mainbody.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB
 
[X] 
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
[X] 
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
 
    For the transition period from _________ to ________
     
    Commission file number 000-25911
 
Skinvisible, Inc.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
   
Nevada
88-0344219
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
6320 South Sandhill Road Suite 10, Las Vegas, Nevada
89120
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
   
Issuer’s telephone number:  702-433-7154  
   
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
 
   
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
None
Not Applicable
   
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
 
   
Common Stock, par value $0.001
 
(Title of class)
 
 
 
Check whether the Issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past  12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes [X]       No [   ]

Check if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes [   ]   No [X]

State issuer’s revenue for its most recent fiscal year.  $777,685

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days.
$6,361,259.03 as of April 11, 2008

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.   75,487,238 Common Shares as of March 31, 2008.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One):  Yes [   ]   No [X]
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
Page
 
PART I
 
 
PART II
 
 
PART III
 

2


PART I
 
Item 1.   Description of Business Overview

We develop innovative polymer delivery vehicles and related compositions that hold active ingredients on the skin for up to four hours when applied topically. We designed a process for combining water soluble and insoluble polymers that is specifically formulated to carry water insoluble active ingredients in water-based products without the use of alcohol, silicones, waxes, or other organic solvents. This enables active agents the ability to perform their intended functions for an extended period of time. Our polymer delivery vehicles trademarked Invisicare® allow normal skin respiration and perspiration. The polymer compositions we develop wear off as part of the natural exfoliation process of the skin's outer layer cells.

Products that successfully incorporate Invisicare to date include antimicrobial hand sanitizer lotions, suncare products, skincare moisturizers, sunless tanning products as well as various dermatology products for various skin disorders.  On an ongoing basis, we are seeking to develop polymer formulations that can successfully be incorporated into other products. 
Our primary objective is to license Invisicare to established brand manufacturers and marketers of prescription and over-the-counter products in the dermatological, medical, cosmetic, and skincare markets. With the exception of sales to one vendor, our management’s policy is to only sell Invisicare to vendors that have executed a license agreement with us. We conduct our research and development in-house. We engage an outside party that currently handles all of our manufacturing and distribution needs. 

Developments in our Current Products and Agreements

Aside from disclosures provided below, we have no developments to report in our current product line or distribution agreements in place for those products.

Patent Developments

On January 4, 2000, we filed a patent application for our antimicrobial dermal barrier composition. We received patent approval (US Patent No. 6,582,683) for our antimicrobial dermal barrier formulation in February 2003 and received the patent certificate in June 2003.

We filed a patent application on August 20, 2001 titled “Topical Compositions, Topical Composition Precursors, and Methods for Manufacturing and Using” for our Invisicare® topical compositions and our methodology for manufacturing and utilization of numerous delivery systems and related applications. The United States Patent and Trademark Office split this application into three different applications as follows: (a) Methods of Manufacturing (b) Topical Compositions and (c) Methods of Use. We received patent approval for the application on Methods of Manufacturing (US Patent No. 6,756,059). However, as the Patent approval of June 2003 already was covered on one of the polymer compositions noted in the Methods of Manufacturing the Patent Office further split this application into 2 distinct patents. Topical Compositions and Methods of Use are pending.
 
3


We have also filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) the Patent titled “Topical Compositions, Topical Composition Precursors, and Methods for Manufacturing and Using” for certain foreign countries. As of December 31, 2005, this patent application is still pending.

In addition to the United States patents currently pending on the core patent technology, we have filed 6 more patents which cover product classes including sunless tanning spray, sunless tanning lotion, sunscreens, chlorhexidine antimicrobial hand lotion, anti-fungal and acne formulations..

During the current reporting period, we have been granted a comprehensive patent in India. The patent grants protection for our Invisicare product in the areas of “Topical Composition,” “Topical Composition Precursor,” and “Methods for Manufacturing and Using.” These key patent components now allow for the protected manufacturing, marketing and distribution of our Invisicare technology in India. We are also seeking patent protection for our dermatology products formulated with Invisicare for India. Management believes that India, with a population of over 1.1 billion people, will be a key market for our company.

Trademarks

In January 2002, we received trademark approval in the United States for the name "Invisicare" to identify our family of polymer delivery systems. We have filed this trade name with the Cosmetic, Fragrance and Toiletries Association ("CFTA") as an ingredient for use in skincare and cosmetic formulations.

We have also applied and received trademark approval for the corporate logo “Skinvisible” and for our sunless and sun tanning products under the name “Solerra” both in the US and Canada.

We are seeking to extend the protection of our trademarks in additional countries where we currently conduct business and those additional countries where we intend to conduct business.
 
Antibacterial/Antimicrobial Hand Sanitizer Lotion

Last quarter, we reported attempts to negotiate with JD Nelson to acquire rights from us to distribute, market, sell, and promote our antimicrobial hand sanitizer lotion that utilizes the active ingredient Triclosan 1% in every country in the world except Canada, the United States, and Mexico. (JD Nelson currently has rights to market and distribute our antimicrobial hand sanitizer lotion composition in the United States of America, Canada and Mexico.) We offered to JD Nelson these acquisition rights in exchange for $500,000 and a 10% royalty payment. We extended the termination date of our offer to JD Nelson to acquire these rights to August 31, 2007. As of the date of this report, no agreement with JD Nelson has been reached.  As such, we have abandoned negotiations with JD Nelson and we are currently looking to establish relationships with potential distributors in countries other than North America.  We can provide no assurance that we will be able to execute any agreement with a potential distributor for these rights.

4

 
Sunless Tanning Spray Product

On June 9, 2004, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals, Inc., entered into a Trademark License Agreement and Distribution Agreement ("Distribution Agreement") with Cross Global, Inc. ("Cross Global"), a Delaware corporation, to grant Cross Global the exclusive right to distribute, market, sell, and promote our proprietary sunless tanning spray products in Canada, the United States, Mexico, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Israel. Cross Global is also utilizing our proprietary polymer formula to manufacture nine additional sun care related products.

Pursuant to the terms of the Distribution Agreement, Cross Global paid us the license fee of $1,000,000. Under the terms of this agreement, we are to receive a minimum royalty fee quarterly of not less than 5% of gross revenue of all sales of our proprietary sunless tanning spray products or $25,000, whichever is greater. We extended the minimum royalty payments terms on 3 different occasions in an effort to accommodate and assist Cross Global in the early stage of their operations. Despite our efforts, Cross Global remains delinquent for the minimum payments due at the present time in the amount of $120,000. We have the ability to terminate the Distribution Agreement as a result of this material breach upon providing notice to Cross Global. Cross Global is prohibited under this agreement from manufacturing, marketing, distributing, or selling any competing product while the Distribution Agreement is in full force and effect.

We have negotiated a new agreement with Sunless Beauty Inc. (“Sunless Beauty”), a company with the same shareholder base as Cross Global, which will replace the existing agreement with Cross Global regarding this matter. The new agreement releases and forever discharges Cross Global from the $120,000 delinquency and requirement to pay a minimum royalty payment monthly. The new agreement offers Sunless Beauty the exclusive right to utilize our proprietary polymer formula in connection with the distribution, marketing, and sale of sunless tanning products in the applicable territory, but only for use in their proprietary product called Solerra Mitt, which is a sunless tanning mitt. They are required to purchase the Invisicare exclusively form Skinvisible and pay a royalty of 5% on Mitt sales within the territory.  Further information on Sunless Beauty and the sunless tanning products they sell can be obtained at www.solerra.com.

Acne Formulation

On January 30, 2008 , our wholly-owned subsidiary, Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals, Inc., entered into a Trademark License Agreement and Distribution Agreement ("Distribution Agreement") with Panalab Internacional S.A. ("Panalab"). The Agreement is for the right to develop and commercialize Skinvisible's prescription anti-acne products formulated with adapalene and Invisicare® in Argentina, Brazil and Chile.

Under the terms of the agreement Panalab, a multi-national dermatology company headquartered in Panama with subsidiaries and partners in most Latin American countries, will be responsible for filing and obtaining marketing approval in the countries they have licensed. While all terms of the agreement were not disclosed, Skinvisible will receive a research and development fee
 
5

 
plus a licensing fee allocated as an upfront fee plus milestone payments. In addition the Company will receive royalties based on revenues generated by the sale of the products. According to the agreement, Panalab will have the right to manufacture, distribute, market, sell and promote the adapalene formulations in the specified territory.

Sunscreen and Skin Care Products

We developed and successfully tested the application of Invisicare in sunscreen products with SPF 15 and SPF 30, sunless tanning lotions, moisturizing creams, aloe after-sun products, and other skin care products. We currently offer Invisicare for incorporation into these products on a private label basis and have multiple agreements in place.

During the reporting period, we developed two additional sunscreen products.   One of the products utilizes the active ingredient Parsol 1789.  The other product utilizes the active ingredient Tinasorb which has been approved for distribution in Europe, Japan, Australia and recently Canada.  Tinasorb has not yet have approval in the US. Tinasorb is a broad spectrum UVA/UVB ingredient. The manufacturer of Tinasorb is Ciba Chemicals. It is our intention to license out the distribution of both of these formulas where approved.

Status of Research and Development for New Applications

We believe that the enhancement and extension of our existing products and the development of new product categories have contributed significantly to our growth to date and are necessary for our continued growth. Our management evaluates new ideas and seeks to develop new products and improvements to existing products to satisfy industry requirements and changing consumer preferences. We seek to identify trends in consumer preferences and to generate new product ideas. Specific to the objective of generating new products, we are continuing our research and development toward developing additional applications with Invisicare. We are currently at various development stages for the following potential applications using Invisicare:
 
6

 
 
 
 
Skinvisible’s Formulas with Invisicare:  graphic 1
 


ACTIVE INGREDIENT
TYPE
Availability
Patent
Acne
     
Adapalene Cream (0.1% & 0.3%)
                     Rx
yes
              pending
Adapalene Gel (0.1% & 0.3%)
Rx
yes
pending
Clindamycin Hydrochloride Cream (1%)
Rx
yes
pending
Retinoic Acid Cream (0.1%)
Rx
yes
pending
Analgesics
     
Topical Spray with Menthol (6% & 8%)
OTC
yes
technology
Topical Roll-On with Menthol (6% & 8%)
OTC
yes
technology
Topical Cream with Salicylate (10%)
OTC
yes
technology
Anti-Aging
     
Retinol Cream & Lotion (0.15% )
Cosmetic
yes
technology
Retinol Cream (0.3%)
Cosmetic
yes
technology
Anti-Fungal
     
Terbinafine Cream, Gel  (1%)
OTC
yes
pending
Naftifine Cream (1%)
Rx
yes
pending
Clotrimazole Cream (1%)
OTC
yes
pending
Anti-Inflammatory
     
Hydrocortisone Cream (1%)
OTC
yes
technology
Triamcinolone (1%)
Rx
yes
technology
Triamcinolone Acetonide (1%)
Rx
yes
technology
Clobetasole Proprionate (0.3%)
Rx
in-progress
technology
Betamethasone (1%)
Rx
yes
technology
Antimicrobial Hand Sanitizing Lotion
     
Triclosan Lotion (1%) with Nonoxynol-9
OTC
yes*
granted
Triclosan Lotion (1%) with Tomadol 901
OTC
yes*
granted
Benzalkonium Chloride Lotion (0.13%)
OTC
yes*
granted
Chlorhexidine Gluconate Lotion (4%)
OTC / NDA
in-progress
pending
Moisturizers
     
Non-Steroidal Atopic Dermatitis Cream
Rx / Cosmetic
yes
technology
Skin Protectant Lotion with Allantoin (0.5%)
OTC
yes
technology
Super Moisturizer with Ectoin
Cosmetic
yes
technology
UVA / UVB  Sunscreen
     
Parsol 1789 - SPF 30 Lotion
OTC
 in-progress
pending
Tinosorb S – SPF 30  Lotion
OTC
     in-progress
pending
Other Skin / Hair
     
Skin Whitening, Hyperpigmentation
Cosmetic
in-progress
technology
Scar Lotion with Onion Bulb
             Cosmetic
yes
technology
Glycolic Acid Cream (5% & 10%)
Cosmetic
yes
technology
Fragrance – Long Lasting Gel
Cosmetic
yes
technology
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     *excludes North America
 
7

 
Competition

Our primary business objective is to license our technology and formulated products to manufacturers of Rx and OTC skincare products.  Market research undertaken to date has indicated that, at present, there is reasonably limited competition for our polymer-based delivery systems and related technologies such as delivery vehicles and technologies that offer the same performance capabilities for topically administered products.

 Research and Development Expenditures

We incurred research and development expenditures in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of $20,291 and $172,674 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Existing and Probable Governmental Regulation

We are not subject to any significant or material federal or state government regulation in connection with the research and development and licensing of our innovative topical polymer-based delivery systems and technologies.

With respect to our products under development, our licensing agreements require the licensee to seek all required approvals for marketing, distribution, and sale in the jurisdictions for which it is desired to make the product available should we succeed in developing a successful product.

We are not subject to any significant or material environmental regulation in the normal operation of our business.

Compliance with Environmental Laws

We did not incur any costs in connection with the compliance with any federal, state, or local environmental laws.

Employees

We currently have 5 total employees, including our sole executive officer, and all are full-time employees.

Item 2.   Description of Property

Currently, we do not own any real estate. We are leasing our executive offices and research facility. We are located at 6320 South Sandhill Road, Suite 10, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120.

Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals, Inc., our wholly owed subsidiary, owns the manufacturing and laboratory equipment at this location.

8

 
Item 3.   Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters have been submitted to our security holders for a vote, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

PART II

Item 5.    Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Market Information

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), which is sponsored by the NASD.  The OTCBB is a network of security dealers who buy and sell stock.  The dealers are connected by a computer network that provides information on current "bids" and "asks", as well as volume information.  Our shares are quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “SKVI.”

The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotations for our common stock for each of the periods indicated as reported by the OTCBB.  These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2007
Quarter Ended
 
High $
 
Low $
March 31, 2007
 
0.25
 
0.23
June 30, 2007
 
0.35
 
0.20
September 30, 2007
 
0.32
 
0.18
December 31, 2007
 
0.30
 
0.13
 
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006
Quarter Ended
 
High $
 
Low $
March 31, 2006
 
0.72
 
0.18
June 30, 2006
 
0.62
 
0.362
September 30, 2006
 
0.37
 
0.30
December 31, 2006
 
0.75
 
0.24


Penny Stock

The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions
 
9

 
in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a market price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading; (b) contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation of such duties or other requirements of the securities laws; (c) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; (e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (f) contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type size and format, as the SEC shall require by rule or regulation.

The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; (b) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; (c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (d) a monthly account statement showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account.

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement as to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity for our common stock. Therefore, stockholders may have difficulty selling our securities.

Holders of Our Common Stock

As of March 31, 2008, we had approximately one hundred eighty-four (184) holders of record of our common stock and several hundred other stockholders who hold shares in street name.

Dividends

There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that restrict us from declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where, after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:

 
1.
We would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or
 
10

 
 
2.
Our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities, plus the amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The information set forth below relates to our issuances of securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 during the reporting period which were not previously included in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB or Current Report on Form 8-K.

On October 19, 2007, we entered into a loan conversion agreement at a rate of $0.15 per share with five shareholders, converting total principal debt balances of $129,450 into 863,000 restricted shares of our common stock. These shares were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The shareholders represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view towards distribution. The shareholders were given adequate information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to the restricted stock.

On November 27, 2007, entered into debt conversion agreements at a rate of $0.10 per share with four shareholders, converting total principal debt balances of $229,000 into 2,290,000 restricted shares of our common stock. These shares were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The shareholders represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view towards distribution. The shareholders were given adequate information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to the restricted stock.

On November 30, 2007, one shareholder exercised warrants to purchase 210,000 shares at a price of $0.05 per share. These shares were issued pursuant to the terms of the Company’s applicable Private Offering Memorandum dated September 30, 2002.

On October 11, 2007, we granted options to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock, exercisable at $0.20 per share for a period of 5 years from the date of issuance, to shareholder Dr. George Korkos in exchange for consulting services to be rendered. These options were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information about our compensation plans under which shares of common stock may be issued upon the exercise of options as of December 31, 2007.

In July 2006, we adopted the 2006 Skinvisible, Inc. Stock Option Plan, which provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
 
11

 
stock, performance shares and performance units, and stock awards our officers, directors or employees of, as well as advisers and consultants. This plan was confirmed by our stockholders on August 7, 2006 at the annual shareholders meeting.

Under the 2006 Skinvisible, Inc. Stock Option Plan, we reserved 10,000,000 shares of common stock for the granting of options and rights.

Equity Compensation Plans as of December 31, 2007
 
A
B
C
Plan Category
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and right
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (A))
Equity compensation plans
approved by security
holders
 
4,345,000
 
0.24
 
5,655,000
Equity compensation plans
not approved by security
holders
 
4,210,000
 
0.0785
 
-
Total
8,555,000
$0.16
5,655,000


Item 6.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Forward-Looking Statements
 
Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.   These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions.  We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions.  Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or
 
12

 
the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.  Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

Revenues

Our total revenue reported for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $777,685, a 12.47% increase from $691,452for the year ended December 31, 2006.  The increase in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the prior year is attributable to increased sales of polymers to our licensees. During the year ending 2006 we sold finished product formulations with the polymers incorporated into the finished formulas. We no longer supply finished product formulas as our licensees now manufacture themselves.

Cost of Revenues

Our cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased to $140,875 from the prior year when cost of revenues was $77,465. The increase in our cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the prior year is attributable to a shift in our business during the reporting period where we primarily sold the polymers and not completed formulated products that incorporate the polymers.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $636,810, or approximately 82% of sales. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $613,987, or approximately 89% of sales. The increase in total gross profit for the for  year ended December 31, 2007 from the prior year is attributable to higher sales of polymers and increased revenue generated from royalties.
 
Operating Expenses

Operating expenses decreased to $2,001,955 for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $2,710,840 for the year ended December 31, 2006. Our operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007 consisted of depreciation and amortization expenses of $18,176 and selling, stock based compensation of $475,006 and general and administrative expenses of $1,508,773. Our operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 consisted of depreciation and amortization expenses of $21,187, stock based compensation of $859,160 and selling, general
 
13

 
and administrative expenses of $1,830,493.  The decrease in operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the prior year is primarily attributable to not manufacturing finished product formulas and only selling polymers.

Net Loss

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $1,606,922, compared to net loss of $2,097,604 for the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease in our net loss was primarily attributable to not manufacturing finished product formulas and only selling polymers.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2007, we had total current assets of $425,528 and total assets in the amount of $712,841. Our total current liabilities as of December 31, 2007 were $1,069,805.  We had a working capital deficit of $644,277 as of December 31, 2007.

Operating activities used $743,872 in cash for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our net loss of $1,606,922 was the primary component of our negative operating cash flow. Cash flows used by investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2007 was $4,662.  Cash flows provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2007 consisted of $153,132 as proceeds from related party loans, $410,500 as proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes payable, and $198,000 as proceeds from the issuance of common stock.

Based upon our current financial condition, we do not have insufficient cash to operate our business at the current level for the next twelve months. We intend to fund operations through increased sales and debt and/or equity financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund expenditures or other cash requirements. We plan to seek additional financing in a private equity offering to secure funding for operations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional funding. If we are not able to secure additional funding, the implementation of our business plan will be impaired. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2007, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred cumulative net losses of approximately $15,296,848 since our inception and require capital for our contemplated operational and marketing activities to take place. Our ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of the common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of our contemplated plan of operations, and our transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for us to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these
 
14

 
factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.

Critical Accounting Policies

In December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their three to five most “critical accounting polices” in the Management Discussion and Analysis. The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results, and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe that the following accounting policies fit this definition.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are recognized during the period in which the revenues are earned. Costs and expenses are recognized during the period in which they are incurred.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are generally 3 to 10 years. The cost of repairs and maintenance is charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for property betterments and renewals are capitalized. Upon sale or other disposition of a depreciable asset, cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in other income (expense).

We periodically evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life of fixed assets or whether the remaining balance of fixed assets should be evaluated for possible impairment. We use an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the fixed assets in measuring their recoverability.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Beginning January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. According to this statement, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization, but rather an annual assessment of impairment by applying a fair-value based test. Fair value for goodwill is based on discounted cash flows, market multiples and/or appraised values as appropriate. Under SFAS No. 142, the carrying value of assets are calculated at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows.

SFAS 142 requires us to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount on an annual basis to determine if there is potential impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the
 
15

 
goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Upon adoption and during 2002, we completed an impairment review and did not recognize any impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets already included in the financial statements. We expect to receive future benefits from previously acquired goodwill over an indefinite period of time. Accordingly, beginning January 1, 2002, we have foregone all related amortization expense. Prior to January 1, 2002, we amortized goodwill over an estimated useful life ranging from 3 to 15 years using the straight-line method.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”.  SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosure about fair values.  This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Management believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial results.
 
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, "Employer's Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)" (FAS 158). FAS 158 requires that employers recognize the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans on the balance sheet and recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the plan-related gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. We will prospectively adopt FAS 158 on April 30, 2007.  Management believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 158 will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial results of the Company.
 
 
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115" (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The provisions of FAS 159 become effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS 159 will have on our financial statements.
 
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 which applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. The statement is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2008.
 
At December 31, 2007, the Company did not have any derivative instruments or hedging activities. Management is aware of the requirements of SFAS 161 and will disclose when appropriate.
 
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,” (SFAS “161”) as amended and interpreted, which requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the transparency of financial reporting.  Disclosing the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format provides a more complete picture of the location in an entity’s financial statements of both the derivative positions existing at period end and the effect of using derivatives during the reporting period.  Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.  Early adoption is permitted.
 
16

 
Item 7.   Financial Statements
 
Index to Financial Statements:
 
Audited Financial Statements:
 
   
   
   
   
   
 
17

 
 
SARNA & COMPANY
   
     
Certified
Public
Accountants
   
     
     
     
   
310
N. Westlake
Boulevard
Suite 270 
Westlake
Village
California
91362 
805
371-8900
Fax 805
379-0140
 
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors
Skinvisible, Inc.
Las Vegas, Nevada

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Skinvisible, Inc. as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Skinvisible, Inc. as of December 31, 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. Absent the successful completion of one of these alternatives, the Company’s operating results will increasingly become uncertain.  The financial statements do not contain any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/Sarna & Company
Sarna & Company
April 10, 2008
Westlake Village, California
 
F-1

SKINVISIBLE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(AUDITED)
 
 ASSETS
December 31, 2007
   
Current assets
 
Cash
$ 63,168
Accounts receivable
  42,088
Inventory
  20,455
Due from related party
  1,196
Financing cost, net of accumulated amortization of $344
  53,484
Prepaid royalty fees - current portion
  240,000
Prepaid expense and other current assets
  5,137
Total current assets
  425,528
     
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $317,657
  22,440
     
Intangible and other assets
   
Patents and trademarks, net of accumulated amortization of $40,021
  34,873
License and distributor rights
  50,000
Prepaid royalty fees - long term portion
  180,000
     
Total assets
$ 712,841
     
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
     
Current liabilities
   
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$ 479,554
Accrued interest payable
  6,948
Loans from related party
  78,860
Convertible notes payable, net of unamortized debt discount of $95,557
  54,443
Unearned revenue
  450,000
Total current liabilities
  1,069,805
     
     
Total liabilities
  1,069,805
     
Commitments and contingencies
  --
     
Stockholders' deficit
   
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares 70,739,248 shares issued and outstanding
  70,739
Additional paid-in capital
  14,869,145
Accumulated deficit
  (15,296,848)
Total stockholders' deficit
  (356,964)
     
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
$ 712,841
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
F-2

SKINVISIBLE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(AUDITED)
 
 
For the year ended
December 31, 2007
 
For the year ended
December 31, 2006
       
Revenues
$ 777,685   $ 691,452
           
Cost of revenues
  140,875     77,465
           
Gross profit
  636,810     613,987
           
Operating expenses
         
Depreciation and amortization
  18,176     21,187
Stock based compensation
  475,006     859,160
Selling general and administrative
  1,508,773     1,830,493
Total operating expenses
  2,001,955     2,710,840
           
Loss before provision for income taxes
  (1,365,145)     (2,096,853)
           
Other income (expense)
  --     192
Interest expense
  (241,777)     (943)
Total other income (expense)
  (241,777)     (751)
           
Provision for income taxes
  --     --
           
Net loss
$ (1,606,922)   $ (2,097,604)
           
Basic loss per common share
$ (0.02)   $ (0.03)
           
 
         
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
  66,150,436     61,925,163
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(AUDITED)
 
 
Common Stock 
Shares                        Amount
 
Additional 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Stock
Subscription
Receivable
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Total
Stockholders'
Equity (Deficit)
Balance, December 31, 2005
58,225,248   $ 58,225   $ 11,486,002   $ 134,873       $ (11,592,322)   $ 86,778
                                     
Issuance of stock for cash, $0.15 per share
3,415,000     3,415     508,708     (134,873)         --     377,250
                                     
Issuance of stock for cash, $0.03 per share
50,000     50     1,429     --         --     1,479
                                     
Issuance of stock for cash, $0.05 per share
75,000     75     3,675     --         --     3,750
                                     
Issuance of stock for services, $0.05 per share
50,000     50     2,450     --         --     2,500
                                     
Issuance of stock for cash, $0.08 per share
75,000     75     5,925     --         --     6,000
                                     
Issuance of stock for cash, $0.10 per share
112,500     113     11,137     --         --     11,250
                                     
Issuance of stock for cash, $0.18 per share
110,000     110     19,690     --         --     19,800
                                     
Issuance of stock for cash, $0.20 per share
915,000     915     182,056     --         --     182,971
                                     
Issuance of stock options for services
--     --     643,051     --         --     643,051
                                     
Issuance of stock options to employees and directors
--     --     120,131     --         --     120,131
                                     
Issuance of stock options for services
            73,002     --         --     73,002
                                     
Issuance of stock for debt , $ 0.25  per share
20,000     20     4,980     --         --     5,000
                                     
Issuance of stock for debt , $ 0.25  per share
56,000     56     13,944     --         --     14,000
                                     
Issuance of stock for cash, $0.20 share
1,340,000     1,340     266,660     --         --     268,000
                                     
Issuance of stock options for services
            8,995     --         --     8,995
                                     
Issuance of stock option to employees
            11,482     --         --     11,482
                                     
Effect of foreign currency translation
--     --     --     --         --     --
                                     
Net loss
--     --     --     --         (2,097,604)     (2,097,604)
                                     
Balance, December 31, 2006
64,443,748     64,444     13,363,317     --     --     (13,689,926)     (262,165)
                                       
Issuance of stock for cash, $0.20 per share
775,000     775     154,225     --     --     --     155,000
                                       
Issuance of stock for services, $0.20 per share
242,500     242     50,758     --     --     --     51,000
                                       
Issuance of stock upon exercise of options for cash, $0.10 per share
300,000     300     29,700     --     --     --     30,000
                                       
Return of stock for accounts receivable
--     --     --     --     (48,931)     --     (48,931)
                                       
Issuance of 150,000 shares of  treasury stock for services, $0.25 per share
--     --     (11,431)     --     48,931     --     37,500
                                       
Issuance of stock upon exercise of options for accounts payable, $0.05 per share
200,000     200     9,800     --     --     --     10,000
                                       
Issuance of stock for accounts payable, $0.10 per share
130,000     130     12,870     --     --     --     13,000
                                       
Issuance of stock for accounts payable $0.20 share
70,000     70     13,930     --     --     --     14,000
                                       
Issuance of stock upon exercise of options for cash, $0.05 per share
260,000     260     12,740     --     --     --     13,000
                                       
Issuance of stock for services, $0.10 per share
160,000     160     15,840     --     --     --     16,000
                                       
Issuance of stock upon exercise of warrants in lieu of debt, $0.05 per share
500,000     500     24,500     --     --     --     25,000
                                       
Issuance of stock in lieu of debt, $0.10 per share
750,000     750     74,250     --     --     --     75,000
                                       
Issuance of stock for conversion of loan, $0.10 per share
250,000     250     24,750     --     --     --     25,000
                                       
Issuance of stock upon exercise of warrants for conversion of loan, $0.10 per share
210,000     210     10,290     --     --     --     10,500
                                       
Issuance of stock for conversion of loan, $0.15 per share
863,000     863     128,587     --     --     --     129,450
                                       
Issuance of stock for conversion of loan, $0.20 per share
500,000     500     99,500     --     --     --     100,000
                                       
Issuance of stock for services, $0.25 per share
20,000     20     4,980     --     --     --     5,000
                                       
Issuance of stock for accounts payable, $0.25 per share
40,000     40     9,960     --     --     --     10,000
                                       
Issuance of stock for donation, $0.20 per share
25,000     25     4,975     --     --     --     5,000
                                       
Issuance of stock for salaries owed, $0.10 per share
1,000,000     1,000     99,000     --     --     --     100,000
                                       
Beneficial Conversion feature related to convertible notes payable
--     --     311,655     --     --     --     311,655
                                       
Financing costs related to convertible notes payable
--     --     54,443     --     --     --     54,443
                                       
Vesting of employee stock options
--     --     78,441     --     --     --     78,441
                                       
Issuance of stock options for services
--     --     292,065     --     --     --     292,065
                                       
Net loss
--     --     --     --     --     (1,606,922)     (1,606,922)
                                       
Balance, December 31, 2007
70,739,248   $ 70,739     14,869,145   $ --   $ --   $ (15,296,848)   $ (356,964)
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
(AUDITED)
 
 
For the year ended
December 31, 2007
 
For the year ended
December 31, 2006
       
Cash flows from operating activities:
     
Net loss
$ (1,606,922)   $ (2,097,604)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
         
 cash used by operating activities:
         
Depreciation and amortization
  18,176     21,187
Stock based compensation
  475,006     859,160
Stock issued for donation
  5,000     --
Interest expense related to beneficial conversion feature
  217,056     943
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
         
Decrease in inventory
  2,447     50,892
Increase in accounts receivable
  (37,207)     99,177
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets
  13,324     2,883
Increase in related party receivable
  (77)     --
Decrease in prepaid royalty fees
  240,000     240,000
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  317,927     113,322
Increase in accrued interest
  11,398     --
Decrease in unearned revenue
  (400,000)     (153,000)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
  (743,872)     (863,040)
           
Cash flows from investing activities:
         
Purchase of fixed assets and untangible assets
  (4,662)     (13,847)
Net cash used by investing activities
  (4,662)     (13,847)
           
Cash flows from financing activities:
         
Proceeds from related party loans
  153,132     25,728
Proceeds from convertible notes payable
  410,500     --
proceeds from stock subscription payable
  --     --
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
  198,000     870,500
Net cash provided by financing activities
  761,632     896,228
           
Net change in cash
  13,098     19,341
           
Cash, beginning of period
  50,070     30,729
           
Cash, end of period
$ 63,168   $ 50,070
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
 
1.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES

Description of business - Skinvisible, Inc., (referred to as the “Company”) is focused on the development and manufacture of innovative topical polymer-based delivery system technologies and formulations incorporating its patent-pending formula/process for combining hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymer emulsions. The technologies and formulations have broad industry applications within the pharmaceutical, over-the-counter, personal skincare and cosmetic arenas. The Company’s antibacterial/antimicrobial hand sanitizer formulations, available for private label commercialization opportunities, offer skincare solutions for the healthcare, food service, industrial, cosmetic and salon industries, as well as for personal use in the retail marketplace. The Company maintains manufacturing, executive and sales offices in Las Vegas, Nevada.

History - Skinvisible, Inc. ( referred to as the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on March 6, 1998 under the name of Microbial Solutions, Inc. The Company underwent a name change on February 26, 1999, when it changed its name to Skinvisible, Inc. The Company’s subsidiary’s name of Manloe Labs, Inc. was also changed to Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Skinvisible, Inc. together with its subsidiary shall herein be collectively referred to as the “Company”.

Going concern - The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred cumulative net losses of $15,296,848 since its inception and requires capital for its contemplated operational and marketing activities to take place. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, and its transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.

Principles of consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Definition of fiscal year - The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.

Use of estimates - The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue recognition
Product sales - Revenues from the sale of products are recognized when title to the products are transferred to the customer and only when no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive reasonably assured payments for products sold and delivered.

Royalty sales – The Company also recognizes royalty revenue from licensing its patent and trademarks, only when earned, with no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive and retain reasonably assured payments.

Distribution and license rights sales – The Company also recognizes revenue from distribution and license rights only when earned, with no further contingencies or material performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to receive and retain reasonably assured payments.

Costs of RevenueCost of revenue includes raw materials, component parts, and shipping supplies. Shipping and handling costs is not a significant portion of the cost of revenue.
 
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
 
1.     DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES (continued)

Accounts Receivable – Accounts receivable is comprised of uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date.  The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reviewed periodically for collectability.  If management determines that collection is unlikely, an allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected is recorded.  Management reviews each accounts receivable balance that exceeds 30 days from the invoice date and, based on an assessment of creditworthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected.  At December 31, 2007 the Company did not recorded a reserve for doubtful accounts.

Inventory - Substantially all inventory consist of finished goods and are valued based upon first-in first-out ("FIFO") cost, not in excess of market. The determination of whether the carrying amount of inventory requires a write-down is based on an evaluation of inventory.

Fixed assets - Fixed assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are generally 3 to 10 years. The cost of repairs and maintenance is charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for property betterments and renewals are capitalized. Upon sale or other disposition of a depreciable asset, cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in other income (expense).

The Company periodically evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life of fixed assets or whether the remaining balance of fixed assets should be evaluated for possible impairment. The Company uses an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the fixed assets in measuring their recoverability.

Goodwill and intangible assets - Beginning January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. According to this statement, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization, but rather an annual assessment of impairment by applying a fair-value based test. Fair value for goodwill is based on discounted cash flows, market multiples and/or appraised values as appropriate. Under SFAS No. 142, the carrying value of assets are calculated at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows.

SFAS 142 requires the Company to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount on an annual basis to determine if there is potential impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Upon adoption and during 2002, the Company completed an impairment review and did not recognize any impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets already included in the financial statements. The Company expects to receive future benefits from previously acquired goodwill over an indefinite period of time. Accordingly, beginning January 1, 2002, the Company has foregone all related amortization expense. Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company amortized goodwill over an estimated useful life ranging from 3 to 15 years using the straight-line method.

Fair value of financial instruments - Financial accounting standards Statement No. 107, “Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, requires the Company to disclose, when reasonably attainable, the fair market values of its assets and liabilities which are deemed to be financial instruments. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature.

Income taxes - The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
1.  
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES (continued)

Comprehensive income (loss) - The Company has no components of other comprehensive income. Accordingly, net loss equals comprehensive loss for all periods.

Segment information - The Company discloses segment information in accordance with Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” which uses the Management approach to determine reportable segments. The Company operates under one segment.

Advertising costs - Advertising costs incurred in the normal course of operations are expensed as incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company incurred advertising costs totaling $58,233 and $87,741, respectively.

Research and development costs - Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred. Costs incurred to internally develop the product, including costs incurred during all phases of development, are charged to expense as incurred.

Expenses of offering - The Company accounts for specific incremental costs directly to a proposed or actual offering of securities as a direct charge against the gross proceeds of the offering.

Stock-based compensation - On January 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (R) “Share-Based Payment” which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and employee stock purchases related to a Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on the estimated fair values.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which required the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2005.  The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).  In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements for the prior periods have not been restated, and do not include the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).  Stock based compensation expense recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) for the years ended  December 31, 2007 and 2006 totaled $475,006 and $974,902, respectively.

Earnings (loss) per share - The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has not been presented since the effect of the assumed exercise of options and warrants to purchase common shares (common stock equivalents) would have an anti-dilutive effect. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, common stock equivalent shares excluded from the earnings (loss) per share calculations totaled 8,472,500 and 7,230,000, respectively.

Recent accounting pronouncements - In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”.  SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosure about fair values.  This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Management believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial results of the Company.
 
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
 
1.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES (continued)
 
Recent accounting pronouncements (continued)
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, "Employer's Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)" (FAS 158). FAS 158 requires that employers recognize the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans on the balance sheet and recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the plan-related gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. We will prospectively adopt FAS 158 on April 30, 2007. Management believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 158 will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial results of the Company.
 
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115" (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The provisions of FAS 159 become effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS 159 will have on our financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 which applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. The statement is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2008.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,” (SFAS “161”) as amended and interpreted, which requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the transparency of financial reporting.  Disclosing the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format provides a more complete picture of the location in an entity’s financial statements of both the derivative positions existing at period end and the effect of using derivatives during the reporting period.  Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.  Early adoption is permitted.
 
At December 31, 2007, the Company did not have any derivative instruments or hedging activities. Management is aware of the requirements of SFAS 161 and will disclose when appropriate.
 
Reclassification – The financial statements from 2006 reflect certain reclassifications, which will have no effect on net income, to conform to classifications in the current year.

SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)

2.     FIXED ASSETS

Fixed assets consist of the following as of December 31, 2007:
 
Machinery and equipment  
$ 55,463
Furniture and fixtures
  113,635
Computers, equipment and software   42,484
Leasehold improvements   12,569
Lab equipment                                                                                                                                                                  115,946
    340,097
Less: accumulated depreciation   317,657
     
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation $ 22,440
 
Depreciation expense for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $7,023 and $10,343, respectively.
 
3.     INTANGIBLE AND OTHER ASSETS
Patents and trademarks are capitalized at its historical cost and are amortized over their useful lives. As of December 31, 2007, patents and trademarks total $74,894, and  amortization expense for 2007 and 2006 were $10,963 and $10,219, respectivley.

License and distributor rights (“agreement”) was acquired by the Company in January 1999 and provides exclusive use distribution of polymers and polymer based products. The Company has a non-expiring term on the license and distribution rights. Accordingly, the Company annually assesses this license and distribution rights for impairment and has determined that no impairment write-down is considered necessary as of December 31, 2007.

Future amortization expense for patents and trademarks as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:
 
2008 $ 11,256
2009
  11,256
2010
  3,223
2011
  3,223
2012
  3,223

Prepaid royalties fees are amounts prepaid by the Company related to the license and distributor rights. The future royalties payments required by the Company total $2,000,000. The royalties fees are to be paid at the equal to the greater of (a) $6,000 per month; or (b) 1.5% of net revenues realized by the sale of the associated polymer products subject to a cap of $2,000,000. The Company will make payments of $6,000 per month, and by a payment on any royalties in excess of $72,000 in each year payable on an annual basis calculated within 60 days of each anniversary date of the agreement. The future royalties payments are to be amortized over eight years, which is the life of the agreement.  As of December 31, 2007, the Company has paid a total of  $1,880,000 of which $1,220,000 has been expensed and $420,000 has been recorded as prepaid royalties the Company will expense the prepayment in the future in accordance to the terms of the agreement. The remaining future royalties payments related to the agreement approximates $120,000.
 
4.     UNEARNED REVENUE

 
Unearned revenue totaling $450,000 as of December 31, 2007 relates to two marketing and distribution rights agreements entered into during 2004 for which monies were received and not considered earned. (See Note 7 for further discussion.)
 
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)

 
5.      ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following as of December 31, 2007:
 
Accounts payable                                                                                              
$ 256,695
Credit card payable 
  106,338
Accrued officers salary payables    105,453
Accrued payroll taxes 
  9,848
Other accrued expenses                                                                                      
  1,220
     
  $ 479,554
 
 
6.
STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

Stock options employees and directors – During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company granted stock options to employees and directors totaling  2,075,000 and 7,292,525  shares of its common stock with a weighted average strike price of $0.24 and $0.13 per share, respectively. Certain stock options were exercisable upon grant and have a life ranging from 3 months to 5 years. The stock options have been valued at $221,867 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 5 years,  risk free interest rates ranging from 3.5% to 4.5%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rates ranging from 178 % to 184%.  The vesting periods range from 1 year to 3 years.  The Company has recorded an expense of $78,441  for the year ended December 31, 2007 based upon the vested portion of the stock options totaling 691,667 up through December 31, 2007.

Stock options non-employees and directors – During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company granted stock options for services totaling  637,500 and 670,000  shares of its common stock with a weighted average strike price of $0.25 and $0.30 per share, respectively. Certain stock options were exercisable upon grant and have a life ranging from 3 months to 5 years. The stock options have been valued at $292,065 using the Black-Scholes option  pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 5 years,  risk free interest rates ranging from 3.5% to 4.5%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rates ranging from  120% to 139%.

The following is a summary of option activity during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
 
 
Number
Of
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
       
Balance, December 31, 2005
2,825,000   $ 0.08
         Options granted and assumed
7,292,525     0.13
         Options expired
5,817,525     --
         Options canceled
--     --
         Options exercised
100,000     0.05
Balance, December 31, 2006
4,200,000   $ 0.11
         Options granted and assumed
2,075,000     0.24
         Options expired
--     --
         Options canceled
--     --
         Options exercised
760,000     0.05
         
Balance, December 31, 2007
5,515,000   $ .17
 
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, 4,031,500 and 2,671,667 stock options, respectively, are exercisable.

SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)

6.
STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (continued)
 
Stock warrants -

The following is a summary of warrants activity during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:

 
Number
Of
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Balance, December 31, 2005
7,162,000   $ 0.15
         Warrants granted and assumed
670,000     0.30
         Warrants expired
4,802,000     0.20
         Warrants canceled
--     --
         Warrants exercised
--     --
Balance, December 31, 2006
3,030,000   $ 0.11
         Warrants granted and assumed
1,911,500     0.25
         Warrants expired
--     --
         Warrants canceled
--     --
         Warrants exercised
710,000     0.05
         
Balance, December 31, 2007
4,231,500   $ 0.15
 
All warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are exercisable.

7.      INCOME TAXES

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had a federal operating loss carryforward of approximately $6,220,500 and $4,470,500, respectively, which begins to expire in 2018.

Components of net deferred tax assets, including a valuation allowance, are as follows at December 31:

 
2007
 
2006
Deferred tax assets:
     
Net operating loss carryforward
$ 2,177,187   $ 1,564,674
Stock-based compensation
  168,877     296,687
      Total deferred tax assets
  2,346,064     1,861,361
Less: Valuation Allowance
  (2,346,064)     (1,861,361)
           
 Net Deferred Tax Assets
$ --   $ --

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $2,346,064 and $1,861,361, respectively.  In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.  Management considers the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.  As a result, management determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and recorded a full valuation allowance.

SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
 
7.      INCOME TAXES (continued)

Reconciliation between the statutory rate and the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:

 
2007
 
2006
       
Federal statutory tax rate
(35.0)%
 
(35.0)%
Change in valuation allowance
35.0%
 
35.0%
       
Effective tax rate
0.0%
 
0.0%


8.    LETTER OF INTENT AND DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT

In March 2004, the Company entered into a letter of intent (“LOI”) with Dermal Defense, Inc. for the exclusive marketing and distribution rights to its patented Antimicrobial Hand Sanitizer product for North America. Terms of the LOI require Dermal Defense, Inc. to pay a fee of $1 million comprising of a non-refundable deposit of $250,000 with the balance of $750,000 payable as to $75,000 per calendar quarter or 5% of product sales (whichever is greater) until the entire $750,000 is received. The $1 million fee will be recognized as revenue ratably over a five year period. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has received $1,000,000 and has reflected $200,000 as unearned revenue and $800,000 as revenue on cumulative basis of which $200,000 has been recorded as revenue for both years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. In addition and further to the payment fee of $1 million, Dermal Defense, Inc. agrees to pay a royalty fee of 5% on product sales of the Antimicrobial Hand Sanitizer.

In June 2004, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Cross Global, Inc. (“Cross Global”) whereby, the Company would provide exclusive marketing and distribution rights to its proprietary "Sunless Tanning Spray Formulation" for Canada, the United States, Mexico, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom and Israel. In addition CGI is granted the right to use the name "Solerra(TM)" within the territory. Terms of the agreement require Cross Global to pay a fee of $1 million comprising of a non-refundable deposit of $200,000 with the balance of $800,000 payable as $200,000 due August 30, 2004, November 30, 2004, February 28, 2005 and May 30, 2005. The $1 million fee will be recognized as revenue ratably over a five year period. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has received $1,000,000 and has reflected $250,000 as unearned revenue and $750,000 as revenue on a cumulative basis of which $200,000 has been recorded as revenue for both years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.  In addition and further to the payment fee of $1 million, Cross Global agrees to pay a royalty fee of 5% on product sales of the Sunless Tanning Spray Formulation.

On April 11, 2007, we entered into a Licensing Agreement (“Agreement”) with DRJ Group, Inc. (“DRJ”), a California corporation. Under the terms of this Agreement, we granted DRJ the exclusive right to distribute, market, sell, and promote a topical analgesic that incorporates our proprietary and patented Invisicare polymer in North America. DRJ manufactures STOPAIN®, a cream product topically applied which is designed to provide relief to people suffering from muscle stiffness, arthritis or muscle strains. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will generate revenues from product sales of Invisicare to DRJ and be entitled to receive royalties from all product sales generated by DRJ.  As of December 31, 2007, the Company has received $22,179 in royalties from DRJ.
 
SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
 
9.      CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

During 2007, the Company issued an aggregate of $260,500 consisting of promissory convertible notes to seven individuals. The notes are due by August 30, 2007, one note due June 30, 2007, accruing interest at 10% per annum. At the investor’s option until the repayment date. The note can be converted to shares of the Company’s common stock at  a fixed price of $0.20 per share along with additional warrants to purchase one share per every two shares issued at the exercise price of $0.25 per share if exercised in year one and $0.30 per share if exercised in year two and available only upon conversion of the note payable.   As of December 31, 2007, $260,500 plus accrued interest of $5,650 were converted into 2,073,000 shares.

In accordance with EITF 00-27, the Company has determined value associated with the conversion feature and detachable warrants issued in connection with these convertible notes payable. The Company has determined the debentures to have a beneficial conversion feature totaling $216,098 which has been fully expensed as of December 31, 2007.  The beneficial conversion feature has been recorded as a debt discount which will be amortized over the life of the loan.  The beneficial conversion feature is valued under the intrinsic value method and warrants were valued under the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: stock price range from $0.23 to $0.31, life of  3 years, a dividend yield of 0%, volatility raging from 78% to 127%, and a debt discount rate of 4.50%.   The investor shall have one year from December 11, 2007 to exercise 1,250,000 warrants.  The warrant strike price shall be $0.25 per share.  The Company has determined the warrants to have a value of $78,915 which has been fully expensed as of December 31, 2007.

During 2007, the Company issued a $150,000 promissory convertible note from one individual. The note is due by December 11, 2008, accruing interest at 10% per annum. At the investor’s option until the repayment date. The note can be converted to shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed price of $0.075 per share along with additional warrants to purchase one share per every two shares issued at the exercise price of $0.15 per share if exercised in year one and available only upon conversion of the note payable.  As of December 31, 2007, the $150,000 convertible note payable remains outstanding.

In accordance with EITF 00-27, the Company has determined value associated with the conversion feature and detachable warrants issued in connection with these convertible notes payable. The Company has determined the debentures to have a beneficial conversion feature totaling $95,557.  The beneficial conversion feature has been recorded as a debt discount which will be amortized over the life of the loan.  The beneficial conversion feature is valued under the intrinsic value method and warrants were valued under the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.14, life of  3 years, a dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 106%, and a debt discount rate of 4.50%.   The investor shall have one year from December 11, 2007 to exercise 1,000,000 warrants.  The warrant strike price shall be $0.15 per share.  The Company has determined the warrants to have a value of $53,829 which has been reflected as a financing cost and will be amortized over the life of the loan.   As of December 31, 2007, financing costs total $53,484, net of accumulated amortization of $344.

10.    RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As of December 31,  2007, the Company had an unsecured loan payable due to the CEO with an interest rate of 10% per annum, due on demand totaling $68,360.

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had an unsecured loan payable due to a shareholder, bearing no interest, due on demand totaling $10,500.

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had a receivable due to them from a shareholder totaling $1,196.

SKINVISIBLE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)

11.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease obligations – The Company has operating leases for its offices.  The lease for its offices expires on December 29, 2009.  Future minimum lease payments under the operating leases for the facilities as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:
 
2008     $ 97,028
2009        98,622
 
Rental expense, resulting from operating lease agreements for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, was $102,539 and $93,388, respectively.
 
12.    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

         During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock for a conversion of a loanat $0.075 per share totaling $150,000.

         During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 248,000 shares of common stock for payment on accounts payable at $0.10 per share totaling $24,000.

         During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 799,990 shares of common stock for a conversion of a loan at $0.10 per share totaling $79,999.

         During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock for a conversion of a loan at $0.05 per share totaling $60,000.
 
F-15

 
Item 8.   Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

No events occurred requiring disclosure under Item 304(b) of Regulation S-B.

Item 8A.  Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered in this report. Based on the foregoing, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
 
There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.  
 
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
 
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Framework”). Based on this evaluation under the COSO Framework management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007.
 
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

18

 
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all fraud and material error. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving our objectives and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level.  Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the internal control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Item 8B.  Other information

None.

PART III

Item 9.  Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

The following information sets forth the names of our current directors and executive officers, their ages and their present positions.

Name
Age
Position(s) and Office(s) Held
Terry Howlett
60
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, & Director
Brian Piwek
62
Director
Greg McCartney
56
Director

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of each of our current executive officers and directors.

Mr. Terry H. Howlett, has been our Chief Executive Officer & Director since March 5, 1998. Mr. Howlett has a diversified background in market initialization and development, sales and venture capital financing for emerging growth companies. He has held senior management, marketing and sales positions with various companies, including the Canadian Federation of
 
19

 
Independent Business, Family Life Insurance, and Avacare of Canada and founded Presley Laboratories, Inc., which marketed cosmetic and skin, care products on a direct sales basis. For the ten years prior to becoming President of the Company, Mr. Howlett was the President and CEO of Voice-it Solutions, Inc., a publicly traded company on the Vancouver Stock exchange that made voice response software for order entry systems.
 
Mr. Brian Piwek joined our board of directors in January, 2008. Mr. Piwek's experience and expertise is in the international retail industry. He was president of Overwaitea Foods supermarket from 1991 until 1997. In 1997 Brian accepted the position as Co-CEO with A&P Canada (The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company Inc.) and in 2000 was appointed Chairman, President and CEO of A&P Canada. In late 2002 he moved to the U.S. as President and Chief Executive Officer of A&P US (New York Stock Exchange symbol "GAP") where he began the turnaround of North America's oldest retail food chain. Brian retired from A&P in July 2005. Brian is an MBA graduate and has served on many voluntary boards.
 
Mr. Greg McCartney has been a member of our board of directors since January 10, 2005. Mr. McCartney is Managing Director of Taylor, Butterfield & Worth Asset Management Corporation a management consulting services firm assisting clients in becoming  fully reporting public companies. Previously Mr. McCartney was the Chairman of the Board for Genesis Bioventures (formely BioLabs) and also formerly served as their CEO. Genesis Bioventures is currently trading on the OTCBB. Mr. McCartney has over 20 years experience serving as officer and director of both private and public companies in various manufacturing and technology industries. Prior to founding BioLabs in 1997, Mr. McCartney was the founder and director of Aspenwood Holdings Corporation, a business consulting firm specializing in financing, public relations and venture capital in the technology and manufacturing industries. From 1986 to 1995 he was the President of an emerging high technology company and also served as officer and director of other companies. Previously, he was involved with international real estate and land development.

Term of Office

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws.

Our executive officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.

Significant Employees

We have one significant employee that makes a significant contribution to our business other than our officers and directors.

Dr. James A. Roszell, Ph.D, is a doctoral chemist with over 35 years' experience in product formulation, experimental design, analysis, and method validation. Since joining Skinvisible in 1998, he has been responsible for research and development of our patented technology, related polymer delivery vehicles, product formulations and compositions. Dr. Roszell is a joint
 
20

 
contributor to Skinvisible's Patent Number 6.756.059 and responsible for our eight pending patents. Prior to joining Skinvisible, he worked as chemist for Supertech Products, Inc. in Florida where his responsibilities included ensuring compliance with OSHA, EPA and other standards and regulations, maintenance of quality control, research and development for new products. Dr. Roszell's background includes work in chemical, pharmaceutical, environmental and clinical laboratory arenas. His chemical and scientific expertise makes a significant contribution to our business.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To  the best of our knowledge, during the past five years, none of the following  occurred with  respect to a present director,  person nominated to become director, executive officer, or  control person:  (1)  any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at  the  time  of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal  proceeding  or  being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding  traffic  violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or  vacated, of  any court  of  competent  jurisdiction,  permanently  or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in  any  type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by  a  court  of  competent  jurisdiction  (in  a  civil action), the SEC or the Commodities  Futures  Trading  Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

Audit Committee

We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee.  The entire board of directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the board of directors when performing the functions of that would generally be performed by an audit committee. The board of directors approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to financial reporting. In addition, the board of directors reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance of the independent auditor.

We do not have an audit committee financial expert because of the size of our company and our board of directors at this time.  We believe that we do not require an audit committee financial expert at this time because we retain outside consultants who possess these attributes as needed.  

For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, the board of directors:
 
21

 
1.  
Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, and

2.  
Reviewed and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from our independent auditors on the matters relating to the auditor's independence.

Based upon the board of directors’ review and discussion of the matters above, the board of directors authorized inclusion of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 to be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company.  Officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.  To the best of our knowledge based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 (and any amendments thereof) received by us during or with respect to the year ended December 31, 2007, the following persons have failed to file, on a timely basis, the identified reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during fiscal year ended December 31, 2007:
 
Name and principal position
Number of
late reports
Transactions not
timely reported
Known failures to
file a required form
Terry Howlett
CEO, CFO & Director
3
0
0
Jost Steinbruchel
former Director
0
0
0
Greg McCartney
Director
1
0
0

Code of Ethics Disclosure

We adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Executives, which include our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics was filed as an exhibit to the annual report on Form 10KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and filed with the SEC on April 14, 2005.

22

 
Item 10.  Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Company currently has an employment agreement with its sole executive officer, Terry Howlett.   The term of the agreement is three (3) years.  Unless extended or renewed, the agreement will terminate on January 1, 2009.  Under the agreement, Mr. Howlett earns a cash stipend of $13,333.33 per month ($160,000 per year).  In addition, the agreement provides for Mr. Howlett to be awarded stock options at the discretion of the board of directors.  Our two independent directors currently receive a stipend of $1,000 per month, in addition to discretionary awards of stock options.

Currently, the objective of the cash compensation paid by the company is to provide fair reimbursement for the time spent by our executive officer and independent directors to the extent feasible within the financial constraints faced by our developing business.  The stock options granted to our executive officer and to our independent directors are intended to provide these individuals with incentives to pursue the growth and development of the company’s operations and business opportunities. Although the options awarded to our executive and directors are typically exercisable immediately, they also remain valid and exercisable for terms of several years.  We believe this provides the proper balance of short-term and long-term incentives to increase the value of the company.  Although an immediate increase in share price following the issuance of the options would obviously result in a profit if those options were exercised, the longer exercisable period of the options also provides an incentive to increase value over the long term and gives our executive officer and directors the opportunity to realize gains based on the sustained growth of our operations and revenues.

In addition, our sole executive officer holds substantial ownership in the company and is generally motivated by a strong entrepreneurial interest in expanding our operations and revenue base to the best of his ability.
 
Summary Compensation Table
 
The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our former or current executive officers for the fiscal years ended 2007 and 2006.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
 
Name
and
principal
position
Year
Salary ($)
Bonus
($)
 
Stock
Awards
($)
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Terry Howlett
CEO & CFO
2007
2006
160,000
160,000
-
-
-
-
182,252
36,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
342,252
196,000
 
Narrative Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table
 
We have a 3 year employment agreement dated January 1, 2006 with Mr. Howlett.  Mr. Howlett earned an annual base salary of $160,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007 and $160,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006.  Due to financial constraints, however, we were only able to actually pay Mr. Howlett $58,769.22 in cash during the fiscal year.  During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, we granted Mr. Howlett options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at the exercise price of $0.24 per share with an expiration date of July 29, 2012.  These options are fully vested and immediately exercisable.  The aggregate value of these options, which totaled $182,252, was computed in accordance with FAS 123R and is reported in the summary compensation table above in the column titled “Option Awards.”

At no time during the last fiscal year was any outstanding option repriced or otherwise modified.  There was no tandem feature, reload feature, or tax-reimbursement feature associated with any of the stock options we granted to our executive officers or otherwise.
 
23

 
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The table below summarizes all unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2007.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
OPTION AWARDS
STOCK AWARDS
Name
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
 (#)
Unexercisable
Equity
Incentive
 Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
 Price
 ($)
Option
Expiration
Date
 
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of
Stock That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
Equity
Incentive
 Plan
Awards:
 Number
of
Unearned
 Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
 Not
Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
 Vested
(#)
Terry Howlett
1,000,000
200,000
1,200,000
500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.24
0.18
0.05
0.05
7/29/2012
1/3/2011
04/01/2008
09/29/2008
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-


Compensation of Directors

The table below summarizes all compensation of our directors as of December 31, 2007.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name
 
Fees Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)
 
 
Stock Awards
($)
 
 
Option Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 
All
Other
Compensation
($)
 
 
 
Total
($)
Terry Howlett
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Jost Steinbruchel, former director
12,000
-
45,563
-
-
-
57,563
Greg McCartney
12,000
-
45,563
-
-
-
57,563
Brian Piwek
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

Narrative Disclosure to the Director Compensation Table

The all fees earned or paid in cash and stock options awards granted to Terry Howlett were earned in connection with his service as an executive officer.   Mr. Howlett received no compensation for his service as a member of our board of directors.

We pay our independent directors a monthly fee of $1,000.  Mr. McCartney and Mr. Steinbruchel each received a total of $12,000 in consideration for services rendered as members of our board of directors.  In addition, Mr. McCartney and Mr. Steinbruchel each received options to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.24 per share.  These options are fully vested and immediately exercisable.  The aggregate value of these options, which totaled $45,563 for each independent director, was computed in accordance with FAS 123R and is reported in the director compensation table above in the column titled “Option Awards.”

24

 
Item 11.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2008, the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each executive officer and director, by each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the our common stock and by the executive officers and directors as a group.  Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly and the percentage shown is based on 75,487,238 shares of common stock issued and outstanding on March 31, 2007. Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each person named in this table is c/o Skinvisible, Inc., 6320 South Sandhill Road, Suite 10, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120.

 
Title of class
Name and address
of beneficial owner (1)
Amount of
beneficial ownership
Percent
of class*
       
Executive Officers & Directors:
Common
Terry Howlett
9,823,248 shares
13.01% (2)
Common
Brian Piwek
 600,990 shares
0.80% (3)
Common
Greg McCartney
905,000 shares
1.20% (4)
Total of All Directors and Executive Officers:
11,329,238 shares
15.01%
More Than 5% Beneficial Owners:
None
 
(1)
As used in this table, "beneficial ownership" means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or shared investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, a security). In addition, for purposes of this table, a person is deemed, as of any date, to have "beneficial ownership" of any security that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date.
(2)
Includes options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 1,000,000 shares at a price of $0.24, options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 200,000 shares at a price of $0.18, options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 400,000 shares at $0.10, and warrants that may be immediately exercised to purchase 500,000 shares at a price of $0.15.
(3)
Includes options that may be immediately exercised to purchase 200,000 shares at a price of $0.10 and warrants that may be immediately exercised to purchase 125,000 at $0.12
(4)
Includes options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 100,000 shares at a price of $0.10, options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 100,000 shares at a price of $0.18, options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 250,000 shares at $0.24, and options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 200,000 shares at $0.10.

25


Item 12.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

None of our directors or executive officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all of our outstanding shares, nor any members of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings, and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction since the beginning of our last fiscal year on January 1, 2007 or in any presently proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect us.

Our policy regarding related transactions requires that any director or officer who has an interest in any transaction disclose the presence and the nature of the interest to the board of directors prior to any approval of the transaction by the board of directors. The transaction may then be approved by a majority of the disinterested directors, provided that an interested director may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at the meeting of the board of directors to approve the transaction.

Item 13.   Exhibits

Exhibit Number
Description
10.1
Amendment to Distribution Agreement (1)
10.2
Employment Agreement with Terry Howlett(2)
14.1
Code of Ethics(3)
 
(1) 
Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and those portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(2)   Incorporated by reference to annual report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2007.
(3) 
Incorporated by reference to annual report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2005.
 
26

 
Item 14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed by our auditors for professional services rendered in connection with a review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB and the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were approximately $31,990 and $26,980 respectively.

Audit-Related Fees

Our auditors did not bill any additional fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed by our auditors for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $0 and $0 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed by our auditors for all other non-audit services, such as attending meetings and other miscellaneous financial consulting, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $0 and $0 respectively.
 
27

 
SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Skinvisible, Inc.
 
By: /s/Terry Howlett 
  Terry Howlett
  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
  April 11, 2008
 
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
 
By: /s/Terry Howlett    By: /s/Brian Piwek 
  Terry Howlett     Brian Piwek
  Director     Director
  April 11, 2008     April 11, 2008
 
By:
/s/Greg McCartney 
  Greg McCartney
 
Director
 
April 11, 2008