UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED
SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number |
811-21477 |
|||||||
|
||||||||
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund |
||||||||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
||||||||
|
||||||||
385 East Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, CA |
|
91101 |
||||||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
||||||
|
||||||||
Robert I. Frenkel, Esq. Legg Mason & Co., LLC 100 First Stamford Place Stamford, CT 06902 |
||||||||
(Name and address of agent for service) |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Registrants telephone number, including area code: |
(888) 777-0102 |
|
||||||
|
||||||||
Date of fiscal year end: |
December 31 |
|
||||||
|
||||||||
Date of reporting period: |
December 31, 2009 |
|
||||||
ITEM 1. REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS.
The Annual Report to Stockholders is filed herewith.
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
New York Stock Exchange Symbol: WIW
|
Contents |
|
Commentary |
|
Letter to Shareholders |
ii |
Investment Commentary |
iv |
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Managements Discussion of Fund Performance |
1 |
Fund Highlights |
3 |
Portfolio Diversification |
6 |
Spread Duration |
7 |
Effective Duration |
8 |
Portfolio of Investments |
9 |
Financial Statements |
18 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
23 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
34 |
Important Tax Information |
35 |
Trustees and Officers |
36 |
Trustee Consideration of the Management and Advisory Agreements |
40 |
For more information, visit us on
the web
at www.claymore.com/wiw.
|
Letter to Shareholders |
|
Dear Shareholder:
We thank you for your investment in Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund (the Fund). As investment adviser for the Fund, we are pleased to submit the Funds shareholder report for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund returned 18.40% based on its net asset value (NAV)i and 19.91% based on its New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) market price per share. The Funds unmanaged benchmarks, the Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 1-10 Year Indexii and the Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked All Maturities Indexiii, returned 11.14% and 10.48%, respectively, over the same time frame.
During 2009, the Fund provided its investors with monthly distributions of $0.05 per share in January and February and monthly distributions of $0.04 per share in each month from March through December.
The Fund outperformed its benchmarks during the period as the overall bond market rallied and investor risk appetite increased. The largest contributors to the Funds relative performance for the period were its allocations to high-yield, emerging market and investment grade corporate bonds, as spreads narrowed during the reporting period for each asset class. In particular, the portfolios holdings in the Industrials and Financials sectors generated strong returns. Within the investment grade sector, Metals and Mining company Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc., Indian ICICI Bank Ltd. and U.S. Financials firm JPMorgan Chase and Co. were significant contributors. Exposure to high-yield bonds also meaningfully contributed to results. Within this area, the Funds holdings in Health Care Providers and Services company Tenet Healthcare Corp., Wireless Telecommunication Services firm True Move Co. Ltd. and Automobiles companies General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. all produced strong returns.
Also significantly contributing to performance was the Funds holdings of U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS)iv. At times during the reporting period, we boosted our TIPS exposure through the use of leverage as the market changed and different opportunities arose. Elsewhere, our exposure to structured mortgage-backed securities (MBS), namely collateralized mortgage obligations, was also rewarded.
Somewhat detracting from results was the Funds holding of a Citigroup Depositary Receipt, which performed poorly.
The Funds investment objective is to provide current income. Capital appreciation, when consistent with current income, is a secondary objective. Under the Funds investment policies, under normal market conditions, the Fund will invest:
· At least 80% of its total managed assets in inflation-linked securities
· No more than 40% of its total managed assets in below investment grade securities
· Up to 100% of its total managed assets in non-U.S. dollar investments, which gives the Fund the flexibility to invest up to 100% of its total assets in non-U.S. dollar inflation-linked securities (up to 100% of its non-U.S. dollar exposure may be unhedged)
The Fund may invest up to 20% of the portfolio in debt instruments of emerging markets issuers that are not inflation-linked securities. The Fund currently expects that the average effective durationv of its portfolio will range between zero and fifteen years, although this target duration may change from time to time. The Fund expects to continue its use of credit default swaps.
On July 17, 2009, Claymore Group Inc., the parent of Claymore Advisors, LLC (the Adviser), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger between and among Claymore Group Inc., Claymore Holdings, LLC and GuggClay Acquisition, Inc. (with the latter two entities being wholly-owned, indirect subsidiaries of Guggenheim Partners, LLC (Guggenheim)). The transaction closed on October 14, 2009, whereby GuggClay Acquisition, Inc. merged into Claymore Group Inc., the surviving entity. The transaction resulted in a change-of-control whereby Claymore Group Inc. and its subsidiaries, including the Adviser, became indirect, wholly-owned
The Letter to Shareholders is not a part of the Annual Report to Shareholders.
|
Letter to Shareholders |
|
subsidiaries of Guggenheim. The transaction has not affected the daily operations of the Fund or the investment management activities of the Adviser.
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the 1940 Act), the consummation of this transaction resulted in the automatic termination of the Advisory Agreement and Investment Management Agreements of the Fund. Accordingly, on September 28, 2009, the Board of Trustees approved an interim investment advisory agreement between the Trust and the Adviser (the Interim Advisory Agreement), an interim investment management agreement for each Manager with respect to the Fund (each an Interim Management Agreement), a new investment advisory agreement between the Trust and the Adviser (the New Advisory Agreement) and a new investment management agreement for each Manager with respect to the Fund (together with the New Advisory Agreement, the New Agreements), and recommended that the New Agreements be submitted to the shareholders of the Fund for their approval. The New Agreements were approved by shareholders at the Joint Special Meeting of Shareholders held on January 12, 2010. The New Agreements have an initial term of one year. Thereafter, the New Agreements will continue in effect only if their continuance is approved by the Board of Trustees. Other than effective dates, there are no material differences between the terms of the New Agreements and those of the prior Agreements.
Shareholders have the opportunity to reinvest their dividends from the Fund through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRIP), which is described in detail on page 4 of this report. If shares are trading at a discount to NAV, the DRIP takes advantage of the discount by reinvesting the monthly dividend distribution in common shares of the Fund purchased in the market at a price less than NAV. Conversely, when the market price of the Funds common shares is at a premium above NAV, the DRIP reinvests participants dividends in newly-issued common shares at NAV, subject to an IRS limitation that the purchase price cannot be more than 5% below the market price per share. The DRIP provides a cost-effective means to accumulate additional shares.
We appreciate your investment and look forward to serving your investment needs in the future. For the most up-to-date information on your investment, please visit the Funds website at www.claymore.com/wiw.
Sincerely,
Claymore Advisors, LLC
January 20, 2010
i |
Net asset value (NAV) is calculated by subtracting total liabilities and outstanding preferred stock (if any) from the closing value of all securities held by the Fund (plus all other assets) and dividing the result (total net assets) by the total number of the common shares outstanding. The NAV fluctuates with changes in the market prices of securities in which the Fund has invested. However, the price at which an investor may buy or sell shares of the Fund is the Funds market price as determined by supply of and demand for the Funds shares. |
ii |
The Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 1-10 Year Index measures the performance of the intermediate U.S. TIPS market. |
iii |
The Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked All Maturities Index measures the performance of the U.S. TIPS market. The Index includes TIPS with one or more years remaining maturity with total outstanding issue size of $500 million or more. |
iv |
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are inflation-indexed securities issued by the U.S. Treasury in five-year, ten-year and twenty-year maturities. The principal is adjusted to the Consumer Price Index, the commonly used measure of inflation. The coupon rate is constant, but generates a different amount of interest when multiplied by the inflation-adjusted principal. |
v |
Duration is the measure of the price sensitivity of a fixed-income security to an interest rate change of 100 basis points. Calculation is based on the weighted average of the present values for all cash flows. |
The Letter to Shareholders is not a part of the Annual Report to Shareholders.
|
Investment Commentary |
|
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
Financial Market Overview
While 2008 was characterized by upheaval in the financial markets, periods of extreme volatility, illiquidity and heightened risk aversion, 2009 was largely a return to more normal conditions and increased investor risk appetite.
Looking back at the tail end of 2008, investors fled fixed-income securities that were seen as being risky and flocked to the relative safety of short-term Treasuries, driving the latters prices higher and their yields to historically low levels. In contrast, non-Treasury spreads widened to historically wide levels in some cases, as the market priced in worst-case scenarios. This caused nearly every spread sector to lag equal-durationi Treasuries during the year. While this trend continued in early 2009, some encouraging economic data and a thawing of the once frozen credit markets helped bolster investor confidence.
In a stunning turnaround, by the end of the first quarter of 2009, risk aversion had been replaced by robust demand for riskier, and higher-yielding, fixed-income securities. Despite some temporary setbacks, riskier assets continued to perform well during the remainder of the year. Looking at 2009 as a whole, every spread sector outperformed equal-duration Treasuries.
While economic news often surprised on the upside during 2009, incoming economic data did not suggest a dramatic rebound in growth in 2010. As such, the Federal Reserve Board (Fed)ii continued its accommodative monetary policy during 2009. The Fed met eight times in 2009 and, on each occasion, kept the federal funds rateiii in a range of 0 to 1/4 percent. This trend continued at the Feds meeting in January 2010. At that time, the Fed said that it will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.
Economic Review
While the U.S. economy was weak during the first half of the twelve-month reporting period ended December 31, 2009, the lengthiest recession since the Great Depression finally appeared to have ended during the second half of the year.
Looking back, the U.S. Department of Commerce reported that first quarter 2009 U.S. gross domestic product (GDP)iv contracted 6.4%. The economic environment then started to get relatively better during the second quarter, as GDP fell 0.7%. The economys more modest contraction was due, in part, to smaller declines in both exports and business spending. After contracting four consecutive quarters, the Commerce Department reported that third quarter 2009 GDP growth was 2.2%. A variety of factors helped the economy to expand, including the governments $787 billion stimulus program, its Cash for Clunkers car rebate program, which helped spur an increase in car sales, and tax credits for first-time home buyers. Economic growth then accelerated during the fourth quarter of 2009, as the advance estimate for GDP growth was 5.7%. The Commerce Department cited a slower drawdown in business inventories and consumer spending as contributing factors spurring the economys higher growth rate.
Even before GDP advanced in the third quarter, there were signs that the economy was starting to regain its footing. The manufacturing sector, as measured by the Institute for Supply Managements PMIv, rose to 52.9 in August 2009, the first time it surpassed 50 since January 2008 (a reading below 50 indicates a contraction, whereas a reading above 50 indicates an expansion). PMI data subsequently showed that manufacturing expanded from September through December as well. In addition, Decembers PMI reading of 55.9 was the highest since April 2006.
There were some mixed signals from the housing market toward the end of the reporting period. According to its most recent data, the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indexvi indicated that month-over-month home prices rose for the sixth straight month in November. However, according to the National Association of Realtors, while existing home sales rose 7.4% in November, sales fell by nearly 17% in December.
The Investment Commentary is not a part of the Annual Report to Shareholders.
|
Investment Commentary |
|
One area that remained weakand could hamper the magnitude of economic recoverywas the labor market. While monthly job losses have moderated compared to earlier in the year, the unemployment rate remained elevated during the reporting period. After reaching a twenty-six-year high of 10.1% in October 2009, the unemployment rate fell to 10.0% in November and remained unchanged the following month. Since December 2007, the unemployment rate has more than doubled and the number of unemployed workers has risen by more than eight million.
Market Review
Both short- and long-term Treasury yields fluctuated during the reporting period. When the period began, Treasury yields were extremely low, given numerous flights to quality that were triggered by the fallout from the financial crisis in 2008. After starting the period at 0.76% and 2.25%, respectively, two- and ten-year Treasury yields then generally moved higher (and their prices lower) until early June. Two- and ten-year yields peaked at 1.42% and 3.98%, respectively, before falling and ending the reporting period at 1.14% and 3.85%, respectively. Over the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, longer-term yields moved higher than their shorter-term counterparts as economic data improved and there were concerns regarding future inflation given the governments massive stimulus program. In a reversal from 2008, investor risk aversion faded during the twelve-month reporting period, driving spread sector (non-Treasury) prices higher. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Indexvii returned 5.93%.
During the reporting period, there was a shift in terms of expectations for inflation. Fears of inflation had increased in mid-2008 (before the reporting period began). This was, in part, due to sharply rising oil prices, which peaked at $145 a barrel in July 2008. Fears of inflation were then replaced with fears of deflation, as global economic conditions weakened and the financial crisis took hold in the fall of 2008. By the end of 2008, oil prices had fallen to $45 a barrel as demand waned and oil reserves moved higher. While inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U)viii, was 2.7% during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009, there were fears of higher inflation in the future. This was due to central banks accommodative monetary policies, signs that the global economy was recovering and rising oil prices, which hit $79 a barrel in December 2009. Inflation expectations led to increased demand for U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS)ix, and the Barclays Capital Global Real Index: U.S. TIPSx gained 11.41% during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009.
The investment grade bond market generated solid results during the reporting period. Spreads on these securities had moved to extremely wide levels in late 2008, as the weakening economy and credit crunch triggered fears of escalating default rates. Investment grade bond spreads then significantly narrowed in 2009, as the economic environment improved and corporate profits were often better than expected. All told, the investment grade bond asset class, as measured by the Barclays Capital U.S. Credit Indexxi, returned 16.04% during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009.
In the mortgage-backed securities market, both agency and non-agency issues did well during the year. Agencies were supported by the governments purchase programs of these securities as they sought to keep long-term interest rates low in an attempt to revive the housing market. The non-agency sector improved, particularly later in the year, as housing data stabilized and there was positive sentiment surrounding the launch of the Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP).
The high-yield bond market produced very strong results during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009. In sharp contrast to its poor results in 2008, the asset class posted positive returns during eleven of the twelve months of the reporting period. This strong rally was due to a variety of factors, including the unfreezing of the credit markets, improving economic data and strong investor demand. All told, the Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Cap Indexxii returned 58.76% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009.
Emerging market debt prices rallied sharplyposting positive returns during every month but February of 2009. This rally was triggered by rising commodity prices, optimism that the worst of the global recession was over and increased investor risk appetite. Over the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, the JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global (EMBI Global)xiii returned 28.18%.
The Investment Commentary is not a part of the Annual Report to Shareholders.
|
Investment Commentary |
|
Market Outlook
Some economists have floated the notion of a double-dip economic recession because of the expiration of various fiscal and monetary stimulus programs. However, we believe this economic phenomenon seems unlikely. As long as the Fed maintains the current low rate environment, which we believe it will, access to credit should remain sufficient. Given the elevated levels of unemployment, the recent dip in jobless claims is a positive sign that the labor market is stabilizing. The financial market is focused on consumer spending, but we believe more sustained gains in capital expenditures and exports will be key to the U.S. recovery.
We believe that the Fed is likely to keep the federal funds rate anchored at 0 to 1/4 percent in the near future. A large concern the Fed now faces is excess bank reserves. Government support from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the Feds various special liquidity programs helped banks restore their balance sheets, but banks then held on to reserves in excess of their capital requirements. As the recovery accelerates, banks may quickly reduce these excess reserves by extending credit. We believe increased lending should stimulate economic activity but, in doing so, might also contribute to inflationary pressures. Therefore, as the Fed manages the level of bank reserves, in our opinion, it must be careful not to inhibit economic growth and increase inflation. As long as the economic recovery is still in its infancy, we believe the Fed should continue its current policies.
Although the labor market is stabilizing, the declining trend in jobless claims reflects a drop-off in layoffs rather than an increase in hires. For unemployment to truly decline, we will need to see specific types of job growth. We believe the source of new job growth will probably have to come from the service sector, as the housing market remains weak and is unlikely to contribute significant new jobs any time soon. The recent increase in industrial production and capacity utilization indicates that factory-related jobs could increase in the coming year.
Despite an uptick in consumer spending in November, most likely due to the holidays, we think consumers will likely continue to demonstrate a more conservative mindset with increased savings and less consumption. Businesses, especially those that are export-oriented, should benefit from a lower U.S. dollar and increased future spending. Corporate profits in the fourth quarter of 2009 showed improvement, leading to a better outlook for the business sector compared to a year ago. Therefore, we think that businesses, rather than consumers, are likely to be the primary contributors to future economic growth. Considering current Fed policies, the likelihood of moderate inflation in the months ahead, a stabilizing labor market and an improved business climate, we find fears of a double-dip recession to be exaggerated.
Western Asset Management Company
January 29, 2010
The Investment Commentary is not a part of the Annual Report to Shareholders.
|
Investment Commentary |
|
All index performance reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
i |
Duration is the measure of the price sensitivity of a fixed-income security to an interest rate change of 100 basis points. Calculation is based on the weighted average of the present values for all cash flows. |
ii |
The Federal Reserve Board (Fed) is responsible for the formulation of policies designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
iii |
The federal funds rate is the rate charged by one depository institution on an overnight sale of immediately available funds (balances at the Federal Reserve) to another depository institution; the rate may vary from depository institution to depository institution and from day to day. |
iv |
Gross domestic product (GDP) is the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of time. |
v |
The Institute for Supply Managements PMI is based on a survey of purchasing executives who buy the raw materials for manufacturing at more than 350 companies. It offers an early reading on the health of the manufacturing sector. |
vi |
The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index measures the residential housing market, tracking changes in the value of the residential real estate market in twenty metropolitan regions across the United States. |
vii |
The Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Index is a broad-based bond index comprised of government, corporate, mortgage- and asset-backed issues, rated investment grade or higher, and having at least one year to maturity. |
viii |
The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) is a measure of the average change in prices over time of goods and services purchased by households, which covers approximately 87% of the total population and includes, in addition to wage earners and clerical worker households, groups such as professional, managerial and technical workers, the self-employed, short-term workers, the unemployed and retirees and others not in the labor force. |
ix |
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are inflation-indexed securities issued by the U.S. Treasury in five-year, ten-year and twenty-year maturities. The principal is adjusted to the Consumer Price Index, the commonly used measure of inflation. The coupon rate is constant, but generates a different amount of interest when multiplied by the inflation-adjusted principal. |
x |
The Barclays Capital Global Real Index: U.S. TIPS represents an unmanaged market index made up of U.S. Treasury Inflation-Linked Index securities. |
xi |
The Barclays Capital U.S. Credit Index is an index composed of corporate and non-corporate debt issues that are investment grade (rated Baa3/BBB- or higher). |
xii |
The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield 2% Issuer Cap Index is an index of the 2% Issuer Cap component of the Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Index, which covers the U.S. dollar-denominated, non-investment grade, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bond market. |
xiii |
The JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global (EMBI Global) tracks total returns for U.S. dollar-denominated debt instruments issued by emerging market sovereign and quasi-sovereign entities: Brady bonds, loans, Eurobonds and local market instruments. |
The Investment Commentary is not a part of the Annual Report to Shareholders.
Western Asset/Claymore
Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
|
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Managements Discussion of Fund Performance
Performance Review
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund returned 18.40% based on its net asset value (NAV)i and 19.91% based on its New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) market price per share. The Funds unmanaged benchmarks, the Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 1-10 Year Indexii and the Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked All Maturities Indexiii, returned 11.14% and 10.48%, respectively, over the same time frame. The Lipper Corporate Debt Closed-End Funds BBB-Rated Category Averageiv returned 28.22% for the same period. Please note that Lipper performance returns are based on each funds NAV.
During the twelve-month period, the Fund made distributions to shareholders totaling $0.50 per share, which included a return of capital of $0.06 per share. The performance table shows the Funds twelve-month total return based on its NAV and market price as of December 31, 2009. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
PERFORMANCE SNAPSHOT as of December 31, 2009
PRICE PER SHARE |
|
12-MONTH |
$12.94 (NAV) |
|
18.40% |
$12.04 (Market Price) |
|
19.91% |
All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results.
* |
Total returns are based on changes in NAV or market price, respectively. Total returns assume the reinvestment of all distributions in additional shares. |
The Fund outperformed its benchmarks during the period as the overall bond market rallied and investor risk appetite increased. The largest contributors to the Funds relative performance for the period were its allocations to high-yield, emerging market and investment grade corporate bonds, as spreads narrowed during the reporting period for each asset class. In particular, the portfolios holdings in the Industrials and Financials sectors generated strong returns. Within the investment grade sector, Metals and Mining company Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc., Indian ICICI Bank Ltd. and U.S. Financials firm JPMorgan Chase and Co. were significant contributors. Exposure to high-yield bonds also meaningfully contributed to results. Within this area, the Funds holdings in Health Care Providers and Services company Tenet Healthcare Corp., Wireless Telecommunication Services firm True Move Co. Ltd. and Automobiles companies General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. all produced strong returns.
Also significantly contributing to performance was the Funds holdings of U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS)v. At times during the reporting period, we boosted our TIPS exposure through the use of leverage as the market changed and different opportunities arose. Elsewhere, our exposure to structured mortgage-backed securities (MBS), namely collateralized mortgage obligations, was also rewarded.
Somewhat detracting from results was the Funds holding of a Citigroup Depositary Receipt, which performed poorly.
The market rebounded during 2009. Nominal Treasuries, however, suffered as investors sold them for riskier assets. TIPS, on the other hand, outperformed as fears of deflation subsided and future inflation became a concern due to the various fiscal and monetary stimulus programs created. There were a number of adjustments made to the portfolio during the reporting period. We tactically adjusted our TIPS exposure during the fiscal year. TIPS began the year priced for deflation while the corporate bond market was priced for disaster. At the beginning of the period, we were underweight TIPS, favoring mortgage-backed security pass-throughs as we thought they would be the first sector to recover once the Federal Reserve Board (Fed)vi began its purchase program. We then increased our TIPS exposure, taking full advantage of our ability to use leverage, in the spring of 2009, as economic conditions started to become less negative and monthly changes in inflation (as measured by the Consumer Price Indexvii) turned positive. We maintained this posture through July and then gradually began decreasing leverage and moving back to a neutral position, having found more compelling opportunities elsewhere. By the end of November, the Fund had no leverage at all. We also moved from agency MBS to non-agency MBS because we felt the latter represented greater potential after the government had been supporting the agency mortgage market. We also slightly pared our exposure to investment grade Industrials bonds in the fourth quarter after spreads narrowed significantly and reached pre-Lehman Brothers collapse levels. In contrast, throughout the period, we increased the Funds exposure to both investment grade Financials and Canadian and Australian inflation-linked bonds as we believed these asset classes represented further growth opportunities.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Managements Discussion of Fund Performance
During the fiscal year, we employed the use of Treasury futures and options, Eurodollar futures and interest rate swaps to manage the portfolios yield curveviii strategy and durationix. Credit default swaps were also used during the fiscal year to increase the portfolios corporate exposure. Currency contracts were used to hedge our non-U.S. dollar security exposure. The use of these derivative instruments was, overall, positive for performance.
Western Asset Management Company
January 19, 2010
The information provided is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Views expressed may differ from those of the firm as a whole.
Portfolio holdings and breakdowns are as of December 31, 2009 and are subject to change and may not be representative of the portfolio managers current or future investments. Please refer to pages 9 through 17 for a list and percentage breakdown of the Funds holdings.
The mention of sector breakdowns is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell any securities. The information provided regarding such sectors is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investors seeking financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed should consult their financial professional. The Funds top five sector holdings (as a percentage of net assets) as of December 31, 2009 were: U.S. Government and Agency Obligations (81.3%), Corporate Bonds and Notes (6.8%), Foreign Government Obligations (5.4%), Yankee Bonds (2.0%) and Mortgage-Backed Securities (1.8%). The Funds portfolio composition is subject to change at any time.
RISKS: Bonds are subject to a variety of risks, including interest rate, credit and inflation risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices fall, reducing the value of a fixed-income investments price. The Fund is subject to the additional risks associated with inflation-protected securities, including liquidity risk, prepayment risk, extension risk and deflation risk. Investments in foreign companies, including emerging markets, involve risks beyond those inherent solely in domestic investments. Leverage may cause a fund to be more volatile than if the fund had not been leveraged, which may increase the risk of investment loss. To the extent that the Fund invests in asset-backed, mortgage-backed or mortgage-related securities, its exposure to prepayment and extension risks may be greater than investments in other fixed-income securities. International investments are subject to currency fluctuation, social, economic and political risk. These risks are magnified in emerging markets.
All index performance reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
i |
Net asset value (NAV) is calculated by subtracting total liabilities and outstanding preferred stock (if any) from the closing value of all securities held by the Fund (plus all other assets) and dividing the result (total net assets) by the total number of the common shares outstanding. The NAV fluctuates with changes in the market prices of securities in which the Fund has invested. However, the price at which an investor may buy or sell shares of the Fund is the Funds market price as determined by supply of and demand for the Funds shares. |
ii |
The Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 1-10 Year Index measures the performance of the intermediate U.S. TIPS market. |
iii |
The Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked All Maturities Index measures the performance of the U.S. TIPS market. The Index includes TIPS with one or more years remaining maturity with total outstanding issue size of $500 million or more. |
iv |
Lipper, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reuters, provides independent insight on global collective investments. Returns are based on the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009, including the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, calculated among the 21 funds in the Funds Lipper category. |
v |
U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are inflation-indexed securities issued by the U.S. Treasury in five-year, ten-year and twenty-year maturities. The principal is adjusted to the Consumer Price Index, the commonly used measure of inflation. The coupon rate is constant, but generates a different amount of interest when multiplied by the inflation-adjusted principal. |
vi |
The Federal Reserve Board (Fed) is responsible for the formulation of policies designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
vii |
The Consumer Price Index measures the average change in U.S. consumer prices over time in a fixed market basket of goods and services determined by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. |
viii |
The yield curve is the graphical depiction of the relationship between the yield on bonds of the same credit quality but different maturities. |
ix |
Duration is the measure of the price sensitivity of a fixed-income security to an interest rate change of 100 basis points. Calculation is based on the weighted average of the present values for all cash flows. |
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Fund Highlights
|
|
December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Net Asset Value |
|
$791,707,778 |
|
|
$696,832,887 |
|
|
Per Share |
|
$12.94 |
|
|
$11.39 |
|
|
Market Value Per Share |
|
$12.04 |
|
|
$10.49 |
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
$24,264,757 |
|
|
$52,375,796 |
|
|
Per Common Share |
|
$0.40 |
|
|
$0.86 |
|
|
Dividends Paid to Common ShareholdersA |
|
$30,592,067 |
|
|
$55,680,481 |
|
|
Per Common Share from Net Income |
|
$0.44 |
|
|
$0.91 |
|
|
Per Common Share from Tax Return of Capital |
|
$0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund (WIW or the Fund) is a diversified, closed-end management investment company which seeks to provide current income for its shareholders. Capital appreciation, when consistent with current income, is a secondary investment objective. Substantially all of the Funds net investment income (after any interest expense in connection with forms of leverage (if applicable)) is distributed to the Funds shareholders. A Dividend Reinvestment Plan is available to those shareholders of record desiring to participate. The Funds common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) where they are traded under the symbol WIW.
Fund Performance
Total return for the Fund for various periods ended December 31 are presented below along with those of comparitive indices.
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|||||||
|
|
Year Ended |
|
Three |
|
Five |
|
Since |
|
|||
Total Return Based on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Market Value |
|
19.91% |
|
7.83 |
% |
|
5.22 |
% |
|
2.83 |
% |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
18.40% |
|
5.57 |
% |
|
4.27 |
% |
|
4.34 |
% |
|
Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-10 Year IndexC,D |
|
11.14% |
|
6.78 |
% |
|
4.74 |
% |
|
4.86 |
% |
|
Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Maturities IndexD,E |
|
10.48% |
|
6.67 |
% |
|
4.62 |
% |
|
4.79 |
% |
|
The performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. The investment return and principal value of the Fund will fluctuate so that an investors shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Calculations assume reinvestment of dividends and capital gain distributions. Performance figures for periods shorter than one year represent cumulative figures and are not annualized.
A |
Total dividend distribution of $30,592,067 of which $27,078,390 was from net investment income and $3,513,677 was from tax return of capital. |
B |
The Funds inception date is February 25, 2004. |
C |
This index is the U.S. component of the 1 to 10 year Barclays Global Inflation-Linked Bond Index, which measures the performance of the major government inflation-linked bond markets. Although it is not possible to invest directly in an index, it is possible to purchase investment vehicles designed to track the performance of certain indexes. The performance of the index does not reflect deductions for fees, expenses or taxes. |
D |
This return does not include reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. |
E |
This index is the U.S. component of the all maturities Barclays Global Inflation-Linked Bond Index, which measures the performance of the major government inflation-linked bond markets. |
|
Index return is for the period beginning February 29, 2004. |
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Fund HighlightsContinued
Investment Policies
The Funds investment policies provide that under normal market conditions and at the time of purchase, its portfolio will be invested as follows:
· |
At least 80% of its total managed assetsF in inflation-linked securities |
|
|
· |
No more than 40% of its total managed assets in below investment grade securities |
|
|
· |
Up to 100% of its total managed assets in non-U.S. dollar investments (up to 100% of its non-U.S. dollar exposure may be unhedged) |
Each of the foregoing policies is a non-fundamental policy that may be changed without shareholder approval. The Fund has also adopted the following non-fundamental policy, which, to the extent required by applicable law, may only be changed after notice to shareholders: under normal market conditions, the Fund will invest at least 80% of its total managed assets in inflation protected securities and non-inflation protected securities and instruments with the potential to enhance the Funds income.
The Fund may invest up to 20% of the portfolio in debt instruments of emerging markets issuers that are not inflation-linked securities. Reverse repurchase agreements and other forms of leverage will not exceed 38% of the Funds total managed assets.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The Fund and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC (Agent), as the Transfer Agent and Registrar of WIW, offer a convenient way to add shares of WIW to your account. WIW offers to all common shareholders a Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Plan). Under the Plan, cash distributions (e.g., dividends and capital gains) on the common shares are automatically invested in shares of WIW unless the shareholder elects otherwise by contacting the Agent at the address set forth below.
As a participant in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, you will automatically receive your dividend or net capital gains distribution in newly issued shares of WIW, if the market price of the shares on the date of the distribution is at or above the net asset value (NAV) of the shares, minus estimated brokerage commissions that would be incurred upon the purchase of common shares on the open market. The number of shares to be issued to you will be determined by dividing the amount of the cash distribution to which you are entitled (net of any applicable withholding taxes) by the greater of the NAV per share on such date or 95% of the market price of a share on such date. If the market price of a share on such distribution date is below the NAV, less estimated brokerage commissions that would be incurred upon the purchase of common shares on the open market, the Agent will, as agent for the participants, buy shares of WIW through a broker on the open market. All common shares acquired on your behalf through the Plan will be automatically credited to an account maintained on the books of the Agent.
Additional Information Regarding the Plan
WIW will pay all costs applicable to the Plan, except for brokerage commissions for open market purchases by the Agent under the Plan which will be charged to participants. All shares acquired through the Plan receive voting rights and are eligible for any stock split, stock dividend, or other rights accruing to shareholders that the Board of Trustees may declare.
You may terminate participation in the Plan at any time by giving notice to the Agent. Such termination will be effective prior to the record date next succeeding the receipt of such instructions or by a later date of termination specified in such instructions. Upon termination, a participant will receive a certificate for the full shares credited to his or her account or may request the sale of all or part of such shares. Fractional shares credited to a terminating account will be paid for in cash at the current market price at the time of termination.
F |
Total managed assets means the total assets of the Fund (including any assets attributable to leverage) minus accrued liabilities (other than liabilities representing leverage). |
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Dividends and other distributions invested in additional shares under the Plan are subject to income tax just as if they had been received in cash. After year end, dividends paid on the accumulated shares will be included in the Form 1099-DIV information return to the Internal Revenue Service and only one Form 1099-DIV will be sent to participants each year.
Inquiries regarding the Plan, as well as notices of termination, should be directed to American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC, 59 Maiden Lane, New York, NY 10038. Investor Relations telephone number (888) 888-0151.
Annual Certifications
In May 2009, the Fund submitted its annual Chief Executive Officer certification to the NYSE in which the Funds principal executive officer certified that he was not aware, as of the date of the certification, of any violation by the Fund of the NYSEs Corporate Governance listing standards. In addition, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules, the Funds principal executive and principal financial officers have made quarterly certifications, included in filings with the SEC on Forms N-CSR and N-Q, relating to, among other things, the Funds disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
Schedule of Portfolio Holdings
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. You may obtain a free copy of the Funds Form N-Q by calling 1-800-345-7999, by visiting the Funds website (http://www.westernclaymore.com), or by writing to the Fund, or you may obtain a copy of this report (and other information relating to the Fund) from the SECs website (http://www.sec.gov). Additionally, the Funds Form N-Q can be viewed or copied at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington D.C. Information about the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
Proxy Voting
You may request a free description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how proxies relating to the Funds portfolio securities are voted by calling 1-800-345-7999 or by writing to the Fund, or you may obtain a copy of these policies and procedures (and other information relating to the Fund) from the SECs website (http://www.sec.gov). You may request a free report regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, by calling 1-800-345-7999 or by writing to the Fund, or you may obtain a copy of this report (and other information relating to the Fund) from the SECs website (http://www.sec.gov).
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Portfolio Diversification
December 31, 2009
The pie and bar charts above represent the Funds portfolio as of December 31, 2009 and do not include derivatives such as Futures Contracts and Swaps. The Funds portfolio is actively managed, and its portfolio composition, credit quality breakdown, and other portfolio characteristics will vary from time to time. U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities are unrated, but are backed by the full faith and credit of the government of the United States of America and are therefore considered by the Funds investment manager to be comparable to bonds rated AAA/Aaa.
Quarterly Comparison of Market Price and Net Asset Value (NAV), Discount or Premium to NAV and Average Daily Volume of Shares Traded
|
|
Market |
|
Net Asset |
|
Premium/ |
|
Average |
March 31, 2009 |
|
$10.73 |
|
$11.75 |
|
(8.68)% |
|
207,483 |
June 30, 2009 |
|
$11.57 |
|
$12.26 |
|
(5.63)% |
|
178,513 |
September 30, 2009 |
|
$11.89 |
|
$12.74 |
|
(6.67)% |
|
154,942 |
December 31, 2009 |
|
$12.04 |
|
$12.94 |
|
(6.96)% |
|
160,865 |
A |
Ratings shown are expressed as a percentage of the portfolio. Standard & Poors Ratings Services provide capital markets with credit ratings for the evaluation and assessment of credit risk. |
B |
Expressed as a percentage of the portfolio. |
C |
Yankee Bond a U.S. dollar denominated bond issued in the U.S. by Foreign entities. |
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Spread Duration
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
December 31, 2009
Economic Exposure
Spread duration is defined as the change in value for a 100 basis point change in the spread relative to Treasuries. The spread over Treasuries is the annual risk-premium demanded by investors to hold non-Treasury securities. This chart highlights the market sector exposure of the Funds portfolio and the exposure relative to the selected benchmark as of the end of the reporting period.
ABSAsset Backed Securities
90% BCIL/5% BCUSC/5% JPME90% Barclays Capital Inflation Linked All U.S. Maturities/5% Barclays Capital U.S. Credit/5% J.P. Morgan Embit
CMBSCommercial Mortgage Backed Securities
EMDEmerging Markets Debt
HYHigh Yield
IG CreditInvestment Grade Credit
MBSMortgage Backed Securities
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Effective Duration
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
December 31, 2009
Interest Rate Exposure
Effective duration is defined as the change in value for a 100 basis point change in Treasury yields. This chart highlights the interest rate exposure of the Funds portfolio relative to the selected benchmark as of the end of the reporting period.
ABSAsset Backed Securities
90% BCIL/5% BCUSC/5% JPME90% Barclays Capital Inflation Linked All U.S. Maturities/5% Barclays Capital U.S. Credit/5% J.P. Morgan Embit
CMBSCommercial Mortgage Backed Securities
EMDEmerging Markets Debt
HYHigh Yield
IG CreditInvestment Grade Credit
MBSMortgage Backed Securities
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Portfolio of Investments
December 31, 2009
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
PAR/ |
|
VALUE |
|
|
Long-Term Securities |
|
99.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations |
|
81.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Inflation-Protected SecuritiesA |
|
81.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
2.375% |
|
4/15/11 |
|
36,587,979 |
|
$ |
37,668,458 |
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
3.375% |
|
1/15/12 |
|
973,936 |
|
1,041,655 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
3.000% |
|
7/15/12 |
|
51,517,698 |
|
55,389,562 |
B |
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
1.875% |
|
7/15/13 |
|
67,994,135 |
|
71,611,627 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
2.000% |
|
1/15/14 |
|
5,615,616 |
|
5,938,514 |
C |
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
1.625% |
|
1/15/15 |
|
42,001,281 |
|
43,681,332 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
2.000% |
|
1/15/16 |
|
52,006,435 |
|
54,919,627 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
2.375% |
|
1/15/17 |
|
23,914,758 |
|
25,829,804 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
1.625% |
|
1/15/18 |
|
38,601,883 |
|
39,515,666 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
1.375% |
|
7/15/18 |
|
30,815,620 |
|
30,878,207 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
2.125% |
|
1/15/19 |
|
5,839,730 |
|
6,192,853 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
1.875% |
|
7/15/19 |
|
15,793,752 |
|
16,393,425 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
2.375% |
|
1/15/25 |
|
11,468,100 |
|
12,100,634 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
2.000% |
|
1/15/26 |
|
164,721,534 |
|
165,429,342 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
1.750% |
|
1/15/28 |
|
33,948,194 |
|
32,553,127 |
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
2.500% |
|
1/15/29 |
|
15,404,805 |
|
16,522,855 |
|
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Portfolio of InvestmentsContinued
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income FundContinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
PAR/ |
|
VALUE |
|
|
U.S. Government and Agency ObligationsContinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Inflation-Protected SecuritiesAContinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Treasury Inflation-Protected Security |
|
|
|
3.875% |
|
4/15/29 |
|
21,696,840 |
|
$ |
27,919,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Government and Agency
Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643,586,117 |
|
|
Corporate Bonds and Notes |
|
6.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobiles |
|
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motors Liquidation Co. |
|
|
|
8.375% |
|
7/15/33 |
|
3,920,000 |
|
1,058,400 |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance |
|
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAC LLC |
|
|
|
7.500% |
|
12/31/13 |
|
522,000 |
|
503,730 |
E |
|
GMAC LLC |
|
|
|
8.000% |
|
12/31/18 |
|
626,000 |
|
550,880 |
E |
|
SLM Corp. |
|
|
|
0.000% |
|
2/1/10 |
|
2,500,000 |
|
2,502,150 |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,556,760 |
|
|
Diversified Financial Services |
|
1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of America Corp. |
|
|
|
8.000% |
|
12/29/49 |
|
3,700,000 |
|
3,562,138 |
G |
|
Citigroup Inc. |
|
|
|
6.010% |
|
1/15/15 |
|
3,570,000 |
|
3,645,320 |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase and Co. |
|
|
|
7.900% |
|
12/31/49 |
|
4,120,000 |
|
4,249,615 |
G |
|
TNK-BP Finance SA |
|
|
|
7.875% |
|
3/13/18 |
|
1,270,000 |
|
1,304,925 |
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,761,998 |
|
|
Electric Utilities |
|
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Future Holdings Corp. |
|
|
|
10.875% |
|
11/1/17 |
|
4,000 |
|
3,270 |
|
|
Energy Future Holdings Corp. |
|
|
|
11.250% |
|
11/1/17 |
|
2,208,998 |
|
1,562,866 |
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,566,136 |
|
|
Energy Equipment and Services |
|
0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EEB International Ltd. |
|
|
|
8.750% |
|
10/31/14 |
|
4,090,000 |
|
4,417,200 |
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers and Services |
|
0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenet Healthcare Corp. |
|
|
|
7.375% |
|
2/1/13 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
5,012,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Power Producers and Energy Traders |
|
0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynegy Holdings Inc. |
|
|
|
8.750% |
|
2/15/12 |
|
1,610,000 |
|
1,690,500 |
|
|
The AES Corp. |
|
|
|
8.875% |
|
2/15/11 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
5,212,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,903,000 |
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
PAR/ |
|
VALUE |
|
|
Corporate Bonds and NotesContinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals and Mining |
|
0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CII Carbon LLC |
|
|
|
11.125% |
|
11/15/15 |
|
2,060,000 |
|
$ |
2,072,875 |
E |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. |
|
|
|
8.375% |
|
4/1/17 |
|
3,460,000 |
|
3,788,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,861,575 |
|
|
Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels |
|
1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Paso Corp. |
|
|
|
7.750% |
|
1/15/32 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
4,728,065 |
|
|
Pemex Project Funding Master Trust |
|
|
|
6.625% |
|
6/15/35 |
|
2,350,000 |
|
2,237,555 |
|
|
The Williams Cos. Inc. |
|
|
|
7.500% |
|
1/15/31 |
|
5,000,000 |
|
5,393,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,359,285 |
|
|
Total Corporate Bonds and Notes (Cost$53,799,392) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,496,854 |
|
|
Asset-Backed Securities |
|
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Securities |
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lehman ABS Manufactured Housing Contract 2001-B A3 |
|
|
|
4.350% |
|
5/15/14 |
|
182,729 |
|
162,628 |
|
|
Lehman ABS Manufactured Housing Contract 2001-B A6 |
|
|
|
6.467% |
|
8/15/28 |
|
182,729 |
|
164,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,112 |
|
|
Indexed SecuritiesF |
|
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust 2004-C |
|
|
|
0.861% |
|
5/28/44 |
|
46,936 |
|
37,957 |
|
|
Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2001-3 A1 |
|
|
|
0.681% |
|
10/27/32 |
|
19,355 |
|
12,838 |
|
|
Bear Stearns Asset-Backed Securities Inc. 2007-SD2 2A1 |
|
|
|
0.631% |
|
9/25/46 |
|
196,059 |
|
117,983 |
|
|
Countrywide Asset-Backed Certificates 2004-2 M1 |
|
|
|
0.731% |
|
5/25/34 |
|
550,000 |
|
345,536 |
|
|
Countrywide Home Equity Loan Trust 2007-GW A |
|
|
|
0.983% |
|
8/15/37 |
|
2,062,199 |
|
1,457,719 |
|
|
Greenpoint Mortgage Funding Trust 2005-HE1 |
|
|
|
0.631% |
|
9/25/34 |
|
1,034,338 |
|
548,682 |
|
|
MSDWCC Heloc Trust 2005-1 |
|
|
|
0.421% |
|
7/25/17 |
|
64,291 |
|
29,992 |
|
|
New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2003-A M1 |
|
|
|
0.981% |
|
10/25/33 |
|
461,741 |
|
244,030 |
E |
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Portfolio of InvestmentsContinued
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income FundContinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
PAR/ |
|
VALUE |
|
|
Asset-Backed SecuritiesContinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indexed SecuritiesFContinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RAAC 2006-RP3 A |
|
|
|
0.501% |
|
5/25/36 |
|
1,601,923 |
|
$ |
768,789 |
E |
Structured Asset Securities Corp. 2007-BC4 A3 |
|
|
|
0.481% |
|
11/25/37 |
|
235,261 |
|
219,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,782,987 |
|
|
Variable Rate SecuritiesI |
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security National Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-3A A2 |
|
|
|
5.830% |
|
1/25/37 |
|
300,000 |
|
114,266 |
E |
|
Total Asset-Backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,224,365 |
|
|
Loan Participations and AssignmentsF |
|
1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment and Supplies |
|
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biomet Inc., Term Loan B |
|
|
|
3.231% to 3.251% |
|
3/25/10 |
|
989,873 |
|
943,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers and Services |
|
0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Health Systems Inc., Term Loan, Tranche B |
|
|
|
2.506% |
|
2/26/10 |
|
1,865,039 |
|
1,756,762 |
|
|
Community Health, Delayed Draw Term Loan |
|
|
|
2.506% |
|
2/26/10 |
|
95,326 |
|
89,792 |
|
|
HCA Inc., Term Loan B |
|
|
|
2.501% |
|
3/31/10 |
|
1,510,923 |
|
1,441,420 |
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,287,974 |
|
|
Independent Power Producers and Energy Traders |
|
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calpine Corp., Term Loan |
|
|
|
3.135% |
|
3/31/10 |
|
1,483,876 |
|
1,401,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiline Retail |
|
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar General Corp., Term Loan, Tranche B |
|
|
|
2.981% to 3.031% |
|
1/29/10 |
|
1,243,750 |
|
1,199,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paper and Forest Products |
|
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia-Pacific Corp., First Lien Term Loan |
|
|
|
2.251% to 3.506% |
|
3/31/10 |
|
1,667,191 |
|
1,607,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services |
|
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MetroPCS Wireless Inc. |
|
|
|
2.500% to 2.563% |
|
2/1/10 |
|
989,770 |
|
942,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loan Participations and
Assignments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,383,232 |
|
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
PAR/ |
|
VALUE |
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities |
|
1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Securities |
|
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green Tree Home Improvement Loan Trust 1995-C B2 |
|
|
|
7.600% |
|
7/15/20 |
|
4,063 |
|
$ |
3,168 |
|
Structured Asset Securities Corp. 2002-3 B2 |
|
|
|
6.500% |
|
3/25/32 |
|
771,583 |
|
579,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582,881 |
|
|
Indexed SecuritiesF |
|
1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayview Commercial Asset Trust 2005-2A A2 |
|
|
|
0.581% |
|
8/25/35 |
|
48,474 |
|
31,061 |
E |
|
Bear Stearns Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust 2004-1 23A1 |
|
|
|
5.456% |
|
4/25/34 |
|
619,904 |
|
606,910 |
|
|
Bear Stearns Alt-A Trust 2007-1 1A1 |
|
|
|
0.391% |
|
1/25/47 |
|
395,862 |
|
182,678 |
|
|
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc. 2005-11 A3 |
|
|
|
4.900% |
|
12/25/35 |
|
795,500 |
|
599,917 |
|
|
Countrywide Alternative Loan Trust 2005-J12 |
|
|
|
0.501% |
|
8/25/35 |
|
832,217 |
|
418,530 |
|
|
Countrywide Home Loan Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2003-56 6A1 |
|
|
|
3.461% |
|
12/25/33 |
|
2,233,481 |
|
1,840,101 |
|
|
DSLA Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-AR1 A2B |
|
|
|
0.653% |
|
9/19/44 |
|
64,856 |
|
18,644 |
|
|
First Horizon Alternative Mortgage Securities 2004-AA4 A1 |
|
|
|
2.873% |
|
10/25/34 |
|
25,638 |
|
20,160 |
|
|
First Horizon Alternative Mortgage Securities 2006-FA8 1A8 |
|
|
|
0.601% |
|
2/25/37 |
|
378,335 |
|
187,052 |
|
|
Greenpoint Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-AR7 1A1B |
|
|
|
0.351% |
|
12/25/46 |
|
41,833 |
|
8,348 |
|
|
Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-13 A |
|
|
|
0.413% |
|
11/19/46 |
|
1,077,073 |
|
513,465 |
|
|
Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-7 2A1A |
|
|
|
1.231% |
|
11/25/47 |
|
105,946 |
|
55,100 |
|
|
IndyMac Index Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR15 A1 |
|
|
|
0.351% |
|
7/25/36 |
|
2,964,944 |
|
1,376,497 |
|
|
MASTR Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2006-0A1 1A1 |
|
|
|
0.441% |
|
4/25/46 |
|
746,497 |
|
338,000 |
|
|
RBSGC Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2007-B 1A4 |
|
|
|
0.681% |
|
1/25/37 |
|
376,802 |
|
185,350 |
|
|
Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2003-A1 A2 |
|
|
|
0.731% |
|
3/25/33 |
|
551,166 |
|
498,677 |
|
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Portfolio of InvestmentsContinued
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income FundContinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
PAR/ |
|
VALUE |
|
|
Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesContinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indexed SecuritiesFContinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terwin Mortgage Trust 2006-9HGA A1 |
|
|
|
0.394% |
|
10/25/37 |
|
1,040,709 |
|
$ |
1,041,203 |
E |
WaMu Alternative Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2006-AR01 A1B |
|
|
|
0.551% |
|
2/25/36 |
|
135,126 |
|
26,042 |
|
|
WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2004-AR08 A1 |
|
|
|
0.670% |
|
6/25/44 |
|
41,014 |
|
26,523 |
|
|
WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2004-AR2 A |
|
|
|
1.944% |
|
4/25/44 |
|
2,772,938 |
|
1,577,940 |
|
|
WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2006-AR11 1A |
|
|
|
1.504% |
|
9/25/46 |
|
101,684 |
|
54,889 |
|
|
WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2006-AR6 2A |
|
|
|
1.504% |
|
8/25/46 |
|
422,850 |
|
223,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,830,486 |
|
|
Variable Rate SecuritiesI |
|
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banc of America Funding Corp. 2005-F 4A1 |
|
|
|
5.286% |
|
9/20/35 |
|
329,895 |
|
228,801 |
|
|
Banc of America Funding Corp. 2006-D 6A1 |
|
|
|
5.851% |
|
5/20/36 |
|
1,691,505 |
|
1,042,508 |
|
|
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc. 2007-6 1A1A |
|
|
|
5.345% |
|
3/25/37 |
|
977,919 |
|
364,215 |
|
|
Countrywide Alternative Loan Trust 2004-33 1A1 |
|
|
|
3.117% |
|
12/25/34 |
|
13,569 |
|
9,599 |
|
|
Countrywide Alternative Loan Trust 2004-33 2A1 |
|
|
|
3.571% |
|
12/25/34 |
|
11,565 |
|
7,147 |
|
|
Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-2 |
|
|
|
3.985% |
|
2/25/36 |
|
505,836 |
|
303,502 |
|
|
MASTR Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2006-2 3A1 |
|
|
|
4.845% |
|
1/25/36 |
|
1,245,951 |
|
1,004,190 |
|
|
Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-11AR 2A3 |
|
|
|
6.182% |
|
6/25/37 |
|
279,134 |
|
147,479 |
|
|
Nomura Asset Acceptance Corp. 2004-AR4 1A1 |
|
|
|
2.764% |
|
12/25/34 |
|
95,543 |
|
88,360 |
|
|
Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-4 3A1 |
|
|
|
6.198% |
|
9/25/37 |
|
376,532 |
|
300,894 |
|
|
WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2007-HY1 4A1 |
|
|
|
5.387% |
|
2/25/37 |
|
518,831 |
|
366,949 |
|
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
PAR/ |
|
VALUE |
|
|
Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesContinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate SecuritiesIContinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2007-HY3 1A1 |
|
|
|
5.574% |
|
3/25/37 |
|
406,173 |
|
$ |
280,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,143,732 |
|
|
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities (Cost$10,990,192) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,557,099 |
|
|
Yankee BondsJ |
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks |
|
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glitnir Banki Hf |
|
|
|
6.693% |
|
6/15/16 |
|
2,540,000 |
|
254 |
D,E,G,K |
|
ICICI Bank Ltd. |
|
|
|
6.375% |
|
4/30/22 |
|
1,103,000 |
|
990,177 |
G |
|
Kaupthing Bank Hf |
|
|
|
7.125% |
|
5/19/16 |
|
4,410,000 |
|
441 |
D,E,K |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990,872 |
|
|
Construction and Engineering |
|
0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Odebrecht Finance Ltd. |
|
|
|
7.500% |
|
10/18/17 |
|
2,973,000 |
|
3,084,488 |
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services |
|
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lukoil International Finance BV |
|
|
|
6.356% |
|
6/7/17 |
|
1,570,000 |
|
1,542,525 |
|
|
Lukoil International Finance BV |
|
|
|
6.656% |
|
6/7/22 |
|
570,000 |
|
544,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086,875 |
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services |
|
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Axtel SA |
|
|
|
7.625% |
|
2/1/17 |
|
3,643,000 |
|
3,570,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals and Mining |
|
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vedanta Resources PLC |
|
|
|
8.750% |
|
1/15/14 |
|
770,000 |
|
787,325 |
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels |
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gazprom |
|
|
|
6.212% |
|
11/22/16 |
|
190,000 |
|
181,925 |
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Road and Rail |
|
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grupo Transportacion Ferroviaria Mexicana SA de CV |
|
|
|
9.375% |
|
5/1/12 |
|
1,010,000 |
|
1,047,875 |
|
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Portfolio of InvestmentsContinued
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income FundContinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF |
|
RATE |
|
MATURITY |
|
PAR/ |
|
VALUE |
|
|
Yankee BondsJContinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services |
|
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
True Move Co. Ltd. |
|
|
|
10.750% |
|
12/16/13 |
|
2,040,000 |
|
$ |
1,968,600 |
E |
True Move Co. Ltd. |
|
|
|
10.750% |
|
12/16/13 |
|
1,910,000 |
|
1,843,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,811,750 |
|
|
Total Yankee Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,561,250 |
|
|
Foreign Government Obligations |
|
5.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Government Bond |
|
|
|
4.250% |
|
12/1/21 |
|
13,946,543 |
CAD |
17,580,098 |
L |
|
Commonwealth of Australia |
|
|
|
4.000% |
|
8/20/20 |
|
18,315,000 |
AUD |
25,473,584 |
L |
|
Total Foreign Government
Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,053,682 |
|
|
Preferred Stocks |
|
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie Mae |
|
|
|
8.250% |
|
|
|
591,425 |
shs |
650,568 |
G,M,N |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
|
8.375% |
|
|
|
656,850 |
|
689,692 |
G,M,N |
|
Total Preferred Stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340,260 |
|
|
Total Long-Term Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785,202,859 |
|
|
Total Investments |
|
99.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785,202,859 |
|
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities |
|
0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,504,919 |
|
|
Net Assets |
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
791,707,778 |
|
|
|
EXPIRATION |
|
ACTUAL |
|
DEPRECIATION |
|
||||
Futures Contracts PurchasedP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
German Euro Bobl Futures |
|
March 2010 |
|
96 |
|
$ |
(120,418 |
) |
|
||
U.S. Treasury Note Futures |
|
March 2010 |
|
68 |
|
(220,159 |
) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(340,577 |
) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
N.M. Not Meaningful.
|
Securities are denominated in U.S. Dollars, unless otherwise noted. |
A |
Treasury Inflation-Protected Security Treasury security whose principal value is adjusted daily in accordance with changes to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. Interest is calculated on the basis of the current adjusted principal value. |
B |
All or a portion of this security is collateral to cover futures and options contracts written. |
C |
All or a portion of this security is collateral to cover swaps. |
D |
The coupon payment on these securities is currently in default as of December 31, 2009. |
E |
Rule 144a Security A security purchased pursuant to Rule 144a under the Securities Act of 1933 which may not be resold subject to that rule except to qualified institutional buyers. These securities, which the Funds investment adviser has determined to be liquid, unless otherwise noted, represent 2.16% of net assets. |
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
|
F |
Indexed Security The rates of interest earned on these securities are tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR) Index, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), the one-year Treasury Bill Rate or the ten-year Japanese Government Bond Rate. The coupon rates are the rates as of December 31, 2009. |
G |
Stepped Coupon Security A security with a predetermined schedule of interest or dividend rate changes at which time it begins to accrue interest or pay dividends according to the predetermined schedule. |
H |
Pay-in-Kind (PIK) security A security in which interest or dividends during the initial few years is paid in additional PIK securities rather than in cash. |
I |
The coupon rates shown on variable rate securities are the rates at December 31, 2009. These rates vary with the weighted average coupon of the underlying loans. |
J |
Yankee Bond A dollar-denominated bond issued in the U.S. by foreign entities. |
K |
Illiquid security valued at fair value under the procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
L |
Inflation-Protected Security Security whose principal value is adjusted daily or monthly in accordance with changes to the relevant countrys Consumer Price Index or its equivalent used as an inflation proxy. Interest is calculated on the basis of the current adjusted principal value. |
M |
On September 7, 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency placed Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FHLMC) into conservatorship. |
N |
Non-income producing. |
O |
Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $769,900,467. |
P |
Futures are described in more detail in the notes to financial statements. |
Abbreviations used in this schedule:
AUDAustralian Dollar
CADCanadian Dollar
See notes to financial statements.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2009
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Investment securities at value (Cost$769,896,644) |
|
|
|
$ |
785,202,859 |
|
||
Cash |
|
|
|
281,988 |
|
|||
Interest receivable |
|
|
|
7,281,511 |
|
|||
Unrealized appreciation of swaps |
|
|
|
306,296 |
|
|||
Unrealized appreciation of forward foreign currency contracts |
|
|
|
306,153 |
|
|||
Deposits with brokers for open futures contracts |
|
|
|
276,829 |
|
|||
Amounts receivable for open swaps |
|
|
|
20,061 |
|
|||
Total assets |
|
|
|
793,675,697 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Unrealized depreciation of swaps |
|
$ |
553,022 |
|
|
|
||
Accrued advisory fee |
|
405,553 |
|
|
|
|||
Premiums received on open swaps |
|
365,468 |
|
|
|
|||
Unrealized depreciation of forward foreign currency contracts |
|
161,820 |
|
|
|
|||
Futures variation margin payable |
|
146,981 |
|
|
|
|||
Accrued administration fee |
|
10,617 |
|
|
|
|||
Foreign currency overdraft at value (Cost$8,422) |
|
8,253 |
|
|
|
|||
Accrued expenses |
|
316,205 |
|
|
|
|||
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
1,967,919 |
|
|||
Net Assets |
|
|
|
$ |
791,707,778 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Summary of Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Common shares, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized, 61,184,134 shares issued and outstanding (Note 5) |
|
|
|
$ |
852,918,854 |
|
||
Overdistributed net investment income |
|
|
|
(1,504,348 |
) |
|||
Accumulated net realized loss on investments, options, futures, swaps and foreign currency transactions |
|
|
|
(74,570,011 |
) |
|||
Unrealized appreciation of investments, futures, swaps and foreign currency translations |
|
|
|
14,863,283 |
|
|||
Net Assets |
|
|
|
$ |
791,707,778 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net asset value per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
($791,707,778 ÷ 61,184,134 common shares issued and outstanding) |
|
|
|
|
$12.94 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
See notes to financial statements.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Statement of Operations
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
|
|
FOR THE |
|
||||
Investment Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
31,152,219 |
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
158,438 |
|
|
|
||
Total income |
|
|
|
$ |
31,310,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Advisory fees (Note 2) |
|
5,538,202 |
|
|
|
||
Audit and legal fees |
|
206,641 |
|
|
|
||
Administration fee (Note 2) |
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
||
Reports to shareholders |
|
105,294 |
|
|
|
||
Custodian fees |
|
97,947 |
|
|
|
||
Trustees fees and expenses |
|
90,548 |
|
|
|
||
Transfer agent and shareholder servicing expense |
|
62,080 |
|
|
|
||
Registration fees |
|
48,884 |
|
|
|
||
Taxes, other than federal income taxes |
|
20,755 |
|
|
|
||
Other expenses |
|
56,587 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
6,351,938 |
|
|
|
||
Interest expense (Note 3) |
|
693,962 |
|
|
|
||
Net expenses |
|
|
|
7,045,900 |
|
||
Net Investment Income |
|
|
|
24,264,757 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Investments (Notes 1, 3 and 4): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net realized gain/(loss) on: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments |
|
(21,218,693 |
) |
|
|
||
Written options |
|
733,922 |
|
|
|
||
Futures |
|
(1,211,827 |
) |
|
|
||
Swaps |
|
1,488,473 |
|
|
|
||
Foreign currency transactions |
|
(1,141,098 |
) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
(21,349,223 |
) |
||
Change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) of: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments |
|
107,562,764 |
|
|
|
||
Futures |
|
4,192,166 |
|
|
|
||
Swaps |
|
10,878,616 |
|
|
|
||
Foreign currency translations |
|
(82,122 |
) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
122,551,424 |
|
||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain on Investments |
|
|
|
101,202,201 |
|
||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations |
|
|
|
$ |
125,466,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
See notes to financial statements.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
|
|
FOR THE |
|
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Change in Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net investment income |
|
$ |
24,264,757 |
|
$ |
52,375,796 |
|
Net realized gain/(loss) |
|
(21,349,223 |
) |
17,230,123 |
|
||
Change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) |
|
122,551,424 |
|
(144,892,039 |
) |
||
Change in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
|
125,466,958 |
|
(75,286,120 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Distributions to Common Shareholders from (Note 1 and 7): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net investment income |
|
(27,078,390 |
) |
(55,680,481 |
) |
||
Return of capital |
|
(3,513,677 |
) |
|
|
||
Decrease in net assets from distribution to shareholders |
|
(30,592,067 |
) |
(55,680,481 |
) |
||
Change in Net Assets |
|
94,874,891 |
|
(130,966,601 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Beginning of year |
|
696,832,887 |
|
827,799,488 |
|
||
End of year |
|
$ |
791,707,778 |
|
$ |
696,832,887 |
|
(Overdistributed) and undistributed net investment income, respectively |
|
$ |
(1,504,348 |
) |
$ |
397,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Statement of Cash Flows
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
|
|
FOR THE |
|
|||
Cash flows provided (used) by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividends received |
|
|
$ |
28,965,996 |
|
|
Operating expenses paid |
|
|
(6,279,010 |
) |
|
|
Interest paid |
|
|
(697,578 |
) |
|
|
Net sales and maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
Realized loss on futures contracts |
|
|
(1,211,827 |
) |
|
|
Realized gain on options |
|
|
733,922 |
|
|
|
Realized gain on swap contracts |
|
|
1,488,473 |
|
|
|
Realized loss on foreign currency transactions |
|
|
(1,141,098 |
) |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation on futures contracts |
|
|
4,192,166 |
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized depreciation on foreign currencies |
|
|
(82,122 |
) |
|
|
Purchases of long-term investments |
|
|
(372,710,967 |
) |
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of long-term investments |
|
|
460,719,451 |
|
|
|
Cash deposits with brokers for futures contracts |
|
|
3,823,300 |
|
|
|
Change in premium for written swaps |
|
|
511,051 |
|
|
|
Change in payable to brokervariation margin |
|
|
1,274,372 |
|
|
|
Change in receivable/payable for open forward currency contracts |
|
|
82,158 |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
119,674,905 |
|
|
|
Cash flows provided (used) by financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions paid on common stock |
|
|
(32,981,201 |
) |
|
|
Cash paid on reverse repurchase agreements |
|
|
(92,986,000 |
) |
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(125,967,201 |
) |
|
|
Net decrease in cash |
|
|
(6,292,296 |
) |
|
|
Cash, beginning of year |
|
|
6,566,031 |
|
|
|
Cash, end of year |
|
|
$ |
273,735 |
|
|
Reconciliation of Increase in Net Assets From Operations to Net Cash Flows Provided (Used) by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net assets from operations |
|
|
$ |
125,466,958 |
|
|
Accretion of discount on investments |
|
|
(5,836,255 |
) |
|
|
Amortization of premium on investments |
|
|
2,708,073 |
|
|
|
Increase in investments, at value |
|
|
(8,809,696 |
) |
|
|
Decrease in payable for securities purchased |
|
|
(711,280 |
) |
|
|
Decrease in interest and dividends receivable |
|
|
880,539 |
|
|
|
Decrease in premium for written swaps |
|
|
(511,051 |
) |
|
|
Decrease in receivable for securities sold |
|
|
1,238,475 |
|
|
|
Increase in payable for open forward currency contracts |
|
|
82,158 |
|
|
|
Increase in payable to brokervariation margin |
|
|
1,274,372 |
|
|
|
Decrease in deposits with brokers for futures contracts |
|
|
3,823,300 |
|
|
|
Decrease in interest payable |
|
|
(3,616 |
) |
|
|
Increase in accrued expenses |
|
|
72,928 |
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(5,792,053 |
) |
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
|
$ 119,674,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Financial Highlights
Contained below is per share operating performance data for a share of common stock outstanding throughout each period shown, total investment return, rations to average net assets and other supplemental data. This information has been derived from information in the financial statements.
|
|
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||||
Net asset value, beginning of year |
|
$ |
11.39 |
|
$ |
13.53 |
|
$ |
13.03 |
|
$ |
13.46 |
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net investment income |
|
.40 |
A |
.86 |
A |
.72 |
A |
.71 |
A |
1.15 |
|
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain/(loss) |
|
1.65 |
|
(2.09 |
) |
.52 |
|
(.19 |
) |
(.53 |
) |
|||||
Total from investment operations |
|
2.05 |
|
(1.23 |
) |
1.24 |
|
.52 |
|
.62 |
|
|||||
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net investment income |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
(.29 |
) |
(.22 |
) |
|||||
Total from investment operations applicable to common shareholders |
|
2.05 |
|
(1.23 |
) |
1.24 |
|
.23 |
|
.40 |
|
|||||
Distributions paid to common shareholders from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net investment income |
|
(.44 |
) |
(.91 |
) |
(.74 |
) |
(.44 |
) |
(.94 |
) |
|||||
Return of capital |
|
(.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(.22 |
) |
|
|
|||||
Total distributions |
|
(.50 |
) |
(.91 |
) |
(.74 |
) |
(.66 |
) |
(.94 |
) |
|||||
Net asset value, end of year |
|
$ |
12.94 |
|
$ |
11.39 |
|
$ |
13.53 |
|
$ |
13.03 |
|
$ |
13.46 |
|
Market value, end of year |
|
$ |
12.04 |
|
$ |
10.49 |
|
$ |
11.76 |
|
$ |
11.57 |
|
$ |
11.87 |
|
Average market value per share |
|
$ |
11.32 |
|
$ |
11.51 |
|
$ |
11.68 |
|
$ |
11.59 |
|
$ |
12.58 |
|
Total Investment Return Based On:B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Market value |
|
19.91 |
% |
(3.37 |
)% |
8.21 |
% |
3.15 |
% |
(.26 |
)% |
|||||
Net asset value |
|
18.40 |
% |
(9.50 |
)% |
9.81 |
% |
1.76 |
% |
2.94 |
% |
|||||
Ratios and Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ratio of total expense to average weekly net assets (including interest expense) attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Common sharesC |
|
.95 |
% |
1.20 |
% |
.92 |
% |
1.43 |
% |
1.47 |
% |
|||||
Total managed assetsC,E |
|
.76 |
% |
1.01 |
% |
.90 |
% |
.95 |
% |
.93 |
% |
|||||
Ratio of net expense to average weekly net assets (including interest expense) attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Common sharesD |
|
.95 |
% |
1.20 |
% |
.92 |
% |
1.43 |
% |
1.47 |
% |
|||||
Total managed assetsD,E |
|
.76 |
% |
1.01 |
% |
.90 |
% |
.94 |
% |
.93 |
% |
|||||
Ratio of net expense to average weekly net assets (excluding interest expense) attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Common sharesD |
|
.86 |
% |
.82 |
% |
.75 |
% |
1.15 |
% |
1.20 |
% |
|||||
Total managed assetsD,E |
|
.69 |
% |
.69 |
% |
.73 |
% |
.76 |
% |
.76 |
% |
|||||
Ratio of net investment income to average weekly net assets attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Common sharesD |
|
3.27 |
% |
6.57 |
% |
5.46 |
% |
5.39 |
% |
8.46 |
% |
|||||
Total managed assetsD,E |
|
2.63 |
% |
5.53 |
% |
5.31 |
% |
3.56 |
% |
5.37 |
% |
|||||
Asset coverage on preferred shares, end of yearF |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
G |
301 |
% |
|||||
Portfolio turnover rate |
|
41 |
% |
52 |
% |
82 |
% |
112 |
% |
113 |
% |
|||||
Net assets, end of year (in thousands) |
|
$791,708 |
$696,833 |
$827,799 |
$797,316 |
$823,471 |
A Computed using average daily shares outstanding.
B Total return based on market value reflects changes in market value. Total return based on net asset value reflects changes in the Funds net asset value during the period. Each figure includes reinvestments of dividends and distributions. These figures will differ depending upon the level of any discount from or premium to net asset value at which the Funds shares trade during the period. Total investment return is not annualized for periods of less than one year. Brokerage commissions are not reflected in the calculations.
C This ratio reflects total expenses before compensating balance credits.
D This ratio reflects expenses net of compensating balance credits.
E Total managed assets included the liquidation value of preferred shares through November 22, 2006.
F Asset coverage on preferred shares equals net assets of common shares plus the redemption value of the preferred shares divided by the value of outstanding preferred stock.
G The last series of preferred shares was redeemed on November 22, 2006.
N/A Not applicable.
See notes to financial statements.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund (the Fund) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Fund commenced operations on February 25, 2004.
The Funds primary investment objective is to provide current income for its shareholders. Capital appreciation, when consistent with current income, is a secondary investment objective.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund and are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Estimates and assumptions are required to be made regarding assets, liabilities and changes in net assets resulting from operations when financial statements are prepared. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ. Subsequent events have been evaluated through February 19, 2010, the issuance date of the financial statements.
(a) Investment Valuation.
Debt securities are valued at the last quoted bid provided by an independent pricing service that are based on transactions in debt obligations, quotations from bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various other relationships between securities. Publicly traded foreign government debt securities are typically traded internationally in the over-the-counter market, and are valued at the mean between the last quoted bid and asked prices as of the close of business of that market. Futures contracts are valued daily at the settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Equity securities for which market quotations are available are valued at the last reported sales price or official closing price on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. When prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded, but before the Fund calculates its net asset value, the Fund values these securities at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures approved by the Funds Board of Trustees.
The Fund has adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification Topic 820 (formerly, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157) (ASC Topic 820). ASC Topic 820 establishes a single definition of fair value, creates a three-tier hierarchy as a framework for measuring fair value based on inputs used to value the Funds investments, and requires additional disclosure about fair value. The hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.
· Level 1quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
· Level 2other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
· Level 3significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The Fund uses valuation techniques to measure fair value that are consistent with the market approach and/or income approach, depending on the type of the security and the particular circumstance. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable securities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Notes to Financial StatementsContinued
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Funds assets carried at fair value:
Description |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
Total |
|
||
Long-Term Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations |
|
|
|
|
$643,586,117 |
|
|
|
|
$643,586,117 |
|
Corporate Bonds and Notes |
|
|
|
|
53,496,854 |
|
|
|
|
53,496,854 |
|
Asset-Backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
4,224,365 |
|
|
|
|
4,224,365 |
|
Loan Participations and Assignments |
|
|
|
|
9,383,232 |
|
|
|
|
9,383,232 |
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
14,557,099 |
|
|
|
|
14,557,099 |
|
Yankee Bonds |
|
|
|
|
15,561,250 |
|
|
|
|
15,561,250 |
|
Foreign Government Obligations |
|
|
|
|
43,053,682 |
|
|
|
|
43,053,682 |
|
Preferred Stocks |
|
$1,340,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340,260 |
|
Total Long-Term Investments |
|
$1,340,260 |
|
|
$783,862,599 |
|
|
|
|
$785,202,859 |
|
Other Financial Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts |
|
$ (340,577 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (340,577 |
) |
Forward Foreign Currency Contracts |
|
|
|
|
$ 144,333 |
|
|
|
|
144,333 |
|
Credit Default Swaps on Corporate IssuesSell Protection |
|
|
|
|
(553,022 |
) |
|
|
|
(553,022 |
) |
Credit Default Swaps on Credit IndicesSell Protection |
|
|
|
|
(59,172 |
) |
|
|
|
(59,172 |
) |
Total Other Financial Instruments |
|
(340,577 |
) |
|
(467,861 |
) |
|
|
|
(808,438 |
) |
Total |
|
$ 999,683 |
|
|
$783,394,738 |
|
|
|
|
$784,394,421 |
|
See Portfolio of Investments for additional detailed categorizations.
Values include any premiums paid or received with respect to swap contracts.
(b) Repurchase Agreements
The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that its investment manager has determined are creditworthy. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. Under the terms of a typical repurchase agreement, a fund takes possession of an underlying debt obligation subject to an obligation of the seller to repurchase, and of the fund to resell, the obligation at an agreed-upon price and time, thereby determining the yield during a funds holding period. When entering into repurchase agreements, it is the Funds policy that its custodian or a third party custodian, acting on the Funds behalf, take possession of the underlying collateral securities, the market value of which, at all times, at least equals the principal amount of the repurchase transaction, including accrued interest. To the extent that any repurchase transaction maturity exceeds one business day, the value of the collateral is marked to market and measured against the value of the agreement to ensure the adequacy of the collateral. If the counterparty defaults, the Fund generally has the right to use the collateral to satisfy the terms of the repurchase transaction. However, if the market value of the collateral declines during the period in which the Fund seeks to assert its rights or if bankruptcy proceedings are commenced with respect to the seller of the security, realization of the collateral by the Fund may be delayed or limited.
(c) Reverse Repurchase Agreements
The Fund may enter into reverse repurchase agreements. Under the terms of a typical reverse repurchase agreement, a fund sells a security subject to an obligation to repurchase the security from the buyer at an agreed-upon time and price. In the event the buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase agreement files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, the Funds use of the proceeds of the agreement may be restricted pending a determination by the counterparty, or its trustee or receiver, whether to enforce the Funds obligation to repurchase the securities. In entering into reverse repurchase agreements, the Fund will maintain cash, U.S. government securities or other liquid debt obligations at least equal in value to its obligations with respect to reverse repurchase agreements or will take other actions permitted by law to cover its obligations.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
(d) Futures Contracts
The Fund may use futures contracts to gain exposure to, or hedge against, changes in the value of interest rates or foreign currencies. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit cash or cash equivalents with a broker in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract amount. This is known as the initial margin and subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the Fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuation in the value of the contract. For certain futures, including foreign denominated futures, variation margin is not settled daily, but is recorded as a net variation margin payable or receivable. Futures contracts are valued daily at the settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. The daily changes in contract value are recorded as unrealized gains or losses in the Statement of Operations and the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss when the contract is closed.
Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, risk of loss in excess of the amounts reflected in the financial statements. In addition, there is the risk that the Fund may not be able to enter into a closing transaction because of an illiquid secondary market.
(e) Written Options
When the Fund writes an option, an amount equal to the premium received by the Fund is recorded as a liability, the value of which is marked to market daily to reflect the current market value of the option written. If the option expires, the premium received is recorded as a realized gain. When a written call option is exercised, the difference between the premium received plus the option exercise price and the Funds basis in the underlying security (in the case of a covered written call option), or the cost to purchase the underlying security (in the case of an uncovered written call option), including brokerage commission, is recognized as a realized gain or loss. When a written put option is exercised, the amount of the premium received is subtracted from the cost of the security purchased by the Fund from the exercise of the written put option to form the Funds basis in the underlying security purchased. The writer or buyer of an option traded on an exchange can liquidate the position before the exercise of the option by entering into a closing transaction. The cost of a closing transaction is deducted from the original premium received resulting in a realized gain or loss to the Fund.
The risk in writing a covered call option is that the Fund may forego the opportunity of profit if the market price of the underlying security increases and the option is exercised. The risk in writing a put option is that the Fund may incur a loss if the market price of the underlying security decreases and the option is exercised. The risk in writing a call option is that the Fund is exposed to the risk of loss if the market price of the underlying security increases. In addition, there is the risk that the Fund may not be able to enter into a closing transaction because of an illiquid secondary market.
(f) Forward Foreign Currency Contracts
The Fund may enter into a forward foreign currency contract to hedge against foreign currency exchange rate risk on its non-U.S. dollar denominated securities or to facilitate settlement of a foreign currency denominated portfolio transaction. A forward foreign currency contract is an agreement between two parties to buy and sell a currency at a set price with delivery and settlement at a future date. The contract is marked to market daily and the change in value is recorded by the Fund as an unrealized gain or loss. When a forward foreign currency contract is closed, through either delivery or offset by entering into another forward foreign currency contract, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value of the contract at the time it is closed.
Forward foreign currency contracts involve elements of market risk in excess of the amounts reflected on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign exchange rate underlying the forward foreign currency contract. Risks may also arise upon entering into these contracts from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts.
(g) Swap Agreements
The Fund may invest in swaps for the purpose of managing its exposure to interest rate, credit or market risk, or for other purposes. The use of swaps involves risks that are different from those associated with ordinary portfolio transactions.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Notes to Financial StatementsContinued
Swap contracts are marked to market daily and changes in value are recorded as unrealized appreciation/(depreciation). Gains or losses are realized upon termination of the swap agreement. Periodic payments and premiums received or made by the Fund are recognized in the Statement of Operations as realized gains or losses, respectively. Collateral, in the form of restricted cash or securities, may be required to be held in segregated accounts with the Funds custodian in compliance with the terms of the swap contracts. Securities held as collateral for swap contracts are identified in the Schedule of Investments and restricted cash, if any, is identified on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks may exceed amounts recorded in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. These risks include changes in the returns of the underlying instruments, failure of the counterparties to perform under the contracts terms, and the possible lack of liquidity with respect to the swap agreements.
Payments received or made at the beginning of the measurement period are reflected as a premium or deposit, respectively, on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. These upfront payments are amortized over the life of the swap and are recognized as realized gain or loss in the Statement of Operations. A liquidation payment received or made at the termination of the swap is recognized as realized gain or loss in the Statement of Operations. Net periodic payments received or paid by the Fund are recognized as realized gain or loss at the time of receipt or payment in the Statement of Operations.
As disclosed in the Funds summary of open swap contracts, the aggregate fair value of credit default swaps in a net liability position as of December 31, 2009 was $612,194. The aggregate fair value of assets posted as collateral for all swaps was $627,098. If a defined credit event had occurred as of December 31, 2009, the swaps credit-risk-related contingent features would have been triggered and the Fund would have been required to pay up to $24,108,000 less the value of the contracts related reference obligations.
Credit Default Swaps
The Fund may enter into credit default swap (CDS) contracts for investment purposes, to manage its credit risk or to add leverage. CDS agreements involve one party making a stream of payments to another party in exchange for the right to receive a specified return in the event of a default by a third party, typically corporate or sovereign issuers, on a specified obligation, or in the event of a write-down, principal shortfall, interest shortfall or default of all or part of the referenced entities comprising a credit index. The Fund may use a CDS to provide protection against defaults of the issuers (i.e., to reduce risk where the Fund has exposure to a sovereign issuer) or to take an active long or short position with respect to the likelihood of a particular issuers default. As a seller of protection, the Fund generally receives an upfront payment or a stream of payments throughout the term of the swap provided that there is no credit event. If the Fund is a seller of protection and a credit event occurs, as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement, the maximum potential amount of future payments (undiscounted) that the Fund could be required to make under a credit default swap agreement would be an amount equal to the notional amount of the agreement. These amounts of potential payments will be partially offset by any recovery of values from the respective referenced obligations. As a seller of protection, the Fund effectively adds leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, the Fund is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. As a buyer of protection, the Fund generally receives an amount up to the notional value of the swap if a credit event occurs.
Implied spreads are the theoretical prices a lender receives for credit default protection. When spreads rise, market perceived credit risk rises and when spreads fall, market perceived credit risk falls. The implied credit spread of a particular referenced entity reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may include upfront payments required to enter into the agreement. Wider credit spreads and decreasing market values, when compared to the notional amount of the swap, represent a deterioration of the referenced entitys credit soundness and a greater likelihood or risk of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the agreement. Credit spreads utilized in determining the period end market value of credit default swap agreements on corporate or sovereign issues are disclosed in the Notes to Financial Statements and serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and represent the likelihood or risk of default for credit derivatives. For credit default swap agreements on asset-backed securities and credit indices, the quoted market prices and resulting values, particularly in relation to the notional amount of the contract as well as the annual payment rate, serve as an indication of the current status of the payment/performance risk.
The Funds maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the contract (this risk is mitigated by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the Fund to cover the Funds exposure to the counterparty). As the
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
protection seller, the Funds maximum risk is the notional amount of the contract. Credit default swaps are considered to have credit risk-related contingent features since they require payment by the protection seller to the protection buyer upon the occurrence of a defined credit event.
Entering into a CDS agreement involves, to varying degrees, elements of credit, market and documentation risk in excess of the related amounts recognized on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Such risks involve the possibility that there will be no liquid market for these agreements, that the counterparty to the agreement may default on its obligation to perform or disagree as to the meaning of the contractual terms in the agreement, and that there will be unfavorable changes in net interest rates.
Interest Rate Swaps
The Fund may enter into interest rate swap contracts. Interest rate swaps are agreements between two parties to exchange cash flows based on a notional principal amount. The Fund may elect to pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate, or, receive a fixed rate and pay a floating rate on a notional principal amount. The net interest received or paid on interest rate swap agreements is accrued daily as interest income. Interest rate swaps are marked to market daily based upon quotations from market makers and the change, if any, is recorded as an unrealized gain or loss in the Statement of Operations. When a swap contract is terminated early, the Fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the original cost and the settlement amount of the closing transaction.
The risks of interest rate swaps include changes in market conditions that will affect the value of the contract or changes in the present value of the future cash flow streams and the possible inability of the counterparty to fulfill its obligations under the agreement. The Funds maximum risk of loss from counterparty credit risk is the discounted net value of the cash flows to be received from the counterparty over the contracts remaining life, to the extent that that amount is positive. This risk is mitigated by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the Fund to cover the Funds exposure to the counterparty.
(h) Inflation-Indexed Bonds
Inflation-indexed bonds are fixed-income securities whose principal value or interest rate is periodically adjusted according to the rate of inflation. As the index measuring inflation changes, the principal value or interest rate of inflation-indexed bonds will be adjusted accordingly. Inflation adjustments to the principal amount of inflation-indexed bonds are reflected as an increase or decrease to investment income on the Statement of Operations. Repayment of the original bond principal upon maturity (as adjusted for inflation) is guaranteed in the case of U.S. Treasury inflation-indexed bonds. For bonds that do not provide a similar guarantee, the adjusted principal value of the bond repaid at maturity may be less than the original principal.
(i) Loan Participations
The Fund may invest in loans arranged through private negotiation between one or more financial institutions. The Funds investment in any such loan may be in the form of a participation in or an assignment of the loan. In connection with purchasing participations, the Fund generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement related to the loan, or any rights of off-set against the borrower and the Fund may not benefit directly from any collateral supporting the loan in which it has purchased the participation.
The Fund assumes the credit risk of the borrower, the lender that is selling the participation and any other persons interpositioned between the Fund and the borrower. In the event of the insolvency of the lender selling the participation, the Fund may be treated as a general creditor of the lender and may not benefit from any off-set between the lender and the borrower.
(j) Foreign Currency Translation
Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts based upon prevailing exchange rates on the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts based upon prevailing exchange rates on the respective dates of such transactions.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Notes to Financial StatementsContinued
The Fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, including gains and losses on forward foreign currency contracts, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Funds books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the fair values of assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, on the date of valuation, resulting from changes in exchange rates.
Foreign security and currency transactions may involve certain considerations and risks not typically associated with those of U.S. dollar denominated transactions as a result of, among other factors, the possibility of lower levels of governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets and the possibility of political or economic instability.
(k) Credit and Market Risk
Investments in securities that are collateralized by residential real estate mortgages are subject to certain credit and liquidity risks. When market conditions result in an increase in default rates of the underlying mortgages and foreclosure values of underlying real estate properties are materially below the outstanding amount of these underlying mortgages, collection of the full amount of accrued interest and principal on these investments may be doubtful. Such market conditions may significantly impair the value and liquidity of these investments and may result in a lack of correlation between their credit ratings and values.
(l) Security Transactions and Investment Income
Security transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. The cost of investments sold is determined by use of the specific identification method. To the extent any issuer defaults or credit event occurs by the issuer, the Fund may halt any additional interest income accruals and consider the realizability of interest accrued up to the date of default or credit event.
(m) Distributions to Shareholders
Distributions from net investment income for the Fund, if any, are declared and paid on a monthly basis. Distributions of net realized gains, if any, are declared at least annually. Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date and are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(n) Compensating Balance Agreements
The Fund has an arrangement with its custodian bank whereby a portion of the custodians fees is paid indirectly by credits earned on the Funds cash deposit with the bank.
(o) Other
In the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent upon claims that may be made against the Fund in the future and, therefore, cannot be estimated; however, based on experience, the risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
(p) Federal and Other Taxes
It is the Funds policy to comply with the federal income and excise tax requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies. Accordingly, the Fund intends to distribute its taxable income and net realized gains, if any, to shareholders in accordance with timing requirements imposed by the Code. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required in the Funds financial statements.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Management has analyzed the Funds tax positions taken on federal income tax returns for all open tax years and has concluded that as of December 31, 2009, no provision for income tax is required in the Funds financial statements. The Funds federal and state income and federal excise tax returns for tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by Internal Revenue Service and state departments of revenue.
(q) Reclassification
GAAP requires that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. During the current year, the following reclassifications have been made:
|
|
Overdistributed
Net |
|
Accumulated Net |
|
Paid-in Capital |
|
||
(a) |
|
$ 20,755 |
|
|
|
|
$(20,755 |
) |
|
(b) |
|
891,135 |
|
$(891,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) Reclassifications are primarily due to a non-deductible excise tax paid by the Fund.
(b) Reclassifications are primarily due to foreign currency transactions treated as ordinary income for tax purposes, losses from mortgage backed securities treated as capital losses for tax purposes, book/tax differences in the treatment of swap contracts and book/tax differences in the treatment of Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities.
2. Investment Management Agreement and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The Fund has entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement with Claymore Advisors, LLC (Investment Adviser), which provides for payment of a monthly fee computed at the annual rate of 0.60% of the Funds average weekly assets. The Investment Adviser has, in turn, entered into an Investment Management Agreement with Western Asset Management Company (Investment Manager), pursuant to which the Investment Manager provides investment management services to the Fund. In exchange for the services provided by the Investment Manager, the Investment Adviser pays a portion of the fees it receives from the Fund to the Investment Manager, at the annual rate of 0.27% of the Funds average weekly assets. Average weekly assets means the average weekly value of the total assets of the Fund (including any assets attributable to leverage) minus accrued liabilities (other than liabilities representing leverage). For purposes of calculating average weekly assets, neither the liquidation preference of any preferred shares outstanding nor any liabilities associated with any instrument or transactions used by the Investment Manager to leverage the Funds portfolio (whether or not such instruments or transactions are covered as described in the prospectus) is considered a liability.
Western Asset Management Company Pte. Ltd. (Western Asset Singapore), Western Asset Management Company Limited (Western Asset London) and Western Asset Management Company Ltd (Western Asset Japan) are the Funds investment managers. Western Asset London, Western Asset Singapore and Western Asset Japan provide certain investment management services to the Fund relating to currency transactions and investment in non-U.S. denominated securities. Western Asset London, Western Asset Singapore and Western Asset Japan do not receive any compensation from the Fund.
Under an administrative agreement with the Fund, Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC (LMPFA) (Administrator), an affiliate of the Investment Manager, provides certain administrative and accounting functions for the Fund. In consideration for these services, the Fund pays the Administrator a monthly fee at an annual rate of $125,000.
The Board approved the substitution of LMPFA for Legg Mason Fund Adviser, Inc. (LMFA). Effective September 30, 2009 LMPFA assumed the rights and responsibilities of LMFA under its administrative agreement.
3. Investments
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investments (excluding short-term investments) and U.S Government & Agency Obligations were as follows:
|
|
Investments |
|
U.S.
Government & |
|
Purchases |
|
$68,928,229 |
|
$302,117,180 |
|
Sales |
|
34,471,918 |
|
423,964,902 |
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Notes to Financial StatementsContinued
At December 31, 2009, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Gross unrealized appreciation |
|
$ 55,530,971 |
|
Gross unrealized depreciation |
|
(40,228,579 |
) |
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
$ 15,302,392 |
|
Transactions in reverse repurchase agreements for the Fund during the year ended December 1, 2009 were as follows:
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
Maximum |
|
|
$178,354,464 |
|
0.38% |
|
$332,196,700 |
|
Interest rates on reverse repurchase agreements ranged from 0.18% to 0.70% during the year ended December 31, 2009. Interest expense incurred on reverse repurchase agreements totaled $693,962.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, written option transactions for the Fund were as follows:
|
|
Number of |
|
Premiums |
|
||
Written options, outstanding December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options written |
|
|
725 |
|
|
$ 733,922 |
|
Options closed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
(247,146 |
) |
Options expired |
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
(486,776 |
) |
Written options, outstanding December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, the Fund had the following open forward foreign currency contracts:
|
|
Settlement |
|
Contract to |
|
Unrealized |
|
|||||
Broker |
|
Date |
|
ReceiveA |
|
DeliverA |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|||
Credit Suisse First Boston (London) |
|
2/17/2010 |
|
USD |
2,264,536 |
|
AUD |
2,500,592 |
|
$ |
29,085 |
|
Credit Suisse First Boston (London) |
|
2/17/2010 |
|
USD |
8,148,378 |
|
AUD |
8,955,245 |
|
142,666 |
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston (London) |
|
2/17/2010 |
|
USD |
6,122,407 |
|
AUD |
6,741,996 |
|
95,271 |
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston (London) |
|
2/17/2010 |
|
USD |
9,052,674 |
|
AUD |
10,082,613 |
|
39,131 |
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston (London) |
|
2/17/2010 |
|
USD |
9,295,045 |
|
CAD |
9,890,393 |
|
(161,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
144,333 |
|
A Definitions of currency abbreviations:
AUD Australian Dollar
CAD Canadian Dollar
USD United States Dollar
At December 31, 2009, the Fund had the following open swap contracts:
CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP ON CORPORATE ISSUESSELL PROTECTION1
Swap Counterparty |
|
Termination |
|
Implied Credit
Spread At |
|
Periodic |
|
Contract |
|
Market |
|
Upfront |
|
Unrealized |
|
JP Morgan Chase & Co. |
|
December 20, 2012 |
|
5.14% |
|
2.50% |
|
$8,100,000 |
|
$(553,022) |
|
|
|
$(553,022) |
|
(SLM Corporation, 5.125%, due |
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/27/12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP ON CREDIT INDICESSELL PROTECTION1
Swap Counterparty |
|
Termination |
|
Periodic |
|
Notional |
|
Market |
|
Upfront |
|
Unrealized |
|
|||
Barclays Capital Inc. (CDX HY 8) |
|
June 20, 2012 |
|
2.75% |
|
$ 7,308,000 |
|
$ (27,013 |
) |
$(262,384 |
) |
|
$235,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JP Morgan Chase & Co. (CDX HY 8) |
|
June 20, 2012 |
|
2.75% |
|
8,700,000 |
|
(32,159 |
) |
(103,084 |
) |
|
70,925 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$16,008,000 |
|
$ (59,172 |
) |
|
$(365,468 |
) |
|
$306,296 |
|
|
1 If the Fund is a seller of protection and a credit event occurs, as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement, the Fund will either (i) pay to the buyer of protection an amount equal to the notional amount of the swap and take delivery of the referenced obligation or underlying securities comprising the referenced index or (ii) pay a net settlement amount in the form of cash or securities equal to the notional amount of the swap less the recovery value of the referenced obligation or underlying securities comprising the referenced index.
2 Implied credit spreads, utilized in determining the market value of credit default swap agreements on corporate issues or sovereign issues of an emerging country as of period end serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and represent the likelihood or risk of default for the credit derivative. The implied credit spread of a particular referenced entity reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may include upfront payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. Wider credit spreads represent a deterioration of the referenced entitys credit soundness and a greater likelihood or risk of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the agreement. A credit spread identified as Defaulted indicates a credit event has occurred for the referenced entity or obligation.
3 The maximum potential amount the Fund could be required to make as a seller of credit protection or receive as a buyer of credit protection if a credit event occurs as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement.
4 The quoted market prices and resulting values for credit default swap agreements on asset-backed securities and credit indices serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and represent the likelihood of an expected liability (or profit) for the credit derivative should the notional amount of the swap agreement been closed/sold as of the period end. Decreasing market values when compared to the notional amount of the swap, represent a deterioration of the referenced entitys credit soundness and a greater likelihood or risk of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the agreement.
Percentage shown is an annual percentage rate.
4. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification Topic 815 (formerly, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161) (ASC Topic 815) requires enhanced disclosure about an entitys derivative and hedging activities.
Below is a table, grouped by derivative type that provides information about the fair value and the location of derivatives within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities at December 31, 2009.
Asset Derivatives1
|
|
Foreign Exchange |
|
Credit |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
Swap Contracts |
|
|
|
$306,296 |
|
|
|
$306,296 |
|
Forward Foreign Currency Contracts |
|
$306,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
306,153 |
|
|
|
$306,153 |
|
$306,296 |
|
|
|
$612,449 |
|
Liability Derivatives1
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Foreign Exchange |
|
Credit |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||
Futures Contracts2 |
|
$340,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 340,577 |
|
||
Swap Contracts3 |
|
|
|
|
|
$918,490 |
|
|
|
918,490 |
|
||
Forward Foreign Currency Contracts |
|
|
|
$161,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
161,820 |
|
||
Total |
|
$340,577 |
|
$161,820 |
|
$918,490 |
|
|
|
$1,420,887 |
|
||
1 Generally, the balance sheet location for asset derivatives is receivables/net unrealized appreciation(depreciation) and for liability derivatives is payables/net unrealized appreciation(depreciation).
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Notes to Financial StatementsContinued
2 Includes cumulative appreciation/depreciation of futures contracts as reported in the footnotes. Only current days variation margin is reported within the receivables and/or payables of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
3 Values include premiums paid/(received) on swap contracts which are shown separately in the Statement of Assets and liabilities.
The following tables provide information about the effect of derivatives and hedging activities on the Funds Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2009. The first table provides additional detail about the amounts and sources of gains/(losses) realized on derivatives during the period. The second table provides additional information about the changes in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) resulting from the Funds derivatives and hedging activities during the period.
Amount of Realized Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Foreign Exchange |
|
Credit |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||
Written Options |
|
$ |
733,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
733,922 |
|
Futures Contracts |
|
(1,211,827) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,211,827 |
) |
||
Swap Contracts |
|
4,677,444 |
|
|
|
$(3,188,971) |
|
|
|
1,488,473 |
|
||
Forward Foreign Currency Contracts |
|
|
|
(924,757) |
|
|
|
|
|
(924,757 |
) |
||
Total |
|
$ |
4,199,539 |
|
$(924,757) |
|
$(3,188,971) |
|
|
|
$ |
85,811 |
|
Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Foreign Exchange |
|
Credit |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
Futures Contracts |
|
$4,192,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,192,166 |
|
Swap Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
$10,878,616 |
|
|
|
10,878,616 |
|
|
Forward Foreign Currency Contracts |
|
|
|
$(82,158) |
|
|
|
|
|
(82,158 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$4,192,166 |
|
$(82,158) |
|
$10,878,616 |
|
|
|
$ |
14,988,624 |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2009 the Fund had average market values of $53,492, $7,085,432, $16,461,125, $49,708,184 and $6,097,665 in written options, forward foreign currency contracts to buy, forward foreign currency contracts to sell, futures contracts to buy and futures contracts to sell, respectively, average notional balances in interest rate swap contracts of $12,876,923 and average notional balances of $89,152,954 in credit default swap contracts (to sell protection).
The Fund has several credit related contingent features that if triggered would allow its derivatives counterparties to close out and demand payment or additional collateral to cover their exposure from the Fund. Credit related contingent features are established between the Fund and its derivatives counterparties to reduce the risk that the Fund will not fulfill its payment obligations to its counterparties. These triggering features include, but are not limited to, a percentage decrease in the Funds net assets and or percentage decrease in the Funds Net Asset Value or NAV. The contingent features are established within the Funds International Swap and Derivatives Association, Inc. master agreements which govern positions in swaps, over-the-counter options, and forward currency exchange contracts for each individual counterparty.
5. Common Shares
Of the 61,184,134 shares of beneficial interest outstanding at December 31, 2009, the Investment Manager owned 6,981 shares.
6. Trustee Compensation
Each Independent Trustee receives a fee of $15,000 for serving as a Trustee of the Fund and a fee of $1,500 and related expenses for each meeting of the Board of Trustees attended. The Chairman of the Board receives an additional $5,000 for serving in that capacity. The Audit Committee Chairman and the Governance and Nominating Committee Chairman each receive an additional $3,000 for serving in their respective capacities. Members of the Audit Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee receive $500 for each committee meeting attended.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
7. Income Tax Information and Distributions to Shareholders
Subsequent to the fiscal year end, the Fund has made the following distributions:
|
Record Date |
|
|
|
Payable Date |
|
|
Per Share Distribution |
01/15/2010 |
|
01/29/2010 |
|
$ 0.040000 |
||||
02/12/2010 |
|
02/26/2010 |
|
$ 0.040000 |
The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended December 31, was as follows:
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Distributions paid from: |
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Income |
|
$27,078,390 |
|
$55,680,481 |
|
Tax Return of Capital |
|
3,513,677 |
|
|
|
Total Distributions Paid |
|
$30,592,067 |
|
$55,680,481 |
|
As of December 31, 2009, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Capital loss carryforward* |
|
$(70,186,501 |
) |
Other book/tax temporary differences(a) |
|
(5,884,035 |
) |
Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation)(b) |
|
14,859,460 |
|
Total accumulated earnings/(losses)net |
|
$(61,211,076 |
) |
* As of December 31, 2009, the Fund had the following net capital loss carryforward remaining:
Year of Expiration |
|
Amount |
|
12/31/2012 |
|
$(10,084,162 |
) |
12/31/2013 |
|
(10,088,445 |
) |
12/31/2014 |
|
(30,022,572 |
) |
12/31/2017 |
|
(19,991,322 |
) |
|
|
$(70,186,501 |
) |
These amounts will be available to offset any future taxable capital gains.
(a) Other book/tax temporary differences are attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on straddles, realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains/(losses) on certain futures and foreign currency contracts, the deferral of post-October currency and capital losses for tax purposes, differences between book/tax accrual of interest income on securities in default, book/tax differences in the treatment of Tresury Inflation-Protected Securities and book/tax differences in the timing of the deductibility of various expenses.
(b) The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund:
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund (the Fund) at December 31, 2009, the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as financial statements) are the responsibility of the Funds management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at December 31, 2009 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
February 19, 2010
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Important Tax Information (Unaudited)
The following information is provided with respect to the distributions paid during the taxable year ended December 31, 2009:
Record Date:
|
|
Monthly |
|
Monthly |
|
|||||
Payable Date: |
|
|||||||||
Ordinary Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Qualified Dividend Income for Individuals** |
|
|
0.59% |
|
|
|
0.59% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Qualifying for the Dividends |
|
|
0.59% |
|
|
|
0.59% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest from Federal Obligations |
|
|
51.17% |
* |
|
|
51.17% |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Return of Capital |
|
|
5.86% |
|
|
|
12.11% |
|
|
|
* The Fund has met the quarterly asset requirements for California, Connecticut and New York Resident Shareholders.
** Expressed as a percentage net of Tax Return of Capital.
The law varies in each state as to whether and what percentage of dividend income attributable to Federal obligations is exempt from state income tax. We recommend that you consult with your tax adviser to determine if any portion of the dividends you received is exempt from state income taxes.
Please retain this information for your records.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Trustees and Officers
The Trustees and officers of the Fund, their ages (as of December 31, 2009), and a description of their principal occupations during the past five years are listed below. Except as noted, each Trustees and officers principal occupation and business experience for the last five years has been with the employer(s) indicated, although in some cases the Trustee or officer may have held different positions with such employer(s). Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of the persons listed below is c/o Western Asset Management Company, 385 East Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91101.
Name and Age |
|
Position(s) |
|
Term of |
|
Principal
Occupations |
|
Number of |
|
Other
Directorships |
Independent Trustees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Larson |
|
Trustee and Chairman of the Board of Trustees(B)(C) |
|
Term expires in 2011; served since September 2004 |
|
Chief Investment Officer for William H. Gates III (1994-present). |
|
2 |
|
Pan American Silver Corp. (1999-present); Republic Services, Inc. (2009-present); Grupo Telensa, S.A.B. (2009-present). |
Ronald A. Nyberg |
|
Trustee(B)(C) |
|
Term expires in 2009; served since January 2004 |
|
Partner of Nyberg & Cassioppi, LLC, a law firm specializing in corporate law, estate planning and business transactions (2000- present); Formerly, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Van Kampen Investments (1982-1999). |
|
44 |
|
None |
Ronald E. Toupin, Jr. 51 |
|
Trustee(B)(C) |
|
Term expires in 2010; served since January 2004 |
|
Retired. Formerly: Vice President, Manager and Portfolio Manager of Nuveen Asset Management, an investment advisory firm (1998-1999); Vice President and Portfolio Manager of Nuveen Investment Advisory Corporation, an investment advisory firm (1992-1999); Vice President and Manager of Nuveen Unit Investment Trusts (1991-1999); and Assistant Vice President and Portfolio Manager of Nuveen Unit Trusts (1988- 1999), and John Nuveen & Company, Inc. (1982-1999) |
|
41 |
|
None |
Interested Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Jay Gerken |
|
Trustee and President(D) |
|
Term expires 2010; served since March 2007 |
|
Managing Director of Legg Mason & Co., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co., LLC (Legg Mason & Co.) or its affiliates (2005-present); President of Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC (LMPFA) (2006-present); Chairman of Smith Barney Fund Management LLC and Citi Fund Management Inc. (2002-2005); Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Travelers Investment Adviser, Inc. (2002-2005). |
|
147 |
|
None |
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Name and Age |
|
Position(s) |
|
Term of |
|
Principal
Occupations |
|
Number of |
|
Other
Directorships |
Officers(E) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles A. Ruys de Perez |
|
Vice President |
|
Served since March 2007 |
|
General Counsel of Western Asset Management Company (2007-present). Formerly: Chief Compliance Officer, Putnam Investments (2004-2007); Managing Director and Senior Counsel of Putnam Investments (2001-2004). |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
Frances M. Guggino |
|
Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
|
Served since 2009 |
|
Director of Legg Mason; Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason; formerly, Controller of certain mutual funds associated with Citigroup Asset Management (CAM) (1999 to 2004) |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
Steven M. Hill |
|
Assistant Treasurer |
|
Served since May 2004 |
|
Senior Managing Director of Claymore Advisors, LLC and Claymore Securities, Inc. (2005-present); Chief Financial Officer of Claymore Group Inc. (2005-2006); Managing Director of Claymore Advisors, LLC and Claymore Securities, Inc. (2003- 2005); Chief Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of certain closed-end investment companies in the Claymore fund complex; Treasurer of Henderson Global Funds and Operations Manager for Henderson Global Investors (North America) Inc. (2002-2003). |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
Susan C. Curry |
|
Assistant Treasurer |
|
Served since February 2007 |
|
Director of Tax-Mutual Funds, Legg Mason & Co. (2005- present); Director of Tax-Mutual Funds, Citigroup (2004- 2005); Assistant Treasurer, Western Asset Funds, Inc., Western Asset Income Fund, Western Asset Premier Bond Fund, Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund (2007-present); Partner, Deloitte & Touche (1990-2004). |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Trustees and OfficersContinued
Name and Age |
|
Position(s) |
|
Term of |
|
Principal
Occupations |
|
Number of |
|
Other
Directorships |
Erin K. Morris |
|
Assistant Treasurer |
|
Served since January 2004 |
|
Vice President and Manager, Global Funds Administration, Legg Mason & Co. (2005- present); Assistant Vice President and Manager, Legg Mason Wood Walker, Incorporated (2002-2005); Treasurer, Western Asset Income Fund, Western Asset Funds, Inc. and Western Asset Premier Bond Fund (2006- present); Assistant Treasurer of Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund (2003-present); Assistant Treasurer of certain Legg Mason Partners Fixed Income Fund complex (2007- present); Assistant Treasurer, Western Asset Income Fund, Western Asset Funds, Inc., Western Asset Premier Bond Fund, Legg Mason Income Trust, Inc. and Legg Mason Tax-Free Income Fund (2001-2006). |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
Todd F. Kuehl |
|
Chief Compliance Officer |
|
Served since February 2007 |
|
Vice President, Legg Mason & Co. (2006-present); Chief Compliance Officer of Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund, Western Asset Income Fund, Western Asset Premier Bond Fund, Western Asset Funds, Inc. (2007-present) and Barrett Growth Fund and Barrett Opportunity Fund (2006- present); Branch Chief, Division of Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (2002-2006). |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
Melissa J. Nguyen |
|
Secretary |
|
Served since February 2006 |
|
Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of Claymore Group, Inc. (2005-present); Secretary of certain funds in the Claymore fund complex (2005- present). Formerly, Associate, Vedder Price, P.C. (2003-2005). |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Name and Age |
|
Position(s) |
|
Term of |
|
Principal
Occupations |
|
Number of |
|
Other
Directorships |
Mark E. Mathiasen |
|
Assistant Secretary |
|
Served since May 2007. |
|
Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of Claymore Advisors, LLC (2007 to present). Secretary of certain funds in the Claymore fund complex. Previously, Law Clerk for the Idaho State Courts (2003- 2007). |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
(A) Each Trustee also serves as a Trustee of Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Securities & Income Fund, a closed-end investment company, which is considered part of the same Fund Complex as the Fund. The Investment Manager serves as investment adviser to Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Securities & Income Fund. Messrs. Nyberg and Toupin also serve as Trustees of Claymore Dividend & Income Fund, MBIA Capital/Claymore Managed Duration Investment Grade Municipal Fund, TS&W/Claymore Tax-Advantaged Balanced Fund, Madison/Claymore Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund, Fiduciary/Claymore MLP Opportunity Fund, Old Mutual/Claymore Long- Short Fund, and Claymore/Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund, each of which is a closed-end management investment company, Claymore Exchange-Traded Fund Trust (consisting of 16 separate portfolios) and Claymore Exchange Traded Fund Trust 2 (consisting of 16 separate portfolios), each an open-end management investment company. Additionally, Mr. Nyberg serves as a Trustee for Advent Claymore Convertible Securities & Income Fund, Advent/Claymore Enhanced Growth & Income Fund and Advent/Claymore Global Convertible Securities and Income Fund, each a closed-end investment company. Mr. Gerken serves as Director/Trustee to 145 other portfolios associated with Legg Mason & Co., LLC or its affiliates. Legg Mason & Co., LLC is an affiliate of Western Asset Management Co. (WAM).
(B) Member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees.
(C) Member of the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Trustees.
(D) Mr. Gerken is an interested person (as defined above) of the Fund because of his positions with subsidiaries of, and ownership of shares of common stock of, Legg Mason, Inc., the parent company of WAM.
(E) Each officer shall hold office until his or her respective successor is chosen and qualified, or in each case until he or she sooner dies, resigns, is removed with or without cause or becomes disqualified.
Mr. Dalmaso resigned from the Board on October 14, 2009.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Trustees Consideration of the Management and Advisory Agreements
The Transaction between Claymore Group and Guggenheim.
On October 14, 2009, Claymore Group Inc. (Claymore Group), the parent of Claymore Advisors, LLC (Claymore), merged with an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Guggenheim Partners, LLC (Guggenheim) pursuant to a Merger Agreement. Claymore Group was the surviving company and, as a result, it now is an indirect subsidiary of Guggenheim (the Transaction). As a result of the Transaction, the existing Investment Advisory Agreement between Claymore and the Fund (the Prior Advisory Agreement) terminated pursuant to its terms. The following Investment Management Agreements (the Prior Management Agreements) also terminated with respect to the Fund pursuant to their terms: (i) an Investment Management Agreement between Claymore and Western Asset Management Company (Western Asset), (ii) an Investment Management Agreement between Western Asset and Western Asset Management Company Limited (WAML), (iii) an Investment Management Agreement between Western Asset and Western Asset Management Company Pte. Ltd. in Singapore (Western Singapore) and (iv) an Investment Management Agreement between Western Asset and Western Asset Management Company Ltd in Japan (Western Japan, and together with Western Singapore and WAML the Non-U.S. Managers and together with Western Asset, the Managers and together with Claymore, the Advisers).
As permitted pursuant Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act), the Board (including, with respect to any agreement, a majority of the trustees who are not parties to such agreement or interested persons of any such party, the Independent Trustees) approved an interim investment advisory agreement between the Fund and Claymore (the Interim Advisory Agreement), and approved an interim investment management agreement for each Manager with respect to the Fund (each an Interim Management Agreement). The Interim Advisory Agreement and each Interim Management Agreement became effective on October 14, 2009. Pursuant to Rule 15a-4 and such agreements, the Adviser and the Managers were permitted to continue to serve the Fund in such capacities on an interim basis for up to 150 days following October 14, 2009, pending receipt of shareholder approval of a new Investment Advisory Agreement between the Fund and Claymore (the New Advisory Agreement) and approval of the following new Investment Management Agreements with respect to the Fund (the New Management Agreements) (i) an Investment Management Agreement between Claymore and Western Asset, (ii) an Investment Management Agreement between Western Asset and WAML, (iii) an Investment Management Agreement between Western Asset and Western Singapore and (iv) an Investment Management Agreement between Western Asset and Western Japan. The New Advisory Agreement and New Management Agreements were each approved by shareholders of the Fund at a meeting held on January 12, 2010.
Interim Advisory Agreement and New Advisory Agreement.
Following the execution of the Merger Agreement, a telephonic meeting was held on July 28, 2009 and attended by certain members of the Board, the chief executive officer of Claymore Group and the chief executive officer of Guggenheim. Such executive officers summarized the principal terms of the Merger Agreement, and described the Transaction, the business plans for Claymore following the consummation of the Transaction and answered such questions as were raised at the meeting. Representatives of the Board requested additional information regarding the Transaction, Guggenheim and the impact of the Transaction on the shareholders of the Fund.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Independent Trustees received reports on the progress of the Transaction. As part of its review process, the Independent Trustees were represented by independent legal counsel. The Independent Trustees reviewed materials received from Claymore, Guggenheim and independent legal counsel. Claymore and Guggenheim provided, among other information, information regarding the terms of the Transaction and potential benefits to Claymore from the Transaction. The information provided regarding Guggenheim included (i) financial information, (ii) information regarding senior executives of the firm, (iii) information regarding other Guggenheim affiliated investment managers, (iv) information regarding litigation and regulatory matters and (v) potential conflicts of interest. Claymore and Guggenheim also provided information regarding Guggenheims and Claymores intentions for the business, operations and personnel of Claymore following the closing of the Transaction. The Independent Trustees met and discussed the Transaction and the Interim Advisory Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement in September 2009. On September 25, 2009, the Independent Trustees held a special meeting and discussed materials provided by Guggenheim and Claymore in connection with their consideration of the New Advisory Agreement and New Management Agreements. Additional supplemental information regarding the Transaction and Guggenheim was provided by Claymore and Guggenheim and reviewed by the Independent Trustees.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Subsequently, the Board met in person to consider, and approved, the Interim Advisory Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement at a meeting held on September 28, 2009. The Board met with representatives of Claymore and Guggenheim to discuss the Transaction. Representatives from Claymore and Guggenheim discussed the Transaction with, and answered questions from, the Board. The Independent Trustees met in executive session to discuss the Transaction and the information provided at the Board meeting. The Independent Trustees concluded that it was in the best interest of the Fund to approve the Interim Advisory Agreement and New Advisory Agreement and, accordingly, recommended to the Board the approval of the Interim Advisory Agreement and New Advisory Agreement. The Board subsequently approved the Interim Advisory Agreement and approved the New Advisory Agreement for a one-year term. The Board also determined to consider the continuation of the New Advisory Agreement during the course of the one-year term by conducting a thorough review of the information that is part of the Boards regular annual consideration of the continuation of the Funds investment advisory agreements. In reaching the conclusion to approve the Interim Advisory Agreement and New Advisory Agreement, no single factor was determinative in the Boards analysis, but rather the Board considered a variety of factors.
In connection with the Boards consideration of the Interim Advisory Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement, the Trustees considered, among other information, the following factors:
· |
within the last year, the Board had engaged in a thorough review of the various factors, including fees and performance, that were part of the decision whether to continue the Prior Advisory Agreement; |
|
|
· |
Board approval of the Funds New Advisory Agreement and Interim Advisory Agreement was a condition to the closing of the Transaction; |
|
|
· |
Claymores statement to the Board that the manner in which the Funds assets are managed would not change as a result of the Transaction; |
|
|
· |
the aggregate advisory fee rate payable by the Fund would not change under the Interim Advisory Agreement or New Advisory Agreement; |
|
|
· |
there were no material differences between the terms of the Interim Advisory Agreement and New Advisory Agreement and the terms of the Prior Advisory Agreement, except for those provisions in the Interim Advisory Agreement which are necessary to comply with Rule 15a-4 under the 1940 Act; |
|
|
· |
the capabilities of Claymores personnel who would provide management, shareholder servicing and administrative services to the Fund were not expected to change, and the key personnel who provided management, shareholder servicing and administrative services to the Fund prior to the Transaction were expected to continue to do so after the Transaction; |
|
|
· |
the assurance from Claymore and Guggenheim that following the Transaction there would not be any diminution in the nature, quality and extent of services provided to the Fund; |
|
|
· |
Claymores financial condition prior to the Transaction; |
|
|
· |
the impact of the Transaction on Claymores day-to-day operations; |
|
|
· |
the reputation, capabilities, experience, organizational structure and financial resources of Guggenheim; |
|
|
· |
the long-term business goals of Guggenheim and Claymore with regard to the business and operations of Claymore; |
|
|
· |
that shareholders of the Fund would not bear any costs in connection with the Transaction, inasmuch as Claymore would bear the costs, fees and expenses incurred by the Fund in connection with the related proxy statement and any other costs of the Fund associated with the Transaction; and |
|
|
· |
that Claymore and certain Guggenheim affiliates involved in the Transaction agreed to refrain from imposing or seeking to impose, for a period of two years after the Closing, any unfair burden (within the meaning of Section 15(f) of 1940 Act) on the Fund. |
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Trustees Consideration of the Management and Advisory AgreementsContinued
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided by the Adviser. The Board noted that key management personnel serving the Fund were expected to remain with Claymore following the Transaction and that the services provided to the Fund by Claymore were not expected to change following of the Transaction. The Board also considered Claymores and Guggenheims representations to the Board that Claymore would continue to operate following the closing of the Transaction in much the same manner as it operated prior to the Transaction, and that the impact of the Transaction on the day-to-day operations of Claymore would be neutral or positive. The Board also considered Guggenheims statement that Claymores compliance policies and procedures, disaster recovery plans, information security controls and insurance program would not change materially following consummation of the Transaction. Based on this review, the Board concluded that the range and quality of services provided by Claymore to the Fund were expected to continue under the Interim Advisory Agreement and the New Advisory Agreement at the same or improved levels.
Advisory Fees. The Board also observed that the advisory fee rate payable to Claymore would be the same under the Interim Advisory Agreement and New Advisory Agreement as it was under the Prior Advisory Agreement, which had within the last year been determined to be reasonable. The Board concluded that these factors supported approval of the Interim Advisory Agreement and New Advisory Agreement.
Performance. With respect to the performance of the Fund, the Board noted that Claymore delegated responsibility for the management of the Funds portfolio to the Managers, and the Managers would continue to manage the portfolio following the closing of the Transaction, subject to shareholder approval of the New Management Agreements. The Board concluded that this factor supported approval of the Interim Advisory Agreement and New Advisory Agreement.
Profitability. The Board noted that it was too early to predict how the Transaction may affect Claymores future profitability from its relationship with the Fund, but concluded that this matter would be given further consideration on an annual basis going forward. The Board also noted that Claymores fee rates under the Interim Advisory Agreement and New Advisory Agreement are the same as those assessed under the Prior Advisory Agreement.
Economies of Scale. The Board considered any potential economies of scale that may result from the Transaction. The Board further noted Guggenheims statement that such economies of scale could not be predicted in advance of the closing of the Transaction.
Other Benefits. The Board noted its prior determination that the advisory fee was reasonable, taking into consideration other benefits to Claymore. The Board also considered other benefits to Claymore, Guggenheim and their affiliates expected to be derived from their relationship with the Fund as a result of the Transaction and noted that no additional benefits were reported by Claymore or Guggenheim as a result of the Transaction. Therefore, the Board concluded that the advisory fee continued to be reasonable, taking into consideration other benefits.
Interim Management Agreements and New Management Agreements.
In conjunction with the consideration of the Transaction and the approval of a New Advisory Agreement and Interim Advisory Agreement, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, also considered the Interim Management Agreements and New Management Agreements.
The Board noted that while the closing of the Transaction would result in the termination of each Prior Management Agreement with respect to the Fund pursuant to its terms, no Manager was a party to the Transaction and the operations of each Manager and the services to be provided by each Manager would be unaffected by the Transaction. The Board determined that there were no material differences between the terms of each Interim Management Agreement and New Management Agreement and the corresponding Prior Management Agreement, except with respect to those provisions required to comply with Rule 15a-4 under the 1940 Act. The Board noted that the compensation received by each Manager under the applicable Interim Management Agreement and New Management Agreement was not greater than the compensation such Manager received under the corresponding Prior Management Agreement. The Board noted that the scope and quality of services to be provided to the Fund under each respective Interim Management Agreement and New Management Agreement would be at least equivalent to the scope and quality of services provided under the corresponding Prior Management Agreement. The Board noted that, within the last year, it had engaged in a thorough review of the
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
various factors, including fees and performance, that are part of the evaluation of the renewal or approval of the Prior Management Agreements. The Board noted that the factors previously considered with respect to approval of each Prior Management Agreement continued to support the approval of the corresponding New Management Agreement and Interim Management Agreement. The Board also determined to consider such factors again within one year of the execution of each New Management Agreement. Based upon its review, the Board concluded that it was in the best interest of the Fund to approve each New Management Agreement and Interim Management Agreement.
Reaffirmation of the New Advisory Agreement and New Management Agreements
The Independent Trustees again considered the New Advisory Agreement and New Management Agreements (collectively, the Agreements) at a meeting held on October 26, 2009. At a meeting held on November 16, 2009, the Independent Trustees reported to the full Board of Trustees their considerations and recommendation with respect to the Agreements, and the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, considered and reaffirmed their approval the Agreements that took place on September 28, 2009.
In considering the New Management Agreements, the Trustees noted that although Western Assets business is operated through separate legal entities, such as the Non-U.S. Managers, its business is highly integrated and senior investment personnel at Western Asset have supervisory oversight responsibility over the investment decisions made by the Non-U.S. Managers. Therefore, in connection with their deliberations noted below, the Trustees primarily focused on the information provided by Western Asset when considering the reaffirmation of the New Management Agreements. The Trustees also noted that the Fund does not pay any management fees directly to any of the Non-U.S. Managers because Western Asset pays the Non-U.S. Managers for services provided to the Fund out of the management fees Western Asset receives from Claymore.
In arriving at their decision to reaffirm the Agreements, the Trustees met with representatives of Claymore and Western Asset, including, in the case of Western Asset, relevant investment advisory personnel; reviewed a variety of information prepared by Claymore and Western Asset and materials provided by Lipper Inc. (Lipper) and counsel to the Independent Trustees; reviewed performance and expense information for peer groups of comparable funds, selected and prepared by Lipper, and certain other products available from Western Asset for investments in U.S. TIPS, including separate accounts managed by Western Asset; and requested and reviewed additional information as necessary. These reviews were in addition to information obtained by the Trustees at their regular quarterly meetings with respect to the Funds performance and other relevant matters, such as information on public trading in the Funds shares and differences between the Funds share price and net asset value per share, and related discussions with Claymores and Western Assets personnel.
As part of their review, the Trustees examined Claymores ability to provide high quality oversight and administrative and shareholder support services to the Fund, and the Managers ability to provide high quality investment management services to the Fund. The Trustees considered the experience of Claymores personnel in providing the types of services that Claymore is responsible for providing to the Fund, such as oversight of the Fund and the Managers with respect to portfolio management, and written and oral communications with the closed-end fund analyst community, investment advisers and current and prospective shareholders; the ability of Claymore to attract and retain capable personnel; the capability and integrity of Claymores senior management and staff; and the level of skill required to provide such services to the Fund. The Trustees also considered the investment philosophy and research and decision-making processes of the Managers; the experience of their key advisory personnel responsible for management of the Fund; the ability of the Managers to attract and retain capable research and advisory personnel; the capability and integrity of the Managers senior management and staff; and the level of skill required to manage the Fund, noting in particular the substantial complexities in purchasing fixed income securities of below-investment-grade quality and emerging-markets debt instruments. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the quality of the Claymores and the Managers services with respect to regulatory compliance and compliance with the investment policies of the Fund and conditions that might affect Claymores and the Managers ability to provide high quality services to the Fund in the future, including their business reputations, financial conditions and respective operational stability. Based on the foregoing, the Trustees concluded that the Managers investment process, research capabilities and philosophy were well suited to the Fund given its investment objectives and policies, that Claymores various services were valuable to the Fund and that the Advisers would be able to meet any reasonably foreseeable obligations under the Agreements.
|
Annual Report to Shareholders |
|
Trustees Consideration of the Management and Advisory AgreementsContinued
In reviewing the quality of the services provided to the Fund, the Trustees also reviewed a comparison of the performance of the Fund to the average performance of all leveraged closed-end funds that invest at least 65% of their assets in corporate and government debt issues rated in the top four grades regardless of asset size. The Trustees noted that the Fund had met its primary objective of producing current income to shareholders and, although the performance of the Fund over the one-year period ended August 31, 2009 was well below that of its Lipper peer group, the Funds performance for the three- and five-year periods ended on that date was slightly higher than the average performance of the peer group. The Trustees concluded that the Advisers management of the Fund would continue to be in the best interests of the shareholders.
The Trustees also considered the advisory fee payable by the Fund to Claymore, the management fee payable by Claymore to Western Asset, the management fees payable by Western Asset to the Non-U.S. Managers and the total expenses payable by the Fund. They reviewed information concerning fees paid to investment advisers of similarly-managed funds, the fees paid by Claymores other closed-end fund clients, as well as fees paid by Western Assets other clients, including separate accounts managed by Western Asset. The Trustees observed that the advisory fee paid by the Fund to Claymore and the Funds total expense ratio were each below the corresponding medians of its Lipper peer group as measured without regard to leveraged assets. The Trustees considered that the advisory fee paid by the Fund to Claymore was below the average of the fees paid to Claymore by other closed-end fund clients; that Claymore was responsible for payment of the management fees to the Managers; and that the net fee retained by Claymore was below its fees from other closed-end fund clients. The Trustees noted that the management fee paid by Claymore to Western Asset was generally higher than the fees paid by clients of Western Asset for accounts with similar investment strategies, but that the administrative and operational responsibilities for Western Asset with respect to the Fund were also relatively higher and that the Funds investment strategy included investments in asset classes other than U.S. TIPS, which was generally not the case for Western Assets other clients. In light of these differences, the Trustees concluded that the differences in management fees from those paid by Western Assets other clients were reasonable.
The Trustees further evaluated the benefits of the advisory relationship to the Advisers, including, among others, the profitability of the relationship to Claymore and the Managers; the direct and indirect benefits that Claymore and the Managers may receive from their relationship with the Fund, including the fallout benefits, such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager or adviser; and the affiliation between the Managers and Legg Mason Partners Funds Advisor, LLC, the Funds administrator. In that connection, the Trustees concluded that the Claymores and the Managers profitability was consistent with levels of profitability that had been determined by courts not to be excessive. The trustees noted that Western Asset does not have soft dollar arrangements.
Finally, the Trustees considered, in light of the profitability information provided by Claymore and the Managers, the extent to which economies of scale would be realized by the Advisers as the assets of the Fund grow. The Trustees concluded that, because the Fund is a closed-end fund and does not make a continuous offer of its securities, the Funds size was relatively fixed and it would be unlikely that the Advisers would realize economies of scale from the Funds growth. The Trustees further noted that, as Claymores and the Managers profitability was consistent with levels of profitability that had been determined by courts not to be excessive, any economies of scale that may currently exist were being appropriately shared with shareholders.
In their deliberations with respect to these matters, the Independent Trustees were advised by their independent counsel, who are independent of the Advisers within the meaning of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules regarding the independence of counsel. The Independent Trustees weighed the foregoing matters in light of the advice given to them by their independent counsel as to the law applicable to the review of investment advisory contracts. In arriving at a decision, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, did not identify any single matter as all-important or controlling, and the foregoing summary does not detail all the matters considered. The Trustees judged the terms and conditions of the Agreements, including the investment advisory fees, in light of all of the surrounding circumstances.
Based upon their review, the Trustees, including all of the Independent Trustees, determined, in the exercise of their business judgment, that they were satisfied with the quality of investment advisory services being provided by the Managers and the advisory, oversight, administrative and after-market support services being provided by Claymore; that the fees to be paid to the Advisers under the relevant Agreements were fair and reasonable given the scope and quality of the services rendered by each Adviser; and that reaffirming their prior approval of the Agreements was in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders.
Privacy Policy
We are committed to keeping nonpublic personal information about you secure and confidential. This notice is intended to help you understand how we fulfill this commitment. From time to time, we may collect a variety of personal information about you, including:
· Information we receive from you on applications and forms, via the telephone, and through our websites;
· Information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others (such as your purchases, sales, or account balances); and
· Information we receive from consumer reporting agencies.
We do not disclose nonpublic personal information about our customers or former customers, except to our affiliates (such as broker-dealers or investment advisers within the Legg Mason family of companies) or as is otherwise permitted by applicable law or regulation. For example, we may share this information with others in order to process your transactions or service an account. We may also provide this information to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, such as printing and mailing, or to other financial institutions with whom we have joint marketing agreements. When we enter into such agreements, we will require these companies to protect the confidentiality of this information and to use it only to perform the services for which we hired them.
With respect to our internal security procedures, we maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to protect your nonpublic personal information, and we restrict access to this information.
If you decide at some point either to close your account(s) or become an inactive customer, we will continue to adhere to our privacy policies and practices with respect to your nonpublic personal information.
|
NOT PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT |
|
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked
Opportunities & Income Fund
The Board of Trustees |
Investment Managers (continued) |
R. Jay Gerken |
Western Asset Management Company Pte. Ltd. |
Michael Larson |
1 George Street #23-01 |
Ronald A. Nyberg |
Singapore 049145 |
Ronald E. Toupin, Jr. |
|
|
Western Asset Management Company Ltd |
Officers |
36F Shin-Marunouchi Building |
R. Jay Gerken, President |
5-1 Marunouchi 1-Chronu Chiyoda |
Charles A. Ruys de Perez, Vice-President |
Tokyo 100-6536 |
Todd F. Kuehl, Chief Compliance Officer |
|
Frances
M. Guggino, Treasurer and Principal Financial |
Custodian |
Steven M. Hill, Assistant Treasurer |
1 Lincoln Street |
Erin K. Morris, Assistant Treasurer |
Boston, MA 02111 |
Susan C. Curry, Assistant Treasurer |
|
Melissa J. Nguyen, Secretary |
Counsel |
Mark Mathiasen, Assistant Secretary |
Ropes & Gray LLP |
|
1211 Avenue of the Americas |
Investment Adviser |
New York, NY 10036 |
Claymore Advisors, LLC |
|
2455 Corporate West Drive |
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
Lisle, IL 60532 |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
100 East Pratt Street |
Investment Managers |
Baltimore, MD 21202 |
Western Asset Management Company |
|
385 East Colorado Boulevard |
Transfer Agent |
Pasadena, CA 91101 |
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC |
|
59 Maiden Lane |
Western Asset Management Company Limited |
New York, New York, NY 10038 |
10 Exchange Square |
|
London, England EC2A2EN |
|
This report is sent to shareholders
of Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
for their
information. It is not a Prospectus, circular or representation intended for
use in the purchase or sale of shares of
the Fund or of any securities mentioned in this report.
In accordance with Section 23(c) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Fund hereby gives
notice that it may, from time to time, repurchase its shares in the open market
at the option
of the Board of Trustees, and on such terms as the Board of Trustees shall
determine.
WIW-A(02/10)
Item 2. Code of Ethics
(a) Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund (Registrant) has adopted a Code of Ethics, as defined in the instructions to Item 2 of Form N-CSR, that applies to the Registrants principal executive, financial and accounting officers, a copy of which is attached as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.
(b) Omitted.
(c) Not applicable.
(d) Not applicable.
(e) Not applicable
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Audit Committee of the Registrants Board of Trustees is comprised solely of Trustees who are independent (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Regulations)). In addition, the Board of Trustees of the Registrant has determined that Mr. Ronald E. Toupin, Jr. qualifies as an audit committee financial expert (as such term has been defined in the Regulations) based on its review of his pertinent experience, knowledge and education. The SEC has stated that the designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 of Form N-CSR does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liabilities imposed on such person as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board of Trustees in absence of such designation or identification.
Item 4. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
(a) Audit Fees
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008 $30,000
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009 $31,500
(b) Audit-Related Fees
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008 $0
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009 $0
During the year ended December 31, 2009, review of the rating agency compliance testing for the Registrants auction market preferred shares outstanding was reviewed.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed fees in the amount of $230,000and $410,000, respectively for non-audit services that required preapproval by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X during the Registrants fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP conducted a SAS 70 audit to review and test operating effectiveness of controls placed in operation for Western Asset Management Company. During the year ended December 31, 2009, PricewaterhourseCoopers LLP reviewed the Australian Superannuation Circular.
Tax Fees
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008 $4,000
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009 $4,000
Services include preparation of federal and state income tax returns and preparation of excise tax returns.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP did not bill fees for tax services that required preapproval by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X during the Registrants last two fiscal years.
(c) All Other Fees
There were no fees billed to the Registrant during each of the last two fiscal years by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP that were not disclosed in Items 4(a), (b) or (c) above.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP did not bill fees for services not included in Items 4(a), (b) or (c) above that required pre-approval by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X during the Registrants last two fiscal years.
(e) (1) The Audit Committee has determined that all work performed for the Registrant by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be pre-approved by the full Audit Committee and, therefore, has not adopted preapproval policies and procedures.
(2) None.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) Non-Audit Fees
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008 $362,500
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009 $2,082,000
(h) The Audit Committee of the Registrant has considered whether the non-audit services that were rendered by the Registrants principal accountant to the Registrants investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser and that were not preapproved by the Audit Committee are compatible with maintaining the principal accountants independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
a) Registrant has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)58(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee consists of the following Board members:
Michael Larson
Ronald A. Nyberg
Ronald E. Toupin, Jr.
b) Not applicable
Item 6. Portfolio of Investments
The schedule of investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers as of the close of the reporting period is included as part of the annual report to shareholders contained in Item 1 hereof.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Proxy Voting Guidelines and Procedures
The Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures govern in determining how proxies relating to the funds portfolio securities are voted and are provided below. Information regarding how each fund voted proxies (if any) relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available without charge (1) by calling 888-425-6432, (2) on the funds website at http://www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors and (3) on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
Background
Western Asset Management Company (WA), Western Asset Management Company Limited (WAML), Western Asset Management Company Ltd (WAMCL) and Western Asset Management Company Pte. Ltd. (WAMC) (together Western Asset) have adopted and implemented policies and procedures that we believe are reasonably designed to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interest of clients, in accordance with our fiduciary duties and SEC Rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act). Our authority to vote the proxies of our clients is established through investment management agreements or comparable documents, and our proxy voting guidelines have been tailored to reflect these specific contractual obligations. In addition to SEC requirements governing advisers, our proxy voting policies reflect the long-standing fiduciary standards and responsibilities for ERISA accounts. Unless a manager of ERISA assets has been expressly precluded from voting proxies, the Department of Labor has determined that the responsibility for these votes lies with the Investment Manager.
In exercising its voting authority, Western Asset will not consult or enter into agreements with officers, directors or employees of Legg Mason Inc. or any of its affiliates (except that WA, WAML, WAMCL and WAMC may so consult and agree with each other) regarding the voting of any securities owned by its clients.
Policy
Western Assets proxy voting procedures are designed and implemented in a way that is reasonably expected to ensure that proxy matters are handled in the best interest of our clients. While the guidelines included in the procedures are intended to provide a benchmark for voting standards, each vote is ultimately cast on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration Western Assets contractual obligations to our clients and all other relevant facts and circumstances at the time of the vote (such that these guidelines may be overridden to the extent Western Asset deems appropriate).
Procedures
Responsibility and Oversight
The Western Asset Compliance Department (Compliance Department) is responsible for administering and overseeing the proxy voting process. The gathering of proxies is coordinated through the Corporate Actions area of Investment Support (Corporate Actions). Research analysts and portfolio managers are responsible for determining appropriate voting positions on each proxy utilizing any applicable guidelines contained in these procedures.
Client Authority
Prior to August 1, 2003, all existing client investment management agreements (IMAs) will be reviewed to determine whether Western Asset has authority to vote client proxies. At account start-up, or upon amendment of an IMA, the applicable client IMA are similarly reviewed. If an agreement is silent on proxy voting, but contains an overall delegation of discretionary authority or if the account represents assets of an ERISA plan, Western Asset will assume responsibility for proxy voting. The Client Account Transition Team maintains a matrix of proxy voting authority.
Proxy Gathering
Registered owners of record, client custodians, client banks and trustees (Proxy Recipients) that receive proxy materials on behalf of clients should forward them to Corporate Actions. Prior to August 1, 2003, Proxy Recipients of existing clients will be reminded of the appropriate routing to Corporate Actions for proxy materials received and reminded of their responsibility to forward all proxy materials on a timely basis. Proxy Recipients for new clients (or, if Western Asset becomes aware that the applicable Proxy Recipient for an existing client has changed, the Proxy Recipient for the existing client) are notified at start-up of appropriate routing to Corporate Actions of proxy materials received and reminded of their responsibility to forward all proxy materials on a timely basis. If Western Asset personnel other than Corporate Actions receive proxy materials, they should promptly forward the materials to Corporate Actions.
Proxy Voting
Once proxy materials are received by Corporate Actions, they are forwarded to the Compliance Department for coordination and the following actions:
a. Proxies are reviewed to determine accounts impacted.
b. Impacted accounts are checked to confirm Western Asset voting authority.
c. Compliance Department staff reviews proxy issues to determine any material conflicts of interest. (See conflicts of interest section of these procedures for further information on determining material conflicts of interest.)
d. If a material conflict of interest exists, (i) to the extent reasonably practicable and permitted by applicable law, the client is promptly notified, the conflict is disclosed and Western Asset obtains the clients proxy voting instructions, and (ii) to the extent that it is not reasonably practicable or permitted by applicable law to notify the client and obtain such instructions (e.g., the client is a mutual fund or other commingled vehicle or is an ERISA plan client), Western Asset seeks voting instructions from an independent third party.
e. Compliance Department staff provides proxy material to the appropriate research analyst or portfolio manager to obtain their recommended vote. Research analysts and portfolio managers determine votes on a case-by-case basis taking into account the voting guidelines contained in these procedures. For avoidance of doubt, depending on the best interest of each individual client, Western Asset may vote the same proxy differently for different clients. The analysts or portfolio managers basis for their decision is documented and maintained by the Compliance Department.
f. Compliance Department staff votes the proxy pursuant to the instructions received in (d) or (e) and returns the voted proxy as indicated in the proxy materials.
Timing
Western Asset personnel act in such a manner to ensure that, absent special circumstances, the proxy gathering and proxy voting steps noted above can be completed before the applicable deadline for returning proxy votes.
Recordkeeping
Western Asset maintains records of proxies voted pursuant to Section 204-2 of the Advisers Act and ERISA DOL Bulletin 94-2. These records include:
a. A copy of Western Assets policies and procedures.
b. Copies of proxy statements received regarding client securities.
c. A copy of any document created by Western Asset that was material to making a decision how to vote proxies.
d. Each written client request for proxy voting records and Western Assets written response to both verbal and written client requests.
e. A proxy log including:
1. Issuer name;
2. Exchange ticker symbol of the issuers shares to be voted;
3. Council on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures (CUSIP) number for the shares to be voted;
4. A brief identification of the matter voted on;
5. Whether the matter was proposed by the issuer or by a shareholder of the issuer;
6. Whether a vote was cast on the matter;
7. A record of how the vote was cast; and
8. Whether the vote was cast for or against the recommendation of the issuers management team.
Records are maintained in an easily accessible place for five years, the first two in Western Assets offices.
Disclosure
Part II of the WA Form ADV, the WAML Form ADV, the WAMCL Form ADV and WAMC Form ADV, each, contain a description of Western Assets proxy policies. Prior to August 1, 2003, Western Asset will deliver Part II of its revised Form ADV to all existing clients, along with a letter identifying the new disclosure. Clients will be provided a copy of these policies and procedures upon request. In addition, upon request, clients may receive reports on how their proxies have been voted.
Conflicts of Interest
All proxies are reviewed by the Compliance Department for material conflicts of interest. Issues to be reviewed include, but are not limited to:
1. Whether Western Asset (or, to the extent required to be considered by applicable law, its affiliates) manages assets for the company or an employee group of the company or otherwise has an interest in the company;
2. Whether Western Asset or an officer or director of Western Asset or the applicable portfolio manager or analyst responsible for recommending the proxy vote (together, Voting Persons) is a close relative of or has a personal or business relationship with an executive, director or person who is a candidate for director of the company or is a participant in a proxy contest; and
3. Whether there is any other business or personal relationship where a Voting Person has a personal interest in the outcome of the matter before shareholders.
Voting Guidelines
Western Assets substantive voting decisions turn on the particular facts and circumstances of each proxy vote and are evaluated by the designated research analyst or portfolio manager. The examples outlined below are meant as guidelines to aid in the decision making process.
Guidelines are grouped according to the types of proposals generally presented to shareholders. Part I deals with proposals which have been approved and are recommended by a companys board of directors; Part II deals with proposals submitted by shareholders for inclusion in proxy statements; Part III addresses issues relating to voting shares of investment companies; and Part IV addresses unique considerations pertaining to foreign issuers.
I. Board Approved Proposals
The vast majority of matters presented to shareholders for a vote involve proposals made by a company itself that have been approved and recommended by its board of directors. In view of the enhanced corporate governance practices currently being implemented in public companies, Western Asset generally votes in support of decisions reached by independent boards of directors. More specific guidelines related to certain board-approved proposals are as follows:
1. Matters relating to the Board of Directors
Western Asset votes proxies for the election of the companys nominees for directors and for board-approved proposals on other matters relating to the board of directors with the following exceptions:
a. Votes are withheld for the entire board of directors if the board does not have a majority of independent directors or the board does not have nominating, audit and compensation committees composed solely of independent directors.
b. Votes are withheld for any nominee for director who is considered an independent director by the company and who has received compensation from the company other than for service as a director.
c. Votes are withheld for any nominee for director who attends less than 75% of board and committee meetings without valid reasons for absences.
d. Votes are cast on a case-by-case basis in contested elections of directors.
2. Matters relating to Executive Compensation
Western Asset generally favors compensation programs that relate executive compensation to a companys long-term performance. Votes are cast on a case-by-case basis on board-approved proposals relating to executive compensation, except as follows:
a. Except where the firm is otherwise withholding votes for the entire board of directors, Western Asset votes for stock option plans that will result in a minimal annual dilution.
b. Western Asset votes against stock option plans or proposals that permit replacing or repricing of underwater options.
c. Western Asset votes against stock option plans that permit issuance of options with an exercise price below the stocks current market price.
d. Except where the firm is otherwise withholding votes for the entire board of directors, Western Asset votes for employee stock purchase plans that limit the discount for shares purchased under the plan to no more than 15% of their market value, have an offering period of 27 months or less and result in dilution of 10% or less.
3. Matters relating to Capitalization
The management of a companys capital structure involves a number of important issues, including cash flows, financing needs and market conditions that are unique to the circumstances of each company. As a result, Western Asset votes on a case-by-case basis on board-approved proposals involving changes to a companys capitalization except where Western Asset is otherwise withholding votes for the entire board of directors.
a. Western Asset votes for proposals relating to the authorization of additional common stock.
b. Western Asset votes for proposals to effect stock splits (excluding reverse stock splits).
c. Western Asset votes for proposals authorizing share repurchase programs.
4. Matters relating to Acquisitions, Mergers, Reorganizations and Other Transactions
Western Asset votes these issues on a case-by-case basis on board-approved transactions.
5. Matters relating to Anti-Takeover Measures
Western Asset votes against board-approved proposals to adopt anti-takeover measures except as follows:
a. Western Asset votes on a case-by-case basis on proposals to ratify or approve shareholder rights plans.
b. Western Asset votes on a case-by-case basis on proposals to adopt fair price provisions.
6. Other Business Matters
Western Asset votes for board-approved proposals approving such routine business matters such as changing the companys name, ratifying the appointment of auditors and procedural matters relating to the shareholder meeting.
a. Western Asset votes on a case-by-case basis on proposals to amend a companys charter or bylaws.
b. Western Asset votes against authorization to transact other unidentified, substantive business at the meeting.
II. Shareholder Proposals
SEC regulations permit shareholders to submit proposals for inclusion in a companys proxy statement. These proposals generally seek to change some aspect of a companys corporate governance structure or to change some aspect of its business operations. Western Asset votes in accordance with the recommendation of the companys board of directors on all shareholder proposals, except as follows:
1. Western Asset votes for shareholder proposals to require shareholder approval of shareholder rights plans.
2. Western Asset votes for shareholder proposals that are consistent with Western Assets proxy voting guidelines for board-approved proposals.
3. Western Asset votes on a case-by-case basis on other shareholder proposals where the firm is otherwise withholding votes for the entire board of directors.
III. Voting Shares of Investment Companies
Western Asset may utilize shares of open or closed-end investment companies to implement its investment strategies. Shareholder votes for investment companies that fall within the categories listed in Parts I and II above are voted in accordance with those guidelines.
1. Western Asset votes on a case-by-case basis on proposals relating to changes in the investment objectives of an investment company taking into account the original intent of the fund and the role the fund plays in the clients portfolios.
2. Western Asset votes on a case-by-case basis all proposals that would result in increases in expenses (e.g., proposals to adopt 12b-1 plans, alter investment advisory arrangements or approve fund mergers) taking into account comparable expenses for similar funds and the services to be provided.
IV. Voting Shares of Foreign Issuers
In the event Western Asset is required to vote on securities held in foreign issuers i.e. issuers that are incorporated under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction and that are not listed on a U.S. securities exchange or the NASDAQ stock market, the following guidelines are used, which are premised on the existence of a sound corporate governance and disclosure framework. These guidelines, however, may not be appropriate under some circumstances for foreign issuers and therefore apply only where applicable.
1. Western Asset votes for shareholder proposals calling for a majority of the directors to be independent of management.
2. Western Asset votes for shareholder proposals seeking to increase the independence of board nominating, audit and compensation committees.
3. Western Asset votes for shareholder proposals that implement corporate governance standards similar to those established under U.S. federal law and the listing requirements of U.S. stock exchanges, and that do not otherwise violate the laws of the jurisdiction under which the company is incorporated.
4. Western Asset votes on a case-by-case basis on proposals relating to (1) the issuance of common stock in excess of 20% of a companys outstanding common stock where shareholders do not have preemptive rights, or (2) the issuance of common stock in excess of 100% of a companys outstanding common stock where shareholders have preemptive rights.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
(a)(1):
NAME AND |
|
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING |
ADDRESS |
|
PAST 5 YEARS |
|
|
|
S. Kenneth Leech
Western Asset 385 East Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91101 |
|
Co-portfolio manager of the fund; Chief Investment Officer of Western Asset from 1998 to 2008; Senior Advisor/Chief Investment Officer Emeritus of Western Asset. |
|
|
|
Stephen A. Walsh
Western Asset 385 East Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91101 |
|
Co-portfolio manager of the fund; Deputy Chief Investment Officer of Western Asset from 2000 to 2008; Chief Investment Officer of Western Asset since 2008. |
|
|
|
Keith J. Gardner
Western Asset 385 East Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91101 |
|
Co-portfolio manager of the fund; portfolio manager and research analyst at Western Asset since 1994. |
|
|
|
Michael C. Buchanan
Western Asset 385 East Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91101 |
|
Co-portfolio manager of the fund; Managing Director and head of U.S. Credit Products from 2003-2005 at Credit Suisse Asset Management
|
Peter H. Stutz
Western Asset 385 East Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA |
|
Co-portfolio manager of the fund; portfolio manager at Western Asset since 1997.
|
|
|
|
Paul E. Wynn
Western Asset 385 East Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA |
|
Co-portfolio manager of the fund; portfolio manager at Western Asset for more than five years
|
(a)(2): DATA TO BE PROVIDED BY FINANCIAL CONTROL
The following tables set forth certain additional information with respect to the funds portfolio managers for the fund. Unless noted otherwise, all information is provided as of December 31, 2009.
Other Accounts Managed by Portfolio Managers
The table below identifies the number of accounts (other than the fund) for which the funds portfolio managers have day-to-day management responsibilities and the total assets in such accounts, within each of the following categories: registered investment companies, other pooled investment vehicles, and other accounts. For each category, the number of accounts and total assets in the accounts where fees are based on performance is also indicated.
|
|
Registered |
|
Other Pooled |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
Investment |
|
Investment |
|
Other |
Manager(s) |
|
Companies |
|
Vehicles |
|
Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Kenneth Leech |
|
108 registered investment companies with $184.0 billion in total assets under management |
|
229 Other pooled investment vehicles with $107.7 billion in assets under management* |
|
832 Other accounts with $190.2 on in total assets under management** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen A. Walsh |
|
108 registered investment companies with $184.0 billion in total assets under management |
|
229 Other pooled investment vehicles with $107.7 billion in assets under management* |
|
832 Other accounts with $190.2 billion in total assets under management** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keith J. Gardner |
|
5 registered investment companies with $1.2 billion in total assets under management |
|
6 Other pooled investment vehicles with $0.6 billion in assets under management*** |
|
2 Other accounts with $0.1 billion in total assets under management |
Michael C. Buchanan 17 |
|
registered investment Companies with $9.6 billion in total assets Under management |
|
8 Other pooled investment vehicles with $4.0 billion in assets under management |
|
14 Other accounts with $1.9 billion in total assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter H. Stutz 3 |
|
registered investment Companies with $1.0 billion in total assets Under management |
|
1 Other pooled investment vehicle with $4 million in assets under management |
|
13 Other accounts with $2.5 billion in total assets under management*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul E. Wynn 1 |
|
registered investment Company with $38 million in total assets Under management |
|
4 Other pooled investment vehicles with $0.4 billion in assets under management |
|
27 Other accounts with $8.9 billion in total assets under management**** |
* |
Includes 6 accounts managed, totaling $1.1 billion, for which advisory fee is performance based. |
** |
Includes 93 accounts managed, totaling $24.2 billion, for which advisory fee is performance based. |
*** |
Includes 2 accounts managed, totaling $0.5 billion, for which advisory fee is performance based. |
**** |
Includes 3 accounts managed, totaling $0.6 billion, for which advisory fee is performance based. |
The numbers above reflect the overall number of portfolios managed by employees of Western Asset Management Company (Western Asset). Mr. Leech and Mr. Walsh are involved in the management of all the Firms portfolios, but they are not solely responsible for particular portfolios. Western Assets investment discipline emphasizes a team approach that combines the efforts of groups of specialists working in different market sectors. They are responsible for overseeing implementation of Western Assets overall investment ideas and coordinating the work of the various sector teams. This structure ensures that client portfolios benefit from a consensus that draws on the expertise of all team members.
(a)(3): Portfolio Manager Compensation
With respect to the compensation of the portfolio managers, Western Assets compensation system assigns each employee a total compensation range, which is derived from annual market surveys that benchmark each role with its job function and peer universe. This method is designed to reward employees with total compensation reflective of the external market value of their skills, experience, and ability to produce desired results. Standard compensation includes competitive base salaries, generous employee benefits, and a retirement plan.
In addition, the subadvisers employees are eligible for bonuses. These are structured to closely align the interests of employees with those of the subadviser, and are determined by the professionals job function and pre-tax performance as measured by a formal review process. All bonuses are completely discretionary. The principal factor considered is a portfolio managers investment performance versus appropriate peer groups and benchmarks (e.g., a securities index and with respect to a fund, the benchmark set forth in the funds Prospectus to which the funds average annual total returns are compared or, if none, the benchmark set forth in the funds annual report). Performance is reviewed on a 1, 3 and 5 year basis for compensationwith 3 years having the most emphasis. The subadviser may also measure a portfolio managers pre-tax investment performance against other benchmarks, as it determines appropriate. Because portfolio managers are generally responsible for multiple accounts (including the funds) with similar investment strategies, they are generally compensated on the performance of the aggregate group of similar accounts, rather than a specific account. Other factors that may be considered when making bonus decisions include client service, business development, length of service to the subadviser, management or supervisory
responsibilities, contributions to developing business strategy and overall contributions to the subadvisers business.
Finally, in order to attract and retain top talent, all professionals are eligible for additional incentives in recognition of outstanding performance. These are determined based upon the factors described above and include Legg Mason stock options and long-term incentives that vest over a set period of time past the award date.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of Interest
The manager, subadvisers and portfolio managers have interests which conflict with the interests of the fund. There is no guarantee that the policies and procedures adopted by the manager, the subadvisers and the fund will be able to identify or mitigate these conflicts of interest.
Some examples of material conflicts of interest include:
Allocation of Limited Time and Attention. A portfolio manager who is responsible for managing multiple funds and/or accounts may devote unequal time and attention to the management of those funds and/or accounts. A portfolio manager may not be able to formulate as complete a strategy or identify equally attractive investment opportunities for each of those funds and accounts as might be the case if he or she were to devote substantially more attention to the management of a single fund. Such a portfolio manager may make general determinations across multiple funds, rather than tailoring a unique approach for each fund. The effects of this conflict may be more pronounced where funds and/or accounts overseen by a particular portfolio manager have different investment strategies.
Allocation of Limited Investment Opportunities; Aggregation of Orders. If a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity that may be suitable for multiple funds and/or accounts, the opportunity may be allocated among these several funds or accounts, which may limit the funds ability to take full advantage of the investment opportunity. Additionally, a subadviser may aggregate transaction orders for multiple accounts for purpose of execution. Such aggregation may cause the price or brokerage costs to be less favorable to a particular client than if similar transactions were not being executed concurrently for other accounts. In addition, a subadvisers trade allocation policies may result in the funds orders not being fully executed or being delayed in execution.
Pursuit of Differing Strategies. At times, a portfolio manager may determine that an investment opportunity may be appropriate for only some of the funds and/or accounts for which he or she exercises investment responsibility, or may decide that certain of the funds and/or accounts should take differing positions with respect to a particular security. In these cases, the portfolio manager may place separate transactions for one or more funds or accounts which may affect the market price of the security or the execution of the transaction, or both, to the detriment or benefit of one or more other funds and/or accounts. For example, a portfolio manager may determine that it would be in the interest of another account to sell a security that the fund holds long, potentially resulting in a decrease in the market value of the security held by the fund.
Cross Trades. Portfolio managers may manage funds that engage in cross trades, where one of the managers funds or accounts sells a particular security to another fund or account managed by the same manager. Cross trades may pose conflicts of interest because of, for example, the possibility that one account sells a security to another account at a higher price than an independent third party would pay or otherwise
enters into a transaction that it would not enter into with an independent party, such as the sale of a difficult-to-obtain security.
Selection of Broker/Dealers. Portfolio managers may select or influence the selection of the brokers and dealers that are used to execute securities transactions for the funds and/or accounts that they supervise. In addition to executing trades, some brokers and dealers provide subadvisers with brokerage and research services, These services may be taken into account in the selection of brokers and dealers whether a broker is being selected to effect a trade on an agency basis for a commission or (as is normally the case for the funds) whether a dealer is being selected to effect a trade on a principal basis. This may result in the payment of higher brokerage fees and/or execution at a less favorable price than might have otherwise been available. The services obtained may ultimately be more beneficial to certain of the managers funds or accounts than to others (but not necessarily to the funds that pay the increased commission or incur the less favorable execution). A decision as to the selection of brokers and dealers could therefore yield disproportionate costs and benefits among the funds and/or accounts managed.
Variation in Financial and Other Benefits. A conflict of interest arises where the financial or other benefits available to a portfolio manager differ among the funds and/or accounts that he or she manages. If the amount or structure of the investment managers management fee and/or a portfolio managers compensation differs among funds and/or accounts (such as where certain funds or accounts pay higher management fees or performance-based management fees), the portfolio manager might be motivated to help certain funds and/or accounts over others. Similarly, the desire to maintain assets under management or to enhance the portfolio managers performance record or to derive other rewards, financial or otherwise, could influence the portfolio manager in affording preferential treatment to those funds and/or accounts that could most significantly benefit the portfolio manager. A portfolio manager may, for example, have an incentive to allocate favorable or limited opportunity investments or structure the timing of investments to favor such funds and/or accounts. Also, a portfolio managers or the managers or a subadvisers desire to increase assets under management could influence the portfolio manager to keep a fund open for new investors without regard to potential benefits of closing the fund to new investors. Additionally, the portfolio manager might be motivated to favor funds and/or accounts in which he or she has an ownership interest or in which the investment manager and/or its affiliates have ownership interests. Conversely, if a portfolio manager does not personally hold an investment in the fund, the portfolio managers conflicts of interest with respect to the fund may be more acute.
Related Business Opportunities. The investment manager or its affiliates may provide more services (such as distribution or recordkeeping) for some types of funds or accounts than for others. In such cases, a portfolio manager may benefit, either directly or indirectly, by devoting disproportionate attention to the management of funds and/or accounts that provide greater overall returns to the investment manager and its affiliates.
(a)(4): Portfolio Manager Securities Ownership
The table below identifies the dollar range of securities beneficially owned by each portfolio managers as of December 31, 2009.
Portfolio Manager(s) |
|
Dollar Range of Portfolio Securities Beneficially Owned |
S. Kenneth Leech |
|
A |
Stephen A. Walsh |
|
F |
Keith J. Gardner |
|
D |
Michael C. Buchanan |
|
A |
|
|
|
Peter H. Stutz |
|
C |
Paul E. Wynn |
|
A |
Dollar Range ownership is as follows:
A: none
B: $1 - $10,000
C: 10,001 - $50,000
D: $50,001 - $100,000
E: $100,001 - $500,000
F: $500,001 - $1 million
G: over $1 million
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrants Board of Trustees that have been implemented since the Registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of this Item 10.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Registrants principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods in the SECs rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrants management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There were no changes in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting during the Registrants second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting
Item 12. Exhibits
(a)(1) Code of Ethics subject to the disclosure required by Item 2 filed as an exhibit hereto.
(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 filed as an exhibit hereto.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 filed as an exhibit hereto.
(c) Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures pursuant to the disclosure required by Item 7 filed as an exhibit hereto
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
By: |
/s/ R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
Trustee and President |
|
|
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund |
|
|
|
|
Date: |
March 4, 2010 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: |
/s/ R. Jay Gerken |
|
|
(R. Jay Gerken) |
|
|
Trustee and President |
|
|
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund |
|
|
|
|
Date: |
March 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Frances M. Guggino |
|
|
(Frances M. Guggino) |
|
|
Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
|
|
Western Asset/Claymore Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund |
|
|
|
|
Date: |
March 4, 2010 |