def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
o
|
|
Confidential, For Use of the |
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
Commission Only |
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant
|
|
|
|
(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
o
|
|
to Rule 14a-12 |
|
|
|
|
OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.
(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1. |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
2. |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
3. |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee
is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
4. |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
5. |
|
Total fee paid: |
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration number, or
the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
1. |
|
Amount previously paid: |
|
2. |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
3. |
|
Filing Party: |
|
4. |
|
Date Filed: |
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. |
Notice of Meeting and Management Proxy Circular |
OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.
P.O. Box 2015, Suite 1110
20 Eglinton Avenue West
Toronto, Ontario
M4R 1K8
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To the Shareholders:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. (the Corporation) will
be held at The Toronto Board of Trade Downtown Centre,
4th Floor, 1 First Canadian Place, 77 Adelaide
St. West, Toronto, Ontario on May 15, 2006, at the hour of
4:30 p.m. (Toronto time) for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
1. |
To receive the 2005 Annual Report including the consolidated
financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2005, together with the Auditors Report
thereon; |
|
|
2. |
To elect Directors; |
|
|
3. |
To appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditors of the
Corporation and authorize the Directors to fix their
remuneration; and |
|
|
4. |
To transact such other business as is proper to such meeting or
any adjournment thereof. |
Holders of Class A non-voting shares of the Corporation
are entitled to attend and speak at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. Holders of Class A non-voting shares are not
entitled to vote with respect to the matters referred to
above.
Holders of Class B voting shares who are unable to attend
the meeting in person are required to date, sign and return the
enclosed form of proxy for use by holders of Class B voting
shares. Reference is made to the accompanying Management Proxy
Circular for details of the matters to be acted upon at the
meeting and with respect to the respective voting rights of the
holders of the Class A non-voting shares and the
Class B voting shares.
DATED at Toronto, Ontario this 15th day of March, 2006.
(signed) A.W. OUGHTRED
Secretary
MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
Number | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
i
OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.
MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR
(Note: All dollar amounts expressed herein are U.S. dollars
unless otherwise indicated)
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
This Management Proxy Circular (the Circular) is
forwarded to holders of Class B voting shares (the
Class B Shares) and Class A non-voting
shares (the Class A Shares) of Oppenheimer
Holdings Inc. (the Corporation) in connection with
the solicitation of proxies by the management of the Corporation
from the holders of the Class B Shares (the
Class B Shareholders)for use at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation (the
Meeting) to be held on May 15, 2006, at the
hour of 4:30 p.m. (Toronto time) at The Toronto Board of
Trade Downtown Centre, 4th Floor, 1 First Canadian
Place, 77 Adelaide St. West, Toronto, Ontario and at
any adjournments thereof for the purposes set forth in the
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Notice of
Meeting) which accompanies this Circular. This Circular is
dated March 15, 2006, and is first being mailed to
Shareholders on or about March 28, 2006.
The record date for the determination of shareholders entitled
to receive notice of the meeting is March 24, 2006. In
accordance with the provisions of the Canada Corporations
Act the Corporation will prepare a list of holders of the
Class B Shareholders as of the record date. Class B
Shareholders named in the list will be entitled to vote the
Class B Shares on all matters to be voted on at the Meeting
except to the extent that (a) the Class B Shareholder
has transferred any of the shareholders Class B
Shares after the record date and (b) the transferee of
those shares produces properly endorsed share certificates or
otherwise establishes that the transferee owns such shares and
demands, not later than immediately before a vote on any matter,
that the transferees name be included in the list, in
which case the transferee of the Class B Shares will be
entitled to vote such shares at the Meeting. Holders of
Class A Shares (the Class A Shareholders)
will not be entitled to vote on the matters to be voted on at
the Meeting.
It is planned that the solicitation will be initially by mail,
but proxies may also be solicited by employees of the
Corporation. The cost of such solicitation will be borne by the
Corporation.
No person is authorized to give any information or to make any
representation other than those contained in this Circular and,
if given or made, such information or representation should not
be relied upon as having been authorized by the Corporation. The
delivery of this Circular shall not, under any circumstances,
create an implication that there has not been any change in the
information set forth herein since the date of this Circular.
Except as otherwise stated, the information contained in this
Circular is given as of March 15, 2006.
The Corporation has distributed copies of its Annual Report for
the year ended December 31, 2005, the Notice of the
Meeting, this Circular, and, in the case of Class B
shareholders, a form of proxy for use by the Class B
Shareholders, to intermediaries such as clearing agencies,
securities dealers, banks and trust companies or their nominees
for distribution to non-registered shareholders of the
Corporation whose shares are held by or in the custody of such
intermediaries. Intermediaries are required to forward these
documents to non-registered shareholders. The solicitation of
proxies from non-registered Class B Shareholders will be
carried out by the intermediaries, or by the Corporation if the
names and addresses of Class B Shareholders are provided by
the intermediaries. The cost of such solicitation will be borne
by the Corporation. Non-registered Class B Shareholders who
wish to file proxies should follow the instructions of their
intermediary with respect to the procedure to be followed.
Generally, non-registered Class B Shareholders will either:
(a) be provided with a proxy executed by the intermediary,
as the registered shareholder, but otherwise uncompleted and the
non-registered holder may complete the proxy and return it
directly to the Corporations transfer agent; or
(b) be provided with a request for voting instructions by
the intermediary, as the registered shareholder, then the
intermediary must send to the Corporations transfer agent
an executed proxy form completed in accordance
1
with any voting instructions received by it from the
non-registered holder and may not vote in the event that no
instructions are received.
CLASS A SHARES AND CLASS B SHARES
The Corporation has authorized and issued Class A Shares
and Class B Shares which are equal in all respects except
that Class A Shareholders, as such, are not entitled to
vote at meetings of shareholders of the Corporation unless
entitled to vote by law, pursuant to the Corporations
articles or as may be required by regulatory authorities.
Class A Shareholders are not entitled to vote the
Class A Shares owned or controlled by them on the matters
identified in the Notice of Meeting to be voted on.
Generally, Class A Shareholders are entitled to receive
notices of all meetings of shareholders of the Corporation and
to attend and speak at such meetings. In addition to notices of
shareholders meetings, Class A Shareholders are
entitled to receive all informational documentation sent to the
Class B Shareholders of the Corporation.
Class B Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each
Class B Share held at all meetings of shareholders except
meetings at which only the holders of a specified class of
shares other than the Class B Shares are entitled to vote.
In the event of either a take-over bid or an
issuer bid (as those terms are defined in the
Securities Act of Ontario) being made for the Class B Shares and
no corresponding offer being made to purchase Class A
Shares, the Class A Shareholders would have no right under
the articles of the Corporation or under any applicable statute
to require that a similar offer be made to them to purchase
their Class A Shares.
APPOINTMENT AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES
The persons named in the enclosed form of proxy (the
Management Nominees) are directors and officers of
the Corporation.
Class B Shareholders have the right to appoint persons,
other than the Management Nominees, who need not be a
shareholder to represent them at the Meeting. To exercise this
right, the Class B Shareholder may insert the name of the
desired person in the blank space provided in the form of proxy
accompanying this Circular or may submit another form of
proxy.
Class B Shares represented by properly executed proxies
will be voted by the Management Nominees on any ballot that may
be called for, unless the shareholder has directed otherwise,
(i) for the election of Directors (item 2 in the
Notice of Meeting), and (ii) for the appointment of
auditors and authorizing the directors to fix the remuneration
of the auditors (item 3 in the Notice of Meeting).
It is not intended to use the proxies hereby solicited for the
purpose of voting upon the consolidated financial statements of
the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005, or
the report of the auditors thereon.
Each form of proxy confers discretionary authority with respect
to amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice
of Meeting to which the proxy relates and other matters which
may properly come before such Meeting. Management knows of no
matters to come before the Meeting other than the matters
referred to in the Notice of Meeting. However, if matters which
are not known to the management should properly come before the
Meeting, the proxies will be voted on such matters in accordance
with the best judgment of the person or persons voting the
proxies.
A Class B Shareholder who has given a proxy has the power
to revoke it prior to the commencement of the Meeting by
depositing an instrument in writing executed by the Class B
Shareholder or by the Class B Shareholders attorney
authorized in writing either at the registered office of the
Corporation at any time up to and including the last business
day preceding the day of the Meeting, or any adjournment
thereof, or with the Chairman of the Meeting on the day of the
Meeting or any adjournment thereof or in any other manner
permitted by law. A Class B Shareholder who has given a
proxy has the power to revoke it after the commencement of the
Meeting as to any matter on which a vote has not been cast under
the proxy by delivering written notice of revocation to the
Chairman of the Meeting.
2
A Class B Shareholder who has given a proxy may also revoke
it by signing a form of proxy bearing a later date and returning
such proxy to the Secretary of the Corporation at the registered
office of the Corporation prior to the commencement of the
Meeting.
PARTICULARS OF MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON
|
|
1. |
2005 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS |
The Consolidated Financial Statements and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005, are
included in the Annual Report, which has been mailed to
shareholders with this Circular.
The nominees proposed for election as directors, which were
nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
to the Board of Directors, are listed below under the heading
Directors and Executive Officers. The number of
Directors to be elected at the meeting is seven.
|
|
3. |
APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS |
Management proposes that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP be
reappointed as the independent auditors of the Corporation.
Information with respect to the appointment of auditors appears
below under the heading Principal Accounting Fees and
Services.
Mr. A.G. Lowenthal and Mrs. Olga Roberts have
advised the Corporation that they intend to vote all of the
Class B Shares owned and controlled by them for the matters
referred to in the Notice of Meeting to be voted on at the
Meeting.
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The Board of Directors of the Corporation currently consists of
seven directors to be elected annually. The term of office for
each director is from the date of the meeting at which the
director is elected until the close of the next annual meeting
of shareholders or until his or her successor is duly elected or
appointed, unless his or her office is earlier vacated in
accordance with the
by-laws of the
Corporation.
Pursuant to a Stakeholders Agreement dated December 9, 2002
between the Corporation, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
(CIBC) and others, CIBC has the right to have two of
its designees nominated for election to the Corporations
Board at the Meeting. CIBC has informed the Corporation that it
does not wish to exercise this right at the Meeting.
The Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (the
Committee) has recommended and the directors have
determined that seven directors are to be elected at the
Meeting. Management does not contemplate that any of the
nominees named below will be unable to serve as a director, but,
if such an event should occur for any reason prior to the
Meeting, the Management Nominees reserve the right to vote for
another nominee or nominees in their discretion. The following
sets out information with respect to the proposed nominees for
election as directors as recommended by the Committee, in
accordance with the Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee
Charter (available at www.opco.com). The Committee has reported
that it is satisfied that each of the nominees (who has served
on the Board for the period indicated below) is fully able and
fully committed to serve the best interests of the
Corporations shareholders. The election of the directors
nominated requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of
the Class B shares voted at the meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positions and Offices |
|
|
|
Year | |
|
|
Province/State, | |
|
|
|
held with |
|
Occupation for |
|
Became | |
Name |
|
Country of Residence | |
|
Age | |
|
the Corporation |
|
Previous 5 years |
|
Director | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
J.L. Bitove
|
|
|
Florida, USA |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
Director |
|
Retired Executive |
|
|
1980 |
|
R. Crystal
|
|
|
New York, USA |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director |
|
Partner, Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner LLP
(law firm) |
|
|
1992 |
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positions and Offices |
|
|
|
Year | |
|
|
Province/State, | |
|
|
|
held with |
|
Occupation for |
|
Became | |
Name |
|
Country of Residence | |
|
Age | |
|
the Corporation |
|
Previous 5 years |
|
Director | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A.G. Lowenthal
|
|
|
New York, USA |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation and Oppenheimer |
|
|
1985 |
|
K.W. McArthur
|
|
|
Ontario, Canada |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Lead Director |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, Shurway Capital
Corporation (private investment company) |
|
|
1996 |
|
A.W. Oughtred
|
|
|
Ontario, Canada |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Secretary and Director |
|
Partner, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (law firm) |
|
|
1979 |
|
E.K. Roberts
|
|
|
Ontario, Canada |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
President, Treasurer and Director |
|
President and Treasurer of the Corporation |
|
|
1977 |
|
B. Winberg
|
|
|
Ontario, Canada |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
Director |
|
President, Rockport Holdings Limited (real estate development) |
|
|
1979 |
|
NOTES:
|
|
1. |
There is no Executive Committee of the Board of Directors.
Messrs. J.L. Bitove, K.W. McArthur and B. Winberg
are members of the Audit Committee. Messrs. J.L. Bitove,
K.W. McArthur, B. Winberg and R. Crystal are
members of the Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee.
Messrs. J.L. Bitove and B. Winberg are members of the
Compensation and Stock Option Committee. |
|
2. |
A.W. Oughtred is a director of CI Financial Inc., the shares of
which are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. |
|
3. |
During 2005 15 meetings of the board were held of which all
of the Directors were present at nine, six Directors at four and
five Directors at two meetings. Each of the Directors attended
at least 75% of the Board and Committee meetings held
in 2005. |
|
4. |
The Corporation expects all of the Directors to attend meetings
of shareholders. All of the Directors attended the Annual and
Special Meeting of Shareholders held on May 9, 2005. |
Directors and Officers Insurance
The Corporation carries liability insurance for its directors
and officers and the directors and officers of its subsidiaries.
Between November 30, 2004 and November 30, 2005, the
Corporations aggregate insurance coverage was
$20 million with a $2.5 million deductible at an
aggregate annual premium of $591,000. This coverage was renewed
for a further year effective November 30, 2005 at an
aggregate annual premium of $624,000.
Under the by-laws of the Corporation, the Corporation is
obligated to indemnify the directors and officers of the
Corporation and its subsidiaries to the maximum extent permitted
by the Canada Business Corporations Act. The Corporation has
entered into indemnity agreements with each of its directors
providing for such indemnities.
Directors Compensation
In the year ending December 31, 2005, the Corporation paid
directors fees as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Retainer Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
$15,000 to March 31, 2005 and $17,500 since April 1,
2005 |
Board and Committee Meeting Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,500 per meeting attended in person |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$500 per meeting attended by telephone |
Committee Chairs
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5,000 per year |
Lead Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5,000 per year |
Members of Audit Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,500 per year to March 31 2005 and |
(other than chairman)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5,000 per year since April 1, 2005 |
In 2005, the directors were paid directors fees of
$254,710 in the aggregate. Directors are reimbursed for travel
and related expenses incurred in attending board and committee
meetings. The directors who are not employees of the Corporation
and its subsidiaries are also entitled to the automatic grant of
stock options under the Corporations 1996 Equity Incentive
Plan, as amended, pursuant to a formula set out in the Plan.
4
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Board of Directors has determined that the Audit Committee
includes one financial expert and that Mr. K.W. McArthur,
the financial expert, is independent as that term is used in
Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange
Act. Mr. McArthur is a member of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of British Columbia.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
With respect to the year ended December 31, 2005, the
Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of
Directors (the Committee) was responsible for making
recommendations for approval by the Board of Directors with
respect to the compensation of the Corporations executive
officers. The members of the Committee are John L. Bitove
and Burton Winberg, each of whom are independent directors of
the Corporation and have no interlocking relationship with the
Corporation or its subsidiaries.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth total annual compensation paid
or accrued by the Corporation to or for the account of the
Corporations chief executive officer, chief financial
officer and each of the three most highly paid executive
officers of the Corporation and its subsidiaries,
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (Oppenheimer) and
Oppenheimer Asset Management Inc. (OAM), the
Corporations principal operating subsidiaries, other than
the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, whose
total cash compensation for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 exceeded $100,000 (the Named
Executives).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Occupation |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation (1) | |
|
Options | |
|
Compensation (2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
A.G. Lowenthal,
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,700,000 |
|
|
$ |
31,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
|
Chairman, CEO, and |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
207,568 |
|
|
$ |
27,500 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,525 |
|
|
Director of the Corporation; |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,225,368 |
|
|
$ |
22,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,050 |
|
|
Chairman and CEO, and director of Oppenheimer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.K. Roberts,
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
205,000 |
|
|
$ |
31,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President, Treasurer |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
26,500 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
22,500 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director of the Corporation Treasurer and a director of
Oppenheimer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Neuhoff,
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
260,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
|
Executive Vice |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
260,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,525 |
|
|
President of Oppenheimer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
260,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,050 |
|
Robert Okin (3)
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
848,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
|
Executive Vice President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
780,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,525 |
|
|
of Oppenheimer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
190,256 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,050 |
|
Thomas Robinson (4),
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
|
President of OAM |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,820 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes Directors Fees. |
|
(2) |
This amount represents Corporation contributions to the
Oppenheimer 401(k) Plan. |
|
(3) |
Mr. Okin joined Oppenheimer on January 3, 2003. In
addition to the above compensation, on March 17, 2003
Mr. Okin was awarded 22,222 Class A Shares, which
were issued on January 3, 2006 and priced at $22.50. The
issuance of these conditionally-issued Class A Shares was
confirmed by shareholders on May 12, 2003. |
|
(4) |
Mr. Robinson joined OAM on June 4, 2003. |
5
OPTION GRANTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
The Corporation did not grant any options to the Named
Executives in 2005.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES AND YEAR-END VALUE TABLE
The following table sets forth information with respect to
options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2005
by the Named Executives and as to unexercised options held by
them at December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying unexercised | |
|
Value of unexercised | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Options/SARs | |
|
in-the-money Options/SARs | |
|
|
Acquired | |
|
Value | |
|
at fiscal year end | |
|
at fiscal year end | |
Name |
|
on exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
A.G. Lowenthal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500/262,500 |
|
|
|
0/0 |
|
T. Robinson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500/27,500 |
|
|
|
0/0 |
|
E.K. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500/82,500 |
|
|
|
0/0 |
|
R. Neuhoff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000/50,000 |
|
|
|
0/0 |
|
R. Okin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,500/58,500 |
|
|
|
0/0 |
|
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE
The following report of the Committee discusses generally the
Committees executive compensation objectives and policies
and their relationship to corporate performance in 2005. In
addition, the report specifically discusses the Committees
bases for compensation in 2005 of the Corporations Chief
Executive Officer, as well as the other senior executive
officers of the Corporation and Oppenheimer.
Objectives and Policies
The Committees objective is to provide a competitive
compensation program with appropriate incentives for superior
performance, thereby providing a strong and direct link between
corporate performance and compensation. Performance is defined
in several ways, as more fully discussed below, each of which
has relevance to the Corporations success in the
short-term, long-term or both.
The Corporations compensation program for senior executive
officers consists of the following key elements: a base salary,
an annual bonus, grants of stock options and, in the case of the
Chief Executive Officer, the Performance-Based Compensation
Agreement referred to below.
In arriving at its recommendations concerning the specific
components of the Corporations compensation program, the
Committee considers certain public information about the
compensation paid by a group of comparable public Canadian and
U.S. broker-dealers and the relative performance of the
Corporation as measured by net income levels and earnings per
share, among other factors.
The Committee believes that this approach best serves the
interests of shareholders by enabling the Corporation to
structure compensation in a way that meets the requirements of
the highly competitive environment in which the Corporation
operates, while ensuring that senior executive officers are
compensated in a manner that advances both the short and
long-term interests of shareholders.
Compensation for the Corporations senior executive
officers involves a significant component of remuneration which
is contingent on the performance of both the Corporation and the
senior executive officer: the discretionary annual bonus (which
permits individual performance to be recognized on an annual
basis, and which is based, in significant part, on an evaluation
of the contribution made by the officer to corporate
performance) and stock options (which directly relate a portion
of compensation to stock price appreciation realized by the
Corporations shareholders).
Base Salary. Salaries paid to senior executive officers
(other than the Chief Executive Officer) are reviewed annually
by the Committee considering recommendations made by the Chief
Executive Officer to the Committee, based upon the Chief
Executive Officers assessment of the nature of the
position, and the skills, experience and performance of each
senior executive officer, as well as salaries paid by comparable
companies
6
in the Corporations industry. The Committee then makes
recommendations to the Board with respect to base salaries.
Annual Bonus. Bonuses paid to senior executive officers
(other than the Chief Executive Officer) are reviewed annually
by the Committee considering recommendations made by the Chief
Executive Officer to the Committee, based upon the Chief
Executive Officers assessment of the performance of the
Corporation and his assessment of the contribution of each
senior executive to that performance. The Committee then makes
recommendations to the Board with respect to bonuses. Senior
executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, of
Oppenheimer have the right to elect to defer a portion of their
annual bonus and performance-based compensation under
Oppenheimers Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, a
non-qualified unfunded plan.
Stock Option Grants. Under the Corporations 1996
Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity Incentive Plan),
senior executive officers and employees of the Corporation and
its subsidiaries (other than the Chief Executive Officer) are
granted stock options by the Committee based upon the
recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer and based upon a
variety of considerations, including the date of the last grant
made to the officer or employee, as well as considerations
relating to the contribution and performance of the specific
optionee.
Chief
Executive Officer Compensation
Mr. A.G. Lowenthal, the Chairman of the Board and the Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation and Oppenheimer, is paid a
base salary set by the Committee, plus performance-based
compensation under the Performance-Based Compensation Agreement
referred to below and, at the discretion of the Committee, is
eligible for bonuses and grants of stock options.
On March 15, 2005, the Corporation and Mr. A.G.
Lowenthal entered into an Amended and Restated Performance-Based
Compensation Agreement (the Performance-Based Compensation
Agreement) which replaced an earlier Performance-Based
Compensation Agreement dated January 1, 2001 (the
2001 Agreement) which was due to expire on
December 31, 2005. The Performance-Based Compensation
Agreement was approved by the shareholders of the Corporation at
the annual and special meeting of shareholders held May 9,
2005. The purpose of the Performance-Based Compensation
Agreement is to set the terms under which
Mr. Lowenthals annual performance-based compensation
is to be calculated during the term thereof.
In March of 2005, the Committee established performance goals
under the 2001 Agreement entitling Mr. Lowenthal to a
Performance Award under the 2001 Agreement for the year 2005 of
an aggregate of $2,584,398, determined by the application of a
formula based on the following components: (i) the amount
by which the closing price of one Class A Share at
January 1, 2006, exceeded the closing price of one
Class A Share as at December 31, 2003, multiplied by
200,000 shares; (ii) 5% of the amount by which the
Corporations consolidated profit before income taxes for
the year ended December 31, 2005 exceeded 10% of the amount
of the Corporations restated consolidated
shareholders equity as at December 31, 2004;
(iii) 2.5% of pre tax profit up to $10,000,000, 4% of pre
tax profit in excess of $10,000,000 up to $40,000,000, and 5% of
pre tax profit over $40,000,000; and (iv) $500,000. In
March of 2005, the Committee set Mr. Lowenthals base
salary for 2005 at $500,000. Mr. Lowenthal advised the
Committee that regardless of the Corporations satisfaction
of the 2005 performance goals he would not accept the full
amount of the bonus to which he would be entitled and the
Committee agreed to reduce the amount of his bonus to $1,700,000.
U.S.
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)
The Corporation is a Canadian taxpayer. However, because
Oppenheimer is a U.S. taxpayer, most compensation issues are
affected by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the U.S. Tax Code).
Section 162(m) of the U.S. Tax Code generally disallows a
tax deduction to public corporations for annual compensation of
over $1,000,000 paid to any of the Corporations chief
executive officer and four other most highly paid executive
officers (determined as of the end of each fiscal year) unless
such compensation constitutes qualified performance-based
compensation or otherwise qualifies for an exception.
In order to qualify for exemptions under Section 162(m) in
2001, the 2001 Agreement was adopted and approved by the
Class B Shareholders and in 2005 the Performance-Based
Compensation Agreement was adopted and approved by the
Class B Shareholders.
7
To the extent consistent with the Corporations general
compensation objectives, the Committee considers the potential
effect of Section 162(m) on compensation paid to the
executive officers of the Corporation and its subsidiaries.
However, the Committee reserves the right to award and recommend
the awarding of non-deductible compensation in any circumstances
it deems appropriate. Further, because of ambiguities and
uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of
Section 162(m) and the regulations issued thereunder, no
assurance can be given, notwithstanding the Corporations
efforts to qualify, that the compensation paid by the
Corporation to its executive officers will in fact satisfy the
requirements for the exemption from the Section 162(m)
deduction limit.
Members
of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee
Burton Winberg Chairman
John L. Bitove
Share Performance Graph
The following graph shows changes over the past five year period
of U.S. $100 invested in (1) the Companys
Class A Shares, (2) the Standard & Poors
500 Index, and (3) the Standard & Poors/
Toronto Stock Exchange Composite Index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
Oppenheimer
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
S&P/TSX Composite
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
8
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The authorized capital of the Corporation includes 99,680
Class B Shares all of which are issued and outstanding and
may be voted at the Meeting and an unlimited number of
Class A shares of which 12,631,207 Class A shares
were outstanding as at March 15, 2006.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of each class of shares of the Corporation
as at March 15, 2006, with respect to (i) each person known
by the Corporation to beneficially own, or exercise control or
discretion over, more than 5% of any class of the
Corporations shares, (ii) each of the
Corporations directors, (iii) each of the
Corporations executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table set forth herein and (iv) the directors
and executive officers as a group.
For purposes of the table, beneficial ownership is determined
pursuant to
Rule 13d-3 of the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to
which a person or group of persons is deemed to have
beneficial ownership of shares which such person or
group has the right to acquire within 60 days after
March 15, 2006. The percentage of shares deemed outstanding
is based on 12,631,207 Class A Shares and 99,680
Class B Shares outstanding as of March 15, 2006. In
addition, for purposes of computing the percentage of
Class A Shares owned by each person, the percentage
includes all Class A Shares issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding options held by such persons within 60 days
after March 15, 2006.
There are no outstanding rights to acquire beneficial ownership
of any Class B Shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Shares | |
|
Class B Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Shares | |
|
% | |
|
Shares | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Private Capital Management, L.P.
|
|
|
3,210,574 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIC Limited
|
|
|
788,741 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olga Roberts (1)
|
|
|
324,955 |
|
|
|
2.6% |
|
|
|
44,309 |
|
|
|
44.4% |
|
Executive Officers and Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albert G. Lowenthal (2)
|
|
|
2,859,834 |
|
|
|
22.6% |
|
|
|
50,975 |
|
|
|
51.0% |
|
J.L. Bitove (3)
|
|
|
69,330 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
* |
|
R. Crystal (4)
|
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K.W. McArthur (5)
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Neuhoff (6)
|
|
|
67,807 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Okin (7)
|
|
|
42,654 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.W. Oughtred (8)
|
|
|
22,250 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.K. Roberts (9)
|
|
|
202,344 |
|
|
|
1.6% |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
* |
|
T. Robinson (10)
|
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Winberg (11)
|
|
|
23,150 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers and Directors as a group (9 persons)
|
|
|
3,076,569 |
|
|
|
24.4% |
|
|
|
51,011 |
|
|
|
51% |
|
|
|
* |
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
With respect to the Class B Shares, Mrs. Roberts, who
is the mother of Elaine Roberts, President of the Corporation,
owns 100 Class B Shares directly and 44,209 Class B
Shares indirectly through Elka Estates Limited, an Ontario
corporation (Elka), which is wholly-owned by Mrs.
Roberts. With respect to the Class A Shares,
Mrs. Roberts owns 41,900 Class A Shares directly and
283,055 Class A Shares through Elka. |
|
(2) |
With respect to the Class A Shares, Mr. Lowenthal is
the sole general partner of Phase II Financial L.P., a New York
limited partnership (Phase II L.P.), which is the
record holder of 2,734,430 Class A Shares. Mr.
Lowenthals wife and children are the limited partners of
Phase II Financial L.P. Mr. Lowenthal holds
11,538 Class A Shares through the Oppenheimer 401(k)
plan, and 1,366 Class A Shares directly and
112,500 Class A Shares are beneficially owned in
respect of Class A Shares issuable upon exercise of options
issued under the Equity Incentive. With respect to the
Class B Shares, Phase II, an Ontario corporation
wholly-owned by Mr. Lowenthal, is the holder of record of
all such shares. |
|
(3) |
Mr. Bitove holds 50,480 Class A Shares directly,
100 Class A Shares indirectly through JBs
Investments Inc. and 18,750 Class A Shares are beneficially
owned in respect of Class A Shares issuable upon exercise
of options issued under the Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(4) |
Mr. Crystal owns 3,700 Class A Shares directly
and 1,250 Class A Shares are beneficially owned in
respect of Class A Shares issuable upon exercise of options
issued under the Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(5) |
Mr. McArthur owns 20,000 Class A Shares directly,
29,000 Class A Shares are held through Shurway Capital
and 3,750 Class A Shares are beneficially owned in respect
of Class A Shares issuable on the exercise of options under
the Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(6) |
Mr. Neuhoff owns 50,145 Class A Shares directly,
5,162 Class A Shares through the Oppenheimer
401(k) Plan and 18,750 Class A Shares are
beneficially owned in respect of Class A Shares issuable
upon exercise of options issued under the Equity Incentive Plan. |
9
|
|
(7) |
Mr. Okin owns 29,745 Class A Shares directly,
409 Class A Shares through the Oppenheimer
401(k) Plan and 12,500 Class A Shares are
beneficially owned in respect of Class A Shares issuable
upon exercise of options issued under the Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(8) |
Mr. Oughtred owns 3,500 Class A Shares directly
and 18,750 Class A Shares are beneficially owned in
respect of Class A Shares issuable upon exercise of options
issued under the Equity Incentive Plan. Mr. Oughtreds
wife owns 1,300 Class A Shares directly. |
|
(9) |
Ms. Roberts owns 178,594 Class A Shares directly
and 23,750 Class A Shares are beneficially owned in
respect of Class A Shares issuable upon exercise of options
issued under the Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(10) |
Mr. Robinson owns 6,250 Class A Shares are
beneficially in respect of Class A Shares issuable upon
exercise of options issued under the Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(11) |
Mr. Winberg owns 4,400 Class A Shares directly
and 18,750 Class A Shares are beneficially owned in respect
of Class A Shares issuable upon exercise of options issued
under the Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(12) |
There are no arrangements, known to the Corporation, the
operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change
of control of the Corporation. |
SHARE COMPENSATION PLANS
Equity Incentive Plan
Class A Shares authorized for issuance under the Equity
Incentive Plan, as amended as at December 31, 2005 are as
follows: All Class A Shares authorized under the Equity
Incentive Plan have been approved by the shareholders of the
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Class A |
|
|
|
Number of Class A |
Shares to be issued |
|
Weighted average |
|
Shares remaining |
upon exercise of |
|
exercise price of |
|
available for future |
outstanding options |
|
outstanding options |
|
issuance under the Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
1,775,641
|
|
$27.04 |
|
772,914 |
A description of the Equity Incentive Plan appears in
Note 12 of the Corporations financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2005. The Corporation does not
have any warrants or rights outstanding as at December 31,
2005.
Oppenheimer Employee Share Plan
Class A Shares authorized for issuance under the
Oppenheimer Employee Share Plan (the ESP) as at
December 31, 2005 are as follows: All Class A Shares
authorized for issue under the ESP have been approved by the
shareholders of the Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Class A |
|
|
|
Number of Class A |
Shares to be issued |
|
|
|
Shares remaining |
upon vesting of |
|
Weighted average |
|
available for future |
grants |
|
exercise price of grants |
|
issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
12,407
|
|
$19.59 |
|
737,593 |
Other Share-Based Compensation
Class A Shares issued to certain employees of Oppenheimer
as at December 31, 2005 were as follows: All such
Class A Shares have been approved by the shareholders of
the Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
Number of securities |
to be issued upon |
|
Weighted average |
|
remaining available for |
vesting of grants |
|
exercise price of grants |
|
future issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
31,110
|
|
$22.50 |
|
|
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires the Corporations directors and executive
officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of the Corporations equity securities, to
file by specific dates with the Securities Exchange Commission
(the SEC) initial reports of ownership and reports
of changes in ownership of equity securities of the Corporation.
Officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders
are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Corporation with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. The
Corporation is required to report in this Circular any failure
of its directors and executive
10
officers and greater than ten percent shareholders to file by
the relevant due date any of these reports during the preceding
fiscal year (or, to the extent not previously disclosed, any
prior fiscal year).
To the Corporations knowledge, based solely on review of
copies of such reports furnished to the Corporation during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and representations
made to the Corporation by such persons, all Section 16(a)
filing requirements applicable to the Corporations
officers, directors and greater than ten percent Shareholders
were complied with.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers
The following sets out information with respect to the aggregate
indebtedness of directors and executive officers under
securities purchase and other programs. At December 31,
2005 and since that date none of the directors and the executive
officers of the Corporation were or have been indebted to the
Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financially | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Largest | |
|
Amount | |
|
Assisted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Outstanding as | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Involvement of |
|
Outstanding | |
|
at March 15, | |
|
Purchases | |
|
|
|
Forgiven |
|
|
Company or |
|
During 2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
During 2005 | |
|
Security for |
|
During 2005 |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Subsidiary |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
(#) | |
|
Indebtedness |
|
($) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) | |
|
(d) | |
|
(e) | |
|
(f) |
|
(g) |
Securities Purchase Programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.G. Lowenthal |
|
Oppenheimer Margin Account |
|
$ |
41,250 |
|
|
$ |
6,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margined securities |
|
|
R. Okin
Executive Vice President of Oppenheimer |
|
Oppenheimer Margin Account |
|
$ |
20,489 |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margined securities |
|
|
During the year 2005 certain of the directors, executive
officers and senior officers of the Company, Oppenheimer and OAM
maintained margin accounts with Oppenheimer in connection with
the purchase of securities (including securities of the Company)
which margin accounts are substantially on the same terms,
including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing
from time to time for comparable transactions with
non-affiliated persons and do not involve more than the normal
risk of collectibility.
Other Relationships and Transactions
Robert Lowenthal, the son of A.G. Lowenthal, the Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, is the
head of Information Technology for Oppenheimer. He received a
salary, bonus and other perquisites aggregating $292,000 during
fiscal 2005. In addition, on February 25, 2005, Robert
Lowenthal was awarded options to purchase
5,000 Class A Shares at $23.31 per share under
the Equity Incentive Plan. The Corporation is sponsoring Robert
Lowenthal in the pursuit of an Executive MBA at Columbia
University ($72,000 paid in 2005 is included in the total above).
Andrew Crystal, brother of R. Crystal, a director of the
Corporation, is an Oppenheimer financial advisor and is
compensated on the same basis as other Oppenheimer financial
advisors in comparable circumstances.
As disclosed under Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management, Olga Roberts, the mother
of E.K. Roberts, a director of the Corporation and President and
Treasurer of the Company, owns 324,955 Class A Shares and
44,309 Class B Shares, representing 2.6% of the outstanding
Class A Shares and 44.4% of the outstanding Class B
Shares.
11
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The following information is provided in accordance with the
requirements of Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A of the
Exchange Act, Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served as the auditors of the
Corporation since 1993. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has advised
the Corporation that neither the firm nor any of its members or
associates has any direct financial interest or any material
indirect financial interest in the Corporation or any of its
affiliates other than as accountants.
The fees billed to the Corporation and its subsidiaries by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during the years 2005 and 2004 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit fees
|
|
$ |
975,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,075,000 |
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
All other fees
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
$ |
1,037,500 |
|
|
$ |
1,125,000 |
|
The audit fees include the fees for the audit of the
Corporations annual consolidated financial statements for
the year 2005 and the review of the quarterly financial
statements included in the
Forms 10-Q filed
by the Corporation during the year and the interim reports to
shareholders sent to shareholders during the year. Other
audit-related fees include fees for audits of the
Corporations employee benefit plans. During 2005 and 2004,
the Corporation retained Ernst & Young LLP to provide tax
related services to the Corporation.
The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to
nominate independent auditors for appointment by shareholders,
and to recommend to shareholders that independent auditors be
removed. The Audit Committee has nominated
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for appointment as the
Corporations auditors by the shareholders at the Meeting.
The Audit Committee recommends and the Board approves all audit
engagement fees and terms as well as approves all non-audit
engagements and engagement fees provided by independent
auditors. The process begins prior to the commencement of the
audit. The fees described above were 100% pre-approved.
The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LP as independent
auditors requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of
the Class B Shares voted at the Meeting.
STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
The Class A Shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange
and the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE).
Accordingly, the Corporation is subject to the corporate
governance and disclosure requirements of the Canadian
securities administrators (the CSA), the NYSE
Corporate Governance Rules (the NYSE Rules) and the
United States Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX).
Attached as Schedule A are a description of the
Corporations governance practices as required by the CSA
and checklists describing the Corporations alignment with
the NYSE Rules, the governance provisions of SOX and
descriptions of the Committees of the Board of Directors. The
Companys Statement of Corporate Governance Practices, Code
of Conduct and Committee Charters, as well as its Code of Ethics
and Whistleblower Policy are posted on the Companys
website at www.opco.com. These documents can also be requested
by writing to the Company at its head office or by making an
email request to investorrelations@opy.ca.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
As required by the Corporations Audit Committee charter,
the Audit Committee reports as follows.
The Audit Committee of the Board oversees the Corporations
financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. It meets
with management, the internal audit group and the
Corporations auditors regularly and reports the results of
its activities to the Board. In this connection, the Audit
Committee has done with respect to fiscal 2005 the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed and discussed with the Corporations management
and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Corporations unaudited
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q and
quarterly reports to shareholders for the first three quarters
of the year; |
12
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed and discussed the Corporations audited financial
statements and report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 with the
Corporations management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP; |
|
|
|
Discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required
to be discussed by SAS 61 (American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants Codification of Statements on Auditing
Standards), as amended; |
|
|
|
Received written disclosure regarding independence from
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as required by Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit
Committee) and discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its
independence; and |
|
|
|
Discussed with management, the internal audit group and Grant
Thornton LLP (who were retained by the Corporation to assist
management) and with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the
documentation and testing of the Corporations internal
accounting controls in accordance with the requirements of
section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and discussed with management and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the accounting for leases and the
restatements of the Corporations financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2004 and the quarters ended
March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2004. |
Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee recommended to the
Board that the Corporations audited financial statements
prepared in accordance with US GAAP be included in the
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K and Annual
Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Members
of the Audit Committee
|
|
|
Burton Winberg Chairman |
|
John L. Bitove |
|
Kenneth W. McArthur Financial Expert |
During 2005, nine meetings of the Audit Committee were held. All
of the members of the Audit Committee attended such meetings
except for two meetings which were attended by two of the
members of the Audit Committee.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
The Corporations consolidated financial statements
including its consolidated balance sheets for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, its
consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders
equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003 and the notes thereto contained in the
Corporations Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005, a copy of which is being
contemporaneously distributed with this Circular, are
incorporated by reference into this Circular. Any statement
contained in a document which is incorporated, or deemed to be
incorporated, by reference into this Circular, shall be
considered modified or superseded for purposes of this Circular
to the extent that a statement contained in this Circular or in
any other subsequently filed document which also is, or is
deemed to be, incorporated by reference herein modifies or
supersedes such statement. Any such statement so modified or
superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or
superseded, to constitute a part of this Circular.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
The Canada Business Corporations Act (the CBCA),
which governs the Corporation provides that a shareholder
entitled to vote at a meeting of shareholders may, in accordance
with the provisions of the CBCA submit a notice of a proposal to
the Corporation that the shareholder wishes to be considered by
the shareholders entitled to vote at a meeting of shareholders.
In order for any shareholder proposal, for the next meeting of
shareholders of the Corporation following the May 15, 2006
Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, to be included in the
Circular for such meeting, the proposal must comply with the
provisions of the CBCA and be submitted to the Corporation at
its registered office at 20 Eglinton Avenue West,
Suite 1110, Toronto, Ontario M4R 1K8 (Attention:
Secretary) prior to February 15, 2007 in the case of the
Corporations 2007 annual meeting of shareholders or at
least 60 days prior to any special meeting of shareholders.
13
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
Holders of Class A and Class B Shares may communicate
with the Board, including to request copies of the
Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, including its financial
statements and MD&A, by
e-mail to
investorrelations@opy.ca (Attention: Board of Directors) or by
mail to:
|
|
|
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. |
|
Board of Directors |
|
c/o The President |
|
20 Eglinton Avenue West |
|
Suite 1110, P.O. Box 2015 |
|
Toronto, Ontario |
|
M4R 1K8 |
All such correspondence will be forwarded to the Lead Director
or to any individual Director or Directors to whom the
communication is or are directed, unless the communication is
unduly hostile, threatening, illegal, does not reasonably relate
to the Corporation or its business or is similarly
inappropriate. The President of the Corporation has the
authority to discard or disregard inappropriate communications
or to take other reasonable actions with respect to any such
inappropriate communications.
Additional information relating to the Corporation is available
on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
DIRECTORS APPROVAL
The contents of and sending of this Circular have been approved
by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
DATED AS OF this 15th day of March, 2006.
(signed) A.W. Oughtred
Secretary
14
SCHEDULE A
STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES/ CSA
REQUIREMENTS
Mandate and Duties of the Board of Directors
The fundamental responsibility of the Board is to supervise the
management of the business of the Corporation with a view to
maximizing shareholder value and ensuring corporate conduct in a
legal and ethical manner through a system of corporate
governance and internal controls appropriate to the
Corporations business. Given the nature of the
Corporations business and the size and composition of the
Board, the Board has determined that there is no current need to
develop a specific mandate for the Board, the chief executive
officer or the chairs of the Board committees. The Board has
adopted a statement of Corporate Governance Guidelines to which
it adheres.
In fulfilling its mandate, the Boards responsibilities
include:
|
|
|
|
|
the establishment and maintenance of an appropriate system of
corporate governance, including practices to ensure that the
Board functions effectively and independently of management; |
|
|
|
monitoring and overseeing the Corporations strategic
planning; |
|
|
|
monitoring the performance of the Corporations business,
identifying and evaluating opportunities and risks and
controlling risk; |
|
|
|
overseeing monitoring systems for internal controls, audit and
information management systems; |
|
|
|
assessing and monitoring the performance of senior management
and overseeing succession planning; |
|
|
|
remuneration of executive officers and senior management and
reviewing the general compensation policy of the Corporation; |
|
|
|
reviewing and approving the Corporations financial
statements and overseeing the Corporations compliance with
applicable audit, accounting and financial reporting
requirements; and |
|
|
|
overseeing corporate communications to all stakeholders. |
Independence of the Board of Directors
Four of the Corporations seven directors are independent
as required by the CSA Guidelines for Corporate Governance and
by the New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Rules. To be
considered independent under these rules, the Board must
determine that a Director has no direct or indirect material
relationship with the Corporation. The board has determined that
Messrs. Bitove, Crystal, McArthur and Winberg are
independent directors and that Mr. Lowenthal, the Chairman
of the Board and chief executive officer of the Corporation,
Ms. Roberts, the President and Treasurer of the Corporation
and Mr. Oughtred, the Secretary of the Corporation, are not
independent.
At each regular meeting of the Board, the independent directors
are afforded an opportunity to meet in the absence of
management. As well, at meetings of the Audit Committee, the
members of the Committee are afforded the opportunity to meeting
with the auditors in the absence of management.
The independent Directors and the Directors that are not
independent, understand the need for directors to be independent
minded and to assess and question management initiatives and
recommendations from an independent perspective. The Board has a
Lead Director, Mr. K. W. McArthur, an independent
director who, among other things, chairs sessions of the
independent directors in the absence of management.
Orientation and Continuing Education
The Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, as
required by its Charter, is responsible for the orientation of
new directors as to the business of the Corporation, the role of
the board and the Board committees.
The Board encourages the Directors to maintain the skill and
knowledge necessary to meet their obligations as Directors. This
includes attendance at continuing education sessions and
providing written materials on governance and related matters.
Mr. A. W. Oughtred attended the Institute of
Corporate Directors (Canada)
A-1
Corporate Governance College Programme and is certified as an
Institute of Corporate Directors Director (ICD.D).
Nomination of Directors
The Board currently consists of seven Directors. The Board has
determined that this is an appropriate size for the Board
The Board has a Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee each
of the members of which are independent. The duties of this
Committee which include the recruitment of directors and the
nomination of individuals for Board positions are set out below.
Board Compensation
The Board has a Compensation and Stock Option Committee the
duties of which (described below) include making recommendations
as to directors compensation. The Directors other than
Mr. Lowenthal and Ms. Roberts are entitled to the
automatic grant of stock options on a periodic basis under the
Corporations 1996 Equity Incentive Plan.
In addition to the Committees referred to above, the Board has
an Audit Committee composed of three independent directors the
duties of which are described below.
Director, Committee Assessments
The Board does not currently have a formal director assessment
process. The Boards Lead Director is responsible for
assessing the performance and contribution of individual Board
members and, if necessary, to address issues arising from such
assessments with members of the Board.
The Board does formally assess the Audit Committee on an annual
basis.
A-2
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE AND SARBANES-OXLEY GOVERNANCE
REQUIREMENTS
Set out below are (i) checklists summarizing the corporate
governance requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Corporations alignment
with such requirements and a description of how the
Corporations corporate governance policies align with such
requirements and (ii) descriptions of the
Corporations Board Committees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the |
|
|
|
NYSE Corporate |
|
|
Corporation |
|
|
OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. |
Governance |
|
|
Align? |
|
|
GOVERNANCE PROCEDURES |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Board must affirmatively determine each directors
independence and disclose those determinations. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Board has not adopted formal
categorical standards to assist in determining independence.
The Board has considered the
relationship of each non-management/officer director and has
made a determination that the four non-management/
officer directors of the Corporation are independent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the four non-management/officer
Directors, the Board has determined that the only Director that
has a relationship with the Corporation (other than as a
Director) is Mr. Crystal. The Board has determined that
although Mr. Crystal is a partner in the firm of Brown
Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner LLP, which firm
provides legal services to the Corporation, in view of the
professional ethical standards which govern his conduct, the
fact that less than one percent of the annual revenues of his
firm are derived from the Corporation and that Mr. Crystal
receives no direct compensation from the Corporation other than
his Directors compensation, his relationship with the
Corporation is not material for the purposes of determining that
Mr. Crystal is an independent director. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A majority of the directors must be independent. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
A majority of the directors are
independent.
Assuming the slate of directors
nominated for election at the Corporations 2006
shareholders meeting are elected, four of the seven directors
will be independent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled
executive sessions without management. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
At each regular Board and Audit
Committee meeting, the independent members of the Board and the
members of the Audit Committee are afforded the opportunity to
meet in the absence of management. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There must be a nominating/corporate governance committee
composed entirely of independent directors. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation has a Nominating/
Corporate Governance Committee composed of independent Directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the |
|
|
|
NYSE Corporate |
|
|
Corporation |
|
|
OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. |
Governance |
|
|
Align? |
|
|
GOVERNANCE PROCEDURES |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The nominating/ corporate governance committee must have a
written charter that addresses: (i) the committees
purpose and responsibilities; and (ii) an annual
performance evaluation. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation has a Nominating/
Governance Charter which addresses (i) the Committees
purpose and responsibilities and (ii) annual performance
evaluation of the Board members and effectiveness of the Board
Committees. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There must be a compensation committee composed entirely of
independent directors. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation has a Compensation and
Stock Option Committee composed entirely of independent
directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The compensation committee must have a written charter that
addresses: (i) the committees purpose and
responsibilities; and (ii) an annual performance evaluation. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporations Compensation and
Stock Option Committee Charter addresses the Committees
purpose and responsibilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The audit committee must have a minimum of three members all of
whom must be independent. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation has an Audit Committee
of three members, all of whom are independent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The audit committee must have a written charter that addresses:
(i) the committees purpose and responsibilities; and
(ii) an annual performance evaluation. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation has an Audit Committee
Charter which addresses the Committees purpose and
responsibilities and provides for an annual performance
evaluation of the Committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation must have an internal audit function. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporations principal
operating subsidiary has an Internal Audit Department. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation must adopt and disclose corporate governance
guidelines. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation has Board of Directors
Corporate Governance Guidelines which are summarized in the
Corporations annual Management Information Circular dated
March 15, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation must adopt and disclose a code of business
conduct and ethics. The Corporation must disclose any waiver of
the Code of Conduct for directors and officers. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation has a Code of Conduct
and Business Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees which
is posted on the Corporations website and available in
hard copy from the Corporations head office. No waivers
were granted in 2005 or to date in 2006 under the Code for
Directors and Officers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the |
|
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and |
|
|
Corporation |
|
|
OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. |
Related United States Requirements |
|
|
Align? |
|
|
GOVERNANCE PROCEDURES |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The CEO and CFO must certify, among other things, that the
financial statements contained in the Corporations annual
and quarterly reports filed with the SEC fairly present the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation prepares and files
annually and quarterly for the first three quarters of the year
the required CEO and CFO certificates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CEO and CFO must certify, among other things, that the
Corporations annual and quarterly reports filed with the
SEC: (i) does not contain an untrue statement of material
fact; and (ii) that the financial information in its annual
filing fairly presents the financial condition of the
Corporation. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation prepares and files
annually and quarterly for the first three quarters of the year
the required CEO and CFO certificates which include
certification that the Corporations annual report
(i) does not contain an untrue statement of material fact
and (ii) that the financial information filed fairly
presents the financial condition of the Corporation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation must disclose the CEOs and CFOs
(i) conclusions on the effectiveness of the
Corporations disclosure controls and procedures; and
(ii) any changes to internal controls which might have a
material impact on internal controls. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The CEO and CFO certificates filed with
the SEC include certification that the CEO and CFO are satisfied
with the Corporations disclosure controls and
procedures.
After the issue of the
Corporations financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004, the Corporation discovered errors in its
accounting for certain leases. The Corporation corrected its
internal controls with respect to these matters and restated its
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2004 and its quarterly financial statements for the quarters
ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2004.
In 2005, there were no other changes to
internal controls that might have a material impact on internal
controls. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation must have disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that all material information flows to those persons
responsible for the Corporations public disclosures. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation has internal disclosure
controls and procedures that ensure that all material
information flows to the CEO and CFO and others responsible for
the Corporations public disclosures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation must have a written code of ethics and conduct
applicable to senior financial officers and the CEO, and must
disclose any waivers of the code. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporation has a Code of Conduct
and Business Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees.
In 2005 no waiver of the Code was
granted for officers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the |
|
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
|
|
Corporation |
|
|
OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. |
and Related United States Requirements |
|
|
Align? |
|
|
GOVERNANCE PROCEDURES |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Corporation must disclose the identity of the financial
expert on the Audit Committee. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
All of the members of the audit
committee are financially literate.
The Board has determined that
Mr. Kenneth W. McArthur is an audit committee financial
expert. Mr. McArthur is a member of the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of British Columbia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit Committee must establish policies and procedures for
pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
In accordance with the
Corporations Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee
pre- approves the audit, audit related and non-audit services
provided by the Corporations auditors and fee estimates
for such services. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation must have in place procedures for the treatment
of complaints regarding, and for the submission by employees of
complaints relating to, accounting and auditing matters. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
The Corporations Code of Conduct
and Business Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees
provides for the reporting of complaints relating to accounting
and auditing matters and protection of any employee reporting
such behaviour. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation must have a process in place to protect
employees who have provided information or assisted in an
investigation of securities fraud or related crimes. |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
See immediately preceding paragraph. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-6
BOARD COMMITTEES
Board Committees
The Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation and Stock
Option Committee and a Nominating/ Corporate Governance
Committee.
The following is a brief summary of the responsibilities of
these Committees,
|
|
|
Audit Committee (Messrs. Bitove, McArthur and Winberg
(Chair)) |
The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee,
a copy of which is attached to the Management Information
Circular of the Corporation dated March 25, 2004 as
Schedule D. The Audit Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
reviews annual, quarterly and all legally required public
disclosure documents containing financial information that are
submitted to the Board; |
|
|
|
reviews the nature, scope and timing of the annual audit carried
out by the external auditors and reports to the Board; |
|
|
|
evaluates the external auditors performance for the
preceding fiscal year; reviews their fees and makes
recommendations to the Board; |
|
|
|
reviews internal financial control policies, procedures and risk
management and reports to the Board; |
|
|
|
meets with the external auditors quarterly to review quarterly
and annual financial statements and reports and to consider
material matters which, in the opinion of the external auditors,
should be brought to the attention of the Board and the
shareholders; |
|
|
|
reviews internal audit activities, meets regularly with internal
audit personnel and reports to the Board; |
|
|
|
reviews accounting principles and practices; |
|
|
|
reviews management reports with respect to litigation, capital
expenditures, tax matters and corporate administration charges
and reports to the Board; |
|
|
|
reviews related party transactions; |
|
|
|
reviews and approves changes or waivers to the
Corporations Code of Ethics for Senior Executive,
Financial and Accounting Officers; and |
|
|
|
annually reviews the Audit Committee Charter and recommends and
make changes thereto as required. |
(see also Report of The Audit Committee)
|
|
|
Compensation and Stock Option Committee (Messrs. Bitove
and Winberg (Chair)) |
The Board has adopted a Compensation and Stock Option Committee
Charter. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
makes recommendations to the Board with respect to compensation
policy for the Corporation and its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
makes recommendations to the Board with respect to salary, bonus
and benefits paid and provided to senior management of the
Corporation; |
|
|
|
in accordance with the provisions of the Corporations 1996
Equity Incentive Plan, authorizes grants of stock options and
recommends modifications to the Plan; |
|
|
|
grants certain compensation awards to senior management of the
Corporation based on criteria linked to the performance of the
individual and/or the Corporation; |
|
|
|
administers the Performance-Based Compensation Agreement between
the Corporation and Mr. A.G. Lowenthal; |
|
|
|
certifies compliance with the criteria performance-based awards
or grants; and |
|
|
|
administers and makes awards under the Corporations Stock
Appreciation Rights Plan. |
(see also Report of the Compensation and Stock Option
Committee)
A-7
|
|
|
Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee
(Messrs. Bitove, McArthur (Chair), Winberg and Crystal) |
The Board has adopted a Nominating/ Corporate Governance
Committee Charter.
The Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee:
|
|
|
|
|
makes recommendations to the Board with respect to corporate
governance; |
|
|
|
when necessary, oversees the recruitment of new Directors for
the Corporation; |
|
|
|
recommends nominees for election or appointment to the Board; |
|
|
|
maintains an orientation program for new directors and oversees
the continuing education needs of Directors; |
|
|
|
evaluates Director performance; |
|
|
|
reviews and makes recommendations with respect to the
Corporations Corporate Governance Guidelines; |
|
|
|
reviews and approves governance reports for publication in the
Corporations Management Information Circular and Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
|
A-8
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.
Suite 1110, P.O. Box 2015 |
20 Eglinton Avenue West
Toronto ON Canada M4R1K8 |
OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.
Class B Voting Shares
Proxy, Solicited by Management, for the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
May 15, 2006
The undersigned holder of Class B voting shares of
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. hereby appoints Mr. A.G.
Lowenthal or, failing him, Ms. E.K. Roberts or instead of
either of them
________________________________________________________________________________
as nominee, with full power of substitution, to attend, vote
and otherwise act for the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on May 15, 2006 and at any
adjournment thereof to the same extent and with the same power
as if the undersigned were personally present at the said
meeting or adjournment or adjournments thereof and hereby
revokes any proxy previously given; provided that the
undersigned shareholder specifies and directs the persons above
named that the Class B voting shares registered in the name
of the undersigned shall be:
|
|
1. |
VOTED o WITHHELD
FROM VOTING o
|
(or if no specification is made, VOTED FOR) for the
election of directors. (Listed as item #2 on the Notice of
Meeting).
|
|
2. |
VOTED o WITHHELD
FROM VOTING o
|
(or if no specification is made, VOTED FOR) for the
appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditors and
authorizing the directors to fix the remuneration of the
auditors. (Listed as item #3 on the Notice of Meeting).
DATED ,
2006.
|
|
|
_____________________________________________
Signature of Shareholder |
|
|
|
A shareholder has the right to appoint a person, who need not
be a shareholder, to represent him at the meeting other than the
persons designated herein. To exercise this right a shareholder
may insert the name of the desired person in the blank space
provided herein or may submit another form of proxy. |
|
|
If any amendments or variations to matters identified in the
notice of the meeting are proposed at the meeting or if any
other matters properly come before the meeting, this proxy
confers discretionary authority to vote on such amendments or
variations or such other matters according to the best judgment
of the person voting the proxy at the meeting. |
|
|
|
|
1. |
Please date and sign the form of proxy exactly as your name
appears on this form of proxy. If a shareholder is a corporation
the form of proxy must be executed under its corporate seal or
by an officer or attorney thereof duly authorized. |
|
|
2. |
Your name and address are recorded on this form of proxy, please
report any change. |