UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission File Number:  1-4488

MESABI TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      Yes  x  No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer o           Accelerated filer x           Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).        Yes  o  No  x

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.                     Financial Statements.  (Note 1)

Mesabi Trust
Condensed Statements of Income
Three and Nine Months Ended October 31, 2007 and 2006

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

2

Mesabi Trust
Condensed Balance Sheets
October 31, 2007 and January 31, 2007

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

3

Mesabi Trust
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended October 31, 2007 and 2006

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

4

MESABI TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

October 31, 2007 (Unaudited)

5

Item 2.  Trustees’ Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933.  All such forward-looking statements, including those statements estimating iron ore pellet production or shipments, are based on information from the lessee/operator (and its parent corporation) of the mine located on the lands owned and held in trust for the benefit of the holders of units of beneficial interest of Mesabi Trust.  These statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking words, such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” “intend,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “potential,” “plan,” “should,” “assume,” “forecast” and other similar words.  Such forward-looking statements are inherently subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties.  Actual results and future developments could differ materially from the results or developments expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements.  These risks and uncertainties include volatility of iron ore and steel prices, product supply and demand, competition, regulation or government action, litigation and uncertainties about estimates of reserves.  Further, substantial portions of royalties earned by Mesabi Trust are based on estimated prices that are subject to interim and final adjustments which can be positive or negative and are dependent in part on multiple price and inflation index factors under agreements to which Mesabi Trust is not a party and that are not known until after the end of a contract year.  For a discussion of the factors, including, without limitation, those that could materially and adversely affect Mesabi Trust’s actual results and performance, see “Risk Factors” in Part I — Item 1A of Mesabi Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended January 31, 2007.  Mesabi Trust undertakes no obligation, other than that imposed by law, to make any revisions to the forward-looking statements contained in this filing or to update them to reflect circumstances occurring after the date of this filing.

Background

Mesabi Trust (“Mesabi Trust” or the “Trust”), formed pursuant to an Agreement of Trust dated July 18, 1961 (the “Agreement of Trust”), is a trust organized under the laws of the State of New York.  Mesabi Trust holds all of the interests formerly owned by Mesabi Iron Company (“MIC”), including all right, title and interest in the Amendment of Assignment, Assumption and Further Assignment of Peters Lease (the “Amended Assignment of Peters Lease”), the Amendment of Assignment, Assumption and Further Assignment of Cloquet Lease (the “Amended Assignment of Cloquet Lease” and together with the Amended Assignment of Peters Lease, the “Amended Assignment Agreements”), the beneficial interest in the Mesabi Land Trust (as such term is defined below) and all other assets and property identified in the Agreement of Trust. The Amended Assignment of Peters Lease relates to an Indenture made as of April 30, 1915 among East Mesaba Iron Company (“East Mesaba”), Dunka River Iron Company (“Dunka River”) and Claude W. Peters (the “Peters Lease”) and the Amended Assignment of Cloquet Lease relates to an Indenture made May 1, 1916 between Cloquet Lumber Company and Claude W. Peters (the “Cloquet Lease”).

The Agreement of Trust specifically prohibits the Trustees from entering into or engaging in any business.  This prohibition applies even to business activities the Trustees may deem necessary or proper for the preservation and protection of the Trust Estate.  Accordingly, the Trustees’ activities in connection with the administration of Trust assets are limited to collecting income, paying expenses and liabilities, distributing net income to the holders of Certificates of Beneficial Interest in Mesabi Trust (“Unitholders”) after the payment of, or provision for, such expenses and liabilities, and protecting and conserving the assets held.

6

The Trustees do not intend to expand their responsibilities beyond those permitted or required by the Agreement of Trust, the Amendment to the Agreement of Trust dated October 25, 1982 (the “Amendment”), and those required under applicable law.  Mesabi Trust has no employees, but it engages independent consultants to assist the Trustees in, among other things, monitoring the volume and sales prices of iron ore products shipped from Silver Bay, Minnesota, based on information supplied to the Trustees by Northshore Mining Company (“Northshore”), the lessee/operator of the Mesabi Trust lands, and its parent company Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (“CCI”).  References to Northshore in this quarterly report, unless the context requires otherwise, are applicable to CCI as well.

Leasehold royalty income constitutes the principal source of Mesabi Trust’s revenue.  Royalty rates are determined in accordance with the terms of Mesabi Trust’s leases and assignments of leases.  Three types of royalties, as well as royalty bonuses, comprise the Trust’s leasehold royalty income:

•                                          Base overriding royalties.  Base overriding royalties have historically constituted the majority of Mesabi Trust’s royalty income.  Base overriding royalties are determined by both the volume and selling price of iron ore products shipped.  Northshore is obligated to pay Mesabi Trust base overriding royalties in varying amounts, based on the volume of iron ore products shipped.  Base overriding royalties are calculated as a percentage of the gross proceeds of iron ore products produced at Mesabi Trust lands (and to a limited extent other lands) and shipped from Silver Bay, Minnesota.  The percentage ranges from 2-1/2% of the gross proceeds for the first one million tons of iron ore products so shipped annually to 6% of the gross proceeds for all iron ore products in excess of 4 million tons so shipped annually.  Base overriding royalties are subject to price adjustments under the CCI Pellet Agreements and, as described elsewhere in this report, such adjustments may be positive or negative.

•                                          Royalty bonuses.  Mesabi Trust earns royalty bonuses when iron ore products shipped from Silver Bay are sold at prices above a threshold price.  The royalty bonus is based on a percentage of the gross proceeds of product shipped from Silver Bay and sold at prices above a threshold price.  The threshold price is adjusted (but not below $30.00 per ton) on an annual basis for inflation and deflation (the “Adjusted Threshold Price”).  The Adjusted Threshold Price was $44.60 per ton for calendar year 2006 and is $45.98 for calendar year 2007.  The royalty bonus percentage ranges from 1/2 of 1% of the gross proceeds (on all tonnage shipped for sale at prices between the Adjusted Threshold Price and $2.00 above the Adjusted Threshold Price) to 3% of the gross proceeds (on all tonnage shipped for sale at prices $10.00 or more above the Adjusted Threshold Price).  Royalty bonuses are subject to price adjustments under the CCI Pellet Agreements and, as described elsewhere in this report, such adjustments may be positive or negative.

•                                          Fee royalties.  Fee royalties have historically constituted a smaller component of the Trust’s total royalty income.  Fee royalties are payable to the Mesabi Land Trust, a Minnesota land trust, which holds a 20% interest as fee owner in the Amended Assignment of Peters Lease.  Mesabi Trust holds the entire beneficial interest in the Mesabi Land Trust for which U.S. Bank N.A. acts as the corporate trustee.  Mesabi Trust receives the net income of the Mesabi Land Trust, which is generated from royalties on the amount of crude ore mined after the payment of expenses to U.S. Bank N.A. for its services as corporate trustee.  Crude ore is the source of iron oxides used to make iron ore pellets and other products.  The fee royalty on crude ore is based on an agreed price per ton, subject to certain indexing.

7

•                                          Minimum advance royalties.  Northshore’s obligation to pay base overriding royalties and royalty bonuses with respect to the sale of iron ore products generally accrues upon the shipment of those products from Silver Bay.  However, regardless of whether any shipment has occurred, under the terms of the Amended Assignment Agreements, Northshore is obligated to pay to Mesabi Trust a minimum advance royalty.  Each year, the amount of the minimum advance royalty is adjusted (but not below $500,000 per annum) for inflation and deflation in accordance with the Amended Assignment Agreements.  The minimum advance royalty was $743,420 for calendar year 2006 and is $766,510 for calendar year 2007.  Until overriding royalties (and royalty bonuses, if any) for a particular year equal or exceed the minimum advance royalty for the year, Northshore must make quarterly payments of up to 25% of the minimum advance royalty for the year.  Because minimum advance royalties are essentially prepayments of base overriding royalties and royalty bonuses earned each year, any minimum advance royalties paid in a fiscal quarter are recouped by credits against base overriding royalties and royalty bonuses earned in later fiscal quarters during the year.

Northshore is obligated to make royalty payments in January, April, July and October of each year based on shipments of iron ore products from Silver Bay during each calendar quarter.  In the case of base overriding royalties and royalty bonuses, these quarterly royalty payments are to be made whether or not the related proceeds of sale have been received by Northshore by the time such payments become due.

Under the relevant agreements, Northshore has the right to mine and ship iron ore products from lands other than Mesabi Trust lands.  Based on its current mining and engineering plan, Northshore alone determines whether to conduct mining operations on Trust and/or such other lands.  The Trustees do not exert any influence over mining operational decisions.  To encourage the use of iron ore products from Mesabi Trust lands, Mesabi Trust receives royalties on stated percentages of iron ore shipped from Silver Bay, whether or not the iron ore products are from Mesabi Trust lands.  Mesabi Trust receives royalties at the greater of (i) the aggregate quantity of iron ore products shipped that were mined from Mesabi Trust lands, and (ii) a portion of the aggregate quantity of all iron ore products shipped from Silver Bay that were mined from any lands, such portion being 90% of the first four million tons shipped from Silver Bay during such year, 85% of the next two million tons shipped during such year, and 25% of all tonnage shipped during such year in excess of six million tons.

As noted above, the information regarding amounts and sales prices of shipped iron ore products is used to compute the royalties payable to Mesabi Trust by Northshore.  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, the Corporate Trustee, also performs certain administrative functions for Mesabi Trust.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Iron Ore Pellet Production and Shipments for the Three and Nine Months Ended October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006

As shown in the table below, production of iron ore pellets at Northshore from Mesabi Trust lands during the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2007 totaled approximately 1.33 million tons and shipments over the same period totaled approximately 1.36 million tons.  By comparison, pellet production during the same period in 2006 totaled approximately 0.95 million tons, and shipments approximated 1.28 million tons.

8

The 39.7% increase in production and 6.4% increase in shipments from Trust lands are attributable to the fact that Northshore produced and shipped more iron ore products from lands owned by Mesabi Trust during the three months ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the three months ended October 31, 2006.

For the nine months ended October 31, 2007, production of iron ore pellets at Northshore from Mesabi Trust lands totaled approximately 3.54 million tons, and shipments over the same period totaled approximately 2.95 million tons.  By comparison, pellet production during the same period in 2006 totaled approximately 3.42 million tons, and shipments approximated 3.24 million tons.

Production for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 exceeded production during the same period ended October 31, 2006 by approximately 3.6%.  Shipments for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 decreased 9.1% compared to the nine months ended October 31, 2006.

Comparison of Royalty Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006

Total royalty income for the three months ended October 31, 2007 was $6,690,125. This represents a decrease of approximately 6.6% as compared to the comparable prior period.  Base overriding royalties decreased 7.0% to $4,059,893 and bonus royalties decreased nearly 7.8% to $2,491,383.  The decrease in base overriding royalties received by the Trust is the result of lower contract prices for shipped iron ore products and a reduction in total shipments of iron ore from Trust lands through October 31, 2007.  The decrease in bonus royalties received by the Trust is primarily due to lower contract prices for shipped iron ore products and a higher adjusted threshold price for 2007 resulting in a smaller bonus royalty amount, which is calculated by multiplying the applicable royalty rate by the difference between the sales price per ton and the adjusted threshold price for 2007 of $45.98 per ton.  Fee royalties paid to the Mesabi Land Trust increased approximately 50.2% to $138,849 for the three months ended October 31, 2007.  The following table summarizes the components of the total royalty income received by Mesabi Trust during the three months ended October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006.

9

Total royalty income for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 decreased 14.6% from the prior comparable period to $12,896,302.  Base overriding royalties decreased 14.7% to $7,063,974 and bonus royalties decreased 15.9% to $5,474,730 for the nine months ended October 31, 2007.  The decrease in base overriding royalties received by the Trust is the result of lower contract prices for shipped iron ore products and a reduction in total shipments of iron ore from Trust lands through October 31, 2007.  The decrease in bonus royalties received by the Trust is primarily due to lower contract prices for shipped iron ore and a higher adjusted threshold price for 2007 resulting in a smaller bonus royalty amount, which is calculated by multiplying the applicable royalty rate by the difference between the sales price per ton and the adjusted threshold price for 2007 of $45.98 per ton.  Fee royalties paid to the Mesabi Land Trust increased approximately 12.6% to $357,598 for the nine months ended October 31, 2007.  The following table summarizes the components of Mesabi Trust’s total royalty income for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006.

Comparison of Trust Income and Expenses for the Three and Nine Months Ended October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006

Net income for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2007 was $6,593,131, a decrease of approximately 6.4% as compared to the three months ended October 31, 2006.  The decrease in net income is the result of lower base overriding royalties and bonus royalties and is partially offset by higher fee royalties and lower trust expenses for the three months ended October 31, 2007.  Interest income received by Mesabi Trust decreased 36.6% as compared to the prior comparable period primarily due to a decrease in the total investments held by Mesabi Trust.  Mesabi Trust expenses decreased 18.3% from the comparable prior period, primarily due to a decrease in the legal and accounting fees incurred in the administration of the Trust.  The following is a summary of Mesabi Trust’s income and expenses for the three months ended October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006.

10

Net income for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 was $12,466,888, a decrease of approximately 15.2% as compared to the nine months ended October 31, 2006.  This decrease can be attributed to lower base overriding royalties and bonus royalties and is partially offset by higher fee royalties, as compared to the nine months ended October 31, 2006.  Interest income received by Mesabi Trust decreased 39.8% from the prior comparable period due to a decrease in the total investments held by Mesabi Trust.  Expenses incurred by Mesabi Trust increased 3.0% from the comparable prior period.  The following table summarizes Mesabi Trust’s income and expenses for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006.

Unallocated Reserve

The Unallocated Reserve as of October 31, 2007 was $2,651,353, a decrease of 6.5% as compared to the $2,834,647 in Unallocated Reserve as of October 31, 2006.  The decrease in the Unallocated Reserve is the result of a decrease in the cash and investments held by the Trust at the end of the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2007.  The Trustees have determined that a portion of the Unallocated Reserve, usually within the range of $500,000 to $1,000,000 or such other amount as the Trustees may deem prudent, should be maintained for unexpected loss contingencies.  As of October 31, 2007, $692,570, or 26% of the Unallocated Reserve was unallocated cash and U.S. Government securities, whereas, at October 31, 2006, $900,859, or 32% of the Unallocated Reserve was unallocated cash and U.S. Government securities.

At October 31, 2007, $1,958,783, or approximately 74% of the Unallocated Reserve was accrued revenue, primarily representing royalties not yet received by the Trust but anticipated to be received from Northshore in January 2008.  Comparatively, at October 31, 2006, $1,933,788, or approximately 68% of the Unallocated Reserve was accrued revenue.  The slight increase in accrued revenue, which is based upon reported lessee shipping activity for the month of October 2007, is reflected as accrued income receivable on the balance sheet at October 31, 2007.  The Trustees anticipate that the accrued income receivable will be distributed to Unitholders in January 2008, after providing for expenses and unexpected loss contingencies.

The Trust’s Unallocated Reserve as of October 31, 2007 increased by $1,511,679, or 132%, as compared to the Unallocated Reserve for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007.  This increase in the Unallocated Reserve is primarily due to the accrual of royalty income for shipments from Northshore during the month of October 2007.  At January 31, 2007, $409,764, or approximately 36% of the Unallocated Reserve was accrued income receivable while $729,910 or 64% was unallocated cash and U.S. Government securities.

The Trustees will continue to monitor the economic circumstances of the Trust to strike a responsible balance between distributions to Unitholders and the need to maintain adequate reserves at a prudent level, given the unpredictable nature of the iron ore industry, the Trust’s dependence on the actions of the lessee/operator, and the fact that the Trust essentially has no other liquid assets.

11

Although the actual amount of the Unallocated Reserve will fluctuate from time to time, and may increase or decrease from its current level, it is currently intended that future distributions will be highly dependent upon royalty income as it is received and the level of Trust expenses.  The amount of future royalty income available for distribution will be subject to the volume of iron ore product shipments and the dollar level of sales by Northshore.  Shipping activity is greatly reduced during the winter months and economic conditions, particularly those affecting the steel industry, may adversely affect the amount and timing of such future shipments and sales.

Recent Developments

Production and Shipments.  CCI reported in its Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2007 that production at Northshore for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was 1.3 million tons and total production for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was approximately 3.9 million tons.    Comparatively, production of iron ore pellets at Northshore for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, was 1.3 million tons and 3.8 million tons, respectively.  Northshore has not provided the Trustees with an estimate of total expected shipments of iron ore pellets for calendar year 2007.

During calendar years 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the percentage of shipments of iron ore products from Mesabi Trust lands was approximately 90.9%, 90.1%, 92.0%, 95.5% and 97.5%, respectively, of total shipments.  Northshore has not advised the Trustees as to the percentage of iron ore products from Mesabi Trust lands it anticipates shipping in calendar year 2007.  See the description of the uncertainty of market conditions in the iron ore and steel industry under “Important Factors Affecting Mesabi Trust” below and the information under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I — Item 1A of Mesabi Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended January 31, 2007.

Mesabi Nugget Project.  In 2002, CCI began participating in the Mesabi Nugget Project with Kobe Steel, Ltd. (“Kobe Steel”), Steel Dynamics, Inc., Ferrometrics, Inc. and the State of Minnesota by constructing a pilot plant at its Northshore mine.  The pilot plant was used to develop and apply a new iron making technology (Kobe Steel’s Itmk3 process) for converting iron ore into nearly pure iron nugget form.  After a third operating phase of the pilot plant test in 2004 confirmed the commercial viability of the technology, the pilot plant ended operations on August 3, 2004. In November 2006, CCI announced that the participants in the Mesabi Nugget Project were unable to reach agreement on terms necessary to move forward with construction of a reduced iron plant and efforts to jointly develop the Mesabi Nugget Project at CCI’s Cliffs Erie site in Hoyt Lakes, Minnesota were suspended.

In its Form 10-K filed May 25, 2007, CCI announced that it was evaluating opportunities to develop a commercial-scale reduced iron nugget production facility to utilize Kobe Steel’s ITmk3 technology.  In its Form 8-K filed August 17, 2007, CCI announced that it and Kobe Steel intend to construct a commercial-scale reduced iron nugget production facility at CCI’s Empire Mine site in Palmer, Michigan.  CCI also announced that the project is subject to obtaining environmental permits, execution of final agreements between CCI and Kobe Steel, and final approval of each company’s board of directors.  The Trust has never been a participant in the Mesabi Nugget Project in any respect and the Trustees are unable to make any projections regarding the extent to which CCI’s plans to build the commercial-scale reduced iron plant at CCI’s Empire Mine site might impact shipments from Silver Bay or future royalties payable to Mesabi Trust.

Capacity Expansions.  In its Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2007, CCI confirmed that it is continuing construction activity to restart an idled pellet furnace at Northshore’s pelletizing facility in Silver Bay, Minnesota.  CCI reported that the restart of the idled furnace will increase annual capacity by approximately 600,000 tons beginning in 2008, increasing capacity to approximately 800,000 tons thereafter.  CCI has not indicated whether the increase in capacity will result in an increase in production

12

at Northshore or shipments of iron ore pellets from Silver Bay, Minnesota.  Accordingly, the Trustees are unable to make any projections regarding the extent to which the restart of the idled furnace at Northshore may impact future royalties payable to Mesabi Trust.

Iron Ore Pricing and Contract Adjustments.  During the course of its fiscal year some portion of the royalties paid to Mesabi Trust are based on estimated prices for iron ore products sold under term contracts between CCI and its subsidiaries and certain of their customers (the “CCI Pellet Agreements”).  Mesabi Trust is not a party to any of the CCI Pellet Agreements.  These prices are subject to interim and final pricing adjustments, which can be positive or negative, and which adjustments are dependent in part on a variety of price and inflation index factors, including but not limited to the international benchmark pellet price, hot band steel prices and various Producer Price Indexes.  Although Northshore makes interim adjustments to the royalty payments on a quarterly basis, these price adjustments cannot be finalized until after the end of a contract year. This may result in significant and frequent variations in royalties received by Mesabi Trust (and in turn the resulting amount of funds available for distribution to Unitholders by the Trust) from quarter to quarter and on a comparative historical basis, and these variations, which can be positive or negative, cannot be predicted by Mesabi Trust.

Northshore Administrative Permitting Proceedings.  In its Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2007, CCI did not provide an update to the matters previously reported regarding the administrative permit amendment application that CCI submitted on December 16, 2006 to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency with respect to Northshore’s Title V operating permit or the Notice of Intent to Sue that Northshore received from the Save Lake Superior Association and the Sierra Club on July 30, 2007.  See the disclosure under the heading “Recent Developments - Northshore Administrative Permit Amendment” in the Trust’s Form 10-Q filed September 9, 2007 for more information on these proceedings.  Even though the Trust is not a party to either of these proceedings, the Trustees will continue to monitor the status of the proceedings.  Given the inherent uncertainty surrounding these proceedings, the Trustees are unable to predict what effect, if any, a decision adverse to Northshore and/or CCI with respect to these proceedings would have on royalties payable to the Trust.

Securities Regulation.  Mesabi Trust is a publicly-traded trust listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and is therefore subject to extensive regulation under, among others, the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) and the rules and regulations of the NYSE.  Issuers failing to comply with such authorities risk serious consequences, including criminal as well as civil and administrative penalties.  In most instances, these laws, rules and regulations do not specifically address their applicability to publicly-traded trusts such as Mesabi Trust.  In particular, Sarbanes-Oxley mandated the adoption by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and NYSE of certain rules and regulations that are impossible for Mesabi Trust to literally satisfy because of its nature as a pass-through trust.  Pursuant to NYSE rules Mesabi Trust is exempt from many of the corporate governance requirements that apply to publicly traded corporations.   Mesabi Trust does not have, nor does the Agreement of Trust provide for, a board of directors, an audit committee, a corporate governance committee or a compensation committee.  The Trustees intend to closely monitor the rulemaking activity of the SEC and the NYSE and will comply with such rules and regulations to the extent applicable.

Important Factors Affecting Mesabi Trust

The Agreement of Trust specifically prohibits the Trustees from entering into or engaging in any business.  This prohibition seemingly applies even to business activities the Trustees deem necessary or proper for the preservation and protection of the Trust Estate (as such term is defined below).  Accordingly, the Trustees’ activities in connection with the administration of Trust assets are limited to collecting income, paying expenses and liabilities, distributing net income to Mesabi Trust’s Unitholders

13

after the payment of, or provision for, such expenses and liabilities, and protecting and conserving the assets held.  Consequently, the income of Mesabi Trust is highly dependent upon the activities and operations of Northshore, and the terms and conditions of the leases and assignments of leases between Mesabi Trust and Northshore.

Neither Mesabi Trust nor the Trustees have any control over the operations and activities of Northshore, except within the framework of the Amended Assignment Agreements.  CCI alone controls (i) historical operating data, including iron ore production volumes, marketing of iron ore products, operating and capital expenditures as they relate to Northshore, environmental and other liabilities and the effects of regulatory changes; (ii) plans for Northshore’s future operating and capital expenditures; (iii) geological data relating to ore reserves (iv) projected production of iron ore products; (v) contracts between CCI and Northshore with their customers; and (vi) the decision to mine off Mesabi Trust and/or state lands (which is based on its current mining and engineering plan).  The Trustees do not exert any influence over mining operational decisions, nor do the Trustees provide any input regarding the ore reserve estimate reported by CCI.  While the Trustees request material information for use in periodic reports as part of their evaluation of Mesabi Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Trustees do not control this information and they rely on the information in CCI’s periodic and current filings with the SEC to provide accurate and timely information in Mesabi Trust’s reports filed with the SEC.

In accordance with the Agreement of Trust and the Amendment, the Trustees are entitled to, and in fact do rely, upon certain experts in good faith, including (i) the independent consultants with respect to monthly production and shipment reports, which include figures on crude ore production and iron ore pellet shipments, and discussions concerning the condition and accuracy of the scales and plans regarding the development of Mesabi Trust’s mining property; and (ii) the accounting firm they have contracted with for non-audit services, including reviews of financial data related to shipping and sales reports provided by Northshore and a review of the schedule of leasehold royalties payable to Mesabi Trust.

For a discussion of additional factors, including but not limited to those that could adversely affect Mesabi Trust’s actual results and performance, see “Risk Factors” in Part I — Item 1A of Mesabi Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended January 31, 2007.

Critical Accounting Policies

This “Trustees’ Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is based upon Mesabi Trust’s financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  The preparation of these financial statements requires the Trustees to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.  The Trustees base their estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that the Trustees believe are reasonable under the circumstances.  However, future events are subject to change and the best estimates and judgments may require adjustment.

Critical accounting policies are those that have meaningful impact on the reporting of Mesabi Trust’s financial condition and results, and that require significant management judgment and estimates.  The Trustees have determined that there are no critical accounting policies.

14

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Trustees maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Mesabi Trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Mesabi Trust is accumulated and communicated by Northshore and consultants to the Trustees as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As part of their evaluation of Mesabi Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Trustees rely on quarterly shipment and royalty calculations provided by Northshore.  Because Northshore has declined to support this information with a written certification attesting to whether Northshore has established disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls sufficient to enable it to verify that the information furnished to the Trustees is accurate and complete, the Trustees also rely on (a) an annual certification from Northshore and Northshore’s parent, CCI, certifying as to the accuracy of the royalty calculations, and (b) the related due diligence review performed by the Trust’s external accountants.  In addition, Mesabi Trust’s consultants review the schedule of leasehold royalties payable and shipping and sales reports provided by Northshore against production and shipment reports prepared by the Eveleth Fee Office, Inc., an independent consultant to Mesabi Trust (“Eveleth Fee Office”). The Eveleth Fee Office gathers production and shipping information from Northshore and prepares monthly production and shipment reports for the Trustees. Furthermore, as part of its engagement by Mesabi Trust, the Eveleth Fee Office also attends Northshore’s calibration and testing of its crude ore scales and boat loader scales which are conducted on a periodic basis.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Trustees carried out an evaluation of Mesabi Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures.  The Trustees have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  To the knowledge of the Trustees, there has been no change in Mesabi Trust’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Mesabi Trust’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Mesabi Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.  The Trustees note for purposes of clarification that they have no authority over, and make no statement concerning, the internal control over financial reporting of Northshore or CCI.

15

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.                     Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 1A.            Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in Mesabi Trust’s risk factors as described in Part I Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in Mesabi Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2007.

Item 2.                     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3.                     Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.                     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

Item 5.                     Other Information.

None.

Item 6.                     Exhibits.

31        Certification of Corporate Trustee of Mesabi Trust pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
                Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32                        Certification of Corporate Trustee of Mesabi Trust pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

99.1               Report of Gordon, Hughes & Banks, LLP, dated December 5, 2007 regarding its review of the unaudited interim financial statements of Mesabi Trust for its quarter ended October 31, 2007.

16

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  December 5, 2007

* There are no principal executive officers or principal financial officers of the registrant.

17