Unassociated Document

United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.  20549

Form N-CSR
Certified Shareholder Report of Registered Management Investment Companies




811-21235

(Investment Company Act File Number)


Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund
_______________________________________________________________

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)



Federated Investors Funds
4000 Ericsson Drive
 Warrendale, PA 15086-7561
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)


(412) 288-1900
(Registrant's Telephone Number)


John W. McGonigle, Esquire
Federated Investors Tower
1001 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-3779
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
(Notices should be sent to the Agent for Service)






Date of Fiscal Year End:  11/30/10


Date of Reporting Period:  Six months ended 5/31/10







Item 1.                      Reports to Stockholders

Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund

Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund


Semi-Annual Shareholder Report

May 31, 2010

FEDERATED INVESTORS' CLOSED-END MUNICIPAL FUNDS

Established 2002

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIOS OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE
SOURCE OF DISTRIBUTIONS - NOTICE


Financial Highlights - Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund

(For a Common Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Six Months
Ended
(unaudited)
5/31/2010
Year Ended November 30,
20092008200720062005
Net Asset Value,
Beginning of Period
$13.25$11.08$14.60$15.56$15.05$14.66
Income From
Investment Operations:
Net investment income10.531.071.121.121.121.12
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, swap contracts and futures contracts0.612.13(3.59)(0.96)0.550.43
Distributions to preferred shareholders from net investment income2(0.01)(0.02)(0.25)(0.32)(0.29)(0.19)
TOTAL FROM
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS
1.133.18(2.72)(0.16)1.381.36
Less Distributions to
Common Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income(0.53)(1.01)(0.80)(0.80)(0.87)(0.97)
Net Asset Value, End of Period$13.85$13.25$11.08$14.60$15.56$15.05
Market Price, End of Period$14.34$14.47$9.37$13.92$15.80$14.44
Total Return at Net Asset Value38.69%29.89%(19.45)%(1.01)%9.51%9.49%
Total Return at Market Price42.91%67.59%(28.31)%(7.03)%15.90%7.75%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
Net expenses51.03%61.03%0.98%70.85%0.85%0.85%
Net expenses excluding interest and trust expenses on inverse floater structures50.85%60.85%0.85%0.85%0.85%0.85%
Net investment income87.81%68.59%6.37%5.33%5.49%6.16%
Expense waiver/reimbursement90.45%60.56%0.54%0.47%100.45%100.45%10
Supplemental Data:
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)$85,240$81,443$67,990$89,528$95,291$92,013
Portfolio turnover14%79%32%12%21%3%
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
1

Asset Coverage Requirements for Investment Company Act of 1940 - Preferred Shares
Total Amount
Outstanding
Asset
Coverage
Per Share
Minimum
Required
Asset
Coverage
Per Share
Involuntary
Liquidating
Preference
Per Share
Average
Market
Value
Per Share11
5/31/2010$36,575,000$83,264$50,008$25,004$25,000
11/30/2009$36,575,000$80,668$50,006$25,003$25,000
11/30/2008$44,075,000$63,565$50,006$25,003$25,000
11/30/2007$53,675,000$66,699$50,006$25,003$25,000
11/30/2006$53,675,000$69,383$50,034$25,017$25,000
11/30/2005$53,675,000$67,857$50,024$25,012$25,000
1Per share numbers have been calculated using the average shares method.
2The amounts shown are based on Common Share equivalents.
3Total Return at Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in the Common Share net asset value, reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any, and does not reflect the sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4Total Return at Market Price is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of the reinvestment.
5Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders and any associated commission costs.
6Computed on an annualized basis.
7The net expense ratio is calculated without reduction for expense offset arrangements. The net expense ratio for the year ended November 30, 2008, is 0.98% after taking into account this expense reduction.
8Ratios reflect reductions for dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
9This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.
10Additional information relating to contractual expense waivers, which has no effect on net expenses, net investment income and net assets previously reported, has been provided to conform to the current year presentation.
11Represents initial public offering price.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
2

Financial Highlights - Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund

(For a Common Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Six Months
Ended
(unaudited)
5/31/2010
Year Ended November 30,
20092008200720062005
Net Asset Value,
Beginning of Period
$13.46$11.90$14.15$14.83$14.41$14.53
Income From
Investment Operations:
Net investment income10.430.920.970.990.960.92
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, swap contracts and futures contracts0.251.54(2.29)(0.66)0.44(0.08)
Distributions to preferred shareholders from net investment income2(0.01)(0.02)(0.24)(0.32)(0.29)(0.20)
TOTAL FROM
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS
0.672.44(1.56)0.011.110.64
Less Distributions to
Common Shareholders:
From net investment income(0.45)(0.88)(0.69)(0.69)(0.69)(0.76)
Net Asset Value, End of Period$13.68$13.46$11.90$14.15$14.83$14.41
Market Price, End of Period$13.27$13.62$9.37$12.50$13.81$12.68
Total Return at Net Asset Value35.04%21.24%(11.47)%0.10%7.94%4.46%
Total Return at Market Price40.71%56.22%(20.62)%(4.80)%14.63%(0.66)%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
Net expenses51.05%61.08%0.98%70.89%0.89%0.89%
Net expenses excluding interest and trust expenses on inverse floater structures0.89%60.89%0.89%0.89%0.89%0.89%
Net investment income86.40%67.01%5.43%4.63%4.61%4.97%
Expense waiver/reimbursement90.35%60.43%0.45%0.42%100.39%100.40%10
Supplemental Data:
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)$95,269$93,598$82,655$98,317$103,017$100,124
Portfolio turnover19%47%20%17%46%15%
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
3

Asset Coverage Requirements for Investment Company Act of 1940 - Preferred Shares
Total Amount
Outstanding
Asset
Coverage
Per Share
Minimum
Required
Asset
Coverage
Per Share
Involuntary
Liquidating
Preference
Per Share
Average
Market
Value
Per Share11
5/31/2010$41,900,000$81,843$50,002$25,001$25,000
11/30/2009$41,900,000$80,846$50,000$25,000$25,000
11/30/2008$50,900,000$65,597$50,004$25,002$25,000
11/30/2007$61,025,000$65,277$50,018$25,009$25,000
11/30/2006$61,025,000$67,203$50,010$25,005$25,000
11/30/2005$61,025,000$66,017$50,004$25,002$25,000
1Per share numbers have been calculated using the average shares method.
2The amounts shown are based on Common Share equivalents.
3Total Return at Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in the Common Share net asset value, reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any, and does not reflect the sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
4Total Return at Market Price is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of the reinvestment.
5Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders and any associated commission costs.
6Computed on an annualized basis.
7The net expense ratio is calculated without reduction for expense offset arrangements. The net expense ratio for the year ended November 30, 2008, is 0.98% after taking into account this expense reduction.
8Ratios reflect reductions for dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
9This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.
10Additional information relating to contractual expense waivers, which has no effect on net expenses, net investment income and net assets previously reported, has been provided to conform to the current year presentation.
11Represents initial public offering price.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
4

Portfolio of Investments Summary Table (unaudited) - Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund

At May 31, 2010, the Fund's sector composition1 was as follows:

Sector Composition Percentage of
Total Investments2
GO Local14.6%
GO State12.5%
Hospital12.1%
Special Tax10.6%
Transportation10.0%
Electric & Gas5.8%
Senior Care5.8%
Pre-refunded5.7%
Public Power5.3%
Water & Sewer4.9%
Other312.7%
TOTAL100.0%
1Sector classifications, and the assignment of holdings to such sectors, are based upon the economic sector and/or revenue source of the underlying borrower, as determined by the Fund's Adviser. For securities that have been enhanced by a third-party (other than a bond insurer), such as a guarantor, sector classifications are based upon the economic sector and/or revenue source of the third party, as determined by the Fund's Adviser. Securities that are insured by a bond insurer are assigned according to the economic sector and/or revenue source of the underlying obligor. Pre-refunded securities are those whose debt service is paid from escrowed funds, usually U.S. government securities.
2Percentages reflect the fully consolidated asset of any inverse floater trust as presented in the Portfolio of Investments.
3For purposes of this table, sector classifications constitute 87.3% of the Fund's investments. Remaining sectors have been aggregated under the designation “Other.”
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
5

Portfolio of Investments - Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund

May 31, 2010 (unaudited)

Principal
Amount
Value
Municipal Bonds – 99.7%
Alabama – 0.5%
$350,000Courtland, AL IDB, PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (International Paper Co.), 6/1/2025324,174
415,000Selma, AL IDB, Gulf Opportunity Zone Bonds (Series 2010A), 5.80% (International Paper Co.), 5/1/2034419,565
TOTAL743,739
Arizona – 2.0%
2,000,000Pima County, AZ IDA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2008B), 5.75% (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 9/1/20292,044,540
750,000Verrado Community Facilities District No. 1, AZ, Revenue Bonds, 6.50%, 7/15/2027702,202
TOTAL2,746,742
California – 8.6%
2,000,000Bay Area Toll Authority, CA, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge Revenue Bonds (Series 2009F-1), 5.00%, 4/1/20282,127,680
1,280,000California State, Refunding Economic Recovery Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.00% (California State Fiscal Recovery Fund), 7/1/20181,452,352
1,000,000California State, Various Purpose UT GO Bonds, 6.00% (Original Issue Yield: 6.10%), 4/1/20381,088,570
260,000Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds (Series 2007A-1), 5.75%, 6/1/2047189,714
750,000Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A-2), 7.90% (United States Agency PRF 6/1/2013@100), 6/1/2042893,460
1,500,000M-S-R Energy Authority, CA, Gas Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A), 7.00% (GTD by Citigroup, Inc.), 11/1/20341,753,110
2,000,000Regents of University of California, General Revenue Bonds (Series 2009Q), 5.25%, 5/15/20292,172,140
2,000,000San Francisco, CA City & County Airport Commission, Second Series Revenue Bonds (Series 2009E), 5.50%, 5/1/20252,207,460
TOTAL11,884,486
Colorado – 4.4%
725,000Antelope Heights Metropolitan District, CO, LT GO Bonds, 8.00% (United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2013@101), 12/1/2023897,137
1,000,000Buckhorn Valley Metropolitan District No. 2, CO, LT GO Bonds, 7.00%, 12/1/2023985,430
500,000Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series A), 7.00% (Denver Academy)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.25%), 11/1/2023520,880
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
6

Principal
Amount
Value
$230,000Colorado State Higher Education Capital Construction Lease Purchase Financing Program, COP (Series 2008), 5.50% (Original Issue Yield: 5.60%), 11/1/2027247,475
90,000Colorado State Higher Education Capital Construction Lease Purchase Financing Program, COP (Series 2008), 5.50% (United States Treasury & Agency PRF 11/1/2018@100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.60%), 11/1/2027107,363
250,000Conservatory Metropolitan District, CO, LT GO Bonds, 6.75% (United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2013@102), 12/1/2034295,972
500,000Conservatory Metropolitan District, CO, LT GO Bonds, 7.55% (United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2013@102), 12/1/2032616,155
665,000Conservatory Metropolitan District, CO, Refunding & Improvement LT GO Bonds, 5.125% (Radian Asset Assurance, Inc. INS), 12/1/2037499,455
1,000,000Denver, CO Health & Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.25% (United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2014@100)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.28%), 12/1/20331,203,460
500,000Southlands, CO Metropolitan District No. 1, LT GO Bonds (Series 2004), 7.00% (United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2014@100)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.05%), 12/1/2024618,730
TOTAL5,992,057
Connecticut – 0.9%
1,250,000Connecticut State Development Authority, First Mortgage Gross Revenue Health Care Project Bonds (Series 2003), 5.85% (Elim Park Baptist Home, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.98%), 12/1/20331,185,875
Delaware – 0.5%
715,000Delaware EDA, Gas Facilities Refunding Bonds, 5.40% (Delmarva Power and Light Co.), 2/1/2031731,238
District of Columbia – 1.8%
2,500,000District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, 6.50% (Original Issue Yield: 6.67%), 5/15/20332,441,725
Florida – 5.2%
540,000Broward County, FL Airport System, Airport System Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2009O), 5.375% (Original Issue Yield: 5.48%), 10/1/2029568,523
1,215,000Harbor Bay, FL Community Development District, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, 6.75%, 5/1/2034839,540
400,000Orlando, FL Urban Community Development District, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, 6.25%, 5/1/2034349,140
1,000,000Orlando, FL Utilities Commission, Utility System Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.25%, 10/1/20391,074,530
1,000,000South Lake County, FL Hospital District, Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A), 6.00% (South Lake Hospital, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.05%), 4/1/20291,032,430
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
7

Principal
Amount
Value
$1,000,000South Lake County, FL Hospital District, Revenue Bonds, 6.625% (South Lake Hospital, Inc.), 10/1/20231,033,360
1,000,000Tolomato Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds (Series 2007), 6.65% (Original Issue Yield: 6.70%), 5/1/2040812,080
970,000Verandah West, FL Community Development District, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 6.625% (Original Issue Yield: 6.75%), 5/1/2033938,349
480,000Winter Garden Village at Fowler Groves Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment Bonds (Series 2006), 5.65%, 5/1/2037445,032
TOTAL7,092,984
Georgia – 3.1%
1,500,000Atlanta, GA Water & Wastewater, Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A), 6.00% (Original Issue Yield: 6.14%), 11/1/20241,667,565
1,000,000Atlanta, GA, Tax Allocation Bonds (Series 2005B), 5.60% (Eastside Tax Allocation District)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.65%), 1/1/20301,001,700
1,500,000DeKalb Private Hospital Authority, GA, Revenue Anticipation Certificates (Series 2009), 5.00% (Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Inc.), 11/15/20241,566,660
TOTAL4,235,925
Guam – 0.3%
375,000Guam Government GO (Section 30), Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.625% (Original Issue Yield: 5.875%), 12/1/2029385,984
Hawaii – 1.7%
750,000Hawaii State Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Revenue Bonds (Series 2009), 6.50% (Hawaiian Electric Co., Inc.), 7/1/2039817,043
1,400,000Hawaii State Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Revenue Bonds (Series A), 8.00% (Kahala Nui)/(Original Issue Yield: 8.175%), 11/15/20331,495,116
TOTAL2,312,159
Illinois – 2.6%
977,000Antioch Village, IL Special Service Area No. 1, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, 6.625% (Deercrest Project), 3/1/2033749,955
1,000,000Chicago, IL Special Assessment, Improvement Revenue Bonds, 6.75% (Lakeshore East Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.769%), 12/1/2032953,410
420,000DuPage County, IL, Special Tax Bonds (Series 2006), 5.625% (Naperville Campus LLC), 3/1/2036329,520
1,000,000Illinois Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.70% (Augustana College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.90%), 10/1/20321,010,810
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
8

Principal
Amount
Value
$625,000Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 6.00% (Landing at Plymouth Place)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.04%), 5/15/2037511,006
TOTAL3,554,701
Indiana – 2.4%
1,500,000Indiana Health & Educational Facility Financing Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2007), 5.50% (Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana), 3/1/20371,483,290
1,930,000Indiana Health & Educational Facility Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.25% (Baptist Homes of Indiana), 11/15/20351,789,612
TOTAL3,272,902
Kentucky – 0.2%
325,000Kentucky EDFA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 6.625% (Norton Healthcare, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.97%), 10/1/2028329,644
Maryland – 0.9%
550,000Baltimore, MD, Special Obligation Revenue Bonds (Series 2008A), 7.00% (East Baltimore Research Park), 9/1/2038555,401
690,000Maryland State Economic Development Corp., Revenue Bonds (Series B), 5.75% (Ports America Chesapeake, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.875%), 6/1/2035707,947
TOTAL1,263,348
Massachusetts – 1.3%
1,730,000Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Highway System Revenue Bonds (Series 2010B), 5.00%, 1/1/20321,776,347
Michigan – 1.1%
1,500,000Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (Henry Ford Health System, MI)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.00%), 11/15/20391,507,560
Mississippi – 1.4%
2,000,000Mississippi Development Bank, Special Obligation Bonds (Series 2006A), 5.00% (Municipal Energy Agency of Mississippi)/(Syncora Guarantee, Inc. INS), 3/1/20411,869,100
Missouri – 0.4%
500,000Missouri Development Finance Board, Infrastructure Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.50% (Branson, MO)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.56%), 12/1/2032500,575
New Jersey – 0.4%
500,000New Jersey EDA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 2004), 5.75% (NJ Dedicated Cigarette Excise Tax)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.89%), 6/15/2029498,835
211,4121New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.50% (Pascack Valley Hospital Association)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.72%), 7/1/20232
TOTAL498,837
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
9

Principal
Amount
Value
New Mexico – 0.6%
$750,0002,3Jicarilla, NM Apache Nation, Revenue Bonds, 5.50%, 9/1/2023788,078
New York – 7.2%
1,030,000Chautauqua County, NY IDA, Exempt Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2009), 5.875% (NRG Energy, Inc.), 4/1/20421,051,846
800,0002New York City, NY IDA, Liberty Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.50%
(7 World Trade Center LLC), 3/1/2035
800,656
1,000,000New York City, NY Municipal Water Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Original Issue Yield: 5.57%), 6/15/20261,155,720
2,000,000New York City, NY Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue Bonds (Series Fiscal 2009EE), 5.25% (Original Issue Yield: 5.50%), 6/15/20402,159,800
1,430,000New York City, NY, UT GO Bonds (Series 2009E), 5.00%, 8/1/20261,542,255
1,000,000New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2009C), 5.00% (School District Financing Program)/(Assured Guaranty Corp. INS), 10/1/20251,082,940
2,000,000Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, NY, General Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A-2), 5.25% (Original Issue Yield: 5.44%), 11/15/20342,158,600
TOTAL9,951,817
North Carolina – 1.3%
1,000,000North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Power System Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2003C), 5.375% (Original Issue Yield: 5.57%), 1/1/20171,068,830
800,000North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.80% (Arc of North Carolina Projects), 10/1/2034790,680
TOTAL1,859,510
Ohio – 2.0%
1,090,000Ohio State Air Quality Development Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.70% (FirstEnergy Solutions Corp.), 8/1/20201,172,709
430,000Ohio State Higher Educational Facility Commission, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2010), 5.75% (Summa Health System)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.92%), 11/15/2040424,509
500,000Ohio State University, General Receipts Bonds (Series 2008A), 5.00%, 12/1/2026548,220
500,000Ohio State University, General Receipts Bonds (Series 2008A), 5.00%, 12/1/2027545,170
TOTAL2,690,608
Oregon – 0.3%
500,0002Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, Tax-Exempt Tax Revenue Bonds (Series 2006C), 5.625%, 10/1/2026354,955
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
10

Principal
Amount
Value
Pennsylvania – 7.8%
$1,000,000Allegheny County, PA IDA, Environmental Improvement Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2009), 6.50% (United States Steel Corp.), 5/1/20171,077,270
935,000Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority, Retirement Community Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 7.25% (Wesley Affiliated Services, Inc. Obligated Group)/(United States Treasury PRF 1/1/2013@101)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.50%), 1/1/20351,083,786
360,000Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority, Retirement Community Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 7.25% (Wesley Affiliated Services, Inc. Obligated Group)/(United States Treasury PRF 1/1/2013@101)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.50%), 1/1/2035417,287
1,500,000Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2008A), 5.50% (St. Lukes Hospital of Bethlehem)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.60%), 8/15/20351,501,830
2,000,000Pennsylvania State Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Subordinate Revenue Bonds (Series 2009D), 5.50%, 12/1/20412,115,260
1,630,000Philadelphia, PA Water & Wastewater System, Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.00% (Original Issue Yield: 5.13%), 1/1/20271,701,655
2,500,000Philadelphia, PA, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.25% (Assured Guaranty Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.30%), 8/1/20222,768,850
TOTAL10,665,938
Puerto Rico – 1.6%
2,000,000Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (First Subordinate Series 2009A), 6.00% (Original Issue Yield: 6.25%), 8/1/20422,163,920
South Carolina – 0.8%
1,170,000South Carolina Jobs-EDA, Health System Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.625% (Bon Secours Health System)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.84%), 11/15/20301,171,170
South Dakota – 2.0%
1,000,000Educational Enhancement Funding Corp., SD, Tobacco Revenue Bonds (Series 2002B), 6.50%, 6/1/20321,001,610
1,750,000South Dakota State Health & Educational Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.65% (Westhills Village Retirement Community)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.75%), 9/1/20231,780,660
TOTAL2,782,270
Tennessee – 2.0%
2,580,000Tennessee State School Board Authority, Higher Educational Facilities Second Program Bonds (Series 2008B), 5.50%, 5/1/20382,813,103
Texas – 15.5%
700,000Decatur, TX Hospital Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 7.125% (Wise Regional Health System), 9/1/2034702,632
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
11

Principal
Amount
Value
$385,000HFDC of Central Texas, Inc., Retirement Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2006A), 5.50% (Village at Gleannloch Farms, Inc.), 2/15/2027321,922
585,000HFDC of Central Texas, Inc., Retirement Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2006A), 5.50% (Village at Gleannloch Farms, Inc.), 2/15/2037435,076
2,000,000Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2009), 5.625% (St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital), 2/15/20252,157,580
2,000,000Houston, TX Airport System, Senior Lien Revenue & Refunding Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.00%, 7/1/20222,200,140
1,500,000Lower Colorado River Authority, TX, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2009), 5.25%, 5/15/20291,606,200
1,050,000Sabine River Authority, TX, PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2003B), 6.15% (Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC), 8/1/2022619,216
10,000,0004Spring Branch, TX ISD, LT GO Bonds, 5.250%, 2/1/203410,693,045
500,000Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Revenue Bonds, (Series 2006A), 6.00% (Northwest Senior Housing Corp. Edgemere Project), 11/15/2036478,310
1,985,000Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.30%, 7/1/20342,049,175
TOTAL21,263,296
Virginia – 3.0%
1,000,000Broad Street CDA, VA, Revenue Bonds, 7.50% (Original Issue Yield: 7.625%), 6/1/2033884,180
500,000Fairfax County, VA IDA, Health Care Revenue Bonds (Series 2009C), 5.00% (Inova Health System), 5/15/2025528,850
1,400,000Peninsula Port Authority, VA, Residential Care Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 7.375% (Virginia Baptist Homes Obligated Group)/(United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2013@100)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.625%), 12/1/20321,661,212
1,000,000Virginia Peninsula Port Authority, Coal Terminal Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2003), 6.00% (Brinks Co. (The)), 4/1/20331,028,150
TOTAL4,102,392
Washington – 12.0%
2,000,000Tobacco Settlement Authority, WA, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, 6.625% (Original Issue Yield: 6.875%), 6/1/20321,982,840
1,000,000Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Group Health Cooperative)/(Radian Asset Assurance, Inc. INS), 12/1/2036871,680
12,790,0004Washington State, UT GO Bonds, (Series 2008A), 5.000%, 7/1/203013,666,243
TOTAL16,520,763
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
12

Principal
Amount
Value
Wisconsin – 3.0%
$2,000,000Wisconsin State General Fund Appropriation, Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A), 6.00% (Wisconsin State)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.10%), 5/1/20362,221,540
500,000Wisconsin State HEFA, Revenue Bonds, 6.50% (Tomah Memorial Hospital, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.75%), 7/1/2023483,315
500,000Wisconsin State HEFA, Revenue Bonds, 6.625% (Tomah Memorial Hospital, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.875%), 7/1/2028488,140
1,000,000Wisconsin State HEFA, Revenue Bonds, 7.25% (Community Memorial Hospital)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.45%), 1/15/2033938,820
TOTAL4,131,815
Wyoming – 0.9%
1,200,000Sweetwater County, WY PCRB, PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2006), 5.25% (Idaho Power Co.), 7/15/20261,273,800
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS
(IDENTIFIED COST $133,162,725)
136,859,363
Short-Term Municipal – 0.3%;5
Michigan – 0.3%
450,000Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, (Series 2007) Weekly VRDNs (Henry Ford Health System, MI)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 0.270%, 6/2/2010
(AT AMORTIZED COST)
450,000
TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS — 100.0%
(IDENTIFIED COST $133,612,725)6
137,309,363
OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — NET7(15,494,046)
LIQUIDATION VALUE OF AUCTION PREFERRED SHARES(36,575,000)
TOTAL NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS$85,240,317

At May 31, 2010, the Fund held no securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).

1Obligor filed for bankruptcy. On September 30, 2008, a Notice of Initial Distribution was received and a portion of the bond was redeemed at par. Subsequent distributions have occurred on various dates to redeem portions of the remaining bonds at discounts to par. The market value of the holding is adjusted to reflect the expected value of future distributions.
2Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At May 31, 2010, these restricted securities amounted to $1,943,689, which represented 1.4% of total market value.
3Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to “qualified institutional buyers” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees (the “Trustees”). At May 31, 2010, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $788,078, which represented 0.6% of total market value.
4Underlying security in inverse floater structure.
5Current rate and next reset date shown for Variable Rate Demand Notes.
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
13

6The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $116,390,163.
7Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total market value at May 31, 2010.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

As of May 31, 2010, all investments of the Fund utilized Level 2 inputs in valuing the Fund's assets carried at fair value.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

CDA — Community Development Authority
COP — Certificate of Participation
EDA — Economic Development Authority
EDFA — Economic Development Finance Authority
GO — General Obligation
GTD — Guaranteed
HEFA — Health and Education Facilities Authority
HFDC — Health Facility Development Corporation
IDA — Industrial Development Authority
IDB — Industrial Development Bond
INS — Insured
ISD — Independent School District
LOC — Letter of Credit
LT — Limited Tax
PCR — Pollution Control Revenue
PCRB — Pollution Control Revenue Bond
PRF — Prerefunded
UT — Unlimited Tax
VRDNs — Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
14

Portfolio of Investments Summary Table (unaudited) - Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund

At May 31, 2010, the Fund's sector composition1 was as follows:

Sector Composition Percentage of
Total Investments2
GO State24.3%
Public Power11.3%
Special Tax10.1%
Hospital7.6%
Transportation6.3%
Pre-refunded6.2%
Electric & Gas5.7%
Education5.4%
Senior Care4.6%
Water & Sewer4.3%
Other314.2%
TOTAL100.0%
1Sector classifications, and the assignment of holdings to such sectors, are based upon the economic sector and/or revenue source of the underlying borrower, as determined by the Fund's Adviser. For securities that have been enhanced by a third-party (other than a bond insurer), such as a guarantor, sector classifications are based upon the economic sector and/or revenue source of the third party, as determined by the Fund's Adviser. Securities that are insured by a bond insurer are assigned according to the economic sector and/or revenue source of the underlying obligor. Pre-refunded securities are those whose debt service is paid from escrowed funds, usually U.S. government securities.
2Percentages reflect the fully consolidated asset of any inverse floater trust as presented in the Portfolio of Investments.
3For purposes of this table, sector classifications constitute 85.8% of the Fund's total investments. Remaining sectors have been aggregated under the designation “Other.”
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
15

Portfolio of Investments - Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund

May 31, 2010 (unaudited)

Principal
Amount
Value
Municipal Bonds – 99.5%
Alabama – 0.2%
$350,000Courtland, AL IDB, PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (International Paper Co.), 6/1/2025324,174
Arizona – 2.5%
1,500,000Arizona Transportation Board, Subordinated Highway Revenue Bonds (Series 2004B), 5.00%, 7/1/20201,666,935
690,000Pima County, AZ IDA, PCRBs (Series 2009A), 4.95% (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 10/1/2020705,090
1,500,000Verrado Community Facilities District No. 1, AZ, Revenue Bonds, 6.15%, 7/15/20171,512,150
TOTAL3,884,175
Arkansas – 0.8%
1,000,000Independence County, AR, PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2005), 5.00% (Entergy Arkansas, Inc.), 1/1/20211,000,390
300,000Jefferson County, AR, PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2006), 4.60% (Entergy Arkansas, Inc.), 10/1/2017302,667
TOTAL1,303,057
California – 8.2%
570,000California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Health Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2004I), 4.95% TOBs (Catholic Healthcare West), Mandatory Tender 7/1/2014616,683
2,000,000California State Department of Water Resources Power Supply Program, Power Supply Revenue Bonds (Series 2010L), 5.00%, 5/1/20212,236,140
1,705,000California State, Refunding Economic Recovery Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.00% (California State Fiscal Recovery Fund), 7/1/20181,934,578
1,335,000California Statewide CDA, Proposition 1A Receivables Program (Series 2009), 5.00% (California State), 6/15/20131,451,986
2,000,000California Statewide CDA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2007), 5.00% (Inland Regional Center), 12/1/20171,848,580
1,475,000Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A-1), 6.25% (United States Agency PRF 6/1/2013@100)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.55%), 6/1/20331,642,855
1,500,000San Diego, CA Public Facilities Authority, Senior Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2009B), 5.00%, 5/15/20161,706,475
1,000,000San Francisco, CA City & County Airport Commission, Second Series Refunding Revenue Private Activity Bonds (Series 2010C), 5.00%, 5/1/20211,106,530
TOTAL12,543,827
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
16

Principal
Amount
Value
Colorado – 4.3%
$725,000Antelope Heights Metropolitan District, CO, LT GO Bonds, 8.00% (United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2013@101), 12/1/2023897,137
500,000Buckhorn Valley Metropolitan District No. 2, CO, LT GO Bonds, 7.00%, 12/1/2023492,715
260,000Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.25% (Denver Academy)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.50%), 11/1/2013268,700
500,000Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series A), 7.00% (Denver Academy)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.25%), 11/1/2023520,880
1,265,000Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.00% (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), 12/1/20131,316,523
865,000Conservatory Metropolitan District, CO, LT GO Bonds, 7.40% (United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2013@102), 12/1/20161,032,187
600,000Denver (City & County), CO, Airport System Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.00% (Denver, CO City & County Department of Aviation), 11/15/2016670,698
675,000Denver (City & County), CO, Airport System Revenue Bonds (Series 2010A), 5.00% (Denver, CO City & County Department of Aviation), 11/15/2022735,500
500,000Southlands, CO Metropolitan District No. 1, LT GO Bonds (Series 2004), 7.00% (United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2014@100)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.05%), 12/1/2024618,730
TOTAL6,553,070
District of Columbia – 0.7%
1,000,000District of Columbia, Ballpark Revenue Bonds (Series 2006B-1), 5.25% (FGIC and National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation INS), 2/1/20161,063,890
Florida – 4.3%
600,0001Capital Trust Agency, FL, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 8.95% (Seminole Tribe of Florida Convention and Resort Hotel Facilities)/(United States Treasury PRF 10/1/2012@102)/(Original Issue Yield:8.95%), 10/1/2033714,540
1,000,000Citizens Property Insurance Corp. FL, Senior Secured Bonds (Series 2009A-1), 5.00% (Assured Guaranty Corp. INS), 6/1/20141,070,160
145,000Fishhawk Community Development District II, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds (Series 2004B), 7.04% (Original Issue Yield: 7.087%), 11/1/2014142,463
360,000Orlando, FL Urban Community Development District, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, 6.00%, 5/1/2020323,809
500,000Orlando, FL, Senior Tourist Development Tax Revenue Bonds (Series 2008A), 5.25% (6th Cent Contract Payments)/(Assured Guaranty Corp. INS), 11/1/2020522,725
1,500,000Tolomato Community Development District, FL, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds (Series 2007), 6.375%, 5/1/20171,381,140
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
17

Principal
Amount
Value
$2,390,000University of Central Florida Athletics Association, Inc., FL, COP (Series 2004A), 5.125% (FGIC and National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation INS), 10/1/20222,433,737
TOTAL6,588,574
Georgia – 3.7%
1,500,000Atlanta, GA Water & Wastewater, Revenue Bonds (Series 2009A), 6.00%, 11/1/20191,745,115
1,400,000Burke County, GA Development Authority, PCRBs (Series 2007E), 4.75% TOBs (Oglethorpe Power Corp.)/(National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation INS), Mandatory Tender 4/1/20111,442,854
500,000DeKalb Private Hospital Authority, GA, Revenue Anticipation Certificates (Series 2009), 5.00% (Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Inc.), 11/15/2016549,720
750,000Fulton County, GA Residential Care Facilities, Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 6.00% (Canterbury Court), 2/15/2022718,897
1,115,000Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.25% (National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation INS), 11/1/20151,207,969
TOTAL5,664,555
Guam – 0.9%
1,250,000Guam Government LO (Section 30), Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.00%, 12/1/20151,321,238
Hawaii – 1.1%
1,550,000Hawaii State Department of Budget & Finance, Special Purpose Revenue Bonds (Series A), 7.00% (Kahala Nui)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.00%), 11/15/20121,647,557
Illinois – 3.8%
1,825,000Chicago, IL Sales Tax, Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS), 1/1/20191,987,114
1,000,000Chicago, IL Special Assessment, Improvement Bonds (Series 2002), 6.625% (Lakeshore East Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.637%), 12/1/2022982,110
1,000,000Illinois Educational Facilities Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.00% (Augustana College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.05%), 10/1/20141,038,880
875,000Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 6.00% (Landing at Plymouth Place), 5/15/2025773,894
1,000,000Illinois Finance Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (Depaul University), 10/1/20141,091,450
TOTAL5,873,448
Indiana – 1.4%
1,050,000Indiana Health & Educational Facility Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.00% (Baptist Homes of Indiana), 11/15/20141,110,459
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
18

Principal
Amount
Value
$955,000Indiana State Finance Authority, Environmental Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2009B), 4.90% (Indianapolis, IN Power & Light Co.), 1/1/20161,032,918
TOTAL2,143,377
Kansas – 0.8%
1,055,000Butler County, KS Union School District No. 394, UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS), 9/1/20201,159,783
Kentucky – 0.9%
1,335,000Kentucky EDFA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 6.25% (Norton Healthcare, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.45%), 10/1/20121,366,399
Louisiana – 1.5%
981,000Lakeshore Villages Master Community Development District, LA, Special Assessment Bonds (Series 2007), 5.25% (Original Issue Yield: 5.378%), 7/1/2017593,152
1,000,000Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities CDA, Revenue Bonds, 5.375% (BRCC Facilities Corp.)/(National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation INS), 12/1/20141,070,280
635,000West Feliciana Parish, LA, PCRBs, 7.00% (Entergy Gulf States Louisiana LLC), 11/1/2015636,784
TOTAL2,300,216
Maryland – 10.7%
1,000,000Maryland State Economic Development Corp., Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.125% (Ports America Chesapeake, Inc. )/(Original Issue Yield: 5.25%), 6/1/20201,012,890
13,500,0002Maryland State, UT GO Bonds (Second Series 2008), 5.000%, 7/15/202215,423,210
TOTAL16,436,100
Massachusetts – 2.1%
2,000,000Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Highway System Revenue Bonds (Series 2010B), 5.00%, 1/1/20242,131,680
1,030,000Massachusetts HEFA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2010A), 5.00% (Northeastern University), 10/1/20231,109,248
TOTAL3,240,928
Michigan – 2.5%
2,000,000Cornell Township MI, Economic Development Corp., Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.875% (MeadWestvaco Corp.)/(United States Treasury PRF 5/1/2012@100), 5/1/20182,187,140
1,500,000Michigan State Building Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2009I), 5.00% (Michigan State), 10/15/20161,643,415
TOTAL3,830,555
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
19

Principal
Amount
Value
Nevada – 2.5%
$2,000,000Clark County, NV, IDRBs (Series 2003C), 5.45% TOBs (Southwest Gas Corp.), Mandatory Tender 3/1/20132,096,740
975,000Las Vegas, NV, Local Improvement Special Assessment Bonds (Series 2004), 5.50% (Providence SID No. 607), 6/1/2013964,382
805,000North Las Vegas, NV SID No. 60, Subordinate LT Obligation Refunding Bonds (Series 2006B), 5.00% (Aliante SID No. 60)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.05%), 12/1/2017737,726
TOTAL3,798,848
New Jersey – 0.3%
500,000New Jersey EDA, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.75% (Winchester Gardens at Ward Homestead)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.75%), 11/1/2024501,910
251,7503New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.00% (Pascack Valley Hospital Association)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.25%), 7/1/20133
TOTAL501,913
New Mexico – 1.3%
1,000,000Farmington, NM, PCR Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.20% TOBs (Public Service Co., NM), Mandatory Tender 6/1/2020999,220
1,000,000Farmington, NM, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 4.00% TOBs (El Paso Electric Co.)/(FGIC INS), Mandatory Tender 8/1/20121,001,320
TOTAL2,000,540
New York – 7.6%
2,000,000Dutchess County, NY IDA, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Marist College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.15%), 7/1/20202,068,280
800,0001New York City, NY IDA, Liberty Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.25%
(7 World Trade Center LLC), 3/1/2015
806,552
2,000,000New York City, NY, UT GO Bonds (Fiscal 2002 Series D), 5.00% (Original Issue Yield: 5.21%), 6/1/20172,125,600
2,000,000New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2009C), 5.00% (School District Financing Program)/(Assured Guaranty Corp. INS), 10/1/20152,286,140
2,000,000Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NY, (Series 2003B-1C), 5.50% (New York State), 6/1/20192,183,400
2,000,000Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NY, Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A-1), 5.25% (New York State)/(AMBAC INS), 6/1/20222,137,980
TOTAL11,607,952
North Carolina – 5.0%
1,000,000North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Power System Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series D), 5.50%, 1/1/20141,122,550
2,000,000North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Refunding Revenue Bonds, 6.00% (AMBAC INS), 1/1/20182,309,120
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
20

Principal
Amount
Value
$965,000North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.50% (Arc of North Carolina Projects), 10/1/2024962,086
3,000,000North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1, Electric Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.50%, 1/1/20143,304,680
TOTAL7,698,436
Ohio – 3.9%
2,000,000Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, OH, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds (Series 2007A-2), 5.875% (Original Issue Yield: 5.95%), 6/1/20301,613,160
1,000,000Cuyahoga, OH Community College District, General Receipts Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.00% (AMBAC INS), 12/1/20221,039,650
2,135,000Franklin County, OH Hospital Facility Authority, Hospital Improvement Revenue Bonds (Series 2009), 5.00% (Nationwide Children's Hospital), 11/1/20192,289,083
925,000Ohio State Air Quality Development Authority, Environmental Improvement Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1995), 5.00% TOBs (Marathon Oil Corp.), Mandatory Tender 11/1/2011966,449
TOTAL5,908,342
Oregon – 1.0%
500,0001Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, Tax-Exempt Tax Revenue Bonds (Series 2006C), 5.625%, 10/1/2026354,955
1,000,000Yamhill County, OR Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.50% (Friendsview Retirement Community)/(United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2013@101), 12/1/20181,179,750
TOTAL1,534,705
Pennsylvania – 11.9%
435,000Allegheny County, PA IDA, Environmental Improvement Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.50% (United States Steel Corp.), 11/1/2016440,612
1,000,000Allegheny County, PA IDA, Environmental Improvement Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2009), 6.50% (United States Steel Corp.), 5/1/20171,077,270
12,000,0002Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, UT GO Bonds, 5.00%, 3/15/202513,371,480
1,000,000Lancaster, PA Higher Education Authority, College Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Franklin & Marshall College), 4/15/20191,086,310
1,420,000Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2008A), 5.25% (St. Lukes Hospital of Bethlehem)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.37%), 8/15/20241,447,392
675,000Philadelphia, PA Water & Wastewater System, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2010A), 5.00% (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. INS), 6/15/2019759,334
TOTAL18,182,398
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
21

Principal
Amount
Value
South Carolina – 0.7%
$1,000,000Georgetown County, SC Environmental Improvements, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 5.95% (International Paper Co.), 3/15/20141,094,170
South Dakota – 1.1%
1,715,000Educational Enhancement Funding Corp., SD, Tobacco Revenue Bonds (Series 2002B), 6.50%, 6/1/20321,717,761
Tennessee – 0.8%
1,000,000Memphis, TN Electric System, Subordinate Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2010), 5.00%, 12/1/20181,165,530
Texas – 7.1%
1,000,000Brazos River Authority, TX, PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2003D), 5.40% TOBs (Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC), Mandatory Tender 10/1/2014721,920
1,000,000Decatur, TX Hospital Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 6.50% (Wise Regional Health System), 9/1/20141,048,990
1,000,000Harris County, TX, Toll Road Senior Lien Revenue Bonds (Series 2009D), 5.00%, 8/15/20181,147,190
1,000,000Houston, TX Airport System, Senior Lien Revenue & Refunding Bonds (Series 2009A), 5.00%, 7/1/20181,140,020
2,000,000Lower Colorado River Authority, TX, Transmission Contract Refunding & Improvement Revenue Bonds (Series 2010), 5.00% (LCRA Transmission Services Corp.), 5/15/20222,195,580
165,000Sabine River Authority, TX, PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2006), 4.95% (Southwestern Electric Power Co.)/(National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation INS), 3/1/2018173,770
545,000Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Retirement Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2007), 5.00% (Air Force Village), 5/15/2016551,148
500,000Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Revenue Bonds (Series 2006A), 6.00% (Northwest Senior Housing Corp. Edgemere Project), 11/15/2026506,120
1,000,000Tyler, TX HFDC, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Mother Frances Hospital ), 7/1/20121,043,810
2,235,000West Harris County, TX Regional Water Authority, Water System Revenue Bonds (Series 2006), 5.00% (AMBAC INS), 12/15/20212,381,258
TOTAL10,909,806
Virginia – 1.5%
167,000Bell Creek CDA, VA, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds (Series 2003), 6.75%, 3/1/2022154,238
1,000,000Broad Street CDA, VA, Revenue Bonds, 7.10% (Original Issue Yield: 7.15%), 6/1/20161,006,830
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
22

Principal
Amount
Value
$1,000,000Peninsula Port Authority, VA, Residential Care Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 7.375% (Virginia Baptist Homes Obligated Group)/(United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2013@100)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.50%), 12/1/20231,201,310
TOTAL2,362,378
Washington – 2.5%
2,000,000Energy Northwest, WA, Project 3 Electric Refunding Revenue Bond (Series 2010-A), 5.00%, 7/1/20182,333,900
1,435,000Tobacco Settlement Authority, WA, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, 6.50% (Original Issue Yield: 6.65%), 6/1/20261,448,589
TOTAL3,782,489
Wisconsin – 1.9%
2,000,000Wisconsin State HEFA, Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (SynergyHealth, Inc.), 11/15/20152,151,340
790,000Wisconsin State HEFA, Revenue Bonds, 7.125% (Community Memorial Hospital)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.25%), 1/15/2022790,277
TOTAL2,941,617
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS
(IDENTIFIED COST $147,859,035)
152,451,808
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS – 0.5%;4
Michigan – 0.2%
200,000Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, (Series 2007) Weekly VRDNs (Henry Ford Health System, MI)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 0.270%, 6/2/2010200,000
New York – 0.2%
300,000New York City, NY Transitional Finance Authority, New York City Recovery Bonds (2003 Sub Series 3-E) Daily VRDNs (GTD by Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg LIQ), 0.280%, 6/1/2010300,000
Pennsylvania – 0.1%
200,000Philadelphia, PA Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Series B of 2008) Daily VRDNs (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LIQ), 0.280%, 6/1/2010200,000
TOTAL SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS
(AT AMORTIZED COST)
700,000
TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS — 100.0%
(IDENTIFIED COST $148,559,035)5
153,151,808
OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES — NET6(15,982,845)
LIQUIDATION VALUE OF AUCTION PREFERRED SHARES(41,900,000)
TOTAL NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS$95,268,963
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
23

At May 31, 2010, the Fund held no securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).
1Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At May 31, 2010, these restricted securities amounted to $1,876,047, which represented 1.2% of total market value.
2Underlying security in inverse floater structure.
3Obligor filed for bankruptcy. On September 30, 2008, a Notice of Initial Distribution was received and a portion of the bond was redeemed at par. Subsequent distributions have occurred on various dates to redeem portions of the remaining bonds at discounts to par. The market value of the holding is adjusted to reflect the expected value of future distributions.
4Current rate and next reset date shown for Variable Rate Demand Notes.
5The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $129,313,147.
6Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total market value at May 31, 2010.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

As of May 31, 2010, all investments of the Fund utilized Level 2 inputs in valuing the Fund's assets carried at fair value.

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
24

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:
AMBAC — American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
CDA — Community Development Authority
COP — Certificate of Participation
EDA — Economic Development Authority
EDFA — Economic Development Finance Authority
FGIC — Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
GO — General Obligation
GTD — Guaranteed
HEFA — Health and Education Facilities Authority
HFDC — Health Facilities Development Corporation
IDA — Industrial Development Authority
IDB — Industrial Development Bond
IDRBs — Industrial Development Revenue Bonds
INS — Insured
LIQ — Liquidity Agreement
LO — Limited Obligation
LOC — Letter of Credit
LT — Limited Tax
PCR — Pollution Control Revenue
PCRBs — Pollution Control Revenue Bonds
PRF — Prerefunded
SID — Special Improvement District
TOBs — Tender Option Bonds
UT — Unlimited Tax
VRDNs — Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
25

Statements of Assets and Liabilities

May 31, 2010 (unaudited)

Federated
Premier
Municipal
Income Fund
Federated
Premier
Intermediate
Municipal
Income Fund
Assets:
Total investments in securities, at value$137,309,363$153,151,808
Cash71,12324,472
Income receivable2,091,4582,285,158
Receivable for investments sold — 2,352,458
TOTAL ASSETS139,471,944157,813,896
Liabilities:
Payable for floating rate certificate securities (Note 2)17,100,00019,125,000
Payable for investments purchased — 1,000,000
Income distribution payable — Common Shares535,557487,348
Income distribution payable — Preferred Shares6,3741,468
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees1,2481,245
Accrued expenses13,44829,872
TOTAL LIABILITIES17,656,62720,644,933
Auction Market Preferred Shares (1,463 and 1,676 shares, respectively, authorized and issued at $25,000 per share)$36,575,000$41,900,000
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares Consist of:
Paid-in capital$87,231,145$98,675,625
Net unrealized appreciation of investments3,696,6384,592,773
Accumulated net realized loss on investments(6,306,632)(8,316,099)
Undistributed net investment income619,166316,664
TOTAL NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES$85,240,317$95,268,963
Common Shares Outstanding, ($0.01 par value,
unlimited shares authorized)
6,155,3066,961,724
Net asset value per share$13.85$13.68
Investments, at identified cost$133,612,725$148,559,035

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
26

Statements of Operations

Six Months Ended May 31, 2010 (unaudited)

Federated
Premier
Municipal
Income Fund
Federated
Premier
Intermediate
Municipal
Income Fund
Investment Income:
Interest $3,726,478$3,554,801
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)329,222373,468
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)74,79574,795
Custodian fees1,7251,902
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses17,22717,196
Directors'/Trustees' fees4,0684,104
Auditing fees20,46020,460
Legal fees6,7775,489
Portfolio accounting fees37,95038,200
Printing and postage11,52010,758
Insurance premiums2,2022,205
Auction agent fees3,2413,241
Trailer commission fees (Note 2)45,79152,957
Interest and trust expenses (Note 2)74,89272,018
Miscellaneous34,29534,195
TOTAL EXPENSES664,165710,988
Waivers and Reimbursement (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee(34,983)(39,715)
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee(74,795)(74,795)
Reimbursement of other operating expenses(77,905)(50,824)
TOTAL WAIVERS AND REIMBURSEMENT(187,683)(165,334)
Net expenses476,482545,654
Net investment income3,249,9963,009,147
Realized and Unrealized Gain on Investments:
Net realized gain on investments327,181116,194
Net change in unrealized appreciation of investments3,431,1571,585,783
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments3,758,3381,701,977
Income distributions declared to Preferred Shareholders(35,007)(40,672)
Change in net assets resulting from operations applicable to common shares$6,973,327$4,670,452

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
27

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

Federated Premier
Municipal Income Fund
Federated
Premier Intermediate
Municipal Income Fund
Six Months
Ended
(unaudited)
5/31/2010
Year Ended
11/30/2009
Six Months
Ended
(unaudited)
5/31/2010
Year Ended
11/30/2009
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income$3,249,996$6,557,167$3,009,147$6,363,257
Net realized gain (loss) on investments327,181(2,789,157)116,194(4,052,217)
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments3,431,15715,896,2941,585,78314,846,199
Distributions from net investment income — Preferred Shares(35,007)(143,262)(40,672)(161,038)
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES6,973,32719,521,0424,670,45216,996,201
Distributions to
Common Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income — Common Shares(3,267,067)(6,209,927)(3,110,644)(6,139,077)
Share Transactions Applicable to Common Shares:
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared91,300141,293111,27385,482
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS91,300141,293111,27385,482
Change in net assets3,797,56013,452,4081,671,08110,942,606
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares:
Beginning of period81,442,75767,990,34993,597,88282,655,276
End of period$85,240,317$81,442,757$95,268,963$93,597,882
Undistributed net investment income included in net assets at end of period$619,166$671,244$316,664$458,833

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
28

Notes to Financial Statements

May 31, 2010 (unaudited)

1. ORGANIZATION

Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (individually referred to as the “Fund,” or collectively as the “Funds”) are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as diversified, closed-end management investment companies. Each Fund's investment objective is to provide current income exempt from federal income tax, including the federal AMT.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements. These policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

Investment Valuation

In calculating its net asset value (NAV), each Fund generally values investments as follows:

If the Funds cannot obtain a price or price evaluation from a pricing service for an investment, the Funds may attempt to value the investment based upon the mean of bid and asked quotations or fair value the investment based on price evaluations, from one or more dealers. If any price, quotation, price evaluation or other pricing source is not readily available when the NAV is calculated, the Funds use the fair value of the investment determined in accordance with the procedures described below. There can be no assurance that the Funds could purchase or sell an investment at the price used to calculate each Fund's NAV.

Fair Valuation and Significant Events Procedures

The Trustees have authorized the use of pricing services to provide evaluations of the current fair value of certain investments for purposes of calculating the NAV. Factors considered by pricing services in evaluating an investment include the yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, call rights and other potential prepayments, terms and type, reported transactions, indications as to values from dealers and general market conditions. Some pricing services provide a single price evaluation reflecting the bid-side of the market for an investment (a “bid” evaluation). Other pricing services offer both bid evaluations and price evaluations indicative of a price between the prices bid and asked for the investment (a “mid” evaluation). The Funds normally use bid evaluations for U.S. Treasury and Agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. The Funds normally use mid evaluations for other types of fixed-income securities and OTC derivative contracts. In the event that market quotations and price evaluations are not available for an investment, the fair value of the investment is determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Trustees.

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
29

The Trustees also have adopted procedures requiring an investment to be priced at its fair value whenever the Adviser determines that a significant event affecting the value of the investment has occurred between the time as of which the price of the investment would otherwise be determined and the time as of which the NAV is computed. An event is considered significant if there is both an affirmative expectation that the investment's value will change in response to the event and a reasonable basis for quantifying the resulting change in value. Examples of significant events that may occur after the close of the principal market on which a security is traded, or after the time of a price evaluation provided by a pricing service or a dealer, include:

The Funds may seek to obtain more current quotations or price evaluations from alternative pricing sources. If a reliable alternative pricing source is not available, the Funds will determine the fair value of the investment using another method approved by the Trustees.

Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses and Distributions

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade-date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified-cost basis. Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value. Distributions to common shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date and are declared and paid monthly. Distributions to preferred shareholders are recorded daily and paid weekly at a rate set through auction procedures or under each Fund's Statement of Preferences. The dividend rate to preferred shareholders for Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund at May 31, 2010, was 0.309% and 0.287%, respectively.

Each auction requires the participation of one or more Broker-Dealers. The auction agent, currently Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, will enter into agreements with one or more Broker-Dealers selected by the Funds, which provide for the participation of those Broker-Dealers in auctions for preferred shares. The auction agent will pay each Broker-Dealer after each auction, from funds provided by the Funds. The trailer commissions for Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund for the six months ended May 31, 2010 were $45,791 and $52,957, respectively.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized/accreted for financial statement purposes.

Federal Taxes

It is each Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary. As of and during the six months ended May 31, 2010, the Funds did not have a liability for any uncertain tax positions. The Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
30

Funds recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to tax liabilities as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. As of May 31, 2010, tax years 2006 through 2009 remain subject to examination by the Funds' major tax jurisdictions, which include the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Funds may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Funds record when-issued securities on the trade date and maintain security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Inverse Floater Structures

The Funds may participate in Inverse Floater Structures in which fixed-rate, tax-exempt municipal bonds purchased by the Funds are transferred to a trust. The trust subsequently issues two or more variable rate securities that are collateralized by the cash flows of the fixed-rate, tax-exempt municipal bonds. One or more of these variable-rate securities pays interest based on a floating rate set by a remarketing agent at predetermined intervals. A residual-interest tax-exempt security, which is transferred to the Funds, is also created by the trust and pays interest based on the remaining cash flow of the trust, after payment of interest on the other securities and various expenses of the trust.

The Funds account for the transfer of bonds to the trusts as secured borrowings, with the securities transferred remaining in the Funds' investments, and the related floating rate notes reflected as Fund liabilities under the caption, “Payable for floating rate certificate securities” in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. At May 31, 2010, for Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund, investments with a value of $24,359,288 are held by the trust and serve as collateral for the $17,100,000 in floating-rate certificate securities outstanding at that date, and for the Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund, investments with a value of $28,794,690 are held by the trust and serve as collateral for the $19,125,000 in floating-rate certificate securities outstanding at that date. The Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and the Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund recorded interest and trust expenses of $74,892 and $72,018, respectively, for these investments for the six months ended May 31, 2010.

While these inverse floater structures are accounted for as secured borrowings, the Funds' Adviser has determined that they do not constitute borrowings for purposes of any fundamental limitation on borrowings that may be applicable to the Funds.

Restricted Securities

The Funds may purchase securities which are considered restricted. Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Funds or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
31

under criteria established by the Trustees. The Funds will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. The Funds' restricted securities are valued at the price provided by dealers in the secondary market or, if no market prices are available, at the fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Trustees.

Additional information on restricted securities, excluding securities purchased under Rule 144A, if applicable, that have been deemed liquid by the Trustees, held at May 31, 2010, is as follows:

Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund:

SecurityAcquisition DateAcquisition CostMarket Value
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, Tax-Exempt Tax Revenue Bonds (Series 2006C), 5.625%, 10/1/20266/9/2006$500,000$354,955
New York City, NY IDA, Liberty Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.50% (7 World Trade Center LLC), 3/1/20353/15/2005$800,000$800,656

Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund:

SecurityAcquisition DateAcquisition CostMarket Value
Capital Trust Agency, FL, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 8.95% (Seminole Tribe of Florida Convention and Resort Hotel Facilities)/(United States Treasury PRF 10/1/2012@102)/(Original Issue Yield: 8.95%), 10/1/20335/9/2003$600,000$714,540
Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, Tax-Exempt Tax Revenue Bonds (Series 2006C), 5.625%, 10/1/20266/9/2006$500,000$354,955
New York City, NY IDA, Liberty Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.25% (7 World Trade Center LLC), 3/1/20153/15/2005$800,000$806,552

Other

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

3. Common Shares

The following tables summarize share activity:

Federated Premier Municipal Income FundSix Months
Ended
5/31/2010
Year Ended
11/30/2009
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared6,51710,995
TOTAL CHANGE RESULTING FROM FUND SHARE TRANSACTIONS6,51710,995
Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
32

Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income FundSix Months
Ended
5/31/2010
Year Ended
11/30/2009
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared8,2486,495
TOTAL CHANGE RESULTING FROM FUND SHARE TRANSACTIONS8,2486,495

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

At May 31, 2010, the following amounts apply for federal income tax purposes:

Cost of
Investments
Unrealized
Appreciation
Unrealized
Depreciation
Net Unrealized
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
Federated Premier Municipal
Income Fund
$116,390,163$7,002,813$3,183,614$3,819,199
Federated Premier Intermediate
Municipal Income Fund
$129,313,147$6,835,356$2,121,695$4,713,661

At November 30, 2009, Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund had capital loss carryforwards of $6,725,912 and $8,565,637, respectively, which will reduce the Funds' taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Funds of any liability for federal income tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforwards will expire as follows:

201120122013201520162017Total
Capital Loss
Carryforwards
Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund$ — $1,497,121$678,904$ — $1,763,799$2,786,088$6,725,912
Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund$5,504$1,598,165$1,175,977$615,196$1,122,663$4,048,132$8,565,637

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Each Fund has entered into an Investment Management Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Federated Investment Management Company (the “Adviser”), to serve as investment manager to the Funds. The Agreement provides for an annual management fee, payable daily, at the annual rate of 0.55% of each Fund's managed assets.

In order to reduce the Funds' expenses, the Adviser has contractually agreed to waive a portion of its investment adviser fee at the annual rate of 0.20% of the average daily net value of each Fund's managed assets, inclusive of any assets attributable to any preferred shares that may be issued, from the commencement of operations through December 31, 2007, and at a declining rate thereafter through December 31, 2010. Effective January 1, 2009 and Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
33

continuing through December 31, 2009, the contractual waiver was reduced to 0.10%. Effective January 1, 2010 and continuing through December 31, 2010, the contractual waiver was reduced to 0.05%. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, the Adviser waived $34,983 and $39,715 of its fee for Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund, respectively. Additionally, for the six months ended May 31, 2010, the Adviser reimbursed other operating expenses of $77,905 and $50,824 for Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund, respectively.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Funds with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Administrative FeeAverage Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds
0.150%on the first $5 billion
0.125%on the next $5 billion
0.100%on the next $10 billion
0.075%on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the six months ended May 31, 2010, FAS waived its entire fee of $74,795 on each Fund.

Interfund Transactions

During the six months ended May 31, 2010, the Funds engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and were as follows:

PurchasesSales
Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund$11,950,000$14,200,000
Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund$18,040,000$21,090,000

General

Certain Officers and Trustees of the Funds are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. PREFERRED SHARES

On February 13, 2003, Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund offered 2,147 and 2,441 Auction Market Preferred Shares (AMPS), respectively. The AMPS are redeemable at the option of the Funds at the redemption price of $25,000 per share plus an amount equal to accumulated, but unpaid dividends thereon through the redemption date. As of May 31, 2010, Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund currently have outstanding 1,463 and 1,676 AMPS, respectively.

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
34

On July 17, 2008, the Funds' Trustees approved a plan to use inverse floater structures to refinance a portion of the Funds' outstanding AMPS. During the year ended November 30, 2009, Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund redeemed $7,500,000 and $9,000,000, representing 300 and 360 of their outstanding preferred shares, respectively, at liquidation value, using proceeds that arose from the use of the inverse floater structures. During the year ended November 30, 2008, Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund and Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund redeemed $9,600,000 and $10,125,000, representing 384 and 405 of their outstanding preferred shares, respectively, at liquidation value, using proceeds that arose from the use of the inverse floater structures.

Whenever AMPS are outstanding, common shareholders will not be entitled to receive any distributions from the Funds unless all accrued dividends on preferred shares have been paid, the Funds satisfy the 200% asset coverage requirement, and certain other requirements imposed by any nationally recognized statistical ratings organizations (NRSROs) rating the preferred shares have been met. Should these requirements not be met, or should dividends accrued on the AMPS not be paid, the Funds may be restricted in their ability to declare dividends to common shareholders or may be required to redeem certain of the AMPS. At May 31, 2010, there were no such restrictions on the Funds.

7. Investment TRANSACTIONS

Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations, for the six months ended May 31, 2010, were as follows:

PurchasesSales
Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund$17,136,749$16,472,991
Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund$26,433,599$25,010,129

8. INTERFUND LENDING

Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Funds, along with other funds advised by subsidiaries of Federated Investors, Inc., may participate in an interfund lending program. This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the Funds to borrow from other participating affiliated funds. As of May 31, 2010, there were no outstanding loans. During the six months ended May 31, 2010, the program was not utilized.

9. Legal Proceedings

Since October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and related entities (collectively, “Federated”), and various Federated sponsored mutual funds (“Federated Funds”) have been named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of certain Federated Funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. Federated without admitting the validity of any claim has reached a preliminary settlement with the Plaintiffs in these cases. Any settlement would have to be approved by the Court. Federated entities have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits that are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. These lawsuits have been consolidated into a single action alleging Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
35

excessive advisory fees involving one of the Federated Funds. The Board of the Federated Funds retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Federated Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Federated Funds, and their respective counsel, have been defending this litigation, and none of the Federated Funds remains a defendant in any of the lawsuits. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek monetary damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Federated Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the allegations in these matters will not result in increased redemptions, or reduced sales, of shares of the Federated Funds or other adverse consequences for the Federated Funds.

10. Subsequent events

Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued, and determined that no events have occurred that require additional disclosure.

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
36

Evaluation and Approval of Advisory
Contract - May 2010

Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund (“FMN” or the “Fund”)

Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund
(“FPT” or the “Fund”)

The Fund's Board reviewed each Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2010. The Board's decision regarding these contracts reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

In this connection, the Federated funds' Board had previously appointed a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated fund. The Senior Officer has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent, written evaluation that covered topics discussed below. The Board considered that evaluation, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of these contracts, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with and considered judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize “economies of scale” as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for what might be viewed as like services and the cost to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates for supplying such services. The Board was aware of these factors and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent it considered them to be appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
37

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise and accompany the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board also received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or “peer group” funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); and the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates. The Board also considered the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the investment company industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the fund marketplace. With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other closed-end funds with comparable investment programs to be relevant, given the high degree of competition in the investment company industry. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar funds more heavily than non-fund products or services because it is believed that they are more relevant. For example, other closed-end funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
38

fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to Federated registered investment companies as well as products outside the Federated family of funds (e.g., institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that registered investment companies and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences include, but are not limited to, different types of targeted investors; being subject to different laws and regulations; different legal structures; different average account sizes; different associated costs; portfolio management techniques made necessary by such differences; and portfolio manager time spent in review of securities pricing. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be determinative in judging the appropriateness of fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, using data supplied by independent fund ranking organizations, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other regulated investment companies, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups are relevant in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

For the periods covered by the report, FMN's performance for the one-year and five-year periods was above the median of the relevant peer group, and FMN's performance fell below the median of the relevant peer group for the three-year period. The Board discussed FMN's performance with the Adviser and recognized the efforts being undertaken by the Adviser. The Board will continue to monitor these efforts and the performance of FMN.

For the periods covered by the report, FPT's performance for the one-year and five-year periods was above the median of the relevant peer group, and FPT's performance fell below the median of the relevant peer group for the three-year period. The Board discussed FPT's performance with the Adviser and recognized the efforts being undertaken by the Adviser. The Board will continue to monitor these efforts and the performance of FPT.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades. In addition, the Board Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
39

also considered the fact that, in order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have disclosed to fund investors and/or indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate. Moreover, the Board receives regular reports regarding the institution or elimination of these voluntary waivers.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund-by-fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs (and the unavoidable arbitrary aspects of that exercise) and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs may render such allocation reports unreliable. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board and the Senior Officer also reviewed a report compiled by Federated comparing profitability information for Federated to other publicly held fund management companies. In this regard, the Senior Officer noted the limited availability of such information, but nonetheless concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive and the Board agreed.

The Board also considered whether the Fund might benefit from “economies of scale” and noted that, as a “closed-end fund,” which has made an offering of a fixed number of common shares and (other than the issuance of preferred shares contemplated at the time of the Fund's initial public offering) has not made and does not expect to make additional offerings to raise more assets (although it may make additional offerings to replace existing preferred shares), the Fund is unlikely to grow materially in size and, as a consequence, there are no meaningful “economies of scale” to be realized from internal growth. Accordingly, the Board concluded that this was not a relevant consideration in its overall evaluation.

It was noted in the materials for the Board meeting that for the period covered by the report, FMN's investment advisory fee was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of FMN with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of FMN remained competitive.

It was noted in the materials for the Board meeting that for the period covered by the report, FPT's investment advisory fee was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of FPT with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of FPT remained competitive.

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
40

The Senior Officer's evaluation noted his belief that the information and observations contained in his evaluation supported a finding that the proposed management fees are reasonable, and that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. Under these circumstances, no changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to, the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract. The Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates were satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that many shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and with the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were necessarily relevant to the Fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
41

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that each Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on “Form N-PX” of how the Fund voted any proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available from Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com. To access this information go to the “Products” section of the website, select “Closed-End Funds,” select the name of the Fund, then select “Shareholder and Regulatory Reports” from the left menu. This information is also available directly from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

Each Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on “Form N-Q.” These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the “Products” section of the Federated Investors website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on “Closed-End Funds,” selecting the name of the Fund, then selecting “Portfolio Holdings” from the left menu.

Source of Distributions - Notice

Under the federal securities laws, the Funds are required to provide a notice to shareholders regarding the source of distributions made by the Funds if such distributions are from sources other than ordinary investment income. In addition, important information regarding the Funds' distributions, if applicable, is available in the “Products” section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com. To access this information from the “Products” section of the website, click on the “Notice to Shareholders - Source of Distribution” link under “Related Information.”

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
42

Closed-end funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board or any other government agency. Investment in closed-end funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

This Overview and Report is for shareholder information. This is not a Prospectus intended for use in the sale of Fund Shares. Statements and other information contained in this Overview and Report are as dated and subject to change.

IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT FUND DOCUMENT DELIVERYIn an effort to reduce costs and avoid duplicate mailings, the Fund(s) intend to deliver a single copy of certain documents to each household in which more than one shareholder of the Fund(s) resides (so-called “householding”), as permitted by applicable rules. The Fund's “householding” program covers its Semi-Annual and Annual Shareholder Reports and any Proxies or information statements. Shareholders must give their written consent to participate in the “householding” program. The Fund is also permitted to treat a shareholder as having given consent (“implied consent”) if (i) shareholders with the same last name, or believed to be members of the same family, reside at the same street address or receive mail at the same post office box, (ii) the Fund gives notice of its intent to “household” at least sixty (60) days before it begins “householding” and (iii) none of the shareholders in the household have notified the Fund(s) or their agent of the desire to “opt out” of “householding.” Shareholders who have granted written consent, or have been deemed to have granted implied consent, can revoke that consent and opt out of “householding” at any time: shareholders who purchased shares through an intermediary should contact their representative; other shareholders may call the Fund at 1-800-730-6001 or email CEinfo@federatedinvestors.com.

Semi-Annual Shareholder Report
43

Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund
Federated Premier Intermediate Municipal Income Fund
Federated Investors Funds
4000 Ericsson Drive
Warrendale, PA 15086-7561

Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 31423P108
Cusip 31423P207
Cusip 31423M105
Cusip 31423M204

28583 (7/10)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc.
2010  © Federated Investors, Inc.


Item 2.                      Code of Ethics

Not Applicable
 
Item 3.                      Audit Committee Financial Expert

Not Applicable
 
Item 4.                      Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Not Applicable

Item 5.                      Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

Not Applicable

Item 6.                      Schedule of Investments

Not Applicable

Item 7.
Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies

 
Not Applicable

Item 8.
Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies

 
No change in any of the Portfolio Managers identified in Item 8(a)(1) in the Registrant’s most recent annual report.

Item 9.
Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers

 
No such purchases this period.

Item 10.                      Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No changes to report.

Item 11.                                Controls and Procedures

(a) The registrant’s President and Treasurer have concluded that the
registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Act) are effective in design and operation and are sufficient to form the basis of the certifications required by Rule 30a-(2) under the Act, based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR.

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12.                                Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed with this report:

(a)(2)
Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.
(b)
Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.







SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant
Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund
By
/S/ Richard A. Novak
Date
July 21, 2010
   
   
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
   
   
By
/S/ J. Christopher Donahue
 
J. Christopher Donahue, Principal Executive Officer
Date
July 21, 2010
   
   
By
/S/ Richard A. Novak
 
Richard A. Novak, Principal Financial Officer
Date
July 21, 2010