UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant

☒

​

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

☐

​

Check the appropriate box:

☐

Preliminary Proxy Statement

​

☐

​

☒

Definitive Proxy Statement

​

☐

Definitive Additional Materials

​

☐

Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

​

AMERIS BANCORP

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒

No fee required

​

☐

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

​

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
   

​

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
   

​

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
   

​

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
   

​

(5)

Total fee paid:
   

​

☐

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

​

☐

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

​

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:
   

​

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
   

​

(3)

Filing Party:
   

​

(4)

Date Filed:
   

​

April 2, 2018

Dear Shareholder:

It is my pleasure to invite you to this year’s annual meeting of shareholders, which will be held on Tuesday, May 15, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., local time, at our offices located at 24 Second Avenue Southeast, in Moultrie, Georgia.

The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders that follows describes the business to be conducted at the meeting. We will also report on matters of current interest to our shareholders.

We will be using the Internet as our primary means of furnishing proxy materials to shareholders. Accordingly, most shareholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials. We will instead send shareholders a notice with instructions for accessing the proxy materials and voting via the Internet. The notice also provides information on how shareholders may obtain paper copies of our proxy materials if they so choose.

Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please vote as soon as possible to ensure that your shares will be represented and voted at the annual meeting. You may vote via the Internet, by telephone or, if you receive a paper proxy card in the mail, by mailing the completed proxy card. If you attend the annual meeting, you may vote your shares in person even though you have previously voted your proxy.

On behalf of Ameris Bancorp, I thank you for your continued support and look forward to seeing you at this year’s annual meeting.

Sincerely,

Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
Executive Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer

Ameris Bancorp
310 First Street, S.E.
Moultrie, Georgia 31768

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 15, 2018

To the Shareholders of Ameris Bancorp:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Ameris Bancorp (the “Company”) will be held at the Company’s offices located at 24 Second Avenue Southeast, Moultrie, Georgia, on Tuesday, May 15, 2018, commencing at 9:30 a.m, local time, for the following items of business:

(1)

the election of three Class III directors for a three-year term of office;

​

(2)

the ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018;

​

(3)

the advisory approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

​

(4)

an advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and

​

(5)

any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

​

The close of business on March 6, 2018, has been fixed as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by any shareholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting, during normal business hours, for a period of at least 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting at the Company’s corporate offices located at the address set forth above.

INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

In accordance with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules, we are using the Internet as our primary means of furnishing proxy materials to shareholders. Consequently, most shareholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials. We will instead send shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials with instructions for accessing the proxy materials, including our proxy statement and annual report, and voting via the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also provides information on how shareholders may obtain paper copies of our proxy materials if they so choose.

i

AMERIS BANCORP
310 First Street, S.E.
Moultrie, Georgia 31768

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 15, 2018

Why am I receiving these materials?

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Ameris Bancorp (the “Company”) has made these materials available to you on the Internet or, upon your request, has delivered printed versions of these materials to you by mail, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the Board for use at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at the Company’s offices located at 24 Second Avenue Southeast, Moultrie, Georgia, on Tuesday, May 15, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., local time, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. These materials were first made available to shareholders on April 2, 2018. Shareholders of the Company are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

What is included in these materials?

These materials include:

•

the Company’s Proxy Statement; and

​

•

the Company’s 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements.

​

If you request printed versions of these materials by mail, these materials will also include the proxy card for the Annual Meeting.

What am I voting on?

You will be voting on each of the following:

•

the election of three Class III directors for a three-year term of office;

​

•

the ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP (“Crowe Horwath”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018;

​

•

the advisory approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

​

•

an advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and

​

•

any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

​

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board knows of no other matters that will be brought before the Annual Meeting.

You may not cumulate your votes for any matter being voted on at the Annual Meeting, and you are not entitled to appraisal or dissenters’ rights.

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail or e-mail notification regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company has provided access to its proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, the Company is sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to shareholders of record and beneficial owners. All shareholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the

1

Notice, free of charge, or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, shareholders may request to receive proxy materials electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis.

How can I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

The Notice provides you with instructions regarding how to:

•

view proxy materials for the Annual Meeting on the Internet and execute a proxy; and

​

•

instruct the Company to send future proxy materials to you electronically by e-mail.

​

Choosing to receive future proxy materials by e-mail will save the Company the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the impact of its annual meetings on the environment. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Who can vote?

You may vote if you owned shares of the Company’s common stock, $1.00 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), as of the close of business on March 6, 2018, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”). As of the Record Date, there were 38,323,675 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

How do I vote?

You have four voting options. You may vote using one of the following methods:

•

over the Internet, which you are encouraged to do if you have access to the Internet;

​

•

by telephone;

​

•

for those shareholders who request to receive a paper proxy card in the mail, by completing, signing and returning the proxy; or

​

•

by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

​

The Notice provides instructions on how to access your proxy card, which contains instructions on how to vote via the Internet or by telephone. For those shareholders who request to receive a paper proxy card in the mail, instructions for voting via the Internet, by telephone or by mail are set forth on the proxy card. Please follow the directions on your proxy card carefully.

Can I vote at the Annual Meeting?

You may vote your shares at the Annual Meeting if you attend in person. Even if you plan to be present at the Annual Meeting, you are encouraged to vote your shares by proxy. You may vote your proxy via the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Even if you have already voted your shares by proxy, you may change your vote and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting if you attend in person.

What if my shares are registered in more than one person’s name?

If you own shares that are registered in the name of more than one person, each person must sign the proxy. If an attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian or any other person signs the proxy in a representative capacity, the full title of the person signing the proxy should be given and a certificate should be furnished showing evidence of appointment.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice?

If you receive more than one Notice, then you have multiple accounts with brokers or the Company’s transfer agent. Please vote all of these shares. It is recommended that you contact your broker or the Company’s transfer agent, as applicable, to consolidate as many accounts as possible under the same name and address. The Company’s transfer agent is Computershare Investor Services, which may be contacted by telephone at (800) 568-3476.

2

Can I change my mind after I vote?

You may change your vote at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. You may do this by using one of the following methods:

•

voting again by telephone or over the Internet prior to 1:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 15, 2018;

​

•

giving written notice to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this Proxy Statement;

​

•

delivering a later-dated proxy; or

​

•

voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

​

How many votes am I entitled to?

All holders of Common Stock are entitled to cast one vote per share held as of the Record Date.

How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

In order for the Company to conduct the Annual Meeting, the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of the Record Date must be present at the Annual Meeting. This is referred to as a quorum. Your shares will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you do one of the following:

•

vote via the Internet or by telephone;

​

•

return a properly executed proxy by mail (even if you do not provide voting instructions); or

​

•

attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.

​

How many votes are needed to elect directors?

Earlier this year, the Board implemented majority voting in uncontested elections, which is an election in which the number of nominees for director is less than or equal to the number of directors to be elected. As a result, each director will be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, meaning that each director nominee must receive a greater number of such shares voted “for” such director than the number of such shares voted “against” such director. In an uncontested election, withholding authority for a particular nominee by checking the “withhold” box by the nominee’s name where it appears on the proxy card will have the effect of voting against such nominee.

If an incumbent director does not receive a greater number of such shares voted “for” such director than the number of such shares voted “against” such director, then such director must tender his or her resignation to the Board. In that situation, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board would make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether to take other action. Within 90 days from the date the election results are certified, the Board will act on the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s recommendation and will publicly disclose its decision and rationale behind it.

In a contested election, which is an election in which the number of nominees for director is greater than the number of directors to be elected, director nominees are elected by a plurality vote.

How many votes are needed to ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018 or to approve the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers?

Approval of each of these proposals requires the affirmative vote in favor of such proposal of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

3

How is the advisory vote on the frequency of the vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executed officers determined?

With respect to this proposal, the alternative that obtains a plurality of the votes cast by the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will constitute the non-binding recommendation of the shareholders.

How many votes are needed for other matters that may be brought before the Annual Meeting?

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to approve any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting. The Board knows of no other matters at this time that will be brought before the Annual Meeting. If other matters are properly introduced, the persons named in the proxy as the proxy holders will vote on such matters in their discretion.

Will my shares be voted if I do not provide my proxy?

Your shares may be voted under certain circumstances if they are held in the name of a brokerage firm. Brokerage firms have the authority under stock exchange rules to vote customers’ unvoted shares on “routine” matters, which include the ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Accordingly, if a brokerage firm votes your shares on these matters in accordance with these rules, your shares will count as present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum and will count as “for” votes or “against” votes, as the case may be, with respect to all “routine” matters voted on at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares directly in your own name, they will not be voted if you do not vote them or provide a proxy. If a brokerage firm signs and returns a proxy on your behalf that does not contain voting instructions, your shares will count as present at the Annual Meeting for quorum purposes and will count as a “for” vote for the appointment of Crowe Horwath as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018, but your shares will not count as a “for” vote or a “withhold” vote on the election of the director nominees named in this Proxy Statement and will not be counted as an advisory vote on executive compensation or on the advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation. These are referred to as “broker non-votes.” Questions regarding these procedures may be directed to the Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this Proxy Statement.

4

The business and affairs of the Company are managed under the direction of the Board in accordance with the Georgia Business Corporation Code, subject to any limitations set forth in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. The Board selects and oversees the members of senior management, who are charged by the Board with conducting the business of the Company. The Company’s executive officers are appointed annually by the Board and serve at the discretion of the Board, subject to applicable employment agreements.

The Company has a classified board of directors currently consisting of three Class I directors (Edwin W. Hortman, Jr., who currently serves as Executive Chairman, Daniel B. Jeter, who currently serves as Lead Independent Director, and William H. Stern), three Class II directors (William I. Bowen, Jr., Robert P. Lynch and Elizabeth A. McCague) and three Class III directors (R. Dale Ezzell, Leo J. Hill and Jimmy D. Veal). The Class III directors currently serve until the Annual Meeting, and the Class I and Class II directors currently serve until the annual meetings of shareholders to be held in 2019 and 2020, respectively. After the Annual Meeting, the Class I, Class II and Class III directors will serve until the annual meetings of shareholders to be held in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively, and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.

At each annual meeting of shareholders, directors are duly elected for a full term of three years to succeed those whose terms are expiring, although directors may be elected for shorter terms in certain instances, such as filling a vacancy in a particular class of directors. Vacancies on the Board and newly created directorships also can generally be filled by a vote of a majority of the directors then in office. The Company’s Bylaws require each director to retire at the annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders following the date that he or she reaches age 75.

At the Annual Meeting, shareholders are being asked to re-elect Messrs. Ezzell, Hill and Veal to serve as Class III directors until the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

Proxies cannot be voted at the Annual Meeting for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

Unless otherwise directed, the persons named as proxies and attorneys in the enclosed form of proxy intend to vote “FOR” the election of all nominees as directors for the ensuing term and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. If any such nominee for any reason should not be available as a candidate for director, votes will be cast pursuant to authority granted by the enclosed proxy for such other candidate or candidates as may be nominated by the Board. The Board is unaware of a nominee who is unable to serve as a director or will decline to serve as a director, if elected.

The following sets forth certain information, as of the Record Date, for the Class III nominees:

R. Dale Ezzell (age 68) has served as a director of the Company and as a director of the Bank since May 2010. Mr. Ezzell served as a director of Southland Bank, formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, from 1983 until the merger of Southland Bank into the Bank in 2006. He also served as Southland Bank’s Chairman from 1995 until such merger. Mr. Ezzell currently serves as Chairman of the Bank’s community board in Dothan, Alabama. Mr. Ezzell is the founder and owner of Wisecards Printing and Mailing, a direct mail advertising business in Abbeville, Alabama. Prior to establishing Wisecards in 2001, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Ezzell’s Inc., which operated several department stores in southeast Alabama and southwest Georgia, from 1987 to 2000. Mr. Ezzell holds a bachelor’s degree in engineering from Auburn University and resides in the Abbeville, Alabama market. His years as a director of a subsidiary bank, along with his varied business and practical experience, give him a valuable understanding of the issues faced by the Company and its customers.

Leo J. Hill (age 62) has served as a director of the Company and as a director of the Bank since January 2013. Mr. Hill is the owner of Advisor Network Solutions, LLC, a consulting services firm, and currently serves as Lead Independent Director of Transamerica Mutual Funds. Prior to his service with Transamerica, Mr. Hill held various positions in banking, including Senior Vice President and Senior Loan Administration Officer for Wachovia Bank of Georgia’s southeastern corporate lending unit, President and Chief Executive Officer of Barnett Treasure Coast Florida with Barnett Banks and Market President of

5

Sun Coast Florida with Bank of America. He has a bachelor’s degree in management and a master’s degree in finance, both from Georgia State University, and he has completed Louisiana State University’s Graduate School of Banking. Mr. Hill is involved with the Investment Company Institute, the Conference of Fund Leaders, the National Association of Corporate Directors and the Institute for Independent Business. With his wide-ranging professional and banking background, he brings a wealth of business and management experience to the Board.

Jimmy D. Veal (age 69) has served as a director of the Company and as a director of the Bank since May 2008. Mr. Veal was a founding director of Golden Isles Financial Holdings, Inc., which was the corporate parent of The First Bank of Brunswick prior to its acquisition by the Company and subsequent merger into the Bank. He served as a director of both Golden Isles Financial Holdings, Inc. and The First Bank of Brunswick from their inception in 1989 until their acquisition by the Company in 2001 and as Vice Chairman of both companies from 1996 until 2001. Mr. Veal currently serves as Chairman of the Bank’s community Board for the Southeast Georgia Coast. Mr. Veal has been active in the hospitality industry for over 35 years. Together with his family, he currently owns and operates Beachview Tent Rentals, Inc. in Brunswick, Georgia. He is also active in various real estate and timberland ventures in Glynn County, Georgia and Camden County, Georgia. In addition to his experience in banking, he has gained knowledge of many and varied industries and sectors of the economy, which provides him a unique and beneficial perspective for his service on the Board.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of the nominated directors. Proxies will be voted FOR the election of the three nominees discussed above unless otherwise specified.

The following sets forth certain information, as of the Record Date, for all other directors of the Company, whose terms of office will continue after the Annual Meeting:

William I. Bowen, Jr. (age 53) has served as a director of the Company and as a director of Ameris Bank, the Company’s wholly owned banking subsidiary (the “Bank”), since November 2014. Mr. Bowen resides in our Tifton, Georgia market, and he currently serves as Chairman of the community board of the Bank for that market. He has served as a member of the community board since 2012. Mr. Bowen is a partner and the President of Bowen Donaldson Home for Funerals. He also serves as managing partner of Bowen Farming Enterprises, LLC, a timber, cattle, cotton and peanut farming operation, Bowen Land and Timber, LLC, Bowen Family Partnership and Fulwood Family Partnership, a farming and real estate development firm. He also serves as Trustee of Tift County Hospital Authority and is a member of the Georgia Board of Funeral Service. Mr. Bowen holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Georgia. His extensive business experience and knowledge of the local economy, as well as his expertise in the real estate and farming industries, make Mr. Bowen a valuable resource for the Board. Mr. Bowen’s term expires in 2020.

Edwin W. Hortman, Jr. (age 64) has served as a director of the Company since November 2003 and as a director of the Bank since February 2006. He has served as Executive Chairman of both the Company and the Bank since January 2018. Mr. Hortman has also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 2005. From November 2003 through December 2004, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, and from 2002 to 2003, he served as Executive Vice President and North Regional Executive of the Company. From 1998 through 2003, Mr. Hortman served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Security Bank, formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Hortman also served as a director of Citizens Security Bank from 1998 to 2004. In addition, he served as a director of Central Bank & Trust, Southland Bank, First National Bank of South Georgia and Merchants & Farmers Bank, formerly wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, from 2002 to 2004. Mr. Hortman also serves as Chairman of the Georgia Bankers Association Insurance Trust. He holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in business administration, with emphasis in accounting and finance, from the University of Georgia. He is also a graduate of the Graduate School of Banking of the South at Louisiana State University. Having served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company for more than ten years, after successfully serving as a banking executive in other capacities for much of his career, Mr. Hortman brings not only extensive experience in banking and executive management to the Board, but also an intimate knowledge of the Company’s day-to-day business and operations. Mr. Hortman’s term expires in 2019.

6

Daniel B. Jeter (age 66) has served as a director of the Company since 1997 and as a director of the Bank since 2002. Since January 2018, he has served as Lead Independent Director of both the Company and the Bank. He served as Chairman of the Board of the Company and of the Board of Directors of the Bank from May 2007 through December 2017. He also serves on the community bank board for the Company’s Moultrie, Georgia market. Mr. Jeter is the Chairman and co-owner of Standard Discount Corporation, a family-owned consumer finance company. He joined Standard in 1979 and is an officer and director of each of Standard’s affiliates, including Colquitt Loan Company, Globe Loan Company of Hazelhurst, Globe Loan Company of Tifton, Globe Loan Company of Moultrie, Peach Finance Company, Personal Finance Service of Statesboro and Globe Financial Services of Thomasville. He is co-owner of Classic Insurance Company and President of Cavalier Insurance Company, both of which are re-insurance companies. Mr. Jeter is also a partner in a real estate partnership that develops owner-occupied commercial properties for office and professional use. He serves as a director and an officer of the Georgia Industrial Loan Corporation and as a director of Allied Business Systems. He received a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Georgia. Mr. Jeter’s extensive experience in financial services, with a particular emphasis on lending activities, gives him invaluable insight into, and affords him a greater understanding of, the Company’s operations in his service as Lead Independent Director. As a long-tenured member of the Board, he has been closely involved in the Company’s expansion into new markets in recent years. Mr. Jeter’s term expires in 2019.

Robert P. Lynch (age 54) has served as a director of the Company since 2000 and as a director of the Bank since February 2006. Mr. Lynch is the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Lynch Management Company, which owns and manages seven automobile dealerships located in the Southeast. He has been with Lynch Management Company for more than 30 years. Mr. Lynch’s family also owns and operates Shady Dale Farm, a beef cattle operation located in Shady Dale, Georgia. He holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Florida. Mr. Lynch resides in our Jacksonville, Florida market and currently serves as a member of the community board of the Bank for that market. His business experience is extensive and varied, which gives him a firsthand understanding of the adversities faced by not only the Company but also its commercial customers. This understanding informs his service as a director and is a key benefit to the Board. Mr. Lynch’s term expires in 2020.

Elizabeth A. McCague (age 68) has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since August 2016. Ms. McCague previously served as a consultant for the Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund, where she was responsible for the management of the $1.6 billion pension portfolio and the administration of benefits. Additionally, Ms. McCague provides mediation services for resolution of financial disputes through her business, McCague & Company, LLC. Ms. McCague currently serves on the UF Health Hospital Jacksonville board as the chair of the finance committee and will continue to serve in this capacity through 2018. She has previously served as Chair of the University of Florida Foundation. She has held various executive positions with Wachovia Bank including President of the Company’s Tennessee Bank and EVP of Wealth Management North Florida. She was also formerly the Chief Operating Officer of a software development company. She holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Florida and a master of business administration degree from Jacksonville University. She resides in the Jacksonville, Florida market. Ms. McCague’s business experience is extensive and diverse, which provides valuable insight for the Bank and its customers. Ms. McCague’s term expires in 2020.

William H. Stern (age 61) has served as a director of the Company and as a director of the Bank since November 2013. Mr. Stern currently serves as Chairman of the Bank’s community board for the State of South Carolina. Mr. Stern has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Stern & Stern Associates, a real estate development firm doing work throughout the Southeast, since 1980. He currently serves as Chairman of the Board of the South Carolina State Ports Authority and as a member of the board of the South Carolina Coordinating Council for Economic Development. His knowledge of the real estate industry, in addition to his extensive business experience and economic background, makes Mr. Stern a valuable resource for the Board. Mr. Stern’s term expires in 2019.

7

Each member of the Board, other than Mr. Hortman, is “independent,” as defined for purposes of the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”). For a director to be considered independent, the Board must determine that the director does not have a relationship with the Company that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In making this determination, the Board will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including any transactions or relationships between the director and the Company or its subsidiaries.

The Executive Committee is currently comprised of four directors, only one of whom is a current or former employee of the Company. The current members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Hortman, Jeter (Chairman), Lynch and Veal. The Executive Committee is authorized to exercise all of the powers of the Board, except the power to declare dividends, elect directors, amend the Company’s Bylaws, issue stock or recommend any action to the Company’s shareholders.

The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of four directors — Messrs. Hill (Chairman), Jeter, Lynch and Stern — none of whom is a current or former employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and all of whom are independent directors of the Company. The duties of the Compensation Committee, which operates under a written charter, are generally to establish the compensation for the Company’s executive officers and to act on such other matters relating to compensation as it deems appropriate, including an annual evaluation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the design and oversight of all compensation and benefit programs in which the Company’s employees and officers are eligible to participate. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for consideration of executive officer compensation is provided in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. The complete text of the Compensation Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.amerisbank.com.

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of five directors, none of whom is a current or former employee of the Company and all of whom are independent directors of the Company. The current members of the Audit Committee are Ms. McCague and Messrs. Bowen, Ezzell, Lynch (Chairman) and Veal. The Audit Committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Audit Committee, which operates under a written charter, represents the Board in discharging its responsibility relating to the accounting, reporting and financial practices of the Company and its subsidiaries. Its primary functions include monitoring the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, system of internal controls and compliance with regulatory and legal requirements; monitoring the independence, qualifications and performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditing services; and providing a vehicle for communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, management, internal audit and the Board. The complete text of the Audit Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.amerisbank.com.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is currently comprised of five directors, none of whom is a current or former employee of the Company and all of whom are independent directors of the Company. The members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are Messrs. Bowen, Ezzell, Hill, Stern and Veal (Chairman). Pursuant to its written charter, the Corporate Governance and

8

Nominating Committee is responsible for considering, and making recommendations to the Board regarding, the size and composition of the Board, recommending and nominating candidates to fill Board vacancies that may occur and recommending to the Board the director nominees for whom the Board will solicit proxies. Additional information regarding the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s processes and procedures is provided under the heading “Identifying and Evaluating Nominees” in this Proxy Statement. The complete text of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.amerisbank.com.

The following table provides a summary of the membership of the Board and its committees during 2017, together with information regarding the number of meetings held during 2017.

(1)

In addition to his chair role, Mr. Lynch serves as the financial expert for the Audit Committee.

​

Each director attended at least 75% of all meetings of the full Board and of those committees on which he or she served and was eligible to attend in 2017. Additionally, the independent directors met in executive sessions, without any members of management or other employees, five times in 2017. These executive sessions allow the Board to review key decisions and discuss matters in a manner that is independent of management.

The Company’s 2017 annual meeting of shareholders was attended by all members of the Board, except for Elizabeth A. McCague and William H. Stern, due to travel and weather conflicts. Directors are expected to attend annual meetings of shareholders absent exceptional cause.

With respect to the nomination process, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the composition and size of the Board to ensure that it has the proper expertise and independence; determines the criteria for the selection of Board members and Board committee members; plans for continuity on the Board as existing Board members retire, whether at age 75 or earlier, or rotate off the Board; establishes criteria for qualifications as independent directors, consistent with applicable laws and listing standards; maintains a file of suitable candidates for consideration as nominees to the Board; reviews Board candidates recommended by shareholders in compliance with all director nomination procedures for shareholders; and recommends to the Board the slate of nominees of directors to be elected by the shareholders and any directors to be elected by the Board to fill vacancies.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has not established specific minimum age, education, years of business experience or specific types of skills for potential candidates but, in general, expects qualified candidates will have ample experience and a proven record of business success and leadership. Director candidates will be evaluated based on their financial literacy, business acumen and experience, independence for purposes of compliance with SEC and Nasdaq rules and willingness, ability and availability for service. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee requires

9

that each Board candidate have the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, including respectfulness, honesty and a commitment to teamwork and high standards consistent with the core values of the Company, and consistently exercise sound and objective business judgment. It is also anticipated that the Board as a whole have individuals with significant appropriate senior management or other leadership experience, a long-term and strategic perspective and the ability to advance constructive debate.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. In determining whether to recommend a director nominee, the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee consider and discuss diversity, among other factors, with a view toward the role and needs of the Board as a whole. When identifying and recommending director nominees, the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee generally view diversity expansively to include, without limitation, concepts such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint and perspective, professional experience, education, skill and other qualities or attributes that together contribute to the functioning of the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believes that the inclusion of diversity as one of many factors considered in selecting director nominees is consistent with the goal of creating a Board that best serves the needs of the Company and the interests of its shareholders.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has performed a review of the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of the Company’s current directors and nominees and believes that such persons possess a variety of complementary skills and characteristics, including the following:

•

personal characteristics, including leadership, character, integrity, accountability, sound business judgment and personal reputation;

​

•

successful business or professional experience;

​

•

various areas of expertise or experience, including financial, strategic and general management;

​

•

expertise or experience in various industries, including banking and financial services, hospitality, consumer finance, automotive, real estate, timber, agricultural and mediation services;

​

•

residence in the Bank’s market areas;

​

•

willingness and ability to commit the necessary time to fully discharge the responsibilities of a director in connection with the affairs of the Company; and

​

•

a demonstrated commitment to the success of the Company.

​

In addition, one-third of the Board’s current members represent diversity through race, ethnicity or gender.

For a discussion of the specific backgrounds and qualifications of our current directors and nominees, see “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” in this Proxy Statement.

Although the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has authority to retain a search firm or consultant to assist in identifying director candidates, to date no such search firm or consultant has been engaged. Additionally, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee would consider any director candidate proposed by any shareholder of record who has given timely written notice to the Corporate Secretary as required by Article III, Section 2(b) of the Company’s Bylaws. The proposing shareholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must set forth the information required by such section, including the director candidate’s name, credentials, contact information and his or her consent to be considered as a director candidate, as well as the proposing shareholder’s own contact information and a statement of his or her share ownership (how many shares held and for how long). To be timely, a proposing shareholder’s notice must be received at the Company’s principal executive office no later than the date determined in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws. There are no differences in the manner in which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates director candidates it identifies and candidates who are recommended for nomination for membership on the Board by a shareholder.

10

The Company is committed to having sound corporate governance principles and practices, and independent board oversight is valued as an essential component of our corporate governance framework. Our commitment to independent oversight is demonstrated by the fact that all of our directors, except our Chief Executive Officer, are independent. In addition, all of the members of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are independent.

Effective as of January 1, 2018, Mr. Hortman, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, was named to also serve as Executive Chairman. The Board believes that, at this time, having a single leader serving as both Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, together with an experienced Lead Independent Director is the most appropriate leadership structure for the Company. However, the Board retains the flexibility to revise this structure in the future based upon its assessment of the Company’s needs.

Under this structure, Mr. Hortman chairs and directs meetings of the Board, where the Board discusses both strategic and ongoing business issues. The Board believes that this approach is preferable because the Chief Executive Officer is the individual with primary responsibility for implementing the Company’s strategy, directing the work of other officers and leading implementation of the Company’s strategic plans as approved by the Board. This structure creates a single leader who is directly accountable to the Board and, through the Board, to shareholders, and enables the Chief Executive Officer to act as the key link between the Board and other members of management. In addition, Mr. Hortman personally brings to the combined role of Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman a long history with the Company.

Also as of January 1, 2018, Mr. Jeter, who served as Chairman of the Board from May 2007 through December 2017, began serving as Lead Independent Director. The Board established the new position of Lead Independent Director in furtherance of the Board’s belief that strong, independent board leadership is a critical aspect of effective corporate governance. The Lead Independent Director, who must be independent, is elected by the independent directors. The Lead Independent Director presides over executive sessions of the independent directors, consults with the Executive Chairman, oversees the flow of information to the Board and acts as liaison between the non-employee directors and management. The Lead Independent Director also serves as a focal point for the independent directors, thereby enhancing and clarifying the Board’s independence from management.

The Audit Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management processes on behalf of the full Board, although the Board and all of its committees are sensitive to risks relating to the Company and its operations. The Audit Committee focuses on financial reporting risk, oversees the entire audit function and evaluates the effectiveness of internal and external audit efforts. It receives reports from management regularly regarding the Company’s assessment of risks and the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control systems. Through its interaction with the Company’s Chief Risk Officer, the Audit Committee oversees credit risk, market risk (including liquidity and interest rate risk) and operational risk (including compliance and legal risk). Our Chief Risk Officer meets with the Audit Committee as necessary to discuss potential risk or control issues. In addition, our external auditors meet at least quarterly with the Audit Committee in executive session to discuss potential risk and control issues involving the Company. The Audit Committee reports regularly to the full Board, which also considers the Company’s entire risk profile, including additional strategic and reputational risks. While the Board oversees the Company’s risk management, management is responsible for the day-to-day risk management processes. We believe that this division of responsibility is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing the Company; however, we will continue to re-examine our Board leadership structure on a regular basis, recognizing that different structures may be appropriate in different situations faced by the Company.

The Board conducts a self-assessment annually, and individual directors are separately evaluated each year in connection with director performance reviews. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews and discusses with the Board the results of these annual assessments.

11

Director education is an essential component of good governance and effective compliance practices for financial institutions. It increases the likelihood of retaining good directors and attracting more highly skilled candidates to serve on the boards of banks. The Board’s monthly meetings include an educational and strategic session focused on a variety of topics, such as legislative and regulatory developments, important banking industry trends and fundamental bank directorship knowledge. In addition, our corporate counsel updates the Board as appropriate on relevant developments with respect to corporate governance matters.

Reflecting our commitment to principles of director education, in September 2017, Messrs. Bowen, Ezzell and Veal and Ms. McCague attended the Bank Director Bank Board Training Forum in Atlanta, Georgia. The training focused on building a high-performance bank and topics included building a strong governance culture, impacts of technology, audit and risk challenges, meeting compliance expectations, effective compensation programs and succeeding in today’s competitive landscape.

None of Messrs. Hill, Jeter, Lynch or Stern, each of whom is a member of the Compensation Committee, is or has been an officer or employee of the Company.

Our shareholders may communicate with the Board by directing correspondence to the Board, any of its committees or one or more individual members, in care of the Corporate Secretary, Ameris Bancorp, 310 First Street, S.E., Moultrie, Georgia 31768. The Corporate Secretary will forward such correspondence to the persons to whom it is addressed.

12

The objectives of our non-employee director compensation program are to attract highly qualified individuals to serve on the Board and to appropriately align the interests of the Company’s directors with those of our shareholders. The Compensation Committee reviews the director compensation program periodically to ensure that it continues to meet these objectives. In order to determine whether the director compensation program is competitive, the Compensation Committee considers peer group and general market information on program design provided by its independent compensation consultant, as well as the significant amount of time that directors expend in fulfilling their duties to the Company and the skill level required by members of the Board.

For 2017, director compensation is comprised of the following components:

•

Annual Cash Retainer — each director receives an annual cash retainer of  $50,000, and the non-executive Chairman of the Board receives an additional annual cash retainer of  $15,000

​

•

Annual Equity Retainer — each director receives an annual award of  $50,000 of time-based restricted stock that vests after one year

​

•

Committee Fees — the chair of each committee (other than the Executive Committee) receives an additional annual cash retainer of  $10,000

​

The following Director Compensation Table sets forth the total compensation earned by directors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. Directors who are also named executive officers are not included in the table below. Compensation paid to named executive officers for their service in a director capacity is presented in the supplementary table to the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement.

(1)

The stock award figure represents the fair value of the stock awards as calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The shares were issued May 17, 2017 and the fair value was $43.65 per share. The shares vest on the earlier of May 17, 2018 and the date of the Company’s 2018 annual shareholders’ meeting, provided that the grantee continues to serve as a director of the Company through the vesting date.

​

13

The following table sets forth certain information regarding each executive officer of the Company.

14

15

During 2017 and early 2018, the Company made the following strategic leadership changes impacting its executive team:

•

In March 2017, Mr. Bassett was promoted to Executive Vice President and Banking Group President, the title and role formerly held by Andrew B. Cheney.

​

•

Concurrently with Mr. Bassett’s promotion, Mr. Cheney assumed the role of Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Executive and began to serve in an expanded oversight and advisory role to the leadership team. Mr. Cheney retired effective December 31, 2017 and continues to serve both the Company and the Bank in a non-employee advisory role.

​

•

As announced in December 2017, with a January 1, 2018 effective date, Mr. Zember was promoted to Chief Executive Officer of the Bank, a title formerly held by Mr. Hortman. Mr. Zember retained the title of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

​

•

Concurrently with Mr. Zember’s promotion, Ms. Stokes was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, a title formerly held by Mr. Zember.

​

•

In addition to the promotion of Mr. Zember and Ms. Stokes, and also effective January 1, 2018, Mr. Hortman assumed the role of Executive Chairman of both the Company and the Bank.

​

16

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis contains statements regarding future individual and Company performance targets or goals. We have disclosed these targets or goals in the limited context of the Company’s compensation programs; therefore, you should not take these statements to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We specifically caution investors not to apply such statements in other contexts.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis is intended to assist our shareholders in understanding the Company’s compensation programs. It presents and explains the philosophy underlying our compensation strategy and the fundamental elements of compensation paid to our named executive officers (collectively, “named executive officers” or “NEOs”) whose 2017 compensation information is provided in the tables following this discussion. Our 2017 NEOs are the following:

(1)

Mr. Zember also served as Chief Financial Officer from February 2005 through December 2017.

​

(2)

Mr. Cheney retired effective December 31, 2017.

​

Specifically, this Compensation Discussion and Analysis addresses the following:

•

certain relevant 2017 business performance highlights;

​

•

our compensation philosophy and the objectives of our compensation programs;

​

•

what our compensation programs are designed to reward;

​

•

shareholder outreach;

​

•

our process for determining executive officer compensation, including:

​

—

the role and responsibility of the Compensation Committee;

​

—

the role of the Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers;

​

—

the role of compensation consultants; and

​

—

benchmarking and other market analyses;

​

•

elements of compensation provided to our executive officers, including:

​

—

the purpose of each element of compensation;

​

—

why we elect to pay each element of compensation;

​

—

how we determine the levels or payout opportunities for each element; and

​

—

decisions on final payments for each element and how these align with performance; and

​

•

other compensation and benefit policies affecting our executive officers.

​

17

•

In January 2017, the Company acquired 4.99% of U.S. Premium Finance Holding Company (“USPF”)

​

•

In October 2017, the Company announced the signing of a definitive merger agreement to acquire Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation, the parent company of Atlantic Coast Bank

​

•

In December 2017, the Company was notified by the FDIC and the GDBF that the Consent Order related to the Bank Secrecy Act that was issued in December 2016 was terminated due to full compliance by the Company

​

•

In January 2018, the Company announced the signing of a definitive merger agreement to acquire Hamilton State Bancshares, Inc., the parent company of Hamilton State Bank

​

•

Total assets were $7.86 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of  $964.2 million, or 14.0%, from December 31, 2016

​

•

Growth in operating net earnings of 14.4%

​

•

Organic growth in loans of  $1.0 billion, or 22.2%, compared to $660.4 million, or 20.8%, in 2016

​

•

Adjusted operating return on average assets of 1.26%, compared with 1.31% in 2016, with the decline almost entirely related to lower contribution to earnings from retail mortgage

​

•

Adjusted operating return on average tangible common equity of 14.66%, compared with 16.85% in 2016

​

•

Improvement in adjusted operating efficiency ratio to 60.2%, compared with 61.6% for 2016

​

•

Increase in tangible book value per share of 23.9% to $17.86 at December 31, 2017

​

•

Excluding accretion, increases in net interest margin of 3 bps during 2017 compared to 2016

​

•

Loan to deposit ratio at the end of 2017 of 91.3% compared to 94.4% at the end of 2016

​

•

Increase in total revenue of 12.1 to $364.6 million

​

•

Annualized net charge-offs of 0.12% of total loans and 0.13% of non-purchased loans

​

The Compensation Committee believes that the most effective compensation programs strive to accomplish the following objectives:

•

aligning the interests of the employee with those of the Company’s shareholders;

​

•

attracting and retaining talented individuals and top performers; and

​

•

motivating performance toward the achievement of short-term and long-term goals.

​

To meet these objectives, the Compensation Committee has carefully structured the Company’s compensation programs in the following manner:

•

base compensation levels benchmarked to, and competitive with, the 50th percentile of market, defined in terms of geography, company type and company size, with actual base pay varying in a normal range around the 50th percentile based on individual performance and other factors;

​

•

annual incentive compensation that varies in a consistent manner with the achievement of both the financial and operating objectives of the Company and individual performance objectives, which together support our business strategy;

​

•

long-term incentive compensation (equity) that balances retention with the achievement of longer-term (three-year) financial and strategic goals;

​

18

•

executive benefits that are meaningful and competitive with, and comparable to, those offered by similar organizations; and

​

•

an appropriate balance between base pay, short-term incentives, long-term incentives and benefits that provides a total target compensation opportunity that generally aligns with the market 50th percentile.

​

In designing and administering the Company’s executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee strives to maintain an appropriate balance across all of the various compensation elements, realizing that at times some objectives may be more difficult to achieve than others, or even in conflict with others. In addition, external factors, such as the general state of the economy and the banking industry or legislative changes impacting executive compensation, may impact the effectiveness of existing approaches to executive compensation. Such events require ongoing monitoring and a careful reconsideration of existing approaches by the Compensation Committee. On an annual basis the Compensation Committee carefully evaluates and, where appropriate, makes decisions and adjustments to future compensation programs in an effort to consistently implement the strategic objectives of executive compensation.

Our executive officers’ compensation programs use different components to reward different performance considerations. Base salary is provided to reward each executive for daily contributions and the application of his or her knowledge, experience and talent to the success of the Company. Base salary is also a reflection of the external value of each executive’s position in the job market and the internal value of his or her assigned roles and responsibilities to the success and ongoing viability of the Company.

Annual incentives are provided to focus performance on the key strategic short-term objectives defined and established on an annual basis. These incentives are strongly linked to the success of achieving annual performance objectives and provide each executive with cash rewards commensurate with the Company’s annual performance and the Board’s assessment of the executive’s personal performance.

Long-term incentives reward executives for the longer-term success of the Company. In 2017, the Company granted long-term incentives in the form of restricted stock with both time-based and performance-based vesting conditions. This equity-based compensation rewards executives for the long-term performance of the Company and maintains the alignment between executive compensation levels and shareholder value.

Benefits provided to each executive officer are in line with our broad-based employee benefits, which meet basic health and welfare needs. We also provide supplemental executive retirement programs for certain of our key executive officers. Perquisites for our executives remain conservative and primarily serve to enhance our executives’ business development activities.

The following charts show the relative value of the various compensation components for 2017 (base salary, annual incentive at target, long-term incentive value at grant date and other compensation, including supplemental retirement and perquisites), as a percentage of 2017 total compensation.

19

At the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, approximately 95.6% of the voting shareholders approved the Company’s 2016 executive compensation program for the NEOs. We believe that these voting results reflect our shareholders’ endorsement and support of our executive compensation program and affirm alignment of our program with shareholder interests. We continue to maintain an active and open dialogue with our shareholders to identify ways to further refine and improve our executive compensation program, and the Compensation Committee believes our current program adequately and effectively addresses shareholder concerns, promotes the Company’s business strategy and aligns pay with performance and shareholder value.

The Compensation Committee administers the Company’s executive compensation program. Throughout 2017, the Compensation Committee included Leo J. Hill, Daniel B. Jeter, Robert P. Lynch and William H. Stern. The members of the Compensation Committee all qualify as independent, outside members of the Board in accordance with the requirements of Nasdaq and current SEC regulations.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for all compensation decisions for the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the levels of compensation along with the performance results on goals and objectives relating to compensation for the named executive officers. Based on this evaluation, the Compensation Committee makes decisions related to our executive compensation program with final approval by the Board, except where the Compensation Committee has otherwise been given final authority with respect to a specific component of compensation.

Additionally, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews our incentive plans and other equity-based plans. The Compensation Committee reviews, adopts and submits to the Board any proposed arrangement or plan and any amendment to an existing arrangement or plan that provides or will provide benefits to the executive officers collectively or to an individual executive officer. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate compensation consultants and other advisors as it deems appropriate.

The Chief Executive Officer, with the assistance of the Company’s Chief Administrative Officer, annually reviews the performance of the other named executive officers, after which the Chief Executive Officer presents his conclusions and recommendations to the Compensation Committee for approval. The Compensation Committee has absolute discretion as to whether it approves the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer or makes adjustments, as it deems appropriate. The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer may also work with the Compensation Committee to gather and compile data needed for benchmarking purposes or for other analysis conducted by the Compensation Committee’s independent consultants and advisors.

In 2017, the Compensation Committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”) to serve as the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain, terminate and approve the fees of its compensation consultant. In its role as the Compensation Committee’s independent advisor, FW Cook regularly attended Compensation Committee meetings and advised on matters including compensation program design, benchmarking compensation and relative pay for performance. FW Cook also provided market data, analyses and advice regarding compensation of our NEOs and other executive officers. FW Cook has not provided any services to the Company other than executive compensation consulting services provided to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee considered the independence of FW Cook in light of current SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards and concluded that the work of FW Cook did not raise any conflict of interest.

20

The Compensation Committee reviews competitive data for comparable executive positions in the market. External market data is used by the Compensation Committee as a point of reference in its executive pay decisions in conjunction with financial and individual performance data. In considering the competitive environment, the Compensation Committee reviews compensation information disclosed by a peer group of comparably sized companies with which we compete for business and executive talent and information derived from published survey data that compares the elements of each executive officer’s target total direct compensation to the market information for executives with similar roles. The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant compiles this information and size-adjusts the published survey data to reflect our asset size in relation to the survey participants to more accurately reflect the scope of responsibility for each executive officer.

The Compensation Committee, with input from its independent compensation consultant, annually reviews and selects the peer companies, which generally consist of publicly-traded regional commercial bank holding companies. For 2017, the peer companies were selected primarily based upon the following criteria: (i) similar business operations and geographic footprint; (ii) assets and market capitalization between approximately one-third and three times our assets and market capitalization; and (iii) competitors for executive talent. As a result of this review and selection process, four bank holding companies were removed from our 2016 peer group.

For 2017, our peer group for compensation purposes consisted of the following companies:

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Data as of 12/31/2017. ($mm)

21

The components of the 2017 executive compensation program, as well as the type of compensation and the objectives of the compensation, are included in the table below:

It is the Company’s philosophy that employees be paid a base salary that is competitive with the salaries paid by comparable organizations based on each employee’s experience, performance and any other unique factors or qualifications. Generally, the Company has chosen to position cash compensation in a range around market median levels in order to remain competitive in attracting and retaining executive talent. The range is also benchmarked, and employees are paid within the market benchmarked range based on their unique situation. Actual base salaries paid vary within a range based on performance over time. The allocation of total cash compensation between base salary and annual bonus or incentives is based on a variety of factors. In addition to the market positioning of the base salary and the mix of total compensation, the Compensation Committee also takes into consideration the following:

•

the executive’s performance;

​

•

the performance of the Company;

​

•

the performance of the individual business or corporate function for which the executive is responsible;

​

•

the nature and importance of the position and role within the Company;

​

•

the scope of the executive’s responsibility; and

​

•

the current compensation package in place for the executive, including the executive’s current annual salary and potential awards under the Company’s incentive plan.

​

22

After reviewing the total compensation targets for our NEOs against market data, the Compensation Committee approved the following 2017 base salary amounts with an effective date of February 23, 2017:

The increase in Mr. Bassett’s base salary reflects movement towards the market for his newly assumed position as of March 2017.

The Compensation Committee believes a formalized annual incentive plan with well-defined and clearly communicated objectives strengthens the link between performance and compensation. Using the same design in both 2016 and 2017, the annual incentive plan was developed to subject a portion of our NEOs’ cash compensation to achievement of pre-established performance targets to ensure the continued alignment of executive compensation, Company performance and strategic goal attainment. Annual incentive cash payouts reflect the extent to which annual targets for performance goals are met or exceeded. Targets for performance goals are set with the intent that achievement will ultimately result in enhancement to shareholder value. When determining the targets, the Compensation Committee considers past financial performance of the Company and its internal estimates of the current’s year planned financial performance. Growth expectations as well as improved profitability and operating efficiencies are the gauge by which meaningful targets are set and executive performance is measured.

The Compensation Committee uses three performance levels when setting cash incentive targets: Threshold, Target and Maximum. The performance levels are set relative to the prior fiscal year’s actual results and current fiscal year projections. The Compensation Committee expects the Company to achieve or exceed the Target level of performance, which is intended to be a stretch target. The Threshold performance level is the minimum performance level required for any cash incentive payout, while the Maximum level of performance is set at a high level of performance that requires significant efforts and exceptional execution to achieve.

The 2017 performance goals for short-term incentive compensation were chosen because each of the goals strongly aligned with the overall business objectives of the Company for the year. The 2017 goals included the following:

EPS refers to Earnings per Share
ROA refers to Return on Assets

For 2017, achievement by the NEOs at Threshold pays out at 50% of the performance goal’s weight. Achievement at Target pays out at 100% of the performance goal’s weight. Achievement at Maximum pays out at 170% (the maximum achievement level or “cap”) of the performance goal’s weight. Actual results are prorated based on where they fall along the continuum from the Threshold amount through the Target amount, and from the Target amount through the Maximum amount.

In addition to the performance measures listed above, the Compensation Committee also considered asset quality. In the event that legacy non-performing assets exceeded 1% of total assets, the Compensation Committee could apply negative discretion to reduce the incentive payout. Asset quality for 2017 was in line with expectations, with legacy non-performing assets less than 1% of total assets, and thus no negative adjustment was considered.

23

During the first quarter of 2017, the Compensation Committee established the target percentage of base salary for each of the NEOs. The Compensation Committee used the 2017 base salary in calculating the annual incentive award payments. The following chart shows the range of annual incentive award opportunities expressed as a percentage of salary for the NEOs.

The following formula was used to calculate the payment that could be awarded to a named executive officer under the 2017 annual incentive award program:

Base Salary × Target Percentage of Base Salary × Company Achievement

The 2017 performance goals for short-term incentive compensation were chosen because each of the goals strongly aligned with the overall business objectives of the Company for the year and were as follows:

Based on the operating performance of the Company relative to the targets established for 2017, a 125.75% Company achievement factor was reached, compared to the targeted payout factor of 100%. The Compensation Committee believes these incentive payments are aligned with the Company’s business results and compensation philosophy and the contribution of each named executive officer.

In deciding the amount of the incentive award, the Compensation Committee can consider, among other things, the Company’s overall performance and the individual participant’s specific contributions and performance throughout the performance period, as well as any actual or perceived inappropriate risks taken by participants. The Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to decrease, but not increase, any amounts payable to a participant under the annual incentive plan as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

Annual incentive payouts for 2017 performance for the NEOs are listed below:

The Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s executive compensation program should include a significant equity-based component because this best aligns the interests of our executives with those of the Company’s shareholders. The Company’s employees, non-employee directors and consultants

24

and advisors who perform services for the Company and its subsidiaries may participate in the Company’s shareholder-approved 2014 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which was set forth as Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2014 annual meeting of shareholders. Awards may be granted under the 2014 Plan from time to time and may be in the form of stock options, stock units, stock awards, stock appreciation rights and other stock-based awards.

The Compensation Committee carefully considers the following factors when determining the type and amount of equity to award:

•

prior awards issued to the executive officer;

​

•

the current amount and intrinsic value of unvested equity held by the executive officer;

​

•

current number of shares owned by the executive officer;

​

•

proportion of total compensation on an annual basis consisting of equity awards; and

​

•

market data on the median level of equity awarded to comparable positions.

​

We consider long-term equity-based compensation to be critical to the alignment of executive compensation with shareholder value creation. Therefore, a market competitive, long-term equity-based incentive component is an integral part of our overall executive compensation program. The total long-term incentive award in a given year is based on a targeted dollar value that is then converted into the specific equity awards. The following chart reflects the target award opportunities for each NEO:

Target long-term incentive opportunities are established based on competitive market practices. The fair value of 2017 long-term incentive awards is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement. In 2017, our long-term equity incentive program consisted of the following components:

•

Performance-based restricted stock (50% of long-term incentive award) — During 2017, all NEOs received performance-based restricted stock awards February 14, 2017. These performance-based restricted stock grants are awards that will be earned based upon the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the 3-year return on tangible common equity (“ROTCE”) of the Company ranked in terms of a percentile in relation to the 3-year ROTCE for the same period of a peer group consisting of the companies comprising the KBW Nasdaq Regional Banking Index (KRX). The Company must perform at the 50th percentile of the index in order to earn the target awards. Performance at the 25th percentile results in a payout of 25% of the target number of shares, while performance below the 25th percentile results in forfeiture of the target shares. The awards are capped so that performance that is at or above the 75th percentile results in payout of 200% of the target shares. Actual results are prorated based on where they fall along the continuum from the Threshold amount through the Target amount, and from the Target amount through the Maximum amount. In order to further ensure that the named executive officers are aligned with shareholders, in the event that the Company’s ROTCE is negative, the maximum number of shares earned will be limited to the target grant. These performance-based awards are also eligible to receive dividends declared based on the initial award and have voting rights. Shares earned will vest in the first quarter of 2020.

​

•

Time-based restricted stock (50% of long-term incentive award) — Restricted shares are awarded subject to transfer and vesting restrictions. Restricted share awards are intended to build stock ownership and foster executive retention. All of the NEOs received restricted share awards on February 14, 2017. All of these restricted share awards have dividend and voting rights. The time-based restricted shares have three-year cliff vesting.

​

25

We provide our NEOs with very few perquisites, limited to a company car and club membership for certain NEOs. The aggregate cost of all perquisites for all of our named executive officers was approximately $227,618. No individual named executive officer received a total value of perquisites in excess of  $84,217 during 2017. Additional details on perquisites are provided in a supplementary table to the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement.

We view certain perquisites as being beneficial to the Company, in addition to being directly compensatory to the executive officers. For example, club memberships are regularly used in the general course of our business, such as for business meetings and entertaining. Company cars, which are provided to certain executive officers based on business needs, are used primarily for business purposes. In addition, these perquisites, as a minor expense to the Company, provide a useful benefit in our efforts to recruit, attract and retain top executive talent.

On November 7, 2012, the Bank and certain executive officers and other employees of the Bank and the Company entered into Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreements (each, a “Retirement Agreement”), the purpose of which is to provide a select group of employees who are expected to contribute significantly to the future business success of the Company and the Bank with supplemental retirement income and death benefits. Such benefits are meant to retain quality executive talent over a long period of time, which is required in order to execute long term strategy. Each Retirement Agreement provides for the payment of an annual retirement benefit, payable in monthly installments, commencing when the employee reaches age 65, provided that the employee remains employed by the Bank until the required age of 65. Included among the officers entering into a Retirement Agreement were Messrs. Hortman and Zember, both named executive officers, and each of whom is to receive annual retirement benefits under his or her respective Retirement Agreement as follows: (i) Mr. Hortman, $250,000 for 10 years; and (ii) Mr. Zember, $200,000 for 15 years.

On November 7, 2016, the Bank and the Company entered into a second Retirement Agreement with Mr. Hortman to provide similar benefits as his 2012 Retirement Agreement for an additional period of five years, with payment of such benefits commencing after the full payout of the comparable benefits under his 2012 Retirement Agreement, provided that Mr. Hortman remains employed by the Bank until the required age of 66. Taken together, Mr. Hortman’s 2012 and 2016 Retirement Agreements, which are generally described below on an aggregate basis, provide for a total of 15 years of retirement benefits to him, which is consistent with the level provided to certain other named executive officers and is more closely aligned with competitive market practice.

Each Retirement Agreement provides for a reduced benefit in the event that the employee terminates his or her employment prior to reaching the required age. If the termination is voluntary and without “good reason,” as defined in the Retirement Agreements (with reference to that term as defined in any employment agreement between the employee and the Company), then the termination benefit is equal to the liability balance then accrued in the Company’s accounting records for the employee, to be paid out in monthly installments ratably over a period of 10 – 15 years, as the case may be; however, Mr. Hortman does not become vested in this benefit until after the five-year anniversary of the date of his 2012 Retirement Agreement (or the one-year anniversary of the date of his 2016 Retirement Agreement), and Mr. Zember does not become vested in this benefit until after the 10-year anniversary of the date of his Retirement Agreement. If the termination of employment is involuntary and without “cause,” as defined in the Retirement Agreements (with reference to that term as defined in any employment agreement between the employee and the Company), or is voluntary but with good reason, then the termination benefit is equal to the liability balance then accrued in the Company’s accounting records for the employee, to be paid out in monthly installments ratably over a period of 10 – 15 years, as the case may be, without a time-vesting precondition. If the employee is terminated for cause at any time, then all remaining benefits under his or her Retirement Agreement will be forfeited.

Each Retirement Agreement also provides that if the applicable employee dies prior to reaching the required age, then the annual retirement benefit will be payable in monthly installments to the employee’s beneficiary for a period of 10 – 15 years, as the case may be, commencing upon the employee’s death.

26

In addition, if the employee becomes disabled prior to reaching the required age, then the employee will be entitled to a benefit equal to the liability balance then accrued in the Company’s accounting records for the employee, to be paid out in monthly installments ratably over a period of 5-10 years, as the case may be, commencing at the time of disability. The Retirement Agreement with Mr. Hortman further provides that, following a “change in control” (defined to mean a change in the ownership or effective control of, or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of, the Bank, as provided in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”)), Mr. Hortman will be entitled to receive his annual retirement benefit in monthly installments for a period of 15 years, without regard to whether he continues to be employed by the Bank until reaching the required age.

Executive officers are also eligible to participate in our 401(k) and profit sharing retirement plan, which is a Company-wide, tax-qualified retirement plan. The intent of this plan is to provide all employees with a tax-advantaged savings opportunity for retirement. We sponsor this plan to help employees in all levels of the Company save and accumulate assets for use during their retirement. As required, eligible pay under this plan is capped at annual limits in the IRC. The Company offers a discretionary match to employee contributions based upon the performance of the Company and subject to the approval of the Board. Company contributions to the 401(k) and profit sharing plan vest in equal annual installments over a five-year period.

In addition, we also provide our employees with an employee stock purchase plan, which provides the employee with the opportunity to purchase shares of Common Stock via payroll deduction. The minimum purchase is $50, and the plan does not provide discounts or look-back features. The plan covers the administrative costs involved in the purchase of the stock.

The named executive officers are eligible to participate in Company-sponsored benefit plans on the same terms and conditions as those generally provided to salaried employees. Basic health benefits, dental benefits and similar programs are provided to make certain that access to healthcare and income protection is available to our employees and their family members. Health benefits also include a Section 125 plan or a health savings account to provide for pre-tax deferral for non-reimbursable health expenses. The cost of Company-sponsored benefit plans is negotiated with the providers of such benefits, and the executive officers contribute to the cost of the benefits.

Consistent with the recently adopted rules under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees to that of Edwin W. Hortman, Jr., our Chief Executive Officer.

The median 2017 annual total compensation of all employees of the Company (other than our Chief Executive Officer) was $44,512, and the 2017 annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer was $2,720,022. Based on this information, for 2017, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median annual total compensation of all our employees was 61:1.

We identified our median employee based on the 2017 total gross earnings for all employees, excluding our Chief Executive Officer, who were employed by us on December 31, 2017. We included full-time and part-time employees and annualized earnings for those employees who joined us throughout the year. We excluded contractors as they are used sparingly (representing less than one percent of our personnel) and their pay fell below that of our median employee. We believe the use of total gross earnings is a consistently applied compensation measure in that it captures all of the components of earnings for all our employees.

After identifying the median employee based on total gross earnings, we calculated the annual total compensation for our median employee using the same methodology we use for our named executive officers as set forth in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement.

27

We currently maintain an employment agreement with each of our named executive officers. The employment agreements provide for the payment of severance to the executive upon a termination of employment by the executive for “good reason” (as defined in the employment agreements) or by the Company without “cause” (as defined in the employment agreements). We do not maintain a separate severance plan for our named executive officers. Severance benefits for our named executive officers are limited to those set forth in the executive’s employment agreement and, if applicable, the executive’s Retirement Agreement.

The employment agreements provide that if  (i) the severance payments payable in connection with termination of employment would result in the imposition of an excise tax under Section 4999 of the IRC and (ii) the after-tax amount retained by the executive after taking into account the excise tax would have a lesser aggregate value than the after-tax amount retained by the executive if the total payments were reduced so that the excise tax would not be incurred, then the Company shall reduce such payments to avoid the imposition of such excise tax.

Set forth below are the general terms and conditions of each employment agreement applicable to our named executive officers.

All employment agreements limit severance benefits to a termination of employment by the executive for good reason or by the Company without cause. The following summarizes the definition of good reason as set forth in the employment agreements:

•

a material reduction in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities;

​

•

requiring the executive to materially change the geographic location from which the executive regularly performs his or her duties and services to the Company (not including a change in location which is closer to the executive’s home); or

​

•

a material breach by the Company of the executive’s employment agreement.

​

The following summarizes the definition of cause as set forth in the employment agreements:

•

the executive’s willful and continued failure to perform his or her duties;

​

•

the executive’s willful misconduct or gross negligence in connection with the performance of his or her duties or the Company’s business;

​

•

the executive’s habitual substance abuse, conviction for a felony or crime of moral turpitude or willful theft, embezzlement or similar act of dishonesty against the Company;

​

•

the executive’s willful act which constitutes a material breach of his or her fiduciary duties to the Company;

​

•

the executive’s material breach of his or her employment agreement; or

​

•

any other conduct by the executive resulting in the permanent removal of the executive from his or her position as an officer or employee of the Company pursuant to an order by any banking regulatory agency.

​

Each employment agreement provides that the Company, in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Compensation Committee, will review each executive’s total compensation at least annually and may increase (but not decrease) the executive’s annual salary from the minimum amount set forth in the executive’s employment agreement. Additionally, each agreement specifies term, position and duties, salary and incentive eligibility, benefits, perquisites, expense reimbursement and vacation. In addition, each agreement includes non-compete and non-solicit covenants. Following are certain details with respect to each agreement.

28

Edwin W. Hortman, Jr. — Executive Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

The Company entered into an executive employment agreement with Mr. Hortman effective as of December 15, 2014 (the “Hortman Employment Agreement”), replacing Mr. Hortman’s prior employment agreement with the Company and pursuant to which Mr. Hortman agreed to serve for a continuously (on a daily basis) renewing, three year period until such time as either party gives written notice to the other party not to extend the term of the Hortman Employment Agreement beyond the date that is three years after the date specified in such notice. The Hortman Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Hortman will receive a minimum base salary of  $485,000.

In addition, the Hortman Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Hortman is entitled to participate, as determined by the Compensation Committee, in all incentive plans of the Company (including short-term and long-term incentive plans and equity compensation plans) and in all employee benefit plans, practices, policies and programs provided by the Company applicable to its senior executives generally. The Hortman Employment Agreement further provides that, in the event of termination of Mr. Hortman’s employment by the Company without cause or by Mr. Hortman for good reason, the Company will pay to Mr. Hortman, in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts, (i) an amount equal to three times the sum of his salary and his highest cash bonus earned with respect to any fiscal year within the three most recently completed fiscal years immediately preceding his date of termination; (ii) a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that he would have earned for the fiscal year during which his termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals; and (iii) reimbursement for any monthly COBRA premium paid for a period of as many as 18 months. In the event of termination of Mr. Hortman’s employment on account of his death or disability, the Company will pay to Mr. Hortman (or his estate or beneficiaries), in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts, a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that he would have earned for the fiscal year during which his termination occurred based on the achievement of applicable performance goals.

The Hortman Employment Agreement also includes certain restrictive covenants that limit Mr. Hortman’s ability to compete with the Company and to solicit, or attempt to solicit, certain customers and any employee of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates for a period of up to three years after termination or to divulge certain confidential information concerning the Company for any purpose other than as necessary in performance of his duties to the Company.

Dennis J. Zember Jr. — Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

The Company entered into an executive employment agreement with Mr. Zember effective as of December 15, 2014 (the “Zember Employment Agreement”), replacing Mr. Zember’s prior employment agreement with the Company. The Zember Employment Agreement has an initial term of two years, which initial term is automatically renewed for additional consecutive two-year terms unless timely notice of non-renewal is given by either the Company or Mr. Zember. The Zember Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Zember will receive a minimum base salary of  $285,000.

In addition, the Zember Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Zember is entitled to participate, as determined by the Compensation Committee, in all incentive plans of the Company (including short-term and long-term incentive plans and equity compensation plans) and in all employee benefit plans, practices, policies and programs provided by the Company applicable to its senior executives generally. The Zember Employment Agreement further provides that, in the event of termination of Mr. Zember’s employment by the Company without cause or by Mr. Zember for good reason, the Company will pay to Mr. Zember, in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts, (i) an amount equal to two times the sum of his salary and his highest cash bonus earned with respect to any fiscal year within the three most recently completed fiscal years immediately preceding his date of termination; (ii) a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that he would have earned for the fiscal year during which his termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals; and (iii) reimbursement for any monthly COBRA premium paid for a period of as many as 18 months. In the event of termination of Mr. Zember’s employment on account of his death or disability, the Company will pay to Mr. Zember (or his estate or beneficiaries), in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts, a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that he would have earned for the fiscal year during which his termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals.

29

The Zember Employment Agreement also includes certain restrictive covenants that limit Mr. Zember’s ability to compete with the Company and to solicit, or attempt to solicit, certain customers and any employee of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates for a period of up to two years after termination or to divulge certain confidential information concerning the Company for any purpose other than as necessary in performance of his duties to the Company.

Lawton E. Bassett, III — Executive Vice President and Banking Group President

The Company entered into an executive employment agreement with Mr. Bassett effective as of December 15, 2014 (the “Bassett Employment Agreement”). The Bassett Employment Agreement has an initial term of one year, which initial term is automatically renewed for additional consecutive one-year terms unless timely notice of non-renewal is given by either the Company or Mr. Bassett. The Bassett Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Bassett will receive a minimum base salary of  $195,000.

In addition, the Bassett Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Bassett is entitled to participate, as determined by the Compensation Committee, in all incentive plans of the Company (including short-term and long-term incentive plans and equity compensation plans) and in all employee benefit plans, practices, policies and programs provided by the Company applicable to its senior executives generally. The Bassett Employment Agreement further provides that, in the event of termination of Mr. Bassett’s employment by the Company without cause or by Mr. Bassett for good reason, the Company will pay to Mr. Bassett, in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts, (i) an amount equal to the sum of his salary and his highest cash bonus earned with respect to any fiscal year within the three most recently completed fiscal years immediately preceding his date of termination; (ii) a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that he would have earned for the fiscal year during which his termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals; and (iii) reimbursement for any monthly COBRA premium paid for a period of as many as 18 months. In the event of termination of Mr. Bassett’s employment on account of his death or disability, the Company will pay to Mr. Bassett (or his estate or beneficiaries), in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts, a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that he would have earned for the fiscal year during which his termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals.

The Bassett Employment Agreement also includes certain restrictive covenants that limit Mr. Bassett’s ability to compete with the Company and to solicit, or attempt to solicit, certain customers and any employee of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates for a period of up to one year after termination or to divulge certain confidential information concerning the Company for any purpose other than as necessary in performance of his duties to the Company.

Andrew B. Cheney — Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Executive

The Company entered into an executive employment agreement with Mr. Cheney effective as of December 15, 2014 (the “Cheney Employment Agreement”), replacing Mr. Cheney’s prior employment agreement with the Company. The Cheney Employment Agreement has an initial term of two years, which initial term is automatically renewed for additional consecutive two-year terms unless timely notice of non-renewal is given by either the Company or Mr. Cheney. The Cheney Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Cheney will receive a minimum base salary of  $350,000.

In addition, the Cheney Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Cheney is entitled to participate, as determined by the Compensation Committee, in all incentive plans of the Company (including short-term and long-term incentive plans and equity compensation plans) and in all employee benefit plans, practices, policies and programs provided by the Company applicable to its senior executives generally. The Cheney Employment Agreement further provides that, in the event of termination of Mr. Cheney’s employment by the Company without cause or by Mr. Cheney for good reason, the Company will pay to Mr. Cheney, in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts, (i) an amount equal to two times the sum of his salary and his highest cash bonus earned with respect to any fiscal year within the three most recently completed fiscal years immediately preceding his date of termination; (ii) a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that he would have earned for the fiscal year during which his termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals; and (iii) reimbursement for any monthly COBRA premium paid for a period of as many as 18 months. In the event of termination of Mr. Cheney’s employment on

30

account of his death or disability, the Company will pay to Mr. Cheney (or his estate or beneficiaries), in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts, a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that he would have earned for the fiscal year during which his termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals.

The Cheney Employment Agreement also includes certain restrictive covenants that limit Mr. Cheney’s ability to compete with the Company and to solicit, or attempt to solicit, certain customers and any employee of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates for a period of up to two years after termination or to divulge certain confidential information concerning the Company for any purpose other than as necessary in performance of his duties to the Company.

The Cheney Employment Agreement was terminated as of December 31, 2017 in connection with Mr. Cheney’s retirement from the Company and the Bank.

Joseph B. Kissel — Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer

The Company entered into an executive employment agreement with Mr. Kissel effective as of July 25, 2016 (the “Kissel Employment Agreement”). The Kissel Employment Agreement has an initial term of two years, which initial term is automatically renewed for additional consecutive two-year terms unless timely notice of non-renewal is given by either the Company or Mr. Kissel. The Kissel Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Kissel will receive a minimum base salary of  $280,000.

In addition, the Kissel Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Kissel is entitled to participate, as determined by the Compensation Committee, in all incentive plans of the Company (including short-term and long-term incentive plans and equity compensation plans) and in all employee benefit plans, practices, policies and programs provided by the Company applicable to its senior executives generally. The Kissel Employment Agreement further provides that, in the event of termination of Mr. Kissel’s employment by the Company without cause or by Mr. Kissel for good reason, the Company will pay to Mr. Kissel, in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts, (i) an amount equal to two times the sum of his salary and his highest cash bonus earned with respect to any fiscal year within the three most recently completed fiscal years immediately preceding his date of termination; (ii) a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that he would have earned for the fiscal year during which his termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals; and (iii) reimbursement for any monthly COBRA premium paid for a period of as many as 18 months. In the event of termination of Mr. Kissel’s employment on account of his death or disability, the Company will pay to Mr. Kissel (or his estate or beneficiaries), in addition to certain accrued but unpaid amounts, a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that he would have earned for the fiscal year during which his termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals.

The Kissel Employment Agreement also includes certain restrictive covenants that limit Mr. Kissel’s ability to compete with the Company and to solicit, or attempt to solicit, certain customers and any employee of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates for a period of up to two years after termination or to divulge certain confidential information concerning the Company for any purpose other than as necessary in performance of his duties to the Company.

To further ensure that the long-term interests of the Company’s senior management are aligned with those of the Company’s shareholders, the named executive officers, as well as the Company’s directors and other officers, are required by the Company’s stock ownership guidelines to acquire and maintain a specified investment in the Company. Our current guidelines require our directors to own 10,000 shares of stock, with a five-year period provided to attain this level of ownership. We require our Chief Executive Officer to own stock with a market value (determined as of the end of the first quarter of each year) equivalent to six times the executive’s base salary and all other named executive officers to own stock with a market value (determined as of the end of the first quarter of each year) equivalent to three times the

31

executive’s base salary. Newly hired or promoted executives are provided a five-year timeframe to meet this ownership requirement. During the annual review conducted in June 2017, it was determined that all requirements of ownership were satisfied at that time consistent with the applicable periods to achieve the required ownership levels.

The Board has adopted an insider trading policy statement. The provisions of this policy expressly prohibit directors, officers and other employees from trading, either directly or indirectly, in securities of the Company after becoming aware of material nonpublic information related to the Company. To further ensure adherence with this policy, guidelines have been established for blackout periods and for appropriate disclosure of internal information to external parties. The insider trading policy provides guidance as to what constitutes material information and when information becomes public. The insider trading policy addresses transactions by family members and under Company plans, as well as other transactions which may be prohibited, such as short-term trading, short sales, publicly trading in options, hedging transactions, margin purchases and post-termination transactions. The policy discusses the consequences of an insider trading violation, additional trading restrictions and certain reporting requirements applicable to directors, officers and designated key employees. The policy requires all senior officers, including all named executive officers, to provide written certification of their understanding of, and intent to comply with, the policy.

A grant of equity compensation to eligible persons generally is awarded on an annual basis. The Compensation Committee has adopted a schedule and process of reviewing the program provisions and grant levels in the first quarter of the year to coincide with the annual performance management compensation review process established by the Company for all officers and other employees. The Compensation Committee specifically approves all grants of equity compensation to named executive officers, other officers covered by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and other key employees, including the determination of the grant date for those awards.

We do not believe that our compensation programs encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking. The Compensation Committee annually reviews, with the assistance of the Company’s senior risk officers, compensation arrangements, agreements and benefit plans of the Company made available to the named executive officers and to all other employees of the Company to ensure that such arrangements, agreements and benefit plans do not encourage those employees to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the financial condition of the Company.

In connection with this review, the Compensation Committee reviews an inventory of its executive and non-executive compensation programs, with particular emphasis on incentive compensation plans or programs. The Compensation Committee evaluates, with the assistance of appropriate officers of the Company, the primary components of its compensation plans and practices to identify whether those components, either alone or in combination, properly balance compensation opportunities and risk. The Compensation Committee considers various risk-mitigating policies adopted by the Company in connection with this analysis, including the Company’s stock ownership requirements, incentive compensation and clawback policy. The Compensation Committee concluded, after such review, that the arrangements, agreements and benefit plans of the Company do not encourage those employees to take such risks. The Compensation Committee expects to continue monitoring and periodically evaluating these incentive compensation arrangements, agreements and benefit plans at least annually, as part of the Company’s oversight of risk management for the organization.

32

It has been and continues to be the Compensation Committee’s intent that all non-equity incentive payments be deductible, to the extent permitted by law, unless maintaining such deductibility would undermine the Company’s ability to meet its primary compensation objectives or would otherwise not be in the Company’s best interest. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee gives strong consideration to the deductibility of compensation in making its compensation decisions for executive officers, while balancing the goal of maintaining an executive compensation program that will enable the Company to attract and retain qualified executives with the goal of maximizing the creation of long-term shareholder value. The Company also regularly analyzes the tax effects of various forms of compensation and the potential for excise taxes to be imposed on the executive officers which might have the effect of frustrating the goals of such compensation. The following provisions of the Code have been considered by the Compensation Committee:

•

Section 162(m) — Prior to 2018, Section 162(m) of the IRC provided that compensation in excess of  $1 million paid for any year to a corporation’s chief executive officer and the four other highest paid executive officers at the end of such year would not be deductible for federal income tax purposes unless (i) the compensation qualified as “performance-based compensation” and (ii) the Company advised its shareholders of, and the shareholders approved, the material terms of the performance goals under which such compensation was paid. The Section 162(m) exception for performance-based compensation was repealed for 2018 and years thereafter.

​

•

Sections 280G and 4999 — IRC Section 4999 imposes a 20% non-deductible excise tax on the recipient of an “excess parachute payment” and IRC Section 280G disallows the tax deduction to the payor of any amount of an excess parachute payment that is contingent on a change in control. A payment as a result of a change in control must exceed three times the executive’s base amount in order to be considered an excess parachute payment, and then the excise tax is imposed on the parachute payments that exceed the executive’s base amount.

​

•

Section 409A — Amounts deferred under non-qualified deferred compensation programs after December 31, 2004 are subject to Section 409A of the IRC, which governs when elections for deferrals of compensation may be made, the form and timing permitted for payment of such deferred amounts and the ability to change the form and timing of payments initially established. Section 409A imposes sanctions for failure to comply, including accelerated income inclusion, a 20% penalty and an interest penalty. The Company has made amendments to its compensation plans, including its executive employment agreements, to avoid the application of Section 409A.

​

33

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with the Company’s management and, based on such review and discussions, has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee:

Leo J. Hill (Chair)
Daniel B. Jeter
Robert P. Lynch
William H. Stern

34

SUMMARY COMPENSATION AND OTHER TABLES

The Summary Compensation Table below sets forth the total compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers for 2015, 2016 and 2017.

(1)

Mr. Zember also served as Chief Financial Officer from February 2005 through December 2017.

​

(2)

Mr. Cheney retired effective December 31, 2017.

​

(3)

Mr. Kissel was hired on July 25, 2016. All compensation data provided for 2016 represents amounts earned and awarded based upon his partial year of employment.

​

(4)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair values of the awards. For 2017, grants were made in the form of restricted stock, with 50% of the awards vesting after a three-year period and 50% of the awards vesting at the end of a three-year period provided that established performance goals are achieved, with the exception of  (i) $50,023 of Mr. Hortman’s shares granted that vest on the earlier of May 17, 2018 and the date of the Company’s 2018 annual shareholders’ meeting, provided that he continues to be employed by, or provide service to, the Company through the vesting date. For 2016, grants were made in the form of restricted stock, with 50% of the awards vesting after a three-year period and 50% of the awards vesting at the end of a three-year period provided that established performance goals are achieved, with the exception of  (i) $50,003 of Mr. Hortman’s shares granted that vest on the earlier of May 18, 2017 and the date of the Company’s 2017 annual shareholders’ meeting, provided that he continues to be employed by, or provide service to, the Company through the vesting date, (ii) $624,982 of Mr. Cheney’s shares that vest after a three-year period and (iii) $450,003 of Mr. Kissel’s shares that vest ratably over a four-year period. For 2015, grants were made in the form of restricted stock, with 50% of the awards fully vesting after a three-year period and 50% of the awards vesting annually over a three-year period based on annual performance targets. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for more detail on vesting.

​

35

(5)

Details on the amounts reported for “All Other Compensation” in 2017 are set forth in the following supplementary table:

​

(a)

Amounts reported in the table reflect the personal-use levels of this perquisite.

​

(b)

Reflects annual cash fees for Board service. Additional information regarding fees provided for Board responsibilities is set forth in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation of Directors.”

​

The Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below sets forth the total number of equity awards granted in 2017 and the grant date fair values of those awards. The Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table should be read in conjunction with the Summary Compensation Table.

(1)

The amounts shown under the Target column reflect the possible payment if performance measures are achieved at target level under the short-term incentive plan as approved by the Board on February 14, 2017. The amounts shown under the Threshold column reflect the possible minimum payment level under the short-term incentive plan, which is 50% of Target. The amounts shown under the Maximum column reflect the maximum possible payment under the short-term incentive plan, which is 170% of Target.

​

(2)

Amounts represent the estimated Threshold, Target and Maximum payouts as of the grant date for the NEOs’ 2017 awards of performance-based restricted stock. The grant date fair value of the restricted

​

36

stock awards approved by the Board and granted on February 14, 2017 was $47.60 per share. The actual value realized by the NEO for the 2017 restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock awards will not be determined until the time of vesting.

(3)

Amounts granted pursuant to the Company’s 2014 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. Assumptions used to calculate fair market value are provided in Note 18 to the Company’s consolidated financial statement included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

​

The Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table below sets forth information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers at December 31, 2017. The value of stock awards is based on $48.20, the reported closing price of one share of Common Stock on December 29, 2017.

(1)

Restricted shares vest 50% on January 31, 2018 based on the achievement of an established performance goal for fiscal 2015 through 2017. Performance goals are set by the Board and consist of both quantitative and qualitative criteria customized to the employee. The remaining 50% fully vests after three years.

​

37

(2)

Restricted shares vest 50% on February 16, 2019 based on the achievement of an established performance goal for fiscal 2016 through 2018. Performance goals are set by the Board and consist of both quantitative and qualitative criteria customized to the employee. The remaining 50% fully vests after three years.

​

(3)

Restricted shares vest 50% on February 20, 2020 based on the achievement of an established performance goal for fiscal 2017 through 2019. Performance goals are set by the Board and consist of both quantitative and qualitative criteria customized to the employee. The remaining 50% fully vests after three years.

​

(4)

Restricted stock will vest on the earlier of May 17, 2018 and the date of the Company’s 2018 annual shareholders’ meeting, provided that the grantee continues to be employed by, or provide service to, the Company through the vesting date.

​

(5)

Restricted stock fully vests after three years.

​

(6)

Restricted stock vests ratably over four years.

​

The Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table below reflects stock options actually exercised by each of our named executive officers during 2017 and restricted stock vesting during fiscal year 2017.

(1)

Reflects the difference, for 20,561 shares acquired on exercise, between the closing price of  $49.25 for one share of Common Stock on June 9, 2017 and the option awards’ exercise price of  $22.23 for one share of Common Stock, and the difference, for 15,421 shares acquired on exercise, between the closing price of  $47.15 for one share of Common Stock on May 8, 2017 and the option awards’ exercise price of  $7.47 for one share of Common Stock.

​

(2)

Reflects the difference, for the aggregate number of shares acquired on exercise, between the closing price of  $44.05 for one share of Common Stock on June 5, 2017 and the option awards’ exercise price of  $22.23 for one share of Common Stock.

​

(3)

Reflects the difference, for the aggregate number of shares acquired on exercise, between the closing price of  $43.65 for one share of Common Stock on May 17, 2017 and the option awards’ exercise price of  $22.23 for one share of Common Stock.

​

(4)

Reflects the difference, for the aggregate number of shares acquired on exercise, between the closing price of  $47.00 for one share of Common Stock on December 12, 2017 and the option awards’ exercise price of  $5.55 for one share of Common Stock.

​

(5)

Reflects the value of 9,524 shares at the closing price of  $47.90 for one share of Common Stock on February 15, 2017 and the value of 1,613 shares at the closing price of  $45.95 for one share of Common Stock on May 18, 2017.

​

(6)

Reflects the value of shares at the closing price of  $47.90 for one share of Common Stock on February 15, 2017.

​

38

The Pension Benefits table below provides information regarding the Retirement Agreements in effect during 2017.

(1)

The number of years credited service began on the respective date of the Retirement Agreement.

​

(2)

Present value amounts represent the current liability included in the Company’s accounting records for each of the named executive officers under his respective Retirement Agreement.

​

The Company does not maintain for the named executive officers a defined contribution or other plan providing for the deferral of compensation on a nonqualified basis.

The following discussion presents the potential payments for each named executive officer upon a termination of employment or change in control. Pursuant to applicable SEC rules, the analysis contained in this discussion does not consider or include payments made to a named executive officer with respect to contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements to the extent they do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of named executive officers of the Company and that are available generally to all salaried employees. The actual amounts that would be paid upon a named executive officer’s termination of employment can only be determined at the time of such executive officer’s termination. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any compensation or benefits provided upon the termination events, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be higher or lower than reported below. Among other factors that could affect these amounts are the timing during the year of any such event and our stock price.

In accordance with applicable SEC rules, the following discussion assumes that: (i) the termination event in question occurred on December 31, 2017; and (ii) with respect to calculations based on our stock price, the applicable price is $48.20, which is the reported closing price of one share of Common Stock on December 29, 2017.

The employment agreements between the Company and all of the named executive officers require the Company to make certain severance payments and provide severance benefits to the applicable executive upon the termination of the executive’s employment with the Company by the executive for “good reason” or by the Company without “cause.” The employment agreements between the Company and all of the named executive officers also require that, upon the termination of an executive by reason of the executive’s death or disability, the Company pay to the applicable executive a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that the executive would have earned for the fiscal year during which the executive’s termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals. There are no severance payments otherwise required under the employment agreements, including in connection with voluntary termination/​early retirement or involuntary termination for cause. However, the Retirement Agreements provide for potential payments to certain of the named executive officers upon a termination of their employment. These payments are discussed in greater detail in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Retirement Benefits.”

39

For purposes of the employment agreements, “good reason” is generally defined to mean that the executive has determined in good faith that one or more of the following events has occurred:

•

a material reduction in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities;

​

•

the executive has been required to materially change the geographic location from which the executive regularly performs his or her duties and services to the Company (not including a change in location which is closer to the executive’s home); or

​

•

a material breach by the Company of the executive’s employment agreement.

​

For purposes of the employment agreements, “cause” is generally defined as:

•

the executive’s willful and continued failure to perform his or her duties;

​

•

the executive’s willful misconduct or gross negligence in connection with the performance of the executive’s duties or the Company’s business;

​

•

the executive’s habitual substance abuse, conviction for a felony or crime of moral turpitude or willful theft, embezzlement or similar act of dishonesty against the Company;

​

•

a willful act by the executive which constitutes a material breach of his or her fiduciary duties to the Company;

​

•

the executive’s material breach of his or her employment agreement; or

​

•

any other conduct by the executive resulting in the permanent removal of the executive from his or her position as an officer or employee of the Company pursuant to an order by any banking regulatory agency.

​

If a named executive officer terminates his or her employment under the executive’s employment agreement for “good reason” or if the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause,” then the executive will receive the following:

•

a lump sum amount equal to one times (in the case of Mr. Bassett), two times (in the case of Messrs. Cheney, Kissel and Zember) or three times (in the case of Mr. Hortman) the sum of the executive’s salary and the executive’s highest cash bonus earned with respect to any fiscal year within the three most recently completed fiscal years immediately preceding the executive’s date of termination;

​

•

a pro-rata portion of the cash bonus, if any, that the executive would have earned for the fiscal year during which the executive’s termination occurred, based on the achievement of applicable performance goals; and

​

•

reimbursement for any monthly COBRA premium paid for a period of as many as 18 months.

​

In addition, pursuant to the Company’s 2005 Omnibus Stock ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), which is operative now only with respect to the vesting or exercise of awards previously granted, in the event an executive terminates his or her employment with the Company for “good reason” (as defined in the 2005 Plan), or is terminated by the Company other than for “cause”, death or disability, in each case, within 12 months after the date of a “change of control” (as defined in the 2005 Plan), such executive’s equity awards granted under the 2005 Plan will become fully vested and, in the case of options, fully exercisable. Under the 2014 Plan, equity awards automatically become fully vested and, in the case of options, fully exercisable upon death, disability or the occurrence of a “change of control” (as defined in the 2014 Plan).

The foregoing payments and benefits may be subject to reduction under the named executive officers’ employment agreements in connection with certain tax matters. Those agreements provide that if  (i) the severance payable to the executive would be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the IRC and (ii) the after-tax amount retained by the executive after taking into account the excise tax would have a lesser aggregate value than the after-tax amount retained by the executive if the total payments were reduced to avoid the imposition of such tax, then such benefit payments shall be reduced to be the largest

40

amounts that will result in no portion of the benefit payments being subject to the tax imposed by Section 4999. For purposes of Section 409A of the IRC, all of the named executive officers’ employment agreements are structured to be in compliance with payment timing and other relevant requirements.

The estimated severance benefits payable to each of the named executive officers, based upon a hypothetical termination of each named executive officer on December 31, 2017, are presented in the following table. The following table also sets forth the benefits payable to each of the named executive officers following a change of control of the Company. The amounts include cash, equity, welfare benefits and retirement benefits.