e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
May 26, 2006
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from
to
|
Commission file number 1-11098
SOLECTRON CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-2447045
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
847 Gibraltar Drive
Milpitas, California 95035
(Address of principal executive
offices including zip code)
(408) 957-8500
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date.
At June 29, 2006, 907,871,779 shares of Common Stock
of the Registrant were outstanding (including approximately
20.2 million shares of Solectron Global Services Canada,
Inc., which are exchangeable on a
one-to-one
basis for the Registrants common stock)
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION
INDEX TO
FORM 10-Q
1
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
August 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments*
|
|
$
|
1,269.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,722.3
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
1,351.1
|
|
|
|
1,180.7
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,480.4
|
|
|
|
1,108.5
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
273.0
|
|
|
|
211.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
4,373.6
|
|
|
|
4,222.9
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
691.4
|
|
|
|
666.3
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
152.4
|
|
|
|
148.8
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
216.6
|
|
|
|
219.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,434.0
|
|
|
$
|
5,257.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
78.9
|
|
|
$
|
165.7
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,617.8
|
|
|
|
1,371.2
|
|
Accrued employee compensation
|
|
|
167.0
|
|
|
|
167.0
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
465.3
|
|
|
|
509.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,329.0
|
|
|
|
2,213.5
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
627.5
|
|
|
|
540.9
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
78.4
|
|
|
|
59.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
3,034.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,813.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
7,600.9
|
|
|
|
7,774.1
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(5,110.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5,206.5
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(92.7
|
)
|
|
|
(124.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,399.1
|
|
|
|
2,444.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,434.0
|
|
|
$
|
5,257.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes $31.4 million and $13.2 million of restricted
cash balances as of May 31, 2006 and August 31, 2005,
respectively, and $24.7 million and $26.3 million of
short term investments as of May 31, 2006 and
August 31, 2005, respectively. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
2
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
May 31
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share
data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,702.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,596.0
|
|
|
$
|
7,658.6
|
|
|
$
|
8,042.6
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,560.4
|
|
|
|
2,461.4
|
|
|
|
7,261.8
|
|
|
|
7,594.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
134.6
|
|
|
|
396.8
|
|
|
|
448.0
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
112.2
|
|
|
|
109.7
|
|
|
|
323.9
|
|
|
|
310.0
|
|
Restructuring and impairment costs
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
84.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
|
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
53.6
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)
|
|
|
(50.3
|
)
|
Other expense net
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(47.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(42.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) from
continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
(68.1
|
)
|
|
|
78.9
|
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
(66.7
|
)
|
|
|
79.7
|
|
|
|
(22.3
|
)
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
(64.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
96.4
|
|
|
$
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income(loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute basic net
income (loss) per share
|
|
|
908.1
|
|
|
|
978.4
|
|
|
|
916.2
|
|
|
|
968.4
|
|
Shares used to compute diluted net
income (loss) per share
|
|
|
909.6
|
|
|
|
978.4
|
|
|
|
917.2
|
|
|
|
968.4
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
3
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
(64.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
96.4
|
|
|
$
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
64.7
|
|
|
$
|
(65.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
128.1
|
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated unrealized foreign currency translation losses were
$82.5 million at May 31, 2006 and $114.2 million
at August 31, 2005. Foreign currency translation
adjustments consist of adjustments to consolidate subsidiaries
that use the local currency as their functional currency and
transaction gains and losses related to intercompany
dollar-denominated debt that is not expected to be repaid in the
foreseeable future.
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
4
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
96.4
|
|
|
$
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
130.4
|
|
|
|
148.2
|
|
Impairment of property, equipment
and other long-term assets, net
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
Loss on debt retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.3
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on termination of interest
rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowance
|
|
|
(168.2
|
)
|
|
|
259.8
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(371.7
|
)
|
|
|
268.6
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
(65.6
|
)
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
246.6
|
|
|
|
(74.3
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(104.9
|
)
|
|
|
702.8
|
|
Net cash (used in) operating
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
(113.1
|
)
|
|
|
696.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale (purchase) of available
for sale securities, net
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
(28.8
|
)
|
Change in restricted cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Settlement of receivable related to
synthetic lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(155.6
|
)
|
|
|
(102.0
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Receipts from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(160.6
|
)
|
|
|
(75.3
|
)
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(143.5
|
)
|
|
|
(62.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities of continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayment of bank lines of
credit and other debt arrangements
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(23.3
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net
|
|
|
147.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments made to redeem ACES and
Senior Notes
|
|
|
(150.0
|
)
|
|
|
(544.7
|
)
|
Common stock repurchase
|
|
|
(205.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Proceeds from termination of swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72.5
|
|
Net proceeds from stock issued
under option and employee purchase plans
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(204.3
|
)
|
|
|
(505.1
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(213.2
|
)
|
|
|
(512.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(469.8
|
)
|
|
|
129.6
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
continuing operations at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,682.8
|
|
|
|
1,412.7
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
discontinuing operations at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
1,682.8
|
|
|
|
1,412.7
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
continuing operations at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,213.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,542.3
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
discontinued operations at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents at
end of period
|
|
$
|
1,213.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,542.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
5
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 Basis
of Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying financial data as of May 31, 2006 and for
the three and nine months ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 has
been prepared by the management of Solectron, without audit,
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The
August 31, 2005 condensed consolidated balance sheet was
derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does
not include all disclosures required by generally accepted
accounting principles. However, the management of Solectron
believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading. These condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in Solectrons Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005.
Solectrons third quarters of fiscal 2006 and 2005 ended on
May 26, 2006 and May 27, 2005, respectively.
Solectrons fiscal year 2005 ended on August 26, 2005.
For clarity of presentation, Solectron has indicated its third
quarter as having ended on May 31 and its fiscal year as
having ended on August 31.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include
normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present a fair
consolidated statement of financial position as of May 31,
2006, the results of operations and comprehensive income for the
three and nine months ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 and cash
flows for the nine months ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 have
been made. The consolidated results of operations for the three
and nine months ended May 31, 2006 are not necessarily
indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or
any future periods.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Research
and Development Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expense includes
$6.2 million and $21.9 million of research and
development expenses for the three and nine months ended
May 31, 2006, respectively, and $8.6 million and
$23.8 million for the three and nine months ended
May 31, 2005, respectively.
Restricted
Cash
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, Solectron elected to
put in place a line of credit for the issuance of standby
letters of credit. The letters of credit are principally related
to self-insurance for workers compensation liability coverage.
These standby letters of credit were previously issued under
Solectrons revolving credit facility. Solectron opted to
post cash collateral totaling 105% of the standby letter of
credit balances in order to reduce annual issuance commissions
of the standby letters of credit. Total cash collateral of
$18.2 million at May 31, 2006, is classified as
restricted cash and cash equivalents in the condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Solectron also has
$13.2 million of restricted cash in connection with its
synthetic leases. See also
Note 8 Commitments and
Contingencies for a discussion of these synthetic leases.
6
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, as an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting
for Asset Retirement Obligations (FASB No. 143). This
interpretation clarifies that the term conditional asset
retirement obligation as used in FASB No. 143, refers to a
legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in
which the timing or method of settlement are conditional on a
future event that may or may not be within the control of the
entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity
is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing
or method of settlement. Accordingly, an entity is required to
recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset
retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be
reasonably estimated. This interpretation also clarifies when an
entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate
the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is
effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2005. The Company is currently assessing the
impact of the adoption of FIN 47.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to
conform to the current period presentation.
NOTE 2 Revision
of Statement of Cash Flows
Solectron has revised its statements of cash flows for the nine
months ended May 31, 2006 and May 31, 2005,
respectively, to present cash flows related to discontinued
operations consistent with the requirements of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement
No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. This revision
includes beginning the indirect method of determining cash flows
from operating activities with net income (loss) rather than net
income (loss) from continuing operations. In addition, the
operating, financing and investing cash flows of discontinued
operations have been separately presented within the body of the
statements of cash flows which in prior periods were reported on
a consolidated basis as a single amount. Solectron intends to
utilize this revised presentation in all future annual and
quarterly filings. The following table presents revised summary
cash flow information for each of the three most recently
completed fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
August 31
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
(177.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,452.6
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Earnings) loss from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
(85.0
|
)
|
|
|
443.7
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
193.3
|
|
|
|
276.3
|
|
|
|
330.3
|
|
Loss (gain) on retirement of debt
and interest rate swaps
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
72.1
|
|
|
|
(39.4
|
)
|
Deferred tax charge (benefit)
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
528.9
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and
intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
1,792.0
|
|
Loss on disposal and impairment of
property and equipment, net
|
|
|
46.6
|
|
|
|
60.2
|
|
|
|
157.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
7
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
August 31
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowance
|
|
|
362.9
|
|
|
|
(144.3
|
)
|
|
|
123.4
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
348.5
|
|
|
|
(134.1
|
)
|
|
|
420.4
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
106.9
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(53.6
|
)
|
|
|
150.3
|
|
|
|
(132.0
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
(69.0
|
)
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
947.3
|
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
|
281.0
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
109.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
|
969.7
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
390.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
44.5
|
|
|
|
169.8
|
|
Sales and maturities of short-term
investments
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
252.5
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(28.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56.1
|
)
|
Settlement of loan receivable
related to synthetic lease
|
|
|
31.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(42.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.3
|
)
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(150.4
|
)
|
|
|
(149.6
|
)
|
|
|
(124.6
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
68.9
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
Dispositions and receipts from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
38.9
|
|
|
|
505.6
|
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
Supply agreement and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(112.2
|
)
|
|
|
497.1
|
|
|
|
384.8
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
466.3
|
|
|
|
(112.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
|
|
(95.7
|
)
|
|
|
963.4
|
|
|
|
272.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds used for ACES early
settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayment of bank lines of
credit and other debt arrangements
|
|
|
(23.8
|
)
|
|
|
(50.5
|
)
|
|
|
(85.0
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of ACES and
Senior Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments made to redeem ACES and
Senior Notes
|
|
|
(544.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (costs) proceeds to settle
interest rate swap
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of LYONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(950.2
|
)
|
|
|
(967.5
|
)
|
Common stock repurchase
|
|
|
(71.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
77.7
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
8
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
August 31
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
(Revised)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(570.0
|
)
|
|
|
(510.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1,016.3
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(38.9
|
)
|
|
|
(507.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(608.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1,017.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,022.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
270.1
|
|
|
|
(45.4
|
)
|
|
|
(323.8
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
continuing operations at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,412.7
|
|
|
|
1,425.3
|
|
|
|
1,742.9
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
discontinued operations at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
1,412.7
|
|
|
|
1,458.1
|
|
|
|
1,781.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
continuing operations at end of period
|
|
|
1,682.8
|
|
|
|
1,412.7
|
|
|
|
1,425.3
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of
discontinued operations at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents at
end of period
|
|
$
|
1,682.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,412.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,458.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (received) during the
period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
(199.6
|
)
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
59.0
|
|
|
$
|
100.8
|
|
|
$
|
133.4
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early settlement of ACES for stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,006.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued stock repurchase
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
NOTE 3 Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective September 1, 2005, Solectron began recording
compensation expense associated with stock options and other
forms of equity compensation in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123-R,
Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123R) as
interpreted by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107.
Prior to September 1, 2005, the Company accounted for stock
options according to the provisions of Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, and
therefore no related compensation expense was recorded for
awards granted with no intrinsic value. Solectron adopted the
modified prospective transition method provided for under
SFAS 123R, and consequently has not retroactively adjusted
results from prior periods. Under this transition method,
compensation cost associated with stock options now includes
1) quarterly amortization related to the remaining unvested
portion of all stock option awards granted prior to
September 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of
SFAS 123; and 2) quarterly amortization related to all
stock option awards granted subsequent to September 1,
2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS 123R. In addition, Solectron
records expense over the offering period and the vesting term,
respectively, in connection with 1) shares issued under its
employee stock purchase plan and 2) restricted stock and
discounted stock options. The compensation expense for stock
based compensation awards includes an estimate for forfeitures
and is recognized over the expected term of the options using
the straight-line method. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS 123R, Solectrons earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes, earnings from continuing
9
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
operations, and net earnings for the three-month and nine-month
period ended May 31, 2006, were $4.1 million and
$11.7 million lower, respectively, than they would have
otherwise been under Solectrons previous accounting method
for share-based compensation. Prior to adoption of
SFAS 123R, benefits of tax deductions in excess of
recognized compensation costs were reported as operating cash
flows. SFAS 123R requires that they be recorded as a
financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid.
For the quarter ended May 31, 2006, no excess tax benefits
were generated from option exercises. The Company evaluated the
need to record a cumulative effect adjustment for estimated
forfeitures upon the adoption of SFAS 123R and determined
the amount to be immaterial. The Company is in the process of
computing the excess tax benefits in additional paid-in capital
as of the date of adoption of SFAS 123R. This analysis is
not expected to result in a material change to Solectrons
financial statements.
Total stock compensation expense for the three months ended
May 31, 2006, of $6.7 million was included in cost of
sales and selling, general and administrative expense in the
amounts of $1.5 million and $5.2 million,
respectively. Total stock compensation expense for the nine
months ended May 31, 2006, of $16.9 million was
included in cost of sales and selling, general and
administrative expense in the amounts of $5.1 million and
$11.8 million, respectively. Total stock compensation
expense for the three months and nine months ended May 31,
2005, of $3.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively,
was included in selling, general, and administrative expense.
For stock options granted prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123R, if compensation expense for the Companys
various stock option plans had been determined based upon
estimated fair values at the grant dates in accordance with
SFAS 123, the Companys pro forma net income (loss),
and basic and diluted income (loss) per share would have been as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2005
|
|
|
May 31, 2005
|
|
|
Net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(64.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Fair value-based expense, net of
tax
|
|
$
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$
|
(67.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(63.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Pro Forma
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Pro Forma
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Stock
Options
Solectrons stock option plans provide for grants of
options to employees to purchase common stock at the fair market
value of such shares on the grant date. The options vest monthly
over a four-year period beginning on the grant date. The term of
the options is seven years for options granted between
January 12, 1994 and September 20, 2001, and ten years
for options granted thereafter. Options assumed under past
acquisitions generally vest over periods ranging from
immediately to five years from the original grant date and have
terms ranging from two to ten years. Solectrons 2002 stock
option plan, as amended, also provides for grants of discounted
stock options at a price below the market value on the day of
the stock option grant.
10
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model and the
assumptions noted in the following table. The expected life of
options is based on observed historical exercise patterns.
Groups of employees that have similar historical exercise
patterns have been considered separately for valuation purposes.
The expected volatility of stock options is based upon equal
weightings of the historical volatility of Solectron stock and,
for fiscal periods in which there is sufficient trading volume
in options on Solectrons stock, the implied volatility of
traded options on Solectron stock having a life of more than six
months. The expected volatility of Employee Share Purchase Plan
shares is based on the implied volatility of traded options on
the Companys stock in periods in which there is sufficient
trading volume in those options. Otherwise, historical
volatility is utilized. The risk free interest rate is based on
the implied yield on a U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issue with
a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option. The
dividend yield reflects that Solectron has not paid any cash
dividends since inception and does not intend to pay any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
May 31
|
|
May 31
|
Stock Options
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
59%
|
|
66%
|
|
52% - 59%
|
|
66% - 70%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
Expected life of options
|
|
4.4 years
|
|
4.4 years
|
|
4.3 yrs - 4.9 yrs
|
|
3.9 yrs - 4.4 yrs
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
4.90%
|
|
3.92%
|
|
4.26% - 4.91%
|
|
3.31% - 3.92%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
May 31
|
Employee Stock Purchase
Plan
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Weighted-average volatility
|
|
30%
|
|
43%
|
|
30% - 44%
|
|
39% - 43%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
Expected life of purchase right
|
|
6 - 12 months
|
|
6 - 12 months
|
|
6 - 12 months
|
|
6 -12 months
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
4.43%
|
|
3.13%
|
|
3.94% - 4.43%
|
|
2.32% - 3.13%
|
11
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company has recorded $3.4 million and $9.3 million
of compensation expenses relative to stock options (other than
discounted stock options) for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended May 31, 2006 in accordance with
SFAS 123R. As of May 31, 2006, there was
$18.7 million of total unrecognized compensation costs
related to stock options. These costs are expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.35 years. A
summary of stock option activity under the plans for the
three-months and nine-months ended May 31, 2006 is
presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 1, 2005
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
$
|
9.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 30, 2005
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
$
|
9.57
|
|
|
|
6.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, November 30, 2005
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.34
|
|
|
|
6.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 30, 2005
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
$
|
9.57
|
|
|
|
6.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, February 28, 2006
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
|
$
|
9.41
|
|
|
|
6.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, February 28, 2006
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
$
|
11.09
|
|
|
|
6.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, February 28, 2006
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
|
$
|
9.41
|
|
|
|
6.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, May 31, 2006
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
$
|
9.21
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, May 31, 2006
|
|
|
35.8
|
|
|
$
|
10.70
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during
the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2006, was
$2.08 and $1.92, respectively. The total intrinsic value of
stock options exercised during the three months and nine months
ended May 31, 2006, was $0.55 million and
$0.58 million, respectively.
At May 31, 2006, an aggregate of 62.8 million shares
were authorized for future issuance under our stock plans, which
cover stock options, Employee Stock Purchase Plans, Restricted
Stock Awards and Discounted Stock Options. A total of
51.9 million shares of common stock were available for
grant under Solectrons stock option plans as of
May 31, 2006. Awards that expire or are cancelled without
delivery of shares generally become available for issuance under
the plans.
An initial option is granted to each new outside member of
Solectrons Board of Directors to purchase
20,000 shares of common stock at the fair value on the date
of the grant. On December 1 of each year, each outside
member is granted an additional option to purchase
20,000 shares of common stock at the fair market value on
such date. These options vest over one year and have a term of
seven years.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Under Solectrons Employee Stock Purchase Plan, employees
meeting specific employment qualifications are eligible to
participate and can purchase shares semi-annually through
payroll deductions at the lower of 85% of the
12
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
fair market value of the stock at the commencement or end of the
offering period. The Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to
purchase common stock through payroll deductions for up to 10%
of qualified compensation. We have treated the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan as a compensatory plan. The Company has recorded
compensation expense relative to the Purchase Plan in the
three-month and nine-month periods ended May 31, 2006 of
$0.7 million and $2.4 million, respectively.
Restricted
Stock Awards and Discounted Stock Options
During fiscal 2003, Solectron issued restricted stock awards of
1.4 million shares of common stock to certain eligible
executives at a purchase price of $0.001 per share. These
restricted shares were not issued pursuant to Solectrons
stock option plans. These restricted shares are not transferable
until fully vested and are subject to the Company Repurchase
Option for all unvested shares upon certain early termination
events and also subject to accelerated vesting in certain
circumstances. Compensation expense computed under the fair
value method for the three and nine months ended May 31,
2006, is being amortized over the vesting period and was
$0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
Compensation expense computed under the intrinsic value method
for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2005, is being
amortized over the vesting period and was $0.1 million and
$1.1 million, respectively.
During fiscal 2005 and 2004, Solectron issued discounted stock
options under its 2002 stock option plan of 1.5 million and
0.7 million shares, respectively, to certain eligible
executives and employees at a price below the market value on
the day of the stock option grant. During the nine month period
ended May 31, 2006, an additional 4.4 million
discounted options were granted to certain eligible employees.
Compensation expense under the fair value method for the three
months and nine months ended May 31, 2006, is being
amortized over the vesting period and was $2.0 million and
$4.4 million, respectively. Compensation expense under the
intrinsic value method for the three months and nine months
ended May 31, 2005, was $0.2 million and
$0.7 million, respectively. For compensation expense
purposes, the intrinsic value of restricted stock awards and
discounted stock options equals the fair market value of these
awards.
The weighted-average fair value of the discounted stock options
granted in the three-month and nine-month periods ended
May 31, 2006 was $4.01 and $3.84, respectively. At
May 31, 2006, unrecognized costs related to restricted
stock awards and discounted stock options totaled approximately
$17.0 million and is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.6 years. The total fair value
of restricted stock and discounted stock options vested was
$1.0 million during the three months and nine months ended
May 31, 2006.
Pro
Forma Net Loss and Assumptions for Fiscal Years 2005 and
2004
The table below sets out the pro forma amounts of net loss and
net loss per share that would have resulted for fiscal years
2005 and 2004, if Solectron accounted for its employee stock
plans under the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per-share
data)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as reported
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
$
|
(177.4
|
)
|
Stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value method, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
(58.7
|
)
|
|
|
(60.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(55.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(237.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and
diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Basic and
diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
13
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Stock based employee compensation expense determined under the
fair value method, net of related tax effects, included zero and
$6.5 million of expense relating to discontinued operations
during fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively.
For purposes of computing pro forma net loss, the fair value of
each option grant and employee stock purchase plan purchase
right was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The assumptions used to value the option
grants and purchase rights are stated below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life of options
|
|
4.5 years
|
|
3.9 years
|
Volatility
|
|
57%
|
|
75%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
3.79%
|
|
2.30% to 3.06%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
Employee Stock Purchase
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life of purchase right
|
|
6 months
|
|
6 months
|
Volatility
|
|
37%
|
|
77%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
2.90%
|
|
1.00% to 1.70%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
zero
|
|
zero
|
NOTE 4 Stock
Repurchase
On November 1, 2005, Solectrons Board of Directors
approved a stock repurchase program whereby the Company is
authorized to repurchase up to $250 million of the
Companys common stock. Solectron commenced this
$250 million repurchase program at the end of the quarter
ended February 28, 2006. As of May 31, 2006, Solectron
has repurchased and retired 6.9 million shares of its
common stock under this plan at an average price of $3.83 for
approximately $26.5 million.
NOTE 5 Inventories
Inventories related to continuing operations as of May 31,
2006 and August 31, 2005, consisted of the following (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
August 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
1,125.9
|
|
|
$
|
771.0
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
187.3
|
|
|
|
152.8
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
167.2
|
|
|
|
184.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,480.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,108.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
NOTE 6 Accounts
Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable, net related to continuing operations as of
May 31, 2006 and August 31, 2005 consisted of the
following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
August 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
$
|
1,365.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,203.0
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful
accounts
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable, net
|
|
$
|
1,351.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,180.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7 Property
and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net related to continuing operations as
of May 31, 2006 and August 31, 2005 consisted of the
following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
August 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Original Cost
|
|
$
|
1,885.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,818.3
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,194.1
|
|
|
|
1,152.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
691.4
|
|
|
$
|
666.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8 Commitments
and Contingencies
Synthetic
Leases
Solectron has synthetic lease agreements relating to three
manufacturing sites. The synthetic leases have expiration dates
in August 2007. At the end of the lease terms, Solectron has an
option, subject to certain conditions, to purchase or to cause a
third party to purchase the facilities subject to the synthetic
leases for the Termination Value, which approximates
the lessors original cost for each facility, or may market
the property to a third party at a different price. Solectron is
entitled to any proceeds from a sale of the properties to third
parties in excess of the Termination Value and is liable to the
lessor for any shortfall not to exceed 85% of the Termination
Value. Solectron has provided loans to the lessor equaling
approximately 85% of the Termination Value for each synthetic
lease. These loans are repayable solely from the sale of the
properties to third parties in the future, are subordinated to
the amounts payable to the lessor at the end of the synthetic
leases, and may be credited against the Termination Values
payable if Solectron purchases the properties. The approximate
aggregate Termination Values and loan amounts were
$87.7 million and $74.5 million, respectively, as of
May 31, 2006.
In addition, cash collateral of $13.2 million, an amount
equal to the difference between the aggregate Termination Values
and the loan amounts, is pledged as collateral. Each synthetic
lease agreement contains various affirmative covenants. A
default under a lease, including violation of these covenants,
may accelerate the termination date of the arrangement.
Solectron was in compliance with all applicable covenants as of
May 31, 2006. Monthly lease payments are generally based on
the Termination Value and
30-day LIBOR
index (5.0225% as of May 31, 2006) plus an
interest-rate margin, which may vary depending upon
Solectrons Moodys Investors Services and
Standard and Poors ratings, and are allocated between the
lessor and Solectron based on the proportion of the loan amount
to the Termination Value for each synthetic lease.
During fiscal 2004, Solectron determined that it is probable
that the expected fair value of the properties under the
synthetic lease agreements will be less than the Termination
Value at the end of the lease terms by approximately
$13.5 million. The $13.5 million is being accreted
over the remaining lease terms. As of May 31, 2006,
Solectron had accreted $8.3 million.
15
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Solectron accounts for these synthetic lease arrangements as
operating leases in accordance with SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, as amended. Solectrons
loans to the lessor and cash collateral are included in other
assets and restricted cash and cash equivalents, respectively,
in the consolidated balance sheets.
Future
Minimum Lease Obligations
Future minimum payments for operating lease obligations related
to facilities in use, including the synthetic leases discussed
above, are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period (as of
May 31, 2006)
|
|
|
|
|
Short-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Term
|
|
FY07
|
|
FY08
|
|
FY09
|
|
FY10
|
|
FY11
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Operating lease
|
|
$
|
138.0
|
|
|
$
|
28.1
|
|
|
$
|
18.5
|
|
|
$
|
19.8
|
|
|
$
|
17.3
|
|
|
$
|
15.0
|
|
|
$
|
12.6
|
|
|
$
|
26.7
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
Solectron is from time to time involved in various litigation
and legal matters incidental to the normal course of its
business. Management believes that the final resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position, cash flows, or
results of operations. By describing any particular matter,
Solectron does not intend to imply that it or its legal advisors
have concluded or believe that the outcome of any of those
particular matters is or is not likely to have a material
adverse impact upon Solectrons consolidated financial
position, cash flows or results of operations.
Solectron has settled the previously reported shareholder class
action lawsuit entitled Abrams v. Solectron Corporation
et al., Case
No. C-03-0986
CRB, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California, on terms not considered to be material
to Solectron. Court approval of the settlement terms was
obtained on March 3, 2006.
NOTE 9 Segment
Information and Geographic Information
SFAS No. 131 Disclosure about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information established standards
for reporting information about operating segments in annual
consolidated financial statements and requires selected
information about operating segments in interim financial
reports issued to stockholders. It also established standards
for related disclosures about products and services, geographic
areas and major customers. Operating segments are defined as
components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the
chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in
deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
Solectrons chief operating decision maker is the Chief
Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer evaluates
financial information on a company-wide basis for purposes of
making decisions and assessing financial performance.
Accordingly, Solectron has one operating segment.
16
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Geographic net sales are attributable to the country in which
the product is manufactured. Geographic information for
continuing operations as of and for the periods presented is as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Geographic net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
787.4
|
|
|
$
|
713.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,392.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,328.9
|
|
Other North and Latin America
|
|
|
403.9
|
|
|
|
420.8
|
|
|
|
1,147.6
|
|
|
|
1,342.5
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
306.6
|
|
|
|
354.5
|
|
|
|
909.3
|
|
|
|
1,169.8
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
568.7
|
|
|
|
559.4
|
|
|
|
1,580.8
|
|
|
|
1,510.6
|
|
China
|
|
|
398.2
|
|
|
|
311.3
|
|
|
|
936.8
|
|
|
|
1,000.9
|
|
Other Asia Pacific
|
|
|
237.8
|
|
|
|
236.3
|
|
|
|
691.6
|
|
|
|
689.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,702.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,596.0
|
|
|
$
|
7,658.6
|
|
|
$
|
8,042.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
August 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
295.3
|
|
|
$
|
314.3
|
|
Other North and Latin America
|
|
|
171.1
|
|
|
|
165.7
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
139.9
|
|
|
|
138.0
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
300.0
|
|
|
|
275.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
906.3
|
|
|
$
|
893.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain customers accounted for 10% or more of our net sales.
The following table includes these customers and the percentage
of net sales attributed to them:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cisco Systems
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.8%
|
|
|
|
17.1%
|
|
|
|
15.0%
|
|
Nortel Networks
|
|
|
|
***
|
|
|
11.3%
|
|
|
|
10.3%
|
|
|
|
10.8%
|
|
Solectron has concentrations of credit risk due to sales to the
customers listed above as well as to Solectrons other
significant customers. No customer accounted for 10% or more of
total accounts receivable at May 31, 2006.
NOTE 10 Long-Term
Debt
8.00% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016
On February 14, 2006, Solectrons wholly owned
subsidiary Solectron Global Finance Ltd (Solectron Global
Finance) issued $150 million of senior subordinated
notes to qualified institutional buyers in reliance on
Rule 144A under the Securities Act. The notes are
unconditionally guaranteed by Solectron on a senior subordinated
basis, and will mature on March 15, 2016, and bear interest
at the rate of 8% annually. Cash interest payments on the notes
will be made semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September
15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2006. The notes
will be redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after
March 15, 2011 at specified redemption prices plus accrued
and unpaid interest. Prior to March 15, 2011, subject to
certain outstanding principal amount and redemption timing
conditions, Solectron Global Finance will have the option to
redeem the notes, in whole or in
17
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
part at a price equal to the greater of 100% or the make-whole
premium plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, subject
to certain conditions, prior to March 15, 2009, Solectron
Global Finance or Solectron may redeem up to 35% of the
aggregate principal amount of notes with the net proceeds of a
public common stock offering by Solectron at a redemption price
of 108% of the principal amount of the notes, plus any accrued
and unpaid interest to the redemption date. Solectron used the
net proceeds from the offering, together with cash on hand, to
repay its 7.375% Senior Notes on March 1, 2006.
Pursuant to a Registration Rights Agreement, Solectron Global
Finance and Solectron have agreed to register the notes under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended within a specified
time or pay additional amounts to the holders of the notes.
7.375% Senior
Notes
In February 1996, Solectron issued $150 million aggregate
principal amount of unsubordinated notes. These notes are in
denominations and have a maturity value of $1,000 each and were
due on March 1, 2006. Interest is payable semiannually at a
rate of 7.375% per annum. These notes were redeemed at
maturity on March 1, 2006.
0.5% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2034
On February 17, 2004, Solectron issued $450 million of
convertible senior notes (the Original Notes), to
qualified institutional buyers in reliance on Rule 144A
under the Securities Act. The Original Notes are unsecured and
unsubordinated indebtedness of Solectron and will mature on
February 15, 2034.
On February 10, 2005, Solectron completed an exchange offer
with respect to the Original Notes for an equal amount of its
newly issued 0.5% convertible senior notes, Series B
due 2034 (the New Notes) and cash. Solectron
accepted for exchange $447.3 million aggregate principal
amount of outstanding notes, representing approximately 99.4% of
the total outstanding notes. Upon conversion of the New Notes,
Solectron will deliver $1,000 in cash for the principal amount,
and at its election, either common stock or cash, for the
conversion value above the principal amount. Holders electing to
convert upon a change of control, prior to February 15,
2011, unless the consideration consists of at least 90% in the
form of listed shares (excluding cash payments for fractional
shares and cash payments made pursuant to dissenters
appraisal rights), shall be eligible for an increase in the
conversion rate in accordance with the terms of the New Notes.
On or after February 20, 2011, Solectron will have the
option to redeem all or a portion of the convertible notes that
have not been previously purchased, repurchased or converted, at
100% of the principal amount of the convertible notes to be
redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages
owed, if any, up to, but excluding, the date of the purchase.
Holders of the convertible notes may require Solectron to
purchase all or a portion of the convertible notes for cash on
each of February 15, 2011, 2014, 2019, 2024, and 2029 at a
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the convertible
notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, up to,
but excluding, the date of repurchase. Holders will have the
option, subject to certain conditions, to require Solectron to
repurchase any convertible notes held by such holder in the
event of a change in control, as defined, at a price
of 100% of the principal amount of the convertible notes plus
accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the date of
repurchase. The convertible notes are convertible into shares of
common stock of Solectron at any time prior to maturity, subject
to the terms of the notes.
After the exchange offer was complete, there were approximately
$2.7 million aggregate principal amount of Original Notes
outstanding. Interest on both the Original Notes and the New
Notes (together, the convertible notes) will be paid
on February 15 and on August 15 of each year. The conversion
rate for the convertible notes is 103.4468 per $1,000
principal amount. As of May 31, 2006, the aggregate
carrying amount of the convertible notes of $450.0 million
was classified as long-term debt.
18
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Adjustable
Conversion-Rate Equity Securities (ACES)
On August 31, 2004, there were 2.6 million ACES units
remaining. Each ACES unit has a stated amount of $25.00 and
consisted of (a) a contract requiring the holder to
purchase, for $25.00, a number of shares of Solectron common
stock (subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments); and
(b) a $25 principal amount of 7.97% subordinated
debenture due November 2006.
On November 15, 2004, Solectron issued 6.6 million
shares of its common stock at a settlement rate of
2.5484 shares per ACES unit as defined above. Solectron
received cash proceeds of $64.3 million which resulted in a
corresponding increase in additional paid in capital. The equity
component of the ACES has been settled. Accordingly, the
remaining obligation of the original ACES is the
7.97% subordinated debentures.
As of May 31, 2006, the 7.97% subordinated debentures
due November 2006 had a carrying value of $64.3 million and
were classified as short-term debt.
Liquid
Yield Option Notes
(LYONstm)
On May 31, 2006, Solectron had $8.3 million aggregate
accreted value of
LYONstm
outstanding with an interest rate of 2.75%. These notes are
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Solectron.
Solectron will pay no interest prior to maturity. Each note has
a yield of 2.75% with a maturity value of $1,000 on May 8,
2020. Each note is convertible at any time by the holder to
common shares at a conversion rate of 12.3309 shares per
note. Holders will be able to require Solectron to purchase all
or a portion of their notes on May 8, 2010, at a price of
$761.00 per note. Solectron, at its option, may redeem all
or a portion of the notes at any time on or after May 20,
2004. As of May 31, 2006, the accreted value of the 2.75%
LYONstm
is classified as long-term debt.
On May 31, 2006, Solectron had $1.1 million aggregate
accreted value of
LYONstm
outstanding with an interest rate of 3.25%. These notes are
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Solectron.
Solectron will pay no interest prior to maturity. Each note has
a yield of 3.25% with a maturity value of $1,000 on
November 20, 2020. Each note is convertible at any time by
the holder to common shares at a conversion rate of
11.7862 shares per note. Holders will be able to require
Solectron to purchase all or a portion of their notes on
November 20, 2010, at a price of $724.42 per note.
Solectron, at its option, may redeem all or a portion of the
notes at any time on or after May 20, 2004. As of
May 31, 2006, the accreted value of the 3.25%
LYONstm
is classified as long-term debt.
NOTE 11 Derivative
Instruments
Solectron enters into foreign exchange forward contracts
intended to reduce the short-term impact of foreign currency
fluctuations on foreign currency receivables, investments,
payables and indebtedness. The gains and losses on the foreign
exchange forward contracts are intended to largely offset the
transaction gains and losses on the foreign currency
receivables, investments, payables, and indebtedness recognized
in operating results. Solectron does not enter into foreign
exchange forward contracts for speculative purposes.
Solectrons foreign exchange forward contracts related to
current assets and liabilities are generally three months or
less in original maturity.
As of May 31, 2006, Solectron had outstanding foreign
exchange forward contracts with a total notional amount of
approximately $364.8 million.
For all derivative transactions, Solectron is exposed to
counterparty credit risk to the extent that the counterparties
may not be able to meet their obligations towards Solectron. To
manage the counterparty risk, Solectron limits its derivative
transactions to those with major financial institutions.
Solectron does not expect to experience any material adverse
financial consequences as a result of default by
Solectrons counterparties.
Financial instruments that potentially subject Solectron to
concentrations of credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents
and trade accounts receivable. Concentrations of credit risk in
accounts receivable resulting from sales to major customers are
discussed in Note 9, Segment Information and
Geographic Information.
19
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
NOTE 12 Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill information is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Balance at August 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
148.8
|
|
Additions/adjustments
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
152.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solectrons intangible assets are classified as other
assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and
categorized into three main classes: supply agreements,
intellectual property and contractual and non-contractual
customer relationships obtained in asset purchases or business
combinations. The following table summarizes the intangible
asset balance at May 31, 2006 and August 31, 2005 (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual
|
|
|
Customer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
May 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross amount
|
|
$
|
89.0
|
|
|
$
|
56.2
|
|
|
$
|
101.1
|
|
|
$
|
246.3
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(86.0
|
)
|
|
|
(52.6
|
)
|
|
|
(90.3
|
)
|
|
|
(228.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
10.8
|
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross amount
|
|
$
|
91.9
|
|
|
$
|
61.0
|
|
|
$
|
98.9
|
|
|
$
|
251.8
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(86.7
|
)
|
|
|
(56.2
|
)
|
|
|
(84.1
|
)
|
|
|
(227.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
14.8
|
|
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended May 31, 2006, Solectron
recorded a $2.4 million impairment of an intangible asset
in connection with the termination of a customer relationship
for which an intangible asset had been established. A
$0.5 million gain on sale of fully depreciated equipment to
this former customer has been reported as a component of
restructuring and impairment costs
Amortization expense for the three months and nine months ended
May 31, 2006 was approximately $1.0 million and
$5.0 million, respectively. Annual amortization expense for
these intangibles over the next five years would be
approximately $4.8 million, $4.4 million,
$4.0 million, $3.0 million and $1.3 million.
NOTE 13 Discontinued
Operations
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and the first quarter
of fiscal 2004, as a result of a full review of its portfolio of
businesses, Solectron committed to a plan to divest a number of
business operations that are outside its core competencies. The
companies which we have divested and that are included in
discontinued operations are Dy 4 Systems Inc., Kavlico
Corporation, Solectrons MicroTechnology division, SMART
Modular Technologies Inc., Stream International Inc.,
Solectrons 63% interest in US Robotics Corporation, and
Force Computers, Inc.
These businesses each qualify as a discontinued operation
component of Solectron under SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets. Solectron has reported the results of operations
and consolidated financial position of these businesses in
discontinued operations within the consolidated statements of
operations and the balance sheets for all periods presented.
20
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The results from discontinued operations were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Operating expense
(income) net
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
Interest
income net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2004, Solectron completed the sale of six of its
discontinued operations. During the first quarter of fiscal
2005, Solectron completed the sale of its MicroTechnology
division, the final discontinued operation, for cash proceeds of
$30.0 million resulting in a $10.1 million pre-tax
gain which is included in operating income net
for the quarter ended November 30, 2004. As a result of
this disposition, Solectron transferred approximately
$28.3 million from accumulated foreign currency translation
gains, included in accumulated other comprehensive losses within
Stockholders Equity and recognized that amount as part of
the pre-tax gain. The sale agreement for this divesture provided
for a possible adjustment to the proceeds and gain based upon
final settlement of Microtechnologys working capital at
closing. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, the working
capital adjustment pursuant to the sale agreement was resolved,
resulting in a gain of $9.4 million.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, Solectron increased the
net loss on disposal of those discontinued operations by
approximately $0.5 million resulting from a few
insignificant adjustments pursuant to the terms of the disposal
transaction. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, Solectron
sold a building that was subject to a synthetic lease agreement.
The synthetic lease agreement was associated with a discontinued
operation that has been sold. As a result of the transaction,
Solectron recorded a gain of approximately $0.9 million in
operating income net as disclosed above.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, Solectron recorded a
$2.1 million gain on sale of assets of discontinued
operations having no remaining book value and $1.7 million
associated with the favorable resolution of certain
contingencies. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006,
Solectron recorded a $2.1 million gain on the sale of
assets formerly associated with a discontinued operation and
$1.8 million associated with the favorable resolution of
certain contingencies.
The sale agreements for the divestitures contain certain
indemnification provisions pursuant to which Solectron may be
required to indemnify the buyer of the divested business for a
limited period subsequent to the completion of the sale for
liabilities, losses, or expenses arising out of breaches of
covenants and certain breaches of representations and warranties
relating to the condition of the business prior to and at the
time of sale. As of May 31, 2006, most of these
indemnification provisions have expired and Solectron is
contingently liable, in aggregate, until the end of fiscal 2006
for up to $21 million under such indemnification
obligations. As of May 31, 2006, there were no significant
liabilities recorded under these indemnification obligations.
Additionally, Solectron may be required to indemnify a buyer for
environmental remediation costs until 2011, such indemnification
not to exceed $13 million. Solectron maintains an insurance
policy to cover environmental remediation liabilities in
21
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
excess of reserves previously established upon the acquisition
of these properties. Solectron did not record any environmental
charges upon disposition of these properties.
NOTE 14 Restructuring
and Impairment
Over the past few years, Solectron has recorded restructuring
and impairment costs as it rationalized operations in light of
customer demand declines and the economic downturn. The
measures, which included reducing the workforce, consolidating
facilities and changing the strategic focus of a number of
sites, was largely intended to align Solectrons capacity
and infrastructure to anticipated customer demand and transition
our operations to lower cost regions. The restructuring and
impairment costs include employee severance and benefit costs,
costs related to leased facilities abandoned and subleased,
impairment of owned facilities no longer used by Solectron which
will be disposed, costs related to leased equipment that has
been abandoned, and impairment of owned equipment that will be
disposed. For owned facilities and equipment, the impairment
loss recognized was based on the fair value less costs to sell,
with fair value estimated based on existing market prices for
similar assets. Severance and benefit costs are recorded in
accordance with SFAS No. 112, Employers
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits, as Solectron has
concluded that it had a substantive severance plan. In
accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, the
estimated lease loss accrued for leased facilities abandoned and
subleased after December 31, 2002 represents the fair value
of the lease liability as measured by the present value of
future lease payments subsequent to abandonment less the present
value of any estimated sublease income. For those facilities
abandoned and subleased before January 1, 2003, as part of
restructuring activities under EITF Issue
No. 94-3,
the estimated lease loss represents payments subsequent to
abandonment less any estimated sublease income. In order to
estimate future sublease income, we work with real estate
brokers to estimate the length of time until we can sublease a
facility and the amount of rent we can expect to receive.
Estimates of expected sublease income could change based on
factors that affect our ability to sublease those facilities
such as general economic conditions and the real estate market,
among others. At each reporting date, the Company evaluates its
accruals for exit costs and employee separation costs to ensure
the accruals are still appropriate. In certain circumstances,
accruals are no longer required because of efficiencies in
carrying out the plans or because employees previously
identified for separation resigned from the Company and did not
receive severance or were redeployed due to circumstances not
foreseen when the original plans were initiated. The Company
reverses accruals through the income statement line item where
the original charges were recorded when it is determined that
they are no longer required.
See also Note 12, Goodwill and Intangible
Assets, for discussion of intangible asset impairment
charges.
Overview
of Restructuring Plans
Fiscal
Year 2005 Restructuring Plan
During fiscal year 2005, in response to a decline in revenues
from fiscal year 2004 levels, we reviewed our cost structure and
geographic footprint and determined that cost savings could be
realized by moving certain activities from high-cost facilities
in Europe and North America to facilities in low cost
geographies. During Fiscal 2006, the Company had lowered its
total anticipated restructuring costs for the 2005 restructuring
plan from $80-$95 million to $55-$65 million. The
original anticipated costs were based on the occurrence of
certain future events. Due to non-occurrence of some events and
changes in business conditions, the Company has lowered its
total anticipated costs. However, for the restructuring items
that were executed, the Company expects cost savings to be in
line with the original estimates. This restructuring plan as
amended will result in restructuring charges of approximately
$55 million to $65 million, and includes the following
measures:
|
|
|
|
|
Closing our facilities in Hillsboro, Oregon; Winnipeg, Canada;
Lincoln, California; Turnhout, Belgium; and Munich, Germany.
|
22
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminating approximately 2,500 positions at (1) the
facilities being closed; (2) our facilities in Bordeaux,
France; Dunfermline, Scotland; Guadalajara, Mexico; Jaguariuna,
Brazil; and other facilities; and (3) within our material
procurement and sales organizations in Europe and North America.
These actions included the elimination of certain positions, the
migration of certain functional activities to facilities in
lower cost geographies and the outsourcing of certain activities.
|
|
|
|
Impair certain long-lived assets (primarily building and
leasehold improvement) in connection with the facilities being
vacated and equipment made obsolete to the extent that we would
be unable to recover their carrying value upon sales to third
parties.
|
Cumulative restructuring costs recorded under this plan as of
May 31, 2006 were $57.4 million. As of May 31,
2006, we have reduced our workforce by 2,300 personnel in
connection with this plan and expect to reduce headcount by an
additional 200 personnel prior to the completion of this plan.
We expect to substantially complete this restructuring plan by
the end of 2006.
Fiscal
Year 2004 Restructuring Plan
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, in order to drive savings
in its human resources and information technology functions, as
well as reduce labor costs in certain high cost facilities,
Solectron committed to a plan to eliminate approximately
2,100 full-time positions primarily in Europe and North
America, consolidate certain facilities, and impair certain
long-lived assets.
This plan was expected to result in total restructuring charges
of $20.0 million. Through May 31, 2006, Solectron had
recorded restructuring charges of approximately
$24.7 million related to this plan. This amount consisted
of $10.0 million of severance charges, $10.2 million
relating to the impairment of certain long-lived assets, and
$4.5 million of facility lease obligation and other
expenses. For the three month period ended May 31, 2006, we
released $1.2 million of severance accruals no longer
required. This restructuring plan is substantially complete. The
remaining accrual balance of $2.5 million as of
May 31, 2006 is primarily related to an ongoing facility
lease obligation. The facility lease obligation currently
expires in 2011. However, we may incur restructuring costs as we
revise estimates due to changes in assumptions used for the
facility lease loss accrual.
Legacy
Restructuring Plans
From 2001 through 2003, a significant economic downturn
adversely impacted Solectrons business, resulting in a
decline in revenues from $17.4 billion in fiscal year 2001
to $9.8 billion in fiscal year 2003. In response to these
trends, Solectron initiated a series of restructuring measures
to align its capacity and infrastructure with anticipated
customer demand. These actions included significant reductions
in the Companys workforce, the closure and consolidation
of facilities, and the impairment of certain long-lived assets.
These restructuring activities are substantially complete as of
May 31, 2006, as the remaining accrual is almost entirely
attributable to ongoing facility lease obligations, which are
currently leased through 2014. However, we expect to incur
restructuring costs as we continue to sell restructured
long-lived assets and revise previous estimates in connection
with these plans. Revisions to estimates will primarily be due
to changes in assumptions used for the facility lease loss
accrual.
Three
and nine months ended May 31, 2006 and 2005
Solectron continued to incur expected restructuring charges in
the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2006 in
accordance with previously announced plans. The employee
severance and benefit costs included in the restructuring
charges recorded in the first three quarters of fiscal 2006
primarily arose from the 2005 Restructuring Plan described
above. During the third quarter of fiscal 2006, Solectron also
recorded a $.7 million reversal in restructuring expenses
related to a release of an accrual established under acquisition
accounting that is no longer required. This reversal to the
income statement is necessitated due to all the long-term assets
relating to the acquisition being fully impaired.
23
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes restructuring charges included in
the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Nature
|
|
Loss on disposal of and impairment
of equipment and facilities, net
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
8.7
|
|
|
$
|
42.4
|
|
|
non-cash
|
Intangible asset impairment
charge, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment of equipment,
facilities and intangibles
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
|
non-cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and benefit costs
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
(10.1
|
)
|
|
|
43.5
|
|
|
cash
|
Net adjustment to facility lease
loss accrual
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
cash
|
Net adjustment to equipment lease
loss accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash restructuring
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and non-cash
restructuring
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
$
|
84.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
Accrual
The following table summarizes the restructuring accrual balance
for continuing operations as of May 31, 2006 (in millions).
The amounts presented include remaining obligations under both
the 2005 Restructuring Plan and prior plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Leased Facilities
|
|
|
Other Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Benefits
|
|
|
& Equipment
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance of accrual at
August 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
44.9
|
|
|
$
|
32.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
77.7
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Q1-FY06 Provision Adjustments
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
Q1-FY06 Cash Payments
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Adjustment
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of accrual at
November 30, 2005
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Q2-FY06 Provision Adjustments
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
Q2-FY06 Cash Payments
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Adjustment
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of accrual at
February 28, 2006
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Q3-FY06 Provision Adjustments
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
Q3-FY06 Cash Payments
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(10.5
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Adjustment
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of accrual at May 31,
2006
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
$
|
25.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Accruals related to restructuring activities were recorded in
accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets. Solectron expects to pay amounts related to
severance and benefits in the next year. The remaining balance,
primarily consisting of lease commitment costs on facilities, is
expected to be paid out through 2014.
Restructuring
Activity by Plan
The restructuring and impairment charges incurred by
restructuring plan during the nine month period ended
May 31, 2006, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004
|
|
|
Legacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at August 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
40.2
|
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
$
|
77.7
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Provision adjustments
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Adjustment
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at November 30, 2005
|
|
$
|
29.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
|
$
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1FY2006 loss on disposal of and
impairment of equipment and facilities, net
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Provision adjustments
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Adjustment
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at February 28, 2006
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
$
|
42.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2FY2006 loss on disposal of and
impairment of equipment and facilities, net
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Provision adjustments
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
(10.5
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Adjustment
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
10.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
23.3
|
|
|
$
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q3FY2006 loss on disposal of and
impairment of equipment and facilities, net
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 15
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share Calculation
|
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share
calculates the effect of dilutive securities on weighted average
shares. Dilutive securities include options to purchase common
stock and shares issuable upon conversion of Solectrons
LYONs and ACES.
25
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Net income (loss) per share data were computed as follows (in
millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
(64.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
96.4
|
|
|
$
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Shares used in computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares
outstanding
|
|
|
908.1
|
|
|
|
978.4
|
|
|
|
916.2
|
|
|
|
968.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
42.0
|
|
|
$
|
(64.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
96.4
|
|
|
$
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Shares used in computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares
outstanding
|
|
|
908.1
|
|
|
|
978.4
|
|
|
|
916.2
|
|
|
|
968.4
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of
convertible securities
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
909.6
|
|
|
|
978.4
|
|
|
|
917.2
|
|
|
|
968.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the weighted average dilutive
securities that were excluded from the above computation of
diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have an
anti-dilutive effect (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
40.3
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
Shares issuable upon conversion of
convertible securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dilutive potential common
shares
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is
more likely than not that all or a portion of
deferred tax assets will not be realized. A review of all
available positive and negative evidence needs to be considered,
including the Companys performance, the market environment
in which the Company operates, the utilization of past tax
credits, length of carryback and carryforward periods, and
existing contracts or sales backlog that will result in future
profits, among other factors. It further states that forming a
conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult
when there is negative evidence such as cumulative losses in
recent years in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax
assets relate. Therefore, cumulative losses weigh heavily in the
overall assessment. As a result of the review undertaken after
the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2003, Solectron concluded
that it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance
for most of the net deferred tax assets arising from its
operations in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax assets
relate. The total valuation allowance is approximately
$1.7 billion as of May 31, 2006. In addition,
Solectron expects to continue to provide a full valuation
allowance on future tax benefits until it can demonstrate a
sustained level of profitability that establishes its ability to
utilize the assets in the jurisdictions to which the assets
relate. Solectron incurs tax expense in certain countries which
are not subject to the aforementioned valuation allowance during
the three and nine months ended May 31, 2006.
26
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Certain of Solectrons non-US operations are reporting
taxable profits, mostly arising in lower-cost locations.
Accordingly, Solectron anticipates some tax expense in future
quarters related to those operations. Solectron will not be able
to offset this tax expense with unrecognized deferred tax assets
described above, because, for the most part, those assets did
not arise in the jurisdictions where Solectron is realizing
taxable profits.
The income tax provision for the interim periods is based on the
best estimate of the effective tax rate expected to be
applicable for the full fiscal year. Changes in the interim
period for the tax (or benefit) related to items other than
ordinary income are individually computed and recognized when
the items occur. During the three months ended May 31,
2006, the Company recorded income tax benefits of
$17.5 million associated with a refund of taxes paid on the
reinvested earnings of a foreign subsidiary of which
$5.6 million of the tax benefit was included in the
computation of the foreign entitys estimated annual
effective tax rate. The remaining portion was individually
computed and recognized in the three months ended May 31,
2006.
In addition, Solectron has established contingency reserves for
income taxes in various jurisdictions in accordance with
SFAS No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies.
The estimate of appropriate tax reserves is based upon the
probable amount of prior tax benefit that is at risk upon audit
and upon the reasonable estimate of the amount at risk.
Solectron periodically reassesses the amount of such reserves
and adjusts reserve balances as necessary. During the nine
months ended May 31, 2006, we recorded an additional
accrual related to a transfer pricing adjustment assessed by a
foreign tax authority. The recorded amount represents
managements best estimate of the cost it will incur in
relation to the exposure, but there is a reasonable possibility
that the final settlement could differ from the estimate. The
estimate of the range of possible loss is $1.0 million to
$12.0 million.
During the three months ended May 31, 2006, the
Company recorded a net $2.7 million correcting adjustment,
primarily relating to the reversal of a provision for
transaction taxes, relating to one of its foreign subsidiaries
that had been previously incorrectly provided in books of
account. The Company recorded the net amount during the current
quarter, as the amounts are not material to any of the prior
periods and are not expected to be material to fiscal
year 2006.
During the three months ended May 31, 2006, we received an
examination report from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
showing proposed changes to the Companys tax for the
periods ended August 2001 and August 2002. The Company will be
filing an appeals with the IRS during the fourth quarter for
proposed changes that the Company does not agree with. Although
the outcome of the appeals process is always uncertain, the
Company believes that adequate amounts of tax and interest have
been provided for any adjustments that are expected to result
for these years.
A domestic state jurisdiction is currently conducting a sales
and use tax audit for the period from January 1, 1999
through December 31, 2001. Solectron filed an application
to participate in an amnesty program in order to protect itself
from any penalties that may arise as a result of a potential
audit assessment. Although there is a reasonable possibility
that a loss may be incurred, no estimate of the possible loss
can be made at this time.
|
|
NOTE 17
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
In January 2006, Paul Tufano became Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Solectron. Mr. Tufano is also a
member of the Board of Directors of Teradyne, a customer of
Solectron. Solectron has for the past 10 years, in the
ordinary course of business, sold printed circuit board
assemblies to Teradyne and purchased in-circuit testers from
Teradyne. During the quarter ended May 31, 2006, Solectron
had sales of $67.0 million to Teradyne, all of which were
made on an arms-length basis.
|
|
NOTE 18
|
Guarantee
of Subsidiary Notes
|
Solectrons 8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 were
issued in February 2006 by Solectron Global Finance LTD, an
indirect 100%-owned finance subsidiary of Solectron Corporation.
The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior
subordinated basis by Solectron Corporation. No other subsidiary
of Solectron Corporation guarantees the notes.
27
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
With the exception of historical facts, the statements
contained in this quarterly report are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), and are subject to the safe harbor provisions set
forth in the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements
relate to matters including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
future sales and operating results, including future earnings,
growth, rates and trends;
|
|
|
|
our anticipation of the timing and amounts of our future
obligations and commitments and our ability to meet those
commitments;
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding valuation allowances on future tax
benefits in various countries;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our reserves for potential tax liabilities for
open periods;
|
|
|
|
the amount of available future cash and our belief that our cash
and cash equivalents, short-term investments, lines of credit
and cash from continuing operations will be sufficient for us to
meet our obligations for the next twelve months;
|
|
|
|
the success, capabilities and capacities of our business
operations;
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our restructuring provisions and timing of our
restructuring actions and their impact on our business or
results of operations;
|
|
|
|
the anticipated financial impact of recent and future
acquisitions and divestitures and the adequacy of our provisions
for indemnification obligations pursuant to such transactions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to comply with the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
|
|
our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
our belief that our current or future environmental liability
exposure related to our facilities will not be material to our
business, financial condition or results of operations; and
|
|
|
|
various other forward-looking statements contained in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
We intend that our forward-looking statements be subject to
the safe harbors created by the Exchange Act. The
forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words
such as intend, anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect
and other similar words and statements and variations or
negatives of these words. Our forward-looking statements are
based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions and are
subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in condition,
significance, value and effect, including those discussed under
the heading Risk Factors in this report and in our
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
Forms 10-K,
10-Q,
8-K,
S-3 and
S-4. Such
risks, uncertainties and changes in condition, significance,
value and effect could cause our actual results to differ
materially from our anticipated outcomes. Although we believe
that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements
are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate.
Therefore, we can give no assurance that the results implied by
these forward-looking statements will be realized. The inclusion
of forward-looking information should not be regarded as a
representation by our company or any other person that the
future events, plans or expectations contemplated by Solectron
will be achieved. Furthermore, past performance in operations
and share price is not necessarily indicative of future
performance. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update
or revise any forward-looking statements contained in the
documents incorporated by reference herein, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We provide a range of worldwide manufacturing and integrated
supply chain services to companies who design and market
electronic products. Our revenue is generated from sales of our
services primarily to customers in the Computing &
Storage, Networking, Communications, Consumer, Industrial,
Automotive, and Other (includes
28
Medical, Defense and Aerospace) markets. As a result of the
services we perform for our customers, we are impacted by our
customers ability to appropriately predict market demand
for their products. While we work with our customers to
understand their demand needs, we are removed from the actual
end-market served by our customers. Consequently, determining
future trends and estimates of activity can be very difficult.
Summary
of Results and Key Performance Indicators
The following table sets forth, for the three-month and
nine-month periods indicated, certain key operating results and
other financial information (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,702.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,596.0
|
|
|
$
|
7,658.6
|
|
|
$
|
8,042.6
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
134.6
|
|
|
|
396.8
|
|
|
|
448.0
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense
|
|
|
112.2
|
|
|
|
109.7
|
|
|
|
323.9
|
|
|
|
310.0
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
(66.7
|
)
|
|
|
79.7
|
|
|
|
(22.3
|
)
|
Management regularly reviews financial and non-financial
performance indicators to assess the Companys operating
results. The following table sets forth, for the quarterly
periods indicated, certain of managements key financial
performance indicators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
February 28,
|
|
November 30,
|
|
August 31,
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2005
|
|
2005
|
|
Inventory turns
|
|
7.2 turns
|
|
7.4 turns
|
|
8.0 turns
|
|
7.9 turns
|
|
8.1 turns
|
Days sales outstanding (DSO)
|
|
42 days
|
|
44 days
|
|
45 days
|
|
46 days
|
|
46 days
|
Days payable outstanding (DPO)
|
|
54 days
|
|
54 days
|
|
53 days
|
|
54 days
|
|
50 days
|
Cash-to-cash
cycle (C2C)
|
|
38 days
|
|
40 days
|
|
37 days
|
|
38 days
|
|
41 days
|
Capital expenditures (in millions)
|
|
$46.0
|
|
$50.2
|
|
$58.9
|
|
$48.4
|
|
$35.9
|
Inventory turns is calculated as the ratio of cost of sales
compared to the average inventory for the quarter. DSO is
calculated as the ratio of average accounts receivable, net, for
the quarter compared to average daily net sales for the quarter.
DPO is calculated as the ratio of average accounts payable
during the quarter compared to average daily cost of sales for
the quarter. The C2C cycle is determined by taking the ratio of
360 days compared to inventory turns plus DSO minus DPO.
Capital expenditures are primarily related to equipment
purchases supporting replacement of aged equipment, increased
demand in certain products, new programs and information
technology projects.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management is required to make judgments, assumptions and
estimates that affect the amounts reported when we prepare
consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. Note 1, Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial
statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005, describes the
significant accounting policies and methods used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Estimates
are used for, but not limited to, our accounting for revenue
recognition, inventory valuation, allowance for doubtful
accounts, goodwill, intangible assets, restructuring and related
impairment costs, income taxes, loss contingencies and
stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ from these
estimates. The following critical accounting policies are
impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
29
Revenue
Recognition
Solectron principally generates revenue from the manufacture of
products for customers, the repair of both in-warranty and
out-of-warranty
products, and the provision of supply chain services. The
Company recognizes manufacturing revenue, net of estimated
product return costs, when it ships goods or the goods are
received by its customer, title and risk of ownership have
passed, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and
recoverability is reasonably assured. Generally, there are no
formal customer acceptance requirements related to manufacturing
services. If such requirements or obligations exist, then the
Company recognizes revenues at the time when such requirements
are completed and the obligations are fulfilled. The Company
recognizes service revenue when the services have been
performed, and the related costs are expensed as incurred.
We record reductions to revenue for customer incentive programs
in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue No.
01-09,
Accounting for Consideration Given from a Vendor to a
Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors
Products). Such incentive programs include premium
payments and rebates. Premium payments are up-front payments to
customers at program inception, made as a part of a competitive
bidding arrangement, and sometimes in lieu of acquiring
manufacturing assets and workforce from the customer. Premium
payments are recognized either up-front or over time based on
the terms of the customer agreement. In order to recognize a
premium over time, the customer agreement must clearly state
that we are entitled to a refund of the premium payment from the
customer, either pro rata or otherwise, if certain production
levels are not achieved. Where such contractual recovery
provisions exist, we believe that a probable future economic
benefit exists and, thus, establish an asset, which is amortized
against revenue as product
and/or
service delivery occurs under the contract. When the contractual
recovery provisions do not exist, we record the premium payment
as an immediate up-front reduction of revenues. For those
incentives that require the estimation of future sales, such as
for rebates, we use historical experience and internal and
customer data to estimate the sales incentive at the time
revenue is recognized. In the event that the actual results of
these items differ from the estimates, adjustments to the sales
incentive accruals are recorded. To date, these adjustments have
not been material.
From
time-to-time,
Solectron includes an extended warranty at the time of product
shipment. The revenue associated with the extended warranty is
deferred and recognized over the extended warranty period.
Certain customer arrangements require evaluation of the criteria
outlined in EITF Issue
No. 99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an
Agent, in determining whether it is appropriate to record
the gross amount of sales and related costs or the net amount
earned as commissions. Generally, when Solectron is primarily
obligated in a transaction, is subject to general and physical
inventory risk, has latitude in establishing prices, has
discretion in selecting suppliers, changes the product or
performs the service, is involved in the determination of
product or service specifications, and has credit risk, or has
several but not all of these indicators, revenue is recorded
gross. If several of these indicators are not present, Solectron
generally records the net amounts as commissions earned. For
example, in a situation where a customer retains ownership of
the materials utilized in their products, Solectron would
generally only recognize revenue on a net basis.
Inventory
Valuation
Our inventories are stated at the lower of weighted average cost
or market. Our industry is characterized by rapid technological
change, short-term customer commitments and rapid changes in
demand, as well as other factors which may influence the
recoverability of inventories. We make provisions for estimated
excess and obsolete inventory based on our regular reviews of
inventory quantities on hand and the latest forecasts of product
demand and production requirements from our customers. Our
provisions for excess and obsolete inventory are also impacted
by our contractual arrangements with our customers including our
ability or inability to re-sell such inventory to them. If
actual market conditions or our customers product demands
are less favorable than those projected or if our customers are
unwilling or unable to comply with any contractual arrangements
related to excess and obsolete inventory, additional provisions
may be required. If an additional 0.2% to 0.5% of our inventory
were determined to be excess and obsolete at May 31, 2006,
our gross profit and operating income from continuing operations
before income taxes for the nine months ended May 31, 2006
would have each decreased by $3.0 million to
$7.4 million.
30
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Another area of judgment affecting reported revenue and net
income is managements estimate of receivables that will
ultimately be collected. We evaluate the collectability of our
accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. When we
are aware of circumstances that may impair a specific
customers ability to meet its financial obligations to us,
we record a specific allowance against amounts due to us and
thereby reduce the net receivable to the amount we reasonably
believe is likely to be collected. For all other customers, we
recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length
of time the receivables are outstanding, industry and geographic
concentrations, the current business environment and our
historical experience. If the financial condition of our
customers deteriorates or if economic conditions worsen,
additional allowances may be required. Using this information,
management reserves an amount that is believed to be
uncollectible. Based on managements analysis of
uncollectible accounts, reserves totaling $14.8 million or
1.1% of the gross accounts receivable balance were established
at May 31, 2006, compared with $22.3 million or 1.4%
of the gross accounts receivable balance at August 31, 2005.
Goodwill
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, we review the carrying amount of
goodwill for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth
quarter (as of June 1). Additionally, we perform an impairment
assessment of goodwill whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may
not be recoverable. Significant changes in circumstances can be
both internal to our strategic and financial direction, as well
as changes to the competitive and economic landscape. We have
determined that there is a single reporting unit for the purpose
of goodwill impairment tests under SFAS No. 142. For
purposes of assessing the impairment of our goodwill, we
estimate the value of the reporting unit using our market
capitalization as the best evidence of fair value. This fair
value is then compared to the carrying value of the reporting
unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its
carrying value, we then allocate the fair value of the unit to
all the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any
unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting units
fair value was the purchase price to acquire the reporting unit.
The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the
amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied
fair value of the goodwill. If the carrying amount of the
reporting units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of
that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to that excess. The process of evaluating the potential
impairment of goodwill is subjective and requires judgment at
many points during the test including future revenue forecasts,
discount rates and various reporting unit allocations. During
fiscal year 2003, Solectron recorded a $1.6 billion
goodwill impairment as a result of significant negative industry
and economic trends impacting Solectrons operations and
stock price.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets consist of supply agreements, intellectual
property, and contractual and non-contractual customer
relationships obtained in acquisitions. Intangible assets are
evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. Intangible assets subject to impairment testing
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate total
$17.4 million as of May 31, 2006. The carrying amount
of an intangible asset is not recoverable if its carrying value
exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to
result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset.
Impairment is measured by comparing the intangible assets
carrying amounts to the fair values as determined using
discounted cash flow models. There is significant judgment
involved in determining these cash flows. During fiscal years
2004 and 2003, respectively, Solectron recorded impairments of
intangible assets in connection with our disengagement from
certain product lines and as a result of reduced expectations of
sales to be realized under certain supply agreements,
respectively.
Restructuring
and Related Impairment Costs
Over the past few years, we have recorded restructuring and
impairment costs as we rationalized our operations in light of
customer demand declines and the economic downturn. These
measures, which included reducing the workforce, consolidating
facilities and changing the strategic focus of a number of
sites, were largely intended to
31
align our capacity and infrastructure to anticipated customer
demand and transition our operations to lower cost regions.
These restructuring measures were undertaken in accordance with
restructuring plans that were reasonable, probable and unlikely
of significant change at the time of plan establishment. These
restructuring and impairment costs include employee severance
and benefit costs, costs related to leased facilities abandoned
and subleased, impairment of owned facilities no longer used by
us which will be disposed, costs related to leased equipment
that has been abandoned, and impairment of owned equipment that
will be disposed. For owned facilities and equipment, the
impairment loss recognized was based on the fair value less
costs to sell, with fair value estimated based on existing
market prices for similar assets.
Severance and benefit costs are recorded in accordance with
SFAS No. 112, Employers Accounting for
Postemployment Benefits, as we concluded that we had a
substantive severance plan based on past restructuring actions
in many of the geographies in which we operate. These costs are
recognized when Solectron management has committed to a formal
restructuring plan and the severance costs are probable and
estimable. We apply the provisions of SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities relating to one-time termination benefits to
both (1) severance activities in geographies where we do
not have a substantive severance plan and (2) situations in
which the severance benefits offered to employees within a given
geography are in excess of those offered under prior
restructuring plans. Severance costs accounted for under
SFAS No. 146 are recognized when Solectron management
has committed to a restructuring plan and communicated those
actions to employees. Our estimate of severance and benefit
costs assumptions is subjective as it is based on estimates of
employee attrition and assumptions about future business
opportunities.
In accordance with SFAS No. 146, the estimated lease
loss accrued for leased facilities abandoned and subleased after
December 31, 2002 represents the fair value of the lease
liability as measured by the present value of future lease
payments subsequent to abandonment less the present value of any
estimated sublease income. For those facilities abandoned and
subleased before January 1, 2003, as part of restructuring
activities under EITF Issue
No. 94-3,
Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination
Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity, the
estimated lease loss represents payments subsequent to
abandonment less any estimated sublease income. In order to
estimate future sublease income, we work with real estate
brokers to estimate the length of time until we can sublease a
facility and the amount of rent we can expect to receive.
Estimates of expected sublease income could change based on
factors that affect our ability to sublease those facilities
such as general economic conditions and the real estate market,
among others.
Other exit costs include costs to consolidate facilities or
close facilities and relocate employees. A liability for such
costs is recorded at its fair value in the period in which the
liability is incurred.
At each reporting date, we evaluate our accruals for exit costs
and employee separation costs to ensure the accruals are still
appropriate. In certain circumstances, accruals are no longer
required because of efficiencies in carrying out the plans or
because employees previously identified for separation resigned
and did not receive severance or were redeployed due to
circumstances not foreseen when the original plans were
initiated. If necessary, we reverse accruals through the income
statement line item entitled Restructuring and impairment
costs, where the original charges were recorded, when it
is determined that they are no longer required.
Income
Taxes
We currently have significant deferred tax assets in certain
jurisdictions resulting from tax credit carry-forwards, net
operating losses and other deductible temporary differences,
which will reduce taxable income in such jurisdictions in future
periods. We have provided valuation allowances for future tax
benefits resulting from U.S. and foreign net operating loss
carry-forwards and for certain other U.S. and foreign deductible
temporary differences where we believe future realizability is
in doubt. SFAS No. 109 requires a valuation allowance
be established when it is more likely than not that
all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized,
and further provides that it is difficult to conclude that a
valuation allowance is not needed when there is negative
evidence in the form of cumulative losses in recent years.
Therefore, cumulative losses weigh heavily in the overall
assessment. In the third quarter of fiscal year 2003, we
established a valuation allowance for most of our deferred tax
assets. This was primarily due to cumulative losses from prior
years and uncertainty regarding our ability to generate certain
minimum levels of taxable income within the next three years. We
have not yet established a
32
sustained level of profitability since that time in those
countries in which the deferred tax assets arose and thus expect
to record a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits. Our
ability to realize sustained profitability in those
jurisdictions in the near term is uncertain as Solectron derives
the majority of its revenue from low-cost locations. It is these
low-cost locations where Solectron anticipates reporting taxable
profits. Solectron will not be able to offset any tax expense
associated with these taxable profits with the unrecognized
deferred tax assets described above. As a result of our
assessment, our total valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
arising from continuing operations is approximately
$1.7 billion at May 31, 2006.
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining
our worldwide income tax provision and evaluating tax positions.
There are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate
tax determination is uncertain and we are regularly under audit
by tax authorities. Accordingly, we have established contingency
reserves for income taxes in various jurisdictions in accordance
with SFAS No. 5 Accounting for
Contingencies.
We believe that our accruals for tax liabilities are adequate
for all open years, based on our assessment of many factors,
including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied
to the facts of each matter. Although we believe that our
accruals for tax liabilities are reasonable, tax regulations are
subject to interpretation and the tax controversy process is
inherently uncertain; therefore, our assessments can involve
both a series of complex judgments about future events and rely
heavily on estimates and assumptions. To the extent that the
probable tax outcome of these matters changes, such changes in
estimates will impact the income tax provision in the period in
which such determination is made.
Loss
Contingencies
We are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies
arising in the ordinary course of business (for example,
environmental and legal matters). We consider the likelihood of
the loss occurring and our ability to reasonably estimate the
amount of loss in determining the necessity for, and amount of,
any loss contingencies. Estimated loss contingencies are accrued
when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly
evaluate information available to us to determine whether any
such accruals should be adjusted. Such revisions in the
estimates of the potential loss contingencies could have a
material impact on our consolidated results of operations and
financial position.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment. Under the fair value recognition
provisions of this statement, share-based compensation cost is
measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and
is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining
the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires
judgment, including estimating our stock price volatility and
employee stock option exercise behaviors. If actual results
differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based
compensation expense and our results of operations could be
materially impacted.
Our expected volatility is based upon equal weightings of the
historical volatility of Solectrons stock and, for fiscal
periods in which there is sufficient trading volume in options
on Solectrons stock, the implied volatility of traded
options on Solectron stock having a life of more than
6 months.
The expected life of options is based on observed historical
exercise patterns, which can vary over time.
As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, the amount of expense has been
reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123R
requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and
revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were
estimated based on historical experience.
If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the
application of SFAS No. 123R, the compensation expense
that we record in future periods may differ significantly from
what we have recorded in the current period.
33
Results
of Operations
The following table summarizes certain items in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of net
sales. The financial information and the discussion below should
be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. The
discussion following the table is provided separately for
continuing and discontinued operations. For all periods
presented, our condensed consolidated statements of operations
exclude the results from certain operations we plan to divest
which have been classified as discontinued operations.
Information related to the discontinued operations results is
provided separately; following the continuing operations
discussion below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
94.7
|
|
|
|
94.8
|
|
|
|
94.8
|
|
|
|
94.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Restructuring and impairment costs
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Other (expense)
income net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Operating income (loss) from
continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Sales Continuing Operations
Net sales increased to $2.7 billion and decreased to
$7.7 billion for the three and nine months ended
May 31, 2006, respectively, from $2.6 billion and
$8.0 billion in the corresponding periods of fiscal 2005.
Computing & storage end market revenues increased by
$58 million, or 7%, and $137 million, or 6%, in the
three month and nine month periods ended May 31, 2006
versus the corresponding periods of fiscal 2005. This increase
was largely due to higher demand for computer servers. Largely
due to increased sales of semiconductor manufacturing equipment,
industrial revenues increased by $91 million, or 58%, and
$202 million, or 45%, respectively, in the three month and
nine month periods ended May 31, 2006 versus the
corresponding period of fiscal 2005. The networking market
increased $29 million, or 5%, but decreased slightly by
$2 million, or 0%, in the three month and nine month
periods ended May 31, 2006.
Partially offsetting the increase for the three months and
driving the decrease for the nine months ended May 31, 2006
were decreases in the consumer, communications, and automotive
markets. The majority of this reduction occurred in the consumer
end market which declined by $20 million, or 6%, and
$475 million, or 38%, respectively in the three month and
nine month periods ended May 31, 2006, versus the
corresponding periods of fiscal 2005. This decline in the
consumer sector was attributable to a significant drop in sales
of 3G cellular handsets
34
and set-top boxes. However, sales of set-top boxes have
increased sequentially from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005
through each of the first three quarters of fiscal 2006. Due to
lower customer demand, primarily for telecom infrastructure
equipment, the communications market declined by
$23 million, or 4%, and $197 million, or 12%,
respectively, in the three month and nine month periods ended
May 31, 2006, versus the corresponding periods of fiscal
2005. The automotive market decreased by $34 million, or
38% and $48 million, or 19% in the three month and nine
month periods ended May 31, 2006, versus the corresponding
periods of fiscal 2005 due to lower demand in this market.
The following table depicts, for the periods indicated, revenue
by market expressed as a percentage of net sales. The
distribution of revenue across our markets has fluctuated, and
will continue to fluctuate, as a result of customer demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Computing & Storage
|
|
|
32.4
|
%
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
|
|
33.0
|
%
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
Communications
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.6
|
%
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
Networking
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
25.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
Industrial
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Automotive
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
Sales Continuing Operations
In the three and nine months ended May 31, 2006, our
international locations contributed approximately 70.9% and
68.8% of net sales compared to approximately 72.5% and 71.0%,
respectively, for the corresponding period of fiscal 2005.
Major
Customers Continuing Operations
Certain customers accounted for 10% or more of our net sales.
The following table includes these customers and the percentage
of net sales attributed to them:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cisco Systems
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.8%
|
|
|
|
17.1%
|
|
|
|
13.8%
|
|
Nortel Networks
|
|
|
|
***
|
|
|
11.3%
|
|
|
|
10.3%
|
|
|
|
11.3%
|
|
Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 61.4% and
61.1% of net sales for the three and nine months ended
May 31, 2006, compared to approximately 62.2% and 61.3% in
the corresponding periods of fiscal 2005.
We believe that our ability to grow depends on increasing sales
to existing customers and on successfully attracting new
customers. Customer contracts can be canceled and volume levels
can be changed or delayed. The timely replacement of delayed,
canceled or reduced orders with new business cannot be ensured.
In addition, we cannot assume that any of our current customers
will continue to utilize our services. Consequently, our results
of operations may be materially adversely affected.
Cisco launched its Lean initiative as part of their ongoing
effort to improve accuracy of demand forecasting and planning in
their supply chain. Cisco is in the midst of a phased
implementation of the Cisco Lean initiative
35
amongst its manufacturing partners, with the Solectron
transition scheduled to begin in the first quarter of fiscal
2007. In the initial stages of this implementation, Solectron
expects inventory to increase by approximately $200 million.
Gross
Profit Continuing Operations
Our gross profit percentage increased to 5.3% for the three
months ended May 31, 2006 as compared to 5.2% for the
corresponding period in fiscal 2005. Our gross profit decreased
to 5.2% for the nine months ended May 31, 2006 as compared
to 5.6% for the corresponding period in fiscal 2005. The gross
profit percentage increase for the three months ended
May 31, 2006 when compared to the gross profit percentage
for the three months ended May 31, 2005 was primarily
attributable to a $16.7 million charge incurred in 2005 in
connection to tax audit exposure of our Brazilian operation.
These tax audits primarily relate to indirect taxes for
inventory and other components of cost of sales. Cost of sales
increased by $99.0 million, or 4.0%, and decreased by
$332.8 million, or 4.4%, in the three months and nine
months ended May 31, 2006, respectively, versus the
corresponding periods in fiscal 2005. This gross profit
percentage increase for the three months and decline for the
nine months ended May 31, 2006 versus the corresponding
periods of fiscal 2005 was primarily the result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
A 0.7 percentage point decrease and 0.2 percentage
point increase as a percentage of revenue in direct labor and
manufacturing support costs for the three and nine months ended
May 31, 2006, respectively, over the corresponding periods
in fiscal 2005. The 0.7 percentage point decrease was a
result of reductions in manufacturing scrap and higher equipment
utilization. The 0.2 percentage point increase was driven
by additions of headcount in anticipation of certain customer
program ramps as well as wage increases.
|
|
|
|
A 1.2 percentage point and 0.4 percentage point
increase in material and material supply chain costs as a
percentage of revenues, largely attributable to higher freight,
duties, fuel costs, and labor costs, for each of the three and
nine months ended May 31, 2006, respectively, over the
corresponding periods in fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
In addition, to the above items, the adoption of SFAS 123R
during fiscal 2006, increased cost of sales by $1.5 million
and $5.1 million during the three month and nine month
periods ended May 31, 2006, respectively, compared to the
corresponding periods of fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
As discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company reversed $2.8 million relating to
foreign transaction taxes.
|
Sales of inventory previously written down or written off have
not been significant and have not had any material impact on our
gross profits for the three and nine months ended May 31,
2006.
Selling,
General and Administrative (SG&A)
Expenses Continuing Operations
SG&A expenses increased $2.5 million, or 2.3%, for the
three months ended May 31, 2006 compared to the
corresponding period in fiscal 2005. SG&A expenses increased
$13.9 million, or 4.5% for the nine months ended
May 31, 2006, compared to the corresponding period in
fiscal 2005. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses
remained flat at 4.2% for the three months ended May 31,
2006 as compared to the corresponding period in fiscal 2005. As
a percentage of net sales for the nine months ended May 31,
2006, SG&A expenses increased to 4.2% compared to 3.9% for
the corresponding period in fiscal 2005.
The increase for the nine months ended May 31, 2006
compared to the corresponding period in fiscal 2005 was
attributable to approximately $7 million in new SG&A
expenses due to the adoption of FAS 123R and approximately
$14 million arising from additional headcount in the
sales & account management and program management
areas. In addition, we incurred $5 million in severance
expenses related to operating reductions. These increases were
partially offset by a $3 million reduction in bad debt
expense, lower R&D spending of $2 million, and reduced
insurance expenses of $4 million and approximately
$3 million of miscellaneous other charges.
36
Restructuring
and Impairment Continuing Operations
Total restructuring and impairment charges were
$2.6 million and $9.1 million during the three and
nine months ended May 31, 2006, respectively.
The restructuring and impairment charges incurred during the
third quarter of fiscal 2006 consist of $1.8 million of
charges arising from the abandonment of a leased facility and
changes in lease estimates relative to restructured facilities;
$0.8 million of transfer and other exit costs;
$0.2 million of equipment and facilities impairment
charges; and a net reduction to the severance provision of
$0.2 million due to changes in planned severance actions.
Included in these amounts is a $0.7 million reversal
related to a release of an accrual established under acquisition
accounting that is no longer required
During the nine months ended May 31, 2006, Solectron
recorded a $1.9 million net impairment charge in connection
with the termination of a customer relationship for which an
intangible asset had previously been established. This net
amount consisted of a $2.4 million impairment charge offset
by a $0.5 million gain on the sale of equipment to this
former customer.
Currently, Solectron estimates that the restructuring plan
initiated during fiscal year 2005 is expected to realize a
savings of approximately $30 million annually due to
reductions in workforce, facility, lease and depreciation
expenses. We expect a substantial amount of these savings are
and will be used to offset the impact on gross margin by market
forces as we consolidate facilities and shift manufacturing and
repair services from high cost countries to lower costs
countries. These savings predominantly relate to cost of sales.
Cash payments associated with the fiscal year 2005 plan
scheduled in the next 12 months, which have already been
accrued for, are expected to be $10.1 million.
We continue to evaluate our operations and we may propose
selected future restructuring actions as a result of changes in
market conditions and footprint alignment with our
customers production needs.
Interest
Income Continuing Operations
Interest income decreased $0.3 million to
$12.3 million for the three months ended May 31, 2006
from $12.6 million in the corresponding period in fiscal
2005. Interest income increased $9.2 million to
$36.7 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2006
from $27.5 million in the corresponding period in fiscal
2005. The increase was primarily due to higher balances.
Interest
Expense Continuing Operations
Interest expense decreased $10.1 million to
$7.2 million for the three months ended May 31, 2006
from $17.3 million in the corresponding period in fiscal
2005. Interest expense decreased $29.5 million to
$20.8 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2006
from $50.3 million in the corresponding period in fiscal
2005. The decrease was primarily due to the May 2005 redemption
of $500 million aggregate principal amount of
9.625% senior notes.
Other
(Expense)
Income net Continuing
Operations
Other (expense) income net decreased
$47.0 million to an expense of $0.8 million for the
three months ended May 31, 2006 from expense of
$47.8 million in the corresponding period in fiscal 2005.
Other (expense) income net decreased
$41.2 million to $0.8 million for the nine months
ended May 31, 2006 from expense of $42.0 million in
the corresponding period in fiscal 2005. The fluctuation is
primarily due to the recognition of a loss on the early
retirement of debt in the third quarter of 2005.
Income
Taxes Continuing Operations
Our income tax expense was a $10.7 million benefit and a
$0.8 million benefit, respectively, for the three and nine
months ended May 31, 2006 as compared to a
$1.4 million benefit and $11.1 million expense,
respectively, for the three and nine months ended May 31,
2005. We incurred net tax expense in certain countries in which
we had profitable operations during the periods ended
May 31, 2006 and May 31, 2005. Income tax expense for
the three
37
and nine months ended May 31, 2006 include the recognition
of benefits of $17.5 million associated with a refund of
taxes paid on the earnings by reinvesting the earnings of a
foreign subsidiary.
The effective income tax rate is largely a function of the
balance between income and losses from domestic and
international operations. Our international operations, taken as
a whole, have been subject to tax at a lower rate than
operations in the United States, primarily due to tax holidays
granted to certain of our overseas sites in Malaysia and
Singapore. The Malaysian tax holiday is effective through
January 2012, subject to certain conditions, including
maintaining certain levels of research and development
expenditures. The Singapore tax holiday is effective through
March 2011, subject to certain conditions. Solectron also enjoys
the benefit of low statutory income tax rates in various
provinces throughout China on the basis of the qualification as
a high tech enterprise. During the three months ended
May 31, 2006, the Company included in its computation of
its estimated annual effective income tax rate for fiscal 2006 a
$5.6 million benefit resulting from taxes paid on the
earnings by reinvesting the earnings of one of the international
operations. It is anticipated that the annual effective tax rate
for the foreign subsidiary will be favorably impacted in future
periods as the Company intends to continue to apply for refunds
of taxes paid on the reinvested earnings of the foreign
subsidiary. The Company plans to reinvest the earnings after the
current fiscal year end.
Certain of our offshore operations are reporting taxable
profits, mostly arising in low-cost locations. Accordingly, we
are recognizing some tax expense related to those operations. We
will not be able to offset this tax expense with unrecognized
deferred tax assets (See Note 16 Taxes),
because, for the most part, those assets did not arise in the
jurisdictions where we are realizing taxable profits.
During the three months ended May 31, 2006, we received an
examination report from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
showing proposed changes to the companys tax for the
periods ended August 2001 and August 2002. The company will be
filing an appeals with the IRS during the fourth quarter for
proposed changes that the Company does not agree with. Although
the outcome of the appeals process is always uncertain, the
Company believes that adequate amounts of tax and interest have
been provided for any adjustments that are expected to result
for these years.
A domestic state jurisdiction is currently conducting a sales
and use tax audit for the period from January 1, 1999
through December 31, 2001. Solectron filed an application
to participate in an amnesty program in order to protect itself
from any penalties that may arise as a result of a potential
audit assessment. Although there is a reasonable possibility
that a loss may be incurred, no estimate of the possible loss
can be made at this time.
In addition, Solectron has established contingency reserves for
income taxes in various jurisdictions. The estimate of
appropriate tax reserves is based upon the probable amount of
prior tax benefit that is at risk upon audit and upon the
reasonable estimate of the amount at risk. Solectron
periodically reassesses the amount of such reserves and adjusts
reserve balances as necessary. During the nine months ended
May 31, 2006, we recorded an additional accrual related to
a transfer pricing adjustment assessed by a foreign tax
authority. The recorded amount represents managements best
estimate of the cost it will incur in relation to the exposure
but there is a reasonable possibility that the final settlement
could differ from the estimate. The estimate of the range of
possible loss is $1.0 million to $12.0 million.
38
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
Cash and cash equivalents decreased to approximately
$1.2 billion at May 31, 2006 from approximately
$1.7 billion at August 31, 2005. The table below, for
the periods indicated, provides selected condensed consolidated
cash flow information (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(104.9
|
)
|
|
|
702.8
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
(113.1
|
)
|
|
|
696.9
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(160.6
|
)
|
|
|
(75.3
|
)
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(143.5
|
)
|
|
|
(62.3
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing
activities of continuing operations
|
|
|
(204.3
|
)
|
|
|
(505.1
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing
activities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(213.2
|
)
|
|
|
(512.2
|
)
|
Net cash used in operating activities was $113.1 million
during the nine months ended May 31, 2006. This change was
generated by a $371.7 million increase in inventories and a
$168.2 million increase in accounts receivable. This was
partially offset by net income of $96.4 million, non-cash
depreciation and amortization charges of $130.4 million,
and a $246.6 million increase in accounts payable. The
inventory increase was attributable to new program ramps,
certain program launch delays and the creation of buffer stock
to accommodate both program transfers between sites and the
go-live date of a new ERP system at one of our facilities.
Net cash used in investing activities of $143.5 million
during the nine months ended May 31, 2006 primarily
consisted of $155.6 million in capital expenditures offset
by $17.1 of cash provided by discontinued operations. The cash
provided by investing activities of discontinued operations
primarily consisted of a working capital settlement and sales of
assets formerly associated with discontinued operations.
Net cash used in financing activities of $213.2 million
during the nine months ended May 31, 2006 primarily
consisted of $205.7 million of share repurchases and
$150 million of payments made to redeem the
7.375% Senior Notes, partially offset by
$147.4 million in net proceeds from the issuance of our
8% senior subordinated notes due 2016.
Debt
As of May 31, 2006, we had available a $500 million
revolving credit facility that expires on August 20, 2007.
Our revolving credit facility is guaranteed by certain of our
domestic subsidiaries and secured by the pledge of domestic
accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, the pledge of
equity interests in certain of our subsidiaries and notes
evidencing intercompany debt. Borrowings under the credit
facility bear interest, at our option, at the London Interbank
offering rate (LIBOR) plus a margin of 2.25% based on our
current senior secured debt ratings, or the higher of the
Federal Funds Rate plus 1/2 of 1% or Bank of America N.A.s
publicly announced prime rate. As of May 31, 2006, there
were no borrowings outstanding under this facility. We are
subject to compliance with certain financial covenants set forth
in this facility including, but not limited to, capital
expenditures, cash interest coverage and leverage. We were in
compliance with all applicable covenants as of May 31, 2006.
In addition, we had no committed foreign lines of credit and
$43.0 million in uncommitted foreign lines of credit and
other bank facilities as of May 31, 2006. A committed line
of credit obligates a lender to loan us amounts under the credit
facility as long as we adhere to the terms of the credit
agreement. An uncommitted line of credit is extended to us at
the sole discretion of a lender. The interest rates range from
the banks prime lending rate to the
39
banks prime rate plus 1.0%. As of May 31, 2006, we
had no borrowings under uncommitted foreign lines of credit and
$2.4 million of guaranteed amounts under uncommitted
foreign lines of credit.
$64.3 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.97% ACES
subordinated debenture is due November 15, 2006. This
obligation is classified as a current liability at May 31,
2006.
Synthetic
Leases
We have synthetic lease agreements relating to three
manufacturing sites for continuing operations. The synthetic
leases have expiration dates in 2007. At the end of the lease
term, we have an option, subject to certain conditions, to
purchase or to cause a third party to purchase the facilities
subject to the synthetic leases for the Termination
Value, which approximates the lessors original cost
for each facility, or we may market the property to a third
party at a different price. We are entitled to any proceeds from
a sale of the properties to third parties in excess of the
Termination Value and liable to the lessor for any shortfall not
to exceed 85% of the Termination Value We have provided loans to
the lessor equaling approximately 85% of the Termination Value
for each synthetic lease. These loans are repayable solely from
the sale of the properties to third parties in the future, are
subordinated to the amounts payable to the lessor at the end of
the synthetic leases, and may be credited against the
Termination Value payable if we purchase the properties. The
approximate aggregate Termination Values and loan amounts were
$87.7 million and $74.5 million, respectively, as of
May 31, 2006.
In addition, cash collateral of $13.2 million, an amount
equal to the difference between the aggregate Termination Values
and the loan amounts, is pledged as collateral. Each synthetic
lease agreement contains various affirmative covenants. A
default under a lease, including violation of these covenants,
may accelerate the termination date of the arrangement. We were
in compliance with all applicable covenants as of May 31,
2006. Monthly lease payments are generally based on the
Termination Value and
30-day LIBOR
index (5.0225% as of May 31, 2006) plus an
interest-rate margin, which may vary depending upon our
Moodys Investors Services and Standard and
Poors ratings, and are allocated between the lessor and us
based on the proportion of the loan amount to the Termination
Value for each synthetic lease.
During fiscal 2004, we determined that it is probable that the
expected fair value of the properties under the synthetic lease
agreements will be less than the Termination Value at the end of
the lease terms by approximately $13.5 million. The
$13.5 million is being accreted over the remaining lease
terms. As of May 31, 2006, Solectron had accreted
$8.3 million.
We account for these synthetic lease arrangements as operating
leases in accordance with SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, as amended. Our loans to the
lessor and cash collateral are included in other assets and
restricted cash and cash equivalents, respectively, in the
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Restricted
Cash
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, Solectron elected to
put in place a line of credit for the issuance of standby
letters of credit. The letters of credit are principally related
to self-insurance for workers compensation liability coverage.
These standby letters of credit were previously issued under
Solectrons revolving credit facility. Solectron opted to
post cash collateral totaling 105% of the standby letter of
credit balances in order to reduce annual issuance commissions
of the standby letters of credit. Total cash collateral of
$18.2 million at May 31, 2006, is classified as
restricted cash and cash equivalents in the condensed
consolidated balance sheets. Solectron also has
$13.2 million of restricted cash in connection with the
synthetic leases described above. The interest earned on
restricted cash is at Solectrons benefit.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
Our off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations
consist of our synthetic and operating leases, our foreign
exchange contracts, and certain indemnification provisions
related to our seven divestures (described in the
Discontinued Operations section below).
A tabular presentation of our contractual obligations is
provided below under Contractual Obligations and
Commitments.
40
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents, short-term
investments, lines of credit and cash anticipated to be
generated from continuing operations will satisfy our expected
working capital, capital expenditures, debt service and
investment requirements through at least the next 12 months.
The following is a summary of certain contractual obligations
and commitments as of May 31, 2006 for continuing
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
FY07
|
|
|
FY08
|
|
|
FY09
|
|
|
FY10
|
|
|
FY11
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$
|
712.3
|
|
|
$
|
78.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
$
|
451.7
|
|
|
$
|
167.3
|
|
Interest Expense on LT Debt
|
|
|
94.0
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
Operating lease
|
|
|
138.0
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
Operating leases for restructured
facilities and equipment
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Purchase obligations(1)
|
|
|
114.8
|
|
|
|
114.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,093.1
|
|
|
$
|
251.8
|
|
|
$
|
27.6
|
|
|
$
|
42.3
|
|
|
$
|
36.6
|
|
|
$
|
45.1
|
|
|
$
|
480.2
|
|
|
$
|
209.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have guaranteed various purchase commitments for materials,
supplies and services incurred during the normal course of
business. |
Other long-term liabilities of $78.4 million disclosed on
the condensed consolidated financial statements includes
deferred tax liabilities related to timing differences and
non-US pension liabilities, which due to their nature are not
projected.
Discontinued
Operations
During fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004, as a result of a full review
of our portfolio of businesses, we committed to a plan to divest
a number of business operations that are no longer part of our
strategic plan for the future. In accordance with
SFAS No. 144, we have reported the results of
operations and financial position of these businesses in
discontinued operations within the consolidated statements of
operations and balance sheets for all periods presented. The
companies that we have divested and that are included in
discontinued operations are: Dy 4 Systems Inc., Kavlico
Corporation, Solectrons MicroTechnology division, SMART
Modular Technologies Inc., Stream International Inc., our 63%
interest in US Robotics Corporation, and Force Computers, Inc.
The collective results from all discontinued operations for all
periods presented were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
May 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Operating expense
(income) net
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
Interest
income net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
(expense) net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued
operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
Net sales, gross profit, and operating income (loss) from
discontinued operations decreased for the nine months ended
May 31, 2006 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2005
primarily due to the fact that the final discontinued operation
was sold during three months ended November 30, 2004. This
transaction resulted in a $10.1 million pre-tax gain from
the sale of the discontinued operations recorded in operating
income net for the three month period ended
November 30, 2004, including the transfer of
$28.3 million from accumulated foreign currency translation
gains, included in accumulated other comprehensive losses within
Stockholders Equity. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006,
the working capital adjustment pursuant to the sales agreement
was resolved, resulting in a gain of $9.4 million.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, Solectron increased the
net loss on disposal of those discontinued operations by
approximately $0.5 million resulting from a few
insignificant adjustments pursuant to the terms of the disposal
transaction. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, Solectron
sold a building that was subject to a synthetic lease agreement.
The synthetic lease agreement was associated with a discontinued
operation that has been sold. As a result of the transaction,
Solectron recorded a gain of approximately $0.9 million in
operating income net as disclosed above.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, Solectron recorded a
$2.1 million gain on sale of assets of discontinued
operations having no remaining book value and $1.7 million
associated with the favorable resolution of certain
contingencies. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006,
Solectron recorded a $2.1 million gain on the sale of
assets formerly associated with a discontinued operation and
$1.8 million associated with the favorable resolution of
certain contingencies.
The sale agreements for the divestitures contain certain
indemnification provisions pursuant to which Solectron may be
required to indemnify the buyer of the divested business for a
limited period subsequent to the completion of the sale for
liabilities, losses, or expenses arising out of breaches of
covenants and certain breaches of representations and warranties
relating to the condition of the business prior to and at the
time of sale. As of May 31, 2006, most of these
indemnification provisions have expired and Solectron is
contingently liable, in the aggregate, until the end of fiscal
2006 for up to $21 million under such indemnification
provisions. As of May 31, 2006, there were no significant
liabilities recorded under these indemnification obligations.
Additionally, Solectron may be required to indemnify a buyer for
environmental remediation costs until 2011, such indemnification
not to exceed $13 million. Solectron maintains an insurance
policy to cover environmental remediation liabilities in excess
of reserves previously established upon the acquisition of these
properties. Solectron did not record any environmental charges
upon disposition of these properties.
RISK
FACTORS
Risks
Related to Our Business
Most
of our sales come from a small number of customers; if we lose
any of these customers, our net sales could decline
significantly.
Most of our annual net sales come from a small number of our
customers. Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately
61.4% and 62.2% of net sales from continuing operations in the
third quarter of fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the
third quarter of fiscal 2006, one of these customers
individually accounted for more than ten percent of our net
sales. Any material delay, cancellation or reduction of orders
from these or other major customers could cause our net sales to
decline significantly, and we may not be able to reduce the
accompanying expenses at the same time. We cannot guarantee that
we will be able to retain any of our largest customers or any
other accounts, or that we will be able to realize the expected
revenues under existing or anticipated supply agreements with
these customers. Our business, market share, consolidated
financial condition and results of
42
operations will continue to depend significantly on our ability
to obtain orders from new customers, retain existing customers,
realize expected revenues under existing and anticipated supply
agreements, as well as on the consolidated financial condition
and success of our customers and their customers.
Sales may not improve, and could decline, in future periods if
there is continued or resumed weakness in customer demand,
particularly in the communications, computing and consumer
sectors, resulting from domestic or worldwide economic
conditions.
Our
customers may cancel their orders, change production quantities
or locations, or delay production.
To remain competitive, EMS companies must provide their
customers increasingly rapid product turnaround, at increasingly
competitive prices. We generally do not have long-term
contractual commitments from our top customers. As a result, we
cannot guarantee that we will continue to receive any orders or
revenues from our customers. Customers may cancel orders at
their sole discretion, change production quantities or delay
production for a number of reasons outside of our control. Many
of our customers have experienced from time to time significant
decreases in demand for their products and services, as well as
continual material price competition and sales price erosion.
This volatility has resulted, and will continue to result, in
our customers delaying purchases on the products we manufacture
for them, and placing purchase orders for lower volumes of
products than previously anticipated. Cancellations, reductions
or delays by a significant customer or by a group of customers
would seriously harm our results of operations by lowering,
eliminating or deferring revenue without substantial offsetting
reductions in our costs thereby reducing our profitability. In
addition, customers may require that manufacturing of their
products be transitioned from one of our facilities to another
of our facilities to achieve cost reductions and other
objectives. Such transfers, if unanticipated or not properly
executed, could result in various inefficiencies and increased
costs, including excess capacity and overhead at one facility
and capacity constraints and related strains on our resources at
the other, disruption and delays in product deliveries and
sales, deterioration in product quality and customer
satisfaction, and increased manufacturing and scrap costs all of
which would have the effect of reducing our profits.
We may
not be able to sell excess or obsolete inventory to customers or
third parties, which could have a material adverse impact on our
consolidated financial condition.
The majority of our inventory purchases and commitments are
based upon demand forecasts that our customers provide to us.
The customers forecasts, and any changes to the forecasts,
including cancellations, may lead to on-hand inventory
quantities and on-order purchase commitments that are in excess
of the customers revised needs, or on-hand inventory that
becomes obsolete.
We generally enter into agreements with our significant
customers. Under these agreements, the extent of our
customers responsibility for excess or obsolete inventory
related to raw materials that were previously purchased or
ordered to meet that customers demand forecast is defined.
If our customers do not comply with their contractual
obligations to purchase excess or obsolete inventory back from
us and we are unable to use or sell such inventory, or if we are
unsuccessful in obtaining our customers agreement to
purchase such inventory contractually, our consolidated
financial condition could be materially harmed. Some of our
customers are in the communications industry, an industry that
in recent years has experienced declining revenue, large losses,
negative cash flows, and several bankruptcies or defaults on
borrowing arrangements. There is a risk that, in the future,
these or other customers may not purchase inventory back from us
despite contractual obligations, which could harm our
consolidated financial condition if we are unable to sell the
inventory at carrying value. In addition, enforcement of these
supply agreements may result in material expenses, delays in
payment for inventory
and/or
disruptions in our customer relationships.
In addition, we are responsible for excess and obsolete
inventory resulting from inventory purchases in excess of
inventory needed to meet customer demand forecasts at the time
the purchase commitments were made, as well as any inventory
purchases outside that provided for in our agreements. For
inventory which is not the customers responsibility,
provisions are made when required to reduce any such excess or
obsolete inventory to its estimated net realizable value based
on the quantity of such inventory on hand, our customers
latest forecasts of production requirements, our assessment of
available disposition alternatives such as use of components on
other programs, the
43
ability and cost to return components to the vendor and our
estimates of resale values and opportunities. These assessments
are based upon various assumptions and market conditions which
are subject to rapid change,
and/or which
may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Any material changes in
our assumptions or market conditions could have a significant
effect on our estimates of net realizable value, could
necessitate material changes in our provisions for excess and
obsolete inventory, and could have a material adverse impact on
our consolidated financial condition. In addition, in the normal
course of business, bona fide disagreements may arise over the
amount
and/or
timing of such claims, and in order to avoid litigation
expenses, collection risks, or disruption of customer
relationships, we may elect to settle such disputes for lesser
amounts than we believe we should be entitled to recover. In
these instances, we must bear the economic loss of any such
excess or obsolete inventory, which could have a material
adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition.
Our
non-U.S. locations
represent a significant portion of our sales; we are exposed to
risks associated with operating internationally.
Approximately 70.9% and 72.5% of our net sales from continuing
operations are the result of services and products manufactured
in countries outside the United States during the third quarter
of fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. As a result of our
foreign sales and facilities, our operations are subject to a
variety of risks and costs that are unique to international
operations, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
adverse movement of foreign currencies against the
U.S. dollar in which our results are reported;
|
|
|
|
import and export duties, and value added taxes;
|
|
|
|
import and export regulation changes that could erode our profit
margins or restrict exports
and/or
imports;
|
|
|
|
potential restrictions on the transfer of funds;
|
|
|
|
government and license requirements governing the transfer of
technology and products abroad;
|
|
|
|
disruption of local labor supply
and/or
transportation services;
|
|
|
|
inflexible employee contracts in the event of business downturns;
|
|
|
|
the burden and cost of compliance with import and export
regulations and foreign laws;
|
|
|
|
economic and political risks in emerging or developing
economies; and
|
|
|
|
risks of conflict and terrorism that could disrupt our or our
customers and suppliers businesses.
|
We have been granted tax holidays, subject to some conditions,
for our Malaysian site, effective through January 2012, and our
Singapore sites, effective through March 2011. These tax
holidays are effective for various terms and are subject to some
conditions. It is possible that the current tax holidays will be
terminated or modified or that future tax holidays that we may
seek will not be granted. If the current tax holidays are
terminated or modified, or if additional tax holidays are not
granted in the future or when our current tax holidays expire,
our future effective income tax rate could increase.
We are
exposed to general economic conditions, which could have a
material adverse impact on our business, operating results and
consolidated financial condition.
As a result of the recent economic conditions in the United
States and internationally, and reduced capital spending as well
as uncertain end-market demand, our sales have been difficult to
forecast with accuracy. Though we have seen some recovery in the
markets that we serve, if there were to be continued weakness,
or any further deterioration in the markets in which we operate
or the business or financial condition of our customers, it
would have a material adverse impact on our business, operating
results and consolidated financial condition. In addition, if
the economic conditions in the United States and the other
markets we serve worsen, we may experience a material adverse
impact on our business, operating results and consolidated
financial condition.
44
Possible
fluctuation of operating results from quarter to quarter and
factors out of our control could affect the market price of our
securities.
Our quarterly earnings
and/or stock
price may fluctuate in the future due to a number of factors
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
differences in the profitability of the types of manufacturing
services we provide. For example, high velocity and low
complexity printed circuit boards and systems assembly services
have lower gross profit than low volume/complex printed circuit
boards and systems assembly services;
|
|
|
|
our ability to maximize the hours of use of our equipment and
facilities is dependent on the duration of the production run
time for each job and customer;
|
|
|
|
the amount of automation that we can use in the manufacturing
process for cost reduction varies, depending upon the complexity
of the product being made;
|
|
|
|
our customers demand for our products and their ability to
take delivery of our products and make timely payments for
delivered products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to optimize the ordering of inventory as to timing
and amount to avoid holding inventory in excess of immediate
production needs;
|
|
|
|
our ability to offer technologically advanced, cost-effective,
quick response manufacturing services;
|
|
|
|
our ability to drive down manufacturing costs in accordance with
customer and market requirements is dependent upon our ability
to apply Lean Six Sigma operating principles;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the availability and pricing of components;
|
|
|
|
timing of expenditures in anticipation of increased sales;
|
|
|
|
cyclicality in our target markets;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our market share;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
expenses and disruptions associated with acquisitions and
divestitures;
|
|
|
|
announcements of operating results and business conditions by
our customers;
|
|
|
|
announcements by our competitors relating to new customers or
technological innovation or new services;
|
|
|
|
economic developments in the electronics industry as a whole;
|
|
|
|
credit rating and stock analyst downgrades;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate changes to our enterprise
resource planning, or ERP system;
|
|
|
|
political and economic developments in countries in which we
have operations; and
|
|
|
|
general market conditions.
|
If our operating results in the future are below the
expectations of securities analysts and investors, the market
price of our outstanding securities could be harmed.
If we
incur more restructuring-related charges than currently
anticipated, our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations may suffer.
We incurred approximately $2.6 million of restructuring and
impairment costs relating to continuing operations in the third
quarter of fiscal 2006 and approximately $40.5 million
during the third quarter of fiscal 2005. If our estimates about
previous restructuring charges prove to be inadequate, our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations may
suffer. We continue to evaluate our cost structure relative to
future financial
45
results and customer demand. If our estimates about future
financial results and customer demand prove to be inadequate,
our consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of
operations may suffer.
Failure
to attract and retain key personnel and skilled associates could
hurt our operations.
Our continued success depends to a large extent upon the efforts
and abilities of key managerial and technical associates. Losing
the services of key personnel could harm us. Our business also
depends upon our ability to continue to attract and retain key
executives, senior managers and skilled associates. Failure to
do so could harm our business.
We
depend on limited or sole source suppliers for critical
components. The inability to obtain sufficient components as
required, and under favorable purchase terms, would cause harm
to our business.
We are dependent on certain suppliers, including limited and
sole source suppliers, to provide key components used in our
products. We have experienced, and may in the future experience,
delays in component deliveries, which in turn could cause delays
in product shipments and require the redesign of certain
products. In addition, if we are unable to procure necessary
components under favorable purchase terms, including at
favorable prices and with the order lead-times needed for the
efficient and profitable operation of our factories, our results
of operations could suffer. The electronics industry has
experienced in the past, and may experience in the future,
shortages in semiconductor devices, including
application-specific integrated circuits, DRAM, SRAM, flash
memory, certain passive devices such as tantalum capacitors, and
other commodities that may be caused by such conditions as
overall market demand surges or supplier production capacity
constraints. The inability to continue to obtain sufficient
components as and when required, or to develop alternative
sources as and when required, could cause delays, disruptions or
reductions in product shipments or require product redesigns
which could damage relationships with current or prospective
customers, and increase inventory levels and costs, thereby
causing harm to our business.
We
potentially bear the risk of price increases associated with
shortages in electronics components.
At various times, there have been shortages of components in the
electronics industry leading to increased component prices. One
of the services that we perform for many customers is purchasing
electronics components used in the manufacturing of the
customers products. As a result of this service, we
potentially bear the risk of price increases for these
components if we are unable to purchase components at the
pricing level anticipated to support the margins assumed in our
agreements with our customers.
Our
net sales could decline if our competitors provide comparable
manufacturing services and improved products at a lower
cost.
We compete with a number of different contract manufacturers,
depending on the type of service we provide or the geographic
locale of our operations. This industry is intensely competitive
and some of our competitors may have greater manufacturing,
financial, R&D
and/or
marketing resources than we have. In addition, we may not be
able to offer prices as low as some of our competitors because
those competitors may have lower cost structures as a result of
their geographic location or the services they provide, or
because such competitors are willing to accept business at lower
margins in order to utilize more of their excess capacity. In
that event, our net sales would decline. We also expect our
competitors to continue to improve the performance of their
current products or services, to reduce their current products
or service sales prices and to introduce new products or
services that may offer greater value-added performance and
improved pricing. If we are unable to improve our capabilities
substantially, any of these could cause a decline in sales, loss
of market acceptance of our products or services and
corresponding loss of market share, or profit margin
compression. We have experienced instances in which customers
have transferred certain portions of their business to
competitors in response to more attractive pricing quotations
than we have been willing to offer, and there can be no
assurance that we will not lose business in the future in
response to such competitive pricing or other inducements which
may be offered by our competitors.
46
We
depend on the continuing trend of OEMs to
outsource.
A substantial factor in our past revenue growth was attributable
to the transfer of manufacturing and supply-based management
activities from our OEM customers. Future growth is partially
dependent on new outsourcing opportunities. To the extent that
these opportunities are not available, our future growth would
be unfavorably impacted.
Our
strategic relationships with major customers create
risks.
In the past several years, we completed several strategic
transactions with OEM customers. Under these arrangements, we
generally acquired inventory, equipment and other assets from
the OEM, and leased (or in some cases acquired) their
manufacturing facilities, while simultaneously entering into
multi-year supply agreements for the production of their
products. There has been strong competition among EMS companies
for these transactions, and this competition may continue to be
a factor in customers selection of their EMS providers.
These transactions contributed to a significant portion of our
past revenue growth, as well as to a significant portion of our
more recent restructuring charges and goodwill and intangible
asset impairments. While we do not anticipate our acquisitions
of OEM plants and equipment in the near future to return to the
levels at which they occurred in the recent past, there may be
occasions on which we determine it to be advantageous to
complete acquisitions in selected geographic
and/or
industry markets. As part of such arrangements, we would
typically enter into supply agreements with the divesting OEMs,
but such agreements generally do not require any minimum volumes
of purchases by the OEM and the actual volume of purchases may
be less than anticipated. Arrangements which may be entered into
with divesting OEMs typically would involve many risks,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
we may pay a purchase price to the divesting OEMs that exceeds
the value we are ultimately able to realize from the future
business of the OEM;
|
|
|
|
the integration into our business of the acquired assets and
facilities may be time-consuming and costly;
|
|
|
|
we, rather than the divesting OEM, would bear the risk of excess
capacity;
|
|
|
|
we may not achieve anticipated cost reductions and efficiencies;
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to meet the expectations of the OEM as to
volume, product quality, timeliness and cost reductions; and
|
|
|
|
if demand for the OEMs products declines, the OEM may
reduce its volume of purchases, and we may not be able to
sufficiently reduce the expenses of operating the facility or
use the facility to provide services to other OEMs, and we might
find it appropriate to close, rather than continue to operate,
the facility, and any such actions would require us to incur
significant restructuring
and/or
impairment charges.
|
As a result of these and other risks, we may be unable to
achieve anticipated levels of profitability under such
arrangements and they may not result in material revenues or
contribute positively to our earnings.
If we
are unable to manage future acquisitions and cost-effectively
run our operations, our profitability could be adversely
affected.
Our ability to manage and integrate future acquisitions will
require successful integration of such acquisitions into our
manufacturing and logistics infrastructure, and may require
enhancements or upgrades of accounting and other internal
management systems and the implementation of a variety of
procedures and controls. We cannot guarantee that significant
problems in these areas will not occur. Any failure to enhance
or expand these systems and implement such procedures and
controls in an efficient manner and at a pace consistent with
our business activities could harm our consolidated financial
condition and results of operations. In addition, we may
experience inefficiencies from the management of geographically
dispersed facilities and incur substantial infrastructure and
working capital costs.
47
Business
disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and
financial condition and increase our costs and
expenses.
Our worldwide operations could be subject to natural disasters
and other business disruptions, which could seriously harm our
revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and
expenses. We are predominantly self-insured for losses and
interruptions caused by earthquakes, power shortages,
communications failures, water shortages, tsunamis, floods,
typhoons, hurricanes, fires, extreme weather conditions and
other natural or manmade disasters.
Notwithstanding
our recent divestiture of certain businesses, we will remain
subject to certain indemnification obligations for a period of
time after completion of the divestitures.
The sale agreements for our divested businesses contain
indemnification provisions pursuant to which we may be required
to indemnify the buyer of the divested business for liabilities,
losses or expenses arising out of breaches of covenants and
certain breaches of representations and warranties relating to
the condition of the business prior to and at the time of sale.
While we believe, based upon the facts presently known to us,
that we have made adequate provision for any such potential
indemnification obligations, it is possible that other facts may
become known in the future which may subject us to claims for
additional liabilities or expenses beyond those presently
anticipated and provided for. Should any such unexpected
liabilities or expenses be of a material amount, our finances
could be adversely affected.
If we
have a material weakness in our internal controls over financial
reporting, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of
our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in
the value of our securities.
One or more material weaknesses in our internal controls over
financial reporting could occur or be identified in the future.
In addition, because of inherent limitations, our internal
controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements, and any projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness of internal controls to future periods are subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with our
policies or procedures may deteriorate. If we fail to maintain
the adequacy of our internal controls, including any failure to
implement or difficulty in implementing required new or improved
controls, our business and results of operations could be
harmed, we could fail to be able to provide reasonable assurance
as to our financial results or meet our reporting obligations
and there could be a material adverse effect on the price of our
securities.
If our
products are subject to warranty or liability claims, our
business reputation may be damaged and we may incur significant
costs.
We may experience defects in our designs or deficiencies with
respect to our manufacturing services. In certain of our
manufacturing service contracts, we provide a warranty against
such defects or deficiencies. We may be exposed to warranty
and/or
manufacturers liability claims as a result of these
defects
and/or
deficiencies, and some claims may relate to customer product
recalls. A successful claim for damages arising as a result of
such defects or deficiencies for which we are not insured or
where the damages exceed our insurance coverage or any material
claim for which insurance coverage is denied or limited and for
which indemnification is not available could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition. A successful claim for such damages, or a
product recall conducted by one of our customers, also could
have an adverse effect on our business reputation. A claim,
regardless of merit, might be time-consuming and expensive to
resolve.
Our
design and engineering services may result in additional
exposure to product liability, intellectual property
infringement and other claims.
We are offering more design services, primarily those relating
to products that we manufacture for our customers, and we offer
design services related to collaborative design manufacturing
and turnkey solutions. Providing such services can expose us to
different or greater potential liabilities than those we face
when providing our regular manufacturing services. With the
growth of our design services business, we have increased
exposure to
48
potential product liability claims resulting from injuries
caused by defects in products we design, as well as potential
claims that products we design infringe third-party intellectual
property rights. Such claims could subject us to significant
liability for damages and, regardless of their merits, could be
time-consuming and expensive to resolve. We also may have
greater potential exposure from warranty claims, and from
product recalls due to problems caused by product design. Costs
associated with possible product liability claims, intellectual
property infringement claims and product recalls could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rate fluctuations.
We have currency exposure arising from both sales and purchases
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of
our sites. Fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the
currency of the exposure and the functional currency of our
sites could seriously harm our business, operating results and
consolidated financial condition.
As of May 31, 2006, we had outstanding foreign exchange
forward contracts with a total notional amount of approximately
$364.8 million. The change in value of the foreign exchange
forward contracts resulting from a hypothetical 10% change in
foreign exchange rates would be offset by the remeasurement of
the related balance sheet items, the result of which would not
be significant.
The primary objective of our investment activities is to
preserve principal, while at the same time maximize yields
without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this
objective, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents in a
variety of securities, including government and corporate
obligations, certificates of deposit and money market funds. As
of May 31, 2006, substantially our entire total portfolio
was scheduled to mature in less than three months. A
hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would not have a
material effect on the fair value of our investment portfolios.
Our long-term debt instruments are currently subject to fixed
interest rates and the amount of principal to be repaid at
maturity is also fixed. Therefore, although we are not currently
exposed to variable interest rates related to our long-term debt
instruments, we may become exposed if there were to be material
borrowings under our credit facility or we take actions such
that our other long-term debt instruments become exposed to
variable interest rates.
Failure
to comply with environmental and other regulations could harm
our business.
As a company in the electronics manufacturing services industry,
we are subject to a variety of environmental regulations,
including those relating to the use, storage, discharge and
disposal of hazardous chemicals used during our manufacturing
process as well as air quality and water quality regulations,
restrictions on water use, and storm water regulations. We are
also required to comply with laws and regulations relating to
occupational safety and health, product disposal and product
content and labeling. Although we have never sustained any
significant loss as a result of non-compliance with such
regulations, any failure by us to comply with environmental laws
and regulations could result in liabilities or the suspension of
production. In addition, these laws and regulations could
restrict our ability to expand our facilities or require us to
acquire costly equipment or incur other significant costs to
comply with regulations.
We own and lease some contaminated sites (for some of which we
have been indemnified by third parties for required
remediation), sites for which there is a risk of the presence of
contamination, and sites with some levels of contamination for
which we may be liable and which may or may not ultimately
require any remediation. In addition, we have been and are
potentially liable for contamination at sites where we have
disposed of hazardous materials. We have obtained environmental
insurance to reduce potential environmental liability exposures
posed by some of our operations and facilities. We believe,
based on our current knowledge, that the cost of any groundwater
or soil clean up that may be required at our facilities or at
any disposal sites would not materially harm our business,
consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
Nevertheless, the process of remediating contamination in soil
and groundwater at facilities is costly and cannot be estimated
with high levels of confidence, and there can be no assurance
that the costs of such activities would not harm our business,
consolidated financial condition and results of operations in
the future.
49
In general, we are not directly responsible for the compliance
of our manufactured products with laws like the Waste Electrical
and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive relating to the
collection and recycling of certain electronic products and the
Restrictions of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive relating
to the hazardous materials content of certain electronic
products, both adopted by the European Union, as well as similar
laws being adopted in other countries (including the United
States). These laws generally apply to our OEM customers though
OEM customers may require us to certify that our products meet
the requirements of the laws. Solectron also may provide
compliance-related services with respect to WEEE, RoHS and
similar laws to our customers upon request. Failing to have the
capability of delivering the products which comply with these
present and future environmental laws and regulations could
restrict our ability to expand facilities, or could require us
to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant
expenses to comply with environmental regulations, and could
impair our relations with our customers. Moreover, to the extent
we are found non-compliant with any environmental laws and
regulations applicable to our activities, we may incur
substantial fines and penalties.
We may
not be able to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual
property rights and could become involved in intellectual
property disputes.
In the past we have been and may from time to time continue to
be notified of claims that we may be infringing patents,
copyrights or other intellectual property rights owned by other
parties. In the event of an infringement claim, we may be
required to spend a significant amount of money to develop a
non-infringing alternative, to obtain licenses,
and/or to
defend against the claim. We may not be successful in developing
such an alternative or obtaining a license on reasonable terms,
if at all. Any litigation, even where an infringement claim is
without merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion
of resources. Accordingly, the resolution or adjudication of
intellectual property disputes could have a material adverse
effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and
results of operations.
Our ability to effectively compete may be affected by our
ability to protect our proprietary information. We hold a number
of patents, patent applications, and various trade secrets and
license rights. These patents, trade secrets, and license rights
may not provide meaningful protection for our manufacturing
processes and equipment innovations, or we might find it
necessary to initiate litigation proceedings to protect our
intellectual property rights. Any such litigation could be
lengthy and costly and could harm our consolidated financial
condition.
Rating
downgrades may make it more expensive for us to borrow
money.
Our issuer credit rating is B+ with a positive
outlook by Standard & Poors and our long-term
corporate family rating is B1 with stable outlook by
Moodys. These credit ratings are subject to change at the
discretion of the rating agencies. If our credit ratings were
downgraded, it would increase our cost of capital should we
borrow under our revolving lines of credit, and it may make it
more expensive for us to raise additional capital in the future.
Such capital raising may be on terms that may not be acceptable
to us or capital may not be available to us at all. Any future
adverse rating agency actions with respect to our ratings could
have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities,
our ability to compete for new business, our cost of capital,
and our ability to access capital markets.
Unanticipated
changes in our tax rates or in our exposure to additional income
tax liabilities could affect our operating results and financial
condition.
We are subject to income taxes both in the United States and
various foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rates could be
adversely affected by changes in tax laws and increases in the
percentages of our earnings from countries with higher tax
rates, as well as other factors. If any of these changes were to
occur, our income tax provision, operating results and financial
condition could be adversely affected.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for factors related to
fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currency and
fluctuations in interest rates under Risk
Factors We are exposed to fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates, and We are exposed
to interest rate fluctuations.
50
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on their evaluation as of the
end of the period covered by this Report, Solectrons
principal executive officer and principal financial officer have
concluded that Solectrons disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act)) are effective to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by Solectron in reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in internal control over financial
reporting. Solectron implemented a new Enterprise
Resource Planning (ERP) system at one of its facilities during
the third quarter of fiscal 2006. There were no changes in
Solectrons internal control over financial reporting
during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 or in other factors that
materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially
affect our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Solectron is from time to time involved in various litigation
and legal matters incidental to the normal course of its
business. Management believes that the final resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position, cash flows, or results of
operations. By describing any particular matter, Solectron does
not intend to imply that it or its legal advisors have concluded
or believe that the outcome of any of those particular matters
is or is not likely to have a material adverse impact upon
Solectrons consolidated financial position, cash flows or
results of operations.
Solectron has settled the previously reported shareholder class
action lawsuit entitled Abrams v. Solectron Corporation
et al., Case
No. C-03-0986
CRB, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California, on terms not considered to be material
to Solectron. Court approval of the settlement terms was
obtained on March 3, 2006.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Purchases
of Equity Securities
|
On November 1, 2005, Solectrons Board of Directors
approved a stock repurchase program whereby the Company is
authorized to repurchase up to $250 million of the
Companys common stock. Solectron commenced this
$250 million repurchase program at the end of the quarter
ended February 28, 2006. As of May 31, 2006, Solectron
has repurchased and retired 6.9 million shares of its
common stock under this plan at an average price of $3.83 for
approximately $26.5 million. The following table summarizes
the Companys monthly repurchases of its common stock
during the quarter ended May 31, 2006 (in millions, except
per share price):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Approximately
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Shares That May yet
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
be Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
the Plans or Programs
|
|
|
Mar
1 Mar 31, 2006
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
241.5
|
|
Apr 1
Apr 30, 2006
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.96
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
233.5
|
|
May
1 May 31, 2006
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
$
|
223.5
|
|
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended
|
|
3
|
.2**
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the
Registrant
|
|
3
|
.3***
|
|
Certificate of Designation Rights,
Preferences and Privileges of Series A Participating
Preferred Stock of the Registrant
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Consulting Agreement and General
Release dated June 7, 2006 by and between Solectron
Corporation and Marc Onetto
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 filed with
Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 28, 2001, Exhibit 3.1
filed with Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 25, 2000, and
Exhibit 3.1 filed with Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 26, 1999. |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 filed with
Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended November 28, 2003. |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 filed with
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2001. |
52
SOLECTRON
CORPORATION
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SOLECTRON CORPORATION
(Registrant)
Paul J. Tufano
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Warren J. Ligan
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: June 30, 2006
53
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended
|
|
3
|
.2**
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the
Registrant
|
|
3
|
.3***
|
|
Certificate of Designation Rights,
Preferences and Privileges of Series A Participating
Preferred Stock of the Registrant
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Consulting Agreement and General
Release dated June 7, 2006 by and between Solectron
Corporation and Marc Onetto
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 filed with
Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 28, 2001, Exhibit 3.1
filed with Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 25, 2000, and
Exhibit 3.1 filed with Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 26, 1999. |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 filed with
Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended November 28, 2003. |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 filed with
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2001. |