UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 2, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Jamba, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 001-32552 | 20-2122262 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
(Commission File No.) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
6475 Christie Avenue, Suite 150, Emeryville, California 94608
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (510) 596-0100
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Large accelerated filer | £ | Accelerated filer | S |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | £ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of common stock of Jamba, Inc. issued and outstanding as of October 26, 2012 was 77,333,489.
JAMBA, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 2, 2012
Exhibits |
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
EX-32.2 |
EX-101 |
2 |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
October 2, | January 3, | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts) | 2012 | 2012 | ||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 31,856 | $ | 19,607 | ||||
Restricted cash | — | 1,352 | ||||||
Receivables, net of allowances of $325 and $294 | 6,488 | 13,040 | ||||||
Inventories | 2,637 | 2,228 | ||||||
Prepaid and refundable taxes | 846 | 574 | ||||||
Prepaid rent | 2,987 | 2,761 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 809 | 1,509 | ||||||
Total current assets | 45,623 | 41,071 | ||||||
Property, fixtures and equipment, net | 38,884 | 44,760 | ||||||
Goodwill | 1,336 | — | ||||||
Trademarks and other intangible assets, net | 1,439 | 1,130 | ||||||
Other long-term assets | 1,375 | 1,332 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 88,657 | $ | 88,293 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 6,928 | $ | 4,155 | ||||
Accrued compensation and benefits | 4,292 | 6,566 | ||||||
Workers’ compensation and health insurance reserves | 1,161 | 1,092 | ||||||
Accrued jambacard liability | 26,192 | 33,256 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 9,399 | 9,961 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 47,972 | 55,030 | ||||||
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities | 12,855 | 13,079 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 60,827 | 68,109 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) | ||||||||
Series B redeemable preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 304,348 shares authorized; 72,889 and 168,389 shares issued and outstanding at October 2, 2012 and January 3, 2012, respectively | 7,882 | 17,880 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized; 77,333,489 and 67,280,485 shares issued and outstanding at October 2, 2012 and January 3, 2012, respectively | 78 | 68 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 379,449 | 369,027 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (359,579 | ) | (366,791 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 19,948 | 2,304 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 88,657 | $ | 88,293 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except share | 13 Week Period Ended |
12 Week Period Ended |
39 Week Period Ended |
40 Week Period Ended |
||||||||||||
and per share amounts) | October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
Company stores | $ | 61,795 | $ | 54,102 | $ | 174,350 | $ | 173,274 | ||||||||
Franchise and other revenue | 3,687 | 2,976 | 10,223 | 8,834 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | 65,482 | 57,078 | 184,573 | 182,108 | ||||||||||||
Costs and operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales | 14,918 | 11,808 | 40,504 | 39,828 | ||||||||||||
Labor | 16,457 | 14,565 | 49,013 | 53,139 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy | 7,353 | 6,802 | 22,097 | 23,707 | ||||||||||||
Store operating | 9,328 | 8,539 | 26,158 | 25,728 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,793 | 2,805 | 8,528 | 9,621 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 9,663 | 7,398 | 29,125 | 25,881 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 75 | 312 | 637 | 1,214 | ||||||||||||
Other operating, net | 347 | 924 | 579 | 1,503 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and operating expenses | 60,934 | 53,153 | 176,641 | 180,621 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations | 4,548 | 3,925 | 7,932 | 1,487 | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 21 | 99 | 61 | 126 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (52 | ) | (117 | ) | (147 | ) | (456 | ) | ||||||||
Total other expense, net | (31 | ) | (18 | ) | (86 | ) | (330 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income taxes | 4,517 | 3,907 | 7,846 | 1,157 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) | (413 | ) | 217 | (634 | ) | 380 | ||||||||||
Net income | 4,104 | 4,124 | 7,212 | 1,537 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and deemed dividends | (1,123 | ) | (489 | ) | (2,076 | ) | (1,854 | ) | ||||||||
Net income available (loss attributable) to common stockholders | $ | 2,981 | $ | 3,635 | $ | 5,136 | $ | (317 | ) | |||||||
Weighted-average shares used in the computation of earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 70,672,511 | 67,042,745 | 68,450,782 | 66,024,576 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 72,365,921 | 85,196,847 | 70,076,089 | 66,024,576 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.00 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-In | Accumulated | Stockholders’ | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) | Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Equity | |||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 28, 2010 | 63,734,961 | $ | 64 | $ | 365,817 | $ | (358,493 | ) | $ | 7,388 | ||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense | — | — | 830 | — | 830 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to stock plans | 141,003 | — | 145 | — | 145 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to bonus plans | 308,275 | 1 | 613 | — | 614 | |||||||||||||||
Conversion of preferred stock | 2,909,600 | 3 | 3,343 | — | 3,346 | |||||||||||||||
Accretion of Series B preferred shares | — | — | (587 | ) | — | (587 | ) | |||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stock dividends | — | — | (1,267 | ) | — | (1,267 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 1,537 | 1,537 | |||||||||||||||
Balance as of October 4, 2011 | 67,093,839 | $ | 68 | $ | 368,894 | $ | (356,956 | ) | $ | 12,006 | ||||||||||
Balance as of January 3, 2012 | 67,280,485 | $ | 68 | $ | 369,027 | $ | (366,791 | ) | $ | 2,304 | ||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense | — | — | 1,431 | — | 1,431 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to stock plans | 211,002 | — | 97 | — | 97 | |||||||||||||||
Conversion of preferred stock | 9,550,000 | 10 | 10,970 | — | 10,980 | |||||||||||||||
Accretion of Series B preferred shares | — | — | (985 | ) | — | (985 | ) | |||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stock dividends | — | — | (1,091 | ) | — | (1,091 | ) | |||||||||||||
Exercise of warrant | 292,002 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 7,212 | 7,212 | |||||||||||||||
Balance as of October 2, 2012 | 77,333,489 | $ | 78 | $ | 379,449 | $ | (359,579 | ) | $ | 19,948 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5 |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
39 Week | 40 Week | |||||||
Period Ended | Period Ended | |||||||
(In thousands) | October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | ||||||
Cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 7,212 | $ | 1,537 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 8,528 | 9,621 | ||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 637 | 1,214 | ||||||
Store closure costs and gain on disposals | 618 | 1,242 | ||||||
Share-based compensation | 1,431 | 830 | ||||||
Jambacard breakage income | (2,075 | ) | (2,804 | ) | ||||
Bad debt and inventory reserves | 596 | 27 | ||||||
Deferred rent | (698 | ) | (208 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes | — | 39 | ||||||
Equity earnings from joint ventures | (128 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Receivables | 6,463 | (736 | ) | |||||
Inventories | (826 | ) | (274 | ) | ||||
Prepaid rent | (226 | ) | (2,166 | ) | ||||
Prepaid and refundable taxes | (272 | ) | (247 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 700 | 722 | ||||||
Restricted cash from operating activities | 1,352 | 397 | ||||||
Other long-term assets | (155 | ) | 605 | |||||
Accounts payable | 2,363 | (1,205 | ) | |||||
Accrued compensation and benefits | (2,274 | ) | (283 | ) | ||||
Workers’ compensation and health insurance reserves | 69 | (170 | ) | |||||
Accrued jambacard liability | (4,989 | ) | (2,235 | ) | ||||
Other accrued expenses | (535 | ) | (1,974 | ) | ||||
Other long-term liabilities | (785 | ) | (1,245 | ) | ||||
Cash provided by operating activities | $ | 17,006 | $ | 2,630 | ||||
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (3,414 | ) | (8,789 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of business | (391 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from sale of stores | — | 3,063 | ||||||
Capital distributions from investment, net | 71 | — | ||||||
Cash used in investing activities | $ | (3,734 | ) | $ | (5,726 | ) | ||
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities: | ||||||||
Proceeds pursuant to stock plans | 97 | 145 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends paid | (1,120 | ) | (1,233 | ) | ||||
Payment on capital leases | — | (20 | ) | |||||
Cash used in financing activities | $ | (1,023 | ) | $ | (1,108 | ) | ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 12,249 | (4,204 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 19,607 | 29,024 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 31,856 | $ | 24,820 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 115 | $ | 238 | ||||
Income taxes paid | 233 | 28 | ||||||
Noncash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
Property, fixtures and equipment in accounts payable | $ | 411 | $ | 10 | ||||
Conversion of preferred stock | 10,980 | 3,346 | ||||||
Accretion of preferred stock issuance costs | 985 | 587 | ||||||
Dividend accruals | — | 35 | ||||||
Note receivable from sale of stores | — | 671 | ||||||
Contingent consideration | 1,361 | — |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6 |
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Jamba, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) owns and franchises Jamba Juice stores through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Jamba Juice Company. Jamba Juice Company is a leading restaurant retailer of better-for-you, specialty beverage and food offerings, which include great tasting, whole fruit smoothies, fresh squeezed juices and juice blends, hot coffee and teas, hot oatmeal, breakfast wraps, sandwiches and mini-wraps, California Flatbreads™, frozen yogurt, and a variety of baked goods and snacks. Jamba, Inc. was incorporated in January 2005 and went public through an initial public offering later that year. As of October 2, 2012, there were 788 store locations globally. There were 301 Company owned and operated stores (“Company Stores”) and 454 franchise operated stores (“Franchise Stores”) in the United States, and 33 international franchise stores (“International Stores”). Jamba–branded consumer products (“CPG”) for at-home enjoyment are also available through select retailers across the nation and in Jamba outlets in the United States.
Fiscal Quarter Change —Effective January 4, 2012, the Company changed its fiscal quarters to four 13 week periods. The Company’s fiscal year end continues to be the Tuesday closest to December 31. Since the fiscal quarter change was made after the end of fiscal 2011, the Company will continue to report the prior year financial information based on its prior year fiscal calendar. The Company has not prepared financial information for the 13 week period ended September 27, 2011, though pro-forma information for the 13 week period for the prior year is included in the press release dated November 1, 2012. The Company’s financial results for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 are compared to its results for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The comparison of these two quarters is primarily affected by the difference of one week between the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and the third quarter of 2011.
Unaudited Interim Financial Information —The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of October 2, 2012, the condensed consolidated statements of operations for each of the 13 and 39 week periods ended October 2, 2012 and for each of the 12 and 40 week periods ended October 4, 2011 and the condensed statements of stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the 39 and 40 week periods ended October 2, 2012 and October 4, 2011, respectively, have been prepared by the Company, without audit, and have been prepared on the same basis as the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, such statements include all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the financial position as of October 2, 2012, and the results of operations and cash flows for the 13 and 39 week periods ended October 2, 2012 and the 12 and 40 week periods ended October 4, 2011. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 3, 2012 has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements. Operating results for the 13 and 39 week periods ended October 2, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 1, 2013. The Company reports its results of operations on a 52-week or 53-week fiscal year, which is comprised of eight 4-week periods and four 5-week periods or eight 4-week periods, three 5-week periods and one 6-week period. The first, second and third fiscal quarters each are 13 weeks, and the fourth quarter is 13 or 14 weeks. There were 39 weeks in the first three quarters of fiscal 2012 and 40 weeks in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011.
Certain information and disclosures normally included in the notes to annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been omitted from these interim financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2012 (“2011 Annual Report”).
Advertising Fund — The Company participates with its franchisees in an advertising fund established in fiscal 2010, to collect and administer funds contributed for use in advertising and promotional programs designed to increase sales and enhance the reputation of the Company and its franchise owners. Contributions to the advertising fund are required for company owned and traditional franchise stores and are generally based on a percent of store sales. The Company has control of the advertising fund. The fund is consolidated and the Company reports all assets and liabilities of the fund that it consolidates.
The advertising fund assets, consisting primarily of accounts receivable from franchisees, can only be used for selected purposes and are considered restricted. The advertising fund liabilities represent the corresponding obligation arising from the receipts of the marketing program. In accordance with ASC Topic 952-605-25, the receipts from the franchisees are recorded as a liability against which specified advertising costs are charged. The Company does not reflect franchisee contributions to the fund in its Consolidated Statements of Operations or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
7 |
Advertising fund assets of $2.3 million and $1.5 million were recorded in accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheet as of October 2, 2012 and January 3, 2012, respectively. Advertising fund liabilities of $0.5 million were recorded in accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheets as of October 2, 2012 and January 3, 2012.
Comprehensive Income —Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events, excluding changes resulting from investments from owners and distributions to owners. Comprehensive income (loss) equals net income (loss) for all periods presented. No separate statement of comprehensive income is presented.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share —Earnings (loss) per share is computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed based on the weighted-average of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities, which includes preferred shares, outstanding warrants and outstanding options and restricted stock awards granted under the Company’s stock option plans.
Anti-dilutive shares have been excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding. Anti-dilutive shares of 21.2 million and 2.9 million have been excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding in the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 and in the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011, respectively. Anti-dilutive shares of 22.6 million and 24.3 million have been excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding in the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 and in the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011, respectively.
For purposes of determining the net income available (loss attributable) to common stockholders used in the computation of earnings (loss) per share, the amount of the income (loss) is increased (decreased) by the preferred stock dividends and deemed dividends. The deemed dividend represents the accretion of the issuance costs and beneficial conversion feature of the Company’s preferred stock. For the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 and for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011, the convertible preferred shares are anti-dilutive. Therefore, the dividends and deemed dividends related to the preferred stock have not been added back to the net income available to common stockholders. Also the number of preferred shares has not been included in the diluted earnings per share calculation. For the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011, the convertible preferred shares are dilutive, therefore the dividends and deemed dividends related to the preferred stock have been added back to the net income available to common stockholders and the number of preferred shares have been included in the diluted earnings per share calculation.
The number of incremental shares from the assumed exercise of restricted stock awards, warrants and options was calculated by applying the treasury stock method. The “if converted” method was used for the conversion of preferred stock. A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations is as follows (in thousands, except shares):
13 Week Period Ended |
12 Week Period Ended |
39 Week Period Ended |
40 Week Period Ended |
|||||||||||||
October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net income available (loss attributable) to common stockholders (numerator for basic earnings (loss) per share) | $ | 2,981 | $ | 3,635 | $ | 5,136 | $ | (317 | ) | |||||||
Preferred stock dividends and deemed dividends | — | 489 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Numerator for diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 2,981 | $ | 4,124 | $ | 5,136 | $ | (317 | ) | |||||||
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding | 70,672,511 | 67,042,745 | 68,450,782 | 66,024,576 | ||||||||||||
Incremental shares from assumed conversion of Series B preferred shares | — | 16,844,852 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Incremental shares from assumed exercise of restricted stock awards, warrants and options | 1,693,410 | 1,309,250 | 1,625,307 | — | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding | 72,365,921 | 85,196,847 | 70,076,089 | 66,024,576 |
Fair value Measurement —The Company measures its cash equivalents at fair value. There is no difference between the fair value and cost of the Company’s cash equivalents. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is established as a basis for considering such assumptions and for inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
8 |
Level 1: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing.
Impairment of long-lived assets —The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying values of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. The impairment evaluation is generally performed at the individual store asset group level. The Company first compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated future undiscounted cash flows. If the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, the Company measures an impairment loss based on the asset’s estimated fair value. The fair value of a store’s assets is estimated using a discounted cash flow model based on internal projections and taking into consideration the view of a market participant. The estimate of cash flows is based on, among other things, certain assumptions about expected future operating performance. Factors considered during the impairment evaluation include factors related to actual operating cash flows, the period of time since a store has been opened or remodeled, refranchising expectations and the maturity of the relevant market.
Restricted Cash —The Company held no restricted cash at October 2, 2012. The Company held $1.4 million in restricted cash at January 3, 2012. Restricted cash represented cash held in money market accounts or certificates of deposits to collateralize the Company’s letters of credit.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
There has been no development to recently issued accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on the Company’s consolidated financial statements from that disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. ACQUISITION
On January 27, 2012, the Company completed its acquisition of certain assets of Talbott Teas, LLC (“Talbott”), a Chicago based boutique, premium tea company. The acquisition of Talbott is consistent with the Company’s strategy for growth through lifestyle specialty brands that fit well with the Jamba brands and its positioning as a leading health and wellness company. The pro forma effect of the acquisition on the Company’s results of operations is not significant. The revenue and earnings of Talbott, included in the Company’s results since the January 27, 2012 acquisition, and acquisition related expenses included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are not significant.
This purchase was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and the purchase price comprises an upfront cash payment plus contingency payments based on the future performance (the “earn-out arrangement”) of the assets acquired. The purchase price was determined to be the aggregate of the upfront payment and the fair value of the payments subject to the earn-out arrangement, and was allocated to the assets purchased based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Identifiable intangible assets acquired include a trade name and customer relationships totaling $0.4 million and are included in trademarks and other intangible assets, net on the balance sheet. The excess purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired of $1.3 million was recorded as goodwill, which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The purchase price cash consideration paid by the Company at closing was $0.4 million and the fair value of the earn-out arrangement was recorded as a liability, at $1.4 million, as of January 27, 2012. There is no change in the fair value of the earn-out liability as of October 2, 2012.
3. REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company issued (i) 170,000 shares of its Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001, (the “Series B-1 Preferred”) to affiliates of Mistral Equity Partners at a price of $115 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $19.6 million, and (ii) 134,348 shares of its Series B-2 Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001, (the “Series B-2 Preferred”) to CanBa Investments, LLC at a price of $115 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $15.4 million. The issuance of shares of the Series B-1 and B-2 Preferred Stock (together the “Series B Preferred Stock” or “Preferred Stock”) for $35 million, less approximately $3.1 million in total transaction costs, which includes $2.2 million in transaction fees and $885,000 paid to investors, was completed through a private placement to the purchasers as accredited investors and pursuant to the exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The shares of Preferred Stock and the shares of the Company’s Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock include legends restricting transfer other than pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or in accordance with an exemption from registration. The holders of the Series B Preferred Stock have the right to require the Company to redeem all or a portion of the shares of the Preferred Stock on or after seven years from the date of issuance of the Preferred Stock.
9 |
The shares of Preferred Stock are convertible at the election of the holders, at any time, into shares of Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $1.15 per share. The conversion price for the Preferred Stock is subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments for stock splits, dividends or certain other equity restructurings. After a two year period from the original date of issuance, the Company will have the right to require that the shares of Preferred Stock be converted into shares of Common Stock if (i) the Common Stock trading volume averages 150,000 shares per trading day over a 30 trading day period and (ii) the daily volume weighted average price per share of the Common Stock exceeds the product of 2.5 times the then-applicable conversion price for any 20 of the preceding 30 trading days at any time these conditions continue to be satisfied and for a period of 10 trading days thereafter. Upon exercise of this right, the Preferred Stock will be converted at the then-applicable conversion rate and the Company will be obligated to pay any then-existing dividend arrearages in cash. The Shares of Preferred Stock are entitled to an 8% dividend, payable quarterly in cash.
During the 13 and 39 week periods ended October 2, 2012, holders converted 93,500 shares of outstanding Series B-1 Preferred Stock and 2,000 shares of outstanding Series B-2 Preferred Stock into an aggregate of 9,550,000 shares of common stock at the conversion price of $1.15 per share. During the 13 and 39 week periods, respectively, ended October 2, 2012, the Company paid cash dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock totaling $0.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Accretion related to the Series B Preferred Stock for the 13 and 39 week periods ended October 2, 2012 was $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Unamortized accretion as of October 2, 2012 was $0.5 million.
During the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011, holders converted 5,000 shares of outstanding Series B-2 Preferred Stock to an aggregate of 500,000 shares of common stock at the initial conversion price of $1.15 per share. During the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011, holders converted 18,400 shares of outstanding Series B-1 Preferred Stock and 10,696 shares of outstanding Series B-2 Preferred Stock to an aggregate of 2,909,600 shares of common stock at the initial conversion price of $1.15 per share. During the 12 and 40 week period ended October 4, 2011, the Company paid cash dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock totaling $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Accretion related to the Series B Preferred Stock for the 12 and 40 week periods ended October 4, 2011 was $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
4. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company maintains three share-based compensation plans (collectively, the “Plans”). The Company’s Amended and Restated 2006 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan, as amended (the “2006 Plan”) was approved by the Company’s stockholders on November 28, 2006, and provides for the granting of up to eight million shares of common stock in the form of nonqualified and incentive stock options, stock grants or other share-based awards to employees, nonemployee directors and consultants. The amendment and restatement to the 2006 Plan was approved by stockholders on May 20, 2010. In connection with the merger of Jamba, Inc. with Jamba Juice Company on November 28, 2006, the Company assumed the outstanding options under the Jamba Juice Company 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1994 Plan”) and the Jamba Juice Company 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2001 Plan”), both of which provided for the granting of nonqualified and incentive stock options to employees, nonemployee directors and consultants. No additional grants are available under the 2001 Plan and the 1994 Plan. As of October 2, 2012, there remained 981,454 shares available for grant under the Company’s 2006 Plan. In December 2008, the Company also granted an option covering an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of common stock under an inducement grant made outside of the Company’s existing equity plans. A summary of stock option activity under the Plans as of October 2, 2012, and changes during the 39 week period then ended is presented below:
Number of | Weighted-Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||
Options | Exercise Price | Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | (per share) | (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
Options outstanding at January 3, 2012 | 6,178 | $ | 2.25 | |||||||||
Options granted | 172 | 2.17 | ||||||||||
Options exercised | (37 | ) | 1.45 | |||||||||
Options cancelled | (85 | ) | 3.31 | |||||||||
Options outstanding at October 2, 2012 | 6,228 | $ | 2.23 | $ | 5,291 | |||||||
Options vested or expected to vest at October 2, 2012 | 5,775 | $ | 2.26 | $ | 5,043 | |||||||
Options exercisable at October 2, 2012 | 3,882 | $ | 2.57 | $ | 3,606 |
10 |
The fair value of options granted was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Option valuation models, including Black-Scholes, require the input of highly subjective assumptions, and changes in the assumptions used can materially affect the grant date fair value of an award. The risk-free rate of interest is based on the zero coupon U.S. Treasury rates appropriate for the expected term of the award. For expected life, the Company applies the guidance provided by the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110. Expected dividends are zero based on a history of not paying cash dividends on the Company’s common stock and as the Company does not intend to pay dividends in the future. Expected volatility is based on historic daily stock price observations of the Company’s common stock since its inception. As required by authoritative guidance, the Company makes assumptions as to the expected forfeitures in determining share–based compensation expense.
The following are the weighted-average assumptions used to value option grants for the 13 and 39 week periods ended October 2, 2012 and for the 12 and 40 week periods ended October 4, 2011:
13 Week Period Ended | 12 Week Period Ended | 39 Week Period Ended | 40 Week Period Ended | |||||||||||||
October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | |||||||||||||
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate | 0.65 | % | 0.90 | % | 0.90 | % | 1.77 | % | ||||||||
Expected life of options (years) | 6.25 | 6.25 | 6.25 | 6.25 | ||||||||||||
Expected stock volatility | 68.3 | % | 63.8 | % | 69.2 | % | 63.9 | % | ||||||||
Expected dividend yield | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % |
The estimated fair value per share of stock options granted during the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 and for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011, was $1.56 and $1.06, respectively. The estimated fair value per share of stock options granted during the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 and for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011, was $1.35 and $1.38, respectively.
On August 22, 2012, the Company granted 532,500 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to participants in its 2012 Management Incentive Plan at grant date fair value of $2.54. These RSUs will vest over three years. In addition, 176,250 performance stock units (“PSUs”), which are RSUs with performance requirements, were granted on August 22, 2012 to plan participants at the levels of Vice President and above. Each PSU will vest on the one year anniversary of the grant date if the Company achieves predetermined EBITDA targets for the second half of 2012 fiscal year. The aggregate grant date fair value of the 532,500 RSUs granted during the quarter was $1.4 million. The aggregate intrinsic value of RSUs outstanding as of October 2, 2012 was $1.3 million. The aggregate grant date fair value of the 176,250 PSUs granted during the quarter was $0.5 million and the aggregate intrinsic value of those PSUs outstanding as of October 2, 2012 was $0.4 million. The Company has not met the criteria for recording compensation expense related to the PSUs as of October 2, 2012.
Share-based compensation expense, which is included in general and administrative expense, was $0.7 million and $0.3 million for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 and for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011, respectively. Share-based compensation expense was $1.4 million and $0.8 million for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 and for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011, respectively. At October 2, 2012, non-vested share-based compensation for stock options and restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures totaled $1.8 million. This expense will be recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period. There was no income tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense during the 13 and 39 week periods ended October 2, 2012 and for the 12 and 40 week periods ended October 4, 2011.
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 2, 2012 and January 3, 2012 by level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||
October 2, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||
Cash invested in money market fund | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Contingent consideration(2) | — | — | 1,361 | |||||||||
January 3, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||
Cash invested in money market fund (1) | $ | 1,352 | $ | — | $ | — |
(1) | $1.4 million included in restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet at January 3, 2012. |
(2) | $1.0 million included in other long-term liabilities and $0.4 million included in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet at October 2, 2012. |
11 |
For assets that are measured using quoted prices in active markets, fair value is the published market price per unit multiplied by the number of units held without consideration of transaction costs. The Company had no cash invested in money market funds as of October 2, 2012 and $1.4 million as of January 3, 2012.
The following table presents the Company’s assets that were accounted for at fair value on a non-recurring basis and remaining on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 2, 2012 and January 3, 2012. Total losses include losses recognized from all non-recurring fair value measurements for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 and for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011 (in thousands):
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||
October 2, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||
Long-lived assets (1) | — | — | $ | 477 | ||||||||
Goodwill | — | — | 1,336 | |||||||||
Acquired trademark (2) | — | — | 122 | |||||||||
Acquired customer list (2) | — | — | 301 | |||||||||
Total losses recognized for all non-recurring fair value measures for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 | — | — | 75 | |||||||||
Total losses recognized for all non-recurring fair value measures for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 | — | — | 637 | |||||||||
January 3, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||
Long-lived assets (1) | — | — | $ | 1,038 | ||||||||
October 4, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Total losses recognized for all non-recurring fair value measures for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011 | — | — | 312 | |||||||||
Total losses recognized for all non-recurring fair value measures for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011 | — | — | 1,214 |
(1) | Included in property, fixtures and equipment, net on the consolidated balance sheet. |
(2) | Included in trademarks and other intangible assets, net on the consolidated balance sheet. |
The Company classified the fair value of long-lived assets as level 3 because the value is based on unobservable inputs. The significant inputs to the fair value measurement of the long-lived assets are projected future operating results at the store level and the discount rates applied to calculate the present value of the these assets. The fair value of the contingent consideration is classified as level 3 because it is based on unobservable inputs. Significant inputs and assumptions are management’s estimate of operating profits from the related business and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of the liability. Significant changes in any Level 3 input or assumption would result in increases or decreases to fair value measurements for future impairment of the long-lived assets and for contingent consideration.
12 |
6. CREDIT AGREEMENT
On February 14, 2012, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Lender”) whereby the Lender provided the Company with a six million dollar revolving line of credit. The outstanding balance under the credit facility bears interest at a LIBOR Market Index Rate based upon the rate for one month U.S. dollar deposits, plus 3.75% per annum. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company is required to maintain minimum levels of trailing annual consolidated EBITDA and liquidity and is subject to limits on annual capital expenditures. The Credit Agreement terminates January 31, 2013 or may be terminated earlier by the Company or by the Lender. The credit facility is subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants for credit facilities of this type, including limitations on the Company with respect to liens, indebtedness, guaranties, investments, distributions, mergers and acquisitions and dispositions of assets. The credit facility is evidenced by a revolving note made by the Company in favor of the Lender, is guaranteed by the Company and is secured by substantially all of its assets including the assets of its subsidiaries and a pledge of stock of its subsidiaries. In addition, the credit agreement replaced the restricted cash requirements for the Company in prior periods, as the line of credit also collateralizes the Company’s outstanding letters of credit of $1.1 million as of October 2, 2012. During the period ended and as of October 2, 2012, there were no borrowings under the credit agreement. As of October 2, 2012, we were in compliance with all related covenants and the unused borrowing capacity under the agreement was $4.9 million.
7. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG LIVED ASSETS AND STORE LEASE TERMINATION AND CLOSURE COSTS
Impairment of long-lived assets
The Company reviews its entire portfolio on a regular basis. The review includes an analysis of each store’s past and present operating performance combined with projected future results. Impairment charges include the write-down of long-lived assets at stores that were assessed for impairment because of management’s intention to close the store or because of changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company recorded impairment charges of $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 and for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011, respectively. Impairment charges of $0.6 million and $1.2 million were recorded for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 and the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011, respectively.
Store lease termination and closure costs
Lease termination costs consist primarily of the costs of future obligations related to closed store locations. Discounted liabilities for future lease costs net of expected income from related subleases of closed locations are recorded when the stores are closed. All other costs related to closed units are expensed as incurred. In assessing the discounted liabilities for future costs of obligations related to closed stores, the Company makes assumptions regarding amounts of future subleases. If these assumptions or their related estimates change in the future, the Company may be required to record additional exit costs or reduce exit costs previously recorded. Exit costs recorded for each of the periods presented include the effect of such changes in estimates. Lease obligations are payable through 2022, less sublease amounts. The charges are noted below (in thousands):
13 Week Period Ended | 12 Week Period Ended | 39 Week Period Ended | 40 Week Period Ended | |||||||||||||
October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | |||||||||||||
Store lease terminations | $ | 10 | $ | 90 | $ | 135 | $ | 316 |
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending store lease termination and closure accrual is as follows (in thousands):
13 Week Period Ended | 12 Week Period Ended | 39 Week Period Ended | 40 Week Period Ended | |||||||||||||
October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | 402 | $ | 1,144 | $ | 573 | $ | 3,016 | |||||||||
Adjustments | 10 | 90 | 135 | 316 | ||||||||||||
Payments | (133 | ) | (566 | ) | (429 | ) | (2,664 | ) | ||||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 279 | $ | 668 | $ | 279 | $ | 668 |
13 |
8. INCOME TAXES
At the end of each interim period, the Company calculates an estimated annual effective tax rate based on the Company’s best estimate of the tax expense (benefit) that will be provided for the full year. The year-to-date income tax expense (benefit) is a result of applying the estimated annual effective tax rate to the year-to-date actual pre-tax income (loss). The interim period tax expense (benefit) is the difference between the year-to-date amount and the amounts reported for previous interim periods and then adjusted for discrete tax items, if any.
A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has concluded that it is not more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized and a full valuation allowance has been maintained against the Company’s net deferred tax assets.
The Company’s effective tax rate for the 13 and 39 week periods ended October 2, 2012 were 9.4% and 8.2%, respectively. The effective tax rates were affected by pretax income or loss, a change in the valuation allowance related to deductible temporary differences originating during the current year, the alternative minimum taxes and foreign withholding taxes.
As of October 2, 2012, there have been no material changes to the Company’s uncertain tax positions disclosure as provided in Note 12 in the Notes to the Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2012.
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is a defendant in litigation arising in the normal course of business. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of these matters, it is the opinion of the Company’s management, based upon the information available at this time, that the expected outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, liquidity or financial condition of the Company.
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On November 1, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment to its Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Lender”) whereby the Lender increased the revolving line of credit to ten million dollars. The outstanding balance under the amended credit facility bears interest at a LIBOR Market Index Rate based upon the rate for one month U.S. dollar deposits, plus 3.00% per annum. Under the terms of the amended Credit Agreement, the Company is required to maintain minimum levels of trailing annual consolidated EBITDA and liquidity and is subject to limits on annual capital expenditures. The amended Credit Agreement terminates January 31, 2014 or may be terminated earlier by the Company or by the Lender.
14 |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Except for historical information, the discussion in this report contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and assumptions about future events. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology, such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “future,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “forecast” and similar expressions (or the negative of such expressions.) Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning projected new store openings, 2012 revenue growth rates, and capital expenditures. Forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions based on information currently available to us, including financial and operational information, the volatility of our stock price, and current competitive conditions. As a result, these statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. For a discussion of material risks and uncertainties that the Company faces, see the discussion titled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2012.
JAMBA, INC. OVERVIEW
Jamba, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) owns and franchises Jamba Juice stores through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Jamba Juice Company. Jamba Juice Company is a leading restaurant retailer of better-for-you, specialty beverage and food offerings, which include great tasting, whole fruit smoothies, fresh squeezed juices and juice blends, hot coffee and teas, hot oatmeal, breakfast wraps, sandwiches and mini-wraps, California Flatbreads™, frozen yogurt, and a variety of baked goods and snacks. As of October 2, 2012, there were 788 store locations globally. There were 301 Company owned and operated stores (“Company Stores”) and 454 franchise operated stores (“Franchise Stores”) in the United States, and 33 international franchise stores (“International Stores”). Jamba–branded consumer products (“CPG”) for at-home enjoyment are also available through select retailers across the nation and in Jamba outlets in the United States.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Key Overall Strategies
The BLEND Plan continues to guide the Company’s strategic plan to become a globally recognized healthy, active lifestyle brand. The key components of our plan for fiscal year 2012, are driving brand strength, improving store economics, accelerating store or unit development and expansion of our CPG program, and are captured in our BLEND Plan 2.0:
• | make Jamba a top-of-mind healthy food and beverage brand; | |
• | embody a healthy, active lifestyle at store level and broadly across the enterprise; | |
• | accelerate global retail growth through new and existing formats; | |
• | build a global CPG platform in Jamba-relevant categories; and | |
• | pursue new ways to reduce costs and drive productivity. |
Change in Fiscal Quarter
Effective for fiscal 2012, the Company changed the end of its fiscal quarters. Each quarter has 13 weeks, resulting in a 12 period fiscal year. Prior to fiscal 2012, the first quarter had 16 weeks and each of the three subsequent quarters had 12 weeks. The Company’s year-end continues to be the Tuesday closest to December 31.
The prior year comparative financial and other information reported in the financial statements herein continue to be presented based on our prior year fiscal quarter end calendar. Our results for the third quarter of fiscal 2012, which was the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, are compared to our results for the third quarter of fiscal 2011, which was the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The comparison of these two quarters is primarily affected by the difference of one week between the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and the third quarter of 2011. There were 39 weeks in the first three quarters of fiscal 2012 and 40 weeks in the first three quarters of fiscal 2011. The most significant impacts of the fiscal quarter change occurred in the first fiscal quarter.
Although we have not submitted financial information for the 13 week period ended September 27, 2011 in this Form 10-Q, pro-forma information for the 13 week period for the prior year is included in the press release dated November 1, 2012.
15 |
2012 Third Quarter Financial Highlights
· | Company Stores comparable sales increased 3.9%, Franchise Stores comparable sales increased 1.0% and system-wide comparable store sales increased 2.5%. System-wide comparable store sales, non-GAAP financial measure, represent the change in year-over-year sales for all Company and Franchise Stores opened for at least one full year. |
· | Net income was $4.1 million, and represents $0.04 diluted earnings per share for the third quarter, compared to net income of $4.1 million or $0.05 diluted earnings per share for the prior year third quarter. |
· | Investment during the quarter was accelerated in targeted customer value price promotions and several growth initiatives, including JambaGO®. |
· | General and administrative expense increased to $9.7 million from $7.4 million, resulting from the accelerated investment in growth initiatives and an additional week of expenses included in the 2012 fiscal third quarter. |
· | Cash and cash equivalents was $31.9 million as of October 2, 2012. |
· | Cash generated from operations for the 39 week period was $17.0 million, compared to $2.6 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. |
· | Eight new Franchise Stores were opened in the U.S. during the 13 weeks ended October 2, 2012. |
· | Four new International Stores were opened by our international partners during the 13 weeks ended October 2, 2012. |
2012 Third Quarter Business Highlights
Make Jamba a Top of Mind Healthy Food and Beverage Brand
During the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, sales at system-wide Jamba Juice Stores opened more than one full fiscal year increased 2.5% reflecting increases of 3.9% for Company Stores and 1.0% for Franchise Stores. For Company Stores, this increase represents two consecutive years of Company Store comparable sales growth. The increase in Company Store comparable sales during the quarter includes a 510 basis points increase in traffic and a 120 basis points decrease in average check as a result of our targeted “Dollar Days” marketing investment, designed to provide added consumer value during an ever challenging economy. The company continues to see sales growth in all four day-parts.
Product innovation continues to play a critical role in offering the consumer more relevant and habitual products. Make It Light™ smoothies were extended throughout the system, Talbott Teas® offerings and new food options including a toasted bistro sandwich were rolled out to Company Stores.
On October 1, 2012, we announced our first ever major theatrical motion picture partnership with Summit Entertainment, a LIONSGATE® company, for the release of its fifth installment of the TWILIGHT SAGA film franchise, “THE TWILIGHT SAGA: BREAKING DAWN – PART 2” in November 2012. We have planned special activities designed to engage fans, including special screenings and social-media promotions where one person could win a Grand Prize trip for two to attend the Los Angeles premiere of the movie on November 12. Additionally, we have created a nutritious and exclusive, Limited Time Only (LTO) movie-themed smoothie for fans to enjoy during the promotion period. Fans who purchase the LTO smoothie during the promotion period will receive a free special movie-branded premium item.
Embody a Healthy, Active Lifestyle
In August 2012, we announced the enhancement of our comprehensive eco-sustainability strategy. We formed a strategic relationship with the Global Green USA’s Coalition Recovery (CoRR), an industry working group dedicated to accelerating waste diversion programs. Our alliance with CoRR is expected to help us reduce waste and energy consumption and increase use of more environmentally friendly materials. We plan to collaborate with CoRR during our work to phase out the use of polystyrene cups, currently used for cold beverages, during 2013.
Accelerate Global Retail Growth
We continue to grow our restaurant concept primarily through the development of new Franchise Stores. As of October 2, 2012, the Jamba system, globally, is comprised of approximately 62% Franchise Store locations and 38% Company Store locations. As of October 2, 2012, we had 788 Jamba Juice stores, globally, represented by 301 Company Stores and 454 Franchise Stores in the United States, and 33 International Stores.
16 |
Domestic
During the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, franchisees developed and opened eight Franchise Stores, all of which were non-traditional stores. These new stores included our 21st airport location at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas. All our recent new store openings are consistent with our initiative to launch flexible, non-traditional franchise formats in travel hubs, grocery outlets, malls and college and universities.
We also announced expansion plans into five new markets and five existing markets with new and existing franchise partners, to develop a total of 32 new Jamba Juice store locations in ten states, including New York, Wisconsin, Kentucky, California and Connecticut over the next five to seven years. We expect to open 40 to 50 stores in fiscal 2012 primarily through franchisees. During the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, 19 Franchise Stores were opened. The actual number of openings may differ from our expectations due to various factors, including franchisee access to capital and economic conditions.
The expansion of our new growth concept, JambaGO, continued to progress in a variety of locations, including K-12 schools, convenience stores and grocery stores. This concept has enabled us to provide a healthy alternative for schools seeking solutions to combat childhood obesity. As of October 2, 2012, there were 169 JambaGO locations and we expect to open 400 to 500 locations during fiscal 2012.
International
During the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, our master developers opened a total of four international locations, one in South Korea, two in Canada and one in the Philippines. We opened 16 international Jamba Juice store locations during the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, and we continue to actively pursue international development opportunities.
Build a Global CPG Platform in Jamba-Relevant Categories
We are evolving our business model to assume more control over the development, manufacturing and distribution of our CPG products and to ultimately gain more of the profit pool. As an example of this, in June 2012 we finalized an agreement with Nestle to acquire the product formulation and intellectual property for the Jamba All-Natural Energy Drink, for which we continue to expand distribution in and beyond the current Northeast test geography.
17 |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — 13 WEEK PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 2, 2012 AS COMPARED TO 12 WEEK PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 4, 2011 (UNAUDITED)
13 Week Period Ended | 12 Week Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | October 2, 2012 | % (1) | October 4, 2011 | % (1) | ||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 61,795 | 94.4 | % | $ | 54,102 | 94.8 | % | ||||||||
Franchise and other revenue | 3,687 | 5.6 | % | 2,976 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||||
Total revenue | 65,482 | 100.0 | % | 57,078 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Costs and operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales | 14,918 | 24.1 | % | 11,808 | 21.8 | % | ||||||||||
Labor | 16,457 | 26.6 | % | 14,565 | 26.9 | % | ||||||||||
Occupancy | 7,353 | 11.9 | % | 6,802 | 12.6 | % | ||||||||||
Store operating | 9,328 | 15.1 | % | 8,539 | 15.8 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,793 | 4.3 | % | 2,805 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||
General and administrative | 9,663 | 14.8 | % | 7,398 | 13.0 | % | ||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 75 | 0.1 | % | 312 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||
Other operating, net | 347 | 0.5 | % | 924 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||
Total costs and operating expenses | 60,934 | 93.1 | % | 53,153 | 93.1 | % | ||||||||||
Income from operations | 4,548 | 6.9 | % | 3,925 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||
Other income (expense), net: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 21 | 0.0 | % | 99 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense | (52 | ) | 0.0 | % | (117 | ) | (0.2 | )% | ||||||||
Total other expense, net | (31 | ) | 0.0 | % | (18 | ) | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Income before income taxes | 4,517 | 6.9 | % | 3,907 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) | (413 | ) | (0.6 | )% | 217 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||
Net income | 4,104 | 6.3 | % | 4,124 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and deemed dividends | (1,123 | ) | (1.7 | )% | (489 | ) | (0.9 | )% | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 2,981 | 4.6 | % | $ | 3,635 | 6.4 | % |
(1) |
Cost of sales, labor, occupancy and store operating percentages are calculated using Company Stores revenue. All other line items are calculated using total revenue. |
18 |
Revenue
(in 000’s)
13 Week Period Ended | % of Total | 12 Week Period Ended | % of Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | October 2, 2012 | Revenue | October 4, 2011 | Revenue | ||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 61,795 | 94.4 | % | $ | 54,102 | 94.8 | % | ||||||||
Franchise and other revenue | 3,687 | 5.6 | % | 2,976 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||||
Total revenue | 65,482 | 100.0 | % | 57,078 | 100.0 | % |
Total revenue is comprised of revenue from Company Stores, franchise royalties, fees and consumer packaged goods.
Total revenue for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $65.5 million, an increase of $8.4 million or 14.7%, compared to $57.1 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011.
Company Store revenue
Company Store revenue for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $61.8 million, an increase of $7.7 million or 14.2% compared to $54.1 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The increase in Company Store revenue was due primarily to one extra week in the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 compared to the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011 and to Company Store comparable sales improvement as illustrated by the following table:
Company Store Increase in Revenue (in 000’s) | ||||
Third quarter 2012 vs. Third quarter 2011 | ||||
Due to one more week in 2012 third quarter (1) | $ | 6,131 | ||
Company Store comparable sales increase | 2,300 | |||
Reduction in the number of Company Stores, net | (738 | ) | ||
Total change in Company Store revenue | $ | 7,693 |
(1) | Calculated by inclusion of Company Store revenue for one additional week in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. |
Company Store comparable sales increased $2.3 million for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, or 3.9% attributable to an increase of 5.1% in transaction count, partially offset by a decrease of 1.2% in average check resulting from our targeted customer value driven promotions. Company Store comparable sales represents the change in year-over-year sales for all Company Stores opened for at least a full fiscal year. As of October 2, 2012, 100% of our Company Stores had been open for at least one full fiscal year. The percentage change in Company Store comparable sales compares the sales of Company Stores during a 13 week period in 2012 to the sales from the same Company Stores for the equivalent 13 week period in the prior year.
Franchise and other revenue
Franchise and other revenue for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $3.7 million, an increase of $0.7 million, or 23.9%, compared to $3.0 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011, primarily due to the net increase in the number of Franchise and International Stores and the effect of including 13 weeks in the fiscal 2012 third quarter compared to 12 weeks in the fiscal 2011 third quarter. CPG revenue was $0.6 million for fiscal 2012 third quarter compared to $0.3 million for fiscal 2011 third quarter.
19 |
The number of Franchise Stores and International Stores grew to 487 as of October 2, 2012 from 452 as of October 4, 2011.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales is mostly comprised of fruit, dairy, and other products used to make smoothies and juices, paper products, costs related to managing our procurement program and vendor rebates. As a percentage of Company Store revenue, cost of sales increased to 24.1% for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 21.8% for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The increase of cost of sales as a percentage of Company Store revenue was primarily due the net impact of targeted customer value promotional activities (1.6%) and increases in commodity costs (0.9%). Cost of sales for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $14.9 million compared to $11.8 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The change from a 12 week third quarter in fiscal 2011 to a 13 week third quarter in fiscal 2012 has resulted in an increase in Company Stores cost of sales attributed to the quarter.
Labor
Labor costs are comprised of store management salaries and bonuses, hourly team member payroll, training costs and other associated fringe benefits. As a percentage of Company Store revenue, labor costs decreased to 26.6% for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 26.9% for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The 0.3% decrease of labor costs as a percentage of Company Store revenue was primarily due to labor efficiencies, improved sales volumes and more effective wage management achieved (2.1%), partially offset by targeted customer value promotional activities (1.8%). Labor costs for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 were $16.5 million, an increase of $1.9 million, or 13.0%, compared to $14.6 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The change from a 12 week third quarter in fiscal 2011 to a 13 week third quarter in fiscal 2012 has resulted in an increase in Company Stores labor costs partially offset by labor efficiencies, improved sales volumes and more effective wage management.
Occupancy
Occupancy costs include both fixed and variable portions of rent, common area maintenance charges, property taxes, licenses and property insurance for all Company Store locations. As a percentage of Company Store revenue, occupancy costs decreased to 11.9% for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 12.6% for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The decrease in occupancy costs as a percentage of Company Store revenue was primarily due to the impact of leverage as a result of the increase in Company Store comparable sales (approximately 0.6%). Occupancy costs for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 were $7.4 million, an increase of $0.6 million, or 8.1%, compared to $6.8 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The change from a 12 week third quarter in fiscal 2011 to a 13 week third quarter in fiscal 2012 has resulted in an increase in Company Stores occupancy expenses attributable to the quarter.
Store operating
Store operating expenses consist primarily of various store-level costs such as utilities, marketing, repairs and maintenance, credit card fees and other store operating expenses. As a percentage of Company Store revenue, total store operating expenses decreased to 15.1% for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 15.8% for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The decrease in total store operating expenses as a percentage of Company Store revenue was primarily due to a decrease in marketing expense (approximately 0.9%) resulting from a shift into targeted customer value promotions. Total store operating expenses for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 were $9.3 million, an increase of $0.8 million, or 9.2%, compared to $8.5 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The change from a 12 week third quarter in fiscal 2011 to a 13 week third quarter in fiscal 2012 has resulted in an increase in Company Stores operating expenses attributable to the quarter.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation of fixed assets and the amortization of intangible assets. As a percentage of total revenue, depreciation and amortization decreased to 4.3% for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 4.9% for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The decrease in depreciation and amortization as a percentage of total revenue was primarily due to the impact of leverage as a result of the increase in Company Store comparable sales (approximately 0.3%) and of lower carrying value as previously impaired assets approach the end of their economic useful lives (approximately 0.3%). Depreciation and amortization for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $2.8 million, flat, compared to $2.8 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011.
20 |
General and administrative
General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses include costs associated with our corporate headquarters in Emeryville, CA, field supervision, bonuses, outside and contract services, accounting and legal fees, travel and travel-related expenses, share-based compensation and other. As a percentage of total revenue, total G&A expenses increased to 14.8% for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 13.0% for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. Total G&A expenses for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 were $9.7 million, an increase of $2.3 million, or 30.6%, compared to $7.4 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The increase of total G&A expenses was primarily due to costs resulting from accelerated investment in new and expanded growth initiatives (approximately $0.9 million), the change to 13 weeks in the fiscal 2012 third quarter compared to 12 weeks in the fiscal 2011 third quarter (approximately $0.8 million) and increased non-cash share-based compensation (approximately $0.4 million).
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when indicators of impairment are present. Expected future cash flows associated with an asset, in addition to other quantitative and qualitative analyses, including certain assumptions about expected future operating performance and changes in economic conditions are the key factors in determining undiscounted future cash flows. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the amount by which carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Impairment of long-lived assets for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $0.1 million, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 76.0%, compared to $0.3 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The decrease of impairment charge for long-lived assets was primarily due to fewer underperforming stores that had not been previously partially impaired compared to the prior year period.
Other operating, net
Other operating, net consists primarily of gain or loss on disposals, income from jambacard breakage, store lease termination and closure costs, pre-opening costs and franchise related expense, net. For the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, other operating, net was $0.3 million of expense, compared to net expense of $0.9 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The decrease in expense is primarily due to lower loss on disposal of fixed assets (approximately $0.2 million), decrease in charges for store closures and lease termination costs (approximately $0.2 million) and lower pre-opening costs (approximately $0.2 million); partially offset by lower jambacard breakage, net of related expense (approximately $0.1 million).
Income tax expense
We recorded income tax expense at an effective rate of 9.4% for the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012. This is due to the pretax income, a change in valuation allowance related to deductible temporary differences originating during the current year, the alternative minimum taxes and foreign withholding taxes.
We recorded income tax benefit at an effective rate of negative 5.6% for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The effective tax rate was primarily affected by pretax income, a change in the valuation allowance related to deductible temporary differences originating during the current year, the release of uncertain tax benefits on certain unrecognized tax benefits related to deductions, state tax credits and related interest as the statutes have expired, and foreign withholding taxes in connection with foreign franchise revenue.
Preferred stock dividends and deemed dividends
For the 13 week period ended October 2, 2012, preferred stock dividends and deemed dividends were $1.1 million, compared to $0.5 million for the 12 week period ended October 4, 2011. The increase of $0.6 million is primarily due to recording accelerated accretion relating to the beneficial conversion feature and transaction costs, as a result of conversion of 95,500 shares of preferred stock during the quarter (approximately $0.7 million).
21 |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — 39 WEEK PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 2, 2012 AS COMPARED TO 40 WEEK PERIOD ENDED OCOTBER 4, 2011 (UNAUDITED)
39 Week Period Ended | 40 Week Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | October 2, 2012 | % (1) | October 4, 2011 | % (1) | ||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 174,350 | 94.5 | % | $ | 173,274 | 95.1 | % | ||||||||
Franchise and other revenue | 10,223 | 5.5 | % | 8,834 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||
Total revenue | 184,573 | 100.0 | % | 182,108 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Costs and operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales | 40,504 | 23.2 | % | 39,828 | 23.0 | % | ||||||||||
Labor | 49,013 | 28.1 | % | 53,139 | 30.7 | % | ||||||||||
Occupancy | 22,097 | 12.7 | % | 23,707 | 13.7 | % | ||||||||||
Store operating | 26,158 | 15.0 | % | 25,728 | 14.8 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 8,528 | 4.6 | % | 9,621 | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||
General and administrative | 29,125 | 15.8 | % | 25,881 | 14.2 | % | ||||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 637 | 0.3 | % | 1,214 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||
Other operating, net | 579 | 0.3 | % | 1,503 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||
Total costs and operating expenses | 176,641 | 95.7 | % | 180,621 | 99.2 | % | ||||||||||
Income from operations | 7,932 | 4.3 | % | 1,487 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||
Other income (expense), net: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 61 | 0.0 | % | 126 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense | (147 | ) | (0.1 | )% | (456 | ) | (0.3 | )% | ||||||||
Total other expense, net | (86 | ) | (0.1 | )% | (330 | ) | (0.2 | )% | ||||||||
Income before income taxes | 7,846 | 4.2 | % | 1,157 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit | (634 | ) | (0.3 | )% | 380 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||
Net income | 7,212 | 3.9 | % | 1,537 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and deemed dividends | (2,076 | ) | (1.1 | )% | (1,854 | ) | (1.0 | )% | ||||||||
Net income available (attributable ) to common stockholders | $ | 5,136 | 2.8 | % | $ | (317 | ) | (0.2 | )% |
(1) | Cost of sales, labor, occupancy and store operating percentages are calculated using Company Stores revenue. All other line items are calculated using total revenue. |
22 |
Revenue
(in 000’s)
39 Week Period Ended | % of Total | 40 Week Period Ended | % of Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | October 2, 2012 | Revenue | October 4, 2011 | Revenue | ||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
Company Stores | $ | 174,350 | 94.5 | % | $ | 173,274 | 95.1 | % | ||||||||
Franchise and other revenue | 10,223 | 4.5 | % | 8,834 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 184,573 | 100.0 | % | $ | 182,108 | 100.0 | % |
Total revenue is comprised of revenue from Company Stores, franchise royalties, fees and consumer packaged goods.
Total revenue for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $184.6 million, an increase of $2.5 million or 1.4% compared to $182.1 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011.
Company Store revenue
Company Store revenue for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $174.4 million, an increase of $1.1 million or 0.6% compared to $173.3 million for the prior year period. This increase in Company Store revenue is primarily due to the increase in comparable store sales, partially offset by a net reduction in Company Stores due to the refranchising initiative, and there being one fewer week on the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 and as illustrated by the following table:
Company Store Increase in Revenue (in 000’s) | ||||
Year-to-date Q3 2012 Year-to-date Q3 2011 | ||||
Company Store comparable sales increase | $ | 10,758 | ||
Reduction in number of Company Stores, net | (5,457 | ) | ||
Due to one less week in 2012 fiscal year-to-date (1) | (4,225 | ) | ||
Total change in Company Store revenue | $ | 1,076 |
(1) | Calculated by exclusion of Company Store revenue for the one additional week in the year to date period ended October 4, 2011. |
Company Store comparable sales increased $10.8 million for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, or 6.7%, attributable to an increase of 4.5% in transaction count and 2.2% in average check. Company Store comparable sales represents the change in year-over-year sales for all Company Stores opened for at least one full fiscal year. As of October 2, 2012, 100% of our Company Stores had been open for at least one full fiscal year. The percentage change in Company Store comparable sales compares the sales of Company Stores during a 39 week period in 2012 to the sales from the same Company Stores for the equivalent 39 week period in the prior year.
Franchise and other revenue
Franchise and other revenue for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $10.2 million, an increase of $1.4 million, or 15.7%, compared to franchise and other revenue of $8.8 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011 primarily due to the net increase in the number of Franchise and International Stores, partially offset by the effect of including 39 weeks in fiscal 2012 compared to 40 weeks in fiscal 2011.
23 |
Cost of sales
Cost of sales is mostly comprised of fruit, dairy, and other products used to make smoothies and juices, paper products, costs related to managing our procurement program and vendor rebates. As a percentage of Company Store revenue, cost of sales increased to 23.2% for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 23.0% for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. The increase of cost of sales as a percentage of Company Store revenue was primarily due to increases in commodity costs (approximately 0.5%), partially offset by a net favorable product mix shift (approximately 0.3%). Cost of sales for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 were $40.5 million, an increase of $0.7 million, or 1.7%, compared to $39.8 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. The increase in cost of sales was primarily due to an increase in sales.
Labor
Labor costs are comprised of store management salaries and bonuses, hourly team member payroll, training costs and other associated fringe benefits. As a percentage of Company Store revenue, labor costs decreased to 28.1% for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 30.7% for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. The 2.6% decrease of labor costs as a percentage of Company Store revenue was primarily due to labor efficiencies, improved sales volumes and more effective wage management achieved through a smaller, more geographically concentrated Company Store base. Labor costs for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 were $49.0 million, a decrease of $4.1 million, or 7.8%, compared to $53.1 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. Our refranchising initiative which ended in April 2011, has resulted in a decrease in the number of Company Stores and the related labor costs and expenses to operate, manage, and support these refranchised Company Stores. In addition, the change from a 40 week year-to-date period in fiscal 2011 to a 39 week year-to-date-period in fiscal 2012 has resulted in a decrease in Company Stores labor costs attributed to the period.
Occupancy
Occupancy costs include both fixed and variable portions of rent, common area maintenance charges, property taxes, licenses and property insurance for all Company Store locations. As a percentage of Company Store revenue, occupancy costs decreased to 12.7% for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 13.7% for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. The decrease in occupancy costs as a percentage of Company Store revenue was primarily due to the impact of leverage as a result of the increase in Company Store comparable sales (approximately 1.0%). Occupancy costs for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 were $22.1 million, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 6.8%, compared to $23.7 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. Our refranchising initiative has resulted in a decrease in the number of Company Stores and the related occupancy costs and expenses to operate, manage, and support these refranchised Company Stores. In addition, the change from a 40 week year-to-date period in fiscal 2011 to a 39 week year-to-date-period in fiscal 2012 has resulted in a decrease in Company Stores occupancy costs attributed to the period.
Store operating
Store operating expenses consist primarily of various store-level costs such as utilities, marketing, repairs and maintenance, credit card fees and other store operating expenses. As a percentage of Company Store revenue, total store operating expenses increased to 15.0% for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 14.8% for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. The increase in total store operating expenses as a percentage of Company Store revenue was primarily due to increased credit card usage as a percentage of Company Store sales (approximately 0.3%). Total store operating expenses for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 were $26.2 million, an increase of $0.4 million, or 1.7%, compared to $25.7 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation of fixed assets and the amortization of intangible assets. As a percentage of total revenue, depreciation and amortization decreased to 4.6% for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 5.3% for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. The decrease in depreciation and amortization as a percentage of total revenue was primarily due to the impact of leverage as a result of the increase in Company Store comparable sales (approximately 0.4%). Depreciation and amortization for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $8.5 million, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 11.4%, compared to $9.6 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. Our refranchising initiative has resulted in a decrease in the number of Company Stores and related assets, resulting in a reduction in the carrying value of Company Store fixed assets. In addition, the change from a 40 week year-to-date period in fiscal 2011 to a 39 week year-to-date-period in fiscal 2012 has resulted in a decrease in Company Stores depreciation expense attributed to the period.
24 |
General and administrative
General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses include costs associated with our corporate headquarters in Emeryville, CA, field supervision, bonuses, outside and contract services, accounting and legal fees, travel and travel-related expenses, share-based compensation and other. As a percentage of total revenue, total G&A expenses increased to 15.8% for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to 14.2% for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. Total G&A expenses for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 were $29.1 million, an increase of $3.2 million, or 12.5 %, compared to $25.9 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. The increase of total G&A expenses was primarily due to costs resulting from accelerated investment in new and expanded growth initiatives (approximately $1.7 million), the increase in expenses for our semi-annual performance related incentives (approximately $1.3 million), and increased non-cash share-based compensation (approximately $0.6 million), partially offset by the change to 39 weeks in the fiscal 2012 year-to-date period compared to 40 weeks in the fiscal 2011 year-to-date period (approximately $0.6 million)
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when indicators of impairment are present. Expected future cash flows associated with an asset, in addition to other quantitative and qualitative analyses, including certain assumptions about expected future operating performance and changes in economic conditions are the key factors in determining undiscounted future cash flows. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the amount by which carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Impairment of long-lived assets for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $0.6 million, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 47.5%, compared to $1.2 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. The decrease of impairment charge for long-lived assets was primarily due to fewer underperforming stores that had not been previously partially impaired compared to the prior year period.
Other operating, net
Other operating, net consists primarily of gain or loss on disposals, income from jambacard breakage, store lease termination, and closure costs, pre-opening costs and franchise related expenses, net. For the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, other operating, net was $0.6 million of expense, compared to expense of $1.5 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. The decrease in expense is primarily due to a decrease in pre-opening costs (approximately $0.4 million), lower loss on disposal of fixed assets as sale of Company Stores pursuant to our refranchising initiative ended in April 2011 (approximately $1.3 million), and a decline in expenses for store closures and store lease terminations (approximately $0.3 million), partially offset by lower jambacard breakage, net of related expense (approximately $0.8 million) and an increase in franchise related expense, net (approximately $0.3 million).
Interest expense
Interest expense for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 was $0.1 million compared to $0.5 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. In addition, during the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 and the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011, we paid cash dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock totaling $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
Income tax expense
We have recorded an income tax expense at an effective rate of 8.2% for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012. The effective tax rate was primarily due to the pretax income, a change in valuation allowance related to deductible temporary differences originating during the current year, the alternative minimum taxes and foreign withholding taxes.
We have recorded an income tax benefit at an effective rate of negative 32.8% for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. The effective tax rate was primarily affected by pretax income, a change in the valuation allowance related to deductible temporary differences originating during the accounting period, the release of uncertain tax benefits on certain tax deductions, state tax credits and related interest as the statutes have expired and foreign withholding taxes in connection with foreign franchise revenue.
25 |
KEY FINANCIAL METRICS AND NON-GAAP MEASURES
Management reviews and discusses its operations based on both financial and non-financial metrics. Among the key financial metrics upon which management focuses is reviewing the performance based on the Company’s consolidated GAAP results, including Company Store comparable sales. Management also uses certain supplemental, non-GAAP financial metrics in evaluating financial results, including Franchise Store comparable sales and system-wide comparable sales.
Company Store comparable sales represent the change in year-over-year sales for all Company Stores opened for at least one full fiscal year.
Franchise Store comparable sales, a non-GAAP financial measure, represents the change in year-over-year sales for all Franchise Stores opened for at least one full fiscal year, as reported by franchisees and exclude International Stores.
System–wide comparable store sales, a non-GAAP financial measure, represents the change in year-over-year sales for all Company and Franchise Stores opened for at least one full fiscal year and are based on sales by both company-owned and franchise-operated stores, as reported by franchisees, which are in the store base. System-wide comparable store sales do not include International Stores and JambaGO locations.
Company-owned stores that were sold in refranchising transactions are included in the store base for each accounting period of the fiscal quarter in which the store was sold to the extent the sale is consummated at least three days prior to the end of such accounting period, but only for the days such stores have been company-owned. Thereafter, such stores are excluded from the store base until such stores have been franchise-operated for at least one full fiscal year at which point such stores are included in the store base and compared to sales in the comparable period of the prior year. Comparable store sales exclude closed locations.
Management reviews the increase or decrease in Company Store comparable store sales, Franchise Store comparable sales and system-wide comparable sales compared with the same period in the prior year to assess business trends and make certain business decisions. The Company believes that Franchise Store comparable sales and system-wide comparable sales data, non-GAAP, financial measures, are useful in assessing the overall performance of the Jamba brand and, ultimately, the performance of the Company.
The following table sets forth operating data that do not otherwise appear in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the 13 and 39 week periods ended October 2, 2012 and for the 12 and 40 week periods ended October 4, 2011, respectively:
13 Week | 12 Week | 39 Week | 40 Week | |||||||||||||
Period | Period | Period | Period | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | |||||||||||||
Percentage change in Company Store comparable sales (1) | 3.9 | % | 3.3 | % | 6.7 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||||||
Percentage change in Franchise Store comparable sales (2) | 1.0 | % | 4.2 | % | 5.8 | % | 3.3 | % | ||||||||
Percentage change in system-wide comparable sales (2) | 2.5 | % | 3.7 | % | 6.2 | % | 3.3 | % | ||||||||
Total Company Stores | 301 | 310 | 301 | 310 | ||||||||||||
Total Franchise Stores | 454 | 442 | 454 | 442 | ||||||||||||
Total International Stores | 33 | 10 | 33 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Total Stores | 788 | 762 | 788 | 762 |
(1) | Percentage change in Company Store comparable sales compares the sales of Company Stores during a 13 and 39 week period in 2012 to the sales from the same Company Stores for the equivalent period in the prior year. A Company Store is included in this calculation after one full fiscal year of operations. Sales from Franchise Stores are not included in the Company Store comparable sales. |
(2) | Percentage change in system-wide comparable sales compares the combined sales of Company and Franchise-operated Stores during a 13 and 39 week period in 2012 to the combined sales from the same Company and Franchise-operated Stores for the equivalent 13 and 39 week period in the prior year. A Company or Franchise-operated Store is included in this calculation after one full fiscal year of operations. |
26 |
The following table sets forth certain data relating to Company Stores, Franchise and International Stores for the periods indicated:
39 Week Period Ended | 40 Week Period Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Domestic | International | Domestic | International | |||||||||||||
Company Stores: | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period | 307 | 351 | ||||||||||||||
Company Stores opened | ─ | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Company Stores closed | (5 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||
Company Stores sold to franchisees | (1 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Company Stores | 301 | 310 | ||||||||||||||
Franchise Stores: | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period | 443 | 19 | 391 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Franchise Stores opened | 19 | 16 | 20 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Franchise Stores closed | (9 | ) | (2 | ) | (11 | ) | ─ | |||||||||
Franchise Stores purchased from Company | 1 | ─ | 42 | ─ | ||||||||||||
Total Franchise Stores | 454 | 33 | 442 | 10 |
27 |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows Summary
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the 39 and 40 week periods ended October 2, 2012 and October 4, 2011 (in thousands):
39 Week | 40 Week | |||||||
Period Ended | Period Ended | |||||||
October 2, 2012 | October 4, 2011 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 17,006 | $ | 2,630 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (3,734 | ) | (5,726 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (1,023 | ) | (1,108 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 12,249 | $ | (4,204 | ) |
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $17.0 million for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to $2.6 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011, reflecting a net increase of cash flows of $14.4 million. This increase was primarily due to improved cash flows related to receivables (approximately $7.2 million), an increase in net income adjusted for noncash items (approximately $4.7 million) and a net increase in cash flows related to prepaid rent, other operating assets and liabilities (approximately $2.5 million). Collections of receivables during the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012 included amounts (approximately $4.3 million) from Costco which were not included in the prior year period, as we recommenced our jambacard program in the fall of 2011. In the Costco jambacard program, we sell jambacards to Costco who resells them to its customers.
The amount of cash used in our operating activities during any particular quarter is highly subject to variations in the seasons, with the first and fourth quarters of the fiscal year encompassing the winter and holiday season when we traditionally generate our lowest revenue, and our second and third quarters of the fiscal year encompassing the warmer seasons where a significant portion of our revenue and cash flows are realized. For more information on seasonality, refer to the section below entitled “ Seasonality and Quarterly Results ..” We also expect to have increased expenditures during the first part of the fiscal year as we invest in product development and domestic expansion with the goal to have new products released and new stores open by mid-year to take advantage of the busier summer months.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $3.7 million for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to $5.7 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011. Net cash used in investing activities decreased $2.0 million for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011 primarily due to a decrease in spending for the purchase of property and equipment (approximately $5.4 million) partially offset by proceeds from our refranchising initiative which were included in the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011 (approximately $3.1 million) and which were not included in the current year period due to the completion of the refranchising initiative in April 2011.
In fiscal 2012, we expect to incur capital expenditures of about $6 million depending on our liquidity needs, including investing in improvements to our technology infrastructure and maintenance capital.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $1.0 million for the 39 week period ended October 2, 2012, compared to $1.1 million for the 40 week period ended October 4, 2011, primarily due to lower preferred stock dividend payments.
28 |
Capital Resources
As of October 2, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $31.9 million compared to $19.6 million in cash and cash equivalents as of January 3, 2012. As of October 2, 2012 and January 3, 2012, we had no short term or long term debt. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows provided by operating activities. In addition, we have a revolving line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association for $10.0 million, which we may utilize as described below. In the future, and as permitted under the Securities Purchase Agreement for the Series B Preferred Stock, we may enter equipment leasing arrangements and incur additional indebtedness as necessary up to an aggregate amount of $10 million. We cannot assure, however, that such financing will be available on favorable terms or at all.
We expect that our cash on hand and future cash flows provided by operating activities will be sufficient to fund our working capital and general corporate needs, Series B Preferred Stock dividend payments and the non-discretionary capital expenditures for the foreseeable future. Our primary liquidity and capital requirements are for working capital and general corporate needs and the planned fiscal 2012 capital expenditures described above. The use of cash to fund discretionary capital expenditures will be based on the need to conserve our capital.
On February 14, 2012, we entered into a Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Lender”) which, as amended on November 1, 2012 (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”), provides us with a revolving line of credit of up to $10.0 million. The outstanding balance under the amended credit facility bears interest at a LIBOR Market Index Rate based upon the rate for one month U.S. dollar deposits, plus 3.00% per annum. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, we are required to maintain minimum levels of trailing annual consolidated EBITDA and liquidity and are subject to limits on annual capital expenditures. The Credit Agreement terminates January 31, 2014 or may be terminated earlier by us or by the Lender. This credit facility is subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants for credit facilities of this type, including limitations on us with respect to liens, indebtedness, guaranties, investments, distributions, mergers and acquisitions and dispositions of assets. The credit facility is evidenced by a revolving note made by us in favor of the Lender, is guaranteed by us and is secured by substantially all of our assets including the assets of our subsidiaries and a pledge of stock of our subsidiaries. In addition, the Credit Agreement replaced restricted cash requirements established in prior periods, as the line of credit also collateralizes our outstanding letters of credit of $1.1 million.
During the 39 week period ended and as of October 2, 2012, there were no borrowings under the Credit Agreement. To acquire the credit facility, we incurred upfront fees which are being amortized over the term of the credit agreement. As of October 2, 2012, the unamortized commitment fee amount was less than $0.1 million and is recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the balance sheet. As of October 2, 2012, we were in compliance with all related covenants and the unused borrowing capacity under the agreement was $4.9 million.
The adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including the macroeconomic environment, the operating performance of our Company Stores, the successful expansion of our franchise and licensing programs and the successful rollout and consumer acceptance of our new beverage and food initiatives. Given these factors, our foremost priorities for the near term continue to be preserving and generating cash sufficient to fund our liquidity needs.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no significant changes to our contractual obligations table as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2012, other than obligations with respect to dividends payable in connection with, or payments for redemption of, our outstanding Series B-1 and Series B-2 Preferred Stock. The decreases in the obligations relating to our preferred stock were a result of voluntary conversions of some of the shares of previously outstanding preferred stock into common stock by the holders thereof that occurred after January 3, 2012.
Payments Due by Period (in 000’s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less Than | 1-2 Years | 3-4 Years | 5 or More | ||||||||||||||||
Series B redeemable preferred stock redemption | $ | 8,382 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8,382 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Dividends for Series B redeemable preferred stock | $ | 2,515 | $ | 670 | $ | 1,341 | $ | 504 | $ | — |
COMMODITY PRICES, AVAILABILITY AND GENERAL RISK CONDITIONS
We contract for significant amounts of individually quick frozen fruit, fruit concentrate and dairy products to support the needs of both our Company Stores and Franchise Stores. The price and availability of these commodities directly impacts our results of operations and can be expected to impact our future results of operations.
29 |
SEASONALITY AND QUARTERLY RESULTS
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. We expect to realize significant portions of our revenue during the second and third quarters of the fiscal year, which align with the warmer summer season. In addition, quarterly results are affected by the timing of the opening of new stores and weather conditions. However, geographic diversification of our store locations may conceal or diminish the financial statement impact of such seasonal influences. Because of the seasonality of our business, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full fiscal year or any subsequent quarter.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to adopt accounting policies and make significant judgments and estimates to develop amounts reflected and disclosed in the financial statements. In many cases, there are alternative policies or estimation techniques that could be used. We maintain a process to review the application of our accounting policies and to evaluate the appropriateness of the many estimates that we are required to make in order to prepare the financial statements. However, even under optimal circumstances, estimates routinely require adjustment based on changing circumstances and the receipt of new or better information. There have been no significant changes to the policies and estimates as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2012.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Recent Accounting Pronouncements section of Note 1 to our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of new accounting standards.
30 |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The following discussion of market risks contains forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from the following discussion based on general conditions in the financial and commodity markets.
We purchase fruit based on short-term seasonal pricing agreements. These short-term agreements generally set the price of procured frozen fruit and 100% fruit juice concentrates for less than one year based on estimated annual requirements. In order to mitigate the effects of price changes in any one commodity on its cost structure, we contract with multiple suppliers both domestically and internationally. These agreements typically set the price for some or all of our estimated annual fruit requirements, protecting us from short-term volatility. Nevertheless, these agreements typically contain a force majeure clause, which, if utilized (such as when hurricanes in 2004 destroyed the Florida orange crop and more recently with the freeze that affected California citrus), may subject us to significant price increases.
Our pricing philosophy is not to attempt to change consumer prices with every move up or down of the commodity market, but to take a longer term view of managing margins and the value perception of our products in the eyes of our customers. Management’s objective is to maximize our revenue through increased customer frequency. However, management has the ability to increase certain menu prices in response to food commodity prices.
We do not purchase derivative instruments on the open market.
We are subject to changes in the risk free interest rate in connection with the cash we hold in interest bearing accounts.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established and maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company and our subsidiaries required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only a reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was necessarily required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of October 2, 2012.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the fiscal quarter ended October 2, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
31 |
The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business. Based on the information currently available, the Company is not currently a party to any legal proceeding that management believes would have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.
The Company’s risk factors are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2012 and have not materially changed.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None
None.
32 |
Exhibit Number |
Description | Form | File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date |
Filed Herewith | ||||||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | X | ||||||||||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | X | ||||||||||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X | ||||||||||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | X |
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
33 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 2nd day of November, 2012.
JAMBA, INC. | |
By: |
/s/ JAMES D. WHITE |
James D. White | |
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive and President (Duly Authorized Officer) | |
By: |
/s/ KAREN L. LUEY |
Karen L. Luey | |
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary | |
(Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) |
34 |