Edgar Filing: INNODATA ISOGEN INC

Unassociated Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o	Preliminary Proxy Statement

o	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x	Definitive Proxy Statement

o	Definitive Additional Materials

o	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Innodata Isogen, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x	No fee required.

o	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

	1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

	2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

	3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

	4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

	5)	Total fee paid:

o	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

	1)	Amount Previously Paid:

	2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

	3)	Filing Party

	4)	Date Filed:

Three University Plaza

Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD JUNE 12, 2009

To the Stockholders of Innodata Isogen, Inc.:

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Innodata Isogen, Inc. (the "Company") will be held at Innodata Isogen, Inc., Three University Plaza, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 at 11:00 A.M. on June 12, 2009, for the following purposes:

(1)	To elect six Directors of the Company to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified;

(2)	To ratify the selection and appointment by the Company's Board of Directors of J.H. Cohn LLP, independent auditors, as auditors for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2009;

(3)	To approve the Innodata Isogen, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan; and

(4)	To consider and transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.

A Proxy Statement, form of Proxy, and the Annual Report to Stockholders of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 are enclosed herewith. Only holders of record of Common Stock of the Company at the close of business on April 15, 2009 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof. A complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote will be available for inspection by any stockholder during the meeting; in addition, the list will be open for examination by any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours, for a period of at least ten days prior to the meeting at the office of the Secretary of the Company, located at Three University Plaza, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Amy R. Agress

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Hackensack, New Jersey

April 28, 2009

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Meeting. If you do not expect to be present, please sign and date the enclosed form of Proxy and return it promptly using the enclosed envelope. No postage is required if mailed in the United States. Any person giving a Proxy has the power to revoke it at any time prior to its exercise and if present at the Meeting may withdraw it and vote in person.

Voting in Person at the Meeting

Registered holders can vote in person. Beneficial owners must obtain a proxy from their brokerage firm, bank, or other holder of record and present it to the inspector of elections with their ballot in order to be able to vote shares in person at the meeting. Voting in person will replace any previous votes submitted by proxy.

Attendance at the Meeting is limited to stockholders, their proxies and invited guests of the Company.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 12, 2009

We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials both by sending you this full set of proxy materials, including a proxy card, and by notifying you of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet.

This Proxy Statement and the 2008 Annual Report are available on the Internet at: http://www.innodata-isogen.com/proxy

- 2 -

INNODATA ISOGEN, INC.

Three University Plaza

Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

PROXY STATEMENT

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Innodata Isogen, Inc. (the "Company") of Proxies in the form enclosed. Such Proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at Innodata Isogen, Inc., Three University Plaza, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 at 11:00 A.M. on June 12, 2009 (the "Meeting") and at any adjournments thereof for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

This Proxy Statement and accompanying Proxy are being mailed on or about May 6, 2009 to all stockholders of record on April 15, 2009 (the "Record Date").

Any stockholder giving a Proxy has the power to revoke the same at any time before it is voted. The cost of soliciting Proxies will be borne by the Company. The Company has an arrangement with The Altman Company in connection with the solicitation of Proxies. Following the mailing of the Proxy materials, solicitation of Proxies may be made by The Altman Company, and officers and employees of the Company by mail, telephone, facsimile, electronic communication or personal interview. Properly executed Proxies will be voted in accordance with instructions given by stockholders at the places provided for such purpose in the accompanying Proxy and, as to any other matter properly coming before the Meeting (none of which is presently known to the Board of Directors), in accordance with the judgment of the persons designated as proxies. Unless contrary instructions are given by stockholders, persons named in the Proxy intend to vote the shares represented by such Proxies for the election of the six nominees for director named herein, for the selection of J.H. Cohn LLP as independent auditors, and for the approval of the Innodata Isogen, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan. The current members of the Board of Directors presently hold voting authority for Common Stock representing an aggregate of 2,780,689 votes, or approximately 11.49% of the total number of votes eligible to be cast at the Annual Meeting. The members of the Board of Directors have indicated their intention to vote affirmatively on all of the proposals.

VOTING SECURITIES

Stockholders of record as of the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any adjournments thereof. On the Record Date there were 24,206,499 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"). Each holder of Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share held by such holder. The presence, in person or by Proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Meeting. Proxies submitted which contain abstentions or broker non-votes will be deemed present at the Meeting in determining the presence of a quorum.

- 3 -

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

It is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of Proxy, unless such form of Proxy specifies otherwise, to nominate and to vote the shares represented by such Proxy for the election as directors of Jack S. Abuhoff, Haig S. Bagerdjian, Louise C. Forlenza, Stewart R. Massey, Todd H. Solomon and Anthea C. Stratigos to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors shall have been duly elected and qualified. Each of the nominees named below currently serves as a director of the Company and with the exception of Stewart R. Massey, Todd H. Solomon and Anthea C. Stratigos, each was elected at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 5, 2008. The Company has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will become unavailable to serve as director for any reason before the Annual Meeting. However, in the event that any of them shall become unavailable, each of the persons designated as proxy reserves the right to substitute another person of his or her choice when voting at the Annual Meeting.

Name	Age	Position
Jack S. Abuhoff	48	Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President
Haig S. Bagerdjian	52	Director
Louise C. Forlenza	59	Director
Stewart R. Massey	52	Director
Todd H. Solomon	47	Director
Anthea C. Stratigos	48	Director

Jack S. Abuhoff has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since September 15, 1997, and a director of the Company since its founding in 1988. Mr. Abuhoff has been the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors since May 2001. From 1995 to 1997 he was Chief Operating Officer of Charles River Corporation, an international systems integration and outsourcing firm. From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Abuhoff was employed by Chadbourne & Parke, LLP, in connection with its joint venture with Goldman Sachs to develop capital projects in China. Mr. Abuhoff also serves on the board of directors of the Software Information Industry Association, and is a trustee on the board of trustees of the Harvard Law School Association of New Jersey. He practiced international corporate law at White & Case LLP from 1986 to 1992. Mr. Abuhoff holds an A.B. degree in English from Columbia College (1983) and a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School (1986).

Haig S. Bagerdjian has served as one of the Company’s directors since June 2001. He has also been Chairman of the Board of Point.360 (Nasdaq: PTSX), a provider of video and film asset management services to owners, producers and distributors of entertainment and advertising content, since September 2001, and its President and Chief Executive Officer since October 2002. From 1991 to 2002, Mr. Bagerdjian served in various executive management positions at Syncor International Corporation (Nasdaq: SCOR), a leading provider of radiopharmaceuticals, comprehensive nuclear pharmacy services and medical imaging services, including Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer of Syncor Overseas, Ltd., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Syncor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chief Legal Officer, and Senior Vice President, Business Development. Mr. Bagerdjian also served as a director of Advanced Machine Vision Corporation (Nasdaq: AMVC) from 1997 until 2001. Mr. Bagerdjian received a B.A. degree in International Relations and Slavic Languages and Literature, and Certificates in Russian Studies, Strategic Defense and National Security, from the University of Southern California (1983), and a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School (1986). He is admitted to the State Bar of California.

Louise C. Forlenza has served as one of the Company’s directors since October 2002. From 1994 to the present, Ms. Forlenza has been providing audit consultancy, management advisory, and tax planning services to a diverse group of corporate clients. From 1987 through 1992, she was the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Intercontinental Exchange Partners, an international foreign exchange company, and served as a director and as chair of its International Audit Committee. Prior to joining Intercontinental, Ms. Forlenza was Chief Financial Officer of Bierbaum-Martin, a foreign exchange firm. Ms. Forlenza participates actively in various not-for-profit and philanthropic organizations including as benefit chair for Greenwich Hospital and as Director and Treasurer of The Acting Company, a New York City-based promoter of arts and literacy founded in 1972 by actor John Houseman. Ms. Forlenza also serves on the executive, compensation and finance committees of The Acting

- 4 -

Company. She is a Certified Public Accountant and served on the faculty of the accounting department of Iona College from 1981 to 1982. Ms. Forlenza received a B.B.A. degree in Accounting from Iona College (1971).

Stewart R. Massey has served as one of the Company’s directors since March 2009. Mr. Massey is a partner with Massey, Quick and Co. LLC, an investment consulting and wealth advisory firm, which he co-founded in 2004 after a 24-year career on Wall Street. He joined Morgan Stanley’s Private Client group in 1983 after four years with Dean Witter Reynolds. From 1988 through 1993, he led Morgan Stanley’s private client businesses in Asia, Australia, and Japan. Mr. Massey was Head of Japanese Equity Sales in New York from 1993 through 1996, and returned to Tokyo as Head of Institutional Equity Sales and Global Head of Japanese Equities in 1996. He served as President and CEO of Robert Fleming, Inc. in 1997 and 1998. At Fleming, he had regional responsibility for equity sales and trading, research, capital markets, investment banking, and asset management in the Americas, serving on the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the parent company in London. Mr. Massey returned to Morgan Stanley in September of 1998 as a Managing Director and Head of Institutional Sales, Marketing, and Product Development for the firm’s prime brokerage business. Mr. Massey holds a BA degree in History from The College of Wooster (1974). He is an Emeritus Life Trustee of the College. As a member of Wooster’s Board of Trustees, he was Chair of the Investment Committee and a member of the Executive Committee for 15 years. Mr. Massey also serves on the investment committee of the Visiting Nurse Association of Somerset Hills. He is a director of Team Capital Bank and First Santa Fe Wealth Advisors.

Todd H. Solomon has served as one of the Company’s directors since October 2008. Since founding Innodata Isogen in 1988, Mr. Solomon served as a director and officer of the company at various times through 2005. He is a private investor, investment manager and venture capitalist and divides his time between Las Vegas, the Philippines and Bali, Indonesia. Mr. Solomon holds an A.B. degree in History and Physics from Columbia College (1986).

Anthea C. Stratigos has served as one of the Company’s directors since March 2009. Ms. Stratigos is co-founder and CEO of Outsell, Inc. (founded in 1994), a leading research and advisory firm that focuses exclusively on the information and publishing industries, providing analysis and recommendations for high-level executives regarding markets, trends, benchmarks and best practices. She is Outsell’s primary spokesperson, and chairs Outsell’s Leadership Council, a member-service for CEOs and senior executives of publishing and information-provider firms. Ms. Stratigos holds a B.S. degree in Communication from Stanford University (1983) and graduated from the Executive Marketing Program at Harvard University (1992).

There are no family relationships between or among any directors of the Company. Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that Haig S. Bagerdjian, Louise C. Forlenza, Stewart R. Massey, Todd H. Solomon and Anthea C. Stratigos are independent directors. The independent directors comprise a majority of the Board. The only director who is not independent is Jack S. Abuhoff, the Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Company defines independence as meeting the requirements to be considered as an independent director as set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4200. To assist in determining director independence, the Board of Directors also considers any business relationship with any independent director, including any business entity with which any independent director is affiliated, to determine if there is any material relationship that would impair a director’s independence. In making its determination, the Board of Directors reviewed information provided by each of the directors and information gathered by the Company.

- 5 -

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors meets throughout the year on a set schedule. The Board of Directors also holds special meetings and acts by unanimous written consent from time to time as appropriate. The Board of Directors held nine meetings during the year ended December 31, 2008. Each director attended at least (i) 75% of all of the meetings of the Board of Directors held during the period; and (ii) 75% of the meetings of all committees on which he or she served. The Company does not have a policy requiring incumbent directors and director nominees to attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. All directors attended last year’s annual meeting.

The Board of Directors meets in executive sessions without management, as needed, during or immediately following its regularly scheduled meetings. The Board of Directors also schedules executive sessions during the year for the independent directors only.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Audit Committee

The Company has a separately designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. A copy of the charter is available on our website at www.innodata-isogen.com. Serving on the Committee are Ms. Forlenza and Messrs. Marozsan and Bagerdjian. The Board of Directors has determined that it has an audit committee financial expert serving on the audit committee, Ms. Forlenza. The functions of the Audit Committee are, among other things, to make recommendations concerning the selection each year of independent auditors of the Company, to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the quality and integrity of the Company's financial reports and financial reporting processes and systems of internal controls, to consider whether the Company's principal auditor’s provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence and to determine through discussions with the independent auditors whether any instructions or limitations have been placed upon them in connection with the scope of their audit or its implementation. To carry out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met seven times during fiscal 2008. The Company defines independence as meeting the standards to be considered as an independent director as set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4200, and the Board of Directors has determined that all the members of the Audit Committee are "independent" as defined in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(d)(2)(A)(i) and (ii).

Compensation Committee

The Company has a standing Compensation Committee comprised of Messrs. Marozsan and Woodward and Ms. Forlenza. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. A copy of the charter is available on our website at www.innodata-isogen.com. The function of the Compensation Committee is to discharge the responsibilities of the Board of Directors regarding executive and director compensation, including determining and approving the compensation packages of the Company’s executive officers, including its Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves stock option grants to non-executive officer employees. The Chief Executive Officer recommends to the Compensation Committee proposed compensation for the executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee engages the services of an independent compensation consultant on an as-needed basis to provide market data and advice regarding executive compensation and proposed compensation programs and amounts. To carry out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee met five times during fiscal 2008. The Company defines independence as meeting the standards to be considered as an independent director as set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4200, and the Board of Directors has determined that all the members of the Compensation Committee are "independent" as defined in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4200.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Marozsan and Woodward and Ms. Forlenza, none of whom are or were officers or employees of the Company.

Nominating Committee

The Company has a standing Nominating Committee comprised of Messrs. Bagerdjian and Marozsan, and Ms. Forlenza. The Company does not have a Nominating Committee charter. The primary responsibilities of the

- 6 -

Nominating Committee include assisting the Board of Directors in identifying and evaluating qualified candidates to serve as directors; recommending to the Board of Directors candidates for election or re-election to the Board of Directors or to fill vacancies on the Board of Directors; and assisting in attracting qualified candidates to serve on the Board of Directors. Director nominees are selected by Board of Director resolution. All of the nominees recommended for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meetings, with the exception of Stewart R. Massey, Todd H. Solomon and Anthea C. Stratigos, are directors standing for re-election. Mr. Massey was recommended by a non-management director, and Ms. Stratigos was recommended by the CEO. Although the Nominating Committee has not established any minimum qualifications for director candidates, when considering potential director candidates, the Nominating Committee considers the candidate's character, judgment, diversity, skills, including financial literacy, and experience in the context of the needs of the Company and the Board of Directors. To carry out its responsibilities, the Nominating Committee met one time during fiscal 2008 and two times in fiscal 2009 to date. The Company defines independence as meeting the standards to be considered as an independent director as set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4200, and the Board of Directors has determined that all the members of the Nominating Committee are "independent" as defined in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4200. In 2008 the Company did not pay any fees to any third party to assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees.

The Company's By-laws include a procedure whereby its stockholders can nominate director candidates, as more fully described below under “Stockholder Proposals for the 2010 Annual Meeting.” The Board of Directors will consider director candidates recommended by the Company's stockholders in a similar manner as those recommended by members of management or other directors, provided the stockholder submitting such nomination has complied with the procedures set forth in the Company’s By-laws. To date, the Company has not received any recommended nominees from any non-management stockholder or group of stockholders that beneficially owns five percent or more of its voting stock.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Generally, stockholders who have questions or concerns regarding the Company should contact our Investor Relations department at 201-371-8000. However, stockholders may communicate with the Board of Directors by sending a letter to: Board of Directors of Innodata Isogen, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 3 University Plaza, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601. Any communications must contain a clear notation indicating that it is a "Stockholder—Board Communication" or a "Stockholder—Director Communication" and must identify the author as a stockholder. The office of the Corporate Secretary will receive the correspondence and forward appropriate correspondence to the Chairman of the Board or to any individual director or directors to whom the communication is directed. The Company reserves the right not to forward to the Board of Directors any communication that is hostile, threatening, illegal, does not reasonably relate to the Company or its business, or is otherwise inappropriate. The office of the Corporate Secretary has authority to discard or disregard any inappropriate communication or to take any other action that it deems to be appropriate with respect to any inappropriate communications.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

The responsibilities of the Audit Committee, which are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, include providing oversight to the Company’s financial reporting process through periodic meetings with the Company’s independent auditors and management to review accounting, auditing, internal controls and financial reporting matters. The Audit Committee is also responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the Company’s independent auditors. The management of the Company is responsible for the preparation and integrity

- 7 -

of the financial reporting information and related systems of internal controls. The Audit Committee, in carrying out its role, relies on the Company’s senior management, including senior financial management, and its independent auditors.

The Audit Committee has implemented procedures to ensure that during the course of each fiscal year it devotes the attention that it deems necessary or appropriate to each of the matters assigned to it under the Audit Committee's charter. To carry out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met seven times during fiscal 2008.

The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the quality and integrity of the Company's financial reports and financial reporting processes and systems of internal controls. Management of the Company has primary responsibility for the Company's financial statements and the overall reporting process, including maintenance of the Company's system of internal controls. The Company retains independent auditors who are responsible for conducting independent audits of the Company's financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and issuing reports thereon.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s consolidated audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 with management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), including those matters set forth in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees), as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in rule 3200T. The independent auditors have provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with the auditors their independence from the Company. The Audit Committee has concluded that the independent auditors are independent from the Company and its management.

On the basis of the foregoing reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the consolidated audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has also recommended, subject to stockholder approval, the selection of the Company's independent auditors.

The Members of the Audit Committee

Louise C. Forlenza - Chair

Haig S. Bagerdjian

John R. Marozsan

Changes in Independent Registered Accounting Firm

On September 12, 2008, the Company dismissed Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and engaged J.H. Cohn LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company recommended and approved the decision to change independent registered public accounting firms.

The audit reports of Grant Thornton LLP on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, and the audit report of Grant Thornton LLP on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

- 8 -

During the Company’s two fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007 and the subsequent periods through September 12, 2008, there were no disagreements with Grant Thornton LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to Grant Thornton LLP’s satisfaction, would have caused Grant Thornton LLP to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in connection with its reports on the financial statements for such periods.

During the Company’s two fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007 and the subsequent periods through September 12, 2008, there were no reportable events (as defined in Regulation S-K Item 304 (a)(1)(v)).

The Company did not, nor did anyone on its behalf, consult J.H. Cohn LLP during the Company’s two fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007 and any subsequent interim periods prior to the Company’s engagement of that firm regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction (completed or proposed), the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, any matter being the subject of disagreement or reportable event, or any other matter as defined in Regulation S-K, Item 304 (a)(1)(iv) or (a)(1)(v).

Fiscal 2008 and 2007 Accounting Firm Fee Summary

Set forth below is certain information concerning fees billed to the Company by (i) J.H. Cohn LLP; and (ii) Grant Thornton LLP and its international affiliates, in respect of professional services rendered to the Company for the audit of the annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007; the reviews of the financial statements included in reports on Form 10-Q for periods within 2008 and 2007; related regulatory filings for periods within 2008 and 2007; and other services. The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of all services is compatible with maintaining the independence of J.H. Cohn LLP and Grant Thornton LLP.

	J.H. Cohn LLP				Grant Thornton LLP
	2008		2007		2008		2007

Audit Fees	$	340,000		-0-	$	244,000	$	588,000
Audit-Related Fees		-0-		-0-	$	18,000		25,000
Tax Fees		-0-		-0-				-0-
All Other Fees		-0-		-0-				-0-

Audit fees consist of fees for the audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, the review of the interim financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and other professional services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-related fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and the review of the Company’s financial statements and which are not reported under “Audit Fees”. These services relate to consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and are not required by statute or regulation.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

All audit, audit-related services, tax services and other services provided by J.H. Cohn LLP or Grant Thornton LLP must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate to its Chair the authority to pre-approve otherwise permissible non-audit services, provided that any decision made pursuant to such delegation must be presented to the full Audit Committee for informational purposes at its next scheduled meeting.

- 9 -

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Set forth below is information concerning the Executive Officers who are not directors.

Name	Age	Position

Ashok Mishra	54	Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Jurgen C. Tanpho	44	Interim Chief Financial Officer

Ashok Mishra has been the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2007. Mr. Mishra has held senior level positions with the Company and its subsidiaries for more than nine years. Mr. Mishra has served as Senior Vice President since May 2004, after serving as Vice President, Project Delivery from October 2001 through April 2004. Prior thereto, Mr. Mishra served as Assistant Vice President, Project Delivery from November 2000 to September 2001, and as General Manager and Head of the Facility of the Company’s India operations from 1997 to October 2000. Mr. Mishra holds a Bachelor of Technology degree in Mechanical Engineering from Pantnagar University (1976). He also has Component Manufacturing Technical Training from Alcatel France (1985) and completed a condensed MBA course from Indian Institute of Management Banglore (1995).

Jurgen C. Tanpho has been the Company’s interim Chief Financial Officer since April 27, 2009, and a Vice President with various operational and financial responsibilities since March 1998. Mr. Tanpho has served in various management capacities with the Company and its subsidiaries for more than 17 years. Mr. Tanpho served as assistant to the President of the Company’s Manila Operations from 1996 to February 1998; as Assistant Vice President- Administration from 1994 to 1996; and as Facilities and Purchasing Manager from 1991 to 1994. Mr. Tanpho holds a Bachelor of Science degree in industrial engineering from the University of the Philippines (1986).

The Company’s Executive Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors. There are no family relationships between or among any of the Company’s Executive Officers.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

This compensation discussion and analysis describes and analyzes the material elements of compensation awarded, earned by, or paid to each of our executive officers who served as named executive officers during the last completed fiscal year. This compensation discussion and analysis focuses on the information contained in the following tables and related footnotes and narrative for primarily the last completed fiscal year, but we also describe compensation actions taken before or after the last completed fiscal year to the extent it enhances the understanding of our executive compensation disclosure.

Executive Compensation Objectives and Philosophy

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing and administering our executive compensation program and for establishing our executive compensation philosophy. The objectives of our compensation program are to:

- 10 -

	·	Attract, motivate and retain qualified, talented and dedicated executive officers
	·	Motivate executives to achieve business and financial objectives that will enhance stockholder value

Align the interests of our executives with the long term interests of stockholders through stock based incentives

Maintain a strong link between pay and performance by placing a portion of the executive’s total pay at risk

The Committee applies these objectives in selecting the specific elements of compensation. The Committee also reviews and considers:

Company performance, both separately and in relation to similar companies

The individual executive’s performance, experience and scope of responsibilities

Historical compensation levels and stock option awards at the Company

Competitive market and peer company data

Internal equity among executive officers

The recommendations of management

Executive Officer Compensation Processes

The Committee uses the following processes, procedures and resources to help it perform its responsibilities:

Executive Sessions without management present to discuss various compensation matters, including the compensation of our CEO

The services of an independent compensation consultant, who advises the Committee on an as-needed basis

An annual review of all executive compensation and benefit programs for reasonableness and cost effectiveness

The recommendations of the CEO on compensation for the other executive officers

Competitive Benchmarking / Peer Group Analysis

Although the Company has no policy regarding the retention of independent consultants to conduct competitive benchmarking and/or a peer group analysis, it has from time to time engaged such consultants to assist the Committee in the review and determination of various executive compensation matters.

In December 2007 the Company engaged an independent compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (the “Consultant”). The primary purpose of the engagement was to review the Company’s compensation program for 2008, and evaluate how our executive compensation program compares to the competitive market. Competitive comparisons were primarily based on a peer group of 16 publicly-traded business process outsourcing (BPO) and business-to-business information technology companies selected by the Consultant in consultation with the Committee and Company management. The companies in the peer group were Answerthink, APAC Customer Services, Inc., AXS-One Inc., Computer Programs and Systems, Inc., DATATRAK International, Inc., Document Sciences Corporation, Edgewater Technology, Inc., eLoyalty Corporation, Kintera, Inc., LionBridge Technologies, Inc., Manatron, Inc., PeopleSupport, Inc., Streamline Health Solutions, Inc., StarTek Inc., TechTeam Global, Inc., and United American Healthcare Inc. The Company was positioned near the median of the peer group in terms of revenues, net income, and market capitalization, in the upper quadrant in terms of size, and at the top of the peer group in terms of annualized shareholder return. The Consultant did not make specific recommendations on individual pay levels, but rather provided and analyzed competitive data for review and use by the Committee and the Company.

- 11 -

In January 2009 the Committee engaged the Consultant for the primary purpose of reviewing the CEO’s then existing employment agreement in advance of its expiration in February 2009. The agreement was reviewed to assess its market competitiveness relative to employment agreements of other CEOs at 19 similar small cap technology and business services companies. The 19 companies are all publicly traded technology and business services companies similar to the peer group included in the 2007 study. On March 25, 2009 the Company and the CEO executed an employment agreement with an effective date of February 1, 2009 as more fully described below in the Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.

Components of the Executive Compensation Program

The primary elements of the Company’s Executive Compensation Program are:

Base salary

Performance-based cash incentives

Stock-based incentives

Benefits and perquisites

Severance and change in control compensation

In order to determine the compensation packages of the executive officers, the Committee reviewed the total compensation package of each executive officer against the total compensation packages of named executive officers at the peer group companies referenced in the section entitled “Competitive Benchmarking / Peer Group Analysis”. The Committee does not use a pre-set formula to allocate a percentage of total compensation to each compensation component, and the percentage of total compensation allocated to each compensation component varies among the executive officers. Instead, the Committee relies on the processes and factors described in this discussion and analysis, and takes into account the current and historical compensation components, and amount of each component, for each executive officer.

Base Salary

The base salaries of our executive officers are designed to attract and retain a high performing and dedicated leadership team. The Committee reviews the performance evaluations and salary recommendations provided to the Committee by the CEO for each executive officer other than himself. Increases to the CEO’s base salary are determined by the Committee without a recommendation by Company management. Adjustments to base salaries are determined based on the individual’s responsibility levels, performance, contribution and length of service, after considering competitive market data and the Company’s financial performance, as well as any requirements set forth in the executive officer’s employment agreement for those executive officers with an employment agreement. In February 2008 the Committee increased the annual base salaries of the executive officers effective as of January 1, 2008. Mr. Abuhoff’s base salary was increased from $369,000 to $424,350; Mr. Ford’s base salary was increased from $300,000 to $310,500; and Mr. Mishra’s base salary was increased from $175,000 to $220,000. The increases were based on a review of the data from the peer group competitive comparisons discussed in the section entitled “Competitive Benchmarking / Peer Group Analysis” and the factors outlined above.

- 12 -

Performance-Based Cash Incentives

Performance-based cash incentives provide the Company with a means of rewarding performance based upon the attainment of individual goals and corporate financial goals. The Committee reviews Company financial performance and individual performance, as well as recommendations provided to the Committee by the CEO for each executive officer other than the CEO. Cash incentives may be paid pursuant to an incentive compensation plan or as cash bonuses. In 2008, incentive compensation awards for the executive officers were made pursuant to an incentive compensation plan, and were based on the extent to which the Company achieved goals set by the Committee for 2008 revenues (excluding revenue from mergers and acquisitions), bookings and pre-tax income with respect to Messrs. Abuhoff, Ford and Mishra, and revenues from mergers and acquisitions solely with respect to Mr. Ford. Based on the extent of the Company’s achievement of these goals in March 2009 the Committee awarded a performance-based cash incentive to each named executive officer for the year ended 2008 as follows: $244,206 to Mr. Abuhoff, $72,464 to Mr. Ford, and $84,404 to Mr. Mishra. The target awards set under the incentive compensation plan were based on a review of the data from the peer group competitive comparisons discussed in the section entitled “Competitive Benchmarking / Peer Group Analysis” and the factors outlined above.

Stock-Based Incentives

The Company uses stock option grants as the primary vehicle for employee stock-based incentives. The Committee believes stock options align the executive officers’ interests with those of stockholders in building shareholder value, offer executive officers an incentive for the achievement of superior performance over time, and foster the retention of key management personnel. The number of stock options the Committee awards each executive officer is based on his relative position, responsibilities and performance over the previous fiscal year, and his anticipated future performance, potential and responsibilities. The Committee also reviews and considers prior stock option grants to each executive officer. The size of stock option grants is not directly related to the Company’s performance. The Committee also uses data on stock options granted by companies that are comparable by industry and revenue, and takes into consideration recommendations asserted by an independent compensation consulting firm. No stock options were granted to any executive officer in calendar year 2008.

Benefits and Perquisites

The Company offers retirement, health, life, and disability benefits, as well as medical and dependent care reimbursement plans to all full-time employees. These plans do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of executive officers. In addition, in calendar year 2008 the Company reimbursed the CEO $24,085 for the cost of life and disability insurance premiums and related taxes pursuant to his employment agreement, and paid $5,000 for legal expenses incurred by the CEO in connection with the negotiation of his employment agreement. The Company also provided the COO, in connection with his foreign assignment, benefits totaling $41,268 for an apartment rental, utilities, medical insurance, related fringe benefit taxes, and spousal travel.

Severance and Change in Control

The Company uses severance and change of control agreements to attract and retain qualified, talented and dedicated executives and to help it remain competitive in the marketplace.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

The Members of the Compensation Committee

John R. Marozsan, Chair

Louise C. Forlenza

Peter H. Woodward

- 13 -

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid or accrued to Named Executive Officers.

Name and Position	Year	Salary		Bonus			Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (1)		All Other Compensation			Total Compensation

Jack S. Abuhoff Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer	2008	$	424,350	$	-		$	244,206	$	29,085	(2)	$	697,641
	2007		369,000		477,707			-		24,085			870,792
	2006		369,000		-			-		21,114			390,114

Steven L. Ford Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (3)	2008		310,500		-			72,464		-			382,964
	2007		300,000		94,606					-			394,606
	2006		300,000		-								300,000

Ashok Mishra Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (4)	2008		220,000		-			84,404		41,268	(5)		345,672
	2007		175,000		183,433	(6)		-		45,172			403,605

(1) The amounts in this column reflect the cash payment made to the named executive in respect of an incentive compensation plan covering the 2008 performance period and paid in March 2009.

(2) Includes the cost of employer provided executive life and disability insurance in the amount of $13,861, reimbursement for related federal and state income taxes in the amount of $10,224, and the payment of $5,000 for legal expenses incurred by the CEO in connection with the negotiation of his employment agreement.

(3) Through April 27, 2009.

(4) Mr. Mishra was appointed as an executive officer effective as of January 1, 2007.

(5) Includes, in connection with the Executive’s foreign assignment, $23,832 for apartment rental, as well as utilities, medical insurance and spousal travel, and $1,980 for related fringe benefit taxes.

(6) Includes a $30,000 signing bonus.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table summarizes the non-equity awards granted to each Named Executive Officer in 2008

Name	Grant Date		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
			Threshold		Target		Maximum

Jack S. Abuhoff		07-24-2008	$	127,305	$	254,610	$	407,376
Steven L. Ford		07-24-2008		51,233		93,150		149,040
Ashok Mishra		07-24-2008		44,000		88,000		140,800

(1)

The amounts shown reflect the range of potential awards for 2008 pursuant to each named executive officer’s incentive compensation plan. In March 2009 awards were paid to each Named Executive Officer in the amounts set forth under the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

- 14 -

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Employment Agreements

On March 25, 2009 the Company and Mr. Jack S. Abuhoff, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, executed an employment Agreement with an effective date of February 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”). The Agreement will continue until terminated by the Company or Mr. Abuhoff.

The Agreement provides for: annual base salary compensation of $424,350 subject to cost of living adjustments and annual discretionary increases as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors; additional cash incentive or bonus compensation for each calendar year determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in its discretion and conditioned on the attainment of certain quantitative objectives to be established by the Compensation Committee with a target bonus of not less than 60% of Mr. Abuhoff's base salary for the year; and stock options and/or other equity and/or non-equity based awards and incentives as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole and absolute discretion. The Agreement also provides for indemnification, insurance and other fringe benefits, and contains confidentiality, non-compete and non-interference provisions.

In the event Mr. Abuhoff is terminated by the Company other than for cause (as defined), death or disability, or Mr. Abuhoff resigns his employment with the Company for good reason (as defined), Mr. Abuhoff is entitled to receive an amount equal to (i) 200% of his (A) base salary and (B) the greater of his most recently declared bonus (as defined) or the average of his three most recently declared bonuses to be paid in substantially equal payments over a period of 24 months; (ii) the continuation of his medical, dental, life, and disability insurance until the earlier of the end of the maximum applicable COBRA coverage period or for the 24 month period immediately following Mr. Abuhoff’s termination (and if the COBRA period is shorter than the applicable 24 month period, pay Mr. Abuhoff an amount equal to the monthly cost charged by the Company for COBRA coverage during the period beginning upon the expiration of the maximum COBRA coverage period and the end of the 24 month continuation period); and (iii) the removal of any vesting, transfer, lock-up, performance or other restrictions or requirements on his stock options and other equity and non-equity-based awards and incentives. In the event Mr. Abuhoff is terminated by the Company coincident or following a change of control (as defined), Mr. Abuhoff is entitled to receive an amount equal to (i) 300% of his (A) base salary and (B) the greater of his most recently declared bonus (as defined) or the average of his three most recently declared bonuses to be paid in a lump sum payout within 30 days of the date of his termination; (ii) the continuation of his medical, dental, life, and disability insurance until the earlier of the end of the maximum applicable COBRA coverage period or for the 36 month period immediately following Mr. Abuhoff’s termination (and if the COBRA period is shorter than the applicable 36 month period, pay Mr. Abuhoff an amount equal to the monthly cost charged by the Company for COBRA coverage during the period beginning upon the expiration of the maximum COBRA coverage period and the end of the 36 month continuation period; and (iii) the removal of any vesting, transfer, lock-up, performance or other restrictions or requirements on his stock options and other equity and non-equity-based awards and incentives.

In the event Mr. Abuhoff is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Code at the time of his termination of employment, the payments referenced above shall be delayed until the date that is six months and one day following his termination of employment (or, if earlier, the earliest other date as is permitted under Section 409A of the Code). The amount payable on such date shall include all amounts that would have been payable to Mr. Abuhoff prior to that date but for the application of Section 409A and the remaining payments shall be made in substantially equal installments until fully paid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the six month delay shall not apply to any such payments made (A) during the short term deferral period set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4), or (B) after said short term deferral period, payable solely on account of an involuntary separation from service (as defined in Section 409A of the Code) and in an amount less than the Section 409A Severance Exemption Amount. The Agreement also provides for potential tax gross-up payments in respect of taxes, penalties and/or interest that may be incurred by Mr. Abuhoff under Section 409A of the Code.

- 15 -

On May 18, 2007, the Company and Mr. Ashok Mishra, the Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer of the Company, entered into a three year agreement with an effective date of January 1, 2007 whereby the Company agreed to cause one or more of its wholly-owned subsidiaries to offer employment to Mr. Mishra. Mr. Mishra’s agreement automatically renews for one year periods unless the Company either provides a notice of non-renewal by June 30 of the then current term or the Company and Mr. Mishra execute a new agreement prior to the end of the then current term. The agreement provides for annual base compensation of $175,000 per annum, subject to annual reviews for discretionary annual increases; incentive compensation pursuant to an incentive compensation plan; and a signing bonus of $30,000. The agreement also provides for insurance and other fringe benefits, and contains confidentiality, non-compete and non-interference provisions. In the event the Company terminates the agreement without cause, Mr. Mishra is entitled to receive his then base salary for 12 months following the date of termination.

OUTSTANDING EXECUTIVE EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards held by each Named Executive Officer at

December 31, 2008.

	Number of securities underlying					Option		Option
	unexercised options					Exercise Price		Expiration Date
Name and Principal Position	Exercisable			Unexercisable

Jack S. Abuhoff Chairman, President and CEO		31,500			-	$	0.50	06/02/2013
		126,000			-	$	0.50	07/01/2013
		180,000			-	$	0.67	06/08/2014
		154,000			-	$	2.59	03/31/2014
		44,000			-	$	2.59	05/31/2009
		44,000			-	$	2.59	05/31/2010
		44,000			-	$	2.59	05/31/2011
		44,000			-	$	2.59	05/31/2012
		44,000			-	$	2.59	05/31/2013
		154,000			-	$	2.59	09/30/2009
		154,000			-	$	2.59	09/30/2010
		154,000			-	$	2.59	09/30/2011
		154,000			-	$	2.59	09/30/2012
		80,000	(1)		-	$	3.46	12/30/2015
		100,000			-	$	3.75	08/18/2014
Total		1,507,500

- 16 -

	Number of securities underlying					Option		Option
	unexercised options					Exercise Price		Expiration Date
Name and Principal Position	Exercisable			Unexercisable

Steven L. Ford Executive Vice President and CFO (2)
Total		250,000	(3)		-	$	3.28	12/21/2015

Ashok Mishra		10,000				$	2.00	09/29/2014
Executive Vice President and COO		16,000				$	2.59	10/02/2010
		50,000	(1)		-	$	3.46	12/30/2015
		90,000				$	3.35	11/09/2013
Total		166,000

(1) Granted on December 31, 2005. Shares issuable upon exercise of the option are subject to the following restrictions: no shares may be sold during the first year after the date of grant; no more than 25% of the shares may be sold during the second year after the date of grant; no more than a total of 50% of the shares may be sold during the second and third years after the date of grant; and no more than a total of 75% of the shares may be sold during the second, third and fourth years after the date of grant. No restrictions on sales apply after the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

(2) Through April 27, 2009.

(3) Granted on December 22, 2005. Shares issuable upon exercise of the option are subject to the following restrictions: no shares may be sold during the first year after the date of grant; no more than 25% of the shares may be sold during the second year after the date of grant; no more than a total of 50% of the shares may be sold during the second and third years after the date of grant; and no more than a total of 75% of the shares may be sold during the second, third and fourth years after the date of grant. No restrictions on sales apply after the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

- 17 -

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROL

Estimated Termination or Change in Control Benefits at Year-End 2008

The following table summarizes the estimated value of payments to each of the named executive officers assuming different termination events occurred at December 31, 2008.

Name	Cash Compensation		Welfare Benefits		Aggregate Payments

Jack S. Abuhoff
Termination for cause		-		32,642		32,642
Termination without cause (1)		1,337,112		100,792		1,437,904
Change in Control (2)		2,005,668		134,867		2,140,535
Death		244,206		32,642		276,848
Disability		350,294		32,642		382,936

Ashok Mishra
Termination for cause		-		-		-
Termination without cause (1)		304,404		-		304,404
Change in Control		-		-		-
Death		84,404		-		84,404
Disability		139,404		-		139,404

(1)	Includes resignation by the executive with good reason (as described below).

(2)	Assumes the Company’s termination of the executive’s employment coincident or following a change in control (as described below).

Payments on Change in Control

Pursuant to Mr. Abuhoff’s employment agreement, a change of control shall be deemed to have occurred as of the earliest of any of the following events:

The closing of a transaction by the Company or any person (other than the Company, any subsidiary of the Company or any employee benefit plan of the Company or of any subsidiary of the Company) (a “Person”), together with all “affiliates and “associates” (within the meanings of such terms under Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) (the “Exchange Act”) of such Person, shall be the beneficial owner of thirty percent (30%) or more of the Company’s then outstanding voting stock (“Beneficial Ownership”);

A change in the constituency of the Board such that, during any period of thirty-six (36) consecutive months, at least a majority of the entire Board shall not consist of Incumbent Directors. For purposes of this Paragraph 5(c)(ii), “Incumbent Directors” shall mean individuals who at the beginning of such thirty-six (36) month period constitute the Board, unless the election or nomination for election by the shareholders of the Company of each such new director was approved by a vote of a majority of the Incumbent Directors;

The closing of a transaction involving the merger, consolidation, share exchange or similar transaction between the Company and any other corporation other than a transaction which results in the Company’s voting stock immediately prior to the consummation of such transaction continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting stock of the surviving entity) at least two-thirds (2/3rds) of the combined voting power of the Company’s or such surviving entity’s outstanding voting stock immediately after such transaction;

The closing of a transaction involving the sale or disposition by the Company (in one transaction or a series of transactions) of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; or

A plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Company goes into effect.

- 18 -

Upon the Company’s termination of Mr. Abuhoff’s employment coincident or following a change of control, Mr. Abuhoff will receive:

300% of his base salary to be paid in a lump sum payout within 30 days of the date of his termination;

300% of the greater of his most recently declared bonus (as defined) or the average of the his three most recently declared bonuses to be paid in a lump sum payout within 30 days of the date of his termination;

Continuation of his, and his dependents’, medical benefits, dental benefits, life insurance and disability insurance until the earlier of the end of the maximum applicable COBRA coverage period or for the 36 month period immediately following Mr. Abuhoff’s termination (and if the COBRA period is shorter than the applicable 36 month period, pay Mr. Abuhoff an amount equal to the monthly cost charged by the Company for COBRA coverage during the period beginning upon the expiration of the maximum COBRA coverage period and the end of the 36 month continuation period);

The removal of any vesting, transfer, lock-up, performance or other restrictions or requirements on his stock options and other equity and non-equity-based awards and incentives; and

Payment of up to six weeks of accrued but unused vacation.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control without a termination of Mr. Abuhoff’s employment, Mr. Abuhoff will receive:

The removal of any vesting, transfer, lock-up, performance or other restrictions or requirements on his stock options and other equity and non-equity-based awards and incentives.

Payments on Termination (other than upon Change in Control)

Pursuant to Mr. Abuhoff’s employment agreement, if Mr. Abuhoff’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause, death or disability, or Mr. Abuhoff resigns his employment for good reason (including the Company’s breach of its material obligations under the Agreement, the Company, without Mr. Abuhoff’s prior consent, relocating Mr. Abuhoff’s regular office location by more than 50 miles from its present location, the Company assigning duties to Mr. Abuhoff which represent a material diminution of his authorities, duties or responsibilities, or requiring him to report to any person or entity other than the Board of Directors, and the Company does not revoke or reasonably cure any such action within 30 days of receipt of notice from Mr. Abuhoff and Mr. Abuhoff resigns his employment within 30 days thereafter) Mr. Abuhoff will be entitled to (i) 200% of his (A) base salary and (B) the greater of his most recently declared bonus (as defined) or the average of the his three most recently declared bonuses to be paid in substantially equal payments over a period of 24 months; (ii) the continuation of his and his dependents’ medical, dental, life, and disability insurance until the earlier of the end of the maximum applicable COBRA coverage period or for the 24 month period immediately following Mr. Abuhoff’s termination (and if the COBRA period is shorter than the applicable 24 month period, pay Mr. Abuhoff an amount equal to the monthly cost charged by the Company for COBRA coverage during the period beginning upon the expiration of the maximum COBRA coverage period and the end of the 24 month continuation period); and (iii) the removal of any vesting, transfer, lock-up, performance or other restrictions or requirements on his stock options and other equity and non-equity-based awards and incentives. If Mr. Abuhoff’s employment is terminated for death, his estate will receive payment of his base salary through the date of termination, a pro-rated bonus based on his performance of his objectives through the date of termination, and payment of up to six weeks of accrued but unused vacation. If Mr. Abuhoff’s employment is terminated for disability he will receive payment of his base salary for a 90 day period following the date of termination, a pro-rated bonus based on active duty with the Company and conditioned on attainment of quantitative objectives, and payment of up to six weeks of accrued but unused vacation. If Mr. Abuhoff’s employment is terminated for cause, Mr. Abuhoff will receive his base salary through the date of termination, and payment for up to six weeks of accrued but unused vacation. In return for the benefits described above, Mr. Abuhoff is required to sign a separation agreement and general release, and agreed, for a 12 month period following termination of his employment, not to compete or interfere with the Company, and not to employ or retain the services of an employee of the Company.

- 19 -

The Agreement also provides for potential tax gross-up payments in respect of taxes, penalties and/or interest that may be incurred by Mr. Abuhoff under Section 409A of the Code.

In the event Mr. Abuhoff is a “specified employee” as defined in Section 409A of the Code at the time of his termination of employment, the payments referenced above (for both Change of Control and other than upon Change of Control) shall be delayed until the date that is six months and one day following his termination of employment (or, if earlier, the earliest other date as is permitted under Section 409A of the Code). The amount payable on such date shall include all amounts that would have been payable to Mr. Abuhoff prior to that date but for the application of Section 409A and the remaining payments shall be made in substantially equal installments until fully paid. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the six month delay shall not apply to any such payments made (A) during the short term deferral period set forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4), or (B) after said short term deferral period, payable solely on account of an involuntary separation from service (as defined in Section 409A of the Code) and in an amount less than the Section 409A Severance Exemption Amount. The Agreement also provides for potential tax gross-up payments in respect of taxes, penalties and/or interest that may be incurred by Mr. Abuhoff under Section 409A of the Code.

Pursuant to Mr. Mishra’s agreement, if the agreement is terminated without cause or by Mr. Mishra with good reason (including the Company’s material breach of its obligations, reduction of base salary below that set forth in the agreement without Mr. Mishra’s consent, and assignment of duties to Mr. Mishra inconsistent with his position and the Company does not reasonably cure such event after receipt of written notice from Mr. Mishra that he intends to resign his employment), he will be entitled to his base salary for 12 months following the date of his termination or resignation with good reason, any earned but unpaid incentive compensation, and payment for up to six weeks of accrued but unused vacation. If the agreement is terminated due to Mr. Mishra’s death, his estate will receive payment of his base salary through the date of termination, any earned but unpaid incentive compensation, and payment for up to six weeks of accrued but unused vacation. If the agreement is terminated due to Mr. Mishra’s disability he will receive payment of his base salary for a 90 day period following the date of termination, any earned but unpaid incentive compensation, and payment for up to six weeks of accrued but unused vacation. If this agreement is terminated for cause, Mr. Mishra will receive his base salary through the date of termination, and payment for up to six weeks of accrued but unused vacation. In return for the benefits described above, Mr. Mishra is required to sign a separation agreement and general release, and agreed not to compete with the Company for a 12 month period following termination of his employment, and not to solicit the customers of the Company or to solicit or employ the services of an employee of the Company for a 24 month period following termination of employment.

QUALIFICATION BY REFERENCE

The matters described in the sections titled "Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table" and "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control" are qualified in their entirety by reference to agreements previously filed by the Company in reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

- 20 -

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Summary Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid or accrued to directors in fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Option Awards (1)		All Other Compensation		Total

Haig S. Bagerdjian	$	30,000	$	26,800	$	-	$	56,800
Louise C. Forlenza		40,000		26,800		-		66,800
John R. Marozsan		36,000		26,800		-		62,800
Todd H. Solomon		5,000		-		-		5,000
Peter H. Woodward		30,000		26,800		-		56,800
	$	141,000	$	107,200	$	-	$	248,200

(1) The amount set forth in the “Option Awards” column represents the compensation costs for financial statement purposes recognized in 2008 relating to stock option awards that were granted in August 2008 in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. See Note 9 of the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K regarding assumptions underlying valuation of option awards. As of December 31, 2008 each of Messrs. Bagerdjian and Marozsan and Ms. Forlenza has an option to purchase 83,000 shares of common stock, and Mr. Woodward has an option to purchase 28,000 shares of common stock. The grant date fair value was $69,000 for each of Messrs. Bagerdjian, Marozsan and Woodward and Ms. Forlenza.

Narrative Disclosure to Director Compensation Table

Messrs. Bagerdjian, Marozsan, Solomon and Woodward and Ms. Forlenza are compensated at the rate of $2,500 per month, plus out-of-pocket expenses for each Board of Directors meeting they attend. The Chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional $833.34 per month, and the Chair of the Compensation Committee receives an additional $500 per month. The directors do not receive any compensation for serving as a member on a Committee of the Board of Directors.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS

The Company maintains a written policy and procedures for the review, approval, or ratification of any related party transactions that the Company is required to report under this section of the Proxy Statement. A related party, for purposes of the Company’s policy, means any (1) person who is or was (since the beginning of the last fiscal year for which the Company has filed a Form 10-K and proxy statement, even if they do not presently serve in that role) an executive officer, director or nominee for election as a director; (2) greater than five percent beneficial owner of the Company’s common stock; or (3) immediate family member of any of the foregoing. Immediate family member includes a person’s spouse, parents, stepparents, children, stepchildren, siblings, mothers-and fathers-in-law, sons-and daughters-in-law, and brothers-and sisters-in-law and anyone residing in such person’s home (other than a tenant or employee).

Under the related party transaction policy, any transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of transactions, arrangements or relationships in which the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year between the Company and a related party must be approved by the Audit Committee, unless the transaction, arrangement or relationship is pre-approved under the policy.

- 21 -

As set forth in the policy, in the course of its review, approval or ratification of a related party transaction the Audit Committee considers, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable to the Company than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction.

No director shall participate in any discussion or approval of a related party transaction for which he or she is a related party, except that the director shall provide all material information concerning the transaction to the Audit Committee and, if a member of the Audit Committee, may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at any meeting at which the transaction is discussed and/or approved.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2009, certain information regarding the beneficial ownership (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of the Company's Common Stock based upon the most recent information available to the Company for (i) each person known by the Company to own beneficially more than five (5%) percent of the Company's outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each director and nominee for director of the Company, (iii) each of the Company’s Named Executive Officers, and (iv) all Executive Officers and directors of the Company as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each stockholder's address is c/o the Company, Three University Plaza, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601.

	Amount and Nature
Name and Address of	of Beneficial
Beneficial Owner	Ownership		Percent of Class

Directors:
Jack S. Abuhoff (2)		2,187,639		8.52	%
Haig S. Bagerdjian (3)		94,689		*
Louise C. Forlenza (3)		91,999		*
John R. Marozsan (3)		96,699		*
Stewart R. Massey		-
Todd H. Solomon		1,972,311		8.17	%
Anthea C. Stratigos		-		*
Peter H. Woodward (4)		93,848		*

Named Executive Officers:
Steven L. Ford (5)		270,000		1.11	%
Ashok Mishra (6)		166,000		*

All Executive Officers and Directors
as a Group (10 persons) (7)		4,758,185		18.21	%

Known Beneficial Holders of More Than 5%
None

* Less than 1%.

(1) Unless otherwise indicated, (i) each person has sole investment and voting power with respect to the shares indicated; and (ii) the shares indicated are currently outstanding shares. For purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have "beneficial ownership" of any shares as of a given date which such person has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares held by each person or group of persons named above on a given date, any security which such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date is deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such person or persons, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Subject to the foregoing, the percentages are calculated based on 24,154,499 shares outstanding.

- 22 -

(2) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 1,507,500 shares of Common Stock.

(3) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 75,999 shares of Common Stock.

(4) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 20,999 shares of Common Stock. The balance represents shares owned by MHW Partners, L.P. Mr. Woodward is the Managing Member of the general partner of MHW Partners, L.P. Mr. Woodward disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(5) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 250,000 shares of Common Stock.

(6) Represents currently exercisable options to purchase 166,000 shares of Common Stock.

(7) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 1,977,496 shares of Common Stock.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors, certain of its officers, and any person owning more than ten percent of the Company’s securities to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has procedures in place to assist its directors and officers in preparing and filing these reports on a timely basis. Based solely on a review of the forms filed, upon our records, and upon representations furnished by the Company’s officers and directors that no Form 5s were required, the Company believes that during the period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 all officers and directors complied with Section 16(a) filing requirements.

PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Subject to approval by the stockholders, the Board of Directors has appointed J.H. Cohn LLP as the independent auditors to audit the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. J.H. Cohn LLP has served as the Company's auditors since September 2008. A representative of J.H. Cohn LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he desires to do so. A representative of J.H. Cohn LLP is also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions at the meeting.

In the event that the stockholders fail to ratify this appointment, other independent auditors will be considered upon recommendation of the Audit Committee. Even if this appointment is ratified, our Board of Directors, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a new independent accounting firm at any time during the year, if the Board believes that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF THE

APPOINTMENT OF J.H. COHN LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

- 23 -

PROPOSAL 3. APPROVAL OF THE INNODATA ISOGEN, INC. 2009 STOCK PLAN

The Board of Directors has adopted, and recommends that the stockholders approve, the Innodata Isogen, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan. The 2009 Plan permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock units and performance grants. Stockholder approval of the 2009 Plan is required by Nasdaq rules. If we receive stockholder approval, the 2009 Plan will become effective June 12, 2009. If we do not receive stockholder approval, the 2009 Plan will not go into effect.

Additional Information Concerning the Plan

A summary of the material terms of the 2009 Plan is provided below, but is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2009 Plan that is included as Annex A to this proxy statement.

Effective Date. The Plan was approved by the Innodata Isogen Board of Directors on March 23, 2009 and will become effective on the date the Plan is approved by the shareholders of the Company.

Shares Available. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be delivered under the Plan is (i)1,000,000 shares of Common Stock of Innodata Isogen (“Stock”), plus (ii) 835,834, shares of Common Stock that are currently available for issuance under the Company’s 2001 and 2002 Stock Option Plans (the “Prior Plans”), plus (iii) any shares subject to an award or portion of any award under the Prior Plans that are currently outstanding as of the effective date of the Plan that expire or terminate unexercised, become unexercisable or are forfeited or otherwise terminated, surrendered or canceled as to any shares without the delivery of shares of Stock or other consideration, subject to adjustment for certain specified changes to the Company's capital structure. Some awards under the Plan may link future payments to the awardee to the future value of a specified number of shares of common stock. The number of shares used for reference purposes in connection with these awards will be considered "delivered" for purposes of computing the maximum number of shares that may be delivered under the Plan. If an award under the Plan terminates without the shares subject thereto being delivered, the shares subject to such award will thereafter be available for further awards under the Plan.

No further grants may be made under the Prior Plans on or after the date on which the Plan is approved by the shareholders of the Company.

Plan Limits. The maximum number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan as restricted stock awards or with reference to Stock units is 1,000,000 shares, and the maximum number of shares of Stock that may be subject to awards of any combination that may be granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any one individual is 1,000,000 shares, both subject to adjustment for certain specified changes to the Company's capital structure. The maximum amount of cash that may be paid under the Plan to any on individual during any one fiscal year of the Company is $2,000,000.

Share Counting. Any shares of Stock tendered or exchanged by a participant as full or partial payment to the Company of the exercise price under an option and any shares retained or withheld in satisfaction of a participant’s tax withholding obligations with respect to any award shall not be available for issuance, subjected to new awards or otherwise used to increase the number of shares of Stock available for awards under the Plan. The cash proceeds from option exercises shall not be used to repurchase shares of Stock on the open market for reuse under the Plan. SARs issued under the Plan that may be settled in shares of Stock shall reduce the number of shares available for Awards under the Plan by the number of shares of Stock equal to the number of such SARs that are issued. Awards under the Plan that may only be settled in cash shall not reduce the number of shares available for awards under the Plan.

Eligibility. All directors, officers and other employees and other persons who provide services to the Company or any Related Company (as defined in Section 2.21 of the Plan) are eligible to participate in the Plan.

- 24 -

Administration. The administrator of the Plan will be the board or any other committee which the board designates to serve as the administrator of the Plan. The board or committee serving as administrator (the "Committee") will, among other things, have the authority to: construe the Plan and any award under the Plan; select the directors and officers and others who provide services to the Company to whom awards may be granted and the time or times at which awards will be granted; determine the number of shares of common stock to be covered by or used for reference purposes for any award; determine and modify from time to time the terms, conditions, and restrictions of any award; approve the form of written instrument evidencing any award; accelerate or otherwise change the time or times at which an award becomes vested or when an award may be exercised or becomes payable; waive, or accelerate the lapse, in whole or in part, any restriction or condition with respect to any award; impose limitations on awards; modify, extend or renew outstanding awards, or accept the surrender of outstanding awards and substitute new awards (subject to the restrictions below); delegate, to the extent permitted by applicable law, any portion of its authority under the Plan to any officer or director of the Company, subject to any conditions the Committee may establish; and make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan.

Repricing Prohibited. Without prior shareholder approval, the administrator of the Plan is expressly prohibited from (i) lowering the exercise price of any option or SAR after the date of grant; (ii) taking any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles; or (iii) cancelling an option or SAR at a time when its exercise price (or, with respect to an SAR, the fair market value of the Stock covered by the SAR on the grant date) exceeds the fair market value of the underlying Stock in exchange for any other award, unless the cancellation and exchange occurs in connection with a corporate transaction (as described in Section 10.1 of the Plan).

The Committee has not yet made any awards under the Plan. Because the granting of awards is in the sole discretion of the Committee, the nature and magnitude of future awards cannot currently be determined.

Types of Awards. The types of awards that may be made under the Plan are stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, stock units and performance grants. The Committee will fix the terms of each award, including, to the extent relevant, the following: (1) exercise price for options, base price for stock appreciation rights, purchase price, if any, for restricted stock awards, and performance goals for performance grants, (2) vesting requirements and other conditions to exercise, (3) term and termination, (4) effect, if any, of change of control and (5) method of exercise and of any required payment by the recipient. Additional information concerning the types of awards that may be made is set forth below.

Stock Options. The Committee may grant options that are qualified as "incentive stock options" under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code ("ISOs") and options that are not so qualified ("non-qualified options"). ISOs are subject to certain special limitations, including the following: (1) the exercise price per share may not be less than 100% of the fair market value per share of our common stock on the grant date (110% of such fair market value, if the recipient owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our outstanding shares), (2) the term may not exceed 10 years (5 years, if the recipient owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our outstanding shares), and (3) the recipient must be an employee of our Company. The term for non-qualified options may not exceed 10 years.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock appreciation right gives the holder the opportunity to benefit from the appreciation of our common stock over a specified base price determined by the Committee. The base price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Stock covered by the SAR on the date of grant. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right, the holder has the right to receive in respect of each share subject thereto a payment equal to the excess, if any, of: (1) the fair market value of a share of our common stock as of the exercise date over (2) the specified base price. At the discretion of the Committee, any required payment may be made in cash, shares of our common stock, or both. The term of any SAR may not exceed 10 years.

Restricted Stock Awards. A restricted stock award entitles the recipient to acquire shares of our common stock for no consideration or for the consideration specified by the Committee. The shares will be subject to such vesting periods and other restrictions and conditions as the Committee determines

- 25 -

Stock Units. A stock unit is a bookkeeping account to which there is credited the fair market value of a share of our common stock. The value of the account is subsequently adjusted to reflect changes in the fair market value. Upon exercise of a stock unit, the holder is entitled to receive the value of the account. At the discretion of the Committee, any required payment may be made in cash, shares of our common stock, or both.

Performance Grants. A performance grant is an award based on the achievement of performance goals set forth with respect to certain performance criteria. For each performance grant the Committee will establish the amount of cash or shares of our common stock payable at specified levels of performance, based on the performance goals for each performance criterion. Any performance grant will be made not later than 90 days after the start of the performance period to which such award relates and will be made prior to the completion of 25% of the performance period. The Committee may increase, but not decrease, the level of performance needed to achieve any performance goal during the performance period.

Performance Criterion. Performance goals may be based on any one or more of the following performance criteria: cash flow; cash flow from operations; earnings (including, but not limited to, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization); earnings per share, diluted or basic; earnings per share from continuing operations; net asset turnover; inventory turnover; capital expenditures; debt; debt reduction; working capital; return on investment; return on sales; net or gross sales; market share; economic value added; cost of capital; change in assets; expense reduction levels; productivity; delivery performance; safety record; stock price; return on equity; total stockholder return; return on capital; return on assets or net assets; revenue; income or net income; operating income or net operating income; operating profit or net operating profit; gross margin, operating margin or profit margin; and completion of acquisitions, business expansion, product diversification, new or expanded market penetration and other non-financial operating and management performance objectives.

Code Section 162(m). With respect to any restricted stock awards or stock units intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation" under Code Section 162(m), the terms and conditions of such award shall be implemented by the Committee in a manner designed to preserve such awards as “performance-based compensation.”

Modifications. No modification (within the meaning of U.S. Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v)(B)) may be made with respect to any option or SAR if the modification would result in the Option or SAR constituting a deferral of compensation, and no extension (within the meaning of U.S. Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v)(C)) may be made with respect to any Option or SAR if the extension would result in the Option or SAR having an additional deferral feature from the date of grant, in each case without the participant’s consent.

Certain Corporate Transactions. If certain corporate transactions specified in the Plan occur, the Committee shall proportionately adjust the Plan and awards as it deems necessary or appropriate to prevent enlargement or dilution of rights, including, without limitation, (1) the number of shares of stock that can be granted or used for reference purposes pursuant to the Plan and any other limits under the Plan; (2) the number and kind of shares or other securities subject to any then outstanding awards under the Plan; and (3) the exercise price, base price, or purchase price applicable to outstanding awards under the Plan. The Committee may cancel outstanding awards, but not outstanding stock or restricted stock awards, in connection with any merger or consolidation of our Company or any sale or transfer of all or part of our assets or business, or any similar event. The Committee may determine to pay no compensation whatsoever for any canceled awards that are not in-the-money (as defined below) or for any canceled awards to the extent not vested. The Company is required to provide payment in cash or other property for the in-the-money value of the vested portion of awards that are in-the-money and that are canceled as aforesaid. Awards are in-the-money only to the extent of their then realizable market value, without taking into account the potential future increase in the value of the award (whether under Black-Scholes-type formulas or otherwise).

Any adjustment of ISOs shall be made only to the extent not constituting a "modification" within the meaning of Code Section 424(h)(3). Further, with respect to Awards intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Code Section 162(m), such adjustments shall be made only to the extent that the Administrator determines that such adjustments may be made without causing the Company to be denied a tax deduction on account of Code section 162(m). No adjustments of NSOs and SARs shall be made, without the recipient’s consent, to the extent such adjustment would result in the NSO or SAR constituting a deferral of compensation (within the meaning of U.S. Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v)(B) or(C)).

- 26 -

Amendment. The Board of Directors may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan or any portion thereof at any time; provided that no such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation or termination shall be made without shareholder approval if such approval is necessary to comply with any tax or regulatory requirement applicable to the Plan (including as necessary to prevent the Corporation from being denied a tax deduction on account of Code Section 162(m)); and provided further that any such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuance or termination that would impair the rights of any participant or any holder or beneficiary of any award theretofore granted shall not to that extent be effective without the consent of the affected participant, holder or beneficiary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may unilaterally amend the Plan and outstanding Awards without participant consent as it deems necessary or appropriate to ensure compliance with applicable securities laws and provisions of the Code.

Term of Plan. No award may be granted under the Plan after the close of business on the day immediately preceding the tenth anniversary of the adoption of the Plan. However, all awards made prior to such time will remain in effect in accordance with their terms.

Section 409A Compliance.

Separation from Service. With respect to any award that provides for a deferral of compensation for purposes of Code Section 409A and that is payable under its terms on a participant’s termination of employment (including a participant’s termination of employment on account of retirement, if applicable), (i) any references in the Plan and in the participant’s grant agreement to the participant’s termination of employment or date of termination of employment shall refer to the participant’s Separation from Service or date of Separation from Service, as the case may be; and (ii) notwithstanding any provision herein or in the participant’s Grant Agreement to the contrary, if at the time of payment under such an award, the participant is a “specified employee” (as defined below), no such payment shall occur prior to the earlier of (A) the expiration of the six (6)-month period measured from the date of the participant’s Separation from Service, or (B) the date of the participant’s death. Upon the expiration of the six (6)-month deferral period referred to in the preceding sentence or the participant’s death, all amounts that would otherwise have been paid during such period but for these provisions shall be paid and any amounts that remain to be paid under the award shall be paid in accordance with the terms hereof and of the grant agreement. The term “specified employee” shall have the same meaning as assigned to that term under Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) and whether a participant is a specified employee shall be determined in accordance with written guidelines adopted by the Company for such purposes (or, in the absence of such guidelines, in accordance with the default provisions of Code Section 409A).

Qualifying Change of Control. With respect to any award that provides for a deferral of compensation for purposes of Code Section 409A and that is payable under its terms upon a Change of Control (as defined in Section 2.5 of the Plan), or under which the time or form of payment of the award varies depending on whether a Change of Control has occurred, any references herein and in the Participant’s grant agreement to a Change of Control or date of the Change of Control shall refer to a Qualifying Change of Control or the date of a Qualifying Change of Control, as the case may be. A “Qualifying Change of Control” for this purpose is an event which meets all the requirements for a Change of Control and which, in addition, constitutes a change in ownership of the Affected Corporation (as defined in Section 2.2 of the Plan), a change in effective control of the Affected Corporation, or a change in ownership of substantially all of the Affected Corporation’s assets, each as defined in U.S. Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-3(i)(5).

Summary of Federal Income Tax Consequences.

Generally, a participant in the Plan will not incur any federal income tax when he receives an award, unless a participant who receives a restricted stock award makes a valid Section 83(b) election with respect to the award. If the participant makes a valid Section 83(b) election, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the restricted shares on the date of grant, and generally will not recognize any additional ordinary income at the time the restrictions with respect to the shares lapse.

- 27 -

Upon exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, a participant generally will recognize ordinary income equal to the difference between the fair market value of the stock acquired on the date of the exercise and the exercise price. A participant generally will not recognize any ordinary income upon exercise of an incentive stock option unless the participant is subject to the alternative minimum tax. If the participant holds the stock purchased upon exercise of an incentive stock option until the later of two years after the date of grant or one year after exercise, then any profit or loss realized on the later sale or exchange of the stock relative to the exercise price will be capital gain or loss. If the participant sells or exchanges the stock prior to expiration of the holding period, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized upon the sale or exchange) and the exercise price, and any additional profit will be capital gain. If the amount realized upon the sale or exchange of the shares is less than the exercise price paid, then the participant will generally be entitled to a capital loss.

Unless the participant has made a valid Section 83(b) election, upon vesting of restricted stock, a participant will generally recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares, determined at the time of vesting. A participant will generally recognize ordinary income upon payment of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units and performance grants equal to the cash received or the fair market value of the shares paid under the award determined at the time of payment.

If the participant is an employee then ordinary income recognized by the participant in connection with an award as described above is generally subject to applicable tax withholding by us. We generally are not required to withhold taxes in connection with the exercise or disposition of an incentive stock option.

Assuming that a participant’s compensation is otherwise reasonable and that the statutory limitations on compensation deductions (including the limitations under Internal Revenue Code Sections 162(m) and 280G) do not apply, we usually will be entitled to a business expense deduction when and for the amount which a participant recognizes as ordinary income in connection with an incentive award, as described above. We generally do not receive a deduction in connection with the exercise of an incentive stock option unless there is a disqualifying disposition of the shares acquired under the option.

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) imposes a $1,000,000 limit on the amount of the annual compensation deduction allowable to a publicly-held company with respect to its chief executive officer and up to four other most highly compensated officers whose compensation is required to be reported to shareholders under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. An exception to this limit is provided for performance-based compensation if certain requirements are met. The Plan permits awards under the Plan to be granted in a manner that will qualify for this exception from the deduction limit.

The discussion above is subject to the general federal tax doctrines of constructive receipt and economic benefit and to the applicable provisions of Code section 409A. If at any time a participant is in constructive receipt or receives the economic benefit of an award, the participant may incur federal tax liabilities with respect to the award earlier than the times described above. In addition if at any time the Plan, any award under the Plan or any arrangement required to be aggregated with the Plan or any award under the Plan fails to comply with the applicable requirements of Code section 409A, all amounts (including earnings) deferred under the Plan or such award for the taxable year and all preceding taxable years by any participant with respect to whom the failure relates are includible in such participant’s gross income for the taxable year to the extent not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and not previously included in the participant’s gross income. These amounts are also subject to an additional income tax equal to 20 percent of the amount required to be included in gross income and interest equal to the underpayment rate specified by the Internal Revenue Service plus one percentage point, imposed on the underpayments that would have occurred had the compensation been includible in income for the taxable year when first deferred, or if later, when not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE

INNODATA ISOGEN, INC. 2009 STOCK PLAN

- 28 -

VOTE REQUIRED

Election of Directors. Directors will be elected at the meeting by a plurality of the votes cast (i.e., the six nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected as directors).

Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Auditors. The appointment of J.H. Cohn LLP as independent auditors requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.

Approval of the Innodata Isogen, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan. The approval of the Innodata Isogen, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against such approval, whereas broker non-votes and shares not represented at the meeting will not be counted for purposes of determining whether such approval has been received.

EXPENSE OF SOLICITATION

The cost of soliciting Proxies, which also includes the preparation, printing and mailing of the Proxy Statement, will be borne by the Company. Solicitation will be made by the Company primarily through the mail, but regular employees of the Company may solicit Proxies personally, by telephone, facsimile or electronic communication. The Company will request brokers and nominees to obtain voting instructions of beneficial owners of the stock registered in their names and will reimburse them for any expenses incurred in connection therewith. In addition, we have retained The Altman Group to assist in the solicitation of Proxies for the 2009 Annual Meeting at a fee of approximately $6,000, plus associated costs and expenses.

HOUSEHOLDING

We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, multiple shareowners who share the same last name and address and do not participate in electronic delivery will receive only one copy of the annual proxy materials or notice regarding the internet availability of proxy materials. If the household received a printed set of proxy materials by mail, each shareowner will receive his or her own proxy card by mail. We have undertaken householding to reduce our printing costs and postage fees.

If you wish to opt out of householding and continue to receive multiple copies of the proxy materials or notice regarding the internet availability of proxy materials at the same address, you may do so at any time prior to thirty days before the mailing of proxy materials or notice regarding the internet availability of proxy materials, which typically are mailed in May of each year, by notifying us in writing or by telephone at: Innodata Isogen, Inc. Investor Relations, 3 University Plaza, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, (201) 371-8000. You also may request additional copies of the proxy materials or notice regarding the internet availability of proxy materials by notifying us in writing or by telephone at the same address or telephone number.

- 29 -

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING

Notice Required to Include Proposals in Our Proxy Statement

We will review for inclusion in next year's proxy statement shareholder proposals received by December 31, 2009. All proposals must meet the requirements set forth in the rules and regulations of the SEC in order to be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement. Proposals should be sent to Innodata Isogen, Inc., Three University Plaza, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Notice Required to Bring Business Before an Annual Meeting

Our by-laws establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders to make nominations of candidates for election of director or to bring other business before an annual meeting. Under these procedures, a stockholder that proposes to nominate a candidate for director or propose other business at the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders, must give us written notice of such nomination or proposal not less than 60 days and not more than 90 days prior to the scheduled date of the meeting (or, if less than 70 days' notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given, then not later than the 15th day following the earlier of (i) the date such notice was mailed; or (ii) the day such public disclosure was made). Such notice must provide certain information as specified in our by-laws and must be received at our principal executive offices by the deadline specified above.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the SEC, excluding exhibits, is being mailed to you concurrently herewith. The exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K are available upon payment of charges that approximate our cost of reproduction by written request addressed to Investor Relations, Innodata Isogen, Inc., 3 University Plaza, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601.

OTHER MATTERS