As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2003
Registration No. 333-100395
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------
POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
------------------
HECLA MINING COMPANY
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
DELAWARE 8741 82-0126240
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (PRIMARY STANDARD INDUSTRIAL (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) CLASSIFICATION CODE NUMBER) IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)
6500 N. MINERAL DRIVE, SUITE 200
COEUR D'ALENE, IDAHO 83815-9408
(208) 769-4100
(ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER,
INCLUDING AREA CODE, OF REGISTRANT'S PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
------------------
JOHN GALBAVY
CORPORATE COUNSEL AND ASSISTANT SECRETARY
HECLA MINING COMPANY
6500 N. MINERAL DRIVE, SUITE 200
COEUR D'ALENE, IDAHO 83815-9408
(208) 769-4131
(NAME, ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE
NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE, OF AGENT FOR SERVICE)
COPY TO:
JOHN H. BITNER
BELL, BOYD & LLOYD LLC
70 WEST MADISON STREET, SUITE 3300
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602
(312) 807-4306
PROSPECTUS
----------
3,394,883 SHARES
[LOGO]
HECLA MINING COMPANY
COMMON STOCK
This prospectus covers 3,394,883 shares of our common stock that may be
offered and sold from time to time by the stockholders identified in this
prospectus, or by their donees, pledgees, transferees or other successors in
interest, directly or through agents, brokers, or dealers designated from time
to time at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at prices related to
such market prices, or in privately negotiated transactions at prices agreed
upon by the parties. See "Plan of Distribution." We cannot assure you that the
selling stockholders will sell all, or any portion of the common stock. None of
our directors or executive officers is selling stock in this offering, and
neither they nor we will receive any proceeds from the sale of the stock.
We are registering the common stock offered under this prospectus to
satisfy registration rights of the selling stockholders. We have agreed to bear
all expenses of registration of our common stock offered by this prospectus. The
shares to be sold hereunder are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol "HL." On April 25, 2003, the closing price of our common stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange was $3.58 per share.
---------------------------
INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. SEE "RISK
FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 6.
---------------------------
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS
PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
The date of this Prospectus is April __, 2003
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus
and any supplement. We have not authorized any other person to provide you with
different or additional information. If anyone provides you with different or
additional information, you should not rely on it. This prospectus is not an
offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is
not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this
prospectus and any supplement is accurate as of its date only. Our business,
financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may have changed since
that date.
---------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
----
Special Note On Forward-Looking Statements.................................3
Where You Can Find More Information........................................3
Prospectus Summary.........................................................4
Summary Financial Data.....................................................5
Risk Factors...............................................................6
Selling Stockholders......................................................14
Plan Of Distribution......................................................14
Use Of Proceeds...........................................................16
Price Range Of Common Stock And Dividend Policy...........................16
Selected Financial Data...................................................17
Supplementary Financial Data..............................................18
Management's Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition
And Results Of Operations...............................................19
Business .................................................................35
Management................................................................55
Executive Compensation....................................................58
Principal Stockholders....................................................64
Description of Capital Stock..............................................65
Legal Matters.............................................................70
Experts .................................................................70
Glossary of Certain Terms.................................................71
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements...............................F-1
2
SPECIAL NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements that reflect our
current expectations and projections about our future results, performance,
prospects, and opportunities. We have tried to identify these forward-looking
statements by using words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate,"
"believe," "intend," "plan," "estimate," and similar expressions. These
forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us
and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors that
could cause our actual results, performance, prospects, or opportunities to
differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking
statements.
See "Risk Factors" for a description of these factors. Other matters,
including unanticipated events and conditions, also may cause our actual future
results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We cannot
assure you that our expectations will prove to be correct. In addition, all
subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or
persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
cautionary statements mentioned above. You should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. All of these forward-looking statements are
based on our expectations as of the date of this prospectus. Except as required
by federal securities laws, we do not intend to update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events, or otherwise.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly, and special reports, proxy statements, and
other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). You may
read our filings at the web site maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
You may also read and copy our filings at the SEC's public reference rooms at
Judiciary Plaza Building, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Room 1024, Washington, D.C.
20549, as well as at the SEC's regional office at 175 W. Jackson Boulevard,
Suite 900, Chicago, Illinois 60604. You may obtain information about the
operation of the SEC public reference room in Washington, D.C. by calling the
SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may obtain a copy of a filing from the SEC at
prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 450
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 or from commercial document retrieval
services.
Our common stock and Series B cumulative convertible preferred stock
(Series B preferred stock) are both listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE). You can inspect and copy reports, proxy statements and other information
about us at the NYSE's offices at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
This prospectus is part of a registration statement on Form S-1 that we
filed with the SEC. The registration statement contains more information about
us and our common stock, including certain exhibits and schedules. You can
obtain a copy of the registration statement from the SEC in the manner described
above.
A glossary of certain terms appears on page 71 of this prospectus under
"Glossary of Certain Terms."
3
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights material information discussed in more detail
elsewhere in this prospectus. You are strongly urged to review the entire
prospectus before investing in our common stock.
HECLA MINING COMPANY
We are principally engaged in the exploration, development, mining and
processing of silver, gold, lead and zinc and own or have interests in a number
of precious and nonferrous metals properties. Our principal producing metals
properties include:
o The Greens Creek silver mine, a large polymetallic mine in which we
own a 29.73% interest, located near Juneau, Alaska.
o The San Sebastian silver mine, located in the State of Durango,
Mexico.
o The Lucky Friday silver mine, located near Mullan, Idaho.
o The La Camorra gold mine, located in the State of Bolivar, Venezuela.
Our strategy for growth is to focus our efforts and resources on
expanding our precious metals reserves through exploration efforts, primarily on
properties we already own. In 2003, we intend to continue to explore for
additional reserves at, or in the vicinity of, the San Sebastian mine in Mexico,
the La Camorra mine, the Block B and Canaima properties in Venezuela, the Greens
Creek mine in Alaska and the Hollister Development Block in Nevada. We will also
consider acquisition opportunities as a component of our growth strategy.
We were originally incorporated in 1891. We are a Delaware corporation,
with our principal executive offices located at 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite
200, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815-9408, and our telephone number is (208)
769-4100. Our web site address is www.hecla-mining.com. Information contained in
our web site is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus, and you
should not consider information contained in our web site as part of this
prospectus. See "Where you can find more information."
THE OFFERING
SECURITIES OFFERED FOR SALE BY
THE SELLING STOCKHOLDERS .................1,394,883 shares of common stock,
$0.25 par value per share,
currently held by certain selling
stockholders and 2,000,000 shares
of common stock issuable upon
exercise of a warrant issued to
another selling stockholder, each
accompanied by series A junior
participating preferred stock
purchase rights pursuant to our
rights agreement.
VOTING RIGHTS.............................Each share of common stock is
entitled to one vote per share on
all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders (except for the
election of two directors by
holders of preferred stock in the
case of preferred dividend
arrearages, which arrearages
currently exist).
USE OF PROCEEDS..........................The selling stockholders will
receive all of the net proceeds of
the sale of the common stock covered
by this prospectus, as it may be
supplemented. We will not receive
any proceeds from sale of this
common stock.
DIVIDENDS................................We have not declared or paid any
cash dividends for several years and
we have no present intention of
paying dividends in the foreseeable
future (and our preferred dividend
arrearages currently restrict us
from paying any cash dividends on
our common stock).
STOCK EXCHANGE...........................Our common stock is listed on the
New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol "HL." The shares to be sold
hereunder are listed on the New York
Stock Exchange.
4
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except per share data)
The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated
financial data for us for each of the years ended December 31, 1998 through
2002, and is derived from our audited financial statements. The data set forth
below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to, our Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page F-1 of
this prospectus.
2002 2001 2000 1999(1) 1998
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Sales of products $ 105,700 $ 85,247 $ 75,850 $ 73,703 $ 75,108
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Income (loss) from continuing
operations $ 10,863 $ (9,582) $ (84,847) $ (43,391) $ (4,674)
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations (2) (2,224) 11,922 1,529 4,786 4,374
Net income (loss) 8,639 2,340 (83,965) (39,990) (300)
Preferred stock dividends (3) (23,253) (8,050) (8,050) (8,050) (8,050)
Loss applicable to common
shareholders (4) $ (14,614) $ (5,710) $ (92,015) $ (48,040) $ (8,350)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Loss from continuing operations per
common share $ (0.15) $ (0.25) $ (1.39) $ (0.83) $ (0.23)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Basic and diluted loss per
common share $ (0.18) $ (0.08) $ (1.38) $ (0.77) $ (0.15)
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Total assets $ 160,141 $ 153,116 $ 194,836 $ 268,357 $ 252,062
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Accrued reclamation and closure costs $ 49,723 $ 52,481 $ 58,710 $ 49,325 $ 29,753
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Noncurrent portion of debt $ 4,657 $ 11,948 $ 10,041 $ 55,095 $ 42,923
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
(1) On January 1, 1999, we changed our method of accounting for
start-up costs in accordance with Statement of Position 98-5 (SOP
98-5)"Reporting on the Costs of Start-up Activities." The impact of
this change in accounting principle related to unamortized start-up
costs associated with our 29.7331% interest in the Greens Creek Mine
and resulted in a $1.4 million cumulative effect of this change in
accounting principle for the year ended December 31, 1999.
(2) During 2000, in furtherance of our determination to focus our
operations on silver and gold mining and to raise cash to reduce debt
and provide working capital, our board of directors made the decision
to sell our industrial minerals segment. As such, the industrial
minerals segment has been recorded as a discontinued operation as of
and for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2002.
As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, only, the balance sheets have been
reclassified to reflect the net assets of the industrial minerals
segment as a discontinued operation.
(3) As of December 31, 2002, we have not declared or paid $6.6
million of Series B preferred stock dividends. However, since the
dividends are cumulative, they continue to be reported in determining
the income (loss) applicable to common stockholders. We completed an
offer to acquire all of our outstanding Series B preferred stock in
exchange for newly issued shares of our common stock on July 25, 2002.
A total of 1,546,598 shares, or 67.2%, of the total number of Series B
preferred shares outstanding were validly tendered and exchanged into
10,826,186 shares of our common stock. During the third quarter of
2002, we incurred a non-cash dividend of approximately $17.6 million
related to the exchange offer. The $17.6 million dividend represents
the difference between the value of the common stock issued in the
exchange offer and the value of the shares that were issuable under the
stated conversion terms of the Series B preferred stock. The non-cash
dividend had no impact on our total shareholders' equity as the offset
was an increase in common stock and surplus. As a result of the
exchange offer, the total of cumulative preferred dividends is $23.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2002. In 2003, the $8.0 million
annual cumulative preferred dividends that have historically been
included in income (loss) applicable to common shareholders will be
reduced to approximately $2.6 million. The exchange offer also
eliminated $11.2 million of previously undeclared and unpaid preferred
stock dividends.
(4) After recognizing a $2.2 million loss from discontinued
operations and $23.3 million in preferred stock dividends, our loss
applicable to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2002,
was approximately $14.6 million, compared to a loss of $5.7 million in
2001, after recognizing $11.9 million in income from discontinued
operations, due to a gain of $12.7 million on the sale of the majority
of our industrial minerals assets, and $8.0 million in preferred stock
dividends.
5
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described
below, and all of the other information included in this prospectus, before you
decide whether to purchase shares of our common stock. Any of the following
risks could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or
operating results and could negatively impact the value of our common stock. A
glossary of certain terms appears on page 71 of this prospectus under "Glossary
of Certain Terms."
ALTHOUGH WE HAD OPERATING PROFITS IN 2002 AND 2001, WE HAVE INCURRED A TOTAL OF
$168.7 MILLION OF LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS
AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT OUR OPERATIONS WILL REMAIN PROFITABLE.
Our net income improved in 2002 and 2001 as a result, in large part, of
increased gold production, lower silver and gold production costs, lower
interest expense, a gain on the sale of our subsidiary, Kentucky-Tennessee Clay
Company and, recently, increased gold prices. Prior to 2001, we incurred net
losses for each of the prior ten years. Many of the factors affecting our
operating results are beyond our control, including expectations with respect to
the rate of inflation, the relative strength of the United States dollar and
certain other currencies, interest rates, global or regional political or
economic crises, global or regional demand, speculation, and sales by central
banks and other holders and producers of gold and silver in response to these
factors, and we cannot foresee whether our operations will continue to generate
sufficient revenue for us to be profitable. While silver and gold prices
improved in 2002 over average prices in 2001, there can be no assurance such
prices will continue at or above such levels.
OUR PREFERRED STOCK HAS A LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE OF $50 PER SHARE, OR
$37.7 MILLION, PLUS DIVIDENDS IN ARREARS OF APPROXIMATELY $7.3 MILLION.
This means that if we were liquidated as of April 1, 2003, holders of
our preferred stock would have been entitled to receive approximately $44.9
million from any liquidation proceeds before holders of our common stock would
be entitled to receive any proceeds.
WE ARE CURRENTLY INVOLVED IN ONGOING LITIGATION THAT MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT US.
There are several ongoing lawsuits in which we are involved. If any of
these cases results in a substantial monetary judgment against us or is settled
on unfavorable terms, our results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows could be materially adversely affected. For example, we may ultimately
incur environmental remediation costs substantially in excess of the amounts we
have accrued and the plaintiffs in environmental proceedings may be awarded
substantial damages (which costs and damages we may not be able to recover from
our insurers). See "Business -- Legal Proceedings."
OUR EARNINGS MAY BE AFFECTED BY METALS PRICE VOLATILITY.
The majority of our revenues is derived from the sale of silver, gold,
lead and zinc and, as a result, our earnings are directly related to the prices
of these metals. Silver, gold, lead and zinc prices fluctuate widely and are
affected by numerous factors including:
o expectations for inflation;
o speculative activities;
o relative exchange rate of the U.S. dollar;
o global and regional demand and production;
o political and economic conditions; and
o production costs in major producing regions.
6
These factors are beyond our control and are impossible for us to
predict. If the market prices for these metals fall below our costs to produce
them for a sustained period of time, we will experience losses and may have to
discontinue development or mining at one or more of our properties.
In the past, we have used limited hedging techniques to reduce our
exposure to price volatility, but we may not be able to do so in the future. See
"--Our hedging activities could expose us to losses."
The following table sets forth the average daily closing prices of the
following metals for 1985, 1990, 1995, 1998 and each year thereafter through
2002.
1985 1990 1995 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Silver(2) 6.14 4.82 5.19 5.53 5.25 5.00 4.39 4.63
(per oz.)
Gold(1) $ 317.26 $ 383.46 $ 384.16 $ 294.16 $ 278.77 $ 279.03 $ 271.00 $ 309.97
(per oz.)
Lead(3) 0.18 0.37 0.29 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.22 0.21
(per lb.)
Zinc(4) 0.36 0.69 0.47 0.46 0.49 0.51 0.40 0.35
(per lb.)
---------------------------
(1) London Final
(2) Handy & Harman
(3) London Metals Exchange -- Cash
(4) London Metals Exchange -- Special High Grade - Cash
On March 31, 2003, the closing prices for gold, silver, lead and zinc
were $334.85 per ounce, $4.48 per ounce, $0.20 per pound and $0.35 per pound,
respectively.
THE VOLATILITY OF METALS PRICES MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR DEVELOPMENT AND
EXPLORATION EFFORTS.
Our ability to produce silver and gold in the future is dependent upon
our exploration efforts, and our ability to develop new ore reserves. If prices
for these metals decline, it may not be economically feasible for us to continue
our development of a project or to continue commercial production at some of our
properties.
OUR DEVELOPMENT OF NEW OREBODIES MAY COST MORE AND PROVIDE LESS RETURN THAN WE
ESTIMATED.
Our ability to sustain or increase our current level of production of
metals partly depends on our ability to develop new orebodies and/or expand
existing mining operations. Before we can begin a development project, we must
first determine whether it is economically feasible to do so. This determination
is based on estimates of several factors, including:
o reserves;
o expected recovery rates of metals from the ore;
o facility and equipment costs;
o capital and operating costs of a development project;
o future metals prices;
o comparable facility and equipment costs; and
o anticipated climate conditions.
7
Development projects may have no operating history upon which to base
these estimates, and these estimates are based in large part on our
interpretation of geological data, a limited number of drill holes, and other
sampling techniques. As a result, actual cash operating costs and returns from a
development project may differ substantially from our estimates as a result of
which it may not be economically feasible to continue with a development
project.
OUR ORE RESERVE ESTIMATES MAY BE IMPRECISE.
Our ore reserve figures and costs are primarily estimates and are not
guarantees that we will recover the indicated quantities of these metals.
Reserves are estimates made by our technical personnel and no assurance can be
given that the estimate of the amount of metal or the indicated level of
recovery of these metals will be realized. Reserve estimation is an interpretive
process based upon available data. Our reserve estimates for properties that
have not yet started may change based on actual production experience. Further,
reserves are valued based on estimates of costs and metals prices. The economic
value of ore reserves may be adversely affected by:
o declines in the market price of the various metals we mine;
o increased production or capital costs; or
o reduced recovery rates.
Short-term operating factors relating to our ore reserves, such as the
need to sequentially develop orebodies and the processing of new or different
ore grades, may adversely affect our profitability. We may use forward sales
contracts and other hedging techniques to partially offset the effects of a drop
in the market prices of the metals we mine. However, if the price of metals that
we produce declines substantially below the levels used to calculate reserves
for an extended period, we could experience:
o delays in new project development;
o increased net losses;
o reduced cash flow;
o reductions in reserves; and
o possible write-down of asset values.
OUR MINERAL EXPLORATION EFFORTS MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL.
We must continually replace ore reserves depleted by production. Our
ability to expand or replace depleted ore reserves depends on the success of our
exploration program. Mineral exploration, particularly for silver and gold, is
highly speculative. It involves many risks and is often nonproductive. Even if
we find a valuable deposit of minerals, it may be several years before
production is possible. During that time, it may become economically unfeasible
to produce those minerals. Establishing ore reserves requires us to make
substantial capital expenditures and, in the case of new properties, to
construct mining and processing facilities. As a result of these costs and
uncertainties, we may not be able to expand or replace our existing ore reserves
as they are depleted by current production.
Exploration expenditures for the three years ended December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000, were approximately $5.8 million, $2.2 million and $6.3 million,
respectively. Our near-term exploration plan consists of exploring for
additional reserves at, or in the vicinity of, our San Sebastian mine in Mexico;
the La Camorra mine, the Block B and Canaima properties in Venezuela; the Greens
Creek mine in Alaska; and the Hollister Development Block in Nevada. Exploration
expenditures for 2003 are estimated to be in the range of $10.0 million to $15.0
million. For additional information, see Note 4 of Notes to our Consolidated
Financial Statements, beginning on page F-9 of this prospectus.
8
OUR JOINT DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATING ARRANGEMENTS MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL.
We often enter into joint venture arrangements in order to share the
risks and costs of developing and operating properties. For instance, our Greens
Creek mine is operated through a joint venture arrangement. In a typical joint
venture arrangement, we own a percentage of the assets in the joint venture.
Under the agreement governing the joint venture relationship, each party is
entitled to indemnification from each other party and is only liable for the
liabilities of the joint venture in proportion to its interest in the joint
venture. However, if a party fails to perform its obligations under the joint
venture agreement, we could incur losses in excess of our pro-rata share of the
joint venture. In the event any party so defaults, the joint venture agreement
provides certain rights and remedies to the remaining participants, including
the right to sell the defaulting party's percentage interest and use the
proceeds to satisfy the defaulting party's obligations. We currently believe
that our joint venture partners will meet their obligations.
WE FACE STRONG COMPETITION FROM OTHER MINING COMPANIES FOR THE ACQUISITION OF
NEW PROPERTIES.
Mines have limited lives and as a result, we continually seek to
replace and expand our reserves through the acquisition of new properties. In
addition, there is a limited supply of desirable mineral lands available in the
United States and other areas where we would consider conducting exploration
and/or production activities. Because we face strong competition for new
properties from other mining companies, some of whom have greater financial
resources than we do, we may be unable to acquire attractive new mining
properties on terms that we consider acceptable.
THE TITLES TO SOME OF OUR PROPERTIES MAY BE DEFECTIVE.
Unpatented mining claims constitute a significant portion of our
undeveloped property holdings. The validity of these unpatented mining claims is
often uncertain and may be contested. In accordance with mining industry
practice, we do not generally obtain title opinions until we decide to develop a
property. Therefore, while we have attempted to acquire satisfactory title to
our undeveloped properties, some titles may be defective.
In Mexico, there is ongoing litigation concerning a lien that predates
acquisition of the Velardena mill by our subsidiary, Minera Hecla, S.A. de C.V.
For additional information see "Business - Legal Proceedings."
OUR OPERATIONS MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY RISKS AND HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH
THE MINING INDUSTRY.
Our business is subject to a number of risks and hazards including:
o environmental hazards;
o political and country risks;
o industrial accidents;
o labor disputes;
o unusual or unexpected geologic formations;
o cave-ins;
o explosive rock failures; and
o flooding and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous
weather conditions.
Such risks could result in:
o damage to or destruction of mineral properties or producing
facilities;
o personal injury;
9
o environmental damage;
o delays in mining;
o monetary losses; and
o legal liability.
For some of these risks, we maintain insurance to protect against these
losses at levels consistent with our historical experience and industry
practice. However, we may not be able to maintain this insurance, particularly
if there is a significant increase in the cost of premiums. Insurance against
environmental risks is generally either unavailable or too expensive for us and
other companies in our industry, and, therefore, we do not maintain
environmental insurance. To the extent we are subject to environmental
liabilities, we would have to pay for these liabilities. Moreover, in the event
that we are unable to fully pay for the cost of remedying an environmental
problem, we might be required to suspend operations or enter into other interim
compliance measures.
OUR FOREIGN OPERATIONS, INCLUDING OUR OPERATIONS IN VENEZUELA, ARE SUBJECT TO
ADDITIONAL INHERENT RISKS.
We currently conduct mining operations in Mexico and Venezuela and have
exploration projects in Mexico and South America. We anticipate that we will
continue to conduct significant operations in those and other international
locations in the future. Because we conduct operations internationally, we are
subject to political and economic risks such as:
o the effects of local political and economic developments;
o exchange controls and export or sale restrictions;
o currency fluctuations;
o expropriation; and
o taxation and laws or policies of foreign countries and the United
States affecting trade, investment and taxation.
Consequently, our exploration, development and production activities
outside of the United States may be substantially affected by factors beyond our
control, any of which could materially adversely affect our financial position
or results of operations.
Venezuela, the site of our La Camorra mine, recently experienced
political unrest in the form of street marches and demands that the current
president hold a referendum to determine whether to remove him from office. A
general strike commenced in December 2002 and continued into February 2003. The
strike caused shortages of oil and gas supplies in Venezuela and a severe
economic downturn. We continued to operate the La Camorra mine during the
general strike and were able to obtain adequate supplies, including oil and gas
for our operations. Oil and gas operations are not up to full capacity. Although
we believe we will be able to manage and operate our La Camorra mine and related
exploration projects successfully, due to the strike and its ramifications on
supplies of oil, gas and other products, there can be no assurance that we will
be able to operate without interruptions to our operations.
Following the general strike in Venezuela, the Venezuelan government
announced its intent to implement exchange controls on foreign currency
transactions. Rules and regulations regarding the implementation of exchange
controls in Venezuela have not been finalized. Exchange controls may require us
to convert United States dollars into foreign currency. Management is currently
monitoring the implementation of exchange controls in Venezuela. Such
implementation of exchange controls may adversely affect our operations in
Venezuela.
10
OUR OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS.
Currency fluctuations may affect the cash flow which we will realize
from our operations since our products are sold in world markets in United
States dollars. Exchange controls could require us to sell our products in a
currency other than United States dollars or may require us to convert United
States dollars into foreign currency. Foreign exchange fluctuations may
materially adversely affect our financial performance and results of operations.
See the preceding paragraph regarding exchange controls in Venezuela.
WE ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN GOVERNMENTAL PERMITS IN ORDER TO CONDUCT MINING
OPERATIONS.
In the ordinary course of business, mining companies are required to
seek governmental permits for expansion of existing operations or for the
commencement of new operations. Obtaining the necessary governmental permits is
a complex and time-consuming process involving numerous jurisdictions and often
involving public hearings and costly undertakings on our part. The duration and
success of our efforts to obtain permits are contingent upon many variables not
within our control. Obtaining environmental protection permits, including the
approval of reclamation plans, may increase costs and cause delays depending on
the nature of the activity to be permitted and the interpretation of applicable
requirements implemented by the permitting authority. There can be no assurance
that all necessary permits will be obtained and, if obtained, that the costs
involved will not exceed those that we previously estimated. It is possible that
the costs and delays associated with the compliance with such standards and
regulations could become such that we would not proceed with the development or
operation of a mine or mines.
WE FACE SUBSTANTIAL GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS.
Our business is subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and
regulations governing development, production, labor standards, occupational
health, waste disposal, use of toxic substances, environmental regulations, mine
safety and other matters. We have been, and are currently involved in lawsuits
in which we have been accused of violating environmental laws, and we may be
subject to similar lawsuits in the future. See "Business - Legal Proceedings."
New legislation and regulations may be adopted at any time that results in
additional operating expense, capital expenditures or restrictions and delays in
the mining, production or development of our properties.
We maintain reserves for costs associated with mine closure,
reclamation of land and other environmental matters. At December 31, 2002, our
reserves for these matters totaled $49.7 million. We anticipate that we will
make expenditures relating to these reserves over the next five to ten years.
Future expenditures related to closure, reclamation and environmental
expenditures are difficult to estimate due to:
o the early stage of our investigation;
o the uncertainties relating to the costs and remediation methods that
will be required in specific situations;
o the possible participation of other potentially responsible parties;
and
o changing environmental laws, regulations and interpretations.
It is possible that, as new information becomes available, changes to
our estimates of future closure, reclamation and environmental contingencies
could materially adversely affect our future operating results.
Various laws and permits require that financial assurances be in place
for certain environmental and reclamation obligations and other potential
liabilities. We currently have in place such financial assurances in the form of
surety bonds. As of December 31, 2002, we also had set aside as restricted
investments approximately $6.4 million as collateral for these bonds. The amount
of the financial assurances and the amount required to be set aside by us as
collateral for these financial assurances are dependent upon a number of
factors, including our financial condition, reclamation cost estimates,
development of new projects, and the total dollar value of financial assurances
in place. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or add to
our current level of financial assurances.
11
From time to time, the U.S. Congress considers proposed amendments to
the General Mining Law of 1872, as amended, which governs mining claims and
related activities on Federal lands. There was no significant activity with
respect to mining law reform in Congress during 2002. The extent of any such
future changes is not known and the potential impact on us as a result of
Congressional action is difficult to predict. Although a majority of our
existing U.S. mining operations occur on private or patented property, changes
to the General Mining Law, if adopted, could adversely affect our ability to
economically develop mineral resources on federal lands.
OUR HEDGING ACTIVITIES COULD EXPOSE US TO LOSSES.
From time to time, we engage in hedging activities, such as forward
sales contracts and commodity put and call option contracts, to minimize the
effect of declines in metals prices on our operating results. While these
hedging activities may protect us against low metals prices, they may also limit
the price we can receive on hedged products. As a result, we may be prevented
from realizing possible revenues in the event that the market price of a metal
exceeds the price stated in a forward sale or call option contract. We are also
subject to posting margins if the margin free limit of $10.0 million in the
aggregate for all our contracts is exceeded. As of December 31, 2002, if we
closed out our existing hedge contract positions, we would have to pay our
counterparties $6.5 million. In addition, we may experience losses if a
counterparty fails to purchase under a contract when the contract price exceeds
the spot price of a commodity.
OUR BUSINESS DEPENDS ON GOOD RELATIONS WITH OUR EMPLOYEES.
Certain of our employees are represented by unions. At March 31, 2003,
there were 68 hourly employees at the Lucky Friday mine. The United Steelworkers
of America is the bargaining agent for the Lucky Friday hourly employees. The
current labor agreement expires on June 16, 2003, but may be extended to June
16, 2004 under certain circumstances. At March 31, 2003, there were 226 hourly
and 48 salaried employees at the San Sebastian mine and Velardena mill. The
National Mine and Mill Workers Union represents process plant hourly workers at
San Sebastian. Under Mexican labor law, wage adjustments are negotiated annually
and other contract terms every two years. The contract at San Sebastian is due
for negotiation of wages in July 2003 and for wages and other terms in July
2004. At March 31, 2003, there were 377 hourly and 44 salaried employees at our
La Camorra gold mine, most of whom are represented by the Mine Workers Union.
The contract with respect to La Camorra will expire in March 2004. We anticipate
that we will be able to negotiate a satisfactory contract with each union, but
there can be no assurance that this can be done without a disruption to
production.
OUR STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN AND PROVISIONS IN OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION,
OUR BY-LAWS, AND DELAWARE LAW COULD DELAY OR DETER TENDER OFFERS OR TAKEOVER
ATTEMPTS THAT MAY OFFER A PREMIUM FOR OUR COMMON STOCK.
Our stockholder rights plan and provisions in our certificate of
incorporation, our by-laws, and Delaware law could make it more difficult for a
third party to acquire control of us, even if that transaction would be
beneficial to stockholders. These impediments include:
o the rights issued in connection with the stockholder rights plan that
will substantially dilute the ownership of any person or group that
acquires 15% or more of our outstanding common stock unless the rights
are first redeemed by our board of directors, in its discretion.
Furthermore, our board of directors may amend the terms of these
rights, in its discretion, including an amendment to lower the
acquisition threshold to any amount greater than 10% of the
outstanding common stock;
o the classification of our board of directors into three classes
serving staggered three-year terms;
o the ability of our board of directors to issue shares of preferred
stock with rights as it deems appropriate without stockholder
approval;
o a provision that special meetings of our board of directors may be
called only by our chief executive officer or a majority of our board
of directors;
o a provision that special meetings of stockholders may only be called
pursuant to a resolution approved by a majority of our entire board of
directors;
12
o a prohibition against action by written consent of our stockholders;
o a provision that our board members may only be removed for cause and
by an affirmative vote of at least 80% of the outstanding voting
stock;
o a provision that our stockholders comply with advance-notice
provisions to bring director nominations or other matters before
meetings of our stockholders;
o a prohibition against certain business combinations with an acquirer
of 15% or more of our common stock for three years after such
acquisition unless the stock acquisition or the business combination
is approved by our board prior to the acquisition of the 15% interest,
or after such acquisition our board and the holders of two-thirds of
the other common stock approve the business combination; and
o a prohibition against our entering into certain business combinations
with interested stockholders without the affirmative vote of the
holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then outstanding
shares of voting stock.
The existence of the stockholder rights plan and these provisions may
deprive stockholders of an opportunity to sell our stock at a premium over
prevailing prices. The potential inability of our stockholders to obtain a
control premium could adversely affect the market price for our common stock.
For a description of our stockholder rights plan, see "Description of Common
Stock -- Rights."
WE ARE DEPENDENT ON KEY PERSONNEL.
We are currently dependent upon the ability and experience of our
executive officers and there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain
all of such officers. The loss of one or more of the officers could have a
material adverse effect on our operations. We also compete with other companies
both within and outside the mining industry in connection with the recruiting
and retention of qualified employees knowledgeable in mining operations. On
December 18, 2002, Arthur Brown announced that he would retire as Chief
Executive Officer effective in May 2003. Subject to formal board approval, we
expect that he will be succeeded by Phillips S. Baker, Jr., currently our
President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Brown will
remain as Chairman of the Board.
OUR AVAILABLE CASH AND CASH FLOWS MAY BE INADEQUATE TO FUND EXPANSION PROJECTS.
We currently believe that our cash on hand, cash proceeds from an
underwritten public offering completed in January 2003, future cash flows from
operations, and/or future debt or equity security issuances will be adequate to
fund our:
o anticipated minimum capital expenditure requirements;
o idle property expenditures;
o debt service; and
o exploration expenditures.
Although we believe existing cash and cash equivalents are adequate, we
cannot project the cash impact of possible future investment opportunities or
acquisitions, and our operating properties may require more cash than
forecasted.
13
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The selling stockholders are Great Basin Gold Ltd., Hecla Mining
Company Retirement Plan and Lucky Friday Pension Plan.
On August 2, 2002, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Hecla Ventures
Corporation, we entered into an earn-in agreement with Rodeo Creek Gold, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Great Basin Gold Ltd ("Great Basin"). An "earn-in"
agreement is an agreement under which a party must take certain actions in order
to "earn" an interest in an entity. Pursuant to the agreement, described in more
detail under "Business - Exploration," Great Basin was issued a warrant to
purchase 2,000,000 shares of our common stock as of the date of execution of the
Earn-In Agreement. The warrant is exercisable on or before August 1, 2004 at
$3.73 per share. The beneficial owner of the warrant to purchase our common
stock is Great Basin. In the event that we elect to conduct certain development
activities, Great Basin will receive an additional warrant to purchase 1,000,000
shares of our common stock at the future current market value, and, if
development activities are completed, Great Basin will receive a final warrant
to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at the future current market
value.
The Hecla Mining Company Retirement Plan and the Lucky Friday Pension
Plan (the Hecla Benefit Plans) are employee benefit plans in which certain of
our employees can participate. Union Bank of California, NA, successor to Copper
Mountain Trust, the trustee for each Hecla Benefit Plan, purchased our stock at
the instruction of its independent fiduciary, Consulting Fiduciaries, Inc.
The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock
beneficially owned by each of the selling stockholders as of March 31, 2003,
based on information provided to us by such selling stockholders. We are not
able to state with certainty the amount of stock that will be held by each
selling stockholder after the completion of this offering because each selling
stockholder may offer all or some of its shares, and because there currently are
no agreements, arrangements, or understandings with respect to the sale of any
of the stock (other than registration rights agreements). The following table
assumes that (i) Great Basin exercises its existing warrant and sells all of the
shares offered hereby and (ii) all of the shares of stock offered by the Hecla
Benefit Plans pursuant to this prospectus and pursuant to the underwritten
offering will be sold. The selling stockholders are not making any
representation that any stock covered by this prospectus will be offered for
sale.
Total Number Shares Total Number of
of Shares Offered Shares Remaining Percent of Class
Name Before Sale Hereby After Sale Following Sales
---- ----------- ------ ---------- ---------------
Hecla Mining Company Retirement Plan....... 2,726,017 1,120,061 0 0.0%
Lucky Friday Pension Plan.................. 668,866 274,822 0 0.0%
Great Basin Gold Ltd....................... 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 0.0%
This prospectus also covers any additional shares of common stock that
may become issuable in connection with the stock being offered by reason of any
stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, or other similar transaction
effected without the receipt of consideration which results in an increase in
the number of our outstanding shares of common stock. In addition, each share of
common stock is accompanied by a series A junior participating preferred stock
purchase right entitling the holder to purchase additional shares of our common
stock under certain circumstances.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The stock covered by this prospectus may be offered, sold, or
distributed from time to time by the selling stockholders named in this
prospectus, or by their donees, pledgees, transferees, or other successors in
interest. The selling stockholders may sell their stock at market prices
prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing market
prices at the time of sale, at negotiated prices, or at fixed prices, which may
be changed, and which may represent a discount from the prevailing market price.
Each selling stockholder reserves the right to accept or reject, in whole or in
part, any proposed purchase of stock, whether the purchase is to be made
directly or through agents. We are not aware that any selling stockholder has
entered into any arrangements with any underwriters or broker-dealers regarding
the sale of its shares of common stock.
14
The selling stockholders may offer their stock at various times in one
or more of the following transactions under this prospectus:
o in ordinary brokers' transactions and transactions in which a broker
solicits purchasers;
o in transactions involving cross or block trades or otherwise on any
national securities exchange or quotation system on which our common
stock may be listed or quoted;
o in transactions in which brokers, dealers, or underwriters purchase
the stock as principal and resell the stock for their own accounts
pursuant to this prospectus;
o in transactions "at the market" to or through market makers in our
common stock;
o in other ways not involving market makers or established trading
markets, including direct sales of stock to purchasers or sales of
stock effected through agents;
o in transactions in options, swaps, or other derivatives which may or
may not be listed on an exchange;
o in privately negotiated transactions;
o in transactions to cover short sales; or
o in a combination of any of the foregoing transactions.
In addition, the selling stockholders also may sell their stock in
private transactions or in accordance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act of
1933 (Securities Act), to the extent eligible thereunder, rather than under this
prospectus.
From time to time, one or more of the selling stockholders may pledge
or grant a security interest in some or all of the stock owned by it. If a
selling stockholder defaults in performance of the secured obligations, the
pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the stock from time to time. A
selling stockholder also may transfer and donate stock in other circumstances.
If a selling stockholder donates or otherwise transfers its stock, the number of
shares of stock beneficially owned by it will decrease as and when it takes
these actions. The plan of distribution for the stock offered and sold under
this prospectus will otherwise remain unchanged, except that the transferees,
donees, or other successors in interest will be selling stockholders for
purposes of this prospectus.
The selling stockholders may use brokers, dealers, underwriters, or
agents to sell their stock. The persons acting as agents may receive
compensation in the form of commissions, discounts, or concessions. This
compensation may be paid by the selling stockholders or the purchasers of the
stock for whom such persons may act as agent, or to whom they may sell as
principal, or both. The selling stockholders and any agents or broker-dealers
that participate with it in the offer and sale of the stock may be deemed to be
"underwriters" within the meaning of Section 2(a)(11) of the Securities Act. In
addition, the broker-dealers' or their affiliates' commissions, discounts, or
concessions may qualify as underwriters' compensation under the Securities Act.
If a selling stockholder or any of its agents or broker-dealers qualifies as an
"underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act, it will be subject to
the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act, and we will make
copies of this prospectus and any supplements or amendments thereto available to
them for the purpose of satisfying the prospectus delivery requirements of the
Securities Act.
The selling stockholders and any other person participating in a
distribution of the stock covered by this prospectus will be subject to
applicable provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and
the rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, including Regulation M, which
may limit the timing of purchases and sales of the stock by the selling
stockholders and any other such person. Furthermore, under Regulation M, any
person engaged in the distribution of stock may not simultaneously engage in
market-making activities with respect to the stock being distributed for certain
periods prior to the commencement of or during that distribution. All of the
above may affect the marketability of the stock and the ability of any person or
entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the stock.
15
We are registering the common stock under this prospectus to satisfy
registration rights of the selling stockholders. Under our agreements with the
selling stockholders, we are required to bear the expenses relating to the
registration of this offering. The selling stockholders will bear any
underwriting discounts or commissions, brokerage fees, or stock transfer taxes.
We have agreed to indemnify the Hecla Benefit Plans against certain liabilities
arising in connection with this offering, including liabilities under the
Securities Act. The selling stockholders may agree to indemnify any agent,
dealer, or broker-dealer that participates in transactions involving the shares
of common stock against certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under
the Securities Act.
Upon our being notified by a selling stockholder that any material
arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of stock
through a block trade, special offering, exchange distribution, or secondary
distribution or a purchase by a broker or dealer, we will file with the SEC a
supplement to this prospectus, if required, pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the
Securities Act. In addition, upon our being notified by a selling stockholder
that a donee, pledgee, transferee, or other successor in interest intends to
sell more than 500 shares of stock, we will file with the SEC a supplement to
this prospectus.
USE OF PROCEEDS
The selling stockholders are offering all of the shares of common stock
covered by this prospectus. We will not receive any proceeds from the sales of
these shares.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND POLICY
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol "HL." As of March 31, 2003, we had 8,479 common stockholders of record.
Quarterly high and low stock prices, based on the New York Stock Exchange
composite transactions, are shown below:
Fiscal Year Quarter High ($) Low ($)
----------- ------- -------- -------
2003 First 3.94 2.58
Second (through April 25) 3.74 2.90
2002 First 1.99 0.90
Second 5.90 1.90
Third 5.20 2.20
Fourth 5.45 2.96
2001 First 1.00 0.50
Second 1.70 0.66
Third 1.26 0.78
Fourth 1.27 0.77
On April 25, 2003, the closing price of our common stock as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange was $3.58 per share.
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock or
other securities for several years and do not anticipate paying any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. We are currently restricted from paying
dividends on our common stock or repurchasing common stock until such time as we
have paid the cumulative dividends on our Series B preferred stock. In addition,
we have entered into loan documents that constrain our ability to pay dividends
on our common stock or repurchase our common stock.
16
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except shares, per share data and shareholder/employee data)
The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated
financial data for us for each of the years ended December 31, 1998 through
2002, and is derived from our audited financial statements. The data set forth
below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to our Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page F-1 of
this prospectus.
2002 2001 2000 1999(1) 1998
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Sales of products $ 105,700 $ 85,247 $ 75,850 $ 73,703 $ 75,108
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Income (loss) from continuing
operations $ 10,863 $ (9,582) $ (84,847) $ (43,391) $ (4,674)
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations(2) (2,224) 11,922 1,529 4,786 4,374
Net income (loss) 8,639 2,340 (83,965) (39,990) (300)
Preferred stock dividends(3) (23,253) (8,050) (8,050) (8,050) (8,050)
Loss applicable to common
shareholders(4) $ (14,614) $ (5,710) $ (92,015) $ (48,040) $ (8,350)
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Loss from continuing operations
per common share $ (0.15) $ (0.25) $ (1.39) $ (0.83) $ (0.23)
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Basic and diluted loss per
common share $ (0.18) $ (0.08) $ (1.38) $ (0.77) $ (0.15)
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Total assets $ 160,141 $ 153,116 $ 194,836 $ 268,357 $ 252,062
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Accrued reclamation and closure costs $ 49,723 $ 52,481 $ 58,710 $ 49,325 $ 29,753
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Noncurrent portion of debt $ 4,657 $ 11,948 $ 10,041 $ 55,095 $ 42,923
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Cash dividends paid per
common share $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Cash dividends paid per
preferred share(3) $ -- $ -- $ 1.75 $ 3.50 $ 3.50
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Common shares issued 86,187,468 73,068,796 66,859,752 66,844,575 55,166,728
Shareholders of record 8,584 8,926 9,273 9,714 10,162
Employees 720 701 1,195 1,277 1,184
(1) On January 1, 1999, we changed our method of accounting for start-up costs
in accordance with Statement of Position 98-5 "Reporting on the Costs of
Start-up Activities." The impact of this change in accounting principle
related to unamortized start-up costs associated with our 29.7331% interest
in the Greens Creek Mine and resulted in a $1.4 million charge for the year
ended December 31, 1999.
(2) During 2000, in furtherance of our determination to focus our operations on
silver and gold mining and to raise cash to reduce debt and provide working
capital, our board of directors made the decision to sell our industrial
minerals segment. As such, the industrial minerals segment has been
recorded as a discontinued operation as of and for each of the five years
in the period ended December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000,
only, the balance sheets have been reclassified to reflect the net assets
of the industrial minerals segment as a discontinued operation.
(3) As of December 31, 2002, we have not declared or paid $6.6 million of
Series B preferred stock dividends. However, since the dividends are
cumulative, they continue to be reported in determining the income (loss)
applicable to common stockholders, but are excluded in the amount reported
as cash dividends paid per preferred share. We completed an offer to
acquire all of our outstanding Series B preferred stock in exchange for
newly issued shares of our common stock on July 25, 2002. A total of
1,546,598 shares, or 67.2%, of the total number of Series B preferred
shares outstanding were validly tendered and exchanged into 10,826,186
shares of our common stock. During the third quarter of 2002, we incurred a
non-cash dividend of approximately $17.6 million related to the exchange
offer. The $17.6 million dividend represents the difference between the
value of the common stock issued in the exchange offer and the value of the
shares that were issuable under the stated conversion terms of the Series B
preferred stock. The non-cash dividend had no impact on our total
shareholders' equity as the offset was an increase in common stock and
surplus. As a result of the exchange offer, the total of cumulative
preferred dividends is $23.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
In 2003, the $8.0 million annual cumulative preferred dividends that have
historically been included in income (loss) applicable to common
shareholders will be reduced to approximately $2.6 million. The exchange
offer also eliminated $11.2 million of previously undeclared and unpaid
preferred stock dividends.
(4) After recognizing a $2.2 million loss from discontinued operations and
$23.3 million in preferred stock dividends, our loss applicable to common
stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2002 was approximately $14.6
million, compared to a loss of $5.7 million in 2001, after recognizing
$11.9 million in income from discontinued operations, due to a gain of
$12.7 million on the sale of the majority of our industrial minerals assets
and $8.0 million in preferred stock dividends.
17
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except share data)
The following table sets forth supplementary financial data for us for
each quarter of the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, derived from
unaudited consolidated financial statements. The data set forth below should be
read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our
Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page F-1 of this prospectus.
First Second Third Fourth
2002 Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
--------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Sales of products (1) $ 23,383 $ 28,663 $ 27,790 $ 25,864 $ 105,700
Gross profit (1) $ 3,734 $ 7,857 $ 6,414 $ 5,710 $ 23,715
Net income $ 486 $ 4,755 $ 1,533 $ 1,865 $ 8,639
Preferred stock dividends $ (2,012) $ (2,013) $ (18,568) $ (660) $ (23,253)
Income (loss) applicable to
common shareholders $ (1,526) $ 2,742 $ (17,035) $ 1,205 $ (14,614)
Basic and diluted income
(loss) per common share $ (0.02) $ 0.04 $ (0.20) $ 0.01 $ (0.18)
2001
---------------------------
Sales of products (1) $ 16,417 $ 24,561 $ 22,501 $ 21,768 $ 85,247
Gross profit (1) $ 852 $ 2,358 $ 270 $ 1,239 $ 4,719
Net income (loss) $ 9,535 $ (1,555) $ (2,456) $ (3,184) $ 2,340
Preferred stock dividends $ (2,012) $ (2,013) $ (2,013) $ (2,012) $ (8,050)
Income (loss) applicable to
common shareholders $ 7,523 $ (3,568) $ (4,469) $ (5,196) $ (5,710)
Basic and diluted income
(loss) per common share $ 0.11 $ (0.06) $ (0.06) $ (0.07) $ (0.08)
------------------
(1) During 2000, in furtherance of our determination to focus our
operations on silver and gold mining and to raise cash to reduce debt
and provide working capital, our board of directors made the decision
to sell our industrial minerals segment. As such, the industrial
minerals segment has been recorded as a discontinued operation.
18
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We are an 112-year-old company that has long been known as a precious
metals producer. We mine, process, develop and explore for silver, gold, lead
and zinc. We are operated and organized into two segments, silver and gold, and
have a small industrial minerals subsidiary. One of our operating properties is
included in the gold segment and three are included in the silver segment. The
following table presents sales of products and gross profit (loss) by segment
for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------
Sales of products:
Silver $ 56,404 $ 43,795 $ 44,277
Gold 49,296 41,452 31,573
-------- -------- --------
Total sales $105,700 $ 85,247 $ 75,850
======== ======== ========
Gross profit (loss):
Silver $ 7,066 $ (7,474) $ (5,227)
Gold 16,649 12,193 (102)
-------- -------- --------
Total gross profit (loss) $ 23,715 $ 4,719 $ (5,329)
======== ======== ========
During 2002, we produced more silver and gold than at any time in our
history, while continuing to maintain low costs of production. During 2002, we
produced approximately 8.7 million ounces of silver at an average total cash
cost of $2.25 per ounce and approximately 240,000 ounces of gold, 167,000 ounces
of which were produced in our gold segment at an average total cash cost of $137
per ounce. Our silver and gold cash costs per ounce are net of by-product
credits from other metals produced at those mines. Although we are positively
impacted by increases in metals prices, our recent efforts to reduce costs of
operations, improve production, increase our cash position and reduce debt
enhance our ability to operate even in precious metals price environments at
levels below those of the past several years.
In March 2002, we announced we had been awarded the Block B exploration
and mining lease near El Callao in the Venezuelan State of Bolivar by
CVG-Minerven (a Venezuelan government-owned gold mining company). Block B is a
1,795-hectare land position in the historic El Callao gold district that
includes the historic Chile, Laguna and Panama mines, which produced over 1.5
million ounces of gold between 1921 and 1946. Pursuant to the agreement with
CVG-Minerven, we paid CVG-Minerven $500,000 in September 2002. In March 2003 we
made an additional payment of $1.25 million, with a final payment of $1.0
million due September 2003. Additionally, we will also pay CVG-Minerven a
sliding scale royalty of 2% to 3% (depending on the gold price) on production
from Block B.
On June 13, 2002, we offered to holders of our Series B preferred stock
to exchange each of their preferred shares for seven shares of our common stock.
Holders of the preferred stock were offered the opportunity to exchange their
shares at a higher rate in order to limit the impact of the dividend arrearages
and to eliminate the liquidation preferences for converted preferred shares. The
dividends arrearages have the effect of preventing us from paying any dividends
on common stock and allowed the holders of preferred stock to elect two
directors to our board of directors. The arrearages may hinder our ability to
raise capital or negotiate third-party mergers and acquisitions, and may
adversely affect the market value of our common and preferred stock. In
addition, we believed the prospect of not receiving future dividends might be
untenable to our preferred holders and that they should have the opportunity to
exchange their shares for a more actively traded security.
As a result of the completed exchange offer, 1,546,598 shares, or
67.2%, of the total number of preferred shares previously outstanding (2.3
million), were validly tendered and exchanged into 10,826,186 shares of common
stock. Also as a result of the offering, the $8.0 million annual cumulative
preferred dividends that have historically been included in income (loss)
applicable to common shareholders will be reduced to approximately $2.6 million
beginning in 2003. Additionally, $11.2 million of previously undeclared and
unpaid preferred stock dividends were eliminated. During the third quarter, we
incurred a non-cash dividend charge of approximately $17.6 million, which
represents the difference between the value of the common stock issued in the
exchange offer and the value of the shares that were issuable under the stated
conversion terms of the preferred stock.
19
On August 2, 2002, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Hecla
Ventures Corporation, entered into an earn-in agreement with Rodeo Creek Gold,
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Great Basin Gold Ltd. (Great Basin),
concerning exploration, development and production on Great Basin's Hollister
Development Block gold property, located on the Carlin Trend in Nevada. The
agreement provides us with an option to earn a 50% working interest in the
Hollister Development Block in return for funding a two-stage, advanced
exploration and development program leading to commercial production. We
estimate the cost to achieve our 50% interest in the Hollister Development Block
to be approximately $21.8 million. Upon earn-in, we will operate the mine. For
additional information relating to the Hollister Development Block, see Note 4
of Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page F-9 of this
prospectus.
In January 2003, we completed an underwritten public offering of 23.0
million newly issued shares of our common stock. The public offering also
included 2.0 million shares held by the Hecla Mining Company Retirement Plan and
the Lucky Friday Pension Plan (the benefit plans). We received net proceeds from
the offering totaling approximately $91.2 million, which will be used to fund
future exploration and development, working capital requirements, capital
expenditures, possible future acquisitions and for other general corporate
purposes. Our benefit plans realized net proceeds of approximately $8.0 million
from the sale of the 2.0 million shares included in the public offering.
The registration statement of which this prospectus is a part covers
1,394,883 shares of our common stock held by the benefit plans and 2,000,000
shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants issued to Great
Basin Gold Ltd. (Great Basin) pursuant to an Earn-in Agreement discussed in Note
4 of Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page F-9 of
this prospectus.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make a wide
variety of estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of
the date of the financial statements, and (ii) the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods covered by the financial statements.
Our management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and
assumptions affecting the future resolution of the uncertainties increases,
these judgments become even more subjective and complex. We have identified
certain accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of our
current financial condition and results of operations. Our significant
accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 of Notes to our Consolidated
Financial Statements, beginning on page F-9 of this prospectus.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
-------------------
Sales of metals products sold directly to smelters are recorded when
title and risk of loss transfer to the smelter at current spot metals prices.
Due to the time elapsed from the transfer to the smelter and the final assay
settlement with the smelter (generally three months), we must estimate the price
at which our metals will be sold in reporting our profitability and cash flow.
Recorded values are adjusted monthly until final settlement at month-end metals
prices. If there was a significant variance in estimated metals prices or assays
compared to the final actual metals prices and assays, our monthly results of
operations could be affected. Sales of metal in products tolled, rather than
sold to smelters, are recorded at contractual amounts when title and risk of
loss transfer to the buyer.
Changes in the market price of metals significantly affect our
revenues, profitability and cash flow. Metals prices can and often do fluctuate
widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, such as
political and economic conditions, demand, forward selling by producers,
expectations for inflation, central bank sales, the relative exchange rate of
the U.S. dollar, purchases and lending, investor sentiment, and global mine
production levels. The aggregate effect of these factors is impossible to
predict. Because a significant portion of our revenues is derived from the sale
of silver, gold, lead and zinc, our earnings are directly related to the prices
of these metals. If the market price for these metals falls below our total
production costs, we will experience losses on such sales.
20
PROVEN AND PROBABLE ORE RESERVES
--------------------------------
On a periodic basis, management reviews the reserves that reflect
estimates of the quantities and grades of ore at our mines which management
believes can be recovered and sold at prices in excess of the total cost
associated with extraction and processing the ore. Management's calculations of
Proven and Probable ore reserves are based on in-house engineering and
geological estimates using current operating costs, metals prices and demand for
our products. Periodically, management obtains external determinations of
reserves.
Reserve estimates will change as existing reserves are depleted through
production, as well as changes in estimates caused by changing production cost
and/or metals prices. Changes in reserves may also reflect that grades of ore
fed to process may be different from stated reserve grades because of variation
in grades in areas mined, mining dilution and other factors. Reserves estimated
for properties that have not yet commenced production may require revision based
on actual production experience.
Declines in the market price of metals, as well as increased production
or capital costs or reduced recovery rates, may render ore reserves uneconomic
to exploit unless the utilization of forward sales contracts or other hedging
techniques is sufficient to offset such effects. If our realized price for the
metals we produce, including hedging benefits, were to decline substantially
below the levels set for calculation of reserves for an extended period, there
could be material delays in the development of new projects, net losses, reduced
cash flow, restatements or reductions in reserves and asset write-downs in the
applicable accounting periods. Reserves should not be interpreted as assurances
of mine life or of the profitability of current or future operations. No
assurance can be given that the estimate of the amount of metal or the indicated
level of recovery of these metals will be realized.
DEPRECIATION AND DEPLETION
--------------------------
Depreciation is based on the estimated useful lives of the assets and
is computed using straight-line and unit-of-production methods. Depletion is
computed using the unit-of-production method. The unit-of-production method is
based on Proven and Probable ore reserves. As discussed above, our estimates of
Proven and Probable ore reserves may change, possibly in the near term,
resulting in changes to depreciation, depletion, amortization and reclamation
accrual rates in future reporting periods.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
-------------------------------
Management reviews the net carrying value of all facilities, including
idle facilities, on a periodic basis. We estimate the net realizable value of
each property based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows that will be
generated from operations at each property, the estimated salvage value of the
surface plant and equipment and the value associated with property interests.
These estimates of undiscounted future cash flows are dependent upon the future
metals price estimates over the estimated remaining mine life. If undiscounted
cash flows are less than the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss is
recognized based upon the estimated expected future cash flows from the property
discounted at an interest rate commensurate with the risk involved.
Management's estimates of metals prices, recoverable Proven and
Probable ore reserves, and operating, capital and reclamation costs are subject
to risks and uncertainties of change affecting the recoverability of our
investment in various projects. Although management believes it has made a
reasonable estimate of these factors based on current conditions and
information, it is reasonably possible that changes could occur in the near term
which could adversely affect management's estimate of net cash flows expected to
be generated from our operating properties and the need for asset impairment
write-downs.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
---------------------
When it is probable that such costs will be incurred and they are
reasonably estimable, we accrue costs associated with environmental remediation
obligations at the most likely estimate. Accruals for estimated losses from
environmental remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than
completion of the remedial feasibility study for such facility and are charged
to provision for closed operations and environmental matters. We periodically
review our accrued liabilities for such remediation costs as evidence becomes
available indicating that our remediation liability has potentially changed.
Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation are not discounted to
their present value unless subject to a contractually obligated fixed payment
schedule. Such costs
21
are based on management's current estimate of amounts that are expected to be
incurred when the remediation work is performed within current laws and
regulations. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties
are recorded as assets when their receipt is deemed probable.
Future closure, reclamation and environment-related expenditures are
difficult to estimate in many circumstances due to the early stages of
investigation, uncertainties associated with defining the nature and extent of
environmental contamination, the uncertainties relating to specific reclamation
and remediation methods and costs, application and changing of environmental
laws, regulations and interpretations by regulatory authorities and the possible
participation of other potentially responsible parties. Reserves for closure
costs, reclamation and environmental matters totaled $49.7 million at December
31, 2002. We anticipate that expenditures relating to these reserves will be
made over the next five to ten years. It is reasonably possible that the
ultimate cost of remediation could change in the future and that changes to
these estimates could have a material effect on future operating results as new
information becomes known.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
---------------------
The following table displays the actual silver and gold production (in
thousand ounces) by operation for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and
2000, and projected silver and gold production for the year ending December 31,
2003:
Projected Actual
2003 2002 2001 2000
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Silver ounce production:
San Sebastian(1) 3,800 3,432 950 --
Greens Creek(2) 3,300 3,245 3,260 2,754
Lucky Friday 1,900 2,004 3,224 5,012
Other sources(3) -- -- -- 233
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total silver ounces 9,000 8,681 7,434 7,999
========== ========== ========== ==========
Gold ounce production:
La Camorra 150 167 152 93
San Sebastian(1) 35 42 16 --
Greens Creek(2) 30 31 26 25
Other sources(3) -- -- 1 28
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total gold ounces 215 240 195 146
========== ========== ========== ==========
(1) Production commenced in May 2001 at the San Sebastian mine.
(2) Reflects our 29.73% portion.
(3) Includes production from the Rosebud mine, which completed operations
in the third quarter of 2000, and other sources.
22
Total cash and total productions costs, and average metals prices were
as follows:
2002 2001 2000
---- ---- ----
Average costs per ounce of silver produced:
Total cash costs per ounce ($/oz.)(1,2) 2.25 3.57 4.02
Total production costs per ounce ($/oz.)(1,2) 3.68 5.09 5.49
Average costs per ounce of gold produced:
Total cash costs per ounce ($/oz.)(3) 137 133 211
Total production costs per ounce ($/oz.)(3) 206 200 275
Average Metals Prices:
Silver-Handy & Harman ($/oz.) 4.63 4.36 5.00
Gold-Realized ($/oz.) 303 280 284
Gold-London Final ($/oz.) 310 272 279
Lead-LME Cash ($/pound) 0.205 0.216 0.206
Zinc-LME Cash ($/pound) 0.353 0.402 0.512
(1) For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, approximately $0.8
million and $0.4 million, respectively, of costs were classified as
care-and-maintenance costs and included in the determination of the
cost per ounce at Lucky Friday. Excluding the care-and-maintenance
costs, the total cash and total production costs per ounce total $2.16
and $3.59, respectively, during 2002, and $3.52 and $5.04,
respectively, during 2001. Cash costs per ounce of silver or gold
represent non-U.S. GAAP measurements that management uses to monitor
and evaluate the performance of its mining operations and are
calculated pursuant to standards of the Gold Institute. We believe cash
costs per ounce of silver or gold provide an indicator of profitability
at each location and on a consolidated total, as well as a meaningful
basis on which to compare other mining companies and other mining
operating properties. A reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to GAAP
cost of sales and other direct production costs can be found
immediately following this table.
(2) The lower costs per silver ounce during 2002, compared to 2001, are due
in part to significant by-product credits from increased gold
production in the silver segment calculated pursuant to standards of
the Gold Institute.
(3) Costs per ounce of gold are based on the gold produced by the gold
segment only. Gold produced in the silver segment (San Sebastian and
Greens Creek) is treated as a by-product credit in calculating silver
costs per ounce. Cash costs per ounce of silver or gold represent
non-U.S. GAAP measurements that management uses to monitor and evaluate
the performance of its mining operations and are calculated pursuant to
standards of the Gold Institute. We believe cash costs per ounce of
silver or gold provide an indicator of profitability at each location
and on a consolidated total, as well as a meaningful basis on which to
compare other mining companies and other mining operating properties. A
reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to GAAP cost of sales and other
direct production costs can be found immediately following this table.
The following table presents a reconciliation between non-GAAP total
cash costs to GAAP cost of sales and other direct production costs for our gold
segment for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands,
except costs per ounce):
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------
Total cash costs $ 22,879 $ 20,216 $ 24,476
Divided by ounces produced 167 152 116
-------- -------- --------
Total cash cost per ounce produced 137 133 211
Reconciliation to GAAP:
Total cash costs $ 22,879 $ 20,216 $ 24,476
Reclamation 388 354 310
Treatment & freight costs (1,840) (1,467) (57)
By-product credits -- -- 280
Change in product inventory (53) 289 (1,411)
Other costs -- -- 351
-------- -------- --------
Cost of sales and other direct
productions costs (GAAP)(1) $ 21,374 $ 19,392 $ 23,949
======== ======== ========
(1) Cost of sales and other direct production costs is the most comparable
financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP to total cash
costs. For each year, the sum of the cost of sales and other direct
production costs for our gold and silver segments is presented in our
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss beginning
on page F-6 of this Prospectus.
23
The following table presents a reconciliation between non-GAAP total
cash costs to GAAP cost of sales and other direct production costs for our
silver segment for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (in
thousands, except costs per ounce):
2002 2001 2000
-------- -------- --------
Total cash costs $ 19,573 $ 26,567 $ 31,219
Divided by ounces produced 8,681 7,434 7,766
-------- -------- --------
Total cash cost per ounce produced 2.25 3.57 4.02
Reconciliation to GAAP:
Total cash costs $ 19,573 $ 26,567 $ 31,219
Reclamation 1,118 707 591
Treatment & freight costs (17,853) (19,069) (27,040)
By-product credits 37,933 31,487 34,066
Change in product inventory (2,734) 674 (139)
Other costs 38 295 442
-------- -------- --------
Cost of sales and other direct
productions costs (GAAP) (1) $ 38,075 $ 40,661 $ 39,139
======== ======== ========
(1) Cost of sales and other direct production costs is the most comparable
financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP to total cash
costs. For each year, the sum of the cost of sales and other direct
production costs for our gold and silver segments is presented in our
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss beginning
on page F-6 of this Prospectus.
In 2000, we shipped approximately 1,078,000 tons of product from the
Kentucky-Tennessee Clay Company, Kentucky-Tennessee Feldspar Corporation,
Kentucky-Tennessee Clay de Mexico (collectively the K-T Group), which included
ball clay, kaolin and feldspar, as well as approximately 61,000 tons of
specialty aggregates from the Colorado Aggregate division (CAC) of MWCA, Inc.,
and 130,000 cubic yards of landscape material from the Mountain West Products
division (MWP) of MWCA, Inc. In 2001, we shipped approximately 261,000 tons from
the industrial minerals group, including 20,000 tons from CAC. In 2002, we
shipped approximately 10,000 tons from CAC.
During 2000, in furtherance of our determination to focus operations on
silver and gold mining and to raise cash to retire debt and provide working
capital, our board of directors made the decision to sell the industrial
minerals segment. The sale of our industrial minerals assets has allowed our
management to focus on our precious metals operations and exploration for new
precious metals properties and reserves as well as providing us with a portion
of the working capital for these activities. During 2000, we sold substantially
all of the assets of MWP and the landscape operations of CAC. In March 2001, we
completed a sale of the K-T Group and certain other minor inactive industrial
minerals companies. In March 2002, we completed a sale of the pet operations of
CAC. In March 2003, we sold the remaining inventories of MWCA, Inc. and no
longer produce or sell any product from our industrial minerals segment.
2002 COMPARED TO 2001
---------------------
For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, we
recorded net income, before preferred stock dividends, of approximately $8.6
million ($0.11 per common share) and $2.3 million ($0.03 per common share). Our
net income for 2002 includes a loss from discontinued operations of
approximately $2.2 million ($0.03 per common share), compared to income from
discontinued operations of approximately $11.9 million ($0.17 per common share)
during 2001. The income from discontinued operations in 2001 is principally due
to a gain of $12.7 recognized on the sale of the K-T Group.
For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, we
recorded losses applicable to common shareholders of approximately $14.6 million
($0.18 per common share) and $5.7 million ($0.08 per common share). Included in
the losses applicable to common shareholders were preferred stock dividends of
$23.3 million and $8.0 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The 2002
dividends include a non-cash dividend charge of approximately $17.6 million
related to the completed preferred stock exchange offer.
24
SILVER OPERATIONS
-----------------
For the year ended December 31, 2002, the silver segment reported
income from operations of $4.1 million compared to a loss from operations of
$8.6 million during 2001. Sales of products increased by $12.6 million and cost
of sales and other direct production costs as a percentage of sales from
products decreased to 67.4% during 2002 from 92.8% in 2001. The consolidated
improvements in the silver segment primarily are a result of increased
production from the lower cost San Sebastian mine, reduced production at the
higher cost Lucky Friday mine, lower overall unit costs at the Greens Creek mine
and higher average silver and gold prices, partly offset by lower average zinc
and lead prices.
For the year ended December 31, 2002, the San Sebastian mine, located
in the State of Durango, Mexico, reported sales of $23.5 million compared to
$7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, a result of the commencement
of operations in May 2001 with full production reached during the second quarter
of 2002. During 2002, San Sebastian produced approximately 3.4 million ounces of
silver and 42,000 ounces of gold, respectively, at a low total cash cost of
$1.09 per silver ounce. The low cost per silver ounce is due in part to
significant by-product credits from gold production. For the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2001, gold by-product credits were approximately $3.76 per
silver ounce and $4.61 per silver ounce, respectively.
The Greens Creek mine, a 29.73%-owned joint-venture arrangement with
Kennecott Greens Creek Mining Company located on Admiralty Island, near Juneau,
Alaska, reported sales of $23.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, as
compared to $20.3 million during 2001, primarily due to increased mill
throughput resulting in higher concentrate tons produced combined with better
recoveries in the gravity circuit, leading to improved lead/silver/gold
distributions. Our share of Greens Creek's silver production remained
approximately the same at 3.2 million ounces, compared to 3.3 million ounces,
for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, while production of gold ounces
and lead and zinc tons increased by approximately 17%, 11% and 14%,
respectively. The total cash cost per silver ounce decreased from $2.41 during
2001 to $1.81 in 2002.
The Lucky Friday mine, located in northern Idaho and a producing mine
for us since 1958, reported sales of approximately $9.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2002, as compared to $15.7 million during 2001. The reduction
in sales at the Lucky Friday mine is primarily due to the decision in October
2001 to reduce production due to low silver and lead prices.
With minimal additional development, we estimate the Lucky Friday mine
can sustain the lower production levels through 2004 and will continue to
operate as long as the cost of operating is less than putting the property on
care and maintenance. The total cash cost per silver ounce decreased from $5.27
in 2001 to $4.97 in 2002. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001,
approximately $0.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of costs were
classified as care-and-maintenance costs and included in the determination of
the costs per ounce at Lucky Friday. Excluding the care-and-maintenance costs,
the total cash cost per ounce was $4.57 for 2002 and $5.14 for 2001. For the
year ending December 31, 2002, production totaled approximately 2.0 million
silver ounces and 10,000 tons of lead, as compared with total production for the
year ended December 31, 2001, of 3.2 million silver ounces and 21,000 tons of
lead, respectively.
GOLD OPERATIONS
---------------
We currently operate the La Camorra mine, located in the eastern
Venezuelan State of Bolivar, approximately 120 miles southeast of Puerto Ordaz.
At the present time, La Camorra is our sole gold operating unit.
Sales of product increased by $7.8 million and cost of sales and other
direct production costs as a percentage of sales from products decreased to
43.4% during the year 2002 from 46.8% in 2001. The improvement to sales, as well
as to cost of sales and other direct production costs as a percentage of sales,
during 2002 is primarily due to increased mine equipment availability and
improvements to the crushing, milling and adsorption capacities, allowing for
increases in tons milled and gold ounces produced. Also contributing to the
improvements were increases in the average realized price of gold, which
increased 8% during 2002 when compared to 2001.
25
CORPORATE MATTERS
-----------------
For the year ended December 31, 2002, we reported a net income tax
benefit of approximately $2.9 million primarily due to the reversal of a
valuation allowance in Mexico for existing net operating loss carryforwards of
$3.0 million. The reversal of the valuation allowance was principally due to the
performance of the San Sebastian mine and the existence of evidence the mine
will be able to utilize existing net operating loss carryforwards in 2003 and
2004. During 2001, no income tax benefit or provision was recognized. For
further information, see Note 6 of Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements, beginning on page F-9 of this prospectus.
Provision for closed operations and environmental matters decreased
$0.4 million (or 31%) during 2002, compared with 2001, primarily due to
decreased expenditures relating to the Coeur d'Alene Basin litigation ($0.8
million), partly offset by a provision for future reclamation and other closure
costs at various closed properties recognized during the third quarter of 2002
($0.3 million).
Exploration expense increased $3.7 million (170%) during 2002, compared
to 2001, primarily due to increased exploration expenditures in Venezuela at the
La Camorra mine and Block B concessions ($1.9 million); in Mexico at or near the
San Sebastian mine ($1.1 million); at the Hollister Development Block in Nevada
($0.7 million); and at the Greens Creek mine in Alaska ($0.4 million). The
increases in exploration are partially offset by lower miscellaneous project
evaluation expenditures during 2002 ($0.2 million).
Interest expense decreased $2.1 million (or 53%) in 2002, compared with
2001, primarily the result of repayment of a $55.0 million term loan facility in
March 2001.
Miscellaneous expense decreased $1.1 million (or 37%) during 2002,
compared with 2001, primarily due to a foreign exchange gain ($0.9 million) in
2002, due to the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar and a positive foreign
exchange variance in Mexico, as well as a pension curtailment adjustment in 2001
related to the Lucky Friday Pension Plan associated with the cutback in
operations at the mine ($0.9 million). These positive factors are partially
offset by accruals for tax offset bonuses on employee stock option plans ($0.7
million) and legal, consulting and accounting expenses regarding our preferred
stock tender offer ($0.2 million) and various other corporate matters.
Interest and other income decreased $1.6 million (or 47%) during 2002,
compared with 2001, primarily due to decreased pension income ($1.9 million),
offset by a positive mark to market adjustment on our outstanding gold lease
rate swap ($0.3 million).
2001 COMPARED TO 2000
---------------------
We recorded a loss from continuing operations, before preferred stock
dividends, of approximately $9.6 million, or $0.14 per common share, in 2001
compared to a loss from continuing operations, before an extraordinary charge
and preferred stock dividends, of approximately $84.8 million, or $1.27 per
common share, in 2000. After recognizing $11.9 million in income from
discontinued operations and $8.1 million (which has not been declared or paid)
in dividends to holders of our Series B preferred stock, our loss applicable to
common shareholders for 2001 was approximately $5.7 million, or $0.08 per common
share, compared to a loss of $92.0 million, or $1.38 per common share, in 2000
after recognition of $1.5 million in income from discontinued operations, a $0.6
million extraordinary charge for the write-off of debt issuance costs related to
extinguished debt, and $8.1 million (only $4.0 million of which was declared or
paid) in dividends to holders of our Series B preferred stock. Although we did
not declare the dividends for the year 2001 and the third and fourth quarters of
2000, because these dividends are cumulative, the effects of the undeclared
dividends are reflected in the loss applicable to common shareholders.
During 2000, adjustments to the carrying value of mining properties
totaled $40.2 million, including an adjustment of $31.2 million to reduce the
carrying value of the Lucky Friday mine property, plant and equipment.
Additionally during 2000, we recorded adjustments of $4.4 million for
properties, plants and equipment and supply inventory at the Rosebud mine and
$4.7 million for previously capitalized development costs at the Noche Buena
gold property. During 2001, there were no adjustments to the carrying value of
mining properties.
Our provision for closed operations and environmental matters decreased
$18.7 million from $20.0 million in 2000 to $1.3 million in 2001. The reduction
resulted principally from a decrease at the Grouse Creek mine and the
26
Bunker Hill Superfund site of $17.8 million, primarily due to 2000 environmental
and reclamation accruals for future environmental and reclamation expenditures.
SILVER OPERATIONS
-----------------
Sales of products decreased approximately $0.5 million from $44.3
million in 2000 to $43.8 million in 2001, primarily due to lower zinc and silver
prices, lower production at the Lucky Friday mine ($7.4 million) and decreased
hedging activities ($0.9 million) in the 2001 period. These factors were partly
offset by increased sales at the San Sebastian mine, due to the commencement of
operations in May 2001 ($7.8 million).
Cost of sales and other direct production costs increased approximately
$2.0 million, or 5.1%, from $38.7 million in 2000 to $40.7 million in 2001,
primarily due to decreased cost of sales at the Lucky Friday mine ($5.3 million)
resulting from decreased production of silver and lead, offset by increased cost
of sales at the San Sebastian mine ($6.2 million) and increased cost of sales at
the Greens Creek mine ($1.1 million) due to increased production. Cost of sales
and other direct production costs as a percentage of sales increased from 87.4%
in 2000 to 92.8% in 2001 primarily due to lower hedging revenues and lower
profit margins due to lower silver and zinc prices.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased $0.2 million from
$10.8 million in 2000 to $10.6 million in 2001, principally due to decreased
depreciation at the Lucky Friday mine ($1.6 million), due to the write-down of
assets in December 2000, offset by increased depreciation at the San Sebastian
mine ($1.0 million), due to the commencement of operations in May 2001.
Cash operating, total cash and total production cost per silver ounce
decreased from $4.02, $4.02 and $5.49 in 2000 to $3.55, $3.57 and $5.09 in 2001,
respectively. The decreases in the cost per silver ounce were due primarily to
the addition of the low-cost San Sebastian mine, which commenced operations in
May 2001, and the positive impact of Greens Creek's increased silver production
during 2001, resulting from a higher silver grade and increased tons mined. The
full cost per ounce was also positively impacted by decreased per ounce
depreciation at the Lucky Friday mine due to the write-down of the majority of
property, plant and equipment in the fourth quarter of 2000. During the fourth
quarter of 2001, approximately $0.4 million of costs were classified as
care-and- maintenance costs and included in the determination of the cost per
ounce at Lucky Friday. Excluding the $0.4 million in costs, the cash operating,
total cash and total production costs per ounce total $3.49, $3.52 and $5.04,
respectively, for 2001.
GOLD OPERATIONS
---------------
Sales of products increased by approximately $9.9 million, or 31.3%,
from $31.6 million in 2000 to $41.5 million in 2001, primarily a result of
increased production at the La Camorra mine ($16.6 million), partly offset by
the completion of mining activity at the Rosebud mine ($6.6 million) in the
third quarter of 2000.
Cost of sales and other direct production costs decreased approximately
$5.0 million, or 20.5%, from $24.4 million in 2000 to $19.4 million in 2001,
primarily due to decreased cost of sales at the Rosebud mine ($7.5 million), due
to the completion of mining activity in the third quarter of 2000, offset by
increased cost of sales from the La Camorra mine ($3.0 million) due to increased
production.
Cost of sales and other direct production costs as a percentage of
sales decreased from 77.3% in 2000 to 46.8% in 2001. The change was due to
increased production, increased gold ore grade and better efficiencies at the La
Camorra mine and decreased production and sales at the Rosebud mine due to the
completion of mining activity in 2000.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased $2.6 million, or
36%, from $7.3 million in 2000 to $9.9 million in 2001, principally due to
increased depreciation from the La Camorra mine due to increased production
($4.7 million), offset by decreased depreciation at the Rosebud mine ($2.0
million), due to the completion of mining activity in the third quarter of 2000.
Cash operating, total cash and total production costs per gold ounce
decreased from $208, $211 and $275 in 2000 to $133, $133 and $200 in 2001,
respectively. The decreases in costs per gold ounce were primarily
27
attributable to increased gold production at the La Camorra mine, as well as the
completion of mining activity in the third quarter of 2000 at the Rosebud mine.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
-----------------------
We recorded income from discontinued operations of approximately $11.9
million, or $0.17 per common share, in 2001 compared to income of approximately
$1.5 million, or $0.02 per common share, in 2000. On March 27, 2001, we
completed a sale of the K-T Group for $62.5 million, subject to customary
post-closing adjustments, and recorded a gain of $12.7 million on the sale in
2001. Other factors contributing to the change include:
- decreased sales of approximately $53.4 million, a direct result of the
sale of the K-T Group ($47.8 million), as well as decreased shipments
at the MWCA, Inc., group ($5.6 million) due to the sale of MWP in
March 2000 and the landscape operation of CAC in June 2000;
- decreased cost of sales of $47.0 million, directly due to the lower
sales at the K-T Group and the partial sale of MWCA, Inc., during
2000;
- decreased depreciation, depletion and amortization of $2.9 million,
due to the sale of the K-T Group and the partial sale of MWCA, Inc.,
in 2000;
- a loss of $1.0 million on the sale of MWP in 2000; and
- legal fees during 2001 associated with litigation concerning the
failed sale for the K-T Group in January 2001 ($0.8 million).
CORPORATE MATTERS
-----------------
Exploration expense decreased $4.2 million, or 66%, from $6.3 million
in 2000 to $2.1 million in 2001. This decrease is principally due to reduced
exploration activity in Mexico ($1.4 million); decreased expenditures at the
Rosebud mine ($1.3 million), due to completion of operations in the third
quarter of 2000; and decreased expenditures at La Camorra and other South
American countries ($0.8 million).
Interest expense decreased $4.2 million in 2001 as compared to 2000,
primarily the result of the repayment of the $55.0 million term loan facility in
March 2001 and decreased loan fees during 2001 as compared to the 2000 period.
Interest and other income decreased $1.1 million from $4.6 million in
2000 to $3.5 million in 2001, principally a result of the gains recognized
during 2000 on the sale of assets and lower interest income in 2001.
Miscellaneous expense increased $1.1 million from $1.8 million in 2000
to $3.0 million in 2001, primarily due to a pension curtailment adjustment
related to the Lucky Friday Pension Plan associated with the cutback in
operations at the mine.
An extraordinary charge of $0.6 million was recorded in 2000 to write
off previously unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the
extinguishment of debt.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
---------------------------------
Our financial condition improved during 2002, with a current ratio of
1.39 to l at December 31, 2002, compared to 0.99 to 1 at December 31, 2001. At
December 31, 2002, we held cash and cash equivalents of $19.5 million, an
increase of approximately $12.0 million from December 31, 2001. Additionally, in
January 2003 we announced the completion of an underwritten public offering for
23.0 million shares of our common stock, which resulted in net proceeds of
approximately $91.2 million.
We believe cash requirements over the next twelve months will be funded
through a combination of current cash, proceeds from the public offering
completed in January 2003, future cash flows from operations, and/or future debt
or equity security issuances. Although we believe existing cash and cash
equivalents are adequate, we cannot
28
project the cash impact of possible future investment opportunities or
acquisitions, and our operating properties may require more cash than
forecasted.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS
------------------------------------------------------------------
The table below presents our contractual obligations and commitments
primarily with regards to payment of debt, certain capital expenditures and
lease arrangements (in thousands):
Payments Due By Period
---------------------------------------------------------
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Long-term debt $ 7,296 $ 2,332 $ 1,366 $ 959 $ -- $11,953
Capital expenditure commitments (1) 2,250 -- -- -- -- 2,250
Operating lease commitments 608 534 506 482 117 2,247
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total contractual cash obligations $10,154 $ 2,866 $ 1,872 $ 1,441 $ 117 $16,450
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
(1) For further information, see Note 4 of Notes to our Consolidated
Financial Statements, beginning on page F-9 of this prospectus.
We maintain reserves for costs associated with mine closure,
reclamation of land and other environmental matters. At December 31, 2002, our
reserves for these matters totaled $49.7 million, for which no contractual or
commitment obligations exist. Future expenditures related to closure,
reclamation and environmental expenditures are difficult to estimate, although
we anticipate we will make expenditures relating to these reserves over the next
five to ten years. During 2003, expenditures for environmental remediation and
reclamation are estimated to be in the range of $6.0 million and $8.0 million.
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
--------------------
Operating activities provided approximately $20.2 million in cash
during 2002, primarily from cash provided by La Camorra, San Sebastian and
Greens Creek. Significant uses of cash included cash required for reclamation
activities and other noncurrent liabilities ($4.8 million), increases in
inventories ($3.9 million), increases in accounts and notes receivable ($3.5
million), offset by positive changes in accounts payable, payroll and other
accrued expenses ($2.3 million). Principal noncash elements included charges for
depreciation, depletion and amortization of $22.7 million, an increase in the
provision for reclamation and closure costs ($1.9 million), offset by a change
in deferred income taxes ($3.3 million).
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
--------------------
Investing activities required $4.2 million in cash during 2002. The
major use of cash was additions to properties, plants and equipment ($11.2
million), primarily at the La Camorra ($5.8 million), Greens Creek ($2.9
million) and San Sebastian ($1.8 million) mines, as well as the initial payment
in September for the Block B exploration and mining lease in Venezuela ($0.5
million). In 2003, we estimate our capital expenditures will be in the range of
$15.0 to $25.0 million. The lower end of the range of capital expenditures in
2003 represents sustaining capital at our existing operations and equipment
acquisitions at the Hollister Development Block in Nevada. The upper end of the
estimate includes other possible capital projects, including commencement of a
project to construct a shaft at the La Camorra mine in Venezuela and other
possible development activities. There can be no assurance that our estimated
capital expenditures for 2003 will be in the range we have projected.
The cash used for additions to properties, plants and equipment was
partially offset by proceeds received on the sale of the corporate headquarters
building, located in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, which was completed on April 8, 2002
($5.6 million), as well as the sale of the pet operations of CAC ($1.6 million)
during the first quarter of 2002.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
--------------------
During 2002, financing activities used approximately $4.0 million in
cash, primarily for the repayment of debt ($10.4 million). The repayment of debt
was partly offset by borrowings of $3.3 million and proceeds of $2.9 million for
common stock issued for outstanding warrants and employee stock options
exercised.
29
As of December 31, 2002, we had outstanding debt of $12.0 million,
including $7.3 million due over the next twelve months. The outstanding debt
included project financing facilities for the La Camorra mine in Venezuela ($3.5
million) and the Velardena mill at the San Sebastian mine in Mexico ($5.5
million), as well as a $3.0 million subordinated loan.
OTHER
-----
Venezuela, the site of our La Camorra mine, recently experienced
political unrest in the form of street marches and demands that the current
president hold a referendum to determine whether to remove him from office. A
general strike commenced in December 2002 and continued into February 2003. The
strike caused shortages of oil and gas supplies in Venezuela and a severe
economic downturn. We continued to operate the La Camorra mine during the
general strike and were able to obtain adequate supplies, including oil and gas
for our operations. Oil and gas operations are not up to full capacity. Although
we believe we will be able to manage and operate our La Camorra mine and related
exploration projects successfully, due to the strike and its ramifications on
supplies of oil, gas and other products, there can be no assurance that we will
be able to operate without interruptions to our operations.
Following the general strike in Venezuela, the Venezuelan government
announced its intent to implement exchange controls on foreign currency
transactions. Rules and regulations regarding the implementation of exchange
controls in Venezuela have not been finalized. Exchange controls may require us
to convert United States dollars into foreign currency. Management is currently
monitoring the implementation of exchange controls in Venezuela. Such
implementation of exchange controls may adversely affect our operations in
Venezuela.
ENVIRONMENTAL
-------------
In August 2001, we entered into an Agreement in Principle with the
United States and the State of Idaho to settle the governments' claims for
natural resource damages and clean-up costs related to the historic mining
practices in the Coeur d'Alene Basin in northern Idaho. In 2002, due to a number
of changes that have occurred since the signing of the Agreement in Principle,
including improvements in the environmental conditions at Grouse Creek and lower
estimated clean-up costs in the Coeur d'Alene Basin as well as our improved
financial condition, we agreed with the United States and the State of Idaho to
discontinue utilizing the Agreement in Principle as a settlement vehicle.
However, we may participate in further settlement negotiations with the
United States and the State of Idaho in the future to limit our environmental
clean-up liabilities for historic mining practices in the Coeur d'Alene Basin.
Due to a number of uncertainties related to this matter, including the outcome
of pending litigation and the result of any settlement negotiations, we do not
have the ability to estimate what, if any, liability exists related to the Coeur
d'Alene Basin at this time. It is reasonably possible that our ability to
estimate what, if any, liability we may have relating to the Coeur d'Alene Basin
may change in the near or long term depending on a number of factors. In
addition, an adverse ruling against us for liability and damages in this matter
could have a material adverse effect on us. For additional information, see
"Business - Legal Proceedings."
Reserves for closure costs, reclamation and environmental matters
totaled $49.7 million at December 31, 2002. We anticipate that expenditures
relating to these reserves will be made over the next five to ten years.
Although we believe the reserve is adequate based on current estimates of
aggregate costs, we periodically reassess our environmental and reclamation
obligations as new information is developed. Depending on the results of the
reassessment, it is reasonably possible that our estimate of our obligations may
change in the near or long term.
Expenditures for environmental remediation and reclamation for 2003 are
estimated to be in the range of $6.0 million to $8.0 million, principally for
water management activities at the Grouse Creek property, the yard remediation
program at the Bunker Hill Superfund site and reclamation activities at other
locations.
EXPLORATION
-----------
Exploration expenditures for 2003 are estimated to be in the range of
$10.0 million to $15.0 million. In Venezuela, expenditures will focus on the
down-dip extension of the Main and Betzy veins at the La Camorra mine and
drilling and feasibility studies at Canaima and on the Block B concessions. In
Mexico, expenditures will focus
30
on the San Sebastian and Cerro Pedernalillo areas. Exploration in the United
States will include expenditures at the Hollister Development Block in Nevada
and work at the Greens Creek mine in Alaska to explore an area across the
Gallagher fault.
OTHER
-----
Holders of the preferred shares are entitled to receive cumulative cash
dividends at the annual rate of $3.50 per share payable quarterly, when and if
declared by the board of directors and have voting rights related to certain
amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation. As of January 31, 2002, we had
not declared and paid the equivalent of six quarterly dividends, entitling
holders of the preferred shares to elect two directors at our annual
shareholders' meeting. On May 10, 2002, holders of the preferred shares, voting
as a class, elected two additional directors. One of our two directors elected
by holders of Series B preferred stock resigned from our board of directors in
October 2002 to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest as a result of a
new position as a research analyst. In order to fill the resulting vacancy, the
remaining director elected by the holders of Series B preferred stock will name
a new director, currently anticipated to be named during 2003.
The Hecla Mining Company Retirement Plan and the Lucky Friday Pension
Plan (the benefit plans) are employee benefit plans in which certain of our
employees can participate. During 2001, Copper Mountain Trust (succeeded to by
merger by Union Bank of California, NA), the trustee for the benefit plans,
purchased our common stock at the instruction of the benefit plan's independent
fiduciary, Consulting Fiduciaries, Inc. In connection with the purchase, each
plan received the right to request we register the shares of common stock held
by each plan.
In addition, the benefit plans sold 2.0 million common shares as part
of an underwritten public offering for 25.0 million shares of our common stock
completed in January 2003. The benefit plans realized net proceeds of
approximately $8.0 million from the sale. The benefit plans may sell their
remaining 1,394,883 shares at any time after April 20, 2003, as part of their
normal investment strategy. For additional information regarding the public
offering, see Note 10 of Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements,
beginning on page F-9 of this prospectus.
As of December 31, 2002, we have reviewed and modified our assumptions
regarding our benefit plans based upon current market conditions and our current
compensation structure. We have reduced the discount rates utilized in
determining the future pension liability from 7.0% to 6.5%, decreased our
expected rate of return on pension assets from 9% to 8% and increased the
estimated future salary increases assumption from 3% to 4%. We do not believe
these assumptions will have a material impact on the amount of pension income to
be recognized in 2003 as compared to 2002.
During 2002, certain post retirement benefit obligations were
transferred to the benefit plans. As a result of the transfer, approximately
$1.3 million of accrued post retirement benefit obligations were transferred to
the pension plans, which reduced the net prepaid pension benefit by $1.3
million.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
-----------------------------
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143 "Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations," which amends SFAS No. 19, and establishes a uniform
methodology accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. This
statement requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement
obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable
estimate of fair value can be made. The statement was required to be adopted by
January 1, 2003, at which time we recorded an estimated present value of
reclamation liabilities of $5.9 million and increased the carrying value of
related assets by $3.8 million. Subsequently, reclamation costs will be
allocated to expense over the life of the related assets and will be adjusted
for changes resulting from the passage of time and changes to either the timing
or amount of the original present value estimate underlying the obligation. Also
on January 1, 2003, we recorded a gain of $1.1 million as a cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle for the difference between those amounts and the
amounts previously recorded in our consolidated financial statements.
The FASB also issued SFAS No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." This statement addresses financial accounting
and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. It supersedes
SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," and the accounting and reporting
provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of
31
Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and
Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," for
the disposal of a segment of a business. It also amends APB No. 51,
"Consolidated Financial Statements," to eliminate the exception to consolidation
for a subsidiary for which control is likely to be temporary. The provisions of
this statement are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2001, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, with early application encouraged. The provisions of this statement
generally are to be applied prospectively. The adoption of this statement did
not have a material effect on our financial statements.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB
Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections." SFAS No. 145 updates, clarifies and simplifies existing accounting
pronouncements, by rescinding SFAS No. 4, which required all gains and losses
from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an
extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect. As a result, the criteria
in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 will now be used to classify those
gains and losses. Additionally, SFAS No. 145 amends SFAS No. 13 to require that
certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback
transactions be accounted for in the same manner as sale-leaseback transactions.
Finally, SFAS No. 145 also makes technical corrections to existing
pronouncements. While those corrections are not substantive in nature, in some
instances, they may change accounting practice. The provisions of SFAS No. 145
that amend SFAS No. 13 are effective for transactions occurring after May 15,
2002, with all other provisions of SFAS No. 145 being required to be adopted by
us in our consolidated financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal year
2003. Our management currently believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 145 will
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
On July 30, 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146 "Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 requires companies to
recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are
incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan.
Examples of costs covered by the standard include lease termination costs and
certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring,
discontinued operation, plant closing or other exit or disposal activity. SFAS
No. 146 replaces the prior guidance that was provided by EITF Issue No. 94-3
"Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs
to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS
No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated
after December 31, 2002. Our management currently believes that the adoption of
SFAS No. 146 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In October 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 147 "Acquisitions of Certain
Financial Institutions-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB
Interpretation No. 9." SFAS No. 147 will not have any impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148 "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 123." SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for
an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting
for stock-based employee compensation. It also amends the disclosure provisions
of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure about the effects of reported
net income of an entity's accounting policy decisions with respect to
stock-based employee compensation. Finally, this statement amends APB Opinion
No. 28, "Interim Financial Reporting," to require disclosure about those effects
in interim financial information. The amendments to SFAS No. 123, which provides
alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the
fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation is
effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2002. The amendment to SFAS No. 123 relating to disclosures and the amendment to
Opinion 28 is effective for financial reports containing condensed financial
statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. Management
does not intend to adopt the fair value accounting provisions of SFAS No. 123
and currently believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 148 will not have a
material impact on our financial statements.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45),
"Guarantor's Accounting for Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an interpretation of FASB
Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34,
"Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." FIN 45 clarifies
the requirements for a guarantor's accounting for and disclosure of certain
guarantees issued and outstanding. It also requires a guarantor to recognize, at
the inception of
32
a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in
issuing guarantee. This interpretation also incorporates without reconsideration
the guidance in FASB Interpretation No. 34, which is being superseded. The
adoption of FIN 45 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
statements and will be applied prospectively.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46),
"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting
Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements." FIN 46
clarifies the application of ARB No. 51 to certain entities in which equity
investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or
do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities
without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The
adoption of FIN 46 will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The following discussion about our risk-management activities includes
forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties, and summarizes
the financial instruments and derivative instruments held by us at December 31,
2002, which are sensitive to changes in interest rates and commodity prices and
are not held for trading purposes. We believe there has not been a material
change in our market risk since the end of our last fiscal year. Actual results
could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
In the normal course of business, we also face risks that are either
nonfinancial or nonquantifiable (See "Risk Factors - Our hedging activities
could expose us to losses").
INTEREST-RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
At December 31, 2002, our debt was subject to changes in market
interest rates and was sensitive to those changes. We currently have no
derivative instruments to offset the risk of interest rate changes. We may
choose to use derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, to manage the
risk associated with interest rate changes.
The following table presents principal cash flows (in thousands) for
debt outstanding at December 31, 2002, by maturity date and the related average
interest rate. The variable rates are estimated based on implied forward rates
in the yield curve at the reporting date.
Expected Maturity Date
---------------------------------------------------------
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Fair Value
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----------
Subordinated debt $ 2,000 $ 1,000 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 3,000 $ 3,000
Average interest rate 5.4% 6.6% -- -- --
Project financing debt $ 3,000 $ 500 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 3,500 $ 3,500
Average interest rate 3.9% 5.1% -- -- --
Project financing debt $ 2,296 $ 832 $ 1,366 $ 959 $ -- $ 5,453 $ 5,453
Average interest rate 13% 13% 13% 13% --
COMMODITY-PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT
We use commodity forward sales commitments, commodity swap contracts
and commodity put and call option contracts to manage our exposure to
fluctuation in the prices of certain metals which we produce. Contract positions
are designed to ensure that we will receive a defined minimum price for certain
quantities of our production. We use these instruments to reduce risk by
offsetting market exposures. We are exposed to certain losses, generally the
amount by which the contract price exceeds the spot price of a commodity, in the
event of nonperformance by the counter parties to these agreements. The
instruments held by us are not leveraged and are held for purposes other than
trading. We intend to physically deliver metals in accordance with the terms of
the forward sales contracts in place at December 31, 2002. As such, we have
elected to designate the contracts as
33
normal sales in accordance with SFAS 138 and as a result, these contracts are
not required to be accounted for as derivatives under SFAS 133.
The following table provides information about our forward sales
contracts at December 31, 2002. The table presents the notional amount in
ounces, the average forward sales price and the total-dollar contract amount
expected by the maturity dates, which occur between March 31, 2003, and December
31, 2004.
Expected Expected Estimated
Maturity Maturity Fair
2003 2004 Value
---- ---- -----
Forward contracts:
Gold sales (ounces) 54,502 48,928
Future price (per ounce) $ 288 $ 288
Contract amount (in $000's) $ 15,710 $ 14,103 $ (6,480)
Estimated percentage of annual production
committed to contracts 25% 25%
In addition to the above contracts, we have a quarterly Gold Lease Rate
Swap at a fixed rate of 1.5% on 93,729 ounces of the above gold forward
contracts. The ounces covered under the swap are adjusted each quarter, in
accordance with the expiration of the gold forward contracts. At December 31,
2002, the fair market value of the Gold Lease Rate Swap was approximately
$307,000, which represents the amount the counterparty would have to pay us if
the contract was terminated. At December 31, 2002, the current lease rate was
0.75%.
34
BUSINESS
GENERAL
We are principally engaged in the exploration, development, mining and
processing of silver, gold, lead and zinc, and own or have interests in a number
of precious and nonferrous metals properties. A glossary of certain terms
appears on page 71 of this prospectus under "Glossary of Certain Terms."
The following maps indicates the positions of our operations:
[MAP]
The following table presents certain information regarding our metal
mining properties, including the relative percentage each contributed to our
2002 sales:
Name of Date Ownership Percentage of
Property Acquired Interest 2002 Sales
-------- -------- -------- ----------
Greens Creek 1988 29.73% 22%
San Sebastian 1999 100.0% 22%
Lucky Friday 1958 100.0% 9%
La Camorra 1999 100.0% 47%
Sales of metal concentrates and metal products are made principally to
custom smelters and metals traders. We are organized and managed primarily on
the basis of the principle products produced in each of our operating units. The
La Camorra mine is the only operating unit included in the gold segment.
Production from all other mines are considered to be in the silver segment,
since those mines are primarily silver producers. The percentage of sales
contributed by each segment is reflected in the following table:
Year
-----------------------------------------
Product/Segment 2002 2001 2000
--------------- --------- ------- ---------
Silver 53.4% 51.4% 58.4%
Gold 46.6% 48.6% 41.6%
Sales to significant metals customers as a percentage of total sales
from the Silver and Gold segments were as follows for the year ended December
31, 2002:
Customer Percentage of Our Sales
-------- -----------------------
Standard Bank London 24.8%
Met-Mex Penoles, S.A. de C.V. 21.7%
Mitsubishi International Corp. 19.9%
Teck Cominco Ltd. 12.6%
HSBC Bank USA 6.1%
For information with respect to our business segments, including export
sales and geographic areas, refer to Notes 2 and 11 of Notes to our Consolidated
Financial Statements, beginning on page F-9 of this prospectus.
35
The table below summarizes our production and average cash operating
cost, average total cash cost and average total production cost per ounce for
silver and gold, as well as average metals prices for each period indicated:
Year
-------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
---------- ---------- ----------
Silver (ounces)(1) 8,681,293 7,434,290 7,998,677
Gold (ounces)(2) 239,633 194,742 146,038
Lead (tons)(1) 18,291 28,378 39,430
Zinc (tons)(1) 26,134 23,664 25,054
Average cost per ounce of silver produced:
Cash operating cost(3,4) $ 2.16 $ 3.55 $ 4.02
Total cash cost(3,4) $ 2.25 $ 3.57 $ 4.02
Total production cost(3,4) $ 3.68 $ 5.09 $ 5.49
Average cost per ounce of gold produced:
Cash operating cost(5) $ 137 $ 133 $ 208
Total cash cost(5) $ 137 $ 133 $ 211
Total production cost(5) $ 206 $ 200 $ 275
Industrial minerals (tons shipped)(6) 9,588 260,716 1,268,579
Average metals prices:
Silver - Handy & Harman ($/oz.) $ 4.63 $ 4.36 $ 5.00
Gold - Realized ($/oz.) $ 303 $ 280 $ 284
Gold - London Final ($/oz.) $ 310 $ 272 $ 279
Lead - LME Cash ($/pound) $ 0.205 $ 0.216 $ 0.206
Zinc - LME Cash ($/pound) $ 0.353 $ 0.402 $ 0.512
(1) The increase in silver production from 2001 to 2002 was principally a
result of increased production from the San Sebastian mine, which
commenced production in May 2001 and reached full production during the
second quarter of 2002, offset by reduced production at the Lucky Friday
mine, where operations were reduced in October 2001. Decreased lead
production from 2001 to 2002 is principally due to reduced production at
the Lucky Friday mine. Increased zinc production in 2002 compared to 2001
is due to increased mill throughput at Greens Creek during 2002. The
decrease in silver, lead and zinc production from 2000 to 2001 was
principally due to decreased tons mined at Lucky Friday, partly offset by
an increase in tons mined at the Greens Creek mine and at the San
Sebastian mine.
(2) The increase in gold production from 2001 to 2002 was principally due to
increased production of over 25,000 ounces at the San Sebastian mine, and
over 15,000 ounces at the La Camorra mine primarily due to improvements to
the crushing, milling and adsorption capacities, allowing for increases in
tons milled (20% improvement) and gold ounces produced. The increase in
gold production from 2000 to 2001 was principally due to increased
production at the La Camorra mine (59,000 ounces) due to an average higher
gold grade and an 18% increase in tons processed during 2001, and
increased production at the San Sebastian mine, partly offset by decreased
production of 24,000 ounces at the Rosebud mine due to the completion of
operations during the third quarter 2000.
(3) For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, approximately $0.8 million
and $0.4 million of costs, respectively, at the Lucky Friday mine were
classified as care-and-maintenance costs and included in the determination
of the costs per ounce at Lucky Friday. Excluding the $0.8 million and
$0.4 million in costs, the cash operating, total cash and total production
costs per ounce total $2.07, $2.16 and $3.59, respectively, for 2002, and
$3.49, $3.52 and $5.04, respectively, for 2001. Cash costs per ounce of
silver or gold represent non-U.S. GAAP measurements that management uses
to monitor and evaluate the performance of its mining operations and are
calculated pursuant to standards of the Gold Institute. We believe cash
costs per ounce of silver or gold provide an indicator of profitability at
each location and on a consolidated total, as well as a meaningful basis
on which to compare other mining companies and other mining operating
properties. A reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to GAAP cost of
sales and other direct production costs can be found in "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
Results of Operations."
(4) The low costs per silver ounce during 2002, compared to 2001, are due in
part to significant by-product credits from increased gold production in
the silver segment and an increase in the average gold price. Costs per
ounce amounts are calculated pursuant to standards of the Gold Institute.
(5) Cash costs per ounce of silver or gold represent non-U.S. GAAP
measurements that management uses to monitor and evaluate the performance
of its mining operations and are calculated pursuant to standards of the
Gold Institute. We believe cash costs per ounce of silver or gold provide
an indicator of profitability at each location and on a consolidated
total, as well as a meaningful basis on which to compare other mining
companies and other mining operating properties. A reconciliation of this
non-GAAP measure to GAAP cost of sales and other direct production costs
can be found in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations." Gold
produced in the silver segment (San Sebastian and Greens Creek) is treated
as a by-product credit in calculating silver costs per ounce.
(6) The decrease in industrial minerals tons shipped from 2001 to 2002 is due
to the sale of the K-T Group in March 2001, as well as the sale of the pet
operations of the Colorado Aggregate division (CAC) of MWCA, Inc., our
wholly owned subsidiary, in March 2002. The decrease in industrial
minerals tons shipped from 2000 to 2001 was principally due to the sale of
the K-T Group in March 2001.
36
SILVER SEGMENT
THE LUCKY FRIDAY MINE
Since 1958, we have operated the Lucky Friday mine (100% owned), a deep
underground silver and lead mine located in the Coeur d'Alene Mining District in
northern Idaho. The principal ore-bearing structure at the Lucky Friday mine
through 1997 was the Lucky Friday vein, a fissure vein typical of many in the
Coeur d'Alene Mining District. The orebody is located in the Revett Formation,
which is known to provide excellent host rocks for a number of orebodies in the
Coeur d'Alene District. The Lucky Friday vein strikes northeasterly and dips
steeply to the south with an average width of six to seven feet. Its principal
ore minerals are galena and tetrahedrite with minor amounts of sphalerite and
chalcopyrite. The ore occurs as a single continuous orebody in and along the
Lucky Friday vein. The major part of the orebody has extended from the
1,200-foot level to and below the 6,020-foot level.
During 1991, we discovered several mineralized structures containing
some high-grade silver ores in an area known as the Gold Hunter property,
approximately 5,000 feet northwest of the then existing Lucky Friday workings.
We control the Gold Hunter property under a long-term operating agreement that
entitles us, as operator, to an 81.48% interest in the net profits from
operations from the Gold Hunter properties. We will be obligated to pay a
royalty after we have recouped our costs to explore and develop the properties.
As of December 31, 2002, unrecouped costs totaled approximately $32.6 million.
The principal mining method at the Lucky Friday mine is ramp access,
cut and fill. This method utilizes rubber-tired equipment to access the veins
through ramps developed outside of the orebody. Once a cut is taken along the
strike of the vein, it is backfilled with cemented tailings and the next cut is
accessed, either above or below, from the ramp system.
The ore produced from the mine is processed in a 1,100-ton-per-day
conventional flotation mill. In 2002, ore was processed at a rate of
approximately 525 tons per day. The flotation process produces both a
silver-lead concentrate and a zinc concentrate. During 2002, mill recovery
totaled approximately 94% silver, 93% lead and 75% zinc. All silver, lead and
zinc concentrate production during 2002 was shipped to Teck Cominco's smelter in
Trail, British Columbia, Canada.
In the fourth quarter of 2000, due to continuing low silver and lead
prices, our management and board of directors deferred the decision to approve
additional capital expenditures, which are needed to develop the next area of
the mine, and recorded an adjustment of $31.2 million to reduce the carrying
value of the Lucky Friday mine plant, property and equipment. In 2001, due to
low metals prices, we made the decision to reduce the level of mining activity
at the Lucky Friday mine to approximately 30% of full production. During 2002,
mining activity was approximately 50% of full production. We estimate that with
minimal additional development the mine can sustain the lower production levels
through 2004, as long as the cost of operating is less than putting the property
on care and maintenance.
37
Information with respect to the Lucky Friday mine's production, average
cost per ounce of silver produced and Proven and Probable ore reserves for the
past three years is set forth in the table below:
Years
Production 2002 2001 2000
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Ore milled (tons) 159,651 239,330 321,719
Silver (ounces) 2,004,404 3,224,373 5,011,507
Gold (ounces) 206 415 537
Lead (tons) 10,091 20,984 31,946
Zinc (tons) 2,259 2,789 3,107
Average Cost per Ounce
of Silver Produced
Cash operating costs(1) $ 4.97 $ 5.27 $ 5.02
Total cash costs(1) $ 4.97 $ 5.27 $ 5.02
Total production costs(1) $ 5.49 $ 6.05 $ 5.83
Proven and Probable
Ore Reserves(2,3,4) 12/31/02 12/31/01 12/31/00
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total tons -- -- 1,322,270
Silver (ounces per ton) -- -- 16.7
Lead (percent) -- -- 10.7
Zinc (percent) -- -- 1.4
Contained silver (ounces) -- -- 22,089,451
Contained lead (tons) -- -- 141,380
Contained zinc (tons) -- -- 18,546
(1) Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2001, the Lucky Friday mine began a
recalculation of costs per ounce which eliminated costs classified as
care-and-maintenance. Approximately $0.4 million and $0.8 million,
respectively, of costs were classified as care-and-maintenance in the
fourth quarter of 2001 and for the year ended December 31, 2002, and
included in the determination of the costs per ounce at Lucky Friday.
Excluding the $0.4 million and $0.8 million, the cash operating, total
cash and total production costs per ounce total $5.14, $5.14 and $5.92,
respectively, for 2001, and $4.57, $4.57 and $5.09, respectively, for
2002. Cash costs per ounce of silver or gold represent non-U.S. GAAP
measurements that management uses to monitor and evaluate the
performance of its mining operations and are calculated pursuant to
standards of the Gold Institute. We believe cash costs per ounce of
silver or gold provide an indicator of profitability at each location
and on a consolidated total, as well as a meaningful basis on which to
compare other mining companies and other mining operating properties. A
reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to GAAP cost of sales and other
direct production costs can be found immediately following this table.
(2) For Proven and Probable ore reserve assumptions and definitions, see
Glossary of Certain Terms on page 71 of this prospectus.
(3) Reserves are in-place material that incorporate estimates of the amount
of waste which must be mined along with the ore and expected mining
recovery. Mill recoveries are expected to be 93% for silver, 90% for
lead and 50% for zinc.
(4) As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, it was determined that the Lucky
Friday mineralized material did not meet all the criteria established
for disclosure of reserves by the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Industry Guide 7. At December 31, 2002, the estimated mineralized
material included 1,082,000 tons with 13.2 ounces per ton silver, 8.5%
lead and 1.7% zinc. At December 31, 2001, the estimated mineralized
material included 1,205,180 tons with 14.2 ounces per ton silver, 9.4%
lead and 1.6% zinc.
38
The following table presents a reconciliation between non-GAAP total
cash costs to GAAP cost of sales and other direct production costs for the Lucky
Friday mine for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands,
except costs per ounce):
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total cash costs $ 9,960 $ 16,990 $ 25,160
Divided by ounces produced 2,004 3,224 5,012
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total cash cost per ounce produced 4.97 5.27 5.02
Reconciliation to GAAP:
Total cash costs $ 9,960 $ 16,990 $ 25,160
Reclamation 104 112 16
Treatment & freight costs (3,358) (6,663) (12,254)
By-product credits 3,661 7,827 10,927
Change in product inventory 45 418 138
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Cost of sales and other direct
productions costs (GAAP) $ 10,412 $ 18,684 $ 23,987
================== ================= ==================
Ultimate reclamation activities contemplated include stabilization of
tailings ponds and waste rock areas. There were no final reclamation activities
performed in 2002.
The net book value of the Lucky Friday mine property and its associated
plant and equipment was approximately $1.0 million as of December 31, 2002. At
March 31, 2003, there were 90 employees at the Lucky Friday mine. The United
Steelworkers of America is the bargaining agent for the Lucky Friday hourly
employees. The current labor agreement expires on June 16, 2003, but may be
extended to June 16, 2004 under certain circumstances. Avista Corporation
supplies electrical power to the Lucky Friday mine.
For a description of a legal claim involving the Lucky Friday mine, see
"Business - Legal Proceedings."
THE GREENS CREEK MINE
At December 31, 2002, we held a 29.73% interest in the Greens Creek
mine, located on Admiralty Island, near Juneau, Alaska, through a joint-venture
arrangement with Kennecott Greens Creek Mining Company (KGCMC), the manager of
the mine, and Kennecott Juneau Mining Company (KJMC), both wholly owned
subsidiaries of Kennecott Minerals. The Greens Creek mine is a polymetallic
deposit containing silver, zinc, gold and lead.
Greens Creek lies within the Admiralty Island National Monument, an
environmentally sensitive area. The Greens Creek property includes 17 patented
lode claims and one patented millsite claim, in addition to property leased from
the U.S. Forest Service. Greens Creek also has title to mineral rights on 7,500
acres of federal land adjacent to the mine properties. The entire project is
accessed and served by 13 miles of road and consists of the mine, an ore
concentrating mill, a tailings impoundment area, a ship-loading facility, camp
facilities and a ferry dock.
Pursuant to a 1996 land exchange agreement, the joint venture
transferred private property equal to a value of $1.0 million to the U.S. Forest
Service and received access to approximately 7,500 acres of land with potential
mining resources surrounding the existing mine. Production from new ore
discoveries on the exchange lands will be subject to the federal royalties
included in the land exchange agreement. The federal royalties are based on a
defined calculation that is similar to the calculation of net smelter return and
are equal to 0.75% or 3% of the calculated amount depending on the value of the
ore extracted. The royalty is 3% if the average value of the ore during a year
is greater than $120 per ton of ore, and 0.75% if the value is $120 per ton or
less. The benchmark of $120 per ton is escalated annually by the Gross Domestic
Product until the year 2016.
39
Currently, Greens Creek is mining approximately 2,000 tons per day
underground from the 200 South, the Southwest and West ore zones. Ore from the
underground trackless mine is milled at the mine site. The mill produces
silver/gold dore and lead, zinc and bulk concentrates. The dore is marketed to a
precious metal refiner and the three concentrate products are predominantly sold
to a number of major smelters worldwide. Concentrates are shipped from a marine
terminal located on Admiralty Island about nine miles from the mine site. The
Greens Creek mine uses electrical power provided by diesel-powered generators
located on-site.
The employees at the Greens Creek mine are employees of Kennecott
Greens Creek Mining Company and are not represented by a bargaining agent. At
December 31, 2002, our interest in the net book value of the Greens Creek mine
property and its associated plant and equipment was approximately $57.0 million.
The Greens Creek deposit consists of zinc, lead, and iron sulfides and
copper-silver sulfides and sulfosalts with substantial contained silver and gold
values. The deposit has a vein-like to blanket-like form of variable thickness.
The ore is thought to have been laid down by an "exhalative" process (i.e.,
volcanic-related rifts or vents deposited base and precious metals onto an ocean
floor). Subsequently, the mineralization was folded and faulted by multiple
generations of tectonic events.
Kennecott Greens Creek Mining Company's geology and engineering staff
computes the estimated ore reserves for the Greens Creek mine with technical
support from Rio Tinto Zinc. AMEC E&C Services (f/k/a Mineral Resources
Development, Inc.) audited the December 31, 2001 resource models and reserve
statements, assisted in retabulation of December 31,2002 reserve statements, and
in March 2003 prepared a report of its findings. We review geologic
interpretation and reserve methodology, but the reserve compilation is not
independently confirmed by us in its entirety. Information with respect to our
29.73% share of production, average costs per ounce of silver produced and
Proven and Probable ore reserves is set forth in the following table.
Years (reflects 29.73% interest)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Production 2002 2001 2000
---------- ------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Ore milled (tons) 218,072 195,646 184,178
Silver (ounces) 3,244,495 3,259,915 2,754,067
Gold (ounces) 30,531 26,041 24,882
Zinc (tons) 23,875 20,875 21,947
Lead (tons) 8,200 7,394 7,484
Average Cost per Ounce
of Silver Produced
-------------------------
Cash operating costs $ 1.76 $ 2.41 $ 2.20
Total cash costs(1) $ 1.81 $ 2.41 $ 2.20
Total production costs $ 4.28 $ 4.79 $ 4.87
Proven and Probable
Ore Reserves(2,3,4,5) 12/31/02 12/31/01 12/31/00
------------------------- ------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total tons 2,095,703 2,256,663 2,977,198
Silver (ounces per ton) 14.9 16.7 15.7
Gold (ounces per ton) 0.13 0.13 0.13
Zinc (percent) 11.4 11.6 11.9
Lead (percent) 4.2 4.6 4.4
Contained silver (ounces) 31,252,609 37,627,765 46,663,068
Contained gold (ounces) 268,603 299,456 396,891
Contained zinc (tons) 238,029 262,455 353,698
Contained lead (tons) 88,574 103,220 131,515
-------------------------
40
(1) Cash costs per ounce of silver or gold represent non-U.S. GAAP
measurements that management uses to monitor and evaluate the
performance of its mining operations and are calculated pursuant to
standards of the Gold Institute. We believe cash costs per ounce of
silver or gold provide an indicator of profitability at each location
and on a consolidated total, as well as a meaningful basis on which to
compare other mining companies and other mining operating properties. A
reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to GAAP cost of sales and other
direct production costs can be found immediately following this table.
(2) For Proven and Probable ore reserve assumptions and definitions, see
Glossary of Certain Terms on page 71 of this prospectus.
(3) Ore reserves represent in-place material, diluted and adjusted for
expected mining recovery. Mill recoveries of ore reserve grades are
expected to be 74% for silver, 64% for gold, 81% for zinc and 69% for
lead.
(4) The changes in reserves in 2002 versus 2001 were due to a) changes in
forecast metals prices; b) reassessments of metal contents and expected
mining recoveries of certain orebodies; and c) removal of some material
from reserves until new reserve estimates and mining plans are
completed in 2003. Proven and Probable reserves at the Greens Creek
mine are based on average drill spacing of 50 to 100 feet. Cutoff grade
assumptions vary by orebody and are developed based on reserve prices,
anticipated mill recoveries and smelter payables and cash operating
costs. Cutoff grades range from $70 per short ton net smelter return to
$100 per short ton net smelter return.
(5) The changes in reserves in 2001 versus 2000 were due to production,
downward revisions of reserves due to lower assumed metals prices and
reassessment of reserves based on new drilling and a new mine plan for
the Central West orebody.
The following table presents a reconciliation between non-GAAP total
cash costs to GAAP cost of sales and other direct production costs for the
Green's Creek mine for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (in
thousands, except costs per ounce):
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total cash costs $ 5,872 $ 7,857 $ 6,059
Divided by ounces produced 3,245 3,260 2,754
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total cash cost per ounce produced 1.81 2.41 2.20
Reconciliation to GAAP:
Total cash costs $ 5,872 $ 7,857 $ 6,059
Reclamation 611 532 575
Treatment & freight costs (12,271) (12,406) (14,786)
By-product credits 21,367 19,284 23,140
Change in product inventory (690) 548 (280)
------------------- ----------------- -------------------
Cost of sales and other direct
productions costs (GAAP) $ 14,889 $ 15,815 $ 14,708
================== ================= ==================
THE SAN SEBASTIAN MINE
The San Sebastian mine is located in the State of Durango, Mexico, and
is 100% owned by us through a subsidiary, Minera Hecla. The mine is 56 miles
northeast of the city of Durango on concessions acquired through our acquisition
of Monarch Resources Investments Limited in 1999. The processing plant is
located near Velardena, Durango, Mexico, and was acquired in April 2001.
Concession holdings cover over 100-square miles including the mine site and
multiple outlying active exploration areas.
Ore production during 2001 consisted of surface mining and bulk
sampling from four vein systems and underground mine development of the Francine
vein. Underground development started in May 2001, and surface mining ceased
during the fourth quarter of 2001. Limited underground ore production from
development started in September and increased gradually as stopes were
developed during the remainder of 2001. Underground mining production reached
full production (approximately 450 short tons per day) during the second quarter
of 2002. The current mine plan for the Francine vein produces ore through 2004
and into the first quarter of 2005. Exploration is active on the Francine vein
and other nearby vein systems to expand ore reserves.
San Sebastian is a high-grade silver mine with significant gold
credits. Several epithermal veins exist within the San Sebastian Valley and in
the mine area. Known veins include the Francine vein, Profesor vein,
41
Middle vein and North vein systems. These veins are hosted within a series of
shales with interbedded fine-grained sandstones interpreted to belong to the
Cretaceous Caracol Formation.
Our Cerro Pedernalillo exploration project, located about six
kilometers from the Francine vein, has discovered three veins covering more than
1.5 kilometers in length. Our Cerro Pedernalillo drilling project has
intersected significant ore values, with approximately 28% of the drill
intercepts in the Don Sergio vein above mine cutoff grade over a two-meter
horizontal width.
The Francine vein strikes northwest and dips southwest and is located
on the southwestern limb of a doubly plunging anticline. The Francine vein
ranges in true thickness from more than 4.0 meters to less than 0.5 meters and
consists of several episodes of banded quartz, silica-healed breccias and minor
amounts of calcite. The vein is oxidized to a depth of approximately 100
vertical meters and the wall rocks contain an alteration halo of less than 2
meters next to the vein. Mineralization within the oxidized portion of the vein
contains limonite, hematite, silver halides and various copper carbonates.
Higher-grade gold and silver mineralization is associated with disseminated
hematite and limonite after pyrite and chalcopyrite, copper carbonates including
malachite and azurite and hydrous copper silicates including chrysocolla. Native
gold occurs associated with hematite and limonite. Mineralization in the sulfide
portion of the Francine vein contains pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena,
native silver, argentite and trace amounts of aguilarite.
Access to the underground workings is through a ramp from the surface
connecting one or more levels, excavated at a -15% grade. Ore is mined by
cut-and-fill stoping. Ore is extracted from the stopes using rubber-tired
equipment and hauled to the surface in trucks. Subeconomic material is used to
backfill and stabilize mined-out stopes. Electric power is purchased from
Comision Federal de Electridad (federal electric company). Water is supplied
from mine dewatering or hauled from a local reservoir. A conversion from
contractor mining to owner mining began in late January 2003.
Ore is hauled in trucks by a contractor to the processing plant. The
process plant is a conventional leach / counter-current decantation / Merrill
Crowe precipitation circuit. The ore is crushed in a two-staged crushing plant
consisting of a primary jaw, a secondary cone crusher and a double-deck
vibrating screen. The grinding circuit includes a primary ball mill and cyclone
classifiers. The ground ore is thickened followed by agitated leaching and four
stages of counter-current decantation to wash solubilized silver and gold from
the pulp. The solution bearing silver and gold is then clarified, deaerated and
zinc dust added to precipitate silver and gold which is recovered in plate and
frame filters. Precipitate is dried and then shipped to a third-party refiner.
Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2002, over one-half of the precipitate is
refined into dore before being shipped to a third-party refiner.
The plant was constructed in 1994 and is capable of processing
approximately 550 short tons per day. Site infrastructure includes a water
supply system, maintenance shop, warehouse, laboratory and various offices.
Electric power is purchased from Comision Federal de Electridad (federal
electric company).
At December 31, 2002, the net book value of the San Sebastian mine
property and its associated plant and equipment was $8.1 million. Capital
improvements were approximately $1.8 million during 2002 and included a modern
tailings disposal facility, leach circuit expansion, CIC (carbon in column)
scavenger recovery circuit and refinery improvements.
As of December 31, 2002, reclamation and closure accruals of $1.0
million have been established.
For a description of a legal claim relating to our Velardena mill, see
"Business - Legal Proceedings."
At March 31, 2003, there were 226 hourly and 48 salaried employees at
the San Sebastian mine and Velardena mill. The National Mine and Mill Workers
Union represents process plant hourly workers at San Sebastian. Under Mexican
labor law, wage adjustments are negotiated annually and other contract terms
every two years. The contract is due for negotiation of wages in July 2003 and
for wages and other terms in July 2004.
42
Information with respect to the San Sebastian mine's production,
average cost per ounce of silver produced and Proven and Probable ore reserves
are set forth in the table below. SRK Consulting provided an independent third
party audit of the 2001 reserve estimates in December 2002.
Year Year
Production 2002 2001
---------- ------------------ -----------------
Ore milled (tons) 156,532 69,779
Silver (ounces) 3,432,394 950,002
Gold (ounces) 41,510 15,983
Average Cost per Ounce
of Silver Produced
-----------------------
Cash operating costs(1) $ 0.91 $ 1.64
Total cash costs(1) $ 1.09 $ 1.81
Total production costs(1) $ 2.06 $ 2.89
Proven and Probable
Ore Reserves(2,3,4) 12/31/02 12/31/01
----------------------- ------------------ -----------------
Total tons 369,556 304,222
Silver (ounces per ton) 23.7 28.20
Gold (ounces per ton) 0.24 0.30
Contained silver (ounces) 8,761,109 8,579,060
Contained gold (ounces) 88,269 91,267
(1) The low costs per silver ounce during 2002, compared to 2001, are due
in part to significant by-product credits from increased gold
production. Costs per ounce amounts are calculated pursuant to
standards of the Gold Institute. For the years ended December 31, 2002
and 2001, gold by-product credits were approximately $3.76 per silver
ounce and $4.61 per silver ounce, respectively. Cash costs per ounce of
silver or gold represent non-U.S. GAAP measurements that management
uses to monitor and evaluate the performance of its mining operations
and are calculated pursuant to standards of the Gold Institute. We
believe cash costs per ounce of silver or gold provide an indicator of
profitability at each location and on a consolidated total, as well as
a meaningful basis on which to compare other mining companies and other
mining operating properties. A reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure
to GAAP cost of sales and other direct production costs can be found
immediately following this table.
(2) For Proven and Probable ore reserve assumptions and definitions, see
Glossary of Certain Terms on page 71 of this prospectus.
(3) Ore reserves represent in-place material, diluted and adjusted for
expected mining recovery. Mill recoveries of ore reserve grades are
expected to be approximately 90% for gold and 91% for silver. Proven
and Probable reserves at the San Sebastian mine are based on drill
spacing of 35 meters. Cutoff grade assumptions are developed based on a
gold price of $280 and a silver price of $4.50, anticipated mill
recoveries, royalties and cash operating costs. Cutoff grades at San
Sebastian are $34 per tonne net production value.
(4) The increase in Proven and Probable ore reserves from 2001 to 2002 is
the result of: a) incorporation of new definition drilling information
in the estimate of reserves; and b) a new mine plan.
The following table presents a reconciliation between non-GAAP total
cash costs to GAAP cost of sales and other direct production costs for the San
Sebastian mine for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands,
except costs per ounce):
2002 2001
------------------ ------------------
Total cash costs $ 3,741 $ 1,720
Divided by ounces produced 3,432 950
------------------ ------------------
Total cash cost per ounce produced 1.09 1.81
Reconciliation to GAAP:
Total cash costs $ 3,741 $ 1,720
Reclamation 403 63
Treatment & freight costs (2,224) --
By-product credits 12,905 4,376
Change in product inventory (2,089) (292)
Pre-production costs -- 295
------------------ ------------------
Cost of sales and other direct
productions costs (GAAP) $ 12,736 $ 6,162
================== ==================
43
GOLD SEGMENT
THE LA CAMORRA MINE
The La Camorra mine is located in the eastern Venezuelan State of
Bolivar, approximately 120 miles southeast of Puerto Ordaz. It is 100% owned by
us through a Venezuelan subsidiary, Minera Hecla Venezolana, C.A., and has been
a producing mine for us since October 1999. We acquired the La Camorra mine in
June 1999 with the acquisition of Monarch Resources Investments Limited
(Monarch).
See "Risk Factors - Our foreign operations, including our operations in
Venezuela, are subject to additional inherent risks" for a discussion of the
political situation in Venezuela and its potential impact on our Venezuelan
operations.
La Camorra is a high-grade underground gold mine that exploits two
shear-zone hosted quartz veins. It lies in the Botanamo greenstone belt of the
Precambrian Guayana Shield and is hosted by the Caballape Group of
volcaniclastics. The formations most likely date from Archean to Proterozoic age
and consist primarily of intermediate volcanics with subordinate metasediments.
Within the La Camorra concession, the gold mineralization is associated with the
near vertical Main and Betzy quartz veins occurring in a west-northwest,
east-southeast shear zone within medium- to coarse-grained pyroclastics.
Gold occurs both as free particles in quartz and attached to or
included in pyrite. Locally, gold is also seen on chloritic partings.
In 1998, a core drilling program was initiated by Monarch to test the
depth extension of the ore zones below the 400-meter level. We believe the
results of that program, and subsequent drill programs we have carried out,
confirm that ore-grade mineralization extends to depths below the levels to
which the current mine reserves have been delineated.
In 2002, a mid-level core drilling program was undertaken to explore
and define ore between the 400- and 500-meter levels within the mine. Based upon
this drill program, a further deep drill program began in December 2002 to
explore the Main and Betzy veins at depths down to the 575-meter level.
In addition, we control nine other exploration concessions near the La
Camorra mine, encompassing 8,000 hectares. Exploration drilling was conducted on
two of these concessions during 2002, Isbelia and Canaima. Work was concentrated
at Canaima to undertake a prefeasibility diamond drill program and a
hydrogeological and geotechnical investigation, which continued at year end.
Access to the underground workings at the La Camorra mine is through a
ramp from the surface connecting one or more levels, excavated at a -15% grade.
Ore is mined primarily by longhole stoping. Ore is extracted from the stopes
using rubber-tired equipment and hauled to the surface in mine haulage trucks.
Subeconomic material is used to backfill and stabilize mined-out stopes. The
mine is currently producing over 500 tons of ore per day.
The process plant uses a conventional carbon-in-leach process. The ore
is crushed with a three-stage system consisting of a primary jaw crusher with
secondary and tertiary cone crusher with a multi-deck vibrating screen. The
grinding circuit includes a primary and a secondary ball mill. The ground ore is
mixed with a cyanide solution and clarified, followed by countercurrent
carbon-in-leach gold adsorption. The carbon is then stripped and the gold
recovered and poured into gold bars for shipment to a refiner. Mill recovery
averages over 95%.
The plant was constructed in 1994 and is capable of processing
approximately 600 tons per day. Site infrastructure includes a water supply
system, maintenance shop, warehouse, living quarters, a dining facility,
administration building and a National Guard post. We also share a housing
facility located near the town of El Callao with units for approximately 50
families. Mine electric power is purchased from Eleoriente (a state-owned
electric company). Diesel-powered electric generators are available on-site for
operation of critical equipment during power outages. At December 31, 2002, the
net book value of the La Camorra mine property and its associated plant and
equipment was approximately $20.3 million.
44
Our reclamation plan has been approved by the Ministry of Environment
and Natural Resources. Planned activities include regrading and revegetation of
disturbed areas. A reclamation and closure accrual of $1.3 million was
established as of December 31, 2002.
At March 31, 2003, there were 377 hourly and 44 salaried employees at
our La Camorra gold mine, most of whom are represented by the Mine Workers
Union. The contract with respect to La Camorra will expire in March 2004.
Information with respect to the La Camorra mine's production, average
costs per ounce of gold produced and Proven and Probable ore reserves is set
forth in the table below. SRK Consulting provided an independent third party
audit of the 2001 reserve estimates in December 2002.
Year
Production 2002 2001 2000
---------- ------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Ore processed (tons) 194,960 163,139 138,216
Gold (ounces) 167,386 152,303 92,848
Average Cost per Ounce
of Gold Produced
--------------------
Cash operating costs $ 137 $ 133 $ 188
Total cash costs(1) $ 137 $ 133 $ 188
Total production costs $ 206 $ 200 $ 246
Proven and Probable
Ore Reserves(2,3,4) 12/31/02 12/31/01 12/31/00
-------------------- ------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total tons 453,224 482,238 591,464
Gold (ounces per ton) 0.910 0.867 0.634
Contained gold (ounces) 412,332 418,050 375,200
(1) Cash costs per ounce of silver or gold represent non-U.S. GAAP
measurements that management uses to monitor and evaluate the
performance of its mining operations and are calculated pursuant to
standards of the Gold Institute. We believe cash costs per ounce of
silver or gold provide an indicator of profitability at each location
and on a consolidated total, as well as a meaningful basis on which to
compare other mining companies and other mining operating properties. A
reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to GAAP cost of sales and other
direct production costs can be found immediately following this table.
(2) For Proven and Probable ore reserve assumptions, including assumed
metals prices, see Glossary of Certain Terms on page 71 of this
prospectus.
(3) The decrease in tons of Proven and Probable ore reserves in 2002
compared to 2001 is due to the depletion of reserves by mining,
subsequently offset by the addition of new reserves based on new
diamond drilling below the current mining front. Proven and Probable
ore reserves at the La Camorra mine are based on drill spacing of 30 to
50 meters and closely spaced chip sample information. Cutoff grade
assumptions are developed based on reserve prices, anticipated mill
recoveries and cash operating costs. The cutoff grade at La Camorra is
8 grams per tonne.
(4) The decrease in tons of Proven and Probable ore reserves in 2001
compared to 2000 is due to mining, offset by: 1) conversion of
mineralization to reserves based on new development and drilling; and
2) addition of newly delimited mineralization from development and
drilling to reserve. Ore grade and contained metal improvements in
reserve are attributable to a change in reserve methodology in 2001
compared to 2000 based on very favorable mill/model reconciliation and
operations experience with the orebodies.
45
The following table presents a reconciliation between non-GAAP total
cash costs to GAAP cost of sales and other direct production costs for the La
Camorra mine for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands,
except costs per ounce):
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total cash costs $ 22,879 $ 20,216 $ 17,484
Divided by ounces produced 167 152 93
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Total cash cost per ounce produced 137 133 188
Reconciliation to GAAP:
Total cash costs $ 22,879 $ 20,216 $ 17,484
Reclamation 388 354 213
Treatment & freight costs (1,840) (1,467) (1,310)
Change in product inventory (53) 289 49
------------------- ----------------- ------------------
Cost of sales and other direct
productions costs (GAAP) $ 21,374 $ 19,392 $ 16,436
================== ================= ==================
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
During 2000, in furtherance of our determination to focus our
operations on silver and gold mining and to raise cash to reduce debt and
provide working capital, our board of directors made the decision to sell our
industrial minerals segment. At that time, our principal industrial minerals
assets consisted of ball clay operations in Kentucky, Tennessee and Mississippi;
kaolin operations in South Carolina and Georgia; feldspar operations in North
Carolina; a clay slurry plant in Monterrey, Mexico; and specialty aggregate
operations (primarily scoria) in southern Colorado. We conducted these
operations through four wholly owned subsidiaries: (1) Kentucky-Tennessee Clay
Company, which operated our ball clay and kaolin divisions; (2) K-T Feldspar
Corporation, which operated the feldspar business; (3) K-T Clay de Mexico, S.A.
de C.V., which operated the clay slurry plant business; and (4) MWCA, Inc.,
which operates our specialty aggregate business. Based upon the 2000 decision to
sell the industrial minerals segment, our Consolidated Financial Statements
reflect the industrial minerals segment as a discontinued operation.
On March 27, 2001, we completed a sale of Kentucky-Tennessee Clay
Company, K-T Feldspar Corporation, K-T Clay de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and certain
other minor industrial minerals companies (collectively the K-T Group),
transferring all of our interest in each of the companies subject to the
agreement. We completed a sales transaction for the Mountain West Products
division of MWCA in March 2000. We completed a sale of the landscape operations
of the Colorado Aggregate division of MWCA in June 2000. On March 4, 2002, we
completed a sale of the pet operations of the Colorado Aggregate division of
MWCA. In March 2003, we sold the remaining inventories of MWCA, Inc. and no
longer produce or sell any product from our industrial minerals segment.
NONOPERATING PROPERTIES
HOLLISTER DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
In August 2002, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Hecla Ventures
Corporation, entered into an earn-in agreement with Rodeo Creek Gold, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Great Basin Gold Ltd. (Great Basin), concerning
exploration, development and production on an area of Great Basin's Ivanhoe
high-grade gold property, which is referred to as the Hollister Development
Block and is located on the Carlin Trend in Nevada. The agreement provides us
with an option to earn a 50% working interest in the Hollister Development Block
in return for funding a two-stage, advanced exploration and development program
leading to commercial production. We estimate the cost to achieve our 50%
interest in the Hollister Development Block to be approximately $21.8 million.
Upon earn-in, we will operate the mine. For additional information relating to
the Hollister Development Block, see Note 4 of Notes to our Consolidated
Financial Statements, beginning on page F-9 of this prospectus. The Hollister
Development Block is defined by a 6,000-foot by 7,000-foot project boundary (964
acres) within a large claim block held by Great Basin. The area was a producer
of mercury around the turn of the century, and later a producer of
46
gold. The most recent operation was the Hollister mine, consisting of a pair of
open-pits and an associated heap-leach facility, operated from 1990 through
1996. Located on the northwestern extension of the Carlin Trend, the nearest
active mining operations are the Dee mine, located 8 miles to the southeast, and
the Ken Snyder mine, located 12 miles to the northwest. The nearest major
population centers are the towns of Battle Mountain, approximately 38 miles
southwest, and Elko, approximately 47 miles to the southeast.
The underground exploration project will consist of approximately 6,500
feet of decline, cross-cuts and diamond drill stations, a minimum of
approximately 2,500 feet of exploration and bulk sampling on different veins
within the system, and approximately 40,000 feet of diamond drilling from
underground locations. The exploration project will take place out of the
existing East Hollister pit, thereby restricting surface impacts to areas
previously disturbed.
Plans for 2003 include applying for all operating permits, constructing
the surface support facilities and driving the initial 500-foot decline.
BLOCK B
In March 2002, we acquired the Block B exploration and mining lease
near El Callao in the Venezuelan State of Bolivar from CVG-Minerven (a
Venezuelan government-owned gold mining company) through March 2023. Block B is
a seven-square-mile property position in the prolific El Callao gold mining
district. The area's mining history dates back to the 1800s and contains many
historic mines including the Chile, Laguna and Panama mines, which collectively
produced over 1.5 million ounces of gold between 1921 and 1946.
Pursuant to the lease agreement, we paid CVG-Minerven $500,000 in
September 2002. In March 2003, we made an additional payment of $1.25 million,
with a final payment of $1.0 million due in September 2003. We will also pay
CVG-Minerven a royalty of 2% to 3% (depending on the gold price) on production
from Block B.
The El Callao area is accessed by the International Highway from Puerto
Ordaz, on the south side of the River Orinoco, on a maintained, asphalt highway
that runs through to Santa Elena on the Brazilian border. Overall good
infrastructure exists and a 115 kw electricity supply feeds the area dominantly
inhabited by small-scale underground miners. The population of El Callao is
approximately 15,000 people.
Geologically, the gold is found in shear-zone hosted quartz veins and
stockworks hosted by Archean to Proterozoic greenstones composed of andesitic
to basaltic lavas. Gold occurs as free gold in quartz and is also commonly
associated with coarse-grained pyrite.
Exploration has begun in the Chile vein system known to host high-grade
gold mineralization. The Chile mine itself was an important gold producer that
produced more than 550,000 ounces of gold at an average grade of over one ounce
per ton. Since the mine shutdown in the 1940s, two phases of exploration
drilling were undertaken, one in the 1960s and a more recent drill testing in
1998 that encountered high grades west of the old mine.
Based upon this information, we have planned a detailed exploration
drilling campaign of two phases, Phase I, a 35-hole program for 9,100 meters to
confirm the existing information, and Phase II, a 15-hole program for 3,900
meters to in-fill and expand on the results of the Phase I program. Total
budgeted expenditure for these phases of exploration drilling will be
approximately $1.9 million. As of December 31, 2002, 17 holes of Phase I have
been drilled for a completed total of 3,932 meters of diamond drilling.
Depending on the results of the drilling, we will commence a feasibility study
for the development of a ramp.
THE ROSEBUD MINE
The Rosebud gold mine, in which we have a 50% interest, is located in
the Rosebud Mining District, in Pershing County, Nevada. The Rosebud property
consists of a 100% interest in three patented lode-mining claims and 125
unpatented lode-mining claims. The Rosebud mine may be reached from Winnemucca,
Nevada, by traveling west a distance of approximately 58 miles on an all-weather
gravel road.
In June 2000, we announced, together with Newmont Gold Company, which
holds the remaining 50% interest in the mine, the planned closure of the Rosebud
mine when it was recognized that production would cease
47
during the third quarter. Mining activity was completed in July 2000, and
milling activity was completed in August of 2000.
The Rosebud property has been reclaimed per the closure plan approved
by the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection. Revegetation on the
property will be monitored for the next three to five years, after which the
property will completely revert back to the public domain under the U.S. Bureau
of Land Management.
THE GROUSE CREEK MINE
The Grouse Creek gold mine is located in central Idaho, 27 miles
southwest of the town of Challis in the Yankee Fork Mining District. Mining at
Grouse Creek began in late 1994 and ended in April 1997 due to
higher-than-expected operating costs and less-than-expected operating margins,
primarily because the ore occurred in thinner, less continuous structures than
had been originally expected.
We recorded a write-down of the mine's carrying value totaling $97.0
million in 1995. We recorded further adjustments in 1996 for future severance,
holding, reclamation and closure costs totaling $22.5 million, and adjustments
to the carrying value of property, plant and equipment, and inventories totaling
$5.3 million.
Following completion of mining in the Sunbeam pit in April 1997, we
placed the Grouse Creek mine on a care-and-maintenance status. During the
care-and-maintenance period, reclamation was undertaken to prevent degradation
of the property. During 1997, the milling facilities were mothballed and
earthwork completed to contain and control surface waters. In 1998, an
engineered cap was constructed on the waste rock storage facility and
modifications were made to the water treatment facility. In 1999 and 2000,
activities included further work on the waste rock storage facility cover and
continued work controlling surface waters.
We increased the reclamation accrual by $23.0 million in 1999 due to
anticipated changes to the closure plan, including increased dewatering
requirements and other expenditures. The changes to the reclamation plan at
Grouse Creek were necessitated principally by the need to dewater the tailings
impoundment rather than reclaim it as a wetland as originally planned.
In May 2000, we notified state and federal agencies that the Grouse
Creek property would proceed to a permanent suspension of operations. We signed
an agreement with the State of Idaho and a voluntary administrative order on
consent with the U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in
which we agreed to dewater the tailings impoundment, complete a water balance
report and monitoring plan for the site and complete certain studies necessary
for closure of the tailings impoundment. A work plan for final reclamation and
closure of the tailings impoundment is to be submitted by us no later than one
year prior to estimated completion of the tailings impoundment dewatering.
We increased the reclamation accrual by $10.2 million in 2000 based
upon updated cost estimates in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 96-1
"Environmental Remediation Liabilities," due to the requirements of the
administrative order on consent. During 2001, our activities focused on further
containment of surface and subsurface water along with development of a
dewatering plan for the tailings impoundment. The reclamation and closure cost
accrual for the Grouse Creek mine totaled $27.4 million as of December 31, 2002,
although it is possible that the estimate may change in the future due to the
assumptions and estimates inherent in the accrual.
THE REPUBLIC MINE
The Republic gold mine is located in the Republic Mining District near
Republic, Washington. In February 1995, we completed operations at the Republic
mine and have been conducting reclamation work in connection with the mine and
mill closure. In August 1995, we entered into an agreement with Newmont to
explore and develop the Golden Eagle deposit on the Republic mine property. Echo
Bay acquired Newmont's interest in 2000 and has been conducting a limited
exploration program on the project.
At December 31, 2002, the accrued reclamation and closure costs balance
totaled $2.4 million, although it is possible that the estimate may change in
the future due to the assumptions and estimates inherent in the accrual.
Reclamation and closure efforts will continue in 2003.
48
The remaining net book value of the Republic mine property and its
associated plant and equipment was approximately $0.6 million as of December 31,
2002.
EXPLORATION
We conduct exploration activities from our operating units and review
proposals and results from our headquarters in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. We own or
control patented and unpatented mining claims, fee land, mineral concessions and
state and private leases in the United States, Mexico, Venezuela and other South
American countries. Our strategy regarding reserve replacement is to concentrate
our efforts on: (1) existing operations where an infrastructure already exists;
(2) other properties presently being developed; and (3) advanced-stage
exploration properties that have been identified as having potential for
additional discoveries principally in the United States, Mexico and Venezuela.
We intend to focus on low-cost properties that yield high returns and we
continuously evaluate opportunities to acquire additional properties.
Mineral exploration, particularly for silver and gold, is highly
speculative in nature, involves many risks and frequently is nonproductive.
There can be no assurance that our mineral exploration efforts will be
successful. Once mineralization is discovered, it may take a number of years
from the initial phases of drilling until production is possible, during which
time the economic feasibility of production may change. Substantial expenditures
are required to establish ore reserves through drilling, to determine
metallurgical processes to extract the metals from the ore and, in the case of
new properties, to construct mining and processing facilities. As a result of
these uncertainties, no assurance can be given that our exploration programs
will result in the expansion or replacement of existing ore reserves that are
being depleted by current production.
In March 2002, we were informed by CVG-Minerven (a Venezuelan
government-owned gold mining company) that we had been awarded the Block B
exploration and mining lease near El Callao in the Venezuelan State of Bolivar.
Block B is a 1,795-hectare land position in the historic El Callao gold district
that includes the historic Chile, Laguna and Panama mines which produced over
1.5 million ounces of gold between 1921 and 1946. For further information, see
Note 4 of Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page F-9
of this prospectus.
In August 2002, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Hecla Ventures
Corporation, we entered into an earn-in agreement with Rodeo Creek Gold, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Great Basin Gold Ltd. (Great Basin), to acquire a 50%
interest in an area of Great Basin's Ivanhoe high-grade gold property, which is
referred to as the Hollister Development Block and is located on the Carlin
Trend in Nevada. An "earn-in" agreement is an agreement under which a party must
take certain actions in order to "earn" an interest in an entity. In order to
receive the interest, we are required to complete a multi-stage exploration and
development program leading to commercial production. For further information,
see Note 4 of Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page
F-9 of this prospectus.
Exploration expenditures for the three years ended December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000, were approximately $5.8 million, $2.2 million and $6.3 million,
respectively. Our near-term exploration plan consists of exploring for
additional reserves at, or in the vicinity of, our San Sebastian mine in Mexico;
the La Camorra mine, the Block B and Canaima properties in Venezuela; the Greens
Creek mine in Alaska; and the Hollister Development Block in Nevada. Exploration
expenditures for 2003 are estimated to be in the range of $10.0 million to $15.0
million.
REGULATION OF MINING ACTIVITY
Our U.S. mining operations are subject to inspection and regulation by
the Mine Safety and Health Administration of the Department of Labor (MSHA)
under provisions of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. MSHA
directives have had no material adverse impact on our results of operations or
financial condition and we believe that we are substantially in compliance with
the regulations promulgated by MSHA.
All of our exploration, development and production activities in the
United States, Mexico and South America are subject to regulation by
governmental agencies under one or more of the various environmental laws. These
laws address emissions to the air, discharges to water, management of wastes,
management of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, protection
of antiquities and reclamation of lands which are disturbed.
49
We believe that we are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental
regulations. Many of the regulations also require permits to be obtained for our
activities. These permits normally are subject to public review processes
resulting in public input prior to agency approval of the activity. While these
laws and regulations govern how we conduct many aspects of our business, our
management does not believe that they have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations or financial condition at this time. Our projects are
evaluated considering the cost and impact of environmental regulation on the
proposed activity. New laws and regulations are evaluated as they develop to
determine the impact on, and changes necessary to, our operations. It is
possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a
significant impact on some portion of our business, causing those activities to
be economically reevaluated at that time. We believe that an adequate provision
has been made for the reclamation of mine waste and mill tailings at all of our
operating and nonoperating properties in a manner that complies with current
applicable federal and state environmental requirements.
Environmental laws and regulations may also have an indirect impact on
us, such as increased cost for electrical power. Charges by smelters, to which
we sell our metallic concentrates and products, have substantially increased
over the past several years due to requirements that smelters meet revised
environmental quality standards. We have no control over the smelters'
operations or their compliance with environmental laws and regulations. If the
smelting capacity available to us was significantly reduced due to environmental
requirements or otherwise, it is possible that our silver operations could be
adversely affected.
Our U.S. operations are also subject to regulations under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as
amended (CERCLA or Superfund), which regulates and establishes liability for the
release of hazardous substances, and the Endangered Species Act (ESA), which
identifies endangered species of plants and animals and regulates activities to
protect these species and their habitats. See "Risk Factors - We face
substantial government regulation and environmental risks."
LEGISLATION
From time to time, the U.S. Congress considers proposed amendments to
the General Mining Law of 1872, as amended, which governs mining claims and
related activities on federal lands. There was no significant activity with
respect to mining law reform in Congress in 2002. The extent of any such changes
is not known and the potential impact on us as a result of congressional action
is difficult to predict. Although a majority of our existing U.S. mining
operations occur on private or patented property, changes to the General Mining
Law, if adopted, could adversely affect our ability to economically develop
mineral resources on federal lands.
EMPLOYEES
As of March 31, 2003, we employed 850 people, including people employed
with our subsidiaries, 310 of which were covered by labor agreements.
PROPERTIES
Our principal mineral properties are described above. We also have
interests in a number of other mineral properties in the United States, Mexico
and South America. Although some of such properties are known or believed to
contain significant quantities of mineralization, they are not considered
material to our operations at the present time. Encouraging results from further
exploration or increases in the market prices of certain metals could, in the
future, make such properties considerably more valuable to our business taken as
a whole.
Our general corporate office is located in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. We
closed a transaction selling the corporate office building on April 8, 2002, but
we have leased a portion of the building following the sale for continued use as
our general corporate offices. We believe that our existing facilities are
sufficient for our intended purposes.
50
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Bunker Hill Superfund Site
In 1994, we, as a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA),
entered into a consent decree with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
the State of Idaho, concerning environmental remediation obligations at the
Bunker Hill Superfund site located in Kellogg, Idaho. The 1994 Consent Decree
(the "1994 Decree") settled our response-cost liability under CERCLA at the
Bunker Hill 21-square mile site.
In August 2000, Sunshine Mining and Refining Company which was also a
party to the 1994 Decree, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and in January 2001,
the Federal District Court approved a new Consent Decree between Sunshine, the
U.S. Government and the Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe which settled Sunshine's
environmental liabilities in the Coeur d'Alene Basin lawsuits described below
and released Sunshine from further obligations under the 1994 Decree. In
response to a request by us and ASARCO Incorporated, the United States Federal
District Court in Idaho, having jurisdiction over the 1994 Decree, issued an
Order in September 2001 that the 1994 Decree should be modified in light of a
significant change in factual circumstances not reasonably anticipated by the
mining companies at the time they signed the 1994 Decree. In its Order, the
Court reserved the final ruling on the appropriate modification to the 1994
Decree until after the issuance by the EPA of a Record of Decision ("ROD") on
the Basin-wide Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study.
The EPA issued the ROD on the Basin in September 2002, proposing a $359
million Basin clean-up plan to be implemented over 30 years. The ROD also
establishes a review process at the end of the 30-year period to determine if
further remediation would be appropriate. Based on the 2001 Order issued by the
Court, we intend to seek relief from the work program under the 1994 Decree
within the Bunker Hill site. In addition, we and ASARCO negotiated a reduced
2002 work program with the EPA and the State of Idaho pending the outcome of the
dispute resolution over the 1994 Decree. We anticipate negotiating the 2003 work
program during the first half of 2003; however, we expect the work program for
2003 will be subject to a final decision on modification of the 1994 Decree by
the Court.
On February 2, 2003, ASARCO entered into a Consent Decree with the
United States relating to a transfer of certain assets to its parent
corporation, Grupo de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. The Consent Decree also addresses
ASARCO's environmental liabilities on a number of sites in the United States,
including the Bunker Hill site. The provisions of the Consent Decree could limit
ASARCO's annual obligation at the Bunker Hill site for 2003 to 2005. In
addition, in February 2003, we were advised that ASARCO had reached an agreement
with the Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe settling the Tribe's claims against ASARCO
for damages to natural resources. We believe the settlement will have no
material effect on any liability we may have for the Tribe's claims.
As of December 31, 2002, we have estimated and accrued a liability for
remedial activity costs at the Bunker Hill site of $8.3 million. These estimated
expenditures are anticipated to be made over the next three to five years.
Although we believe the accrual is adequate based upon our current estimates of
aggregate costs, it is reasonably possible that our estimate may change in the
future due to the assumptions and estimates inherent in the accrual.
Coeur d'Alene River Basin Environmental Claims
Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe Claims
In July 1991, the Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe brought a lawsuit, under
CERCLA, in Idaho Federal District Court against us, ASARCO and a number of other
mining companies asserting claims for damages to natural resources downstream
from the Bunker Hill site over which the Tribe alleges some ownership or
control. In February 2003, ASARCO reached an agreement with the Coeur d'Alene
Tribe settling the Tribe's claim against ASARCO. The Tribe's natural resource
damage litigation has been consolidated with the United States' litigation
described below.
51
U.S. Government Claims
In March 1996, the United States filed a lawsuit in Idaho Federal
District Court against certain mining companies that conducted historic mining
operations in the Silver Valley of northern Idaho, including us. The lawsuit
asserts claims under CERCLA and the Clean Water Act and seeks recovery for
alleged damages to or loss of natural resources located in the Coeur d'Alene
River Basin in northern Idaho for which the United States asserts it is the
trustee under CERCLA. The lawsuit claims that the defendants' historic mining
activity resulted in releases of hazardous substances and damaged natural
resources within the Basin. The suit also seeks declaratory relief that we and
other defendants are jointly and severally liable for response costs under
CERCLA for historic mining impacts in the Basin outside the Bunker Hill site. We
have asserted a number of defenses to the United States' claims.
As discussed above, in May 1998, the EPA announced that it had
commenced a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study under CERCLA for the entire
Basin, including Lake Coeur d'Alene, in support of its response cost claims
asserted in its March 1996 lawsuit. In October 2001, the EPA issued its proposed
clean-up plan for the Basin. The EPA issued the ROD on the Basin in September
2002, proposing a $359 million Basin clean-up plan to be implemented over 30
years. The ROD also establishes a review process at the end of the 30-year
period to determine if further remediation would be appropriate.
The first phase of the trial commenced on the consolidated Coeur
d'Alene Indian Tribe's and the United States' claims on January 22, 2001, and
was concluded on July 30, 2001. In the first phase of the trial, the Court was
to determine the extent of liability, if any, of the defendants for the
plaintiffs' CERCLA claims. The Court was also asked to determine the liability
of the United States for its historic involvement in the Basin. No decision on
the issues before the Court in the first phase of the litigation has been
issued. If liability is determined in the first phase, a second trial is
anticipated to be scheduled during 2003 to address damages and remedy selection.
Two of the defendant mining companies, Coeur d'Alene Mines Corporation and
Sunshine Mining and Refining Company, settled their liabilities under the
litigation during the first quarter of 2001. We and ASARCO are the only
defendants remaining in the United States' litigation.
During 2000 and into 2001, we were involved in settlement negotiations
with representatives of the U.S. Government and the Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe.
We also participated with certain of the other defendants in the litigation in a
State of Idaho led settlement effort. On August 16, 2001, we entered into a now
terminated Agreement in Principle with the United States and the State of Idaho
to settle the governments' claims for natural resource damages and clean-up
costs related to the historic mining practices in the Coeur d'Alene Basin in
northern Idaho. That Agreement in Principle covered the potential settlement of
liability relating not only to the Coeur d'Alene River Basin, but also other
Idaho related claims for which separate provision has already been made (see
Note 5 of Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements, beginning on page F-9
of this prospectus). The total undiscounted amount of the potential settlement
was $138.0 million. Due to a number of changes that have occurred since the
signing of the Agreement in Principle, including improvements in the
environmental conditions at Grouse Creek and lower estimated clean-up costs in
the Coeur d'Alene Basin as well as our improved financial condition, the terms
of the multiple properties settlement approach set forth in the Agreement in
Principle no longer appears favorable to us. Therefore, the United States, the
State of Idaho and we have agreed to discontinue utilizing the Agreement in
Principle as a settlement vehicle. However, we may participate in further
settlement negotiations with the United States, the State of Idaho and the Coeur
d'Alene Indian Tribe in the future. Due to a number of uncertainties related to
this matter, including the outcome of pending litigation and the result of any
settlement negotiations, we do not have the ability to estimate what, if any,
liability we may have related to the Coeur d'Alene Basin at this time.
It is reasonably possible that our ability to estimate what, if any,
liability we may have relating to the Coeur d'Alene Basin may change in the near
or long term depending on a number of factors. In addition, an adverse ruling
against us for liability and damages in this matter could have a material
adverse effect on us.
Class Action Litigation
On or about January 7, 2002, a class action complaint was filed in the
Idaho District Court, County of Kootenai, against several corporate defendants,
including Hecla. We were served with the complaint on January 29, 2002. The
complaint seeks certification of three plaintiff classes of Coeur d'Alene Basin
residents and current and former property owners to pursue three types of
relief: various medical monitoring programs, real property
52
remediation and restoration programs, and damages for diminution in property
value, plus other damages and costs. On April 23, 2002, we filed a motion with
the Court to dismiss the claims for relief relating to any medical monitoring
programs and the remediation and restoration programs. At a hearing before the
Idaho District Court on our and other defendants' motions held October 16, 2002,
the Judge struck the complaint filed by the plaintiffs in January 2002 and
instructed the plaintiffs to re-file the complaint limiting the relief requested
by the plaintiffs to wholly private damages. The Court also dismissed the
medical monitoring claim as a separate cause of action and stated that any
requested remedy that encroached upon the EPA's cleanup in the Silver Valley
would be precluded by the pending Federal Court case described above. The
plaintiffs re-filed their amended complaint on January 9, 2003. As ordered by
the Court, the amended complaint omits any cause of action for medical
monitoring and no longer requests relief in the form of real property
remediation or restoration programs. We believe the amended complaint is subject
to challenge on a number of bases and intend to vigorously defend this
litigation.
Insurance Coverage Litigation
In 1991, we initiated litigation in the Idaho District Court, County of
Kootenai, against a number of insurance companies that provided comprehensive
general liability insurance coverage to us and our predecessors. We believe the
insurance companies have a duty to defend and indemnify us under their policies
of insurance for all liabilities and claims asserted against us by the EPA and
the Tribe under CERCLA related to the Bunker Hill site and the Basin in northern
Idaho. In 1992, the Idaho State District Court ruled that the primary insurance
companies had a duty to defend us in the Tribe's lawsuit. During 1995 and 1996,
we entered into settlement agreements with a number of the insurance carriers
named in the litigation. We have received a total of approximately $7.2 million
under the terms of the settlement agreements. Thirty percent of these
settlements were paid to the EPA to reimburse the U.S. government for past costs
under the Bunker Hill site Consent Decree. Litigation is still pending against
one insurer with trial suspended until the underlying environmental claims
against us are resolved or settled. The remaining insurer in the litigation,
along with a second insurer not named in the litigation, is providing us with a
partial defense in all Basin environmental litigation. As of December 31, 2002,
we have not reduced our accrual for reclamation and closure costs to reflect the
receipt of any potential insurance proceeds.
Other Claims
In 1999 and 2000, three lawsuits were filed against our then
subsidiary, Kentucky-Tennessee Clay Company (K-T Clay), based upon damages
incurred by animal feed producers, when the Food and Drug Administration
determined trace elements of dioxin were present in poultry as a result of ball
clay from K-T Clay being added to poultry feed. Dioxin was determined to be
inherently present in ball clays generally.
In March 2001, prior to trial, K-T Clay settled the most significant of
claims against K-T Clay through a settlement payment substantially funded by K-T
Clay's insurance carrier. K-T Clay contributed $230,000 toward the settlement.
In July 2002, K-T Clay, through its insurance carrier, negotiated settlements of
both remaining lawsuits. The settlement payments have been funded 100% by K-T
Clay's insurance carrier. Based on the settlement agreements, the respective
courts dismissed both remaining lawsuits.
On November 17, 2000, we entered into an agreement with Zemex U.S.
Corporation guaranteed by its parent, Zemex Corporation of Toronto, Canada, to
sell the stock of K-T Clay and K-T Mexico, which included the ball clay and
kaolin operations, for a price of $68.0 million. On January 18, 2001, Zemex U.S.
Corporation failed to close on the transaction, and on January 22, 2001, we
brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern Division, against the parent, Zemex Corporation, under its
guarantee for its subsidiary's failure to close on the purchase and meet its
obligations under the November 2000 agreement. On January 18, 2003, the parties
reached an agreement to settle our claims in full for $3,950,000, which Zemex
has paid.
In March 2002, Independence Lead Mines Company (Independence), the
holder of a net 18.52% interest in the Gold Hunter or DIA unitized area of the
Lucky Friday mine, notified us of certain alleged defaults by us under the 1968
Lease Agreement between the unit owners (Independence and us under the terms of
the 1968 DIA Unitization Agreement) as lessors and defaults by us as lessee and
operator of the properties. We are a net 81.48% interest holder under these
Agreements. Independence alleges that we violated the "prudent operator
obligations" implied under the lease by undertaking the Gold Hunter project and
violated certain other provisions of the Agreement with respect to milling
equipment and calculating net profits and losses. Under the Lease Agreement,
53
we have the exclusive right to manage, control and operate the DIA properties,
and our decisions with respect to the character of work are final. On June 17,
2002, Independence filed a lawsuit in Idaho State District Court seeking
termination of the Lease Agreement and requesting unspecified damages. On March
18, 2003 Independence filed a motion for partial summary judgment or in the
alternative for preliminary injunction ("Motion"). The Motion requests that the
court, terminate our leasehold interest in property owned by Independence within
the DIA area, rule that we have committed waste while mining ore within property
owned by Independence, and prohibit us from any further mining within property
owned by Independence. We believe that we have fully complied with all
obligations of the 1968 Lease Agreement and will be able to successfully defend
our right to operate the property under the Lease Agreement.
In Mexico, our subsidiary, Minera Hecla, S.A. de C.V. (Minera Hecla),
is involved in litigation in Mexico City concerning a lien on certain major
components of the Velardena mill at the San Sebastian mine that predated the
sale of the mill to Minera Hecla. The unpaid amount of the lien is in dispute.
At the time of the purchase, the lien amount was believed to be approximately
$590,000 and that amount was deposited with the court. The lien holder now
alleges the amount owed is approximately $2,017,000, plus accrued interest. The
lien holder has tried with limited success to remove the mill components subject
to the lien. On January 23, 2003, Minera Hecla deposited $145,000 which
represented the amount of accrued interest since the date of sale and Minera
Hecla requested that the court cancel the lien. The lien holder opposed the
request made by Minera Hecla. On February 19, 2003, the court in Mexico City
issued a decision that the lien was fully satisfied with the deposit made by
Minera Hecla on January 23, 2003, and the court cancelled the lien. On February
24, 2003 the lien holder appealed that decision. The appeal is currently pending
before a federal appeals court in Mexico. We believe that the lien has been
fully satisfied and the lower court decision to cancel the lien will stand on
appeal.
In a related legal proceeding in Mexico, there is currently pending an
appeal in Mexico of the $2,017,000 judgment against the mill's prior owner, BLM
Minera Mexicana (BLM), which underlies the lien. However, the decision by the
court in Mexico City in February 2003 held that the lien on the mill mentioned
above does not guarantee the $2,017,000 judgment against BLM as the lien holder
alleged. Unless the lower court decision is overturned on appeal, Minera Hecla
and the Velardena mill will not be subject to any further attachment by the lien
holder in its pending action against BLM.
We are subject to other legal proceedings and claims not disclosed
above which have arisen in the ordinary course of our business and have not been
finally adjudicated. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate
disposition of these other matters, it is the opinion of our management that the
outcome of these other proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition.
54
MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Information with respect to our directors and executive officers as of
March 31, 2003 is set forth as follows:
Age Position
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.(1) 43 President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
Arthur Brown(1,6,9) 62 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Michael H. Callahan(9) 39 Vice President - Corporate Development
Ronald W. Clayton 44 Vice President - U.S. Operations
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr. 48 Vice President - Operations
Vicki Veltkamp 46 Vice President - Investor and Public Relations
Lewis E. Walde 36 Vice President - Controller and Treasurer
John E. Clute(1,4,5) 68 Director
Joe Coors, Jr.(2,3,5) 61 Director
Ted Crumley(1,2,4,5) 57 Director
Charles L. McAlpine(3,4,5,7) 69 Director
Jorge E. Ordonez C.(2,3,4,7) 63 Director
Dr. Anthony P. Taylor(7,8) 61 Director
---------------------------
(1) Member of Executive Committee
(2) Member of Finance Committee
(3) Member of Audit Committee
(4) Member of Directors Nominating Committee
(5) Member of Compensation Committee
(6) Member of Retirement Board
(7) Member of Technical Committee
(8) Elected by holders of Series B Preferred Stock
(9) Arthur Brown is Michael H. Callahan's father-in-law
Phillips S. Baker, Jr. has been our Chief Financial Officer since May
2001 and President, Chief Operating Officer and director since November 2001.
Prior to joining us, Mr. Baker served as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Battle Mountain Gold Company (a gold mining corporation) from March
1998 to January 2001 and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pegasus
Gold Corporation (a gold mining corporation) from January 1994 to January 1998.
Arthur Brown has been Chairman of our board of directors since June
1987 and has served as our Chief Executive Officer since May 1987. Prior to
that, Mr. Brown was our President from May 1986 to November 2001 and our Chief
Operating Officer from May 1986 to May 1987. Mr. Brown also serves as a director
for AMCOL International Corporation (an American industrial minerals company),
Idaho Independent Bank and Tango Minerals Company (a Canadian mining company).
On December 18, 2002, Arthur Brown announced that he would retire as
Chief Executive Officer effective in May 2003. Subject to formal Board approval,
we expect that he will be succeeded by Phillips S. Baker, Jr., currently our
President. Mr. Brown will remain as Chairman of the Board.
Michael H. Callahan has been our Vice President - Corporate Development
since February 2002 and President of Minera Hecla Venezolana since 2000. Prior
to that Mr. Callahan was Director of Accounting and
55
Information Services from 1999 to 2000. From 1997 to 1999 Mr. Callahan was the
Financial Manager of Silver Valley Resources. Mr. Callahan was also the Senior
Financial Analyst for us from 1994 to 1996.
Ronald W. Clayton was appointed Vice President - U.S. Operations on
September 27, 2002. Prior to joining us, Mr. Clayton was Vice President -
Operations for Stillwater Mining Company from July 2000 to May 2002. Mr. Clayton
was also our Vice President - Metals Operations from May 2000 to July 2000.
Mr. Clayton also served as Manager of Operations and General Manager of our
Rosebud, Republic and Lucky Friday mines from 1987 to 2000.
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr. has been our Vice President - Operations since
June 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Fudge was our Manager of Operations from July 2000
to May 2001 and our Lucky Friday Unit Manager from 1995 to 2000.
Vicki Veltkamp has been our Vice President - Investor and Public
Relations since May 2000. Prior to that, Ms. Veltkamp has served in various
administrative functions with us from 1988 to 1993 and 1995 to 2000.
Ms. Veltkamp was Director of Corporate Communications for Santa Fe Pacific Gold
from 1993 to 1995.
Lewis E. Walde has been our Vice President - Controller since June 2001
and our Treasurer since February 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Walde was our
Controller from May 2000 to May 2001, our Assistant Controller from January 1999
to April 2000 and held various accounting functions with us from June 1992 to
December 1998.
John E. Clute has served as a director since 1981. Mr. Clute has been a
Professor of Law at Gonzaga University School of Law from 2001 to the present.
Prior to that, Mr. Clute was the Dean of Gonzaga University School of Law from
1991 to 2001. Mr. Clute serves as a director of The Jundt Growth Fund, Inc.; the
Jundt Funds, Inc. (Jundt U.S. Emerging Growth Fund, Jundt Opportunity Fund,
Jundt Mid-Cap Growth Fund, Jundt Science & Technology Fund and Jundt Twenty-Five
Fund); American Eagle Funds, Inc. (American Eagle Capital Appreciation Fund,
American Eagle Large-Cap Growth Fund and American Eagle Twenty Fund); and
RealResume, Inc.
Joe Coors, Jr. has served as a director since 1990. Mr. Coors was the
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of CoorsTek, Inc. (formerly
Coors Ceramics Company, a ceramic corporation) from 1985 until his retirement in
2001. Mr. Coors serves as a director of Children's Technology Group and the
Fellowship of Christian Athletes for the state of Colorado. Mr. Coors is the
Retired Chairman of the Air Force Memorial Foundation.
Ted Crumley has served as a director since 1995. Mr. Crumley has served
as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Boise Cascade
Corporation (manufacturer of paper and forest products) from 1994 to the
present. Prior to that, Mr. Crumley was Vice President and Controller of Boise
Cascade Corporation from 1990 to 1994.
Charles L. McAlpine has served as a director since 1989. Concurrently,
Mr. McAlpine served as the President of Arimathaea Resources Inc. (a Canadian
gold exploration company) from 1982 to 1992. Mr. McAlpine serves as a director
of First Tiffany Resource Corporation, Goldstake Explorations Inc. (a Canadian
mining exploration corporation) and Postec Systems Inc.
Jorge E. Ordonez C. has served as a director since 1994. Mr. Ordonez
has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ordonez Profesional
S.C. (a business and management consulting corporation specializing in mining)
from 1988 to present. Mr. Ordonez is a director of Altos Hornos de Mexico, S.A.
de C.V.; Minera Carbonifera Rio Escondido, S.A. de C.V.; Grupo Acerero del
Norte, S.A. de C.V.; and Fischer-Watt Gold Co., Inc. Mr. Ordonez received the
Mexican National Geology Recognition in 1989 and was elected to the Mexican
Academy of Engineering in 1990.
Dr. Anthony P. Taylor has served as a director since May 2002. Mr.
Taylor has been the President, Chief Executive Officer and director of
Millennium Mining Corporation (a minerals exploration corporation) since January
2000, the President of Oakhill Consultants since October 1996 (a minerals
exploration corporation and geographical consulting company) and the President
and director of Caughlin Preschool Corp. since October 2001. Prior to that, Mr.
Taylor was the Vice President - Exploration of First Point US Minerals (a
minerals exploration
56
corporation) from May 1997 to December 1999 and the President and director of
Great Basin Exploration & Mining Co., Inc. (a minerals exploration corporation)
from June 1990 to January 1996.
VACANCY
Mr. David J. Christensen resigned in October 2002 from our board of
directors. Preferred shareholders elected Mr. Christensen and Dr. Anthony P.
Taylor at the May 10, 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Pursuant to the
provisions of the Certificate of Designations of the Series B Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock, Dr. Anthony P. Taylor is entitled to appoint a
replacement director to take the place of Mr. Christensen. As of the date of
this prospectus, a new director had not been appointed to replace Mr.
Christensen.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
We compensate our directors who are not employees for their services as
follows: (i) a retainer fee of $3,000 per calendar quarter; (ii) $2,000 for each
director's meeting attended; and (iii) $1,000 for attending any meeting of any
committee of the board of directors.
In August 1994, we adopted a new Deferred Compensation Plan for
directors which commenced January 1, 1995 (1994 Plan). At the February 2001
quarterly Directors' meeting, the directors elected to terminate the 1994 Plan
effective April 1, 2001, with payment of the dollar amounts and stock held under
the plan to be paid or distributed out to the participants on a monthly basis
over a 24-month period commencing April 15, 2001. If a director retires from or
terminates his employment with us, the director is still entitled to a
distribution of his account and stock held under the plan within a period of 60
days following the date of his termination of employment or retirement.
In March 1995, we adopted the Hecla Mining Company Stock Plan for
Nonemployee Directors (Directors Stock Plan), which became effective following
stockholder approval on May 5, 1995. The maximum number of shares of common
stock that may be issued under the plan is 1,000,000. The Directors Stock Plan
was amended effective on July 18, 2002, and is subject to termination by the
Board of Directors at any time. Pursuant to the Directors Stock Plan, on May 30
of each year, each nonemployee director is credited that number of shares
determined by dividing $10,000 by the average closing price for our common stock
on the New York Stock Exchange for the prior calendar year. Nonemployee
directors joining the Board of Directors after May 30 of any year are credited
with a pro rata number of shares based upon the date they join the Board. All
credited shares are held in a grantor trust, the assets of which are subject to
the claims of the Corporation's creditors, until delivered under the Directors
Stock Plan. The Directors Stock Plan is administered by a committee consisting
of our Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Controller, which has full
authority to construe and interpret the Directors Stock Plan, to establish,
amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Directors Stock Plan,
and to take all such actions and make all such determinations in connection with
the Directors Stock Plan as it may deem necessary or desirable.
The common stock credited under the Plan will be delivered to a
director on or beginning on the earlier to occur of (i) the death of the
director; (ii) the disability of the director preventing continued service on
the board; (iii) the retirement of the director from service; (iv) a cessation
of a director's service to us for any reason other than (i) through (iii) above;
or (v) our change of control (as defined in the Directors Stock Plan). Subject
to certain restrictions, directors may elect to receive the common stock on such
date or in annual installments thereafter over 5, 10 or 15 years. Upon delivery,
a director will receive the common stock plus dividends or other distributions
with respect to the common stock, plus interest at a rate equal to our cost of
funds on all such distributions other than our common stock. The shares of
common stock credited to nonemployee directors pursuant to the Directors Stock
Plan may not be sold until at least six months following the date they are
credited.
Our directors who are also employees may participate in the 1995 Stock
Incentive Plan, described under "Executive Compensation."
57
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth information regarding the aggregate
compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, paid
or accrued for (i) our Chief Executive Officer, and (ii) our four other most
highly paid executive officers.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Long-Term
Compensation
Annual Compensation(1) Awards
---------------------- ------
Name and Principal All Other
Position Year Salary(6) Bonus(6) Options(2) Compensation(3,6)
------------------------- ---- ------- ------ -------- -------------
Arthur Brown................... 2002 $357,508 $402,500(5) 150,000 $402,055
Chairman and Chief 2001 $402,500 $144,900 200,000 $ 43,776
Executive Officer 2000 $402,500 $ 49,616 100,000 $ 40,460
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.......... 2002 $300,000(4) $400,000(5) 150,000 $201,000
President, Chief 2001 $162,500 $ 99,000 60,000 $ 49,609
Operating Officer and 2000 $ 0 $ 0 0 $ 0
Chief Financial Officer
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr............ 2002 $150,000 $120,000(5) 85,000 $132,811
Vice President - 2001 $150,000 $ 45,000 60,000 $ 3,335
Operations 2000 $127,300 $ 19,683 7,000 $ 2,522
Michael H. Callahan............ 2002 $128,333 $104,000(5) 85,000 $ 60,562
Vice President - 2001 $120,000 $ 72,000 30,000 $ 2,154
Corporate Development 2000 $ 85,065 $ 13,440 3,000 $ 1,608
Lewis E. Walde................. 2002 $110,000 $ 88,000(5) 85,000 $117,529
Vice President - 2001 $106,000 $ 33,000 30,000 $ 1,720
Controller & Treasurer 2000 $ 80,420 $ 5,480 3,000 $ 1,290
(1) The annual compensation set forth in the table is based upon salaries of
the Chief Executive Officer and other named executives established in May
of each year for June 1 to May 31. This table reflects compensation paid
to, or earned by, the executive officers during the fiscal year ending
December 31 of each year.
(2) All options granted to the named executives in 2002 were granted under a
vesting schedule described in Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year - footnote
1.
(3) "All Other Compensation" for the last fiscal year includes the following
for Messrs. Brown, Baker, Fudge, Callahan and Walde: (i) the above-market
portion of interest accrued under our Executive Deferral Plan of $28,893,
$-0-, $492, $23 and $-0-, on behalf of each named executive, respectively;
(ii) matching contributions under our Capital Accumulation Plan of $3,000,
$3,000, $2,545, $2,211 and $1,840, for each named executive, respectively;
(iii) the dollar value benefit of premium payments for term life insurance
coverage of $2,585, $-0-, $180, $84 and $64, for each named executive,
respectively; (iv) an economic gain on stock option exercises of $39,499,
$-0-, $30,594, $56,103 and $36,043, for each named executive, respectively;
(v) a tax offset bonus associated with stock option exercises of $18,328,
$-0-, $-0-, $2,141 and $6,982, for each named executive, respectively; (vi)
retention payments made to named executives in 2002 under the Retention
Agreements of $265,650, $198,000, $99,000, $-0- and $72,600, for each named
executive, respectively; (vii) retirement payments made to Mr. Brown in the
amount of $41,415; and (viii) personal tax service provided by consultants
at our expense to Mr. Brown of $2,685.
(4) For the period December 1, 2001, through November 30, 2002, 25% of Mr.
Baker's base salary was comprised of restricted Hecla common stock issued
under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, which was distributed to Mr. Baker in
substantially equal amounts on a quarterly basis through December 1, 2002.
In 2002, Mr. Baker received four quarterly distributions of common stock in
the amount of 19,035 shares on February 1, 2002; 19,035 shares on May 1,
2002; 19,035 shares on August 1, 2002; and 19,037 shares on November 1,
2002. The fair market value of such stock on the dates paid was $22,842,
$58,437, $61,483 and $72,341, respectively, based on the $1.20, $3.07,
$3.23, and $3.80 per share closing prices of our common stock on such
dates.
(5) The compensation under "Bonus" includes the following: Mr. Brown, 41,990
shares of common stock, $67,076 in cash and $201,250 deferred compensation;
Mr. Baker, 41,729 shares of common stock, $66,660 in cash and $200,000
deferred compensation; Mr. Fudge, 20,655 shares of common stock and $54,000
in cash; Mr. Callahan, 10,849 shares in common stock, $17,331 in cash and
$52,000 deferred
58
compensation; and Mr. Walde, 9,180 shares of common stock,
$14,665 in cash and $44,000 deferred compensation. The shares of common
stock were granted under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. For each named
executive, the number of shares awarded was determined by dividing
two-thirds of the nondeferred bonus amount by $3.1954, the average closing
price of our common stock during 2002.
(6) Portions of the named executives "Salary"; "Bonus" and "All Other
Compensation" were deferred into the Key Employee Deferred Compensation
Plan. See Deferred Compensation Table.
DEFERRED 2002 COMPENSATION TABLE
All Other Total Deferred
Name Salary Bonus Compensation Compensation
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------
Arthur Brown $ 0 $ 201,250 $ 88,550 $ 289,800
Phillips S. Baker, Jr. $ 54,471 $ 200,000 $ 66,000 $ 320,471
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr. $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Michael H. Callahan $ 4,500 $ 52,000 $ 0 $ 56,500
Lewis E. Walde $ 22,500 $ 44,000 $ 24,200 $ 90,700
The following table sets forth information regarding options we granted
to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table during 2002.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
Potential Realizable
Value at Assumed
Annual Rate of Stock
Price Appreciation
Individual Grants for Option Term
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------
Number of % of Total
Securities Options Granted
Underlying to Hecla Exercise or
Options Employees in Base Price; Expiration
Name Granted(1) Fiscal Year $/Share Date 5% 10%
---- -------- ----------- ------- ---- -- ---
Arthur Brown 150,000 13.70% $3.23 5/9/05 $76,380 $160,365
Phillips S. Baker, Jr. 150,000 13.70% $3.23 5/9/05 $76,380 $160,365
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr. 85,000 7.76% $3.23 5/9/05 $43,282 $ 90,874
Michael H. Callahan 85,000 7.76% $3.23 5/9/05 $43,282 $ 90,874
Lewis E. Walde 85,000 7.76% $3.23 5/9/05 $43,282 $ 90,874
-----------
(1) There are no tax offset bonuses accompanying these options. One-third
of the options were first exercisable on May 9, 2002, one-third vested
on July 22, 2002, and one-third shall vest on May 9, 2004, unless our
common stock price on the New York Stock Exchange reaches at least
$2.00 above the May 2002 grant price of $3.23 for ten consecutive
business days, then the May 2004 vesting period will accelerate. All
options were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market
value of the common stock on the date of grant.
(2) The potential realizable value shown in the table represents the
maximum gain if held for the full three-year term at each of the
assumed annual appreciation rates. Gains, if any, are dependent upon
the actual performance of the common stock and the timing of any sale
of the common stock received upon exercising the options.
59
TOTAL OPTIONS EXERCISED IN 2002
AND FISCAL YEAR-END VALUES
The following table shows information concerning the exercise of stock
options during fiscal year 2002 by each of the named executive officers and the
value (stock price less exercise price) of the remaining stock options held by
those executive officers at fiscal year-end, using the average ($5.155) of the
high and low trading price of our common stock on December 31, 2002.
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Underlying Unexercised In-the-Money Options/
Options Held at 12/31/02 at 12/31/02
------------------------ -----------
Shares Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
Acquired on Value ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
Name Exercise (#) Realized ($) (#) (#) ($) ($)
---- ------------ ------------ --- --- --- ---
Arthur Brown 25,000 39,499 801,000 50,000 1,309,975 96,250
Phillips S. Baker, Jr. 0 0 160,000 50,000 434,000 96,250
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr. 10,000 30,594 137,166 28,334 353,190 54,543
Michael H. Callahan 23,000 56,103 69,666 28,334 156,172 54,543
Lewis E. Walde 16,000 36,043 82,166 28,334 189,582 54,543
RETIREMENT PLAN
Our officers participate in the Hecla Mining Company Qualified
Retirement Plan (the "Retirement Plan"), which covers substantially all of our
employees, except for certain hourly employees who are covered by separate
plans. Contributions to the Retirement Plan, and the related expense or income,
are based on general actuarial calculations and, accordingly, no portion of our
contributions, and related expenses or income, is specifically attributable to
our officers. We were not required to make a contribution for 2002. We also have
an unfunded Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan adopted in November 1985 (the
"Supplemental Plan") under which the amount of any benefits not payable under
the Retirement Plan by reason of the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue
Code and/or the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended (the
"Acts"), and the loss, if any, due to a deferral of salary made under our
Executive Deferral Plan and/or the Capital Accumulation Plan will be paid out of
our general funds to any employee who may be adversely affected. Under the Acts,
the current maximum annual pension benefit payable by the plan to any employee
is $160,000 subject to specified adjustments. Upon reaching the normal
retirement age of 65, each participant is eligible to receive annual retirement
benefits in monthly installments for life equal to, for each year of credited
service, 1% of final average annual earnings (defined as the highest average
earnings of such employee for any 36 consecutive calendar months during the
final 120 calendar months of service) up to the applicable covered compensation
level (which level is based on the Social Security maximum taxable wage base)
and 1.75% of the difference, if any, between final average annual earnings and
the applicable covered compensation level. The Retirement Plan and Supplemental
Plan define earnings for purposes of the plans to be "a wage or salary for
services of employees inclusive of any bonus or special pay including
gainsharing programs, contract miners' bonus pay and the equivalent."
The following table shows estimated aggregate annual benefits under the
Retirement Plan and the Supplemental Plan payable upon retirement to a
participant who retires in 2002 at age 65 having the years of service and final
average annual earnings as specified. The table assumes Social Security covered
compensation levels as in effect on January 1, 2002.
60
ESTIMATED ANNUAL RETIREMENT BENEFITS
FINAL AVERAGE
ANNUAL YEARS OF CREDITED SERVICE
EARNINGS 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$100,000 $ 7,271 $ 14,542 $ 21,813 $ 29,083 $ 36,354 $ 43,625 $ 50,896
125,000 9,458 18,917 28,375 37,833 47,292 56,750 66,208
150,000 11,646 23,292 34,938 46,583 58,229 69,875 81,521
175,000 13,833 27,667 41,500 55,333 69,167 83,000 96,833
200,000 16,021 32,042 48,063 64,083 80,104 96,125 112,146
225,000 18,208 36,417 54,625 72,833 91,042 109,250 127,458
250,000 20,396 40,792 61,188 81,583 101,979 122,375 142,771
275,000 22,583 45,167 67,750 90,333 112,917 135,500 158,083
300,000 24,771 49,542 74,313 99,083 123,854 148,625 173,396
325,000 26,958 53,917 80,875 107,833 134,792 161,750 188,708
350,000 29,146 58,292 87,438 116,583 145,729 174,875 204,021
375,000 31,333 62,667 94,000 125,333 156,667 188,000 219,333
400,000 33,521 67,042 100,563 134,083 167,604 201,125 234,646
425,000 35,708 71,417 107,125 142,833 178,542 214,250 249,958
450,000 37,896 75,792 113,688 151,583 189,479 227,375 265,271
475,000 40,083 80,167 120,250 160,333 200,417 240,500 280,583
500,000 42,271 84,542 126,813 169,083 211,354 253,625 295,896
525,000 44,621 89,243 133,864 178,485 223,106 267,728 312,349
Benefits listed in the pension table are not subject to any deduction
for Social Security or other offset amounts. As of December 31, 2002, the
following executive officers have completed the indicated number of full years
of credited service: A. Brown, 35 years; P. S. Baker, 1 year; T. Fudge, 9 years;
M. Callahan, 10 years; and L. Walde, 11 years.
1995 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
Our officers and employees, designated by the committee of the board
designated to administer the plan, who are responsible for or contribute to our
management, growth and profitability are eligible to be granted awards under the
Hecla Mining Company 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (1995 Stock Incentive Plan).
Stock options, including incentive stock options, nonqualified stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and performance units are
available for grant under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan by the committee in its
discretion. The 1995 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance of up to
6,000,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the grant or exercise of awards
under the plan. The board committee that administers the 1995 Stock Incentive
Plan has broad authority to fix the terms and conditions of individual
agreements with participants, including the duration of the award and any
vesting requirements.
At the time an award is made under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan or at
any time thereafter, the committee may grant to the participant receiving such
award the right to receive a cash payment in an amount specified by the
committee, to be paid at such time or times (if ever) as the award results in
compensation income to the participant, for the purpose of assisting the
participant to pay the resulting taxes, all as determined by the committee and
on such other terms and conditions as the committee shall determine.
The 1995 Stock Incentive Plan will terminate 15 years after the
effective date of the plan.
HECLA MINING COMPANY KEY EMPLOYEE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
On March 13, 2002, our board of directors adopted the Hecla Mining
Company Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (Deferral Plan). On July 18,
2002, our stockholders approved the Deferral Plan.
61
The Deferral Plan permits our executive officers or key management
level employees who are highly compensated to participate in the Deferral Plan,
subject to approval of the committee. The compensation committee of our board of
directors administers the plan. Each participant may defer eligible compensation
and/or cash incentive compensation into the plan. Distributions under the plan
will be in the form of shares of our common stock, cash or discounted stock
options. 6,000,000 shares of common stock are available for issuance under the
plan or upon exercise of options issued under the Plan. A participant may
receive matching contributions under the Deferral Plan and may receive
additional, discretionary contributions if made by the committee.
Subject to certain limitations, distributions of benefits from
participants' accounts under the Deferral Plan will be made in the form of a
lump sum distribution upon the first to occur of: the participant's disability,
the participant's death, the first day the participant is no longer our
employee, the termination of the Deferral Plan, or a date designated by the
participant on an election form.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS, TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENT AND OTHER
MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS
We have employment agreements (Agreements) with Messrs. Brown, Baker,
Fudge, Callahan and Walde (Executives).
The Agreements were recommended to the board of directors by the
Compensation Committee and were approved by the board of directors on the basis
of such recommendation. The Agreements, which are substantially identical except
for compensation provisions, provide that each of the Executives shall serve in
such executive position as the board of directors may direct. The Agreements
become effective only if we experience a "Change of Control" (Effective Date).
The term of employment under the Agreements is two years from the Effective
Date. The Agreements have a Change in Control period of three years, and this
period is automatically renewed for an additional year in June of each year
unless we give notice of nonrenewal 60 days prior to the renewal date. Under the
Agreements, a Change of Control is deemed to occur if a person (including a
"group" under Section 13d-3 of the Exchange Act) becomes the beneficial owner of
20% or more of our voting power or if, as the result of a tender offer, merger,
proxy fight or similar transaction, the persons who were previously our
directors cease to constitute a majority of the board. The Agreements are
intended to ensure that, in the event of a Change of Control, each Executive
will continue to receive payments and other benefits equivalent to those he was
receiving at the time of a Change of Control for the duration of the term of the
Agreement. The Agreements also provide, among other things, that should an
Executive's employment be terminated by us or by the Executive for good reason
(other than death, incapacity or misconduct) after the Effective Date of the
Agreement, he would receive from us a lump-sum defined amount generally
equivalent to two times the aggregate of his then annual base salary rate and
his highest annual bonus for the three years prior to the Effective Date. The
Executives would also be entitled to lump-sum payments representing the
difference in pension and supplemental retirement benefits to which they would
be entitled on (i) the date of actual termination, and (ii) the end of the
two-year employment period under the Agreements. We would also maintain such
Executive's participation in all benefit plans and programs (or provide
equivalent benefits if such continued participation was not possible under the
terms of such plans and programs). An Executive whose employment has terminated
would not be required to seek other employment in order to receive the defined
benefits. The Agreements also provide that under certain circumstances we will
make an additional gross-up payment if necessary to place the Executive in the
same after-tax position as if no excise tax were imposed by the Internal Revenue
Code. Pursuant to the Agreements between us and each of our named executive
officers, if a Change of Control occurred and the named executive officers were
each terminated as of December 31, 2002, the Executives would be entitled to the
following estimated cash payments pursuant to the Agreements: Mr. Brown,
$1,340,000; Mr. Baker, $1,400,000; Mr. Fudge, $540,000; Mr. Callahan, $468,000;
and Mr. Walde, $396,000. These dollar amounts do not include amounts which would
have otherwise been payable to each Executive if the Executive had terminated
employment on the day prior to a Change of Control.
RETENTION AGREEMENTS
In 2001, we entered into Retention Agreements with Messrs. Brown,
Baker, Fudge and Walde. The Agreements were recommended to the Board of
Directors by the Compensation Committee and were approved by the Board of
Directors on the basis of such recommendation. The Agreements, which were
substantially identical except for compensation provisions, provided that so
long as the Executive remained our employee or worked for us in some other
capacity satisfactory to us, through June 30, 2002, the Executive
62
would be entitled to a payment of 22% of the Executive's annual base salary. If
the Executive remained with us through December 31, 2002, the Executive would be
entitled to an additional payment of 44% of the Executive's annual base salary.
The Agreements also provided for a payment of amounts due under the terminated
Executive Deferral Plan, which had not been previously paid pursuant to the
termination of the plan. Messrs. Brown, Baker, Fudge and Walde were each paid a
payment of 22% of their annual base salary for remaining employed with us
through June 30, 2002, and another payment of 44% of their annual base salary
for remaining employed with us through December 31, 2002. See "Summary
Compensation Table." With the payment of these retention payments, the
Agreements are now terminated.
CONSULTING AGREEMENTS
We entered into consulting agreements with Michael B. White, our
Secretary and retired general counsel, and Mr. William B. Booth, our retired
Vice President - Environmental and Government Affairs on March 1, 2002 and March
16, 2002, respectively. Mr. Booth's agreement will terminate on March 15, 2004
and Mr. White's agreement terminated on February 28, 2003. On March 1, 2003, we
entered into a new consulting agreement with Mr. White pursuant to which he will
continue as a consultant to us during 2003 and part of 2004. Mr. Booth provides
environmental, legislative and other consulting services as requested by us. Mr.
Booth is required to provide consulting services not to exceed 120 hours per
quarter and receives a retainer of $3,230 per month and reimbursement of
reasonable costs and expenses. Mr. White provides legal and other consulting
services as requested by us and acts as our corporate secretary. Mr. White is
required to provide consulting services not to exceed 240 hours per quarter and
receives a retainer of $12,500 per month through May 31, 2004. While consulting
with us, each consultant agrees to protect our confidential information and not
to engage in any activity which would be adverse to us or our mineral properties
or operating interests. Each agreement is subject to termination by the
respective consultant upon thirty days written notice and by us if the
consultant fails to cure within thirty days any intentional and continued gross
malfeasance or material nonfeasance in the performance of his services.
63
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table presents certain information regarding the number
and percentage of the shares of common and preferred stock beneficially owned by
significant stockholders, each of our directors and executive officers and by
all directors and executive officers as a group, as of December 31, 2002. Except
as otherwise indicated, the directors and officers are located at our address
and have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares
beneficially owned by them.
Shares Beneficially Owned
-------------------------
Title of
Name of Beneficial Owner Class Number Nature Percentage(1)
------------------------ ------ ------ ------ ----------
Phillips S. Baker, Jr. 182,609 Direct
235,000 Vested Options(2)
---------
Common 417,609 *
Arthur Brown 315,520 Direct(3)
876,000 Vested Options(2)
---------
Common 1,191,520 1%
Michael H. Callahan 53,131 Direct(4)
109,666 Vested Options(2)
---------
Common 162,797 *
Ronald W. Clayton 4,028 Direct
96,100 Vested Options(2)
---------
Common 100,128 *
John E. Clute 300 Direct
17,383 Indirect(5)
---------
Common 17,683 *
Joe Coors, Jr. Common 17,383 Indirect(5) *
Ted Crumley 4,000 Direct
16,922 Indirect(5)
---------
Common 20,922 *
Thomas F. Fudge, Jr. 22,889 Direct
177,166 Vested Options(2)
---------
Common 200,055 *
Charles L. McAlpine 2,000 Direct
17,383 Indirect(5)
---------
Common 19,383 *
Jorge E. Ordonez C. Common 17,383 Indirect(5) *
Dr. Anthony P. Taylor 4,000 Direct
10,383 Indirect(5)
---------
Common 14,383 *
Vicki J. Veltkamp 22,295 Direct
133,833 Vested Options(2)
---------
Common 156,128 *
64
Lewis E. Walde 30,759 Direct(6)
Common 122,166 Vested Options(2)
---------
152,925 *
All current directors and
executive officers as a group
(13 persons) Common 2,488,299 2%
Series B
Langley Partners, L.P.(7) Preferred 141,300 18.75%
* Represents holdings of less than one percent.
(1) Percent of class is calculated based upon 109,386,487 shares of our
common stock outstanding as of March 13, 2003.
(2) "Vested Options" are options that may be exercised as of May 12, 2003.
(3) Consists of 15,962 shares held jointly with Mr. Brown's spouse.
(4) Consists of 52,931 shares held jointly with Mr. Callahan's spouse.
(5) Shares credited to each nonemployee director, all of which are held
indirectly in trust pursuant to our Stock Plan for Nonemployee
Directors. Each director disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares
held in trust under the stock plan (see "Compensation of Directors").
(6) Consists of 21,579 shares held jointly with Mr. Walde's spouse.
(7) The address for Langley Partners, L.P. is 535 Madison Avenue, 7th
Floor, New York, NY 10022. Each of Langley Partners, L.P., Langley
Management, LLC, Langley Capital, LLC and Jeffrey Thorp may be deemed
to be beneficial owners of 141,300 shares of Series B preferred stock
held of record by Langley Partners, L.P.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following statements are brief summaries of provisions of our
capital stock. The summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the
full text of our certificate of incorporation, as amended (Charter), bylaws, and
the Rights Agreement (as defined below).
COMMON STOCK
We are authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.25
par value per share, of which 109,389,338 shares of common stock were issued and
outstanding as of March 31, 2003.
Subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding shares of
preferred stock, each share of common stock is entitled to:
o one vote on all matters presented to the stockholders, with no
cumulative voting rights;
o receive such dividends as may be declared by the board of directors
out of funds legally available therefor (we have no present intention
of paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future);
o in the event of our liquidation or dissolution, share ratably in any
distribution of our assets.
Holders of shares of common stock do not have preemptive rights or
other rights to subscribe for unissued or treasury shares or securities
convertible into such shares, and no redemption or sinking fund provisions are
applicable. All outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and
nonassessable.
65
All of our currently outstanding shares of common stock are listed on
the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "HL". The shares to be sold
hereunder are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
PREFERRED STOCK
Our Charter authorizes us to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock,
par value $0.25 per share. The preferred stock is issuable in series with such
voting rights, if any, designations, powers, preferences and other rights and
such qualifications, limitations and restrictions as may be determined by our
board of directors or a duly authorized committee thereof, without stockholder
approval. The board may fix the number of shares constituting each series and
increase or decrease the number of shares of any series.
As of March 31, 2003, there were 752,752 shares of Series B Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. In addition, shares of
preferred stock have been designated by us as Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Shares and are reserved for issuance upon the exercise of certain
preferred stock purchase rights associated with each share of outstanding common
stock, as described below. See "Description of Capital Stock -- Rights."
RANKING
The Series B preferred stock ranks senior to our common stock and any
shares of Series A Preferred Shares issued pursuant to the Rights (as defined
below) with respect to payment of dividends and amounts upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up.
While any shares of Series B preferred stock are outstanding, we may
not authorize the creation or issue of any class or series of stock that ranks
senior to the Series B preferred stock as to dividends or upon liquidation,
dissolution or winding up without the consent of the holders of 66% of the
outstanding shares of Series B preferred stock and any other series of preferred
stock ranking on a parity with the Series B preferred stock as to dividends and
upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up (a "Parity Stock"), voting as a
single class without regard to series. However, we may create additional classes
of Parity or Junior Stock, increase the authorized number of shares of Parity or
Junior Stock or issue series of Parity or Junior Stock without the consent of
any holder of Series B preferred stock. See "-- Voting Rights."
DIVIDENDS
Series B preferred stockholders are entitled to receive, when, as and
if declared by the board of directors out of our assets legally available
therefor, cumulative cash dividends at the rate per annum of $3.50 per share of
Series B preferred stock. Dividends on the Series B preferred stock are payable
quarterly in arrears on October 1, January 1, April 1 and July 1 of each year
(and, in the case of any undeclared and unpaid dividends, at such additional
times and for such interim periods, if any, as determined by the board of
directors), at such annual rate. Each such dividend is payable to holders of
record as they appear on our stock records at the close of business on such
record dates, which shall not be more than 60 days or less than 10 days
preceding the payment dates corresponding thereto, as shall be fixed by the
board of directors or a duly authorized committee thereof. Dividends are
cumulative from the date of the original issuance of the Series B preferred
stock, whether or not in any dividend period or periods we have assets legally
available for the payment of such dividends. Accumulations of dividends on
shares of Series B preferred stock do not bear interest. Dividends payable on
the Series B preferred stock for any period greater or less than a full dividend
period are computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day
months. Dividends payable on the Series B preferred stock for each full dividend
period are computed by dividing the annual dividend rate by four.
Except as provided in the next sentence, no dividend will be declared
or paid on any Parity Stock unless full cumulative dividends have been paid on
the Series B preferred stock for all prior dividend periods. If cumulative
dividends on the Series B preferred stock for all prior dividend periods have
not been declared or paid in full, then any dividend declared on the Series B
preferred stock for any dividend period and on any Parity Stock will be declared
ratably in proportion to undeclared and unpaid dividends on the Series B
preferred stock and such Parity Stock.
66
We will not (i) declare, pay or set apart funds for the payment of any
dividend or other distribution with respect to any Junior Stock (as defined
below) or (ii) redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration any
Junior Stock or Parity Stock through a sinking fund or otherwise (except by
conversion into, or exchange for shares of, Junior Stock, and other than a
redemption or purchase or other acquisition of shares of our common stock made
for purposes of our employee incentive or benefit plans), unless all undeclared
and unpaid dividends with respect to the Series B preferred stock and any Parity
Stock at the time such dividends are payable have been paid or funds have been
set apart for payment of such dividends.
As used herein, (i) the term "dividend" does not include dividends
payable solely in shares of Junior Stock on Junior Stock, or in options,
warrants or rights to holders of Junior Stock to subscribe for or purchase any
Junior Stock, and (ii) the term "Junior Stock" means our common stock, any
Series A preferred shares issued pursuant to the Rights, and any other class of
our capital stock now or hereafter issued and outstanding that ranks junior as
to the payment of dividends or amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution and
winding up to the Series B preferred stock.
LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE
The Series B preferred stockholders are entitled to receive, in the
event that we are liquidated, dissolved or wound up, whether voluntarily or
involuntarily, $50.00 per share of Series B preferred stock plus an amount per
share of Series B preferred stock equal to all dividends (whether or not earned
or declared) undeclared and unpaid thereon to the date of final distribution to
such holders (the "Liquidation Preference"), and no more.
Until the Series B preferred stockholders have been paid the
Liquidation Preference in full, no payment will be made to any holder of Junior
Stock upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up. If, upon any liquidation,
dissolution or winding up, our assets, or proceeds thereof, distributable among
the holders of the shares of Series B preferred stock are insufficient to pay in
full the Liquidation Preference and the Liquidation Preference with respect to
any other shares of Parity Stock, then such assets, or the proceeds thereof,
will be distributed among the holders of shares of Series B preferred stock and
any such Parity Stock ratably in accordance with the respective amounts which
would be payable on such shares of Series B preferred stock and any such Parity
Stock if all amounts payable thereof were paid in full. Neither a consolidation,
merger or business combination of us with or into another corporation nor a sale
or transfer of all or substantially all of our assets will be considered a
liquidation, dissolution or winding up, voluntary or involuntary.
REDEMPTION
The Series B preferred stock is redeemable at our option, in whole or
in part, at $50.35 per share if redeemed between July 1, 2002 and June 30, 2003,
and at $50 per share thereafter, plus, in each case, all dividends undeclared
and unpaid on the Series B preferred stock up to the date fixed for redemption,
upon giving notice as provided below.
If fewer than all of the outstanding shares of Series B preferred stock
are to be redeemed, the shares to be redeemed will be determined pro rata or by
lot or in such other manner as prescribed by the board of directors.
At least 30 days, but not more than 60 days, prior to the date fixed
for the redemption of the Series B preferred stock, a written notice will be
mailed to each holder of record of Series B preferred stock to be redeemed,
notifying such holder of our election to redeem such shares, stating the date
fixed for redemption thereof and calling upon such holder to surrender to us on
the redemption date at the place designated in such notice the certificate or
certificates representing the number of shares specified therein. On or after
the redemption date, each holder of Series B preferred stock to be redeemed must
present and surrender his certificate or certificates for such shares to us at
the place designated in such notice and thereupon the redemption price of such
shares will be paid to or on the order of the person whose name appears on such
certificate or certificates as the owner thereof and each surrendered
certificate will be canceled. Should fewer than all the shares represented by
any such certificate be redeemed, a new certificate will be issued representing
the unredeemed shares.
From and after the redemption date (unless we default in payment of the
redemption price), all dividends on the shares of Series B preferred stock
designated for redemption in such notice will cease to cumulate and all rights
of the holders thereof as our stockholders, except the right to receive the
redemption price thereof (including
67
all undeclared and unpaid dividends up to the redemption date), will cease and
terminate and such shares will not thereafter be transferred (except with our
consent) on our books, and such shares shall not be deemed to be outstanding for
any purpose whatsoever. On the redemption date, we must pay any undeclared and
unpaid dividends in arrears for any dividend period ending on or prior to the
redemption date. In the case of a redemption date falling after a dividend
payment record date and prior to the related payment date, the Series B
preferred stockholders at the close of business on such record date will be
entitled to receive the dividend payable on such shares on the corresponding
dividend payment date, notwithstanding the redemption of such shares following
such dividend payment record date. Except as provided in the preceding
sentences, no payment or allowance will be made for undeclared and unpaid
dividends on any shares of Series B preferred stock called for redemption or on
the shares of common stock issuable upon such redemption.
At our election, we may, prior to the redemption date, deposit the
redemption price of the shares of Series B preferred stock so called for
redemption in trust for the holders thereof with a bank or trust company, in
which case such notice to holders of the shares of Series B preferred stock to
be redeemed will (i) state the date of such deposit, (ii) specify the office of
such bank or trust company as the place of payment of the redemption price and
(iii) call upon such holders to surrender the certificates representing such
shares at such place on or after the date fixed in such redemption notice (which
may not be later than the redemption date), against payment of the redemption
price (including all undeclared and unpaid dividends up to the redemption date).
Any moneys so deposited which remain unclaimed by the Series B preferred
stockholders at the end of two years after the redemption date will be returned
by such bank or trust company to us.
VOTING RIGHTS
Except as indicated below, or except as otherwise from time to time
required by applicable law, the Series B preferred stockholders have no voting
rights and their consent is not required for taking any corporate action. When
and if the Series B preferred stockholders are entitled to vote, each holder
will be entitled to one vote per share.
Because we had not declared and paid six quarterly dividends on the
Series B preferred stock, the Series B preferred stockholders, voting as a
single class, elected two additional directors to the board at our recent annual
meeting on May 10, 2002. The Series B preferred stockholders will have the right
to elect two directors (never to total more than two) at each subsequent annual
meeting, until such time as all cumulative dividends have been paid in full.
The affirmative vote or consent of the holders of 66-2/3% of the
outstanding shares of the Series B preferred stock, voting separately as a
class, is required for any amendment of our Charter which alters or changes the
powers, preferences, privileges or rights of the Series B preferred stock so as
to materially adversely affect the holders thereof. The affirmative vote or
consent of the holders of shares representing 66-2/3% of the outstanding shares
of the Series B preferred stock and any other series of Parity Stock, voting as
a single class without regard to series, is required to authorize the creation
or issue of, or reclassify any of our authorized stock into, or issue or
authorize any obligation or security convertible into or evidencing a right to
purchase, any additional class or series of stock ranking senior to all such
series of Parity Stock. However, we may create additional classes of Parity and
Junior Stock, increase the number of shares of Parity and Junior Stock and issue
additional series of Parity and Junior Stock without the consent of any holder
of Series B preferred stock.
CONVERSION
Each share of Series B preferred stock is convertible, in whole or in
part at the option of the holders thereof, into shares of common stock at a
conversion price of $15.55 per share of common stock (equivalent to a conversion
rate of approximately 3.2154 shares of common stock for each share of Series B
preferred stock), subject to adjustment as described below (the "Conversion
Price"). The right to convert shares of Series B preferred stock called for
redemption will terminate at the close of business on the day preceding a
redemption date (unless we default in payment of the redemption price). For
information as to notices of redemption, see "-- Redemption."
Conversion of shares of Series B preferred stock, or a specified
portion thereof, may be effected by delivering certificates evidencing such
shares, together with written notice of conversion and a proper assignment of
68
such certificates to us, or in blank to the principal corporate trust office of
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, our transfer agent.
Each conversion will be deemed to have been effected immediately prior
to the close of business on the date on which the certificates for shares of
Series B preferred stock shall have been surrendered and notice (and, if
applicable, payment of an amount equal to the dividend payable on such shares)
received by us as aforesaid and the conversion shall be at the Conversion Price
in effect at such time and on such date.
Holders of shares of Series B preferred stock at the close of business
on a dividend payment record date are entitled to receive any declared dividend
payable on such shares on the corresponding dividend payment date
notwithstanding the conversion of such shares following such dividend payment
record date and prior to such dividend payment date. However, shares of Series B
preferred stock surrendered for conversion during the period between the close
of business on any dividend payment record date and the opening of business on
the corresponding dividend payment date (except shares converted after the
issuance of a notice of redemption with respect to a redemption with respect to
a redemption date during such period, which will be entitled to such dividend)
must be accompanied by payment of an amount equal to the dividend payable on
such shares on such dividend payment date. A holder of shares of Series B
preferred stock on a dividend record date who (or whose transferee) tenders any
such shares for conversion into shares of common stock on such dividend payment
date will receive the dividend payable by us on such shares of Series B
preferred stock on such date, and the converting holder need not include payment
of the amount of such dividend upon surrender of shares of Series B preferred
stock for conversion. Except as provided above, we will make no payment or
allowance for unpaid dividends, whether or not in arrears, on converted shares
or for dividends on the shares of common stock issued upon such conversion.
Fractional shares of common stock will not be issued upon conversion
but, in lieu thereof, we will pay a cash adjustment based on the current market
price of our common stock on the day prior to the conversion date.
CONVERSION PRICE ADJUSTMENTS
The Conversion Price is subject to adjustment upon certain events,
including (i) dividends (and other distributions) payable in common stock on any
class of our capital stock, (ii) the issuance to all holders of common stock of
certain rights or warrants (other than the Rights or any similar rights issued
under any successor stockholders rights plan) entitling them to subscribe for or
purchase common stock or securities which are convertible into common stock,
(iii) subdivisions, combinations and reclassifications of common stock, and
(iv) distributions to all holders of common stock of evidences of indebtedness
of Hecla or assets (including securities, but excluding those dividends, rights,
warrants and distributions referred to above and dividends and distributions
paid in cash out of the profits or surplus of Hecla). In addition to the
foregoing adjustments, we are permitted to make such reductions in the
Conversion Price as we consider to be advisable in order that any event treated
for federal income tax purposes as a dividend of stock or stock rights will not
be taxable to the holders of our common stock.
In case we are a party to any transaction, including, without
limitation, a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our
assets, as a result of which shares of common stock will be converted into the
right to receive stock, securities or other property (including cash or any
combination thereof), each share of Series B preferred stock will thereafter be
convertible into the kind and amount of shares of stock and other securities and
property receivable (including cash or any combination thereof) upon the
consummation of such transaction by a holder of that number of shares or
fraction thereof of common stock into which one share of Series B preferred
stock is convertible immediately prior to such transaction (assuming such holder
of common stock failed to exercise any rights of election and received per share
the kind and amount received per share by a plurality of non- electing shares).
We may not become a party to any such transaction unless the terms thereof are
consistent with the foregoing.
No adjustment of the Conversion Price will be required to be made in
any case until cumulative adjustments amount to 1% or more of the Conversion
Price. Any adjustments not so required to be made will be carried forward and
taken into account in subsequent adjustments.
69
RIGHTS
Each share of our common stock is accompanied by a Series A junior
participating preferred stock purchase right (a "Right") that trades with the
share of common stock. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of our
Rights Agreement dated as of May 10, 1996 (the "Rights Agreement"), a holder of
a Right is entitled to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A
preferred stock at an exercise price of $50, subject to adjustment in several
circumstances, including upon merger. The Rights are currently represented by
the certificates for our common stock and are not transferable apart therefrom.
Transferable rights certificates will be issued at the earlier of (1) the 10th
day after the public announcement that any person or group has acquired
beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our common stock (an "Acquiring Person")
or (ii) the 10th day after a person commences, or announces an intention to
commence, a tender or exchange offer the consummation of which would result in
any person or group becoming an Acquiring Person. The 15% threshold for becoming
an Acquiring Person may be reduced by the board of directors to not less than
10% prior to any such acquisition.
All the outstanding Rights may be redeemed by us for $0.01 per Right
prior to such time that any person or group becomes an Acquiring Person. Under
certain circumstances, the board of directors may decide to exchange each Right
(except Rights held by an Acquiring Person) for one share of common stock. The
Rights will expire on May 19, 2006 unless earlier redeemed.
A Right is presently attached to each issued and outstanding share of
common stock. As long as the Rights are attached to and evidenced by the
certificates representing our common stock, we will continue to issue one Right
with each share of common stock that shall become outstanding.
The Rights have certain antitakeover effects. The Rights may cause
substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms
not approved by the board of directors. The Rights should not interfere with any
merger or other business combination approved by the board of directors since
the Rights may be redeemed by us prior to the consummation of such transactions.
The foregoing description of the Rights is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Rights Agreement, specifying the terms of the Rights, which is
filed as exhibit 4.2 to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a
part.
See "Risk Factors - Our stockholders rights plan and provisions in our
certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, and Delaware law could delay or deter
tender offers or takeover attempts that may offer you a premium for your common
stock."
LEGAL MATTERS
Michael B. White, Esq., our Secretary and retired general counsel, who
has rendered an opinion on the legality of the securities being registered,
owned 69,691 shares of our common stock and options to purchase 271,500 shares
of our common stock as of March 31, 2003. Mr. White provides services to us
pursuant to a consulting agreement.
EXPERTS
Our financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31,
2001 and December 31, 2002 (excluding Greens Creek Joint Venture) included in
this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of BDO Seidman,
LLP, certified public accountants, given on the authority of said firm as
experts in auditing and accounting.
Our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000
included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants given on the authority of
said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The audited financial statements of Greens Creek Joint Venture, not
separately presented in this Registration Statement, have been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants, whose report thereon
appears herein. Such financial statements, to the extent they have been included
in our financial statements,
70
have been so included in reliance on the report of such independent accountants
given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
GLOSSARY OF CERTAIN TERMS
You may find the following definitions helpful in your reading of this
prospectus.
o Cash Costs -- includes costs directly related to the physical
activities of producing silver and gold, and include mining,
processing and other plant costs, third-party refining and smelting
costs, marketing expense, on-site general and administrative costs,
royalties, in-mine drilling expenditures that are related to
production and other direct costs. Sales of by-product metals are
deducted from the above in computing cash costs. Cash costs exclude
depreciation, depletion and amortization, corporate general and
administrative expense, exploration, interest, and pre-feasibility
costs and accruals for mine reclamation. Cash costs per ounce of
silver or gold represent non-U.S. GAAP measurements that management
uses to monitor and evaluate the performance of its mining operations
and are calculated pursuant to standards of the Gold Institute. We
believe cash costs per ounce of silver or gold provide an indicator of
profitability at each location and on a consolidated total, as well as
a meaningful basis on which to compare other mining companies and
other mining operating properties.
o Cash Operating Costs -- Includes all direct and indirect operating
cash costs incurred at each operating mine, excluding royalties and
mine production taxes.
o Dore -- Unrefined gold and silver bullion bars consisting of
approximately 90% precious metals which will be further refined to
almost pure metal.
o Mineralized Material -- A mineralized body which has been delineated
by appropriately spaced drilling and/or underground sampling to
support a sufficient tonnage and average grade of metals.
o Ore -- A mixture of valuable minerals and gangue (valueless minerals)
from which at least one of the minerals or metals can be extracted at
a profit.
o Orebody -- A continuous, well-defined mass of material of sufficient
ore content to make extraction economically feasible.
o Primary Development --The initial access to an orebody through adits,
shafts, declines and winzes.
o Proven and Probable Ore Reserves -- Reserves that reflect estimates of
the quantities and grades of mineralized material at our mines which
we believe can be recovered and sold at prices in excess of the total
cash cost associated with extracting and processing the ore. The
estimates are based largely on current costs and on prices and demand
for our products. Mineral reserves are stated separately for each of
our mines based upon factors relevant to each mine. Reserves represent
diluted in-place grades and do not reflect losses in the recovery
process. Our estimates of Proven and Probable ore reserves for the
Lucky Friday mine, the San Sebastian mine and the La Camorra mine are
based on the following metals prices:
December 31,
--------------------------------------------
2002 2001
------------------ -----------------
Silver $ 4.75 $ 5.10
Gold $ 300 $ 300
Lead $ 0.21 $ 0.24
Zinc $ 0.44 $ 0.48
71
Proven and Probable ore reserves for the Lucky Friday, San Sebastian
and La Camorra mines are calculated and reviewed in-house and are
subject to periodic audit by others, although audits are not performed
on an annual basis. Proven and Probable ore reserves for the Greens
Creek mine are based on calculations of reserves provided to us by the
operator of Greens Creek that have been reviewed but not independently
confirmed by us. Kennecott Greens Creek Mining Company's estimates of
Proven and Probable ore reserves for the Greens Creek mine as of
December 2002 and 2001 are derived from successive generations of
reserve and feasibility analyses for different areas of the mine each
using a separate assessment of metals prices. The weighted average
prices used were:
December 31,
--------------------------------------------
2002 2001
------------------ -----------------
Silver $ 5.00 $ 4.92
Gold $ 300 $ 309
Lead $ 0.24 $ 0.25
Zinc $ 0.46 $ 0.49
Changes in reserves represent general indicators of the results of
efforts to develop additional reserves as existing reserves are
depleted through production. Grades of ore fed to process may be
different from stated reserve grades because of variation in grades in
areas mined from time to time, mining dilution and other factors.
Reserves should not be interpreted as assurances of mine life or of the
profitability of current or future operations. Our Proven and Probable
ore reserves are sensitive to price changes, although we do not believe
that a 10% increase or decrease in estimated metals prices would have a
significant impact on Proven and Probable ore reserves at our La
Camorra, San Sebastian and Greens Creek mines.
o Probable Reserves -- Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or
quality are computed from information similar to that used for Proven
reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are
farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of
assurance, although lower than that for Proven reserves, is high
enough to assume continuity between points of observation.
o Proven Reserves -- Reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from
dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes;
grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed
sampling, and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement
are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well-defined
that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well-
established.
o Reserves -- That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically
and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve
determination.
o Secondary Development --The preparation of the orebody for production
through crosscuts, raises and stope preparation.
o Stope -- An underground excavation from which ore has been extracted
either above or below mine level.
o Total Cash Costs -- Includes all direct and indirect operating cash
costs, as defined, incurred at each operating mine.
o Total Production Costs -- Includes total cash costs, as defined, plus
depreciation, depletion, amortization and reclamation accruals
relating to each operating mine.
72
o Total Production Costs Per Ounce -- Calculated based upon total
production costs, as defined, net of by-product revenues earned from
all metals other than the primary metal produced at each mine, divided
by the total ounces of the primary metal produced.
o Unpatented Mining Claim -- A parcel of property located on federal
lands pursuant to the General Mining Law and the requirements of the
state in which the unpatented claim is located, the paramount title of
which remains with the federal government. The holder of a valid,
unpatented lode- mining claim is granted certain rights including the
right to explore and mine such claim under the General Mining Law.
73
Index to Financial Statements
Financial Statements Page
-------------------- ----
Reports of Independent Accountants F-2 to F-4
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2002 and 2001 F-5
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 F-7
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-9 to F-37
Financial Statement Schedules*
------------------------------
*Financial statement schedules
have been omitted as they are not applicable
F-1
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
--------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Hecla Mining Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hecla Mining
Company as of December 31, 2002, and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss, cash flows and changes in
shareholders' equity for the years then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit
the financial statements of the Greens Creek Joint Venture, a 29.73 percent
owned subsidiary, which statements reflect total assets and revenues
constituting 31.1 percent and 22.1 percent, respectively, of the related
consolidated totals as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, and 33.7
percent and 26.3 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated totals as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2001. Those statements were audited by other
auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it
relates to the amounts included for the Greens Creek Joint Venture, is based
solely on the reports of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the reports of
the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the
consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Hecla Mining Company at December
31, 2002, and 2001 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging
activities in 2001.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
February 4, 2003
Spokane, Washington
F-2
Report of Independent Accountants
---------------------------------
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Hecla Mining Company:
In our opinion, the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
loss, of cash flows and of changes in shareholders' equity for the year ended
December 31, 2000 present fairly, in all material respects, the results of
operations and cash flows of Hecla Mining Company and its subsidiaries for the
year ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit
of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Francisco, California
March 28, 2001
F-3
Report of Independent Accountants
---------------------------------
To the Management Committee of the Greens Creek Joint Venture:
In our opinion, the accompanying balance sheets and the related statements of
operations, of changes in venturers' equity and of cash flows present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Greens Creek Joint Venture (the
"Venture") at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the years then ended (not separately presented herein) in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Venture's
management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah
January 16, 2003
F-4
Hecla Mining Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
----------
December 31,
-------------------------------------
2002 2001
------------- -------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 19,542 $ 7,560
Accounts and notes receivable 10,154 6,648
Inventories 14,758 10,868
Deferred income taxes 2,700 --
Other current assets 1,780 1,426
Net assets of discontinued operations -- 2,714
------------- -------------
Total current assets 48,934 29,216
Investments 76 69
Restricted investments 6,428 6,375
Properties, plants and equipment, net 92,365 104,593
Deferred income taxes 300 --
Other noncurrent assets 12,038 12,863
------------- -------------
Total assets $ 160,141 $ 153,116
============= =============
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 11,731 $ 7,938
Accrued payroll and related benefits 7,603 7,832
Current portion of long-term debt 7,296 7,043
Accrued taxes 1,572 787
Current portion of accrued reclamation and closure costs 7,005 6,026
------------- -------------
Total current liabilities 35,207 29,626
Deferred income taxes -- 300
Long-term debt 4,657 11,948
Accrued reclamation and closure costs 42,718 46,455
Other noncurrent liabilities 5,629 6,823
------------- -------------
Total liabilities 88,211 95,152
------------- -------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTES 3, 4, 5, 7 AND 8)
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.25 par value, authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued 2002 -
753,402 shares and 2001 - 2,300,000
liquidation preference 2002 - $44,262 and 2001 - $127,075 188 575
Common stock, $0.25 par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares in 2002 and
100,000,000 shares in 2001; issued 2002 - 86,187,468 shares and
issued 2001 - 73,068,796 shares 21,547 18,267
Capital surplus 405,959 404,354
Accumulated deficit (355,544) (364,183)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (36) 173
Less stock held by grantor trust; 2002 - 20,442 common shares and
2001 - 102,114 common shares (66) (330)
Less stock held as unearned compensation; issued 2001 - 19,035 common shares -- (6)
Less treasury stock, at cost; 2002 - 8,274 common shares and
2001 - 62,116 common shares (118) (886)
-------------- --------------
Total shareholders' equity 71,930 57,964
------------- -------------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 160,141 $ 153,116
============= =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Hecla Mining Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
----------
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
-------------- ------------- --------------
Continuing operations:
Sales of products $ 105,700 $ 85,247 $ 75,850
-------------- ------------- --------------
Cost of sales and other direct production costs 59,449 60,053 63,088
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 22,536 20,475 18,091
-------------- ------------- --------------
81,985 80,528 81,179
-------------- ------------- --------------
Gross profit (loss) 23,715 4,719 (5,329)
-------------- ------------- --------------
Other operating expenses:
General and administrative 7,121 7,219 7,303
Exploration 5,825 2,157 6,332
Depreciation and amortization 116 265 282
Provision for closed operations and environmental matters 898 1,310 20,029
Reduction in carrying value of mining properties -- -- 40,240
-------------- ------------- --------------
13,960 10,951 74,186
-------------- ------------- --------------
Income (loss) from operations 9,755 (6,232) (79,515)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Other income (expense):
Interest and other income 1,865 3,491 4,609
Miscellaneous expense (1,859) (2,954) (1,809)
Interest expense (1,816) (3,887) (8,119)
--------------- ------------- --------------
(1,810) (3,350) (5,319)
--------------- ------------- --------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
items shown below 7,945 (9,582) (84,834)
Income tax benefit (provision) 2,918 -- (13)
-------------- ------------- --------------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before items shown below 10,863 (9,582) (84,847)
Discontinued operations:
Income (loss), net of income tax (2,224) (743) 2,572
Gain (loss) on disposal, net of income tax -- 12,665 (1,043)
Extraordinary charge, net of income tax -- -- (647)
-------------- ------------- --------------
Net income (loss) 8,639 2,340 (83,965)
Preferred stock dividends (23,253) (8,050) (8,050)
-------------- ------------- --------------
Loss applicable to common shareholders $ (14,614) $ (5,710) $ (92,015)
============== ============= ==============
Net income (loss): $ 8,639 $ 2,340 $ (83,965)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle -- (136) --
Change in derivative contracts (256) 256 --
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities 9 (26) 13
Reclassification adjustment for losses included
in net income (loss) 38 39 --
Change in foreign currency items -- 4,898 --
-------------- ------------- --------------
Comprehensive income (loss) $ 8,430 $ 7,371 $ (83,952)
============== ============= ==============
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share:
Loss from continuing operations $ (0.15) $ (0.25) $ (1.39)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (0.03) 0.17 0.02
Extraordinary charge -- -- (0.01)
-------------- ------------- --------------
Basic and diluted loss per common share $ (0.18) $ (0.08) $ (1.38)
============== ============= ==============
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding - basic and diluted 80,250 69,396 66,791
============== ============= ==============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Hecla Mining Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
----------
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
----------- ----------- -----------
Operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 8,639 $ 2,340 $ (83,965)
Noncash elements included in net income (loss):
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 22,652 20,740 22,363
Extraordinary charge -- -- 647
(Gain) loss on sale of discontinued operations -- (12,665) 1,043
Gain on disposition of properties, plants and equipment (329) (338) (1,460)
Reduction in carrying value of mining properties -- -- 40,240
Provision for reclamation and closure costs 1,931 1,061 17,601
Deferred income taxes benefit (3,300) -- --
Change in net assets of discontinued operations -- 1,234 1,347
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts and notes receivable (3,506) 4,516 6,486
Inventories (3,890) (1,738) (108)
Other current and noncurrent assets 575 (1,435) 100
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 1,581 417 (1,266)
Accrued payroll and related benefits 312 3,100 669
Accrued taxes 395 (1,401) 97
Accrued reclamation and closure costs and
other noncurrent liabilities (4,825) (7,793) (9,528)
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 20,235 8,038 (5,734)
----------- ----------- ------------
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations 1,585 59,761 9,562
Additions to properties, plants and equipment (11,219) (17,890) (15,210)
Proceeds from disposition of properties, plants and equipment 5,710 545 2,671
Proceeds from the sale of investments -- -- 283
Increase in restricted investments (3) (107) (270)
Purchase of investments and change in cash surrender
value of life insurance, net -- 406 1,354
Other, net (285) (173) 381
------------ ------------ -----------
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities (4,212) 42,542 (1,229)
------------ ----------- ------------
Financing activities:
Common stock issued for warrants and stock option plans 2,925 428 35
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs 72 5,462 --
Dividends paid on preferred stock -- -- (6,037)
Payments for debt issuance costs -- -- (1,811)
Borrowings on debt 3,317 15,909 80,524
Repayments on debt (10,355) (66,192) (67,094)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (4,041) (44,393) 5,617
------------ ------------ -----------
Change in cash and cash equivalents:
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 11,982 6,187 (1,346)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 7,560 1,373 2,719
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 19,542 $ 7,560 $ 1,373
=========== =========== ===========
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during year for:
Interest, net of amount capitalized $ 1,174 $ 2,888 $ 8,376
=========== =========== ===========
Income tax payments (refunds), net $ 9 $ (68) $ 54
=========== ============ ===========
SEE NOTES 4 AND 10 FOR NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Hecla Mining Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
---------------
Preferred Stock Common Stock
--------------- ------------ Capital Accumulated
Shares Amount Shares Amount Surplus Deficit
------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------
Balances, December 31, 1999 2,300 $ 575 66,845 $ 16,711 $ 400,205 $(278,533)
Net loss (83,965)
Preferred stock dividends ($1.75
per share) (4,025)
Stock issued to directors 8 2 19
Stock issued and held by grantor trust 7 2 12
Other comprehensive income
------- ------- ------- -------- --------- ---------
Balances, December 31, 2000 2,300 575 66,860 16,715 400,236 (366,523)
Net income 2,340
Stock issued to directors 7 2 5
Stock issued and held by grantor trust 25 6 38
Stock disbursed by grantor trust (204)
Stock issued under stock option and
warrant plans 408 102 325
Stock issued for cash, net of
issuance costs 5,750 1,437 3,940
Issuance of restricted stock 19 5 14
Amortization of unearned compensation
Other comprehensive income
------- ------- ------- -------- --------- ---------
Balances, December 31, 2001 2,300 575 73,069 18,267 404,354 (364,183)
Net income 8,639
Preferred stock exchange (1,547) (387) 10,826 2,707 (2,320)
Stock issued as compensation 429 108 332
Stock issued to directors 73 18 52
Stock disbursed by grantor trust (264)
Stock issued under stock option and
warrant plans 1,733 433 2,493
Warrants issued under warrant plans 1,936
Issuance of restricted stock 57 14 42
Amortization of unearned compensation
Stock issued as contribution to
benefit plan (666)
Other comprehensive loss
------- ------- ------- -------- --------- ---------
Balances, December 31, 2002 753 $ 188 86,187 $ 21,547 $ 405,959 $(355,544)
======= ======= ======= ======== ========= ==========
[WIDE TABLE CONTINUED FROM ABOVE]
Accumulated Stock
Other Held by
Comprehensive Grantor Unearned Treasury
Income (Loss) Trust Compensation Stock
------------- ----- ------------ -----
Balances, December 31, 1999 $(4,871) $ (500) $ -- $ (886)
Net loss
Preferred stock dividends ($1.75
per share)
Stock issued to directors
Stock issued and held by grantor trust (14)
Other comprehensive income 13
------- ------ ------- --------
Balances, December 31, 2000 (4,858) (514) -- (886)
Net income
Stock issued to directors
Stock issued and held by grantor trust (20)
Stock disbursed by grantor trust 204
Stock issued under stock option and
warrant plans
Stock issued for cash, net of
issuance costs
Issuance of restricted stock (19)
Amortization of unearned compensation 13
Other comprehensive income 5,031
------- ------ ------- --------
Balances, December 31, 2001 173 (330) (6) (886)
Net income
Preferred stock exchange
Stock issued as compensation
Stock issued to directors
Stock disbursed by grantor trust 264
Stock issued under stock option and
warrant plans
Warrants issued under warrant plans
Issuance of restricted stock (56)
Amortization of unearned compensation 62
Stock issued as contribution to
benefit plan 768
Other comprehensive loss (209)
-------- ------ ------- --------
Balances, December 31, 2002 $ (36) $ (66) $ -- $ (118)
======== ======= ======= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
F-8
Hecla Mining Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. Basis of Presentation -- The accompanying consolidated financial
statements include our accounts, our wholly owned subsidiaries and a
proportionate share of the accounts of the joint ventures in which we
participate. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts are
eliminated in consolidation.
Our revenues and profitability are largely dependent on world prices
for silver, gold, lead and zinc, which fluctuate widely and are affected by
numerous factors beyond our control, including inflation and worldwide forces of
supply and demand. The aggregate effect of these factors is not possible to
accurately predict.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ materially
from those estimates.
B. Business and Concentrations of Credit Risk -- We are engaged in mining
and mineral processing activities, including exploration, extraction, processing
and reclamation. Our principal products are metals, primarily silver, gold, lead
and zinc. Substantially all of our operations are conducted in the United
States, Mexico and Venezuela. Sales of metals products are made to domestic and
foreign custom smelters and metal traders.
We sell substantially all of our metallic concentrates to smelters
which are subject to extensive regulations including environmental protection
laws. We have no control over the smelters' operations or their compliance with
environmental laws and regulations. If the smelting capacity available to us was
significantly reduced because of environmental requirements or otherwise, it is
possible that our silver operations could be adversely affected. Industrial
minerals are sold principally to domestic retailers and wholesalers.
In February 2003, the Venezuelan government announced that foreign
currency exchange controls would be implemented in Venezuela. We currently
operate our La Camorra mine and various exploration projects in Venezuela. Rules
and regulations regarding the implementation of exchange controls in Venezuela
have not been finalized. Exchange controls may require us to sell products in
currencies other than the United States dollar or may require us to convert
United States dollars into foreign currency. Management is currently monitoring
the finalization of exchange controls in Venezuela, and there can be no
assurance that the implementation of exchange controls will not affect our
operations in Venezuela.
Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit
risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts
receivable. We place our cash and temporary cash investments with institutions
of high credit-worthiness. At times, such investments may be in excess of the
federal insurance limit. We routinely assess the financial strength of our
customers and, as a consequence, believe that our trade accounts receivable
credit risk exposure is limited.
At December 31, 2001, we had factored accounts receivable without
recourse of $0.5 million. At December 31, 2002, we had no factored receivables.
Factored accounts receivable are eliminated from the balance of accounts
receivable when sold.
C. Inventories -- Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or
estimated net realizable value.
D. Investments -- Marketable equity securities are categorized as
available for sale and carried at quoted market value.
Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are recognized on a
specific identification basis. Unrealized gains and losses are included as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of related deferred
income taxes, unless a permanent impairment in value has occurred, which is then
charged to operations.
F-9
Restricted investments primarily represent investments in money market
funds and bonds of U.S. Government Agencies. These investments are restricted
primarily for reclamation funding or surety bonds.
E. Properties, Plants and Equipment -- Properties, plants and equipment
are stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. Maintenance,
repairs and renewals are charged to operations. Betterments of a major nature
are capitalized. When assets are retired or sold, the costs and related
allowances for depreciation and amortization are eliminated from the accounts
and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Idle facilities,
placed on a standby basis, are carried at the lower of net carrying value or
estimated net realizable value.
Our management reviews the net carrying value of all facilities,
including idle facilities, on a periodic basis. We estimate the net realizable
value of each property based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows
that will be generated from operations at each property, the estimated salvage
value of the surface plant and equipment and the value associated with property
interests. These estimates of undiscounted future cash flows are dependent upon
estimates of metal to be recovered from proven and probable ore reserves, future
production costs and future metals prices over the estimated remaining mine
life. If undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of a property,
an impairment loss is recognized based upon the estimated expected future net
cash flows from the property discounted at an interest rate commensurate with
the risk involved.
Management's estimates of metals prices, proven and probable ore
reserves, and operating, capital and reclamation costs are subject to risks and
uncertainties of change affecting the recoverability of our investment in
various projects. Although management has made a reasonable estimate of these
factors based on current conditions and information, it is reasonably possible
that changes could occur in the near term which could adversely affect
management's estimate of net cash flows expected to be generated from its
operating properties and the need for asset impairment write-downs.
Management's calculations of proven and probable ore reserves are based
on engineering and geological estimates including minerals prices and operating
costs. Changes in the geological and engineering interpretation of various
orebodies, minerals prices and operating costs may change our estimates of
proven and probable ore reserves. It is reasonably possible that certain of our
estimates of proven and probable ore reserves will change in the near term
resulting in a change to amortization and reclamation accrual rates in future
reporting periods.
Depreciation is based on the estimated useful lives of the assets and
is computed using straight-line and unit-of-production methods. Depletion is
computed using the unit-of-production method.
F. Mine Exploration and Development -- Exploration costs and secondary
development costs at operating mines are charged to operations as incurred.
Major mine development expenditures, including primary development costs are
capitalized at operating properties and at new mining properties not yet
producing where proven and probable ore reserves have been identified.
G. Reclamation of Mining Areas -- All our operations are subject to
reclamation and closure requirements. Minimum standards for mine reclamation
have been established by various governmental agencies, which affect certain
operations.
A reserve for mine reclamation costs has been established for restoring
certain abandoned and disturbed mining areas based upon estimates of cost to
comply with existing reclamation standards. Mine reclamation costs for operating
properties have been accrued using the unit-of-production method and charged to
cost of sales and other direct production costs.
The estimated amount of metals or minerals to be recovered from a mine
site is based on internal and external geological data and is reviewed by
management on a periodic basis. Changes in such estimated amounts will be
accounted for prospectively from the date of the change unless there is a
current impairment of an asset's carrying value and a decision is made to
permanently close the property, in which case it is recognized currently and
charged to provision for closed operations and environmental matters. It is
reasonably possible our estimate of our ultimate accrual for reclamation costs
will change in the near term due to possible changes in laws and regulations,
and interpretations thereof, and changes in cost estimates.
F-10
H. Remediation of Mining Areas -- We accrue costs associated with
environmental remediation obligations at the most likely estimate when it is
probable that such costs will be incurred and they are reasonably estimable.
Accruals for estimated losses from environmental remediation obligations
generally are recognized no later than completion of the remedial feasibility
study and are charged to provision for closed operations and environmental
matters. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation are not
discounted to their present value unless subject to a contractually obligated
fixed payment schedule. Such costs are based on management's current estimate of
amounts that are expected to be incurred when the remediation work is performed
within current laws and regulations. Recoveries of environmental remediation
costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their receipt is deemed
probable.
It is reasonably possible that, due to uncertainties associated with
defining the nature and extent of environmental contamination, application of
laws and regulations by regulatory authorities and changes in remediation
technology, the ultimate cost of remediation could change in the future. We
periodically review accrued liabilities for such remediation costs as evidence
becomes available indicating that our remediation liability has potentially
changed.
I. Income Taxes -- We record deferred tax liabilities and assets for the
expected future income tax consequences of events that have been recognized in
our financial statements. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined
based on the temporary differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in
effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.
J. Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share -- Basic earnings per share
(EPS) is calculated by dividing loss applicable to common shareholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted EPS
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if potentially dilutive
securities were exercised or converted to common stock. Due to the losses
applicable to common shareholders in 2002, 2001 and 2000, potentially dilutive
securities were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS, as they were
antidilutive. Therefore, there was no difference in the calculation of basic and
diluted EPS in 2002, 2001 or 2000.
K. Revenue Recognition -- Sales of metal products sold directly to
smelters are recorded when title and risk of loss transfer to the smelter at
current metals spot prices. Recorded values are adjusted to month-end metals
prices until final settlement. Sales of metal in products tolled (rather than
sold to smelters) are recorded at contractual amounts when title and risk of
loss transfer to the buyer. Sales of industrial minerals are recognized as the
minerals are shipped and title transferred.
L. Interest Expense -- Interest costs incurred during the construction of
qualifying assets are capitalized as part of the asset cost.
M. Cash Equivalents -- We consider cash equivalents to consist of highly
liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less when
purchased.
N. Foreign Currency Translation -- We operate in Mexico with our wholly
owned subsidiary, Minera Hecla, S.A. de C.V. (Minera Hecla). We also operate in
Venezuela with our wholly owned subsidiary, Minera Hecla Venezolana, C.A. The
functional currency for Minera Hecla and Minera Hecla Venezolana is the U.S.
dollar. Accordingly, we translate the monetary assets and liabilities of these
subsidiaries at the period-end exchange rate while nonmonetary assets and
liabilities are translated at historical rates. Income and expense accounts are
translated at the average exchange rate for each period. Translation adjustments
and transaction gains and losses are included in the net income or loss for any
period.
O. Risk Management Contracts -- We use derivative financial instruments as
part of an overall risk-management strategy. These instruments are used as a
means of hedging exposure to precious metals prices. We do not hold or issue
derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (SFAS 133), "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS 133 was amended in June 2000 with the
issuance of SFAS 138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain
Hedging Activities." SFAS 133, which we adopted effective January 1, 2001,
requires that derivatives be
F-11
recognized as assets or liabilities and be measured at fair value. Gains or
losses resulting from changes in the fair value of derivatives in each period
are to be accounted for either in current earnings or other comprehensive income
depending on the use of the derivatives and whether they qualify for hedge
accounting. The key criterion for hedge accounting is that the hedging
relationship must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in the
fair value or cash flows of the hedging instruments and the hedged items.
At December 31, 2002, our hedging contracts, used to reduce exposure to
precious metals prices, consisted of forward sales contracts and a gold lease
rate swap. We intend to physically deliver metal in accordance with the terms of
the forward sales contracts. As such, we have accounted for these contracts as
normal sales in accordance with SFAS 138 and as a result, these contracts are
not required to be accounted for as derivatives under SFAS 133. We recorded a
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in other comprehensive
income of approximately $0.1 million loss related to the gold lease rate swap
upon adoption of SFAS 133 on January 1, 2001. This amount is being amortized
over the physical settlement of ounces subject to the gold lease rate swap.
During the next twelve months, approximately $40,000 is expected to be amortized
to the income statement.
P. Accounting for Stock Options -- We measure compensation cost for stock
option plans using the intrinsic value method of accounting prescribed by
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees." We also provide the required disclosures of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS
123).
Q. New Accounting Pronouncements -- In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 143 "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," which amends SFAS No. 19,
and establishes a uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation
and abandonment costs. This statement requires the fair value of a liability for
an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is
incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. On January 1, 2003,
we recorded the estimated present fair value of our reclamation liabilities of
$5.9 million and increased the carrying value of their related assets by $3.8
million. Reclamation costs will be expensed over the life of the related assets
and will be adjusted for changes resulting from the passage of time and changes
to either the timing or amount of the original present fair value estimate
underlying the obligation. On January 1, 2003, we recorded a gain of $1.1
million as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the
difference between those amounts and the amounts previously recorded in our
consolidated financial statements.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144 "Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." This Statement addresses financial
accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. It
supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and
for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," and the accounting and reporting
provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations -
Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary,
Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," for the disposal of
a segment of a business. It also amends APB No. 51, "Consolidated Financial
Statements," to eliminate the exception to consolidation for a subsidiary for
which control is likely to be temporary. This Statement became effective for us
on January 1, 2002, and did not have a material effect on our financial
statements.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145 "Rescission of FASB
Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections." SFAS No. 145 updates, clarifies and simplifies existing accounting
pronouncements, by rescinding SFAS No. 4, which required all gains and losses
from extinguishments of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an
extraordinary item, net of related income tax effects. As a result, the criteria
in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 will now be used to classify those
gains and losses. Additionally, SFAS No. 145 amends SFAS No. 13 to require that
certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback
transactions be accounted for in the same manner as sale-leaseback transactions.
Finally, SFAS No. 145 also makes technical corrections to existing
pronouncements. While those corrections are not substantive in nature, in some
instances, they may change accounting practice. The provision of SFAS No. 145
that amends SFAS No. 13 is effective for transactions occurring after May 15,
2002, with all other provisions of SFAS No. 145 being required to be adopted by
the Company in its consolidated financial statements for the first quarter of
fiscal 2003. Management currently believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 145
will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial
statements.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146 "Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 requires companies to
recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when
F-12
they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal
plan. Examples of costs covered by the standard include lease termination costs
and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring,
discontinued operation, plant closing or other exit or disposal activity. SFAS
No. 146 replaces the prior guidance that was provided by EITF Issue No. 94-3
"Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs
to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS
No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated
after December 31, 2002. Management currently believes the adoption of SFAS No.
146 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 147 "Acquisitions of Certain
Financial Institutions - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB
Interpretation No. 9." SFAS No. 147 has no impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148 "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 123." SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for
an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting
for stock-based employee compensation. It also amends the disclosure provisions
of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure about the effects of reported
net income of an entity's accounting policy decisions with respect to
stock-based employee compensation. Finally, this Statement amends APB Opinion
No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure about those effects
in interim financial information. The amendments to SFAS No. 123, which provides
alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the
fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation is
effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2002. The amendment to SFAS No. 123 relating to disclosures and the amendment to
Opinion 28 is effective for financial reports containing condensed financial
statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. Management
does not intend to adopt the fair value accounting provisions of SFAS 123 and
currently believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 148 will not have a material
impact on our financial statements.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45
"Guarantor's Accounting for Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an interpretation of FASB
Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34,
Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" (FIN 45). FIN 45
clarifies the requirements for a guarantor's accounting for and disclosure of
certain guarantees issued and outstanding. It also requires a guarantor to
recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of
the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. This interpretation also
incorporates without reconsideration the guidance in FASB Interpretation No. 34,
which is being superseded. The adoption of FIN 45 will not have a material
effect on our consolidated financial statements and will be applied
prospectively.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46
"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting
Research Bulletin ("ARB") No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements" (FIN 46).
FIN 46 clarifies the application of ARB No. 51 to certain entities in which
equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial
interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its
activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties.
The adoption of FIN 46 will not have a material effect on our consolidated
financial statements.
NOTE 2: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In furtherance of our determination to focus operations on silver and
gold mining and to raise cash to retire debt and provide working capital, our
board of directors made the decision to sell the industrial minerals segment in
2000.
In March 2000, we sold substantially all the assets of our Mountain
West Products division (MWP) of MWCA, Inc., for $8.5 million in cash. The sale
of MWP resulted in a loss on disposal of $1.0 million during 2000. In June 2000,
we completed a sale of the landscape operations of the Colorado Aggregate
division (CAC) of MWCA, Inc., for $1.1 million in cash. The sale of the
landscape operations did not result in a gain or loss.
In March 2001, we completed a sale of the Kentucky-Tennessee Clay
Company, K-T Feldspar Corporation, K-T Clay de Mexico and certain other minor
inactive industrial minerals companies (collectively the K-T Group) for $62.5
million. We recorded a gain on the sale of the K-T Group of $12.7 million during
2001. The proceeds from
F-13
the sale were used to repay a term loan facility of $55.0 million, and to repay
amounts outstanding under a $2.0 million revolving bank agreement. The remaining
net proceeds were available for general corporate purposes.
In March 2002, we completed a sale of the pet operations of CAC for
approximately $1.6 million in cash. The sale of the pet operations did not
result in a gain or loss. At December 31, 2002, we still owned and operated a
minor portion of the industrial minerals segment. Our management is currently
evaluating available options with regard to the remaining portion of the
industrial minerals segment. At December 31, 2002, the remaining net assets of
this segment have been reclassified from net assets of discontinued operations
to their respective categories of inventory and accrued reclamation.
The net assets of discontinued operations at December 31, 2001, were
$2.7 million, primarily consisting of inventories ($2.1 million), properties,
plants and equipment ($0.6 million) and accrued reclamation ($0.1 million). A
summary of operating results of discontinued operations for the three years
ended December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
------------- ------------- -------------
Sales of products $ 4,221 $ 21,625 $ 75,054
------------- ------------- -------------
Cost of sales 5,145 20,082 67,114
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 116 1,099 3,990
------------- ------------- -------------
5,261 21,181 71,104
------------- ------------- -------------
Gross profit (loss) (1,040) 444 3,950
-------------- ------------- -------------
Other operating expenses:
General and administrative -- 86 355
Exploration -- 174 242
------------- ------------- -------------
-- 260 597
------------- ------------- -------------
Income (loss) from operations (1,040) 184 3,353
-------------- ------------- -------------
Other income (expense):
Interest and other income -- 1 9
Miscellaneous expense (1,178) (923) (516)
Interest expense (6) (5) (59)
-------------- -------------- --------------
(1,184) (927) (566)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before
income taxes and gain (loss) on disposal (2,224) (743) 2,787
Income tax provision -- -- (215)
------------- ------------- --------------
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
before gain (loss) on disposal (2,224) (743) 2,572
Gain (loss) on disposal, net of income tax -- 12,665 (1,043)
------------- ------------- --------------
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations $ (2,224) $ 11,922 $ 1,529
============== ============= =============
F-14
The following is sales information for discontinued operations by
geographic area for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
United States $ 4,141 $ 15,497 $ 52,293
Canada -- 1,336 4,225
Mexico -- 2,950 12,771
Taiwan 44 376 1,275
Venezuela -- 564 1,000
Italy -- 197 849
Other foreign 36 705 2,641
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
$ 4,221 $ 21,625 $ 75,054
================== ================= ==================
The following is sales information for discontinued operations by
country of origin for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
United States $ 4,221 $ 19,037 $ 64,309
Mexico -- 2,588 10,745
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
$ 4,221 $ 21,625 $ 75,054
================== ================== ==================
Our industrial minerals operations lease various facilities and
equipment under noncancelable operating lease arrangements. Rent expense
incurred for these operating leases during the years ended December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000 was approximately $0.1 million, $0.7 million and $3.6 million,
respectively.
NOTE 3: INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
----------------------------------------
2002 2001
------------------ ------------------
Concentrates, bullion, metals in transit
and other products $ 7,034 $ 4,211
Materials and supplies 7,724 6,657
------------------ ------------------
$ 14,758 $ 10,868
================== ==================
At December 31, 2002, we had forward sales commitments through December
31, 2004 for 103,430 ounces of gold at an average price of $288.25 per ounce. We
intend to physically deliver metals in accordance with the terms of the forward
sales contracts. As such, we have elected to designate the contracts as normal
sales in accordance with SFAS 138 and as a result, these contracts are not
required to be accounted for as derivatives under SFAS 133. We are exposed to
certain losses, generally the amount by which the contract price exceeds the
spot price of a commodity, in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties
to these agreements. The London AM gold price at December 31, 2002, was $342.75
per ounce.
We have a quarterly Gold Lease Rate Swap at a fixed rate of 1.5% on
93,729 ounces of the above gold forward contracts. The ounces covered under the
swap are adjusted each quarter, in accordance with the expiration of the gold
forward contracts. At December 31, 2002, the fair market value of the Gold Lease
Rate Swap was approximately $307,000, which represents the amount the
counterparty would have to pay us if the contract was terminated. At December
31, 2002, the current lease rate was 0.75%.
F-15
NOTE 4: PROPERTIES, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT
The major components of properties, plants and equipment are (in thousands):
December 31,
----------------------------------------
2002 2001
------------------ ------------------
Mining properties $ 15,495 $ 8,271
Development costs 109,627 111,827
Plants and equipment 166,584 168,210
Land 760 925
------------------ ------------------
292,466 289,233
Less accumulated depreciation,
depletion and amortization 200,101 184,640
------------------ ------------------
Net carrying value $ 92,365 $ 104,593
================== ==================
During the second quarter of 2002, we sold our headquarters building in
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, for $5.6 million in cash. In connection with the sale, we
entered into a lease agreement with the purchaser to lease a portion of the
building. The lease calls for monthly payments of approximately $39,000 through
April 2004, at which time we have an option to reduce the amount of leased space
for an additional three years. The purchaser of the building also has an option
to terminate the lease agreement with us during the first two years of the lease
agreement, subject to certain payments to us.
The sale of the building resulted in a gain of $0.6 million, which we
are amortizing over the current lease period of five years. During 2002, we
recognized approximately $90,000 of gain on the sale.
On August 2, 2002, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Hecla
Ventures Corporation, entered into an earn-in agreement with Rodeo Creek Gold,
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Great Basin Gold Ltd. (Great Basin),
concerning exploration, development and production on Great Basin's Hollister
Development Block gold property, located on the Carlin Trend in Nevada. An
"earn-in" agreement is an agreement under which a party must take certain
actions in order to "earn" an interest in an entity. The agreement provides us
with an option to earn a 50% working interest in the Hollister Development Block
in return for funding a two-stage, advanced exploration and development program
leading to commercial production. We estimate the cost to achieve our 50%
interest in the Hollister Development Block to be approximately $21.8 million.
Upon earn-in, we will be the operator of the mine.
Pursuant to the Earn-in Agreement, we and Great Basin each have agreed
to issue a series of warrants to the other party, to purchase one another's
common stock exercisable within two years at prevailing market prices at the
time of issuance of the warrant. At execution of the agreement, we issued a
warrant to purchase 2.0 million shares of our common stock to Great Basin and
Great Basin issued warrants to purchase 1.0 million shares of its common stock
to us. The warrant to purchase our common stock is exercisable on or before
August 1, 2004, at $3.73 per share. The warrants we issued to Great Basin were
recorded at their estimated fair value of $1.9 million. The estimated fair value
of the Great Basin warrants received was $0.2 million. The resulting difference
was recorded as an addition to properties, plants and equipment.
The beneficial owner of the warrant to purchase our common stock is
Great Basin Gold Ltd. The agreement obligates us to issue a warrant to purchase
an additional 1.0 million shares of our common stock, at the future current
market value, to Great Basin if and when we decide to commence certain
development activities, and an additional warrant to purchase 1.0 million shares
of our common stock, at the future current market value, following completion of
such activities, if undertaken. Great Basin will issue warrants to purchase
500,000 shares of its common stock to us immediately upon receipt of the second
and third warrants to purchase our stock. In addition to the foregoing, we will
pay to Great Basin from our share of commercial production a sliding scale
royalty that is dependent on the cash operating profit per ounce of gold
equivalent production.
In March 2002, we acquired the Block B exploration and mining lease
near El Callao in the Venezuelan State of Bolivar from CVG-Minerven (a
Venezuelan government-owned gold mining company). Pursuant to the agreement with
CVG-Minerven, we paid CVG-Minerven $500,000 in September 2002. In March 2003, we
are
F-16
obligated to make an additional payment of $1.25 million, with a final payment
of $1.0 million due in September 2003. We will also pay CVG-Minerven a royalty
of 2% to 3% (depending on the gold price) on production from Block B.
In the fourth quarter of 2000, we recorded an adjustment of
$31.2 million to reduce the carrying value of the Lucky Friday mine property,
plant and equipment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of." The adjustment at Lucky Friday was
necessitated due to continued low silver and lead prices combined with further
declines in silver and lead prices during the fourth quarter of 2000. In July
2001, we announced that operations at the Lucky Friday mine would be reduced,
effective October 2001, due to continued low silver and lead prices.
Additionally, during the second quarter of 2000, we recorded
adjustments of $4.4 million for properties, plants and equipment and supply
inventory at the Rosebud mine, and $4.7 million for previously capitalized
deferred development costs at the Noche Buena gold property. The $4.4 million
adjustment at the Rosebud mine was necessitated by the planned closure of the
Rosebud mine. The Rosebud mine completed mining activity in July 2000 and
milling activities in August 2000. At the Noche Buena property, we suspended
activities in 1999 due to a low price for gold. Based upon the continuation of
the lower gold price, an adjustment to the carrying value of the Noche Buena
property was recorded.
NOTE 5: ENVIRONMENTAL AND RECLAMATION ACTIVITIES
The liabilities accrued for our reclamation and closure costs at
December 31, 2002, and 2001, were as follows (in thousands):
Operating properties: 2002 2001
------------------ ------------------
Greens Creek $ 2,763 $ 2,176
La Camorra 1,279 891
San Sebastian 983 79
Lucky Friday 734 631
Nonoperating properties:
Idaho related claims 39,049 43,842
Republic 2,435 2,965
All other sites 2,480 1,897
------------------ ------------------
Total 49,723 52,481
Amount reflected as current (7,005) (6,026)
------------------- -------------------
Amount reflected as long-term $ 42,718 $ 46,455
================== ==================
During 2000, we recorded charges of $16.4 million for future
environmental and reclamation expenditures at the Grouse Creek property, the
Bunker Hill Superfund site and other idle properties. During the fourth quarter
of 2000, an Administrative Order on Consent was entered into with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, requiring us to commence dewatering of the
tailings impoundment at Grouse Creek in 2001. Due to the Administrative Order on
Consent, updated cost estimates were determined in accordance with AICPA
Statement of Position 96-1, "Environmental Remediation Liabilities." At the
Bunker Hill Superfund site, estimated future costs were increased based upon
results of sampling activities completed through 2000 and current cost estimates
to remediate residential yards and commercial properties.
F-17
The activity in our accrued reclamation and closure cost liability for
the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 was as follows (in thousands):
Balance at January 1, 2001 $ 58,710
Accruals for estimated costs 1,062
Payment of reclamation obligations (7,291)
-------------------
Balance at December 31, 2001 52,481
Accruals for estimated costs 2,514
Payment of reclamation obligations (5,272)
-------------------
Balance at December 31, 2002 $ 49,723
==================
For additional information regarding environmental matters, see Note 8
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 6: INCOME TAXES
Major components of our income tax provision (benefit) for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, relating to continuing operations are as
follows (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
--------------- --------------- ----------------
Current:
Federal $ -- $ -- $ --
Foreign 382 -- 13
--------------- --------------- ----------------
Total current income tax provision
(benefit) 382 -- 13
--------------- --------------- ----------------
Deferred:
Federal -- -- --
Foreign (3,300) -- --
---------------- --------------- ----------------
Total deferred income tax provision
(benefit) (3,300) -- --
---------------- --------------- ----------------
Total income tax provision (benefit) $ (2,918) $ -- $ 13
================ =============== ================
For the year ended December 31, 2002, a deferred income tax benefit of
approximately $3.3 million was recognized. Management recognized the benefit
because it believes we are more likely than not to realize the value of some of
the existing net operating loss carryforwards in Mexico resulting from the
performance of the San Sebastian mine.
For the year ended December 31, 2002, and 2001, the income tax
provision related to discontinued operations was zero. For the year ended
December 31, 2000, the income tax provision related to discontinued operations
was $215,000.
Domestic and foreign components of income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes, discontinued operations and extraordinary
charges, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, are as follows
(in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Domestic $ (11,234) $ (19,822) $ (79,645)
Foreign 19,179 10,240 (5,189)
------------------ ------------------ -------------------
Total $ 7,945 $ (9,582) $ (84,834)
================== =================== ===================
F-18
The components of the net deferred tax asset (liability) were as
follows (in thousands):
December 31,
--------------------------------------------
2002 2001
----------------- ------------------
Deferred tax assets:
Accrued reclamation costs $ 16,906 $ 18,231
Investment valuation differences 1,357 1,357
Postretirement benefits other than pensions 1,551 1,437
Deferred compensation 386 902
Foreign net operating losses 9,583 7,579
Federal net operating losses 112,634 109,627
State net operating losses 12,687 12,264
Properties, plants and equipment -- 2,747
Tax credit carryforwards 1,989 1,989
Miscellaneous 1,668 1,479
----------------- ------------------
Total deferred tax assets 158,761 157,612
Valuation allowance (150,165) (153,214)
------------------ -------------------
Net deferred tax assets 8,596 4,398
----------------- ------------------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Pension costs (4,010) (4,398)
Properties, plants and equipment (1,130) --
Other (456) (300)
------------------ -------------------
Total deferred tax liability (5,596) (4,698)
------------------ -------------------
Net deferred tax asset (liability) $ 3,000 $ (300)
================= ===================
We recorded a valuation allowance to reflect the estimated amount of
deferred tax assets, which may not be realized principally due to the expiration
of net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. The changes in the
valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, are as
follows (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Balance at beginning of year $ (153,214) $ (167,109) $ (139,852)
Increase due to exclusion of
net deferred tax liability
associated with discontinued
operations -- -- (3,266)
Increase related to
nonutilization of net operating
loss carryforwards and
nonrecognition of deferred tax
assets due to uncertainty of
recovery -- -- (23,991)
Decrease related to recognition
of foreign deferred tax asset 3,000 -- --
Decrease related to expiration
of foreign net operating loss
carryforwards and an
adjustment to foreign property,
plant and equipment 49 13,895 --
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
Balance at end of year $ (150,165) $ (153,214) $ (167,109)
=================== =================== ===================
F-19
The annual tax provision (benefit) is different from the amount that
would be provided by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to our
pretax income (loss). The reasons for the difference are (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
Computed "statutory"
(benefit)/provision $ 2,701 34% $ (3,258) (34)% $ (28,844) (34)%
Reduction of valuation
allowance on Mexican
loss carryforward (3,000) (38) -- -- -- --
Nonutilization of net
operating losses and
effect of foreign taxes (2,619) (33) 3,258 34 28,857 34
---------- ------- --------- ------- --------- -------
$ (2,918) (37)% $ -- --% $ 13 --%
========== ======= ========= ======== ========= ========
As of December 31, 2002, for income tax purposes, we have net operating
loss carryforwards of $331.3 million and $283.1 million for regular and
alternative minimum tax purposes, respectively. These operating loss
carryforwards substantially expire over the next 15 to 20 years, the majority of
which expire between 2006 and 2021. In addition, we have foreign tax operating
loss carryforwards of approximately $28.2 million, which expire between 2003 and
2012. Approximately $17.4 million of regular tax loss carryforwards are subject
to limitations in any given year due to mergers. We have approximately $0.9
million in alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards eligible to reduce
future regular tax liabilities.
NOTE 7: LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENT
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
--------------------------------------------
2002 2001
------------------ -----------------
Revolving bank debt $ -- $ 2,800
Project financing debt 8,953 13,191
Subordinated bank debt 3,000 3,000
------------------ -----------------
11,953 18,991
Less current portion (7,296) (7,043)
------------------- ------------------
$ 4,657 $ 11,948
================== =================
Future minimum debt repayments associated with long-term debt as of
December 31, 2002, are as follows (in thousands):
Year ending December 31
-------------------------------
2003 $ 7,296
2004 2,332
2005 1,366
2006 959
-----------------
Total long-term debt repayments $ 11,953
=================
In March 2002, we entered into a $7.5 million revolving bank agreement
due in March 2004. Amounts under the bank agreement are available for general
corporate purposes and are collateralized by our interest in the Greens Creek
Joint Venture. At December 31, 2002, there was no amount outstanding under the
revolving agreement.
F-20
In April 2002, we completed a sales transaction for our headquarters
building, terminating a $3.0 million revolving bank agreement collateralized by
the building. For additional information relating to the sale of the
headquarters building, see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
At December 31, 2002 and 2001, our wholly owned subsidiary, Hecla
Resources Investments Limited (HRIL) had $3.5 million and $6.5 million
outstanding under a credit agreement used to provide project financing at the La
Camorra mine. The project financing agreement is payable in semiannual payments
through December 31, 2004, and had an interest rate of 4.2% at December 31,
2002.
HRIL must maintain compliance with certain financial and other
restrictive covenants related to the available ore reserves and financial
performance of the La Camorra mine. We are required to maintain hedged gold
positions sufficient to cover all dollar loans, operating expenditures, taxes,
royalties and similar fees projected for the project. At December 31, 2002,
there were 103,430 ounces of gold sold forward. The forward sales agreement
assumes the ounces of gold committed to forward sales at the end of each quarter
thereafter can be leased at a rate of 1.5% for each following quarter. We
maintain a Gold Lease Rate Swap at a fixed rate of 1.5% on the outstanding
notional volume of the flat forward sale, with settlement being made quarterly
with us receiving the fixed rate and paying the current floating gold lease
rate.
In connection with the project financing agreement, we have outstanding
a $3.0 million subordinated loan agreement, repayable in three semiannual
payments beginning June 30, 2003. The entire $3.0 million subordinated loan was
outstanding at December 31, 2002 and 2001, $2.0 million of which is classified
as current at December 31, 2002. The loan agreement gives us the option to add
interest payments to the principal amount of the loan. At December 31, 2002, the
interest amount added to principal was approximately $0.6 million. The interest
rate on the subordinated debt was 5.8% as of December 31, 2002.
At December 31, 2002, our wholly owned subsidiary, Minera Hecla, S.A.
de C.V., (Minera Hecla) had $5.4 million outstanding under a project loan used
to acquire a processing mill at Velardena, Mexico, to process ore mined from the
San Sebastian mine located near Durango, Mexico. The credit facility is
nonrecourse to us. Under the terms of the credit facility, Minera Hecla will
make monthly payments of principal and interest over 63 months. The loan is
collateralized by the mill at Velardena and the Saladillo, Saladillo 1 and
Saladillo 5 mining concessions and bears interest at the rate of 13%.
NOTE 8: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Bunker Hill Superfund Site
In 1994, we, as a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA),
entered into a consent decree with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
the State of Idaho, concerning environmental remediation obligations at the
Bunker Hill Superfund site located in Kellogg, Idaho. The 1994 Consent Decree
(the "1994 Decree") settled our response-cost liability under CERCLA at the
Bunker Hill 21-square mile site.
In August 2000, Sunshine Mining and Refining Company which was also a
party to the 1994 Decree, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and in January 2001,
the Federal District Court approved a new Consent Decree between Sunshine, the
U.S. Government and the Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe which settled Sunshine's
environmental liabilities in the Coeur d'Alene Basin lawsuits described below
and released Sunshine from further obligations under the 1994 Decree. In
response to a request by us and ASARCO Incorporated, the United States Federal
District Court in Idaho, having jurisdiction over the 1994 Decree, issued an
Order in September 2001 that the 1994 Decree should be modified in light of a
significant change in factual circumstances not reasonably anticipated by the
mining companies at the time they signed the 1994 Decree. In its Order, the
Court reserved the final ruling on the appropriate modification to the 1994
Decree until after the issuance by the EPA of a Record of Decision ("ROD") on
the Basin-wide Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study.
The EPA issued the ROD on the Basin in September 2002, proposing a $359
million Basin clean-up plan to be implemented over 30 years. The ROD also
establishes a review process at the end of the 30-year period to determine if
further remediation would be appropriate. Based on the 2001 Order issued by the
Court, we intend to seek relief from the work program under the 1994 Decree
within the Bunker Hill site. In addition, we and ASARCO
F-21
negotiated a reduced 2002 work program with the EPA and the State of Idaho
pending the outcome of the dispute resolution over the 1994 Decree. We
anticipate negotiating the 2003 work program during the first half of 2003;
however, we expect the work program for 2003 will be subject to a final decision
on modification of the 1994 Decree by the Court.
On February 2, 2003, ASARCO entered into a Consent Decree with the
United States relating to a transfer of certain assets to its parent
corporation, Grupo de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. The Consent Decree also addresses
ASARCO's environmental liabilities on a number of sites in the United States,
including the Bunker Hill site. The provisions of the Consent Decree could limit
ASARCO's annual obligation at the Bunker Hill site for 2003 to 2005. In
addition, in February 2003, we were advised that ASARCO had reached an agreement
with the Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe settling the Tribe's claims against ASARCO
for damages to natural resources. We believe the settlement will have no
material effect on any liability we may have for the Tribe's claims.
As of December 31, 2002, we have estimated and accrued a liability for
remedial activity costs at the Bunker Hill site of $8.3 million. These estimated
expenditures are anticipated to be made over the next three to five years.
Although we believe the accrual is adequate based upon our current estimates of
aggregate costs, it is reasonably possible that our estimate may change in the
future due to the assumptions and estimates inherent in the accrual.
Coeur d'Alene River Basin Environmental Claims
Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe Claims
In July 1991, the Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe brought a lawsuit, under
CERCLA, in Idaho Federal District Court against us, ASARCO and a number of other
mining companies asserting claims for damages to natural resources downstream
from the Bunker Hill site over which the Tribe alleges some ownership or
control. In February 2003, ASARCO reached an agreement with the Coeur d'Alene
Tribe settling the Tribe's claim against ASARCO. The Tribe's natural resource
damage litigation has been consolidated with the United States' litigation
described below.
U.S. Government Claims
In March 1996, the United States filed a lawsuit in Idaho Federal
District Court against certain mining companies that conducted historic mining
operations in the Silver Valley of northern Idaho, including us. The lawsuit
asserts claims under CERCLA and the Clean Water Act and seeks recovery for
alleged damages to or loss of natural resources located in the Coeur d'Alene
River Basin in northern Idaho for which the United States asserts it is the
trustee under CERCLA. The lawsuit claims that the defendants' historic mining
activity resulted in releases of hazardous substances and damaged natural
resources within the Basin. The suit also seeks declaratory relief that we and
other defendants are jointly and severally liable for response costs under
CERCLA for historic mining impacts in the Basin outside the Bunker Hill site. We
have asserted a number of defenses to the United States' claims.
As discussed above, in May 1998, the EPA announced that it had
commenced a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study under CERCLA for the entire
Basin, including Lake Coeur d'Alene, in support of its response cost claims
asserted in its March 1996 lawsuit. In October 2001, the EPA issued its proposed
clean-up plan for the Basin. The EPA issued the ROD on the Basin in September
2002, proposing a $359 million Basin clean-up plan to be implemented over 30
years. The ROD also establishes a review process at the end of the 30-year
period to determine if further remediation would be appropriate.
The first phase of the trial commenced on the consolidated Coeur
d'Alene Indian Tribe's and the United States' claims on January 22, 2001, and
was concluded on July 30, 2001. In the first phase of the trial, the Court was
to determine the extent of liability, if any, of the defendants for the
plaintiffs' CERCLA claims. The Court was also asked to determine the liability
of the United States for its historic involvement in the Basin. No decision on
the issues before the Court in the first phase of the litigation has been
issued. If liability is determined in the first phase, a second trial is
anticipated to be scheduled during 2003 to address damages and remedy selection.
Two of the defendant mining companies, Coeur d'Alene Mines Corporation and
Sunshine Mining and Refining Company, settled their liabilities under the
litigation during the first quarter of 2001. We and ASARCO are the only
defendants remaining in the United States' litigation.
F-22
During 2000 and into 2001, we were involved in settlement negotiations
with representatives of the U.S. Government and the Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe.
We also participated with certain of the other defendants in the litigation in a
State of Idaho led settlement effort. On August 16, 2001, we entered into a now
terminated Agreement in Principle with the United States and the State of Idaho
to settle the governments' claims for natural resource damages and clean-up
costs related to the historic mining practices in the Coeur d'Alene Basin in
northern Idaho. That Agreement in Principle covered the potential settlement of
liability relating not only to the Coeur d'Alene River Basin, but also other
Idaho related claims for which separate provision has already been made (see
Note 5). The total undiscounted amount of the potential settlement was $138.0
million. Due to a number of changes that have occurred since the signing of the
Agreement in Principle, including improvements in the environmental conditions
at Grouse Creek and lower estimated clean-up costs in the Coeur d'Alene Basin as
well as our improved financial condition, the terms of the multiple properties
settlement approach set forth in the Agreement in Principle no longer appears
favorable to us. Therefore, the United States, the State of Idaho and we have
agreed to discontinue utilizing the Agreement in Principle as a settlement
vehicle. However, we may participate in further settlement negotiations with the
United States, the State of Idaho and the Coeur d'Alene Indian Tribe in the
future. Due to a number of uncertainties related to this matter, including the
outcome of pending litigation and the result of any settlement negotiations, we
do not have the ability to estimate what, if any, liability we may have related
to the Coeur d'Alene Basin at this time.
It is reasonably possible that our ability to estimate what, if any,
liability we may have relating to the Coeur d'Alene Basin may change in the near
or long term depending on a number of factors. In addition, an adverse ruling
against us for liability and damages in this matter could have a material
adverse effect on us.
Class Action Litigation
On or about January 7, 2002, a class action complaint was filed in the
Idaho District Court, County of Kootenai, against several corporate defendants,
including Hecla. We were served with the complaint on January 29, 2002. The
complaint seeks certification of three plaintiff classes of Coeur d'Alene Basin
residents and current and former property owners to pursue three types of
relief: various medical monitoring programs, real property remediation and
restoration programs, and damages for diminution in property value, plus other
damages and costs. On April 23, 2002, we filed a motion with the Court to
dismiss the claims for relief relating to any medical monitoring programs and
the remediation and restoration programs. At a hearing before the Idaho District
Court on our and other defendants' motions held October 16, 2002, the Judge
struck the complaint filed by the plaintiffs in January 2002 and instructed the
plaintiffs to re-file the complaint limiting the relief requested by the
plaintiffs to wholly private damages. The Court also dismissed the medical
monitoring claim as a separate cause of action and stated that any requested
remedy that encroached upon the EPA's cleanup in the Silver Valley would be
precluded by the pending Federal Court case described above. The plaintiffs
re-filed their amended complaint on January 9, 2003. As ordered by the Court,
the amended complaint omits any cause of action for medical monitoring and no
longer requests relief in the form of real property remediation or restoration
programs. We believe the complaint is subject to challenge on a number of bases
and intend to vigorously defend this litigation.
Insurance Coverage Litigation
In 1991, we initiated litigation in the Idaho District Court, County of
Kootenai, against a number of insurance companies that provided comprehensive
general liability insurance coverage to us and our predecessors. We believe the
insurance companies have a duty to defend and indemnify us under their policies
of insurance for all liabilities and claims asserted against us by the EPA and
the Tribe under CERCLA related to the Bunker Hill site and the Basin in northern
Idaho. In 1992, the Idaho State District Court ruled that the primary insurance
companies had a duty to defend us in the Tribe's lawsuit. During 1995 and 1996,
we entered into settlement agreements with a number of the insurance carriers
named in the litigation. We have received a total of approximately $7.2 million
under the terms of the settlement agreements. Thirty percent of these
settlements were paid to the EPA to reimburse the U.S. government for past costs
under the Bunker Hill site Consent Decree. Litigation is still pending against
one insurer with trial suspended until the underlying environmental claims
against us are resolved or settled. The remaining insurer in the litigation,
along with a second insurer not named in the litigation, is providing us with a
partial defense in all Basin environmental litigation. As of December 31, 2002,
we have not reduced our accrual for reclamation and closure costs to reflect the
receipt of any potential insurance proceeds.
F-23
Other Claims
In 1999 and 2000, three lawsuits were filed against our then
subsidiary, Kentucky-Tennessee Clay Company (K-T Clay), based upon damages
incurred by animal feed producers, when the Food and Drug Administration
determined trace elements of dioxin were present in poultry as a result of ball
clay from K-T Clay being added to poultry feed. Dioxin was determined to be
inherently present in ball clays generally.
In March 2001, prior to trial, K-T Clay settled the most significant of
claims against K-T Clay through a settlement payment substantially funded by K-T
Clay's insurance carrier. K-T Clay contributed $230,000 toward the settlement.
In July 2002, K-T Clay, through its insurance carrier, negotiated settlements of
both remaining lawsuits. The settlement payments have been funded 100% by K-T
Clay's insurance carrier. Based on the settlement agreements, the respective
courts dismissed both remaining lawsuits.
On November 17, 2000, we entered into an agreement with Zemex U.S.
Corporation guaranteed by its parent, Zemex Corporation of Toronto, Canada, to
sell the stock of K-T Clay and K-T Mexico, which included the ball clay and
kaolin operations, for a price of $68.0 million. On January 18, 2001, Zemex U.S.
Corporation failed to close on the transaction, and on January 22, 2001, we
brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern Division, against the parent, Zemex Corporation, under its
guarantee for its subsidiary's failure to close on the purchase and meet its
obligations under the November 2000 agreement. On January 18, 2003, the parties
reached an agreement to settle our claims in full for $3,950,000, pursuant to
which Zemex has paid.
In March 2002, Independence Lead Mines Company (Independence), the
holder of a net 18.52% interest in the Gold Hunter or DIA unitized area of the
Lucky Friday mine, notified us of certain alleged defaults by us under the 1968
Lease Agreement between the unit owners (Independence and us under the terms of
the 1968 DIA Unitization Agreement) as lessors and defaults by us as lessee and
operator of the properties. We are a net 81.48% interest holder under these
Agreements. Independence alleges that we violated the "prudent operator
obligations" implied under the lease by undertaking the Gold Hunter project and
violated certain other provisions of the Agreement with respect to milling
equipment and calculating net profits and losses. Under the Lease Agreement, we
have the exclusive right to manage, control and operate the DIA properties, and
our decisions with respect to the character of work are final. On June 17, 2002,
Independence filed a lawsuit in Idaho State District Court seeking termination
of the Lease Agreement and requesting unspecified damages. We believe that we
have fully complied with all obligations of the 1968 Lease Agreement and will be
able to successfully defend our right to operate the property under the Lease
Agreement.
In Mexico, our subsidiary, Minera Hecla, S.A. de C.V. (Minera Hecla),
is involved in litigation in Mexico City concerning a lien on certain major
components of the Velardena mill at the San Sebastian mine that predated the
sale of the mill to Minera Hecla. The unpaid amount of the lien is in dispute.
At the time of the purchase, the lien amount was believed to be approximately
$590,000 and that amount was deposited with the court. The lien holder now
alleges the amount owed is approximately $2,017,000, plus accrued interest. The
lien holder has tried with limited success to remove the mill components subject
to the lien. On January 23, 2003, Minera Hecla deposited $145,000 which
represented the amount of accrued interest since the date of sale and Minera
Hecla requested that the court cancel the lien. The lien holder opposed the
request made by Minera Hecla. In February 2003, the court in Mexico City issued
a decision that the lien was fully satisfied with the deposit made by Minera
Hecla on January 23, 2003, and the court cancelled the lien.
In a related legal proceeding in Mexico, there is currently pending an
appeal in Mexico of the $2,017,000 judgment against the mill's prior owner, BLM
Minera Mexicana (BLM), which underlies the lien. However, the decision by the
court in Mexico City in February 2003 held that the lien on the mill mentioned
above does not guarantee the $2,017,000 judgment against BLM as the lien holder
alleged. Based upon that decision, Minera Hecla and the Velardena mill will not
be subject to any further attachment by the lien holder in its pending action
against BLM.
We are subject to other legal proceedings and claims not disclosed
above which have arisen in the ordinary course of our business and have not been
finally adjudicated. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate
disposition of these other matters, it is the opinion of our management that the
outcome of these other proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition.
F-24
NOTE 9: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
We sponsor defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all
employees and provide certain postretirement benefits, principally health care
and life insurance benefits for qualifying retired employees. The following
tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the plans' benefit obligations
and fair value of assets over the two-year period ended December 31, 2002, and a
statement of the funded status as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
------------------------------- -------------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 41,095 $ 45,994 $ 2,618 $ 2,377
Service cost 534 822 9 24
Interest cost 2,814 2,707 183 166
Participant transfers in 79 -- -- --
Plan amendments -- 2,027 (58) --
Actuarial (gain) loss 4,712 (1,678) (397) 177
Divestitures -- (4,044) -- --
Settlements 900 (1,934) (900) --
Curtailments -- (501) -- --
Benefits paid (3,063) (2,298) (79) (126)
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Benefit obligation at end of year 47,071 41,095 1,376 2,618
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year 52,109 67,285 -- --
Actual return on plan assets 11,231 (6,496) -- --
Divestitures -- (4,027) -- --
Employer contributions 120 64 79 126
Settlements -- (2,419) -- --
Benefits paid (3,063) (2,298) (79) (126)
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year 60,397 52,109 -- --
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Funded status at end of year 13,326 11,014 (1,376) (2,618)
Unrecognized net actuarial gain (5,563) (3,333) (252) (153)
Unrecognized transition obligation 12 35 -- --
Unrecognized prior-service cost 2,189 2,687 134 209
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Net amount recognized in consolidated
balance sheets $ 9,964 $ 10,403 $ (1,494) $ (2,562)
============= ============= ============== ==============
The following table provides the amounts recognized in the consolidated
balance sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
------------------------------- -------------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Other noncurrent assets:
Prepaid benefit costs $ 11,792 $ 12,067 $ -- $ --
Other noncurrent liabilities:
Accrued benefit liability (1,828) (1,664) (1,494) (2,562)
-------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Net amount recognized $ 9,964 $ 10,403 $ (1,494) $ (2,562)
============= ============= ============== ==============
F-25
The benefit obligation and prepaid benefit costs were calculated by
applying the following weighted average assumptions:
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
------------------------------- -------------------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Discount rate 6.50% 7.00% 6.50% 7.00%
Expected rate on plan assets 8.00% 9.00% -- --
Rate of compensation increase 4.00% 3.50% -- --
Net periodic pension cost (income) for the plans consisted of the
following in 2002, 2001 and 2000 (in thousands):
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000 2002 2001 2000
----------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- -----------
Service cost $ 534 $ 822 $ 1,406 $ 9 $ 24 $ 24
Interest cost 2,814 2,707 2,989 183 166 169
Expected return on plan assets (4,585) (5,593) (5,192) -- -- --
Amortization of transition
asset (obligation) 23 (711) (426) -- -- --
Amortization of unrecognized prior
service cost 439 246 315 75 75 75
Amortization of unrecognized net
gain (loss) from earlier periods 15 (450) (420) (18) (22) (14)
----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- -----------
Net periodic pension cost (income) (760) (2,979) (1,328) 249 243 254
Curtailment loss -- 395 -- -- -- --
----------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------
Net periodic benefit cost (income)
after curtailment $ (760) $ (2,584) $ (1,328) $ 249 $ 243 $ 254
============ ========== =========== ========= ========== ==========
During 2002, certain postretirement benefit obligations were
transferred to the Hecla Mining Company and Lucky Friday Pension Plans. As a
result of the transfer, approximately $1.2 million of accrued postretirement
benefit obligations were transferred to the pension plans which reduced the net
prepaid pension benefit by $1.2 million.
During 2001, as part of the sale of the K-T Clay Group, we recognized a
$0.5 million pension curtailment gain on the Hecla Mining Company Pension Plan.
This gain was a result of the elimination of salaried employees at K-T Clay from
inclusion in the Hecla Mining Company Pension Plan. Also, as part of the K-T
Clay Group sale, $2.4 million in assets of the Hecla Mining Company Pension Plan
were transferred to the purchaser's pension plan to fund the liability of plan
participants that were employed by the K-T Clay Group at the time of the sale.
In addition, two hourly pension plans for hourly employees of the K-T Clay Group
were transferred to the purchaser in their entirety as part of the sale of the
K-T Clay Group.
As a result of a reduction in the workforce at the Lucky Friday mine
during 2001, we recorded a pension curtailment loss of approximately $0.9
million associated with the Lucky Friday Hourly Pension Plan.
For the year ended December 31, 2000, the net periodic pension cost
related to the defined benefit plans of the industrial minerals segment, which
is reported as a discontinued operation as of December 31, 2000, was $0.1
million. These plans were transferred as part of the sale of the K-T Clay Group
during 2001.
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and
fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations
in excess of plan assets were $1,436,000, $1,436,000 and zero, respectively, as
of December 31, 2002, and $1,303,000, $1,303,000 and zero, respectively, as of
December 31, 2001.
F-26
We have a nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, which permits
eligible officers, directors and key employees to defer a portion of their
compensation. In November 1998, we amended the plan to permit participants to
transfer all or a portion of their deferred compensation amounts into a Hecla
common stock account to be held in trust until distribution. As of December 31,
2002 and 2001, a total of 20,442 and 102,114 shares, respectively, of our common
stock are held in the grantor trust. Shares held in the grantor trust are valued
at fair value at the time of issuance, are recorded in the contra equity account
"Stock held by grantor trust," and are legally outstanding for registration
purposes and dividend payments. The shares held in the grantor trust are
considered outstanding for purposes of calculating loss per share. The deferred
compensation, together with company matching amounts and accumulated interest,
is distributable in cash after retirement or termination of employment, and at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, amounted to approximately $1.0 and $2.3 million,
respectively. During 2001, the plan was terminated and amounts were distributed
during 2002 with the remaining balance to be distributed in 2003.
In 2002, a new Deferred Compensation Plan was approved by our
shareholders and allows eligible officers and key employees to defer a portion
or all of their compensation. A total of 6.0 million shares of common stock are
authorized under this plan. Deferred amounts may be allocated to either an
investment account or a stock account. The investment account is similar to a
cash account and bears interest at the prime rate. In the stock account,
quarterly deferred amounts and a 10% matching amount are converted into stock
units equal to the average closing price of our common stock over a quarterly
period. At the end of each quarterly period, participants are eligible to elect
to convert a portion of their investment account into either the stock account,
with no matching contribution, or participants may utilize the investment
account to purchase discounted stock options. During 2002, participants
purchased approximately 6,740 discounted stock options under the Plan. As of
December 31, 2002, the deferred compensation, together with matching amounts and
accumulated interest, is distributable based upon distribution dates as elected
by the participants, and amounted to approximately $0.1 million.
We have an employees' Capital Accumulation Plan, which is available to
all salaried and certain hourly employees after completion of two months of
service. Employees may contribute from 2% to 15% of their compensation to the
plan. We make a matching contribution of 25% of an employee's contribution up
to, but not exceeding, 6% of the employee's earnings. Our contribution was
approximately $88,000 in 2002, $102,000 in 2001, and $232,700 in 2000. Our
contribution for 2001 was paid through the issuance of 53,842 shares of our
treasury stock.
We have an employee's 401(k) plan, which is available to all hourly
employees at the Lucky Friday mine after completion of six months of service.
Employees may contribute from 2% to 15% of their compensation to the plan. We
make a matching contribution of 25% of an employee's contribution up to, but not
exceeding, 5% of the employee's earnings. Our contribution was approximately
$19,000 in 2002, $40,000 in 2001, and $60,000 in 2000.
NOTE 10: SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred Stock
We are authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $0.25 per share. The preferred stock is issuable in series with such
voting rights, if any, designations, powers, preferences and other rights and
such qualifications, limitations and restrictions as may be determined by our
board of directors or a duly authorized committee thereof, without stockholder
approval. The board may fix the number of shares constituting each series and
increase or decrease the number of shares of any series.
Holders of the preferred shares are entitled to receive cumulative cash
dividends at the annual rate of $3.50 per share payable quarterly, when and if
declared by our board of directors and have voting rights related to certain
amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation. As of January 31, 2002, we had
not declared and paid the equivalent of six quarterly dividends, entitling
holders of the preferred shares to elect two directors at our annual
shareholders' meeting. On May 10, 2002, holders of the preferred shares, voting
as a class, elected two additional directors. One of these directors has since
resigned and the remaining director is anticipated to fill the vacancy during
2003.
The preferred shares are convertible, in whole or in part, at the
option of the holders thereof, into shares of common stock at an initial
conversion price of $15.55 per share of common stock. The preferred shares are
F-27
redeemable at our option at $50.00 per share (plus $0.35 per share if redeemed
between July 1, 2002 and June 30, 2003), plus all dividends in arrears up to the
date fixed for redemption.
On June 13, 2002, we announced our intent to offer to holders of our
preferred shares an exchange of each of their preferred shares for seven shares
of our common stock. A total of 1,546,598 shares, or 67.2%, of the total number
of preferred shares outstanding were validly tendered and exchanged into
10,826,186 shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2002, 753,402 shares
of preferred stock remained outstanding.
As a result of this exchange, we incurred a non-cash dividend charge of
approximately $17.6 million, which represents the difference between the value
of the common stock issued in the exchange offer and the value of the shares
that were issuable under the stated conversion terms of the preferred stock. The
non-cash dividend charge had no impact on our total shareholders' equity, as the
offset was an increase in common stock and surplus. As a result of the completed
exchange offer, the total of cumulative preferred dividends was $23.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2002. Beginning in 2003, the $8.0 million annual
cumulative preferred dividends that have historically been included in the
calculation of earnings applicable to common shareholders will be reduced to
approximately $2.6 million. The completed exchange offering also eliminated
$11.2 million of previously undeclared and unpaid preferred stock dividends.
The preferred shares rank senior as to dividends and upon liquidation
to the common stock and any outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Shares. The
preferred shares have a liquidation preference of $50.00 per share plus all
undeclared and unpaid dividends. Such preference totaled $44,262,000 at December
31, 2002.
Shareholder Rights Plan
Each share of our common stock is accompanied by a preferred stock
purchase right (Right) that trades with the share of common stock. Upon the
terms and subject to the conditions of our Rights Agreement dated as of May 10,
1996 (Rights Agreement), a holder of a Right is entitled to purchase one
one-hundredth of a share of preferred stock at an exercise price of $50, subject
to adjustment, in several circumstances, including upon merger. The Rights are
currently represented by the certificates for our common stock and are not
separately transferable. Transferable rights certificates will be issued at the
earlier of (i) the 10th day after the public announcement that any person or
group has acquired beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our common stock (an
Acquiring Person) or (ii) the 10th day after a person commences, or announces an
intention to commence, a tender or exchange offer the consummation of which
would result in any person or group becoming an Acquiring Person. The 15%
threshold for becoming an Acquiring Person may be reduced by the board of
directors to not less than 10% prior to any such acquisition.
F-28
All the outstanding Rights may be redeemed by us for $0.01 per Right
prior to such time that any person or group becomes an Acquiring Person. Under
certain circumstances, the board of directors may decide to exchange each Right
(except Rights held by an Acquiring Person) for one share of common stock. The
Rights will expire on May 19, 2006, unless earlier redeemed. Additional details
regarding the Rights are set forth in the Rights Agreement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 1996.
Stock Based Plans
At December 31, 2002, executives, key employees and directors had been
granted options to purchase our common shares or were credited with common
shares under the stock based plans described below. We have adopted the
disclosure-only provisions of SFAS 123. No compensation expense has been
recognized in 2002, 2001 or 2000 for unexercised options related to the stock
option plans. Had compensation cost for our stock option plans been determined
based on the fair market value at the grant date for awards in 2002, 2001 and
2000 consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123, our loss and per share loss
applicable to common shareholders would have been increased to the pro forma
amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ------------------ -----------------
Loss applicable to common shareholders:
As reported $ 14,614 $ 5,710 $ 92,015
Stock-based employee compensation
expense included in reported loss (796) (164) (9)
Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair
value based method for all awards 2,353 944 931
------------------ ------------------ -----------------
Pro forma $ 16,171 $ 6,490 $ 92,937
================== ================== =================
Loss applicable to common shareholders per share:
As reported $ 0.18 $ 0.08 $ 1.38
Pro forma $ 0.20 $ 0.09 $ 1.39
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions:
2002 2001 2000
--------- --------- ---------
Expected dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Expected stock price volatility 78.89% 61.24% 49.03%
Risk-free interest rate 2.09% 4.68% 6.74%
Expected life of options 3.0 years 4.3 years 4.1 years
The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2002, 2001 and
2000 was $1.38, $0.47 and $0.51, respectively.
We adopted a nonstatutory stock option plan in 1987. The plan provides
that options may be granted to certain officers and key employees to purchase
common stock at a price of not less than 50% of the fair market value at the
date of grant. The plan also provides that options may be granted with a
corresponding number of stock appreciation rights and/or tax offset bonuses to
assist the optionee in paying the income tax liability that may exist upon
exercise of the options. All of the outstanding stock options under the 1987
plan were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value at the
date of grant and with an associated tax offset bonus. Outstanding options under
the 1987 plan are immediately exercisable for periods up to ten years. During
2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, 46,000, 8,000 and 23,500 options to acquire
shares expired under the 1987 plan. The ability to grant further options under
the plan expired on February 13, 1997.
F-29
Our officers and employees, designated by the committee of the board
designated to administer the plan who are responsible for or who contribute to
our management, growth and profitability are eligible to be granted awards under
the Hecla Mining Company 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (1995 Stock Incentive Plan).
Stock options, including incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and performance units are available
for grant under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan by the committee in its
discretion. The 1995 Stock Incentive Plan as amended in 2002 authorizes the
issuance of up to 6,000,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the grant or
exercise of awards under the plan. The board committee that administers the 1995
Stock Incentive Plan has broad authority to fix the terms and conditions of
individual agreements with participants, including the duration of the award and
any vesting requirements. The 1995 Stock Incentive Plan will terminate 15 years
after the effective date of the plan.
At the time an award is made under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan or at
any time thereafter, the committee may grant to the participant receiving such
award the right to receive a cash payment in an amount specified by the
committee, to be paid at such time or times as the award results in compensation
income to the participant, for the purpose of assisting the participant to pay
the resulting taxes, all as determined by the committee and on such other terms
and conditions as the committee shall determine.
During 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, options to acquire 1,095,000,
698,000 and 481,000 shares were granted to our officers and key employees of
which 1,095,000, 641,000 and 385,000, respectively, of these options were
granted with vesting requirements. Under the vesting requirements for 2002, 33%
of the shares subject to options were purchaseable and were available on the
date of the grant, with an additional 33% made available on July 22, 2002, due
to the stock price remaining $1.00 above the grant price for ten consecutive
days. The remaining 33% will become available on the first to occur of the
second anniversary of grant or when the stock price remains $2.00 above the
grant price for ten consecutive days. For the options granted during 2002, there
is no tax offset bonus provision. During 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively,
4,000, 114,500 and 947,500 options to acquire shares expired under the 1995
plan.
In March 2002, 431,277 shares of our common stock were issued to key
personnel for incentive compensation earned during the year ended December 31,
2001, under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan.
In November 2001, 76,142 shares of our restricted common stock were
issued to one of our officers as a component of the officer's base salary for
the twelve-month period commencing December 1, 2001. These shares were issued
under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan.
At December 31, 2002, there were 2,192,581 shares available for future
grant under the 1995 plan.
In 1995, we adopted the Hecla Mining Company Stock Plan for Nonemployee
Directors (the Directors' Stock Plan), which may be terminated by our board of
directors at any time. Each nonemployee director was credited with 1,000 shares
of our common stock on May 30 of each year. On July 18, 2002, holders of our
common stock approved an amendment to the Directors' Stock Plan to change the
number of shares of common stock to be delivered to each nonemployee director
annually from 1,000 shares to that number of shares determined by dividing
$10,000 by the average closing price for our common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange for the prior calendar year. This amendment was retroactive to our
board of directors approval of the amendment on May 10, 2002. Nonemployee
directors joining our board of directors after May 30 of any year are credited
with a pro-rata number of shares based upon the date they join the Board.
All credited shares are held in trust for the benefit of each director
until delivered to the director. Delivery of the shares from the trust occurs
upon the earliest of (1) death or disability; (2) retirement; (3) a cessation of
the director's service for any other reason; or (4) a change in control. Subject
to certain restrictions, directors may elect to receive delivery of shares on
such date or in annual installments thereafter over 5, 10 or 15 years. The
shares of our common stock credited to nonemployee directors pursuant to the
Directors' Stock Plan may not be sold until at least six months following the
date they are delivered. The maximum number of shares of common stock which may
be granted pursuant to the Directors' Stock Plan was increased from 120,000 to
1,000,000 in 2002. During 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, 72,681, 7,000 and
8,000 shares were credited to the nonemployee directors. During 2002, 2001 and
2000, $70,000, $7,000 and $9,000, respectively, were charged to operations
associated with the Directors' Stock Plan. At December 31, 2002, there were
849,589 shares available for grant in the future under the plan.
F-30
Transactions concerning stock options pursuant to all of the
above-described stock option plans are summarized as follows:
Weighted Average
Shares Exercise Price
------------------- ----------------
Outstanding, December 31, 1999 2,307,915 $ 5.39
Year ended December 31, 2000
Granted 481,000 $ 1.31
Exercised -- $ --
Expired (973,415) $ 4.40
-------------------
Outstanding, December 31, 2000 1,815,500 $ 4.85
Year ended December 31, 2001
Granted 698,000 $ 1.13
Exercised -- $ --
Expired (122,500) $ 2.41
-------------------
Outstanding, December 31, 2001 2,391,000 $ 3.89
Year ended December 31, 2002
Granted 1,095,000 $ 3.25
Exercised (634,330) $ 1.85
Expired (50,000) $ 9.75
-------------------
Outstanding, December 31, 2002 2,801,670 $ 3.99
===================
The following table displays exercisable stock options and the weighted
average exercise price of the exercisable options as of December 31, 2002, 2001
and 2000:
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Exercisable options 2,467,714 1,701,400 1,322,533
Weighted average exercise price $ 4.09 $ 4.62 $ 5.36
The following table presents information about the stock options
outstanding as of December 31, 2002:
Weighted Average
----------------
Range of Remaining
Shares Exercise Price Exercise Price Life (years)
------ -------------- -------------- ------------
Exercisable options 488,001 $ 1.13 - $ 1.31 $ 1.15 4
Exercisable options 323,500 $ 2.88 - $ 2.88 $ 2.88 6
Exercisable options 667,713 $ 3.23 - $ 3.48 $ 3.25 3
Exercisable options 775,000 $ 5.63 - $ 8.00 $ 5.86 5
Exercisable options 213,500 $ 8.63 - $ 9.63 $ 8.91 2
-----------
Total exercisable options 2,467,714 $ 1.13 - $ 9.63 $ 4.09 4
Unexercisable options 333,956 $ 3.23 - $ 3.48 $ 3.25 3
-----------
Total all options 2,801,670 $ 1.13 - $ 9.63 $ 3.99 4
===========
F-31
For the year ended December 31, 2002, approximately $0.7 million was
recognized for tax offset bonus expenditures and accruals on employee stock
option plans. No amounts were charged to operations in connection with the stock
option plans in 2001 or 2000.
Common Stock Offerings
In January 2003, we completed an underwritten public offering of 23.0
million newly issued shares of our common stock. Net proceeds from the offering
totaled approximately $91.2 million, which will be used to fund future
exploration and development, working capital requirements, capital expenditures,
possible future acquisitions and for other general corporate purposes. The
public offering also included 2.0 million shares held by the Hecla Mining
Company Retirement Plan and the Lucky Friday Pension Plan (the Benefit Plans).
The benefit plans realized net proceeds of approximately $8.0 million from the
sale of the 2.0 million shares included in the public offering.
We also filed a Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission covering 1,394,883 shares of our common stock held by the benefit
plans and 2,000,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of
warrants issued to Great Basin Gold Ltd. (Great Basin) pursuant to an Earn-in
Agreement discussed in Note 4. The Registration Statement became effective in
January 2003.
In August 2001, we issued 5,749,883 shares of our common stock in a
private placement transaction for the benefit of the Hecla Mining Company
Retirement Plan and the Lucky Friday Pension Plan for approximately $5.5
million. Proceeds from the private placement were available for general
corporate purposes.
In connection with a May 1999 stock offering, we issued warrants to
purchase 1,603,998 shares of our common stock exercisable until May 11, 2002.
Each warrant entitled the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an
exercise price equal to the lesser of (i) $3.19, or (ii) 102% of the volume
weighted average price on the NYSE for each trading day during the ten
consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date that notice of exercise
is given to us. During 2002 and 2001, warrants to purchase 1,098,801 and 408,000
shares, respectively, were exercised. Proceeds of $1.8 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, were realized from the exercise of the warrants in 2002 and 2001.
NOTE 11: BUSINESS SEGMENTS
We are organized and managed primarily on the basis of our principal
products being produced from our operating units. Three of our operating units
have been aggregated into the Silver segment, one into the Gold segment and one
operating unit has been designated as part of the Industrial Minerals segment.
During November 2000, the Industrial Minerals segment was designated as a
discontinued operation. For further discussion, see Note 2 - Discontinued
Operations. General corporate activities not associated with operating units, as
well as idle properties, are presented as Other. Interest expense is considered
a general corporate expense and is not allocated to segments.
F-32
The tables below present information about reportable segments as of
and for the years ended December 31 (in thousands). Information related to the
statement of operations data relates to continuing operations only. See Note 2
for information related to the Industrial Minerals segment operations.
2002 2001 2000
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Net sales to unaffiliated customers:
Silver $ 56,404 $ 43,795 $ 44,277
Gold 49,296 41,452 31,573
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
$ 105,700 $ 85,247 $ 75,850
================== ================= ==================
Income (loss) from operations:
Silver $ 4,149 $ (8,640) $ (37,699)
Gold 13,741 11,525 (13,982)
Other (8,135) (9,117) (27,834)
------------------- ------------------ -------------------
$ 9,755 $ (6,232) $ (79,515)
================== ================== ===================
Capital expenditures (including noncash additions):
Silver $ 4,690 $ 13,183 $ 6,670
Gold 5,814 4,692 4,592
Discontinued operations -- 145 3,921
Other 715 15 27
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
$ 11,219 $ 18,035 $ 15,210
================== ================= ==================
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
Silver $ 11,263 $ 10,607 $ 10,809
Gold 11,273 9,868 7,282
Other 116 265 282
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
$ 22,652 $ 20,740 $ 18,373
================== ================= ==================
Other significant noncash items:
Silver $ 1,117 $ 707 $ 31,759
Gold 4,420 354 9,241
Discontinued operations 135 -- 159
Other 296 44 17,329
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
$ 5,968 $ 1,105 $ 58,488
================== ================= ==================
Identifiable assets:
Silver $ 82,522 $ 84,845 $ 81,572
Gold 40,004 40,489 42,667
Industrial Minerals 686 -- --
Discontinued operations -- 2,714 44,057
Other 36,929 25,068 26,540
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
$ 160,141 $ 153,116 $ 194,836
================== ================= ==================
F-33
The following is sales information for continuing operations by
geographic area for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
----------------- ------------------ ------------------
United States $ 7,779 $ 15,895 $ 25,147
Canada 13,276 15,951 15,274
Mexico 22,929 12,018 6,193
United Kingdom 28,070 20,771 22,417
Japan 24,090 13,018 3,556
Other foreign 9,556 7,594 3,263
----------------- ------------------ ------------------
$ 105,700 $ 85,247 $ 75,850
================= ================== ==================
The following is sales information for continuing operations by country
of origin for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
2002 2001 2000
----------------- ------------------ ------------------
United States $ 33,439 $ 36,058 $ 51,019
Venezuela 48,730 41,406 24,780
Mexico 23,531 7,783 51
----------------- ------------------ ------------------
$ 105,700 $ 85,247 $ 75,850
================= ================== ==================
The following is properties, plants and equipment information for
continuing operations by geographic area as of December 31 (in thousands):
2002 2001
------------------ -----------------
United States $ 64,031 $ 69,791
Venezuela 20,250 25,677
Mexico 8,084 9,125
------------------ -----------------
$ 92,365 $ 104,593
================== =================
Sales to significant metals customers as a percentage of total sales
from the Silver and Gold segments were as follows for the years ended December
31:
2002 2001 2000
------------- ------------- -------------
Standard Bank London 24.8% 25.2% 24.9%
Met-Mex Penoles, S.A. de C.V. 21.7% 14.1% 8.2%
Mitsubishi International Corp. 19.9% 11.2% --%
Teck Cominco Ltd. 12.6% 16.3% 16.3%
HSBC Bank USA 6.1% 13.8% 15.5%
NOTE 12: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following estimated fair value amounts have been determined using
available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However,
considerable judgment is required to interpret market data and to develop the
estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts we could realize in a current market
exchange.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair
value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to
estimate that value. Potential income tax ramifications related to the
F-34
realization of unrealized gains and losses that would be incurred in an actual
sale or settlement have not been taken into consideration.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes
receivable, restricted investments and current liabilities are a reasonable
estimate of their fair values. Fair value for equity securities investments is
determined by quoted market prices as recognized in the financial statements.
Fair value of forward contracts and commodity swap contracts are supplied by our
counterparties and reflect the difference between the contract prices and
forward prices available on the date of valuation. The fair value of long-term
debt is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows and at December
31, 2002, and 2001 approximates fair value. The discount rate is estimated using
the rates currently offered for debt with similar remaining maturities.
The estimated fair values of other financial instruments are as follows
(in thousands):
December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001
------------------------------- ------------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amounts Value Amounts Value
-------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Financial assets (liabilities):
Gold forward sales contracts $ -- $ (6,480) $ 256 $ 576
Gold lease rate swap $ 307 $ 307 $ (56) $ (56)
NOTE 13: INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators used in the basic and diluted income (loss) per common share
computations. Also shown is the effect that has been given to cumulative
preferred dividends in arriving at the losses applicable to common shareholders
in computing basic and diluted loss per common share (dollars and shares in
thousands, except per share amounts). A non-cash dividend of approximately $17.6
million was included in the 2002 amounts related to the completed preferred
stock exchange offering. For additional information relating to the exchange
offering, see Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2002 2001 2000
------------- ------------- -------------
Income (loss) before extraordinary item
and preferred stock dividends $ 8,639 $ 2,340 $ (83,318)
Less: Extraordinary item -- -- (647)
Less: Preferred stock dividends (23,253) (8,050) (8,050)
-------------- ------------- -------------
Basis and diluted loss applicable to common
shareholders $ (14,614) $ (5,710) $ (92,015)
============== ============= =============
Basic and dilutive weighted average shares 80,250 69,396 66,791
------------- ------------- -------------
Basic and diluted loss per common share $ (0.18) $ (0.08) $ (1.38)
============= ============= =============
These calculations of diluted losses per share exclude the effects of
convertible preferred stock ($37.7 million in 2002 and $115.0 million in 2001
and 2000), as well as common stock issuable upon the exercise of various stock
options and warrants, as their conversion and exercise would be antidilutive, as
follows:
2002 2001 2000
----------------- ------------------ ------------------
Stock Options 2,801,670 2,317,000 1,816,000
Warrants 2,000,000 1,098,801 1,506,998
F-35
NOTE 14: OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Due to the availability of U.S. net operating losses and related
deferred tax valuation allowances, there is no tax effect associated with any
component of other comprehensive income (loss). The following table lists the
beginning balance, yearly activity and ending balance of each component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):
Total
Unrealized Accumulated
Foreign Gains Change in Other
Currency (Losses) Derivative Comprehensive
Items On Securities Contracts(1) Income (Loss)
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance December 31, 1999 $ (4,898) $ 27 $ -- $ (4,871)
2000 change -- 13 -- 13
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Balance December 31, 2000 (4,898) 40 -- (4,858)
2001 change 4,898 (26) 159 5,031
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------
Balance December 31, 2001 -- 14 159 173
2002 change -- 9 (218) (209)
------------- ------------- -------------- --------------
Balance December 31, 2002 $ -- $ 23 $ (59) $ (36)
============= ============= ============== ==============
(1) Included in the change in derivative contracts for the year ended
December 31, 2001, is a $136,000 loss on the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS
133, $39,000 of realization on gold lease swaps during 2001 and a fair value
gain adjustment on swaps outstanding at December 31, 2001, of $256,000. Included
in the change in derivative contracts for the year ended December 31, 2002, was
$38,000 of realization on gold lease swaps during 2002 and a fair value loss
adjustment on swaps expired in January 2002.
NOTE 15: INVESTMENT IN GREENS CREEK JOINT VENTURE
We hold a 29.73% interest in the Greens Creek mine through a
joint-venture arrangement. We record our portion of the assets and liabilities
of the Greens Creek mine on the proportionate consolidation method whereby
29.73% of the assets and liabilities of the Greens Creek mine are included in
our consolidated financial statements. The following summarized balance sheets
as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related summarized statement of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, are derived from the
audited financial statements of the Greens Creek Joint Venture. The financial
information below is presented on a 100% basis (in thousands).
Balance Sheet: 2002 2001
------------------ -----------------
Assets:
Current assets $ 22,945 $ 18,666
Property, plant and equipment, net 144,515 155,028
------------------ -----------------
Total assets $ 167,460 $ 173,694
================== =================
Liabilities and equity:
Liabilities $ 16,642 $ 14,813
Equity 150,818 158,881
------------------ -----------------
Total liabilities and equity $ 167,460 $ 173,694
================== =================
Summary of Operations:
Net Revenue $ 85,429 $ 75,432
================== =================
Operating income (loss) $ 5,274 $ (3,694)
================== =================
Net income (loss) $ 5,437 $ (3,658)
================== =================
F-36
The Greens Creek mine is operated through a joint-venture arrangement,
and we own an undivided 29.73% interest in the assets of the venture. Under the
joint-venture agreement, the joint participants, including us, are entitled to
indemnification from the other participants and are severally liable only for
the liabilities of the participants in proportion to their interest therein. If
a participant defaults on its obligations under the terms of the joint venture,
we could incur losses in excess of our pro-rata share of the joint venture. In
the event any participant so defaults, the agreement provides certain rights and
remedies to the remaining participants. These include the right to force a
dilution of the percentage interest of the defaulting participant and the right
to utilize the proceeds from the sale of the defaulting party's share of
products, or its joint-venture interest in the properties, to satisfy the
obligations of the defaulting participant. Based on the information available to
us, we have no reason to believe that our joint-venture participants with
respect to Greens Creek mine will be unable to meet their financial obligations
under the terms of the agreement.
F-37
================================================================================
3,394,883 SHARES
[LOGO]
HECLA MINING COMPANY
COMMON STOCK
-------------------
PROSPECTUS
-------------------
APRIL __, 2003
================================================================================
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all
of the requirements for filing on Form S-1 and has duly caused this registration
statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Coeur d'Alene, State of Idaho on April 28, 2003.
HECLA MINING COMPANY
By: /s/ Arthur Brown
-------------------------------------
Arthur Brown
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement, or amendment thereto, has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on
April 28, 2003.
Signature Title
--------- -----
/s/ Arthur Brown Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
-------------------------------- (principal executive officer)
Arthur Brown
/s/ Phillips S. Baker, Jr. President, Chief Operating Officer,
-------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer (principal
Phillips S. Baker, Jr. financial officer) and Director
/s/ Lewis E. Walde Vice President - Controller (principal
-------------------------------- accounting officer) and Treasurer
Lewis E. Walde
/s/ John E. Clute Director
--------------------------------
John E. Clute
/s/ Joe Coors, Jr. Director
--------------------------------
Joe Coors, Jr.
/s/ Theodore Crumley Director
--------------------------------
Theodore Crumley
/s/ Charles L. McAlpine Director
--------------------------------
Charles L. McAlpine
/s/ Jorge E. Ordonez Director
--------------------------------
Jorge E. Ordonez
/s/ Anthony P. Taylor Director
--------------------------------
Anthony P. Taylor
Exhibit Index
-------------
3.1(a) Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant as amended to
date. Filed as exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1987 (File No.
1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
3.1(b) Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of
the Registrant. Filed as exhibit 3.1(b) to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1987 (File
No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
3.2 By-Laws of the Registrant as amended to date. Filed as exhibit
3(ii) to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 13, 1998 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by
reference.
4.1(a) Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series
A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Registrant.
Filed as exhibit 4.1(d)(e) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993 (File No.
1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
4.1(b) Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series
B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant.
Filed as exhibit 4.5 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993 (File No. 1-8491) and
incorporated herein by reference.
4.2 Rights Agreement dated as of May 10, 1996, between Hecla
Mining Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company,
which includes the form of Rights Certificate of Designation
setting forth the terms of the Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock of Hecla Mining Company as Exhibit A and the
summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares as Exhibit B.
Filed as exhibit 4 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated May 10, 1996 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein
by reference.
4.3 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 27, 2001 between
Hecla Mining Company and Copper Mountain Trust.**
4.4 Warrant Agreement dated August 2, 2002 between Hecla Mining
Company and Great Basin Gold Ltd.**
4.5 Registration Rights Agreement dated August 2, 2002 between
Hecla Mining Company and Great Basin Gold Ltd.**
Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of
long-term debt of the Registrant and its consolidated
subsidiaries, where the total amount of securities authorized
under any such instrument does not exceed 10% of the
Registrant's consolidated total assets, are not filed herewith
pursuant to Item 601(b)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-K. The
Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to
the Commission upon request.
5.1 Opinion (including consent) of Michael B. White, Esq. as to
the legality of the securities being registered.**
10.1 Fourth Amendment to Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
December 30, 1999, among NationsBank, N.A. and Registrant.
Filed as exhibit 10.1(e) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 1-8491)
and incorporated herein by reference.
10.2 Employment agreement dated June 1, 2000, between Hecla Mining
Company and Arthur Brown. (Registrant has substantially
identical agreements with each of Messrs. Phillips S. Baker,
Thomas F. Fudge, Michael H. Callahan, Ronald W. Clayton, Lewis
E. Walde and Ms. Vicki J. Veltkamp. Such substantially
identical agreements are not included as separate Exhibits.)
Filed as exhibit 10.2 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 (File No.
1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.3(a) Form of Executive Deferral Plan Master Document, as amended,
effective November 13, 1993. Filed as exhibit 10.3(a) to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by
reference.
10.3(b) Form of Director Deferral Plan Master Plan Document effective
January 1, 1995. Filed as exhibit 10.3(b) to Registrant's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1994 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.4(a) 1987 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan of the Registrant. Filed
as exhibit B to Registrant's Proxy Statement dated March 20,
1987 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.4(b) Hecla Mining Company 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as
exhibit 10.4(c) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 (File No. 1-8491) and
incorporated herein by reference.
10.4(c) Hecla Mining Company Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors.
Filed as exhibit B to Registrant's Proxy Statement dated March
27, 1995 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by
reference.
10.4(d) Hecla Mining Company Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan.
Filed as exhibit 4.3 to Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-8 filed on July 24, 2002 (File No. 1-8491) and
incorporated herein by reference.
10.5(a) Hecla Mining Company Retirement Plan for Employees and
Supplemental Retirement and Death Benefit Plan. Filed as
exhibit 10.11(a) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1985 (File No. 1-8491) and
incorporated herein by reference.
10.5(b) Supplemental Excess Retirement Master Plan Documents. Filed as
exhibit 10.5(b) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1994 (File No. 1-8491) and
incorporated herein by reference.
10.5(c) Hecla Mining Company Nonqualified Plans Master Trust
Agreement. Filed as exhibit 10.5(c) to Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 (File
No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.6 Form of Indemnification Agreement dated May 27, 1987, between
Hecla Mining Company and each of its Directors and Officers.
Filed as exhibit 10.15 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1987 (File No. 1-8491)
and incorporated herein by reference.
10.7 Summary of Short-term Performance Payment Plan. Filed as
exhibit 10.7 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1994 (File No. 1-8491) and
incorporated herein by reference.
10.8(a) Amended and Restated Golden Eagle Earn-In Agreement between
Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corporation and Hecla Mining Company
dated as of September 6, 1996. Filed as exhibit 10.11(a) to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 1996 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated
herein by reference.
10.8(b) Golden Eagle Operating Agreement between Santa Fe Pacific Gold
Corporation and Hecla Mining Company dated as of September 6,
1996. Filed as exhibit 10.11(b) to Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996
(File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.8(c) First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Golden Eagle
Earn-in Agreement effective September 5, 2002 by and between
Echo Bay Mines Ltd. and Hecla Mining Company.**
10.9 Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Rosebud Mining
Company, LLC among Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corporation and Hecla
Mining Company dated as of September 6, 1996. Filed as exhibit
10.12 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1996 (File No. 1-8491) and
incorporated herein by reference.
10.10 Restated Mining Venture Agreement among Kennecott Greens Creek
Mining Company, Hecla Mining Company and CSX Alaska Mining
Inc. dated May 6, 1994. Filed as exhibit 99.A to Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1994 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.11 Credit Agreement dated as of June 25, 1999, among Monarch
Resources Investments Limited as Borrower, Monarch Minera
Suramericana, C.A. as an additional obligor and Standard Bank
London Limited as Collateral and Administrative Agent. Filed
as exhibit 10.3 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 1-8491) and
incorporated herein by reference.
10.12 Subordinated Loan Agreement dated as of June 25, 1999, among
Hecla Mining Company as Borrower and Standard Bank London
Limited as Initial Lender, Collateral and Administrative
Agent. Filed as exhibit 10.4 to Registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (File No.
1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.13 Subordination Agreement dated as of June 25, 1999, among
NationsBank, N.A. as Senior Creditor, Standard Bank London
Limited as Subordinated Creditor and Hecla Mining Company.
Filed as exhibit 10.5 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 1-8491) and
incorporated herein by reference.
10.14 Subordinated Loan Agreement dated June 29, 2000, among Hecla
Mining Company as Borrower and Standard Bank London Limited as
Lender. Filed as exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (File No.
1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.15 Subordination Agreement dated June 29, 2000, among Hecla
Mining Company and Standard Bank London Limited as Senior
Creditor and Subordinated Creditor. Filed as exhibit 10.2 to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein
by reference.
10.16 Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 27, 2001, between
Hecla Mining Company and IMERYS USA, Inc. Filed as exhibit 99
to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 27,
2001 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by reference.
10.17 Form of Retention Agreement dated July 20, 2001, between Hecla
Mining Company and Arthur Brown. (Registrant has substantially
identical agreements, with each of Messrs. Thomas F. Fudge,
Lewis E. Walde and Ms. Vicki J. Veltkamp. Filed as exhibit
10.19 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2001 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated
herein by reference.
10.18 Retention Agreement dated November 6, 2001 between Hecla
Mining Company and Phillips S. Baker, Jr.**
10.19 Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement between Hecla Mining
Company and JDL Enterprises, LLC dated October 19, 2001. Filed
as exhibit 10.21 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 1-8491) and
incorporated herein by reference.
10.20 Credit Agreement dated March 27, 2002 between Hecla Mining
Company and IIG Capital LLC.**
10.21 Earn-In Agreement dated August 2, 2002 between Hecla Ventures
Corp. and Rodeo Creek.**
10.22 Lease Agreement dated September 5, 2002 between Hecla Mining
Company and CVG-Minerven.**
11. Computation of weighted average number of common shares
outstanding.*
12. Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges.**
21. List of subsidiaries of the Registrant. Filed as exhibit 21 to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 (File No. 1-8491) and incorporated herein by
reference.
23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.*
23.2 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.*
23.3 Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP.*
23.4 Consent of SRK Consulting.*
23.5 Consent of AMEC E&C Services.*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Filed herewith.
** Previously filed as an exhibit to this Registration Statement