilled accounts
receivable in our government systems segment spread across various customers. Collections in excess
of revenue included in accrued liabilities decreased approximately $15.2 million as we progress
towards completion of certain larger development projects and as we record the related revenues, as
well as the timing of any additional milestones billings.
30
Cash used in investing activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 was $52.9
million as compared to $19.1 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2008. The increase in
cash used in investing activities primarily relates to capital expenditures related to the
construction of our ViaSat-1 satellite of approximately $36.5 million and other additional capital
expenditures for equipment of approximately $14.1 million for the first six months of fiscal year
2009 compared to approximately $9.3 million of capital expenditures for the same period of fiscal
year 2008. In addition, cash used in investing activities for the first six months of fiscal year
2009 included, in connection with the terms of our JAST acquisition, the cash payment of the
remaining portion of the initial purchase price of approximately $0.8 million on the first
anniversary of the closing date. Cash used in investing activities for the first six months of
fiscal year 2008 included $8.7 million paid in cash to certain former Efficient Channel Coding,
Inc. (ECC) stockholders under the terms of the acquisition
agreement for ECC, $0.9 million in cash
paid for the acquisition of JAST on the closing date under the terms of the JAST acquisition
agreement, and $0.3 million paid in cash to former stockholders of Enerdyne Technologies, Inc.
(Enerdyne) under the terms of the Enerdyne acquisition agreement.
Cash provided by financing activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 was $0.6
million as compared to cash provided by financing activities for the first six months of fiscal
year 2008 of $5.8 million. The approximate $5.2 million decrease in cash inflows for the first six
months of fiscal year 2009 compared to the same period of fiscal year 2008 is primarily related to
the $4.7 million repayment of our secured borrowing at the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal
year 2009, offset by $1.5 million in cash receipts related to the sale of stock in a majority-owned
subsidiary. During April 2008, our majority-owned subsidiary, TrellisWare, issued additional shares
of preferred stock and received $1.5 million in cash proceeds from other principal shareholders. We
also invested $1.8 million in order to maintain the level of our percentage ownership interest. In
addition, cash provided by financing activities for both periods included cash received from the
exercise of employee stock options, stock purchases through our employee stock purchase plan and
cash inflows related to the incremental tax benefit from stock option exercises.
In January 2008, we entered into several agreements with Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (SS/L),
Loral Space & Communications, Inc. (Loral) and Telesat Canada (Telesat) related to our high
capacity satellite system. Under the satellite construction contract with SS/L, we will purchase a
new broadband satellite (ViaSat-1) designed by us and to be constructed by SS/L for approximately
$209.1 million, subject to purchase price adjustments based on satellite performance. The total
cost of the satellite is $246.0 million, but, as part of the satellite purchase arrangements, Loral
executed a separate contract with SS/L whereby Loral is purchasing the Canadian beams on the
ViaSat-1 satellite for approximately $36.9 million (15% of the total satellite cost). In addition,
we entered into a beam sharing agreement with Loral, whereby Loral has agreed to reimburse us for
15% of the total costs associated with launch and launch insurance estimated to be approximately
$23.1 million, and for in-orbit insurance and satellite operating costs post launch.
The projected total cost of the ViaSat-1 project, including the satellite, launch, insurance
and related gateway infrastructure, through satellite launch is estimated to be approximately
$400.0 million, and will depend on the timing of the gateway infrastructure roll-out. We have a
current strategy that would limit our total required investment. Our equity participation would be
similar to our current cash and cash equivalents and the remaining amount may be funded by equity
contributions from outside parties and/or debt collateralized by the satellite. Alternatively, we
believe we have adequate sources of funding for the project, which includes our cash on hand,
available borrowing capacity and the cash we expect to generate over the next few years. We believe
this provides us flexibility to execute this project in an appropriate manner and obtain outside
equity in the range indicated under terms that we consider reasonable.
At October 3, 2008, we had $90.8 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments,
$231.6 million in working capital and no outstanding borrowings under our line of credit. At March
28, 2008, we had $125.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, $248.3
million in working capital and no outstanding borrowings under our line of credit. Our cash and
cash equivalents are held in accounts managed by third party financial institutions. To date, we
have experienced no loss of access to our cash equivalents; however, there can be no assurance that
access to our cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial
markets.
31
On January 31, 2005, we entered into a three-year, $60.0 million revolving credit facility
(the Prior Facility) in the form of the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement. On
September 25, 2008, we signed the Sixth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Loan
Agreement reducing the Prior Facilitys size to $40.0 million and extending the current term
to October 31, 2008. At October 3, 2008, we had $5.2 million outstanding under standby
letters of credit, leaving borrowing availability under the Prior Facility of $34.8 million. We were
in compliance with our financial loan covenants under the Prior Facility as of October 3, 2008.
On October 31, 2008, we entered into a three-year, $85.0 million revolving credit facility
(the New Facility) in the form of the Third Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement. The New
Facility amends and restates the Prior Facility. Borrowings under the New Facility are permitted up
to a maximum amount of $85.0 million, including up to $25.0 million of letters of credit, and bear
interest, at our option, at either (a) the higher of the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or the
administrative agents prime rate as announced from time to time, or (b) at the London interbank
offered rate plus, in the case of each of (a) and (b), an applicable margin that is based
on the ratio of our debt to EBITDA. As with the Prior Facility, the New Facility is collateralized
by substantially all of our personal property.
The New Facility contains financial covenants regarding a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum
interest coverage ratio. In addition, the New Facility contains covenants that restrict, among
other things, our ability to incur additional debt, sell assets, make investments and acquisitions,
make capital expenditures, grant liens, pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments.
In April 2007, we filed a new universal shelf registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or SEC, for the future sale of up to an additional $200 million of debt
securities, common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants, bringing the aggregate
available under our universal shelf registration statements to up to $400.0 million. The securities may
be offered from time to time, separately or
together, directly by us or through underwriters at amounts, prices, interest rates and other
terms to be determined at the time of the offering.
Our future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including the timing of cash
required for the ViaSat-1 satellite project and any future broadband satellite project we may
engage in, expansion of our research and development and marketing efforts and the nature and
timing of orders. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate possible acquisitions of, or
investments in complementary businesses, products and technologies which may require the use of
cash. We believe that our current cash balances and net cash expected to be provided by operating
activities along with availability under our credit facility will be sufficient to meet our
anticipated operating requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, we may sell additional
debt or equity securities or obtain additional credit facilities to further enhance our liquidity
position. The sale of additional securities could result in additional dilution of our
stockholders. We invest our cash in excess of current operating requirements in short-term,
interest-bearing, investment-grade securities.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth a summary of our obligations under operating leases,
irrevocable letters of credit, purchase commitments and other long-term liabilities for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
For the Fiscal Years Ending |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010-2011 |
|
|
2012-2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
135,004 |
|
|
$ |
6,390 |
|
|
$ |
29,836 |
|
|
$ |
29,750 |
|
|
$ |
69,028 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
5,231 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5,067 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase commitments
including satellite
procurement agreements |
|
|
317,967 |
|
|
|
118,756 |
|
|
|
151,641 |
|
|
|
6,486 |
|
|
|
41,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
458,202 |
|
|
$ |
125,153 |
|
|
$ |
186,544 |
|
|
$ |
36,393 |
|
|
$ |
110,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We purchase components from a variety of suppliers and use several subcontractors and contract
manufacturers to provide design and manufacturing services for our products. During the normal
course of business, we enter into agreements with subcontractors, contract manufacturers and
suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria defined by us or that
establish the parameters defining our requirements. We have also entered into agreements with
suppliers for the construction of and operation of our ViaSat-1 satellite. In certain instances,
these agreements allow us the option to cancel, reschedule and adjust our requirements based on our
business needs prior to firm orders being placed. Consequently, only a portion of our reported
purchase commitments arising from these agreements are firm, non-cancelable and unconditional
commitments.
32
Our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of October 3, 2008 and March 28, 2008 included
$18.6 million and $17.3 million, respectively, classified as Other liabilities. This caption
primarily consists of our long-term warranty obligations, deferred lease credits and long-term
unrecognized tax position liabilities. These remaining liabilities have been excluded from the
above table as the timing and/or the amount of any cash payment is uncertain. See Note 10 of the
notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our income taxes
and related tax positions and Note 8 for a discussion of our product warranties.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair
value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No.
157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value
Measurement for Purpose of Lease Classification of Measurement under Statement 13, which amends
SFAS 157 to exclude accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purpose of
lease classification or measurement under SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases. In February 2008,
the FASB also issued FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the
effective date of SFAS 157 until the first quarter of fiscal 2010 for all non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS 157 does not require any new
fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior
accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 was effective for financial assets and liabilities, beginning
fiscal year 2009. Adoption of this statement for non-financial assets and liabilities is required
for an entitys first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2008 (our fiscal year 2010). We
adopted this standard for financial assets and liabilities in the current year without any material
impact to our consolidated financial statements. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS
157 will have on our consolidated financial statements when it is applied to non-financial assets
and non-financial liabilities that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis beginning in
first quarter of fiscal year 2010.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 157-3 (FSP 157-3), Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active, to clarify how an entity would
determine fair value in an inactive market. FSP 157-3 is effective immediately and applies to our
financial statements for the quarter ended October 3, 2008. The application of the provisions of FSP 157-3 did not
materially impact our consolidated financial statement disclosures for the period ended October 3,
2008.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. As
we did not elect to fair value any of our financial instruments under the provisions of SFAS 159,
the adoption of this statement effective March 29, 2008 did not have an impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
In June 2007, the FASB ratified EITF 07-3, Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for
Goods or Services to Be Used in Future Research and Development Activities. This issue provides
that nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future
research and development activities should be deferred and capitalized. Such amounts should be
recognized as an expense as the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed.
EITF 07-3 is effective for us in fiscal year 2009. We adopted this standard in the current year
without any material impact to the consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, Business Combinations. The purpose of issuing
the statement is to replace current guidance in SFAS 141 to better represent the economic value of
a business combination transaction. The changes to be effected with SFAS 141R from the current
guidance include, but are not limited to: (1) acquisition costs will be recognized as expenses
separately from the acquisition; (2) known contractual contingencies at the time of the acquisition
will be considered part of the liabilities acquired measured at their fair value; all other
contingencies will be part of the liabilities acquired measured at their fair value only if it is
more likely than not that they meet the definition of a liability; (3) contingent consideration
based on the outcome of future events will be recognized and measured at the time of the
acquisition; (4) business combinations achieved in stages (step acquisitions) will need to
recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as non-controlling interests, in the
acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values; and (5) a bargain purchase (defined as a
business combination in which the total acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets
acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus any non-controlling interest
in the acquiree) will require that excess to be recognized as a gain attributable to the acquirer.
SFAS 141R will be effective for us in fiscal year 2010. The standard applies prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after April 4, 2009, except that
resolution of certain tax contingencies and adjustments to valuation allowances related to business
combinations, which previously were adjusted to goodwill, will be adjusted to income tax expense
for all such adjustments after April 4, 2009, regardless of the date of the original business
combination. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 141R.
33
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51.
SFAS 160, which changed the accounting and reporting
for business acquisitions and non-controlling interests in
subsidiaries. The standard was issued to improve the relevance, comparability, and
transparency of financial information provided to investors. Moreover, SFAS 160 eliminates the
diversity that currently exists in accounting for transactions between an entity and
non-controlling interests by requiring they be treated as equity transactions. SFAS 160 will be
effective for us in fiscal year 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 160 will
have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, which requires additional disclosures about
the objectives of the derivative instruments and hedging activities, the method of accounting for
such instruments under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and a tabular disclosure of
the effects of such instruments and related hedged items on our financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for interim periods beginning subsequent to
November 15, 2008, commencing for us with respect to our fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009. We are currently assessing the potential
impact that adoption of SFAS 161 may have on our consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no material off-balance sheet arrangements at October 3, 2008 as defined in Regulation
S-K Item 303(a)(4) other than as discussed under Contractual Obligations above or disclosed in the
notes to our financial statements included in this Quarterly Report or in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended March 28, 2008.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade
accounts receivable, accounts payable, and short-term obligations including the revolving line of
credit. We consider investments in highly liquid instruments purchased with a remaining maturity of
90 days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Our exposure to market risk for
changes in interest rates relates primarily to short-term investments and short-term obligations.
As a result, we do not expect fluctuations in interest rates to have a material impact on the fair
value of these securities.
As of October 3, 2008, there were no foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding. From
time to time, we enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce the foreign currency risk
for amounts payable to vendors in Euros.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving the objective that information in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified and pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. We carried out an evaluation, with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of October 3, 2008, the end of
the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at
the reasonable assurance level as of October 3, 2008.
During the period covered by this Quarterly Report, there have been no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of
business. While the outcome of these matters is not presently determinable, we believe that the
resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity; however, there can be no
assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity in any period.
34
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the risk factors set forth in our Securities and Exchange Commission
filings, including without limitation, our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, we face new risks associated with the recent
turbulence in the financial markets.
Recent U.S. and international market and economic conditions have been challenging,
with tighter credit conditions and slower growth through the second quarter of fiscal
2009. Continued concerns about the systemic impact of inflation, increasing energy costs,
geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit and other macro-economic factors
have contributed to increased market volatility and diminished expectations for the
global economy and increased market uncertainty and instability. Continued turbulence in
U.S. and international markets and economies may adversely affect our liquidity and
financial condition, and the liquidity and financial condition of our customers. If these
market conditions continue, they may result in an adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders held on October 2, 2008 the stockholders voted on
the following three proposals and cast their votes as follows:
Proposal 1: To elect Mark D. Dankberg, Michael B. Targoff and Harvey P. White to serve as Class
III Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
Mark D. Dankberg |
|
|
27,613,353 |
|
|
|
741,588 |
|
Michael B. Targoff |
|
|
20,961,320 |
|
|
|
7,393,621 |
|
Harvey P. White |
|
|
27,650,936 |
|
|
|
704,005 |
|
Proposal 2: To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending April 3, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Not Voted |
|
28,206,267
|
|
142,247
|
|
6,427
|
|
0 |
Proposal 3: To approve an amendment to the 1996 Equity Participation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Not Voted |
|
18,848,790
|
|
5,434,834
|
|
207,216
|
|
3,864,101 |
Item 6. Exhibits
The Exhibit Index on page 37 is incorporated herein by reference as the
list of exhibits required as part of this Quarterly Report.
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
November 10, 2008 |
VIASAT, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ Mark D. Dankberg
|
|
|
Mark D. Dankberg |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald G. Wangerin
|
|
|
Ronald G. Wangerin |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
36
EXHIBIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
Filed |
|
Number |
|
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
|
File No. |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Filing Date |
|
|
Herewith |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Third Amended and
Restated Revolving
Loan Agreement
Dated as of October
31, 2008 |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-21767 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
11/05/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
1996 Equity
Participation Plan
of ViaSat, Inc. (As
Amended and
Restated Effective
October 2, 2008) |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-21767 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
10/02/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Form of Stock
Option Agreement
for the 1996 Equity
Participation Plan
of ViaSat, Inc. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-21767 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10/02/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Form of Restricted
Stock Unit Award
Agreement for the
1996 Equity
Participation Plan
of ViaSat, Inc. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-21767 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
10/02/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Form of Executive
Restricted Stock
Unit Award
Agreement for the
1996 Equity
Participation Plan
of ViaSat, Inc. |
|
|
8-K |
|
|
|
000-21767 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
10/02/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of
Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of
Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certifications
Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section
906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
37